CN111861137A - Parallel Multi-objective Scheduling Method for Cascade Reservoir Groups - Google Patents
Parallel Multi-objective Scheduling Method for Cascade Reservoir Groups Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN111861137A CN111861137A CN202010595689.2A CN202010595689A CN111861137A CN 111861137 A CN111861137 A CN 111861137A CN 202010595689 A CN202010595689 A CN 202010595689A CN 111861137 A CN111861137 A CN 111861137A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- formula
- reservoir
- individual
- constraint
- population
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 41
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 35
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 18
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 61
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 21
- 238000010248 power generation Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000035772 mutation Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 241000257303 Hymenoptera Species 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 235000012907 honey Nutrition 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- NAWXUBYGYWOOIX-SFHVURJKSA-N (2s)-2-[[4-[2-(2,4-diaminoquinazolin-6-yl)ethyl]benzoyl]amino]-4-methylidenepentanedioic acid Chemical compound C1=CC2=NC(N)=NC(N)=C2C=C1CCC1=CC=C(C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(=C)C(O)=O)C(O)=O)C=C1 NAWXUBYGYWOOIX-SFHVURJKSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000010606 normalization Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000010187 selection method Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 claims 1
- 238000007599 discharging Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 abstract description 11
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 abstract description 4
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 abstract description 2
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005611 electricity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000008239 natural water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004886 process control Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0631—Resource planning, allocation, distributing or scheduling for enterprises or organisations
- G06Q10/06312—Adjustment or analysis of established resource schedule, e.g. resource or task levelling, or dynamic rescheduling
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N3/00—Computing arrangements based on biological models
- G06N3/004—Artificial life, i.e. computing arrangements simulating life
- G06N3/006—Artificial life, i.e. computing arrangements simulating life based on simulated virtual individual or collective life forms, e.g. social simulations or particle swarm optimisation [PSO]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/06—Energy or water supply
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Computational Linguistics (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Computing Systems (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mathematical Physics (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Feedback Control In General (AREA)
Abstract
梯级水库群并行多目标调度方法,属于水电站管理技术,尤其是一种梯级水库群水电能源优化运行管理方法。采用基于Fork/Join并行计算的多目标蜂群算法进行梯级水库群多目标调度模型求解,并通过启发式约束修补策略处理水库群调度过程中各种时段间耦合约束。该方法可快速生成一组分布广泛且均匀的多目标非劣调度方案集,为梯级水库群多目标调度决策提供有力的理论与技术支撑。该方法结合多目标随机并行优化、多重复杂约束启发式修正等高效求解模式,一次求解即可得到在多维目标域空间分布广泛和均匀的非劣调度方案集,为流域梯级水库群联合调度运行提供有力支撑。
The invention discloses a parallel multi-objective dispatching method for cascade reservoir groups, belonging to the hydropower station management technology, in particular to a hydropower energy optimization operation management method for cascade reservoir groups. The multi-objective bee colony algorithm based on Fork/Join parallel computing is used to solve the multi-objective scheduling model of cascade reservoir groups, and the heuristic constraint repair strategy is used to deal with the coupling constraints between various time periods in the process of reservoir group scheduling. This method can quickly generate a set of widely distributed and uniform multi-objective non-inferior dispatching scheme sets, which provides strong theoretical and technical support for multi-objective dispatching decision-making of cascade reservoir groups. This method combines multi-objective stochastic parallel optimization, multiple complex constraint heuristic correction and other efficient solution modes, and a set of non-inferior scheduling schemes that are widely and uniformly distributed in the multi-dimensional target domain space can be obtained in one solution, which provides a basis for the joint scheduling operation of cascade reservoir groups in the basin. Strong support.
Description
技术领域technical field
本发明属于水电站管理技术,尤其是一种梯级水库群水电能源优化运行管理方法。The invention belongs to the hydropower station management technology, in particular to a hydropower energy optimization operation management method for cascade reservoir groups.
背景技术Background technique
梯级水库群联合优化调度必须综合考虑防洪、发电、供水、航运、生态需水和电网安全 等相互竞争、不可公度的调度目标,是一类多因素、多层次、多阶段的复杂多目标优化问题。 目前,已有基于传统运筹学的经典数学建模方法,普遍通过引入目标权重系数或目标约束化 的形式,将多目标问题转化为单目标问题进行求解,这种方式往往局限于获取单一或少量非 劣调度解集,难以充分反映各调度目标间的竞争与制约关系,特别是在处理具有非凸、非连 续多目标前沿特性的调度问题时,模型计算得到的非劣调度方案集不能很好反映实际非劣前 沿特性。并且,受水文气象、径流过程、电站调度模式、机组动态特性等诸多因素影响,梯 级水库群联合优化调度问题呈现出典型的大规模、强耦合、多约束、动态、离散的复杂非线 性特性,基于传统运筹学的经典数学建模方法在求解此类问题时显得十分困难,且受问题求 解复杂度影响,算法执行效率往往不高。The joint optimal dispatching of cascade reservoirs must comprehensively consider the competing and incommensurable dispatching objectives such as flood control, power generation, water supply, shipping, ecological water demand and power grid security. question. At present, there are classical mathematical modeling methods based on traditional operations research, which generally convert multi-objective problems into single-objective problems by introducing objective weight coefficients or objective constraints. The non-inferior scheduling solution set is difficult to fully reflect the competition and constraint relationship between scheduling objectives, especially when dealing with scheduling problems with non-convex and non-continuous multi-objective frontier characteristics, the non-inferior scheduling solution set calculated by the model cannot be very good. Reflects the actual non-inferior frontier characteristics. In addition, affected by many factors such as hydrometeorology, runoff process, power station dispatching mode, and dynamic characteristics of units, the joint optimal dispatching problem of cascade reservoir groups presents typical large-scale, strong coupling, multi-constrained, dynamic and discrete complex nonlinear characteristics. The classical mathematical modeling method based on traditional operations research is very difficult to solve such problems, and the algorithm execution efficiency is often not high due to the complexity of problem solving.
发明内容SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
针对基于传统运筹学的经典数学建模方法难以满足复杂约束条件下流域梯级水库群多目 标调度问题求解要求,提出一种梯级水库群并行多目标调度求解方法,该方法结合多目标随 机并行优化、多重复杂约束启发式修正等高效求解模式,一次求解即可得到在多维目标域空 间分布广泛和均匀的非劣调度方案集,为流域梯级水库群联合调度运行提供有力支撑。Aiming at the fact that the classical mathematical modeling method based on traditional operations research is difficult to meet the multi-objective scheduling problem of cascade reservoir groups in the basin under complex constraints, a parallel multi-objective scheduling solution method for cascade reservoir groups is proposed, which combines multi-objective stochastic parallel optimization, Efficient solution modes such as heuristic correction of multiple complex constraints can obtain a set of non-inferior scheduling schemes that are widely and uniformly distributed in the multi-dimensional target domain space in one solution, providing strong support for the joint scheduling operation of cascade reservoir groups in the basin.
梯级水库群并行多目标调度方法,具体步骤如下:The parallel multi-objective scheduling method for cascade reservoir groups, the specific steps are as follows:
S1,设定水电站群特征参数并初始化算法控制参数,包括精英档案集EliteSet容量NQ、 种群大小NP、算法最大进化代数Gmax以及侦查蜂启动次数Limitabandon;设定算法当前进化代 数g=1;S1, set the characteristic parameters of the hydropower station group and initialize the control parameters of the algorithm, including the EliteSet capacity NQ, the population size NP, the maximum evolution algebra G max of the algorithm, and the number of scout bee starts Limit abandon ; set the current evolution algebra of the algorithm g=1;
S2,构造并初始化NP个种群个体,式(1):S2, construct and initialize NP population individuals, formula (1):
式中,xr为第r个个体;为个体编码;N为梯级水库个数;T为时段数;In the formula, x r is the r-th individual; is the individual code; N is the number of cascade reservoirs; T is the number of time periods;
S3,水库调度约束处理,采用下述式(2)-(7)判断个体是否满足约束,对不满足约束 的种群个体,用式(8)、式(9)逐一对个体中的水电站群时段水位进行修正;S3, Reservoir scheduling constraint processing, the following formulas (2)-(7) are used to determine whether the individual satisfies the constraints. For the population individuals that do not meet the constraints, formulas (8) and (9) are used to pair the time periods of the hydropower station group in the individual one by one. Correct the water level;
①梯级水力联系式(2): ① Cascade hydraulic connection formula (2):
式中,Ii,t为i水库t时段入库流量;τi-1为i-1与i水库间水流时滞;为i-1水库在 t-τi-1时段弃水流量;Ri,t为i-1与i水库间区间入流;In the formula, I i,t is the inflow flow of reservoir i at period t; τ i-1 is the time delay of water flow between i-1 and reservoir i; R i,t is the inflow between the
②水库水量平衡约束(3):Vi,t=Vi,t-1+(Ii,t-Qi,t-Si,t)·Δt;②Reservoir water balance constraint (3): V i,t =V i,t-1 +(I i,t -Q i,t -S i,t )·Δt;
式中,Vi,t为i水库t时段末库容;In the formula, Vi ,t is the storage capacity of reservoir i at the end of period t;
③水位/流量/出力约束式(4):③Water level/flow/output constraint (4):
式中,Pi,t为i水库t时段出力;与Zi,t 、与Qi,t 、与Pi,t 分别为i水库t时段水位、 出库和出力边界;In the formula, P i,t is the output of reservoir i in period t; with Z i,t , with Q i,t , and P i,t are the water level, outgoing and outgoing boundaries of reservoir i at time t, respectively;
④水位/流量/出力变幅约束式(5):④Water level/flow/output variable amplitude constraint formula (5):
式中,ΔZi、ΔQi、ΔPi分别为i水库水位、流量和出力变幅限制;In the formula, ΔZ i , ΔQ i , and ΔP i are the limits of the water level, flow, and output variation of reservoir i, respectively;
⑤水库运行水头约束式(6): ⑤ Reservoir operating head constraint (6):
式中,Hi,t为i水库t时段水头,Hi,t分别为水库稳定运行水头上下限;In the formula, H i,t is the water head of reservoir i during t period, H i, t are the upper and lower limits of the water head for stable operation of the reservoir, respectively;
⑥水库期初、期末水位控制约束式(7): ⑥ Reservoir water level control constraint formula (7) at the beginning and end of the period:
式中,Zi,0、Zi,T、和为i水库调度期初、期末水位及其控制值;In the formula, Z i,0 , Z i,T , and is the water level and its control value at the beginning and end of the dispatching period of the i reservoir;
⑦水位约束廊道生成方法式(8):⑦The generation method of the water level constraint corridor is formula (8):
⑧水位约束廊道生成方法式(9):⑧ Generation method of water level constraint corridor (9):
式中,和分别为t时段末库容和初库容计算函数;和 为下泄流量和出力特征值,其设定为流量和出力的上下边界值;In the formula, and are the calculation functions of the storage capacity at the end of the period t and the initial storage capacity, respectively; and is the characteristic value of discharge flow and output, which is set as the upper and lower boundary values of flow and output;
S4,计算不同种群个体目标适应度值,并进行目标适应度值归一化处理,并基于个体目 标适应度值对种群个体进行非支配排序;将种群中第一层级所有非支配个体加入EliteSet中;S4: Calculate the target fitness values of individuals of different populations, normalize the target fitness values, and perform non-dominated sorting on the population individuals based on the individual target fitness values; add all non-dominated individuals in the first level of the population to EliteSet ;
个体适应度以梯级水库群总发电量最大和各梯级下游河道总的生态缺水量最小为调度目 标,目标函数分别描述为式(10)和式(11):The individual fitness takes the maximum total power generation of cascade reservoirs and the minimum total ecological water shortage of each cascade downstream river as the scheduling objective. The objective functions are described as equations (10) and (11) respectively:
式(10):Formula (10):
式(11):Formula (11):
式中,E为梯级水库群总发电量;Pi,t、Qi,t、Hi,t分别为i水库t时段发电出力、下泄流量 和平均水头;N为梯级水库个数;T、ΔT分别为时段数和时段长;W为梯级生态缺水量;为i水库t时段下泄流量与其下游河道适宜生态需求流量的差值;为t时段i电站下游河道 的适宜生态流量;In the formula, E is the total power generation of cascade reservoirs; P i,t , Qi ,t , H i,t are the power generation output, discharge flow and average water head of reservoir i in t period respectively; N is the number of cascade reservoirs; T, ΔT is the number of periods and the length of the period, respectively; W is the cascade ecological water shortage; is the difference between the discharge flow of the i reservoir and the suitable ecological demand flow of the downstream river channel during t period; is the suitable ecological flow of the river downstream of the i power station in period t;
式(10)和式(11)目标函数间量纲不同,归一化处理,使其成为无量纲函数值;调度目标归一化按式(12)进行计算:Equation (10) and Equation (11) have different dimensions between the objective functions, which are normalized to make it a dimensionless function value; the normalization of the scheduling objective is calculated according to Equation (12):
式(12):Formula (12):
式中,x r 为进化种群中第r个个体;Er、Wr分别r号个体的年发电量和缺水量;Emax和Emin、和分别表示种群中所有个体年发电量和缺水量最大值和最小值;In the formula, x r is the r-th individual in the evolutionary population; Er and W r are the annual power generation and water shortage of individual r, respectively; E max and E min , and represent the maximum and minimum annual power generation and water shortage of all individuals in the population, respectively;
S5,种群进化,包括雇佣蜂阶段、观察蜂阶段和侦查蜂阶段的进化;S5, population evolution, including the evolution of the employed bee stage, the observation bee stage and the scout bee stage;
①雇佣蜂阶段:雇佣蜂阶段通过式(13)-(16)“搜索机制”探寻新的蜜源,并利用式(8)、式(9)对新生成的个体进行约束处理;比较新生成的个体与原始个体的优劣性,采用贪婪策略选择优秀个体至下一代种群中;对EliteSet进行更新及维护,将精英候选个体添加 进EliteSet;①Employment bee stage: The hired bee stage searches for new nectar sources through the "search mechanism" of formulas (13)-(16), and uses formulas (8) and (9) to constrain the newly generated individuals; Based on the pros and cons of the individual and the original individual, the greedy strategy is used to select excellent individuals into the next generation population; the EliteSet is updated and maintained, and the elite candidate individuals are added to the EliteSet;
式(13):Formula (13):
式中,eq,d为从精英档案集EliteSet中随机选择的精英个体q的第l个分量(EliteSet中精 英个体随种群进化过程逐步更新);为第r个变异个体的第l个分量;r1,r2,r3,r4为[0,NP] 内互异的随机整数,NP为种群个数;gc为算法进化代数;Fr∈(0,1)为变异因子;In the formula, e q,d is the lth component of the elite individual q randomly selected from the elite archive set EliteSet (the elite individuals in the EliteSet are gradually updated with the evolution of the population); is the l-th component of the r-th mutant individual; r1, r2, r3, r4 are mutually different random integers in [0, NP], NP is the population number; gc is the algorithm evolution algebra; F r ∈ (0, 1) is the variation factor;
式(14):Formula (14):
式中,为均值为0、标准差为σr的高斯随机变量;Γ[eq]distance为精英个体q在 EliteSet中的拥挤距离,Γmax为EliteSet中个体的最大拥挤距离;In the formula, is a Gaussian random variable with a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of σ r ; Γ[e q ] distance is the crowding distance of the elite individual q in the EliteSet, and Γ max is the maximum crowding distance of the individual in the EliteSet;
式(15):Formula (15):
式(16):Formula (16):
式(15)、(16)中,为第r个原始个体的第l个分量;rnd(r)是[0,1]的随机数;rndr(l) 为{0,1,...,NP}内随机产生的整数;CR∈(0,1)为交叉因子,CRini取值为0.15;In formulas (15) and (16), is the l-th component of the r-th original individual; rnd(r) is a random number in [0,1]; rndr(l) is a randomly generated integer in {0,1,...,NP}; CR∈ (0,1) is the crossover factor, and the value of CR ini is 0.15;
式(15)、式(16)是为提高种群的多样性,避免算法陷入局部最优,对变异后与变异前 的个体进行交叉操作生成新的个体;Equations (15) and (16) are to improve the diversity of the population and avoid the algorithm falling into local optimum, and perform crossover operations on individuals after mutation and before mutation to generate new individuals;
变异和交叉操作完成后,采用贪婪策略选择与中的较优个体进入下一代种群,并对 精英档案集EliteSet进行更新维护;After mutation and crossover operations are completed, a greedy strategy is used to select and The better individuals in the group enter the next generation population, and update and maintain the elite archive set EliteSet;
②观察蜂阶段,利用式(17)计算雇佣蜂对应蜜源被选择的概率值,用轮盘选择法确定 跟随目标,运用与雇佣蜂相同的方法进行邻域搜索;对EliteSet进行更新及维护计算过程中, 采用Fork/Join并行计算模式对个体约束处理、适用度计算、精英个体更新主任务进行分解归 并;② In the observation bee stage, use the formula (17) to calculate the probability value of the recruited bees corresponding to the selected nectar source, use the roulette selection method to determine the following target, and use the same method as the hired bee to perform neighborhood search; update and maintain the EliteSet calculation process In the Fork/Join parallel computing mode, the main tasks of individual constraint processing, fitness calculation, and elite individual update are decomposed and merged;
式(17):Formula (17):
式中,pr为种群中第r个雇佣蜂被选中的概率;voilationj为第j号雇佣蜂的约束破坏深 度;ε为对约束破坏深度进行评判的可行裕度;Nv为不可行解的个数(当雇佣蜂个体约束破 坏深度大于ε时,个体被判定为不可行解);Nd为可行解的个数;In the formula, p r is the probability that the rth hired bee in the population is selected; Voilation j is the constraint destruction depth of the jth hired bee; ε is the feasible margin for evaluating the constraint destruction depth; Nv is the infeasible solution. The number (when the individual constraint destruction depth of the employed bee is greater than ε, the individual is judged as an infeasible solution); Nd is the number of feasible solutions;
③侦查蜂阶段:若某一个雇佣蜂在Limitabandon内未能得到更新,则将该雇佣蜂变为侦查 蜂,通过随机搜索探寻新解。③ Scout bee stage: If a hired bee fails to be updated within Limit abandon , the hired bee will be turned into a scouting bee, and a new solution will be found through random search.
S6:假如g<Gmax,令g=g+1,转至S5;否则,求解完成,将EliteSet作为多目标调 度问题的Pareto最优前沿输出。S6: If g<G max , let g=g+1, go to S5; otherwise, the solution is completed, and the EliteSet is output as the Pareto optimal frontier of the multi-objective scheduling problem.
在本发明的方法中,应用多目标蜂群算法求解流域梯级水库群多目标调度模型时,选取 水库坝前水位作为决策变量进行个体编码,个体粒子为各水库逐时段水位过程,在可行域内 随机初始化NP个个体。而在模型求解过程中,根据水位过程进行“以水定电”仿真计算, 确定水电站各时段水位及下泄流量过程。水库时段出力和水位蓄泄过程控制需综合考虑天然 来水条件、上游出库情况、自身运行方式、电力系统需求等因素,时段以及时段间复杂约束 交织,处理十分困难。为解决这一问题,采用一种基于约束廊道的启发式策略用于处理水库 群调度过程中面临的各种时段间耦合约束,通过水量平衡方程将水库下泄流量约束、出力约 束转换为对水位的限制,并与水库调度期特征水位取交集,形成水位约束廊道。在寻优过程 中,当种群个体决策变量超出该水位廊道边界时,直接将其修正至边界值,以保证种群个体 可行性,有效提高算法寻优效率。In the method of the present invention, when applying the multi-objective bee colony algorithm to solve the multi-objective scheduling model of the cascade reservoir group in the watershed, the water level in front of the reservoir dam is selected as the decision variable for individual coding. Initialize NP individuals. In the process of model solution, the simulation calculation of "determining electricity by water" is carried out according to the water level process, and the water level and discharge flow process of the hydropower station in each period are determined. Reservoir output and water level storage and discharge process control need to comprehensively consider factors such as natural water conditions, upstream discharge conditions, its own operation mode, power system demand, etc., and complex constraints are intertwined between time periods and time periods, which is very difficult to deal with. In order to solve this problem, a heuristic strategy based on constraint corridors is used to deal with various inter-period coupling constraints faced in the process of reservoir group scheduling. and take the intersection with the characteristic water level of the reservoir during the dispatch period to form a water level constraint corridor. In the optimization process, when the individual decision variable of the population exceeds the boundary of the water level corridor, it is directly corrected to the boundary value to ensure the feasibility of the individual population and effectively improve the optimization efficiency of the algorithm.
在将和取流量和出力的上下边界值进行逐时段正反推计算时,可获得水库在不 同运行工况下的水位边界与逐时段将与 求取交集,即可生成决策变量约束廊道 此外,在模型求解过程中,为避免算法陷入局部最优,在推求不同 种群个体水位约束廊道时,可令其中a,b∈(0,1),使种群个体所反 映的调度方案能覆盖整个解空间,以提高种群多样性。in will and When the upper and lower boundary values of flow and output are used for forward and reverse calculation period by period, the water level boundary of the reservoir under different operating conditions can be obtained. and Period by period will be and By finding the intersection, the decision variable constraint corridor can be generated In addition, in the process of model solving, in order to avoid the algorithm falling into local optimum, when estimating the individual water level constraint corridors of different populations, the Among them, a,b∈(0,1), so that the scheduling scheme reflected by the individual population can cover the entire solution space, so as to improve the diversity of the population.
技术方案中利用多目标蜂群算法解决梯级水库群多目标优化调度建模问题,将精英档案 集(EliteSet)以及自适应动态参数控制等策略引入到算法寻优过程中,使得新个体从精英个 体以及其他个体中吸收了更多的信息,有效提高种群多样性,增强算法全局搜索能力。计算 过程中,雇佣蜂在邻域内对蜜源进行搜索,通过在精英个体基础上引入随机扰动的方式实现 变异操作。通常,Fr的取值会影响算法收敛速度,为提高算法收敛能力,可采用高斯随机变 量对Fr进行自适应动态控制。同时,为提高种群的多样性,避免算法陷入局部最优,利用对 变异后与变异前的个体进行交叉操作生成新的个体。在多目标蜂群算法雇佣蜂阶段和观察蜂 阶段,种群中单个个体的约束处理和适应度计算可看作独立的计算流程,可用Fork/Join多线 程并行计算模式对该部分主任务进行分解,将分解后的子种群约束处理和适应度操作作为线 程加入线程池中并行处理。在梯级水库群多目标调度问题求解过程中,可生成具有M个线程 (线程数最好与计算机逻辑线程数相当)的线程池,每个线程中开辟内存空间用以存储NP/M (NP为多目标蜂群算法种群个数)个个体及其中间计算结果。In the technical scheme, the multi-objective bee colony algorithm is used to solve the multi-objective optimization scheduling modeling problem of cascade reservoir groups, and strategies such as EliteSet and adaptive dynamic parameter control are introduced into the algorithm optimization process, so that new individuals can be transformed from elite individuals into the optimization process. And other individuals absorb more information, effectively improve the diversity of the population, and enhance the global search ability of the algorithm. During the calculation process, the hired bees search for the nectar source in the neighborhood, and realize the mutation operation by introducing random disturbances on the basis of elite individuals. Usually, the value of Fr will affect the convergence speed of the algorithm. In order to improve the convergence ability of the algorithm, a Gaussian random variable can be used for adaptive dynamic control of Fr. At the same time, in order to improve the diversity of the population and avoid the algorithm falling into local optimum, new individuals are generated by the crossover operation between the individuals after mutation and those before mutation. In the multi-objective bee colony algorithm hiring bee stage and observation bee stage, the constraint processing and fitness calculation of a single individual in the population can be regarded as an independent calculation process. The decomposed subpopulation constraint processing and fitness operations are added as threads to the thread pool for parallel processing. In the process of solving the multi-objective scheduling problem of cascade reservoir groups, a thread pool with M threads (the number of threads is preferably equal to the number of computer logical threads) can be generated, and a memory space is opened in each thread to store NP/M (NP is Multi-objective bee colony algorithm population number) individuals and their intermediate calculation results.
发明与现有技术相比,具有以下优点和有益效果:Compared with the prior art, the invention has the following advantages and beneficial effects:
1、本发明通过基于Fork/Join并行框架的多目标蜂群算法对梯级水库群多目标调度模型 求解模式进行改进,采用多线程并行计算方式有效提高了算法执行效率;针对梯级水库群多 目标调度的时空耦合关联特性和多重复杂约束条件,设计了自适应寻优机制和相应的启发式 约束修补策略以提升算法搜索性能及鲁棒性,切实保证优化结果质量,使算法具有良好的实 用性和工程可操作性。1. The present invention improves the solution mode of the multi-objective scheduling model of cascade reservoir groups through the multi-objective bee colony algorithm based on the Fork/Join parallel framework, and adopts the multi-thread parallel computing method to effectively improve the execution efficiency of the algorithm; for multi-objective scheduling of cascade reservoir groups The spatio-temporal coupling correlation characteristics and multiple complex constraints are designed, and an adaptive optimization mechanism and a corresponding heuristic constraint repair strategy are designed to improve the search performance and robustness of the algorithm, effectively ensure the quality of the optimization results, and make the algorithm have good practicability and reliability. Engineering operability.
2、本发明提出的并行多目标调度求解方法计算速度快,计算效率高,且一次求解即可获 得在解空间内分布均匀且广泛的非劣调度方案集,在相同的运行环境中运行时间和解的质量 远优于传统基于运筹学的建模方法。2. The parallel multi-objective scheduling solution method proposed by the present invention has fast calculation speed and high calculation efficiency, and a set of non-inferior scheduling schemes that are uniformly distributed and widely distributed in the solution space can be obtained in one solution. The quality is far superior to traditional operations research-based modeling methods.
附图说明Description of drawings
图1为梯级水库群多目标调度模型求解流程图。Fig. 1 is the flow chart of solving the multi-objective dispatching model of cascade reservoir groups.
图2为实施例1多目标调度非劣解前沿图。FIG. 2 is a front view of a non-inferior solution of multi-objective scheduling in
具体实施方式Detailed ways
实施例1:以老挝南欧江流域梯级电站为例进行多目标发电—生态调度模拟。Example 1: Multi-objective power generation-ecological dispatch simulation was carried out by taking the cascade power station in the Nam Ou River basin in Laos as an example.
选取98%频率来水,即特枯来水,如表1所列作为模型输入,采用提出的MOBCO算法对水库群发电多目标优化调度模型进行求解,算法参数设置如下,计算得到梯级电站非劣调 度方案集;Selecting 98% frequency inflow water, that is, extremely dry inflow water, as listed in Table 1 as the model input, the proposed MOBCO algorithm is used to solve the multi-objective optimal scheduling model of the reservoir group power generation. The algorithm parameters are set as follows, and the calculation results of the cascade power station are scheduling scheme set;
种群大小NP=100;Population size NP=100;
精英档案集容量NQ=30;Elite file set capacity NQ=30;
最大进化代数Gmax=600;The maximum evolutionary generation G max = 600;
蜜源废弃计时Limitabandon=10;Honey source abandonment timer Limit abandon = 10;
LS最大迭代次数kmax=20;LS maximum number of iterations km max =20;
表1南欧江流域梯级各电站98%频率来水情况表Table 1 98% frequency of water inflow for each cascade power station in the Nanou River Basin
采用水文学法确定河道适宜生态流量,根据电站坝址处多年天然流量资料,将南欧江流 域梯级电站坝址多年月径流系列按由大到小排序,从序列中选取次最大值和次最小值,形成 年次最大、次最小生态径流过程,作为多目标生态缺水量评估的基础,如表2所列。本实施 例以适宜生态流量区间的下限作为各月生态流量最小控制值;The hydrological method is used to determine the suitable ecological flow of the river channel. According to the natural flow data at the dam site for many years, the series of multi-year monthly runoff at the dam site of the cascade power station in the Nanou River Basin are sorted from large to small, and the second maximum and second minimum are selected from the sequence. , forming the annual maximum and second-minimum ecological runoff process, as the basis for multi-objective ecological water scarcity assessment, as listed in Table 2. In this embodiment, the lower limit of the suitable ecological flow interval is taken as the minimum control value of each month's ecological flow;
表2结合水文学法计算的南欧江梯级适宜生态流量区间Table 2 The suitable ecological flow range of the Nan Ou River cascade calculated by the hydrological method
实施例计算得到关于梯级非劣调度方案集,并对调度结果进行对比分析,具体步骤如下:The embodiment calculates to obtain a set of non-inferior cascaded scheduling schemes, and compares and analyzes the scheduling results. The specific steps are as follows:
步骤一:设定水电站群特征参数,初始化算法控制参数:精英档案集EliteSet容量NQ为 30、种群大小NP为100、算法最大进化代数Gmax为600以及侦查蜂启动次数Limitabandon为10; 设定算法当前进化代数g=1。Step 1: Set the characteristic parameters of the hydropower station group, and initialize the control parameters of the algorithm: the EliteSet capacity NQ is 30, the population size NP is 100, the maximum evolution algebra of the algorithm G max is 600, and the number of scout bee starts Limit abandon is 10; The current evolutionary algebra of the algorithm is g=1.
步骤二:运用式(1)构造并初始化NP个种群个体;采用式(2)-(7)涉及的水库调度约束,判断个体是否满足约束,对不满足约束的种群个体,应用式(8)、式(9)“基于约束 廊道的水电站约束处理策略”,逐一对个体中的水电站群时段水位进行修正。Step 2: Use formula (1) to construct and initialize NP population individuals; use the reservoir scheduling constraints involved in formulas (2)-(7) to determine whether the individual satisfies the constraints, and apply formula (8) to the population individuals that do not meet the constraints , Equation (9) "Hydropower Station Constraint Processing Strategy Based on Constraint Corridor", the water level of the hydropower station group in the individual is corrected one by one.
步骤三:应用式(10)、式(11),计算不同种群个体目标适应度值,总发电量f1和生态 缺水量f2,并通过式(12)进行目标适应度值归一化处理,并基于个体目标适应度值对种群 个体进行非支配排序;将种群中第一层级所有非支配个体加入EliteSet中。Step 3: Apply equations (10) and (11) to calculate the individual target fitness values of different populations, the total power generation f 1 and the ecological water shortage f 2 , and normalize the target fitness values through equation (12). processing, and based on the individual target fitness value, the non-dominated individuals of the population are sorted; all non-dominated individuals in the first level of the population are added to the EliteSet.
步骤四:种群进化,包括雇佣蜂阶段、观察蜂阶段和侦查蜂阶段的进化;Step 4: Population evolution, including the evolution of the employed bee stage, the observation bee stage and the scout bee stage;
①雇佣蜂阶段:雇佣蜂阶段通过式(13)-(16)“搜索机制”探寻新的蜜源,并利用式(8)、式(9)对新生成的个体进行约束处理;比较新生成的个体与原始个体的优劣性,采用贪婪策略选择优秀个体至下一代种群中;对EliteSet进行更新及维护,将精英候选个体添加 进EliteSet;利用式(17)计算雇佣蜂对应蜜源被选择的概率;计算过程中,采用Fork/Join 并行计算模式对个体约束处理、适用度计算、精英个体更新主任务进行分解归并,以提高算 法执行效率。①Employment bee stage: The hired bee stage searches for new nectar sources through the "search mechanism" of formulas (13)-(16), and uses formulas (8) and (9) to constrain the newly generated individuals; Based on the pros and cons of the individual and the original individual, the greedy strategy is used to select excellent individuals into the next generation population; the EliteSet is updated and maintained, and the elite candidate individuals are added to the EliteSet; the probability that the honey source corresponding to the employed bee is selected is calculated by formula (17). ; In the calculation process, the Fork/Join parallel computing mode is used to decompose and merge the main tasks of individual constraint processing, fitness calculation, and elite individual update to improve the execution efficiency of the algorithm.
②观察蜂阶段:观察蜂根据前述蜜源选择概率,采用轮盘选择法确定跟随目标,运用与 雇佣蜂相同的方法进行邻域搜索;对EliteSet进行更新及维护;计算过程中,应用Fork/Join 并行计算模式对个体约束处理、适用度计算、精英个体更新主任务进行分解归并,以提高算 法执行效率;②Observation bee stage: According to the aforementioned nectar source selection probability, the observation bee uses the roulette selection method to determine the following target, and uses the same method as the employed bee to conduct neighborhood search; Update and maintain the EliteSet; In the calculation process, use Fork/Join parallelism The calculation mode decomposes and merges the main tasks of individual constraint processing, applicability calculation, and elite individual update to improve the efficiency of algorithm execution;
③侦查蜂阶段:若某一个雇佣蜂在Limitabandon=10内未能得到更新,则将该雇佣蜂变为 侦查蜂,通过随机搜索探寻新解。③ Scouting bee stage: If a hired bee fails to be updated within Limit abandon = 10, the hired bee will become a scouting bee, and a new solution will be found through random search.
步骤五:假如g<Gmax,令g=g+1,转至步骤四;否则,求解完成,将EliteSet作为多目标调度问题的Pareto最优前沿输出。Step 5: If g<G max , let g=g+1, go to step 4; otherwise, the solution is completed, and the EliteSet is used as the Pareto optimal frontier output of the multi-objective scheduling problem.
经过上述步骤的计算,获得的南欧江流域梯级水库群发电量和生态缺水量非劣调度方案 集空间分布结果如图2,具体调度指标成果如表3。After the calculation of the above steps, the spatial distribution results of the non-inferior dispatching scheme set of the cascade reservoir group in the Nanoujiang River Basin are shown in Figure 2, and the specific dispatching index results are shown in Table 3.
从图2中可以看出,提出的MOBCO算法在求解多目标发电—生态调度问题时应用效果 明显,获得了较好的非劣前沿分布,产生的非劣解前沿收敛性较好,非劣解前沿整体连续光 滑。结合非劣解前沿特性进一步分析可知,当南欧江梯级电站进行联合调度时,梯级水电站 发电量与生态效益的制约、冲突关系十分明显,随着发电量的增加,生态缺水量(缺水程度) 随之增加。方案间的差异主要体现在枯水期,枯水期对生态的影响主要体现在缺水量。生态 效益最大的方案枯水期加大下泄以快速消落水位,减少了枯期生态缺水,从而增加了生态效 益,但也导致水电站整个枯水期在较低水位运行,降低了发电效益。It can be seen from Fig. 2 that the proposed MOBCO algorithm has obvious application effect in solving the multi-objective power generation-ecological scheduling problem, and obtains a good non-inferior frontier distribution, and the non-inferior solution front has good convergence and non-inferior solution. The leading edge is overall continuous and smooth. Further analysis based on the frontier characteristics of the non-inferior solution shows that when the Nanoujiang cascade hydropower stations are jointly dispatched, the constraints and conflicts between the power generation of the cascade hydropower stations and the ecological benefits are very obvious. ) increases accordingly. The difference between the schemes is mainly reflected in the dry season, and the impact on the ecology in the dry period is mainly reflected in the water shortage. The plan with the greatest ecological benefit increases the drainage during the dry season to quickly reduce the water level, which reduces the ecological water shortage in the dry season, thereby increasing the ecological benefit, but it also causes the hydropower station to operate at a lower water level throughout the dry season, reducing the power generation benefit.
表3列出98%频率来水情况下南欧江梯级发电—生态多目标调度方案集,表中的精英档 案集NQ中的30个方案均是可行的调度方案。Table 3 lists the Nanou River cascade power generation-ecological multi-objective dispatch scheme set under the condition of 98% frequency of water inflow. The 30 schemes in the elite file set NQ in the table are all feasible dispatch schemes.
表3 98%频率来水情况下南欧江梯级发电—生态多目标调度方案集Table 3 Cascade power generation in the Nanou River under the condition of 98% frequency inflow—ecological multi-objective dispatching scheme set
Claims (1)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010595689.2A CN111861137A (en) | 2020-06-28 | 2020-06-28 | Parallel Multi-objective Scheduling Method for Cascade Reservoir Groups |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010595689.2A CN111861137A (en) | 2020-06-28 | 2020-06-28 | Parallel Multi-objective Scheduling Method for Cascade Reservoir Groups |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN111861137A true CN111861137A (en) | 2020-10-30 |
Family
ID=72989145
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010595689.2A Pending CN111861137A (en) | 2020-06-28 | 2020-06-28 | Parallel Multi-objective Scheduling Method for Cascade Reservoir Groups |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN111861137A (en) |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN112613720A (en) * | 2020-12-17 | 2021-04-06 | 湖北工业大学 | Reservoir irrigation optimal scheduling method considering multiple uncertainties |
CN113343168A (en) * | 2021-08-06 | 2021-09-03 | 长江水利委员会水文局 | Parallel reservoir combined regulation and control method for coupling ecological environment and water consumption inside and outside river channel |
CN113705972A (en) * | 2021-07-29 | 2021-11-26 | 湖南五凌电力科技有限公司 | Load distribution method, device and storage medium |
CN113780871A (en) * | 2021-09-22 | 2021-12-10 | 大连交通大学 | Multi-target low-carbon flexible job shop scheduling method |
CN114819659A (en) * | 2022-04-28 | 2022-07-29 | 浙江工业大学 | Reservoir optimal scheduling method based on dynamic optimization algorithm |
CN118095790A (en) * | 2024-04-23 | 2024-05-28 | 中国电建集团昆明勘测设计研究院有限公司 | Hydropower station resource allocation method and system based on multi-source equipment state |
Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105809279A (en) * | 2016-03-03 | 2016-07-27 | 河海大学 | Multi-objective quantum Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm (SFLA) based water resource optimization and diversion method |
CN106951985A (en) * | 2017-03-06 | 2017-07-14 | 河海大学 | A multi-objective optimal scheduling method for cascade reservoirs based on improved artificial bee colony algorithm |
CN107563538A (en) * | 2017-07-13 | 2018-01-09 | 大连理工大学 | Multi-objective reservoir group scheduling optimization method for key water level control under large power grid platform |
CN108710970A (en) * | 2018-05-07 | 2018-10-26 | 华中科技大学 | A kind of parallel dimension reduction method of Multiobjective Scheduling of huge Hydro Power Systems with Cascaded Reservoirs |
CN109670650A (en) * | 2018-12-27 | 2019-04-23 | 华中科技大学 | The method for solving of Cascade Reservoirs scheduling model based on multi-objective optimization algorithm |
CN109948847A (en) * | 2019-03-18 | 2019-06-28 | 河海大学 | A Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm for Reservoir Group Scheduling |
CN110322123A (en) * | 2019-06-13 | 2019-10-11 | 华中科技大学 | A kind of Multipurpose Optimal Method and system of Cascade Reservoirs combined dispatching |
-
2020
- 2020-06-28 CN CN202010595689.2A patent/CN111861137A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105809279A (en) * | 2016-03-03 | 2016-07-27 | 河海大学 | Multi-objective quantum Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm (SFLA) based water resource optimization and diversion method |
CN106951985A (en) * | 2017-03-06 | 2017-07-14 | 河海大学 | A multi-objective optimal scheduling method for cascade reservoirs based on improved artificial bee colony algorithm |
CN107563538A (en) * | 2017-07-13 | 2018-01-09 | 大连理工大学 | Multi-objective reservoir group scheduling optimization method for key water level control under large power grid platform |
CN108710970A (en) * | 2018-05-07 | 2018-10-26 | 华中科技大学 | A kind of parallel dimension reduction method of Multiobjective Scheduling of huge Hydro Power Systems with Cascaded Reservoirs |
CN109670650A (en) * | 2018-12-27 | 2019-04-23 | 华中科技大学 | The method for solving of Cascade Reservoirs scheduling model based on multi-objective optimization algorithm |
CN109948847A (en) * | 2019-03-18 | 2019-06-28 | 河海大学 | A Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm for Reservoir Group Scheduling |
CN110322123A (en) * | 2019-06-13 | 2019-10-11 | 华中科技大学 | A kind of Multipurpose Optimal Method and system of Cascade Reservoirs combined dispatching |
Non-Patent Citations (6)
Title |
---|
M.F.XIE 等: ""Multi-objective optimization of cascade hydro plants in dry season"", 《WWW.ATLANTIS-PRESS.COM/ARTICLE/25863160.PDF》 * |
ZHE YANG 等: ""The multi-objective operation for cascade reservoirs using MMOSFLA with emphasis on power generation and ecological benefit"", 《JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS》 * |
卢鹏: ""梯级水电站群跨电网短期联合运行及经济调度控制研究"", 《中国博士学位论文全文数据库 (工程科技Ⅱ辑)》 * |
吴志远 等: ""基于分段粒子群算法的梯级水库多目标优化调度模型研究"", 《水资源与水工程学报》 * |
官云飞 等: ""梯级水库多目标优化调度多属性决策研究"", 《水利规划与设计》 * |
张德发: ""变尺度混沌蜂群算法在梯级库群优化调度中的应用"", 《水电能源科学》 * |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN112613720A (en) * | 2020-12-17 | 2021-04-06 | 湖北工业大学 | Reservoir irrigation optimal scheduling method considering multiple uncertainties |
CN113705972A (en) * | 2021-07-29 | 2021-11-26 | 湖南五凌电力科技有限公司 | Load distribution method, device and storage medium |
CN113343168A (en) * | 2021-08-06 | 2021-09-03 | 长江水利委员会水文局 | Parallel reservoir combined regulation and control method for coupling ecological environment and water consumption inside and outside river channel |
CN113343168B (en) * | 2021-08-06 | 2021-11-19 | 长江水利委员会水文局 | Parallel reservoir combined regulation and control method for coupling ecological environment and water consumption inside and outside river channel |
CN113780871A (en) * | 2021-09-22 | 2021-12-10 | 大连交通大学 | Multi-target low-carbon flexible job shop scheduling method |
CN114819659A (en) * | 2022-04-28 | 2022-07-29 | 浙江工业大学 | Reservoir optimal scheduling method based on dynamic optimization algorithm |
CN118095790A (en) * | 2024-04-23 | 2024-05-28 | 中国电建集团昆明勘测设计研究院有限公司 | Hydropower station resource allocation method and system based on multi-source equipment state |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN111861137A (en) | Parallel Multi-objective Scheduling Method for Cascade Reservoir Groups | |
CN109768573B (en) | Power distribution network reactive power optimization method based on multi-target differential gray wolf algorithm | |
CN109886473B (en) | A multi-objective optimal scheduling method for watershed scenery and water systems considering downstream ecology | |
CN106529166B (en) | A kind of System in Optimal Allocation of Regional Water Resources method based on MAEPSO algorithm | |
CN108694467B (en) | A method and system for predicting line loss rate of distribution network | |
CN106951980B (en) | A Reservoir Group Adaptive Scheduling Method Based on RCP Scenario | |
CN107527119A (en) | Water resources optimal operation method based on improved multi-target quantum genetic algorithm | |
CN106502220B (en) | Cascade pumping station water-carriage system optimization operation control coupling coordination approach and system | |
Wang et al. | An improved partheno genetic algorithm for multi-objective economic dispatch in cascaded hydropower systems | |
CN105207195A (en) | Locating and sizing method for distributed power supply in power distribution network | |
CN111724003A (en) | A method for optimal allocation of complex water resources system based on "zoning-grading" theory | |
CN111612292A (en) | Dispatching control system and method of cascade hydropower station based on key water level control | |
CN107506914A (en) | Transformer station's dynamic expansion planing method of meter and distributed power source permeability variation | |
CN110336285B (en) | Calculation method of optimal economic power flow in power system | |
CN111598447A (en) | A joint optimal scheduling method for reservoir groups based on HMAQGA | |
CN116911538A (en) | A joint search method, system and equipment for multi-source information for reservoir group multi-objective dispatching | |
CN109300058A (en) | A Two-Stage Direct Search Dimensionality Reduction Method for Optimal Scheduling of Hydropower Stations in Extra Large Watersheds | |
CN113675890A (en) | TD 3-based new energy microgrid optimization method | |
CN104915788B (en) | A method of considering the Electrical Power System Dynamic economic load dispatching of windy field correlation | |
CN110348605B (en) | Improved genetic algorithm-based microgrid economic operation optimization method | |
CN111753438A (en) | A double-layer optimization planning method for distributed power and energy storage in distribution network based on time sequence characteristics | |
CN117610828A (en) | Step-size dense-by-dense multi-target cascade hydropower station group optimal scheduling method | |
CN110189231A (en) | A Method for Determining Optimal Power Supply Scheme of Power Grid Based on Improved Genetic Algorithm | |
CN112488564B (en) | Cascade power station scheduling method and system based on random fractal-successive approximation algorithm | |
CN114971039A (en) | A mid- and long-term scheduling method for water-light complementarity based on improved particle swarm optimization algorithm |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20201030 |