CN111899583A - Independent question-proposing type mutual evaluation method and system - Google Patents
Independent question-proposing type mutual evaluation method and system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN111899583A CN111899583A CN202010721455.8A CN202010721455A CN111899583A CN 111899583 A CN111899583 A CN 111899583A CN 202010721455 A CN202010721455 A CN 202010721455A CN 111899583 A CN111899583 A CN 111899583A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- question
- questions
- student
- students
- autonomous
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B5/00—Electrically-operated educational appliances
- G09B5/08—Electrically-operated educational appliances providing for individual presentation of information to a plurality of student stations
- G09B5/14—Electrically-operated educational appliances providing for individual presentation of information to a plurality of student stations with provision for individual teacher-student communication
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/20—Education
- G06Q50/205—Education administration or guidance
- G06Q50/2053—Education institution selection, admissions, or financial aid
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B7/00—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers
- G09B7/02—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the type wherein the student is expected to construct an answer to the question which is presented or wherein the machine gives an answer to the question presented by a student
Abstract
The invention relates to the technical field of teaching and information processing, in particular to an independent proposition type mutual evaluation method and system. The student end is used for solving and answering test questions, setting questions, questioning questions and recording learning conditions; and the management terminal is used for managing all student terminal information and performing statistical storage on the learning condition information of each student, and the question bank of the management terminal is used for storing questions and answers.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of teaching and information processing, in particular to an independent proposition type mutual evaluation method and system.
Background
On 12.1.2020, the world health organization formally named the new coronavirus 2019-nCoV. Coronaviruses are a large family of viruses known to cause the common cold and more serious diseases such as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). The novel coronavirus is a new strain of coronavirus that has not been previously discovered in humans. The novel coronavirus has extremely strong infectivity, the main transmission paths are respiratory tract droplet transmission and contact transmission, and the transmission paths such as aerosol, excrement, mouth and the like are yet to be further clarified. Epidemiological investigation shows that many cases can be traced to the close contact with the diagnosed cases.
In order to ensure that the study of students is not delayed during the extension period of the holiday, the education department proposes advocates and suggestions of 'stopping classes and not stopping learning', web lessons are started all over the country, teachers represent 'web anchors', and students are forced to start on-line class.
The current network teaching is that a teacher gives questions, students answer the questions, the questions are photographed after answering and then are handed to the teacher for correction, the teacher needs to check the questions one by one in front of a computer, online correction cannot be performed, and correction results need to be additionally arranged by the teacher and then fed back to students. Referring to fig. 1, a schematic diagram of network teaching is shown, in which a teacher uploads homework information to a live-broadcast media communication platform, students download homework information from the platform to answer, then upload handwritten answer photos to the platform after answering, the teacher downloads student answer pictures to approve, and then uploads an approval result to the platform, and then the students check homework scores from the platform. The method is a traditional course-accessing method, is time-consuming and labor-consuming, and teachers need to access courses and supervise the homework of students.
Disclosure of Invention
Therefore, an independent question-proposing type mutual evaluation method and system are needed, a management end of the system selects a question examination paper from a question bank and sends the question examination paper to a student end for answering, the student checks the answer after answering, and if the answer is questioned, the question can be questioned. The method saves time, improves learning efficiency, and improves active exploration and autonomous learning of students.
In order to achieve the purpose, the invention provides the following technical scheme:
an autonomous propositional mutual evaluation system comprises,
the student end is used for solving and setting questions, questioning the questions and recording the learning condition;
and the management terminal is used for managing all student terminal information and performing statistical storage on the learning condition information of each student, and the question bank of the management terminal is used for storing questions and answers.
According to the technical scheme, the management terminal is further optimized, a questioning threshold value is set for different types of test questions, and if the questioning threshold value is exceeded, a manager is reminded to answer.
According to the technical scheme, the management end further optimizes the problem, the management end selects the test questions from the question bank to obtain the test paper, and the test questions in the question bank are classified and stored.
Further optimization of the technical scheme is achieved, and the management end manages courses for students to learn.
According to the technical scheme, the student terminal selects the question type to issue the question, the question content and the answer are input, the student terminal issues the question and transmits the question to the management terminal to be audited, and the audited question is stored in the question bank after being audited.
According to the technical scheme, the student end is further optimized, the questions are graded, and grading results are fed back to the management end.
An autonomous propositional mutual evaluation method, comprising the steps of:
step S1: the manager selects questions from the question bank to generate test paper, and sends the test paper to students at the student end to answer;
step S2: the students at the student end answer the questions, correct the questions after answering and the answers, and can grade and question the test students;
step S3: and for the same topic, if the number of the questioning people exceeds a preset threshold value, reminding a manager of memorability confusion.
According to the technical scheme, the student terminal selects the question type to issue the question, the question content and the answer are input, the student terminal issues the question and transmits the question to the management terminal to be audited, and the audited question is stored in the question bank after being audited.
In the further optimization of the technical scheme, the manager modifies the preset threshold.
In the further optimization of the technical scheme, the management terminal counts the number of questions, the success rate of questioning, the success rate of refuting, the success rate of questioning, the failure rate of questioning, the success rate of refuting, the failure rate of refuting and the registration time of students.
Different from the prior art, the technical scheme has the following advantages: the existing learning system generally answers the questions and then checks the answers, if the students have questions and need to be in contact with teachers, particularly in the epidemic situation period, the students have questions at home, one student has questions and the teachers answer the questions and one student, possibly three or four students have questions, after the teachers answer one by one, a plurality of students are found to have the same questions and then go to specially answer the questions in class, and the whole period is long. The method and the device for inquiring the student number realize online questioning, can automatically count the student number of questioning one question, and then solve the questions in a unified mode, save time and improve efficiency. For the mode of traditional mr's student answer, this application has provided the study mode of student's answer, and student's study enthusiasm can be improved to student's answer, lets the student no longer only be the sportsman, also participates in referee's identity, lets the more thorough study of going of student, improves student's study sense of luxurious.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of network teaching in the background art;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of an autonomous propositional inter-evaluation system;
FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating the relationship between the candidate question bank and the formal question bank.
Detailed Description
To explain technical contents, structural features, and objects and effects of the technical solutions in detail, the following detailed description is given with reference to the accompanying drawings in conjunction with the embodiments.
Referring to fig. 1, a schematic diagram of an autonomous propositional mutual evaluation system is shown, which is an autonomous propositional mutual evaluation system, including,
the student end is used for solving and setting questions, questioning the questions and recording the learning condition;
and the management terminal is used for managing all student terminal information and performing statistical storage on the learning condition information of each student, and the question bank of the management terminal is used for storing questions and answers.
The student end can issue questions and question questions, the questions issued by the student end and the question questions are transmitted to the question bank, and the question bank transmits the question questions of the student to the management end to remind the management end of answering. The questions asked by the students are transmitted to the management terminal, the management terminal manages the questions and screens the questions, and the screened questions are stored in the question bank. The test paper generated by the question bank is transmitted to the student end for answering, and the management end manages statistical information.
The management end sets a questioning threshold value for different types of test questions, and if the questioning threshold value is exceeded, the management end is reminded to answer.
The question bank is used for storing questions and answers, and the management end can directly import/export the questions or directly select new questions. The question bank can also be queried, and the query is divided into a question type, an authentication state, a question stem and a question state. The subject types comprise single selection, multiple selection, judgment and simple answer, the authentication state comprises non-authentication and authenticated, the non-authentication is the subject of the student which is just asked for, no teacher checks the subject, and the authenticated subject is the subject which is checked by the teacher. The questioning state comprises that the upper limit is not reached and the upper limit is reached, and the teacher inquires the questions reaching the upper limit for confusion.
The management end selects the test questions from the question bank to produce test paper, and the test questions in the question bank are stored in a classified mode.
And (3) building a test paper at a management end, drafting a test paper name and selecting an examination paper judging mode, wherein the examination paper judging mode comprises a system and a teacher, if the system judges the test paper, the student finishes answering the questions, and the system automatically generates scores according to the answers of the questions. If the teacher judges the paper, the student only stores the answer after submitting the answer, and the teacher logs in the management terminal to judge the paper one by one.
The management terminal takes the examination, the teacher selects the starting time and duration of the examination, then the questions are issued to generate test papers which are sent to the selected students, and the students answer the questions at the starting time.
The one-hundred-person-one-hundred-paper refers to that teachers draft test paper names and test duration, the number of the persons participating in the test is set, and the generated test papers are different.
The management end manages the courses for the students to study.
The main difference between the embodiment and the traditional question bank is that the method saves the arbitration of a few difficult questions and the arrangement of homework and examination in the question bank system, and the work of setting questions, judging the correctness of the questions and judging the degree of goodness and badness which are required by the teacher originally is transferred to students. The students need to make questions, answer questions, ask questions, refute and the like based on the question bank system, and the asking questions and refute are actually the process of mutual communication with other students.
The student end selects the question type to set questions, inputs question content and answers, the student end sets the questions to enter a candidate question bank, the questions of the candidate question bank are trained by a certain number of students and do not reach the upper limit of a questioning threshold value or are manually checked and judged to be correct through a management end, and the questions are stored in a formal question bank.
And the student end grades the questions, and the grading result is fed back to the management end.
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram showing the relationship between the candidate question bank and the formal question bank. After a certain number of exercises are performed on the candidate questions by the students, the system automatically checks the candidate questions based on the exercise and challenge numbers, and the candidate questions become formal questions automatically after the checking is passed. The candidate topic may be referred to as a formal topic as it is after being examined by a teacher/administrator. And the formal questions are fed back to the question-setting person when the teacher/administrator finds that the formal questions are wrong, and the formal questions are modified by the question-setting person and then returned to the candidate question bank again.
An autonomous propositional mutual evaluation method, comprising the steps of:
step S1: the manager selects questions from the official question bank to generate test paper, and sends the test paper to students at the student end to answer. The management terminal counts the number of questions, the success rate of the challenge, the success rate of the refuting, the success rate of the challenge, the failure rate of the challenge, the success rate of the refuting, the failure rate of the refuting and the registration time of the student.
Step S2: the students autonomously select random questions, the students at the student end answer questions in the candidate question bank, the questions are corrected after the answers, the students can rate and question the test questions, and the questioners can correct the questions or refute the questions after receiving the questions. The student end also records the course of the student learning and the learning condition, and the specific learning condition comprises the total accuracy, the total answering times, the total practice times, the number of questions, the question success rate and the refuting success rate.
Step S3: and for the same topic, if the number of the questioning people exceeds a preset threshold value, reminding a manager to perform confusion. The administrator may modify the preset threshold. For the questions in the formal question bank, the manager can manually judge that the questions are wrong, the managers can feed back the questions to the question taker to modify the questions, and the modified new questions can be returned to the candidate question bank.
The student questions are made by the following steps:
s201, a student end selects question types to set questions, inputs question content and answers, the questions automatically enter a candidate question bank, and after a certain amount of other students exercise, the questions do not reach the upper limit of question questions and enter a formal question bank.
S202, the questions of the student end are transmitted to the management end for examination, the manager logs in the management end to check the questions of the student, examination is conducted on the contents and answers of the questions, the questions are stored in the formal question bank after examination, and the questions in the formal question bank can be directly called when the examination paper is drawn next time.
It is noted that, herein, relational terms such as first and second, and the like may be used solely to distinguish one entity or action from another entity or action without necessarily requiring or implying any actual such relationship or order between such entities or actions. Also, the terms "comprises," "comprising," or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or terminal that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or terminal. Without further limitation, an element defined by the phrases "comprising … …" or "comprising … …" does not exclude the presence of additional elements in a process, method, article, or terminal that comprises the element. Further, herein, "greater than," "less than," "more than," and the like are understood to exclude the present numbers; the terms "above", "below", "within" and the like are to be understood as including the number.
Although the embodiments have been described, once the basic inventive concept is obtained, other variations and modifications of these embodiments can be made by those skilled in the art, so that the above embodiments are only examples of the present invention, and not intended to limit the scope of the present invention, and all equivalent structures or equivalent processes using the contents of the present specification and drawings, or any other related technical fields, which are directly or indirectly applied thereto, are included in the scope of the present invention.
Claims (10)
1. An autonomous propositional mutual evaluation system is characterized by comprising,
the student end is used for solving and setting questions, questioning the questions and recording the learning condition;
and the management terminal is used for managing all student terminal information and performing statistical storage on the learning condition information of each student, and the question bank of the management terminal is used for storing questions and answers.
2. The autonomous propositional mutual evaluation system according to claim 1, wherein said management terminal has a questioning threshold for different types of test questions, and if the questioning threshold is exceeded, the manager is reminded to respond.
3. The autonomous propositional mutual evaluation system according to claim 1, wherein said management terminal selects the test paper from the question bank, and the test papers in the question bank are classified and stored.
4. The autonomous propositional mutual assessment evaluation system according to claim 1, wherein said administration terminal manages courses for students to study.
5. The system of claim 1, wherein the student end selects the question type for question setting, inputs the question content and the answer, and transmits the question from the student end to the management end for examination and storage in the question bank.
6. The autonomous propositional mutual evaluation and evaluation system according to claim 1, wherein said student end carries out the evaluation of the subject, and the evaluation result is fed back to the management end.
7. An autonomous propositional mutual evaluation method, characterized in that the method comprises the following steps:
step S1: the manager selects questions from the question bank to generate test paper, and sends the test paper to students at the student end to answer;
step S2: the students at the student end answer the questions, correct the questions after answering and the answers, and can grade and question the test students;
step S3: and for the same topic, if the number of the questioning people exceeds a preset threshold value, reminding a manager of memorability confusion.
8. The method as claimed in claim 7, wherein the student end selects the question type for question setting, inputs the question content and the answer, and transmits the question from the student end to the management end for examination and storage in the question bank.
9. The autonomous propositional mutual assessment evaluation method according to claim 7, characterized in that said manager modifies a preset threshold value.
10. The self-determination question-proposing type mutual evaluation method according to claim 7, wherein the management terminal counts the number of questions asked by the student, the success rate of question asking, the success rate of refuting, the success rate of question asking, the failure rate of question asking, the success rate of refuting, the failure rate of refuting and the registration time.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010721455.8A CN111899583A (en) | 2020-07-24 | 2020-07-24 | Independent question-proposing type mutual evaluation method and system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010721455.8A CN111899583A (en) | 2020-07-24 | 2020-07-24 | Independent question-proposing type mutual evaluation method and system |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN111899583A true CN111899583A (en) | 2020-11-06 |
Family
ID=73190847
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010721455.8A Pending CN111899583A (en) | 2020-07-24 | 2020-07-24 | Independent question-proposing type mutual evaluation method and system |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN111899583A (en) |
Citations (13)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TW454134B (en) * | 1999-12-10 | 2001-09-11 | Nat Science Council | Method for collection and identification of automatic dynamic testing subjects |
| US20060223040A1 (en) * | 2005-03-30 | 2006-10-05 | Edward Brown | Interactive computer-assisted method of instruction and system for implementation |
| CN104268812A (en) * | 2014-09-25 | 2015-01-07 | 肖显全 | Mobile terminal comprehensive learning system based on massive learning resources |
| CN106157715A (en) * | 2015-04-27 | 2016-11-23 | 广州骏颖泰教育科技有限公司 | A kind of multimedia net work teaching system |
| CN107481172A (en) * | 2017-08-31 | 2017-12-15 | 山东财经大学 | Interactive job management method and system based on wechat public platform |
| CN108091194A (en) * | 2017-12-25 | 2018-05-29 | 重庆满荣网络技术有限公司 | Intelligent clearance examination management method |
| CN108447326A (en) * | 2018-04-02 | 2018-08-24 | 华北水利水电大学 | A kind of Language for English learning system |
| CN108932681A (en) * | 2018-06-07 | 2018-12-04 | 河海大学 | A kind of colleges and universities' assisted teaching system based on overturning classroom |
| CN109272796A (en) * | 2018-08-30 | 2019-01-25 | 武汉华工智云科技有限公司 | A kind of intelligent answer exchange method and device |
| WO2019050074A1 (en) * | 2017-09-08 | 2019-03-14 | 주식회사 듀코젠 | Studying system capable of providing cloud-based digital question writing solution and implementing distribution service platform, and control method thereof |
| CN109841107A (en) * | 2019-03-22 | 2019-06-04 | 任磊 | A kind of multimedia education system |
| CN111078850A (en) * | 2019-12-06 | 2020-04-28 | 福建天泉教育科技有限公司 | Method and terminal for realizing electronic book reading |
| CN111414217A (en) * | 2020-03-06 | 2020-07-14 | 乐乐启航（北京）教育科技有限公司 | Online teaching information feedback method, client, electronic equipment, medium and system |
-
2020
- 2020-07-24 CN CN202010721455.8A patent/CN111899583A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (13)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TW454134B (en) * | 1999-12-10 | 2001-09-11 | Nat Science Council | Method for collection and identification of automatic dynamic testing subjects |
| US20060223040A1 (en) * | 2005-03-30 | 2006-10-05 | Edward Brown | Interactive computer-assisted method of instruction and system for implementation |
| CN104268812A (en) * | 2014-09-25 | 2015-01-07 | 肖显全 | Mobile terminal comprehensive learning system based on massive learning resources |
| CN106157715A (en) * | 2015-04-27 | 2016-11-23 | 广州骏颖泰教育科技有限公司 | A kind of multimedia net work teaching system |
| CN107481172A (en) * | 2017-08-31 | 2017-12-15 | 山东财经大学 | Interactive job management method and system based on wechat public platform |
| WO2019050074A1 (en) * | 2017-09-08 | 2019-03-14 | 주식회사 듀코젠 | Studying system capable of providing cloud-based digital question writing solution and implementing distribution service platform, and control method thereof |
| CN108091194A (en) * | 2017-12-25 | 2018-05-29 | 重庆满荣网络技术有限公司 | Intelligent clearance examination management method |
| CN108447326A (en) * | 2018-04-02 | 2018-08-24 | 华北水利水电大学 | A kind of Language for English learning system |
| CN108932681A (en) * | 2018-06-07 | 2018-12-04 | 河海大学 | A kind of colleges and universities' assisted teaching system based on overturning classroom |
| CN109272796A (en) * | 2018-08-30 | 2019-01-25 | 武汉华工智云科技有限公司 | A kind of intelligent answer exchange method and device |
| CN109841107A (en) * | 2019-03-22 | 2019-06-04 | 任磊 | A kind of multimedia education system |
| CN111078850A (en) * | 2019-12-06 | 2020-04-28 | 福建天泉教育科技有限公司 | Method and terminal for realizing electronic book reading |
| CN111414217A (en) * | 2020-03-06 | 2020-07-14 | 乐乐启航（北京）教育科技有限公司 | Online teaching information feedback method, client, electronic equipment, medium and system |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Dyer et al. | Academic dishonesty and testing: How student beliefs and test settings impact decisions to cheat | |
| Prentice | Service learning and civic engagement. | |
| Clare et al. | Best practice principles for the transition from student to registered nurse | |
| Czibor et al. | Does relative grading help male students? Evidence from a field experiment in the classroom | |
| Johnson | Effects of outcome-relevant involvement and prior information on persuasion | |
| Weade et al. | The construction of lessons in effective and less effective classrooms | |
| Medley et al. | Research in teacher competency and teaching tasks | |
| CN110428350A (en) | Classroom instruction auxiliary system | |
| Phelps | Why Testing Experts Hate Testing. | |
| CN107844916A (en) | A kind of system and method for innovation undertaking integration capability test and appraisal | |
| Gomes et al. | Student motivation towards learning to program | |
| Benson et al. | A study of interview refusals. | |
| CN109035088A (en) | Adaptive learning method based on mistake topic | |
| Prizovskaya | Identifying New Jersey teachers' assessment literacy as precondition for implementing student growth objectives | |
| CN108985985B (en) | Artificial intelligence robot technology level examination system and examination method | |
| Fatemipour et al. | The effect of dynamic-assessment on the development of passive vocabulary of intermediate EFL learners | |
| Roberson et al. | Moderating effects of goal orientation on the negative consequences of gender-based preferential selection | |
| CN111899583A (en) | Independent question-proposing type mutual evaluation method and system | |
| Stevenson et al. | Current status of training evaluation in clinical psychology | |
| Harrison | Computer-based assessment strategies in the teaching of databases at honours degree level 1 | |
| Jenkins et al. | A Model for Instructional Objectives: Responsibilities and Advantages | |
| Mehrens | Facts about samples, fantasies about domains | |
| Ali Sulaiman et al. | Theory-practice gaps in developing critical thinking: Insights from a pedagogical study in Omani context | |
| Ferrer | REAL TIME KNOWLEDGE TRANSFERENCE EVALUATION IN UNIVERSITY ENVIRONMENT | |
| Pratto | Assessment abuse by design |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20201106 |