CN112234904A - Servo motor speed control method - Google Patents

Servo motor speed control method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN112234904A
CN112234904A CN202011062993.7A CN202011062993A CN112234904A CN 112234904 A CN112234904 A CN 112234904A CN 202011062993 A CN202011062993 A CN 202011062993A CN 112234904 A CN112234904 A CN 112234904A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
speed
control algorithm
gain coefficient
control
servo motor
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202011062993.7A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
张慧勇
白璐瑶
贾梦
黄莹
魏星原
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Beijing Institute of Specialized Machinery
Original Assignee
Beijing Institute of Specialized Machinery
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Beijing Institute of Specialized Machinery filed Critical Beijing Institute of Specialized Machinery
Priority to CN202011062993.7A priority Critical patent/CN112234904A/en
Publication of CN112234904A publication Critical patent/CN112234904A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02PCONTROL OR REGULATION OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, ELECTRIC GENERATORS OR DYNAMO-ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CONTROLLING TRANSFORMERS, REACTORS OR CHOKE COILS
    • H02P23/00Arrangements or methods for the control of AC motors characterised by a control method other than vector control
    • H02P23/0004Control strategies in general, e.g. linear type, e.g. P, PI, PID, using robust control
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02PCONTROL OR REGULATION OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, ELECTRIC GENERATORS OR DYNAMO-ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CONTROLLING TRANSFORMERS, REACTORS OR CHOKE COILS
    • H02P29/00Arrangements for regulating or controlling electric motors, appropriate for both AC and DC motors

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Control Of Electric Motors In General (AREA)
  • Feedback Control In General (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to a speed control method of a servo motor, and belongs to the field of servo control. In order to solve the problems that the PID control algorithm of the traditional servo driver cannot give consideration to both the speed tracking performance and the load disturbance inhibition performance, and the control algorithm of a high-end servo driver is complex, a pre-low-pass filter is added on the basis of the PI control algorithm to form an improved PI control algorithm; and a proportional gain coefficient K is configured by adopting an automatic parameter setting method or a manual parameter setting methodpAnd the integral gain coefficient KiThe target tracking performance and the disturbance suppression performance of the system can be optimal, and engineers familiar with PID control can easily master the control algorithm and the parameter setting method.

Description

Servo motor speed control method
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of servo control, and particularly relates to a speed control method of a servo motor.
Background
The traditional servo driver generally adopts a PID control algorithm to control the motor speed, and control parameters cannot give consideration to speed tracking performance and load disturbance inhibition performance, so that ideal control characteristics cannot be obtained; some high-end servo drivers can simultaneously realize two performance targets of speed tracking and load Disturbance rejection by adopting a PID control + Disturbance Observer (DOB) method or adopting an Active Disturbance Rejection Control (ADRC) algorithm, but the two algorithms are not only more complicated than the PID control algorithm, but also have certain defects respectively. The disturbance observer depends on a mathematical model of the motor, parameters such as rotational inertia of the servo system need to be known, and the complexity of the control system is increased by online identification of the rotational inertia parameters. The active disturbance rejection control is a new control algorithm, a simple and mature parameter setting method is not available at present, most control engineers are not familiar with the active disturbance rejection control algorithm, the parameters of the active disturbance rejection controller cannot be or cannot be well set, and the advantages of the active disturbance rejection control algorithm cannot be best played. Therefore, the research on a PI control improved algorithm for simultaneously realizing the target tracking and the external disturbance suppression of the motor speed has important significance.
Disclosure of Invention
Technical problem to be solved
The invention provides a servo motor speed control method, and aims to solve the problems that a PID (proportion integration differentiation) control algorithm of a traditional servo driver cannot give consideration to speed tracking performance and load disturbance suppression performance, an ideal control characteristic cannot be obtained, and a high-end servo driver has a complex control algorithm.
(II) technical scheme
In order to solve the technical problem, the invention provides a speed control method of a servo motor, which comprises the following steps:
s1, adding a front low-pass filter on the basis of the PI control algorithm to form an improved PI control algorithm;
the PI control algorithm is as follows:
Figure BDA0002712900280000021
the pre-low-pass filter is as follows:
Figure BDA0002712900280000022
the improved PI control algorithm is applied to an input signal omega*The closed loop transfer function of the servo motor system under the action is as follows:
Figure BDA0002712900280000023
the PI control algorithm and the improved PI control algorithm are used for controlling the load torque disturbance signal TLThe closed loop transfer function of the servo motor system under the action is as follows:
Figure BDA0002712900280000024
wherein, KpIs a proportional gain factor, KiIn order to integrate the gain factor,
Figure BDA0002712900280000025
j is the rotational inertia of the motor, B is the coefficient of friction, K is the speed unit conversion coefficient, K is 1 if the target speed unit is radians per second (rad/s), and K is 1 if the target speed unit is revolutions per minute (rpm)
Figure BDA0002712900280000026
S2, configuring the proportional gain coefficient K by adopting an automatic parameter setting method or a manual parameter setting methodpAnd the integral gain coefficient KiThe target tracking performance and the disturbance suppression performance of the system can be optimized.
Further, the target tracking performance and the disturbance suppression performance of the improved PI control algorithm are only dependent on the closed-loop transfer function phii(s) and phid(s) pole distribution.
Further, in the step S2, a ratio is configured by using an automatic parameter tuning methodGain factor KpAnd integral gain coefficient KiThe method specifically comprises the following steps:
s211, setting a natural oscillation angular frequency omega according to the response speed requirement of a control systemnThe larger the angular frequency is, the faster the response speed is; (ii) a
S212, the natural oscillation angular frequency omeganDetermining the proportional gain factor KpAnd the integral gain coefficient KiThe parameter calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002712900280000031
further, in step S2, a parameter manual tuning method is adopted to configure the proportional gain coefficient KpAnd integral gain coefficient KiThe method specifically comprises the following steps:
s221, the motor controller uses the PI control algorithm firstly, and the proportional gain coefficient KpThe initial value is set as the ratio of rated torque to rated rotation speed, and the integral gain coefficient KiSetting the initial value as 0, and entering the next step;
s222, the proportional gain coefficient KpGradually doubling the initial value, increasing and adjusting, observing the tracking condition of the feedback speed, and when the steady state value of the feedback speed reaches more than 95% of the target speed value, the proportional gain coefficient KpAfter the adjustment is finished, entering the next step;
s223, modifying the motor controller into the improved PI control algorithm, and entering the next step;
s224, the integral gain coefficient KiAnd gradually increasing from 0 to adjust, and finishing parameter adjustment when the feedback speed adjusting time meets the requirement.
(III) advantageous effects
The invention provides a servo motor speed control method, which is characterized in that an improved PI control algorithm is formed by adding a front low-pass filter on the basis of the PI control algorithm; and configuring the proportional gain coefficient K by adopting an automatic parameter setting method or a manual parameter setting methodpAnd the integral increaseCoefficient of benefit KiThe target tracking performance and the disturbance suppression performance of the system can be optimal, and engineers familiar with PID control can easily master the control algorithm and the parameter setting method.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a motor speed control based on PI algorithm in the prior art;
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the motor speed control based on the improved PI algorithm of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a motor speed curve for an automatic parameter tuning method;
fig. 4 is a motor speed curve of the parameter manual setting method.
Detailed Description
In order to make the objects, contents and advantages of the present invention clearer, the following detailed description of the embodiments of the present invention will be made in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and examples.
1 Motor speed model
The velocity differential equation for the servo motor is:
Figure BDA0002712900280000041
in the above formula, ω is the motor speed, J is the motor moment of inertia, TeFor electromagnetic torque of the machine, TLIs the load torque, B is the coefficient of friction;
a velocity transfer function of
Figure BDA0002712900280000042
If the load changes in the running process of the motor, the rotating speed of the motor fluctuates, so that the two targets of target speed tracking and load disturbance suppression need to be considered in the motor speed control, and the target speed can be tracked quickly, stably and accurately.
2 PI control algorithm
The traditional servo driver generally adopts a PID control algorithm to control the speed, but because a differential link can amplify noise, the value of a differential gain coefficient in the speed PID control is small, the differential action is not obvious, and a proportional-integral link mainly plays a main role.
The transfer function of the PI controller is as follows
Figure BDA0002712900280000043
Wherein KpIs a proportional gain factor, KiIs an integral gain factor.
The motor speed control block diagram based on the PI algorithm is shown in FIG. 1; in FIG. 1,. omega.*K is a speed unit conversion coefficient for a target motor rotation speed, where K is 1 if the target speed unit is radian/second (rad/s) and is a revolution/minute (rpm) unit
Figure BDA0002712900280000051
To facilitate system analysis, order
Figure BDA0002712900280000052
The transfer function of the controlled motor is
Figure BDA0002712900280000053
Input signal omega*The closed loop transfer function of the system under action is
Figure BDA0002712900280000054
Disturbance signal TLThe closed loop transfer function of the system under action is
Figure BDA0002712900280000055
In a PI control system, the target tracking performance of the system depends on the distribution of the zero and the pole of a transfer function in an equation 5, the disturbance suppression performance of the system depends on the distribution of the pole of a transfer function in an equation 6, and the zero and the pole cannot be simultaneously configured at an ideal distribution position by adjusting two parameters of proportion and integral; when the system disturbance suppression performance is good, a large integral gain is needed, but the step response of the system is greatly overshot at the moment, and the target tracking performance is deteriorated; therefore, the PI control algorithm cannot achieve two performance goals of "target tracking" and "external disturbance rejection" at the same time.
Improved PI control algorithm
The invention improves the PI control algorithm, and adds a pre-low-pass filter
Figure BDA0002712900280000056
The input-output transfer function of the improved PI control algorithm is as follows:
Figure BDA0002712900280000057
a motor speed control system based on the modified PI algorithm is shown in fig. 2.
Input signal omega*Closed loop transfer function of system under action
Figure BDA0002712900280000058
The control algorithm adds a pre-filter, and zero-pole cancellation is carried out on a filter transfer function (formula 7) and a closed-loop transfer function (formula 5) under the action of an input signal of a PI control system, so that the transfer function of formula 9 has no zero, and the dynamic performance only depends on pole distribution.
The transfer function under the action of the disturbance signal is the same as that of the PI controller, and if the proportional gain coefficient and the integral gain coefficient of the PI controller are consistent, the disturbance suppression performance of the PI controller and the proportional gain coefficient are consistent.
The denominator characteristic polynomials of the closed-loop transfer function (formula 9) under the action of the input signal and the denominator characteristic polynomials of the closed-loop transfer function (formula 6) under the action of the disturbance signal are the same, poles of the two systems are consistent and have no zero, and the target tracking performance and the disturbance rejection performance of the systems are only dependent on the pole distribution of the closed-loop transfer function, so that the target tracking performance and the disturbance rejection performance can be simultaneously considered by improving the PI control algorithm, and when the target tracking performance reaches the best, the disturbance rejection performance also reaches the best.
3.1 automatic parameter setting method
The closed-loop transfer function (formula 9) under the action of the input signal and the closed-loop transfer function (formula 6) under the action of the disturbance signal are both typical second-order systems, and the denominator characteristic polynomials thereof are the same, as shown in the following formula
A(s)=s2+(a+Kpb)s+Kib (10)
According to a typical second-order system, the natural oscillation angular frequency is
Figure BDA0002712900280000061
The damping ratio of the secondary system is
Figure BDA0002712900280000062
As known from an angular frequency formula and a damping ratio formula, two parameters of proportional gain and integral gain determine the response performance of the system, and the integral gain KiThe larger, the angular frequency ωnThe larger the system, the faster the system adjusts, but the smaller the damping ratio ζ, the greater the system oscillations.
The improved PI controller parameter automatic setting method configures a motor speed closed-loop control system as a critical damping system, namely the damping ratio zeta is 1, and a characteristic polynomial is
A(s)=s2+(a+Kpb)s+Kib=(s+ωn)2 (11)
The critical damping system has no overshoot, and the target tracking performance and the disturbance suppression performance are controlled by the angular frequency omeganDetermining that the greater the angular frequency, the system responseThe faster the performance, the better.
Setting the angular frequency omega of natural oscillationnIs a specific value;
from the natural oscillation angular frequency omeganDetermining a proportional gain coefficient and an integral gain coefficient, wherein the parameter calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002712900280000071
the proportional gain coefficient and the integral gain coefficient are configured according to the method, and the target tracking performance and the disturbance suppression performance of the system can be optimal.
3.2 parameter manual setting method
The improved automatic parameter setting method for the PI controller has the defects that two parameters of rotational inertia and friction coefficient of a motor need to be known, if a motor manufacturer does not provide the parameters, parameter identification needs to be carried out, and the parameter setting difficulty of the PI controller is increased. The invention provides a manual setting method of an improved PI control algorithm, which comprises the following steps of;
1) the motor controller firstly uses a PI control algorithm and a proportional gain coefficient KpThe initial value is set as the ratio of rated torque to rated rotation speed and the integral gain coefficient KiSetting the initial value as 0, and entering the next step;
2) proportional gain factor KpGradually doubling the initial value, increasing and adjusting, observing the tracking condition of the feedback speed, finishing the adjustment of the proportional gain coefficient when the steady-state value of the feedback speed reaches more than 95% of the target speed value, and entering the next step;
3) the motor controller is modified into an improved PI control algorithm, and the next step is carried out;
4) integral gain coefficient KiAnd gradually increasing from 0 to adjust, and finishing parameter adjustment when the feedback speed adjusting time meets the requirement.
4 examples of
Taking a certain motor as an example, the rated torque is 4Nm, the rated rotating speed is 3000rpm, the moment of inertia J is 9.5e-4kg.m2, the friction coefficient B is 8.621e-4Nm.s, and the speed unit conversion coefficient is K60/(2 pi). Target speed signal omega of motor speed control system*A step signal with the amplitude of 1000rpm (the jump time is 1s), a load torque signal TLIs 1Nm (4 s at the jump moment).
According to the parameter automatic setting method of the invention, proportional and integral gain coefficients are calculated, and angular frequency omega is takennCalculated as K50p=0.0099,KiThe system outputs of the PI controller and the modified PI controller are shown in fig. 3 at 0.2487. As can be seen from fig. 3, the improved PI control algorithm can simultaneously give consideration to both the "speed tracking performance" and the "load disturbance suppression performance", and in the PI control algorithm, when the load disturbance performance is good, the speed tracking performance becomes poor, and the speed is significantly overshot.
The proportional and integral gain coefficients are adjusted according to the manual parameter adjusting method. The controller is set to PI control algorithm first, and the proportional gain coefficient is increased to KpWhen the feedback speed steady state value reaches the target speed value, the value is 98%, and the integral gain is increased to KiWhen the speed tracking performance of the PI controller is equal to 0.005, the speed tracking performance of the PI controller meets the requirement, the controller is modified into an improved PI control algorithm, and the integral gain coefficient is continuously increased to KiWhen the speed regulation time is 0.08, the requirement is met, the parameter setting is finished, and the system output of the PI controller and the improved PI controller is shown in figure 4. As can be seen from fig. 4, the improved PI control algorithm can simultaneously consider both the "target tracking performance" and the "disturbance suppression performance", and in the PI control algorithm, when the speed tracking performance is good, the load disturbance suppression performance is poor, and the motor speed after the disturbance cannot reach the target value within a long time.
The ratio and the integral gain coefficient of the manual parameter setting method are smaller than those of the ratio and the integral gain coefficient calculated by the automatic parameter setting method, and as can be seen from comparison between fig. 3 and fig. 4, the performance of the controller of the manual parameter setting method is slightly poorer than that of the controller of the automatic parameter setting method, but the use requirements can be met.
The above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention, and it should be noted that, for those skilled in the art, several modifications and variations can be made without departing from the technical principle of the present invention, and these modifications and variations should also be regarded as the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims (4)

1. A servo motor speed control method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
s1, adding a front low-pass filter on the basis of the PI control algorithm to form an improved PI control algorithm;
the PI control algorithm is as follows:
Figure FDA0002712900270000011
the pre-low-pass filter is as follows:
Figure FDA0002712900270000012
the improved PI control algorithm is applied to an input signal omega*The closed loop transfer function of the servo motor system under the action is as follows:
Figure FDA0002712900270000013
the PI control algorithm and the improved PI control algorithm are used for controlling the load torque disturbance signal TLThe closed loop transfer function of the servo motor system under the action is as follows:
Figure FDA0002712900270000014
wherein, KpIs a proportional gain factor, KiIn order to integrate the gain factor,
Figure FDA0002712900270000015
j is the rotational inertia of the motor, B is the friction coefficient, K is the speed unit conversion coefficient, if the target speed is singleThe bit is radians per second (rad/s), K is 1, and if the target speed unit is revolutions per minute (rpm), then
Figure FDA0002712900270000016
S2, configuring the proportional gain coefficient K by adopting an automatic parameter setting method or a manual parameter setting methodpAnd the integral gain coefficient KiThe target tracking performance and the disturbance suppression performance of the system can be optimized.
2. The servo motor speed control method of claim 1 wherein the target tracking performance and disturbance rejection performance of the modified PI control algorithm are both dependent only on the closed loop transfer function phii(s) and phid(s) pole distribution.
3. The servo motor speed control method of claim 1, wherein the proportional gain coefficient K is configured by a parameter auto-tuning method in step S2pAnd integral gain coefficient KiThe method specifically comprises the following steps:
s211, setting a natural oscillation angular frequency omega according to the response speed requirement of a control systemnFor a specific value, the natural oscillation angular frequency ωnThe larger the response speed is;
s212, the natural oscillation angular frequency omeganDetermining the proportional gain factor KpAnd the integral gain coefficient KiThe parameter calculation formula is as follows:
Figure FDA0002712900270000021
4. the servo motor speed control method of claim 1, wherein the step S2 is performed by configuring the proportional gain factor K using a manual parameter tuning methodpAnd integral gain coefficient KiThe method specifically comprises the following steps:
s221, the motor controller uses the PI control algorithm firstly, and the proportional gain coefficient KpThe initial value is set as the ratio of rated torque to rated rotation speed, and the integral gain coefficient KiSetting the initial value as 0, and entering the next step;
s222, the proportional gain coefficient KpGradually doubling the initial value, increasing and adjusting, observing the tracking condition of the feedback speed, and when the steady state value of the feedback speed reaches more than 95% of the target speed value, the proportional gain coefficient KpAfter the adjustment is finished, entering the next step;
s223, modifying the motor controller into the improved PI control algorithm, and entering the next step;
s224, the integral gain coefficient KiAnd gradually increasing from 0 to adjust, and finishing parameter adjustment when the feedback speed adjusting time meets the requirement.
CN202011062993.7A 2020-09-30 2020-09-30 Servo motor speed control method Pending CN112234904A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202011062993.7A CN112234904A (en) 2020-09-30 2020-09-30 Servo motor speed control method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202011062993.7A CN112234904A (en) 2020-09-30 2020-09-30 Servo motor speed control method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN112234904A true CN112234904A (en) 2021-01-15

Family

ID=74120550

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202011062993.7A Pending CN112234904A (en) 2020-09-30 2020-09-30 Servo motor speed control method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN112234904A (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113629763A (en) * 2021-08-11 2021-11-09 南瑞集团有限公司 Current control method and system for medium-voltage direct-hanging energy storage converter under non-ideal power grid
CN113867423A (en) * 2021-09-07 2021-12-31 北京特种机械研究所 Servo turntable azimuth angle tracking control method and device
CN113885332A (en) * 2021-10-27 2022-01-04 中国科学院光电技术研究所 Disturbance observer control method based on speed difference in timing belt servo system
CN116700372A (en) * 2023-07-04 2023-09-05 佛山市兴颂机器人科技有限公司 Servo all-in-one machine speed control method based on improved PI algorithm

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
FRANCISZHAO: "PID的TRICK(二)IP控制器", 《知乎HTTPS://ZHUANLAN.ZHIHU.COM/P/50323981》 *
T. UMENO等: "Robust speed control of DC servomotors using modern two degrees-of-freedom controller design", 《IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS》 *
郭新华等: "基于电磁转矩反馈补偿的永磁同步电机新型IP速度控制器", 《中国电机工程学报》 *

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113629763A (en) * 2021-08-11 2021-11-09 南瑞集团有限公司 Current control method and system for medium-voltage direct-hanging energy storage converter under non-ideal power grid
CN113629763B (en) * 2021-08-11 2023-05-12 南瑞集团有限公司 Current control method and system for medium-voltage direct-hanging energy storage converter under non-ideal power grid
CN113867423A (en) * 2021-09-07 2021-12-31 北京特种机械研究所 Servo turntable azimuth angle tracking control method and device
CN113867423B (en) * 2021-09-07 2023-12-19 北京特种机械研究所 Servo turntable azimuth angle tracking control method and device
CN113885332A (en) * 2021-10-27 2022-01-04 中国科学院光电技术研究所 Disturbance observer control method based on speed difference in timing belt servo system
CN113885332B (en) * 2021-10-27 2023-10-03 中国科学院光电技术研究所 Disturbance observer control method based on speed difference in timing belt servo system
CN116700372A (en) * 2023-07-04 2023-09-05 佛山市兴颂机器人科技有限公司 Servo all-in-one machine speed control method based on improved PI algorithm
CN116700372B (en) * 2023-07-04 2024-03-22 广东兴颂科技有限公司 Servo all-in-one machine speed control method based on improved PI algorithm

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN112234904A (en) Servo motor speed control method
CN107425769B (en) Active disturbance rejection control method and system for permanent magnet synchronous motor speed regulating system
CN110572091B (en) Optimized sensorless control method for permanent magnet synchronous motor
CN110784149B (en) Mechanical resonance suppression method and system for alternating current servo system
EP1496412A1 (en) Positioning servocontroller
CN113067520B (en) Non-sensor response self-adaptive motor control method based on optimized residual error
WO2007096993A1 (en) Motor controller
CN104300863A (en) Self-adaption sliding mode control method for speed regulation of variable-load permanent magnet synchronous motor
CN112953328B (en) Active-disturbance-rejection control method for permanent magnet synchronous motor of electric vehicle
CN111211724A (en) RBF self-adaptive neural network repetitive controller suitable for repetitive servo system
CN112838797A (en) Permanent magnet synchronous motor fuzzy sliding mode control method based on improved index approach law
US5276387A (en) Sliding mode control system
CN114421835A (en) Multi-motor control method based on fuzzy deviation coupling backstepping sliding mode strategy
CN112783099B (en) Fractional order composite control method and permanent magnet synchronous motor speed servo system
CN112241121A (en) PMSM self-tuning control system based on fuzzy PID
CN112104279A (en) Hub motor control method based on nonlinear terminal sliding mode algorithm
CN113602102B (en) Active anti-shake control method and system for electric automobile
CN113872477B (en) Sliding mode control method for permanent magnet synchronous motor and application thereof
CN106814607B (en) Fully closed loop position controller
CN111965969B (en) Double closed-loop anti-interference PID control method and system for speed and position of direct current motor
JPH05224703A (en) Direct-device robot controller
CN109308008B (en) Active disturbance rejection control device with abnormality coping capability
CN112666986A (en) Antenna servo track planning method and system
JP2002531885A (en) Improved servomechanism control system and method
CN109591623B (en) Algorithm for avoiding small accelerator starting jitter in open loop mode

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20210115

RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication