CN112054515B - Receiving-end power grid DC receiving capacity evaluation method based on multi-objective optimization - Google Patents

Receiving-end power grid DC receiving capacity evaluation method based on multi-objective optimization Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN112054515B
CN112054515B CN202010882430.6A CN202010882430A CN112054515B CN 112054515 B CN112054515 B CN 112054515B CN 202010882430 A CN202010882430 A CN 202010882430A CN 112054515 B CN112054515 B CN 112054515B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
direct current
index
total
node
receiving
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN202010882430.6A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN112054515A (en
Inventor
彭晓涛
李华取
覃琴
张健
韩家辉
张立波
郭强
张弛
李楠
姚良忠
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
State Grid Corp of China SGCC
Wuhan University WHU
China Electric Power Research Institute Co Ltd CEPRI
State Grid Tianjin Electric Power Co Ltd
Original Assignee
State Grid Corp of China SGCC
Wuhan University WHU
China Electric Power Research Institute Co Ltd CEPRI
State Grid Tianjin Electric Power Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by State Grid Corp of China SGCC, Wuhan University WHU, China Electric Power Research Institute Co Ltd CEPRI, State Grid Tianjin Electric Power Co Ltd filed Critical State Grid Corp of China SGCC
Priority to CN202010882430.6A priority Critical patent/CN112054515B/en
Publication of CN112054515A publication Critical patent/CN112054515A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN112054515B publication Critical patent/CN112054515B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02JCIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
    • H02J3/00Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/04Forecasting or optimisation specially adapted for administrative or management purposes, e.g. linear programming or "cutting stock problem"
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
    • G06Q10/06393Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/06Energy or water supply
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02JCIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
    • H02J3/00Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks
    • H02J3/36Arrangements for transfer of electric power between ac networks via a high-tension dc link
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02JCIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
    • H02J5/00Circuit arrangements for transfer of electric power between ac networks and dc networks
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02JCIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
    • H02J2203/00Indexing scheme relating to details of circuit arrangements for AC mains or AC distribution networks
    • H02J2203/20Simulating, e g planning, reliability check, modelling or computer assisted design [CAD]
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E60/00Enabling technologies; Technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
    • Y02E60/60Arrangements for transfer of electric power between AC networks or generators via a high voltage DC link [HVCD]

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Supply And Distribution Of Alternating Current (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to a receiving end power grid DC accepting capability evaluation method based on multi-objective optimization, which comprises the steps of firstly, primarily screening DC falling points and reducing the number of scenes; then, adopting a Generalized Equivalent Short Circuit Ratio (GESCR) index, a transient voltage support strength (TVSI) index and a grid loss index as optimization targets of a direct current drop point and unit output, and considering multi-constraint conditions to establish a multi-target optimization model of the direct current feed-in receiving end power grid; then, performing constant step length increment of direct current feed-in scale and repeating direct current point drop and unit optimization until the safe operation constraint condition is not met; and finally, carrying out N-1 safety and stability verification on the reverse sequence of the calculation and analysis result, and taking the verification result as the maximum direct current bearing scale of the receiving-end power grid. The calculation and analysis method provided by the invention has clear logic, comprehensive consideration factors and easy engineering realization, and can effectively obtain the maximum direct current receiving capacity of the receiving-end power grid.

Description

Receiving-end power grid DC receiving capacity evaluation method based on multi-objective optimization
Technical Field
The invention relates to a receiving-end power grid DC receiving capacity calculation method, in particular to a receiving-end power grid maximum DC receiving capacity analysis and detection method which considers the influence of DC drop points and unit output distribution on the DC carrying capacity of a receiving-end power grid and establishes a multi-objective optimization method and multi-constraint conditions.
Background
The high-voltage direct-current transmission has unique advantages in large-capacity and long-distance transmission and plays a key role in energy optimization configuration in China. For a receiving-end power grid, simultaneous feeding of multiple direct currents easily causes a series of safety and stability problems such as voltage collapse, frequency instability, commutation failure and the like, and particularly, with the continuous increase of the scale of the fed direct currents, the safety and stability problems of the receiving-end power grid are increasingly prominent, so that a scientific and effective analysis method for the maximum direct current carrying capacity of the receiving-end power grid is researched and established, the maximum direct current carrying scale of the receiving-end power grid is obtained, and the method has important reference significance for planning and scheduling of an alternating-current and direct-current hybrid power grid.
At present, an evaluation method for researching the direct current receiving capacity of a receiving-end power grid is mainly based on a multi-feed short circuit ratio (MSCR) index, by continuously increasing the direct current feed scale until the MSCR index is equal to a critical value, and performing some safety and stability checks, the carrying scale which can pass various safety constraints is the maximum direct current receiving capacity of the receiving-end power grid. Therefore, in the existing research, the direct current receiving capacity of the receiving-end power grid is quantitatively evaluated mainly by using MSCR indexes, and some safety and stability auxiliary verifications are carried out, but because the critical value of the multi-feed short-circuit ratio depends on engineering experience, the voltage stability margin of the receiving-end power grid cannot be accurately quantified in practical application, the obtained direct current receiving capacity of the receiving-end power grid can have deviation, and meanwhile, a complete direct current receiving capacity evaluation method system of the receiving-end power grid based on multi-objective optimization is not formed in the existing research. Furthermore, existing studies do not consider and relate to the impact of optimal allocation of genset output on dc-carrying size when assessing dc-acceptance of the receiving grid.
The invention establishes an index system and a calculation method for evaluating the maximum direct current bearing scale of a receiving-end power grid from two layers of direct current drop point and unit output optimization through a loop iteration mode and by considering multi-constraint conditions. Firstly, the primary screening of direct current falling points is carried out, and the number of scenes is reduced. And then establishing a direct current drop point and a unit output as optimization targets by adopting a Generalized Equivalent Short Circuit Ratio (GESCR) index, a Transient Voltage Support Intensity (TVSI) index and a network loss index, and establishing a multi-target optimization model of the direct current feed-in receiving-end power grid by considering multi-constraint conditions. And repeatedly performing drop point and unit output optimization through the cyclic increasing of the direct current feed-in scale until the set safe operation constraint condition is not met, performing N-1 safe and stable verification on the reverse sequence of the calculation analysis result, and taking the verification result as the maximum direct current receiving capacity of the receiving-end power grid. And finally, the IEEE 39 node system is used as a receiving-end power grid fed in by multiple direct currents, the maximum direct current admission capacity of the receiving end is obtained through calculation and analysis, and the feasibility and the effectiveness of the established receiving-end power grid maximum direct current admission capacity analysis method are verified.
Disclosure of Invention
The technical problem of the invention is mainly solved by the following technical scheme:
a receiving end power grid DC receiving capacity evaluation method based on multi-objective optimization is characterized by comprising the following steps:
step 1, primarily screening all possible direct current drop points of a receiving-end power grid based on a determined receiving-end power grid structure and a direct current feed-in typical operation mode to obtain an alternative drop point set D;
step 2, defining the direct current feed-in number N of the initial receiving end power grid dc =N 0 And setting the maximum transmission power P of each direct current transmission line dmax Running;
step 3, determining an optimal drop point and an active and reactive power output scheme of the unit through the direct current drop point and the unit output optimization by using the established direct current drop point and unit output combination optimization model;
step 4, under the optimized optimal operation mode, judging whether various safe operation constraint conditions are met, if so, entering step 5, and if not, entering step 7;
step 5, N dc Strip DC increases the transmitted power by a step size Δ P, i.e. P d (N dc )=P d (N dc ) +. DELTA P, with judgment of P d (N dc ) And P dmax Size, if P d (N dc )≤P dmax Entering step 3, otherwise, entering step 6;
step 6, executing N dc =N dc +1, and set the Nth dc The strip DC transmission power being at a minimum limit value, i.e. P d (N dc )=P dmin Running, and entering step 3;
step 7, performing N-1 safety and stability verification on the obtained iterative optimization result in a reverse mode according to the size of the total direct current feed power until a direct current feed scheme without safety and stability problems such as voltage overrun, branch power flow overrun, power flow non-convergence and the like in the N-1 verification is obtained, taking the direct current feed scheme as the maximum direct current receiving scale of a receiving end, and entering step 8;
step 8, determining the final fed direct current number N according to the result in step 7 dc And counting the maximum receiving DC scale P of the receiving-end power grid D_total I.e. by
Figure GDA0002719910640000021
In the method, in order to reduce the number of direct current drop point scenes and improve the optimization accuracy, in step 1, a load concentration index and a node degree index are defined to perform preliminary screening on the drop points, as shown in formula one:
Figure GDA0002719910640000031
in the formula I, F (i) and M (i) are respectively the load concentration ratio of a node i and the index value of the node degree; j is an adjacent node set of the node i; l is a system load node set; p Lj 、P Lk The active loads of the node j and the node k are respectively; l bij Is a branch between the nodes i and j; count is a counting function.
In the method, when the direct current drop point and unit output combined optimization model is established in the step 3, a Generalized Equivalent Short Circuit Ratio (GESCR) index and a transient voltage support intensity index (I) are utilized TVSI ) And constructing an optimization target by the network loss index, wherein the optimization target comprises the following steps:
(1) when the GESCR index quantificationally evaluates the voltage supporting capability of the receiving end power grid, because the theoretical critical value is 1, compared with a multi-feed short circuit ratio (MSCR) index, the GESCR index has better accuracy and practicability, the GESCR index is selected as the index for evaluating the voltage supporting capability of the receiving end power grid, and the GESCR index and the safety margin index are respectively:
Figure GDA0002719910640000032
in the formula II, I bal (i)、I mar (i) Respectively obtaining the balance and safety margin index values under the ith multiple direct current feed-in schemes; n is a radical of dc Total number of DC feeds; GESCR (j) represents the GESCR corresponding to the j direct current feed-in node; GESCR ave Feeding corresponding GESCR average values for each direct current under the ith scheme; GESCR min For node voltageAnd the size of the GESCR corresponding to the boundary stability is equal to 1, wherein the GESCR index is defined as: for LCC type direct current, when the fixed power of a sending end and the fixed extinction angle of a receiving end are adopted for control, the GESCR indexes corresponding to the jth feed-in direct current are as follows:
Figure GDA0002719910640000033
in the formula III, U Lj A node voltage of load node j; z eqj After the influence of other direct current feed-in on the direct current is converted to a current conversion bus j in an impedance form, the equivalent impedance of a feed-in point is obtained; s dj Apparent power for the dc feed node j; QVCF is a reactive voltage compensation coefficient, which represents the influence of the dc control characteristic on the GESCR, and the expression is:
Figure GDA0002719910640000034
in the formula IV, Q dj Absorbing reactive power for the jth direct current conversion bus; theta eqj Is an equivalent impedance Z eqj The impedance angle of (d);
(2) in order to reflect the mutual influence degree among all the commutation buses, a transient voltage support intensity index (I) is adopted TVSI ) As one of the optimization objectives, the average transient voltage support strength index under the ith dc-feed scheme is defined as:
Figure GDA0002719910640000041
in the formula V, N dc Total number of DC feeds; wherein, I TVSI The index is defined as:
Figure GDA0002719910640000042
in the formula VI, X ekj Transfer resistance between k and j nodes in equivalent power grid for only reserving k and j of converter busesResisting; x ek The branch impedance between the node k in the equivalent network and the equivalent power supply is obtained;
(3) and (3) ensuring the operation economy of the power grid in the optimization process, and defining the grid loss index under the ith operation scheme as follows:
I loss (i)=P G_total (i)+P D_total (i)-P L_total (i) Formula seven
In the formula VII, P G_total The total active output of the conventional generator set of the system; p D_total Feeding total power into receiving end direct current; p L_total Is the total load of the system.
In the method, in the first step and the third step, in order to process the inconsistency of the magnitude and the direction of the index, the index under the ith scheme is processed by a range transformation method, the method is shown as the formula eight, and the index is subjected to subjective and objective combination weighting by adopting an analytic hierarchy process and an anti-entropy weight method;
Figure GDA0002719910640000043
in the formula VIII, I 1 、I 2 Respectively representing a negative index and a positive index;
Figure GDA0002719910640000044
respectively are indexes after standardized treatment; i is max 、I min The value range after index normalization is shown, in order to avoid normalization to a closed interval [0,1 ]]When the index value is 0, the index value can be taken as I max =0.996,I min =0.002。
In the method, in step 4, multiple constraint conditions such as system power flow constraint, generator active and reactive power constraint, node voltage constraint, short-circuit current constraint, branch maximum transmission power constraint, GESCR index not less than a critical value, effective direct-current inertia time constant constraint, maximum single feed-in constraint and the like are constructed, as shown in formula nine:
Figure GDA0002719910640000051
in the formula Jiu, P i And Q i Active and reactive power are injected into a node i; delta ij Is the voltage phase difference between nodes i and j; g ij And B ij Respectively, the mutual conductance and the mutual admittance between the nodes i and j;
Figure GDA0002719910640000052
and
Figure GDA0002719910640000053
respectively representing the upper limit and the lower limit of active power output and reactive power output of the generator; n is the total number of system nodes; n is a radical of G The total number of the nodes of the generator of the system is; n is a radical of l Is the total number of system branches;
Figure GDA0002719910640000054
and
Figure GDA0002719910640000055
respectively representing the upper limit and the lower limit of the node voltage;
Figure GDA0002719910640000056
representing the upper limit of node short-circuit current control;
Figure GDA0002719910640000057
representing the upper limit of the transmission power of the branch; h dc Taking the effective direct current inertia time constant to be more than 2-3; gamma ray dcmax,i The ith direct current is locked due to the fault of a receiving end system, after the system recovers the steady state, in order to ensure that the steady state frequency of the system can be maintained within an allowable deviation range, the lower ith direct current transmission power accounts for the maximum ratio of the output power of all the generator sets of the system, wherein H dc And gamma dcmax,i The calculation expression of (a) is:
Figure GDA0002719910640000058
formula ten, J A_total Is the total moment of inertia of the receiving end system; p D_total For feeding the receiving end with a straight wireTotal power of the stream; r eq The equivalent difference adjustment coefficient of the system generator set is obtained; d L Adjusting the coefficient for the system load active frequency; gamma is the ratio of the total power of the fed-in direct current to the sum of the active power output of all the generators in the system; Δ f max Maximum allowable steady state frequency deviation for the system; f. of N The system nominal frequency.
In the method, in the step 3, the direct current drop point and unit output combined optimization model is solved by using an MOEA/D optimization algorithm, so that the local search capability of the MEOA/D optimization algorithm is enhanced, the optimization effect is improved, and the population diversity is increased by adopting Gaussian variation after the evolution operation; for the ith element v in the evolved individual i The mutation operation is as follows:
Figure GDA0002719910640000061
in the eleventh formula, rand is a function for generating random numbers; c is a random number matrix; n is a radical of v Representing the number of independent variables; gussiant (t) denotes a Gaussian function with an argument t;
Figure GDA0002719910640000062
given variance of gaussian variation; p i The mutation rate is.
Therefore, compared with the prior art, the receiving-end power grid DC receiving capacity analysis method based on multi-objective optimization has the following advantages: based on GESCR indexes, a calculation and analysis method for the maximum direct current receiving capacity of a receiving-end power grid is established systematically, and the ambiguity and inaccuracy of the receiving-end voltage supporting capacity evaluated by MSCR indexes in the traditional method are overcome; the influence of different unit output optimization distribution on the direct current scale borne by the receiving end is considered, the optimal drop point and the unit output distribution change are considered along with the iterative increase of the direct current feed-in scale, the direct current drop point and the unit output are repeatedly optimized, the reasonability is achieved, and compared with the method that the optimal drop point is fixed firstly, the power receiving scale obtained by the iterative direct current scale increasing method is not biased to be conservative; in addition, multi-constraint conditions such as effective direct current inertia time constant constraint and maximum single feed-in constraint after direct current feed-in are considered, safety and stability check is carried out on the result according to a reverse order, and the receiving end maximum direct current receiving capacity obtained through calculation by the method is higher in reliability and accuracy.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a flow chart of a receiving-end power grid maximum direct current receiving capacity calculation method based on multi-objective optimization.
Fig. 2 is a topology diagram of an IEEE 39 node system.
Detailed Description
The technical scheme of the invention is further specifically described by the following embodiments and the accompanying drawings.
1. And (3) calculating the maximum direct current receiving capacity of the receiving-end power grid based on multi-objective optimization.
The invention provides a method for analyzing the maximum direct current receiving capacity of a receiving-end power grid based on a multi-objective optimization method, the flow of the method is shown as figure 1, and the specific method comprises the following steps:
step 1, primarily screening all possible direct current drop points of a receiving-end power grid based on a determined receiving-end power grid structure and a direct current feed-in typical operation mode to obtain an alternative drop point set D;
step 2, setting the direct current feed-in number N of the initial receiving end power grid dc =N 0 And setting the maximum transmission power P of each DC line dmax Running;
step 3, determining an optimal drop point and an active and reactive power output scheme of the unit through the drop point and the unit output optimization by using the established direct current drop point and unit output combined optimization model;
step 4, under the obtained optimal operation mode, judging whether various safe operation constraint conditions are met, if so, entering step 5, and if not, entering step 7;
step 5, N dc Strip DC increases the transmitted power by a step size Δ P, i.e. P d (N dc )=P d (N dc ) +. DELTA P, with judgment of P d (N dc ) And P dmax Size, if P d (N dc )≤P dmax Entering step 3, otherwise, entering step 6;
step 6, executing N dc =N dc +1, and set the Nth dc The strip DC transmission power being at a minimum limit value, i.e. P d (N dc )=P dmin Running, and entering step 3;
step 7, performing N-1 safety and stability verification on the obtained iterative optimization result in a reverse mode according to the size of the total direct current feed power until a direct current feed scheme without safety and stability problems such as voltage overrun, branch power flow overrun, power flow non-convergence and the like in the N-1 verification is obtained, taking the direct current feed scheme as the maximum direct current receiving scale of a receiving end, and entering step 8;
step 8, determining the final fed direct current number N according to the result in step 7 dc And counting the maximum receiving DC scale P of the receiving-end power grid D_total I.e. by
Figure GDA0002719910640000071
2. And (5) primarily screening direct current falling points.
According to the method in 1, in order to reduce the number of scenes and improve the optimization accuracy, in step 1, a load concentration index and a node degree index are defined to perform preliminary screening on the drop points, as shown in formula 1:
Figure GDA0002719910640000072
in the formula, F (i) and M (i) are respectively the load concentration ratio of the node i and the index value of the node degree; j is an adjacent node set of the node i; l is a system load node set; p Lj 、P Lk The active loads of the node j and the node k are respectively; l. the bij Is a branch between the nodes i and j; count is a counting function.
3. And constructing a direct current drop point and unit output optimization target.
According to the method in the step 1, in the direct current drop point and unit output combined optimization model in the step 3, a Generalized Equivalent Short Circuit Ratio (GESCR) index and a transient voltage support intensity index (I) are utilized TVSI ) And constructing an optimization target by the network loss index respectively:
(1) When the GESCR index quantificationally evaluates the voltage supporting capability of the receiving end power grid, because the theoretical critical value is 1, compared with a multi-feed short circuit ratio (MSCR) index, the GESCR index has better accuracy and practicability, the GESCR index is selected as the index for evaluating the voltage supporting capability of the receiving end power grid, and the GESCR index and the safety margin index are respectively:
Figure GDA0002719910640000081
in the formula I bal (i)、I mar (i) Respectively obtaining the balance and safety margin index values under the ith multiple direct current feed-in schemes; n is a radical of dc The total number of DC feeds; GESCR (j) represents the GESCR corresponding to the j direct current feed-in node; GESCR ave Feeding corresponding GESCR average values for each direct current under the ith scheme; GESCR min The size of the GESCR corresponding to the critical stability of the node voltage is equal to 1, wherein the GESCR index is defined as: for LCC type direct current, when the fixed power of a sending end and the fixed extinction angle of a receiving end are adopted for control, the GESCR indexes corresponding to the jth feed-in direct current are as follows:
Figure GDA0002719910640000082
in the formula of U Lj A node voltage of load node j; z is a linear or branched member eqj After the influence of other direct current feed-in on the direct current is converted to a current conversion bus j through an impedance form, the equivalent impedance of a feed-in point is obtained; s. the dj Apparent power for the dc feed node j; QVCF is a reactive voltage compensation coefficient, which represents the influence of the dc control characteristic on the GESCR, and the expression is:
Figure GDA0002719910640000083
in the formula, Q di Absorbing reactive power for the ith direct current conversion bus; theta eqi Is an equivalent impedance Z eqj The impedance angle of (c).
(2) In order to reflect the mutual influence degree among all the commutation buses, a transient voltage support strength index (I) is adopted TVSI ) As one of the optimization objectives, the average transient voltage support strength index under the ith dc-feed scheme is defined as:
Figure GDA0002719910640000084
in the formula, N dc The total number of DC feeds; wherein, I TVSI The index is defined as:
Figure GDA0002719910640000085
in the formula, X ekj Only the transfer impedance between the nodes k and j in the equivalent power grid of the converter buses k and j is reserved; x ek Is the branch impedance between node k and the equivalent power source in the equivalent network.
(3) After the direct current drop point and the unit output are combined, the operation economy of the power grid is guaranteed, and the grid loss index under the ith operation scheme is defined as follows:
I loss (i)=P G_total (i)+P D_total (i)-P L_total (i) (7)
in the formula, P G_total The total active output of the conventional generator set of the system; p D_total Feeding total power into receiving end direct current; p L_total Is the total load of the system.
4. Index processing and index weight determination methods.
According to the method described in the step 1, in the step one and the step three, in order to process the inconsistency of the magnitude and the direction of the index, the index under the ith scheme is processed by a range transform method, the method is shown as the formula (8), and the index is subjectively and objectively weighted by an analytic hierarchy process and an entropy weight resisting method.
Figure GDA0002719910640000091
In the formula I 1 、I 2 Respectively representing a negative index and a positive index;
Figure GDA0002719910640000092
respectively are indexes after standardized treatment; i is max 、I min The value range after index normalization is shown, in order to avoid normalization to a closed interval [0,1 ]]When the index value is 0, the index value can be taken as I max =0.996,I min =0.002。
In summary, the total objective function of the primary screening of the direct current drop point, the total objective function of the direct current drop point and the unit output optimization are respectively as follows:
Figure GDA0002719910640000093
in the formula (f) D,i 、f i Primarily screening a total target value for the direct current drop point under the ith scheme and optimizing the total target value by combining the drop point and the unit output; lambda [ alpha ] 1 、λ 2 、α 1 、α 2 、α 3 And alpha 4 Are all weight factors, where 12 =1,α 1234 =1。
5. And constructing multiple constraints.
According to the method in 1, in step 4, multiple constraint conditions such as system power flow constraint, generator active and reactive power constraint, node voltage constraint, short-circuit current constraint, branch maximum transmission power constraint, GESCR index not less than a critical value, effective direct current inertia time constant constraint, maximum single feed-in constraint and the like are constructed, as shown in formula (10):
Figure GDA0002719910640000101
in the formula, P i And Q i Active and reactive power are injected into the node i; delta ij Is the voltage phase difference between nodes i and j; g ij And B ij Between nodes i and j, respectivelyMutual conductance and mutual admittance of (a);
Figure GDA0002719910640000102
and
Figure GDA0002719910640000103
respectively representing the upper limit and the lower limit of active power output and reactive power output of the generator; n is the total number of system nodes; n is a radical of G The total number of the nodes of the generator of the system is; n is a radical of l The total number of the system branches;
Figure GDA0002719910640000104
and
Figure GDA0002719910640000105
respectively representing the upper limit and the lower limit of the node voltage;
Figure GDA0002719910640000106
representing the upper limit of node short-circuit current control;
Figure GDA0002719910640000107
representing the upper limit of the transmission power of the branch; h dc An effective direct current inertia time constant, generally greater than 2-3; gamma ray dcmax,i When the ith direct current is locked due to system faults and the steady-state frequency of the system is ensured to be maintained within an allowable deviation range when the system recovers the steady state, the lower ith direct current transmission power accounts for the maximum ratio of the output power of all the generator sets of the system, wherein H dc And gamma dcmax,i The calculation expression of (a) is:
Figure GDA0002719910640000108
in the formula, J A_total Is the total moment of inertia of the receiving end system; r eq The equivalent difference adjustment coefficient of the system generator set is obtained; d L Adjusting the coefficient for the active frequency of the system load; gamma is the ratio of the total power of the fed-in direct current to the sum of the active power output of all the generators in the system; Δ f max Maximum allowable steady state frequency deviation for the system; f. of N For rating the systemAnd (4) rate.
6. And (6) solving an optimization model.
According to the method in the step 1, in the step 3, the direct current drop point and unit output combined optimization model is solved by using an MOEA/D optimization algorithm, so that the local search capability of the MEOA/D optimization algorithm is enhanced, the optimization effect is improved, and the population diversity is increased by adopting Gaussian variation after the evolution operation. For element v in evolved individuals i The mutation operation is as follows:
Figure GDA0002719910640000111
wherein rand is a function for generating random numbers; c is a random number matrix; n is a radical of v Representing the number of independent variables; gussiant (t) denotes a Gaussian function with an argument t;
Figure GDA0002719910640000112
given variance of gaussian variation; p i The variation rate is shown.
7. Based on the IEEE 39 receiver net rack embodiment.
7.1, setting parameters.
And (3) adopting an IEEE 39 node system as a receiving-end power grid fed with multiple direct currents to carry out maximum direct current bearing scale analysis. The system topology structure is shown in fig. 2, the system includes 29 load nodes and 10 generator nodes, where the node 31 is a generator balancing node, the total load of the system is 6254.23MW, and the reference value is 100MW.
The fed-in direct currents are all LCC type direct currents, and the sending end fixed power and the receiving end fixed extinction angle control mode is adopted. Without loss of generality, the fed direct currents have the same parameters, and the inversion sides are all formed by 12-pulse inverters, wherein the main direct current parameters are shown in table 1.
TABLE 1 feeding in DC control parameters
Figure GDA0002719910640000113
In addition, the maximum DC load to the receiving end networkIn the process of scale evaluation and calculation, the system node voltage U is set i The allowable range of (1) is 0.94 pu-1.06 pu, and the rated value is 1.0pu; upper limit of node short circuit current control
Figure GDA0002719910640000114
Is 63kA; maximum transmission power of branch
Figure GDA0002719910640000115
Is 1000MW; the total rotational inertia of the system is 15000MW & S; setting the equivalent difference adjustment coefficient R of the system eq Is 0.036, and has a load active frequency regulation coefficient D L Is 1.5, the rated frequency f of the system N At 50Hz, the maximum steady state frequency deviation Δ f allowed for the system max Is 0.5Hz; the generator output allowable range is shown in table 3 below.
7.2, maximum admission capacity calculation.
In order to avoid the mutual influence between the converter station and the power plant, when direct current is fed in, direct current falling into the generator nodes is not considered temporarily, so that 29 load nodes are possible direct current falling points, screening and sorting are carried out on all the falling points after the load concentration index and the degree standardization processing of the nodes, the first 15 nodes in the ranking are selected as alternative falling point sets, and sorting results and corresponding index values are shown in a table 2.
TABLE 2 alternative set of DC drop points
Figure GDA0002719910640000121
Setting the direct current increasing step length to be delta P =0.5pu, and setting the initial direct current feed-in number to be N 0 =1,P dmax 、P dmin 1000MW and 500MW respectively. The maximum iteration number of the MOEA/D algorithm is set to be 100, and the Gaussian variation rate is 0.1. For the loop iteration result, starting from the maximum feed-in direct current scale, performing N-1 safety and stability verification in reverse order and performing proper adjustment until a scheme which can pass the safety and stability verification is selected, wherein the final result is as follows: DC transmission power P d1 、P d2 And P d3 Respectively 1000MW, 1000MW and 650MW, and is optimally straightThe current drop points are nodes 16, 2 and 9, and the generator active and reactive power output allowable ranges and the terminal voltage are shown in table 3.
TABLE 3 Unit output Range and optimization results
Figure GDA0002719910640000131
At the DC feed scale, the allowable frequency deviation Δ f of the system max When the frequency is not less than 0.5Hz, the maximum allowable single-direct-current transmission power is 1095MW which is more than P dmax =1000MW, the maximum dc carrying size of the receiving-end grid is 3 times at this time, which is 2650MW.
The specific embodiments described in this application are merely illustrative of the spirit of the invention. Various modifications or additions may be made to the described embodiments or alternatives may be employed by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit or ambit of the invention as defined in the appended claims.

Claims (6)

1. A receiving-end power grid DC receiving capacity evaluation method based on multi-objective optimization is characterized by comprising the following steps:
step 1, preliminarily screening all possible direct current drop points of a receiving end power grid based on a determined receiving end power grid structure and a direct current feed-in typical operation mode to obtain an alternative drop point set D;
step 2, defining the direct current feed-in number N of the initial receiving end power grid dc =N 0 And setting the maximum transmission power P of each direct current transmission line dmax Running;
step 3, determining an optimal drop point and an active and reactive power output scheme of the unit through the established direct current drop point and unit output optimization model;
step 4, under the optimized optimal operation mode, judging whether various safe operation constraint conditions are met, if so, entering step 5, and if not, entering step 7;
step 5, N dc Strip DC increases the transmitted power by a step size Δ P, i.e. P d (N dc )=P d (N dc ) +. DELTA P, with judgment of P d (N dc ) And P dmax Size, if P d (N dc )≤P dmax Entering step 3, otherwise, entering step 6;
step 6, executing N dc =N dc +1, and set the Nth dc The strip DC transmission power being at a minimum limit value, i.e. P d (N dc )=P dmin Running, and entering step 3;
step 7, performing N-1 safety and stability verification on the obtained iterative optimization result in a reverse mode according to the size of the total direct current feed power until a direct current feed scheme without safety and stability problems of voltage overrun, branch power flow overrun and power flow non-convergence in the N-1 verification is obtained, taking the direct current feed scheme as the maximum direct current receiving scale of a receiving end, and entering step 8;
step 8, determining the final fed direct current number N according to the result in step 7 dc And counting the maximum receiving DC scale P of the receiving-end power grid D_total I.e. by
Figure FDA0003836278630000011
2. The method of claim 1, wherein in step 1, a load concentration index and a node degree index are defined to perform a preliminary screening on the drop points for reducing the number of direct current drop point scenes and improving the optimization accuracy, as shown in formula one:
Figure FDA0003836278630000012
in the formula I, F (i) and M (i) are respectively the load concentration ratio of a node i and the index value of the node degree; j is an adjacent node set of the node i; l is a system load node set; p Lj 、P Lk The active loads of the node j and the node k are respectively; l. the bij Is a branch between the nodes i and j; count is a counting function.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the direct current drop point and unit output combined optimization model is established in step 3 by using a Generalized Equivalent Short Circuit Ratio (GESCR) index and a transient voltage support strength index I TVSI And constructing an optimization target by the network loss index, wherein the optimization target comprises the following steps:
(1) when the GESCR index quantificationally evaluates the voltage supporting capability of the receiving end power grid, because the theoretical critical value is 1, compared with the MSCR index with the multi-feed short circuit ratio, the GESCR index has better accuracy and practicability, the GESCR index is selected as the index for evaluating the voltage supporting capability of the receiving end power grid, and the GESCR index and the safety margin index are respectively:
Figure FDA0003836278630000021
in the formula II, I bal (i)、I mar (i) Respectively obtaining the balance and safety margin index values under the ith multiple direct current feed-in schemes; n is a radical of dc Total number of DC feeds; GESCR (j) represents the GESCR corresponding to the j direct current feed-in node; GESCR ave Feeding corresponding GESCR average values for each direct current under the ith scheme; GESCR min The size of the GESCR corresponding to the critical stability of the node voltage is equal to 1, wherein the GESCR index is defined as: for LCC type direct current, when the fixed power of a sending end and the fixed extinction angle of a receiving end are adopted for control, the GESCR indexes corresponding to the jth feed-in direct current are as follows:
Figure FDA0003836278630000022
in the formula III, U Lj A node voltage of load node j; z eqj After the influence of other direct current feed-in on the direct current is converted to a current conversion bus j through an impedance form, the equivalent impedance of a feed-in point is obtained; s dj Apparent power for the dc feed node j; compensation system for QVCF reactive voltageThe number, which represents the influence of the DC control characteristic on GESCR, is expressed as:
Figure FDA0003836278630000023
in the formula IV, Q dj Absorbing reactive power for the jth direct current conversion bus; theta eqj Is an equivalent impedance Z eqj The impedance angle of (d);
(2) in order to reflect the mutual influence degree among all the commutation buses, a transient voltage support strength index I is adopted TVSI As one of the optimization objectives, the average transient voltage support strength index under the ith dc-feeding scheme is defined as:
Figure FDA0003836278630000024
in the formula V, N dc Total number of DC feeds; wherein, I TVSI The index is defined as:
Figure FDA0003836278630000031
in the formula VI, X ekj Only the transfer impedance between the nodes k and j in the equivalent power grid of the current conversion buses k and j is reserved; x ek The branch impedance between the node k in the equivalent network and the equivalent power supply is obtained;
(3) and (3) ensuring the operation economy of the power grid in the optimization process, and defining the grid loss index under the ith operation scheme as follows:
I loss (i)=P G_total (i)+P D_total (i)-P L_total (i) Formula seven
In the formula VII, P G_total The total active output of the conventional generator set of the system; p D_total Feeding total power into receiving end direct current; p L_total Is the total load of the system.
4. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein in the first step and the third step, in order to process the inconsistency of the magnitude and direction of the index, the index under the ith scheme is processed by a range transform method, which is shown in the formula eight, and the index is subjected to subjective and objective combination weighting by an analytic hierarchy process and an entropy weight resisting method;
Figure FDA0003836278630000032
in the formula VIII, I 1 、I 2 Respectively representing a negative index and a positive index;
Figure FDA0003836278630000033
respectively are indexes after standardized treatment; i is max 、I min And the value range of the normalized index is represented.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein multiple constraints are constructed in step 4, such as system power flow constraint, generator active and reactive power constraint, node voltage constraint, short circuit current constraint, branch maximum transmission power constraint, GESCR indicator not less than a critical value, active DC inertia time constant constraint, and maximum single feed-in constraint, as shown in formula nine:
Figure FDA0003836278630000041
in the formula Jiu, P i And Q i Active and reactive power are injected into a node i; delta. For the preparation of a coating ij Is the voltage phase difference between nodes i and j; g ij And B ij Respectively, the mutual conductance and the mutual admittance between the nodes i and j;
Figure FDA0003836278630000042
and
Figure FDA0003836278630000043
respectively representing electricity generationUpper and lower limits of active and reactive power output of the machine; n is the total number of system nodes; n is a radical of G The total number of the nodes of the generator of the system is; n is a radical of l The total number of the system branches;
Figure FDA0003836278630000044
and
Figure FDA0003836278630000045
respectively representing the upper limit and the lower limit of the node voltage;
Figure FDA0003836278630000046
representing the upper limit of node short-circuit current control;
Figure FDA0003836278630000047
representing the upper limit of the transmission power of the branch; h dc Taking the effective direct current inertia time constant to be more than 2-3; gamma ray dcmax,i The ith direct current is locked due to the fault of a receiving end system, after the system recovers the steady state, in order to ensure that the steady state frequency of the system can be maintained within an allowable deviation range, the lower ith direct current transmission power accounts for the maximum ratio of the output power of all the generator sets of the system, wherein H dc And gamma dcmax,i The calculation expression of (a) is:
Figure FDA0003836278630000048
formula ten, J A_total Is the total moment of inertia of the receiver system; p D_total Feeding DC total power to a receiving end; r eq The equivalent difference adjustment coefficient of the system generator set is obtained; d L Adjusting the coefficient for the system load active frequency; gamma is the ratio of the total power of the fed-in direct current to the sum of the active power output of all the generators in the system; Δ f max Maximum allowable steady state frequency deviation for the system; f. of N The system nominal frequency.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein in step 3, MOEA/D optimization is usedThe algorithm solves the direct current drop point and unit output combined optimization model, in order to enhance the local search capability of the MEOA/D optimization algorithm and improve the optimization effect, gaussian variation is adopted after evolution operation to increase population diversity; for the ith element v in the evolved individual i The mutation operation is as follows:
Figure FDA0003836278630000051
in the eleventh formula, rand is a function for generating random numbers; c is a random number matrix; n is a radical of hydrogen v Representing the number of independent variables; gussiant (t) denotes a Gaussian function with an argument t;
Figure FDA0003836278630000052
given variance of gaussian variation; p i The mutation rate is.
CN202010882430.6A 2020-08-28 2020-08-28 Receiving-end power grid DC receiving capacity evaluation method based on multi-objective optimization Active CN112054515B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010882430.6A CN112054515B (en) 2020-08-28 2020-08-28 Receiving-end power grid DC receiving capacity evaluation method based on multi-objective optimization

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010882430.6A CN112054515B (en) 2020-08-28 2020-08-28 Receiving-end power grid DC receiving capacity evaluation method based on multi-objective optimization

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN112054515A CN112054515A (en) 2020-12-08
CN112054515B true CN112054515B (en) 2022-12-06

Family

ID=73606473

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202010882430.6A Active CN112054515B (en) 2020-08-28 2020-08-28 Receiving-end power grid DC receiving capacity evaluation method based on multi-objective optimization

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN112054515B (en)

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102723726B (en) * 2012-06-01 2014-02-12 中国电力科学研究院 Method for determining maximal direct current receiving quantity in alternating current receiving system
CN105048521B (en) * 2015-04-08 2018-05-25 国电南瑞科技股份有限公司 A kind of receiving end power grid direct current access capability computational methods for considering multiple constraint
CN105281325B (en) * 2015-10-10 2017-09-15 国网天津市电力公司 It is a kind of to lift the outer Optimal network frame method by electric energy power of receiving end power network
CN105356481B (en) * 2015-11-18 2018-12-04 中国电力科学研究院 A kind of dynamic passive compensation reconnaissance method based on more feed-in short-circuit ratioes
JP2017158265A (en) * 2016-02-29 2017-09-07 パナソニックIpマネジメント株式会社 Electric power supply system and electric power conversion system
CN106845752A (en) * 2016-11-08 2017-06-13 国家电网公司 A kind of extensive extra-high voltage interconnected network receives electric Scale Evaluation system
CN107134799A (en) * 2017-04-19 2017-09-05 国家电网公司 A kind of extra-high voltage grid transverter reactive configuration method based on short-circuit ratio
CN107681682B (en) * 2017-10-25 2020-10-09 国家电网公司 Alternating current-direct current system equivalence method based on WARD equivalence
CN110048446A (en) * 2019-03-21 2019-07-23 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 A kind of method and system of the determining layering best drop point of direct current access system receiving end
CN109873442A (en) * 2019-04-03 2019-06-11 广东电网有限责任公司电力调度控制中心 A kind of newly-increased direct current synchronizing point comprehensive estimation method of multi-infeed HVDC system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN112054515A (en) 2020-12-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN108418255B (en) Planning method and system suitable for extra-high voltage direct current outgoing power grid containing high-permeability new energy
CN110896231B (en) Distributed photovoltaic capacity receiving calculation method and system for power distribution network in poverty alleviation area
CN111614110B (en) Receiving-end power grid energy storage optimization configuration method based on improved multi-target particle swarm optimization
Liu et al. Voltage regulation strategy for DC distribution networks based on coordination of centralized control and adaptive droop control
CN114996908B (en) Active power distribution network expansion planning method and system considering intelligent soft switch access
Liu et al. Small-signal analysis of DC microgrid and multi-objective optimization segmented droop control suitable for economic dispatch
CN104732302A (en) Multistage electromagnetic loop circuit optimized loop-opening method based on immunity algorithm
Liu et al. Multiobjective optimal dispatch of mobile energy storage vehicles in active distribution networks
CN112054515B (en) Receiving-end power grid DC receiving capacity evaluation method based on multi-objective optimization
CN110970905B (en) Multi-power-supply reactive power coordination method and system for optimizing voltage control capability of wind power plant
CN107732972A (en) A kind of area power grid wind-powered electricity generation receives capability assessment method
CN110768285A (en) Method for obtaining strength of alternating current-direct current hybrid direct current multi-feed-in receiving-end power grid
CN113363991B (en) Tidal current control method based on comprehensive sensitivity
CN112736913B (en) Method for analyzing influence factors of power optimization mode of power distribution network containing distributed power supply
Zhao et al. Optimal Configuration of ESS and SVG for the Coordinated Improvement of Power Quality in Low Voltage Distribution Network with high Penetration PV
CN111884220B (en) Electromagnetic looped network open-loop partition scheme generation method considering regional source-load balance
Elende et al. Distribution network optimization by optimal sizing and placement of d-statcom using teaching and learning based optimization algorithm
CN115048760A (en) Load power quality tracing method based on typical power quality feature library
Zhang et al. EV integration-oriented DC conversion of AC low-voltage distribution networks and the associated adaptive control strategy
CN110707762B (en) Multi-energy complementary alternating current-direct current hybrid micro-grid load flow feasible region calculation method
CN115051392A (en) Reactive power coordination optimization control method containing new energy, stored energy and flexible load
CN113241793A (en) Prevention control method for power system with IPFC (intelligent power flow controller) considering wind power scene
Li et al. Wind farms reactive power optimization using genetic/tabu hybrid algorithm
Zhou et al. Research on multi-objective optimal dispatching and low voltage of distributed generation in rural distribution network
Nagaballi et al. Impact of DG and D-STATCOM Integration in RDN on Power Losses and Voltage Profile Considering Load Growth

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant