CN112232786A

CN112232786A - Airworthiness examination activity rule management method and system

Info

Publication number: CN112232786A
Application number: CN202011220723.4A
Authority: CN
Inventors: 申岳; 邵俊; 蔡喁
Original assignee: China Civil Aviation Shanghai Aircraft Airworthiness Certification Center
Current assignee: China Civil Aviation Shanghai Aircraft Airworthiness Certification Center
Priority date: 2020-11-05
Filing date: 2020-11-05
Publication date: 2021-01-15
Anticipated expiration: 2040-11-05
Also published as: CN112232786B

Abstract

The invention provides a method and a system for managing airworthiness examination activity rules, which provide an examination platform and rule guidance for data examination, field examination, software and hardware examination and manufacturing inspection by establishing compliance activity plan management, standard examination workflow and conference management, and assist the compliance conclusion, examination opinions, concerns, spot check and other work of the examination activity to complete the airworthiness examination activity.

Description

Airworthiness examination activity rule management method and system

Technical Field

The invention relates to the technical field of airworthiness examination, in particular to a method and a system for managing airworthiness examination activity rules.

Background

Airworthiness of a civil aircraft refers to the quality of the safety and physical integrity of the flight of the aircraft (including the overall performance and handling characteristics of its components and subsystems) in the expected service environment and under the use limits. According to the 'civil aviation product and part qualification approval regulation' of the Chinese civil aviation regulations and the 'aircraft model qualification approval program' of the related Chinese civil aviation administration management program, the process of the Chinese civil aviation administration for designing and approving the aviation product is 'airworthiness approval'. In the airworthiness examination activities, airworthiness examination activity rules need to be established to guide relevant personnel to carry out airworthiness activities, and meanwhile, the airworthiness examination rules can also be used as references for carrying out airworthiness examination activities.

Disclosure of Invention

The invention aims to provide a method and a system for managing airworthiness examination activity rules so as to provide a platform for developing airworthiness examination activities for airworthiness daily examination activities.

In order to achieve the above object, an aspect of the present invention provides a airworthiness review activity rule management method, including the following steps:

establishing a compliance activity plan, wherein the compliance activity plan comprises an examination project, an approval plan (CP), a CPI project and an examination activity project (CAI), the examination project is the top layer of the compliance activity plan, each examination project is attached with the corresponding approval plan, the CPI project and the examination activity project, the approval plan (CP) comprises approval bases and approval contents agreed by an applicant and an examinee, the CPI project comprises work items decomposed in the approval plan, and the examination activity project (CAI) is a specific examination activity decomposed for a single CPI project;

establishing a standard review working process, including establishing a review activity tree and a conformance review activity on nodes thereof, wherein the conformance review activity comprises a standard data review process, a standard field review process, a manufacturing conformance inspection process and a system problem management process, and the conformance review activity finally generates a conformance conclusion and a review opinion;

meeting management, including meeting proposal item establishment, meeting creation, examination and approval of the meeting and meeting summary.

Further, in the step of establishing a compliance campaign, the method further comprises:

establishing an approval plan, wherein the approval plan comprises a management approval plan, a professional approval plan, a prototype approval plan and a design guarantee approval plan;

establishing CPI items, wherein the CPI items comprise a management CPI item, a conformity inspection CPI item and a design guarantee CPI item;

establishing a CPI project list, wherein the CPI project list is the sum of CPI projects under each approval plan and comprises a management CPI project list, a conformity inspection CPI project list and a design guarantee CPI project list;

establishing a review activity item, wherein the review activity item comprises evidence archiving, test outline review, test witness and test report review, and the review activity item corresponds to a relevant standard review process.

Further, in the step of establishing the standard inspection workflow, the method further includes:

establishing a standard data evaluation process, wherein the standard data evaluation process is used for evaluating the examined data such as CP examination, test outline, process class plan and the like;

establishing a standard field evaluation process, wherein the standard field evaluation process evaluates the review data such as field test witnesses, development process guarantee intervention, system inspection and the like;

establishing a manufacturing conformance checking flow, wherein the manufacturing conformance checking flow is used for reviewing a manufacturing conformance checking request sheet;

and establishing a system problem management flow, wherein the system problem management flow comprises the steps of reporting, processing and continuously monitoring the problems influencing the airworthiness conformity judgment.

Further, generating a compliance conclusion includes the following steps:

generating a compliance conclusion, wherein the compliance conclusion is any one of approval, approval with an opening and non-compliance;

generating a review opinion of the compliance conclusion, wherein the review opinion is any one of a suggestion item, an opening item, a problem item and a concern item.

Further, the conference management step further includes:

establishing a conference classification, wherein the conference classification comprises a familiarity conference, a technical discussion conference, a review conference and a management conference;

establishing a conference suggestion item, wherein the conference suggestion item is a conference topic suggestion, and the conference topic suggestion item is stored in a conference suggestion item pool;

and establishing a conference rule and an action item, wherein the conference rule comprises a conference creation rule, an approval rule and a conference summary rule, and the action item is generated from the conference summary and is a project of subsequent work.

In another aspect, the present invention further provides a airworthiness review activity rule management system, which includes:

the system comprises a compliance activity plan, a compliance activity plan and a compliance activity plan, wherein the compliance activity plan comprises an examination project, an approval plan (CP), a CPI project and an examination activity project (CAI), the examination project is the top layer of the compliance activity plan, each examination project is attached with the corresponding approval plan, the CPI project and the examination activity project, the approval plan (CP) comprises approval bases and approval contents agreed by an applicant and an examiner, the CPI project comprises work items decomposed from the approval plan, and the examination activity project (CAI) is a specific examination activity decomposed from a single CPI project;

the standard examination work flow comprises an examination activity tree and conformance examination activities on nodes thereof, the conformance examination activities comprise a standard data review flow, a standard field review flow, a manufacturing conformance examination flow and a system problem management flow, and the conformance examination activities finally generate a conformance conclusion and examination opinions;

meeting management including meeting proposal items, creation of a meeting, approval of a meeting, and a meeting summary.

Further, the compliance campaign plan further comprises:

the system comprises an approval plan, a management approval plan, a professional approval plan, a prototype approval plan and a design guarantee approval plan, wherein the approval plan comprises a management approval plan, a professional approval plan, a prototype approval plan and a design guarantee approval plan;

the CPI items comprise a management CPI item, a consistency review CPI item and a design guarantee CPI item;

the CPI project list is the sum of CPI projects under each approval plan and comprises a management CPI project list, a conformity examination CPI project list and a design guarantee CPI project list;

and the examination activity items comprise evidence archiving, test outline examination, test witness and test report examination, and the examination activity items correspond to relevant standard examination processes.

Further, the standard review workflow further comprises:

the standard data review process is used for reviewing the review data such as CP review, test outline, process plan and the like;

the standard field evaluation process evaluates the review data such as field test witness, development process guarantee intervention, system inspection and the like;

a manufacturing conformance checking process for reviewing the manufacturing conformance checking request sheet;

and the system problem management process comprises the steps of reporting, processing and continuously monitoring the problems influencing the airworthiness conformity judgment.

Further, the standard review workflow further comprises:

a compliance conclusion, wherein the compliance conclusion is any one of approval, approval with an opening and non-compliance;

and the examination opinions are any one of suggestion items, opening items, question items and attention items.

Further, the conference management further includes:

a meeting classification including a familiarity meeting, a technical discussion meeting, a review meeting, and a management meeting;

the conference suggestion item is a conference topic suggestion, and the conference topic suggestion item is stored in a conference suggestion item pool;

the conference system comprises conference rules and action items, wherein the conference rules comprise conference creation rules, examination and approval rules and conference summary rules, and the action items are generated from a conference summary and are projects of follow-up work.

Drawings

In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly described below, and it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present invention, and for those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained according to these drawings without creative efforts.

Fig. 1 is a flowchart of an airworthiness censorship activity rule management method according to an embodiment of the invention.

Fig. 2 is a system framework diagram of a flight inspection activity rule management system according to an embodiment of the invention.

Detailed Description

The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.

In the following description, reference is made to "some embodiments" which describe a subset of all possible embodiments, but it is understood that "some embodiments" may be the same subset or different subsets of all possible embodiments, and may be combined with each other without conflict.

Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this application belongs. The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing embodiments of the present application only and is not intended to be limiting of the application.

The invention aims to provide a method and a system for managing airworthiness examination activity rules. And rules and guidance are provided for airworthiness examination activities, and the development of daily airworthiness examination activities is standardized.

Fig. 1 is a flowchart of an airworthiness inspection activity rule management method according to an embodiment of the present invention, and as shown in fig. 1, the airworthiness inspection activity rule management method according to the embodiment includes the following steps:

and S1, establishing a compliance activity plan.

Specifically, the compliance activity plan related to the airworthiness model examination activity comprises four levels of structures of an examination item, an examination plan, a CPI item and an examination activity item.

The examination items are designed on the top layer, each examination item is provided with a corresponding examination group authority, and each examination item comprises an examination plan, a CPI item and an examination activity item.

Preferably, in the process of establishing the examination item, each new model accepted by the civil aviation administration is independently set as one examination item.

The approval plan (CP) is an approval posting, an approval content, and the like agreed between the applicant and the examiner.

Specifically, the approval plan includes:

(1) and the management CP is virtualized in the system by the examiner and used for recording the management data in the work containing the compliance examination.

(2) And the professional CP is a checking plan agreed by an applicant and a checking party in the new model checking, and related data is constructed in the system according to agreed contents.

(3) A prototype CP virtualized in the system by a reviewing party according to the prototype framework to contain review data for testing the retrofit solution.

(4) Design assurance CP, under each design assurance examination project, dividing examination plans by years.

The CPI item is a work item decomposed in the approval plan (CP).

The CPI items also comprise a management CPI item, a conformity inspection CPI item and a design guarantee CPI item.

Specifically, the management type CPI entry is virtualized under each CP as default for the examiner, and is used for accommodating various management type activities that are not compliant with direct activities.

Preferably, the management type CPI entry under the management CP can accommodate data such as the formulation of the PSCP, the censorship group management conference, and the like.

Preferably, the management type CPI entry under the professional CP can accommodate data such as CP formulation, CPI formulation, and professional topic level meeting.

Preferably, corresponding management items CPI can be established under other CPIs to accommodate CP formulation, CPI formulation and related management work data.

Specifically, the CPI items of the compliance review class are compliance review works under professional CP and prototype CP, and should be refined to corresponding work items according to the categories of compliance methods, for example: XXX laboratory tests (MC4), XXX technical protocol review (MC 1).

Specifically, the design guarantee type CPI entry is obtained by decomposing a design guarantee annual review plan, and is generally a unit to be reviewed in the current year.

In one embodiment of the invention, after the CPI entries are created, the system also generates a CPI entry list. The CPI entry list is the sum of the CPI entries under a single CP.

Specifically, the management-type CPI entry list is formulated by the examiner and generated directly in the system. The compliance review class CPI item list and the design assurance class CPI item list are submitted by the applicant through a material review process and are directly generated in the system after approval/approval by the review group. If the applicant makes a change request to the CPI item, the change request should be approved/approved by the reviewer by submitting an updated version of the CP or CPI item manifest file.

The inspection activity item (CAI) is a specific activity that is refined from a single CPI item for this CPI item.

Specifically, the examination activity should be determined after determining the scope and principle of intervention on the CPI terms proposed by the applicant. Such as: the CPI entry of the lowest level of intervention generates only one audit activity entry of "evidence archive". As the degree of intervention increases, the CPI entry will likely result in multiple review activity entries such as "test outline review", "test witness", "test report review", etc.

Preferably, all of the review activity items must include the name, review activity category and assign a review representative accountant who may optionally assign a delegation representative accountant.

Wherein, the authority of the censorship representative and the commission representative in the censorship activity is divided into the following conditions:

(a) if the person responsible for the review activity assigns only a review representative, the review activity is reviewed independently by the review representative to conclude.

(b) If the person responsible for the examination activity only assigns a delegate, but no examination delegate participates, the delegate obtains full authorization and can directly issue an examination conclusion.

(c) If the censorship activity accountant assigns a censorship representative and a delegate, the delegate provides approval/no-pass censorship conclusion suggestions first, and the suggestions are issued after being reviewed by the censorship representative.

(d) If the person responsible for the checking activity does not assign the checking representative or the committing representative, the compliance activity is considered to be not required to be intervened, and the applicant uploads evidence for archiving and checking after completing the activity.

Preferably, the change in the activity item is reviewed, proposed by the applicant and confirmed by the reviewer.

And S2, establishing a standard inspection workflow.

Specifically, the standard review process is the minimum standard process unit for the reviewers to perform compliance review activities using the airworthiness collaboration platform. The standard examination process is organized by an examination activity tree, and the compliance examination activities defined in the examination activity tree are developed according to the standard examination process.

Specifically, the review activity tree refers to a structure that abstracts the content of the review activity and organizes the abstracted attributes according to a branching relationship.

Preferably, each type of audit activity in the audit activity tree has a standard flow corresponding to it. The standard review process comprises a standard data review process, a standard field review process, a manufacturing conformance inspection process, system problem management, a conformance conclusion and review opinions.

Specifically, the standard data review process includes review activities of reviewing static file data such as CP review, test outline, process class plan, and the like. The data review activities include: inputting, reviewing and outputting three rules. Wherein:

in the input rule, the applicant starts a corresponding examination process according to the examination activity item, and the input content comprises the following steps: the files being reviewed, file attributes (name, specialty, version, number, etc.) and associated attributes (ATA, CPI, etc.); attached files, attached file attributes, and associated attributes. The accompanying documents are evidence or material that applicants believe the reviewer to refer to.

In the review rule, the system automatically pushes the relevant reference data existing in the platform to the review representative, including the normative file associated with the document to be reviewed, the self-contained reference file, and other associated CPs. If the censored CP hosts the censored delegate to delegate the delegated delegate to perform the censoring activity, the censoring activity may be judged to be important and marked with a spot check. The examiner firstly carries out formal examination, such as whether the examined document is approved by the applicant, whether the appointed content is completely contained, whether the preposed document is approved, and the like. The formal audit is not passed and can be refuted to wait for the application to resubmit the material. And carrying out substantial examination after the form examination is passed.

In the output rule, the examiner gives a conformity conclusion and an examination opinion after finishing the substantial examination; if the audit activity is checked out by the system, the master audit representative of the CP needs to give an audit conclusion.

Specifically, the standard field review process includes review activities not for reviewing static document data, including field test witnesses, development process assurance interventions, system inspections, and the like. The standard field evaluation process comprises three rules of input, evaluation and output. Wherein:

in the input rule, the applicant submits corresponding review items and lifts the suggested review stroke after making preconditions according to the requirements of the field review items in the review activity items.

In the review rule, the system automatically pushes the existing relevant reference data in the platform to the review representative, including the rest document data under the CPI, the review standard, the review requirement and the like. If the censored representative delegates the delegated activity for the on-site review activity, the importance of the review activity can be determined and a spot check mark can be marked. The examiner performs pre-evaluation including whether the evaluation item is appropriate or not, whether the evaluation travel is appropriate or not, and the like.

In the output rule, the examiner must give a conformity conclusion and an examination opinion after completing the on-site evaluation; the on-site review records comprise an on-site review period, a test observation problem record sheet and the like; the on-site review conclusion includes a test observation report, a stage review report and the like. The development process ensures that the statement in the "stage review report" of the intervention review includes only "approved", "approved with opening" and "not passed".

Specifically, the manufacturing compliance check process is an extension of the field review process, and is considered a special field review. And (5) manufacturing a conformity checking flow. The standard field evaluation process comprises three rules of input, evaluation and output. Wherein:

in the input rule, the applicant establishes a 'manufacture conformity inspection request form' to fill in detailed information such as an inspection address, a drawing part number and the like. After the manufacturing compliance check request ticket is validated by the manufacturing representative, the system automatically creates a corresponding manufacturing compliance check activity CAI. The requester submits corresponding checking items and checking courses to the manufacturing representative after the checking preparation is made according to the item requirements in the manufacturing conformance checking request form in the checking activity item, and submits a manufacturing conformance statement according to the requirements.

In the output rule, the examiner must give a conformity conclusion and an examination opinion in the system after completing the field review; the on-site review records comprise an on-site review period, a test observation problem record sheet and the like. The on-site review conclusion includes a test observation report, a stage review report and the like. The development process ensures that the statement in the "stage review report" of the intervention review includes only "approved", "approved with opening" and "not passed".

Specifically, the manufacturing compliance check process is expanded from the field review process to be considered a special field review. The manufacturing conformance checking process comprises three rules of inputting, reviewing and outputting. Wherein:

in the input rule, the applicant generates a "manufacture conformity checking request form" in the system and fills in detailed information such as a checking address and a drawing part number. After the manufacturing compliance check request ticket is validated by the manufacturing representative, the system automatically creates a corresponding manufacturing compliance check activity CAI. The applicant submits corresponding checking items and checking courses to a manufacturing representative after the checking preparation is made according to the item requirements in the manufacturing conformance checking request form in the examination activity item, and submits a manufacturing conformance statement according to the requirements.

In the review rule, the system automatically pushes the relevant reference data existing in the platform to the review representative, including the rest of document data under the CPI, the check standard, the check requirement and the like. If the reviewing authority commissions the delegated manufacturing representative to perform the inspection activity, the importance of the inspection activity may be determined and a spot check flag may be marked. The examiner performs preliminary examination including checking whether the items are appropriate, checking whether the travel is appropriate, making a statement of compliance complete, and the like. And if the pre-check is passed, converting the check route into a check notification. The inspection notice formally determines the inspection item, the inspector and the inspection time. If the front examination fails, the front examination is directly rejected to wait for the application party to resubmit the examination items and the examination journey. If the reference data needs to be supplemented in the examination process, the material is supplemented by the main flow of the applicant. The single manufacturing inspection activity is only responsible for the version and what is seen in the "manufacturing compliance Requirements," which avoids involvement in the applicant's internal corrective activities.

In the output rule, after the manufacturing representative completes the manufacturing conformance check in the system, the found problems (including configuration problems and manufacturing deviation) are recorded in a manufacturing conformance check record table and sent to the requesting party and the engineering representative. The manufacturing representatives give out dissatisfaction notice and approval release certificate/airworthiness approval label according to the circumstances. In the process of executing the manufacturing conformity inspection, the manufacturing representative can report the discovered system problem to the system problem management through the dissatisfaction item notice. Architecture issues current manufacturing compliance review activities are suspended before they are processed. If the audit activity is checked out by the system, the director manufacturing inspection representative needs to give an audit conclusion.

Preferably, the inspection object in the manufacturing conformance inspection flow is composed of three levels, which correspond to the configuration, the module and the drawing respectively.

Specifically, before actually carrying out the manufacturing activities, the applicant needs to submit the CPI-related applicant product structure according to three levels of the inspection object structure, and the structure at least contains the content of the recommended list of the manufacturing compliance inspection options. After receiving the structure of the inspection object and the recommended list of the manufacturing conformity inspection options, which are clear from the application, the engineering representative and the manufacturing representative select the inspection items to be performed in the system to generate the list of the manufacturing conformity inspection options. The applicant submits a corresponding recommended list of options of the manufacturing conformance checking procedure according to the list of options of the manufacturing conformance checking. The manufacturing representative selects a manufacturing compliance process options list from the system based on the manufacturing compliance review process options recommendation list.

Specifically, during the process of confirming the test configuration and initiating the request for manufacturing conformity, the applicant needs to update the structure version information of the inspection object of the final test configuration through configuration description. All known deviations from the experimental configuration should also be reflected in the description of the configuration. Wherein "significant deviation" is referred to in the configuration description after approval by the reviewing parties. Other deviations require the description of the applicant's assessment conclusions. The examiner determines whether to initiate a manufacturing compliance request form, which must accurately describe the design to be inspected, based on the structure of the inspection object in the system, the configuration description submitted by the applicant, and the manufacturing compliance inspection option list. The manufacturing compliance claim sheet will refer to the inspection object structures in the system to declare the final trial configuration from the manufacturing inspection representative.

Specifically, the system problem management comprises three steps of system problem reporting, system problem processing and system problem continuous monitoring.

In the process of reporting the system problem, the problem which influences the airworthiness conformity judgment and is generated in the standard examination process can directly trigger the system to report.

Preferably, in the system problem processing process, the system firstly judges whether the problem is subjected to a review group or a group processing opinion, then receives the corrective measures and results of the applicant according to the analysis opinion of the review group, and gives a treatment opinion, wherein the treatment opinion comprises a conclusion of approval or approval of the review activity.

Preferably, the continuous monitoring of the system problems includes receiving the latest status of the applicant reporting the correction results and continuous supervision of the system problems. The review group also uploads non-systematic problems found in various review processes by the applicant to the system for review by the review group.

Specifically, the conformity conclusion is that after the examination activity, the examiner makes a judgment on the conformity of the examination materials and airworthiness regulation terms submitted by the applicant and feeds back the judgment to the applicant through the system. The compliance conclusion can only be selected from the four types of approval, approval with opening, and non-compliance.

Specifically, the review opinions are used for describing the review opinions when the compliance conclusion is given, and can be selected from four items, namely a suggestion item, a cotter item and a question item.

Preferably, the suggested item is an unforced requirement or a warning that the hidden danger is not met, which is provided by the examiner to the evaluation object. Whether the compliance conclusion is any one of "approve", "with opening approval", and "not pass", the suggested term may be selected to be filled out. The suggested item can obtain system reminding in subsequent associated tasks, and the examiner can judge manual closing by himself.

Preferably, the opening item is a question item that the examiner allows the review object to retain, and the opening item must first satisfy the condition of the question item, while the opening item requires that the closing condition and closing time thereof must be specified.

Preferably, the question item is the condition that the compliance evidence does not conform to the examination basis, and the question item must be filled when the examiner selects 'fail' as a conclusion; the reviewer should not fill in the question item if he chooses "approve", "approve" or "with opening approval" as a conclusion.

Preferably, the items of interest are known or potential screening questions found during the screening activity, and the system sets the items of interest to three levels: primary concerns, professional topic concerns, and review group concerns.

And S3, managing the conference.

Specifically, the conference management step includes establishing a conference suggestion item, creating a conference, examining and approving the conference, and summarizing the conference.

Wherein, the conference classification mainly comprises: familiarity, technical seminar, censorship, and management.

Preferably, the conference suggestion item is an issue suggestion which is provided by a censoror or an applicant and needs to be discussed subsequently in a conference form. To ensure information traceability, the topic in the meeting notification must come from a pool of meeting suggestions, which is used to manage all meeting suggestions made by reviewers and applicants.

Preferably, during the process of creating the meeting, both the reviewing party and the applying party can become the meeting initiating party to initiate the meeting notification, and the meeting initiating party must select one or more meeting suggestions from the meeting suggestion pool as the subject content in the meeting notification. The meeting notice comprises a meeting name, start and stop time, a place, participants and meeting materials.

Preferably, in the conference approval process, the examiner examines and issues the conference notification, and when the conference notification fails to pass the examination, the conference suggestion item returns to the conference suggestion item pool again.

Preferably, the conference summary needs to record the discussion result and the action item of each conference suggestion item by item corresponding to the conference notification.

Fig. 2 is a system framework diagram of a flight inspection activity rule management system according to an embodiment of the invention. As shown in fig. 2, the aviation inspection activity rule management system of the present invention includes: compliance campaign plan 1, standard review workflow 2, and meeting management 3

Specifically, the compliance activity plan 1 comprises an examination project, an approval plan (CP), a CPI project and an examination activity project (CAI), wherein the examination project is the top layer of the compliance activity plan, each examination project is attached with a corresponding approval plan, CPI project and examination activity project, the approval plan (CP) comprises approval bases and approval contents agreed by an applicant and an examinee, the CPI project comprises work items decomposed in the approval plan, and the examination activity project (CAI) is a specific examination activity decomposed for a single CPI project;

specifically, the standard review workflow 2 includes a review activity tree and compliance review activities on nodes thereof, the compliance review activities include a standard data review process, a standard field review process, a manufacturing compliance inspection process, and a system problem management process, and the compliance review activities finally generate compliance conclusions and review opinions.

Preferably, the standard review process is the minimum standard process unit for the reviewer to perform compliance review activities using the airworthiness collaboration platform. The standard examination process is organized by an examination activity tree, and the compliance examination activities defined in the examination activity tree are developed according to the standard examination process.

Preferably, the review activity tree is a structure that abstracts the content of the review activity and organizes the abstracted attributes in a branching relationship.

Specifically, the conference management 3 includes conference suggestion items, creation of a conference, examination and approval of the conference, and a conference summary.

Although embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described above, it is understood that the above embodiments are exemplary and should not be construed as limiting the present invention, and that variations, modifications, substitutions and alterations can be made to the above embodiments by those of ordinary skill in the art within the scope of the present invention. Any modification, equivalent replacement, or improvement made within the spirit and principle of the present invention should be included in the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. The airworthiness examination activity rule management method is characterized by comprising the following steps of:

2. The airworthiness review activity rule management method of claim 1, wherein in the step of establishing a compliance activity plan, further comprising:

3. The navigable review activity rule management method of claim 2, wherein in the step of establishing a standard review workflow, further comprising:

4. The airworthiness review activity rule management method of claim 3, further comprising generating a compliance conclusion comprising the steps of:

5. The airworthiness review activity rule management method of claim 1, wherein the conference managing step further comprises:

6. An airworthiness review activity rule management system, comprising:

7. The airworthiness review activity rule management system of claim 6, wherein the compliance activity plan further comprises:

8. The airworthiness review activity rule management system of claim 7, wherein the standard review workflow further comprises:

9. The airworthiness review activity rule management system of claim 8, wherein the standard review workflow further comprises:

10. The navigable censoring activity rule management system of claim 6, wherein the meeting management further comprises: