CN112380794A - Multi-disciplinary parallel cooperation optimization design method for aviation turbine engine blade - Google Patents
Multi-disciplinary parallel cooperation optimization design method for aviation turbine engine blade Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN112380794A CN112380794A CN202011441870.4A CN202011441870A CN112380794A CN 112380794 A CN112380794 A CN 112380794A CN 202011441870 A CN202011441870 A CN 202011441870A CN 112380794 A CN112380794 A CN 112380794A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- blade
- model
- optimization
- flow field
- deformation
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
- G06F30/28—Design optimisation, verification or simulation using fluid dynamics, e.g. using Navier-Stokes equations or computational fluid dynamics [CFD]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
- G06F30/23—Design optimisation, verification or simulation using finite element methods [FEM] or finite difference methods [FDM]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2111/00—Details relating to CAD techniques
- G06F2111/04—Constraint-based CAD
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2113/00—Details relating to the application field
- G06F2113/08—Fluids
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2119/00—Details relating to the type or aim of the analysis or the optimisation
- G06F2119/14—Force analysis or force optimisation, e.g. static or dynamic forces
Abstract
The invention relates to a multidisciplinary optimization design method for an aviation turbine engine blade, in particular to a multidisciplinary parallel cooperation optimization design method for an aviation turbine engine blade. The method solves the problems of large calculation amount, low optimization efficiency and difficult multidisciplinary integration when the traditional method is adopted to carry out multidisciplinary optimization design on the blades of the aviation turbine engine. The method is realized by adopting the following steps: the method comprises the following steps: generating a three-dimensional shape of the blade; step two: calculating aerodynamic force of the blade; calculating the deformation of the blade; step three: repeatedly executing the first step to the second step; step four: establishing a blade flow field reduced model; establishing a blade structure reduced model; step five: obtaining a fluid-solid coupling mixed model for blade structure analysis; obtaining a fluid-solid coupling mixed model for analyzing the blade flow field; step six: establishing a blade structure optimization subsystem; establishing a blade flow field optimization subsystem; step seven: and judging whether the calculation result meets the optimization target and the constraint condition.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to a multidisciplinary optimization design method for an aviation turbine engine blade, in particular to a multidisciplinary parallel cooperation optimization design method for an aviation turbine engine blade.
Background
When the multidisciplinary optimization design of the aviation turbine engine blade is carried out, how to calculate the optimal blade geometric parameters is a crucial problem. If the traditional method is adopted for the multidisciplinary optimization design of the blades of the aero-turbine engine, the traditional method is limited by the principle of the traditional method, the blade performance of each group of geometric parameters can be calculated only in an iterative coupling solution mode among multidisciplines, and accordingly the optimal blade parameters are searched, so that the calculation amount is large, the optimization efficiency is low, the multidisciplinary integration is difficult, and the multidisciplinary optimization design process of the blades of the aero-turbine engine is slow. Therefore, a multidisciplinary parallel collaborative optimization design method for the blades of the aero-turbine engine is needed to be invented, so that the problems of huge calculation amount, low optimization efficiency and difficult multidisciplinary integration when the traditional method is adopted to carry out multidisciplinary optimization design on the blades of the aero-turbine engine are solved.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention provides a multidisciplinary parallel cooperative optimization design method for an aviation turbine engine blade, which aims to solve the problems of huge calculation amount, low optimization efficiency and difficult multidisciplinary integration when a traditional method is adopted to carry out multidisciplinary optimization design on the aviation turbine engine blade.
The invention is realized by adopting the following technical scheme:
a multidisciplinary parallel cooperation optimization design method for an aviation turbine engine blade is realized by adopting the following steps:
the method comprises the following steps:
generating geometric parameters, deformation and aerodynamic force of the blades by using a random generator;
then, the coordinate (x) of the first point on the pressure surface of the blade is calculated according to the geometric parameters of the bladep1,yp1) Coordinate (x) of the last point on the pressure surface of the bladep2,yp2) Coordinate (x) of the first point on the suction surface of the blades1,ys1) Coordinate (x) of last point on suction surface of blades2,ys2);
Then, substituting the calculation result into the profile equation set of the pressure surface of the blade and the profile equation set of the suction surface of the blade, thereby calculating the profile parameter [ a ] of the pressure surface of the blade0 a1 a2 a3 a4 a5]TProfile parameter of suction surface of blade0 b1 b2 b3b4 b5]T;
The set of profile equations for the pressure side of the blade is shown below:
the set of profile equations for the suction surface of the blade is shown below:
then, according to the profile parameter [ a ] of the pressure surface of the blade0 a1 a2 a3 a4 a5]TProfile parameter of suction surface of blade0 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5]TObtaining the molded lines of a plurality of blade sections, and generating a three-dimensional blade shape according to the molded line basic stack of each blade section;
then, inputting the three-dimensional modeling and deformation of the blade into a CFD model of the blade;
meanwhile, inputting the three-dimensional modeling of the blade and the aerodynamic force of the blade into a finite element model of the blade;
step two:
calculating blade aerodynamic force corresponding to blade geometric parameters and blade deformation by using a blade CFD model, and storing the calculation result in a database;
meanwhile, calculating blade geometric parameters and blade deformation corresponding to blade aerodynamic force by using a blade finite element model, and storing the calculation result into a database;
step three:
repeating the first step to the second step, thereby accumulating a certain amount of calculation results in the database;
step four:
establishing a blade flow field reduced model of the influence of blade geometric parameters and blade deformation on blade aerodynamic force, and identifying the blade flow field reduced model by using a calculation result in a database;
meanwhile, establishing a blade structure reduced model of which the blade geometric parameters and the blade aerodynamic force influence the blade deformation, and identifying the blade structure reduced model by using the calculation result in the database;
step five:
obtaining a fluid-solid coupling hybrid model of blade structure analysis by the following steps:
step a: a group of blade geometric parameters are given, blade aerodynamic force is calculated by utilizing a blade flow field reduced model, and the blade aerodynamic force is input into a blade finite element model;
step b: calculating blade deformation by using a blade finite element model, and inputting the blade deformation into a blade flow field reduced model;
step c: calculating blade aerodynamic force by using a blade flow field reduced model, and judging whether the blade aerodynamic force is matched with blade deformation; if not, executing step b; if the blade flow field reduced model and the blade finite element model are matched, the coupling of the blade flow field reduced model and the blade finite element model is realized, and thus a fluid-solid coupling mixed model for blade structure analysis is obtained;
meanwhile, a fluid-solid coupling hybrid model for blade flow field analysis is obtained through the following steps:
step a: a group of blade geometric parameters are given, blade deformation is calculated by utilizing a blade structure reduced model, and the blade deformation is input into a blade CFD model;
step b: calculating blade aerodynamic force by using a blade CFD model, and inputting the blade aerodynamic force into a blade structure reduced model;
step c: calculating the blade deformation by using the blade structure reduced model, and judging whether the blade deformation is matched with the blade aerodynamic force; if not, executing step b; if the blade structure reduced order model and the blade CFD model are matched, the blade structure reduced order model and the blade CFD model are coupled, and therefore a fluid-solid coupling mixed model for blade flow field analysis is obtained;
step six:
establishing a blade structure optimization subsystem based on a fluid-solid coupling hybrid model of blade structure analysis; in the blade structure optimization subsystem, a group of new blade geometric parameters are automatically generated by an optimization algorithm, then the current blade structure weight, the current blade service life, the current blade maximum equivalent stress and the current blade maximum deformation are calculated by utilizing a fluid-solid coupling hybrid model of blade structure analysis, and then the calculation result is uploaded to a collaborative optimization system;
meanwhile, a blade flow field optimization subsystem is established based on a fluid-solid coupling mixed model of blade flow field analysis; in the blade flow field optimization subsystem, a group of new blade geometric parameters are automatically generated by an optimization algorithm, then the current total blade pressure ratio, the current aerodynamic lift force of the blade airfoil profile and the current oscillation of the aerodynamic force of the blade are calculated by utilizing a fluid-solid coupling mixed model of the blade flow field analysis, and then the calculation result is uploaded to a cooperative optimization system;
step seven:
judging whether the calculation result meets an optimization target and a constraint condition by using a collaborative optimization system;
if the calculation result does not meet the optimization target and the constraint condition, executing a sixth step;
and if the calculation result meets the optimization target and the constraint condition, ending the optimization.
The blade geometry parameters include: radius r of leading edge of blade1Trailing edge radius r of the blade2Angle of attack i of blade, angle of structure beta of blade inlet1Blade outlet structure angle beta2Blade installation angle gamma, blade chord length b, blade cascade distance t and blade inlet leading edge wedge angle betaqBlade outlet leading edge wedge angle betahDiameter a of blade throat and maximum thickness C of blademax。
In the sixth step, a new blade geometric parameter is generated by using a global optimized MIGA algorithm and a local gradient optimized NLPQL algorithm.
In the seventh step, the optimization objective is: 1) the weight of the blade structure is minimum; 2) the blade total pressure ratio is maximum; the constraint conditions are as follows: 1) the service life of the blade is more than 2e9 cycles; the maximum equivalent stress of the blade and the maximum deformation of the blade do not exceed specified values; 2) the aerodynamic lift of the blade airfoil is greater than a specified value; the oscillation of the aerodynamic force of the blade is less than a specified amplitude; 3) and the geometric parameters of the blades in the blade structure optimization subsystem are consistent with those of the blades in the blade flow field optimization subsystem.
Compared with the traditional method, the multidisciplinary parallel collaborative optimization design method for the blades of the aviation turbine engine is based on a brand new principle, realizes the decoupling solution of each discipline of the multidisciplinary coupling problem, eliminates multidisciplinary coupling iteration, can consider the coupling effect among the disciplines, and further truly realizes the distributed parallel collaborative optimization of the multidisciplinary coupling problem, thereby remarkably reducing the calculation amount, remarkably improving the optimization efficiency, simplifying the multidisciplinary integration, and remarkably accelerating the multidisciplinary optimization design process of the blades of the aviation turbine engine.
The method effectively solves the problems of huge calculation amount, low optimization efficiency and difficult multidisciplinary integration when the traditional method is adopted to carry out multidisciplinary optimization design on the blades of the aero-turbine engine, and is suitable for the multidisciplinary optimization design of the blades of the aero-turbine engine.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic flow diagram of the present invention.
Detailed Description
A multidisciplinary parallel cooperation optimization design method for an aviation turbine engine blade is realized by adopting the following steps:
the method comprises the following steps:
generating geometric parameters, deformation and aerodynamic force of the blades by using a random generator;
then, the coordinate (x) of the first point on the pressure surface of the blade is calculated according to the geometric parameters of the bladep1,yp1) Coordinate (x) of the last point on the pressure surface of the bladep2,yp2) Coordinate (x) of the first point on the suction surface of the blades1,ys1) Coordinate (x) of last point on suction surface of blades2,ys2);
Then, substituting the calculation result into the profile equation set of the pressure surface of the blade and the profile equation set of the suction surface of the blade, thereby calculating the profile parameter [ a ] of the pressure surface of the blade0 a1 a2 a3 a4 a5]TProfile parameter of suction surface of blade0 b1 b2 b3b4 b5]T;
The set of profile equations for the pressure side of the blade is shown below:
the set of profile equations for the suction surface of the blade is shown below:
then, according to the profile parameter [ a ] of the pressure surface of the blade0 a1 a2 a3 a4 a5]TProfile parameter of suction surface of blade0 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5]TObtaining the molded lines of a plurality of blade sections, and generating a three-dimensional blade shape according to the molded line basic stack of each blade section;
then, inputting the three-dimensional modeling and deformation of the blade into a CFD model of the blade;
meanwhile, inputting the three-dimensional modeling of the blade and the aerodynamic force of the blade into a finite element model of the blade;
step two:
calculating blade aerodynamic force corresponding to blade geometric parameters and blade deformation by using a blade CFD model, and storing the calculation result in a database;
meanwhile, calculating blade geometric parameters and blade deformation corresponding to blade aerodynamic force by using a blade finite element model, and storing the calculation result into a database;
step three:
repeating the first step to the second step, thereby accumulating a certain amount of calculation results in the database;
step four:
establishing a blade flow field reduced model of the influence of blade geometric parameters and blade deformation on blade aerodynamic force, and identifying the blade flow field reduced model by using a calculation result in a database;
meanwhile, establishing a blade structure reduced model of which the blade geometric parameters and the blade aerodynamic force influence the blade deformation, and identifying the blade structure reduced model by using the calculation result in the database;
step five:
obtaining a fluid-solid coupling hybrid model of blade structure analysis by the following steps:
step a: a group of blade geometric parameters are given, blade aerodynamic force is calculated by utilizing a blade flow field reduced model, and the blade aerodynamic force is input into a blade finite element model;
step b: calculating blade deformation by using a blade finite element model, and inputting the blade deformation into a blade flow field reduced model;
step c: calculating blade aerodynamic force by using a blade flow field reduced model, and judging whether the blade aerodynamic force is matched with blade deformation; if not, executing step b; if the blade flow field reduced model and the blade finite element model are matched, the coupling of the blade flow field reduced model and the blade finite element model is realized, and thus a fluid-solid coupling mixed model for blade structure analysis is obtained;
meanwhile, a fluid-solid coupling hybrid model for blade flow field analysis is obtained through the following steps:
step a: a group of blade geometric parameters are given, blade deformation is calculated by utilizing a blade structure reduced model, and the blade deformation is input into a blade CFD model;
step b: calculating blade aerodynamic force by using a blade CFD model, and inputting the blade aerodynamic force into a blade structure reduced model;
step c: calculating the blade deformation by using the blade structure reduced model, and judging whether the blade deformation is matched with the blade aerodynamic force; if not, executing step b; if the blade structure reduced order model and the blade CFD model are matched, the blade structure reduced order model and the blade CFD model are coupled, and therefore a fluid-solid coupling mixed model for blade flow field analysis is obtained;
step six:
establishing a blade structure optimization subsystem based on a fluid-solid coupling hybrid model of blade structure analysis; in the blade structure optimization subsystem, a group of new blade geometric parameters are automatically generated by an optimization algorithm, then the current blade structure weight, the current blade service life, the current blade maximum equivalent stress and the current blade maximum deformation are calculated by utilizing a fluid-solid coupling hybrid model of blade structure analysis, and then the calculation result is uploaded to a collaborative optimization system;
meanwhile, a blade flow field optimization subsystem is established based on a fluid-solid coupling mixed model of blade flow field analysis; in the blade flow field optimization subsystem, a group of new blade geometric parameters are automatically generated by an optimization algorithm, then the current total blade pressure ratio, the current aerodynamic lift force of the blade airfoil profile and the current oscillation of the aerodynamic force of the blade are calculated by utilizing a fluid-solid coupling mixed model of the blade flow field analysis, and then the calculation result is uploaded to a cooperative optimization system;
step seven:
judging whether the calculation result meets an optimization target and a constraint condition by using a collaborative optimization system;
if the calculation result does not meet the optimization target and the constraint condition, executing a sixth step;
and if the calculation result meets the optimization target and the constraint condition, ending the optimization.
The blade geometry parameters include: radius r of leading edge of blade1Trailing edge radius r of the blade2Angle of attack i of blade, angle of structure beta of blade inlet1Blade outlet structure angle beta2Blade installation angle gamma, blade chord length b, blade cascade distance t and blade inlet leading edge wedge angle betaqBlade outlet leading edge wedge angle betahDiameter a of blade throat and maximum thickness C of blademax。
In the sixth step, a new blade geometric parameter is generated by using a global optimized MIGA algorithm and a local gradient optimized NLPQL algorithm.
In the seventh step, the optimization objective is: 1) the weight of the blade structure is minimum; 2) the blade total pressure ratio is maximum; the constraint conditions are as follows: 1) the service life of the blade is more than 2e9 cycles; the maximum equivalent stress of the blade and the maximum deformation of the blade do not exceed specified values; 2) the aerodynamic lift of the blade airfoil is greater than a specified value; the oscillation of the aerodynamic force of the blade is less than a specified amplitude; 3) and the geometric parameters of the blades in the blade structure optimization subsystem are consistent with those of the blades in the blade flow field optimization subsystem.
While specific embodiments of the invention have been described above, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that these are by way of example only, and that the scope of the invention is defined by the appended claims. Various changes and modifications to these embodiments may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, and these changes and modifications are within the scope of the invention.
Claims (4)
1. A multidisciplinary parallel collaborative optimization design method for an aviation turbine engine blade is characterized by comprising the following steps: the method is realized by adopting the following steps:
the method comprises the following steps:
generating geometric parameters, deformation and aerodynamic force of the blades by using a random generator;
then, the coordinate (x) of the first point on the pressure surface of the blade is calculated according to the geometric parameters of the bladep1,yp1) Coordinate (x) of the last point on the pressure surface of the bladep2,yp2) Coordinate (x) of the first point on the suction surface of the blades1,ys1) Coordinate (x) of last point on suction surface of blades2,ys2);
Then, substituting the calculation result into the profile equation set of the pressure surface of the blade and the profile equation set of the suction surface of the blade, thereby calculating the profile parameter [ a ] of the pressure surface of the blade0 a1 a2 a3 a4 a5]TProfile parameter of suction surface of blade0 b1 b2 b3 b4b5]T;
The set of profile equations for the pressure side of the blade is shown below:
the set of profile equations for the suction surface of the blade is shown below:
then, according to the profile parameter [ a ] of the pressure surface of the blade0 a1 a2 a3 a4 a5]TProfile parameter of suction surface of blade0 b1b2 b3 b4 b5]TObtaining the molded lines of a plurality of blade sections, and generating a three-dimensional blade shape according to the molded line basic stack of each blade section;
then, inputting the three-dimensional modeling and deformation of the blade into a CFD model of the blade;
meanwhile, inputting the three-dimensional modeling of the blade and the aerodynamic force of the blade into a finite element model of the blade;
step two:
calculating blade aerodynamic force corresponding to blade geometric parameters and blade deformation by using a blade CFD model, and storing the calculation result in a database;
meanwhile, calculating blade geometric parameters and blade deformation corresponding to blade aerodynamic force by using a blade finite element model, and storing the calculation result into a database;
step three:
repeating the first step to the second step, thereby accumulating a certain amount of calculation results in the database;
step four:
establishing a blade flow field reduced model of the influence of blade geometric parameters and blade deformation on blade aerodynamic force, and identifying the blade flow field reduced model by using a calculation result in a database;
meanwhile, establishing a blade structure reduced model of which the blade geometric parameters and the blade aerodynamic force influence the blade deformation, and identifying the blade structure reduced model by using the calculation result in the database;
step five:
obtaining a fluid-solid coupling hybrid model of blade structure analysis by the following steps:
step a: a group of blade geometric parameters are given, blade aerodynamic force is calculated by utilizing a blade flow field reduced model, and the blade aerodynamic force is input into a blade finite element model;
step b: calculating blade deformation by using a blade finite element model, and inputting the blade deformation into a blade flow field reduced model;
step c: calculating blade aerodynamic force by using a blade flow field reduced model, and judging whether the blade aerodynamic force is matched with blade deformation; if not, executing step b; if the blade flow field reduced model and the blade finite element model are matched, the coupling of the blade flow field reduced model and the blade finite element model is realized, and thus a fluid-solid coupling mixed model for blade structure analysis is obtained;
meanwhile, a fluid-solid coupling hybrid model for blade flow field analysis is obtained through the following steps:
step a: a group of blade geometric parameters are given, blade deformation is calculated by utilizing a blade structure reduced model, and the blade deformation is input into a blade CFD model;
step b: calculating blade aerodynamic force by using a blade CFD model, and inputting the blade aerodynamic force into a blade structure reduced model;
step c: calculating the blade deformation by using the blade structure reduced model, and judging whether the blade deformation is matched with the blade aerodynamic force; if not, executing step b; if the blade structure reduced order model and the blade CFD model are matched, the blade structure reduced order model and the blade CFD model are coupled, and therefore a fluid-solid coupling mixed model for blade flow field analysis is obtained;
step six:
establishing a blade structure optimization subsystem based on a fluid-solid coupling hybrid model of blade structure analysis; in the blade structure optimization subsystem, a group of new blade geometric parameters are automatically generated by an optimization algorithm, then the current blade structure weight, the current blade service life, the current blade maximum equivalent stress and the current blade maximum deformation are calculated by utilizing a fluid-solid coupling hybrid model of blade structure analysis, and then the calculation result is uploaded to a collaborative optimization system;
meanwhile, a blade flow field optimization subsystem is established based on a fluid-solid coupling mixed model of blade flow field analysis; in the blade flow field optimization subsystem, a group of new blade geometric parameters are automatically generated by an optimization algorithm, then the current total blade pressure ratio, the current aerodynamic lift force of the blade airfoil profile and the current oscillation of the aerodynamic force of the blade are calculated by utilizing a fluid-solid coupling mixed model of the blade flow field analysis, and then the calculation result is uploaded to a cooperative optimization system;
step seven:
judging whether the calculation result meets an optimization target and a constraint condition by using a collaborative optimization system;
if the calculation result does not meet the optimization target and the constraint condition, executing a sixth step;
and if the calculation result meets the optimization target and the constraint condition, ending the optimization.
2. The multidisciplinary parallel collaborative optimization design method for an aircraft turbine engine blade according to claim 1, characterized in that: the blade geometry parameters include: radius r of leading edge of blade1Trailing edge radius r of the blade2Vane, and vaneAttack angle i, blade inlet structure angle beta1Blade outlet structure angle beta2Blade installation angle gamma, blade chord length b, blade cascade distance t and blade inlet leading edge wedge angle betaqBlade outlet leading edge wedge angle betahDiameter a of blade throat and maximum thickness C of blademax。
3. The multidisciplinary parallel collaborative optimization design method for an aircraft turbine engine blade according to claim 1, characterized in that: in the sixth step, a new blade geometric parameter is generated by using a global optimized MIGA algorithm and a local gradient optimized NLPQL algorithm.
4. The multidisciplinary parallel collaborative optimization design method for an aircraft turbine engine blade according to claim 1, characterized in that: in the seventh step, the optimization objective is: 1) the weight of the blade structure is minimum; 2) the blade total pressure ratio is maximum; the constraint conditions are as follows: 1) the service life of the blade is more than 2e9 cycles; the maximum equivalent stress of the blade and the maximum deformation of the blade do not exceed specified values; 2) the aerodynamic lift of the blade airfoil is greater than a specified value; the oscillation of the aerodynamic force of the blade is less than a specified amplitude; 3) and the geometric parameters of the blades in the blade structure optimization subsystem are consistent with those of the blades in the blade flow field optimization subsystem.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202011441870.4A CN112380794B (en) | 2020-12-08 | 2020-12-08 | Multi-disciplinary parallel cooperation optimization design method for aviation turbine engine blade |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202011441870.4A CN112380794B (en) | 2020-12-08 | 2020-12-08 | Multi-disciplinary parallel cooperation optimization design method for aviation turbine engine blade |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN112380794A true CN112380794A (en) | 2021-02-19 |
CN112380794B CN112380794B (en) | 2022-11-08 |
Family
ID=74589718
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202011441870.4A Active CN112380794B (en) | 2020-12-08 | 2020-12-08 | Multi-disciplinary parallel cooperation optimization design method for aviation turbine engine blade |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN112380794B (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN114139298A (en) * | 2021-10-20 | 2022-03-04 | 中国航发四川燃气涡轮研究院 | Method for multidisciplinary coupling analysis of gas, heat and solid |
CN114896699A (en) * | 2022-05-23 | 2022-08-12 | 西安交通大学 | Multidisciplinary optimization design method for centripetal turbine impeller in aircraft engine |
Citations (28)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20030125644A1 (en) * | 2001-10-12 | 2003-07-03 | Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha | Method of preparing fluid-structure interactive numerical model and method of manufacturing fluttering robot using the same |
US20030150962A1 (en) * | 2002-02-12 | 2003-08-14 | Bela Orban | Method for controlling and delaying the separation of flow from a solid surface by suction coupling (controlling separation by suction coupling, CSSC) |
EP1696356A1 (en) * | 2005-02-24 | 2006-08-30 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Flow acoustic simulation with the Lattice-Boltzmann method |
JP2008276807A (en) * | 2001-10-12 | 2008-11-13 | Sharp Corp | Method of manufacturing fluttering robot using method of preparing fluid-structure interactive numerical model |
CN101882177A (en) * | 2010-06-18 | 2010-11-10 | 北京航空航天大学 | Aeroelastic stability fluid-structure interaction prediction method of turbo-machine changed interblade phase angles |
WO2011042312A1 (en) * | 2009-10-09 | 2011-04-14 | Rolls-Royce Plc | Rotor behaviour determination |
US20120152007A1 (en) * | 2007-01-12 | 2012-06-21 | Richard Holmes | Testing performance of a material for use in a jet engine |
CN102799730A (en) * | 2012-07-13 | 2012-11-28 | 北京航空航天大学 | Method for estimating reverse twisting process of fan blade of gas turbine |
CN102938003A (en) * | 2012-10-17 | 2013-02-20 | 北京航空航天大学 | Method for predicting aeroelasticity stability numerical value of turbomachinery with error frequency included |
CN104331553A (en) * | 2014-10-29 | 2015-02-04 | 浙江大学 | Optimal design method of large turbo expander impeller blade structure with defect consideration |
CN105843073A (en) * | 2016-03-23 | 2016-08-10 | 北京航空航天大学 | Method for analyzing wing structure aero-elasticity stability based on aerodynamic force uncertain order reduction |
CN106055791A (en) * | 2016-05-31 | 2016-10-26 | 西北工业大学 | Prediction-correction algorithm-based aircraft global pneumatic optimization method |
CN106227967A (en) * | 2016-08-01 | 2016-12-14 | 杭州汽轮机股份有限公司 | Industrial steam turbine low-pressure stage group vane type line optimization method |
CN106529072A (en) * | 2016-11-25 | 2017-03-22 | 江苏大学 | High-temperature and high-pressure centrifuging pump impeller comprehensive design method based on multidisciplinary optimization |
CN106777526A (en) * | 2016-11-25 | 2017-05-31 | 江苏大学 | HTHP receded disk impeller multidisciplinary design optimization method based on genetic algorithm |
CN108170972A (en) * | 2018-01-10 | 2018-06-15 | 浙江吉润汽车有限公司 | A kind of finite element method of equation motorcycle race vehicle frame |
CN108182328A (en) * | 2018-01-05 | 2018-06-19 | 北京航空航天大学 | A kind of big angle of attack Nonlinear Aerodynamic reduced-order model suitable for stall flutter |
CA2977245A1 (en) * | 2016-12-21 | 2018-06-21 | The Boeing Company | Wing flap deflection control removal |
CN108278180A (en) * | 2018-03-09 | 2018-07-13 | 杭州培聚教育科技有限公司 | On-bladed wind power generation plant based on vortex vibration and electromagnetic induction principle |
CN207920774U (en) * | 2018-03-09 | 2018-09-28 | 杭州科以才成科技有限公司 | A kind of on-bladed wind power generation plant based on vortex vibration and electromagnetic induction principle |
CN108710746A (en) * | 2018-02-08 | 2018-10-26 | 哈尔滨广瀚燃气轮机有限公司 | Take into account the anti-twisted design method that naval vessel combustion engine compressor blade and blade predeformation influences |
US20180341850A1 (en) * | 2017-05-23 | 2018-11-29 | The Boeing Company | System and method for predicting preliminary design requirements using artificial neural networks |
CN109002680A (en) * | 2018-10-28 | 2018-12-14 | 扬州大学 | A kind of multidisciplinary automatic optimizing design method of axial-flow pump impeller |
US20190128112A1 (en) * | 2017-11-02 | 2019-05-02 | Reveal Energy Services, Inc. | Determining geometries of hydraulic fractures |
CA3017382A1 (en) * | 2017-12-07 | 2019-06-07 | The Boeing Company | Pre-deformed aircraft spoilers and droop panels designed to seal with flap in deflected state |
US10415581B1 (en) * | 2018-04-25 | 2019-09-17 | Brien Aven Seeley | Ultra-quiet propeller system |
WO2019210330A1 (en) * | 2018-04-28 | 2019-10-31 | The Research Foundation For The State University Of New York | Flexible wind turbine blade with actively variable twist distribution |
CN111563339A (en) * | 2020-04-27 | 2020-08-21 | 江苏理工学院 | CFRP (carbon fiber reinforced plastics) air guide sleeve integrated design method based on variable coupling and software integration |
-
2020
- 2020-12-08 CN CN202011441870.4A patent/CN112380794B/en active Active
Patent Citations (28)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20030125644A1 (en) * | 2001-10-12 | 2003-07-03 | Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha | Method of preparing fluid-structure interactive numerical model and method of manufacturing fluttering robot using the same |
JP2008276807A (en) * | 2001-10-12 | 2008-11-13 | Sharp Corp | Method of manufacturing fluttering robot using method of preparing fluid-structure interactive numerical model |
US20030150962A1 (en) * | 2002-02-12 | 2003-08-14 | Bela Orban | Method for controlling and delaying the separation of flow from a solid surface by suction coupling (controlling separation by suction coupling, CSSC) |
EP1696356A1 (en) * | 2005-02-24 | 2006-08-30 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Flow acoustic simulation with the Lattice-Boltzmann method |
US20120152007A1 (en) * | 2007-01-12 | 2012-06-21 | Richard Holmes | Testing performance of a material for use in a jet engine |
WO2011042312A1 (en) * | 2009-10-09 | 2011-04-14 | Rolls-Royce Plc | Rotor behaviour determination |
CN101882177A (en) * | 2010-06-18 | 2010-11-10 | 北京航空航天大学 | Aeroelastic stability fluid-structure interaction prediction method of turbo-machine changed interblade phase angles |
CN102799730A (en) * | 2012-07-13 | 2012-11-28 | 北京航空航天大学 | Method for estimating reverse twisting process of fan blade of gas turbine |
CN102938003A (en) * | 2012-10-17 | 2013-02-20 | 北京航空航天大学 | Method for predicting aeroelasticity stability numerical value of turbomachinery with error frequency included |
CN104331553A (en) * | 2014-10-29 | 2015-02-04 | 浙江大学 | Optimal design method of large turbo expander impeller blade structure with defect consideration |
CN105843073A (en) * | 2016-03-23 | 2016-08-10 | 北京航空航天大学 | Method for analyzing wing structure aero-elasticity stability based on aerodynamic force uncertain order reduction |
CN106055791A (en) * | 2016-05-31 | 2016-10-26 | 西北工业大学 | Prediction-correction algorithm-based aircraft global pneumatic optimization method |
CN106227967A (en) * | 2016-08-01 | 2016-12-14 | 杭州汽轮机股份有限公司 | Industrial steam turbine low-pressure stage group vane type line optimization method |
CN106777526A (en) * | 2016-11-25 | 2017-05-31 | 江苏大学 | HTHP receded disk impeller multidisciplinary design optimization method based on genetic algorithm |
CN106529072A (en) * | 2016-11-25 | 2017-03-22 | 江苏大学 | High-temperature and high-pressure centrifuging pump impeller comprehensive design method based on multidisciplinary optimization |
CA2977245A1 (en) * | 2016-12-21 | 2018-06-21 | The Boeing Company | Wing flap deflection control removal |
US20180341850A1 (en) * | 2017-05-23 | 2018-11-29 | The Boeing Company | System and method for predicting preliminary design requirements using artificial neural networks |
US20190128112A1 (en) * | 2017-11-02 | 2019-05-02 | Reveal Energy Services, Inc. | Determining geometries of hydraulic fractures |
CA3017382A1 (en) * | 2017-12-07 | 2019-06-07 | The Boeing Company | Pre-deformed aircraft spoilers and droop panels designed to seal with flap in deflected state |
CN108182328A (en) * | 2018-01-05 | 2018-06-19 | 北京航空航天大学 | A kind of big angle of attack Nonlinear Aerodynamic reduced-order model suitable for stall flutter |
CN108170972A (en) * | 2018-01-10 | 2018-06-15 | 浙江吉润汽车有限公司 | A kind of finite element method of equation motorcycle race vehicle frame |
CN108710746A (en) * | 2018-02-08 | 2018-10-26 | 哈尔滨广瀚燃气轮机有限公司 | Take into account the anti-twisted design method that naval vessel combustion engine compressor blade and blade predeformation influences |
CN108278180A (en) * | 2018-03-09 | 2018-07-13 | 杭州培聚教育科技有限公司 | On-bladed wind power generation plant based on vortex vibration and electromagnetic induction principle |
CN207920774U (en) * | 2018-03-09 | 2018-09-28 | 杭州科以才成科技有限公司 | A kind of on-bladed wind power generation plant based on vortex vibration and electromagnetic induction principle |
US10415581B1 (en) * | 2018-04-25 | 2019-09-17 | Brien Aven Seeley | Ultra-quiet propeller system |
WO2019210330A1 (en) * | 2018-04-28 | 2019-10-31 | The Research Foundation For The State University Of New York | Flexible wind turbine blade with actively variable twist distribution |
CN109002680A (en) * | 2018-10-28 | 2018-12-14 | 扬州大学 | A kind of multidisciplinary automatic optimizing design method of axial-flow pump impeller |
CN111563339A (en) * | 2020-04-27 | 2020-08-21 | 江苏理工学院 | CFRP (carbon fiber reinforced plastics) air guide sleeve integrated design method based on variable coupling and software integration |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
DAN SU等: "A reduced order model for uncoupled and coupled cascade flutter analysis", 《JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES》 * |
罗骁: "基于降阶模型的尾流激励下的叶片气动弹性快速分析方法", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库 工程科技II辑》 * |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN114139298A (en) * | 2021-10-20 | 2022-03-04 | 中国航发四川燃气涡轮研究院 | Method for multidisciplinary coupling analysis of gas, heat and solid |
CN114139298B (en) * | 2021-10-20 | 2023-10-03 | 中国航发四川燃气涡轮研究院 | Multi-disciplinary coupling analysis method for gas, heat and solid |
CN114896699A (en) * | 2022-05-23 | 2022-08-12 | 西安交通大学 | Multidisciplinary optimization design method for centripetal turbine impeller in aircraft engine |
CN114896699B (en) * | 2022-05-23 | 2024-03-19 | 西安交通大学 | Multidisciplinary optimization design method for centripetal turbine impeller in aero-engine |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN112380794B (en) | 2022-11-08 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Oyama et al. | Transonic axial-flow blade optimization: Evolutionary algorithms/three-dimensional Navier-Stokes solver | |
Benini | Three-dimensional multi-objective design optimization of a transonic compressor rotor | |
CN112380794B (en) | Multi-disciplinary parallel cooperation optimization design method for aviation turbine engine blade | |
Jeong et al. | Optimization of thick wind turbine airfoils using a genetic algorithm | |
CN109578085B (en) | Method for weakening unsteady acting force of turbine movable blade through guide blade inclination | |
CN112597709B (en) | Turbine blade cascade flow channel CFD calculation method considering transition disturbance factor | |
Liou et al. | Challenges and progress in aerodynamic design of hybrid wingbody aircraft with embedded engines | |
CN114186513A (en) | Modeling design method for axial flow compressor blade with reverse S-shaped front edge | |
Tran et al. | Aerodynamic performance optimization of a single-stage axial compressor using circumferential bleeding airflow | |
Zhang et al. | Effect of boundary layer suction on aerodynamic performance of high-turning compressor cascade | |
Chen | Optimization of wind turbine airfoils/blades and wind farm layouts | |
Ling et al. | Relationship between optimum curved blade generate line and cascade parameters in subsonic axial compressor | |
CN114165477B (en) | Axial ultrasonic through-flow fan serial configuration and serial configuration optimization method | |
CN114065423B (en) | Method for rapidly evaluating flutter of fan blade of aircraft engine | |
CN112883575B (en) | Impeller mechanical boundary layer transition model correction method considering surface roughness | |
CN112632728B (en) | Turbine mechanical blade profile design and performance prediction method based on deep learning | |
Teichel et al. | Optimized preliminary design of compact axial compressors: A comparison of two design tools | |
Chahine et al. | Multidisciplinary design optimization of an aero-engine fan blade with consideration of bypass and core performance | |
Shao et al. | Aerodynamic optimization of the radial inflow turbine for a 100kW-class micro gas turbine based on metamodel-semi-assisted method | |
CN105822510A (en) | Blade tip serialization segmentation blade and design method thereof | |
Jinxin et al. | Aerodynamic optimization design of compressor blades based on improved artificial bee colony algorithm | |
Lei et al. | Three-Dimensional Multi-Objective Design Optimization of a 6.5-Stage Axial Flow Compressor Blades With Lean and Twist | |
Rehman et al. | Non-Axisymmetric Endwall Profiling of a Stator Row in the Presence of the Rotor in a High Pressure Turbine | |
Becker et al. | Multi-objective optimization in axial compressor design using a linked cfd-solver | |
Xi et al. | Aerodynamic optimization design of vaned diffusers for the 100 kW micro gas turbine’s centrifugal compressor |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |