CN112101849B - Nuclear power station data automatic verification method, device, equipment and medium - Google Patents

Nuclear power station data automatic verification method, device, equipment and medium Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN112101849B
CN112101849B CN202010801603.7A CN202010801603A CN112101849B CN 112101849 B CN112101849 B CN 112101849B CN 202010801603 A CN202010801603 A CN 202010801603A CN 112101849 B CN112101849 B CN 112101849B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
nuclear power
power station
execution
operation instruction
result
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN202010801603.7A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN112101849A (en
Inventor
张凤斌
董永胜
李坤奇
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
China General Nuclear Power Corp
CGN Power Co Ltd
Daya Bay Nuclear Power Operations and Management Co Ltd
Lingdong Nuclear Power Co Ltd
Guangdong Nuclear Power Joint Venture Co Ltd
Lingao Nuclear Power Co Ltd
Original Assignee
China General Nuclear Power Corp
CGN Power Co Ltd
Daya Bay Nuclear Power Operations and Management Co Ltd
Lingdong Nuclear Power Co Ltd
Guangdong Nuclear Power Joint Venture Co Ltd
Lingao Nuclear Power Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by China General Nuclear Power Corp, CGN Power Co Ltd, Daya Bay Nuclear Power Operations and Management Co Ltd, Lingdong Nuclear Power Co Ltd, Guangdong Nuclear Power Joint Venture Co Ltd, Lingao Nuclear Power Co Ltd filed Critical China General Nuclear Power Corp
Priority to CN202010801603.7A priority Critical patent/CN112101849B/en
Publication of CN112101849A publication Critical patent/CN112101849A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN112101849B publication Critical patent/CN112101849B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/08Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
    • G06Q10/087Inventory or stock management, e.g. order filling, procurement or balancing against orders
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06NCOMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N3/00Computing arrangements based on biological models
    • G06N3/02Neural networks
    • G06N3/04Architecture, e.g. interconnection topology
    • G06N3/045Combinations of networks
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y04INFORMATION OR COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES HAVING AN IMPACT ON OTHER TECHNOLOGY AREAS
    • Y04SSYSTEMS INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO POWER NETWORK OPERATION, COMMUNICATION OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING THE ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION, MANAGEMENT OR USAGE, i.e. SMART GRIDS
    • Y04S10/00Systems supporting electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
    • Y04S10/50Systems or methods supporting the power network operation or management, involving a certain degree of interaction with the load-side end user applications

Abstract

The invention relates to the field of intelligent storage of nuclear power stations, and discloses a method, a device, equipment and a medium for automatically verifying data of a nuclear power station, wherein the method comprises the following steps: the method comprises the steps of converting a nuclear power station warehousing operation instruction into a nuclear power station management operation instruction by receiving the nuclear power station warehousing operation instruction from a nuclear power station intelligent warehousing system, and sending the nuclear power station warehousing operation instruction to a nuclear power station management system; receiving an execution result which comprises an execution result identifier and an execution log record and is fed back by a nuclear power station management system; inputting the nuclear power station warehouse operation instruction and the execution log record into a nuclear power station data automatic verification model, and verifying the execution log record according to the nuclear power station warehouse operation instruction to obtain a verification result; if the execution result identification and the check result are both successful, determining that the check result of the execution result is successful, and sending an execution success instruction. The invention realizes the effect of double check through log record check and improves the correctness and reliability of the data execution of the nuclear power station.

Description

Nuclear power station data automatic verification method, device, equipment and medium
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of intelligent storage of nuclear power stations, in particular to a method, a device, equipment and a medium for automatically verifying data of a nuclear power station.
Background
At present, the problem of data transmission failure and error exists in data butt joint between a nuclear power station intelligent storage system and a nuclear power station management system, repeated operation can occur once the problem of data transmission failure or error occurs, so that data difference between the two systems is caused, for example, the nuclear power station intelligent storage system sends posting operation data to the nuclear power station management system, the nuclear power station intelligent storage system does not receive an execution result fed back by executing the posting operation data for a long time, thereby determining that execution fails, sending posting operation data to the nuclear power station management system again, and the nuclear power station management system has already executed the posting operation data, receives the posting operation data again and causes inconsistent accounting data between the two systems.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention provides a method, a device, equipment and a medium for automatically checking data of a nuclear power station, which achieve the effect of double check through log record check, ensure that the storage operation instruction of the nuclear power station of an intelligent storage system of the nuclear power station is correctly executed, avoid the loss of execution, improve the correctness and reliability of the execution of the data of the nuclear power station, greatly reduce the manual check cost and further reduce the operation cost of the nuclear power station.
An automatic verification method for nuclear power station data comprises the following steps:
receiving a nuclear power station warehousing operation instruction from a nuclear power station intelligent warehousing system, converting the nuclear power station warehousing operation instruction into a nuclear power station management operation instruction, and sending the nuclear power station management operation instruction to a nuclear power station management system;
after receiving a successful receiving instruction fed back by the nuclear power station management system aiming at the nuclear power station management operation instruction, waiting for an execution result fed back by the nuclear power station management system aiming at the nuclear power station management operation instruction; the execution result comprises an execution result identifier and an execution log record;
receiving an execution result fed back by the nuclear power station management system;
inputting the nuclear power station warehouse operation instruction and the execution log record into a nuclear power station data automatic verification model, and checking the execution log record according to the nuclear power station warehouse operation instruction through the nuclear power station data automatic verification model to obtain a checking result output by the nuclear power station data automatic verification model;
and if the execution result identification and the check result are both successful in execution, determining that the check result of the execution result is successful, and sending an execution success instruction aiming at the nuclear power station warehousing operation instruction to the nuclear power station intelligent warehousing system.
An automatic nuclear power station data verification device, comprising:
the receiving module is used for receiving a nuclear power station warehousing operation instruction from the intelligent nuclear power station warehousing system, converting the nuclear power station warehousing operation instruction into a nuclear power station management operation instruction, and sending the nuclear power station management operation instruction to the nuclear power station management system;
the waiting module is used for waiting for an execution result fed back by the nuclear power station management system aiming at the nuclear power station management operation instruction after receiving a successful receiving instruction fed back by the nuclear power station management system aiming at the nuclear power station management operation instruction; the execution result comprises an execution result identifier and an execution log record;
the execution result module is used for receiving an execution result fed back by the nuclear power station management system;
the checking module is used for inputting the nuclear power station storage operation instruction and the execution log record into a nuclear power station data automatic checking model, checking the execution log record according to the nuclear power station storage operation instruction through the nuclear power station data automatic checking model, and obtaining a checking result output by the nuclear power station data automatic checking model;
and the determining module is used for determining that the verification result of the execution result is successful if the execution result identification and the verification result are both successful, and sending an execution success instruction aiming at the nuclear power station storage operation instruction to the nuclear power station intelligent storage system.
A computer device comprising a memory, a processor and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, the processor implementing the steps of the above-described nuclear power plant data auto-verification method when the computer program is executed.
A computer readable storage medium storing a computer program which when executed by a processor performs the steps of the above-described nuclear power plant data automatic verification method.
According to the automatic verification method, the automatic verification device, the automatic verification equipment and the automatic verification medium for the nuclear power station data, the nuclear power station storage operation instruction is converted into the nuclear power station management operation instruction by receiving the nuclear power station storage operation instruction from the intelligent storage system of the nuclear power station, and the nuclear power station management operation instruction is sent to the nuclear power station management system; after receiving a successful receiving instruction fed back by the nuclear power station management system aiming at the nuclear power station management operation instruction, waiting for an execution result fed back by the nuclear power station management system aiming at the nuclear power station management operation instruction; the execution result comprises an execution result identifier and an execution log record; receiving an execution result fed back by the nuclear power station management system; inputting the nuclear power station warehouse operation instruction and the execution log record into a nuclear power station data automatic verification model, and checking the execution log record according to the nuclear power station warehouse operation instruction through the nuclear power station data automatic verification model to obtain a checking result output by the nuclear power station data automatic verification model; if the execution result identification and the checking result are both successful in execution, the checking result of the execution result is determined to be successful, and an execution success instruction aiming at the nuclear power station storage operation instruction is sent to the nuclear power station intelligent storage system.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention, the drawings that are needed in the description of the embodiments of the present invention will be briefly described below, it being obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present invention, and that other drawings may be obtained according to these drawings without inventive effort for a person skilled in the art.
FIG. 1 is a schematic view of an application environment of a method for automatically verifying nuclear power plant data according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a flow chart of a method for automatically verifying nuclear power plant data in an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 3 is a flowchart of step S40 of a method for automatically verifying nuclear power plant data according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a flowchart of step S402 of the automatic verification method of nuclear power plant data in an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a flowchart of step S403 of the automatic verification method of nuclear power plant data in an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 6 is a schematic block diagram of an automatic nuclear power plant data verification device in an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 7 is a functional block diagram of a verification module of the nuclear power plant data automatic verification device in an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 8 is a schematic block diagram of a prediction unit of the automatic nuclear power plant data verification device in an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 9 is a schematic block diagram of an alignment unit of the automatic nuclear power plant data verification device in an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram of a computer device in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
Detailed Description
The following description of the embodiments of the present invention will be made clearly and fully with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which it is evident that the embodiments described are some, but not all embodiments of the invention. All other embodiments, which can be made by those skilled in the art based on the embodiments of the invention without making any inventive effort, are intended to be within the scope of the invention.
The nuclear power station data automatic verification method provided by the invention can be applied to an application environment as shown in fig. 1, wherein a client (computer equipment) communicates with a server through a network. Among them, clients (computer devices) include, but are not limited to, personal computers, notebook computers, smartphones, tablet computers, cameras, and portable wearable devices. The server may be implemented as a stand-alone server or as a server cluster composed of a plurality of servers.
In one embodiment, as shown in fig. 2, there is provided a nuclear power plant data automatic verification method, which includes the following steps S10 to S50:
S10, receiving a nuclear power station warehousing operation instruction from a nuclear power station intelligent warehousing system, converting the nuclear power station warehousing operation instruction into a nuclear power station management operation instruction, and sending the nuclear power station management operation instruction to a nuclear power station management system.
The intelligent storage system of the nuclear power plant is a system for managing storage of the nuclear power plant, the operation instruction of the warehouse of the nuclear power plant is an instruction triggered by the intelligent storage system of the nuclear power plant operating related data in the storage, the received operation instruction of the warehouse of the nuclear power plant is converted to obtain the operation instruction of the management of the nuclear power plant corresponding to the operation instruction of the warehouse of the nuclear power plant, the operation instruction of the management of the nuclear power plant is an instruction which meets the execution requirement of the management system of the nuclear power plant and can be executed in the management system of the nuclear power plant, and the management system of the nuclear power plant is a system for managing all departments of the nuclear power plant.
S20, after receiving a successful receiving instruction fed back by the nuclear power station management system aiming at the nuclear power station management operation instruction, waiting for an execution result fed back by the nuclear power station management system aiming at the nuclear power station management operation instruction; the execution result comprises an execution result identification and an execution log record.
Understandably, after the nuclear power plant management system receives the nuclear power plant management operation instruction, the nuclear power plant management system feeds back the reception success instruction to a nuclear power plant server, and after the nuclear power plant server receives the reception success instruction, the nuclear power plant management system waits for an execution result fed back after executing the nuclear power plant management operation instruction, where the execution result includes an execution result identifier and an execution log record, the execution result identifier includes an execution result identifier that is an execution success and an execution result identifier that is an execution failure, the execution result identifier indicates whether the nuclear power plant management system has executed all identifiers corresponding to the nuclear power plant management operation instruction, and the execution log record is a record of each execution action performed by the nuclear power plant management system in the process of executing the nuclear power plant management operation instruction.
In an embodiment, after the step S20, that is, after the waiting for the execution result of the feedback of the operation instruction of the nuclear power plant management system for the nuclear power plant management, the method further includes:
s201, if the execution result identification is not received and the execution log record is received within a preset time period, inputting the nuclear power plant storage operation instruction and the execution log record into a nuclear power plant data automatic verification model, and checking the execution log record according to the nuclear power plant storage operation instruction through the nuclear power plant data automatic verification model to obtain a checking result output by the nuclear power plant data automatic verification model.
Understandably, the preset time period may be set according to the requirement, for example, the preset time period is 3, 4 or 5 seconds, and when the execution result identifier is not received but the execution log record is received in the preset time period, the operation instruction and the execution log record are input into the automatic verification model of the nuclear power plant data, and the automatic verification model of the nuclear power plant data performs splitting and prediction on the operation instruction of the nuclear power plant and log splitting on the execution log record, and then checks the operation instruction of the nuclear power plant against the execution log record to obtain the check result, where the check result includes a result that the check result is that the execution is successful and the check result is that the execution fails, and the check result characterizes whether the operation instruction of the nuclear power plant warehouse matches with the execution log record.
S202, if the checking result is that the execution is successful, an execution success instruction aiming at the nuclear power station warehousing operation instruction is sent to the intelligent warehousing system of the nuclear power station.
And when the checking result is that the execution is successful, an execution success instruction aiming at the nuclear power station storage operation instruction is sent to the nuclear power station intelligent storage system, wherein the execution success instruction characterizes that the nuclear power station management system has already executed the nuclear power station storage operation instruction, so that the checking result is automatically identified by checking the execution log record through the automatic nuclear power station data checking model after receiving the execution log record in a preset time period, and according to the checking result, whether the execution success instruction is sent is determined, the execution efficiency is improved, and the cost of manual checking is reduced.
The invention provides a method for checking the execution log record according to the storage operation instruction of the nuclear power station through the automatic nuclear power station data checking model when the execution result identifier is not received but the execution log record is received within a preset time period, so as to obtain a checking result; if the checking result is that the execution is successful, an execution success instruction aiming at the nuclear power station storage operation instruction is sent to the nuclear power station intelligent storage system, and the execution of the nuclear power station storage operation instruction is completed, so that the automatic checking of whether the execution is successful or not through a nuclear power station data automatic checking model and the output of the checking result are realized when only the execution log record is received in a preset time period, whether the execution success instruction is sent or not is determined according to the checking result, the execution efficiency is improved, and the cost of manual checking is reduced.
In an embodiment, after the step S201, that is, after the obtaining the verification result output by the automatic verification model of nuclear power plant data, the method further includes:
and S203, if the checking result is that the execution fails, retransmitting the nuclear power station management operation instruction to the nuclear power station management system.
Understandably, when the verification result is that the execution fails, the nuclear power plant management operation instruction is resent to the nuclear power plant management system, which characterizes that the nuclear power plant management operation instruction is not completely executed in the nuclear power plant management system and needs to be re-executed.
In this way, the invention provides that if the execution result identification is inconsistent with the checking result and the checking result is the execution failure, the nuclear power station management operation instruction is resent to the nuclear power station management system, so that the condition that the nuclear power station management system does not execute the nuclear power station management operation instruction is avoided.
In an embodiment, after the step S203, that is, after retransmitting the nuclear power plant management operation instruction to the nuclear power plant management system, the method includes:
s2031, receiving a re-execution result fed back by the nuclear power station management system; the re-execution result is that the nuclear power plant management system acquires an interrupt event corresponding to the nuclear power plant management operation instruction according to the re-sent nuclear power plant management operation instruction, performs exception correction on the interrupt event and the re-sent nuclear power plant management operation instruction, generates a corrected nuclear power plant management operation instruction corresponding to the re-sent nuclear power plant management operation instruction, and executes a feedback result after the corrected nuclear power plant management operation instruction; the re-execution result comprises a re-execution result identification and a re-execution log record.
Understandably, the interrupt event is an interrupt request that causes execution failure in the process of executing the history of the nuclear power plant management operation instruction by the nuclear power plant management system, the interrupt event and the retransmitted nuclear power plant management operation instruction are subjected to exception correction, a corrected nuclear power plant management operation instruction corresponding to the retransmitted nuclear power plant management operation instruction is generated, that is, an exception code of the interrupt event is identified, a correction code matched with the exception code is obtained, the correction code is combined with the retransmitted nuclear power plant management operation instruction, the corrected nuclear power plant management operation instruction is generated, the occurrence of the interrupt event can be avoided after the corrected nuclear power plant management operation instruction is executed by the nuclear power plant management operation instruction, the problem of execution failure is solved, and the problem of the execution failure is solved.
S2032, inputting the re-sent nuclear power station warehousing operation instruction and the re-execution log record into a nuclear power station data re-automatic verification model, and checking the re-execution log record according to the re-sent nuclear power station warehousing operation instruction through the nuclear power station data re-automatic verification model to obtain a re-check result output by the nuclear power station data re-automatic verification model.
Understandably, the nuclear power station data re-automatic verification model splits and predicts the re-sent nuclear power station storage operation instruction, splits the re-execution log record, and then checks the re-sent nuclear power station storage operation instruction against the re-execution log record to obtain the re-verification result, wherein the re-verification result comprises a re-verification result which is an execution success and a re-verification result which is an execution failure, and the verification result represents a result whether the re-sent nuclear power station storage operation instruction is matched with the re-execution log record.
S2033, if the re-execution result identification and the re-checking result are both successful in execution, determining that the re-checking result of the re-execution result is successful, and sending a re-execution success instruction for the re-sent nuclear power station warehousing operation instruction to the nuclear power station intelligent warehousing system.
Understandably, if both the re-execution result identifier and the re-checking result include execution success, determining that the checking result of the re-execution result is successful, where the re-checking result indicates that the nuclear power plant management system has executed the re-sent nuclear power plant warehousing operation instruction, and the nuclear power plant server sends the re-execution success instruction to the nuclear power plant intelligent warehousing system.
In this way, the re-execution result fed back by the nuclear power station management system is received, and is the result of the nuclear power station management system executing after the corrected nuclear power station management operation instruction generated by carrying out exception correction according to the re-sent nuclear power station management operation instruction and the interrupt event, and then the nuclear power station data is checked by the re-automatic check model, and whether the re-sent nuclear power station storage operation instruction is executed again is determined according to the re-execution result identification and the re-check result, so that the automatic correction of the re-sent nuclear power station storage operation instruction is realized, and meanwhile, the effect of double check is achieved through re-log record check, the correct execution of the re-sent nuclear power station storage operation instruction is ensured, the execution loss is avoided, the accuracy and the reliability of the nuclear power station data execution are improved, the manual correction and check cost is greatly reduced, and the operation cost of the nuclear power station is further reduced.
S30, receiving an execution result fed back by the nuclear power station management system.
Understandably, the monitoring is performed on the nuclear power plant management operation instruction, and after the execution result fed back by the nuclear power plant management system on the nuclear power plant management operation instruction is monitored, the execution result is received.
In an embodiment, in the step S30, that is, the receiving the execution result fed back by the nuclear power plant management system includes:
s301, acquiring time for receiving the execution result, and determining the time as receiving time.
Understandably, the time when the execution result is received is marked as the reception time.
S302, storing the execution log record, and associating the execution log record with the receiving time.
Understandably, the execution log record is stored in a database in association with the time of receipt.
In this way, the present invention provides a storage manner of log records associated with the receiving time, so as to provide the latest execution log record subsequently.
The invention provides a storage mode of log records and receiving time association, which aims at providing the latest execution log records subsequently.
S40, inputting the nuclear power station warehouse operation instruction and the execution log record into a nuclear power station data automatic verification model, and checking the execution log record according to the nuclear power station warehouse operation instruction through the nuclear power station data automatic verification model to obtain a checking result output by the nuclear power station data automatic verification model.
The method comprises the steps of inputting a nuclear power station warehousing operation instruction and an execution log record into a nuclear power station data automatic verification model, splitting and predicting the nuclear power station warehousing operation instruction, splitting the execution log record, checking the execution log record by the nuclear power station warehousing operation instruction to obtain a checking result, wherein the checking result comprises a result that the checking result is successful in execution and a result that the checking result is failed in execution, and the checking result represents whether the nuclear power station warehousing operation instruction is matched with the execution log record or not.
In an embodiment, as shown in fig. 3, in step S40, that is, the step of checking the execution log record according to the storage operation instruction of the nuclear power plant by the automatic calibration model of the nuclear power plant data, obtaining a check result output by the automatic calibration model of the nuclear power plant data includes:
s401, splitting the storage operation instruction of the nuclear power station through a nuclear power station parameter splitting module to obtain a plurality of operation step instructions; the nuclear power station parameter splitting module is used for splitting the log of the execution log to obtain a plurality of execution step logs; the automatic nuclear power station data verification model comprises a nuclear power station parameter splitting module, a nuclear power station prediction module and a nuclear power station comparison module.
Understandably, the nuclear power plant parameter splitting module splits the nuclear power plant storage operation instruction, that is, the nuclear power plant parameter splitting module identifies a start character string and an end character string in the nuclear power plant storage operation instruction, wherein the start character string is a character string at the beginning of the operation step instruction, the end character string is a character string at the end of the operation step instruction, the start character string and the end character string are a plurality of preset character strings, and the content between the start character string and the next end character string adjacent to the start character string is determined as the operation step instruction.
The method comprises the steps that log splitting is carried out on an execution log through a nuclear power station parameter splitting module, namely the nuclear power station parameter splitting module is used for identifying a preset starting sentence and a preset ending sentence in the execution log, wherein the starting sentence is a fixed sentence written before an operation step instruction is executed, the starting sentence is used for indicating that the operation step instruction is executed, the ending sentence is a fixed sentence written after the operation step instruction is executed, the ending sentence is used for indicating that the operation step instruction is executed, and the content between the starting sentence and the next ending sentence adjacent to the starting sentence is determined to be the execution step log.
S402, performing code prediction on each operation step instruction through the nuclear power station prediction module to obtain a predicted code record corresponding to each operation step instruction.
The method comprises the steps of carrying out statement splitting on the operation step instruction, carrying out execution code prediction on each split statement by the nuclear power station prediction module, predicting the execution code into an execution code template corresponding to the operation step instruction, combining the split statements according to a combination mode of the execution codes to obtain a plurality of combined codes, carrying out prediction processing on each combined code to obtain execution data with the highest confidence value, combining the execution data with the identified execution code template, and generating a prediction code record corresponding to the operation step instruction, thereby obtaining the prediction code records corresponding to all the operation step instructions.
In an embodiment, as shown in fig. 4, in step S402, that is, performing, by the nuclear power plant prediction module, code prediction on each operation step instruction to obtain a predicted code record corresponding to each operation step instruction includes:
S4021, carrying out statement splitting on the operation step instruction through the nuclear power station prediction module to obtain statement steps and statement data.
Understandably, the statement is split into component parts for identifying each statement in the operation step instruction, identifying the statement step and the statement data, dividing the identified statement step and the statement data, wherein the statement step is a statement related to execution logic in the operation step instruction, the statement data is an execution object in the operation step instruction, such as a statement in which the statement step is a select part in an SQL statement, a statement in an update part, and the like, and the statement data is a statement in a where the window part in the SQL statement, and the like.
S4022, inquiring an execution code template corresponding to the statement step from the nuclear power station prediction module, and predicting the statement data and the statement step through the nuclear power station prediction module to obtain execution data.
The execution code template is a general template written according to each sentence step and corresponding to each sentence step one by one, the execution code template corresponding to the sentence step is searched according to the sentence step, the execution code template comprises basic code content, meanwhile, the sentence data and the sentence step are predicted, the prediction is to combine the sentence data and the sentence step according to a combination mode of the execution codes to obtain a plurality of combination codes, and the combination codes are subjected to prediction processing (namely, a convolution process in a neural network) to obtain execution data with the highest confidence value.
S4023, combining the queried execution code template with the execution data through the nuclear power station prediction module to obtain the prediction code record corresponding to the operation step instruction.
Understandably, the nuclear power plant prediction module combines (merges) the execution code template with the execution data, that is, inserts the execution data into a blank area in the execution code template, thereby obtaining the prediction code record corresponding to the operation step instruction one-to-one.
According to the invention, statement steps and statement data are split by the statement of the operation step instruction through the nuclear power station prediction module; inquiring an execution code template corresponding to the statement step, and simultaneously predicting the statement data and the statement step to obtain execution data; and combining the execution code template with the execution data to obtain the corresponding prediction code record, so that the method for predicting the code record is provided, and the efficiency and the accuracy are improved for subsequent verification.
S403, inputting each prediction code record and each execution step log into the nuclear power station comparison module, and matching the similarity value of each prediction code record and each execution step log through the nuclear power station comparison module to obtain the maximum similarity value corresponding to each prediction code record; the maximum similarity value refers to the maximum value in the similarity value between the predicted code record and each execution step log.
As can be appreciated, the nuclear power plant comparison module is a trained deep neural network model, and the network structure of the nuclear power plant comparison module may be set according to requirements, for example, the network structure of the nuclear power plant comparison module is a network structure of a Word2vec model, and preferably, the nuclear power plant comparison module is a Word2vec model based on a cosine similarity algorithm, and calculates a similarity value between each predicted code record and each execution step log through the cosine similarity algorithm, so as to obtain a maximum similarity value of each predicted code record, where the maximum similarity value refers to the maximum value in the similarity values of the predicted code record and each execution step log.
In an embodiment, as shown in fig. 5, in step S403, that is, the matching, by the nuclear power plant comparison module, the similarity value between each of the prediction code records and each of the execution step logs, to obtain a maximum similarity value corresponding to each of the prediction code records includes:
s4031, obtaining similarity values of each prediction code record and each execution step log through the nuclear power station comparison module according to a cosine similarity algorithm.
The cosine similarity algorithm is to calculate the cosine distance (i.e. cosine similarity) between two texts or sentences, the process of the cosine similarity algorithm includes word segmentation, word frequency calculation, word vector calculation, and calculation of the cosine distance between each other according to the word vector, and the prediction code record is traversed through all the execution step logs by the cosine similarity algorithm to obtain the similarity value of the prediction code record and each execution step log.
S4032, obtaining the maximum value of all the similarity values corresponding to the predicted code records, and determining the similarity value corresponding to the obtained maximum value as the maximum similarity value of the predicted code records.
It is understood that, after traversing all the execution step logs and obtaining the similarity values of the prediction code records and each of the execution step logs, obtaining the largest value of the similarity values of the prediction code records and each of the execution step logs, the largest value is marked as the largest similarity value of the prediction code records, and the largest similarity value indicates the most similar degree of the prediction code records in the execution step logs.
According to the invention, the similarity value of each prediction code record and each execution step log is obtained through the nuclear power station comparison module according to a cosine similarity algorithm; and the maximum similarity value is obtained, so that the maximum similarity value of each predicted code record is obtained through cosine similarity calculation, and the checking accuracy is improved.
S404, determining the checking result according to the maximum similarity value recorded by each prediction code.
It is to be understood that the determination may be set according to the need, for example, the determination may be made according to whether the average value of all the maximum similarity values is greater than a preset threshold value, the determination may be made according to whether each of the maximum similarity values is greater than a preset threshold value, the determination may be made according to the check result, or the determination may be made according to the ratio of the number of the maximum similarity values greater than a preset threshold value, the determination may be made according to the ratio of the number of the maximum similarity values, the determination may be made according to the comparison result, for example: if the number proportion of more than 90% in all the maximum similarity values is more than 80%, the check result is determined to be successful in execution.
Wherein the check result includes execution success and execution failure.
The invention realizes the splitting of the storage operation instruction of the nuclear power station through the nuclear power station parameter splitting module to obtain a plurality of operation step instructions; the nuclear power station parameter splitting module is used for splitting the log of the execution log to obtain a plurality of execution step logs; performing code prediction on each operation step instruction through the nuclear power station prediction module to obtain a predicted code record corresponding to each operation step instruction; inputting each prediction code record and each execution step log into the nuclear power station comparison module, and matching the similarity value of each prediction code record and each execution step log through the nuclear power station comparison module to obtain the maximum similarity value corresponding to each prediction code record; and determining the checking result according to the maximum similarity value of each predicted code record, so that the predicted code records are obtained by splitting and predicting the code of the checking station storage operation instruction, the execution step logs are obtained by splitting the execution logs, and the checking result is determined according to the predicted code records and the similarity value of the execution step logs, thereby improving the checking efficiency and the preparation rate and the checking accuracy and the checking reliability.
S50, if the execution result identification and the check result are both successful in execution, determining that the check result of the execution result is successful, and sending an execution success instruction aiming at the nuclear power station storage operation instruction to the nuclear power station intelligent storage system.
Understandably, if the execution result identifier and the verification result both include execution success, determining that the verification result of the execution result is successful, where the verification result indicates that the nuclear power plant management system has executed the storage operation instruction of the nuclear power plant, and the nuclear power plant server sends the execution success instruction to the intelligent storage system of the nuclear power plant.
According to the invention, the nuclear power station warehouse operation instruction is converted into a nuclear power station management operation instruction by receiving the nuclear power station warehouse operation instruction from the intelligent nuclear power station warehouse system, and the nuclear power station management operation instruction is sent to a nuclear power station management system; after receiving a successful receiving instruction fed back by the nuclear power station management system aiming at the nuclear power station management operation instruction, waiting for an execution result fed back by the nuclear power station management system aiming at the nuclear power station management operation instruction; receiving an execution result fed back by the nuclear power station management system; the execution result comprises an execution result identifier and an execution log record; inputting the nuclear power station warehouse operation instruction and the execution log record into a nuclear power station data automatic verification model, and checking the execution log record according to the nuclear power station warehouse operation instruction through the nuclear power station data automatic verification model to obtain a checking result output by the nuclear power station data automatic verification model; and if the execution result identification and the check result are both successful in execution, determining that the check result of the execution result is successful, and sending an execution success instruction aiming at the nuclear power station warehousing operation instruction to the nuclear power station intelligent warehousing system.
Therefore, the invention realizes that the checking result is obtained by checking the storage operation instruction of the nuclear power plant and the execution log record, and then the storage operation instruction of the nuclear power plant of the intelligent storage system of the nuclear power plant is confirmed to be completed according to the successful execution of the execution result identification and the checking result, and the dual checking effect is achieved by checking the log record, thereby ensuring the correct execution of the storage operation instruction of the nuclear power plant of the intelligent storage system of the nuclear power plant, avoiding the loss of execution, improving the accuracy and the reliability of the execution of the data of the nuclear power plant, greatly reducing the manual checking cost and further reducing the operation cost of the nuclear power plant.
In an embodiment, after the step S40, that is, after the obtaining the verification result output by the automatic verification model of nuclear power plant data, the method further includes:
s60, if the execution result identification and the check result are both execution failures, determining that the check result of the execution result is failure, and retransmitting the nuclear power station management operation instruction to the nuclear power station management system.
Understandably, if the execution result identifier and the verification result are both execution failures, marking the verification result of the execution result as failure, and retransmitting the nuclear power plant management operation instruction to the nuclear power plant management system.
Therefore, the invention realizes that the situation that the nuclear power station management system does not execute the nuclear power station management operation instruction is avoided by determining that the verification result of the execution result is failed and resending the nuclear power station management operation instruction to the nuclear power station management system if the execution result identifier and the verification result both contain the execution failure.
In an embodiment, after the step S40, that is, after the obtaining the verification result output by the automatic verification model of nuclear power plant data, the method further includes:
s70, if the execution result identification is inconsistent with the verification result, and the verification result is successful in execution, determining the verification result as successful, and sending an execution success instruction aiming at the nuclear power station storage operation instruction to the nuclear power station intelligent storage system.
Understandably, if the execution result identifier is inconsistent with the verification result, and the verification result is execution success, that is, the execution result identifier is execution failure and the verification result is execution success, the verification result of the execution result is marked as success, and the nuclear power station server sends the execution success instruction to the nuclear power station intelligent warehousing system.
Therefore, the invention realizes that when the execution result identification is inconsistent with the check result and the check result is successful, the check result is determined to be successful, and the successful execution is determined according to the log record in the execution process of the nuclear power station management system, so that the repeated execution of the nuclear power station management system is avoided.
In an embodiment, after the step S40, that is, after the obtaining the verification result output by the automatic verification model of nuclear power plant data, the method further includes:
s80, if the execution result identification is inconsistent with the checking result, and the checking result is that the execution fails, retransmitting the nuclear power station management operation instruction to the nuclear power station management system.
Understandably, if the execution result identifier is inconsistent with the verification result, and the verification result is execution failure, that is, the execution result identifier is execution success and the verification result is execution failure, marking the verification result of the execution result as failure, and retransmitting the nuclear power plant management operation instruction to the nuclear power plant management system.
In this way, the invention provides that if the execution result identification is inconsistent with the checking result and the checking result is the execution failure, the nuclear power station management operation instruction is resent to the nuclear power station management system, so that the condition that the nuclear power station management system does not execute the nuclear power station management operation instruction is avoided.
It should be understood that the sequence number of each step in the foregoing embodiment does not mean that the execution sequence of each process should be determined by the function and the internal logic, and should not limit the implementation process of the embodiment of the present invention.
In an embodiment, a device for automatically verifying data of a nuclear power plant is provided, where the device for automatically verifying data of a nuclear power plant corresponds to the method for automatically verifying data of a nuclear power plant in one-to-one correspondence. As shown in fig. 6, the nuclear power plant data automatic verification device includes a receiving module 11, a waiting module 12, an execution result module 13, a verification module 14, and a determination module 15. The functional modules are described in detail as follows:
the receiving module 11 is configured to receive a storage operation instruction of a nuclear power plant from an intelligent storage system of the nuclear power plant, convert the storage operation instruction of the nuclear power plant into a management operation instruction of a nuclear power plant, and send the management operation instruction of the nuclear power plant to a management system of the nuclear power plant;
a waiting module 12, configured to wait for an execution result fed back by the nuclear power plant management system for the nuclear power plant management operation instruction after receiving a reception success instruction fed back by the nuclear power plant management system for the nuclear power plant management operation instruction; the execution result comprises an execution result identifier and an execution log record;
An execution result module 13, configured to receive an execution result fed back by the nuclear power station management system;
the checking module 14 is configured to input the operation instruction of the nuclear power plant warehouse and the execution log record into a nuclear power plant data automatic checking model, and check the execution log record according to the operation instruction of the nuclear power plant warehouse through the nuclear power plant data automatic checking model to obtain a checking result output by the nuclear power plant data automatic checking model;
and the determining module 15 is configured to determine that the verification result of the execution result is successful if the execution result identifier and the verification result are both successful, and send an execution success instruction for the nuclear power station warehousing operation instruction to the intelligent warehousing system of the nuclear power station.
In one embodiment, as shown in fig. 7, the collation module 14 comprises:
an input unit 41, configured to split the storage operation instruction of the nuclear power plant through a parameter splitting module of the nuclear power plant to obtain a plurality of operation step instructions; the nuclear power station parameter splitting module is used for splitting the log of the execution log to obtain a plurality of execution step logs; the nuclear power plant data automatic verification model comprises a nuclear power plant parameter splitting module, a nuclear power plant prediction module and a nuclear power plant comparison module;
The prediction unit 42 is configured to perform code prediction on each operation step instruction by using the nuclear power station prediction module, so as to obtain a predicted code record corresponding to each operation step instruction;
the comparison unit 43 is configured to input each prediction code record and each execution step log into the nuclear power plant comparison module, and match a similarity value between each prediction code record and each execution step log through the nuclear power plant comparison module, so as to obtain a maximum similarity value corresponding to each prediction code record; the maximum similarity value refers to the maximum value in the similarity value between the predicted code record and each execution step log;
and an output unit 44 for determining the collation result based on the maximum similarity value of each of the prediction code records.
In one embodiment, as shown in fig. 8, the prediction unit 42 includes:
a splitting subunit 421, configured to split the statement of the operation step instruction by using the nuclear power station prediction module, so as to obtain a statement step and statement data;
an obtaining subunit 422, configured to obtain an execution code template corresponding to the statement step, and predict the statement data through the nuclear power station prediction module to obtain execution data;
And the combining subunit 423 is configured to obtain the predicted code record corresponding to the operation step instruction by combining the execution code template with the execution data.
In one embodiment, as shown in fig. 9, the alignment unit 43 includes:
a computing subunit 431, configured to obtain, according to a cosine similarity algorithm, a similarity value between each of the prediction code records and each of the execution step logs through the nuclear power plant comparison module;
a determining subunit 432, configured to obtain a maximum value of all the similarity values corresponding to the predicted code records, and determine the similarity value corresponding to the obtained maximum value as the maximum similarity value of the predicted code record.
The specific limitation of the automatic verification device for the data of the nuclear power plant can be referred to as the limitation of the automatic verification method for the data of the nuclear power plant in the above description, and the description is omitted here. All or part of each module in the automatic nuclear power station data verification device can be realized by software, hardware and a combination thereof. The above modules may be embedded in hardware or may be independent of a processor in the computer device, or may be stored in software in a memory in the computer device, so that the processor may call and execute operations corresponding to the above modules.
In one embodiment, a computer device is provided, which may be a terminal, and an internal structure diagram thereof may be as shown in fig. 10. The computer device includes a processor, a memory, a network interface, a display screen, and an input device connected by a system bus. Wherein the processor of the computer device is configured to provide computing and control capabilities. The memory of the computer device includes a non-volatile storage medium and an internal memory. The non-volatile storage medium stores an operating system and a computer program. The internal memory provides an environment for the operation of the operating system and computer programs in the non-volatile storage media. The network interface of the computer device is for communicating with an external server via a network connection. The computer program, when executed by the processor, implements a method for automatically verifying nuclear power plant data.
In one embodiment, a computer device is provided, including a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored on the memory and executable on the processor, where the processor executes the computer program to implement the method for automatically verifying nuclear power plant data in the above embodiment.
In one embodiment, a computer readable storage medium is provided, on which a computer program is stored, which when executed by a processor, implements the method for automatically verifying nuclear power plant data in the above embodiment.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that implementing all or part of the above described methods may be accomplished by way of a computer program stored on a non-transitory computer readable storage medium, which when executed, may comprise the steps of the embodiments of the methods described above. Any reference to memory, storage, database, or other medium used in embodiments provided herein may include non-volatile and/or volatile memory. The nonvolatile memory can include Read Only Memory (ROM), programmable ROM (PROM), electrically Programmable ROM (EPROM), electrically Erasable Programmable ROM (EEPROM), or flash memory. Volatile memory can include Random Access Memory (RAM) or external cache memory. By way of illustration and not limitation, RAM is available in a variety of forms such as Static RAM (SRAM), dynamic RAM (DRAM), synchronous DRAM (SDRAM), double Data Rate SDRAM (DDRSDRAM), enhanced SDRAM (ESDRAM), synchronous Link DRAM (SLDRAM), memory bus direct RAM (RDRAM), direct memory bus dynamic RAM (DRDRAM), and memory bus dynamic RAM (RDRAM), among others.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that, for convenience and brevity of description, only the above-described division of the functional units and modules is illustrated, and in practical application, the above-described functional distribution may be performed by different functional units and modules according to needs, i.e. the internal structure of the apparatus is divided into different functional units or modules to perform all or part of the above-described functions.
The above embodiments are only for illustrating the technical solution of the present invention, and not for limiting the same; although the invention has been described in detail with reference to the foregoing embodiments, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that: the technical scheme described in the foregoing embodiments can be modified or some technical features thereof can be replaced by equivalents; such modifications and substitutions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention, and are intended to be included in the scope of the present invention.

Claims (10)

1. An automatic verification method for nuclear power station data is characterized by comprising the following steps:
receiving a nuclear power station warehousing operation instruction from a nuclear power station intelligent warehousing system, converting the nuclear power station warehousing operation instruction into a nuclear power station management operation instruction, and sending the nuclear power station management operation instruction to a nuclear power station management system;
After receiving a successful receiving instruction fed back by the nuclear power station management system aiming at the nuclear power station management operation instruction, waiting for an execution result fed back by the nuclear power station management system aiming at the nuclear power station management operation instruction; the execution result comprises an execution result identifier and an execution log record;
receiving an execution result fed back by the nuclear power station management system;
inputting the nuclear power station warehouse operation instruction and the execution log record into a nuclear power station data automatic verification model, and checking the execution log record according to the nuclear power station warehouse operation instruction through the nuclear power station data automatic verification model to obtain a checking result output by the nuclear power station data automatic verification model;
if the execution result identification and the check result are both successful in execution, determining that the check result of the execution result is successful, and sending an execution success instruction aiming at the nuclear power station storage operation instruction to the nuclear power station intelligent storage system;
the step of checking the execution log record according to the storage operation instruction of the nuclear power station through the automatic nuclear power station data checking model to obtain a checking result output by the automatic nuclear power station data checking model comprises the following steps:
Splitting the nuclear power station storage operation instruction through a nuclear power station parameter splitting module to obtain a plurality of operation step instructions; the nuclear power station parameter splitting module is used for splitting the log of the execution log to obtain a plurality of execution step logs; the nuclear power plant data automatic verification model comprises a nuclear power plant parameter splitting module, a nuclear power plant prediction module and a nuclear power plant comparison module;
performing code prediction on each operation step instruction through the nuclear power station prediction module to obtain a predicted code record corresponding to each operation step instruction;
inputting each prediction code record and each execution step log into the nuclear power station comparison module, and matching the similarity value of each prediction code record and each execution step log through the nuclear power station comparison module to obtain the maximum similarity value corresponding to each prediction code record; the maximum similarity value refers to the maximum value in the similarity value between the predicted code record and each execution step log;
determining the checking result according to the maximum similarity value of each prediction code record;
performing code prediction on each operation step instruction by the nuclear power station prediction module to obtain a predicted code record corresponding to each operation step instruction, where the predicting includes:
Statement splitting is carried out on the operation step instruction through the nuclear power station prediction module, so that statement steps and statement data are obtained;
inquiring an execution code template corresponding to the statement step from the nuclear power station prediction module, and predicting the statement data and the statement step through the nuclear power station prediction module to obtain execution data;
combining the queried execution code template with the execution data through the nuclear power station prediction module to obtain the prediction code record corresponding to the operation step instruction;
the matching, by the nuclear power plant comparison module, the similarity value between each of the prediction code records and each of the execution step logs, and obtaining a maximum similarity value corresponding to each of the prediction code records, including:
obtaining a similarity value of each prediction code record and each execution step log through the nuclear power station comparison module according to a cosine similarity algorithm;
and obtaining the maximum value of all the similarity values corresponding to the predicted code records, and determining the similarity value corresponding to the obtained maximum value as the maximum similarity value of the predicted code records.
2. The method for automatically verifying the data of the nuclear power plant according to claim 1, further comprising, after the obtaining of the verification result output by the automatic verification model of the data of the nuclear power plant:
if the execution result identification and the check result are both execution failures, determining that the check result of the execution result is failure, and retransmitting the nuclear power station management operation instruction to the nuclear power station management system.
3. The method for automatically verifying the data of the nuclear power plant according to claim 1, further comprising, after the obtaining of the verification result output by the automatic verification model of the data of the nuclear power plant:
if the execution result identification is inconsistent with the checking result, and the checking result is successful in execution, the checking result is determined to be successful, and an execution success instruction aiming at the nuclear power station storage operation instruction is sent to the nuclear power station intelligent storage system.
4. The method for automatically verifying the data of the nuclear power plant according to claim 1, further comprising, after the obtaining of the verification result output by the automatic verification model of the data of the nuclear power plant:
and if the execution result identification is inconsistent with the checking result, and the checking result is that the execution fails, retransmitting the nuclear power station management operation instruction to the nuclear power station management system.
5. The method for automatically verifying the data of the nuclear power plant according to claim 1, wherein after waiting for the execution result fed back by the management system of the nuclear power plant for the management operation instruction of the nuclear power plant, the method further comprises:
if the execution result identification is not received and the execution log record is received within a preset time period, inputting the nuclear power station storage operation instruction and the execution log record into a nuclear power station data automatic verification model, and checking the execution log record according to the nuclear power station storage operation instruction through the nuclear power station data automatic verification model to obtain a checking result output by the nuclear power station data automatic verification model;
and if the checking result is that the execution is successful, sending an execution success instruction aiming at the nuclear power station warehousing operation instruction to the nuclear power station intelligent warehousing system.
6. The method for automatically verifying the data of the nuclear power plant according to claim 5, further comprising, after the obtaining of the verification result output by the automatic verification model of the data of the nuclear power plant:
and if the checking result is that the execution fails, retransmitting the nuclear power station management operation instruction to the nuclear power station management system.
7. The method for automatically verifying nuclear power plant data as defined in claim 6, wherein after retransmitting the nuclear power plant management operation command to the nuclear power plant management system, comprising:
receiving a re-execution result fed back by the nuclear power station management system; the re-execution result is that the nuclear power plant management system acquires an interrupt event corresponding to the nuclear power plant management operation instruction according to the re-sent nuclear power plant management operation instruction, performs exception correction on the interrupt event and the re-sent nuclear power plant management operation instruction, generates a corrected nuclear power plant management operation instruction corresponding to the re-sent nuclear power plant management operation instruction, and executes a feedback result after the corrected nuclear power plant management operation instruction; the re-execution result comprises a re-execution result identification and a re-execution log record;
inputting the re-sent nuclear power station warehousing operation instruction and the re-execution log record into a nuclear power station data re-automatic verification model, and checking the re-execution log record according to the re-sent nuclear power station warehousing operation instruction through the nuclear power station data re-automatic verification model to obtain a re-checking result output by the nuclear power station data re-automatic verification model;
And if the re-execution result identification and the re-checking result are both successful in execution, determining that the re-checking result of the re-execution result is successful, and sending a re-execution success instruction for the re-sent nuclear power station warehousing operation instruction to the nuclear power station intelligent warehousing system.
8. An automatic nuclear power station data verification device, comprising:
the receiving module is used for receiving a nuclear power station warehousing operation instruction from the intelligent nuclear power station warehousing system, converting the nuclear power station warehousing operation instruction into a nuclear power station management operation instruction, and sending the nuclear power station management operation instruction to the nuclear power station management system;
the waiting module is used for waiting for an execution result fed back by the nuclear power station management system aiming at the nuclear power station management operation instruction after receiving a successful receiving instruction fed back by the nuclear power station management system aiming at the nuclear power station management operation instruction; the execution result comprises an execution result identifier and an execution log record;
the execution result module is used for receiving an execution result fed back by the nuclear power station management system;
the checking module is used for inputting the nuclear power station storage operation instruction and the execution log record into a nuclear power station data automatic checking model, checking the execution log record according to the nuclear power station storage operation instruction through the nuclear power station data automatic checking model, and obtaining a checking result output by the nuclear power station data automatic checking model;
The determining module is used for determining that the verification result of the execution result is successful if the execution result identification and the verification result are both successful, and sending an execution success instruction aiming at the nuclear power station storage operation instruction to the nuclear power station intelligent storage system;
the collation module includes:
the input unit is used for splitting the storage operation instruction of the nuclear power station through the nuclear power station parameter splitting module to obtain a plurality of operation step instructions; the nuclear power station parameter splitting module is used for splitting the log of the execution log to obtain a plurality of execution step logs; the nuclear power plant data automatic verification model comprises a nuclear power plant parameter splitting module, a nuclear power plant prediction module and a nuclear power plant comparison module;
the prediction unit is used for performing code prediction on each operation step instruction through the nuclear power station prediction module to obtain a prediction code record corresponding to each operation step instruction;
the comparison unit is used for inputting each prediction code record and each execution step log into the nuclear power station comparison module, and matching the similarity value of each prediction code record and each execution step log through the nuclear power station comparison module to obtain the maximum similarity value corresponding to each prediction code record; the maximum similarity value refers to the maximum value in the similarity value between the predicted code record and each execution step log;
The output unit is used for determining the checking result according to the maximum similarity value recorded by each prediction code;
the prediction unit includes:
the splitting subunit is used for carrying out statement splitting on the operation step instruction through the nuclear power station prediction module to obtain statement steps and statement data;
the acquisition subunit is used for acquiring an execution code template corresponding to the statement step, and simultaneously predicting the statement data through the nuclear power station prediction module to obtain execution data;
a combination subunit, configured to obtain the predicted code record corresponding to the operation step instruction by combining the execution code template with the execution data;
the comparison unit includes:
the computing subunit is used for obtaining the similarity value of each prediction code record and each execution step log through the nuclear power station comparison module according to a cosine similarity algorithm;
and the determining subunit is used for acquiring the maximum value of all the similarity values corresponding to the predicted code records, and determining the similarity value corresponding to the acquired maximum value as the maximum similarity value of the predicted code records.
9. A computer device comprising a memory, a processor and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, characterized in that the processor, when executing the computer program, implements the steps of the nuclear power plant data automatic verification method according to any one of claims 1 to 7.
10. A computer readable storage medium storing a computer program, wherein the computer program when executed by a processor performs the steps of the nuclear power plant data automatic verification method according to any one of claims 1 to 7.
CN202010801603.7A 2020-08-11 2020-08-11 Nuclear power station data automatic verification method, device, equipment and medium Active CN112101849B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010801603.7A CN112101849B (en) 2020-08-11 2020-08-11 Nuclear power station data automatic verification method, device, equipment and medium

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010801603.7A CN112101849B (en) 2020-08-11 2020-08-11 Nuclear power station data automatic verification method, device, equipment and medium

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN112101849A CN112101849A (en) 2020-12-18
CN112101849B true CN112101849B (en) 2023-12-01

Family

ID=73752813

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202010801603.7A Active CN112101849B (en) 2020-08-11 2020-08-11 Nuclear power station data automatic verification method, device, equipment and medium

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN112101849B (en)

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20120013765A (en) * 2010-08-06 2012-02-15 주식회사 포스코아이씨티 Apparatus for Controlling Nuclear Power Generation and Method for Transmitting or Receiving Data of That Apparatus
CN109274845A (en) * 2018-08-31 2019-01-25 平安科技(深圳)有限公司 Intelligent sound pays a return visit method, apparatus, computer equipment and storage medium automatically
CN110175756A (en) * 2019-05-07 2019-08-27 岭澳核电有限公司 Nuclear power station information system operational safety method for early warning, device, equipment and medium
CN110297814A (en) * 2019-05-22 2019-10-01 中国平安人寿保险股份有限公司 Method for monitoring performance, device, equipment and the storage medium of database manipulation
CN111259791A (en) * 2020-01-15 2020-06-09 大亚湾核电运营管理有限责任公司 Nuclear power station material acceptance method and device, computer equipment and storage medium

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10929799B2 (en) * 2017-06-29 2021-02-23 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Identification of inaccurate addresses for package deliveries

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20120013765A (en) * 2010-08-06 2012-02-15 주식회사 포스코아이씨티 Apparatus for Controlling Nuclear Power Generation and Method for Transmitting or Receiving Data of That Apparatus
CN109274845A (en) * 2018-08-31 2019-01-25 平安科技(深圳)有限公司 Intelligent sound pays a return visit method, apparatus, computer equipment and storage medium automatically
CN110175756A (en) * 2019-05-07 2019-08-27 岭澳核电有限公司 Nuclear power station information system operational safety method for early warning, device, equipment and medium
CN110297814A (en) * 2019-05-22 2019-10-01 中国平安人寿保险股份有限公司 Method for monitoring performance, device, equipment and the storage medium of database manipulation
CN111259791A (en) * 2020-01-15 2020-06-09 大亚湾核电运营管理有限责任公司 Nuclear power station material acceptance method and device, computer equipment and storage medium

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN112101849A (en) 2020-12-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN109325865B (en) Exception handling method, exception handling device, computer equipment and storage medium
CN110069572B (en) HIVE task scheduling method, device, equipment and storage medium based on big data platform
CN111866149B (en) Cluster deployment method and device, computer equipment and storage medium
CN110222028B (en) Data management method, device, equipment and storage medium
CN110764998B (en) Data comparison method, device, equipment and storage medium based on Django framework
CN112613993B (en) Transaction data processing method and device, computer equipment and storage medium
US10761920B2 (en) Individualized channel error detection and resolution
CN112015752A (en) Method and device for dynamically querying data, electronic equipment and storage medium
CN111611009A (en) Database script management method and device, computer equipment and storage medium
CN109462661B (en) Data synchronization method and device, computer equipment and storage medium
CN104484167A (en) Task processing method and device
CN110458184B (en) Optical character recognition assistance method, device, computer equipment and storage medium
CN116225932A (en) Automatic chip verification method, system, equipment and medium
CN112101849B (en) Nuclear power station data automatic verification method, device, equipment and medium
CN113626218A (en) Data processing method, data processing device, storage medium and computer equipment
CN109298928B (en) Service processing method and device
CN115277678B (en) File downloading method, device, computer equipment and storage medium
CN114429408B (en) Method, device, equipment and system for checking configuration file of intelligent substation
CN115729477A (en) Distributed storage IO path data writing and reading method, device and equipment
CN112363929B (en) System online method and device, computer equipment and storage medium
CN114116268A (en) Method and device for checking Flink SQL statement, computer equipment and storage medium
CN112783866A (en) Data reading method and device, computer equipment and storage medium
CN113051008A (en) Interface request processing method and device, computer equipment and storage medium
CN111309806B (en) Data synchronization method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium
CN116483611B (en) Cross-level distributed abnormal data identification and processing system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant