CN112347238A

CN112347238A - Method and device for extracting judgment result of legal document

Info

Publication number: CN112347238A
Application number: CN202011262981.9A
Authority: CN
Inventors: 王晓岚; 周晗; 田浩宇
Original assignee: Beijing Jindi Technology Co Ltd
Current assignee: Beijing Jindi Technology Co Ltd
Priority date: 2020-11-12
Filing date: 2020-11-12
Publication date: 2021-02-09

Abstract

The embodiment of the invention discloses a method and a device for extracting a judge result of a legal document, wherein the method comprises the following steps: extracting the parties of the legal information to be processed and the litigation positions of the parties; extracting a text containing a judgment result from the legal information as a target text; and determining a referee result label of the party according to the target text and the litigation status of the party, wherein the referee result label is used for representing a referee result corresponding to the party. The embodiment of the invention can automatically extract the referee result aiming at each party in the legal information, so that the user can see the result of legal action clearly and directly.

Description

Method and device for extracting judgment result of legal document

Technical Field

The invention relates to a natural language processing technology, in particular to a method and a device for extracting a judge result of a legal document.

Background

At present, if a user wants to judge a judge result from a legal document, such as a judge document, the user needs to read the judge document line by line to know the content of each part. However, the legal documents are long and complicated, and therefore, the user cannot obtain the judgment result in a short time.

Disclosure of Invention

The embodiment of the invention aims to solve the technical problem that: the manual extraction of the referee results is inefficient. A method and apparatus for extracting judge result of legal document are provided.

According to an aspect of the embodiments of the present invention, there is provided a method for extracting a referee result of a legal document, applied to an electronic device, including:

extracting the parties of the legal information to be processed and the litigation positions of the parties;

extracting a text containing a judgment result from the legal information as a target text;

and determining a referee result label of the party according to the target text and the litigation status of the party, wherein the referee result label is used for representing a referee result corresponding to the party.

Optionally, the determining the referee result tag of the party according to the target text and the litigation status of the party includes:

when the target text is determined not to contain any party and not to contain any litigation position, determining a first target label matched with the target text from a preset label set according to a preset label matching rule, determining the first target label as a judgment result label of a first party, and determining a judgment result label of a second party according to the first target label; the first party is a party with a designated litigation status, and the second party is a party with an antithetical status with the designated litigation status;

when determining that any party or any litigation position is contained in the target text, determining the referee result tags of the parties contained in the target text or the parties corresponding to the litigation positions contained in the target text according to the target text;

optionally, the method further includes:

when other parties exist, determining judgment result labels of the other parties according to a preset label setting rule; the other parties refer to parties that do not appear in the target text.

Optionally, the preset tag setting rule includes:

setting the judgment result labels of the other parties as preset appointed labels; alternatively, the first and second electrodes may be,

searching a preset label mapping relation set according to a second target label to obtain a second target label mapping relation containing the second target label; the second target label refers to a referee result label of the party contained in the target text or the party corresponding to the litigation status contained in the target text;

and setting the judgment result labels of the other parties as labels corresponding to the second target labels in the second target label mapping relation.

Optionally, the determining a referee result tag of the second party according to the first target tag includes:

searching a preset label mapping relation set according to the first target label to obtain a first target label mapping relation containing the first target label;

and determining a label corresponding to the first target label in the first target label mapping relation as a judgment result label of a second party.

Optionally, the determining, according to the target text, the referee result tag of the party included in the target text or the party corresponding to the litigation status included in the target text includes:

segmenting the target text to obtain a plurality of sub-texts;

for each sub-text, determining an action subject corresponding to the sub-text from the parties contained in the sub-text or the parties corresponding to the litigation positions contained in the sub-text;

and determining a third target tag matched with the subfile from a preset tag set according to a preset tag matching rule, determining the third target tag as a judging result tag of the action subject, and determining the judging result tag of the action subject according to the third target tag when determining that the party contained in the subfile or the party corresponding to the litigation situation contained in the subfile contains the action subject.

Optionally, the determining, from the parties contained in the subfile or the parties corresponding to the litigation status contained in the subfile, an action subject corresponding to the subfile includes:

when determining that the sub-text does not contain any party but contains any litigation status, determining the party corresponding to any litigation status as an action subject corresponding to the sub-text;

and when determining that any party is contained in the sub-text, determining an action body corresponding to the sub-text from the parties contained in the sub-text according to a preset body identification rule.

Optionally, the determining the referee result tag of the action object according to the third target tag includes:

searching a preset label mapping relation set according to the third target label to obtain a third target label mapping relation containing the third target label;

and determining a label corresponding to the third target label in the mapping relation of the third target label as a judgment result label of the action object.

Optionally, the method further includes:

extracting a text containing specified content from the legal information as an auxiliary text;

when any party is determined to be contained in the auxiliary text, an auxiliary label of the party contained in the auxiliary text is determined according to the auxiliary text;

and for each party, when the party has a judgment result label and an auxiliary label, determining a final judgment result label of the party according to the judgment result label and the auxiliary label.

Optionally, the determining a final referee result tag of the party according to the referee result tag and the auxiliary tag includes:

selecting a label meeting a set condition from the judgment result label and the auxiliary label of the party, and determining the selected label as the final judgment result label of the party; alternatively, the first and second electrodes may be,

and fusing the judgment result label of the party with the auxiliary label according to a preset label fusion rule to obtain a final judgment result label of the party.

Optionally, the selecting one referee result tag meeting the set condition from the referee result tag and the auxiliary tag of the current person includes:

and according to a preset priority rule, selecting one label with the highest priority from the judgment result labels and the auxiliary labels of the current person.

According to another aspect of the embodiments of the present invention, there is provided an apparatus for extracting a referee result of a legal document, applied to an electronic device, including:

the first determination module is used for extracting the party of the legal information to be processed and the litigation position of the party;

the text extraction module is used for extracting a text containing a judgment result from the legal information as a target text;

and the second determining module is used for determining a referee result label of the party according to the target text and the litigation status of the party, wherein the referee result label is used for representing a referee result corresponding to the party.

Optionally, the second determining module determines the referee result tag of the party according to the target text and the litigation status of the party, and includes:

optionally, the second determining module is further configured to:

Optionally, the preset tag setting rule includes:

Optionally, the determining, by the second determining module, a referee result tag of the second party according to the first target tag, includes:

Optionally, the second determining module determines, according to the target text, the referee result tag of the party included in the target text or the party corresponding to the litigation status included in the target text, including:

segmenting the target text to obtain a plurality of sub-texts;

Optionally, the second determining module determines the action subject corresponding to the subfile from the parties contained in the subfile or the parties corresponding to the litigation status contained in the subfile, and includes:

when the fact that the sub text does not contain any party but contains any litigation status is determined, determining the party corresponding to any litigation status as an action subject corresponding to the sub text;

Optionally, the determining, by the second determining module, a referee result tag of the action object according to a third target tag, includes:

Optionally, the text extraction module is further configured to: extracting a text containing specified content from the legal information as an auxiliary text;

further comprising:

a third determining module, configured to determine, when it is determined that any one of the parties is included in the auxiliary text, an auxiliary tag of the party included in the auxiliary text according to the auxiliary text;

and the fourth determining module is used for determining the final judgment result label of each party according to the judgment result label and the auxiliary label when the party has the judgment result label and the auxiliary label.

Optionally, the fourth determining module determines the final referee result tag of the party according to the referee result tag and the auxiliary tag, and includes:

Optionally, the fourth determining module selects a referee result tag meeting a set condition from the referee result tag and the auxiliary tag of the party, and includes:

According to still another aspect of an embodiment of the present invention, there is provided an electronic apparatus including:

a memory for storing a computer program;

a processor, configured to execute the computer program stored in the memory, and when the computer program is executed, implement the method for extracting a referee result of a legal document according to any one of the above embodiments.

According to a further aspect of the embodiments of the present invention, there is provided a computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, which, when executed by a processor, implements the method for extracting a referee result of a legal document according to any one of the embodiments described above.

Based on the embodiment of the invention, the judge result of each party in the judge document is automatically extracted by extracting the party of the legal information to be processed and the litigation status of the party, extracting the text containing the judge result from the legal information as the target text, and determining the judge result label of the party according to the target text and the litigation status of the party, so that a user can directly see the legal litigation result at a glance.

The technical solution of the present invention is further described in detail by the accompanying drawings and embodiments.

Drawings

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.

The invention will be more clearly understood from the following detailed description, taken with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:

fig. 1 is a flowchart of an embodiment of a method for extracting a referee result of a legal document according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

fig. 2 is a flowchart of implementing step 103 according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating an implementation procedure after step 103 according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

fig. 4 is a block diagram of an embodiment of an apparatus for extracting a referee result of a legal document according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

fig. 5 is a block diagram of an electronic device provided in an exemplary embodiment of the invention.

Detailed Description

Various exemplary embodiments of the present invention will now be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. It should be noted that: the relative arrangement of the components and steps, the numerical expressions and numerical values set forth in these embodiments do not limit the scope of the present invention unless specifically stated otherwise.

Meanwhile, it should be understood that the sizes of the respective portions shown in the drawings are not drawn in an actual proportional relationship for the convenience of description.

The following description of at least one exemplary embodiment is merely illustrative in nature and is in no way intended to limit the invention, its application, or uses.

Techniques, methods, and apparatus known to those of ordinary skill in the relevant art may not be discussed in detail but are intended to be part of the specification where appropriate.

It should be noted that: like reference numbers and letters refer to like items in the following figures, and thus, once an item is defined in one figure, further discussion thereof is not required in subsequent figures.

Embodiments of the invention are operational with numerous other general purpose or special purpose computing system environments or configurations. Examples of well known computing systems, environments, and/or configurations that may be suitable for use with electronic devices, such as computer systems/servers, include, but are not limited to: personal computer systems, server computer systems, thin clients, thick clients, hand-held or laptop devices, microprocessor-based systems, set-top boxes, programmable consumer electronics, networked personal computers, minicomputer systems, mainframe computer systems, distributed cloud computing environments that include any of the above, and the like.

The electronic device, such as a computer system/server, may be described in the general context of computer system-executable instructions, such as program modules, being executed by a computer system. Generally, program modules may include routines, programs, objects, components, logic, data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. The computer system/server may be practiced in distributed cloud computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed cloud computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote computer system storage media including memory storage devices.

Referring to fig. 1, an embodiment of a method for extracting a referee result of a legal document according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention is shown in a flowchart, and the method includes the following steps:

101. the party who extracted the legal information to be processed and the litigation status of the party.

In the present invention, the legal information is information in a legal document (such as a referee document). The principal is a person who enters lawsuit due to dispute between rights and interests of the entity law or direct relation with specific legal facts and is restricted by the judge of the court.

The litigation status of the party is related to the litigation type, for example, the litigation status in administrative litigation includes: original reports (or called appellators), comforters (or called appellators), common litigators and third persons, and the status of litigation in criminal litigation includes: self-telling persons, public complaint organs, defendants, original defenders and defendants with civil litigation, and the like. The present invention will not be described in detail herein.

As one example, the parties and litigation positions of the parties for whom legal information is to be processed may be extracted by a method of named entity identification. The main technical method for identifying the named entity comprises a rule and dictionary-based method, a statistical-based method, a mixed method of the rule and the dictionary-based method and the like, and the specific method adopted by the invention is not limited.

Optionally, the named entity identification is to identify a complete entity name in legal information, such as a person name, a company name, an organization name, and the like, for example, zhang san, XX company, XX institute, and the like. Based on this, by analyzing the text before the identified entity name in the legal information, the litigation status of the party, such as the appetizer, the defendant, etc., can be obtained.

It should be noted that, in the current legal information, for example, in the referee document, there may be multiple titles for the same party, for example, the title of zhang san in the referee document includes zhang san and zhang yi, which means that the named entity identification of the referee document can identify zhang san and zhang yi, and actually, zhang san and zhang yi refer to the same entity. In this case, in order to avoid identifying entity names actually corresponding to the same entity as different entities, after identifying the entity names, the identified entity names may be processed such that a plurality of entity names referring to the same entity are all mapped to the entity.

Optionally, named entity identification herein refers to identifying litigation positions in legal information, such as plaintiff and defendant. Based on this, the name of the party, such as zhang san, company XX, institute XX, etc., can be obtained by parsing the text following the identified entity name in the legal information.

As another example, the parties of legal information to be processed and the litigation positions of the parties can be extracted through a rule matching method. Optionally, the rule matching here refers to keyword/word matching, such as using original and reported as keywords.

102. And extracting a text containing the judgment result from the legal information as a target text.

Taking legal information as the information in the official document as an example, the official document usually contains the following contents: (1) facts and reasons for cases, litigation requests, disputes; (2) determining recognized facts and reasons, applicable laws and reasons; (3) the burden of the referee results and litigation costs; (4) the period of complaints and the court of complaints. The present invention is directed to extracting the referee result of the referee document, and therefore, in this step 102, a text containing the referee result is extracted from the referee document as a target text.

As an embodiment, the referee document may be first divided into several parts according to line separators, paragraph separators, or punctuation marks, and then for each part, whether the part contains the referee result is determined by a topic model or rule matching method, and if so, the part is determined as the target text.

Optionally, in order to reduce noise interference and improve the accuracy of the extracted referee result, the target text may be further cleaned, so as to clean some information in the target text that is not related to the substantial content of the referee result.

Optionally, some information that is not related to the substance of the referee result is assumed class information. For example, "if the decision is not taken, the XX may be submitted with a complaint, and a copy is submitted by the number of people of the other party, and the XX may be referred to the law," if XX is not fulfilled for the period designated by the decision, the debt interest during the delayed fulfillment period should be paid doubly according to the rules of the second thirteen clause of the people's republic of china and national affairs litigation law ".

Optionally, some information that is not related to the substance of the referee result is description type information. For example, "XX, XX should be fulfilled within XX days from the day of legal effect in the present case".

103. And determining a referee result label of the party according to the target text and the litigation status of the party, wherein the referee result label is used for representing a referee result corresponding to the party.

Continuing with the example of legal information as information in the referee document, in general, the referee results corresponding to parties with different litigation statuses in the same referee document are different, for example, the referee result of the original report is a litigation request supporting the original report, and the referee result of the report is a XXXX element for judging whether the original report is compensated. Meanwhile, the referees corresponding to the parties in the same litigation status may be different, for example, the referee result of the defendant A assumes the main responsibility, and the referee result of the defendant B assumes the joint responsibility. Based on the above, in the invention, the referee result label for representing the referee result corresponding to the referee is determined by the referee unit according to the target text and the litigation status of the referee.

As for the specific implementation of the step 103, it is explained by the flow shown in fig. 2 and fig. 3, and will not be described in detail here.

Thus, the description of the flow shown in fig. 1 is completed.

As can be seen from the process shown in fig. 1, by extracting the parties of the legal information to be processed and the litigation statuses of the parties, extracting the text containing the referee result from the legal information as the target text, and determining the referee result tag of the party according to the target text and the litigation statuses of the parties, the automatic extraction of the referee result for each party in the legal information is realized, so that the user can see the legal litigation result at a glance.

The following describes a specific implementation of determining the referee result label of the party according to the target text and the litigation status of the party in step 103:

in practical applications, there are two cases: (1) the target text does not contain any party or litigation position; (2) the target text contains any party or any litigation place. The specific implementation of step 103 described above differs in different cases. The following describes the specific implementation of step 103 in the three cases by two specific embodiments:

first, a specific implementation of step 103 in the above case (1) is explained by the following specific examples:

referring to fig. 2, an implementation process of step 103 provided in embodiment 1 of the present invention includes:

201. and determining a first target label matched with the target text from a preset label set according to a preset label matching rule, and determining the first target label as a judgment result label of the first party.

Here, the preset tag set may include a plurality of referee result tags, such as support, refund, partial support, withdrawal, victory, loser, responsibility irresponsible, responsibility-related, responsibility-complete, compensation, apology-open, and the like, which is not limited in the present invention. In the embodiment of the present invention, a referee result tag (hereinafter, referred to as a first target tag for convenience of description) matched with a target text is determined from a preset tag set according to a preset tag matching rule.

As an embodiment, each referee result label corresponds to one judgment rule. Optionally, the determination rule may be formed by manually formulating a keyword or a matching pattern, or may be formed by fitting a mathematical model, such as a deep learning model, a machine learning model, or other algorithm models. Based on this, in this step 201, it may be checked whether the target text satisfies the determination rule corresponding to each referee result tag in the tag set, and if so, the referee result tag is determined as the first target tag matching the target text. In other words, in this step 201, the preset tag matching rule refers to: and if the target text meets the judgment rule corresponding to the judgment result label, determining the judgment result label as a first target label.

As another embodiment, in this step 201, the similarity between the target text and each referee result tag in the tag set may be calculated, and the referee result tag whose similarity satisfies the preset condition is determined as the first target tag. Optionally, the referee result tag with the highest similarity is determined as the first target tag, that is, the preset condition refers to that the corresponding similarity is highest. In other words, in this step 201, the preset tag matching rule refers to: and if the similarity between the target text and the judgment result label meets a preset condition, determining the judgment result label as a first target label.

Here, the first party is the party who specifies litigation status. Alternatively, the current official documents clearly contain the official results of the original reports, such as litigation requests for supporting the original reports, litigation requests for refuting the original reports, or litigation requests for supporting the original reports in some cases, and therefore the designated litigation place is the original report.

202. And determining a judgment result label of the second party according to the first target label.

Here, the second party is a party with a litigation status that is opposite to the designated litigation status, such as a party with a litigation status that is defended.

In practical applications, there is a mapping relationship between the judgment results of two parties with opposite litigation positions, for example, if one party judges a victory or a failure, the other party judges a failure. Based on this, in this step 202, the referee result tag of the second party is determined according to the first target tag, i.e. the referee result tag of the first party.

As an embodiment, a mapping relationship between two referee result labels may be established in advance, for example, a mapping relationship between "victory complaint" and "failure complaint" and a mapping relationship between "all responsibility assumed" and "no responsibility assumed" are established, and the established mapping relationships are grouped into the same set (hereinafter referred to as a label mapping relationship set).

Based on this, the specific implementation of this step 202 may include the following:

a1, searching a preset label mapping relationship set according to the first target label to obtain a first target label mapping relationship containing the first target label.

a2, determining the label corresponding to the first target label in the first target label mapping relation as the judgment result label of the second party.

So far, the description of the flow shown in fig. 2 is completed.

Through the process shown in fig. 2, it is realized that, under the condition that the target text does not contain any party nor any litigation status, the referee result tag used for representing the referee result corresponding to the party is determined according to the target text and the litigation status of the party.

The following describes a specific implementation of step 103 in case (2) above by using specific examples:

first, when it is determined that any one of the parties is contained in the target text, the referee result tags of the parties contained in the target text are determined according to the target text. Specific implementations of this process may include:

b1, segmenting the target text to obtain a plurality of sub texts.

As an embodiment, before the target text is segmented, the name of the party contained in the target text may be replaced with the combined text of the litigation status and the name of the party. For example, the target text is: the litigation request of the three pairs of the lie four in the rejectable original report is changed into the litigation request of the three pairs of the defended lie four in the rejectable original report after the replacement is finished. By the processing, the accuracy of the judgment result label of the party determined according to the target text can be improved.

As an embodiment, the target text may be divided into several parts according to line separators, paragraph separators, other designated separators, or punctuation marks, and each part is referred to as a sub-text for convenience of description.

b2, for each sub text, determining the action subject corresponding to the sub text from the parties contained in the sub text or the parties corresponding to the litigation status contained in the sub text.

The judgment result label of the party involved in the sub-text is determined in units of the sub-text, that is, for each sub-text. By this processing, the accuracy of the decided judge result label of the party can be improved.

As an embodiment, when any party is included in the sub-text, an action subject of the sub-text is determined among the parties included in the sub-text according to a preset subject recognition rule, and the parties except the action subject in the sub-text are determined as an action object of the sub-text, where the action subject refers to a subject of the sub-text and is a narration subject of the sub-text, and the action object refers to an object of the sub-text and is an object of an action of the action subject. Of course, there is a case where only the action body is included in the child text. For example, if the sub-text is "apology with publication of four-to-original-poster", the action subject of the sub-text is four-to-poster and the action object is three-to-original-poster; for another example, if the sub-text is "litigation request supporting original three", the action subject of the sub-text is original three.

Alternatively, the subject identification rules may be formed by dependency syntax, grammatical relations of the sub-text and litigation status of the party.

As an embodiment, when the sub-text does not include any party but includes a litigation status, the litigation status included in the sub-text is determined, and the party corresponding to the litigation status is determined as the action subject of the sub-text. For example, if the child text is "litigation request for supporting original report", the target litigation included in the child text is regarded as original report, and zhang is determined as the action subject of the child text.

Optionally, the target litigation position contained in the subfile may be obtained by means of keyword matching or named entity identification.

b3, determining a third target label matched with the subfile from a preset label set according to a preset label matching rule, determining the third target label as a judge result label of the action subject, and determining the judge result label of the action object according to the third target label when determining that the subfile contains the action object or the action object is contained in the party corresponding to the litigation status contained in the action subject.

In the embodiment of the present invention, for convenience of description, a referee result tag matching with the subfile in the preset tag set is referred to as a third target tag.

As to how to determine the third target tag matched with the sub-document from the preset tag set according to the preset tag matching rule, reference may be made to the description of determining the first target tag in step 202, which is not described herein again.

In addition, when it is determined that the party included in the subfile or the party corresponding to the litigation status included in the subfile includes the action object, the referee result tag of the action object is determined according to the third target tag, that is, according to the referee result tag of the action subject. Optionally, the described tag mapping relationship set is searched for according to a third target tag, a mapping relationship including the third target tag (hereinafter referred to as a third target tag mapping relationship) is obtained, and a tag corresponding to the third target tag in the third target tag mapping relationship is determined as a judgment result tag of the action object.

Further, in practical applications, there may be a case where a party is included in the target text, but a referee result tag of the party is not obtained by the above processing. In this case, the referee result tag of the other party can be determined as the referee result tag of the party in the same litigation case and other parties having the same litigation status as the party according to the litigation status of the party. For example, the party includes original poster three, advertised plum four and king five, and the referee result label of king five is not obtained through the following processing, so that the referee result label of plum four can be given to king five.

And when the target text is determined to contain any target party, determining the description of the judgment result label of the party contained in the target text according to the target text.

Furthermore, it is understood that the inclusion of either party in the target text also encompasses two scenarios: (i) the target text contains all the parties; (ii) the target text contains a part of the party or the litigation status of a part of the party, in other words, there are parties that do not appear in the target text, and it should be noted that if the litigation status of a party appears in the target text, it means that the party appears in the target text.

For the above case (i), the referee result tags of all parties contained in the target text can be determined by the above description.

For the above case (ii), the referee result tag of the party (hereinafter referred to as other party) not present in the target text is determined according to a preset tag setting rule.

As an embodiment, the preset tag setting rule is: and setting the judgment result labels of other parties as preset appointed labels. Optionally, one referee result tag in the preset tag set may be set as the designated tag.

As another embodiment, the preset label setting rule is: searching the label mapping relationship set according to the judgment result labels (for convenience of description, hereinafter referred to as second target labels) of the parties contained in the target text or the parties corresponding to the litigation positions contained in the target text to obtain a label mapping relationship (hereinafter referred to as second target label mapping relationship) containing the second target labels, and setting the judgment result labels of other parties as labels corresponding to the second target labels in the second target label mapping relationship.

For example, suppose that lie four and wangwu are both reported, but the final referee result indicates that lie four assumes full responsibility, while wangwu assumes no responsibility. In this case, the target text may not include wang five. According to the above description, the referee result tag of wang five can be set as a preset designated tag of "not taking responsibility". Or, the label mapping relationship set is searched according to the label 'undertake all responsibility' of the referee result label of lie four, the label 'undertake all responsibility' corresponding to the label 'undertake no responsibility' is obtained, and the referee result label of wang five is set as 'undertake no responsibility'.

For another example, suppose that lie four is the original report and king five is the reported report, and the final referee result indicates the winning of lie four. In this case, the target text may not include wang five. According to the above description, the referee result tag of wang five can be set as the preset designated tag of "complaint". Or, the label mapping relation set is searched according to the judgment result label 'victory' of lie four, the label 'lossle' corresponding to the label 'victory' is obtained, and the judgment result label of wang five is set as 'lossle'.

Optionally, in order to further improve the accuracy of the determined referee result tag, the present invention further provides the following embodiments:

referring to fig. 3, an implementation flow after step 103 is provided for an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, where the flow includes:

301. text containing specified content is extracted from legal information as auxiliary text.

Optionally, the specific content includes content related to case fees, content related to court opinions, content related to court exposition bases, and the like, and the present invention is not particularly limited thereto.

302: when any party is determined to be contained in the auxiliary text, the auxiliary label of the party contained in the auxiliary text is determined according to the auxiliary text.

In the present invention, for convenience of description, a tag determined for a party included in the auxiliary text based on the auxiliary text is referred to as an auxiliary tag. As to how to determine the auxiliary tag of the party according to the auxiliary text, reference may be made to the above-mentioned related description of how to determine the referee result tag of the party according to the target text in the flow shown in fig. 2, and details are not repeated here.

It should be noted that, in this embodiment, the

steps

301 and 302 are set after the step 103 only as an example, and in practical applications, the execution sequence of the

steps

301 and 302 is not limited. For example, step 301 may be performed in synchronization with step 102 in the flowchart shown in fig. 1, and step 302 may be performed in synchronization with step 103 in the flowchart shown in fig. 1. The present invention is not particularly limited thereto.

303: and for each party, when the party has a referee result label and an auxiliary label, determining a final referee result label of the party according to the referee result label and the auxiliary label.

In general, a party corresponds to only one referee result in the same referee document, and thus, a party may have only one referee result tag. Accordingly, after performing step 302 above, it is checked for each party determined in step 101 whether the party has an auxiliary tag.

When it is checked that the party has only one referee result tag, no processing may be done.

When the party is checked to have both the referee result label and the auxiliary label, determining the final referee result label of the party according to the referee result label and the auxiliary label.

As an embodiment, a label satisfying a set condition may be selected from the referee result label and the auxiliary label of the party, and the selected label may be determined as the final referee result label of the party.

Optionally, the referee result tags and the auxiliary tags of the parties may be sorted according to a preset priority rule, where the priority rule is used to indicate the priority corresponding to each tag, or the priority order. Based on the sorting result, the label with the highest priority is selected as the final referee result label of the party, i.e. the setting condition is the highest priority. For example, the referee result label of original three is "victory complaint", the auxiliary label is "partial support", and assuming that the preset priority rule indicates that the priority of the "partial support" is higher than that of the "victory complaint", the "partial support" is determined as the final referee result label of original three.

Optionally, after determining the referee result tag with the highest priority, the referee result tag with the highest priority may be further checked to see whether it has a decision event. If so, selecting the referee result label with the highest priority as the final referee result label of the party, namely, the set condition is that the priority is highest and has a judgment event. For example, the referee result label of the advertised article four includes "both of the lossiness" and the indemnities ", assuming that the indemnities are higher in priority than the loserinities, and since the indemnities represent specific decision events, the indemnities are determined as the final referee result label of the advertised article four.

If the referee result tag with the highest priority does not have a decision event, it can check whether the referee result tag ranked next in the ranking results has a decision event. If the judgment result labels are not matched, the judgment result label with the highest priority is selected as the final judgment result label of the party.

It should be noted that the above description of selecting one referee result tag satisfying the set condition from all referee result tags of the parties is only by way of example and is not limiting.

As another embodiment, the referee result label and the auxiliary label of the party are fused according to a preset label fusion rule to obtain a final referee result label of the party. For example, the label of the referee result of the original three is "complaint", the auxiliary label is "withdrawal", and the preset fusion rule is as follows: and (3) combining the 'complaint' and the 'withdrawal' into 'withdrawal', and finally determining that the label of the judgment result of the original notice III is 'withdrawal'.

Furthermore, in practical applications, there may be a relationship between different parties. For example, in a civil case, two or more parties share debt, and a relationship exists between the two or more parties. In this case, the referee result tags of the parties with the association relationship can be subjected to the consistency processing according to the preset tag consistency rule.

Optionally, the label consistency rule here refers to: and (4) carrying out the consistency processing on the judgment result labels of the parties having association with the current person according to the judgment result labels of the parties firstly appearing in the judgment documents. For example, lie four and wangwu share the debt of Zhang three, wherein the referee result label of lie four is "compensation", the referee result label of wangwu is "complaint", and the referee result label of wangwu is updated to "compensation" assuming that the appearance order of lie four is earlier than that of wangwu in the referee document.

So far, the description of the flow shown in fig. 3 is completed.

Through the process shown in fig. 3, the auxiliary correction of the referee result label determined according to the target text is realized according to the auxiliary text in the referee document, and the accuracy of the referee result label finally determined is improved.

Corresponding to the embodiment of the method for extracting the referee result of the legal document, the invention also provides an embodiment of a device for extracting the referee result of the legal document.

Referring to fig. 4, a block diagram of an embodiment of an apparatus for extracting a referee result of a legal document according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention is provided, the apparatus including:

a first determination module 41 for extracting the party of the legal information to be processed and the litigation position of the party;

a text extraction module 42, configured to extract a text containing a referee result from the legal information as a target text;

and a second determining module 43, configured to determine, according to the target text and the litigation status of the party, a referee result tag of the party, where the referee result tag is used to represent a referee result corresponding to the party.

Optionally, the second determining module 43 determines the referee result tag of the party according to the target text and the litigation status of the party, and includes:

optionally, the second determining module 43 is further configured to: when other parties exist, determining judgment result labels of the other parties according to a preset label setting rule; the other parties refer to parties that do not appear in the target text.

Optionally, the preset tag setting rule includes:

Optionally, the second determining module 43 determines the referee result tag of the second party according to the first target tag, including:

Optionally, the second determining module 43 determines, according to the target text, the referee result tag of the party included in the target text or the referee result tag of the party corresponding to the litigation status included in the target text, including:

segmenting the target text to obtain a plurality of sub-texts;

for each sub-text, determining an action subject corresponding to the sub-text from the parties contained in the sub-text or the parties corresponding to the litigation positions contained in the sub-text; and determining a second target tag matched with the subfile from a preset tag set according to a preset tag matching rule, determining the second target tag as a judging result tag of the action subject, and determining the judging result tag of the action subject according to the second target tag when determining that the party contained in the subfile or the party corresponding to the litigation situation contained in the subfile contains the action subject.

Optionally, the second determining module 43 determines the action subject corresponding to the sub-document from the parties contained in the sub-document or the parties corresponding to the litigation positions contained in the sub-document, including:

Optionally, the determining module 43 determines the referee result tag of the action object according to the second target tag, including:

searching a preset label mapping relation set according to the second target label to obtain a second target label mapping relation containing the second target label;

and determining a label corresponding to the second target label in the second target label mapping relationship as a judgment result label of the action object.

Optionally, the text extracting module 42 is further configured to: extracting a text containing specified content from the legal information as an auxiliary text;

further comprising (not shown in fig. 4):

Next, an electronic apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention is described with reference to fig. 5. The electronic device may be either or both of the first device 100 and the second device 200, or a stand-alone device separate from them that may communicate with the first device and the second device to receive the collected input signals therefrom.

FIG. 5 illustrates a block diagram of an electronic device in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

As shown in fig. 5, the electronic device 50 includes one or more processors 51 and a memory 52.

The processor 51 may be a Central Processing Unit (CPU) or other form of processing unit having data processing capabilities and/or instruction execution capabilities, and may control other components in the electronic device 50 to perform desired functions.

The memory 52 may include one or more computer program products that may include various forms of computer-readable storage media, such as volatile memory and/or non-volatile memory. The volatile memory may include, for example, Random Access Memory (RAM), cache memory (cache), and/or the like. The non-volatile memory may include, for example, Read Only Memory (ROM), hard disk, flash memory, etc. One or more computer program instructions may be stored on the computer-readable storage medium and executed by processor 11 to implement the legal document referent result extraction method and/or other desired functions of the various embodiments of the present invention described above. Various contents such as an input signal, a signal component, a noise component, etc. may also be stored in the computer-readable storage medium.

In one example, the electronic device 50 may further include: an input device 53 and an output device 54, which are interconnected by a bus system and/or other form of connection mechanism (not shown).

For example, when the electronic device is the first device 100 or the second device 200, the input device 53 may be a microphone or a microphone array as described above for capturing an input signal of a sound source. When the electronic device is a stand-alone device, the input means 53 may be a communication network connector for receiving the acquired input signals from the first device 100 and the second device 200.

The input device 53 may also include, for example, a keyboard, a mouse, and the like. The output device 54 may output various information to the outside, including the determined distance information, direction information, and the like. The output devices 54 may include, for example, a display, speakers, a printer, and a communication network and remote output devices connected thereto, among others.

Of course, for the sake of simplicity, only some of the components of the electronic device 50 relevant to the present invention are shown in fig. 5, and components such as buses, input/output interfaces, and the like are omitted. In addition, electronic device 50 may include any other suitable components, depending on the particular application.

In addition to the above-described methods and apparatus, embodiments of the present invention may also be a computer program product comprising computer program instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform the steps in the method for extraction of referee results of legal documents according to various embodiments of the present invention described in the above-mentioned "exemplary methods" section of this specification.

The computer program product may write program code for carrying out operations for embodiments of the present invention in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Java, C + + or the like and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the "C" programming language or similar programming languages. The program code may execute entirely on the user's computing device, partly on the user's device, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computing device and partly on a remote computing device, or entirely on the remote computing device or server.

Furthermore, embodiments of the present invention may also be a computer-readable storage medium having stored thereon computer program instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform the steps in the method for extracting a referee result of a legal document according to various embodiments of the present invention described in the above section "exemplary method" of the present specification.

The computer-readable storage medium may take any combination of one or more readable media. The readable medium may be a readable signal medium or a readable storage medium. A readable storage medium may include, for example, but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or a combination of any of the foregoing. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of the readable storage medium include: an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable disk, a hard disk, a Random Access Memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing.

The basic principles of the present invention have been described above with reference to specific embodiments, but it should be noted that the advantages, effects, etc. mentioned in the present invention are only examples and are not limiting, and the advantages, effects, etc. must not be considered to be possessed by various embodiments of the present invention. Furthermore, the foregoing disclosure of specific details is for the purpose of illustration and description and is not intended to be limiting, since the invention is not limited to the specific details described above.

In the present specification, the embodiments are described in a progressive manner, each embodiment focuses on differences from other embodiments, and the same or similar parts in the embodiments are referred to each other. For the system embodiment, since it basically corresponds to the method embodiment, the description is relatively simple, and for the relevant points, reference may be made to the partial description of the method embodiment.

Those of ordinary skill in the art will understand that: all or part of the steps for implementing the method embodiments may be implemented by hardware related to program instructions, and the program may be stored in a computer readable storage medium, and when executed, the program performs the steps including the method embodiments; and the aforementioned storage medium includes: various media that can store program codes, such as ROM, RAM, magnetic or optical disks.

The method and apparatus of the present invention may be implemented in a number of ways. For example, the methods and apparatus of the present invention may be implemented in software, hardware, firmware, or any combination of software, hardware, and firmware. The above-described order for the steps of the method is for illustrative purposes only, and the steps of the method of the present invention are not limited to the order specifically described above unless specifically indicated otherwise. Furthermore, in some embodiments, the present invention may also be embodied as a program recorded in a recording medium, the program including machine-readable instructions for implementing a method according to the present invention. Thus, the present invention also covers a recording medium storing a program for executing the method according to the present invention.

The description of the present invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, and is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to practitioners skilled in this art. The embodiment was chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and the practical application, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.

Claims

1. A judge result extraction method of a legal document is applied to electronic equipment and comprises the following steps:

extracting the parties in the legal information to be processed and the litigation positions of the parties;

2. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the referee result tag of the party according to the target text and the litigation status of the party comprises:

when determining that any party or any litigation position is contained in the target text, determining the referee result tags of the parties contained in the target text or the parties corresponding to the litigation positions contained in the target text according to the target text.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the preset tag setting rule comprises:

5. The method of claim 2, wherein determining the referee result label for the second party based on the first target label comprises:

6. The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the determining of the referee result tag of the party contained in the target text or the party corresponding to the litigation status contained in the target text according to the target text comprises:

segmenting the target text to obtain a plurality of sub-texts;

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the determining the action subject corresponding to the subfile from the parties contained in the subfile or the parties corresponding to the litigation status comprises:

8. The method according to claim 6, wherein said determining the referee result label of the action object according to the third target label comprises:

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

10. The method as claimed in claim 9, wherein the determining the final referee result label of the party according to the referee result label and the auxiliary label comprises:

11. The method of claim 10, wherein selecting one referee result tag satisfying a predetermined condition from the referee result tags and the auxiliary tags of the current person comprises:

12. A judge result extraction device of a legal document, comprising:

the first determination module is used for extracting the party and the litigation position of the party in the legal information to be processed;

13. An electronic device, comprising:

a memory for storing a computer program;

a processor for executing a computer program stored in the memory, and when executed, implementing the method of any of the preceding claims 1-11.

14. A computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, which, when being executed by a processor, carries out the method of any one of the preceding claims 1 to 11.