CN112132384A - Work efficiency evaluation method and device, storage medium and computer equipment - Google Patents
Work efficiency evaluation method and device, storage medium and computer equipment Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN112132384A CN112132384A CN202010793831.4A CN202010793831A CN112132384A CN 112132384 A CN112132384 A CN 112132384A CN 202010793831 A CN202010793831 A CN 202010793831A CN 112132384 A CN112132384 A CN 112132384A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- work efficiency
- efficiency evaluation
- employee
- determining
- evaluated
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 190
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000013210 evaluation model Methods 0.000 description 24
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010801 machine learning Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000611 regression analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06398—Performance of employee with respect to a job function
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a work efficiency evaluation method, a work efficiency evaluation device, a storage medium and computer equipment, relates to the technical field of information, and mainly aims to effectively evaluate the work efficiency of staff and improve the evaluation precision of the work efficiency of the staff. The method comprises the following steps: acquiring time length information of each office software used by an employee to be evaluated in a preset time period; determining a working efficiency evaluation result corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the duration information corresponding to each office software; and determining the work efficiency evaluation grade corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the work efficiency evaluation result and the dynamic rule. The method is suitable for evaluating the working efficiency of the staff.
Description
Technical Field
The present invention relates to the field of information technology, and in particular, to a method and an apparatus for evaluating work efficiency, a storage medium, and a computer device.
Background
With the continuous development of social economy and science and technology, computers have become indispensable tools for staff to assist in work, and because the functions of the computers are too extensive, the computers can not only be used for work, but also be used for watching news, playing games and other entertainment projects, and various information in the network induces people to browse and check, so that when the staff of an enterprise work by using the computers, much time may be spent in other entertainment aspects, and the work efficiency of image staff is influenced, so that the management department needs to evaluate and examine the work efficiency of internal staff to ensure that internal teams of the enterprise can efficiently complete work.
Currently, when the work efficiency of an employee is evaluated, a management department usually calculates the work efficiency of the employee according to monthly workload reported by the employee. However, the statistical time corresponding to the workload reported by the employee is likely to include the time when the employee is on vacation and on business trip, so that the work efficiency of the employee in the time cannot be completely reflected only by the workload of the employee within a period of time, and the manual calculation mode has more subjective factors and cannot effectively and accurately evaluate the work efficiency of the employee.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention provides a work efficiency evaluation method, a work efficiency evaluation device, a storage medium and computer equipment, which are mainly used for effectively evaluating the work efficiency of staff and improving the evaluation precision of the work efficiency of the staff.
According to a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a work efficiency evaluation method including:
acquiring time length information of each office software used by an employee to be evaluated in a preset time period;
determining a working efficiency evaluation result corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the duration information corresponding to each office software;
and determining the work efficiency evaluation grade corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the work efficiency evaluation result and the dynamic rule.
According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided an operation efficiency evaluation device including:
the system comprises an acquisition unit, a processing unit and a processing unit, wherein the acquisition unit is used for acquiring the time length information of each office software used by the staff to be evaluated in a preset time period;
the first determining unit is used for determining a working efficiency evaluation result corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the duration information corresponding to each office software;
and the second determining unit is used for determining the work efficiency evaluation grade corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the work efficiency evaluation result and the dynamic rule.
According to a third aspect of the present invention, there is provided a computer readable storage medium having stored thereon a computer program which, when executed by a processor, performs the steps of:
acquiring time length information of each office software used by an employee to be evaluated in a preset time period;
determining a working efficiency evaluation result corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the duration information corresponding to each office software;
and determining the work efficiency evaluation grade corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the work efficiency evaluation result and the dynamic rule.
According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, there is provided a computer device comprising a memory, a processor and a computer program stored on the memory and executable on the processor, the processor implementing the following steps when executing the program:
acquiring time length information of each office software used by an employee to be evaluated in a preset time period;
determining a working efficiency evaluation result corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the duration information corresponding to each office software;
and determining the work efficiency evaluation grade corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the work efficiency evaluation result and the dynamic rule.
Compared with the mode that the working efficiency of the staff is calculated by a management department according to the monthly workload reported by the staff at present, the working efficiency evaluation method, the working efficiency evaluation device, the storage medium and the computer equipment can acquire the time length information of each office software used by the staff to be evaluated in a preset time period; determining a working efficiency evaluation result corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the duration information corresponding to each office software; meanwhile, according to the work efficiency evaluation result and the dynamic rule, the work efficiency evaluation level corresponding to the staff to be evaluated is determined, so that the work efficiency of the staff can be effectively evaluated, the evaluation precision of the work efficiency of the staff is improved, meanwhile, an enterprise management department can master the work state of the staff according to the work efficiency evaluation level of the staff, namely, whether the staff works seriously is known, the staff of the enterprise is effectively managed, and the overall work efficiency of the enterprise is improved.
Drawings
The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this application, illustrate embodiment(s) of the invention and together with the description serve to explain the invention without limiting the invention. In the drawings:
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a method for evaluating work efficiency according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a flow chart of another work efficiency assessment method provided by the embodiment of the invention;
fig. 3 is a schematic structural diagram illustrating an operation efficiency evaluation apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 4 is a schematic structural diagram of another work efficiency evaluation apparatus provided in the embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 5 shows a physical structure diagram of a computer device according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The invention will be described in detail hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings in conjunction with embodiments. It should be noted that the embodiments and features of the embodiments in the present application may be combined with each other without conflict.
Currently, when the work efficiency of an employee is evaluated, a management department usually calculates the work efficiency of the employee according to monthly workload reported by the employee. However, the statistical time corresponding to the workload reported by the employee is likely to include the time when the employee is on vacation and on business trip, so that the work efficiency of the employee in the time cannot be completely reflected only by the workload of the employee within a period of time, and the manual calculation mode has more subjective factors and cannot effectively and accurately evaluate the work efficiency of the employee.
In order to solve the above problem, an embodiment of the present invention provides a method for evaluating work efficiency, as shown in fig. 1, the method includes:
101. and acquiring the time length information of the employee to be evaluated using each office software in a preset time period.
Wherein, wait to evaluate the staff that the staff need carry out the work efficiency aassessment for the inside staff that need of enterprise, including the ordinary staff of the different positions of enterprise and the leader of different department levels, each office software is each office software that the required use of the inside different positions staff official working of enterprise, for example, each office software includes: for the embodiment of the invention, in order to solve the problem that the working efficiency of employees cannot be effectively evaluated in the prior art, the embodiment of the invention adopts a machine learning technology to construct a preset working efficiency evaluation model so as to effectively evaluate the working efficiency of employees in an enterprise, and the execution main body of the embodiment of the invention is a device or equipment capable of evaluating the working efficiency of employees and can be specifically arranged on one side of a client or a server.
For the embodiment of the present invention, in order to evaluate the work efficiency of employees in an enterprise, it is necessary to obtain the time length information of each office software used by the employee to be evaluated in a preset time period, wherein each office software may be set according to the business requirements of different enterprises, the technical software used by different types of enterprises is different, for example, a software development enterprise may involve programming software and testing software, a mechanical manufacturing enterprise may involve various engineering drawing software, the preset time period may be set according to the evaluation period required by the enterprise, for example, the work efficiency of the employee is evaluated every month or every quarter, specifically, after the evaluation period of each office software and the enterprise work efficiency required to be used in the enterprise is determined, the time length information of each office software used by the employee to be evaluated in the preset time period is collected, the time information of using each office software by employees of different positions is different definitely, for example, the time of using office software by employees of the office position is longer, the time of using software related to technical development is shorter, or the employees are not used, and after the using time length information of using each office software by the employees to be evaluated in the preset time period is obtained, the working efficiency of the employees to be evaluated is evaluated according to the time length information.
102. And determining a working efficiency evaluation result corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the duration information corresponding to each office software.
For the embodiment of the invention, a machine learning technology is adopted to construct a preset work efficiency evaluation model so as to evaluate the work efficiency of the staff to be evaluated by using the preset work efficiency evaluation model, in particular, when the preset work efficiency evaluation model is constructed, the time length information of the staff with different positions in an enterprise using each office software in a preset time period is collected, further, the staff is divided into different work efficiency evaluation grades, the time length information data of the staff is labeled according to the work efficiency evaluation grade to which the staff belongs, in particular, when the staff is divided into different work efficiency evaluation grades, the workload corresponding to a plurality of continuous evaluation periods of each staff can be obtained, the average workload of each staff in each evaluation period is calculated, and the workload evaluation grade to which the average workload corresponding to each staff belongs is determined, meanwhile, according to the determined workload evaluation grade corresponding to each employee, determining the work efficiency evaluation grade corresponding to each employee, for example, if the grade of the average workload of a certain employee is A grade (excellent), determining the work efficiency evaluation grade of the employee is one grade (high work efficiency), because the workload of the employee in a plurality of continuous evaluation periods can reach A grade, the work efficiency of the employee can be considered to be high, so that the work efficiency evaluation grade of each employee can be determined, marking the collected duration information of each office software used by each employee in a preset time period based on the determined work efficiency evaluation grade, taking the duration information as sample data, training the sample data by using a preset Logic regression analysis algorithm, constructing a preset work efficiency evaluation model, and the preset work efficiency evaluation model can evaluate the work efficiency of the employee and the like according to the time information of each office software used by the employee in the preset time period And (4) predicting, wherein the work efficiency evaluation grade can be set according to the assessment requirement of the enterprise, for example, the enterprise divides the work efficiency evaluation grade into 5 grades, including one grade (high work efficiency), two grades (high work efficiency), three grades (general work efficiency), four grades (low work efficiency) and five grades (low work efficiency).
For the embodiment of the invention, when the work efficiency of the staff to be evaluated needs to be evaluated, the acquired duration information of each office software used by the staff to be evaluated in a preset time period is input into the preset work efficiency evaluation model for evaluation, specifically, when the preset work efficiency evaluation model is used for evaluation, the duration information corresponding to each office software is input into the input layer corresponding to the preset work efficiency evaluation model, and then the work efficiency evaluation result corresponding to the staff to be evaluated is determined according to the duration information corresponding to each office software, wherein the work efficiency evaluation result is an intermediate value obtained when the preset work efficiency evaluation model is used for evaluation, so that the work efficiency evaluation grade corresponding to the staff to be evaluated is determined according to the work efficiency evaluation result (intermediate value).
103. And determining the work efficiency evaluation grade corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the work efficiency evaluation result and the dynamic rule.
For the embodiment of the invention, after the evaluation result corresponding to the employee to be evaluated is obtained by using the preset work efficiency evaluation model, the evaluation result is input to the classifier in the preset work efficiency evaluation model for classification, specifically, the work efficiency evaluation result and the classification number of each employee with the same position as the employee to be evaluated in the preset time period are obtained, wherein the classification number is set by an enterprise management department according to the evaluation requirement, for example, the classification number is divided into 5 work efficiency evaluation grades (5 types), further, according to the work efficiency evaluation result and the classification number of each employee, a dynamic rule is determined, that is, a plurality of work efficiency evaluation intervals are formed, the target work efficiency evaluation interval to which the work efficiency evaluation result corresponding to the employee to be evaluated belongs is determined, further, the work efficiency evaluation grade corresponding to the employee to be evaluated is determined based on the determined target work efficiency evaluation interval, therefore, accurate assessment of the working efficiency grade of the staff can be achieved by utilizing the pre-constructed working efficiency assessment model.
Compared with the mode that the management department calculates the working efficiency of the staff according to the monthly workload reported by the staff at present, the working efficiency evaluation method provided by the embodiment of the invention can acquire the time length information of each office software used by the staff to be evaluated in a preset time period; determining a working efficiency evaluation result corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the duration information corresponding to each office software; meanwhile, according to the work efficiency evaluation result and the dynamic rule, the work efficiency evaluation level corresponding to the staff to be evaluated is determined, so that the work efficiency of the staff can be effectively evaluated, the evaluation precision of the work efficiency of the staff is improved, meanwhile, an enterprise management department can master the work state of the staff according to the work efficiency evaluation level of the staff, namely, whether the staff works seriously is known, the staff of the enterprise is effectively managed, and the overall work efficiency of the enterprise is improved.
Further, in order to better explain the above process of evaluating the work efficiency of the employee, as a refinement and an extension of the above embodiment, an embodiment of the present invention provides another work efficiency evaluation method, as shown in fig. 2, where the method includes:
201. and acquiring the time length information of the employee to be evaluated using each office software in a preset time period.
For the embodiment of the present invention, in order to obtain the time length information of each office software used by the employee to be evaluated in the preset time period, step 201 specifically includes: acquiring the operation duration of the staff to be evaluated on the movable window of each office software within a preset time period; and determining the operation duration of the active window of each office software as duration information of each office software used by the staff to be evaluated. The preset time period can be set according to the evaluation period of the enterprise management department, for example, the work efficiency of the employee is evaluated every month or every quarter, in addition, when the employee works, the active window of each office software is opened in the computer screen, however, although the employee opens the active window of the office software, the employee is not meant to use the office software, and therefore, the operation time of the mouse of the employee in the active window of each office software in the preset time period needs to be acquired, and therefore, the evaluation precision of the work efficiency of the employee can be improved according to the data.
202. Determining the position information corresponding to the staff to be evaluated, and determining the weighted value corresponding to the duration information of each office software based on the determined position information.
The job information may include a clerk job, a technical job, a management job, etc., and in the embodiment of the present invention, the types and time information of office software mainly used by employees of different jobs are different, for example, office software is the main office software of the clerk job, so the time length of using office software is longest, and the time length of using technical development software is relatively shorter for other technical development software, such as programming software, engineering drawing software, etc., which is not the main office software of the clerk job, so the evaluation accuracy of the job efficiency of the employee needs to be improved by introducing the dimension information of the employee job in the preset job efficiency evaluation model, and the job information of the employee to be evaluated needs to be obtained when the job efficiency evaluation is performed by using the preset job efficiency evaluation model, for example, if the position of the employee to be evaluated is a clerk, the weight value corresponding to the office software used by the employee to be evaluated is determined to be 0.8, the weight value corresponding to the programming software is 0.1, and the weight value corresponding to the engineering drafting software is 0.1; if the position of the employee to be evaluated is a software developer, determining that the weight value corresponding to the programming software used by the employee to be evaluated is 0.8, the weight value corresponding to the office software is 0.1, and the weight value corresponding to the engineering drawing software is 0.1, so that the weight value corresponding to each office software required by an enterprise can be determined according to the position information corresponding to the employee to be evaluated.
203. And determining a working efficiency evaluation result corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the determined weight value and the time length information corresponding to each office software.
For the embodiment of the invention, after the preset work efficiency evaluation model determines the weight value corresponding to each office software used by the preset work efficiency evaluation model according to the position information of the employee to be evaluated, the work efficiency evaluation result corresponding to the employee to be evaluated is calculated according to the determined weight value corresponding to each office software and the duration information corresponding to each office software, so that the accuracy of the preset work efficiency evaluation model in calculating the work efficiency evaluation result can be improved.
204. And determining the work efficiency evaluation grade corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the work efficiency evaluation result and the dynamic rule.
For the embodiment of the present invention, in order to determine the dynamic rule in the preset work efficiency evaluation model, step 204 specifically includes: obtaining the work efficiency evaluation result and the classification number of each employee with the same position as the employee to be evaluated in the preset time period; and determining the dynamic rules according to the work efficiency evaluation results of all the employees and the classification numbers. Further, the determining the dynamic rule according to the work efficiency evaluation result and the classification number of each employee includes: determining the maximum value and the minimum value in the work efficiency evaluation results of all the employees; determining the dynamic rule using the classification number based on the determined maximum and minimum values. Further, the determining the dynamic rule using the classification number based on the determined maximum and minimum values includes: determining a working efficiency evaluation interval range according to the maximum value and the minimum value; determining the dynamic rule based on the determined evaluation interval range and the classification number. Based on this, the determining the work efficiency evaluation level corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the work efficiency evaluation result and the dynamic rule includes: determining each working efficiency evaluation interval based on the dynamic rule; determining a target work efficiency evaluation interval to which the work efficiency evaluation result belongs from each work efficiency evaluation interval; and determining the working efficiency evaluation grade corresponding to the employee to be evaluated based on the target working efficiency evaluation interval.
Specifically, after a work efficiency evaluation result corresponding to a staff to be evaluated is calculated by using a preset work efficiency evaluation model, the work efficiency evaluation result is input to a classifier in the preset work efficiency evaluation model for classification, namely, a work efficiency evaluation grade corresponding to the staff to be evaluated is determined, in the classification process, a work efficiency evaluation result and a classification number corresponding to each staff with the same position as the staff to be evaluated in a preset time period are obtained, wherein the classification number (the work efficiency evaluation grade number) is set by a management department in an enterprise, further, a maximum value and a minimum value in the work efficiency evaluation result corresponding to each staff are determined, a work efficiency evaluation range is determined according to the maximum value and the minimum value, and the work efficiency evaluation range is divided by using the classification number to form a plurality of work efficiency evaluation intervals, the different work efficiency evaluation intervals correspond to different work efficiency evaluation grades, for example, more than 0.9 indicates that the work efficiency is high, (0.75, 0.9) indicates that the work efficiency is high, (0.6, 0.75) indicates that the work efficiency is general, (0.45, 0.6) indicates that the work efficiency is low, and less than 0.45 indicates that the work efficiency is low, further, the work efficiency evaluation interval to which the work efficiency evaluation result of the employee to be evaluated belongs is judged, that is, the target work efficiency evaluation interval to which the work efficiency evaluation result of the employee to be evaluated belongs is determined, the target work efficiency evaluation grade corresponding to the target work efficiency evaluation interval is determined, and the target work efficiency evaluation grade is determined as the work efficiency evaluation grade corresponding to the employee to be evaluated.
Further, the work efficiency evaluation level of the employee to be evaluated, which is output by the preset work efficiency evaluation model, may be verified, specifically, the workload of the employee to be evaluated in a plurality of evaluation cycles is obtained, whether the output work efficiency evaluation level of the employee to be evaluated is reasonable is verified according to the workload of the employee to be evaluated in the plurality of evaluation cycles, for example, the workload evaluation level corresponding to the employee to be evaluated is determined to be a level a (excellent) according to the workload of the employee to be evaluated in the plurality of evaluation cycles, and then it is inferred that the work efficiency of the employee to be evaluated is high, while the work efficiency evaluation level output by the preset evaluation model is low, the result difference is large, the output result may be corrected, and at the same time, the employee to be evaluated uses the time length information and the work efficiency evaluation level of each office software in the preset time period as sample data, and training the preset evaluation model again so as to improve the evaluation precision of the preset work efficiency evaluation model and continuously perfect and optimize the model.
Compared with the mode that the management department calculates the working efficiency of the staff according to the monthly workload reported by the staff at present, the other working efficiency evaluation method provided by the embodiment of the invention can acquire the time length information of each office software used by the staff to be evaluated in a preset time period; determining a working efficiency evaluation result corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the duration information corresponding to each office software; meanwhile, according to the work efficiency evaluation result and the dynamic rule, the work efficiency evaluation level corresponding to the staff to be evaluated is determined, so that the work efficiency of the staff can be effectively evaluated, the evaluation precision of the work efficiency of the staff is improved, meanwhile, an enterprise management department can master the work state of the staff according to the work efficiency evaluation level of the staff, namely, whether the staff works seriously is known, the staff of the enterprise is effectively managed, and the overall work efficiency of the enterprise is improved.
Further, as a specific implementation of fig. 1, an embodiment of the present invention provides a work efficiency evaluation apparatus, as shown in fig. 3, the apparatus includes: an acquisition unit 31, a first determination unit 32 and a second determination unit 33.
The obtaining unit 31 may be configured to obtain time length information of the employee to be evaluated using each office software within a preset time period. The acquiring unit 31 is a main functional module in the device for acquiring time length information of each office software used by the employee to be evaluated in a preset time period.
The first determining unit 32 may be configured to determine a work efficiency evaluation result corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the duration information corresponding to each office software. The first determining unit 32 is a main functional module, which is also a core module, in the device, and determines the work efficiency evaluation result corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the duration information corresponding to each office software.
The second determining unit 33 may be configured to determine, according to the work efficiency evaluation result and the dynamic rule, a work efficiency evaluation level corresponding to the employee to be evaluated. The second determining unit 33 is a main function module, which determines the work efficiency evaluation level corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the work efficiency evaluation result and the dynamic rule in the device, and is also a core module.
For the embodiment of the present invention, in order to determine the work efficiency evaluation result corresponding to the employee to be evaluated, as shown in fig. 4, the first determining unit 32 includes: a first determination module 321 and a second determination module 322.
The first determining module 321 may be configured to determine position information corresponding to the employee to be evaluated, and determine, based on the determined position information, a weight value corresponding to the duration information of each office software.
The second determining module 322 may be configured to determine a work efficiency evaluation result corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the determined weight value and the duration information corresponding to each office software.
Further, in order to determine the dynamic rule, the second determining unit 33 includes an obtaining module 331 and a determining module 332.
The obtaining module 331 may be configured to obtain a work efficiency evaluation result and a classification number of each employee with the same position as the employee to be evaluated within the preset time period.
The determining module 332 may be configured to determine the dynamic rule according to the work efficiency evaluation result of each employee and the classification number.
Further, to determine the dynamic rule, the determination module 332 includes a first determination submodule and a second determination submodule.
The first determining submodule may be configured to determine a maximum value and a minimum value in the work efficiency evaluation results of the respective employees.
The second determining submodule may be configured to determine the dynamic rule using the classification number based on the determined maximum value and the determined minimum value.
Further, in order to determine the dynamic rule by using the classification number, the second determining submodule may be configured to determine a working efficiency evaluation interval range according to the maximum value and the minimum value; determining the dynamic rule based on the determined evaluation interval range and the classification number.
Further, in order to determine the work efficiency evaluation level corresponding to the employee to be evaluated, the determining module 332 may be specifically configured to determine each work efficiency evaluation interval based on the dynamic rule; determining a target work efficiency evaluation interval to which the work efficiency evaluation result belongs from each work efficiency evaluation interval; and determining the working efficiency evaluation grade corresponding to the employee to be evaluated based on the target working efficiency evaluation interval.
Further, in order to obtain the time length information of the employee to be evaluated using each office software within the preset time period, the obtaining unit 31 includes: an acquisition module 311 and a determination module 312.
The obtaining module 311 may be configured to obtain an operation duration of the employee to be evaluated on the active window of each office software within a preset time period.
The determining module 312 may be configured to determine the operation duration of the active window of each office software as duration information of the employee to be evaluated using each office software.
It should be noted that other corresponding descriptions of the functional modules related to the work efficiency evaluation apparatus provided in the embodiment of the present invention may refer to the corresponding description of the method shown in fig. 1, and are not described herein again.
Based on the method shown in fig. 1, correspondingly, an embodiment of the present invention further provides a computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, where the computer program, when executed by a processor, implements the following steps: acquiring time length information of each office software used by an employee to be evaluated in a preset time period; determining a working efficiency evaluation result corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the duration information corresponding to each office software; and determining the work efficiency evaluation grade corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the work efficiency evaluation result and the dynamic rule.
Based on the above embodiments of the method shown in fig. 1 and the apparatus shown in fig. 3, an embodiment of the present invention further provides an entity structure diagram of a computer device, as shown in fig. 5, where the computer device includes: a processor 41, a memory 42, and a computer program stored on the memory 42 and executable on the processor, wherein the memory 42 and the processor 41 are both arranged on a bus 43 such that when the processor 41 executes the program, the following steps are performed: acquiring time length information of each office software used by an employee to be evaluated in a preset time period; determining a working efficiency evaluation result corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the duration information corresponding to each office software; and determining the work efficiency evaluation grade corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the work efficiency evaluation result and the dynamic rule.
By the technical scheme, the time length information of each office software used by the staff to be evaluated in the preset time period can be acquired; determining a working efficiency evaluation result corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the duration information corresponding to each office software; meanwhile, according to the work efficiency evaluation result and the dynamic rule, the work efficiency evaluation level corresponding to the staff to be evaluated is determined, so that the work efficiency of the staff can be effectively evaluated, the evaluation precision of the work efficiency of the staff is improved, meanwhile, an enterprise management department can master the work state of the staff according to the work efficiency evaluation level of the staff, namely, whether the staff works seriously is known, the staff of the enterprise is effectively managed, and the overall work efficiency of the enterprise is improved.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the modules or steps of the present invention described above may be implemented by a general purpose computing device, they may be centralized on a single computing device or distributed across a network of multiple computing devices, and alternatively, they may be implemented by program code executable by a computing device, such that they may be stored in a storage device and executed by a computing device, and in some cases, the steps shown or described may be performed in an order different than that described herein, or they may be separately fabricated into individual integrated circuit modules, or multiple ones of them may be fabricated into a single integrated circuit module. Thus, the present invention is not limited to any specific combination of hardware and software.
The above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention and is not intended to limit the present invention, and various modifications and changes may be made by those skilled in the art. Any modification, equivalent replacement, or improvement made within the spirit and principle of the present invention should be included in the protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (10)
1. A method for evaluating work efficiency, comprising:
acquiring time length information of each office software used by an employee to be evaluated in a preset time period;
determining a working efficiency evaluation result corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the duration information corresponding to each office software;
and determining the work efficiency evaluation grade corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the work efficiency evaluation result and the dynamic rule.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the determining the work efficiency evaluation result corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the duration information corresponding to each office software comprises:
determining position information corresponding to the employee to be evaluated;
determining a weight value corresponding to the time length information of each office software based on the determined position information;
and determining a working efficiency evaluation result corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the determined weight value and the time length information corresponding to each office software.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the method of determining dynamic rules comprises:
obtaining the work efficiency evaluation result and the classification number of each employee with the same position as the employee to be evaluated in the preset time period;
and determining the dynamic rules according to the work efficiency evaluation results of all the employees and the classification numbers.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein said determining the dynamic rules based on the work efficiency assessment results and the classification numbers of the respective employees comprises:
determining the maximum value and the minimum value in the work efficiency evaluation results of all the employees;
determining the dynamic rule using the classification number based on the determined maximum and minimum values.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein determining the dynamic rule using the classification number based on the determined maximum and minimum values comprises:
determining a working efficiency evaluation interval range according to the maximum value and the minimum value;
determining the dynamic rule based on the determined evaluation interval range and the classification number.
6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the determining the work efficiency evaluation level corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the work efficiency evaluation result and the dynamic rule comprises:
determining each working efficiency evaluation interval based on the dynamic rule;
determining a target work efficiency evaluation interval to which the work efficiency evaluation result belongs from each work efficiency evaluation interval;
and determining the working efficiency evaluation grade corresponding to the employee to be evaluated based on the target working efficiency evaluation interval.
7. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the obtaining of the time length information of the employee to be evaluated using each office software within the preset time period comprises:
acquiring the operation duration of the staff to be evaluated on the movable window of each office software within a preset time period;
and determining the operation duration of the active window of each office software as duration information of each office software used by the staff to be evaluated.
8. An operation efficiency evaluation device characterized by comprising:
the system comprises an acquisition unit, a processing unit and a processing unit, wherein the acquisition unit is used for acquiring the time length information of each office software used by the staff to be evaluated in a preset time period;
the first determining unit is used for determining a working efficiency evaluation result corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the duration information corresponding to each office software;
and the second determining unit is used for determining the work efficiency evaluation grade corresponding to the employee to be evaluated according to the work efficiency evaluation result and the dynamic rule.
9. A computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, which, when being executed by a processor, carries out the steps of the method of any one of claims 1 to 7.
10. A computer arrangement comprising a memory, a processor and a computer program stored on the memory and executable on the processor, characterized in that the computer program realizes the steps of the method of any one of claims 1 to 7 when executed by the processor.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010793831.4A CN112132384A (en) | 2020-08-10 | 2020-08-10 | Work efficiency evaluation method and device, storage medium and computer equipment |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010793831.4A CN112132384A (en) | 2020-08-10 | 2020-08-10 | Work efficiency evaluation method and device, storage medium and computer equipment |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN112132384A true CN112132384A (en) | 2020-12-25 |
Family
ID=73851197
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010793831.4A Pending CN112132384A (en) | 2020-08-10 | 2020-08-10 | Work efficiency evaluation method and device, storage medium and computer equipment |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN112132384A (en) |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN113128835A (en) * | 2021-03-19 | 2021-07-16 | 福建省万物智联科技有限公司 | Method, device, equipment and storage medium for assisting personal work |
| CN113792981A (en) * | 2021-08-18 | 2021-12-14 | 宜卡科技(深圳)有限公司 | Efficiency statistical method, device and computer readable storage medium |
| TWI755318B (en) * | 2021-04-26 | 2022-02-11 | 和碩聯合科技股份有限公司 | Classification method and electronic apparatus |
| JP7338740B2 (en) | 2018-08-31 | 2023-09-05 | カシオ計算機株式会社 | Information processing device, personnel information management support method and program |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109146028A (en) * | 2018-08-09 | 2019-01-04 | 广东工业大学 | A kind of working efficiency assessment system and method based on wearable device |
| CN109583686A (en) * | 2018-10-15 | 2019-04-05 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Assets management method, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
| CN109583769A (en) * | 2018-12-03 | 2019-04-05 | 深圳市酷开网络科技有限公司 | Method, equipment and the storage medium of evaluation work efficiency |
| CN111159052A (en) * | 2019-12-31 | 2020-05-15 | 斑马网络技术有限公司 | Software testing efficiency evaluation method |
-
2020
- 2020-08-10 CN CN202010793831.4A patent/CN112132384A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109146028A (en) * | 2018-08-09 | 2019-01-04 | 广东工业大学 | A kind of working efficiency assessment system and method based on wearable device |
| CN109583686A (en) * | 2018-10-15 | 2019-04-05 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Assets management method, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
| CN109583769A (en) * | 2018-12-03 | 2019-04-05 | 深圳市酷开网络科技有限公司 | Method, equipment and the storage medium of evaluation work efficiency |
| CN111159052A (en) * | 2019-12-31 | 2020-05-15 | 斑马网络技术有限公司 | Software testing efficiency evaluation method |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| 曲小速: "AI.HR员工能力评测系统", 《HTTPS://MP.WEIXIN.QQ.COM/S?SRC=11&TIMESTAMP=1671662071&VER=4241&SIGNATURE=IVOGTK6NOXXVTZ4MQXWYPT2LHEIJ9KANDDTQ0GDJXU4IOV0J7RNMFMX5HP16LEWUCEPCBJEIDFJAONBZXIFMO*XG5PIWKEDXO7C3WEUVKVTPYHSACMZF3RIMC7-GRM3O&NEW=1》 * |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP7338740B2 (en) | 2018-08-31 | 2023-09-05 | カシオ計算機株式会社 | Information processing device, personnel information management support method and program |
| CN113128835A (en) * | 2021-03-19 | 2021-07-16 | 福建省万物智联科技有限公司 | Method, device, equipment and storage medium for assisting personal work |
| TWI755318B (en) * | 2021-04-26 | 2022-02-11 | 和碩聯合科技股份有限公司 | Classification method and electronic apparatus |
| CN113792981A (en) * | 2021-08-18 | 2021-12-14 | 宜卡科技(深圳)有限公司 | Efficiency statistical method, device and computer readable storage medium |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN112132384A (en) | Work efficiency evaluation method and device, storage medium and computer equipment | |
| Roldán et al. | Variance-based structural equation modeling: Guidelines for using partial least squares in information systems research | |
| DE112011100143B4 (en) | Optimize electrical power consumption in a data center | |
| CN109615129B (en) | Real estate customer transaction probability prediction method, server and computer storage medium | |
| Di et al. | Characterizing and modeling cloud applications/jobs on a Google data center | |
| CA3069908A1 (en) | Differentially private query budget refunding | |
| CN104834731A (en) | Recommendation method and device for self-media information | |
| CN113095773A (en) | Employee performance assessment method and device, storage medium and computer equipment | |
| CN110675069B (en) | Real estate industry client signing risk early warning method, server and storage medium | |
| Wang et al. | A regularized convex nonnegative matrix factorization model for signed network analysis | |
| Chen et al. | Silhouette: Efficient cloud configuration exploration for large-scale analytics | |
| CN113742069A (en) | Capacity prediction method and device based on artificial intelligence and storage medium | |
| Coulden et al. | Performance modelling of database contention using queueing petri nets | |
| Huang et al. | A comparative evaluation on the accuracies of software effort estimates from clustered data | |
| CN110287158A (en) | Monitor the method, apparatus and storage medium of distributed file system IO time delay | |
| Ichikawa et al. | Static load balancing of parallel PDE solver for distributed computing environment | |
| CN114862140A (en) | Behavior analysis-based potential evaluation method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| Masuda et al. | A statistical approach for determining release time of software system with modular structure | |
| CN115081515A (en) | Energy efficiency evaluation model construction method and device, terminal and storage medium | |
| CN109271303B (en) | Software configuration recommendation method | |
| CN107239660B (en) | Coarse set model establishing method and device based on mixed integer linear programming | |
| CN111859985A (en) | AI customer service model testing method, device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN112199269A (en) | Data processing method and related device | |
| CN110717787A (en) | User classification method and device | |
| CN113190339B (en) | Task processing method and device |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20201225 |