CN111861056A - Evaluation method for technical innovation level - Google Patents
Evaluation method for technical innovation level Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN111861056A CN111861056A CN201910350828.2A CN201910350828A CN111861056A CN 111861056 A CN111861056 A CN 111861056A CN 201910350828 A CN201910350828 A CN 201910350828A CN 111861056 A CN111861056 A CN 111861056A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- evaluation
- level
- index
- technical innovation
- evaluation index
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 156
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 27
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 238000012163 sequencing technique Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000010197 meta-analysis Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000013210 evaluation model Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 abstract description 9
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 abstract description 7
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000011002 quantification Methods 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000011158 quantitative evaluation Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000009897 systematic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013551 empirical research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000556 factor analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001737 promoting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012797 qualification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007670 refining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001131 transforming effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0637—Strategic management or analysis, e.g. setting a goal or target of an organisation; Planning actions based on goals; Analysis or evaluation of effectiveness of goals
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a method for evaluating the technical innovation level, which comprises the following steps: establishing a factor set; determining evaluation index weights of all levels: establishing a technical innovation level evaluation index hierarchical structure system and an evaluation index judgment matrix; the method comprises the steps of (1) performing single-level sequencing, establishing a judgment matrix table, and calculating relative weight by adopting a summation method; and (4) performing total hierarchical sequencing, namely performing total hierarchical sequencing according to the result of the single hierarchical sequencing and the order of the first-level index and the second-level index of the technical innovation level evaluation on the hierarchy. The invention carries out innovation evaluation from multiple angles, and does not carry out evaluation from innovation capability independently, so that the rating system is more comprehensive. The research of evaluation index quantification adopts a more objective method to select the evaluation index, avoids the randomness of evaluation index selection, carries out correct risk early warning and evaluation mechanism for technical innovation, and improves the success rate of enterprise technical innovation activities.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of informatization systems, in particular to an evaluation system of technical innovation level.
Background
The technical innovation level is a key factor influencing regional core competitiveness, and scientific and reasonable evaluation of the technical innovation level is an important link for transferring and transforming scientific and technological achievements and an important condition for promoting the establishment of our market to become a western innovation center. Evaluation of scientific and technological achievements in the past, the government has been responsible for identifying the scientific and technological achievements. However, the quantitative evaluation system of the technology innovation level in the city is lacked, so that the third-party technology evaluation service capability in the city cannot meet the actual requirement of technology element trading facilitation, and the activity of the regional technology element trading market is seriously influenced. Under the condition, a scientific and reasonable technical innovation level evaluation system and an implementation method which meet the scientific and technological innovation reality of our city are researched and established, so that the technical innovation level evaluation work is promoted to a scientific and systematic new level, and the guidance, recommendation and conversion of the technical innovation level evaluation on the scientific and technological innovation are fully exerted.
And the Yuan flying and the like incorporate a value chain into an evaluation index system of technical innovation capability, and an electronic information industry technical innovation capability evaluation index system of 15 secondary indexes is constructed. On the basis of constructing a technical innovation capability evaluation index system, quantitative evaluation is carried out on the technical innovation capability of the metropolis electronic information industry by utilizing a hierarchical analysis method, and some suggestions are provided for developing the metropolis electronic information industry on the basis of comprehensive evaluation of the technical innovation capability of the metropolis electronic information industry for 3 years continuously; the plum-peng plum is analyzed by combining technical innovation and industrial competitiveness indexes, and the strength of the industrial competitiveness is considered to depend on not only the economic system and enterprise management system of one country, but also the scientific and technical level and the human capital condition. The most important thing here is the technical innovation ability, which is a comprehensive reflection of scientific discovery ability, technical innovation ability, technical application ability and management ability; the concept of applying game theory research industry technical innovation competition strategy is proposed by the Chelijun, Liu Tao and Gaojun mountain, compared with the industry and tissue economics before the game theory is applied, the new industry and tissue economics pay more attention to the speciality of the industry, dynamic analysis is introduced into the industry and tissue research, the original structure-behavior-performance (S-C-P) paradigm based on the structure determinant is abandoned, and the industry structure paradigm is considered to be endophytic to the company strategy. The enterprise strategic decision relates to various complex factors from the internal environment to the external environment of the enterprise, and the new characteristics enable the game theory to be more suitable for analyzing the business strategic decision of the enterprise compared with the original industrial organization economics;
According to the current situation of the scholars in China on the research of industrial technical innovation evaluation, the research on the industrial technical innovation evaluation is mostly concentrated on the high and new technical industry, the evaluation on the technical innovation capability is the key point, the evaluation on the technical innovation efficiency is the next place, and the evaluation on the technical innovation environment and the technical innovation risk is relatively less. The existing industrial technology innovation level evaluation system has the following problems: the technical innovation level evaluation definition is fuzzy, and many scholars equal the technical innovation capability evaluation or the technical innovation efficiency evaluation to the technical innovation level evaluation; index selection of industrial technology innovation level evaluation is subjective and has no uniform selection standard; the evaluation of industrial technological innovation level is mostly focused on the empirical research of a specific industry. The existing technical innovation level evaluation research mainly focuses on innovation output, performance of an innovation process is neglected, qualitative indexes are too much, a technical innovation evaluation index system depends on an enterprise technical innovation evaluation index system too much, an independent evaluation system is not formed, and a correct risk early warning and evaluation mechanism cannot be carried out on technical innovation. Therefore, an evaluation system with a more comprehensive rating system and quantitative evaluation indexes needs to be established, and the randomness of evaluation index selection is avoided.
Disclosure of Invention
In view of the above-mentioned shortcomings of the prior art, the present invention aims to provide an evaluation system of technical innovation level, which performs innovation evaluation from multiple angles, and does not perform evaluation from innovation capability alone, so that the rating system is more comprehensive. The research of the quantitative evaluation index can adopt a more objective method to select the evaluation index, thereby avoiding the randomness of the evaluation index selection.
In order to solve the technical problems, the invention adopts the following technical scheme: a method for evaluating the technical innovation level is characterized by comprising the following steps:
1) establishing a set of factors
Searching relevant documents in domestic and foreign well-known periodical databases such as Google academia, Elsevier, CNKI, IEEE/IET, Wanfang digital periodical and the like, wherein the searched keywords mainly comprise analyzing and summarizing the relevant documents within 10 years, and identifying evaluation indexes aiming at the technical innovation level by using a meta-analysis method;
2) determination of evaluation index weights of all levels
(1) Establishing a hierarchical structure system of technical innovation level evaluation indexes
The method comprises a first-level evaluation index and a second-level evaluation index system:
if the evaluation factor set is U and k evaluation factors are set, the following are provided:
U ═ is each primary index in the formula, () is the jth secondary evaluation index of the ith primary index in the formula;
2) establishing an evaluation index judgment matrix
Establishing a hierarchical analysis judgment matrix according to the hierarchical structure of the technical innovation level evaluation indexes; according to the action size of each evaluation index and comparison of each index, the importance degree is assigned according to 1-5, and the importance scale value is shown in table 2;
TABLE 2 significance Scale of values
3) Hierarchical single ordering
Establishing a judgment matrix table, and calculating relative weight by adopting a summation method;
4) total ordering of layers
According to the result of the single-level sequencing, the primary indexes and the secondary indexes evaluated by the technical innovation level are integrated to carry out total level sequencing on the level sequence; the hierarchical single-ranking result of the first-level evaluation index of the technical innovation level is the hierarchical single-ranking result of the jth second-level evaluation index of the ith first-level evaluation index.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the following beneficial effects:
1. the construction process of the technical innovation level evaluation index system provided by the invention is a process of gradually deepening, gradually refining and perfecting the recognition of the overall number characteristics of the technical innovation, and a scientific and applicable index system is the basis for well-done evaluation work. The technical innovation level evaluation index system is wide in design and large in content of information, and various factors need to be considered from multiple angles when the evaluation index system is constructed. And the principles of combining scientificity and reality, combining comprehensiveness and importance, and combining operability, dynamic continuity, comparability, quantification and qualification are followed, so that the systematic, standardized, normalized and scientific index system can objectively and comprehensively reflect the whole condition of the technical innovation level, the evaluation result is more accurate, and technical support is provided for correct decision.
2. The invention carries out innovation evaluation from multiple angles, and does not carry out evaluation from innovation capability independently, so that the rating system is more comprehensive. The research of evaluation index quantification adopts a more objective method to select the evaluation index, avoids the randomness of evaluation index selection, carries out correct risk early warning and evaluation mechanism for technical innovation, and improves the success rate of enterprise technical innovation activities.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of a detailed structure of an evaluation system of a technical innovation level of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The present invention will be described in further detail with reference to examples.
A method for evaluating a technical innovation level includes the following steps:
1. establishing a set of factors
Relevant documents in domestic and foreign well-known periodical databases such as Google academia, Elsevier, CNKI, IEEE/IET, Wanfang digital periodical and the like are searched, searched keywords mainly comprise relevant documents within 10 years of analysis and summary, and evaluation indexes aiming at the technical innovation level are identified by using a meta-analysis method.
The evaluation index system is shown in fig. 1, and constitutes an evaluation factor set, which is denoted as U.
U＝{u_1，u_2，…，u_m}，m＝3
In the evaluation of the technical innovation level, factors are evaluation indexes, and the factors can comprehensively evaluate the technical innovation level.
2. Determination of evaluation index weights of all levels
1) Establishing hierarchical structure of evaluation index
Through the analysis, in the technical innovation level evaluation index system, the primary evaluation index has three evaluation indexes of technical innovation capability, technical innovation risk, technical innovation environment and the like, the secondary evaluation index is shown in table 1, and a hierarchical structure formed by the evaluation indexes can be obtained according to the factor analysis result, as shown in fig. 1.
If the evaluation factor set is U and k evaluation factors are set, the following are provided:
u ═ represents each primary index in the formula, () represents the j-th secondary evaluation index of the i-th primary index in the formula. Establishing a technical innovation level evaluation index system as shown in a table 1:
TABLE 1 technical innovation level evaluation index system
2) Establishing an evaluation index judgment matrix
And establishing a hierarchical analysis judgment matrix according to the hierarchical structure of the technical innovation level evaluation indexes in the figure 1. The subject group is discussed by the special subject group after comparing the action size of each evaluation index and each index, the importance degree is assigned according to 1-5, and the importance scale value is shown in table 2. A decision matrix table is established as shown in table 3, table 4, table 5 and table 6.
TABLE 2 significance Scale of values
3) Hierarchical single ordering
The calculation of the relative weights was performed by the summation method, and the calculation results are shown in the last two columns of tables 3, 4, and 5.
TABLE 3 technical innovation level first-level index judgment matrix table
TABLE 4 evaluation index judgment matrix table for technical innovation ability
TABLE 5 technical innovation risk evaluation index judgment matrix table
TABLE 6 evaluation matrix table for technical innovation environment
| Second level index | External environment | Mechanism of internal mechanism | w | |
| External environment | 1 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.33 |
| Mechanism of internal mechanism | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.67 |
| 4.5 | 1.00 |
4) Total ordering of layers
And (4) performing overall hierarchical sequencing according to the hierarchical single sequencing result and the order of the first-level index and the second-level index of the technical innovation level evaluation on the hierarchy, wherein the sequencing method is shown in the table 7.
Table 7 total hierarchical ordering method
The hierarchical single-ranking result of the first-level evaluation index of the technical innovation level is the hierarchical single-ranking result of the jth second-level evaluation index of the ith first-level evaluation index. Based on this, the overall ranking results of the technical innovation level evaluation indexes are shown in table 8.
TABLE 8 Total rank results of the evaluation index of the technical innovation level
TABLE 9 evaluation index weight of technical innovation level
From the above-mentioned research, the weights of the indexes are found, where the weight of the primary index is (0.57, 0.29, 0.14), and the weight of the secondary index is:
＝(0.09，0.04，0.26，0.26，0.35)
＝(0.07，0.27，0.2，0.26，0.2)
＝(0.33，0.67)
3. Establishing an evaluation set
The evaluation results for each evaluation factor were classified into 5 classes, which were referred to as evaluation sets and denoted as V.
V {, …, }, (where n is 5), i.e., V ═ strong, and typically weak }. The results are shown in Table 10.
Watch 10
4. Each group of factor sets comprehensively evaluating technical innovation level
(1) Evaluation matrix calculation method
The method comprises the following steps of firstly, setting a factor set consisting of first-level technical innovation level evaluation indexes as U, wherein the U is {, }.
Let P be (,) is the weight set of the first-level scientific and technological innovation achievement evaluation index. Wherein,
not less than 0 (i-1, 2, 3), and
and the formula (U) is each primary index, and the formula (I) is the jth secondary evaluation index of the ith primary index. Let it be the weight set of the secondary index.
≧ 0 denotes the weight in (1)
And fourthly, determining the weight of each primary evaluation index and each secondary evaluation index, wherein the detailed process is as described above.
And fifthly, setting the comment set of the technical innovation level evaluation index system as V {, … }, wherein the level difference exists between any two comments, so that the comment set is a full-order set.
Sixthly, comprehensively evaluating the secondary evaluation indexes of each factor set of U {, … }, and m ═ 3. The following were used:
-evaluating each secondary evaluation index in each group respectively to determine which grade of the comment set each secondary index is in, i.e. the degree to which the factor belongs to the comment, and obtaining a fuzzy evaluation matrix
And the membership degree of the k-grade comment obtained by the jth secondary evaluation index of the factor set is represented. The mode of special discussion by experienced evaluators and experts is adopted here, and the value given to the degree of membership is obtained by solving through a membership function, and a formula is calculated.
Wherein the number of experts presenting a level k comment on the jth secondary technology innovation level evaluation index of the factor set is represented; d represents the total number of experts.
-calculating an evaluation result matrix for each group.
(2) The evaluation data is collected in a mode of thematic discussion by experienced evaluators and experts, then the collected questionnaires are sorted and counted, and a multi-level fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model is established to calculate the evaluation matrix of each factor set.
In summary, the invention clusters the 12 technological innovation level evaluation indexes into 3 common factors according to the analysis: technical innovation capability, technical innovation risk and technical innovation environment. Therefore, countermeasure proposals for raising the level of technical innovation are proposed in these 3 aspects.
The above description is only exemplary of the present invention and should not be taken as limiting, and any modifications, equivalents, improvements, etc. made within the spirit and scope of the present invention should be included.
Claims (2)
1. A method for evaluating the technical innovation level is characterized by comprising the following steps:
1) establishing a set of factors
Searching relevant documents in domestic and foreign well-known journal databases such as Google academia, Elsevier, CNKI, IEEE/IET, Wanfang digital journal and the like, wherein the searched keywords mainly comprise analyzing and summarizing the relevant documents within 10 years, and identifying evaluation indexes aiming at technical innovation levels by using a meta-analysis method;
2) determination of evaluation index weights of all levels
(1) Establishing a hierarchical structure system of technical innovation level evaluation indexes
The method comprises a first-level evaluation index and a second-level evaluation index system:
if the evaluation factor set is U and k evaluation factors are set, the following are provided:
u ═ is each primary index in the formula, () is the jth secondary evaluation index of the ith primary index in the formula;
2) establishing an evaluation index judgment matrix
Establishing a hierarchical analysis judgment matrix according to the hierarchical structure of the technical innovation level evaluation indexes; according to the action size of each evaluation index and comparison of each index, the importance degree is assigned according to 1-5, and the importance scale value is shown in table 2;
TABLE 2 significance Scale of values
3) Hierarchical single ordering
Establishing a judgment matrix table, and calculating relative weight by adopting a summation method;
4) total ordering of layers
According to the result of the single-level sequencing, the primary indexes and the secondary indexes evaluated by the technical innovation level are integrated to carry out total level sequencing on the level sequence; the hierarchical single-ranking result of the first-level evaluation index of the technical innovation level is the hierarchical single-ranking result of the jth second-level evaluation index of the ith first-level evaluation index.
2. The method for evaluating the level of technical innovation according to claim 1, further comprising the steps of:
3) establishing an evaluation set
The evaluation results for each evaluation factor were classified into 5 classes, which were referred to as evaluation sets and denoted as V.
V {, …, }, (where n ═ 5), i.e., V ═ strong, general, weak };
4) each group of factor sets comprehensively evaluating technical innovation level
(1) Evaluation matrix calculation method
The method comprises the following steps of firstly, setting a factor set consisting of first-level technical innovation level evaluation indexes as U, wherein the U is {, }.
Let P be (,) is the weight set of the first-level scientific and technological innovation achievement evaluation index. Wherein,
not less than 0 (i-1, 2, 3), and
And the formula (U) is each primary index, and the formula (I) is the jth secondary evaluation index of the ith primary index. Let it be the weight set of the secondary index.
≧ 0 denotes the weight in (1)
And fourthly, determining the weight of each primary evaluation index and each secondary evaluation index, wherein the detailed process is as described above.
And fifthly, setting the comment set of the technical innovation level evaluation index system as V {, … }, wherein the level difference exists between any two comments, so that the comment set is a full-order set.
Sixthly, comprehensively evaluating the secondary evaluation indexes of each factor set of U {, … }, and m ═ 3. The following were used:
evaluating each secondary evaluation index in each group respectively to determine which grade of the comment set each secondary index is in, namely the degree of the comment to which the factor belongs, and obtaining a fuzzy evaluation matrix;
and the membership degree of the k-grade comment obtained by the jth secondary evaluation index of the factor set is represented. The mode of special discussion is carried out by experienced evaluators and experts, and the value of the membership degree is obtained through the membership function;
wherein the number of experts presenting a level k comment on the jth secondary technology innovation level evaluation index of the factor set is represented; d represents the total number of experts.
-calculating an evaluation result matrix for each group.
(2) The evaluation data is collected by adopting a mode of thematic discussion by experienced evaluators and experts, then the collected questionnaires are sorted and counted, and a multi-level fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model is established to calculate the evaluation matrix of each factor set.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910350828.2A CN111861056A (en) | 2019-04-28 | 2019-04-28 | Evaluation method for technical innovation level |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910350828.2A CN111861056A (en) | 2019-04-28 | 2019-04-28 | Evaluation method for technical innovation level |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN111861056A true CN111861056A (en) | 2020-10-30 |
Family
ID=72966288
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910350828.2A Pending CN111861056A (en) | 2019-04-28 | 2019-04-28 | Evaluation method for technical innovation level |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN111861056A (en) |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112966921A (en) * | 2021-03-01 | 2021-06-15 | 上海近屿智能科技有限公司 | Innovation ability evaluation method based on programming ability evaluation |
| CN117436726A (en) * | 2023-12-14 | 2024-01-23 | 惠民县黄河先进技术研究院 | Regional high and new technology industry evaluation method and system |
-
2019
- 2019-04-28 CN CN201910350828.2A patent/CN111861056A/en active Pending
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112966921A (en) * | 2021-03-01 | 2021-06-15 | 上海近屿智能科技有限公司 | Innovation ability evaluation method based on programming ability evaluation |
| CN117436726A (en) * | 2023-12-14 | 2024-01-23 | 惠民县黄河先进技术研究院 | Regional high and new technology industry evaluation method and system |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Brauers et al. | MULTIMOORA for the EU Member States updated with fuzzy number theory | |
| Xiao et al. | Multistage decision support framework for sites selection of solar power plants with probabilistic linguistic information | |
| CN112035658B (en) | Enterprise public opinion monitoring method based on deep learning | |
| WO2021128523A1 (en) | Technology readiness level determination method and system based on science and technology big data | |
| CN105046591A (en) | Method for evaluating electricity utilization energy efficiency of power consumer | |
| CN110689195A (en) | Power daily load prediction method | |
| CN110135587A (en) | It is hesitated based on section and obscures the Multiple Attribute Group Decision of more granularity decision rough sets | |
| CN112488565A (en) | Oversea engineering project risk evaluation method based on matter element extension | |
| CN111861056A (en) | Evaluation method for technical innovation level | |
| CN113033886B (en) | Power distribution network planning construction evaluation method | |
| CN109992592B (en) | College poverty and poverty identification method based on flow data of campus consumption card | |
| CN114219245B (en) | Rural power index evaluation method and device based on big data and storage medium | |
| CN109063944A (en) | City banking index analysis method and device based on big data analysis technology | |
| Jiang et al. | SRGM decision model considering cost-reliability | |
| Barnett et al. | Machine learning classification for document review | |
| Biolcati-Rinaldi et al. | Assessing the reliability and validity of Google Scholar indicators. The case of social sciences in Italy | |
| CN112052430A (en) | Photovoltaic station correlation comprehensive evaluation system based on improved TOPSIS | |
| Zhu et al. | Research on grey relational evaluation of the competitiveness of aviation industrial cluster: By taking Xi'an Yanliang aviation park as an example | |
| CN112488360A (en) | Distribution transformer abnormity analysis early warning method based on artificial intelligence | |
| CN112488438A (en) | Industrial enterprise comprehensive benefit evaluation method and system combining credit information | |
| Li et al. | Big-Data Measurement-Model Research about Judges’ Actual Workload in China | |
| Wang et al. | Research on Credit Decision Issues of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Based on TOPSIS and Hierarchical Cluster Analysis | |
| CN113537734B (en) | Energy data application catalog extraction method based on maximum correlation minimum redundancy | |
| Li et al. | Financial Intelligence Decision Analysis System Based on Decision Tree Algorithm | |
| CN112215516B (en) | Quality evaluation feedback method for power information system |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |