CN111881025B - Automatic test task scheduling method, device and system - Google Patents
Automatic test task scheduling method, device and system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN111881025B CN111881025B CN202010697109.0A CN202010697109A CN111881025B CN 111881025 B CN111881025 B CN 111881025B CN 202010697109 A CN202010697109 A CN 202010697109A CN 111881025 B CN111881025 B CN 111881025B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- executed
- task
- execution
- tasks
- operation parameters
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3668—Software testing
- G06F11/3672—Test management
- G06F11/3688—Test management for test execution, e.g. scheduling of test suites
Abstract
The embodiment of the specification provides an automatic test task scheduling method, device and system. The method comprises the following steps: acquiring a plurality of tasks to be executed with an association relationship, and determining the execution sequence of each task to be executed; creating a parameter relation comparison table; the parameter relation comparison table comprises operation parameters corresponding to each execution task, and a comparison relation between output parameters of the executed tasks to be executed and operation parameters corresponding to the executed tasks to be executed; executing each task to be executed according to the execution sequence according to the corresponding operation parameters in the parameter relation comparison table; and inserting the output parameters obtained after the execution of the tasks to be executed which are executed first into the parameter relation comparison table, and modifying the operation parameters corresponding to the tasks to be executed which are executed after modification, so that the tasks to be executed after modification are executed according to the operation parameters which are modified in the parameter relation comparison table, thereby improving the automatic test efficiency.
Description
Technical Field
The embodiment of the specification relates to the field of automatic testing, in particular to an automatic testing task scheduling method, device and system.
Background
In a large-scale financial enterprise, a plurality of business product lines are generally owned at the same time, the product characteristics among different product lines may be greatly different, and corresponding IT information support systems also have products of different channels such as browser WEB end, mobile end, PC client end and the like. Based on the product service characteristics of the financial industry, in one service activity provided for the customer, a user is often required to operate among a plurality of IT information systems or connect a plurality of functional modules in series, so that one complete financial service can be provided for the customer. In this process, the user is required to log in different IT information systems to operate, or to connect multiple modules in series in the same IT information system.
With the maturity of an automatic testing tool system, more and more financial enterprises also introduce automatic testing tools and frameworks to carry out the conservation work of the quality of software products, and particularly in the acceptance testing link, the conservation effect of the automatic testing frameworks and tools on the quality of software versions is more and more obvious.
In the working process of introducing an automatic test tool, the interface type test is relatively simple, and the corresponding test can be finished mainly through configuration and interaction of uniformly formatted messages, so that the interface type test is relatively simple. However, when the UI automation test is performed, the automation test tools correspondingly used due to the product characteristics of the IT information systems with different architectures also have great differences, such as the control recognition principle based on the tool recognition principle, the image recognition principle based on the windows handle recognition principle. In terms of scripting maintenance, there are recording playback modes, manual coding modes based on scripts, and the like. The different automation tools have larger workload output difference, and UI testers cannot complete all automation tests by using one test tool like interface testers, so that the automation test work of the corresponding system can be completed by using different automation test tools. Because of the large difference among different automated test tools, such as an Eggplant client software automated test tool, an air mobile terminal automated test tool, a selenium, a UFT and other automated test tool products, each tool has characteristics and applicable scenes, each tool is self-organized, the adopted script writing frame, script writing language, script running mode and script execution result display mode are different, and a tester often needs to write a plurality of automated test scripts by using different automated test tools in a complete service scene automated test process to finish the work.
In a complete service scene, parameter transfer is often needed among scripts in a workflow related to the execution of an automatic test script of a plurality of tools, but because the parameter formats of all the automatic test tools are not uniform, service personnel are required to manually paste the execution result of the previous script, after processing and maintaining the execution result in the parameter of the next script, the execution task of the second automatic test script can be submitted, the manual switching workload is large, and the work efficiency is low because the tools are required to be switched and connected.
Disclosure of Invention
The embodiment of the specification aims to provide an automatic test task scheduling method, device and system so as to improve automatic test efficiency.
To solve the above problems, an embodiment of the present disclosure provides an automated test task scheduling method, including: acquiring a plurality of tasks to be executed with an association relationship, and determining the execution sequence of each task to be executed; creating a parameter relation comparison table; the parameter relation comparison table comprises operation parameters corresponding to each execution task, and a comparison relation between output parameters of the executed tasks to be executed and operation parameters corresponding to the executed tasks to be executed; executing each task to be executed according to the execution sequence according to the corresponding operation parameters in the parameter relation comparison table; and inserting the output parameters obtained after the execution of the tasks to be executed which are executed first into the parameter relation comparison table, and modifying the operation parameters corresponding to the tasks to be executed which are executed after modification, so that the tasks to be executed after modification are executed according to the operation parameters which are executed after modification in the parameter relation comparison table.
To solve the above problem, embodiments of the present disclosure further provide an automatic test task scheduling device, where the device includes: the acquisition module is used for acquiring a plurality of tasks to be executed with an association relationship and determining the execution sequence of each task to be executed; the creation module is used for creating a parameter relation comparison table; the parameter relation comparison table comprises operation parameters corresponding to each execution task, and a comparison relation between output parameters of the executed tasks to be executed and operation parameters corresponding to the executed tasks to be executed; the execution module is used for executing each task to be executed according to the execution sequence according to the corresponding operation parameters in the parameter relation comparison table; and inserting the output parameters obtained after the execution of the tasks to be executed which are executed first into the parameter relation comparison table, and modifying the operation parameters corresponding to the tasks to be executed which are executed after modification, so that the tasks to be executed after modification are executed according to the operation parameters which are executed after modification in the parameter relation comparison table.
To solve the above problem, embodiments of the present disclosure further provide an electronic device, including: a memory for storing a computer program; a processor for executing the computer program to implement: acquiring a plurality of tasks to be executed with an association relationship, and determining the execution sequence of each task to be executed; creating a parameter relation comparison table; the parameter relation comparison table comprises operation parameters corresponding to each execution task, and a comparison relation between output parameters of the executed tasks to be executed and operation parameters corresponding to the executed tasks to be executed; executing each task to be executed according to the execution sequence according to the corresponding operation parameters in the parameter relation comparison table; and inserting the output parameters obtained after the execution of the tasks to be executed which are executed first into the parameter relation comparison table, and modifying the operation parameters corresponding to the tasks to be executed which are executed after modification, so that the tasks to be executed after modification are executed according to the operation parameters which are executed after modification in the parameter relation comparison table.
To solve the above problem, embodiments of the present disclosure further provide an automated test task scheduling system, including: the task integrating module is used for integrating the tasks to be executed in the task set to obtain a plurality of task packages; each task package comprises a plurality of tasks to be executed, wherein the tasks to be executed are arranged according to an execution sequence and have an association relation; creating a parameter relation comparison table; the parameter relation comparison table comprises operation parameters corresponding to each execution task, and a comparison relation between output parameters of the executed tasks to be executed and operation parameters corresponding to the executed tasks to be executed; placing the plurality of task packages into a task queue; the task scheduling module is used for acquiring a task packet from the task queue, and distributing the task to be executed in the task packet and the corresponding operation parameters to the corresponding execution engines according to the execution sequence and the corresponding operation parameters in the parameter relation comparison table; the task execution module is used for executing the task to be executed through the test tool after the execution engine acquires the task to be executed and the execution parameters, recording the operation parameters and the output parameters corresponding to the task to be executed each time, inserting the output parameters into the parameter relation comparison table, and modifying the operation parameters corresponding to the task to be executed after the execution, so that the task scheduling module can conveniently take the modified operation parameters in the parameter relation comparison table as the operation parameters corresponding to the task to be executed after the execution.
As can be seen from the technical solutions provided in the embodiments of the present specification, a plurality of tasks to be executed with an association relationship may be obtained, and an execution sequence of each task to be executed is determined; creating a parameter relation comparison table; the parameter relation comparison table comprises operation parameters corresponding to each execution task, and a comparison relation between output parameters of the executed tasks to be executed and operation parameters corresponding to the executed tasks to be executed; executing each task to be executed according to the execution sequence according to the corresponding operation parameters in the parameter relation comparison table; the output parameters obtained after the execution of the tasks to be executed which are executed first are inserted into the parameter relation comparison table, and the operation parameters corresponding to the tasks to be executed which are executed after modification are conveniently executed by the tasks to be executed which are executed after modification according to the operation parameters which are executed after modification in the parameter relation comparison table, so that the problems of low working efficiency and easy error generation of manual copying and pasting parameters in a manual maintenance mode are solved, and the efficiency of automatic test is improved due to the fact that complicated operation problems that users are required to manually switch between various test tools in a back-and-forth mode are solved due to different system environments and different driving modes, the serial scheduling of different test tools is automatically carried out, the unified transmission of the operation parameters corresponding to different types of tasks to be executed is realized according to the parameter relation comparison table, and the operation parameters to be executed by each task to be executed are maintained through automatic serial connection work.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present description or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings that are required in the embodiments or the description of the prior art will be briefly described below, and it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments described in the present description, and other drawings may be obtained according to these drawings without inventive effort for a person skilled in the art.
FIG. 1 is a schematic functional structure diagram of an automatic test task scheduling according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of an execution mechanism of a task scheduling module according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an execution engine according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of an execution mechanism of the task execution module according to the embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of a functional module for an automated test task according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
fig. 6 is a schematic functional structural diagram of an electronic device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
fig. 7 is a functional schematic diagram of an automatic test task scheduler according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions of the embodiments of the present specification will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present specification, and it is apparent that the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the present specification, not all embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be made by one of ordinary skill in the art without undue burden from the present disclosure, are intended to be within the scope of the present disclosure.
In the embodiments of the present disclosure, during the operation of introducing the automated test tools, different automated test tools may be required to complete the automated test operation of the corresponding system. Taking the credit and proxy investment management system loan issuing transaction test scenario as an example, mainly several test operations as shown in table 1 are involved.
TABLE 1
As can be seen from table 1, when the test is performed, the tester expands the test verification work according to the test execution step sequence described by the service scenario, in the test process, the corresponding automatic test frames or tools are required to be used for submitting the automatic test scripts for different operation steps, because the plurality of automatic test tools used in the whole test are respectively organized and cannot be uniformly scheduled, in the verification case verification of one service scenario, the tester is required to manually switch back and forth among different test tools to perform script submitting operation, if the serial execution relation requirements among the plurality of scripts are strict, for example, parameter transfer among the scripts is required, because the parameter formats of each automatic test tool are not uniform, the tester is required to manually paste the execution results of the previous script or the execution results of the previous scripts, after processing and maintaining the parameters of the next script, the manual switching workload is large, and the work efficiency is low because the switching and the connection among the tools are required. In consideration of the fact that if parameters among different types of scripts are uniformly transmitted, input parameter values to be executed by each script are automatically maintained in real time according to the association relation between the scripts and the parameters through automatic serial connection work, the problem of low testing work efficiency caused by non-uniform parameter formats of various automatic testing tools is hopefully solved.
Referring to fig. 1, an embodiment of the present disclosure provides an automated test task scheduling system 100. The automated test task scheduling system 100 may include a task integration module 110, a task scheduling module 120, and a task execution module 130.
In some embodiments, the task integration module 110 may be configured to obtain a task to be executed from a task set to be executed, integrate the task to be executed with an association relationship, and obtain a plurality of task packages; each task package comprises a plurality of tasks to be executed, wherein the tasks to be executed are arranged according to an execution sequence and have an association relation; and placing the plurality of task packages into a task queue. Each task to be executed comprises a test script and corresponding operation parameters, and the plurality of execution tasks are executed by at least two different test tools. In particular, the operating parameters may include at least one parameter. For example, an operating parameter for performing a task may include only one parameter, such as only an age parameter; the operating parameters of a task may also be parameters such as name, age, gender, etc.
In some embodiments, the set of tasks to be performed includes a plurality of different tasks to be performed, which may be manually input or automatically generated according to the test requirements. In some scenarios, different tasks to be executed need to perform parameter transfer, that is, the operation parameter of one task to be executed needs to be obtained through the output parameter after another task to be executed is executed, or the operation parameter of one task to be executed needs to be obtained through the output parameters after a plurality of other tasks to be executed are executed. The plurality of tasks to be executed with the association relationship are the plurality of tasks to be executed which need parameter transmission. The task integration module 110 may integrate the tasks to be executed with parameter transfer relationships according to the execution sequence, so as to obtain a plurality of task packages. The task package may include a plurality of tasks to be executed, or may include one task to be executed. For example, if a task to be executed and other tasks to be executed do not need parameter transfer, the task package may include a task to be executed; if parameter transfer is required between one task to be executed and other tasks to be executed, the task package may include a plurality of tasks to be executed having a parameter transfer relationship.
In some embodiments, the plurality of task packages may be arranged in a priority order in the task queue. The priority may be determined according to a time sequence obtained by each task package, or may be determined according to importance degrees of tasks to be executed in each task package. Of course, the priority may be determined by other means, which is not limited in this specification.
In some embodiments, the task integration module 110 may also be configured to create a parameter relationship lookup table; the parameter relation comparison table comprises operation parameters corresponding to each task to be executed, and comparison relations between output parameters of the executed task to be executed and operation parameters corresponding to the executed task to be executed. The output parameter after execution of a task to be executed may include only one parameter, or may include only a plurality of parameters.
In some embodiments, among the plurality of tasks to be executed having an association relationship, an operation parameter corresponding to a task to be executed later needs to be obtained according to an output parameter after the task to be executed earlier. For example, if there are two tasks to be executed with an association relationship, the operation parameters corresponding to the tasks to be executed after the execution may be composed of the output parameters of the tasks to be executed previously, the parameter relationship comparison table includes the operation parameters corresponding to each task to be executed, and the comparison relationship between the operation parameters corresponding to the two tasks to be executed and the output parameters after the execution; if three tasks to be executed with an association relationship exist, the operation parameters corresponding to the tasks to be executed which are executed last may be composed of the output parameters of the tasks to be executed which are executed last or may be composed of the output parameters of the tasks to be executed which are executed last, and the parameter relationship comparison table includes the operation parameters corresponding to each task to be executed and the comparison relationship between the operation parameters corresponding to the three tasks to be executed and the output parameters after being executed.
For example, if the parameter transfer is required between the task a to be executed and the task B to be executed, the execution sequence is to execute the task a to be executed first, and then execute the task B to be executed, and if the output parameters after the execution of the task a to be executed include 10 parameters, the operation parameters corresponding to the task B to be executed may include all the output parameters after the execution of the task a to be executed, or may include some of the output parameters after the execution of the task a to be executed, then the parameter relation comparison table may include the operation parameters corresponding to the task a to be executed, the operation parameters corresponding to the task B to be executed, and the comparison relation between the operation parameters corresponding to the task B to be executed and the output parameters after the execution of the task a to be executed. If the execution sequence is that the task A to be executed is executed first, the task B to be executed is executed later, and the task C to be executed is executed finally, if the output parameters after the execution of the task A to be executed comprise 10 parameters, the operation parameters corresponding to the task B to be executed comprise partial output parameters after the execution of the task A to be executed, the output parameters after the execution of the task B to be executed comprise 5 parameters, the operation parameters corresponding to the task C to be executed may comprise only all output parameters or partial output parameters after the execution of the task B to be executed, or may comprise all output parameters or partial output parameters after the execution of the task A to be executed, or all output parameters or partial output parameters after the execution of the task B to be executed, and the parameter relation table may comprise the operation parameters corresponding to the task A to be executed, the operation parameters corresponding to the task B to be executed, the operation parameters corresponding to the task C to be executed, and the relation between the corresponding operation parameters and the output parameters after the execution.
In some embodiments, the task scheduling module 120 may be configured to obtain a task package from the task queue, and allocate, according to the execution order, the task to be executed and the corresponding operation parameter in the task package to the corresponding execution engine according to the corresponding operation parameter in the parameter relation lookup table. Specifically, the task to be executed which is executed first in the task package can be taken out, and the remaining tasks to be executed in the task package are put into a subtask queue in the form of task packages. And distributing the first executed task to be executed and the corresponding operation parameters to an execution engine so as to facilitate the execution of the task to be executed by the execution engine, after the execution of the first executed task to be executed is finished, taking the first executed task to be executed out of a task package of a subtask queue, and distributing the first executed task to be executed and the corresponding operation parameters to the execution engine until the execution of the task to be executed in the task package of the subtask queue is finished.
In some embodiments, the task scheduling module 120 is implemented as shown in FIG. 2.
S201: and acquiring a task package.
S202: and taking out the task to be executed, which is executed first, from the task package.
S203: and whether the task to be executed is executed by the appointed execution engine.
In some embodiments, if yes, execution 206; otherwise, execution proceeds to 204.
S204: and whether the execution engine corresponding to the task to be executed is idle or not.
In some embodiments, if yes, 206 is performed, otherwise 205 is performed.
S205: and placing the task package into a subtask queue.
In some embodiments, after waiting for the execution engine corresponding to the task to be executed to be idle, the task package may be obtained from the subtask queue.
S206: and acquiring the corresponding operation parameters of the task to be executed from a parameter relation comparison table.
S207: and distributing the task to be executed and the corresponding operation parameters to the corresponding execution engines.
In some embodiments, the task execution module 130 may be comprised of multiple execution engines, which may include multiple test tools that run in the same environment. Because the operating environments required for different test tools are different, some test tools need to be run on the mobile end, some test tools need to be run on a 64-bit operating system, and so on. Execution engines using the same running environment are grouped together according to the requirements of the test tool on the test environment, as shown in fig. 3.
In some embodiments, the task execution module 130 may be configured to execute the task to be executed through a test tool after the execution engine obtains the task to be executed and the execution parameter, record the operation parameter and the output parameter corresponding to the task to be executed each time, insert the output parameter into the parameter relation comparison table, and modify the operation parameter corresponding to the task to be executed after the modification, so that the task scheduling module 120 uses the modified operation parameter in the parameter relation comparison table as the operation parameter corresponding to the task to be executed after the modification.
In some embodiments, the execution mechanism of the task execution module 130 is as shown in fig. 4.
S401: and acquiring the task to be executed and the corresponding operation parameters.
S402: whether to switch environments.
If yes, executing S403; otherwise, S404 is executed.
S403: the environment is switched.
S404: and installing the operation parameters.
S405: executing the script.
S406: recording output parameters;
s407: and judging whether the output parameters have a comparison relation with the operation parameters corresponding to the later-executed task to be executed according to the parameter relation comparison table.
If yes, execute 408; otherwise execution proceeds to 409.
S408: and inserting the output parameters into the parameter relation comparison table, and modifying the operation parameters corresponding to the executed task to be executed.
S409: and recording and executing the operation parameters and the output parameters corresponding to the task to be executed.
In some embodiments, because the execution results and the execution log contents of different automation frame scripts are not uniform, a tester needs to use different automation testing tools to perform log query collection and execution result judgment, and after integrating information and manually screening, the tester can acquire the useful information of problem investigation to perform the problem investigation work, so that the execution log collection workload is large, the problem investigation time is long, and the testing work efficiency is low. In order to solve the problems, the automatic test task scheduling system can automatically display the execution logs and the execution results generated by all the test tools in a unified mode through unified log grabbing and displaying modes.
In some embodiments, the automated test task scheduling system 100 may further include a log capture module 140 for recording execution of each task to be executed. Specifically, the log capturing module 140 may record the execution process of executing each task to be executed in an automatic screenshot manner, and splice the screenshot into a video, so as to facilitate visual display of the execution process of each task to be executed.
The log capturing module 140 may be further configured to parse execution logs generated by the execution tasks executed by different execution engines to obtain a test result, and output the test result file in a preset text format. Specifically, the preset text format may be Html, PDF, word or the like.
In some embodiments, if different operation steps need to be submitted by using corresponding automated test frames or tools in the test process, when the execution of the automated test scripts is interrupted, for example, when a test environment problem is encountered or test data problem causes the execution failure of the automated test scripts, after the environment service to be tested is recovered to be normal or the maintenance of the test data is completed, the execution is resumed from the interrupted link, because of the different automated frames involved, the script execution results and the execution log content are not uniform, the test personnel need to use different automated test tools to perform log query collection and execution result judgment, and do a large number of acquisition screening and processing works of output data generated by the completed execution steps, and the workload required to be input for resuming the automated test at the breakpoint is large, so that the work efficiency is low.
Based on this, in some embodiments, the task integration module 110 may further obtain the task to be executed with the execution failure and the task to be executed with the execution sequence after the task to be executed with the execution failure, integrate the task to be executed with the execution sequence after the task to be executed with the execution failure to obtain a task package, put the task package into a task queue, and create a new parameter relation comparison table according to the operation parameters and the output parameters corresponding to the task to be executed with the execution sequence before the task to be executed with the execution failure, so that the task scheduling module 120 distributes the task to be executed and the corresponding operation parameters in the task package to the corresponding execution engine according to the execution sequence according to the corresponding operation parameters in the new parameter relation comparison table.
In a specific example, if the task package includes a task a to be executed, a task B to be executed, a task C to be executed, a task D to be executed, and a task E to be executed, each task to be executed is executed according to the arrangement sequence of the task a to be executed, the task B to be executed, the task C to be executed, the task D to be executed, and the task E to be executed. The task execution module 130 may record the operation parameters and the output parameters after each execution of the task to be executed, if the task to be executed a and the task to be executed B have been executed, when the task to be executed C is executed, the task to be executed C fails to execute due to various reasons, so that the task execution process is interrupted, the task integration module 110 may integrate the task to be executed C and the task to be executed D and the task to be executed E after the task to be executed C in the execution order to obtain a task package, and create a new parameter relation comparison table according to the operation parameters and the output parameters after the execution of the task a and the task to be executed B, so that the task scheduling module 120 distributes the task to be executed C, the task to be executed D and the task to be executed E in the task package and the corresponding operation parameters to the corresponding execution engine according to the execution order.
The automatic test task scheduling system provided by the embodiment of the specification can uniformly schedule various test tools, automatically execute various tasks to be executed, solve the complex operation problem that users are required to manually switch back and forth among various test tools because the system environments and driving modes required by different test tools are different, realize uniform transmission of operation parameters corresponding to different types of tasks to be executed according to the parameter relation comparison table by automatically scheduling the different test tools in series, maintain the operation parameters to be executed of each task to be executed through automatic serial connection work, solve the problems of low working efficiency and easiness in error generation of manually copying and pasting parameters in a manual maintenance mode, and improve the efficiency of automatic test.
Please refer to fig. 5. The embodiment of the description also provides an automatic test task scheduling method. In the embodiment of the present specification, the main body for executing the automatic test task scheduling method may be an electronic device having a logic operation function, and the electronic device may be a server. The server may be an electronic device with a certain arithmetic processing capability. Which may have a network communication unit, a processor, a memory, etc. Of course, the server is not limited to the electronic device with a certain entity, and may be software running in the electronic device. The server may also be a distributed server, and may be a system having a plurality of processors, memories, network communication modules, etc. operating in concert. Alternatively, the server may be a server cluster formed for several servers. The method may comprise the following steps.
S510: and acquiring a plurality of tasks to be executed with an association relationship, and determining the execution sequence of each task to be executed.
In some embodiments, the server may obtain a plurality of tasks to be executed having an association relationship from the set of tasks to be executed, and determine an execution order of the respective tasks to be executed.
In some embodiments, each task to be performed includes a test script and an operating parameter, and the plurality of execution tasks are performed by at least two different test tools. In particular, the operating parameters may include at least one parameter. For example, an operating parameter for performing a task may include only one parameter, such as only an age parameter; the operating parameters of a task may also be parameters such as name, age, gender, etc.
In some embodiments, the set of tasks to be performed includes a plurality of different tasks to be performed. In some scenarios, different tasks to be executed need to perform parameter transfer, that is, the operation parameter of one task to be executed needs to be obtained through the output parameter after another task to be executed is executed, or the operation parameter of one task to be executed needs to be obtained through the output parameters after a plurality of other tasks to be executed are executed. The plurality of tasks to be executed with the association relationship are the plurality of tasks to be executed which need parameter transmission.
S520: creating a parameter relation comparison table; the parameter relation comparison table comprises operation parameters corresponding to each execution task, and a comparison relation between output parameters of the executed tasks to be executed and operation parameters corresponding to the executed tasks to be executed.
In some embodiments, an output parameter after execution of a task to be executed may include only one parameter, or may include only a plurality of parameters. Among the plurality of tasks to be executed with the association relationship, the operation parameters corresponding to the tasks to be executed after the execution are needed to be obtained according to the output parameters of the tasks to be executed before the execution. For example, if there are two tasks to be executed with an association relationship, the operation parameters corresponding to the tasks to be executed after the execution may be composed of the output parameters of the tasks to be executed previously, the parameter relationship comparison table includes the operation parameters corresponding to each task to be executed, and the comparison relationship between the operation parameters corresponding to the two tasks to be executed and the output parameters after the execution; if three tasks to be executed with an association relationship exist, the operation parameters corresponding to the tasks to be executed which are executed last may be composed of the output parameters of the tasks to be executed which are executed last or may be composed of the output parameters of the tasks to be executed which are executed last, and the parameter relationship comparison table includes the operation parameters corresponding to each task to be executed and the comparison relationship between the operation parameters corresponding to the three tasks to be executed and the output parameters after being executed.
For example, if the parameter transfer is required between the task a to be executed and the task B to be executed, the execution sequence is to execute the task a to be executed first, and then execute the task B to be executed, and if the output parameters after the execution of the task a to be executed include 10 parameters, the operation parameters corresponding to the task B to be executed may include all the output parameters after the execution of the task a to be executed, or may include some of the output parameters after the execution of the task a to be executed, then the parameter relation comparison table may include the operation parameters corresponding to the task a to be executed, the operation parameters corresponding to the task B to be executed, and the comparison relation between the operation parameters corresponding to the task B to be executed and the output parameters after the execution of the task a to be executed. If the execution sequence is that the task A to be executed is executed first, the task B to be executed is executed later, and the task C to be executed is executed finally, if the output parameters after the execution of the task A to be executed comprise 10 parameters, the operation parameters corresponding to the task B to be executed comprise partial output parameters after the execution of the task A to be executed, the output parameters after the execution of the task B to be executed comprise 5 parameters, the operation parameters corresponding to the task C to be executed may comprise only all output parameters or partial output parameters after the execution of the task B to be executed, or may comprise all output parameters or partial output parameters after the execution of the task A to be executed, or all output parameters or partial output parameters after the execution of the task B to be executed, and the parameter relation table may comprise the operation parameters corresponding to the task A to be executed, the operation parameters corresponding to the task B to be executed, the operation parameters corresponding to the task C to be executed, and the relation between the corresponding operation parameters and the output parameters after the execution.
S530: executing each task to be executed according to the execution sequence according to the corresponding operation parameters in the parameter relation comparison table; and inserting the output parameters obtained after the execution of the tasks to be executed which are executed first into the parameter relation comparison table, and modifying the operation parameters corresponding to the tasks to be executed which are executed after modification, so that the tasks to be executed after modification are executed according to the operation parameters which are executed after modification in the parameter relation comparison table.
Specifically, if the acquired plurality of tasks to be executed with the association relationship include a task to be executed A and a task to be executed B, the operation parameters corresponding to the task to be executed B are obtained according to the output parameters after the task to be executed A is executed, and the execution sequence of each task to be executed is that the task to be executed A is executed first and then the task to be executed B is executed. The server can determine the corresponding operation parameters of the task A to be executed according to the parameter relation comparison table, distribute the task A to be executed and the corresponding operation parameters to the corresponding test tools 1 for execution, obtain the output parameters of the task A to be executed, insert the output parameters of the task A to be executed into the parameter relation comparison table, modify the operation parameters of the task B to be executed according to the output parameters of the task A to be executed, and distribute the task B to be executed and the operation parameters obtained after modification to the corresponding test tools 2, so as to obtain the output parameters of the task B to be executed. Of course, the obtained plurality of tasks to be executed with the association relationship is not limited to the case of including two tasks to be executed, but may include the case of including 3, 4 or other numbers, in which case the plurality of tasks to be executed with the association relationship is 3, 4 or other numbers, the output parameters obtained after the execution of the tasks to be executed with the previous execution may be inserted into the parameter relationship comparison table, and the operation parameters corresponding to the tasks to be executed after modification are modified, so that the tasks to be executed after modification may be executed according to the operation parameters modified in the parameter relationship comparison table, and a specific process may refer to the case that the plurality of tasks to be executed with the association relationship includes two tasks to be executed.
In some embodiments, if different operation steps need to be submitted by using corresponding automated test frames or tools in the test process, when the execution of the automated test scripts is interrupted, for example, when a test environment problem is encountered or test data problem causes the execution failure of the automated test scripts, after the environment service to be tested is recovered to be normal or the maintenance of the test data is completed, the execution is resumed from the interrupted link, because of the different automated frames involved, the script execution results and the execution log content are not uniform, the test personnel need to use different automated test tools to perform log query collection and execution result judgment, and do a large number of acquisition screening and processing works of output data generated by the completed execution steps, and the workload required to be input for resuming the automated test at the breakpoint is large, so that the work efficiency is low.
Based on this, the method may further comprise the following steps.
S540: recording operation parameters and output parameters corresponding to each execution of the task to be executed, so that under the condition that the task to be executed fails to execute, the task to be executed with the execution failure and the task to be executed with the execution sequence after the task to be executed with the execution failure are acquired, creating a new parameter relation comparison table according to the operation parameters and the output parameters corresponding to the task to be executed before the task to be executed with the execution failure, and executing each task to be executed according to the execution sequence according to the operation parameters corresponding to the new parameter relation comparison table.
Specifically, if the plurality of tasks to be executed with the association relationship obtained in S510 are the task a to be executed, the task B to be executed, the task C to be executed, the task D to be executed, and the task E to be executed, and each task to be executed is executed according to the arrangement sequence of the task a to be executed, the task B to be executed, the task C to be executed, the task D to be executed, and the task E to be executed. The server can record the operation parameters and the output parameters corresponding to the task to be executed each time, if the task to be executed A and the task to be executed B are already executed, when the task to be executed C is executed, the task to be executed C fails to execute due to various reasons, so that the task execution process is interrupted, the server can acquire the task to be executed C and the task to be executed D and the task to be executed E which are executed in sequence after the task to be executed C, and create a new parameter relation comparison table according to the operation parameters and the output parameters corresponding to the task to be executed A and the task to be executed B, and execute the task to be executed C, the task to be executed D and the task to be executed E according to the execution sequence according to the new parameter relation comparison table.
It can be known from this that, through S540, the operation parameters and the output parameters corresponding to each execution of the task to be executed may be recorded, so that in the case of failure in execution of the task to be executed, the task to be executed with failure in execution and the task to be executed with failure in execution sequence after the task to be executed with failure in execution may be acquired, a new parameter relation comparison table may be created according to the operation parameters and the output parameters corresponding to the task to be executed with failure in execution sequence before the task to be executed with failure in execution sequence, each task to be executed according to the operation parameters corresponding to the new parameter relation comparison table may be executed with failure or interruption of the task to be executed, and the server may recover the corresponding execution site according to the recorded data, thereby greatly reducing the cost of manual operation of the interrupt execution site when the multitask execution process is interrupted halfway, and improving the test efficiency.
In some embodiments, because the execution results and the execution log contents of different automation frame scripts are not uniform, a tester needs to use different automation testing tools to perform log query collection and execution result judgment, and after integrating information and manually screening, the tester can acquire the useful information of problem investigation to perform the problem investigation work, so that the execution log collection workload is large, the problem investigation time is long, and the testing work efficiency is low. Based on this, the method may further comprise the following steps.
S550: recording the execution process of executing each task to be executed so as to visually show the execution process.
Specifically, the server may record, in a screenshot manner, an execution process of executing each task to be executed, obtain multiple shots, splice the multiple shots into a video, and output the video.
S560: acquiring an execution log generated in the process of executing the task to be executed by a test tool; analyzing the execution log to obtain a test result; and outputting the test result in a preset text format.
In some embodiments, the preset text format may include Html, PDF, word, etc.
The automatic test task scheduling method provided by the embodiment of the specification can acquire a plurality of tasks to be executed with an association relationship, and determine the execution sequence of each task to be executed; creating a parameter relation comparison table; the parameter relation comparison table comprises operation parameters corresponding to each execution task, and a comparison relation between output parameters of the executed tasks to be executed and operation parameters corresponding to the executed tasks to be executed; executing each task to be executed according to the execution sequence according to the corresponding operation parameters in the parameter relation comparison table; the output parameters obtained after the execution of the tasks to be executed which are executed first are inserted into the parameter relation comparison table, and the operation parameters corresponding to the tasks to be executed which are executed after modification are conveniently executed by the tasks to be executed which are executed after modification according to the operation parameters which are executed after modification in the parameter relation comparison table, so that the problems of low working efficiency and easy error generation of manual copying and pasting parameters in a manual maintenance mode are solved, and the efficiency of automatic test is improved due to the fact that complicated operation problems that users are required to manually switch between various test tools in a back-and-forth mode are solved due to different system environments and different driving modes, the serial scheduling of different test tools is automatically carried out, the unified transmission of the operation parameters corresponding to different types of tasks to be executed is realized according to the parameter relation comparison table, and the operation parameters to be executed by each task to be executed are maintained through automatic serial connection work.
Fig. 6 is a functional structural diagram of an electronic device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure, which may include a processor and a memory for storing processor-executable instructions.
In some embodiments, the memory may be used to store processor-executable instructions that implement various functions of automated test task scheduling by executing the instructions stored in the memory, and invoking data stored in the memory. The memory may mainly include a storage program area and a storage data area, wherein the storage program area may store an operating system, at least one application program required for a function; the storage data area may store data created according to the use of the user terminal. In addition, the memory may include high-speed random access memory, and may also include non-volatile memory, such as a hard disk, memory, plug-in hard disk, smart Media Card (SMC), secure Digital (SD) Card, flash Card (Flash Card), at least one disk storage device, flash memory device, or other volatile solid-state storage device.
The processor may be a central processing unit (Central Processing Unit, CPU), but may also be other general purpose processors, digital signal processors (Digital Signal Processor, DSP), application specific integrated circuits (APPlication Specific Integrated Circuit, ASIC), off-the-shelf programmable gate arrays (Field-Programmable Gate Array, FPGA) or other programmable logic devices, discrete gate or transistor logic devices, discrete hardware components, or the like. A general purpose processor may be a microprocessor or the processor may be any conventional processor or the like. The processor may execute the computer instructions to implement the steps of: acquiring a plurality of tasks to be executed with an association relationship, and determining the execution sequence of each task to be executed; creating a parameter relation comparison table; the parameter relation comparison table comprises operation parameters corresponding to each execution task, and a comparison relation between output parameters of the executed tasks to be executed and operation parameters corresponding to the executed tasks to be executed; executing each task to be executed according to the execution sequence according to the corresponding operation parameters in the parameter relation comparison table; and inserting the output parameters obtained after the execution of the tasks to be executed which are executed first into the parameter relation comparison table, and modifying the operation parameters corresponding to the tasks to be executed which are executed after modification, so that the tasks to be executed after modification are executed according to the operation parameters which are executed after modification in the parameter relation comparison table.
In the embodiments of the present disclosure, the specific functions and effects of the electronic device may be explained in comparison with other embodiments, which are not described herein.
Fig. 7 is a schematic functional structural diagram of an automatic test task scheduler according to an embodiment of the present disclosure, where the apparatus may specifically include the following structural modules.
The acquiring module 710 is configured to acquire a plurality of tasks to be executed with an association relationship, and determine an execution sequence of each task to be executed;
a creating module 720, configured to create a parameter relationship comparison table; the parameter relation comparison table comprises operation parameters corresponding to each execution task, and a comparison relation between output parameters of the executed tasks to be executed and operation parameters corresponding to the executed tasks to be executed;
an execution module 730, configured to execute each task to be executed according to the execution sequence according to the corresponding operation parameters in the parameter relation comparison table; and inserting the output parameters obtained after the execution of the tasks to be executed which are executed first into the parameter relation comparison table, and modifying the operation parameters corresponding to the tasks to be executed which are executed after modification, so that the tasks to be executed after modification are executed according to the operation parameters which are executed after modification in the parameter relation comparison table.
It should be noted that, in the present specification, each embodiment is described in a progressive manner, and the same or similar parts of each embodiment are referred to each other, and each embodiment mainly describes differences from other embodiments. In particular, for the device embodiments and the apparatus embodiments, since they are substantially similar to the method embodiments, the description is relatively simple, and reference is made to the description of the method embodiments in part.
Those skilled in the art, after reading this specification, will recognize without undue burden that any and all of the embodiments set forth herein can be combined, and that such combinations are within the scope of the disclosure and protection of the present specification.
In the 90 s of the 20 th century, improvements to one technology could clearly be distinguished as improvements in hardware (e.g., improvements to circuit structures such as diodes, transistors, switches, etc.) or software (improvements to the process flow). However, with the development of technology, many improvements of the current method flows can be regarded as direct improvements of hardware circuit structures. Designers almost always obtain corresponding hardware circuit structures by programming improved method flows into hardware circuits. Therefore, an improvement of a method flow cannot be said to be realized by a hardware entity module. For example, a programmable logic device (Programmable Logic Device, PLD) (e.g., field programmable gate array (Field Programmable Gate Array, FPGA)) is an integrated circuit whose logic function is determined by the programming of the device by a user. A designer programs to "integrate" a digital system onto a PLD without requiring the chip manufacturer to design and fabricate application-specific integrated circuit chips. Moreover, nowadays, instead of manually manufacturing integrated circuit chips, such programming is mostly implemented with "logic compiler" software, which is similar to the software compiler used in program development and writing, and the original code before the compiling is also written in a specific programming language, which is called hardware description language (Hardware Description Language, HDL), but HDL is not only one, but a plurality of kinds, such as ABEL (Advanced Boolean Expression Language), AHDL (AlteraHardware Description Language), confluence, CUPL (Cornell University Programming Language), HDCal, JHDL (Java Hardware Description Language), lava, lola, myHDL, PALASM, RHDL (Ruby Hardware Description Language), etc., VHDL (Very-High-Speed Integrated Circuit Hardware Description Language) and Verilog2 are most commonly used at present. It will also be apparent to those skilled in the art that a hardware circuit implementing the logic method flow can be readily obtained by merely slightly programming the method flow into an integrated circuit using several of the hardware description languages described above.
The system, apparatus, module or unit set forth in the above embodiments may be implemented in particular by a computer chip or entity, or by a product having a certain function. One typical implementation is a computer. In particular, the computer may be, for example, a personal computer, a laptop computer, a cellular telephone, a camera phone, a smart phone, a personal digital assistant, a media player, a navigation device, an email device, a game console, a tablet computer, a wearable device, or a combination of any of these devices.
From the above description of embodiments, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the present description may be implemented in software plus a necessary general purpose hardware platform. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of the present specification may be embodied in essence or a part contributing to the prior art in the form of a software product, which may be stored in a storage medium, such as a ROM/RAM, a magnetic disk, an optical disk, etc., including several instructions to cause a computer device (which may be a personal computer, a server, or a network device, etc.) to execute the method described in the embodiments or some parts of the embodiments of the present specification.
In this specification, each embodiment is described in a progressive manner, and identical and similar parts of each embodiment are all referred to each other, and each embodiment mainly describes differences from other embodiments. In particular, for system embodiments, since they are substantially similar to method embodiments, the description is relatively simple, as relevant to see a section of the description of method embodiments.
The specification is operational with numerous general purpose or special purpose computer system environments or configurations. For example: personal computers, server computers, hand-held or portable devices, tablet devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based systems, set top boxes, programmable consumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, distributed computing environments that include any of the above systems or devices, and the like.
The description may be described in the general context of computer-executable instructions, such as program modules, being executed by a computer. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. The specification may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote computer storage media including memory storage devices.
Although the present specification has been described by way of example, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that there are many variations and modifications to the specification without departing from the spirit of the specification, and it is intended that the appended claims encompass such variations and modifications as do not depart from the spirit of the specification.
Claims (9)
1. An automated test task scheduling method, the method comprising:
acquiring a plurality of tasks to be executed with an association relationship, and determining the execution sequence of each task to be executed;
creating a parameter relation comparison table; the parameter relation comparison table comprises operation parameters corresponding to each execution task, and a comparison relation between output parameters of the executed tasks to be executed and operation parameters corresponding to the executed tasks to be executed;
executing each task to be executed according to the execution sequence according to the corresponding operation parameters in the parameter relation comparison table; the output parameters obtained after the execution of the tasks to be executed which are executed first are inserted into the parameter relation comparison table, and the operation parameters corresponding to the tasks to be executed which are executed after modification are convenient for the tasks to be executed after modification to be executed according to the operation parameters which are executed after modification in the parameter relation comparison table;
The method further comprises the steps of: recording operation parameters and output parameters corresponding to each execution of the task to be executed, so that under the condition that the task to be executed fails to execute, the task to be executed with the execution failure and the task to be executed with the execution sequence after the task to be executed with the execution failure are acquired, creating a new parameter relation comparison table according to the operation parameters and the output parameters corresponding to the task to be executed before the task to be executed with the execution failure, and executing each task to be executed according to the execution sequence according to the operation parameters corresponding to the new parameter relation comparison table.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein each of the tasks to be performed comprises a test script.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of tasks to be performed are performed by at least two different test tools.
4. A method according to any one of claims 1-3, wherein the method further comprises: recording the execution process of executing each task to be executed so as to visually show the execution process.
5. A method according to any one of claims 1-3, wherein the method further comprises:
Acquiring an execution log generated in the process of executing the task to be executed by a test tool;
analyzing the execution log to obtain a test result;
and outputting the test result in a preset text format.
6. An automated test task scheduling device, the device comprising:
the acquisition module is used for acquiring a plurality of tasks to be executed with an association relationship and determining the execution sequence of each task to be executed;
the creation module is used for creating a parameter relation comparison table; the parameter relation comparison table comprises operation parameters corresponding to each execution task, and a comparison relation between output parameters of the executed tasks to be executed and operation parameters corresponding to the executed tasks to be executed;
the execution module is used for executing each task to be executed according to the execution sequence according to the corresponding operation parameters in the parameter relation comparison table; the output parameters obtained after the execution of the tasks to be executed which are executed first are inserted into the parameter relation comparison table, and the operation parameters corresponding to the tasks to be executed which are executed after modification are convenient for the tasks to be executed after modification to be executed according to the operation parameters which are executed after modification in the parameter relation comparison table;
The device is also for: recording operation parameters and output parameters corresponding to each execution of the task to be executed, so that under the condition that the task to be executed fails to execute, the task to be executed with the execution failure and the task to be executed with the execution sequence after the task to be executed with the execution failure are acquired, creating a new parameter relation comparison table according to the operation parameters and the output parameters corresponding to the task to be executed before the task to be executed with the execution failure, and executing each task to be executed according to the execution sequence according to the operation parameters corresponding to the new parameter relation comparison table.
7. An automated test task scheduling system, the system comprising:
the task integrating module is used for integrating the tasks to be executed in the task set to obtain a plurality of task packages; each task package comprises a plurality of tasks to be executed, wherein the tasks to be executed are arranged according to an execution sequence and have an association relation; creating a parameter relation comparison table; the parameter relation comparison table comprises operation parameters corresponding to each execution task, and a comparison relation between output parameters of the executed tasks to be executed and operation parameters corresponding to the executed tasks to be executed; placing the plurality of task packages into a task queue;
The task scheduling module is used for acquiring a task packet from the task queue, and distributing the task to be executed in the task packet and the corresponding operation parameters to the corresponding execution engines according to the execution sequence and the corresponding operation parameters in the parameter relation comparison table;
the task execution module is used for executing the task to be executed through the test tool after the execution engine acquires the task to be executed and the execution parameters, recording the operation parameters and the output parameters corresponding to the task to be executed each time, inserting the output parameters into the parameter relation comparison table, and modifying the operation parameters corresponding to the task to be executed after the execution, so that the task scheduling module takes the modified operation parameters in the parameter relation comparison table as the operation parameters corresponding to the task to be executed after the execution;
the task integrating module is further configured to record an operation parameter and an output parameter corresponding to each execution of the task to be executed, so that the task to be executed with the execution failure and the task to be executed with the execution sequence after the task to be executed with the execution failure are acquired under the condition that the task to be executed fails to execute, integrate the task to be executed with the execution sequence after the task to be executed with the execution failure, obtain a task package, and put the task package into a task queue; creating a new parameter relation comparison table according to the operation parameters and the output parameters corresponding to the tasks to be executed before the tasks to be executed which fail to be executed according to the execution sequence;
The task scheduling module is further configured to allocate the task to be executed in the task package and the corresponding operation parameter to the corresponding execution engine according to the execution sequence according to the corresponding operation parameter in the new parameter relation comparison table.
8. The system of claim 7, wherein the system further comprises:
the log capturing module is used for recording the execution process of executing each task to be executed so as to visually display the execution process of each task to be executed; analyzing execution logs generated by different execution engines for executing tasks to be executed, obtaining test results, and outputting test result files in a preset text format.
9. An electronic device comprising a processor and a memory for storing processor-executable instructions, wherein the processor, when executing the instructions, performs the steps of the method of any one of claims 1 to 5.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010697109.0A CN111881025B (en) | 2020-07-20 | 2020-07-20 | Automatic test task scheduling method, device and system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010697109.0A CN111881025B (en) | 2020-07-20 | 2020-07-20 | Automatic test task scheduling method, device and system |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN111881025A CN111881025A (en) | 2020-11-03 |
| CN111881025B true CN111881025B (en) | 2023-08-04 |
Family
ID=73155730
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010697109.0A Active CN111881025B (en) | 2020-07-20 | 2020-07-20 | Automatic test task scheduling method, device and system |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN111881025B (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112306661B (en) * | 2020-11-06 | 2023-09-15 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Task scheduling method and device, electronic equipment and readable storage medium |
Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN107526676A (en) * | 2016-06-20 | 2017-12-29 | 苏宁云商集团股份有限公司 | A kind of cross-system method of testing and device |
| CN109726119A (en) * | 2018-12-04 | 2019-05-07 | 北京奇艺世纪科技有限公司 | Test scene creation method, application method, device, client and server |
| CN109857667A (en) * | 2019-02-03 | 2019-06-07 | 苏州市龙测智能科技有限公司 | Automatic interface testing method, test device, test equipment and storage medium |
| CN110377520A (en) * | 2019-07-22 | 2019-10-25 | 中国工商银行股份有限公司 | The test method and device, electronic equipment and readable storage medium storing program for executing for scene of trading |
| CN110489321A (en) * | 2019-07-08 | 2019-11-22 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Test case screening technique, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
| CN111209184A (en) * | 2019-12-20 | 2020-05-29 | 北京你财富计算机科技有限公司 | Automatic testing method and device and electronic equipment |
-
2020
- 2020-07-20 CN CN202010697109.0A patent/CN111881025B/en active Active
Patent Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN107526676A (en) * | 2016-06-20 | 2017-12-29 | 苏宁云商集团股份有限公司 | A kind of cross-system method of testing and device |
| CN109726119A (en) * | 2018-12-04 | 2019-05-07 | 北京奇艺世纪科技有限公司 | Test scene creation method, application method, device, client and server |
| CN109857667A (en) * | 2019-02-03 | 2019-06-07 | 苏州市龙测智能科技有限公司 | Automatic interface testing method, test device, test equipment and storage medium |
| CN110489321A (en) * | 2019-07-08 | 2019-11-22 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Test case screening technique, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
| CN110377520A (en) * | 2019-07-22 | 2019-10-25 | 中国工商银行股份有限公司 | The test method and device, electronic equipment and readable storage medium storing program for executing for scene of trading |
| CN111209184A (en) * | 2019-12-20 | 2020-05-29 | 北京你财富计算机科技有限公司 | Automatic testing method and device and electronic equipment |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN111881025A (en) | 2020-11-03 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN109933522B (en) | Test method, test system and storage medium for automatic case | |
| CN107729139B (en) | Method and device for concurrently acquiring resources | |
| WO2019153472A1 (en) | Automated interface testing method, device, equipment, and storage medium | |
| CN107526676B (en) | Cross-system test method and device | |
| CN107122289A (en) | The method of system regression test, apparatus and system | |
| US11144437B2 (en) | Pre-populating continuous delivery test cases | |
| CN111881025B (en) | Automatic test task scheduling method, device and system | |
| CN113836014A (en) | Interface testing method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN112035230B (en) | Task scheduling file generation method, device and storage medium | |
| US11449407B2 (en) | System and method for monitoring computing platform parameters and dynamically generating and deploying monitoring packages | |
| US8406401B2 (en) | Interactive voice response system to business application interface | |
| WO2020073200A1 (en) | Program debugging method and system | |
| CN115080433A (en) | Testing method and device based on flow playback | |
| CN114116509A (en) | Program analysis method, program analysis device, electronic device, and storage medium | |
| CN114217790A (en) | Interface scheduling method and device, electronic equipment and medium | |
| CN115114147A (en) | Test system based on structured description language | |
| CN114036060A (en) | Method, system and computer readable medium for chip testing | |
| CN110377401B (en) | Transaction request processing method, device, server and storage medium based on IDEA | |
| CN113448578A (en) | Page data processing method, processing system, electronic device and readable storage medium | |
| CN112394920A (en) | Application software development method, platform and electronic equipment | |
| CN111367889B (en) | Cross-cluster data migration method and device based on webpage interface | |
| CN113360368B (en) | Method and device for testing software performance | |
| WO2022199387A1 (en) | File processing method and system, and computer device and medium | |
| CN117215961A (en) | Automated Murex system, control method, electronic device and storage medium | |
| CN116243913A (en) | Data processing method, device, electronic equipment and storage medium |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |