CN112015088A - Fault-tolerant motion planning method for joint locking fault six-legged robot - Google Patents
Fault-tolerant motion planning method for joint locking fault six-legged robot Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN112015088A CN112015088A CN202010945877.3A CN202010945877A CN112015088A CN 112015088 A CN112015088 A CN 112015088A CN 202010945877 A CN202010945877 A CN 202010945877A CN 112015088 A CN112015088 A CN 112015088A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- coordinate system
- leg
- joint
- fault
- robot
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 30
- 210000002414 leg Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 97
- 241000238631 Hexapoda Species 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 210000004394 hip joint Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 210000000629 knee joint Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 210000000689 upper leg Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 31
- 230000005021 gait Effects 0.000 claims description 26
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000004069 differentiation Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 244000309466 calf Species 0.000 claims description 2
- 210000001503 joint Anatomy 0.000 claims 5
- 230000007257 malfunction Effects 0.000 abstract description 2
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003190 augmentative effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005728 strengthening Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000002230 centromere Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/04—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
- G05B13/042—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators in which a parameter or coefficient is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B62—LAND VEHICLES FOR TRAVELLING OTHERWISE THAN ON RAILS
- B62D—MOTOR VEHICLES; TRAILERS
- B62D57/00—Vehicles characterised by having other propulsion or other ground- engaging means than wheels or endless track, alone or in addition to wheels or endless track
- B62D57/02—Vehicles characterised by having other propulsion or other ground- engaging means than wheels or endless track, alone or in addition to wheels or endless track with ground-engaging propulsion means, e.g. walking members
- B62D57/032—Vehicles characterised by having other propulsion or other ground- engaging means than wheels or endless track, alone or in addition to wheels or endless track with ground-engaging propulsion means, e.g. walking members with alternately or sequentially lifted supporting base and legs; with alternately or sequentially lifted feet or skid
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B9/00—Safety arrangements
- G05B9/02—Safety arrangements electric
- G05B9/03—Safety arrangements electric with multiple-channel loop, i.e. redundant control systems
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05D—SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
- G05D1/00—Control of position, course, altitude or attitude of land, water, air or space vehicles, e.g. using automatic pilots
- G05D1/08—Control of attitude, i.e. control of roll, pitch, or yaw
- G05D1/0891—Control of attitude, i.e. control of roll, pitch, or yaw specially adapted for land vehicles
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Transportation (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Manipulator (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to a fault-tolerant motion planning method for a joint locking fault hexapod robot. At present, foot robots have better terrain adaptability, however, when the robot is working remotely, the malfunction of the actuator is a serious problem. A fault-tolerant motion planning method for a joint locking fault six-legged robot comprises the following steps: the robot comprises a six-legged robot body, the six-legged robot body is composed of a body (1) and six legs (2), the body is of a regular hexagon structure, the six legs comprise a first leg (2-1), a second leg (2-2), a third leg (2-3), a fourth leg (2-4), a fifth leg (2-5) and a sixth leg (2-6), the following joints (3) are rotary joints, the body and a base joint are connected, the hip joints (4) are first-level pitching joints, the base joint and a thigh are connected, and the knee joints (5) are second-level pitching joints and are connected with the thigh and the shank. The invention relates to a fault-tolerant motion planning method of a hexapod robot applied to joint locking faults.
Description
The technical field is as follows:
the invention relates to a fault-tolerant motion planning method for a joint locking fault hexapod robot.
Background art:
the foot robot has better terrain adaptability. They may be dispatched to perform tasks that are not human-safe. However, when the robot is working remotely, the malfunction of the actuator is a serious problem. The failure may be caused by a variety of reasons, such as communication failure, motor overload protection braking, and mechanical damage. Whereas hexapod robots can find many fault tolerant gaits, such as tripodal and quadruped gaits. Hexapod robots with problematic legs can still perform omnidirectional walking, turning, following a lead gait, and the like. The fault tolerant gait of a hexapod robot is far from being discovered. Periodic crab walking and optimized two-phase intermittent gait are provided. There is a degree of similarity between them: once the leg is diseased, the entire leg and body are considered stationary. In the support phase, the failing leg does not actively swing, and only participates in the body support work. In the transfer phase, once lifted away, the faulty leg will perform a passive movement with the displacement of the robot body, i.e. the position relative to the robot body will not change. According to this method, if two actuators fail on different legs, both legs will be fixed to the body. This would make walking very difficult. Another common point of existing fault-tolerant gaits is that the body direction is undefined. In general, the direction of the body is usually parallel to the ground or defined by other criteria. This reduces 3 planning degrees of freedom. The motion of the hexapod robot has strong coupling, and the robot can be disturbed by the fault of any joint, thereby causing serious consequences.
The invention content is as follows:
the invention aims to provide a hexapod robot fault-tolerant motion planning method for joint locking faults.
The above purpose is realized by the following technical scheme:
a fault-tolerant motion planning method for a joint locking fault six-legged robot comprises the following steps: six sufficient robot bodies, six sufficient robot bodies constitute by organism and six legs, wherein the organism adopt regular hexagon structure, six legs include a leg, No. two legs, No. three legs, No. four legs, No. five legs and No. six legs, just six legs evenly distributed in the organism outside, the structure homogeneous phase of every leg is the same, all has three degree of freedom, wherein is rotary joint with the joint, connects organism and base joint, the hip joint is one-level every single move jointThe base joint is connected with the thigh, the knee joint is a two-stage pitching joint and is connected with the thigh and the shank, the angles of rotation of the heel joint, the hip joint and the knee joint are respectively alpha, beta and gamma, and the length of the base joint is L1Thigh length L2The length of the shank is L3。
The joint locking fault six-legged robot fault-tolerant motion planning method is characterized in that a world coordinate system and a robot coordinate system are respectivelyAndno. one leg, No. two legs, No. three legs, No. four legs, No. five legs and No. six legs are related to a coordinate system of the bodyThe first leg, the fourth leg, the third leg and the sixth leg are symmetrical relative to a machine body coordinate systemWhen the joint rotation angle is zero, the second leg and the fifth leg are collinear with the axis, and in an initial state, a world coordinate systemCoordinate system with machine bodyAnd (4) overlapping.
The fault-tolerant motion planning method of the joint locking fault six-legged robot defines sigma G-XgYgZgIs a world coordinate system, sigma O-XoYoZoIs a coordinate system of the machine body, sigma B-XbYbZbFor the coordinate system of the heel joint, sigma H-XhYhZhIs a hip joint coordinate system, sigma K-XkYkZkIs a knee joint coordinate system, sigma F-XfYfZfIs a foot end coordinate system, and in an initial state,the world coordinate system is superposed with the body coordinate system;
the jacobian matrix for a single leg of a hexapod robot is:
the fault-tolerant motion planning method for the hexapod robot comprises the following steps:
quintic bezier curve expression is written:
f=c0(1-t)5+5c1(1-t)4t+10c2(1-t)3t2+10c3(1-t)2t3+5c4(1-t)t4+c5t5 (3)
is sigma G-XgYgZgJacobian matrix in a coordinate system, JiIs sigma O-XoYoZoJacobian matrix in a coordinate system, RBA rotation matrix of the robot body relative to a world coordinate system;
BPi=[BPix BPiy BPiz]Tthe coordinates of the foot end of the ith leg in a coordinate system of the machine body are obtained;
is the velocity of the foot end in the world coordinate system,is the speed in the broad sense of the word,is LiA Jacobian matrix with a foot end in a world coordinate system;
wherein,GPiis the coordinate of the foot end under the ground coordinate system,is the coordinate of the foot end under the body coordinate system, XBRepresenting the position of the origin of the body coordinate system in the ground coordinate system, RBA rotation matrix representing a robot body coordinate system to a ground coordinate system;
ensuring that the mass center of the machine body is positioned in the supporting polygon is an important condition for ensuring the motion stability of the robot, so that the displacement of the machine body COM on the X, Y axis is more important than other degrees of freedom in static gait;
suppose a faulty leg LiIf the j (j ═ 1, 2, and 3) th joint has a locking failure, the angular velocity of the joint is known to be 0, and the following formula can be obtained:
When the hexapod robot is in the walking phase, vxvyvzMore important for the stability of the body, and thus as a known quantity, ωx、ωy、ωzCan be used as an unknown quantity;
it can be seen that if θ is made to be [ roll pitch yaw ]]TIn order to optimally solve the redundancy equation, a projection matrix corresponding to the jacobian matrix is first constructed as follows:
obtaining a minimum value of the joint variable value theta of g (theta) on the premise of satisfying the formula that f (theta) is equal to x*The following requirements need to be satisfied;
in the formula [ theta ]*Indicates the joint configuration at which g (θ) reaches the optimum value. It is worth noting that the jacobian matrixThe rank is m, the rank of phi (theta) is n-m, GiCombining the constraints of these optimal values with f (θ) x to obtain the equation that θ needs to satisfy:
simultaneous differentiation of both sides yields the relationship between joint velocity and tip velocity as follows:
although in fault tolerant gait by adjusting ω is requiredx、ωy、ωzTo ensure the accuracy of the COM trajectory and the foot end trajectory of the machine body, we still want the deviation between the adjusted attitude angle and the planned attitude angle to be as small as possible, so the optimization objective function can be set as follows:
g(θ)=(roll-rolld)2+(pitch-pitchd)2+(yaw-yawd)2 (22)
in the above formula, roll, pitch, and yaw are adjustment values of the fault-tolerant body attitude angle, respectively. And is a rolld、pitchd、yawdAttitude angle expectation in normal gait. After the optimization objective function is determined, the optimized ω can be obtained according to the formulax、ωy、ωz。
Has the advantages that:
1. the fault-tolerant gait planning method is suitable for fault-tolerant gait planning of joint locking faults. Establishing a redundancy equation at a locked joint through a floating body kinematics model of the hexapod robot; and (4) utilizing the augmented Jacobian matrix to complete the solution of a redundancy equation containing an optimization function, thereby realizing fault-tolerant gait planning. The feasibility and the effectiveness of the method are verified through simulation analysis and prototype tests. The results show that compared with the existing method, the fault-tolerant gait planning method can effectively improve the efficiency of fault-tolerant gait.
2. According to the method, a redundancy equation is established at a locked joint through the floating body kinematics, and then the redundancy equation solution containing an optimization function is completed by utilizing an augmented Jacobian matrix. And the feasibility and the effectiveness of the method are verified through simulation analysis and prototype test. Compared with the prior planning method, the method provided by the invention has the following innovation points:
(1) the fault-tolerant gait planning problem under the joint locking fault is converted into the solution of a redundancy equation by adopting the floating body kinematics.
(2) The redundancy equation converted by the fault-tolerant gait is combined with the optimization function to form an extended Jacobian matrix, and the extended Jacobian matrix is used for solving the fault-tolerant gait, so that the movement efficiency of the fault-tolerant gait of the robot is effectively improved. In this context, sudden changes in acceleration during robot centromere motion are the main cause of body wobble in fault-tolerant gait. In subsequent research, the influence of a foot end track and a robot centroid motion track on fault-tolerant gait stability is researched from an acceleration level so as to further improve the stability of the algorithm.
Description of the drawings:
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of the overall configuration of the hexapod robot.
Fig. 2 is a schematic view of the single leg configuration of fig. 1.
In the figure: 1. the novel leg-strengthening and leg-strengthening chair comprises a body, 2, six legs, 2-1, first leg, 2-2, second leg, 2-3, third leg, 2-4, fourth leg, 2-5, fifth leg, 2-6, sixth leg, 3 heel joint, 4 hip joint and 5 knee joint.
The specific implementation mode is as follows:
example 1:
a fault-tolerant motion planning method for a joint locking fault six-legged robot comprises the following steps: the six-legged robot comprises a six-legged robot body, wherein the six-legged robot body is composed of a body 1 and six legs 2, the body is of a regular hexagon structure, the six legs comprise a first leg 2-1, a second leg 2-2, a third leg 2-3, a fourth leg 2-4, a fifth leg 2-5 and a sixth leg 2-6, the six legs are uniformly distributed on the outer side of the body, the structure of each leg is the same and has three degrees of freedom, a heel joint 3 is a rotary joint, the body is connected with a base joint, a hip joint 4 is a first-level pitching joint, the base joint is connected with a thigh, a knee joint 5 is a second-level pitching joint and is connected with the thigh and the calf, the heel joint, the hip joint and the knee joint are respectively alpha, beta and gamma, and the base joint is L in length1Thigh length L2The length of the shank is L3。
Example 2:
according to the method for planning the fault-tolerant motion of the hexapod robot with the joint locking fault in the embodiment 1, the world coordinate system and the body coordinate system are respectivelyAndno. one leg, No. two legs, No. three legs, No. four legs, No. five legs and No. six legs are related to a coordinate system of the bodyThe first leg, the fourth leg, the third leg and the sixth leg are symmetrical relative to a machine body coordinate systemWhen the joint rotation angle is zero, the second leg and the fifth leg are collinear with the axis, and in an initial state, a world coordinate systemCoordinate system with machine bodyAnd (4) overlapping.
Example 3:
the method for fault-tolerant motion planning of a hexapod robot with joint locking failure as described in embodiment 1 or 2, defined as world coordinate system, Σ O-XoYoZoIs a coordinate system of the machine body, sigma B-XbYbZbFor the coordinate system of the heel joint, sigma H-XhYhZhIs a hip joint coordinate system, sigma K-XkYkZkIs a knee joint coordinate system, sigma F-XfYfZfThe system is a foot end coordinate system, and in an initial state, a world coordinate system is superposed with a body coordinate system;
the jacobian matrix for a single leg of a hexapod robot is:
example 4:
a method for fault-tolerant motion planning for a hexapod robot with joint locking failure as described in any one of embodiments 1-3, the method comprising the steps of:
quintic bezier curve expression is written:
f=c0(1-t)5+5c1(1-t)4t+10c2(1-t)3t2+10c3(1-t)2t3+5c4(1-t)t4+c5t5 (25)
is sigma G-XgYgZgJacobian matrix in a coordinate system, JiIs sigma O-XoYoZoJacobian matrix in a coordinate system, RBA rotation matrix of the robot body relative to a world coordinate system;
BPi=[BPix BPiy BPiz]Tthe coordinates of the foot end of the ith leg in a coordinate system of the machine body are obtained;
is the velocity of the foot end in the world coordinate system,is the speed in the broad sense of the word,is LiA Jacobian matrix with a foot end in a world coordinate system;
wherein,GPiis the coordinate of the foot end under the ground coordinate system,is the coordinate of the foot end under the body coordinate system, XBRepresenting the position of the origin of the body coordinate system in the ground coordinate system, RBA rotation matrix representing a robot body coordinate system to a ground coordinate system;
ensuring that the mass center of the machine body is positioned in the supporting polygon is an important condition for ensuring the motion stability of the robot, so that the displacement of the machine body COM on the X, Y axis is more important than other degrees of freedom in static gait;
suppose a faulty leg LiIf the j (j ═ 1, 2, and 3) th joint has a locking failure, the angular velocity of the joint is known to be 0, and the following formula can be obtained:
When the hexapod robot is in the walking phase, vx vy vzMore important for the stability of the body, and thus as a known quantity, ωx、ωy、ωzCan be used as an unknown quantity;
it can be seen that if θ is made to be [ roll pitch yaw ]]TIn order to optimally solve the redundancy equation, a projection matrix corresponding to the jacobian matrix is first constructed as follows:
obtaining a minimum value of the joint variable value theta of g (theta) on the premise of satisfying the formula that f (theta) is equal to x*The following requirements need to be satisfied;
in the formula [ theta ]*Indicates the joint configuration at which g (θ) reaches the optimum value. It is worth noting that the jacobian matrixThe rank is m, the rank of phi (theta) is n-m, GiCombining the constraints of these optimal values with f (θ) x to obtain the equation that θ needs to satisfy:
simultaneous differentiation of both sides yields the relationship between joint velocity and tip velocity as follows:
although in fault tolerant gait by adjusting ω is requiredx、ωy、ωzTo ensure the accuracy of the COM track and the foot end track of the machine body, but we still want the adjusted attitude angle and the planned attitude angleThe deviation between them is as small as possible, so the optimization objective function can be set as:
g(θ)=(roll-rolld)2+(pitch-pitchd)2+(yaw-yawd)2 (44)
in the above formula, roll, pitch, and yaw are adjustment values of the fault-tolerant body attitude angle, respectively. And is a rolld、pitchd、yawdAttitude angle expectation in normal gait. After the optimization objective function is determined, the optimized ω can be obtained according to the formulax、ωy、ωz。
Claims (4)
1. A fault-tolerant motion planning method for a joint locking fault six-legged robot comprises the following steps: six sufficient robot bodies, characterized by: the six-legged robot body comprises a body and six legs, wherein the body adopts a regular hexagon structure, the six legs comprise a first leg, a second leg, a third leg, a fourth leg, a fifth leg and a sixth leg, the six legs are uniformly distributed on the outer side of the body, the structure of each leg is identical and has three degrees of freedom, the following joints are rotary joints and are connected with the body and the base joint, the hip joints are first-level pitching joints and are connected with the base joint and the thigh, the knee joints are second-level pitching joints and are connected with the thigh and the calf, the following joints, the hip joints and the knee joints have corners of alpha, beta and gamma respectively, and the length of the base joint is L1Thigh length L2The length of the shank is L3。
2. The joint locking failure hexapod robot fault-tolerant motion planning method of claim 1, wherein: the world coordinate system and the body coordinate system are respectivelyAndno. one leg, No. two legs, No. three legs, No. four legs, No. five legs and No. six legsLeg-to-body coordinate systemThe first leg, the fourth leg, the third leg and the sixth leg are symmetrical relative to a machine body coordinate systemWhen the joint rotation angle is zero, the second leg and the fifth leg are collinear with the axis, and in an initial state, a world coordinate systemCoordinate system with machine bodyAnd (4) overlapping.
3. The joint locking failure hexapod robot fault-tolerant motion planning method of claim 2, wherein: definition of ∑ G-XgYgZgIs a world coordinate system, sigma O-XoYoZoIs a coordinate system of the machine body, sigma B-XbYbZbFor the coordinate system of the heel joint, sigma H-XhYhZhIs a hip joint coordinate system, sigma K-XkYkZkIs a knee joint coordinate system, sigma F-XfYfZfThe system is a foot end coordinate system, and in an initial state, a world coordinate system is superposed with a body coordinate system;
the jacobian matrix for a single leg of a hexapod robot is:
4. a method for fault-tolerant motion planning of a joint locking fault hexapod robot according to any one of claims 1-3, characterized by: the method comprises the following steps:
quintic bezier curve expression is written:
f=c0(1-t)5+5c1(1-t)4t+10c2(1-t)3t2+10c3(1-t)2t3+5c4(1-t)t4+c5t5 (3)
is sigma G-XgYgZgJacobian matrix in a coordinate system, JiIs sigma O-XoYoZoJacobian matrix in a coordinate system, RBA rotation matrix of the robot body relative to a world coordinate system;
BPi=[BPix BPiy BPiz]Tthe coordinates of the foot end of the ith leg in a coordinate system of the machine body are obtained;
is the velocity of the foot end in the world coordinate system,is the speed in the broad sense of the word,is LiA Jacobian matrix with a foot end in a world coordinate system;
wherein,GPiis the coordinate of the foot end under the ground coordinate system,is the coordinate of the foot end under the body coordinate system, XBRepresenting the position of the origin of the body coordinate system in the ground coordinate system, RBA rotation matrix representing a robot body coordinate system to a ground coordinate system;
ensuring that the mass center of the machine body is positioned in the supporting polygon is an important condition for ensuring the motion stability of the robot, so that the displacement of the machine body COM on the X, Y axis is more important than other degrees of freedom in static gait;
suppose a faulty leg LiIf the j (j ═ 1, 2, and 3) th joint has a locking failure, the angular velocity of the joint is known to be 0, and the following formula can be obtained:
When the hexapod robot is in the walking phase, vx vy vzMore important for the stability of the body, and thus as a known quantity, ωx、ωy、ωzCan be used as an unknown quantity;
it can be seen that if θ is made to be [ roll pitch yaw ]]TTo cope with redundancyPerforming optimization solution on the redundancy equation, and firstly constructing a projection matrix corresponding to the Jacobian matrix as follows:
obtaining a minimum value of the joint variable value theta of g (theta) on the premise of satisfying the formula that f (theta) is equal to x*The following requirements need to be satisfied;
in the formula [ theta ]*The Jacobian matrix representing the configuration of the joint when g (theta) reaches an optimum valueThe rank is m, the rank of phi (theta) is n-m, GiCombining the constraints of these optimal values with f (θ) x to obtain the equation that θ needs to satisfy:
simultaneous differentiation of both sides yields the relationship between joint velocity and tip velocity as follows:
although in fault tolerant gait by adjusting ω is requiredx、ωy、ωzSo as to ensure the accuracy of the COM track and the foot end track of the machine body, and the deviation between the adjusted attitude angle and the planning attitude angle is as small as possible, so that the optimization objective function can be set as the following formula:
g(θ)=(roll-rolld)2+(pitch-pitchd)2+(yaw-yawd)2 (22)
in the above formula, roll, pitch and yaw are respectively the adjustment values of the fault-tolerant body attitude angle, and are rolld、pitchd、yawdAfter the attitude angle expected value in normal gait is determined and the optimization objective function is determined, the optimized omega is obtained according to the formulax、ωy、ωz。
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010945877.3A CN112015088A (en) | 2020-09-10 | 2020-09-10 | Fault-tolerant motion planning method for joint locking fault six-legged robot |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010945877.3A CN112015088A (en) | 2020-09-10 | 2020-09-10 | Fault-tolerant motion planning method for joint locking fault six-legged robot |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN112015088A true CN112015088A (en) | 2020-12-01 |
Family
ID=73522720
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010945877.3A Pending CN112015088A (en) | 2020-09-10 | 2020-09-10 | Fault-tolerant motion planning method for joint locking fault six-legged robot |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN112015088A (en) |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN112776005A (en) * | 2021-01-13 | 2021-05-11 | 中联重科股份有限公司 | Multi-arm-section arm support detection method, device and system and storage medium |
CN112918583A (en) * | 2021-03-05 | 2021-06-08 | 华南理工大学 | Pipeline inner wall four-foot wall-climbing robot and kinematics analysis method thereof |
CN113084826A (en) * | 2021-03-24 | 2021-07-09 | 深圳市注能科技有限公司 | Energy-saving robot capable of adjusting working mode based on environment |
CN114153218A (en) * | 2021-12-16 | 2022-03-08 | 广州城市理工学院 | Robot leg support algorithm |
CN114859947A (en) * | 2022-03-21 | 2022-08-05 | 哈尔滨理工大学 | Fault-tolerant gait planning method of hexapod robot based on rollover performance index analysis |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN108909872A (en) * | 2018-06-22 | 2018-11-30 | 河海大学常州校区 | The imitative spider robot of six foot of one kind and its gait planning method |
CN110253620A (en) * | 2019-07-25 | 2019-09-20 | 长安大学 | A kind of integrated joint of fast demountable can variant multi-foot robot |
CN111240339A (en) * | 2020-02-11 | 2020-06-05 | 之江实验室 | Humanoid gait planning method of biped robot |
-
2020
- 2020-09-10 CN CN202010945877.3A patent/CN112015088A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN108909872A (en) * | 2018-06-22 | 2018-11-30 | 河海大学常州校区 | The imitative spider robot of six foot of one kind and its gait planning method |
CN110253620A (en) * | 2019-07-25 | 2019-09-20 | 长安大学 | A kind of integrated joint of fast demountable can variant multi-foot robot |
CN111240339A (en) * | 2020-02-11 | 2020-06-05 | 之江实验室 | Humanoid gait planning method of biped robot |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
卢展 等: "六足机器人腿部损伤的容错行走研究", 《机械设计与研究》 * |
常青 等: "四足机器人容错性步态规划方法研究", 《机床与液压》 * |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN112776005A (en) * | 2021-01-13 | 2021-05-11 | 中联重科股份有限公司 | Multi-arm-section arm support detection method, device and system and storage medium |
CN112776005B (en) * | 2021-01-13 | 2022-04-15 | 中联重科股份有限公司 | Multi-arm-section arm support detection method, device and system and storage medium |
CN112918583A (en) * | 2021-03-05 | 2021-06-08 | 华南理工大学 | Pipeline inner wall four-foot wall-climbing robot and kinematics analysis method thereof |
CN113084826A (en) * | 2021-03-24 | 2021-07-09 | 深圳市注能科技有限公司 | Energy-saving robot capable of adjusting working mode based on environment |
CN114153218A (en) * | 2021-12-16 | 2022-03-08 | 广州城市理工学院 | Robot leg support algorithm |
CN114153218B (en) * | 2021-12-16 | 2023-12-08 | 广州城市理工学院 | Robot leg supporting algorithm |
CN114859947A (en) * | 2022-03-21 | 2022-08-05 | 哈尔滨理工大学 | Fault-tolerant gait planning method of hexapod robot based on rollover performance index analysis |
CN114859947B (en) * | 2022-03-21 | 2024-04-05 | 哈尔滨理工大学 | Six-foot robot fault-tolerant gait planning method based on tipping performance index analysis |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN112015088A (en) | Fault-tolerant motion planning method for joint locking fault six-legged robot | |
US20100138038A1 (en) | Robot and method of controlling the same | |
CA2080822A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for controlling geometrically simple parallel mechanisms with distinct connections | |
Li et al. | A task-space form-finding algorithm for tensegrity robots | |
CN113625735A (en) | Control method based on leg-arm multiplexing hexapod robot and robot | |
Chen et al. | Kinematic analysis and motion planning of a quadruped robot with partially faulty actuators | |
Li et al. | A deformable tetrahedron rolling mechanism (DTRM) based on URU branch | |
Duan et al. | Tripod gaits planning and kinematics analysis of a hexapod robot | |
CN104044138A (en) | 8-UPS (Uninterruptible Power Supply) walking processing parallel robot | |
Xu et al. | Gait analysis of a radial symmetrical hexapod robot based on parallel mechanisms | |
Qiu et al. | Elimination of force singularity of the cable and cabin structure for the next generation large radio telescope | |
CN115994288B (en) | Method and device for solving inverse kinematics of biped robot | |
CN109050699B (en) | A kind of changeable constructed machine people system | |
KR20210051348A (en) | Balance Control Methods of Humanoid Robots through an Extended Task Space Formulation | |
JPS62251284A (en) | Harmonious control method for multi-leg mechanism | |
Chen et al. | Fault-tolerant gait a quadruped robot with partially fault legs | |
Wu et al. | Design of a novel side-mounted leg mechanism with high flexibility for a multi-mission quadruped earth rover BJTUBOT | |
Liu et al. | Feedback control of the locomotion of a tailed quadruped robot | |
Wang et al. | Configuration design of movable heavy-duty reconfigurable posture adjustment platform with dual motion modes | |
Li et al. | Optimal fault tolerant control of flexure jointed hexapods for applications requiring less than six degrees of freedom | |
Bhavanibhatla et al. | Kinematic analysis of the legged mobile manipulator | |
Wang et al. | Design of A Bipedal Robot via Modular Actuator | |
Gajendran | Dynamic simulation and design of a simple hexapod robot | |
Tang et al. | Omni-directional gait of a passive-spine hexapod | |
Zhou et al. | Design of a PMA-driven bionic neck robot with a spring spine |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20201201 |