CN112035767A

CN112035767A - Method and device for displaying prompt information

Info

Publication number: CN112035767A
Application number: CN202010821212.1A
Authority: CN
Inventors: 伍星扬; 董澈; 王欣怡; 杨哲
Original assignee: Beijing Sankuai Online Technology Co Ltd
Current assignee: Beijing Sankuai Online Technology Co Ltd
Priority date: 2020-08-14
Filing date: 2020-08-14
Publication date: 2020-12-04

Abstract

The specification discloses a method and a device for displaying prompt information, wherein when an interface for inputting user generated content needs to be displayed, prompt information corresponding to an evaluation progress bar, each evaluation node and each evaluation node is determined according to a content evaluation strategy corresponding to the interface, and the prompt information, the evaluation progress bar and each evaluation node are determined and displayed in the interface according to the prompt information corresponding to an initial node in each evaluation node, so that the progress of the progress bar is adjusted according to the content input by a user, and the prompt information is updated according to a current node reached by the progress. Because the components such as the progress bar can be independently displayed, the interference on the input content of the user can be avoided, the progress of the progress bar is adjusted along with the input content of the user, and the user can clearly determine the evaluation of the input content. In addition, different prompt messages are displayed by setting different evaluation nodes, so that the user input content can be prompted in stages, and the probability of the user inputting UGC is improved.

Description

Method and device for displaying prompt information

Technical Field

The present application relates to the field of computer technologies, and in particular, to a method and an apparatus for displaying prompt information.

Background

Currently, as the internet continues to deeply live, individual users gradually become one of the main sources of information generation in the internet, and the most common is User Generated Content (UGC) in each large platform website. A large amount of UGC is generated in the internet every day, and generally only a small part of UGC is effective content for other users or data processing, that is, high-quality content, while a large part of UGC is low-quality content.

In order to improve the quality of the UGC and improve the quality of the content generated by the user, in the prior art, a reward and punishment mode is usually adopted to stimulate the user to output the higher-quality UGC or improve the willingness of the user to output the UGC. And displaying prompt information in an interface for inputting the UGC by the user, wherein the prompt information is used for prompting the user to output the UGC meeting the conditions so as to obtain the reward. For example, when the UGC output by the user meets the preset condition, the corresponding reward is provided.

However, in the prior art, prompt information is usually displayed in an original UGC input interface. Space limitations lead to simpler prompt information content and difficulty in achieving the intended function. In order to distinguish from the interface component and avoid interfering with the user, the prompt message with low visibility is generally adopted, and the effect is not good.

Disclosure of Invention

The method and the device for displaying the prompt message provided by the embodiment of the specification are used for partially solving the problems in the prior art.

The embodiment of the specification adopts the following technical scheme:

the method for displaying the prompt message provided by the specification comprises the following steps:

determining an interface for inputting user generated content according to the monitored user operation;

determining an evaluation progress bar, each evaluation node and prompt information corresponding to each evaluation node according to a content evaluation strategy corresponding to the interface, wherein the prompt information corresponding to different evaluation nodes is not identical;

determining initial prompt information according to the prompt information corresponding to the initial evaluation node in each evaluation node, and displaying the interface comprising the evaluation progress bar, each evaluation node and the initial prompt information;

monitoring the content input by the user in the interface;

and adjusting the progress of the evaluation progress bar according to the content input by the user and the content evaluation strategy, taking an evaluation node to which the progress of the evaluation progress bar reaches as a current node, updating prompt information according to the progress and the prompt information corresponding to the current node, and displaying the prompt information in the interface.

Optionally, the method further comprises:

determining resources corresponding to each evaluation node according to the content evaluation strategy corresponding to the interface;

and when the user input is determined to be finished, determining the resources corresponding to the current node according to the resources corresponding to the evaluation nodes respectively, and distributing the resources to the user.

Optionally, determining an interface for inputting user-generated content according to the monitored user operation specifically includes:

and determining an interface for inputting the user-generated content of the service according to the monitored operation of the user on the service content generation inlet.

Optionally, determining the evaluation progress bar, each evaluation node, and prompt information corresponding to each evaluation node according to the content evaluation policy corresponding to the interface, specifically including:

determining a content evaluation strategy corresponding to the interface according to the service type of the service and the corresponding relation between the preset service type and the content evaluation strategy;

and determining the evaluation progress bar, each evaluation node and prompt information corresponding to each evaluation node according to the determined content evaluation strategy.

Optionally, determining the evaluation progress bar, each evaluation node, and prompt information corresponding to each evaluation node respectively includes:

and determining the evaluation range of the evaluation progress bar, the number of the evaluation nodes, the positions of the evaluation nodes on the evaluation progress bar, the evaluation range corresponding to the evaluation nodes and the prompt information corresponding to the evaluation nodes.

Optionally, adjusting the progress of the evaluation progress bar according to the content input by the user and the content evaluation policy includes:

determining the total score of the content input by the user according to the corresponding relation between the content type and the score in the content evaluation strategy;

determining the proportion of the total score to the maximum value of the evaluation range of the evaluation progress bar, and adjusting the progress of the evaluation progress bar;

wherein, the scores corresponding to different content types are not completely the same, and the content types at least include: one of characters, pictures and videos.

Optionally, updating the prompt information according to the progress and the prompt information corresponding to the current node, and specifically including:

determining a difference value between the progress and a next evaluation node of the current node according to the progress of the evaluation progress bar;

determining the content corresponding to the difference value according to the determined difference value and the corresponding relation between the content type and the score;

and updating the prompt information according to the determined content, wherein the updated prompt information is used for prompting the content of the difference between the content input by the user and the next evaluation node.

Optionally, the method further comprises:

and highlighting the identification of the evaluation node which reaches the progress of the evaluation progress bar, wherein the identification is used for prompting the user of the evaluation node which reaches the evaluation progress.

Optionally, the method further comprises:

and when monitoring that the user operates the anonymous operation entrance, displaying the evaluation progress bar and the currently displayed prompt information with low visibility, and displaying anonymous information, wherein the anonymous information is used for prompting that the user cannot acquire resources when being anonymous.

The device for displaying prompt information provided by the specification comprises:

the interface determining module is used for determining an interface for inputting user generated content according to the monitored user operation;

the component determining module is used for determining the evaluation progress bar, each evaluation node and prompt information corresponding to each evaluation node according to the content evaluation strategy corresponding to the interface, wherein the prompt information corresponding to different evaluation nodes is not identical;

the display module is used for determining initial prompt information according to the prompt information corresponding to the initial evaluation node in each evaluation node and displaying the interface comprising the evaluation progress bar, each evaluation node and the initial prompt information;

the monitoring module monitors the content input by the user in the interface;

and the prompt information updating module is used for adjusting the progress of the evaluation progress bar according to the content input by the user and the content evaluation strategy, taking an evaluation node reached by the progress of the evaluation progress bar as a current node, updating prompt information according to the progress and the prompt information corresponding to the current node, and displaying the prompt information in the interface.

A computer-readable storage medium, storing a computer program which, when executed by a processor, implements any of the methods described above.

The electronic device provided by the present specification comprises a memory, a processor and a computer program stored on the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor implements any of the above methods when executing the program.

The embodiment of the specification adopts at least one technical scheme which can achieve the following beneficial effects:

when an interface for inputting user generated content needs to be displayed, according to a content evaluation strategy corresponding to the interface, determining an evaluation progress bar, each evaluation node and prompt information corresponding to each evaluation node respectively, according to the prompt information corresponding to an initial node in each evaluation node, determining and displaying the prompt information, the evaluation progress bar and each evaluation node in the interface, so that the progress of the progress bar can be adjusted according to the content input by a user, and the prompt information can be updated according to a current node reached by the progress. Because the components such as the progress bar can be independently displayed, the interference on the input content of the user can be avoided, the progress of the progress bar is adjusted along with the input content of the user, and the user can clearly determine the evaluation of the input content. In addition, different prompt messages are displayed by setting different evaluation nodes, so that the user input content can be prompted in stages, the effectiveness of the prompt messages is improved, and the probability of the user inputting UGC is increased.

Drawings

The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the application and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this application, illustrate embodiment(s) of the application and together with the description serve to explain the application and not to limit the application. In the drawings:

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an interface for displaying prompt information in the prior art;

fig. 2 is a schematic flow chart illustrating a prompt message according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of an interface for displaying prompt information according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIGS. 4a to 4d are schematic diagrams illustrating changes in the interface provided in the embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIGS. 5 and 6 are schematic diagrams of apparatuses for displaying prompt information according to embodiments of the present disclosure;

fig. 7 is a schematic structural diagram of an electronic device for implementing presentation of prompt information according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.

Detailed Description

In order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present disclosure more apparent, the technical solutions of the present disclosure will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the specific embodiments of the present disclosure and the accompanying drawings. It should be apparent that the described embodiments are only some of the embodiments of the present application, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments obtained by a person skilled in the art based on the embodiments in the present specification without any inventive step are within the scope of the present application.

At present, in order to increase the willingness of a user to input UGC, fixed prompt information is usually displayed in an original UGC interface, as shown in fig. 1. In the left interface in fig. 1, it can be seen that, in the content input box, the prompt message "write 40 words and evaluate the score" is displayed, and the statistical "0 character" of the input word number is in the lower right corner. After the user starts to input content, in order to avoid interfering with the user, the prompt information in the input box is hidden, and the number of the statistical characters is displayed in the lower right corner, for example, in the right-side interface in fig. 1, the user inputs 3 characters, "i think", and the lower right corner displays 3 characters.

In order to present information to avoid interference with the user, the content that is not input by the user in the input box is usually distinguished from the user input content in terms of font and color, and is usually processed to be low-visible, that is, processed to be not easily visible, and usually a font color close to the background color is selected, for example, a white background is selected as a light gray font color, or a black background is selected as a dark gray font color.

This further leads to a conflict between the requirement for significant prompting information and the inability of the prompting information to interfere with the user, making the prompting information in the current UGC input interface difficult to gap and difficult to perform as intended.

The technical solutions provided by the embodiments of the present application are described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.

Fig. 2 is a schematic flow chart of displaying prompt information provided in an embodiment of the present specification, including:

s100: determining an interface for inputting user-generated content based on the monitored user operation.

Since the UGC is typically entered by the user in the terminal, in one or more embodiments of the present description, the process of presenting the reminder information is performed by the terminal. The terminal can be a mobile phone, a personal computer, a tablet personal computer and other devices, and the description is not limited and can be set as required. Furthermore, the type of the UGC input by the user is not limited in this specification, and in one or more embodiments of this specification, the content type of the UGC input by the user may include at least: at least one of text, image, video, audio.

Furthermore, because the UGC input by the user generally needs to be uploaded to a server of a service provider and then distributed by the server, the user can input the UGC in an interface of an application provided by the service provider installed in the terminal, and the terminal establishes a communication connection with the server through the application and uploads the UGC. Similarly, in this specification, the interface for inputting the user-generated content is also an interface of an application presentation running in the terminal. Of course, for convenience of description, the terminal is taken as an execution subject of the process of presenting the prompt message in the following description, and the process of presenting the prompt message is described.

Specifically, the terminal may determine an interface for inputting user-generated content according to the monitored user operation. Also, generally, a user may select to input UGC in a plurality of cases, and the corresponding types of UGC input in different cases may be different. For example, a user's evaluation of a service provided by a service provider belongs to one UGC, and the user's content of information for recording daily life belongs to another UGC.

Also, the expectation of the UGC content is not exactly the same for different types of UGC. For example, for UGC that is a movie look-after-view, it is generally expected that the more the user enters the text description in the UGC, the higher the "value" of the UGC, and the more text that the user is prompted to enter when the prompting information is presented. For the evaluation UGC of the photographing service, it is generally desirable that the user can provide more images so that other users can refer to the images, and the user is prompted to input more images when the prompting information is presented.

While the entry of the generally different UGC's input is also not generally identical, e.g., entry of ratings for different business services is generally in different business detail interfaces. Therefore, further in one or more embodiments of the present specification, the terminal may further determine a service type of the service when monitoring an operation of a user on a content generation entry of the service, and determine an interface for inputting the user-generated content of the service according to a corresponding relationship between a preset service type and an interface of the user-generated content. So that the following steps can determine the incompletely same prompt information displayed in the interface according to different service types.

The service types can include different service evaluation types, different types of original content and the like, and the types of the original content at least include content created by a user, such as a work shot by the user, an article written by the user and the like.

For different types of services provided by a service provider, the services can be divided into a plurality of different service types, such as service types biased to text description, service types biased to image description, service types biased to video description or service types mixed with a plurality of description modes.

For the type of the original content, the service type may also include a service type biased to text description, a service type biased to image description, a service type biased to video description, or a service type mixed with multiple description modes. In addition, for the original content, generally, in addition to determining the service type according to different user operation entries, the service type can also be comprehensively determined according to the type of UGC historically issued by the user. For example, a user who distributes photographic works on a daily basis, when monitoring that the user operates an entrance for distributing UGC, the terminal may determine that the service type is a service type biased to image description.

Of course, the service types may be set, subdivided, or combined as needed, and this specification does not limit this.

Table 1 is a schematic diagram of a correspondence relationship between service types and specific services provided in this specification.

Type of service	Concrete service
		Type of service described in text	Exhibition evaluation, movie evaluation, concert evaluation, and the like
Image-described service types	Photographic service evaluation, wedding service evaluation, and the like
		Video-described traffic types	Micro-recording (video blog), dance original content, etc
Mixed description of traffic types	Restaurant evaluation, travel service evaluation, and the like

TABLE 1

Of course, although the service evaluation original content is not classified more finely in table 1, generally, the "amount" of the UGC of the original content is generally larger than the "amount" of the UGC of the service evaluation, for example, the photography service evaluation user uploads 3 images on average, while the original content of the photography work distribution is generally more numerous, and therefore, the presentation content may not be completely the same when presentation information is presented in the interface for different business types. For convenience of subsequent description and simplification of the flow, the UGC of service evaluation is used as a description in the following of the present specification.

S102: and determining the evaluation progress bar, each evaluation node and prompt information corresponding to each evaluation node according to the content evaluation strategy corresponding to the interface, wherein the prompt information corresponding to different evaluation nodes is not identical.

S104: and determining initial prompt information according to the prompt information corresponding to the initial evaluation node in each evaluation node, and displaying the interface comprising the evaluation progress bar, each evaluation node and the initial prompt information.

In this specification, after the terminal determines an interface to be displayed, prompt information corresponding to the evaluation progress bar, each evaluation node, and each evaluation node may be determined according to a content evaluation policy corresponding to the interface, where the prompt information corresponding to the evaluation progress bar, each evaluation node, and each evaluation node is used to display the progress of the user's subsequent input content and display the prompt information in the interface. In this specification, the presentation information corresponding to different evaluation nodes is not identical, so that the user presents the information that is not identical at different stages of inputting the content. For example, the user is prompted to input words at an initial stage of the user inputting the UGC, and is prompted to input pictures when the number of words input by the user reaches a certain degree (i.e., at different stages), and the like.

Specifically, in one or more embodiments of the present specification, the terminal may store a content evaluation policy in advance, and determine, according to the content evaluation policy, an evaluation range of the evaluation progress bar, the number of evaluation nodes, a position of each evaluation node on the evaluation progress bar, an evaluation range corresponding to each evaluation node, and prompt information corresponding to each evaluation node. Of course, the content evaluation policy may be set as needed, and the present specification is not limited thereto.

And because the user has not input content in the interface when the interface is initially displayed, when the terminal displays the interface, the terminal can determine initial prompt information according to the prompt information corresponding to the initial evaluation node in each evaluation node, and render an interface containing the evaluation progress bar, each evaluation node and the initial prompt information, so that the terminal displays the rendered interface.

In one or more embodiments of the present specification, the display position of the evaluation progress bar, each evaluation node, and the initial prompt information may be at the top of the interface, and since the display position is not set in a dialog box or the like for inputting content by user, and does not interfere with the user input content, the display position may be set to be more easily perceived by the user in terms of color, pattern, and the like. Therefore, the contradiction that the existing prompt information needs to be obvious and the prompt information cannot interfere with the user is avoided, so that the prompt information can be obviously displayed in the interface and the user cannot be interfered.

Fig. 3 is a schematic diagram of an interface for displaying prompt information provided in this specification, where the terminal may determine a component for displaying prompt information in the interface according to the determined content evaluation policy. It can be seen that the evaluation range of the evaluation progress bar is 0 to 100, the evaluation nodes include 3 default initial nodes, the 3 evaluation nodes are respectively located at different positions (respectively at 0%, 30% and 100% of the evaluation progress bar) of the evaluation progress bar, and the corresponding evaluation ranges are 0 to 29, 30 to 99 and 100. Fig. 3 shows the initial prompt information corresponding to the prompt information "input content acquisition reward" as the initial evaluation node.

Certainly, the prompt information corresponding to different nodes is not included in fig. 3, and other prompt information may be displayed along with the content input by the user in the subsequent step. For example, the prompt information corresponding to the initial evaluation node may further include: the "still difference XX words" is used for displaying after monitoring the content input by the user, and the prompt information corresponding to the evaluation node located at 30% of the evaluation progress bar may include: "still differ by XX words and XX pictures", the prompt information corresponding to the evaluation node located at 100% of the evaluation progress bar may include: "May you meet the Standard! "

The terminal can determine the displayed content according to the content evaluation strategy.

In addition, in one or more embodiments of the present specification, as described in step S100, the prompting information of different service types may not be completely the same, so that the terminal may store a correspondence relationship between each service type and each content evaluation policy, determine the content evaluation policy corresponding to the interface according to the service type of the service determined in step S100, and determine the prompting information corresponding to the evaluation progress bar, each evaluation node, and each evaluation node according to the determined content evaluation policy. As described in step S100, the content evaluation policies of different UGC content biased to different service types may not be identical, for example, the content evaluation policy biased to image, and the prompt information corresponding to the initial evaluation node may be: "still differ by XX pictures".

Further, according to the description in step S100 of this specification, in one or more embodiments of this specification, there are multiple content types of the UGC content input by the user, and therefore, the interface displayed by the terminal may further include input entries of UGC with different content types, for example, a dialog box for text input, a button for inputting pictures, a button for recording videos, and the like. Of course, the content types such as pictures and videos may be previously collected by the user and stored in the terminal, and may be obtained by calling. Since the method for calling the required data from the stored data is mature, detailed description of the detailed process of the process is omitted in this application.

S106: monitoring the content input by the user in the interface.

In this specification, after the terminal displays the interface, the terminal may detect the content input by the user in the interface, so as to display the progress of the content input by the user in the form of the progress of a visual progress bar according to the content input by the user, and determine the current evaluation node according to the content input by the user to determine the prompt information to be displayed.

Specifically, according to the description in step S100 of the present specification, in one or more embodiments of the present specification, there are a plurality of content types of the UGC content input by the user, and thus the terminal may monitor the content of different content types input by the user.

S108: and adjusting the progress of the evaluation progress bar according to the content input by the user and the content evaluation strategy, taking an evaluation node to which the progress of the evaluation progress bar reaches as a current node, updating prompt information according to the progress and the prompt information corresponding to the current node, and displaying the prompt information in the interface.

In this specification, the terminal may adjust the progress of the evaluation progress bar according to the monitored content input by the user and the content evaluation policy determined in step S102 in real time, and prompt the user how much content is input in an intuitive graphical visualization manner. And the terminal can also take the evaluation node to which the progress of the evaluation progress bar reaches as the current node, and update the prompt information according to the progress and the prompt information corresponding to the current node.

Specifically, in this specification, since there are a plurality of content types of content input by a user, and the information amount that can be expressed by UGC of different content types is different, for example, characters express graphics, shapes, and patterns, which are not as direct as images, and usually require more characters to describe, and the information amount included in video information is much larger than that of images, in one or more embodiments of the specification, in order to be able to evaluate content input by a user based on the same standard, a score of each content type may be determined in advance for each content type, so as to obtain a corresponding relationship between each content type and the score.

Table 2 is an illustration of the correspondence between content type and rating provided in the present specification.

Content type	Scoring
		Character(s)	1-character 1
Image of a person	20 points for 1 image
		Video	15s video 50 points

TABLE 2

Then, in step S108 of this specification, first, the terminal may determine a total score of the monitored content input by the user in an accumulated manner according to a preset corresponding relationship between the content type and the score.

Secondly, the terminal can determine the proportion of the total score to the maximum value of the evaluation range of the evaluation progress bar, and adjust the progress of the evaluation progress bar according to the determined proportion. For example, if the maximum value of the evaluation range is 100, the total score is 32, and the ratio is 32%, the progress of the evaluation progress bar is adjusted to 32%. As shown in fig. 4a, fig. 4a is a schematic view of an interface after the progress of the evaluation progress bar is adjusted with respect to fig. 3.

In addition, in this specification, in addition to the progress of the progress bar as information for prompting the user to input a content, the terminal may further use an evaluation node to which the progress of the evaluation progress bar is reached as a current node to update the prompt information according to the incompletely identical prompt information corresponding to different evaluation nodes.

Specifically, first, the terminal may take an evaluation node to which the progress of the evaluation progress bar is reached as a current node, which may, of course, remain unchanged or change when the progress increases to reach a next evaluation node.

Secondly, the terminal can determine the difference between the progress and the next evaluation node of the current node according to the progress of the evaluation progress bar. For example, assuming that the progress of the current evaluation progress bar is 30% and the position of the next evaluation node of the current node is 50%, the difference is 20% to 50% -30%. And determining the score corresponding to 20% according to the evaluation range of the evaluation progress bar, wherein if the evaluation range is 500, the score corresponding to 20% is 100.

Then, the terminal may determine the content corresponding to the difference value according to the determined difference value and the correspondence between the content type and the score. Continuing with the above example, assuming that the correspondence between the content type and the score is shown in table 2, the content corresponding to the difference value of 100 is: 100 words or 5 images or 30s video.

And finally, the terminal can update the prompt information according to the determined content, wherein the updated prompt information is used for prompting the content of the difference between the content input by the terminal and the next evaluation node. Continuing with the above example, the prompt may be presented in the interface as updated to "100 words worse".

Further, in one or more embodiments of the present specification, since the information that different evaluation nodes need to prompt is not identical, for example, the initial prompt information corresponding to the current node is "poor M word + N graph", there may be multiple content types of the content that meet the requirement that the progress of the evaluation progress bar reaches the next evaluation node, and therefore the terminal may further update the prompt information according to the content that the user has already input and the content that is needed to reach the next evaluation node.

Continuing to use the above example, when the number of the characters in the content which has been input by the user satisfies the condition, but the input image does not satisfy the condition, that is, the input characters are greater than or equal to M characters, and the images are less than N, the prompt information is updated to be "the difference N-X images", where X is the number of the images in the content which has been input by the user. As shown in fig. 4b, fig. 4b is a schematic view of an interface provided in the present specification after the prompt information is updated with respect to fig. 3.

And when the number of the content characters which are already input by the user does not meet the condition, but the input image meets the condition, namely the input characters are less than M characters, and the image is more than or equal to N, updating the prompt message to be 'poor N-Y pictures', wherein Y is the number of the characters in the content which is already input by the user.

In addition, in one or more embodiments of the present specification, the terminal may highlight, when the progress of the evaluation progress bar reaches a next evaluation node, an identifier of the next evaluation node, so that, in each evaluation node displayed on the interface, the identifier of the evaluation node that the progress of the evaluation progress bar reaches is highlighted, and the identifier is used to prompt a user of the evaluation node that the evaluation progress has reached.

Further, in one or more embodiments of the present specification, if the content input by the user does not satisfy the content type of the content required to reach the next rating node or the number of required contents, the content input by the user does not actually reach the expectation. Then, in order to further prompt the user, the terminal may determine that the progress of the evaluation progress bar reaches the next evaluation node according to the total score, and does not adjust the progress of the progress bar any more, and does not highlight the next evaluation node, and in combination with the prompt information of the current node, prompt the user that the progress reaches the next evaluation node only when the content required to reach the next evaluation node needs to be input.

For example, assume that the content required to reach the next evaluation node is: the M characters and the N images, and the M + A characters and the N-1 images input by the user, so that the progress corresponding to the proportion of the total score to the maximum value of the evaluation range of the evaluation progress bar already exceeds the position of the next evaluation node in the evaluation progress bar, but because the content input by the user does not reach the N images, the western prompting information of 'still worse by 1 picture' is displayed in the interface at the moment, the progress bar does not grow any more, and the next evaluation node is not highlighted, as shown in fig. 4 c.

The dotted line in fig. 4c represents the progress corresponding to the ratio of the current total score to the maximum value of the evaluation range of the evaluation progress bar, and it can be seen that the dotted line has exceeded the position of the next evaluation node in the evaluation progress bar, and of course, the dotted line may be displayed in an interface for prompting the user of a recoverable progress position after inputting the content according to the prompt information, and of course, may not be displayed.

Further, in one or more embodiments of the present specification, since there may be a case as shown in fig. 4c described above, there is another case where the content continuously input by the user satisfies the content required for reaching the next evaluation node, and the terminal may restore the progress corresponding to the ratio of the total score to the maximum value of the evaluation range of the evaluation progress bar.

Continuing with the above example, in the case shown in fig. 4c, assuming that the user continues to input 1 image, the terminal may determine that the content input by the user satisfies the content required for reaching the next evaluation node, resume the progress presentation, and update the prompt information with the next evaluation node as the current node. As shown in fig. 4 d.

The updatable prompt message "still worse by H words and J pictures" and the progress of the recovery is shown in fig. 4 d.

Based on the method for displaying the prompt information shown in fig. 2, when an interface for inputting the content generated by the user needs to be displayed, the evaluation progress bar, each evaluation node and the prompt information corresponding to each evaluation node are determined according to the content evaluation strategy corresponding to the interface, the prompt information, the evaluation progress bar and each evaluation node are determined and displayed in the interface according to the prompt information corresponding to the initial node in each evaluation node, so that the progress of the progress bar is adjusted according to the content input by the user, and the prompt information is updated according to the current node reached by the progress. Because the components such as the progress bar can be independently displayed, the interference on the input content of the user can be avoided, the progress of the progress bar is adjusted along with the input content of the user, and the user can clearly determine the evaluation of the input content. In addition, different prompt messages are displayed by setting different evaluation nodes, so that the user input content can be prompted in stages, the effectiveness of the prompt messages is improved, and the probability of the user inputting UGC is increased.

Further, in this specification, different evaluation nodes may also correspond to different resources, and the resources are used to allocate the resources corresponding to the current node to the user after the user inputs content for distribution. And the resources corresponding to different evaluation nodes are different, and the resources corresponding to the evaluation nodes positioned at the back in the evaluation progress bar are larger than the resources corresponding to the evaluation nodes positioned at the front in the evaluation progress bar. That is, the more backward the position in the evaluation progress bar, the more resources the evaluation node corresponds to, so as to encourage the user to input more content.

In this specification, allocating a resource to the user may be determined by the terminal as to the resource that needs to be allocated, and sent to a server of the service provider, which allocates the resource to the user. Wherein, the allocation resource may be: the specific form of the resource is not limited in the present specification, and may be set as needed.

Furthermore, in this specification, the interface further includes an entry for anonymous operation, and when the operation of the user on the entry for anonymous operation is monitored, the terminal may determine that the content input by the user is the content distributed anonymously.

However, since the public trust of the anonymously published content is weak, in order to reduce the probability of the anonymous content publication by the user, when the terminal monitors the operation of the user on the anonymous operation entry, the terminal displays the evaluation progress bar and the currently displayed prompt information with low visibility, and displays anonymous information, wherein the anonymous information is used for prompting that the user cannot acquire resources when being anonymous.

In addition, in this specification, since the evaluation nodes may be provided at different positions of the evaluation progress bar, and as long as the progress of the evaluation progress bar reaches any one of the evaluation nodes, resources may be allocated to the user after the user has finished inputting the content, so that the condition for allocating resources to the user may be reduced to increase the willingness of the user to input the evaluation content. And because a plurality of evaluation nodes can be arranged, and the more the position in the evaluation progress bar is, the more resources corresponding to the evaluation nodes are, the willingness of the user to input more contents can be improved by displaying the prompt information and the progress bar. In general, the UGC content and the UGC quality are positively correlated, so that the UGC quality obtained by the service provider can be improved.

Further, as described in step S100 of the present specification, since the "amount" of the UGC of the original content is generally larger than the "amount" of the UGC evaluated for the service, the content evaluation policy described in step S102 of the present specification differs between the content evaluation policies corresponding to the original content and the service evaluation two types of UGC input interfaces. For example, when the total score is calculated by using the same correspondence between the content type and the score, the UGC content amount of the original content is usually large, so that the evaluation range of the evaluation progress corresponding to the interface for inputting the original content is larger than the evaluation range of the evaluation progress corresponding to the interface for inputting the service evaluation.

Alternatively, in the present specification, as shown in table 1, when the total score is determined in step S108, regardless of the difference between the original content and the service evaluation, different correspondence between the content type and the score may be used for the two types of UGC of the original content and the service evaluation, for example, table 3.

TABLE 3

So that the total rating of the inputted service evaluation content is higher than the total rating of the inputted original content in the case that the contents inputted by the user are the same.

In addition, in the present specification, the service evaluation and the original content are only a way of distinguishing different types of UGC, and do not indicate that the service evaluation input by the user is not original by the user, nor that the original content input by the user is not evaluated by a certain object. In addition, in the present specification, only the two types of UGC are described as an example, and the two types of UGC are not limited to these examples.

Based on the process of displaying the prompt information shown in fig. 2, the embodiment of this specification further corresponds to a schematic structural diagram of an apparatus for providing the display prompt information, as shown in fig. 5.

Fig. 5 is a schematic structural diagram of an apparatus for displaying a prompt message provided in an embodiment of the present specification, where the apparatus includes:

an interface determination module 200, which determines an interface for inputting user generated content according to the monitored user operation;

the component determining module 202 is configured to determine, according to the content evaluation policy corresponding to the interface, an evaluation progress bar, each evaluation node, and prompt information corresponding to each evaluation node, where the prompt information corresponding to different evaluation nodes is not identical;

the display module 204 determines initial prompt information according to the prompt information corresponding to the initial evaluation node in each evaluation node, and displays the interface including the evaluation progress bar, each evaluation node and the initial prompt information;

a monitoring module 206 for monitoring the content input by the user in the interface;

and the prompt information updating module 208 is used for adjusting the progress of the evaluation progress bar according to the content input by the user and the content evaluation strategy, taking the node where the progress of the evaluation progress bar reaches as the current node, updating prompt information according to the progress and the prompt information corresponding to the current node, and displaying the prompt information in the interface.

Optionally, the apparatus further comprises: the module 210 is assigned as shown in fig. 6.

The allocating module 210 determines resources corresponding to each node according to a content evaluation policy corresponding to the interface, and when it is determined that the user input is completed, determines resources corresponding to the current node according to the resources corresponding to each node, and allocates the resources to the user, wherein the more backward the evaluation node is positioned in the evaluation progress bar, the more resources corresponding to the evaluation node are.

Optionally, the interface determining module 200 determines an interface for inputting the user-generated content of the service according to the monitored operation of the user on the content generation entry of the service.

Optionally, the component determining module 202 determines a content evaluation policy corresponding to the interface according to the service type of the service and a preset correspondence between the service type and the content evaluation policy;

Optionally, the component determining module 202 determines an evaluation range of the evaluation progress bar, the number of the evaluation nodes, a position of each evaluation node in the evaluation progress bar, an evaluation range corresponding to each evaluation node, and prompt information corresponding to each evaluation node.

Optionally, the prompt information updating module 208 determines, according to a corresponding relationship between a content type and a score in the content evaluation policy, a total score of the content input by the user in an accumulated manner, determines a ratio of the total score to a maximum value of an evaluation range of the evaluation progress bar, and adjusts the progress of the evaluation progress bar, where the scores corresponding to different content types are not completely the same, and the content types at least include: one of characters, pictures and videos.

Optionally, the prompt information updating module 208 determines a difference between the progress and a next evaluation node of the current node according to the progress of the evaluation progress bar, determines a content corresponding to the difference according to the determined difference and the corresponding relationship between the content type and the score, and updates the prompt information according to the determined content, where the updated prompt information is used to prompt the user for the content of the difference between the content input by the user and the next evaluation node.

Optionally, the display module 204 highlights an identifier of an evaluation node where the progress of the evaluation progress bar reaches, where the identifier is used to prompt the user that the evaluation node where the evaluation progress reaches is reached.

Optionally, the display module 204 is configured to, when it is monitored that the user operates an anonymous operation entry, perform low visibility display on the evaluation progress bar and the currently displayed prompt information, and display an anonymous prompt, where the anonymous prompt is used to prompt that the user cannot acquire resources when being anonymous.

Embodiments of the present specification further provide a computer-readable storage medium, where the storage medium stores a computer program, and the computer program can be used to execute any one of the above presentation prompt information methods.

Based on the process of presenting the prompt message provided in fig. 2, an embodiment of this specification further provides a schematic structural diagram of the electronic device shown in fig. 7. As shown in fig. 7, the electronic device includes a processor, an internal bus, a network interface, a memory, and a non-volatile memory, and the processor reads a corresponding computer program from the non-volatile memory into the memory and then runs the computer program to implement any one of the above methods for presenting the prompt message.

Of course, besides the software implementation, the present specification does not exclude other implementations, such as logic devices or a combination of software and hardware, and the like, that is, the execution subject of the following processing flow is not limited to each logic unit, and may be hardware or logic devices.

In the 90 s of the 20 th century, improvements in a technology could clearly distinguish between improvements in hardware (e.g., improvements in circuit structures such as diodes, transistors, switches, etc.) and improvements in software (improvements in process flow). However, as technology advances, many of today's process flow improvements have been seen as direct improvements in hardware circuit architecture. Designers almost always obtain the corresponding hardware circuit structure by programming an improved method flow into the hardware circuit. Thus, it cannot be said that an improvement in the process flow cannot be realized by hardware physical modules. For example, a Programmable Logic Device (PLD), such as a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), is an integrated circuit whose Logic functions are determined by programming the Device by a user. A digital system is "integrated" on a PLD by the designer's own programming without requiring the chip manufacturer to design and fabricate application-specific integrated circuit chips. Furthermore, nowadays, instead of manually making an Integrated Circuit chip, such Programming is often implemented by "logic compiler" software, which is similar to a software compiler used in program development and writing, but the original code before compiling is also written by a specific Programming Language, which is called Hardware Description Language (HDL), and HDL is not only one but many, such as abel (advanced Boolean Expression Language), ahdl (alternate Hardware Description Language), traffic, pl (core universal Programming Language), HDCal (jhdware Description Language), lang, Lola, HDL, laspam, hardward Description Language (vhr Description Language), vhal (Hardware Description Language), and vhigh-Language, which are currently used in most common. It will also be apparent to those skilled in the art that hardware circuitry that implements the logical method flows can be readily obtained by merely slightly programming the method flows into an integrated circuit using the hardware description languages described above.

The controller may be implemented in any suitable manner, for example, the controller may take the form of, for example, a microprocessor or processor and a computer-readable medium storing computer-readable program code (e.g., software or firmware) executable by the (micro) processor, logic gates, switches, an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), a programmable logic controller, and an embedded microcontroller, examples of which include, but are not limited to, the following microcontrollers: ARC 625D, Atmel AT91SAM, Microchip PIC18F26K20, and Silicone Labs C8051F320, the memory controller may also be implemented as part of the control logic for the memory. Those skilled in the art will also appreciate that, in addition to implementing the controller as pure computer readable program code, the same functionality can be implemented by logically programming method steps such that the controller is in the form of logic gates, switches, application specific integrated circuits, programmable logic controllers, embedded microcontrollers and the like. Such a controller may thus be considered a hardware component, and the means included therein for performing the various functions may also be considered as a structure within the hardware component. Or even means for performing the functions may be regarded as being both a software module for performing the method and a structure within a hardware component.

The systems, devices, modules or units illustrated in the above embodiments may be implemented by a computer chip or an entity, or by a product with certain functions. One typical implementation device is a computer. In particular, the computer may be, for example, a personal computer, a laptop computer, a cellular telephone, a camera phone, a smartphone, a personal digital assistant, a media player, a navigation device, an email device, a game console, a tablet computer, a wearable device, or a combination of any of these devices.

For convenience of description, the above devices are described as being divided into various units by function, and are described separately. Of course, the functions of the various elements may be implemented in the same one or more software and/or hardware implementations of the present description.

As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, embodiments of the present invention may be provided as a method, system, or computer program product. Accordingly, the present invention may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. Furthermore, the present invention may take the form of a computer program product embodied on one or more computer-usable storage media (including, but not limited to, disk storage, CD-ROM, optical storage, and the like) having computer-usable program code embodied therein.

The present invention is described with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each flow and/or block of the flow diagrams and/or block diagrams, and combinations of flows and/or blocks in the flow diagrams and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, embedded processor, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.

These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable memory that can direct a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory produce an article of manufacture including instruction means which implement the function specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.

These computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer or other programmable apparatus to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide steps for implementing the functions specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.

In a typical configuration, a computing device includes one or more processors (CPUs), input/output interfaces, network interfaces, and memory.

The memory may include forms of volatile memory in a computer readable medium, Random Access Memory (RAM) and/or non-volatile memory, such as Read Only Memory (ROM) or flash memory (flash RAM). Memory is an example of a computer-readable medium.

Computer-readable media, including both non-transitory and non-transitory, removable and non-removable media, may implement information storage by any method or technology. The information may be computer readable instructions, data structures, modules of a program, or other data. Examples of computer storage media include, but are not limited to, phase change memory (PRAM), Static Random Access Memory (SRAM), Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM), other types of Random Access Memory (RAM), Read Only Memory (ROM), Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technology, compact disc read only memory (CD-ROM), Digital Versatile Discs (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other non-transmission medium that can be used to store information that can be accessed by a computing device. As defined herein, a computer readable medium does not include a transitory computer readable medium such as a modulated data signal and a carrier wave.

It should also be noted that the terms "comprises," "comprising," or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. Without further limitation, an element defined by the phrase "comprising an … …" does not exclude the presence of other like elements in a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises the element.

As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, embodiments of the present description may be provided as a method, system, or computer program product. Accordingly, the description may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. Furthermore, the description may take the form of a computer program product embodied on one or more computer-usable storage media (including, but not limited to, disk storage, CD-ROM, optical storage, and the like) having computer-usable program code embodied therein.

This description may be described in the general context of computer-executable instructions, such as program modules, being executed by a computer. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. The specification may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote computer storage media including memory storage devices.

The embodiments in the present specification are described in a progressive manner, and the same and similar parts among the embodiments are referred to each other, and each embodiment focuses on the differences from the other embodiments. In particular, for the system embodiment, since it is substantially similar to the method embodiment, the description is simple, and for the relevant points, reference may be made to the partial description of the method embodiment.

The above description is only an example of the present specification, and is not intended to limit the present specification. Various modifications and alterations to this description will become apparent to those skilled in the art. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement, etc. made within the spirit and principle of the present specification should be included in the scope of the claims of the present specification.

Claims

1. A method for presenting prompt information, comprising:

monitoring the content input by the user in the interface;

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the method further comprises:

when the user input is determined to be finished, determining resources corresponding to the current node according to the resources corresponding to the evaluation nodes respectively, and distributing the resources to the user;

the more the evaluation node is positioned in the evaluation progress bar, the more the resources corresponding to the evaluation node are.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein determining an interface for inputting user-generated content based on the monitored user actions comprises:

4. The method according to claim 3, wherein determining the evaluation progress bar, each evaluation node, and prompt information corresponding to each evaluation node according to the content evaluation policy corresponding to the interface specifically includes:

5. The method according to claim 1 or 4, wherein determining the evaluation progress bar, each evaluation node, and the prompt information corresponding to each evaluation node specifically includes:

6. The method according to claim 5, wherein adjusting the progress of the evaluation progress bar according to the content input by the user and the content evaluation policy specifically includes:

7. The method of claim 6, wherein updating the prompt information according to the progress and the prompt information corresponding to the current node comprises:

8. The method of claim 2, wherein the method further comprises:

9. The method of claim 2 or 8, wherein the method further comprises:

and when monitoring that the user operates an anonymous operation entrance, displaying the evaluation progress bar and the currently displayed prompt information at a low visibility degree, and displaying an anonymous prompt, wherein the anonymous prompt is used for prompting that the user cannot acquire resources when being anonymous.

10. An apparatus for presenting a reminder, comprising:

the monitoring module monitors the content input by the user in the interface;

11. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that the storage medium stores a computer program which, when executed by a processor, implements the method of any of the preceding claims 1-9.

12. An electronic device comprising a memory, a processor and a computer program stored on the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor implements the method of any of claims 1-9 when executing the program.