CN111861219A - A method and system for identifying global structural risk bottlenecks in regional rail transit - Google Patents

A method and system for identifying global structural risk bottlenecks in regional rail transit Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN111861219A
CN111861219A CN202010711200.3A CN202010711200A CN111861219A CN 111861219 A CN111861219 A CN 111861219A CN 202010711200 A CN202010711200 A CN 202010711200A CN 111861219 A CN111861219 A CN 111861219A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
risk
station
road network
channel
capacity
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN202010711200.3A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN111861219B (en
Inventor
董炜
孙新亚
吉吟东
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Tsinghua University
Original Assignee
Tsinghua University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Tsinghua University filed Critical Tsinghua University
Priority to CN202010711200.3A priority Critical patent/CN111861219B/en
Publication of CN111861219A publication Critical patent/CN111861219A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN111861219B publication Critical patent/CN111861219B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
    • G06Q10/06393Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0635Risk analysis of enterprise or organisation activities
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10Services
    • G06Q50/26Government or public services

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

本发明涉及一种区域轨道交通全局结构风险瓶颈识别方法,包括如下步骤:数据获取步骤:获取路网结构风险数据、通道通行能力数据;灵敏度数据处理步骤;风险瓶颈结果输出:输出优化灵敏度和失效灵敏度,即完成风险瓶颈识别。本发明的有益效果在于,提供了一种基于灵敏度分析的区域轨道交通全局结构风险瓶颈识别方法及系统。建立路网全局结构风险评估指标后,通过灵敏度分析,评估路网的站内通道/区间失效及优化对路网全局结构风险的影响,从而为路网风险瓶颈的防护和优化提供决策支持。并且以成渝地区区域轨道交通为实例,验证了方法的有效性。

Figure 202010711200

The invention relates to a method for identifying global structural risk bottlenecks of regional rail transit, comprising the following steps: a data acquisition step: acquiring road network structure risk data and passage capacity data; sensitivity data processing steps; risk bottleneck result output: outputting optimization sensitivity and failure Sensitivity, that is, to complete the identification of risk bottlenecks. The beneficial effect of the present invention is to provide a method and system for identifying global structural risk bottlenecks of regional rail transit based on sensitivity analysis. After establishing the global structural risk assessment index of the road network, through sensitivity analysis, the influence of the failure and optimization of the in-station passage/section of the road network on the global structural risk of the road network is evaluated, so as to provide decision support for the protection and optimization of the road network risk bottleneck. And the regional rail transit in Chengdu-Chongqing area is taken as an example to verify the effectiveness of the method.

Figure 202010711200

Description

一种区域轨道交通全局结构风险瓶颈识别方法及系统A method and system for identifying global structural risk bottlenecks in regional rail transit

技术领域technical field

本发明属于基于特定计算模型的计算机系统领域,特别涉一种区域轨 道交通全局结构风险瓶颈识别方法及系统。The invention belongs to the field of computer systems based on specific calculation models, and particularly relates to a method and system for identifying global structural risk bottlenecks of regional rail transit.

背景技术Background technique

区域轨道交通是指面向区域经济一体化需求形成的包含高速铁路、 城际列车、单轨、地铁等多种轨道交通制式的综合轨道交通系统。随 着区域经济的快速发展与城市圈的形成,区域轨道交通正面临更安全、 更高效、更舒适的发展要求,体现出异构性、整体性、互动性和协同 性的发展特点。Regional rail transit refers to a comprehensive rail transit system that includes high-speed railways, intercity trains, monorails, subways and other rail transit systems formed for the needs of regional economic integration. With the rapid development of regional economy and the formation of urban circles, regional rail transit is facing the development requirements of safer, more efficient and more comfortable, reflecting the development characteristics of heterogeneity, integrity, interaction and synergy.

区域轨道交通多制式并存的特点,既适应了区域经济一体化发展 的需求,提升了居民出行的便利,但也带来了更多风险,同时多制式 之间的互动性和路网的整体性使风险影响面增加、风险后果增大,因 而,风险瓶颈识别对于区域轨道交通系统实现有针对性的关键风险点 防护和优化、有效降低全局风险具有重要意义。然而,现有轨道交通 路网全局风险评估的相关研究很多采用指标融合的方法,虽然能够对 风险因素进行评估和排序,但因含有较多主观因素影响,无法从运能 角度体现路网全局结构风险,亦无法有效识别路网全局风险瓶颈。路 网内各节点/区间对路网全局风险有着不同的影响,有些节点/区间失效后会大大增加路网风险,而有些部分优化后会大大降低路网风险。The coexistence of multiple modes of regional rail transit not only meets the needs of the integrated development of the regional economy and improves the convenience of residents' travel, but it also brings more risks. At the same time, the interaction between the multiple modes and the integrity of the road network Therefore, the identification of risk bottlenecks is of great significance for the realization of targeted protection and optimization of key risk points in the regional rail transit system, and the effective reduction of overall risks. However, many existing researches on global risk assessment of rail transit network use the method of index fusion. Although risk factors can be evaluated and ranked, they cannot reflect the overall structure of the road network from the perspective of transportation capacity due to the influence of many subjective factors. risks, and cannot effectively identify the global risk bottlenecks of the road network. Each node/interval in the road network has a different impact on the overall risk of the road network. The failure of some nodes/intervals will greatly increase the risk of the road network, while the optimization of some parts will greatly reduce the risk of the road network.

现有对轨道交通全局风险评估的研究受主观因素影响较大,目前 少有对轨道交通路网全局结构风险的评估,且少有评估路网结构优化 对全局风险影响的文献;在风险瓶颈识别方面,目前没有将灵敏度分 析与轨道交通风险瓶颈识别相结合的报道。The existing research on the global risk assessment of rail transit is greatly affected by subjective factors. At present, there are few evaluations of the global structural risk of the rail transit road network, and there are few literatures evaluating the impact of the optimization of the road network structure on the global risk; in the identification of risk bottlenecks On the one hand, there is no report on the combination of sensitivity analysis and identification of rail transit risk bottlenecks.

发明内容SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

本发明在评估路网全局结构风险的基础上,使用灵敏度分析法评 估路网各个站内通道/区间失效以及优化对路网全局结构风险的影响, 从而为路网风险瓶颈的防护和优化提供决策支持。On the basis of evaluating the global structural risk of the road network, the present invention uses the sensitivity analysis method to evaluate the failure of passages/sections in each station of the road network and the influence of optimization on the global structural risk of the road network, thereby providing decision support for the protection and optimization of the road network risk bottleneck. .

本发明一方面提供了区域轨道交通全局结构风险瓶颈识别方法, 包括如下步骤:On the one hand, the present invention provides a method for identifying global structural risk bottlenecks of regional rail transit, including the following steps:

数据获取步骤:获取路网结构风险数据、通道通行能力数据;Data acquisition steps: acquire road network structure risk data and channel traffic capacity data;

灵敏度数据处理步骤:按照式1计算优化灵敏度,以及按照式2 计算失效灵敏度,Sensitivity data processing steps: Calculate the optimal sensitivity according to Equation 1, and calculate the failure sensitivity according to Equation 2,

Figure BDA0002596592180000021
Figure BDA0002596592180000021

其中S*为路网结构风险,

Figure BDA0002596592180000022
表示通道
Figure BDA0002596592180000023
的优化灵敏度,
Figure BDA0002596592180000024
表示通 道
Figure BDA0002596592180000025
的通行能力;where S * is the risk of road network structure,
Figure BDA0002596592180000022
Indicates the channel
Figure BDA0002596592180000023
optimized sensitivity,
Figure BDA0002596592180000024
Indicates the channel
Figure BDA0002596592180000025
capacity;

Figure BDA0002596592180000026
Figure BDA0002596592180000026

其中

Figure BDA0002596592180000027
为通道
Figure BDA0002596592180000028
的失效灵敏度,S*'为通道通行能力变化后路网结 构风险;in
Figure BDA0002596592180000027
for the channel
Figure BDA0002596592180000028
The failure sensitivity of , S * ' is the road network structure risk after the passage capacity changes;

风险瓶颈结果输出:输出优化灵敏度和失效灵敏度,即完成风险 瓶颈识别。Risk bottleneck result output: Output optimization sensitivity and failure sensitivity, that is, complete risk bottleneck identification.

本发明的另外一方面还提供了区域轨道交通全局结构风险瓶颈识 别系统,所述系统包括至少一个处理器;以及存储器,其存储有指令, 当通过至少一个处理器来执行该指令时,实施本发明所提供的方法。 本发明的有益效果在于,提供了一种基于灵敏度分析的区域轨道交通 全局结构风险瓶颈识别方法及系统。建立路网全局结构风险评估指标后,通过灵敏度分析,评估路网的站内通道/区间失效及优化对路网全 局结构风险的影响,从而为路网风险瓶颈的防护和优化提供决策支持。 并且以成渝地区区域轨道交通为实例,验证了方法的有效性。Another aspect of the present invention also provides a regional rail transit global structural risk bottleneck identification system, the system comprising at least one processor; and a memory storing instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, implement the present invention The method provided by the invention. The beneficial effect of the present invention is to provide a method and system for identifying global structural risk bottlenecks of regional rail transit based on sensitivity analysis. After establishing the global structural risk assessment index of the road network, through sensitivity analysis, the impact of the failure and optimization of the in-station passage/section of the road network on the global structural risk of the road network is evaluated, so as to provide decision support for the protection and optimization of road network risk bottlenecks. And the regional rail transit in Chengdu-Chongqing area is taken as an example to verify the effectiveness of the method.

附图说明Description of drawings

图1区域轨道交通路网全局运能风险决定因素;Figure 1. The determinants of the global transport capacity risk of the regional rail transit network;

图2.重庆区域轨道交通线路拓扑图;Figure 2. Topological map of Chongqing regional rail transit lines;

图3.计算流程示意图;Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the calculation process;

具体实施方式Detailed ways

本发明的一些实施例的区域轨道交通全局结构风险瓶颈识别方法,包 括如下步骤:The method for identifying the global structural risk bottleneck of regional rail transit in some embodiments of the present invention includes the following steps:

数据获取步骤:获取路网结构风险数据、通道通行能力数据;Data acquisition steps: acquire road network structure risk data and channel traffic capacity data;

灵敏度数据处理步骤:按照式1计算优化灵敏度,以及按照式2 计算失效灵敏度,Sensitivity data processing steps: Calculate the optimal sensitivity according to Equation 1, and calculate the failure sensitivity according to Equation 2,

Figure BDA0002596592180000031
Figure BDA0002596592180000031

其中S*为路网结构风险,

Figure BDA0002596592180000032
表示通道
Figure BDA0002596592180000033
的优化灵敏度,
Figure BDA0002596592180000034
表示通 道
Figure BDA0002596592180000035
的通行能力;where S * is the risk of road network structure,
Figure BDA0002596592180000032
Indicates the channel
Figure BDA0002596592180000033
optimized sensitivity,
Figure BDA0002596592180000034
Indicates the channel
Figure BDA0002596592180000035
capacity;

Figure BDA0002596592180000036
Figure BDA0002596592180000036

其中

Figure BDA0002596592180000037
为通道
Figure BDA0002596592180000038
的失效灵敏度,S*'为通道通行能力变化后路网结 构风险;in
Figure BDA0002596592180000037
for the channel
Figure BDA0002596592180000038
The failure sensitivity of , S * ' is the road network structure risk after the passage capacity changes;

风险瓶颈结果输出:输出优化灵敏度和失效灵敏度,即完成风险 瓶颈识别。Risk bottleneck result output: Output optimization sensitivity and failure sensitivity, that is, complete risk bottleneck identification.

本发明的优化灵敏度表示随某一通道容量的增加,路网全局结构 风险的变化程度(负值表示风险降低),其值越小(即绝对值越大)表 示相应通道的优化对降低全局结构风险的贡献越大。The optimization sensitivity of the present invention represents the change degree of the risk of the global structure of the road network with the increase of the capacity of a certain channel (a negative value indicates that the risk is reduced), and the smaller the value (that is, the larger the absolute value), the better the corresponding channel. The greater the contribution of risk.

本发明的失效灵敏度表示随某一通道容量的失效,路网全局结构 风险的变化程度(大于一的值表示风险增加),其值越大表示相应通道 的失效对全局结构风险升高的贡献越大。The failure sensitivity of the present invention represents the degree of change of the global structural risk of the road network with the failure of a certain channel capacity (a value greater than one indicates that the risk increases), and the larger the value, the greater the contribution of the failure of the corresponding channel to the increase of the global structural risk. big.

在这些具体的实施例中,按照式2计算优化灵敏度,In these specific examples, the optimal sensitivity is calculated according to Equation 2,

Figure BDA0002596592180000041
Figure BDA0002596592180000041

其中,

Figure BDA0002596592180000042
Figure BDA0002596592180000043
的微小变化量,优选的
Figure BDA0002596592180000044
Figure BDA0002596592180000045
的十分之一。in,
Figure BDA0002596592180000042
for
Figure BDA0002596592180000043
A small amount of variation, the preferred
Figure BDA0002596592180000044
for
Figure BDA0002596592180000045
one-tenth of .

在这些具体的实施例中,生成所述路网结构风险数据的步骤包括:In these specific embodiments, the step of generating the road network structure risk data includes:

用优化算法优化以路网全局运能风险最低为优化目标的目标函数, 所述目标函数如式4所示:Use the optimization algorithm to optimize the objective function that takes the lowest risk of the global transportation capacity of the road network as the optimization objective, and the objective function is shown in Equation 4:

Figure BDA0002596592180000046
Figure BDA0002596592180000046

其中,xi(t)代表t时刻的车站(或区间)i的客流需求量(单位为: 人/小时),ci(t)代表t时刻的车站(或区间)i的客流容量(单位为: 人/小时),xi(t)/ci(t)表示t时刻的车站(或区间)i的客流需求负荷; f(x)为运能风险概率函数,用于将客流需求负荷映射为运能风险发生的 可能性,wi(t)表示t时刻编号为i的车站或区间的运能风险后果。Among them, x i (t) represents the passenger flow demand of station (or section) i at time t (unit: person/hour), and c i (t) represents the passenger flow capacity of station (or section) i at time t (unit: is: person/hour), x i (t)/c i (t) represents the passenger flow demand load of the station (or section) i at time t; f(x) is the transport capacity risk probability function, which is used to calculate the passenger flow demand load It is mapped to the possibility of the occurrence of transport capacity risk, and w i (t) represents the transport capacity risk consequence of the station or section numbered i at time t.

在这些具体的实施例中,所述风险后果wi(t)如式5所示:In these specific embodiments, the risk consequence w i (t) is shown in Equation 5:

wi(t)=min(xi(t),ci(t)) 式5。w i (t)=min( xi (t), ci (t)) Eq.

在这些具体的实施例中,所述运能风险概率函数如式6所示:In these specific embodiments, the capacity risk probability function is shown in Equation 6:

Figure BDA0002596592180000051
Figure BDA0002596592180000051

在一些具体的实施例中,所述目标函数如式7所示:In some specific embodiments, the objective function is shown in formula 7:

Figure BDA0002596592180000052
Figure BDA0002596592180000052

在另外一些具体的实施例中,所述目标函数如式8所示:In some other specific embodiments, the objective function is shown in Formula 8:

Figure BDA0002596592180000053
Figure BDA0002596592180000053

其中,i=1,...S为车站编号,k=1,…T为区间编号;a为车站入口,b 为车站出口;c,d为各轨道交通制式的上下车地点;f(x)表示运能风 险概率函数;

Figure BDA0002596592180000054
表示通道
Figure BDA0002596592180000055
的OD需求,
Figure BDA0002596592180000056
表示通道
Figure BDA0002596592180000057
的通行能力,
Figure BDA0002596592180000058
表示通道
Figure BDA0002596592180000059
的运能风险的风险后果;
Figure BDA00025965921800000510
表示通道
Figure BDA00025965921800000511
的OD需求,
Figure BDA00025965921800000512
表 示通道
Figure BDA00025965921800000513
的通行能力,
Figure BDA00025965921800000514
表示通道
Figure BDA00025965921800000515
的运能风险的风险后果;
Figure BDA00025965921800000516
表 示通道
Figure BDA00025965921800000517
的OD需求,
Figure BDA00025965921800000518
表示通道
Figure BDA00025965921800000519
的通行能力,
Figure BDA00025965921800000520
表示通道
Figure BDA00025965921800000521
的 运能风险的风险后果;qk表示区间ek的OD需求,Lk表示区间ek的通行 能力,Wk表示区间k的运能风险的风险后果。Among them, i=1,...S is the station number, k=1,...T is the section number; a is the station entrance, b is the station exit; c, d are the pick-up and drop-off locations for each rail transit system; f(x ) represents the transport capacity risk probability function;
Figure BDA0002596592180000054
Indicates the channel
Figure BDA0002596592180000055
OD requirements,
Figure BDA0002596592180000056
Indicates the channel
Figure BDA0002596592180000057
capacity,
Figure BDA0002596592180000058
Indicates the channel
Figure BDA0002596592180000059
the risk consequences of the capacity risk;
Figure BDA00025965921800000510
Indicates the channel
Figure BDA00025965921800000511
OD requirements,
Figure BDA00025965921800000512
Indicates the channel
Figure BDA00025965921800000513
capacity,
Figure BDA00025965921800000514
Indicates the channel
Figure BDA00025965921800000515
the risk consequences of the capacity risk;
Figure BDA00025965921800000516
Indicates the channel
Figure BDA00025965921800000517
OD requirements,
Figure BDA00025965921800000518
Indicates the channel
Figure BDA00025965921800000519
capacity,
Figure BDA00025965921800000520
Indicates the channel
Figure BDA00025965921800000521
q k represents the OD demand of the interval ek , L k represents the traffic capacity of the interval ek , and W k represents the risk consequence of the transportation capacity risk of the interval k.

在一些具体的实施例中,所述目标函数的约束条件包括用来计算 车站进站客流的式9;用来计算车站出站客流的式10,用来计算车站 换乘客流的式11,用来计算区间客流的式12,表示客流分配约束的式 13、式14:In some specific embodiments, the constraints of the objective function include Equation 9 used to calculate the inbound passenger flow of the station; Equation 10 used to calculate the outbound passenger flow of the station, and Equation 11 used to calculate the station exchange passenger flow, using Equation 12 to calculate the passenger flow in the interval, and Equation 13 and Equation 14 representing the passenger flow distribution constraints:

Figure BDA00025965921800000522
Figure BDA00025965921800000522

其中,

Figure BDA00025965921800000523
为决策变量,表示分配到路径pij m的OD需求,
Figure BDA00025965921800000524
表示站 vi内从a点到c点的通道,pij m表示从站i到站j的第m条简单路径,g(a,p)表示a是路网内的某个通道或区间,p是一条简单路径,如果a 在路径p上,则g(a,p)=1,否则(a,p)=0;需要指出的是,这里g(a,p) 只是并不是具体的函数,只是判断路网内的某个通道或区间a是不是 在路径p上。in,
Figure BDA00025965921800000523
is the decision variable, representing the OD demand assigned to the path p ij m ,
Figure BDA00025965921800000524
represents the channel from point a to point c in station v i , p ij m represents the mth simple path from station i to station j, g(a, p) represents that a is a certain channel or interval in the road network, p is a simple path, if a is on the path p, then g(a,p)=1, otherwise (a,p)=0; it should be pointed out that g(a,p) here is just not a specific function , just to determine whether a certain channel or interval a in the road network is on the path p.

判断结果是根据路网的实际情况给出的。The judgment result is given according to the actual situation of the road network.

Figure BDA0002596592180000061
Figure BDA0002596592180000061

其中,xji m为决策变量,表示分配到路径pji m的OD需求;Among them, x ji m is a decision variable, representing the OD requirement assigned to the path p ji m ;

Figure BDA0002596592180000062
Figure BDA0002596592180000062

其中,xnj m表示决策变量,表示分配到路径pnj m的OD需求;Among them, x nj m represents the decision variable, which represents the OD demand allocated to the path p nj m ;

Figure BDA0002596592180000063
Figure BDA0002596592180000063

其中,

Figure BDA0002596592180000064
为决策变量,表示分配到路径pij m的OD需求,ek表示第k 个区间,pij m表示从站i到站j的第m条简单路径;in,
Figure BDA0002596592180000064
is a decision variable, representing the OD demand assigned to the path p ij m , e k represents the kth interval, and p ij m represents the mth simple path from station i to station j;

Figure BDA0002596592180000065
Figure BDA0002596592180000065

Figure BDA0002596592180000066
Figure BDA0002596592180000066

其中,qij表示站i到站j的OD需求。Among them, q ij represents the OD demand from station i to station j.

在一些具体的实施例中,所述目标函数的最小化全局运能风险的 模型为:以无向图G(V,E)表示区域轨道交通路网,其中V为路网中所有 车站组成的集合,E为路网中所有区间组成的集合;路网中一共存在S 个车站和T个区间,vi表示第i个车站,ek为第k个区间,其中i=1,...S为 车站编号,k=1,…T为区间编号。In some specific embodiments, the model of the objective function to minimize the global transport capacity risk is as follows: an undirected graph G(V, E) represents the regional rail transit road network, where V is composed of all stations in the road network set, E is the set composed of all the intervals in the road network; there are S stations and T intervals in the road network, v i represents the i-th station, and e k is the k-th interval, where i=1,... S is the station number, k=1,...T is the section number.

本发明的另外一些实施例中,提供了一种区域轨道交通全局结构 风险瓶颈识别系统,所述系统包括至少一个处理器;以及存储器,其 存储有指令,当通过至少一个处理器来执行该指令时,实施本发明的 方法。In other embodiments of the present invention, there is provided a system for identifying global structural risk bottlenecks in regional rail transit, the system including at least one processor; and a memory storing instructions that when executed by the at least one processor , the method of the present invention is implemented.

下面进一步对本发明具体实施例进行说明。Specific embodiments of the present invention will be further described below.

1.区域轨道交通全局运能风险评估方法(此处“全局运能风险” 并非“全局结构风险”,“全局运能风险”是评估“全局结构风险”的 基础)。1. The assessment method of global capacity risk of regional rail transit (here, "global capacity risk" is not "global structural risk", and "global capacity risk" is the basis for assessing "global structural risk").

区域轨道交通全局风险分为两个方面:运能风险和人员设备损失 风险。运能风险取决于多种因素,本实施例将会详细说明。车站和区 间的人/物/环/管因素会造成单点风险,最终在路网内形成人员设备损 失风险。运能风险和单点风险之间存在联系:单点风险通过降低车站 和区间的运能从而影响运能风险,而较高的运能风险(这表示存在较 高的客流需求负荷,将在本实施例进行详细说明)可能会引发新的单 点风险。由于单点风险与全局结构之间关系并不紧密,因此实施例将 聚焦于运能风险,从而评估全局结构风险。The overall risk of regional rail transit is divided into two aspects: the risk of transportation capacity and the risk of loss of personnel and equipment. The capacity risk depends on a variety of factors, which will be described in detail in this example. The factors of people/objects/environment/management in stations and areas will cause single-point risks, which will eventually lead to the risk of loss of personnel and equipment in the road network. There is a link between capacity risk and single-point risk: single-point risk affects capacity risk by reducing the capacity of stations and sections, while higher capacity risk (which indicates a higher passenger flow demand load, will Examples for details) may introduce new single point risks. Since the relationship between single point risk and global structure is not tight, embodiments will focus on capacity risk to assess global structural risk.

当路网车站/区间的运能不能满足旅客的出行需求时,势必会造成 该站点/区间的拥堵,从而带来风险。这里将客流需求与路网客流容量 之比称为客流需求负荷指标,作为计算运能风险的核心要素。随着客 流需求负荷指标的增大,运能风险也相应增加。各车站和区间的运能 风险通过加和能够得到路网全局运能风险。路网的全局运能风险主要 与OD需求、路网各部分客流容量(其中包含了单点风险的影响)、客 流分配策略等因素有关:OD需求在路网客流容量约束下,经过客流分 配形成车站及区间的客流(需求)负荷分布,进而决定整个路网的运能 风险。When the transportation capacity of the station/section of the road network cannot meet the travel needs of passengers, it will inevitably cause congestion at the station/section, which will bring risks. Here, the ratio of passenger flow demand to road network passenger flow capacity is called the passenger flow demand load index, which is the core element for calculating transport capacity risk. With the increase of the demand load index of passenger flow, the risk of transportation capacity also increases accordingly. The overall transport capacity risk of the road network can be obtained by summing the transport capacity risks of each station and section. The global transport capacity risk of the road network is mainly related to the OD demand, the passenger flow capacity of each part of the road network (including the impact of single-point risk), the passenger flow distribution strategy and other factors: OD demand is constrained by the passenger flow capacity of the road network. The passenger flow (demand) load distribution of stations and sections determines the transport capacity risk of the entire road network.

基于以上描述,本发明一些实施例中路网全局(运能)风险计算 如式4所示。Based on the above description, in some embodiments of the present invention, the global (transport capacity) risk calculation of the road network is shown in Equation 4.

Figure BDA0002596592180000081
Figure BDA0002596592180000081

其中,xi(t)代表t时刻的车站(或区间)i的客流需求量(单位为: 人/小时),ci(t)代表t时刻的车站(或区间)i的客流容量(单位为: 人/小时),xi(t)/ci(t)表示t时刻的车站(或区间)i的客流需求负荷。 f(x)为运能风险概率函数,用于将客流需求负荷映射为运能风险发生的 可能性,wi(t)表示t时刻编号为i的车站或区间的运能风险后果。Among them, x i (t) represents the passenger flow demand of station (or section) i at time t (unit: person/hour), and c i (t) represents the passenger flow capacity of station (or section) i at time t (unit: is: person/hour), x i (t)/ ci (t) represents the passenger flow demand load of station (or section) i at time t. f(x) is the transport capacity risk probability function, which is used to map the passenger flow demand load to the possibility of transport capacity risk, and w i (t) represents the transport capacity risk consequence of the station or section numbered i at time t.

运能风险概率函数以客流需求负荷作为输入,并考虑随着客流需 求负荷的增长,风险概率应首先保持较低水平并缓慢增加,然后进入 快速增长的阶段,之后风险概率达到很高的水平并迅速趋近于1。在一 些实施例中,进行参数标定后,选择

Figure RE-GDA0002642241740000082
作为风险概率函数。车 站和区间发生风险后,其风险后果与其客流量及其容量有关,在此取 值为车站/区间的容量与其客流需求的较小值,即wi(t)=min(xi(t),ci(t))。The transport capacity risk probability function takes the passenger flow demand load as the input, and considers that as the passenger flow demand load increases, the risk probability should first keep a low level and increase slowly, and then enter a stage of rapid growth, after which the risk probability reaches a very high level and increases. rapidly approaching 1. In some embodiments, after parameter calibration, select
Figure RE-GDA0002642241740000082
as a risk probability function. After a risk occurs in a station or section, the risk consequence is related to its passenger flow and its capacity. The value here is the smaller value of the capacity of the station/section and its passenger flow demand, that is, w i (t)=min(x i (t) , ci (t)).

2.区域轨道交通全局结构风险评估方法2. Global structural risk assessment method for regional rail transit

区域轨道交通路网全局运能风险由三个方面的因素决定(如图1 所示):①OD需求、②路网(车站/区间)客流容量、③客流分配策略, 其中①是外部条件,②是路网固有的结构因素,而③是非结构因素(动 态调度策略),要实现路网全局结构风险评估,为了使评估结果真正体 现路网固有结构因素的影响,需要去除其中的非结构因素。基于这一 思路,本实施例中将因素③作为优化变量,通过最优配流方案,使路 网全局运能风险达到最小值,从而去除客流分配策略这一非结构因素 的影响。本实施例将这一路网全局运能风险最小值定义为区域轨道交 通全局结构风险,如式7所示。The global capacity risk of regional rail transit network is determined by three factors (as shown in Figure 1): ①OD demand, ②passenger flow capacity of road network (station/intersection), ③passenger flow allocation strategy, where ①is external conditions, ② It is the inherent structural factor of the road network, and ③ is the non-structural factor (dynamic scheduling strategy). To realize the global structural risk assessment of the road network, in order to make the assessment result truly reflect the influence of the inherent structural factors of the road network, it is necessary to remove the non-structural factors. Based on this idea, in this embodiment, factor ③ is taken as the optimization variable, and the global transport capacity risk of the road network is minimized through the optimal flow distribution scheme, thereby removing the influence of the non-structural factor of the passenger flow distribution strategy. In this embodiment, the minimum value of the global transport capacity risk of the road network is defined as the global structural risk of regional rail transit, as shown in Equation 7.

Figure BDA0002596592180000091
Figure BDA0002596592180000091

本发明的一些实施例中,最小化全局运能风险的模型如下所示。 以无向图G(V,E)表示区域轨道交通路网,其中V为路网中所有车站组成 的集合,E为路网中所有区间组成的集合。路网中一共存在S个车站和 T个区间,vi表示第i个车站,ek为第k个区间,其中i=1,...S为车站编 号,k=1,...T为区间编号。In some embodiments of the present invention, the model for minimizing the global capacity risk is as follows. The regional rail transit road network is represented by an undirected graph G(V, E), where V is the set composed of all stations in the road network, and E is the set composed of all sections in the road network. There are a total of S stations and T sections in the road network, v i represents the i-th station, and e k is the k-th section, where i=1,...S is the station number, k=1,...T number for the interval.

在一些具体实施例中将车站通道划分为进站通道、换乘通道、出 站通道三部分:

Figure BDA0002596592180000092
其中vi表示路网中第i个车站,a 为车站入口,b为车站出口,将车站等效为只有一个入口和一个出口; c,d为各轨道交通制式的上下车地点,即站台,
Figure BDA0002596592180000093
表示站i内从a入 口到站台c的进站通道,
Figure BDA0002596592180000094
表示站i内从站台c到出口b的出站通道,
Figure BDA0002596592180000095
表示站i内从站台c换乘到站台d的换乘通道,为简化处理,认为 站内每对端点之间只存在两个通道,这两个通道方向相反,且站内各 个通路之间均相互独立。模型符号如表1所示。In some specific embodiments, the station passage is divided into three parts: inbound passage, transfer passage, and outbound passage:
Figure BDA0002596592180000092
where v i represents the i-th station in the road network, a is the station entrance, b is the station exit, and the station is equivalent to only one entrance and one exit; c, d are the alighting and boarding locations of each rail transit system, that is, the platform,
Figure BDA0002596592180000093
Indicates the inbound passage from entrance a to platform c in station i,
Figure BDA0002596592180000094
represents the outbound channel from platform c to exit b in station i,
Figure BDA0002596592180000095
Indicates the transfer channel from platform c to platform d in station i. In order to simplify the processing, it is considered that there are only two channels between each pair of endpoints in the station, these two channels are in opposite directions, and each channel in the station is independent of each other . Model symbols are shown in Table 1.

表1全局运能风险优化模型相关符号Table 1 Relevant symbols of the global capacity risk optimization model

Figure BDA0002596592180000096
Figure BDA0002596592180000096

Figure BDA0002596592180000101
Figure BDA0002596592180000101

由于在区域轨道交通路网内部存在诸多环路,因此一个OD对可能 对应着众多的可行路径,在一些具体实施例中只考虑前K条最短简单 路径,本算例中取K=5。这K条最短路径通过python中的图形工具求 出。以最小化全局运能风险为目标函数:Since there are many loops in the regional rail transit road network, one OD pair may correspond to many feasible paths. In some specific embodiments, only the first K shortest simple paths are considered. In this example, K=5 is taken. The K shortest paths are obtained by graphical tools in python. The objective function is to minimize the global capacity risk:

Figure BDA0002596592180000102
Figure BDA0002596592180000102

约束条件为:The constraints are:

Figure BDA0002596592180000103
Figure BDA0002596592180000103

Figure BDA0002596592180000104
Figure BDA0002596592180000104

Figure BDA0002596592180000105
Figure BDA0002596592180000105

Figure BDA0002596592180000106
Figure BDA0002596592180000106

Figure BDA0002596592180000107
Figure BDA0002596592180000107

Figure BDA0002596592180000108
Figure BDA0002596592180000108

(式9)用来计算车站进站客流,(式10)用来计算车站出站客流, (式11)用来计算车站换乘客流,(式12)用来计算区间客流,(式13) (式14)表示客流分配约束。模型通过遗传算法求解。(Equation 9) is used to calculate the inbound passenger flow at the station, (Equation 10) is used to calculate the station exit passenger flow, (Equation 11) is used to calculate the station exchange passenger flow, (Equation 12) is used to calculate the section passenger flow, (Equation 13) (Equation 14) represents the passenger flow distribution constraint. The model is solved by a genetic algorithm.

3.基于灵敏度分析的结构风险瓶颈识别方法3. Structural risk bottleneck identification method based on sensitivity analysis

风险评估的目的一方面是为了了解系统整体风险水平,另一方面, 更重要的目的是为了识别系统风险瓶颈所在,以便防护或优化风险瓶 颈点。对于不同的目的,风险识别应该采用不同的方法。第一类方法 针对风险瓶颈点优化的需求,需要找到在同样优化水平下使系统全局 风险降低最多的区间或车站换乘通道即为路网的安全优化瓶颈点,需 要重点优化;第一类方法针对风险瓶颈点防护的需求,需要找到在瓶 颈点失效的条件下使系统全局风险升高最多的区间或车站换乘通道即 为路网的安全防护瓶颈点,需要重点防护。On the one hand, the purpose of risk assessment is to understand the overall risk level of the system, and on the other hand, the more important purpose is to identify where the system risk bottleneck is, so as to prevent or optimize the risk bottleneck point. Risk identification should take different approaches for different purposes. The first type of method is based on the need for optimization of risk bottleneck points. It is necessary to find the interval or station transfer channel that reduces the overall risk of the system under the same optimization level, which is the safety optimization bottleneck point of the road network, and needs to be optimized. The first type of method needs to be optimized. In response to the demand for protection of risk bottleneck points, it is necessary to find the interval or station transfer channel that increases the global risk of the system the most under the condition of failure of the bottleneck point.

第一类灵敏度分析:优化灵敏度Type 1 Sensitivity Analysis: Optimizing Sensitivity

对路网结构采取优化措施提升其通行能力后,路网结构风险会发 生改变;并且不同的路网结构得到同样的优化后,路网结构风险的降 低程度会有区别。将路网结构风险对各通道的通行能力求偏导,得出 各通道优化灵敏度:After taking optimization measures to improve the traffic capacity of the road network structure, the risk of road network structure will change; and after the same optimization of different road network structures, the degree of risk reduction of the road network structure will be different. Taking the partial derivation of the road network structure risk to the traffic capacity of each channel, the optimal sensitivity of each channel is obtained:

Figure BDA0002596592180000111
Figure BDA0002596592180000111

其中S*为路网结构风险,

Figure BDA0002596592180000112
表示通道
Figure BDA0002596592180000113
的优化灵敏度,
Figure BDA0002596592180000114
表示通 道
Figure BDA0002596592180000115
的通行能力。通道优化灵敏度能够直观地表现出此通道的通行能 力得到提升后,路网全局结构风险的降低效果。where S * is the risk of road network structure,
Figure BDA0002596592180000112
Indicates the channel
Figure BDA0002596592180000113
optimized sensitivity,
Figure BDA0002596592180000114
Indicates the channel
Figure BDA0002596592180000115
of traffic capacity. The channel optimization sensitivity can intuitively show the reduction effect of the overall structural risk of the road network after the traffic capacity of this channel is improved.

本实施例在计算中通过差分法近似求解此偏导数,即:In this embodiment, the partial derivative is approximately solved by the difference method, that is:

Figure BDA0002596592180000116
Figure BDA0002596592180000116

其中

Figure BDA0002596592180000117
Figure BDA0002596592180000118
的微小变化量,本实施例取为
Figure BDA0002596592180000119
的十分之一。in
Figure BDA0002596592180000117
for
Figure BDA0002596592180000118
The slight variation of , this embodiment is taken as
Figure BDA0002596592180000119
one-tenth of .

第二类灵敏度分析:失效灵敏度Type II Sensitivity Analysis: Failure Sensitivity

当路网内各通道失效后,路网将重新进行客流分配,此时计算路 网全局结构风险,得到通道能力变化前后路网全局结构风险的比值, 以此衡量通道失效对路网全局结构风险的影响。由于某些通道的失效 将导致某些地点不可达,考虑到非轨道交通还有一定的通行能力,本 实施例将这些通道的通行能力调至较小值(而不是设为0),从而避免 计算中出现无穷大的情况。When each channel in the road network fails, the road network will redistribute the passenger flow. At this time, the global structural risk of the road network is calculated to obtain the ratio of the global structural risk of the road network before and after the change of the channel capacity, so as to measure the global structural risk of the road network caused by the channel failure. Impact. Since the failure of some passages will cause some locations to be unreachable, considering that non-rail traffic still has a certain capacity, this embodiment adjusts the capacity of these passages to a smaller value (instead of setting it to 0), so as to avoid Infinity occurs in the calculation.

Figure BDA0002596592180000121
Figure BDA0002596592180000121

其中

Figure BDA0002596592180000122
为通道
Figure BDA0002596592180000123
的失效风险灵敏度,S*'为通道通行能力变化后路 网全局结构风险,S*为通道通行能力变化之前路网全局结构风险。in
Figure BDA0002596592180000122
for the channel
Figure BDA0002596592180000123
The failure risk sensitivity of , S * ' is the global structural risk of the road network after the change of the passage capacity, and S * is the global structural risk of the road network before the change of the passage capacity.

实例分析Case Analysis

本实施例的实例中的数据来源为:重庆轨道交通集团官网线路信 息(https://www.cqmetro.cn/search-way.html),由重庆市规划局牵头、市交通规 划研究院承担编制的《2018重庆市主城区交通发展年度报告》 (http://ghzrzyj.cq.gov.cn/zwxx_186/bmdt/201912/t20191225_2992986.html)。The data source in the example of this embodiment is: Chongqing Rail Transit Group official website route information (https://www.cqmetro.cn/search-way.html), which is led by the Chongqing Municipal Planning Bureau and compiled by the Municipal Transportation Planning and Research Institute "2018 Annual Report on Traffic Development in Chongqing's Main Urban Area" (http://ghzrzyj.cq.gov.cn/zwxx_186/bmdt/201912/t20191225_2992986.html).

算例场景Example scenario

本实施例以成渝地区为例进行实例研究。图2为重庆区域轨道交 通线路拓扑图。在重庆区域轨道交通线路拓扑图中只保留了区域轨道 交通各线路的始发站、终点站以及换乘站,总共包含了10条线路,42 个站,55个区间,63个进站通道,63个出站通道,56个换乘通道, 涵盖了高速铁路、城际铁路、单轨、地铁四种轨道交通制式。In this embodiment, the Chengdu-Chongqing area is taken as an example to conduct a case study. Figure 2 shows the topology of rail transit lines in Chongqing. In the Chongqing regional rail transit line topology map, only the starting station, the terminal station and the transfer station of each regional rail transit line are retained, including a total of 10 lines, 42 stations, 55 sections, and 63 entry channels. There are 63 outbound channels and 56 transfer channels, covering four types of rail transit systems: high-speed railway, intercity railway, monorail and subway.

数据集data set

本实施例主要给出用于计算路网客流容量的数据及OD需求数据。This embodiment mainly provides the data for calculating the passenger flow capacity of the road network and the OD demand data.

1)车站客流容量的计算依据1) Calculation basis of station passenger flow capacity

本实施例将站点分为大型站、中等站和小型站三种。划分依据为: 通过查询重庆轨道交通各站点线路规划,站内包含三条及以上线路的 为大型站,包含两条线路的为中型站,其余为小型站。三种站的内部 通道的通行能力如表2所示:In this embodiment, the sites are divided into three types: large-scale sites, medium-sized sites, and small-scale sites. The division is based on: By querying the line planning of each station of Chongqing Rail Transit, the stations with three or more lines are large stations, those with two lines are medium-sized stations, and the rest are small stations. The capacity of the internal channels of the three stations is shown in Table 2:

表2站内通道通行能力Table 2 Channel capacity within the station

stand 大型站large station 中型站medium station 小型站small station 进站通道通行能力(人/小时)Passage capacity of pit lane (person/hour) 1280012800 96009600 64006400 出站通道通行能力(人/小时)Outbound channel capacity (person/hour) 1280012800 96009600 64006400 换乘通道通行能力(人/小时)Transfer channel capacity (person/hour) 96009600 64006400 none

2)区间客流容量的计算依据2) Calculation basis of passenger flow capacity in the interval

路网内各线路的运输能力通过各线路的车厢型号、车厢最大编 组数、最小发车间隔求出。重庆轨道交通交通线路信息如表3所示。 成渝客专列车车型为CRH380D,定员数目为1328人,发车间隔为 20min,渝万铁路列车车型为CRH2A,定员人数为623人,发车间隔 为50min。The transportation capacity of each line in the road network is obtained from the type of carriages, the maximum number of carriages, and the minimum departure interval of each line. The information of Chongqing rail transit routes is shown in Table 3. The Chengdu-Chongqing passenger train model is CRH380D, with a capacity of 1,328 people, and the departure interval is 20 minutes; the train model of the Yu-Wan Railway is CRH2A, with a capacity of 623 people, and the departure interval is 50 minutes.

表3线路资料Table 3 Line Information

Figure BDA0002596592180000131
Figure BDA0002596592180000131

3)OD需求数据3) OD demand data

本实施例选取的成渝地区区域轨道交通典型OD需求如表4所示。The typical OD requirements of regional rail transit in the Chengdu-Chongqing area selected in this embodiment are shown in Table 4.

表4成渝地区区域轨道交通典型OD需求Table 4 Typical OD demand of regional rail transit in Chengdu-Chongqing area

Figure BDA0002596592180000141
Figure BDA0002596592180000141

计算流程Calculation process

基于路网容量和OD需求,本实施例采用最优客流分配方法去除 客流分配对路网全局运能风险计算的影响,从而得到路网的全局结 构风险计算结果。全局结构风险的值是在最优客流分配条件下路网 内所有进站通道、出站通道、换乘通道以及区间的风险之和。在求 解失效灵敏度时,将失效后的通道通行能力取为原通行能力的十分 之一。在每一次改变通道通行能力后,路网都将重新进行最优客流 分配,并通过遗传算法求解。本实施例遗传算法的设置参数为:迭 代次数1500,种群规模2000。计算流程图如图3所示。计算过程中用到的参数如表5所示。Based on the road network capacity and OD requirements, this embodiment adopts the optimal passenger flow distribution method to remove the influence of passenger flow distribution on the calculation of the global transport capacity risk of the road network, thereby obtaining the calculation result of the global structural risk of the road network. The value of the global structural risk is the sum of the risks of all inbound corridors, outbound corridors, transfer corridors and sections in the road network under the optimal passenger flow distribution condition. When solving the failure sensitivity, the passage capacity after failure is taken as one tenth of the original capacity. After each change of the passage capacity, the road network will re-distribute the optimal passenger flow and solve it by genetic algorithm. The setting parameters of the genetic algorithm in this embodiment are: the number of iterations is 1500, and the population size is 2000. The calculation flow chart is shown in Figure 3. The parameters used in the calculation process are shown in Table 5.

表5参数表Table 5 Parameter table

Figure BDA0002596592180000151
Figure BDA0002596592180000151

结果分析Result analysis

对路网内的换乘通道进行两类灵敏度分析,得出各换乘通道优 化灵敏度以及失效风险灵敏度,其中影响较大的前十个换乘通道如 表6及表7所示。Two types of sensitivity analysis are carried out on the transfer channels in the road network, and the optimization sensitivity and failure risk sensitivity of each transfer channel are obtained. Among them, the top ten transfer channels with greater influence are shown in Table 6 and Table 7.

表6路网换乘通道优化灵敏度Table 6. Sensitivity of the optimization of the transfer channel of the road network

通道所在站点The site where the channel is located 通道首尾线路The first and last lines of the channel 优化灵敏度Optimize sensitivity 重庆北南Chongqing North and South 3号线-环线Line 3 - Ring Line -12.295-12.295 红旗河沟Hongqihegou 3号线-6号线Line 3-Line 6 -8.014-8.014 重庆北北Chongqing Beibei 城际-4号线Intercity-Line 4 -6.711-6.711 重庆北南Chongqing North and South 3号线-10号线Line 3 - Line 10 -6.112-6.112 五里店Wulidian 环线-6号线Ring Line - Line 6 -5.368-5.368 上新街Shangxin Street 6号线-环线Line 6 - Ring Line -3.267-3.267 大坪Daping 2号线-1号线Line 2-Line 1 -3.243-3.243 重庆北北Chongqing Beibei 城际-10号线Intercity-Line 10 -1.923-1.923 民安大道Min'an Avenue 环线-4号线Ring Line - Line 4 -1.87-1.87 重庆北南Chongqing North and South 10号线-3号线Line 10-Line 3 -1.277 -1.277

表7路网换乘通道失效灵敏度 Table 7 Failure Sensitivity of Transfer Channels in the Road Network

通道所在站点The site where the channel is located 通道首尾线路The first and last lines of the channel 失效灵敏度failure sensitivity 重庆北南Chongqing North and South 3号线-10号线Line 3 - Line 10 1.3531.353 民安大道Min'an Avenue 环线-4号线Ring Line - Line 4 1.1781.178 重庆北北Chongqing Beibei 10号线-高铁Line 10 - High Speed Rail 1.1581.158 小什字Small Shizi 1号线-6号线Line 1-Line 6 1.1551.155 上新街Shangxin Street 环线-6号线Ring Line - Line 6 1.1351.135 重庆北北Chongqing Beibei 城际-10号线Intercity-Line 10 1.1341.134 红旗河沟Hongqihegou 6号线-3号线Line 6-Line 3 1.1251.125 重庆北北Chongqing Beibei 高铁-10号线High Speed Rail-Line 10 1.1221.122 上新街Shangxin Street 6号线-环线Line 6 - Ring Line 1.1211.121 重庆北北Chongqing Beibei 10号线-城际Line 10 - Intercity 1.116 1.116

由结果可见,重庆北站南广场由3号线换乘至环号线的通道需要 重点优化,重庆北站南广场由3号线换乘至10号线的通道需要进行重 点防护。并且重庆北站北广场、重庆北站南广场、上新街、红旗河沟 等站均有多个换乘通道优化灵敏度/失效风险较大,需要针对采取优化 或防护措施。It can be seen from the results that the passage from Line 3 to Huan Line in Chongqing North Station South Square needs to be optimized, and the passage from Chongqing North Station South Square from Line 3 to Line 10 needs to be protected. In addition, Chongqing North Railway Station North Square, Chongqing North Railway Station South Square, Shangxin Street, Hongqihegou and other stations all have multiple transfer channels with high optimization sensitivity/failure risk, and optimization or protective measures need to be taken.

本说明书中描述的主题的实施方式和功能性操作可以在以下中实 施:数字电子电路,有形实施的计算机软件或者固件,计算机硬件,包 括本说明书中公开的结构及其结构等同体,或者上述中的一者以上的组 合。本说明书中描述的主题的实施方式可以被实施为一个或多个计算机 程序,即,一个或多个有形非暂时性程序载体上编码的计算机程序指令 的一个或多个模块,用以被数据处理设备执行或者控制数据处理设备的 操作。The implementations and functional operations of the subject matter described in this specification can be implemented in digital electronic circuits, in tangibly embodied computer software or firmware, in computer hardware, including the structures disclosed in this specification and their structural equivalents, or in A combination of one or more of . Embodiments of the subject matter described in this specification can be implemented as one or more computer programs, ie, one or more modules of computer program instructions encoded on one or more tangible non-transitory program carriers, for processing by data The device performs or controls the operation of the data processing device.

作为替代或者附加,程序指令可以被编码在人工生成的传播信号上, 例如,机器生成的电信号、光信号或者电磁信号,上述信号被生成为编 码信息以传递到用数据处理设备执行的适当的接收器设备。计算机存储 介质可以是机器可读存储装置、机器可读的存储基片、随机或者串行存 取存储器装置或者上述装置中的一种或多种的组合。Alternatively or additionally, the program instructions may be encoded on artificially generated propagated signals, eg, machine-generated electrical, optical or electromagnetic signals, which are generated as encoded information for communication to an appropriate device for execution by a data processing device. receiver device. The computer storage medium can be a machine-readable storage device, a machine-readable storage substrate, a random or serial access memory device, or a combination of one or more of the foregoing.

术语“数据处理设备”包含所有种类的用于处理数据的设备、装 置以及机器,作为实例,包括可编程处理器、计算机或者多重处理器或 者多重计算机。设备可以包括专用逻辑电路,例如,FPGA(现场可编程 门阵列)或者ASIC(专用集成电路)。设备除了包括硬件之外,还可以包 括创建相关计算机程序的执行环境的代码,例如构成处理器固件、协议 栈、数据库管理系统、操作系统或者它们中的一种或多种的组合代码。The term "data processing apparatus" includes all kinds of apparatus, apparatus, and machines for processing data, including, by way of example, programmable processors, computers, or multiple processors or multiple computers. A device may include special purpose logic circuitry, for example, an FPGA (field programmable gate array) or an ASIC (application specific integrated circuit). In addition to hardware, an apparatus may also include code that creates an execution environment for the associated computer program, such as code that constitutes processor firmware, a protocol stack, a database management system, an operating system, or a combination of one or more of these.

计算机程序(还可以被称为或者描述为程序、软件、软件应用、模 块、软件模块、脚本或者代码)可以以任意形式的编程语言而被写出, 包括编译语言或者解释语言或者声明性语言或过程式语言,并且计算机 程序可以以任意形式展开,包括作为独立程序或者作为模块、组件、子 程序或者适于在计算环境中使用的其他单元。计算机程序可以但不必须 对应于文件系统中的文件。程序可以被存储在保存其他程序或者数据的 文件的一部分中,例如,存储在如下中的一个或多个脚本:在标记语言 文档中;在专用于相关程序的单个文件中;或者在多个协同文件中,例 如,存储一个或多个模块、子程序或者代码部分的文件。计算机程序可 以被展开为执行在一个计算机或者多个计算机上,所述计算机位于一处, 或者分布至多个场所并且通过通信网络而互相连接。A computer program (which may also be called or described as a program, software, software application, module, software module, script, or code) may be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted or declarative or A procedural language, and a computer program may be developed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program may, but need not, correspond to a file in a file system. Programs may be stored in a portion of a file that holds other programs or data, for example, one or more scripts stored in a markup language document; in a single file dedicated to the associated program; or in multiple collaborative In a file, for example, a file that stores one or more modules, subroutines, or portions of code. A computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers, which are located at one site, or distributed over multiple sites and interconnected by a communication network.

在本说明书中描述的处理和逻辑流程可以由一个或多个可编程计 算机执行,该计算机通过运算输入数据并且生成输出而执行一个或多个 的计算机程序,以运行函数。处理和逻辑流程还可以由专用逻辑电路, 例如,FPGA(可现场编程门阵列)或者ASIC(专用集成电路)执行,并且设 备也可以被实施为专用逻辑电路。The processes and logic flows described in this specification can be performed by one or more programmable computers executing one or more computer programs to perform functions by operating on input data and generating output. The processes and logic flows can also be performed by, and devices can also be implemented as, special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) or an ASIC (application specific integrated circuit).

适于实行计算机程序的计算机包括并且示例性地可以基于通用微 处理器或者专用微处理器或者上述处理器两者,或者任意其他种类的中 央处理单元。通常地,中央处理单元将接收来自只读存储器或者随机存 取存储器或者这两者的指令和数据。计算机的主要元件是用于运行或者 执行指令的中央处理单元以及用于存储指令和数据的一个或多个存储 器装置。通常地,计算机还将包括或者是可操作性地耦合,以从用于存 储数据的一个或多个大容量存储装置接收数据或者传递数据到大容量 存储装置,或者接收和传递两者,该大容量存储器例如为磁盘、磁光盘 或者光盘。然而,计算机不必须具有这样的装置。此外,计算机可以被 嵌入到另一装置中,例如,移动电话、个人数字助理(PDA)、移动音频 或者视频播放器、游戏主控台、全球定位系统(GPS)接收器或者可移动 存储设备,例如,通用串行总线(USB)闪存盘等。A computer suitable for the execution of a computer program includes, and by way of example may be based on a general purpose microprocessor or a special purpose microprocessor or both, or any other kind of central processing unit. Typically, the central processing unit will receive instructions and data from read-only memory or random access memory, or both. The main elements of a computer are a central processing unit for running or executing instructions and one or more memory devices for storing instructions and data. Typically, a computer will also include, or be operably coupled to receive data from, or transfer data to, one or more mass storage devices for storing data, or both, the The capacity storage is, for example, a magnetic disk, a magneto-optical disk or an optical disk. However, the computer need not have such a device. Additionally, the computer may be embedded in another device, such as a mobile phone, personal digital assistant (PDA), mobile audio or video player, game console, global positioning system (GPS) receiver, or removable storage device, For example, Universal Serial Bus (USB) flash drives, etc.

适于存储计算机程序指令和数据的计算机可读介质包括所有形式 的非易失存储器、介质和存储器装置,作为实例,包括:半导体存储器 装置,例如,EPROM、EEPROM和闪速存储器装置;磁盘,例如,内置硬 盘或者可移动磁盘;磁光盘;CD-ROM和DVD-ROM盘。处理器和存储器可 以补充以或者并入至专用逻辑电路。Computer readable media suitable for storing computer program instructions and data include all forms of non-volatile memory, media and memory devices including, by way of example: semiconductor memory devices such as EPROM, EEPROM and flash memory devices; magnetic disks such as , built-in hard disk or removable disk; magneto-optical disk; CD-ROM and DVD-ROM disks. The processor and memory may be supplemented by or incorporated into special purpose logic circuitry.

Claims (10)

1. A regional rail transit global structure risk bottleneck identification method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
a data acquisition step: acquiring road network structure risk data and channel traffic capacity data;
and a sensitivity data processing step: the optimum sensitivity is calculated according to equation 1, and the failure sensitivity is calculated according to equation 2,
Figure FDA0002596592170000011
wherein S*In order to solve the risk of the road network structure,
Figure FDA0002596592170000012
indicating a channel
Figure FDA0002596592170000013
The sensitivity of the light source is optimized,
Figure FDA0002596592170000014
indicating a channel
Figure FDA0002596592170000015
(ii) a traffic capacity;
Figure FDA0002596592170000016
wherein
Figure FDA0002596592170000017
Is a channel
Figure FDA0002596592170000018
Sensitivity to failure, S*'The risk of the road network structure after the passage traffic capacity is changed;
and (4) outputting a risk bottleneck result: and outputting the optimized sensitivity and the failure sensitivity, namely completing risk bottleneck identification.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the optimal sensitivity is calculated according to equation 2,
Figure FDA0002596592170000019
Wherein,
Figure FDA00025965921700000110
is composed of
Figure FDA00025965921700000111
A slight variation of (2), preferably
Figure FDA00025965921700000112
Is composed of
Figure FDA00025965921700000113
One tenth of the total.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein said step of generating said road network structure risk data comprises:
optimizing an objective function taking the lowest global operation energy risk of the road network as an optimization target by using an optimization algorithm, wherein the objective function is shown as a formula 4:
Figure FDA0002596592170000021
wherein x isi(t) represents the passenger flow demand (in units of: man/hour) at station (or section) i at time t, ci(t) represents the traffic capacity (in: man/hour) of station (or section) i at time t, xi(t)/ci(t) represents the passenger flow demand load of a station (or section) i at time t; (x) is a capacity risk probability function for mapping the passenger flow demand load to the probability of capacity risk occurrence, wi(t) represents the performance risk consequence of the station or section with time t being number i.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein the risk consequence wi(t) is represented by formula 5:
wi(t)=min(xi(t),ci(t)) formula 5.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the performance risk probability function is as shown in equation 6:
Figure FDA0002596592170000023
6. the method of claim 3, wherein the objective function is as shown in equation 7:
Figure FDA0002596592170000024
7. the method of claim 3, wherein the objective function is as shown in equation 8:
Figure FDA0002596592170000025
Wherein, i is 1, … S is station number, k is 1, … T is section number; a is a station entrance, and b is a station exit; c and d are the getting-on and getting-off points of each rail transit system; (x) a function representing the probability of performance risk;
Figure FDA0002596592170000031
indicating a channel
Figure FDA0002596592170000032
The OD requirement of (a) is,
Figure FDA0002596592170000033
indicating a channel
Figure FDA0002596592170000034
The capacity of the vehicle to pass through,
Figure FDA0002596592170000035
indicating a channel
Figure FDA0002596592170000036
Risk consequences of the performance risk;
Figure FDA0002596592170000037
indicating a channel
Figure FDA0002596592170000038
The OD requirement of (a) is,
Figure FDA0002596592170000039
indicating a channel
Figure FDA00025965921700000310
The capacity of the vehicle to pass through,
Figure FDA00025965921700000311
indicating a channel
Figure FDA00025965921700000312
Risk consequences of the performance risk;
Figure FDA00025965921700000313
indicating a channel
Figure FDA00025965921700000314
The OD requirement of (a) is,
Figure FDA00025965921700000315
indicating a channel
Figure FDA00025965921700000316
The capacity of the vehicle to pass through,
Figure FDA00025965921700000317
indicating a channel
Figure FDA00025965921700000318
Risk consequences of the performance risk; q. q.skRepresents a section ekOD requirement of (1), LkRepresents a section ekTraffic capacity of WkRepresenting the risk consequences of the capacity risk of the interval k.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the constraints of the objective function include equation 9 for calculating station inbound traffic; equation 10 for calculating station outbound passenger flow, equation 11 for calculating station transfer passenger flow, equation 12 for calculating block passenger flow, equations 13 and 14 representing passenger flow distribution constraints:
Figure FDA00025965921700000319
wherein,
Figure FDA00025965921700000320
for decision variables, the representation is assigned to path pij mThe OD requirement of (a) is,
Figure FDA00025965921700000321
representing station viPath from point a to point c, p ij mRepresenting the mth simple path from station i to station j, g (a, p) representing that a is a certain channel or section in the network, and p is a simple path, if a is on the path p, g (a, p) is 1, otherwise (a, p) is 0;
Figure FDA00025965921700000322
wherein x isji mFor decision variables, the representation is assigned to path pji mThe OD requirement of (1);
Figure FDA00025965921700000323
wherein x isnj mRepresenting decision variables, representing assignment to paths pnj mThe OD requirement of (1);
Figure FDA0002596592170000041
wherein,
Figure FDA0002596592170000042
for decision variables, the representation is assigned to path pij mOD requirement of (e)kDenotes the k-th interval, pij mRepresents the mth simple path from station i to station j;
Figure FDA0002596592170000043
Figure FDA0002596592170000044
wherein q isijIndicating the OD requirements of station i to station j.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the model of the objective function that minimizes global operational risk is: an undirected graph G (V, E) represents a regional rail transit road network, wherein V is a set formed by all stations in the road network, and E is a set formed by all intervals in the road network; there are S stations and T intervals altogether in the road network, viIndicates the ith station, ekIs the kth section, where i 1.. S is the station number, k 1.. T is the section number.
10. A regional rail transit global structure risk bottleneck identification system, the system comprising at least one processor; and
A memory storing instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, perform the method according to any one of claims 1-8.
CN202010711200.3A 2020-07-22 2020-07-22 Regional rail transit global structure risk bottleneck identification method and system Active CN111861219B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010711200.3A CN111861219B (en) 2020-07-22 2020-07-22 Regional rail transit global structure risk bottleneck identification method and system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010711200.3A CN111861219B (en) 2020-07-22 2020-07-22 Regional rail transit global structure risk bottleneck identification method and system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN111861219A true CN111861219A (en) 2020-10-30
CN111861219B CN111861219B (en) 2024-09-24

Family

ID=72949204

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202010711200.3A Active CN111861219B (en) 2020-07-22 2020-07-22 Regional rail transit global structure risk bottleneck identification method and system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN111861219B (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112488568A (en) * 2020-12-14 2021-03-12 上海工程技术大学 Method for evaluating large passenger flow operation risk of subway station and application thereof

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140019194A1 (en) * 2012-07-12 2014-01-16 Bank Of America Predictive Key Risk Indicator Identification Process Using Quantitative Methods
CN108345983A (en) * 2018-01-04 2018-07-31 北京轨道交通路网管理有限公司 The appraisal procedure of road network operation security situation and risk, device and processor
CN109872008A (en) * 2019-03-13 2019-06-11 清华大学 Safety assessment and enhancement method of urban rail transit road network based on passenger flow distribution
CN110879575A (en) * 2018-08-29 2020-03-13 西门子科技与服务私人有限公司 Computer realization method and sensitivity analysis system of sensitivity analysis

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140019194A1 (en) * 2012-07-12 2014-01-16 Bank Of America Predictive Key Risk Indicator Identification Process Using Quantitative Methods
CN108345983A (en) * 2018-01-04 2018-07-31 北京轨道交通路网管理有限公司 The appraisal procedure of road network operation security situation and risk, device and processor
CN110879575A (en) * 2018-08-29 2020-03-13 西门子科技与服务私人有限公司 Computer realization method and sensitivity analysis system of sensitivity analysis
CN109872008A (en) * 2019-03-13 2019-06-11 清华大学 Safety assessment and enhancement method of urban rail transit road network based on passenger flow distribution

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
俞礼军;杨灿杰;: "随机路网中风险爱好出行者的路径选择分析", 华南理工大学学报(自然科学版), no. 12, 15 December 2015 (2015-12-15), pages 133 - 138 *
孙家臣;王海燕;任瑶;杨家其;: "西非铝矾土进口海运供应链风险评估", 上海船舶运输科学研究所学报, no. 01, 30 March 2020 (2020-03-30), pages 74 - 80 *
陈洪波;王宁;王建西;: "基于三角模糊云贝叶斯网络的盾构下穿段施工风险评估", 国防交通工程与技术, no. 03, 19 May 2020 (2020-05-19), pages 17 - 22 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112488568A (en) * 2020-12-14 2021-03-12 上海工程技术大学 Method for evaluating large passenger flow operation risk of subway station and application thereof

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN111861219B (en) 2024-09-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN109543934B (en) Evaluation method of comprehensive index of urban bus network
CN111401614B (en) Dynamic passenger flow distribution method and system for urban rail transit
CN108846514B (en) Method for predicting demand of rail transit passenger flow evacuation in emergency
CN112465205B (en) Rail transit train running density optimization method for single-wire multi-station cooperative current limiting
CN107403235A (en) Rail traffic platform passenger waits position inducible system and method
CN109872008B (en) Safety assessment and enhancement method of urban rail transit road network based on passenger flow distribution
CN112906179B (en) An optimization method for passenger flow control of urban rail transit based on fluid queuing network
CN115049156B (en) Traffic line network operation diagram linkage optimization method, electronic equipment and storage medium
CN113762598B (en) Comprehensive transportation hub emergency evacuation vehicle path planning method
CN111861219A (en) A method and system for identifying global structural risk bottlenecks in regional rail transit
Gong et al. Equity‐Oriented Train Timetabling with Collaborative Passenger Flow Control: A Spatial Rebalance of Service on an Oversaturated Urban Rail Transit Line
CN113362208A (en) Multi-station cooperative current limiting method for urban rail transit network
d'Ariano et al. Simulation and optimization for railway operations management
CN113408859B (en) Urban rail transit line passenger flow and train matching method considering passenger flow management and control measures
CN111723991B (en) Prediction and evaluation method for impact influence of large-scale movable scattered field passenger flow on subway station
CN113935595A (en) Urban rail transit road network peak large passenger flow dredging system
CN118618457A (en) A station flow limiting and train operation optimization method and system under a reservation entry mechanism
CN112465396B (en) Bus scheduling method and system based on station events along line
CN111754071A (en) A global safety enhancement method for regional rail transit
DONG et al. Potential assessment and renewal strategy for regenerating urban abandoned railways: The case study of the Dalian Locomotive Factory Railway Line
CN116822762B (en) Metro network system stability monitoring control method, system and equipment
Zhang et al. A study of metro organization based on multi-objective programming and hybrid genetic algorithm
Xue et al. Cooperative optimization of bus-subway-shared bicycle based on uncertainty theory
CN118365092B (en) A subway congestion relief method and system based on prediction data
CN113779741B (en) Modeling method for service evolution model of rail transit system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant