CN112153657A - Network boundary coverage rationality judgment method, device, equipment and storage medium - Google Patents

Network boundary coverage rationality judgment method, device, equipment and storage medium Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN112153657A
CN112153657A CN202011097207.7A CN202011097207A CN112153657A CN 112153657 A CN112153657 A CN 112153657A CN 202011097207 A CN202011097207 A CN 202011097207A CN 112153657 A CN112153657 A CN 112153657A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
boundary
main service
cell
determining
signal strength
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN202011097207.7A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN112153657B (en
Inventor
李召华
彭发龙
李涛
李民
李慧莲
万其斌
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
China United Network Communications Group Co Ltd
Original Assignee
China United Network Communications Group Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by China United Network Communications Group Co Ltd filed Critical China United Network Communications Group Co Ltd
Priority to CN202011097207.7A priority Critical patent/CN112153657B/en
Publication of CN112153657A publication Critical patent/CN112153657A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN112153657B publication Critical patent/CN112153657B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W16/00—Network planning, e.g. coverage or traffic planning tools; Network deployment, e.g. resource partitioning or cells structures
    • H04W16/18—Network planning tools
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W24/00—Supervisory, monitoring or testing arrangements
    • H04W24/02—Arrangements for optimising operational condition
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W24/00—Supervisory, monitoring or testing arrangements
    • H04W24/08—Testing, supervising or monitoring using real traffic

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)

Abstract

The application provides a method, a device, equipment and a storage medium for judging network boundary coverage rationality, wherein the method acquires geographical boundary of a preset area, position information of a base station and MDT data; determining a boundary buffer area of a preset area according to the position information, and dividing the boundary buffer area to obtain a plurality of buffer subareas; determining a main service cell and a non-main service cell of a boundary buffer area according to the MDT data, the geographical boundary, the base station position information and the plurality of buffer subareas; and determining whether the unreasonable boundary coverage exists in the boundary buffer area according to the MDT data of the main service cell and the MDT data of the non-main service cell, thereby improving the accuracy and efficiency of judging the rationality of the network boundary coverage.

Description

Network boundary coverage rationality judgment method, device, equipment and storage medium
Technical Field
The present invention relates to the field of communications technologies, and in particular, to a method, an apparatus, a device, and a storage medium for determining network boundary coverage rationality.
Background
In recent years, with the rapid development of the internet, the requirements of people on the network quality are higher and higher, in order to improve the network quality, the layout of base stations is increasingly dense, the dense layout of the base stations causes overlapping coverage among wireless signals, so that inter-frequency interference is caused, the network quality is affected, and particularly, the problems of inter-cell wireless signal mutual interference, cross-area coverage and the like of boundaries are frequently caused due to unreasonable network coverage at two sides of the boundaries in boundary areas.
The traditional method for judging the coverage problem of the network boundary mainly comprises the steps of manually utilizing a road tester to carry out field test, obtaining sampling data of limited time and a specific place, and judging the network coverage condition according to the obtained sampling data.
However, the prior art needs manual detection, is difficult to operate and high in cost, and has limited collected data, so that the efficiency and the accuracy are low.
Disclosure of Invention
The application provides a method, a device, equipment and a storage medium for judging network boundary coverage rationality, so that the technical problems that manual detection is needed, the operation is difficult, the cost is high, the collected data are limited, the efficiency is low and the accuracy is low in the prior art are solved.
In a first aspect, the present application provides a method for determining network boundary coverage rationality, including:
acquiring position information of a preset area and Minimization of Drive Tests (MDT) data, wherein the position information comprises geographical boundary and base station position information;
determining a boundary buffer area of the preset area according to the position information, and dividing the boundary buffer area to obtain a plurality of buffer sub-areas;
determining a main service cell and a non-main service cell of the boundary buffer area according to the MDT data, the geographical boundary, the base station position information and the plurality of buffer sub-areas;
and determining whether the problem of unreasonable boundary coverage exists in the boundary buffer area according to the MDT data of the main service cell and the MDT data of the non-main service cell.
The method and the device for determining the network coverage of the border buffer area determine the network coverage of the border buffer area according to the position information and the MDT data of the preset area, and the position information and the MDT data can be obtained from daily data of a base station and a user terminal, so that the data is easy to obtain, the test difficulty is reduced, a large amount of manpower and material resources are not needed, and the cost is reduced.
Optionally, the MDT data includes location information and signal strength of the terminal;
determining a primary serving cell and a non-primary serving cell of the border buffer area according to the MDT data, the geographical border, the base station location information and the plurality of buffer sub-areas, including:
and determining the cell with the maximum cell signal strength in the boundary buffer area according to the position information and the signal strength of the terminal, taking the cell with the maximum cell signal strength as the main service cell, and taking the rest cells except the main service cell in the cells of the boundary buffer area as the non-main service cells.
Here, in the embodiment of the present application, the cell with the largest cell signal strength is determined according to the location information and the signal strength of the terminal, and if the signal strength is the largest, the cell is the main serving cell, and other cells are non-main serving cells, and the main serving cell in the boundary buffer can be accurately determined according to the signal strength, so that the accuracy of the judgment on the network boundary coverage rationality is further improved.
Optionally, the MDT data includes location information and signal strength of the terminal;
determining a primary serving cell and a non-primary serving cell of the border buffer area according to the MDT data, the geographical border, the base station location information and the plurality of buffer sub-areas, including:
and determining a cell with the ratio of the number of sampling points with the signal intensity greater than the first preset signal intensity in the boundary buffer sub-area to the number of total sampling points in the boundary buffer sub-area greater than the first preset ratio according to the position information and the signal intensity of the terminal, taking the determined cell as the main service cell, and taking the rest cells except the main service cell in the cells of the boundary buffer area as the non-main service cell.
Here, when the main serving cell is determined, the cell with the largest number of buffered sub-regions in the boundary buffered region, in which the signal strength of the buffered sub-region is greater than the first preset signal strength, is determined as the main serving cell, so that the information of the main serving cell can be accurately determined, and the accuracy of judging the network boundary coverage rationality is further improved.
Optionally, the determining, according to the MDT data of the primary serving cell and the MDT data of the non-primary serving cell, whether there is an unreasonable boundary coverage problem in the boundary buffer area includes:
determining the average signal strength of the main service cell according to the MDT data of the main service cell, and determining the average signal strength of the non-main service cell according to the MDT data of the non-main service cell;
and if the average signal strength of the non-main service cell is smaller than a second preset strength threshold value and the difference value between the average signal strength of the main service cell and the average signal strength of the non-main service cell is larger than a first preset signal strength difference value, determining that the problem of unreasonable boundary coverage does not exist in the boundary buffer area.
Here, in the embodiment of the present application, it is determined whether there is a situation of unreasonable boundary coverage in the boundary buffer area according to the signal strengths of the main serving cell and the non-main serving cell of the boundary buffer area, and if the average signal strength of the non-main serving cell in the current boundary buffer area is smaller than the second preset strength threshold and the difference between the average signal strength of the main serving cell and the average signal strength of the non-main serving cell is greater than the first preset signal strength difference, it may be determined that the network signal of the current boundary buffer area is mainly provided by the main serving cell, so that there is no unreasonable boundary coverage problem in the boundary buffer area, and the network coverage situation is determined by the limitations of the two conditions, thereby further improving the accuracy of the judgment on the rationality of network boundary coverage.
Optionally, the determining, according to the MDT data of the primary serving cell and the MDT data of the non-primary serving cell, whether there is an unreasonable boundary coverage problem in the boundary buffer area includes:
determining the average signal strength of the main service cell according to the MDT data of the main service cell, and determining the average signal strength of the non-main service cell according to the MDT data of the non-main service cell;
and if the average signal strength of the non-main service cell is greater than a third preset strength threshold value, and the difference value between the average signal strength of the main service cell and the average signal strength of the non-main service cell is smaller than a second preset signal strength difference value, determining that the problem of unreasonable boundary coverage exists in the boundary buffer area.
Here, in the embodiment of the present application, it is determined whether there is a situation where the boundary coverage is unreasonable in the boundary buffer area according to the signal strengths of the primary serving cell and the non-primary serving cell of the boundary buffer area, and if the difference between the average signal strength of the primary serving cell and the average signal strength of the non-primary serving cell in the boundary buffer area is smaller than the second preset signal strength difference, and the average signal strength of the non-primary serving cell is greater than the third preset strength threshold, it may be determined that the non-primary serving cell provides a network signal in the current boundary buffer area, and then there is a problem where the boundary coverage is unreasonable in the boundary buffer area, and the network coverage situation is determined by the limitations of the above two conditions, so as to further improve the accuracy of determining the network boundary coverage rationality.
Optionally, after determining that there is an unreasonable problem of boundary coverage in the boundary buffer area, the method further includes:
determining that a buffer sub-area with unreasonable boundary coverage exists in the boundary buffer area according to the MDT data of the main service cell and the MDT data of the non-main service cell;
calculating the proportion of the number of buffer subregions with unreasonable boundary coverage problems in the boundary buffer region to the total number of the buffer subregions in the boundary buffer region;
and if the proportion is larger than a second preset proportion, determining that the boundary buffer area has a signal out-of-range condition.
Here, after determining that the current boundary buffer area has the problem of unreasonable boundary coverage, the embodiment of the present application may further determine whether the boundary buffer area has the signal out-of-bounds condition according to a ratio of the number of buffer sub-areas having the problem of unreasonable boundary coverage in the boundary buffer area to the total number of buffer sub-areas in the boundary buffer area, so as to further improve accuracy of network boundary coverage rationality determination, and facilitate comprehensive and accurate grasping of the network coverage condition.
In a second aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a device for determining network boundary coverage rationality, including:
the acquisition module is used for acquiring the position information of a preset area and MDT data of the minimized road side;
the dividing module is used for determining a boundary buffer area of the preset area according to the position information and dividing the boundary buffer area to obtain a plurality of buffer sub-areas;
a first determining module, configured to determine a primary serving cell and a non-primary serving cell of the border buffer area according to the MDT data, the geographic border, the base station location information, and the plurality of buffer sub-areas;
and a second determining module, configured to determine whether there is an unreasonable boundary coverage problem in the boundary buffer area according to the MDT data of the primary serving cell and the MDT data of the non-primary serving cell.
Optionally, the MDT data includes location information and signal strength of the terminal;
the first determining module is specifically configured to determine, according to the location information and the signal strength of the terminal, a cell with the largest cell signal strength in the boundary buffer area, use the cell with the largest cell signal strength as the primary serving cell, and use remaining cells, except the primary serving cell, in the cells of the boundary buffer area as the non-primary serving cells.
Optionally, the MDT data includes location information and signal strength of the terminal;
the first determining module is specifically configured to determine, according to the position information and the signal strength of the terminal, a cell in which a ratio of the number of sampling points in the boundary buffer sub-area, where the signal strength is greater than a first preset signal strength, to the number of total sampling points in the boundary buffer sub-area is greater than a first preset ratio, use the determined cell as the main serving cell, and use remaining cells except the main serving cell in the cells in the boundary buffer area as the non-main serving cell.
Optionally, the second determining module is specifically configured to:
determining the average signal strength of the main service cell according to the MDT data of the main service cell, and determining the average signal strength of the non-main service cell according to the MDT data of the non-main service cell;
and if the average signal strength of the non-main service cell is smaller than a second preset strength threshold value and the difference value between the average signal strength of the main service cell and the average signal strength of the non-main service cell is larger than a first preset signal strength difference value, determining that the problem of unreasonable boundary coverage does not exist in the boundary buffer area.
Optionally, the second determining module is specifically configured to:
determining the average signal strength of the main service cell according to the MDT data of the main service cell, and determining the average signal strength of the non-main service cell according to the MDT data of the non-main service cell;
and if the average signal strength of the non-main service cell is greater than a third preset strength threshold value, and the difference value between the average signal strength of the main service cell and the average signal strength of the non-main service cell is smaller than a second preset signal strength difference value, determining that the problem of unreasonable boundary coverage exists in the boundary buffer area.
Optionally, after determining that there is an unreasonable boundary coverage problem in the boundary buffer area, the apparatus further includes:
a third determining module, configured to determine, according to the MDT data of the primary serving cell and the MDT data of the non-primary serving cell, that a buffer sub-region with unreasonable boundary coverage exists in the boundary buffer region;
and calculating the proportion of the number of buffer subregions with unreasonable boundary coverage problems in the boundary buffer region to the total number of the buffer subregions in the boundary buffer region, and if the proportion is larger than a second preset proportion, determining that the boundary buffer region has a signal out-of-range condition.
In a third aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a device for determining network boundary coverage rationality, including: at least one processor; and a memory communicatively coupled to the at least one processor; wherein the memory stores instructions executable by the at least one processor to enable the at least one processor to perform a method of network boundary coverage rationality determination as described in the first aspect or an alternative to the first aspect.
In a fourth aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a computer-readable storage medium, in which computer-executable instructions are stored, and when the computer-executable instructions are executed by a processor, the method for determining network boundary coverage rationality according to the first aspect or the alternatives of the first aspect is implemented.
The method, the device, the equipment and the storage medium for judging the network boundary coverage rationality provided by the embodiment of the application determine the network coverage condition of a boundary buffer area according to the position information and the MDT data of a preset area, and the position information and the MDT data can be obtained from daily data of a base station and a user terminal, so that the data is easy to obtain, the test difficulty is reduced, a large amount of manpower and material resources are not needed, and the cost is reduced.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present application or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings needed to be used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly introduced below, and it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present application, and it is obvious for those skilled in the art that other drawings can be obtained according to the drawings without inventive exercise.
Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of a network boundary coverage rationality determination system architecture according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
fig. 2 is a schematic flowchart of a method for determining network boundary coverage rationality according to an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 3 is a schematic flowchart of another method for determining network boundary coverage rationality according to an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 4 is a schematic flowchart of another method for determining the rationality of network boundary coverage according to an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 5 is a schematic flowchart of another method for determining network boundary coverage rationality according to an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 6 is a schematic flowchart of another method for determining network boundary coverage rationality according to an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 7 is a schematic structural diagram of a network boundary coverage rationality determining apparatus according to an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 8 is a schematic structural diagram of a network boundary coverage rationality determining device according to an embodiment of the present application.
With the foregoing drawings in mind, certain embodiments of the disclosure have been shown and described in more detail below. These drawings and written description are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosed concepts in any way, but rather to illustrate the concepts of the disclosure to those skilled in the art by reference to specific embodiments.
Detailed Description
Reference will now be made in detail to the exemplary embodiments, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. When the following description refers to the accompanying drawings, like numbers in different drawings represent the same or similar elements unless otherwise indicated. The implementations described in the exemplary embodiments below are not intended to represent all implementations consistent with the present disclosure. Rather, they are merely examples of apparatus and methods consistent with certain aspects of the present disclosure, as detailed in the appended claims.
The terms "first," "second," "third," and "fourth," if any, in the description and claims of this application and the above-described figures are used for distinguishing between similar elements and not necessarily for describing a particular sequential or chronological order. It is to be understood that the data so used is interchangeable under appropriate circumstances such that the embodiments of the application described herein are capable of operation in sequences other than those illustrated or described herein. Furthermore, the terms "comprises," "comprising," and "having," and any variations thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, system, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of steps or elements is not necessarily limited to those steps or elements expressly listed, but may include other steps or elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus.
With the rapid development of the mobile internet, the requirement of the user on the network signal coverage is increasingly high, in order to improve the network quality, the layout of the base stations is increasingly dense, the wireless signals are overlapped to cause inter-frequency interference, which affects the network quality, especially, the problem that the boundary coverage is unreasonable easily occurs in the boundary area, the problems of the inter-cell wireless signal mutual interference and the cross-zone coverage are frequently caused by the unreasonable network coverage at the two sides of the boundary, and the quality deterioration of the network boundary is increasingly severe. The existing network boundary coverage test mainly comprises the steps of manually testing on site by using a road tester to obtain sampling data of limited time and a specific place, and judging the network coverage condition according to the obtained sampling data.
In order to solve the above problems, embodiments of the present application provide a method, an apparatus, a device, and a storage medium for determining network coverage rationality of a boundary buffer area according to location information and MDT data of a preset area, where the location information and the MDT data can be obtained from daily data of a base station and a user terminal, so that the data is easy to obtain, the test difficulty is reduced, a large amount of manpower and material resources are not needed, and the cost is reduced.
Optionally, fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of a network boundary coverage rationality judgment and evaluation system architecture provided in an embodiment of the present application. In fig. 1, the above-described architecture includes at least one of a receiving device 101, a processor 102, and a display device 103.
It is to be understood that the illustrated structure of the embodiment of the present application does not constitute a specific limitation on the network boundary coverage rationality judgment evaluation architecture. In other possible embodiments of the present application, the foregoing architecture may include more or less components than those shown in the drawings, or combine some components, or split some components, or arrange different components, which may be determined according to practical application scenarios, and is not limited herein. The components shown in fig. 1 may be implemented in hardware, software, or a combination of software and hardware.
In a specific implementation process, the receiving device 101 may be an input/output interface or a communication interface.
The processor 102 may determine the network coverage condition of the boundary buffer area according to the location information and the MDT data of the preset area through the receiving device 101, and since the location information and the MDT data may be obtained from the daily data of the base station and the user terminal, the data is easy to obtain, the testing difficulty is reduced, a large amount of manpower and material resources are not needed, and the cost is reduced.
The display device 103 may be used to display the above results and the like.
The display device may also be a touch display screen for receiving user instructions while displaying the above-mentioned content to enable interaction with a user.
It should be understood that the processor may be implemented by reading instructions in the memory and executing the instructions, or may be implemented by a chip circuit.
In addition, the network architecture and the service scenario described in the embodiment of the present application are for more clearly illustrating the technical solution of the embodiment of the present application, and do not constitute a limitation to the technical solution provided in the embodiment of the present application, and it can be known by a person skilled in the art that along with the evolution of the network architecture and the appearance of a new service scenario, the technical solution provided in the embodiment of the present application is also applicable to similar technical problems.
The technical scheme of the application is described in detail by combining specific embodiments as follows:
fig. 2 is a flowchart of a method for determining the rationality of network boundary coverage according to an embodiment of the present application. The execution subject in the embodiment of the present application may be the processor 102 in fig. 1, and the specific execution subject may be determined according to an actual application scenario, as shown in fig. 2, the method includes the following steps:
s201: and acquiring the position information of the preset area and the MDT data of the minimized road side.
The location information includes geographic boundaries and base station location information.
Here, the preset area is an area where a network condition needs to be determined, and it is understood that the range of the preset area may be determined according to an actual situation, and the present application is not limited specifically.
Optionally, the preset area may be a junction divided by geographic locations of different cities, counties, and the like.
Optionally, the location information may be longitude and latitude information of a preset area, or coordinate information of the preset area on a map, and the like, which is not specifically limited in the present application.
S202: and determining a boundary buffer area of the preset area according to the position information, and dividing the boundary buffer area to obtain a plurality of buffer subareas.
Optionally, the boundary buffer area may be determined according to the range of the junction of different areas in the preset area, because the wireless signals of both sides of the boundary have overlapping coverage areas, the boundary line such as the city of land is taken as the center, and the range of the preset range threshold value which is outwards expanded along both sides of the boundary center line is taken as the boundary buffer area.
Optionally, the plurality of buffer sub-regions may be a plurality of grids, so that the network coverage condition is conveniently judged according to data of the plurality of grids, and the accuracy is high.
S203: and determining a main service cell and a non-main service cell of the boundary buffer area according to the MDT data, the geographical boundary, the base station position information and the plurality of buffer subareas.
S204: and determining whether the unreasonable boundary coverage problem exists in the boundary buffer area according to the MDT data of the main service cell and the MDT data of the non-main service cell.
According to the embodiment of the application, the network coverage condition of the boundary buffer area is determined according to the position information and the MDT data of the preset area, and the position information and the MDT data can be obtained from the daily data of the base station and the user terminal, so that the data is easy to obtain, the test difficulty is reduced, a large amount of manpower and material resources are not needed, the cost is reduced, in addition, the boundary buffer area is divided according to the position information, the network coverage condition is determined according to a plurality of divided buffer sub-areas and the position information and the MDT data which can be obtained in real time, the quantity of collected data is large, the precision is high, the real-time performance is high, and the accuracy and the efficiency of judging the network boundary coverage rationality are improved.
Optionally, the MDT data includes location information and signal strength of the terminal, and a primary serving cell and a non-primary serving cell of the boundary buffer area may be determined according to the location information and the signal strength of the terminal, and accordingly, fig. 3 is a flowchart of another network boundary coverage rationality determination method provided in this embodiment of the present application, and as shown in fig. 3, the method includes:
s301: and acquiring the position information of the preset area and the MDT data of the minimized road side.
S302: and determining a boundary buffer area of the preset area according to the position information, and dividing the boundary buffer area to obtain a plurality of buffer subareas.
S303: and determining a main service cell and a non-main service cell of the boundary buffer area according to the position information, the signal strength and the plurality of buffer subareas of the terminal.
S304: and determining whether the unreasonable boundary coverage problem exists in the boundary buffer area according to the MDT data of the main service cell and the MDT data of the non-main service cell.
The steps S301, S302, and S304 are the same as the steps S201, S202, and S204 described above, and are not described herein again.
For step S303, optionally, the MDT data further includes an antenna feeder physical parameter of the base station, where the antenna feeder physical parameter may include an inclination angle of the base station, so that the main serving cell may be determined according to the inclination angle, and accuracy of the determination is further improved.
The following optional modes are provided for determining the main service cell and the non-main service cell of the boundary buffer area according to the position information, the signal strength and the plurality of buffer sub-areas of the terminal:
the first alternative is as follows:
and determining the cell with the maximum cell signal strength in the boundary buffer area according to the position information and the signal strength of the terminal, taking the cell with the maximum cell signal strength as a main service cell, and taking the rest cells except the main service cell in the cells of the boundary buffer area as non-main service cells.
Here, in the embodiment of the present application, the cell with the largest cell signal strength is determined according to the location information and the signal strength of the terminal, and if the signal strength is the largest, the cell is the main serving cell, and other cells are non-main serving cells, and the main serving cell in the boundary buffer can be accurately determined according to the signal strength, so that the accuracy of the judgment on the network boundary coverage rationality is further improved.
The second option is:
and determining a cell with the signal intensity greater than the first preset signal intensity in the boundary buffer sub-region and the ratio of the number of the sampling points to the total number of the sampling points in the boundary buffer sub-region greater than the first preset ratio according to the position information and the signal intensity of the terminal, taking the determined cell as a main service cell, and taking the rest cells except the main service cell in the cells of the boundary buffer region as non-main service cells.
Here, when the main serving cell is determined, the cell with the largest number of buffered sub-regions in the boundary buffered region, in which the signal strength of the buffered sub-region is greater than the first preset signal strength, is determined as the main serving cell, so that the information of the main serving cell can be accurately determined, and the accuracy of judging the network boundary coverage rationality is further improved.
Optionally, in order to accurately determine the primary serving cell, the following conditions need to be satisfied: the ratio of the number of the buffer sub-regions of the main serving cell to the total number of the buffer sub-regions is greater than the preset buffer sub-region ratio threshold, and it can be understood that the size of the preset buffer sub-region ratio threshold may be determined according to the actual situation and the density of the base station, which is not specifically limited in this application.
Optionally, the average signal strength of the primary serving cell may be determined according to MDT data of the primary serving cell, so as to determine that the network does not have coverage, and accordingly, fig. 4 is a schematic flow chart of another method for determining network boundary coverage rationality provided in the embodiment of the present application, as shown in fig. 4, the method includes:
s401: and acquiring the position information of the preset area and the MDT data of the minimized road side.
S402: and determining a boundary buffer area of the preset area according to the position information, and dividing the boundary buffer area to obtain a plurality of buffer subareas.
S403: and determining a main service cell and a non-main service cell of the boundary buffer area according to the MDT data, the geographical boundary, the base station position information and the plurality of buffer subareas.
The steps S401 to S403 are the same as the steps S201 to S203, and are not described herein again.
S404: and determining the average signal strength of the main service cell according to the MDT data of the main service cell, and determining the average signal strength of the non-main service cell according to the MDT data of the non-main service cell.
S405: and if the average signal strength of the non-main service cell is smaller than a second preset strength threshold value and the difference value between the average signal strength of the main service cell and the average signal strength of the non-main service cell is larger than a first preset signal strength difference value, determining that the problem of unreasonable boundary coverage does not exist in the boundary buffer area.
It is to be understood that the second preset intensity threshold and the first preset signal intensity difference may be determined according to actual situations, and the application is not particularly limited.
According to the embodiment of the application, whether the situation of unreasonable boundary coverage exists in the boundary buffer area is determined according to the signal strength of the main service cell and the non-main service cell of the boundary buffer area, if the average signal strength of the non-main service cell in the current boundary buffer area is smaller than a second preset strength threshold value, and the difference value between the average signal strength of the main service cell and the average signal strength of the non-main service cell is larger than a first preset signal strength difference value, it can be determined that the network signal of the current boundary buffer area is mainly provided by the main service cell, so that the unreasonable boundary coverage problem does not exist in the boundary buffer area, the network coverage situation is determined through the limitation of the two conditions, and the accuracy of judging the rationality of the network boundary coverage is further improved.
Optionally, in this embodiment of the present application, the average signal strength of the primary serving cell may also be determined according to the MDT data of the primary serving cell, so as to determine that the network has a coverage condition, and accordingly, fig. 5 is a flowchart of another method for determining the rationality of network boundary coverage provided in this embodiment of the present application, as shown in fig. 5, the method includes:
s501: and acquiring the position information of the preset area and the MDT data of the minimized road side.
S502: and determining a boundary buffer area of the preset area according to the position information, and dividing the boundary buffer area to obtain a plurality of buffer subareas.
S503: and determining a main service cell and a non-main service cell of the boundary buffer area according to the MDT data, the geographical boundary, the base station position information and the plurality of buffer subareas.
The steps S501 to S503 are the same as the steps S201 to S203, and are not described herein again.
S504: and determining the average signal strength of the main service cell according to the MDT data of the main service cell, and determining the average signal strength of the non-main service cell according to the MDT data of the non-main service cell.
S505: and if the average signal strength of the non-main service cell is greater than a third preset strength threshold value and the difference value between the average signal strength of the main service cell and the average signal strength of the non-main service cell is smaller than a second preset signal strength difference value, determining that the problem of unreasonable boundary coverage exists in the boundary buffer area.
It is to be understood that the third preset intensity threshold and the second preset signal intensity difference may be determined according to actual situations, and the application is not particularly limited.
According to the embodiment of the application, whether the situation of unreasonable boundary coverage problem exists in the boundary buffer area is determined according to the signal strength of the main service cell and the non-main service cell of the boundary buffer area, if the difference value between the average signal strength of the main service cell and the average signal strength of the non-main service cell in the boundary buffer area is smaller than the second preset signal strength difference value, and the average signal strength of the non-main service cell is larger than the third preset strength threshold value, it can be determined that the non-main service cell provides network signals in the current boundary buffer area, the problem of unreasonable boundary coverage exists in the boundary buffer area, the network coverage situation is determined through the limitation of the two conditions, and the accuracy of the judgment on the rationality of the network boundary coverage is further improved.
In addition, after determining that coverage exists in the network, the embodiment of the present application may further determine, according to the MDT data in the buffer sub-area, whether a signal out-of-bounds condition exists in the boundary buffer area, where fig. 6 is a flowchart of another method for determining rationality of network boundary coverage provided in the embodiment of the present application, and as shown in fig. 6, the method includes:
s601: and acquiring the position information of the preset area and the MDT data of the minimized road side.
S602: and determining a boundary buffer area of the preset area according to the position information, and dividing the boundary buffer area to obtain a plurality of buffer subareas.
S603: and determining a main service cell and a non-main service cell of the boundary buffer area according to the MDT data, the geographical boundary, the base station position information and the plurality of buffer subareas.
S604: and determining the average signal strength of the main service cell according to the MDT data of the main service cell, and determining the average signal strength of the non-main service cell according to the MDT data of the non-main service cell.
S605: and if the average signal strength of the non-main service cell is greater than a third preset strength threshold value and the difference value between the average signal strength of the main service cell and the average signal strength of the non-main service cell is smaller than a second preset signal strength difference value, determining that the problem of unreasonable boundary coverage exists in the boundary buffer area.
The steps S601 to S605 are the same as the steps S501 to S505, and are not described herein again.
S606: and determining that the buffer subarea with unreasonable boundary coverage exists in the boundary buffer area according to the MDT data of each buffer subarea of the main service area and the MDT data of the non-main service area.
S607: and calculating the proportion of the number of the buffer subregions with unreasonable boundary coverage problems in the boundary buffer region to the total number of the buffer subregions in the boundary buffer region, and determining that the boundary buffer region has a signal out-of-range condition if the proportion is greater than a second preset proportion.
It is understood that the second preset proportion can be determined according to actual conditions, and the application is not particularly limited.
Optionally, the boundary buffer sub-area may be a grid of a network-covered buffer area after rasterization processing is performed on the boundary buffer area, and accordingly, a buffer sub-area in which there is an unreasonable boundary coverage problem in the boundary buffer area may be determined as an out-of-range grid, and it may be determined whether there is a signal out-of-range situation, that is, a ratio of the number of out-of-range grids of the end signal to the total number of out-of-range grids of the boundary, according to an out-of-range grid ratio, and if the ratio is greater than a second preset ratio, it is determined that there is a signal out.
After the unreasonable boundary coverage problem of the current boundary buffer area is determined, whether the boundary buffer area has the signal out-of-bounds condition or not can be determined according to the proportion of the number of the buffer sub-areas with the unreasonable boundary coverage problem in the boundary buffer area to the total number of the buffer sub-areas in the boundary buffer area, the accuracy of network boundary coverage rationality judgment is further improved, and the network coverage condition can be comprehensively and accurately mastered.
Fig. 7 is a schematic structural diagram of a device for determining network boundary coverage rationality according to an embodiment of the present application, and as shown in fig. 7, the device according to the embodiment of the present application includes: an obtaining module 701, a dividing module 702, a first determining module 703 and a second determining module 704. The network boundary coverage rationality determination means here may be the processor 102 itself described above, or a chip or an integrated circuit that realizes the functions of the processor 102. It should be noted here that the division of the obtaining module 701, the dividing module 702, the first determining module 703 and the second determining module 704 is only a division of logic functions, and the two may be integrated or independent physically.
The obtaining module 701 is configured to obtain location information of a preset area and minimization of roadside MDT data.
The dividing module 702 is configured to determine a boundary buffer area of the preset area according to the position information, and divide the boundary buffer area to obtain a plurality of buffer sub-areas.
A first determining module 703 is configured to determine a primary serving cell and a non-primary serving cell of a border buffer area according to the MDT data, the geographic border, the base station location information, and the plurality of buffer sub-areas.
A second determining module 704, configured to determine whether there is an unreasonable boundary coverage problem in the boundary buffer area according to the MDT data of the primary serving cell and the MDT data of the non-primary serving cell.
Optionally, the MDT data includes location information and signal strength of the terminal.
The first determining module 703 is specifically configured to determine, according to the location information and the signal strength of the terminal, a cell with the largest cell signal strength in the boundary buffer area, use the cell with the largest cell signal strength as a primary serving cell, and use remaining cells, except the primary serving cell, in the cells of the boundary buffer area as non-primary serving cells.
Optionally, the MDT data includes location information and signal strength of the terminal.
The first determining module 703 is specifically configured to determine, according to the position information and the signal strength of the terminal, a cell in which the ratio of the number of sampling points in the boundary buffer sub-region, whose signal strength is greater than the first preset signal strength, to the number of total sampling points in the boundary buffer sub-region is greater than the first preset ratio, use the determined cell as a main serving cell, and use remaining cells except the main serving cell in the cells in the boundary buffer region as non-main serving cells.
Optionally, the second determining module 704 is specifically configured to:
and determining the average signal strength of the main service cell according to the MDT data of the main service cell, and determining the average signal strength of the non-main service cell according to the MDT data of the non-main service cell.
And if the average signal strength of the non-main service cell is smaller than a second preset strength threshold value and the difference value between the average signal strength of the main service cell and the average signal strength of the non-main service cell is larger than a first preset signal strength difference value, determining that the problem of unreasonable boundary coverage does not exist in the boundary buffer area.
Optionally, the second determining module 704 is specifically configured to:
and determining the average signal strength of the main service cell according to the MDT data of the main service cell, and determining the average signal strength of the non-main service cell according to the MDT data of the non-main service cell.
And if the average signal strength of the non-main service cell is greater than a third preset strength threshold value and the difference value between the average signal strength of the main service cell and the average signal strength of the non-main service cell is smaller than a second preset signal strength difference value, determining that the problem of unreasonable boundary coverage exists in the boundary buffer area.
Optionally, after determining that there is an unreasonable boundary coverage problem in the boundary buffer area, the apparatus further includes:
a third determining module 705, configured to determine, according to the MDT data of each buffer sub-region of the primary serving cell and the MDT data of the non-primary serving cell, that a buffer sub-region with unreasonable boundary coverage exists in the boundary buffer region;
and calculating the proportion of the number of the buffer subregions with unreasonable boundary coverage problems in the boundary buffer region to the total number of the buffer subregions in the boundary buffer region, and determining that the boundary buffer region has a signal out-of-range condition if the proportion is greater than a second preset proportion.
Fig. 8 is a schematic structural diagram of a network boundary coverage rationality determining device according to an embodiment of the present application. The components shown herein, their connections and relationships, and their functions, are meant to be exemplary only, and are not limiting to the implementations of the present application described and/or claimed herein.
As shown in fig. 8, the network boundary coverage rationality judging device includes: processor 801 and memory 802, the various components being interconnected using different buses, and may be mounted on a common motherboard or in other manners as desired. The processor 801 may process instructions for execution within the network boundary coverage rationality determining apparatus, including instructions for graphical information stored in or on a memory for display on an external input/output device (such as a display device coupled to an interface). In other embodiments, multiple processors and/or multiple buses may be used, along with multiple memories and multiple memories, as desired. Fig. 8 illustrates an example of a processor 801.
The memory 802 serves as a non-transitory computer readable storage medium, and may be used to store non-transitory software programs, non-transitory computer executable programs, and modules, such as program instructions/modules corresponding to the method of the network boundary coverage rationality determining apparatus in the embodiments of the present application (for example, the acquiring module 701, the dividing module 702, the first determining module 703, and the second determining module 704, or the acquiring module 701, the dividing module 702, the first determining module 703, the second determining module 704, and the third determining module 705 shown in fig. 7). The processor 801 executes various functional applications of the server and data processing by running non-transitory software programs, instructions, and modules stored in the memory 802, that is, implements the method of the network boundary coverage rationality determination device in the above-described method embodiment.
The network boundary coverage rationality judging device may further include: an input device 803 and an output device 804. The processor 801, the memory 802, the input device 803, and the output device 804 may be connected by a bus or other means, and are exemplified by a bus in fig. 8.
The input device 803 may receive input numeric or character information and generate key signal inputs related to user settings and function control of the network boundary coverage rationality determination apparatus, such as a touch screen, a keypad, a mouse, or a plurality of mouse buttons, a trackball, a joystick, or the like. The output device 804 may be an output device such as a display device of the network boundary coverage rationality judging device. The display device may include, but is not limited to, a Liquid Crystal Display (LCD), a Light Emitting Diode (LED) display, and a plasma display. In some implementations, the display device can be a touch screen.
The network boundary coverage rationality determining device in the embodiment of the present application may be configured to execute the technical solutions in the method embodiments of the present application, and the implementation principle and the technical effect are similar, which are not described herein again.
An embodiment of the present application further provides a computer-readable storage medium, where a computer-executable instruction is stored in the computer-readable storage medium, and when the computer-executable instruction is executed by a processor, the computer-executable instruction is used to implement any one of the above-mentioned network boundary coverage rationality determination methods.
In the several embodiments provided in the present application, it should be understood that the disclosed system, apparatus and method may be implemented in other manners. For example, the above-described apparatus embodiments are merely illustrative, and for example, the division of the units is only one logical division, and other divisions may be realized in practice, for example, a plurality of units or components may be combined or integrated into another system, or some features may be omitted, or not executed. In addition, the shown or discussed mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection may be an indirect coupling or communication connection through some interfaces, devices or units, and may be in an electrical, mechanical or other form.
In addition, functional units in the embodiments of the present application may be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit may exist alone physically, or two or more units are integrated into one unit. The integrated unit can be realized in a form of hardware, and can also be realized in a form of a software functional unit.
Other embodiments of the disclosure will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the disclosure disclosed herein. This application is intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the disclosure following, in general, the principles of the disclosure and including such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice within the art to which the disclosure pertains. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope and spirit of the disclosure being indicated by the following claims.
It will be understood that the present disclosure is not limited to the precise arrangements described above and shown in the drawings and that various modifications and changes may be made without departing from the scope thereof. The scope of the present disclosure is limited only by the appended claims.

Claims (10)

1. A method for judging network boundary coverage rationality is characterized by comprising the following steps:
acquiring position information of a preset area and MDT data of a minimized road side, wherein the position information comprises a geographical boundary and base station position information;
determining a boundary buffer area of the preset area according to the position information, and dividing the boundary buffer area to obtain a plurality of buffer sub-areas;
determining a main service cell and a non-main service cell of the boundary buffer area according to the MDT data, the geographical boundary, the base station position information and the plurality of buffer sub-areas;
and determining whether the problem of unreasonable boundary coverage exists in the boundary buffer area according to the MDT data of the main service cell and the MDT data of the non-main service cell.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the MDT data includes location information and signal strength of a terminal;
determining a primary serving cell and a non-primary serving cell of the border buffer area according to the MDT data, the geographical border, the base station location information, and the plurality of buffer sub-areas, including:
and determining the cell with the maximum cell signal strength in the boundary buffer area according to the position information and the signal strength of the terminal, taking the cell with the maximum cell signal strength as the main service cell, and taking the rest cells except the main service cell in the cells of the boundary buffer area as the non-main service cells.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the MDT data includes location information and signal strength of a terminal;
determining a primary serving cell and a non-primary serving cell of the border buffer area according to the MDT data, the geographical border, the base station location information, and the plurality of buffer sub-areas, including:
and determining a cell with the ratio of the number of sampling points with the signal intensity greater than the first preset signal intensity in the boundary buffer sub-area to the number of total sampling points in the boundary buffer sub-area greater than the first preset ratio according to the position information and the signal intensity of the terminal, taking the determined cell as the main service cell, and taking the rest cells except the main service cell in the cells of the boundary buffer area as the non-main service cell.
4. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the determining whether the border buffer area has unreasonable coverage according to the MDT data of the primary serving cell and the MDT data of the non-primary serving cell comprises:
determining the average signal strength of the main service cell according to the MDT data of the main service cell, and determining the average signal strength of the non-main service cell according to the MDT data of the non-main service cell;
and if the average signal strength of the non-main service cell is smaller than a second preset strength threshold value and the difference value between the average signal strength of the main service cell and the average signal strength of the non-main service cell is larger than a first preset signal strength difference value, determining that the problem of unreasonable boundary coverage does not exist in the boundary buffer area.
5. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the determining whether the border buffer area has unreasonable coverage according to the MDT data of the primary serving cell and the MDT data of the non-primary serving cell comprises:
determining the average signal strength of the main service cell according to the MDT data of the main service cell, and determining the average signal strength of the non-main service cell according to the MDT data of the non-main service cell;
and if the average signal strength of the non-main service cell is greater than a third preset strength threshold value, and the difference value between the average signal strength of the main service cell and the average signal strength of the non-main service cell is smaller than a second preset signal strength difference value, determining that the problem of unreasonable boundary coverage exists in the boundary buffer area.
6. The method of claim 5, after said determining that there is an unreasonable problem of boundary coverage within said boundary buffer region, further comprising:
determining that a buffer sub-area with unreasonable boundary coverage exists in the boundary buffer area according to the MDT data of the main service cell and the MDT data of the non-main service cell;
calculating the proportion of the number of buffer subregions with unreasonable boundary coverage problems in the boundary buffer region to the total number of the buffer subregions in the boundary buffer region;
and if the proportion is larger than a second preset proportion, determining that the boundary buffer area has a signal out-of-range condition.
7. A network boundary coverage rationality judgment device, comprising:
the system comprises an acquisition module, a data processing module and a data processing module, wherein the acquisition module is used for acquiring position information of a preset area and MDT data of the minimized road side, and the position information comprises a geographical boundary and base station position information;
the dividing module is used for determining a boundary buffer area of the preset area according to the position information and dividing the boundary buffer area to obtain a plurality of buffer sub-areas;
a first determining module, configured to determine a primary serving cell and a non-primary serving cell of the border buffer area according to the MDT data, the geographic border, the base station location information, and the plurality of buffer sub-areas;
and a second determining module, configured to determine whether there is an unreasonable boundary coverage problem in the boundary buffer area according to the MDT data of the primary serving cell and the MDT data of the non-primary serving cell.
8. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the MDT data comprises location information and signal strength of a terminal;
the first determining module is specifically configured to determine, according to the location information and the signal strength of the terminal, a cell with the largest cell signal strength in the boundary buffer area, use the cell with the largest cell signal strength as the primary serving cell, and use remaining cells, except the primary serving cell, in the cells of the boundary buffer area as the non-primary serving cells.
9. A network boundary coverage rationality judging device, characterized by comprising:
at least one processor; and
a memory communicatively coupled to the at least one processor; wherein,
the memory stores instructions executable by the at least one processor to enable the at least one processor to perform the method of any one of claims 1 to 6.
10. A computer-readable storage medium having computer-executable instructions stored thereon, which when executed by a processor, are configured to implement the network boundary coverage rationality determining method according to any one of claims 1 to 6.
CN202011097207.7A 2020-10-14 2020-10-14 Network boundary coverage rationality judgment method, device, equipment and storage medium Active CN112153657B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202011097207.7A CN112153657B (en) 2020-10-14 2020-10-14 Network boundary coverage rationality judgment method, device, equipment and storage medium

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202011097207.7A CN112153657B (en) 2020-10-14 2020-10-14 Network boundary coverage rationality judgment method, device, equipment and storage medium

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN112153657A true CN112153657A (en) 2020-12-29
CN112153657B CN112153657B (en) 2022-08-05

Family

ID=73953068

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202011097207.7A Active CN112153657B (en) 2020-10-14 2020-10-14 Network boundary coverage rationality judgment method, device, equipment and storage medium

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN112153657B (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN115250479A (en) * 2021-04-26 2022-10-28 中国移动通信有限公司研究院 Information processing method, device and equipment

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030003918A1 (en) * 2001-06-19 2003-01-02 Paul Proctor Methods and systems for adjusting sectors across coverage cells
US20180242181A1 (en) * 2015-09-11 2018-08-23 Nec Corporation Apparatus, method, and system relating to minimization of drive tests (mdt) measurements
WO2020030713A2 (en) * 2018-08-08 2020-02-13 Sony Corporation Communications device, infrastructure equipment, core network equipment and methods
CN110881191A (en) * 2019-11-20 2020-03-13 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 Method, device and system for acquiring longitude and latitude of cell and storage medium
CN111405598A (en) * 2020-03-10 2020-07-10 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 Indoor distribution signal leakage detection method and equipment

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030003918A1 (en) * 2001-06-19 2003-01-02 Paul Proctor Methods and systems for adjusting sectors across coverage cells
US20180242181A1 (en) * 2015-09-11 2018-08-23 Nec Corporation Apparatus, method, and system relating to minimization of drive tests (mdt) measurements
WO2020030713A2 (en) * 2018-08-08 2020-02-13 Sony Corporation Communications device, infrastructure equipment, core network equipment and methods
CN110881191A (en) * 2019-11-20 2020-03-13 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 Method, device and system for acquiring longitude and latitude of cell and storage medium
CN111405598A (en) * 2020-03-10 2020-07-10 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 Indoor distribution signal leakage detection method and equipment

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
杨宗林等: "农村网络结构优化及用户感知提升新思路", 《电信工程技术与标准化》 *
范琨等: "基于精准位置的网络覆盖智能监控与提升", 《邮电设计技术》 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN115250479A (en) * 2021-04-26 2022-10-28 中国移动通信有限公司研究院 Information processing method, device and equipment

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN112153657B (en) 2022-08-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN104461281B (en) Management method, management server and the mobile terminal of mobile terminal desktop icon
CN111898787B (en) Base station planning method, base station planning device, terminal equipment and storage medium
CN107431896B (en) Wireless coverage verification based on connection technology
CN110069580B (en) Road marking display method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium
CN103377585B (en) Method for locating administrative division based on longitude and latitude
CN106569942A (en) Test method and apparatus
CN110096540A (en) Surveying and mapping data conversion method, equipment, storage medium and device
CN110392379A (en) A kind of localization method of network problem, device, electronic equipment and storage medium
CN109257125B (en) Method and device for detecting reverse connection of antenna feeder of base station
CN108540987B (en) LTE network coverage state evaluation method and device
CN111818537A (en) Method, device and equipment for determining cell coverage condition and storage medium
CN114885369B (en) Network coverage quality detection processing method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium
CN112153657B (en) Network boundary coverage rationality judgment method, device, equipment and storage medium
CN110597940A (en) WeChat-based natural resource field check method and system, server and medium
CN108961345A (en) A kind of effective determination method and determining device of color in Urine test paper
CN105744554A (en) GSM network switching failure management method and system
CN109408309A (en) The test method and device of multiple terminals
CN106332130A (en) Base station survey method, apparatus and system
CN109413715A (en) It quickly accesses the implementation method of Internet of Things, realize equipment and computer readable storage medium
CN113645625B (en) Pseudo base station positioning method, pseudo base station positioning device, electronic equipment and readable medium
CN105282692A (en) Speed measurement information display method and device
CN104035871B (en) Based on fault handling method and the device of the application program in geographic position
CN110967036B (en) Test method and device for navigation product
CN111405598A (en) Indoor distribution signal leakage detection method and equipment
JP2017069780A (en) Base station design device and program

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant