CN111930012A - Closed-loop control method of magnetorheological actuator - Google Patents
Closed-loop control method of magnetorheological actuator Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN111930012A CN111930012A CN202010724837.6A CN202010724837A CN111930012A CN 111930012 A CN111930012 A CN 111930012A CN 202010724837 A CN202010724837 A CN 202010724837A CN 111930012 A CN111930012 A CN 111930012A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- moment
- damping force
- current
- control
- actuator
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/04—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
- G05B13/042—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators in which a parameter or coefficient is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F16—ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
- F16F—SPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; MEANS FOR DAMPING VIBRATION
- F16F15/00—Suppression of vibrations in systems; Means or arrangements for avoiding or reducing out-of-balance forces, e.g. due to motion
- F16F15/002—Suppression of vibrations in systems; Means or arrangements for avoiding or reducing out-of-balance forces, e.g. due to motion characterised by the control method or circuitry
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F16—ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
- F16F—SPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; MEANS FOR DAMPING VIBRATION
- F16F2224/00—Materials; Material properties
- F16F2224/04—Fluids
- F16F2224/045—Fluids magnetorheological
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F16—ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
- F16F—SPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; MEANS FOR DAMPING VIBRATION
- F16F2230/00—Purpose; Design features
- F16F2230/18—Control arrangements
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Feedback Control In General (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to the technical field of vibration control, in particular to a closed-loop control method of a magnetorheological actuator. The method comprises the steps of monitoring the change of the damping force/moment in real time through a damping force/moment monitoring system, selecting a corresponding control mode through a logic switching module according to error information and a mapping relation between the expected damping force/moment and the actual damping force/moment, summarizing a fuzzy control rule by utilizing expert experience, and reasoning continuous and smooth increment of control current/voltage, so that smoother control current/voltage is obtained. Compared with the traditional closed-loop control method of the magnetorheological actuator based on the Heaviside function, the damping force/moment of the magnetorheological actuator is controlled by smooth current/voltage, so that buffeting of the damping force/moment can be reduced, and the closed-loop control method has outstanding advantages of prolonging the service life of the magnetorheological actuator and improving the vibration suppression effect.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of vibration control, in particular to a closed-loop control method of a magnetorheological actuator.
Background
The magneto-rheological actuator has the advantages of real-time adjustable damping, wide dynamic range, high response speed, low power consumption and relatively simple structure, and has wide application prospect in the vibration and impact control fields of vehicle suspension, civil bridges, engine suspension, cannon recoil buffering and the like. As the core of the magneto-rheological vibration control system, the vibration system and the control strategy of the magneto-rheological actuator determine the vibration suppression capability of the structure.
The main problems and deficiencies in the prior art include: at present, the control modes of the magneto-rheological actuator are two. The most common method is to establish an inverse model of damping force-current/voltage according to the mapping relation of the damping force/moment, speed, displacement, acceleration, temperature, current and the like of the actuator, such as a polynomial model, a Bingham model, a Bouc-Wen model, a hyperbolic tangent algebraic model, a neural network model and the like. However, due to the influence of complex multi-field coupling effects such as electromagnetic fields, flow fields and temperature fields inside the magnetorheological actuator, the mechanical behavior of the magnetorheological actuator has phenomena such as hysteresis, temperature dependence and frequency dependence, and the established mechanical model usually has certain errors. The mechanical model mismatch which is difficult to avoid by the magnetorheological actuator not only can cause the control performance to be seriously deviated from the initial design value, but also can cause the stability and the reliability of the system to be difficult to evaluate, which is unacceptable in certain structural vibration control fields such as large-scale civil structures and bridge stay cables.
The common inverse model control of the damping force/moment-current/voltage of the magneto-rheological actuator is an open-loop control strategy, has certain errors, and can improve the control precision by adopting closed-loop control. The existing closed-loop control algorithm, such as a control method based on the Heaviside function proposed by scholars such as Dyke of the university of Holly, St.Louis, Washington, USA, is a switching control method with only two modes, and the control method is realized by using a closed-loop control algorithm ImaxAnd IminOr VmaxAnd VminThe damping force/moment is controlled continuously, so that there is a phenomenon that the damping force/moment buffets at high frequency (as shown in fig. 1). The high-frequency buffeting of the damping force/moment can not only bring certain impact to the structure, but also cause the fatigue damage of the mechanical structure of the magneto-rheological actuator, thereby greatly reducing the vibrationThe service life of the device is prolonged.
Therefore, a control strategy for controlling the smoothness of the current/voltage is explored, and the method has important theoretical significance and engineering application value for improving the control performance and reliability of a vibration control system and prolonging the service life of the magnetorheological actuator.
Disclosure of Invention
Aiming at the problems and the defects in the prior art, the invention provides a closed-loop control method of a magnetorheological actuator, which monitors the variation of damping force/moment in real time through a damping force/moment monitoring system, selects a corresponding control mode according to the error information and the mapping relation between expected damping force/moment and actual damping force/moment through a logic switching module, and then summarizes a fuzzy control rule and infers continuous and smooth increment of control current/voltage by utilizing expert experience, thereby obtaining smoother control current/voltage.
In order to achieve the purpose, the invention adopts the following technical scheme:
a closed-loop control method of a magneto-rheological actuator comprises a damping force/moment monitoring system, a switching logic module, a fuzzy controller, the magneto-rheological actuator, an actuator controller and a current driver, wherein the actuator controller comprises the switching logic module and the fuzzy controller;
the damping force/moment monitoring system is used for monitoring the actual damping force/moment value of the magneto-rheological actuator at the current moment in real time and feeding the actual damping force/moment value back to the actuator controller; the switching logic module is used for judging the control mode of the actuator controller according to the distribution relation between the expected damping force/moment and the actual damping force/moment value of the magnetorheological actuator at the current moment monitored by the damping force/moment monitoring system in real time; the fuzzy controller is used for obtaining a corresponding continuous and smooth current/voltage control increment through a fuzzy control rule according to an error between an expected damping force/moment and an actual damping force/moment, and controlling the damping force/moment of the magnetorheological actuator through the current driver.
Furthermore, the damping force/moment monitoring system is used for monitoring the actual damping force/moment value of the magnetorheological actuator at the current moment in real time, and the actual damping force/moment value is realized through an actual physical force/moment sensor testing system or is realized through a virtual force/moment monitoring system.
Still further, the actual physical force/torque sensor test system: estimating the damping force/moment value at the current moment according to the measurable/predictable state of the magnetorheological actuator at the previous moment by utilizing a mapping model of the damping force/moment of the existing magnetorheological actuator on speed, displacement, acceleration, temperature and current factors, such as a polynomial model, a Bingham model, a Bouc-Wen model, a hyperbolic tangent algebraic model, a neural network model and the like; the virtual force/moment monitoring system reconstructs a damping force/moment value at the current moment according to the state of the vibration control system by utilizing an observer design technology (an augmented state and interference) in a modern control theory or a system identification module with a storage function.
Further, the switching logic module is configured to determine a control mode of the actuator controller according to a distribution relationship between the expected damping force/moment and an actual damping force/moment value of the magnetorheological actuator monitored by the damping force/moment monitoring system in real time, specifically:
if the desired damping force/moment is in the same quadrant as the actual damping force/moment, when controlling the current the control mode is:
I(k)＝I(k-1)+ΔI(k)
wherein I (k) represents the control current at the current moment, I (k-1) represents the control current at the previous moment, and Delta I (k) represents the corresponding continuous and smooth current control increment obtained by the fuzzy control rule;
when the voltage is controlled, the control mode is as follows:
U(k)＝U(k-1)+ΔU(k)
wherein U (k) represents the control voltage at the current moment, U (k-1) represents the control voltage at the previous moment, and delta U (k) represents the corresponding continuous and smooth voltage control increment obtained by the fuzzy control rule;
if the desired damping force/moment is in a different quadrant from the actual damping force/moment, when controlling the current the control mode is:
I(k)＝0；
when the voltage is controlled, the control mode is as follows:
U(k)＝0。
still further, the control current at the current moment needs to be limited in a control feasible region, namely I (k) is more than or equal to 0 and less than or equal to Imax(ii) a The control voltage at the current moment needs to be limited in a control feasible region, namely U (k) is more than or equal to 0 and less than or equal to Vmax。
Further, an error between the desired damping force/moment and the actual damping force/moment is defined as e (k) ═ Fc(k)-Fa(k) In which F isc(k) Indicating the desired damping force/moment at the present moment, Fa(k) Representing the actual damping force/moment at the present moment.
Further, the fuzzy control rule is that the error between the expected damping force/moment and the actual damping force/moment is normalized from the natural universe of discourse [ -e ]min,emax]Mapping to the ambiguity Domain [ -1,1]And defining a fuzzy subset in the fuzzy domain to represent the fuzzy state of the input or the fuzzy state of the output.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the following advantages:
aiming at the problems of low open-loop control precision of the existing magneto-rheological actuator and buffeting of the magneto-rheological actuator closed-loop dual-mode control method based on the Heaviside step function, the invention provides a magneto-rheological actuator closed-loop control method based on fuzzy control, which overcomes the defect of current/voltage control quantity jump of the Heaviside step function, and corrects the current/voltage value at the previous moment by an incremental method to obtain smooth control current/voltage, so that the buffeting of the damping force/moment of the magneto-rheological actuator is reduced.
Drawings
FIG. 1 shows experimental effects of a closed-loop control method for a magnetorheological actuator based on a Heaviside step function;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a closed loop control system for a magnetorheological actuator;
FIG. 3 is a membership function of the damping force/moment tracking error of the magnetorheological actuator;
FIG. 4 is a magnetorheological actuator closed-loop control routine.
Detailed Description
The present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments, which are provided for illustration only and are not to be construed as limiting the invention.
As shown in fig. 2, the present invention discloses a closed-loop control method for a magnetorheological actuator, which includes a damping force/moment monitoring system, a switching logic module, a fuzzy controller, a magnetorheological actuator, an actuator controller and a current driver, wherein the actuator controller includes a switching logic module and a fuzzy controller;
the damping force/moment monitoring system is used for monitoring the actual damping force/moment value of the magnetorheological actuator at the current moment in real time and feeding the actual damping force/moment value back to the actuator controller; the damping force/moment monitoring system is used for monitoring the actual damping force/moment value of the magnetorheological actuator at the current moment in real time through an actual physical force/moment sensor testing system or a virtual force/moment monitoring system, and the virtual force/moment monitoring system is realized through a method of an extended state observer or a system identification module with a storage function.
The switching logic module is used for judging the control mode of the actuator controller according to the distribution relation between the expected damping force/moment and the actual damping force/moment value of the magnetorheological actuator monitored by the damping force/moment monitoring system in real time at the current moment, and specifically comprises the following steps:
if the desired damping force/moment is in the same quadrant as the actual damping force/moment, when controlling the current the control mode is:
I(k)＝I(k-1)+ΔI(k)
wherein I (k) represents the control current at the current moment, I (k-1) represents the control current at the previous moment, and Delta I (k) represents the current control increment which is obtained by the fuzzy rule and corresponds to continuous smoothness;
when the voltage is controlled, the control mode is as follows:
U(k)＝U(k-1)+ΔU(k)
wherein U (k) represents the control voltage at the current moment, U (k-1) represents the control voltage at the previous moment, and delta U (k) represents the corresponding continuous and smooth voltage control increment obtained by the fuzzy rule;
if the desired damping force/moment is in a different quadrant from the actual damping force/moment, when controlling the current the control mode is:
I(k)＝0；
when the voltage is controlled, the control mode is as follows:
U(k)＝0。
the control current at the current moment needs to be limited in a control feasible region, namely I (k) is more than or equal to 0 and less than or equal to Imax(ii) a The control voltage at the current moment needs to be limited in a control feasible region, namely U (k) is more than or equal to 0 and less than or equal to Vmax。
The fuzzy controller is used for obtaining a corresponding continuous and smooth current/voltage control increment according to an error between an expected damping force/moment and an actual damping force/moment through a fuzzy control rule, and controlling the damping force/moment of the magnetorheological actuator through the current driver, wherein the error between the expected damping force/moment and the actual damping force/moment is defined as e (k) ═ Fc(k)-Fa(k) In which F isc(k) Indicating the desired damping force/moment at the present moment, Fa(k) Representing the actual damping force/moment at the present moment; the fuzzy rule is that the error between the expected damping force/moment and the actual damping force/moment is normalized from the natural universe of discourse [ -e ]min,emax]Mapping to the ambiguity Domain [ -1,1]And defining a fuzzy subset in the fuzzy domain to represent the fuzzy state of the input or the fuzzy state of the output.
The method specifically comprises the following steps:
(1) defining the damping force/moment tracking error as e (k) ═ Fc(k)-Fa(k) Then the error is normalized from the natural discourse domain [ -e ] using a normalization methodmin,emax]Mapping to the ambiguity Domain [ -1,1]The same applies to mapping control current increments to the corresponding ambiguity domain.
(2) Defining fuzzy sets and membership functions of input and output variables, wherein the fuzzy controller is a single-input single-output system, and input and output variables need the same fuzzy subset number, generally five or seven, such as: { negative large (NB), Negative Medium (NM), Negative Small (NS), Zero (ZE), Positive Small (PS), Positive Medium (PM), positive large (PB) }, membership functions of input variables are as follows, and membership functions of output variables are similar thereto, as shown in fig. 3.
(3) According to the normalized error information and the direction of the actual damping force/moment, 2 fuzzy control rules are designed as follows:
| e(k) | NB | NM | NS | ZE | PS | PM | PB |
| Fa(k)>0 | NB | NM | NS | ZE | PS | PM | PB |
| Fa(k)<0 | PB | PM | PS | ZE | NS | NM | NB |
(4) the current/voltage increments of the fuzzy control are mapped to the corresponding control natural domain.
(5) Limiting control current/voltage to [0, I ] using saturation clipping functionmax]Or [0, Vmax]Within the range.
Alternatively, the current control increment Δ I (k) may be implemented by a fuzzy controller, or a classical PID control strategy or an adaptive control strategy.
The invention provides a closed-loop control method of a magneto-rheological actuator, which aims at solving the problems of low open-loop control precision of the existing magneto-rheological actuator and buffeting of the closed-loop bimodal control method of the magneto-rheological actuator based on a Heaviside step function. Compared with the traditional control method of the magnetorheological actuator based on the Heaviside step function, the method has higher control precision, can improve the performance and reliability of structural vibration control, and prolongs the service life of the magnetorheological actuator.
The above description is only for the purpose of illustrating the preferred embodiments of the present invention and is not to be construed as limiting the invention, and any modifications, equivalents and improvements made within the spirit and scope of the present invention are intended to be covered thereby.
Claims (7)
1. The closed-loop control method of the magneto-rheological actuator is characterized by comprising a damping force/moment monitoring system, a switching logic module, a fuzzy controller, the magneto-rheological actuator, an actuator controller and a current driver, wherein the actuator controller comprises the switching logic module and the fuzzy controller;
the damping force/moment monitoring system is used for monitoring the actual damping force/moment value of the magnetorheological actuator at the current moment in real time and feeding the actual damping force/moment value back to the actuator controller; the switching logic module is used for judging the control mode of the actuator controller according to the distribution relation between the expected damping force/moment and the actual damping force/moment value of the magnetorheological actuator monitored by the damping force/moment monitoring system in real time; the fuzzy controller is used for obtaining a corresponding continuous and smooth current/voltage control increment through a fuzzy rule according to an error between an expected damping force/moment and an actual damping force/moment, and controlling the damping force/moment of the magnetorheological actuator through the current driver.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the damping force/torque monitoring system is configured to monitor the actual damping force/torque value of the magnetorheological actuator at the current moment in real time by an actual physical force/torque sensor test system or by a virtual force/torque monitoring system.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the virtual force/torque monitoring system is a method by an extended state observer or a system identification module with memory function.
4. The closed-loop control method of the magnetorheological actuator according to claim 1, wherein the switching logic module is configured to determine the control mode of the actuator controller according to the distribution relationship between the expected damping force/moment and the actual damping force/moment value of the magnetorheological actuator at the current moment monitored in real time by the damping force/moment monitoring system, and specifically comprises:
if the desired damping force/moment is in the same quadrant as the actual damping force/moment, when controlling the current the control mode is:
I(k)＝I(k-1)+ΔI(k)
wherein I (k) represents the control current at the current moment, I (k-1) represents the control current at the previous moment, and Delta I (k) represents the current control increment which is obtained by the fuzzy rule and corresponds to continuous smoothness;
when the voltage is controlled, the control mode is as follows:
U(k)＝U(k-1)+ΔU(k)
wherein U (k) represents the control voltage at the current moment, U (k-1) represents the control voltage at the previous moment, and delta U (k) represents the corresponding continuous and smooth voltage control increment obtained by the fuzzy rule;
if the desired damping force/moment is in a different quadrant from the actual damping force/moment, when controlling the current the control mode is:
I(k)＝0；
when the voltage is controlled, the control mode is as follows:
U(k)＝0。
5. the method of claim 4, wherein the current time control current is limited to a control feasible region, i.e., 0 ≦ I (k) ≦ Imax(ii) a The control voltage at the current moment needs to be limited in a control feasible region, namely U (k) is more than or equal to 0 and less than or equal to Vmax。
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the error between the desired damping force/torque and the actual damping force/torque is defined as e (k) ═ Fc(k)-Fa(k) In which F isc(k) Indicating the desired damping force/moment at the present moment, Fa(k) Representing the actual damping force/moment at the present moment.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the fuzzy rule is normalizing the error between the desired damping force/moment and the actual damping force/moment from the natural universe of discourse [ -e ]min,emax]Mapping to the ambiguity Domain [ -1,1]And defining a fuzzy subset in the fuzzy domain to represent the fuzzy state of the input or the fuzzy state of the output.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010724837.6A CN111930012B (en) | 2020-07-24 | 2020-07-24 | Closed-loop control method of magnetorheological actuator |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010724837.6A CN111930012B (en) | 2020-07-24 | 2020-07-24 | Closed-loop control method of magnetorheological actuator |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN111930012A true CN111930012A (en) | 2020-11-13 |
| CN111930012B CN111930012B (en) | 2022-12-16 |
Family
ID=73314579
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010724837.6A Active CN111930012B (en) | 2020-07-24 | 2020-07-24 | Closed-loop control method of magnetorheological actuator |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN111930012B (en) |
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112872920A (en) * | 2021-03-01 | 2021-06-01 | 中国工程物理研究院机械制造工艺研究所 | Robot magnetorheological polishing normal positioning actuator and method based on force feedback |
| WO2023061015A1 (en) * | 2021-10-13 | 2023-04-20 | 山东科技大学 | Cluster control method and system for magnetorheological anti-impact device |
| CN116787987A (en) * | 2023-06-25 | 2023-09-22 | 中国第一汽车股份有限公司 | Damper hysteresis compensation method and device, vehicle, electronic equipment and medium |
Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP2277726A1 (en) * | 2009-07-23 | 2011-01-26 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Control device for damping-force adjustable damper |
| CN102322495A (en) * | 2011-06-23 | 2012-01-18 | 中北大学 | Fuzzy control method of gray prediction of magneto-rheological fluid damper |
| CN103809458A (en) * | 2014-03-04 | 2014-05-21 | 福州大学 | Magneto-rheological damping control method based on improved leapfrogging algorithm |
| CN105155717A (en) * | 2015-09-18 | 2015-12-16 | 福州大学 | Magneto-rheological damping fuzzy controller design method based on imperialist competition algorithm |
| CN109278563A (en) * | 2018-09-30 | 2019-01-29 | 合肥工业大学 | The control method of automobile-used magnetorheological fluid braking system based on braking intention identification |
| CN110318945A (en) * | 2019-07-16 | 2019-10-11 | 大连理工大学 | A kind of magnetorheological intelligent controller reducing blower fan pylon vibration |
-
2020
- 2020-07-24 CN CN202010724837.6A patent/CN111930012B/en active Active
Patent Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP2277726A1 (en) * | 2009-07-23 | 2011-01-26 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Control device for damping-force adjustable damper |
| CN102322495A (en) * | 2011-06-23 | 2012-01-18 | 中北大学 | Fuzzy control method of gray prediction of magneto-rheological fluid damper |
| CN103809458A (en) * | 2014-03-04 | 2014-05-21 | 福州大学 | Magneto-rheological damping control method based on improved leapfrogging algorithm |
| CN105155717A (en) * | 2015-09-18 | 2015-12-16 | 福州大学 | Magneto-rheological damping fuzzy controller design method based on imperialist competition algorithm |
| CN109278563A (en) * | 2018-09-30 | 2019-01-29 | 合肥工业大学 | The control method of automobile-used magnetorheological fluid braking system based on braking intention identification |
| CN110318945A (en) * | 2019-07-16 | 2019-10-11 | 大连理工大学 | A kind of magnetorheological intelligent controller reducing blower fan pylon vibration |
Non-Patent Citations (4)
| Title |
|---|
| 夏筱筠等: "基于双模糊控制算法的数控机床过象限误差补偿方法研究", 《小型微型计算机系统》 * |
| 胡为 等: "磁流变阻尼器的半主动控制算法设计与仿真", 《控制工程》 * |
| 陈国兵 等: "盘式磁流变液阻尼器的简化逆动态模型", 《华侨大学学报(自然科学版)》 * |
| 霍发力等: "基于模糊理论海洋平台的MRFD半主动控制理论研究", 《中国海洋平台》 * |
Cited By (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112872920A (en) * | 2021-03-01 | 2021-06-01 | 中国工程物理研究院机械制造工艺研究所 | Robot magnetorheological polishing normal positioning actuator and method based on force feedback |
| CN112872920B (en) * | 2021-03-01 | 2024-05-07 | 中国工程物理研究院机械制造工艺研究所 | Robot magnetorheological polishing normal positioning actuator and method based on force feedback |
| WO2023061015A1 (en) * | 2021-10-13 | 2023-04-20 | 山东科技大学 | Cluster control method and system for magnetorheological anti-impact device |
| CN116787987A (en) * | 2023-06-25 | 2023-09-22 | 中国第一汽车股份有限公司 | Damper hysteresis compensation method and device, vehicle, electronic equipment and medium |
| CN116787987B (en) * | 2023-06-25 | 2024-05-03 | 中国第一汽车股份有限公司 | Damper hysteresis compensation method and device, vehicle, electronic equipment and medium |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN111930012B (en) | 2022-12-16 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN111930012B (en) | Closed-loop control method of magnetorheological actuator | |
| Shen et al. | An integral terminal sliding mode control scheme for speed control system using a double-variable hydraulic transformer | |
| Piltan et al. | Control of IC engine: design a novel MIMO fuzzy backstepping adaptive based fuzzy estimator variable structure control | |
| CN111781837B (en) | Closed-loop control method of magneto-rheological actuator based on dynamic model reconstruction | |
| Thornhill et al. | A comparison of idle speed control schemes | |
| CN113934183B (en) | Electrohydraulic servo system friction compensation method based on improved firefly algorithm | |
| CN109591659A (en) | A kind of pure electric automobile energy management control method of intelligence learning | |
| CN113022548B (en) | Mode switching control system and control method for hybrid electric vehicle | |
| CN110649648A (en) | Power spring control method based on variable-discourse-domain fuzzy PI self-adaptive control | |
| Ding et al. | Intelligent switching control of hybrid electromagnetic active suspension based on road identification | |
| Wilson et al. | Structural vibration reduction using self-tuning fuzzy control of magnetorheological dampers | |
| Jiao et al. | Active load sensitive electro-hydrostatic actuator on more electric aircraft: Concept, design, and control | |
| Xu et al. | Vibration analysis and control of semi-active suspension system based on continuous damping control shock absorber | |
| CN113359468B (en) | Wind turbine generator fault-tolerant control method based on robust self-adaption and sliding mode variable structure control | |
| CN115629538A (en) | Magnetorheological damper semi-active control method based on improved chicken flock algorithm | |
| Lin | RETRACTED: Design of a composite recurrent Laguerre orthogonal polynomial neural network control system with ameliorated particle swarm optimization for a continuously variable transmission system | |
| Wang et al. | Sliding mode active disturbance rejection control for magnetorheological impact buffer system | |
| Bao et al. | Deep deterministic policy gradient-based combustion optimization method for coal-fired boiler | |
| Zhong et al. | Fast dynamics and low power losses of high-speed solenoid valve based on optimized pre-excitation control algorithm | |
| CN111058952A (en) | Electronic throttle control method and system based on self-adaptive fuzzy technology and vehicle | |
| Chongxuan et al. | Design and Experiment of Magnetorheological shimmy damper controller based on deep neural network | |
| Wang et al. | A Reinforcement Learning PID Compound Protocol Design Method for Ultrasonic Motor Control | |
| Al Mhdawi et al. | Adaptive PI-Fuzzy Like Control of a Stack Pneumatic Actuators Testbed for Multi-Configuration Small Scale Soft Robotics | |
| Zhang et al. | Simulation and experimental research on adaptive control algorithm of helicopter fly-by-wire actuator | |
| CN115145151A (en) | Parallel control method and system of electro-hydraulic servo system |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |