CN112165406A - Interface message testing method and device, computer equipment and storage medium - Google Patents
Interface message testing method and device, computer equipment and storage medium Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN112165406A CN112165406A CN202010895798.6A CN202010895798A CN112165406A CN 112165406 A CN112165406 A CN 112165406A CN 202010895798 A CN202010895798 A CN 202010895798A CN 112165406 A CN112165406 A CN 112165406A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- interface message
- target
- node
- nodes
- actual
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L43/00—Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
- H04L43/50—Testing arrangements
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Debugging And Monitoring (AREA)
- Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)
Abstract
The application relates to an interface message testing method, an interface message testing device, computer equipment and a storage medium. The method comprises the following steps: acquiring an actual interface message, wherein the actual interface message carries a current interface identifier; acquiring a corresponding target reference interface message according to the current interface identifier; determining a difference node set according to the actual interface message and the target reference interface message; and determining an interface message test result according to the node value corresponding to the different node in the different node set, wherein the interface message test result is used for determining the correctness of the actual interface message. The method can comprehensively test the interface message so as to improve the accuracy of the interface message test.
Description
Technical Field
The present application relates to the field of computer technologies, and in particular, to a method and an apparatus for testing an interface packet, a computer device, and a storage medium.
Background
At present, the interface message test usually performs the full matching of character strings on the received interface message, and the test can be passed only if the field name and the corresponding field value are completely consistent, and the test mode easily ignores the condition that the field value is empty or the field does not exist, resulting in low test accuracy of the interface message.
Disclosure of Invention
Therefore, it is necessary to provide an interface message testing method, an interface message testing device, a computer device, and a storage medium, which can comprehensively perform an interface message test and thereby improve the accuracy of the interface message test.
A method for testing interface message includes:
acquiring an actual interface message, wherein the actual interface message carries a current interface identifier;
acquiring a corresponding target reference interface message according to the current interface identifier;
determining a difference node set according to the actual interface message and the target reference interface message;
and determining an interface message test result according to the node value corresponding to the different node in the different node set, wherein the interface message test result is used for determining the correctness of the actual interface message.
In one embodiment, the interface message testing method further includes: acquiring a candidate reference interface message set, wherein the candidate reference interface message set comprises at least one candidate reference interface message; acquiring a candidate interface identifier corresponding to each candidate interface; establishing an incidence relation between the candidate standard interface message and the corresponding candidate interface identifier; obtaining a corresponding target reference interface message according to the current interface identifier, including: and acquiring a corresponding target reference interface message according to the incidence relation and the current interface identifier.
In one embodiment, determining a difference node set according to an actual interface packet and a target reference interface packet includes: traversing the actual node name in the actual interface message; traversing the reference node name in the target reference interface message; and determining the nodes with different actual node names and reference node names as difference nodes to form a difference node set.
In one embodiment, determining an interface packet test result according to a node value corresponding to a difference node in a difference node set includes: eliminating the difference nodes with empty node values from the difference node set to obtain a new difference node set; and when the difference nodes in the new difference node set are inconsistent, determining that the interface message test result is an interface message test result failure.
In one embodiment, the interface message testing method further includes: when the difference nodes in the new difference node set are consistent, determining a target node set according to the actual interface message and the target reference interface message; and when the target nodes in the target node set are consistent, determining that the interface message test result is successful.
In one embodiment, determining a target node set according to an actual interface packet and a target reference interface packet includes: traversing the actual node name in the actual interface message; traversing the reference node name in the target reference interface message; and determining the nodes with the same actual node names and reference node names as target nodes to form a target node set.
In one embodiment, when the target nodes in the target node set are consistent, the method includes: the node names corresponding to the target nodes in the target nodes are the same, the node values corresponding to the target nodes are the same, and the target nodes in the target node set are determined to be consistent; if the target node comprises a plurality of target child nodes, the method further comprises: when the number of target sub-nodes corresponding to the target node in the actual interface message is the same as the number of target sub-nodes corresponding to the target node in the target reference interface message, acquiring the names of the target sub-nodes corresponding to the target sub-nodes in the actual interface message and the target reference interface message and the values of the target sub-nodes corresponding to the target sub-nodes; and when the names of the target child nodes are the same and the values of the target child nodes are the same, determining that the target nodes in the target node set are consistent.
An interface message testing device, the device comprising:
the actual interface message acquisition module is used for acquiring an actual interface message, and the actual interface message carries a current interface identifier;
the reference interface message acquisition module is used for acquiring a corresponding target reference interface message according to the current interface identifier;
the difference node set determining module is used for determining a difference node set according to the actual interface message and the target reference interface message;
and the interface message test result determining module is used for determining an interface message test result according to the node value corresponding to the different node in the difference node set, and the interface message test result is used for determining the correctness of the actual interface message.
A computer device comprising a memory, a processor and a computer program stored on the memory and executable on the processor, the processor implementing the following steps when executing the computer program:
acquiring an actual interface message, wherein the actual interface message carries a current interface identifier;
acquiring a corresponding target reference interface message according to the current interface identifier;
determining a difference node set according to the actual interface message and the target reference interface message;
and determining an interface message test result according to the node value corresponding to the different node in the different node set, wherein the interface message test result is used for determining the correctness of the actual interface message.
A computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored which, when executed by a processor, carries out the steps of:
acquiring an actual interface message, wherein the actual interface message carries a current interface identifier;
acquiring a corresponding target reference interface message according to the current interface identifier;
determining a difference node set according to the actual interface message and the target reference interface message;
and determining an interface message test result according to the node value corresponding to the different node in the different node set, wherein the interface message test result is used for determining the correctness of the actual interface message.
The interface message testing method, the device, the computer equipment and the storage medium acquire an actual interface message, wherein the actual interface message carries a current interface identifier; acquiring a corresponding target reference interface message according to the current interface identifier; determining a difference node set according to the actual interface message and the target reference interface message; and determining an interface message test result according to the node value corresponding to the different node in the different node set, wherein the interface message test result is used for determining the correctness of the actual interface message. The difference node set is obtained by comparing the actual interface message with the corresponding target reference interface message, the interface message test result can be obtained according to the node value corresponding to the difference node in the difference node set, the condition that the node value is empty or the node does not exist can not be ignored, and the interface message test can be comprehensively carried out, so that the interface message test accuracy is improved.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a diagram of an application environment of a method for interface message testing in one embodiment;
FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating a method for interface message testing according to an embodiment;
FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating a method for interface message testing in one embodiment;
FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating the step of determining a set of difference nodes in one embodiment;
FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating the interface message test result determination step in one embodiment;
FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating a method for interface message testing according to an embodiment;
FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating the target node set determination step in one embodiment;
FIG. 8 is a flowchart illustrating the processing steps of a target node in a set of target nodes in one embodiment;
FIG. 9 is a block diagram of an interface message test apparatus according to an embodiment;
FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an internal structure of a computer device in one embodiment;
FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating an internal structure of a computer device in one embodiment.
Detailed Description
In order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present application more apparent, the present application is described in further detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of the present application and are not intended to limit the present application.
The interface message testing method provided by the application can be applied to the application environment shown in fig. 1. Wherein the terminal 102 communicates with the server 104 via a network. The terminal 102 may be, but not limited to, various personal computers, notebook computers, smart phones, tablet computers, and portable wearable devices, and the server 104 may be implemented by an independent server or a server cluster formed by a plurality of servers.
Specifically, the terminal 102 sends an actual interface message to the server 104 through an interface corresponding to a current interface identifier, the server 104 obtains the actual interface message, the actual interface message carries the current interface identifier, obtains a corresponding target reference interface message according to the current interface identifier, determines a difference node set according to the actual interface message and the target reference interface message, and determines an interface message test result according to a node value corresponding to the difference node in the difference node set, where the interface message test result is used to determine the correctness of the actual interface message. Further, the interface message test result may be returned to the terminal 102 for the terminal user to view.
In another embodiment, the terminal 102 obtains an actual interface message, where the actual interface message carries a current interface identifier, obtains a corresponding target reference interface message according to the current interface identifier, determines a difference node set according to the actual interface message and the target reference interface message, and determines an interface message test result according to a node value corresponding to a difference node in the difference node set, where the interface message test result is used to determine the correctness of the actual interface message.
In an embodiment, as shown in fig. 2, an interface message testing method is provided, which is described by taking the application of the method to the terminal or the server in fig. 1 as an example, and includes the following steps:
The actual interface message refers to an interface message acquired through a current interface, the current interface corresponds to a current interface identifier, the current interface identifier is used for uniquely identifying the current interface, and different interfaces correspond to different interface identifiers.
Among them, the Interface API (Application Programming Interface) is a predefined function for providing the Application and developer the ability to access a set of routines based on certain software or hardware without accessing the source code or understanding the details of the internal working mechanism. The interface message is message data acquired through an interface, and the message is a data unit exchanged and transmitted in a network, that is, a data block to be sent by a station at one time. The message contains complete data information to be sent, the lengths of the data information are quite different, and the number of the data information is unlimited and variable. Specifically, the actual interface message may be obtained by calling the current interface corresponding to the current interface identifier, and the actual interface message carries the current interface identifier.
And 204, acquiring a corresponding target reference interface message according to the current interface identifier.
The target standard interface message refers to a correct interface message corresponding to the current interface identifier, and may be used to detect the correctness of the actual interface message. The reference interface messages corresponding to different interface identifiers may be different or the same, and may be determined according to a service requirement, an actual application scenario, or a product requirement.
Specifically, after the actual interface message is obtained, the corresponding target reference interface message may be obtained according to the current interface identifier carried in the actual interface message. Specifically, candidate interface identifiers corresponding to the candidate reference interface messages are obtained, and the candidate reference interface message corresponding to the candidate interface identifier that is the same as the current interface identifier is determined as the target reference interface message corresponding to the current interface identifier.
And step 206, determining a difference node set according to the actual interface message and the target reference interface message.
The difference node set is a set composed of at least one difference node, the difference node is a node where an actual interface message is different from a target reference interface message, the difference node may be a node where a field name in the actual interface message is different from a field name in the target reference interface message, a node where a field value in the actual interface message is different from a field value in the target reference interface message, a node where the actual interface message is lost relative to the target reference interface message, or a node where the actual interface message is added relative to the target reference interface message. The nodes can be used as difference nodes to form a difference node set.
Specifically, after the actual interface message and the target reference interface message are obtained, all actual nodes in the actual interface message are traversed, reference nodes in the target reference interface message are traversed, and a difference node is determined according to an actual node name of the actual node and a reference node name, where a node with a different actual node name and a different reference node name may be determined as the difference node. Or after the actual interface message and the target reference interface message are obtained, the actual interface message and the target reference interface message are compared, and the node where the actual interface message is lost or the node which is added relative to the target reference interface message can be determined as a difference node, so that a difference node set is obtained.
And 208, determining an interface message test result according to the node value corresponding to the different node in the different node set, wherein the interface message test result is used for determining the correctness of the actual interface message.
The difference node set comprises difference nodes in an actual interface message and difference nodes in a target reference interface message, the difference nodes comprise node names and corresponding node values, and an interface message test result can be determined according to the node names of the difference nodes and the corresponding node values. The interface message test result is used for determining the correctness of the actual interface message, and the interface message test result comprises the success of the interface message test result and the failure of the interface message test result. The successful test result of the interface message indicates that the received actual interface message is correct, the test is successful, and the failed test result of the interface message indicates that the received actual interface message has problems, and the actual interface message needs to be checked and corrected.
Specifically, the difference nodes with empty node values in the difference node set are removed from the difference node set to obtain a new difference node set, an interface message test result is determined according to the difference nodes in the new difference node set, and if the difference nodes in the new difference node set are inconsistent, the interface message test result is determined to be an interface message test result failure.
Otherwise, if the difference nodes in the new difference node set are consistent, the target node set can be determined according to the actual interface message and the target reference interface message, and if the target nodes in the target node set are consistent, the interface message test result is determined to be the successful interface message test result. The target node in the target node set refers to a node with the same name in the actual interface message and the target reference interface message, and is determined as the target node. And if the node name of the target node is the same as the corresponding node value, the target nodes in the target node set are consistent.
In the interface message testing method, an actual interface message is obtained, and the actual interface message carries a current interface identifier; acquiring a corresponding target reference interface message according to the current interface identifier; determining a difference node set according to the actual interface message and the target reference interface message; and determining an interface message test result according to the node value corresponding to the different node in the different node set, wherein the interface message test result is used for determining the correctness of the actual interface message. The difference node set is obtained by comparing the actual interface message with the corresponding target reference interface message, the interface message test result can be obtained according to the node value corresponding to the difference node in the difference node set, the condition that the node value is empty or the node does not exist can not be ignored, and the interface message test can be comprehensively carried out, so that the interface message test accuracy is improved.
In an embodiment, as shown in fig. 3, the interface message testing method further includes:
And step 304, acquiring a candidate interface identifier corresponding to each candidate interface.
And 308, acquiring a corresponding target reference interface message according to the association relation and the current interface identifier.
The reference interface messages corresponding to different interface identifiers may be different or the same, and may be determined according to a service requirement, an actual application scenario, or a product requirement. The incidence relation between the candidate interface identifier and the candidate reference interface message can be established in advance, and can be established according to business requirements, actual application scenes or product requirements. Specifically, a candidate reference interface message set is obtained, where the candidate reference interface message set includes at least one candidate reference interface message, and a candidate interface identifier corresponding to each candidate reference interface message may be determined according to a service requirement, an application scenario, and the like, and different candidate reference interface messages may correspond to different candidate interface identifiers, may also correspond to the same candidate interface identifier, and may specifically be determined according to an actual requirement.
Further, after determining the candidate interface identifier corresponding to each candidate standard interface message, establishing an association relationship between the candidate standard interface message and the corresponding candidate interface identifier, and obtaining a target standard interface message matched with the current interface identifier according to the association relationship and the current interface identifier carried by the actual interface message after subsequently obtaining the actual interface message. Specifically, candidate interface identifiers corresponding to the candidate reference interface messages are obtained, and the candidate reference interface message corresponding to the candidate interface identifier that is the same as the current interface identifier is determined as the target reference interface message corresponding to the current interface identifier.
In one embodiment, as shown in fig. 4, determining a difference node set according to an actual interface packet and a target reference interface packet includes:
And step 406, determining the nodes with different actual node names and reference node names as difference nodes to form a difference node set.
The difference node set is a set composed of at least one difference node, the difference node is a node where an actual interface message is different from a target reference interface message, the difference node may be a node where a field name in the actual interface message is different from a field name in the target reference interface message, a node where a field value in the actual interface message is different from a field value in the target reference interface message, a node where the actual interface message is lost relative to the target reference interface message, or a node where the actual interface message is added relative to the target reference interface message. The nodes can be used as difference nodes to form a difference node set.
Specifically, after the actual interface message and the target reference interface message are obtained, all actual nodes in the actual interface message are traversed, reference nodes in the target reference interface message are traversed, and a difference node is determined according to an actual node name of the actual node and a reference node name, where a node with a different actual node name and a different reference node name may be determined as the difference node. Or after the actual interface message and the target reference interface message are obtained, the actual interface message and the target reference interface message are compared, and the node where the actual interface message is lost or the node which is added relative to the target reference interface message can be determined as a difference node, so that a difference node set is obtained.
For example, the target reference interface message:
wherein, the actual interface message:
specifically, the nodes with different actual node names and reference node names may be determined as difference nodes, and the difference nodes are: test3 in the target reference interface message and test2 in the real interface message.
In an embodiment, as shown in fig. 5, determining an interface packet test result according to a node value corresponding to a difference node in a difference node set includes:
Specifically, after the difference node set is obtained, an interface message test result may be determined according to a node value corresponding to a difference node in the difference node set, and specifically, the difference node with an empty node value in the difference node set may be removed from the difference node set to obtain a new difference node set.
For example, the target reference interface message:
wherein, the actual interface message:
specifically, the nodes with different actual node names and reference node names may be determined as difference nodes, and the difference node set includes: test3 in the target reference interface message and test2 in the real interface message. The node values of test3 and test2 are all null, so that test3 and test2 are removed from the difference node set to obtain a new difference node set, and the new difference node set has no difference nodes.
Further, after the new difference node set is obtained, an interface message test result is determined according to the difference nodes in the new difference node set, and if the difference nodes in the new difference node set are inconsistent, the interface message test result is determined to be an interface message test result failure. And if the different nodes in the new different node set are inconsistent, determining that the different nodes in the new different node set are inconsistent if the node names and the node values of the different nodes are different. And if the difference nodes in the new difference node set are inconsistent, the actual interface message and the target reference interface message are different, the actual interface message has a problem, and the interface message test result is an interface message test result failure. In another embodiment, a switch may be provided, and the switch is used to control whether a difference node with an empty node value needs to be removed from a difference node set, specifically, the difference node may be determined according to a service requirement, a product requirement, or an application scenario, and the switch generally controls the difference node with an empty node value to be removed from the difference node set in a default condition.
In an embodiment, as shown in fig. 6, the interface message testing method further includes:
And step 604, when the target nodes in the target node set are consistent, determining that the interface message test result is successful.
If the difference nodes in the new difference node set are consistent, a target node set can be determined according to the actual interface message and the target reference interface message, and if the target nodes in the target node set are consistent, the interface message test result is determined to be the success of the interface message test result. The target node in the target node set refers to a node with the same name in the actual interface message and the target reference interface message, and is determined as the target node. And if the node name of the target node is the same as the corresponding node value, the target nodes in the target node set are consistent.
The target node in the target node set may specifically be that the actual interface packet is compared with the target reference interface packet, and the node with the same node name and corresponding node value is determined as the target node, that is, after the difference node is determined by the actual interface packet and the target reference interface packet, the remaining nodes may be all used as the target nodes.
The target nodes in the target node set may specifically be that the node names of the target nodes are the same as the corresponding node values, and it may be determined that the interface message test result is a successful interface message test result, which indicates that there is no difference between the actual interface message and the target reference interface message, and the actual interface message has no problem, and the interface message test result is a successful interface message test result.
For example, the target reference interface message:
wherein, the actual interface message:
specifically, the nodes with different actual node names and reference node names may be determined as difference nodes, and the difference node set includes: the test3 in the target reference interface message and the test2 in the actual interface message, the target node is: and test1, if the node values corresponding to the target node test1 in the actual interface message and the target reference interface message are both 1, determining that the interface message test result is successful.
In one embodiment, as shown in fig. 7, determining a target node set according to an actual interface packet and a target reference interface packet includes:
The target node in the target node set refers to a node with the same name in the actual interface message and the target reference interface message, and is determined as the target node. And if the node name of the target node is the same as the corresponding node value, the target nodes in the target node set are consistent.
The specific step of determining the target node may be to traverse the actual node name in the actual interface message and traverse the reference node name in the target reference interface message, and determine the node with the actual node name being the same as the reference node name as the target node to form a target node set. In fact, the actual interface message is compared with the target reference interface message, and the node with the actual node name in the actual interface message and the reference node name in the target reference interface message are determined as the target node. In another embodiment, after the difference node is determined by the actual interface packet and the target reference interface packet, the remaining nodes may be all used as target nodes.
For example, the target reference interface message:
wherein, the actual interface message:
specifically, the nodes with different actual node names and reference node names may be determined as difference nodes, and the difference node set includes: the test3 in the target reference interface message and the test2 in the actual interface message, the target node is: test 1.
In one embodiment, as shown in fig. 8, when the target nodes in the target node set are consistent, the method includes:
If the node names corresponding to the target nodes in the target node set are the same and the node values corresponding to the target nodes are the same, it is indicated that there is no difference between the actual interface message and the target reference interface message, and it is determined that the target nodes in the target node set are the same. Specifically, the actual interface message and the target reference interface message are compared, a node with the same actual node name in the actual interface message and the reference node name in the target reference interface message is determined as a target node, and if a node value corresponding to the target node in the actual interface message is the same as a node value in the target reference interface message, it may be determined that the target nodes in the target node set are the same.
If the target node comprises a plurality of target sub-nodes, whether the number of the target sub-nodes in the target node is consistent in the actual interface message and the target reference interface message or not is judged, if the number of the target sub-nodes corresponding to the target node in the actual interface message is the same as the number of the target sub-nodes corresponding to the target node in the target reference interface message, the names of the target sub-nodes corresponding to the target sub-nodes in the actual interface message and the target reference interface message and the values of the target sub-nodes corresponding to the target sub-nodes are obtained, and when the names of the target sub-nodes are the same and the values of the target sub-nodes are the same, the target nodes in the target node set are determined to be.
If the number of the target sub-nodes corresponding to the target node in the actual interface message is different from the number of the target sub-nodes corresponding to the target node in the target reference interface message, the interface message test result can be directly determined to be the interface message test result failure.
For example, the target reference interface message:
wherein, the actual interface message:
if the target node test2 includes a plurality of target sub-nodes, and the number of target sub-nodes corresponding to the target node in the actual interface message is longer than the number of target sub-nodes corresponding to the target node in the target reference interface message, that is, the number of target sub-nodes corresponding to the target node in the actual interface message is different from the number of target sub-nodes corresponding to the node target node in the target reference interface message, it may be directly determined that the interface message test result is an interface message test result failure.
If the number of target sub-nodes corresponding to the target node in the actual interface message is the same as the number of target sub-nodes corresponding to the node target node in the target reference interface message, whether the names of the target sub-nodes corresponding to the target sub-nodes in the actual interface message and the target reference interface message are the same as the values of the target sub-nodes corresponding to the target sub-nodes is obtained, if the names of the target sub-nodes are the same and the values of the target sub-nodes are the same, it is determined that the target nodes in the target node set are the same, otherwise, if the names of the target sub-nodes are the same and the values of the target sub-nodes are not the same, it is determined that the test result of the interface. In another embodiment, a switch may be provided, and whether to perform sequential detection between target child nodes is controlled by the switch, which may be specifically set according to a service requirement, an actual application scenario, or a product requirement.
In a specific embodiment, a method for testing an interface message is provided, which specifically includes the following steps:
1. and acquiring a candidate reference interface message set, wherein the candidate reference interface message set comprises at least one candidate reference interface message.
2. And acquiring a candidate interface identifier corresponding to each candidate interface.
3. And establishing an incidence relation between the candidate reference interface message and the corresponding candidate interface identifier.
4. And acquiring an actual interface message, wherein the actual interface message carries the current interface identifier.
5. And acquiring a corresponding target reference interface message according to the incidence relation and the current interface identifier.
6. And determining a difference node set according to the actual interface message and the target reference interface message.
6-1, traversing the actual node name in the actual interface message.
6-2, traversing the reference node name in the target reference interface message.
And 6-3, determining the nodes with different actual node names and reference node names as difference nodes to form a difference node set.
7. And determining an interface message test result according to the node value corresponding to the different node in the different node set, wherein the interface message test result is used for determining the correctness of the actual interface message.
7-1, removing the difference nodes with empty node values from the difference node set to obtain a new difference node set.
7-2, when the difference nodes in the new difference node set are not consistent, determining that the interface message test result is an interface message test result failure.
7-3, when the difference nodes in the new difference node set are consistent, determining a target node set according to the actual interface message and the target reference interface message.
7-3-1, traversing the actual node name in the actual interface message.
7-3-2, traversing the reference node name in the target reference interface message.
7-3-3, determining the nodes with the same actual node names and reference node names as target nodes to form a target node set.
7-4, when the target nodes in the target node set are consistent, determining that the interface message test result is successful.
7-4-1, determining that the target nodes in the target node set are consistent, wherein the node names corresponding to the target nodes in the target nodes are the same, and the node values corresponding to the target nodes are the same.
7-4-1, if the target node comprises a plurality of target sub-nodes, when the number of the target sub-nodes corresponding to the target node in the actual interface message is the same as the number of the target sub-nodes corresponding to the target node in the target reference interface message, acquiring the names of the target sub-nodes corresponding to the target sub-nodes in the actual interface message and the target reference interface message and the values of the target sub-nodes corresponding to the target sub-nodes.
7-4-2, when the names of the target child nodes are the same and the values of the target child nodes are the same, determining that the target nodes in the target node set are consistent.
It should be understood that, although the steps in the above-described flowcharts are shown in order as indicated by the arrows, the steps are not necessarily performed in order as indicated by the arrows. The steps are not performed in the exact order shown and described, and may be performed in other orders, unless explicitly stated otherwise. Moreover, at least a portion of the steps in the above-described flowcharts may include multiple sub-steps or multiple stages, which are not necessarily performed at the same time, but may be performed at different times, and the order of performing the sub-steps or the stages is not necessarily sequential, but may be performed alternately or alternatingly with other steps or at least a portion of the sub-steps or stages of other steps.
In one embodiment, as shown in fig. 9, there is provided an interface message testing apparatus 900, including: an actual interface message obtaining module 902, a reference interface message obtaining module 904, a difference node set determining module 906, and an interface message test result determining module 908, wherein:
an actual interface message obtaining module 902, configured to obtain an actual interface message, where the actual interface message carries a current interface identifier.
A reference interface message obtaining module 904, configured to obtain a corresponding target reference interface message according to the current interface identifier.
A difference node set determining module 906, configured to determine a difference node set according to the actual interface packet and the target reference interface packet.
The interface message test result determining module 908 is configured to determine an interface message test result according to a node value corresponding to a difference node in the difference node set, where the interface message test result is used to determine correctness of an actual interface message.
In an embodiment, the interface message testing apparatus 900 is further configured to obtain a candidate reference interface message set, where the candidate reference interface message set includes at least one candidate reference interface message, obtain a candidate interface identifier corresponding to each candidate interface, and establish an association relationship between the candidate reference interface message and the corresponding candidate interface identifier.
In this embodiment, the reference interface message obtaining module 904 is further configured to obtain a corresponding target reference interface message according to the association relationship and the current interface identifier.
In one embodiment, the difference node set determining module 906 is further configured to traverse the actual node name in the actual interface message, traverse the reference node name in the target reference interface message, and determine the node with the different actual node name and the different reference node name as the difference node to form the difference node set.
In an embodiment, the interface message test result determining module 908 is further configured to remove a difference node with a null node value from the difference node set to obtain a new difference node set, and determine that the interface message test result is an interface message test result failure when the difference node in the new difference node set is inconsistent.
In one embodiment, the interface packet testing apparatus 900 is further configured to determine the target node set according to the actual interface packet and the target reference interface packet when the difference nodes in the new difference node set are consistent, and determine that the interface packet testing result is successful when the target nodes in the target node set are consistent.
In one embodiment, the interface packet testing apparatus 900 is further configured to traverse the actual node name in the actual interface packet, traverse the reference node name in the target reference interface packet, and determine the node with the actual node name being the same as the reference node name as the target node to form a target node set.
In an embodiment, the interface packet testing apparatus 900 is further configured to determine that the target nodes in the target node set are consistent when the node names corresponding to the target nodes in the target nodes are the same and the node values corresponding to the target nodes are the same.
In an embodiment, if the target node includes a plurality of target sub-nodes, the interface packet testing apparatus 900 is further configured to obtain names of the target sub-nodes corresponding to the target sub-nodes in the actual interface packet and the target reference interface packet and values of the target sub-nodes corresponding to the target sub-nodes when the number of the target sub-nodes corresponding to the target node in the actual interface packet is the same as the number of the target sub-nodes corresponding to the target node in the target reference interface packet, and determine that the target nodes in the target node set are the same when the names of the target sub-nodes are the same and the values of the target sub-nodes are the same.
For the specific limitation of the interface message testing apparatus, reference may be made to the above limitation on the interface message testing method, which is not described herein again. All or part of each module in the interface message testing device can be realized by software, hardware and a combination thereof. The modules can be embedded in a hardware form or independent from a processor in the computer device, and can also be stored in a memory in the computer device in a software form, so that the processor can call and execute operations corresponding to the modules.
In one embodiment, a computer device is provided, which may be a server, and its internal structure diagram may be as shown in fig. 10. The computer device includes a processor, a memory, a network interface, and a database connected by a system bus. Wherein the processor of the computer device is configured to provide computing and control capabilities. The memory of the computer device comprises a nonvolatile storage medium and an internal memory. The non-volatile storage medium stores an operating system, a computer program, and a database. The internal memory provides an environment for the operation of an operating system and computer programs in the non-volatile storage medium. The database of the computer device is used for storing the interface message test result. The network interface of the computer device is used for communicating with an external terminal through a network connection. The computer program is executed by a processor to implement an interface message testing method.
In one embodiment, a computer device is provided, which may be a terminal, and its internal structure diagram may be as shown in fig. 11. The computer device includes a processor, a memory, a network interface, a display screen, and an input device connected by a system bus. Wherein the processor of the computer device is configured to provide computing and control capabilities. The memory of the computer device comprises a nonvolatile storage medium and an internal memory. The non-volatile storage medium stores an operating system and a computer program. The internal memory provides an environment for the operation of an operating system and computer programs in the non-volatile storage medium. The network interface of the computer device is used for communicating with an external terminal through a network connection. The computer program is executed by a processor to implement an interface message testing method. The display screen of the computer equipment can be a liquid crystal display screen or an electronic ink display screen, and the input device of the computer equipment can be a touch layer covered on the display screen, a key, a track ball or a touch pad arranged on the shell of the computer equipment, an external keyboard, a touch pad or a mouse and the like.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the configurations shown in fig. 10 or 11 are merely block diagrams of some configurations relevant to the present disclosure, and do not constitute a limitation on the computing devices to which the present disclosure may be applied, and that a particular computing device may include more or less components than those shown, or may combine certain components, or have a different arrangement of components.
In one embodiment, a computer device is provided, comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored on the memory and executable on the processor, the processor implementing the following steps when executing the computer program: acquiring an actual interface message, wherein the actual interface message carries a current interface identifier; acquiring a corresponding target reference interface message according to the current interface identifier; determining a difference node set according to the actual interface message and the target reference interface message; and determining an interface message test result according to the node value corresponding to the different node in the different node set, wherein the interface message test result is used for determining the correctness of the actual interface message.
In one embodiment, the processor, when executing the computer program, further performs the steps of: acquiring a candidate reference interface message set, wherein the candidate reference interface message set comprises at least one candidate reference interface message; acquiring a candidate interface identifier corresponding to each candidate interface; establishing an incidence relation between the candidate standard interface message and the corresponding candidate interface identifier; obtaining a corresponding target reference interface message according to the current interface identifier, including: and acquiring a corresponding target reference interface message according to the incidence relation and the current interface identifier.
In one embodiment, the processor, when executing the computer program, further performs the steps of: traversing the actual node name in the actual interface message; traversing the reference node name in the target reference interface message; and determining the nodes with different actual node names and reference node names as difference nodes to form a difference node set.
In one embodiment, the processor, when executing the computer program, further performs the steps of: eliminating the difference nodes with empty node values from the difference node set to obtain a new difference node set; and when the difference nodes in the new difference node set are inconsistent, determining that the interface message test result is an interface message test result failure.
In one embodiment, the processor, when executing the computer program, further performs the steps of: when the difference nodes in the new difference node set are consistent, determining a target node set according to the actual interface message and the target reference interface message; and when the target nodes in the target node set are consistent, determining that the interface message test result is successful.
In one embodiment, the processor, when executing the computer program, further performs the steps of: traversing the actual node name in the actual interface message; traversing the reference node name in the target reference interface message; and determining the nodes with the same actual node names and reference node names as target nodes to form a target node set.
In one embodiment, the processor, when executing the computer program, further performs the steps of: the node names corresponding to the target nodes in the target nodes are the same, the node values corresponding to the target nodes are the same, and the target nodes in the target node set are determined to be consistent; if the target node comprises a plurality of target child nodes, the method further comprises: when the number of target sub-nodes corresponding to the target node in the actual interface message is the same as the number of target sub-nodes corresponding to the target node in the target reference interface message, acquiring the names of the target sub-nodes corresponding to the target sub-nodes in the actual interface message and the target reference interface message and the values of the target sub-nodes corresponding to the target sub-nodes; and when the names of the target child nodes are the same and the values of the target child nodes are the same, determining that the target nodes in the target node set are consistent.
In one embodiment, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, having a computer program stored thereon, which when executed by a processor, performs the steps of: acquiring an actual interface message, wherein the actual interface message carries a current interface identifier; acquiring a corresponding target reference interface message according to the current interface identifier; determining a difference node set according to the actual interface message and the target reference interface message; and determining an interface message test result according to the node value corresponding to the different node in the different node set, wherein the interface message test result is used for determining the correctness of the actual interface message.
In one embodiment, the processor, when executing the computer program, further performs the steps of: acquiring a candidate reference interface message set, wherein the candidate reference interface message set comprises at least one candidate reference interface message; acquiring a candidate interface identifier corresponding to each candidate interface; establishing an incidence relation between the candidate standard interface message and the corresponding candidate interface identifier; obtaining a corresponding target reference interface message according to the current interface identifier, including: and acquiring a corresponding target reference interface message according to the incidence relation and the current interface identifier.
In one embodiment, the processor, when executing the computer program, further performs the steps of: traversing the actual node name in the actual interface message; traversing the reference node name in the target reference interface message; and determining the nodes with different actual node names and reference node names as difference nodes to form a difference node set.
In one embodiment, the processor, when executing the computer program, further performs the steps of: eliminating the difference nodes with empty node values from the difference node set to obtain a new difference node set; and when the difference nodes in the new difference node set are inconsistent, determining that the interface message test result is an interface message test result failure.
In one embodiment, the processor, when executing the computer program, further performs the steps of: when the difference nodes in the new difference node set are consistent, determining a target node set according to the actual interface message and the target reference interface message; and when the target nodes in the target node set are consistent, determining that the interface message test result is successful.
In one embodiment, the processor, when executing the computer program, further performs the steps of: traversing the actual node name in the actual interface message; traversing the reference node name in the target reference interface message; and determining the nodes with the same actual node names and reference node names as target nodes to form a target node set.
In one embodiment, the processor, when executing the computer program, further performs the steps of: the node names corresponding to the target nodes in the target nodes are the same, the node values corresponding to the target nodes are the same, and the target nodes in the target node set are determined to be consistent; if the target node comprises a plurality of target child nodes, the method further comprises: when the number of target sub-nodes corresponding to the target node in the actual interface message is the same as the number of target sub-nodes corresponding to the target node in the target reference interface message, acquiring the names of the target sub-nodes corresponding to the target sub-nodes in the actual interface message and the target reference interface message and the values of the target sub-nodes corresponding to the target sub-nodes; and when the names of the target child nodes are the same and the values of the target child nodes are the same, determining that the target nodes in the target node set are consistent.
It will be understood by those skilled in the art that all or part of the processes of the methods of the embodiments described above can be implemented by hardware instructions of a computer program, which can be stored in a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium, and when executed, can include the processes of the embodiments of the methods described above. Any reference to memory, storage, database, or other medium used in the embodiments provided herein may include non-volatile and/or volatile memory, among others. Non-volatile memory can include read-only memory (ROM), Programmable ROM (PROM), Electrically Programmable ROM (EPROM), Electrically Erasable Programmable ROM (EEPROM), or flash memory. Volatile memory can include Random Access Memory (RAM) or external cache memory. By way of illustration and not limitation, RAM is available in a variety of forms such as Static RAM (SRAM), Dynamic RAM (DRAM), Synchronous DRAM (SDRAM), Double Data Rate SDRAM (DDRSDRAM), Enhanced SDRAM (ESDRAM), Synchronous Link DRAM (SLDRAM), Rambus Direct RAM (RDRAM), direct bus dynamic RAM (DRDRAM), and memory bus dynamic RAM (RDRAM).
The technical features of the above embodiments can be arbitrarily combined, and for the sake of brevity, all possible combinations of the technical features in the above embodiments are not described, but should be considered as the scope of the present specification as long as there is no contradiction between the combinations of the technical features.
The above-mentioned embodiments only express several embodiments of the present application, and the description thereof is more specific and detailed, but not construed as limiting the scope of the invention. It should be noted that, for a person skilled in the art, several variations and modifications can be made without departing from the concept of the present application, which falls within the scope of protection of the present application. Therefore, the protection scope of the present patent shall be subject to the appended claims.
Claims (10)
1. A method for testing interface messages, the method comprising:
acquiring an actual interface message, wherein the actual interface message carries a current interface identifier;
acquiring a corresponding target reference interface message according to the current interface identifier;
determining a difference node set according to the actual interface message and the target reference interface message;
and determining an interface message test result according to a node value corresponding to the different node in the different node set, wherein the interface message test result is used for determining the correctness of the actual interface message.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
acquiring a candidate reference interface message set, wherein the candidate reference interface message set comprises at least one candidate reference interface message;
acquiring a candidate interface identifier corresponding to each candidate interface;
establishing an incidence relation between the candidate standard interface message and the corresponding candidate interface identifier;
the obtaining of the corresponding target reference interface message according to the current interface identifier includes:
and acquiring a corresponding target reference interface message according to the incidence relation and the current interface identifier.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein determining a set of differencing nodes from the actual interface packet and the target reference interface packet comprises:
traversing the actual node name in the actual interface message;
traversing the reference node name in the target reference interface message;
and determining the nodes with different actual node names and reference node names as difference nodes to form a difference node set.
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the determining an interface packet test result according to a node value corresponding to a differential node in the differential node set comprises:
eliminating the difference nodes with empty node values from the difference node set to obtain a new difference node set;
and when the difference nodes in the new difference node set are inconsistent, determining that the interface message test result is an interface message test result failure.
5. The method of claim 4, further comprising:
when the difference nodes in the new difference node set are consistent, determining a target node set according to the actual interface message and the target reference interface message;
and when the target nodes in the target node set are consistent, determining that the interface message test result is successful.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein determining a set of target nodes from the actual interface packet and the target reference interface packet comprises:
traversing the actual node name in the actual interface message;
traversing the reference node name in the target reference interface message;
and determining the nodes with the same actual node name and reference node name as target nodes to form a target node set.
7. The method according to claim 5, wherein when the target nodes in the target node set are consistent, the method comprises:
determining that the target nodes in the target node set are consistent when the node names corresponding to the target nodes in the target nodes are the same and the node values corresponding to the target nodes are the same;
if the target node comprises a plurality of target child nodes, the method further comprises:
when the number of target sub-nodes corresponding to the target node in the actual interface message is the same as the number of target sub-nodes corresponding to the target node in the target reference interface message, acquiring the names of the target sub-nodes corresponding to the target sub-nodes in the actual interface message and the target reference interface message and the values of the target sub-nodes corresponding to the target sub-nodes;
and when the names of the target child nodes are the same and the values of the target child nodes are the same, determining that the target nodes in the target node set are consistent.
8. An interface message testing apparatus, the apparatus comprising:
the actual interface message acquisition module is used for acquiring an actual interface message, and the actual interface message carries a current interface identifier;
a reference interface message obtaining module, configured to obtain a corresponding target reference interface message according to the current interface identifier;
a difference node set determining module, configured to determine a difference node set according to the actual interface packet and the target reference interface packet;
and the interface message test result determining module is used for determining an interface message test result according to the node value corresponding to the different node in the difference node set, wherein the interface message test result is used for determining the correctness of the actual interface message.
9. A computer device comprising a memory, a processor and a computer program stored on the memory and executable on the processor, characterized in that the steps of the method of any of claims 1 to 7 are implemented when the computer program is executed by the processor.
10. A computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, which, when being executed by a processor, carries out the steps of the method of any one of claims 1 to 7.
Priority Applications (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010895798.6A CN112165406B (en) | 2020-08-31 | 2020-08-31 | Interface message testing method and device, computer equipment and storage medium |
| CA3129150A CA3129150C (en) | 2020-08-31 | 2021-08-27 | Interface message test method and device, computer equipment and storage medium |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010895798.6A CN112165406B (en) | 2020-08-31 | 2020-08-31 | Interface message testing method and device, computer equipment and storage medium |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN112165406A true CN112165406A (en) | 2021-01-01 |
| CN112165406B CN112165406B (en) | 2022-09-20 |
Family
ID=73857306
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010895798.6A Active CN112165406B (en) | 2020-08-31 | 2020-08-31 | Interface message testing method and device, computer equipment and storage medium |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN112165406B (en) |
| CA (1) | CA3129150C (en) |
Citations (12)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4467147A (en) * | 1982-07-16 | 1984-08-21 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Switching network for interactive access and testing of subscriber loops |
| EP0705521A1 (en) * | 1993-06-15 | 1996-04-10 | Italtel s.p.a. | Signaling processor for digital mobile radio systems |
| CN101335648A (en) * | 2008-07-25 | 2008-12-31 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Automatic converting method for packets of different interfaces and apparatus thereof |
| CN103023720A (en) * | 2012-12-04 | 2013-04-03 | 迈普通信技术股份有限公司 | System and method for testing wide area network (WAN) interface performance |
| CN107453784A (en) * | 2017-07-25 | 2017-12-08 | 南方电网科学研究院有限责任公司 | Communication interface sensitivity test method and system |
| EP3333711A1 (en) * | 2016-12-09 | 2018-06-13 | Cyara Solutions Pty Ltd | Case-based automated email testing |
| CN110399293A (en) * | 2019-06-21 | 2019-11-01 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | System detection method, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
| CN110399932A (en) * | 2019-07-31 | 2019-11-01 | 中国工商银行股份有限公司 | Soft Clause in Letter of Credit recognition methods and device |
| CN110806973A (en) * | 2019-10-11 | 2020-02-18 | 苏宁云计算有限公司 | Automatic generation method and device of interface message |
| CN111026645A (en) * | 2019-11-20 | 2020-04-17 | 航天信息股份有限公司 | User interface automatic testing method and device, storage medium and electronic equipment |
| CN111159049A (en) * | 2019-12-31 | 2020-05-15 | 中国银行股份有限公司 | Automatic interface testing method and system |
| CN111177005A (en) * | 2019-12-31 | 2020-05-19 | 中国银行股份有限公司 | Service application testing method, device, server and storage medium |
-
2020
- 2020-08-31 CN CN202010895798.6A patent/CN112165406B/en active Active
-
2021
- 2021-08-27 CA CA3129150A patent/CA3129150C/en active Active
Patent Citations (12)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4467147A (en) * | 1982-07-16 | 1984-08-21 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Switching network for interactive access and testing of subscriber loops |
| EP0705521A1 (en) * | 1993-06-15 | 1996-04-10 | Italtel s.p.a. | Signaling processor for digital mobile radio systems |
| CN101335648A (en) * | 2008-07-25 | 2008-12-31 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Automatic converting method for packets of different interfaces and apparatus thereof |
| CN103023720A (en) * | 2012-12-04 | 2013-04-03 | 迈普通信技术股份有限公司 | System and method for testing wide area network (WAN) interface performance |
| EP3333711A1 (en) * | 2016-12-09 | 2018-06-13 | Cyara Solutions Pty Ltd | Case-based automated email testing |
| CN107453784A (en) * | 2017-07-25 | 2017-12-08 | 南方电网科学研究院有限责任公司 | Communication interface sensitivity test method and system |
| CN110399293A (en) * | 2019-06-21 | 2019-11-01 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | System detection method, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
| CN110399932A (en) * | 2019-07-31 | 2019-11-01 | 中国工商银行股份有限公司 | Soft Clause in Letter of Credit recognition methods and device |
| CN110806973A (en) * | 2019-10-11 | 2020-02-18 | 苏宁云计算有限公司 | Automatic generation method and device of interface message |
| CN111026645A (en) * | 2019-11-20 | 2020-04-17 | 航天信息股份有限公司 | User interface automatic testing method and device, storage medium and electronic equipment |
| CN111159049A (en) * | 2019-12-31 | 2020-05-15 | 中国银行股份有限公司 | Automatic interface testing method and system |
| CN111177005A (en) * | 2019-12-31 | 2020-05-19 | 中国银行股份有限公司 | Service application testing method, device, server and storage medium |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| 谭敏生，赵治国等: ""特殊报文对标识字段比特随机性的影响研究"", 《南华大学学报》 * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN112165406B (en) | 2022-09-20 |
| CA3129150C (en) | 2024-02-27 |
| CA3129150A1 (en) | 2022-02-28 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN109474578B (en) | Message checking method, device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN109446068B (en) | Interface test method, device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN110008118B (en) | Page data testing method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN110209652B (en) | Data table migration method, device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN108829477B (en) | Interface jump method, device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN108427613B (en) | Abnormal interface positioning method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN108400978B (en) | Vulnerability detection method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN110162453B (en) | Test method, test device, computer readable storage medium and computer equipment | |
| CN111475376A (en) | Method and device for processing test data, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN106843947B (en) | Method and device for processing code defects | |
| CN110781070A (en) | Big data test verification method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN111353143A (en) | Sensitive authority detection method and device and storage medium | |
| CN112363937A (en) | Method and device for testing differential coverage rate, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN110688305B (en) | Test environment synchronization method, device, medium and electronic equipment | |
| CN111328068B (en) | Card writing method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN108304289B (en) | Terminal fingerprint test method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN112612706A (en) | Automated testing method, computer device and storage medium | |
| CN112165406B (en) | Interface message testing method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN116107781A (en) | Log tracking method, device, electronic equipment and computer program product | |
| CN110704218B (en) | Data processing method, data processing device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN112463630A (en) | Version difference testing method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN112446723A (en) | Method, computer-readable storage medium, and apparatus for determining user invitation relationship | |
| CN111209187B (en) | Service request processing method, device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN111158935B (en) | Application program detection method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN115242621B (en) | Network private line monitoring method, device, equipment and computer readable storage medium |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |