CN111915890B - Network connection optimization control method for main road traffic signals - Google Patents
Network connection optimization control method for main road traffic signals Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN111915890B CN111915890B CN202010720893.2A CN202010720893A CN111915890B CN 111915890 B CN111915890 B CN 111915890B CN 202010720893 A CN202010720893 A CN 202010720893A CN 111915890 B CN111915890 B CN 111915890B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- vehicle
- variable
- intersection
- dual
- updating
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
- G08G1/00—Traffic control systems for road vehicles
- G08G1/01—Detecting movement of traffic to be counted or controlled
- G08G1/0104—Measuring and analyzing of parameters relative to traffic conditions
- G08G1/0125—Traffic data processing
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
- G08G1/00—Traffic control systems for road vehicles
- G08G1/01—Detecting movement of traffic to be counted or controlled
- G08G1/0104—Measuring and analyzing of parameters relative to traffic conditions
- G08G1/0137—Measuring and analyzing of parameters relative to traffic conditions for specific applications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
- G08G1/00—Traffic control systems for road vehicles
- G08G1/07—Controlling traffic signals
- G08G1/081—Plural intersections under common control
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02T—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
- Y02T10/00—Road transport of goods or passengers
- Y02T10/10—Internal combustion engine [ICE] based vehicles
- Y02T10/40—Engine management systems
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to a network connection optimization control method for a main road traffic signal, and belongs to the technical field of intelligent traffic flow control. The method comprises the steps of modeling a network connection control problem, decoupling the problem by introducing a consistency variable to construct a consistency optimization problem, realizing parallel calculation by using an alternative direction multiplier method, updating an original variable, a consistency variable and a dual variable in parallel until a set termination condition is met, and sending signal lamp control quantity obtained by calculation to each signal lamp for execution. Each step of calculation of the method can be respectively carried out on the calculation nodes of the signal lamps, and parallelization of problem solving is achieved. The method effectively improves the calculation and solving efficiency, and the calculation complexity is irrelevant to the number of intersections, thereby being more suitable for the cooperative control of large-scale trunk road traffic signals. The network connection optimization control method of the main road traffic signal improves the control efficiency, realizes real-time control, relieves the problems of traffic jam and the like, and is beneficial to improving the traffic efficiency.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to a network connection optimization control method for a main road traffic signal, and belongs to the technical field of intelligent traffic flow control.
Technical Field
The main traffic flows in urban street networks are on thoroughfares and roads along thoroughfares. The optimal timing control of traffic signals along the main road has important significance for solving the problems of traffic jam, energy conservation, emission reduction, traffic safety and the like. The cooperative control of traffic lights along the arterial road has a number of advantages: the method can provide higher-level traffic service, improve the overall speed of the traffic flow and reduce the parking times of the vehicles. And secondly, the traffic flow is smoother, the vehicle distance can be reduced, and the road capacity can be improved. Thirdly, by reasonably controlling the signal lamps, the duration of the green light when the traffic flow reaches the intersection is maximized, and the rear-end collision phenomenon caused by the stop of the traffic light is reduced. Fourthly, the distance between traffic flows is reduced by reasonably controlling the signal lamps, and the phenomenon that pedestrians cross the road within the duration of green light can also be reduced.
At present, the control modes aiming at the main road traffic signals are mainly divided into two modes of maximizing the passing time, minimizing the integral delay time and the parking times of vehicles. Because the mode of minimizing the overall delay time and the number of times of stopping the vehicle needs to evaluate variables such as time delay, the number of times of stopping and the like, the model is more complex and involves nonlinearity, and the traditional method mostly adopts the mode of maximizing the passing time. For the traffic signal lamp control mode of maximizing the traffic time, the current mainstream solving mode comprises two modes of constructing an optimization problem solution and adopting a heuristic algorithm to solve the optimization problem solution. For a solution mode constructed as an optimization problem, most of the existing work constructs the problem as a mixed integer linear programming problem (MILP), the calculation complexity of the problem is greatly increased along with the increase of the scale of the problem, the online control of traffic signals has a certain real-time requirement, and the mode constructed as the optimization problem is difficult to be applied to the large-scale traffic signal control problem. The solving method adopting the heuristic algorithm aims to improve the solving speed of the problem so that the problem can meet the real-time requirement of control, but the heuristic algorithm often cannot find the optimal solution or only finds a certain feasible solution due to time limitation. Both the two solving methods cannot well solve the control problem of the large-scale main road traffic signals.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a network connection optimization control method of a main road traffic signal, which decouples the network connection optimization control problem by introducing a consistency variable, and realizes the parallel computation of sub-nodes by using an alternative direction multiplier algorithm so as to effectively reduce the computation complexity increased along with the number of controlled intersections, thereby improving the computation efficiency and achieving better computation instantaneity.
The invention provides a network connection optimization control method of main road traffic signals, which considers three different intersection conditions and has three different control methods, wherein the first method comprises the following steps:
(1) setting N intersections in the trunk road, and establishing a trunk road signal lamp cooperative control optimization model when any two continuous intersections in the N intersections are green, wherein the trunk road signal lamp cooperative control optimization model comprises the following steps:
satisfies the following conditions: a is (i) ≤x (i) -t i ≤y (i) -t i ≤a (i) +g i-1
b (i) ≤x (i) ≤y (i) ≤b (i) +g i
i=1,2,...,N-2
Wherein i is the serial number of the crossing, N is the total number of the crossings on the main road, and w i Andweight coefficient, Δ, for forward and reverse travel of the vehicle i Starting a green time interval, eta, for forward and reverse running of the vehicle i Already running in reverse direction for vehicleCrossing the cycle number, c represents a signal lamp cycle;
x andrespectively representing the starting position, y and y of the current road section when the vehicle drives forward and the vehicle drives backward to share the green light timingIndicating the end position of the current road section, a andgreen light start time, b andgreen light start time, o andindicating the periodic interval between adjacent road sections, g and g, between which the vehicle is travelling in the forward direction and in the reverse directionIndicating the duration of the green light, t, andrepresents the time required for the vehicle to reach the intersection from the previous intersection in the forward direction and the reverse direction, wherein x (i) ,y (i) ,a (i) ,b (i) For variables to be optimized, the subscript i in the formulaThe ith intersection;
(2) setting the relationship between intersections on the main road as follows: the starting time b of the green light of the current road section when the vehicle at the upper intersection in the forward running process of the vehicle runs in the forward direction is the same as the starting time a of the green light of the upper road section in the forward running process of the vehicle plus the time t required by the vehicle to reach the current intersection from the upper intersection, namely b (i) =a (i) +t i At the current crossing in reverse directionAt the next crossing when travelling in the reverse direction of the vehiclePlus the time required for the vehicle to reach the current intersection from the next intersectionAre identical, i.e. that
Decoupling the coupling part in the model in the step (1) by introducing a consistency variable Z, wherein the decoupled submodel is as follows:
F 1 X 1i =Δ 1i
A 1 X 1i =Z 1i
i=1,2,...,N-2
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
F 1 =[0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1]
(3) and (3) further simplifying the sub-model decoupled in the step (2) into a model with an indication function:
satisfies the following conditions: a. the 1 X 1i =Z 1i
Wherein Z is 1i In order to be a consistent variable, the data rate,to limit the range of the variable, the indicator function is:
wherein S represents a set of feasible solutions for the optimization function, i.e., a set of feasible solutions that satisfy the following constraints:
F1X 1i =Δ 1i
(4) using dual variables lambda in augmented Lagrange form 1 And a penalty factor rho, the consistency optimization model in the step (3) is rewritten into an augmented Lagrange form L 1ρ (X 1 ,Z 1 ,λ 1 ) The following were used:
wherein, the superscript T is a matrix transposition;
(5) by using an alternating direction multiplier method (ADMM for short), iteratively solving the augmented Lagrange formal model in the step (4), realizing the network connection type group cooperative control on the trunk signal lamp, and comprising the following steps:
sequential updating of the consistency variable Z using an alternate direction multiplier method 1 Original variable X 1 And a dual variable λ 1 And setting the iteration number k to be 1 during initialization:
(5-1) at each intersection of the trunk road, for the original variable X 1 And performing parallel updating, wherein an updating formula is as follows:
(5-2)Updating the original variable X according to the step (5-1) 1 For the consistency variable Z 1 Updating is carried out, and an updating formula is as follows:
wherein Ω represents and Z 1i Associated X 1i A set of (a);
(5-3) updating the original variable X according to the step (5-1) 1 And step (5-2) updating the consistency variable Z 1 Update the dual variable lambda 1 The update formula is as follows:
(5-4) setting an original threshold value epsilon according to a convergence judgment condition of an alternative direction multiplier method for solving the augmented Lagrange formal model pri And dual threshold e dual Separately calculating the original errorAnd dual errorIf r k+1 ≤∈ pri And s is k+1 ≤∈ dual Then will beAs the optimal solution of the main road cooperative control, x, y,a (i) ,b (i) ,realize the network connection type cooperative control of the main road traffic signal, if r k+1 >∈ pri Or s k+1 >∈ dual Then go back to step(5-1), and continuing the steps of (5-1) to (5-4).
The second method comprises the following steps:
(1) setting N intersections in the trunk road, and establishing a trunk road signal lamp cooperative control optimization model when any three continuous intersections in the N intersections are green, wherein the trunk road signal lamp cooperative control optimization model comprises the following steps:
satisfies the following conditions: a is a (i) +t i ≤x (i) ≤y (i) ≤a (i) +g i-1 +t i
b (i) ≤x (i) ≤y (i) ≤b (i) +g i
d (i) -t i+1 ≤x (i) ≤y (i) ≤d (i) +g i+1 -t i+1
i=1,2,...,N-2
Wherein i is the serial number of the road junction, N is the total number of the road junctions on the main road, w i Andweighting coefficients for forward running and reverse running of the vehicle; delta i Starting a green time interval, eta, for both forward and reverse running of the vehicle i C represents a signal light period for the number of crossing periods that the vehicle has crossed when driving in reverse.
x andrespectively representing the starting position, y and y of the current road section when the vehicle drives forward and the vehicle drives backward to share the green light timingIndicating the end position of the current road section, a andgreen light start time, b andgreen light start time, d and d indicating that the vehicle is driving in forward direction and the vehicle is driving in reverse direction on the current road sectionA green light start time indicating that the vehicle is traveling in the forward direction and the vehicle is traveling in the reverse direction on the next road section, andindicating the periodic interval between adjacent road sections, g and g, between which the vehicle is travelling in the forward direction and in the reverse directionIndicating the duration of the green light, t, andrepresents the time required for the vehicle to reach the intersection from the previous intersection in the forward direction and the reverse direction, wherein x (i) ,y (i) ,a (i) ,b (i) ,For the variables to be optimized, the corner mark i in the formula represents the ith intersection;
(2) setting the relationship between the main road intersections as follows: the starting time b of the green light of the current road section when the vehicle is running in the forward direction is the same as the starting time a of the green light of the previous road section when the vehicle is running in the forward direction plus the time t required for the vehicle to reach the current intersection from the previous intersection, namely b (i) =a (i) +t i And the starting time b of the green light of the current road section when the vehicle is running in the forward direction is the same as the time t required by the vehicle to reach the next road section from the current road section by subtracting the starting time d of the green light of the next road section when the vehicle is running in the forward direction, namely b (i) =d (i) -t i+1 At the current crossing when the vehicle is travelling in the reverse directionAt the next crossing when travelling in the reverse direction of the vehiclePlus the time required for the vehicle to reach the current intersection from the next intersectionAre identical, i.e. thatAnd at the current intersection when the vehicle is travelling in the reverse directionAt the next crossing when travelling in the reverse direction of the vehicleMinus the time required for the vehicle to reach the next intersection from the current intersectionAre identical, i.e. that
Decoupling the coupling part in the model in the step (1) by introducing a consistency variable, wherein the decoupled submodel is as follows:
F 2 X 2i =δ i
A 2 X 2i =Z 2i
i=1,2,...,N-2
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
(3) and further simplifying the decoupled submodel into a model with an indication function:
satisfies the following conditions: a. the 2 X 2i =Z 2i
Wherein Z is 2i In order to be a consistent variable, the data rate,to limit the range of the variable, the indicator function is:
wherein S represents a set of feasible solutions for the optimization function, i.e., a set of feasible solutions that satisfy the following constraints:
F 2 X 2i =δ i
(4) using dual variables lambda in augmented Lagrange form 2 And a penalty factor rho, and rewriting the consistency optimization model in the step (3-2-1) into an augmented Lagrange form L 2ρ (X 2 ,Z 2 ,λ 2 ) The following were used:
wherein, the superscript T is a matrix transposition;
(5) and (3) iteratively solving the augmented Lagrange formal model in the step (4) by using an alternating direction multiplier method to realize the network connection type group cooperative control on the trunk signal lamp, wherein the method comprises the following steps:
updating the consistency variable Z in sequence 2 Original variable X 2 And a dual variable λ 2 And setting the iteration number k to be 1 during initialization:
(5-1) at each intersection of the trunk road, for the original variable X 2 And performing parallel updating, wherein an updating formula is as follows:
(5-2) updating the original variable X according to the step (5-1) 2 For the consistency variable Z 2 Updating is carried out, and an updating formula is as follows:
wherein Ω represents and Z 2i Associated X 2i A set of (a);
(5-3) updating the original variable X according to the step (5-1) 2 And step (5-2) updating the consistency variable Z 2 Update the dual variable lambda 2 The update formula is as follows:
(5-4) setting an original threshold value epsilon according to a convergence judgment condition of an alternative direction multiplier method for solving the augmented Lagrange formal model pri And dual threshold e dual Separately calculating the original errorAnd dual errorIf r is k+1 ≤∈ pri And s is k+1 ≤∈ dual Then will beObtaining x as the optimal solution of the main road cooperative control optimization model (i) ,y (i) ,a (i) ,b (i) ,d (i) ,Realize the network connection type cooperative control of the main road traffic signal, if r k+1 >∈ pri Or s k+1 >∈ dual And returning to the step (5-1) and continuing to circulate the steps from (5-1) to (5-4).
The third method comprises the following steps:
(1) setting N intersections in the main road, and establishing a main road signal lamp cooperative control optimization model when green lamps of all the intersections in the N intersections are matched as follows:
(i=1,2,…,N-2)
(2) setting the relationship between intersections as follows: the starting time b of the green light of the current road section when the vehicle is running in the forward direction is the same as the starting time a of the green light of the previous road section when the vehicle is running in the forward direction plus the time t required for the vehicle to reach the current intersection from the previous intersection, namely b (i) =a (i) +t i At the current crossing when the vehicle is travelling in the reverse directionAt the next crossing when travelling in the reverse direction of the vehiclePlus the time required for the vehicle to reach the current intersection from the next intersectionAre identical, i.e. thatSetting the timing x and y of green lights at all intersections to be the same, and adopting the timing x and y at the first intersection to obtain the starting time b of the green light at the ith intersection (i) X less than or equal to the first crossing plus the cumulative time of the first crossing to reach the ith crossingNamely, it isThe vehicle can be obtained in the same way in the reverse driving process;
decoupling the coupling part in the model in the step (1) by introducing a consistency variable, wherein the decoupled submodel is as follows:
F 3 X 3i =Δ 3i
X 3i =Z 3i
i=0,1,...,N-2
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
F 3 =[0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1]
(3) and further simplifying the decoupled submodel into a model with an indication function:
satisfies the following conditions: x 3i =Z 3i
Wherein Z is 3i In order to be a consistent variable,to limit the range of the variable, the indicator function is:
wherein S represents a set of feasible solutions for the optimization function, i.e., a set of feasible solutions that satisfy the following constraints:
F 3 X 3i =Δ 3i
(4) using dual variables lambda in augmented Lagrangian form 3 And a penalty factor rho, the consistency optimization model in the step (2) is rewritten into an augmented Lagrange form L 3ρ (X 3 ,Z 3 ,λ 3 ) The following were used:
wherein, the superscript T is a matrix transposition;
(5) and (3) iteratively solving the augmented Lagrange formal model in the step (4) by using an alternating direction multiplier method to realize the network connection type group cooperative control on the trunk signal lamp, wherein the method comprises the following steps:
updating the consistency variable Z in sequence 3 Original variable X 3 And a dual variable λ 3 And setting the iteration number k to be 1 during initialization:
(5-1) at each intersection of the trunk road, for the original variable X 3 And performing parallel updating, wherein an updating formula is as follows:
(5-2) updating the original variable X according to the step (5-1) 3 For the consistency variable Z 3 Updating is carried out, and an updating formula is as follows:
wherein Ω represents and Z 3i Associated X 3i A set of (a);
(5-3) updating the original variable X according to the step (5-1) 3 And step (5-2) updating the consistency variable Z 3 Update the dual variable lambda 3 The update formula is as follows:
(5-4) setting an original threshold value epsilon according to a convergence judgment condition of an alternative direction multiplier method for solving the augmented Lagrange formal model pri And dual threshold e dual Separately calculating the original errorAnd dual errorIf r k+1 ≤∈ pri And s is k+1 ≤∈ dual Then will beAs the optimal solution of the main road cooperative control optimization model, obtaining x, y,a (i) ,b (i) ,realize the network connection type cooperative control of the main road traffic signal, if r k+1 >∈ pri Or s k+1 >∈ dual And returning to the step (5-1) and continuing to circulate the steps from (5-1) to (5-4).
The network connection optimization control method of the main road traffic signals under one, two or three or any two combinations of the three different conditions comprises the following steps:
(1) setting N intersections in the main road, and establishing a sub-model after the main road signal lamp cooperative control decoupling when green lights of all the intersections in the N intersections are matched as follows:
F 1 X 1i =Δ 1i
A 1 X 1i =Z 1i
F 2 X 2i =δ i
A 2 X 2i =Z 2i
F 3 X 3i =Δ 3i
X 3i =Z 3i
i=1,2,...,N-2
wherein, the first and the second end of the pipe are connected with each other,in the first method, when the vehicle is driving in the forward direction, the green light at the ith intersection starts,vehicle in the second methodWhen the vehicle is running forward, the green light starting time of the ith crossing,indicating the green light start time of the ith intersection when the vehicle is traveling in the forward direction in the third method,indicating the starting time of the green light at the ith intersection when the vehicle is traveling in reverse in the first method,indicating the starting time of the green light at the ith intersection when the vehicle is traveling in reverse in the second method,indicating the green light starting time of the ith intersection when the vehicle is driven in reverse in the third method,
further simplified as follows:
satisfies the following conditions: GX i ≤H (i)
FX i =ζ i
AX i =Z i
i=1,2,...,N-2
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
L=[L 1 ,L 2 ,L 3 ]
X i =[X 1i, X 2i ,X 3i ] T
Z i =[Z 1i, Z 2i ,Z 3i l T
F=[F 1 ,F 2 ,F 3 ]
ζ i =[Δ 1i ,δ i ,Δ 2i ] T
A=[A 1 ,A 2 ,I] T
(2) and simplifying the decoupled submodel into a model with an indication function:
satisfies the following conditions: AX i =Z i
Wherein Z is i In order to be a consistent variable,to limit the range of the variable, the indicator function is:
wherein S represents a set of feasible solutions for the optimization function, i.e., a set of feasible solutions that satisfy the following constraints:
GX i ≤H (i)
FX i =ζ i
(3) utilizing a dual variable lambda and a penalty factor rho in the augmented Lagrange form to rewrite the consistency optimization model in the step (2) into an augmented Lagrange form L ρ (X, Z, λ) is as follows:
wherein, the superscript T is a matrix transposition;
(4) and (3) iteratively solving the augmented Lagrange formal model in the step (3) by using an alternating direction multiplier method to realize the network connection type group cooperative control on the trunk signal lamp, wherein the method comprises the following steps:
sequentially updating a consistency variable Z, an original variable X and a dual variable lambda, and setting the iteration number k to be 1 during initialization:
(4-1) at each intersection of the main road, updating the original variable X in parallel, wherein the updating formula is as follows:
(4-2) updating the consistency variable Z according to the original variable X updated in the step (4-1), wherein the updating formula is as follows:
wherein Ω represents and Z i Associated X i A set of (a);
(4-3) updating the dual variable lambda according to the original variable X updated in the step (4-1) and the consistency variable Z updated in the step (4-2), wherein the updating formula is as follows:
(4-4) setting an original threshold value epsilon according to the convergence judgment condition of the alternative direction multiplier method for solving the augmented Lagrange formal model pri And dual threshold e dual Separately calculating the original errorAnd dual errorIf r k+1 ≤∈ pri And s is k+1 ≤∈ dual Then will beObtaining X as the optimal solution of the main road cooperative control optimization model 1i ,X 2i ,X 3i Realizing the network connection type cooperative control of the main road traffic signal, if r k+1 >∈ pri Or s k+1 >∈ dual And returning to the step (4-1) and continuing to circulate the steps from (4-1) to (4-4).
The network connection optimization control method of the main road traffic signal provided by the invention has the advantages that:
the network connection optimization control method of the main road traffic signals, provided by the invention, is used for decoupling the network connection optimization control problem on the basis of the construction of a central problem of cooperative control of the main road traffic signals, and in the step of updating the ADMM, the calculation of each step can be respectively carried out on the calculation nodes of respective signal lamps, so that the parallelization of problem solution is realized. Compared with a centralized solving mode, the method provided by the invention effectively improves the calculation solving efficiency. Particularly, the calculation complexity of the method is irrelevant to the number of intersections, so that the method is more suitable for cooperative control of large-scale trunk road traffic signals. The network connection optimization control method of the main road traffic signal improves the control efficiency, realizes real-time control, relieves the problems of traffic jam and the like, and is beneficial to improving the traffic efficiency.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of the cooperative control of main road signal lamps when any two continuous intersections or all intersections are matched in the method of the present invention.
Fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of the cooperative control of trunk signal lamps when any three continuous intersections match in the method of the present invention.
Fig. 3 is a schematic diagram of cooperative control of trunk signal lamps in three types of intersection timing combinations.
Fig. 4 is a flowchart of a network connection optimization control method for a main road traffic signal according to the present invention.
Detailed Description
The flow chart of the network connection optimization control method of the main road traffic signal provided by the invention is shown in fig. 4, the invention considers three different intersection conditions and has three different control methods, wherein the first method comprises the following steps:
(1) setting N intersections in the main road, and establishing a main road signal lamp control optimization model when any two continuous intersections in the N intersections are in green light timing as follows: the optimization model is shown in fig. 1.
Satisfies the following conditions: a is (i) ≤x (i) -t i ≤y (i) -t i ≤a (i) +g i-1
b (i) ≤x (i) ≤y (i) ≤b (i) +g i
i=1,...,N-2
Wherein i is the serial number of the road junction, N is the total number of the road junctions on the main road, w i Andweight coefficient, Δ, for forward and reverse travel of the vehicle i For forward and reverse running of the vehicleStarting green time interval at running timing i C represents a signal lamp period;
x andrespectively representing the starting position, y and y of the current road section when the vehicle drives forward and the vehicle drives backward to share the green light timingIndicating the end position of the current road section, a andgreen light start time, b anda green light start time indicating that the vehicle is traveling in the forward direction and the vehicle is traveling in the reverse direction on the current road section, andindicating the periodic interval between adjacent road sections, g and g, between which the vehicle is travelling in the forward direction and in the reverse directionIndicating the duration of the green light, t, andrepresents the time required for the vehicle to reach the intersection from the upper intersection in the forward direction and the reverse direction, wherein x (i) ,y (i) ,a (i) ,b (i) ,For the variables to be optimized, the corner mark i in the formula represents the ith intersection;
(2) setting the relationship between intersections on the main road as follows: the starting time b of the green light of the current road section when the vehicle at the upper intersection in the forward running process of the vehicle runs in the forward direction is the same as the starting time a of the green light of the upper road section in the forward running process of the vehicle plus the time t required by the vehicle to reach the current intersection from the upper intersection, namely b (i) =a (i) +t i At the current crossing when the vehicle is travelling in the reverse directionAt the next crossing when travelling in the reverse direction of the vehiclePlus the time required for the vehicle to reach the current intersection from the next intersectionAre identical, i.e. that
Decoupling the coupling part in the model in the step (1) by introducing a consistency variable Z, wherein the decoupled submodel is as follows:
F 1 X 1i =Δ 1i
A 1 X 1i =Z 1i
i=1,2,...,N-2
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
F 1 =[0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1]
(3) and (3) further simplifying the sub-model decoupled in the step (2) into a model with an indication function:
satisfies the following conditions: a. the 1 X 1i =Z 1i
Wherein Z is 1i In order to be a consistent variable,to limit the range of the variable, the indicator function is:
wherein S represents a set of feasible solutions for the optimization function, i.e., a set of feasible solutions that satisfy the following constraints:
F 1 X 1i =Δ 1i
(4) using dual variables lambda in augmented Lagrange form 1 And a penalty factor rho, the consistency optimization model in the step (3) is rewritten into an augmented Lagrange form L 1ρ (X 1 ,Z 1 ,λ 1 ) The following were used:
wherein, the superscript T is a matrix transposition;
(5) by using an alternating direction multiplier method (ADMM for short), iteratively solving the augmented Lagrange formal model in the step (4), realizing the network connection type group cooperative control on the trunk signal lamp, and comprising the following steps:
sequential updating of the consistency variable Z using an alternate direction multiplier method 1 Original variable X 1 And a dual variable λ 1 And setting the iteration number k to be 1 during initialization:
(5-1) at each intersection of the trunk road, for the original variable X 1 And performing parallel updating, wherein an updating formula is as follows:
(5-2) updating the original variable X according to the step (5-1) 1 For the consistency variable Z 1 Updating is carried out, and an updating formula is as follows:
wherein Ω represents and Z 1i Associated X 1i A set of (a);
(5-3) updating the original variable X according to the step (5-1) 1 And step (5-2) updating the consistency variable Z 1 Update the dual variable lambda 1 The update formula is as follows:
(5-4) setting an original threshold value epsilon according to a convergence judgment condition of an alternative direction multiplier method for solving the augmented Lagrange formal model pri And dual threshold e dual Separately calculating the original errorAnd dual errorIf r k+1 ≤∈ pri And s is k+1 ≤∈ dual Then will beAs the optimal solution of the main road cooperative control, x, y,a (i) ,b (i) ,network connection type for realizing main road traffic signalCo-operating under control of r k+1 >∈ pri Or s k+1 >∈ dual And returning to the step (5-1) and continuing to circulate the steps from (5-1) to (5-4).
The second method comprises the following steps:
(1) setting N intersections in the trunk road, and establishing a trunk road signal lamp cooperative control optimization model when any three continuous intersections in the N intersections are green, wherein the trunk road signal lamp cooperative control optimization model comprises the following steps: the optimization model is shown in FIG. 2
Satisfies the following conditions: a is (i) +t i ≤x (i) ≤y (i) ≤a (i) +g i-1 +t i
b (i) ≤x (i) ≤y (i) ≤b (i) +g i
d (i) -t i+1 ≤x (i) ≤y (i) ≤d (i) +g i+1 -t i+1
i=1,2,...,N-2
Wherein i is the serial number of the road junction, N is the total number of the road junctions on the main road, w i Andweighting coefficients for forward running and reverse running of the vehicle; delta i Starting a green time interval, eta, for forward and reverse running of the vehicle i C represents a signal light period for the number of crossing periods that the vehicle has crossed when driving in reverse.
x andrespectively representing the starting position, y and y of the current road section when the vehicle drives forward and the vehicle drives backward to share the green light timingIndicating the end position of the current road section when the vehicle has a green light in both forward and reverse directions, a andgreen light start time, b andgreen light start time, d and d indicating that the vehicle is driving in forward direction and the vehicle is driving in reverse direction on the current road sectionA green light start time indicating that the vehicle is traveling in the forward direction and the vehicle is traveling in the reverse direction on the next road section, andindicating forward and reverse travel of the vehiclePeriodic interval between adjacent road sections, g andindicating the duration of the green light, t, andrepresents the time required for the vehicle to reach the intersection from the previous intersection in the forward direction and the reverse direction, wherein x (i) ,y (i) ,a (i) ,b (i) ,For the variables to be optimized, the corner mark i in the formula represents the ith intersection;
(2) setting the relationship between the main road intersections as follows: the starting time b of the green light of the current road section when the vehicle is running in the forward direction is the same as the starting time a of the green light of the previous road section when the vehicle is running in the forward direction plus the time t required for the vehicle to reach the current intersection from the previous intersection, namely b (i) =a (i) +t i And the starting time b of the green light of the current road section when the vehicle is running in the forward direction is the same as the time t required by the vehicle to reach the next road section from the current road section by subtracting the starting time d of the green light of the next road section when the vehicle is running in the forward direction, namely b (i) =d (i) -t i+1 At the current crossing when the vehicle is travelling in the reverse directionAt the next crossing when travelling in the reverse direction of the vehiclePlus the time required for the vehicle to reach the current intersection from the next intersectionAre identical, i.e. thatAnd at the current intersection when the vehicle is travelling in the reverse directionAt the next crossing when travelling in the reverse direction of the vehicleMinus the time required for the vehicle to reach the next intersection from the current intersectionAre identical, i.e. that
Decoupling the coupling part in the model in the step (1) by introducing a consistency variable, wherein the decoupled submodel is as follows:
F 2 X 2i =δ i
A 2 X 2i =Z 2i
i=1,2,...,N-2
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
(3) and further simplifying the decoupled submodel into a model with an indication function:
satisfies the following conditions: a. the 2 X 2i =Z 2i
Wherein, Z 2i In order to be a consistent variable, the data rate,to limit the range of the variable, the indicator function is:
wherein S represents a set of feasible solutions for the optimization function, i.e., a set of feasible solutions that satisfy the following constraints:
F 2 X 2i =δ i
(4) using dual variables lambda in augmented Lagrange form 2 And a penalty factor rho, and rewriting the consistency optimization model in the step (3-2-1) into an augmented Lagrange form L 2ρ (X 2 ,Z 2 ,λ 2 ) The following were used:
wherein, the superscript T is a matrix transposition;
(5) and (3) iteratively solving the augmented Lagrange formal model in the step (4) by using an alternating direction multiplier method to realize the network connection type group cooperative control on the trunk signal lamp, wherein the method comprises the following steps:
updating the consistency variable Z in sequence 2 Original variable X 2 And dual variable lambda 2 And setting the iteration number k to be 1 during initialization:
(5-1) at each intersection of the trunk road, for the original variable X 2 And performing parallel updating, wherein an updating formula is as follows:
(5-2) according to the stepsOriginal variable X after update of step (5-1) 2 For the consistency variable Z 2 Updating is carried out, and an updating formula is as follows:
wherein Ω represents and Z 2i Associated X 2i A set of (a);
(5-3) updating the original variable X according to the step (5-1) 2 And step (5-2) updating the consistency variable Z 2 Update the dual variable lambda 2 The update formula is as follows:
(5-4) setting an original threshold value epsilon according to a convergence judgment condition of an alternative direction multiplier method for solving the augmented Lagrange formal model pri And dual threshold e dual Separately calculating the original errorAnd dual errorIf r k+1 ≤∈ pri And s is k+1 ≤∈ dual Then will beObtaining x as the optimal solution of the main road cooperative control optimization model (i) ,y (i) ,a (i) ,b (i) ,d (i) ,Realize the network connection type cooperative control of the main road traffic signal, if r k+1 >∈ pri Or s k+1 >∈ dual And returning to the step (5-1) and continuing to circulate the steps from (5-1) to (5-4).
The third method comprises the following steps:
(1) setting N intersections in the main road, and establishing a main road signal lamp cooperative control optimization model when green lamps of all the intersections in the N intersections are matched as follows: the optimization model is shown in FIG. 1
(i=1,2,...,N-2)
(2) setting the relationship between intersections as follows: the starting time b of the green light of the current road section when the vehicle is running in the forward direction is the same as the starting time a of the green light of the previous road section when the vehicle is running in the forward direction plus the time t required for the vehicle to reach the current intersection from the previous intersection, namely b (i) =a (i) +t i At the current crossing when the vehicle is travelling in the reverse directionAt the next crossing when travelling in the reverse direction of the vehiclePlus the time required for the vehicle to reach the current intersection from the next intersectionAre identical, i.e. thatSetting the timing x and y of green lights at all intersections to be the same, and adopting the timing x and y at the first intersection to obtain the starting time b of the green light at the ith intersection (i) X less than or equal to the first crossing plus the cumulative time of the first crossing to reach the ith crossingNamely, it isThe vehicle can be obtained in the same way in the reverse driving process;
decoupling the coupling part in the model in the step (1) by introducing a consistency variable, wherein the decoupled submodel is as follows:
F 3 X 3i =Δ 3i
X 3i =Z 3i
i=1,...,N-2
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
F 3 =[0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1]
(3) and further simplifying the decoupled submodel into a model with an indication function:
satisfies the following conditions: x 3i =Z 3i
Wherein Z is 3i In order to be a consistent variable,an indication function for limiting the value range of the variable, namely:
wherein S represents a set of feasible solutions for the optimization function, i.e., a set of feasible solutions that satisfy the following constraints:
F 3 X 3i =Δ 3i
(4) using dual variables lambda in augmented Lagrange form 3 And a penalty factor rho, the consistency optimization model in the step (2) is rewritten into an augmented Lagrange form L 3ρ (X 3 ,Z 3 ,λ 3 ) The following were used:
wherein, the superscript T is a matrix transposition;
(5) and (3) iteratively solving the augmented Lagrange formal model in the step (4) by using an alternating direction multiplier method to realize the network connection type group cooperative control on the trunk signal lamp, wherein the method comprises the following steps:
updating the consistency variable Z in sequence 3 Original variable X 3 And a dual variable λ 3 And setting the iteration number k to be 1 during initialization:
(5-1) at each intersection of the trunk road, for the original variable X 3 And performing parallel updating, wherein an updating formula is as follows:
(5-2) updating the original variable X according to the step (5-1) 3 For the consistency variable Z 3 Updating is carried out, and an updating formula is as follows:
wherein Ω represents and Z 3i Associated X 3i A set of (a);
(5-3) updating the original variable X according to the step (5-1) 3 And step (5-2) updating the consistency variable Z 3 Update the dual variable lambda 3 The update formula is as follows:
(5-4) setting an original threshold value epsilon according to a convergence judgment condition of an alternative direction multiplier method for solving the augmented Lagrange formal model pri And dual threshold e dual Separately calculating the original errorAnd dual errorIf r is k+1 ≤∈ pri And s is k+1 ≤∈ dual Then will beAs the optimal solution of the main road cooperative control optimization model, x, y,a (i) ,b (i) ,realize the network connection type cooperative control of the main road traffic signal, if r k+1 >∈ pri Or s k+1 >∈ dual And returning to the step (5-1) and continuing to circulate the steps from (5-1) to (5-4).
The network connection optimization control method of the main road traffic signals under one, two or three or any two combinations of the three different conditions comprises the following steps:
(1) setting N intersections in the main road, and establishing a sub-model after the main road signal lamp cooperative control decoupling when green lights of all the intersections in the N intersections are matched as follows: the optimization model is shown in figure 3 of the drawings,
F 1 X 1i =Δ 1i
A 1 X 1i =Z 1i
F 2 X 2i =δ i
A 2 X 2i =Z 2i
F 3 X 3i =Δ 3i
X 3i =Z 3i
i=1,2,...,N-2
wherein the content of the first and second substances,vehicle in the first methodWhen the vehicle is running forward, the green light starting time of the ith crossing,in the second method, when the vehicle is driving in the forward direction, the green light at the ith intersection starts,indicating the green light start time of the ith intersection when the vehicle is traveling in the forward direction in the third method,indicating the starting time of the green light at the ith intersection when the vehicle is traveling in reverse in the first method,indicating the starting time of the green light at the ith intersection when the vehicle is traveling in reverse in the second method,indicating the green light starting time of the ith intersection when the vehicle is driven in reverse in the third method,
further simplification is as follows:
satisfies the following conditions: GX i ≤H (i)
FX i =ζ i
AX i =Z i
i=1,2,...,N-2
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
L=[L 1 ,L 2 ,L 3 ]
X i =[X 1i, X 2i ,X 3i ] T
Z i =[Z 1i, Z 2i ,Z 3i ] T
F=[F 1 ,F 2 ,F 3 ]
ζ i =[Δ 1i ,δ i ,Δ 2i ] T
A=[A 1 ,A 2 ,I] T
(2) and simplifying the decoupled sub-model into a model with an indication function:
satisfies the following conditions: AX i =Z i
Wherein, Z i In order to be a consistent variable,an indication function for limiting the value range of the variable, namely:
wherein S represents a set of feasible solutions for the optimization function, i.e., a set of feasible solutions that satisfy the following constraints:
GX i ≤H (i)
FX i =ζ i
(3) utilizing a dual variable lambda and a penalty factor rho in the augmented Lagrange form to rewrite the consistency optimization model in the step (2) into the augmented Lagrange form L ρ (X, Z, λ) is as follows:
wherein, the superscript T is a matrix transposition;
(4) and (3) iteratively solving the augmented Lagrange formal model in the step (3) by using an alternating direction multiplier method to realize the network connection type group cooperative control on the trunk signal lamp, wherein the method comprises the following steps:
sequentially updating a consistency variable Z, an original variable X and a dual variable lambda, and setting the iteration number k to be 1 during initialization:
(4-1) at each intersection of the main road, updating the original variable X in parallel, wherein the updating formula is as follows:
(4-2) updating the consistency variable Z according to the original variable X updated in the step (4-1), wherein the updating formula is as follows:
wherein Ω represents and Z i Associated X i A set of (a);
(4-3) updating the dual variable lambda according to the original variable X updated in the step (4-1) and the consistency variable Z updated in the step (4-2), wherein the updating formula is as follows:
(4-4) augmenting Lagrange according to solvingThe convergence judgment condition of the alternative direction multiplier method of the day-form model is set as an original threshold belonging to pri And dual threshold e dual Separately calculating the original errorAnd dual errorIf r k+1 ≤∈ pri And s is k+1 ≤∈ dual Then will beObtaining X as the optimal solution of the main road cooperative control optimization model 1i ,X 2i ,X 3i Realize the network connection type cooperative control of the main road traffic signal, if r k+1 >∈ pri Or s k+1 >∈ dua1 And returning to the step (4-1) and continuing to circulate the steps from (4-1) to (4-4).
Claims (4)
1. A network connection optimization control method of a main road traffic signal is characterized by comprising the following steps:
(1) setting N intersections in the trunk road, and establishing a trunk road signal lamp cooperative control optimization model when any two continuous intersections in the N intersections are green, wherein the trunk road signal lamp cooperative control optimization model comprises the following steps:
satisfies the following conditions: a is (i) ≤x (i) -t i ≤y (i) -t i ≤a (i) +g i-1
b (i) ≤x (i) ≤y (i) ≤b (i) +g i
i=1,2,...,N-2
Wherein i is the serial number of the road junction, N is the total number of the road junctions on the main road, w i Andweight coefficient, Δ, for forward and reverse travel of the vehicle i Starting a green time interval, eta, for forward and reverse running of the vehicle i C represents a signal lamp period;
x andrespectively representing the starting position, y and y of the current road section when the vehicle drives forward and the vehicle drives backward to share the green light timingIndicating the end position of the current road section, a andgreen light start time, b andgreen light start time, o andindicating the periodic interval between adjacent road sections, g and g, between which the vehicle is travelling in the forward direction and in the reverse directionIndicating the duration of the green light, t, andrepresents the time required for the vehicle to reach the intersection from the previous intersection in the forward direction and the reverse direction, wherein x (i) ,y (i) ,a (i) ,b (i) ,For the variables to be optimized, the corner mark i in the formula represents the ith intersection;
(2) setting the relationship between intersections on the main road as follows: the starting time b of the green light of the current road section when the vehicle at the upper intersection in the forward running process of the vehicle runs in the forward direction is the same as the starting time a of the green light of the upper road section in the forward running process of the vehicle plus the time t required by the vehicle to reach the current intersection from the upper intersection, namely b (i) =a (i) +t i At the current crossing when the vehicle is travelling in the reverse directionAt the next crossing when travelling in the reverse direction of the vehiclePlus the time required for the vehicle to reach the current intersection from the next intersectionAre identical, i.e. that
Decoupling the coupling part in the model in the step (1) by introducing a consistency variable Z, wherein the decoupled submodel is as follows:
F 1 X 1i =Δ 1i
A 1 X 1i =Z 1i
i=1,2,...,N-2
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
F 1 =[0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1]
(3) and (3) further simplifying the sub-model decoupled in the step (2) into a model with an indication function:
satisfies the following conditions: a. the 1 X 1i =Z 1i
Wherein Z is 1i In order to be a consistent variable,to limit the range of the variable, the indicator function is:
wherein S represents a set of feasible solutions for the optimization function, i.e., a set of feasible solutions that satisfy the following constraints:
F 1 X 1i =Δ 1i
(4) using dual variables lambda in augmented Lagrange form 1 And a penalty factor rho, the consistency optimization model in the step (3) is rewritten into an augmented Lagrange form L 1ρ (X 1 ,Z 1 ,λ 1 ) The following were used:
wherein, the superscript T is a matrix transposition;
(5) and (3) iteratively solving the augmented Lagrange formal model in the step (4) by using an alternating direction multiplier method to realize the network connection type group cooperative control on the trunk signal lamp, wherein the method comprises the following steps:
sequential updating of the consistency variable Z using an alternate direction multiplier method 1 Original variable X 1 And a dual variable λ 1 And setting the iteration number k to be 1 during initialization:
(5-1) at each intersection of the trunk road, for the original variable X 1 And performing parallel updating, wherein an updating formula is as follows:
(5-2) updating the original variable X according to the step (5-1) 1 For the consistency variable Z 1 Updating is carried out, and an updating formula is as follows:
wherein Ω represents and Z 1i Associated X 1i A set of (a);
(5-3) updating the original variable X according to the step (5-1) 1 And step (5-2) updating the consistency variable Z 1 Update dual variablesλ 1 The update formula is as follows:
(5-4) setting an original threshold value epsilon according to the convergence judgment condition of the alternative direction multiplier method for solving the augmented Lagrange formal model pri And dual threshold e dual Separately calculating the original errorAnd dual errorIf r k+1 ≤∈ pri And s is k+1 ≤∈ dual Then will beAs the optimal solution of the main road cooperative control, x, y,a (i) ,b (i) ,realize the network connection type cooperative control of the main road traffic signal, if r k+1 >∈ pri Or s k+1 >∈ dual And returning to the step (5-1) and continuing to circulate the steps from (5-1) to (5-4).
2. A network connection optimization control method of a main road traffic signal is characterized by comprising the following steps:
(1) setting N intersections in the trunk road, and establishing a trunk road signal lamp cooperative control optimization model when any three continuous intersections in the N intersections are green, wherein the trunk road signal lamp cooperative control optimization model comprises the following steps:
satisfies the following conditions: a is (i) +t i ≤x (i) ≤y (i) ≤a (i) +g i-1 +t i
b (i) ≤x (i) ≤y (i) ≤b (i) +g i
d (i) -t i+1 ≤x (i) ≤y (i) ≤d (i) +g i+1 -t i+1
i=1,2,...,N-2
Wherein i is the serial number of the road junction, N is the total number of the road junctions on the main road, w i Andweighting coefficients for forward running and reverse running of the vehicle; delta i Starting a green time interval, eta, for forward and reverse running of the vehicle i C represents a signal lamp period;
x andrespectively representing the starting position, y and y of the current road section when the vehicle drives forward and the vehicle drives backward to share the green light timingIndicating the end position of the current road section, a andgreen light start time, b andgreen light start time, d and d indicating that the vehicle is driving in forward direction and the vehicle is driving in reverse direction on the current road sectionGreen light starting time, o andindicating the periodic interval between adjacent road sections, g and g, between which the vehicle is travelling in the forward direction and in the reverse directionIndicating the duration of the green light, t, andrepresents the time required for the vehicle to reach the intersection from the previous intersection in the forward direction and the reverse direction, wherein x (i) ,y (i) ,a (i) ,b (i) ,For the variables to be optimized, the corner mark i in the formula represents the ith intersection;
(2) setting the relationship between the main road intersections as follows: the starting time b of the green light of the current road section when the vehicle is running in the forward direction is the same as the starting time a of the green light of the previous road section when the vehicle is running in the forward direction plus the time t required for the vehicle to reach the current intersection from the previous intersection, namely b (i) =a (i) +t i And the starting time b of the green light of the current road section when the vehicle is running in the forward direction is the same as the time t required by the vehicle to reach the next road section from the current road section by subtracting the starting time d of the green light of the next road section when the vehicle is running in the forward direction, namely b (i) =d (i) -t i+1 At the current crossing when the vehicle is travelling in the reverse directionAt the next crossing when travelling in the reverse direction of the vehiclePlus the time required for the vehicle to reach the current intersection from the next intersectionAre identical, i.e. thatAnd at the current intersection when the vehicle is travelling in the reverse directionAt the next crossing when travelling in the reverse direction of the vehicleMinus the time required for the vehicle to reach the next intersection from the current intersectionAre identical, i.e. that
Decoupling the coupling part in the model in the step (1) by introducing a consistency variable, wherein the decoupled submodel is as follows:
F 2 X 2i =δ i
A 2 X 2i =Z 2i
i=1,2,...,N-2
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
(3) and further simplifying the decoupled submodel into a model with an indication function:
satisfies the following conditions: a. the 2 X 2i =Z 2i
Wherein Z is 2i In order to be a consistent variable,to limit the range of the variable, the indicator function is:
wherein S represents a set of feasible solutions for the optimization function, i.e., a set of feasible solutions that satisfy the following constraints:
F 2 X 2i =δ i
(4) using dual variables lambda in augmented Lagrange form 2 And a penalty factor rho, and rewriting the consistency optimization model in the step (3-2-1) into an augmented Lagrange form L 2ρ (X 2 ,Z 2 ,λ 2 ) The following:
wherein, the superscript T is a matrix transposition;
(5) and (3) iteratively solving the augmented Lagrange formal model in the step (4) by using an alternating direction multiplier method to realize the network connection type group cooperative control on the trunk signal lamp, wherein the method comprises the following steps:
updating the consistency variable Z in sequence 2 Original variable X 2 And a dual variable λ 2 And setting the iteration number k to be 1 during initialization:
(5-1) at each intersection of the trunk road, for the original variable X 2 And performing parallel updating, wherein an updating formula is as follows:
(5-2) updating the original variable X according to the step (5-1) 2 For the consistency variable Z 2 Updating is carried out, and an updating formula is as follows:
wherein Ω represents and Z 2i Associated X 2i A set of (a);
(5-3) updating the original variable X according to the step (5-1) 2 And step (5-2) updating the consistency variable Z 2 Update the dual variable lambda 2 The update formula is as follows:
(5-4) setting an original threshold value epsilon according to a convergence judgment condition of an alternative direction multiplier method for solving the augmented Lagrange formal model pri And dual threshold e dual Separately calculating the original errorAnd dual errorIf r k+1 ≤∈ pri And s is k+1 ≤∈ dual Then will beObtaining x as the optimal solution of the main road cooperative control optimization model (i) ,y (i) ,a (i) ,b (i) ,d (i) ,Realize the network connection type cooperative control of the main road traffic signal, if r k+1 >∈ pri Or s k+1 >∈ dual And returning to the step (5-1) and continuing to circulate the steps from (5-1) to (5-4).
3. A network connection optimization control method of a main road traffic signal is characterized by comprising the following steps:
(1) setting N intersections in the main road, and establishing a main road signal lamp cooperative control optimization model when green lamps of all the intersections in the N intersections are matched as follows:
i=1,2,...,N-2
wherein i is the serial number of the road junction, N is the total number of the road junctions on the main road, w i Andweight coefficient, Δ, for forward and reverse travel of the vehicle i Starting a green time interval, eta, for forward and reverse running of the vehicle i C represents a signal lamp period;
x andrespectively representing the starting position, y and y of the current road section when the vehicle drives forward and the vehicle drives backward to share the green light timingIndicating the end position of the current road section, a andgreen light start time, b andthe green light start time, t, andindicating the time required for the vehicle to reach the intersection from the previous intersection in the forward direction and the reverse direction,andcumulative transit time, g and g, representing the time the vehicle travels in the forward direction and in the reverse direction from the first intersection to the ith intersectionIndicating the duration of the green light, t, andrepresents the time required for the vehicle to reach the intersection from the previous intersection in the forward direction and the reverse direction, wherein a (i) ,b (i) ,For the variables to be optimized, the corner mark i in the formula represents the ith intersection;
(2) setting the relationship between intersections as follows: the starting time b of the green light of the current road section when the vehicle is running in the forward direction is the same as the starting time a of the green light of the previous road section when the vehicle is running in the forward direction plus the time t required for the vehicle to reach the current intersection from the previous intersection, namely b (i) =a (i) +t i At the current crossing when the vehicle is travelling in the reverse directionAt the next crossing when travelling in the reverse direction of the vehiclePlus the time required for the vehicle to reach the current intersection from the next intersectionAre identical, i.e. thatSetting the timing x and y of green lights at all intersections to be the same, and adopting the timing x and y at the first intersection to start the green light at the ith intersectionTime b (i) X less than or equal to the first crossing plus the cumulative time of the first crossing to reach the ith crossingNamely, it isThe vehicle can be obtained in the same way in the reverse driving process;
decoupling the coupling part in the model in the step (1) by introducing a consistency variable, wherein the decoupled submodel is as follows:
F 3 X 3i =Δ 3i
X 3i =Z 3i
i=1,...,N-2
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
F 3 =[0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1]
(3) and further simplifying the decoupled submodel into a model with an indication function:
satisfies the following conditions: x 3i =Z 3i
Wherein Z is 3i In order to be a consistent variable,to limit the range of the variable, the indicator function is:
wherein S represents a set of feasible solutions for the optimization function, i.e., a set of feasible solutions that satisfy the following constraints:
F 3 X 3i =Δ 3i
(4) using dual variables lambda in augmented Lagrange form 3 And a penalty factor rho, and rewriting the consistency optimization model in the step (2) into an augmented Lagrange form L 3ρ (X 3 ,Z 3 ,λ 3 ) The following were used:
wherein, the superscript T is a matrix transposition;
(5) and (3) iteratively solving the augmented Lagrange formal model in the step (4) by using an alternating direction multiplier method to realize the network connection type group cooperative control on the trunk signal lamp, wherein the method comprises the following steps:
updating the consistency variable Z in sequence 3 Original variable X 3 And a dual variable λ 3 And setting the iteration number k to be 1 during initialization:
(5-1) at each intersection of the trunk road, for the original variable X 3 And performing parallel updating, wherein an updating formula is as follows:
(5-2) updating the original variable X according to the step (5-1) 3 For the consistency variable Z 3 Updating is carried out, and an updating formula is as follows:
wherein Ω represents and Z 3i Associated X 3i A set of (a);
(5-3) updating the original variable X according to the step (5-1) 3 And step (5-2) updating the consistency variable Z 3 Update the dual variable lambda 3 More, moreThe new formula is as follows:
(5-4) setting an original threshold value epsilon according to a convergence judgment condition of an alternative direction multiplier method for solving the augmented Lagrange formal model pri And dual threshold e dual Separately calculating the original errorAnd dual errorIf r k+1 ≤∈ pri And s is k+1 ≤∈ dual Then will beAs the optimal solution of the main road cooperative control optimization model, x, y,a (i) ,b (i) ,realize the network connection type cooperative control of the main road traffic signal, if r k+1 >∈ pri Or s k+1 >∈ dual And returning to the step (5-1) and continuing to circulate the steps from (5-1) to (5-4).
4. A network connection optimization control method of a main road traffic signal is characterized by comprising the following steps:
(1) setting N intersections in the main road, and establishing a sub-model after the main road signal lamp cooperative control decoupling when green lights of all the intersections in the N intersections are matched as follows:
F 1 X 1i =Δ 1i
A 1 X 1i =Z 1i
F 2 X 2i =δ i
A 2 X 2i =Z 2i
F 3 X 3i =Δ 3i
X 3i =Z 3i
i=1,2,...,N-2
wherein the content of the first and second substances,indicating the starting time of the green light at the ith intersection when the vehicle of claim 1 is traveling in the forward direction,representing rightsThe vehicle in 2 is required to be driven forward at the starting moment of the green light at the ith intersection,indicating the starting time of the green light at the ith intersection when the vehicle of claim 3 is traveling in the forward direction,indicating the start time of the green light at the ith intersection when the vehicle of claim 1 is traveling in reverse,indicating the starting time of the green light at the ith intersection when the vehicle of claim 2 is traveling in reverse,indicating the green light start time, L, of the ith intersection when the vehicle of claim 3 is traveling in reverse 1 ,X 1i ,G 1 ,F 1 ,Δ 1i ,A 1 ,Z 1i As defined in claim 1; l is 2 ,X 2i ,G 2 ,F 2 ,δ i ,A 2 ,Z 2i Is as defined in claim 2; l is 3 ,X 3i ,G 3 ,F 3 ,Δ 3i ,A 3 ,Z 3i Is as defined in claim 3;
further simplification is as follows:
satisfies the following conditions: GX i ≤H (i)
FX i =ζ i
AX i =Z i
i=1,2,...,N-2
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
L=[L 1 ,L 2 ,L 3 ]
X i =[X 1i ,X 2i ,X 3i ] T
Z i =[Z 1i ,Z 2i ,Z 3i ] T
F=[F 1 ,F 2 ,F 3 ]
ζ i =[Δ 1i ,δ i ,Δ 3i ] T
A=[A 1 ,A 2 ,A 3 ] T
(2) and simplifying the decoupled submodel into a model with an indication function:
satisfies the following conditions: AX i =Z i
Wherein Z is i In order to be a consistent variable,to take value ranges for variablesThe indicator function that limits, namely:
wherein S represents a set of feasible solutions for the optimization function, i.e., a set of feasible solutions that satisfy the following constraints:
GX i ≤H (i)
FX i =ζ i
(3) utilizing a dual variable lambda and a penalty factor rho in the augmented Lagrange form to rewrite the consistency optimization model in the step (2) into an augmented Lagrange form L ρ (X, Z, λ) is as follows:
wherein, the superscript T is a matrix transposition;
(4) and (3) iteratively solving the augmented Lagrange formal model in the step (3) by using an alternating direction multiplier method to realize the network connection type group cooperative control on the trunk signal lamp, wherein the method comprises the following steps:
sequentially updating a consistency variable Z, an original variable X and a dual variable lambda, and setting the iteration number k to be 1 during initialization:
(4-1) at each intersection of the main road, updating the original variable X in parallel, wherein the updating formula is as follows:
(4-2) updating the consistency variable Z according to the original variable X updated in the step (4-1), wherein the updating formula is as follows:
wherein Ω represents and Z i Associated X i A set of (a);
(4-3) updating the dual variable lambda according to the original variable X updated in the step (4-1) and the consistency variable Z updated in the step (4-2), wherein the updating formula is as follows:
(4-4) setting an original threshold value epsilon according to a convergence judgment condition of an alternative direction multiplier method for solving the augmented Lagrange formal model pri And dual threshold e dual Separately calculating the original errorAnd dual errorIf r k+1 ≤∈ pri And s is k+1 ≤∈ dual Then will beObtaining X as the optimal solution of the main road cooperative control optimization model 1i ,X 2i ,X 3i Realizing the network connection type cooperative control of the main road traffic signal, if r k+1 >∈ pri Or s k+1 >∈ dual And returning to the step (4-1) and continuing to circulate the steps from (4-1) to (4-4).
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010720893.2A CN111915890B (en) | 2020-07-24 | 2020-07-24 | Network connection optimization control method for main road traffic signals |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010720893.2A CN111915890B (en) | 2020-07-24 | 2020-07-24 | Network connection optimization control method for main road traffic signals |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN111915890A CN111915890A (en) | 2020-11-10 |
CN111915890B true CN111915890B (en) | 2022-08-12 |
Family
ID=73280776
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010720893.2A Active CN111915890B (en) | 2020-07-24 | 2020-07-24 | Network connection optimization control method for main road traffic signals |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN111915890B (en) |
Family Cites Families (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN104575021B (en) * | 2014-12-17 | 2016-06-15 | 浙江工业大学 | Distributed model predictive control method based on neighborhood Optimizing City road network system |
CN106504536B (en) * | 2016-12-09 | 2019-01-18 | 华南理工大学 | A kind of traffic zone coordination optimizing method |
WO2018130307A1 (en) * | 2017-01-13 | 2018-07-19 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | An architecture and coordination mechanism to distribute and parallelize any mcf solver |
CN107545729B (en) * | 2017-08-25 | 2020-02-18 | 华南理工大学 | Traffic network distributed region control method based on data driving |
CN109410606B (en) * | 2018-03-22 | 2021-05-04 | 合肥革绿信息科技有限公司 | Main road cooperative annunciator control method based on video |
CN109035766A (en) * | 2018-07-13 | 2018-12-18 | 北京工业大学 | The dynamic traffic control and induction cooperative optimization method of variable cycle are considered under a kind of car networking environment |
CN109889564B (en) * | 2018-12-04 | 2020-10-09 | 清华大学 | Centralized group cooperative control method for networked automobiles |
CN109935079A (en) * | 2019-03-19 | 2019-06-25 | 吉林大学 | Intersection supply and demand cooperates with optimal control method |
CN110942627B (en) * | 2019-11-27 | 2020-11-03 | 北京建筑大学 | Road network coordination signal control method and device for dynamic traffic |
-
2020
- 2020-07-24 CN CN202010720893.2A patent/CN111915890B/en active Active
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN111915890A (en) | 2020-11-10 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN108847037B (en) | Non-global information oriented urban road network path planning method | |
CN106875710B (en) | A kind of intersection self-organization control method towards net connection automatic driving vehicle | |
CN110264757B (en) | Intelligent networking automobile layered speed planning method based on continuous signal lamp information | |
CN110032782B (en) | City-level intelligent traffic signal control system and method | |
CN114241778B (en) | Multi-objective optimization control method and system for expressway internet of vehicles cooperating with ramp junction | |
CN109840641B (en) | Method for quickly optimizing train multi-section operation curve | |
CN107016857B (en) | Signal control intersection left-turn traffic combination design optimization method | |
CN104766484A (en) | Traffic control and guidance system and method based on evolutionary multi-objective optimization and ant colony algorithm | |
CN103198673B (en) | Bus green wave arrangement control system for controlling station stop and road section driving | |
CN112319461B (en) | Hybrid electric vehicle energy management method based on multi-source information fusion | |
CN113269963B (en) | Internet vehicle signal lamp control intersection economic passing method based on reinforcement learning | |
CN104485004A (en) | Signal control method combining main trunk road bidirectional dynamic green wave and secondary trunk road semi-induction | |
CN106297329A (en) | A kind of signal timing dial adaptive optimization method of networking signals machine | |
Lin et al. | Traffic signal optimization based on fuzzy control and differential evolution algorithm | |
CN107331166B (en) | A kind of dynamic restricted driving method based on path analysis | |
CN114038212A (en) | Signal lamp control method based on two-stage attention mechanism and deep reinforcement learning | |
CN109544922B (en) | Traffic network distributed predictive control method based on region division | |
CN103500511B (en) | A kind of Intersections split control method based on car networking | |
Kong et al. | Urban arterial traffic two-direction green wave intelligent coordination control technique and its application | |
CN113421439B (en) | Single intersection traffic signal timing optimization method based on Monte Carlo algorithm | |
CN113593226A (en) | Control method for automatic driving special road intersection in mixed traffic flow environment | |
CN112286212A (en) | Vehicle network cooperative energy-saving control method | |
CN111915890B (en) | Network connection optimization control method for main road traffic signals | |
CN115344972A (en) | Method for optimizing signal timing of special road position and intersection for man-machine hybrid driving automatic driving | |
CN110021168B (en) | Grading decision method for realizing real-time intelligent traffic management under Internet of vehicles |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |