CN111932416A - Learning management method and system - Google Patents
Learning management method and system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN111932416A CN111932416A CN202010862522.8A CN202010862522A CN111932416A CN 111932416 A CN111932416 A CN 111932416A CN 202010862522 A CN202010862522 A CN 202010862522A CN 111932416 A CN111932416 A CN 111932416A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- wrong
- question
- questions
- time
- review
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 33
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 85
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 14
- 230000002452 interceptive effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 3
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 18
- 241000272525 Anas platyrhynchos Species 0.000 description 15
- 238000007639 printing Methods 0.000 description 5
- 241000272522 Anas Species 0.000 description 3
- BQCADISMDOOEFD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silver Chemical compound [Ag] BQCADISMDOOEFD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 210000004556 brain Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229910052709 silver Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000004332 silver Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000019771 cognition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000029087 digestion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003203 everyday effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001788 irregular Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003446 memory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001737 promoting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010998 test method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000002700 urine Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/20—Education
- G06Q50/205—Education administration or guidance
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B7/00—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers
- G09B7/02—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the type wherein the student is expected to construct an answer to the question which is presented or wherein the machine gives an answer to the question presented by a student
- G09B7/04—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the type wherein the student is expected to construct an answer to the question which is presented or wherein the machine gives an answer to the question presented by a student characterised by modifying the teaching programme in response to a wrong answer, e.g. repeating the question, supplying a further explanation
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Educational Technology (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- Electrically Operated Instructional Devices (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides a learning management method and a system, wherein student users perform interactive learning with teachers and other student users by means of computers and internet technology, and the method comprises the steps of forming an exclusive electronic wrong question bank of the student users; determining the time for recommending and reviewing the wrong question; recommending corresponding wrong question contents in the electronic wrong question library according to set time; investigating the wrong review effect; the system comprises a login module, an entry module, a module for determining the time for recommending and reviewing the wrong questions, a wrong question reviewing recommendation module, a survey module and an announcement module. According to the invention, the special electronic wrong question bank of the user is generated, and the review recommended time is calculated by using the Ebinghaos forgetting curve according to the time for inputting wrong questions, so that the student user can obtain a better review effect.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of intelligent learning management, in particular to a learning management method and a system which correct learning by wrong questions as a primer by means of a computer and the Internet.
Background
The wrong questions are never converted into meeting questions because the wrong questions are forgotten to be reviewed due to untimely review and lazy review. The wrong questions are scattered in the test paper, the exercise book and the books, and the finding is inconvenient. Copying the wrong question on the wrong question book by the traditional method is too time-consuming. The thought of the user on the wrong exercise book cannot be understood during review, so that review cannot be performed. This is a learning problem that students often encounter when learning.
Therefore, there are some methods for managing wrong questions by using computer and internet technology, and chinese patent publication No. CN 105224665B discloses a wrong question management method and system, the wrong question management method includes:
acquiring a picture of a wrong question;
performing character recognition on the picture to acquire keywords of the wrong question;
matching the test questions in the cloud question bank by using the keywords;
if the same or similar test questions are matched, inputting the test questions into an electronic wrong question bank; if no matched test questions exist, the wrong questions are fed back to the background server, and the background server records the wrong questions into the electronic wrong question bank;
the method for matching the test questions in the cloud question bank by using the keywords specifically comprises the following steps: and matching the test questions in the cloud question bank by using the keywords and the synonyms of the keywords.
The method provides a wrong question management method, the method is used for managing wrong questions through a computer and an internet technology, character recognition is carried out on wrong question pictures, the wrong question entry electronic wrong question book is obtained from a cloud question bank or a background server by using keywords of the wrong questions, the wrong question entry efficiency is improved, and classification, sorting and review recommendation are facilitated for the wrong questions.
But a practical review recommendation method is not provided, and the requirements of students and parents cannot be met.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention provides a learning management method and a system aiming at the defect that the existing method for managing the wrong questions by means of the methodolor through a computer and an internet technology cannot meet the requirements of students and parents.
The technical scheme for realizing the technical purpose of the invention is as follows: a learning management method, student users carry on the interactive study with teacher and other student users with the help of computer and Internet technology, including the cloud question bank;
forming an exclusive electronic error bank for student users; in the step, the student user inputs wrong questions, and downloads a corresponding correct solution from the cloud question bank to form an electronic wrong question bank;
determining the time for recommending and reviewing the wrong questions, wherein in the step, the time for recording the wrong questions is recorded; calculating review recommended time according to an Ebinghaos forgetting curve;
recommending corresponding wrong question contents in the electronic wrong question library according to set time; in the step, if the students are not on line at the set time, the students are instantly recommended after being on line;
investigating the wrong review effect; in the step, the review condition is inquired, if the wrong question is mastered, the wrong question in the electronic wrong question library is marked as a meeting question, and the recommendation is not carried out at the later time.
Further, in the learning management method described above: in the step of forming the electronic wrong question bank, when a student user inputs wrong questions, the wrong questions are uploaded in a photographing or character inputting mode, and when the wrong questions are input by photographing, a background identifies photos, and then the photos are recorded in the wrong question bank in a character mode.
Further, in the learning management method described above: in the step of forming the electronic wrong question bank, if the cloud question bank does not have the wrong question, the background pushes the question surface to a teacher user or announces the wrong question to all users, and a solution of the wrong question is collected; and adding the different collected correct solutions into the electronic wrong question bank of the student user, and enriching the cloud question bank.
Further, in the learning management method described above: after the step of forming the electronic wrong question library, the background also records the wrong question reason of the wrong question, counts the frequency of the wrong question and classifies the wrong question;
the classification of the fault questions specifically comprises the following steps: classifying according to the error attribute;
the attributes include grade, subject, knowledge point.
Further, in the learning management method described above: before the step of determining the time for recommending to review the wrong questions, the method also comprises a step of inputting the study week plan of the student user, wherein the on-line time of the student user is determined in the week plan.
Further, in the learning management method described above: and determining the time for recommending and reviewing the wrong questions, and determining the time for recommending and reviewing the wrong questions to be the online time of the student user.
Further, in the learning management method described above: when the student user responds to the recommended review wrong questions, a learning mind sharing area of the student user is further arranged, and the learning mind is recorded in an attachment corresponding to the wrong questions in an exclusive electronic wrong question library of the student user.
Further, in the learning management method described above: in the step of investigating the wrong-question review effect, the knowledge points generate corresponding test questions to be recommended to the student users according to the reasons of the wrong questions.
Further, in the learning management method described above: in the step of investigating the wrong-question review effect, the speed mastered by other student users with the same wrong question is also referred.
The invention also provides a learning management system, which comprises a background and a cloud question bank, and further comprises:
the login module is used for user login;
the input module is used for inputting wrong questions or user hearts;
the module for determining the time for recommending review of the wrong questions calculates the time for reviewing recommendation according to the Ebinghaos forgetting curve by utilizing the time for inputting the wrong questions;
the wrong question review recommending module recommends wrong question review to the user when the time is up;
the investigation module is used for investigating the learning effect through learning;
and the announcement module announces to all users by the users or the background.
According to the invention, the special electronic wrong question bank of the user is generated, and the review recommended time is calculated by using the Ebinghaos forgetting curve according to the time for inputting wrong questions, so that the student user can obtain a better review effect.
The present invention will be described in more detail with reference to the following examples.
Detailed Description
The embodiment is a learning management method and a system for students to manage review time, and is commonly called 'review ducks'. The system is provided with a background and a cloud question bank, users (including student users and teacher users) utilize intelligent terminals including a desktop computer, a notebook computer, a handheld learning terminal, a smart phone and the like to log in the system, the student users can upload error questions, the system establishes an electronic error question bank special for each student user, the system calculates review recommended time according to an Ebinghaos forgetting curve by taking the moment of entering (uploading) the error questions as a starting point, and times are counted and recommended to the student users when the time is up, so that the students can be scientifically distributed with review time and frequency, and the memory effect is good. The method specifically comprises the following steps:
A. forming an exclusive electronic error bank for student users; in the step, after a student logs in, the student user inputs wrong questions, and downloads a corresponding correct solution from a cloud question bank to form an electronic wrong question bank; the mode of typing in the wrong questions is many, and when the student user typed the wrong questions, the wrong questions are uploaded in a photographing or character typing mode, and when the wrong questions are typed by photographing, the photos are identified by the background and then recorded in the wrong question bank in a character form.
In the step of forming the electronic wrong question bank, if the cloud question bank does not have the wrong question, the background pushes the question surface to a teacher user or announces the wrong question to all users, and a solution of the wrong question is collected; and adding the different collected correct solutions into the electronic wrong question bank of the student user, and enriching the cloud question bank.
After the step of forming the electronic wrong question library, the background also records the wrong question reason of the wrong question, counts the frequency of the wrong question and classifies the wrong question;
the classification of the fault questions specifically comprises the following steps: classifying according to the error attribute;
the attributes include grade, subject, knowledge point.
The student user uploads the wrong questions to the system (duck review) by taking pictures, typing, screenshot or voice, selects the subjects corresponding to the wrong questions, selects the familiarity degree of the student user with the wrong questions, and the system automatically plans review time according to the Ebinghaos forgetting rule.
In order to highlight the key places, the duck training device is also designed with the function of a key marking pen, and can be used for directly performing key sketching and marking on the duck.
The electronic wrong question bank is provided for the student user to inquire at any time, the user can directly inquire on the duck, and the question bank in the duck is divided into a system question bank and a wrong question bank, so that the question checking requirement of the user is met.
When on-line query is carried out, the wrong question bank is clicked and stored, and then the wrong question bank can be converted into the wrong question book.
B. Determining the time for recommending and reviewing the wrong questions, wherein in the step, the time for recording the wrong questions is recorded; and calculating the review recommended time according to the Ebinghaos forgetting curve.
Before the step of determining the time for recommending to review the wrong questions, the method also comprises a step of inputting the study week plan of the student user, wherein the on-line time of the student user is determined in the week plan. The system can only be used for learning when online, so that the time for the students to clearly learn online in the learning plan is required.
In the step of determining the time for recommending the review of the wrong question, the time for recommending the review of the wrong question is determined to be the time when the student user is online.
C. Recommending corresponding wrong question contents in the electronic wrong question library according to set time; in the step, if the students are not on line at the set time, the students are instantly recommended after being on line; once the user is online, the review recommendation time can be calculated according to the Einghaos forgetting curve, and the review of the corresponding wrong questions is recommended to the user.
When a student user reviews online, if the topic searched on the Internet has a step of not understanding, the student user can ask questions about the step of the topic, and other users can solve the questions, which is similar to a message board.
If the user sets the review time to be 9 points, the review ducks carry out alarm clock at 9 points to prompt the user to review, the user can choose to carry out autonomous review, plan the review task by himself, and also can carry out intelligent review, the intelligent review carries out intelligent planning according to the Einghaus forgetting curve rule and the familiarity of the user to the question chosen by the user himself, and the user can master the wrong question bank more and more firmly through the memory curve.
Considering that the user wants to systematically review the wrong questions made by the user in the end-of-term review stage, the review duck also supports the printing function, and the contents to be printed are selected, so that the Word version can be transferred out to complete printing, and the user can also contact with a customer service to purchase an exclusive customized wrong question book.
D. Investigating the wrong review effect; in the step, the review condition is inquired, if the wrong question is mastered, the wrong question in the electronic wrong question library is marked as a meeting question, and the recommendation is not carried out at the later time.
When the student user responds to the recommended review wrong questions, a learning mind sharing area of the student user is further arranged, and the learning mind is recorded in an attachment corresponding to the wrong questions in an exclusive electronic wrong question library of the student user.
In the step of investigating the wrong-question review effect, the knowledge points generate corresponding test questions to be recommended to the student users according to the reasons of the wrong questions. In the step of investigating the wrong-question review effect, the speed mastered by other student users with the same wrong question is also referred.
The duck of this embodiment gives professional platform for the student's customer who wants high-quality review. The wrong questions are never converted into meeting questions because the wrong questions are forgotten to be reviewed due to untimely review and lazy review. The wrong questions are scattered in the test paper, the exercise book and the books, and the finding is inconvenient. Copying the wrong question on the wrong question book by the traditional method is too time-consuming. The thought of the user on the wrong exercise book cannot be understood during review, so that review cannot be performed. The rehabilitation duck App adopts a certain solution aiming at the situations.
Through investigation, 77.37% of students pay great attention to review in the learning process, but 84.67% of the students often forget to review, which causes great contradiction, and the students can learn to review but always forget. Therefore, it is very necessary to design an App which can help students review.
In this embodiment, the bionghaus forgetting law is applied to cloud review: the forgetting curve is discovered by the research of the psychological home aibihaus (h.ebbinghaus) in germany and describes the law of forgetting new things by the human brain. The human brain can intuitively describe the forgetting of the new things step by step, and people can grasp the forgetting rule from the forgetting curve and utilize the rule, so that the self-memory capability is improved. The curve has a great influence on the research of human memory cognition. Forgetting starts immediately after learning and the process of forgetting is not uniform. The forgetting speed is fast at first and gradually slows down later. He thinks "keep and forget as a function of time", he uses nonsense syllables (syllables consisting of several syllable letters that can be read but have no content meaning, i.e. are not words) as memory material and calculates the amount of keep and forget in a conservative manner. And drawing a curve for describing the forgetting process according to the experimental result of the user, namely a famous Ebingois memory forgetting curve.
The software for carrying out words by using the Ebenhaos forgetting rule curve on the market is various and mature in technology, but no App for carrying out wrong question review management by using the rule is observed and found through market research results, most students are found to be relevant to search questions by combining self experience and field investigation conducted in schools, the requirement of photographing and checking the questions is met, but the requirement of storing and reviewing the wrong questions needs to be met, so that the Ebenhaos forgetting rule is applied to wrong question management, the problem that the scientific review of the wrong questions by the students is not timely and irregular is solved, and forgetting starts after information is input into the brain. The forgetting rate is fast before slow along with the lapse of time, particularly, the forgetting is fastest in a short time just learned, the rule is suitable for all kinds of memory, the rule is applied to all types of wrong question review, and the next review time is arranged on the rule by combining the time of inputting wrong questions by a system and the familiarity degree selected by a client.
The user can review the exercise in time to grasp the best memory opportunity; from frequent self-tests, it can be ascertained which knowledge is not well learned, not remembered, and where it is easily confused and erroneous to verify corrections immediately. In the examination, the examination questions are often changed in angle, which is different from the original study. If the self-test method is frequently used, the knowledge to be learned can understand the digestion from multiple aspects, and the chest will be bamboo-forming and rushing to the throb.
The review duck of this embodiment has the function:
for students who do not like copying and finishing, the storage of wrong questions is extremely important, the students can be relieved by reviewing the special storage management function of the duck App, and the phenomenon that one wrong question exists on one scroll, and the scroll cannot be thrown is solved. The on-line storage can permanently store wrong questions, and the long-time storage function is particularly important in examinations facing middle and high schools, which have long learning cycle, wide span and many subjects.
Meanwhile, the rehabilitation ducks are stored in different departments, and different subjects can be stored in different classifications, so that the rehabilitation is more targeted. The subject classifications of different versions are also different, and the middle and primary schools set mathematics, Chinese, English, physics, chemistry, politics, history, geography, biology, other ten classified subjects, and the AI is used for automatically identifying the subject and entering the wrong question book. University needs to set subject first because of complicated direction, and AI identification may have error and needs to check by oneself.
Dedicated review book:
the duck APP of practising resumes the ordinary single mode of turning over on the net when oneself record wrong problem or note, promotes sticker and picture pen and comes for study book richening style.
In consideration of different preferences of students, newly-built notes are the simplest type, and favorite stickers or paintbrushes can be added to mark key points according to personal interests and hobbies. The client can independently create through the mode of point exchanging paster, charting and the like.
Voice adding remarks:
the function is similar to the remark of characters, and the investigation finds that the memory time of the characters is shorter than that of pictures and shorter than that of voice, most students forget to review thought and clearly write the steps on the questions but cannot understand the questions when reviewing wrong questions. The phenomenon is caused by writing discontinuity, a voice remark is put forward to replace a character remark aiming at the point, a user records a theme idea by voice, impression is deepened, review is facilitated, and in order to prevent some urgent children from hearing own voice too slowly or too fast in the later period, a speed doubling function is added, so that the speed can be adjusted to be fast or slow, and the speed is adjusted to be the most suitable speed.
Mass question bank:
in order to meet the requirement of a user for ordinary search answers, a mass question bank is arranged in the review duck to help the user to search answers.
Wrong question printing function:
a corrigent machine:
at present, mini printers (corrigents) for printing are available on the market, and the mini printers can print out notes and paste the notes on books so as to be convenient to look over and carry. Therefore, the cloud review is used, and the learning interest of the user is enhanced by matching with the original learning method.
And (3) autonomous printing into a roll:
consider that some users need to review the wrong questions of the whole year at the end of the school year. At this time, the wrong urine label printed by the corrigent machine is inconvenient to review and arrange. The customer can then choose to print a paper size of a4 or a5 with the printer for review.
The question bank sharing function:
if the user agrees, the user can share the wrong question bank, look up the shared question banks of other people, find individual differences and learn more pertinently.
The opinion feedback function:
the client feeds back the opinion function, a special message leaving area is designed, if the opinion provided by the user is adopted, the user is rewarded with gift, and the reviewing duck is dedicated to listening to the market sound and is used as the APP wanted by the user.
The same group traffic function:
the same-group communication function is used for promoting users with the same age to gather in the same group, and meeting the common problem, people can discuss communication in the group, and the function is mainly aimed at leaving the study or researching the direction of the university students. People can share learning materials, learning experience and experience of heart in groups, and study by checking cards together with agreement, thereby supervising and encouraging each other and improving learning atmosphere.
The question function:
the incomplete resolution procedure, which takes into account some wrong questions, can result in the students not being able to understand and understand the problems. We have developed a questioning function for this situation. The user can ask a question of a certain step in the wrong question, and other users can answer the question if the other users can do the question. The interpretation of the wrong questions is carried out at the visual angle of the student user, which is more effective than the interpretation of the teacher. The learning effect of the broad interest of thinking is better.
Functions such as integral acquisition sticker:
the user can purchase the special sticker of the review duck, the manual account ornaments such as a silver pen and the like to decorate the unique wrong exercise book, and can obtain the customized wrong exercise book of the review duck if the learning score meets the standard.
An integration mechanism:
the user enthusiasm is mobilized by adopting the point system, and the acquired points can be exchanged for needed study articles such as a sticker silver pen and the like in a point store.
And (3) integral acquisition: (the number in parentheses is an integral)
Logging in every day (+ 1) and forwarding every time (+ 1) to share the heart rate, public data, a paper or wrong-answer notebook (+ 1) to obtain a point praise (+ 1) and forwarding the seven-day additional bonus points (+ 2) until the login time per day exceeds five minutes (+ 2) and the new user (+ 3) completes the specified learning plan per day (+ 3)
Integration use: (the number in parentheses is an integral)
Error question (-30) of paster purchase (-35) silver pen/work version converted from (-25)
All the projects of the inventor do not use any black technology and technology which is difficult to understand, the existing technology is developed to the maximum extent, dynamic continuity innovation is used, and the applied technology is simple and easy to understand and convenient to operate. The generation of black technology is not considered to be possible by common college students, but the existing technology is brought into full play, and the generation of black technology can be realized by people.
Claims (10)
1. A learning management method, student users carry on the interactive study with teacher and other student users with the help of computer and Internet technology, including the cloud question bank; the method is characterized in that: the method comprises the following steps:
forming an exclusive electronic error bank for student users; in the step, the student user inputs wrong questions, and downloads a corresponding correct solution from the cloud question bank to form an electronic wrong question bank;
determining the time for recommending and reviewing the wrong questions, wherein in the step, the time for recording the wrong questions is recorded; calculating review recommended time according to an Ebinghaos forgetting curve;
recommending corresponding wrong question contents in the electronic wrong question library according to set time; in the step, if the students are not on line at the set time, the students are instantly recommended after being on line;
investigating the wrong review effect; in the step, the review condition is inquired, if the wrong question is mastered, the wrong question in the electronic wrong question library is marked as a meeting question, and the recommendation is not carried out at the later time.
2. The learning management method according to claim 1, characterized in that: in the step of forming the electronic wrong question bank, when a student user inputs wrong questions, the wrong questions are uploaded in a photographing or character inputting mode, and when the wrong questions are input by photographing, a background identifies photos, and then the photos are recorded in the wrong question bank in a character mode.
3. The learning management method according to claim 1, characterized in that: in the step of forming the electronic wrong question bank, if the cloud question bank does not have the wrong question, the background pushes the question surface to a teacher user or announces the wrong question to all users, and a solution of the wrong question is collected; and adding the different collected correct solutions into the electronic wrong question bank of the student user, and enriching the cloud question bank.
4. The learning management method according to claim 1, characterized in that: after the step of forming the electronic wrong question library, the background also records the wrong question reason of the wrong question, counts the frequency of the wrong question and classifies the wrong question;
the classification of the fault questions specifically comprises the following steps: classifying according to the error attribute;
the attributes include grade, subject, knowledge point.
5. The learning management method according to claim 1, characterized in that: before the step of determining the time for recommending to review the wrong questions, the method also comprises a step of inputting the study week plan of the student user, wherein the on-line time of the student user is determined in the week plan.
6. The learning management method according to claim 5, characterized in that: and determining the time for recommending and reviewing the wrong questions, and determining the time for recommending and reviewing the wrong questions to be the online time of the student user.
7. The learning management method according to claim 1, characterized in that: when the student user responds to the recommended review wrong questions, a learning mind sharing area of the student user is further arranged, and the learning mind is recorded in an attachment corresponding to the wrong questions in an exclusive electronic wrong question library of the student user.
8. The learning management method according to claim 4, characterized in that: in the step of investigating the wrong-question review effect, the knowledge points generate corresponding test questions to be recommended to the student users according to the reasons of the wrong questions.
9. The learning management method according to claim 4, characterized in that: in the step of investigating the wrong-question review effect, the speed mastered by other student users with the same wrong question is also referred.
10. A learning management system comprises a background and a cloud question bank, and is characterized in that: further comprising:
the login module is used for user login;
the input module is used for inputting wrong questions or user hearts;
the module for determining the time for recommending review of the wrong questions calculates the time for reviewing recommendation according to the Ebinghaos forgetting curve by utilizing the time for inputting the wrong questions;
the wrong question review recommending module recommends wrong question review to the user when the time is up;
the investigation module is used for investigating the learning effect through learning;
and the announcement module announces to all users by the users or the background.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010862522.8A CN111932416A (en) | 2020-08-25 | 2020-08-25 | Learning management method and system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010862522.8A CN111932416A (en) | 2020-08-25 | 2020-08-25 | Learning management method and system |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN111932416A true CN111932416A (en) | 2020-11-13 |
Family
ID=73305147
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010862522.8A Pending CN111932416A (en) | 2020-08-25 | 2020-08-25 | Learning management method and system |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN111932416A (en) |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN113204581A (en) * | 2021-05-28 | 2021-08-03 | 上海易教科技股份有限公司 | Topic recommendation method, device and equipment based on big data and storage medium |
| CN113760203A (en) * | 2021-08-26 | 2021-12-07 | 北京辰光信安电子有限公司 | Authentication printing method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium |
Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20150099256A1 (en) * | 2013-12-17 | 2015-04-09 | Chien Cheng Liu | Intelligent teaching and tutoring test method |
| CN105374244A (en) * | 2015-12-10 | 2016-03-02 | 广东小天才科技有限公司 | Learning method and system based on wrong problem analysis |
| CN109785691A (en) * | 2019-01-18 | 2019-05-21 | 广东小天才科技有限公司 | A kind of method and system by terminal assisted learning |
| CN110189581A (en) * | 2019-04-03 | 2019-08-30 | 王韬轶 | The learning log sheet and its application method of included review function based on memory curve |
| CN110334223A (en) * | 2019-07-01 | 2019-10-15 | 深圳市快易典教育科技有限公司 | Wrong answer list management method and system |
| CN110400117A (en) * | 2018-04-24 | 2019-11-01 | 中国移动通信集团有限公司 | A kind of based reminding method, electronic equipment and the storage medium of wrong topic |
-
2020
- 2020-08-25 CN CN202010862522.8A patent/CN111932416A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20150099256A1 (en) * | 2013-12-17 | 2015-04-09 | Chien Cheng Liu | Intelligent teaching and tutoring test method |
| CN105374244A (en) * | 2015-12-10 | 2016-03-02 | 广东小天才科技有限公司 | Learning method and system based on wrong problem analysis |
| CN110400117A (en) * | 2018-04-24 | 2019-11-01 | 中国移动通信集团有限公司 | A kind of based reminding method, electronic equipment and the storage medium of wrong topic |
| CN109785691A (en) * | 2019-01-18 | 2019-05-21 | 广东小天才科技有限公司 | A kind of method and system by terminal assisted learning |
| CN110189581A (en) * | 2019-04-03 | 2019-08-30 | 王韬轶 | The learning log sheet and its application method of included review function based on memory curve |
| CN110334223A (en) * | 2019-07-01 | 2019-10-15 | 深圳市快易典教育科技有限公司 | Wrong answer list management method and system |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| 常方圆等: "中学生错题管理系统设计", 《中国教育技术装备》 * |
| 李世超等: ""互联网+"课堂：一种基于艾宾浩斯遗忘曲线和网络题库的教学新模式探索", 《高教学刊》 * |
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN113204581A (en) * | 2021-05-28 | 2021-08-03 | 上海易教科技股份有限公司 | Topic recommendation method, device and equipment based on big data and storage medium |
| CN113760203A (en) * | 2021-08-26 | 2021-12-07 | 北京辰光信安电子有限公司 | Authentication printing method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium |
| CN113760203B (en) * | 2021-08-26 | 2022-05-10 | 北京辰光信安电子有限公司 | Authentication printing method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Sweet et al. | Team-based learning in the social sciences and humanities: Group work that works to generate critical thinking and engagement | |
| McWhorter | Successful college writing: skills-strategies-learning styles | |
| Hume et al. | Student experiences of carrying out a practical science investigation under direction | |
| CN107851398A (en) | For self-adaptive estimation and the system and method for training | |
| Harward et al. | Writing instruction in elementary classrooms: Why teachers engage or do not engage students in writing | |
| Ge | Does mismatch between learning media preference and received learning media bring a negative impact on Academic performance? An experiment with e-learners | |
| Alieto et al. | An investigation on digital and print reading attitudes: Samples from Filipino preservice teachers from a non-metropolitan-based university | |
| US20190272765A1 (en) | Online Teaching System and Method thereof | |
| US20100062410A1 (en) | Computerized testing device with a network editing interface | |
| CN111932416A (en) | Learning management method and system | |
| Bell et al. | Strategies for assessing classroom teaching: Examining administrator thinking as validity evidence | |
| Williams | Using information and communication technology with special educational needs students: The views of frontline professionals | |
| Mandernach | Three ways to improve student engagement in the online classroom | |
| Perin | Repetition and the informational writing of developmental students | |
| Lamb | Wondering Wiggling, and Weaving: A New Model for Project and Community Based Learning on the Web | |
| Herro | Bibliographic instruction and critical thinking | |
| Miksza et al. | Music Education Research: An Introduction | |
| Cunningham | Early years teachers and the influence of Piaget: evidence from oral history | |
| Dali et al. | What citation patterns reveal about reading research and practice in academic libraries | |
| Miller | Plugging your pencil into the wall: An investigation of word processing and writing skills at the middle school level | |
| Gottlieb | The Language Proficiency Handbook: A Practitioner's Guide to Instructional Assessment. | |
| D'Andrea | Practices and preferences among students who read Braille and use assistive technology | |
| Paciga | Emergently digital in grade two: Another case of “3.6 minutes per day?” | |
| Charron et al. | Reading with Writing in Mind: A Guide for All Middle and High School Educators | |
| Hamidani | Ethnographic Research |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20201113 |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |