CN112133137B - ITWR system and ATC system correlation consistency checking method and device - Google Patents
ITWR system and ATC system correlation consistency checking method and device Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN112133137B CN112133137B CN202011004683.XA CN202011004683A CN112133137B CN 112133137 B CN112133137 B CN 112133137B CN 202011004683 A CN202011004683 A CN 202011004683A CN 112133137 B CN112133137 B CN 112133137B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- itwr
- flight
- track
- comprehensive
- atc
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
- G08G5/00—Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
- G08G5/003—Flight plan management
Abstract
The invention discloses a method for checking the correlation between an ITWR system and an ATC system, which comprises the following steps: the ITWR system receives an ATC system comprehensive track; carrying out track association on the integrated track of the ITWR system and the integrated track of the ATC system to obtain the one-to-one corresponding relation of the integrated tracks of the two systems; judging whether the ITWR system establishes association with the comprehensive track of the existing ATC system, and if the track association is established, performing auxiliary association by referring to the comprehensive track of the ATC system; if no track association is established, the ITWR system autonomously performs flight plan correlation. The method realizes the consistency check of the ITWR system and the ATC system, improves the consistency of the flight plans of the two systems, ensures the accuracy and consistency of the flight plans of the two systems, does not need manual operation, and reduces the manual workload.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of air control, in particular to a method and a device for checking correlation between an ITWR (International telecommunication Unionwrite) system and an ATC (advanced telecom computing platform) system.
Background
A navigation management Secondary Radar track target (hereinafter referred to as a Secondary Radar target) is an air aircraft target which is identified by a Secondary Radar system through a ground scanning interrogation Radar and an airborne Secondary Radar (Secondary Radar) responder and carries important information. The secondary radar target carries very important airplane code information, and important airplane identification information such as an airplane code, an airplane 24-bit address code, a flight number and the like besides the longitude, the latitude, the altitude and the speed of the primary radar track target. The system receives a single radar target, a secondary radar target, an ADSB target, a multi-point target and the like, calculates and uniformly outputs a system track target (hereinafter referred to as a comprehensive track).
Flight Plan (Flight Plan) is a Plan that provides Flight data to the air traffic service unit regarding the completion of a Flight by the aircraft. The main information carried by a flight plan includes: flight number, departure airport, destination airport, secondary code, aircraft 24-digit address code, expected departure time, expected landing time, date of flight taken, etc.
The system integrates the identification of the flight path target related to the flight plan (hereinafter referred to as flight plan for short), which means that whether the flight path target is the same aircraft which executes flight and is described by the flight plan is identified by comparing the information carried in the secondary radar target with the information carried by the flight plan, and the identification is used for presenting important information related to the flight plan on the radar target screen flight path target and providing service for the control and command of a control unit. Flight plan-related identification relies primarily on: secondary code, 24-bit address code, flight number. On the contrary, the comprehensive track target and the flight plan are subjected to related identification removal (hereinafter referred to as flight plan removal correlation or decorrelation), that is, the system removes the one-to-one correspondence relationship between the comprehensive track target and the flight plan.
An Air Traffic Control automation System (Air Traffic Control System, hereinafter abbreviated as ATC System) mainly provides Air aircraft flight situation display, flight conflict early warning, flight conflict warning, Control command, Control handover and the like, a flight plan mainly comes from AFTN dynamic telegraph, and simultaneously accesses an Air Traffic Control radar monitoring data source to provide flight plan dynamic related information for Air Traffic Control, and the Air Traffic Control automation System is a core integrated System for Air Traffic Control units to implement Air Control command.
An Integrated Tower System (ITWR System) is a Tower control and command System that integrates field monitoring and Tower control command operations. The ITWR system is accessed into a flight plan through AFTN dynamic telegraph data, realizes autonomous correlation through accessing into tower navigation management radar data, and is simultaneously accessed into ATC system flight plan data and ATC system comprehensive track data.
The conventional independent and autonomous correlation between the ITWR system and the ATC system is maintained, namely, the ITWR system carries out flight planning correlation according to the flight planning and the comprehensive flight path of the system. The correlation between the two sets of integrated systems cannot influence each other, and the independence and autonomy are kept. The flight plans of the comprehensive tracks of the systems of the other party are not mutually referred to for auxiliary correlation, so that the correlation of the two systems is inconsistent, and manual operation needs to be repeatedly carried out. The two systems respectively independently and autonomously carry out the related calculation of the flight plan. The method specifically comprises the following conditions:
(1) the ITWR system of the inbound flight is inconsistent with the ATC system, the ITWR system is wrong, and the ITWR system is not related to the ATC system to maintain the flight plan. The entrance flight causes the ATC system and the ITWR system to be automatically related to a wrong flight plan (for example: CSC8097) due to the error of the set configuration onboard secondary responder, and the ATC system controller finds the error correlation because the flight is under the control of the ATC system and carries out manual decorrelation operation on the flight correlation and simultaneously manually correlates the flight correlation to a correct flight plan (for example: CCA 4450). In this case, the flight path-related plan in the ITWR system is then, of course, the previously automatically related wrong flight plan (CSC8097), and if necessary to maintain the correct correlation, the ITWR system must take over, then re-correlate it and manually correlate the correct flight plan again (CCA 4450).
(2) And on inbound flights, the decorrelation of the ITWR system with the ATC system is inconsistent, the correlation error of the ITWR system is not correlated with the flight plan decorrelation which keeps consistent with the ATC system. The entrance flight has one error flight plan (CSC8097) related to both ATC system and ITWR system, and the error flight plan is controlled by ATC system. At this point in the ITWR system the flight path related plan is then, of course, the previously automatically related wrong flight plan (CSC8097), then the ITWR needs to be re-correlated after takeover.
Disclosure of Invention
Aiming at the defects in the prior art, the embodiment of the invention provides a method and a device for checking the relevant consistency of an ITWR system and an ATC system, which realize the relevant consistency check of the flight plans of the ITWR system and the ATC system, improve the relevant consistency of the flight plans of the two systems, ensure the relevant accuracy and consistency of the flight plans of the two systems, do not need manual operation and reduce the manual workload.
In a first aspect, an ITWR system and ATC system related consistency checking method provided in an embodiment of the present invention includes:
the ITWR system receives an ATC system comprehensive track;
carrying out track association on the integrated track of the ITWR system and the integrated track of the ATC system to obtain the one-to-one corresponding relation of the integrated tracks of the two systems;
judging whether the ITWR system is associated with the comprehensive track of the existing ATC system or not;
if the track association is established, the ATC system comprehensive track is referenced to carry out auxiliary association;
if no track association is established, the ITWR system autonomously performs flight plan correlation.
Further, the data processing method for leading the ATC system comprehensive track to the ITWR system comprises the following steps:
when the ITWR system is accessed to the ATC system comprehensive track, judging whether the ATC system comprehensive track is related to a flight plan, if the ATC system comprehensive track is related to the flight plan, carrying key information of the flight plan, including a flight number, a takeoff airport, a destination airport, predicted takeoff time, predicted landing time and a flying receiving date, for matching the flight plan;
if the ATC system comprehensive track is not related to the flight plan, not performing flight plan matching and updating the ATC system comprehensive track cached by the ITWR system;
if the comprehensive track of the ATC system is related to the flight plan, whether the key item information of the matched flight plan is consistent with the key item information of the last flight plan or not is judged;
if the integrated flight path of the ATC system is consistent with the integrated flight path of the ATC system, binding the unique identification of the ITWR system flight plan matched last time with the integrated flight path of the ATC system, and updating the cached integrated flight path of the ATC system;
and if not, the unique identifier of the existing related flight plan is unbound with the comprehensive flight path of the ATC system, the flight plan is matched again, a new unique identifier of the flight plan is obtained, and the cached comprehensive flight path of the ATC system is updated.
Further, the ITWR system integrated track and the ATC system integrated track both comprise a flight number, a secondary code, a longitude, a latitude and an altitude.
Further, the data processing method for performing track association on the ITWR system integrated track and the ATC system integrated track comprises the following steps:
judging whether the flight number and one of the secondary codes in the flight path of the ITWR system comprehensive flight path and the ATC system comprehensive flight path are the same or not;
if the flight number is different from the secondary code, the comprehensive track of the TWR system is not associated with the comprehensive track of the ATC system;
if the flight number is the same as one of the secondary codes, judging whether the height is within a set range;
if the height is not in the set range, the comprehensive track of the TWR system is not associated with the comprehensive track of the ATC system;
if the height is within the set range, judging whether the horizontal position is within the set range;
if the horizontal position is in the set range, the integrated track of the ITWR system is associated with the integrated track of the ATC system;
and if the horizontal position is not in the set range, the comprehensive track of the ITWR system is not associated with the comprehensive track of the ATC system.
Further, the specific method for performing the auxiliary correlation with reference to the ATC system includes:
the ITWR system comprehensive track is related to the ATC system comprehensive track, and the ATC system related state is mainly used for keeping consistent decorrelation;
and the comprehensive track of the ITWR system is related to the comprehensive track of the reference ATC system, and the related state of the ATC system is mainly kept consistent and related.
Further, the specific method for keeping consistent decorrelation by taking the ATC system correlation state as the main basis for the ITWR system comprehensive track correlation reference ATC system comprehensive track comprises the following steps:
judging whether the ATC system comprehensive track related flight plan is matched with an ITWR flight plan or not;
if not, judging whether the integrated flight path of the ITWR system is related to a flight plan or not;
if the comprehensive flight path of the ITWR system is not related to the flight plan, the ITWR system autonomously performs flight plan correlation;
if the integrated flight path of the ITWR system is related to the flight plan, judging whether the flight plan related to the integrated flight path of the ITWR system is controlled by an ATC system;
if the flight plan related to the comprehensive track of the ITWR system is not in the ATC control, the ITWR system autonomously performs flight plan correlation;
if the flight plan related to the comprehensive track of the ITWR system is in the control of the ATC system, removing the plan related to the ITWR system, and keeping a decorrelation state with the comprehensive track of the ATC system;
ITWR flight planning related completion.
Further, the ITWR system integrated track is related to the ATC system integrated track, and the specific method for keeping consistent correlation mainly based on the ATC system correlation state further includes:
if the ITWR flight plan is matched, judging whether the ATC system comprehensive track related flight plan is controlled by the ATC system;
if the ACT system is not controlled, the ITWR system autonomously carries out flight plan correlation;
if the flight plan ATC system is controlled, judging whether the integrated flight path of the ITWR system is related to the flight plan;
if not, judging whether the flight plan state related to the integrated flight path of the ATC system meets the condition of the ITWR system flight plan related to the flight path,
if the condition is not met, the ITWR system autonomously performs flight plan correlation;
if the condition is met, judging whether the flight plan related to the comprehensive flight path of the ATC system is related to other flight paths of the ITWR system;
if the flight plan is related to other tracks of the ITWR system, removing the related information of the other tracks currently related to the flight plan of the ITWR system;
if the comprehensive flight path of the ITWR system is related to the comprehensive flight path of the ATC system, adding the comprehensive flight path of the ITWR system to a flight plan related to the comprehensive flight path of the ATC system, and keeping the comprehensive flight path of the ITWR system related to the comprehensive flight path of the ATC system consistent;
if the flight plan is not related to other paths of the ITWR system and is related to the comprehensive path of the ATC system, adding the comprehensive path of the ITWR system to the flight plan related to the comprehensive path of the ATC system, and keeping the correlation and consistency with the comprehensive path of the ATC system;
ITWR flight planning related completion.
Further, the method further comprises: the ITWR system comprehensive track is related to the ATC system comprehensive track, and the method for keeping consistent correlation mainly based on the ATC system correlation state further comprises the following steps:
if the comprehensive flight path of the ITWR system is related to the flight plan, judging whether the comprehensive flight path of the ITWR system is related to the comprehensive flight path of the ATC system;
if the integrated flight path of the ITWR system is consistent, the integrated flight path of the ITWR system is relevant and consistent with the integrated flight path of the ATC system;
ITWR flight planning related completion.
Further, the method further comprises: the ITWR system comprehensive track is related to the ATC system comprehensive track, and the method for keeping consistent correlation mainly based on the ATC system correlation state further comprises the following steps:
if the ITWR system comprehensive track correlation is inconsistent with the ATC system comprehensive track correlation, judging whether the ITWR system comprehensive track correlation flight plan is in the ITWR system control;
if the aircraft is under the control of the ITWR system, the ITWR system autonomously performs flight planning correlation;
if the integrated flight path is not under the control of the ITWR system, judging whether a flight plan related to the integrated flight path of the ATC system is under the control of the ATC system;
if the aircraft is not under the ATC system control, the ITWR system autonomously carries out flight plan correlation;
if the integrated flight path is in the ATC system control, judging whether the flight plan state related to the integrated flight path of the ATC system meets the conditions related to the flight path and the ITWR system flight plan;
if the condition is not met, the ITWR system autonomously performs flight plan correlation;
if the condition is met, removing the planning correlation of the ITWR system;
and returning to execute the step of judging whether the flight plan related to the comprehensive flight path of the ATC system is related to other flight paths of the ITWR system.
In a second aspect, an ITWR system and ATC system related consistency check system provided in an embodiment of the present invention is applicable to the method described in the foregoing embodiment, and includes: a track association unit and a judgment unit,
the flight path association unit is used for carrying out flight path association on the ITWR system comprehensive flight path and the ATC system comprehensive flight path to obtain the one-to-one corresponding relation of the two sets of system comprehensive flight paths;
the judging unit is used for judging whether the ITWR system is associated with the comprehensive track of the existing ATC system or not;
if the track association is established, the ATC system comprehensive track is referenced to carry out auxiliary association;
if no track association is established, the ITWR system autonomously performs flight plan correlation.
The invention has the beneficial effects that:
the method for checking the relevant consistency of the ITWR system and the ATC system provided by the embodiment of the invention has the advantages that the flight plan of the ITWR system and the ATC system is related in a bidirectional auxiliary way by mainly using the correlation in control, the problem of the relevant inconsistency of the ITWR system and the flight plan of the ATC system is thoroughly solved, the relevant consistency check of the ITWR system and the flight plan of the ATC system is realized, the relevant consistency of the flight plans of the two systems is improved, the relevant accuracy and consistency of the flight plans of the two systems are ensured, the manual operation is not needed, and the manual workload is reduced.
The device for checking the relevant consistency of the ITWR system and the ATC system provided by the embodiment of the invention ensures that the flight plan of the ITWR system and the ATC system is related in a bidirectional auxiliary way by mainly taking the correlation in control, thoroughly solves the problem of the relevant inconsistency of the ITWR system and the flight plan of the ATC system, realizes the check of the relevant consistency of the ITWR system and the flight plan of the ATC system, improves the relevant consistency of the flight plans of the two systems, ensures the relevant accuracy and consistency of the flight plans of the two systems, does not need manual operation, and reduces the manual workload.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the detailed description of the invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings that are needed in the detailed description of the invention or the prior art will be briefly described below. Throughout the drawings, like elements or portions are generally identified by like reference numerals. In the drawings, elements or portions are not necessarily drawn to scale.
FIG. 1 is a flow chart illustrating a method for checking the consistency between an ITWR system and an ATC system according to a first embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a flowchart of a data processing method for leading the ITWR system to the ATC system integrated track in the present embodiment;
FIG. 3 is a flow chart showing the path association of the ITWR system integrated path and the ATC system integrated path in the present embodiment;
fig. 4 shows a flow chart of the auxiliary correlation step in the present embodiment.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are some, not all, embodiments of the present invention. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
It will be understood that the terms "comprises" and/or "comprising," when used in this specification and the appended claims, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
It is also to be understood that the terminology used in the description of the invention herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used in the specification of the present invention and the appended claims, the singular forms "a," "an," and "the" are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
It should be further understood that the term "and/or" as used in this specification and the appended claims refers to and includes any and all possible combinations of one or more of the associated listed items.
As used in this specification and the appended claims, the term "if" may be interpreted contextually as "when", "upon" or "in response to a determination" or "in response to a detection". Similarly, the phrase "if it is determined" or "if a [ described condition or event ] is detected" may be interpreted contextually to mean "upon determining" or "in response to determining" or "upon detecting [ described condition or event ]" or "in response to detecting [ described condition or event ]".
It is to be noted that, unless otherwise specified, technical or scientific terms used herein shall have the ordinary meaning as understood by those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains.
Fig. 1 is a flowchart illustrating a method for checking the consistency between an ITWR system and an ATC system according to a first embodiment of the present invention, where the method includes:
and S1, the ITWR system receives the ATC system comprehensive track.
Specifically, the ITWR system connects to the ATC system integrated track, the ITWR system receives the ATC system integrated track, the ATC system integrated track carries flight plan information (referred to as a flight plan in this application) related to the track, and the key information of the flight plan information includes a flight number, a takeoff airport, a destination airport, a predicted takeoff time, a predicted landing time, a fly-receiving date, and the like.
As shown in fig. 2, a flow chart of a data processing method for leading an ATC system integrated track to an ITWR system is shown, and the method comprises the following steps:
when the ITWR system is accessed to the ATC system comprehensive track, judging whether the ATC system comprehensive track is related to a flight plan;
if the comprehensive flight path of the ATC system is not related to the flight plan, not performing flight plan matching and updating the comprehensive flight path cache of the ATC system;
if the comprehensive track of the ATC system is related to the flight plan, whether the key item information of the matched flight plan is consistent with the key item information of the last flight plan or not is judged;
if the integrated flight path of the ITWR system is consistent with the integrated flight path of the ATC system, the unique identification of the ITWR system flight plan matched last time is bound with the integrated flight path of the ATC system, and the integrated flight path of the ATC system is updated to the integrated flight path cache of the new ATC system;
and if not, the unique identifier of the existing related flight plan is unbound with the comprehensive flight path of the ATC system, and the flight plan is matched again to obtain a new flight plan displacement identifier and cache the comprehensive flight path of the ATC system.
And S2, performing track association on the ITWR system comprehensive track and the ATC system comprehensive track to obtain the one-to-one corresponding relation of the two sets of system comprehensive tracks.
As shown in fig. 3, a flow chart of performing track association between the ITWR system integrated track and the ATC system integrated track is shown, and the track association between the ITWR system integrated track and the ATC system integrated track is performed to obtain a one-to-one correspondence relationship (hereinafter referred to as track association) between two sets of system integrated tracks. Whether the integrated flight paths of the two systems are the same described flight path target or not is judged mainly by the flight number, the secondary code, the longitude, the latitude and the height in the integrated flight paths (ITWR integrated flight path and ATC integrated flight path), and the judgment conditions are as follows:
firstly, the ITWR integrated track and the ATC integrated track both have flight numbers, and the flight numbers are required to be consistent (at least one of the flight number and the secondary code is required to be satisfied);
secondly, the ITWR integrated flight path and the ATC integrated flight path both have secondary codes, and the secondary codes are required to be consistent (at least one of flight number and the secondary codes is required to be satisfied);
calculating the plane distance of the two targets to be L meters according to the longitude and latitude carried by the ITWR comprehensive track and the ATC comprehensive track, wherein the distance L is less than or equal to a parameter L1 configured by the system (the plane distance of the two tracks is different by a plurality of meters and can be regarded as the same track);
and fourthly, calculating the height difference H m of the two targets according to the heights carried by the ITWR comprehensive track and the ATC comprehensive track, wherein the height difference H needs to be less than or equal to a parameter H1 configured by the system (how many meters of the height difference between the two tracks can be regarded as the same track).
And S3, judging whether the ITWR system is associated with the comprehensive track of the existing ATC system.
And S4, if the track association is established, the auxiliary correlation is carried out by referring to the comprehensive track of the ATC system.
If no track association is established, flight plan correlation is performed autonomously with the ITWR system S5.
Specifically, whether the ITWR system establishes the track association with the existing ATC system comprehensive track or not is judged, and if the track association is established, the ATC system comprehensive track needs to be referred for auxiliary association. As shown in fig. 4, a flowchart of the auxiliary correlation steps is shown, and the auxiliary correlation steps are as follows, where the ITWR system synthetic track is TWRTRACK, and the ATC system synthetic track is ATCTRACK:
(1) the TWRTRACK cannot find the track association relation corresponding to the ATTRACK; the ITWR system is subject to autonomous correlation;
(2) the ATTRACK unrelated flight plan associated with the corresponding track for TWRTRACK (not related, or the tower does not have that plan); TWRTRACK unrelated flight plans; the ITWR system is subject to autonomous correlation;
(3) the ATTRACK unrelated flight plan associated with the corresponding track for TWRTRACK (not related, or the tower does not have that plan); TWRTRACK-related flight plans (flight plan ATC system not controlled); the ITWR system is subject to autonomous correlation;
(4) the ATTRACK unrelated flight plan associated with the corresponding track for TWRTRACK (not related, or the tower does not have that plan); TWRTRACK-related flight plans (under ATC system control); and performing auxiliary correlation by using the ATC system comprehensive track correlation relationship, performing decorrelation on the TWRTRACK, and keeping the decorrelation state consistent with the decorrelation state of the ATCTRACTACK.
(5) The ATTRACK related flight plan (the ATC system is not controlled) associated with the corresponding track of the TWRTRACK; subject to the autonomous correlation of the ITWR system.
(6) An ATTRACK related flight plan (in ATC system control) associated with a corresponding track of TWRTRACK; TWRTRACK unrelated flight plans; ATCTRACK related flight plans do not meet ITWR system related conditions; subject to the autonomous correlation of the ITWR system.
(7) An ATTRACK related flight plan (in ATC system control) associated with a corresponding track of TWRTRACK; TWRTRACK unrelated flight plans; ATTRACK-related flight plans satisfy ITWR system-related conditions; ATTRACK-related flight plans have been correlated with other integrated trajectories at the ITWR system; and performing auxiliary correlation by using the ATC system comprehensive track correlation relationship, performing decorrelation on the ATTRACK-related flight plan and other comprehensive tracks in the ITWR system, and correlating the plan and the TWRTRACK to keep the correlation state of the plan and the ATTRACK consistent.
(8) An ATTRACK related flight plan (in ATC system control) associated with a corresponding track of TWRTRACK; TWRTRACK unrelated flight plans; ATTRACK-related flight plans satisfy ITWR system-related conditions; ATTRACK-related flight plans are not related to other integrated tracks at the ITWR system; and performing auxiliary correlation by using the ATC system comprehensive track correlation relationship, and correlating the ATCRACK-related flight plan with the TWRTRACK to keep consistent with the ATCRACK-related state.
(9) An ATTRACK related flight plan (in ATC system control) associated with a corresponding track of TWRTRACK; TWRTRACK has associated flight plans; the TWRTRACK-related flight plan is consistent with the ATCTRACK-related flight plan; and performing auxiliary correlation by using the comprehensive track correlation of the ATC system, and keeping the correlation state consistent with that of the ATTRACK.
(10) An ATTRACK related flight plan (in ATC system control) associated with a corresponding track of TWRTRACK; TWRTRACK has associated flight plans; the TWRTRACK-related flight plan is not consistent with the ATCTRACK-related flight plan; TWRTRACK-related flight plans are under ITWR system control; the ITWR system is subject to autonomous correlation;
(11) an ATTRACK related flight plan (in ATC system control) associated with a corresponding track of TWRTRACK; TWRTRACK has associated flight plans; the TWRTRACK-related flight plan is not consistent with the ATCTRACK-related flight plan; the TWRTRACK-related flight plan ITWR system is unregulated; the ATTRACK-related flight plan ATC system is not regulated; the ITWR system is subject to autonomous correlation;
(12) an ATTRACK related flight plan (in ATC system control) associated with a corresponding track of TWRTRACK; TWRTRACK has associated flight plans; the TWRTRACK-related flight plan is not consistent with the ATCTRACK-related flight plan; the TWRTRACK-related flight plan ITWR system is unregulated; ATTRACK-related flight plan ATC system control; and performing auxiliary correlation by using the ATC system comprehensive track correlation relationship, performing decorrelation on the related plan of the TWRTRACK, and correlating the flight plan related to the ATCRACK with the TWRTRACK to keep the consistency with the related state of the ATCRACK.
According to the method for checking the relevant consistency of the ITWR system and the ATC system, the flight plan of the ITWR system and the ATC system is related and is mainly related in control to carry out bidirectional auxiliary correlation through the steps, the problem that the flight plan of the ITWR system and the ATC system is related and is inconsistent is thoroughly solved, the check of the relevant consistency of the flight plan of the ITWR system and the ATC system is realized, the relevant consistency of the flight plans of the two systems is improved, the relevant accuracy and consistency of the flight plans of the two systems are guaranteed, manual operation is not needed, and the manual workload is reduced.
In the first embodiment, a method for checking the correlation between the ITWR system and the ATC system is provided, and correspondingly, another embodiment of the present invention further provides a device for checking the correlation between the ITWR system and the ATC system. Since the apparatus embodiments are substantially similar to the method embodiments, they are described in a relatively simple manner, and reference may be made to some of the descriptions of the method embodiments for relevant points. The device embodiments described below are merely illustrative.
Another embodiment of the present invention provides a device for checking the correlation between an ITWR system and an ATC system, which is suitable for the method described in the foregoing embodiment, and includes: a track association unit and a judgment unit,
the flight path association unit is used for carrying out flight path association on the ITWR system comprehensive flight path and the ATC system comprehensive flight path to obtain the one-to-one corresponding relation of the two sets of system comprehensive flight paths;
the judging unit is used for judging whether the ITWR system is associated with the comprehensive track of the existing ATC system or not;
if the track association is established, the ATC system comprehensive track is referenced to carry out auxiliary association;
if no track association is established, the ITWR system autonomously performs flight plan correlation.
The device for checking the relevant consistency of the ITWR system and the ATC system, provided by the embodiment, realizes the purpose that the flight plan of the ITWR system and the ATC system is related and mainly related in control to carry out bidirectional auxiliary correlation, thoroughly solves the problem of the inconsistency of the flight plan of the ITWR system and the ATC system, realizes the check of the relevant consistency of the flight plan of the ITWR system and the ATC system, improves the relevant consistency of the flight plans of the two systems, ensures the relevant accuracy and consistency of the flight plans of the two systems, does not need manual operation, and reduces the manual workload.
Finally, it should be noted that: the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solution of the present invention, and not to limit the same; while the invention has been described in detail and with reference to the foregoing embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that: the technical solutions described in the foregoing embodiments may still be modified, or some or all of the technical features may be equivalently replaced; such modifications and substitutions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the present invention, and they should be construed as being included in the following claims and description.
Claims (9)
1. An ITWR system and ATC system related consistency checking method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
the ITWR system receives an ATC system comprehensive track;
carrying out track association on the integrated track of the ITWR system and the integrated track of the ATC system to obtain the one-to-one corresponding relation of the integrated tracks of the two systems;
judging whether the ITWR system is associated with the comprehensive track of the existing ATC system or not;
if the track association is established, the ATC system comprehensive track is referenced to carry out auxiliary association;
if no track association is established, the ITWR system autonomously carries out flight plan association;
the data processing method for leading the ITWR system to the ATC system comprehensive track comprises the following steps:
when the ITWR system is accessed to the ATC system comprehensive track, judging whether the ATC system comprehensive track is related to a flight plan, if the ATC system comprehensive track is related to the flight plan, carrying key information of the flight plan, including a flight number, a takeoff airport, a destination airport, predicted takeoff time, predicted landing time and a flying receiving date, for matching the flight plan;
if the ATC system comprehensive track is not related to the flight plan, not performing flight plan matching and updating the ATC system comprehensive track cached by the ITWR system;
if the comprehensive track of the ATC system is related to the flight plan, whether the key item information of the matched flight plan is consistent with the key item information of the last flight plan or not is judged;
if the integrated flight path of the ATC system is consistent with the integrated flight path of the ATC system, binding the unique identification of the ITWR system flight plan matched last time with the integrated flight path of the ATC system, and updating the cached integrated flight path of the ATC system;
and if not, the unique identifier of the existing related flight plan is unbound with the comprehensive flight path of the ATC system, the flight plan is matched again, a new unique identifier of the flight plan is obtained, and the cached comprehensive flight path of the ATC system is updated.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the ITWR system integrated track and the ATC system integrated track each comprise a flight number, a secondary code, a longitude, a latitude, and an altitude.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the data processing method for performing track correlation between the ITWR system integrated track and the ATC system integrated track comprises:
judging whether the flight number and one of the secondary codes in the flight path of the ITWR system comprehensive flight path and the ATC system comprehensive flight path are the same or not;
if the flight number is different from the secondary code, the comprehensive track of the TWR system is not associated with the comprehensive track of the ATC system;
if the flight number is the same as one of the secondary codes, judging whether the height is within a set range;
if the height is not in the set range, the comprehensive track of the TWR system is not associated with the comprehensive track of the ATC system;
if the height is within the set range, judging whether the horizontal position is within the set range;
if the horizontal position is in the set range, the integrated track of the ITWR system is associated with the integrated track of the ATC system;
and if the horizontal position is not in the set range, the comprehensive track of the ITWR system is not associated with the comprehensive track of the ATC system.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein the specific method of assisted correlation with reference to the ATC system comprises:
the ITWR system comprehensive track is related to the ATC system comprehensive track, and the ATC system related state is mainly used for keeping consistent decorrelation;
and the comprehensive track of the ITWR system is related to the comprehensive track of the reference ATC system, and the related state of the ATC system is mainly kept consistent and related.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the ITWR system integrated track correlation reference ATC system integrated track, the specific method for keeping consistent decorrelation based on ATC system correlation status comprises:
judging whether the ATC system comprehensive track related flight plan is matched with an ITWR flight plan or not;
if not, judging whether the integrated flight path of the ITWR system is related to a flight plan or not;
if the comprehensive flight path of the ITWR system is not related to the flight plan, the ITWR system autonomously performs flight plan correlation;
if the integrated flight path of the ITWR system is related to the flight plan, judging whether the flight plan related to the integrated flight path of the ITWR system is controlled by an ATC system;
if the flight plan related to the comprehensive track of the ITWR system is not in the ATC control, the ITWR system autonomously performs flight plan correlation;
if the flight plan related to the comprehensive track of the ITWR system is in the control of the ATC system, removing the plan related to the ITWR system, and keeping a decorrelation state with the comprehensive track of the ATC system;
ITWR flight planning related completion.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the ITWR system integrated track correlation reference ATC system integrated track, the specific method for keeping consistent correlation based on the ATC system correlation status further comprises:
if the ITWR flight plan is matched, judging whether the ATC system comprehensive track related flight plan is controlled by the ATC system;
if the ACT system is not controlled, the ITWR system autonomously carries out flight plan correlation;
if the flight plan ATC system is controlled, judging whether the integrated flight path of the ITWR system is related to the flight plan;
if not, judging whether the flight plan state related to the integrated flight path of the ATC system meets the condition of the ITWR system flight plan related to the flight path,
if the condition is not met, the ITWR system autonomously performs flight plan correlation;
if the condition is met, judging whether the flight plan related to the comprehensive flight path of the ATC system is related to other flight paths of the ITWR system;
if the flight plan is related to other tracks of the ITWR system, removing the related information of the other tracks currently related to the flight plan of the ITWR system; if the comprehensive flight path of the ITWR system is related to the comprehensive flight path of the ATC system, adding the comprehensive flight path of the ITWR system to a flight plan related to the comprehensive flight path of the ATC system, and keeping the comprehensive flight path of the ITWR system related to the comprehensive flight path of the ATC system consistent;
if the flight plan is not related to other paths of the ITWR system and is related to the comprehensive path of the ATC system, adding the comprehensive path of the ITWR system to the flight plan related to the comprehensive path of the ATC system, and keeping the correlation and consistency with the comprehensive path of the ATC system;
ITWR flight planning related completion.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the method further comprises: the ITWR system comprehensive track is related to the ATC system comprehensive track, and the method for keeping consistent correlation mainly based on the ATC system correlation state further comprises the following steps:
if the comprehensive flight path of the ITWR system is related to the flight plan, judging whether the comprehensive flight path of the ITWR system is related to the comprehensive flight path of the ATC system;
if the integrated flight path of the ITWR system is consistent, the integrated flight path of the ITWR system is relevant and consistent with the integrated flight path of the ATC system;
ITWR flight planning related completion.
8. The method of claim 6, wherein the method further comprises: the ITWR system comprehensive track is related to the ATC system comprehensive track, and the method for keeping consistent correlation mainly based on the ATC system correlation state further comprises the following steps:
if the ITWR system comprehensive track correlation is inconsistent with the ATC system comprehensive track correlation, judging whether the ITWR system comprehensive track correlation flight plan is in the ITWR system control;
if the aircraft is under the control of the ITWR system, the ITWR system autonomously performs flight planning correlation;
if the integrated flight path is not under the control of the ITWR system, judging whether a flight plan related to the integrated flight path of the ATC system is under the control of the ATC system;
if the aircraft is not under the ATC system control, the ITWR system autonomously carries out flight plan correlation;
if the integrated flight path is in the ATC system control, judging whether the flight plan state related to the integrated flight path of the ATC system meets the conditions related to the flight path and the ITWR system flight plan;
if the condition is not met, the ITWR system autonomously performs flight plan correlation;
if the condition is met, removing the planning correlation of the ITWR system;
and returning to execute the step of judging whether the flight plan related to the comprehensive flight path of the ATC system is related to other flight paths of the ITWR system.
9. An apparatus for checking the consistency of an ITWR system with respect to an ATC system, the apparatus being adapted to the method of any one of claims 1 to 8, the apparatus comprising: a track association unit and a judgment unit,
the flight path association unit is used for carrying out flight path association on the ITWR system comprehensive flight path and the ATC system comprehensive flight path to obtain the one-to-one corresponding relation of the two sets of system comprehensive flight paths;
the judging unit is used for judging whether the ITWR system is associated with the comprehensive track of the existing ATC system or not;
if the track association is established, the ATC system comprehensive track is referenced to carry out auxiliary association;
if no track association is established, the ITWR system autonomously performs flight plan correlation.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202011004683.XA CN112133137B (en) | 2020-09-22 | 2020-09-22 | ITWR system and ATC system correlation consistency checking method and device |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202011004683.XA CN112133137B (en) | 2020-09-22 | 2020-09-22 | ITWR system and ATC system correlation consistency checking method and device |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN112133137A CN112133137A (en) | 2020-12-25 |
| CN112133137B true CN112133137B (en) | 2021-11-02 |
Family
ID=73842644
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202011004683.XA Active CN112133137B (en) | 2020-09-22 | 2020-09-22 | ITWR system and ATC system correlation consistency checking method and device |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN112133137B (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP4083964A1 (en) * | 2021-04-26 | 2022-11-02 | GE Aviation Systems Limited | Method and system for validating a flight plan |
Family Cites Families (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US8942914B2 (en) * | 2011-02-22 | 2015-01-27 | General Electric Company | Methods and systems for managing air traffic |
| CN102508737B (en) * | 2011-10-12 | 2013-07-10 | 南京莱斯信息技术股份有限公司 | Method for synchronizing data between main system and backup system of air traffic control |
| CN102509475B (en) * | 2011-10-26 | 2013-11-06 | 南京航空航天大学 | Air traffic control system and method for four-dimensional (4D)-trajectory-based operation |
| CN104881752A (en) * | 2015-06-04 | 2015-09-02 | 南京莱斯信息技术股份有限公司 | Integrated control tower automation system and construction method thereof |
| CN105336220B (en) * | 2015-12-08 | 2017-12-05 | 成都民航空管科技发展有限公司 | A kind of air traffic control automation system flight plan correlation correcting method |
| CN110930769A (en) * | 2019-10-25 | 2020-03-27 | 中国民用航空中南地区空中交通管理局 | Automatic empty pipe alarming method and system and terminal equipment |
-
2020
- 2020-09-22 CN CN202011004683.XA patent/CN112133137B/en active Active
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN112133137A (en) | 2020-12-25 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US8108087B2 (en) | Sequencing, merging and approach-spacing systems and methods | |
| US9575489B2 (en) | Method of error detection of an aircraft flight management and guidance system and high-integrity flight management and guidance system | |
| US10678265B2 (en) | Revised speed advisory for an aircraft during flight based on holding time | |
| CN106385442B (en) | Method for integrating new navigation services into an open architecture avionics on-board system | |
| US20200365039A1 (en) | Information processing apparatus | |
| CN109131938A (en) | A kind of flight check system | |
| US10235892B1 (en) | Aircraft surface state event track system and method | |
| EP2023310B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for managing instrument missed approaches | |
| US10043401B2 (en) | Methods and apparatus for detecting airport terminal area congestion | |
| CN107566049B (en) | Method for realizing intelligent shooting and sending of civil aviation telegraph by utilizing computer | |
| CN103810906A (en) | Management system for aircraft | |
| US20160180716A1 (en) | Method and system for guidance of an aircraft | |
| US11668811B2 (en) | Method and system to identify and display suspicious aircraft | |
| CN112133137B (en) | ITWR system and ATC system correlation consistency checking method and device | |
| AU2022201028A1 (en) | Control system at an airport | |
| CN112002147B (en) | Method and device for checking correlation between ATC (advanced telecom computing) system and ITWR (International telecom computing platform) system | |
| CN107544536B (en) | Method and system for performance-based reach and ordering and spacing | |
| RU2682031C1 (en) | System of forming aircraft coordinates in terms of incomplete and inaccurate navigation information | |
| EP1777674B1 (en) | Aircraft takeoff/landing time measuring method and aircraft takeoff/landing management method using the method | |
| TWI714023B (en) | Method of identifying aircraft during landing and docking processes and identifying system thereof | |
| CN111833658A (en) | Method and system for identifying landing and stopping process of aircraft | |
| KR20190011440A (en) | Method and apparatus for assist an aircraft in flight | |
| Foggia et al. | CASSTl-The Chicago Department of Aviation's Advanced Technology Implementation Program |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |