CN111914491A - Method for researching interaction mechanism of active power distribution network, distributed power supply, energy storage and diverse loads - Google Patents
Method for researching interaction mechanism of active power distribution network, distributed power supply, energy storage and diverse loads Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN111914491A CN111914491A CN202010901944.1A CN202010901944A CN111914491A CN 111914491 A CN111914491 A CN 111914491A CN 202010901944 A CN202010901944 A CN 202010901944A CN 111914491 A CN111914491 A CN 111914491A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- load
- energy storage
- storage device
- power
- scheduling
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
- G06F30/27—Design optimisation, verification or simulation using machine learning, e.g. artificial intelligence, neural networks, support vector machines [SVM] or training a model
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N3/00—Computing arrangements based on biological models
- G06N3/12—Computing arrangements based on biological models using genetic models
- G06N3/126—Evolutionary algorithms, e.g. genetic algorithms or genetic programming
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/04—Forecasting or optimisation specially adapted for administrative or management purposes, e.g. linear programming or "cutting stock problem"
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/06—Electricity, gas or water supply
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2113/00—Details relating to the application field
- G06F2113/04—Power grid distribution networks
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y04—INFORMATION OR COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES HAVING AN IMPACT ON OTHER TECHNOLOGY AREAS
- Y04S—SYSTEMS INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO POWER NETWORK OPERATION, COMMUNICATION OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING THE ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION, MANAGEMENT OR USAGE, i.e. SMART GRIDS
- Y04S10/00—Systems supporting electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
- Y04S10/50—Systems or methods supporting the power network operation or management, involving a certain degree of interaction with the load-side end user applications
Abstract
The invention discloses a method for researching an interaction mechanism of an active power distribution network, a distributed power supply, energy storage and various loads, which takes the minimized operation cost of the active power distribution network as one of objective functions, improves the economic benefit of a power grid company by formulating a reasonable scheduling strategy and realizes the economic operation of the active power distribution network. In addition, the large fluctuation of the load curve may cause the influence of unstable voltage, reduced power supply reliability, and the like. Therefore, with minimized load curve variance as the 2 nd objective function, peak clipping and valley filling of the load curve is achieved by proper scheduling of the energy storage device and demand side response.
Description
The application is application number: 201911148487.7, filing date: 2019.11.21, entitled "method for studying interaction mechanism of active distribution network with distributed power supply, energy storage and diverse load".
Technical Field
The invention relates to a method for researching an interaction mechanism of an active power distribution network, a distributed power supply, energy storage and various loads.
Background
The purpose of multi-source cooperative interaction of the active power distribution network is to comprehensively coordinate 'source-network-load-storage' of the active power distribution network, so that the interaction mechanism of the active power distribution network and a distributed power supply, energy storage and diversified loads needs to be researched and analyzed.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a method for researching an interaction mechanism of an active power distribution network, a distributed power supply, energy storage and various loads with good effect.
The technical solution of the invention is as follows:
a method for researching an interaction mechanism of an active power distribution network, a distributed power supply, energy storage and various loads is characterized by comprising the following steps: the method comprises the following steps:
the method comprises the steps that the minimum active power distribution network operation cost is taken as one of objective functions, the minimum load curve variance is taken as the 2 nd objective function, and peak clipping and valley filling of a load curve are achieved by reasonably scheduling the energy storage device and the demand side response;
the first objective function is that the total operating cost of the active power distribution network is minimal. The operation cost of the active power distribution network comprises the cost of purchasing power to a superior power grid, the operation cost of an energy storage device, the cost of response compensation of a demand side and the cost of network loss; the expression of the objective function 1 is shown in equations (3-56):
in the formula, CIL,i(t) demand side response compensation cost of interruptible load which is connected to the grid at the node i at the t-th scheduling moment; cESS,j(t) the running cost of the energy storage device connected to the grid at the node j at the t-th scheduling moment; cgrid(t) the cost for purchasing/selling electricity to the superior power grid at the tth scheduling moment; stipulate the time of purchase of electricity Cgrid(t) is positive; closs(t) network loss cost of the active power distribution network at the tth scheduling moment; n is a radical ofILThe number of grid-connected nodes capable of interrupting the load; n is a radical ofESSThe number of energy storage devices for grid connection; t is the number of scheduling moments;
the second objective function is that the variance of the total load curve of the active power distribution network is minimum; the load curve variance can reflect the fluctuation degree of the load curve, and the objective function 2 is shown as formula (3-57):
in the formula, PL(t) the total load power of the active power distribution network at the tth scheduling moment;
the optimal scheduling model constraints are as follows:
(1) load shedding power constraints that can disrupt the load, as shown in equations (3-58):
PILmin,i≤PIL,i(t)≤PILmax,i (3-58)
PILmin,iand PILmax,iRespectively is the minimum value and the maximum value of load shedding power of the interruptible load connected to the grid at the node i;
(2) energy storage device charge/discharge power constraints, as shown in equations (3-59):
PESSmin,j≤PESS,j(t)≤PESSmax,j (3-59)
in the formula, PESSmin,jAnd PESSmax,jThe upper limit and the lower limit of active power which can be provided by the energy storage device connected to the grid at the node j are respectively set;
(3) energy storage device VSOCConstraint, as shown in formulas (3-60) and (3-61):
VSOCmin,j≤VSOC,j(t)≤VSOCmax,j (3-60)
VSOC,j(ti)＝VSOC,j(tf) (3-61)
in the formula, VSOCmin,jAnd VSOCmax,jRespectively representing the lower limit and the upper limit of the residual capacity of the energy storage device connected to the grid at the node j; vSOC,j(t) is the residual capacity of the energy storage device connected to the grid at the node j at the t-th scheduling moment; t is tiAnd tfRespectively a scheduling period starting time and a scheduling period ending time;
(4) node voltage constraints are as shown in equations (3-62):
Umin,k<Uk(t)<Umax,k (3-62)
in the formula of Uk(t) is the voltage value at node k at the t-th scheduling time; u shapemin,kAnd Umax,kThe minimum value and the maximum value of the voltage allowed at the node k are respectively;
(5) the power balance constraint, as shown in equations (3-63):
(6) and (3) constraining the power flow equation as shown in the formula (3-64):
in the formula, Pi(t) and Qi(t) respectively injecting active power and reactive power into the node i at the t-th scheduling time; u shapei(t) and Uj(t) the voltage amplitudes of the node i and the node j at the t-th scheduling time respectively; gijAnd BijRespectively the conductance and susceptance of the active power distribution network branch ij;ij(t) is the voltage phase angle difference of the node i and the node j at the t-th scheduling moment;
(7) the balance nodes are constrained, and the balance nodes are taken as transformer substations of the active power distribution network and the superior power grid for transaction; when the active power distribution network operates, a higher-level power grid can make a production plan according to the day-ahead load prediction information, and meanwhile, certain rotation standby is guaranteed, so that power constraint of a balance node needs to be considered; the balanced node constraint is as shown in equation (3-65):
Pmin,S≤PS(t)≤Pmax,S (3-65)
in the formula, Pmin,SAnd Pmax,SRespectively the upper and lower limits of the active power of the balancing node S; pS(t) the transaction power of the active power distribution network and the power purchased/sold by the superior power grid at the t-th scheduling moment;
(8) branch power constraints, as shown in equations (3-66):
Pl(t)≤Pmax,l (3-66)
in the formula, Pl(t) is the power passed by the ith branch at the tth scheduling time; pmax,lThe maximum allowed power for the ith branch.
An improved IEEE33 node power distribution system is selected as an example for analysis, and the improvement scheme is as follows:
The invention has good effect; the operation economy and reliability of the active power distribution network can be effectively improved, and the comprehensive benefit maximization is realized, so that the optimized operation of the active power distribution network is realized.
Drawings
The invention is further illustrated by the following figures and examples.
Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of an improved IEEE33 node power distribution system.
Detailed Description
A method for researching an interaction mechanism of an active power distribution network, a distributed power supply, energy storage and various loads comprises the following steps:
the method comprises the steps that the minimum active power distribution network operation cost is taken as one of objective functions, the minimum load curve variance is taken as the 2 nd objective function, and peak clipping and valley filling of a load curve are achieved by reasonably scheduling the energy storage device and the demand side response;
the first objective function is that the total operating cost of the active power distribution network is minimal. The operation cost of the active power distribution network comprises the cost of purchasing power to a superior power grid, the operation cost of an energy storage device, the cost of response compensation of a demand side and the cost of network loss; the expression of the objective function 1 is shown in equations (3-56):
in the formula, CIL,i(t) demand side response compensation cost of interruptible load which is connected to the grid at the node i at the t-th scheduling moment; cESS,j(t) the running cost of the energy storage device connected to the grid at the node j at the t-th scheduling moment; cgrid(t) the cost for purchasing/selling electricity to the superior power grid at the tth scheduling moment; stipulate the time of purchase of electricity Cgrid(t) is positive; closs(t) network loss cost of the active power distribution network at the tth scheduling moment; n is a radical ofILThe number of grid-connected nodes capable of interrupting the load; n is a radical ofESSThe number of energy storage devices for grid connection; t is the number of scheduling moments;
the second objective function is that the variance of the total load curve of the active power distribution network is minimum; the load curve variance can reflect the fluctuation degree of the load curve, and the objective function 2 is shown as formula (3-57):
in the formula, PL(t) the total load power of the active power distribution network at the tth scheduling moment;
the optimal scheduling model constraints are as follows:
(1) load shedding power constraints that can disrupt the load, as shown in equations (3-58):
PILmin,i≤PIL,i(t)≤PILmax,i (3-58)
PILmin,iand PILmax,iRespectively is the minimum value and the maximum value of load shedding power of the interruptible load connected to the grid at the node i;
(2) energy storage device charge/discharge power constraints, as shown in equations (3-59):
PESSmin,j≤PESS,j(t)≤PESSmax,j (3-59)
in the formula, PESSmin,jAnd PESSmax,jThe upper limit and the lower limit of active power which can be provided by the energy storage device connected to the grid at the node j are respectively set;
(3) energy storage device VSOCConstraint, as shown in formulas (3-60) and (3-61):
VSOCmin,j≤VSOC,j(t)≤VSOCmax,j (3-60)
VSOC,j(ti)＝VSOC,j(tf) (3-61)
in the formula, VSOCmin,jAnd VSOCmax,jRespectively representing the lower limit and the upper limit of the residual capacity of the energy storage device connected to the grid at the node j; vSOC,j(t) is the residual capacity of the energy storage device connected to the grid at the node j at the t-th scheduling moment; t is tiAnd tfRespectively a scheduling period starting time and a scheduling period ending time;
(4) node voltage constraints are as shown in equations (3-62):
Umin,k<Uk(t)<Umax,k (3-62)
in the formula of Uk(t) is the voltage value at node k at the t-th scheduling time; u shapemin,kAnd Umax,kThe minimum value and the maximum value of the voltage allowed at the node k are respectively;
(5) the power balance constraint, as shown in equations (3-63):
(6) and (3) constraining the power flow equation as shown in the formula (3-64):
in the formula, Pi(t) and Qi(t) respectively injecting active power and reactive power into the node i at the t-th scheduling time; u shapei(t) and Uj(t) the voltage amplitudes of the node i and the node j at the t-th scheduling time respectively; gijAnd BijAre respectively an active power distribution network branchThe conductance and susceptance of ij;ij(t) is the voltage phase angle difference of the node i and the node j at the t-th scheduling moment;
(7) the balance nodes are constrained, and the balance nodes are taken as transformer substations of the active power distribution network and the superior power grid for transaction; when the active power distribution network operates, a higher-level power grid can make a production plan according to the day-ahead load prediction information, and meanwhile, certain rotation standby is guaranteed, so that power constraint of a balance node needs to be considered; the balanced node constraint is as shown in equation (3-65):
Pmin,S≤PS(t)≤Pmax,S (3-65)
in the formula, Pmin,SAnd Pmax,SRespectively the upper and lower limits of the active power of the balancing node S; pS(t) the transaction power of the active power distribution network and the power purchased/sold by the superior power grid at the t-th scheduling moment;
(8) branch power constraints, as shown in equations (3-66):
Pl(t)≤Pmax,l (3-66)
in the formula, Pl(t) is the power passed by the ith branch at the tth scheduling time; pmax,lThe maximum allowed power for the ith branch.
In order to verify the reasonability and the effectiveness of the established active power distribution network multi-target multi-source interaction optimization operation strategy model, an improved IEEE33 node power distribution system is selected as an example to be analyzed, and the improvement scheme is as follows:
node 12 is provided with a storage battery energy storage device PQ node, and E is takenmax＝1200kWh，PESSmin,j＝300kW，PESSmax,j＝300kW，VSOCmin,j＝0.1，VSOCmax,j＝0.9，VSOC,j(ti)＝VSOC,j(tf)＝0.5，ηd＝0.98，ηc0.97, γ 0.01; the node 14 is provided with two wind power distributed power PQ nodes in the same area; the load of the node 6 is set as interruptible load, and P is takenILmin,i＝0，PILmax,i100 kW; setting node 1 as balance node, taking Pmin,S＝-200kW，Pmax,S200 kW; the reference capacity of the system is selected to be 10MVA, and the reference voltage is selected to be 12.66KV, get Umin,k＝0.95p.u.，Umax,k1.2 p.u.; the total load of the whole network is 3.715+2.3 MVA; for the cost coefficient, the interruptible load compensation cost a is 1.8 yuan/kWh, the energy storage device charging and discharging cost b is 0.1 yuan/kWh, the electricity purchasing/selling price is set to be the peak-valley price, namely 8: 00-22: 00, c1(t) ═ 1.0 membered/kWh, c2(t) ═ 0.5 membered/kWh; 0:00 to 8:00 and 22:00 to 24:00, c1(t) ═ 0.4 membered/kWh, c2(t) ═ 0.2 membered/kWh; for the NSGA-II algorithm, the initial population number N is takenpopulation100, iteration number Niteration10000, cross coefficient NcrossCoefficient of variation N of 20mutant20, cross probability Pcorss0.7, probability of mutation Pmutant＝0.3。
The peak-valley electricity price is set in the embodiment, the electricity price is lower when the load is in the low-valley period of 0: 00-8: 00, and the electricity price is higher when the load is in the high-peak period of 8: 00-22: 00. The following analyses were performed:
(1) analyzing the relation between the objective functions: there is a conflict between the total operating cost and the total load curve variance, i.e. there is no optimal solution to minimize the 2 objective function values at the same time. The reason why the analysis of the total operating cost and the total load curve variance are negative overall is that: reducing the load curve variance requires relying on the interruptible load and the peak clipping and valley filling effects of the energy storage device, but the interruptible load compensation cost is higher than the peak electricity price, and if the demand side response is used excessively, the operation cost is increased, which is not favorable for the economic operation of the active power distribution network.
(2) Analyzing a scheduling strategy of the output of the energy storage device: to minimize the total operating cost, the output of the energy storage device should be scheduled according to the peak-valley electricity price, that is, the energy storage device is used for discharging to reduce the electricity purchased to the upper-level power grid in the peak electricity price period, and the energy storage device is charged in the valley electricity price period to prepare for the load peak period. And carrying out targeted scheduling on the total load curve if the variance of the total load curve is minimum, and maximizing the peak clipping and valley filling effects of the energy storage device through the output scheduling scheme of the energy storage device, thereby reducing the variance of the load curve.
(3) Analyzing a scheduling strategy of interruptible load shedding amount: since the compensation cost for interruptible loads is higher than the peak electricity prices, the scheduling of interruptible loads is minimized to minimize the total operating cost. To minimize the total load curve variance, the load curve variance is reduced by maximizing the load shedding and valley filling effect of the interruptible load.
(4) Analyzing a scheduling strategy of trading power with a superior power grid: the trading power with the superior power grid is determined by various factors such as active power distribution network load, wind power output, an energy storage device and demand side response at the current scheduling moment. To minimize the total operating cost, the electricity purchasing power from the upper-level grid should be reduced and the electricity selling power should be increased during the peak electricity price period, and vice versa during the valley electricity price period. In order to minimize the variance of the total load curve, the trading power with the upper-level grid is determined according to the scheduling strategy of the energy storage device and the interruptible load.
(5) The effect of the energy storage device was analyzed: for convenience of analysis, the project finds a Pareto solution set without considering the energy storage device, and compares the Pareto solution set with considering the energy storage device. The total operation cost and the total load curve variance considering the output of the energy storage device are lower than those not considering the output of the energy storage device, because the operation cost of the energy storage device is lower than the transaction power cost of an upper-level power grid, the energy storage device can be charged at the valley power price and discharged at the peak power price, and therefore the total operation cost is reduced; in addition, because the valley power price is corresponding to the low valley of the load, the peak power price is corresponding to the high peak of the load, and the energy storage device can cut the peak and fill the valley of the load curve when the load is charged at the low valley and discharged at the high peak of the load, thereby reducing the variance of the total load curve.
(6) The effect of interruptible load was analyzed: for convenience of analysis, the project finds a Pareto solution set without considering interruptible load, and compares the Pareto solution set with considering interruptible load; the total operating cost considering interruptible loads is higher than that not considering interruptible loads, and the total load curve variance is lower than that not considering interruptible loads. The total operating cost of the interruptible load is considered to be high because the load shedding compensation cost of the interruptible load is higher than the peak electricity price, and therefore if the interruptible load is used for demand-side response, the total operating cost increases. The low total load curve variance of the interruptible loads is considered because the total load curve variance can be reduced by reducing the load curve peak by demand-side response to the interruptible loads at peak load times.
According to the above analysis, the absence of a solution enables 2 objective function values to be minimized simultaneously. Therefore, the project firstly obtains the entropy weight coefficient of each objective function, obtains the comprehensive index of each optimized operation strategy according to the obtained entropy weight coefficient, and selects the maximum comprehensive index as the optimal solution.
The strategy reasonably schedules the energy storage device, the interruptible load and the trading power with the superior power grid, avoids the subjectivity of preference of a decision maker, can better represent the solved Pareto solution set to serve as an optimal scheduling strategy of the active power distribution network, can realize the maximization of the comprehensive benefits of the operation of the active power distribution network, and further realizes the optimal operation of the active power distribution network.
The analysis result of the above examples shows that: 1) according to the difference of real-time electricity prices, the operating cost of the active power distribution network can be reduced by reasonably scheduling the charging and discharging states of the energy storage device; 2) aiming at the uncontrollable output of the intermittent distributed power supply, the energy storage device and the response of the demand side can perform the functions of peak clipping and valley filling on a load curve; 3) the total operation cost and the total load curve variance are contradictory and cannot reach the minimum at the same time, so that an optimal solution needs to be selected to represent the solved Pareto solution set. In order to avoid subjectivity of preference of a decision maker, objective weighting can be carried out on each objective function through an entropy weight method, and an optimal solution is selected according to comprehensive indexes of each objective function, so that an optimized operation strategy of the active power distribution network is obtained.
Claims (1)
1. A method for researching an interaction mechanism of an active power distribution network, a distributed power supply, energy storage and various loads is characterized by comprising the following steps: the method comprises the following steps:
the method comprises the steps that the minimum active power distribution network operation cost is taken as one of objective functions, the minimum load curve variance is taken as the 2 nd objective function, and peak clipping and valley filling of a load curve are achieved by reasonably scheduling the energy storage device and the demand side response;
the first objective function is that the total operation cost of the active power distribution network is minimum; the operation cost of the active power distribution network comprises the cost of purchasing power to a superior power grid, the operation cost of an energy storage device, the cost of response compensation of a demand side and the cost of network loss; the expression of the objective function 1 is shown in equations (3-56):
in the formula, CIL,i(t) demand side response compensation cost of interruptible load which is connected to the grid at the node i at the t-th scheduling moment; cESS,j(t) the running cost of the energy storage device connected to the grid at the node j at the t-th scheduling moment; cgrid(t) the cost for purchasing/selling electricity to the superior power grid at the tth scheduling moment; stipulate the time of purchase of electricity Cgrid(t) is positive; closs(t) network loss cost of the active power distribution network at the tth scheduling moment; n is a radical ofILThe number of grid-connected nodes capable of interrupting the load; n is a radical ofESSThe number of energy storage devices for grid connection; t is the number of scheduling moments;
the second objective function is that the variance of the total load curve of the active power distribution network is minimum; the load curve variance can reflect the fluctuation degree of the load curve, and the objective function 2 is shown as formula (3-57):
in the formula, PL(t) the total load power of the active power distribution network at the tth scheduling moment;
the optimal scheduling model constraints are as follows:
(1) load shedding power constraints that can disrupt the load, as shown in equations (3-58):
PILmin,i≤PIL,i(t)≤PILmax,i (3-58)
PILmin,iand PILmax,iRespectively is the minimum value and the maximum value of load shedding power of the interruptible load connected to the grid at the node i;
(2) energy storage device charge/discharge power constraints, as shown in equations (3-59):
PESSmin,j≤PESS,j(t)≤PESSmax,j (3-59)
in the formula, PESSmin,jAnd PESSmax,jThe upper limit and the lower limit of active power which can be provided by the energy storage device connected to the grid at the node j are respectively set;
(3) energy storage device VSOCConstraint, as shown in formulas (3-60) and (3-61):
VSOCmin,j≤VSOC,j(t)≤VSOCmax,j (3-60)
VSOC,j(ti)＝VSOC,j(tf) (3-61)
in the formula, VSOCmin,jAnd VSOCmax,jRespectively representing the lower limit and the upper limit of the residual capacity of the energy storage device connected to the grid at the node j; vSOC,j(t) is the residual capacity of the energy storage device connected to the grid at the node j at the t-th scheduling moment; t is tiAnd tfRespectively a scheduling period starting time and a scheduling period ending time;
(4) node voltage constraints are as shown in equations (3-62):
Umin,k<Uk(t)<Umax,k (3-62)
in the formula of Uk(t) is the voltage value at node k at the t-th scheduling time; u shapemin,kAnd Umax,kThe minimum value and the maximum value of the voltage allowed at the node k are respectively;
(5) the power balance constraint, as shown in equations (3-63):
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,
the meaning is as follows: the active power which can be provided by the ith distributed power supply which is connected with the grid at the t-th scheduling moment;
the meaning is as follows: the active power which can be provided by the jth energy storage device connected with the grid at the tth scheduling moment; pgrid(t)) means: the power of electricity purchasing/electricity selling to a superior power grid at the t-th scheduling moment is positive, and negative electricity purchasing and electricity selling are performed; pL(t): the total load power of the active power distribution network at the t-th scheduling moment; ploss(t): network loss power of the active power distribution network at the t-th scheduling moment; pIL,i(t) load shedding power for interruptible loads at node i for the tth scheduling time;
(6) and (3) constraining the power flow equation as shown in the formula (3-64):
in the formula, Pi(t) and Qi(t) respectively injecting active power and reactive power into the node i at the t-th scheduling time; u shapei(t) and Uj(t) the voltage amplitudes of the node i and the node j at the t-th scheduling time respectively; gijAnd BijRespectively the conductance and susceptance of the active power distribution network branch ij;ij(t) is the voltage phase angle difference of the node i and the node j at the t-th scheduling moment;
(7) the balance nodes are constrained, and the balance nodes are taken as transformer substations of the active power distribution network and the superior power grid for transaction; when the active power distribution network operates, a higher-level power grid can make a production plan according to the day-ahead load prediction information, and meanwhile, certain rotation standby is guaranteed, so that power constraint of a balance node needs to be considered; the balanced node constraint is as shown in equation (3-65):
Pmin,S≤PS(t)≤Pmax,S (3-65)
in the formula, Pmin,SAnd Pmax,SActive power of balancing nodes S respectivelyUpper and lower limits; pS(t) the transaction power of the active power distribution network and the power purchased/sold by the superior power grid at the t-th scheduling moment;
(8) branch power constraints, as shown in equations (3-66):
Pl(t)≤Pmax,l (3-66)
in the formula, Pl(t) is the power passed by the ith branch at the tth scheduling time; pmax,lThe maximum power allowed for the l branch;
an improved IEEE33 node power distribution system is selected as an example for analysis, and the improvement scheme is as follows:
node 12 is provided with a storage battery energy storage device PQ node, and E is takenmax＝1200kWh，PESSmin,j＝300kW，PESSmax,j＝300kW，VSOCmin,j＝0.1，VSOCmax,j＝0.9，VSOC,j(ti)＝VSOC,j(tf)＝0.5，ηd＝0.98，ηc0.97, γ 0.01; the node 14 is provided with two wind power distributed power PQ nodes in the same area; the load of the node 6 is set as interruptible load, and P is takenILmin,i＝0，PILmax,i100 kW; setting node 1 as balance node, taking Pmin,S＝-200kW，Pmax,S200 kW; selecting the system with reference capacity of 10MVA and reference voltage of 12.66KV, and taking Umin,k＝0.95p.u.，Umax,k1.2 p.u.; the total load of the whole network is 3.715+2.3 MVA; for the cost coefficient, the interruptible load compensation cost a is 1.8 yuan/kWh, the energy storage device charging and discharging cost b is 0.1 yuan/kWh, the electricity purchasing/selling price is set to be the peak-valley price, namely 8: 00-22: 00, c1(t) ═ 1.0 membered/kWh, c2(t) ═ 0.5 membered/kWh; 0:00 to 8:00 and 22:00 to 24:00, c1(t) ═ 0.4 membered/kWh, c2(t) ═ 0.2 membered/kWh; for the NSGA-II algorithm, the initial population number N is takenpopulation100, iteration number Niteration10000, cross coefficient NcrossCoefficient of variation N of 20mutant20, cross probability Pcorss0.7, probability of mutation Pmutant＝0.3；
And (3) analysis:
(1) analyzing the relation between the objective functions: the total operation cost and the total load curve variance are contradictory, namely an optimal solution does not exist, so that 2 objective function values are simultaneously minimized; the reason why the analysis of the total operating cost and the total load curve variance are negative overall is that: the load curve variance is reduced by relying on the interruptible load and the peak clipping and valley filling effects of the energy storage device, but the interruptible load compensation cost is higher than the peak electricity price, and if the demand side response is used excessively, the operation cost is increased, so that the economic operation of the active power distribution network is not facilitated;
(2) analyzing a scheduling strategy of the output of the energy storage device: in order to minimize the total operation cost, the output of the energy storage device is scheduled according to the peak-valley electricity price, namely, the energy storage device is used for discharging to reduce the electricity purchased to an upper-level power grid in the peak-valley electricity price period, and the energy storage device is charged in the valley-valley electricity price period to prepare for coping with the load peak period; the total load curve variance is required to be minimized, the total load curve is subjected to targeted scheduling, and the peak clipping and valley filling effects of the energy storage device can be maximized through the output scheduling scheme of the energy storage device, so that the load curve variance is reduced;
(3) analyzing a scheduling strategy of interruptible load shedding amount: because the compensation cost of the interruptible load is higher than the peak electricity price, the scheduling of the interruptible load is reduced as much as possible to minimize the total operating cost; to minimize the total load curve variance, the load curve variance is reduced by maximizing the peak clipping and valley filling effects of the interruptible load;
(4) analyzing a scheduling strategy of trading power with a superior power grid: the transaction power with the superior power grid is determined by various factors such as active power distribution network load, wind power output, an energy storage device, demand side response and the like at the current scheduling moment; to minimize the total operating cost, the electricity purchasing power from the superior power grid should be reduced and the electricity selling power should be increased at the peak electricity price period, and the opposite is true at the valley electricity price period; in order to minimize the variance of the total load curve, the transaction power with the superior power grid is determined according to the energy storage device and the scheduling strategy of the interruptible load;
(5) the effect of the energy storage device was analyzed: for convenience of analysis, a Pareto solution set without considering the energy storage device is solved, and is compared with the Pareto solution set with considering the energy storage device; the total operation cost and the total load curve variance considering the output of the energy storage device are lower than those not considering the output of the energy storage device, because the operation cost of the energy storage device is lower than the transaction power cost of an upper-level power grid, the energy storage device can be charged at the valley power price and discharged at the peak power price, and therefore the total operation cost is reduced; in addition, because the valley electricity price is corresponding to the low valley of the load, the peak electricity price is corresponding to the high peak of the load, the energy storage device can cut the peak and fill the valley of the load curve when the load is charged at the low valley, and the energy storage device can discharge electricity at the high peak of the load, thereby reducing the variance of the total load curve;
(6) the effect of interruptible load was analyzed: for convenience of analysis, the project finds a Pareto solution set without considering interruptible load, and compares the Pareto solution set with considering interruptible load; the total operating cost considering the interruptible load is higher than that not considering the interruptible load, and the variance of the total load curve is lower than that not considering the interruptible load; the total operating cost of the interruptible load is considered to be high because the load shedding compensation cost of the interruptible load is higher than the peak electricity price, so if the interruptible load is used for demand side response, the total operating cost is increased; the reason why the total load curve variance of the interruptible load is considered to be low is that the total load curve variance can be reduced by reducing the load curve peak through demand-side response to the interruptible load at the time of load peak;
according to the above analysis, the absence of a solution enables 2 objective function values to be minimized simultaneously; therefore, the project firstly obtains the entropy weight coefficient of each objective function, obtains the comprehensive index of each optimized operation strategy according to the obtained entropy weight coefficient, and selects the maximum comprehensive index as the optimal solution;
the strategy reasonably schedules the energy storage device, the interruptible load and the trading power with the superior power grid, avoids the subjectivity of preference of a decision maker, can better represent the solved Pareto solution set to serve as an optimal scheduling strategy of the active power distribution network, can realize the maximization of the comprehensive benefit of the operation of the active power distribution network, and further realizes the optimal operation of the active power distribution network;
the analysis result of the above examples shows that: 1) according to the difference of real-time electricity prices, the operating cost of the active power distribution network can be reduced by reasonably scheduling the charging and discharging states of the energy storage device; 2) aiming at the uncontrollable output of the intermittent distributed power supply, the energy storage device and the response of the demand side can perform the functions of peak clipping and valley filling on a load curve; 3) the total operation cost and the total load curve variance are contradictory and cannot reach the minimum at the same time, so that an optimal solution needs to be selected to represent the solved Pareto solution set; in order to avoid subjectivity of preference of a decision maker, objective weighting can be carried out on each objective function through an entropy weight method, and an optimal solution is selected according to comprehensive indexes of each objective function, so that an optimized operation strategy of the active power distribution network is obtained.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010901944.1A CN111914491B (en) | 2019-11-21 | 2019-11-21 | Method for researching interaction mechanism of active power distribution network, distributed power supply, energy storage and diverse loads |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911148487.7A CN110929454B (en) | 2019-11-21 | 2019-11-21 | Method for researching interaction mechanism of active power distribution network, distributed power supply, energy storage and diverse loads |
| CN202010901944.1A CN111914491B (en) | 2019-11-21 | 2019-11-21 | Method for researching interaction mechanism of active power distribution network, distributed power supply, energy storage and diverse loads |
Related Parent Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911148487.7A Division CN110929454B (en) | 2019-11-21 | 2019-11-21 | Method for researching interaction mechanism of active power distribution network, distributed power supply, energy storage and diverse loads |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN111914491A true CN111914491A (en) | 2020-11-10 |
| CN111914491B CN111914491B (en) | 2021-09-10 |
Family
ID=69850568
Family Applications (2)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010901944.1A Active CN111914491B (en) | 2019-11-21 | 2019-11-21 | Method for researching interaction mechanism of active power distribution network, distributed power supply, energy storage and diverse loads |
| CN201911148487.7A Active CN110929454B (en) | 2019-11-21 | 2019-11-21 | Method for researching interaction mechanism of active power distribution network, distributed power supply, energy storage and diverse loads |
Family Applications After (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911148487.7A Active CN110929454B (en) | 2019-11-21 | 2019-11-21 | Method for researching interaction mechanism of active power distribution network, distributed power supply, energy storage and diverse loads |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (2) | CN111914491B (en) |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN113162031A (en) * | 2021-04-01 | 2021-07-23 | 南方电网数字电网研究院有限公司 | Industrial load monitoring and scheduling method and device, computer equipment and storage medium |
| CN113507110A (en) * | 2021-06-20 | 2021-10-15 | 东北电力大学 | Distributed energy storage cluster optimization control method for improving new energy consumption in power distribution network |
| CN114039351A (en) * | 2022-01-10 | 2022-02-11 | 国网江西省电力有限公司电力科学研究院 | Energy storage capacity configuration method and device |
| CN114204563A (en) * | 2021-12-23 | 2022-03-18 | 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 | Power Internet of things oriented communication network and power distribution network supply and demand interaction method and device |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112766602A (en) * | 2021-01-30 | 2021-05-07 | 上海电机学院 | Improved distributed power supply site selection and volume fixing method |
Citations (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN104361413A (en) * | 2014-11-18 | 2015-02-18 | 国家电网公司 | Method for reconstructing power distribution network containing distributed power source |
| CN106208160A (en) * | 2016-07-28 | 2016-12-07 | 东南大学 | Dispatching method based on the sale of electricity company region within the jurisdiction power distribution network that second order cone optimizes |
| CN107133415A (en) * | 2017-05-22 | 2017-09-05 | 河海大学 | A kind of electric automobile charge and discharge Electric optimization for considering user's satisfaction and distribution safety |
| CN107368977A (en) * | 2017-08-08 | 2017-11-21 | 国网江苏省电力公司盐城供电公司 | A kind of improved IEEE33 node power distributions net test system |
| WO2017210124A1 (en) * | 2016-05-28 | 2017-12-07 | PXiSE Energy Solutions, LLC | Decoupling synchrophasor based control system for distributed energy resources |
| CN109217291A (en) * | 2018-08-28 | 2019-01-15 | 南京理工大学 | Consider the electrical interconnection system Multipurpose Optimal Method of peak load shifting model |
| CN110165666A (en) * | 2019-05-29 | 2019-08-23 | 四川大学 | A kind of active distribution network dispatching method based on IGDT |
| CN110210647A (en) * | 2019-04-29 | 2019-09-06 | 国网江苏省电力有限公司电力科学研究院 | A kind of distributed generation resource, energy storage and flexible load combined scheduling method and device |
| CN110365057A (en) * | 2019-08-14 | 2019-10-22 | 南方电网科学研究院有限责任公司 | Distributed energy based on intensified learning participates in power distribution network peak regulation method for optimizing scheduling |
Family Cites Families (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2013067061A2 (en) * | 2011-10-31 | 2013-05-10 | Siemens Corporation | Simulating customer behavior for demand response |
| CN102624017B (en) * | 2012-03-22 | 2014-03-26 | 清华大学 | Battery energy storage system peak clipping and valley filling real-time control method based on load prediction |
| CN103514487B (en) * | 2013-07-15 | 2016-08-03 | 国家电网公司 | A kind of distribution network load Forecasting Methodology containing distributed power source |
| CN104463357A (en) * | 2014-11-27 | 2015-03-25 | 国家电网公司 | Method for evaluating random intermittent DG optimized integration based on random optimal power flow |
| CN107274087A (en) * | 2017-06-09 | 2017-10-20 | 燕山大学 | One kind meter and the probabilistic active distribution network bi-level programming method of Demand Side Response |
| US11471982B2 (en) * | 2017-08-18 | 2022-10-18 | The Regents Of The University Of Michigan | Unified fatigue life evaluation method for welded structures |
| CN107492901B (en) * | 2017-08-29 | 2020-04-07 | 广东电网有限责任公司电力科学研究院 | Distributed energy storage system real-time optimization method and device |
| CN109217310A (en) * | 2018-10-25 | 2019-01-15 | 三峡大学 | A kind of orderly charge control method of electric car considering new energy consumption |
-
2019
- 2019-11-21 CN CN202010901944.1A patent/CN111914491B/en active Active
- 2019-11-21 CN CN201911148487.7A patent/CN110929454B/en active Active
Patent Citations (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN104361413A (en) * | 2014-11-18 | 2015-02-18 | 国家电网公司 | Method for reconstructing power distribution network containing distributed power source |
| WO2017210124A1 (en) * | 2016-05-28 | 2017-12-07 | PXiSE Energy Solutions, LLC | Decoupling synchrophasor based control system for distributed energy resources |
| CN106208160A (en) * | 2016-07-28 | 2016-12-07 | 东南大学 | Dispatching method based on the sale of electricity company region within the jurisdiction power distribution network that second order cone optimizes |
| CN107133415A (en) * | 2017-05-22 | 2017-09-05 | 河海大学 | A kind of electric automobile charge and discharge Electric optimization for considering user's satisfaction and distribution safety |
| CN107368977A (en) * | 2017-08-08 | 2017-11-21 | 国网江苏省电力公司盐城供电公司 | A kind of improved IEEE33 node power distributions net test system |
| CN109217291A (en) * | 2018-08-28 | 2019-01-15 | 南京理工大学 | Consider the electrical interconnection system Multipurpose Optimal Method of peak load shifting model |
| CN110210647A (en) * | 2019-04-29 | 2019-09-06 | 国网江苏省电力有限公司电力科学研究院 | A kind of distributed generation resource, energy storage and flexible load combined scheduling method and device |
| CN110165666A (en) * | 2019-05-29 | 2019-08-23 | 四川大学 | A kind of active distribution network dispatching method based on IGDT |
| CN110365057A (en) * | 2019-08-14 | 2019-10-22 | 南方电网科学研究院有限责任公司 | Distributed energy based on intensified learning participates in power distribution network peak regulation method for optimizing scheduling |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| 程庭莉: "含分布式储能的主动配电网多目标优化调度方法研究", 《中国博士学位论文全文数据库 工程科技Ⅱ辑》 * |
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN113162031A (en) * | 2021-04-01 | 2021-07-23 | 南方电网数字电网研究院有限公司 | Industrial load monitoring and scheduling method and device, computer equipment and storage medium |
| CN113162031B (en) * | 2021-04-01 | 2022-07-29 | 南方电网数字电网研究院有限公司 | Industrial load monitoring and scheduling method and device, computer equipment and storage medium |
| CN113507110A (en) * | 2021-06-20 | 2021-10-15 | 东北电力大学 | Distributed energy storage cluster optimization control method for improving new energy consumption in power distribution network |
| CN114204563A (en) * | 2021-12-23 | 2022-03-18 | 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 | Power Internet of things oriented communication network and power distribution network supply and demand interaction method and device |
| CN114204563B (en) * | 2021-12-23 | 2024-01-23 | 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 | Power Internet of things-oriented communication network and power distribution network supply and demand interaction method and device |
| CN114039351A (en) * | 2022-01-10 | 2022-02-11 | 国网江西省电力有限公司电力科学研究院 | Energy storage capacity configuration method and device |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN111914491B (en) | 2021-09-10 |
| CN110929454B (en) | 2020-10-20 |
| CN110929454A (en) | 2020-03-27 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN111914491B (en) | Method for researching interaction mechanism of active power distribution network, distributed power supply, energy storage and diverse loads | |
| Mbungu et al. | An optimal energy management system for a commercial building with renewable energy generation under real-time electricity prices | |
| Saleh et al. | Load aggregation from generation-follows-load to load-follows-generation: Residential loads | |
| Chen et al. | Optimal allocation and economic analysis of energy storage system in microgrids | |
| Bhamidi et al. | Optimal sizing of smart home renewable energy resources and battery under prosumer-based energy management | |
| CN108321796B (en) | Household energy management system and method | |
| Hossain et al. | Design a novel controller for stability analysis of microgrid by managing controllable load using load shaving and load shifting techniques; and optimizing cost analysis for energy storage system | |
| Li et al. | Operation cost minimization of droop-controlled DC microgrids based on real-time pricing and optimal power flow | |
| CN112800658A (en) | Active power distribution network scheduling method considering source storage load interaction | |
| CN108376994B (en) | Alternating current-direct current hybrid micro-grid operation optimization method based on three-port power electronic transformer grid connection | |
| KR20210051043A (en) | Method and apparatus for optimizing home energy management system in three-phase unbalanced low-voltage distribution network | |
| Greunsven et al. | Capacity management within a multi-agent market-based active distribution network | |
| Hu et al. | Network constrained transactive control for electric vehicles integration | |
| Suchetha et al. | Optimization techniques for operation and control of microgrids–Review | |
| CN112508325A (en) | Multi-time-scale electric energy scheduling method for household micro-grid | |
| Kazemi et al. | An optimized scheduling strategy for plugged-in electric vehicles integrated into a residential smart microgrid for both grid-tied and islanded modes | |
| Mao et al. | Operation optimization for multi-microgrids based on centralized-decentralized hybrid hierarchical energy management | |
| Parol et al. | Optimization of exchange of electrical energy between microgrid and electricity utility distribution network | |
| Kumari et al. | Integration of solar and flexible resources into expected security cost with dynamic optimal power flow problem using a Novel DE algorithm | |
| Cherukuri et al. | Hybrid energy management strategy for residential consumers using virtual and actual storage systems | |
| Mahto et al. | Demand-side management approach using heuristic optimization with solar generation and storage devices for future smart grid | |
| Lokeshgupta et al. | Coordinated smart home energy sharing with a centralized neighbourhood energy management | |
| Maulik et al. | Determination of optimal size of battery energy storage system (BESS) for a renewable power based microgrid | |
| Hwangbo et al. | Application of economic operation strategy on battery energy storage system at Jeju | |
| Baloyi et al. | Sizing and selection of battery energy storage system for time of use arbitrage in a commercial building in South Africa |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |