CN111817595A - quasi-Z-source inverter model prediction control method without weight coefficient - Google Patents
quasi-Z-source inverter model prediction control method without weight coefficient Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN111817595A CN111817595A CN202010572451.8A CN202010572451A CN111817595A CN 111817595 A CN111817595 A CN 111817595A CN 202010572451 A CN202010572451 A CN 202010572451A CN 111817595 A CN111817595 A CN 111817595A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- current
- voltage
- state
- output
- quasi
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02M—APPARATUS FOR CONVERSION BETWEEN AC AND AC, BETWEEN AC AND DC, OR BETWEEN DC AND DC, AND FOR USE WITH MAINS OR SIMILAR POWER SUPPLY SYSTEMS; CONVERSION OF DC OR AC INPUT POWER INTO SURGE OUTPUT POWER; CONTROL OR REGULATION THEREOF
- H02M7/00—Conversion of ac power input into dc power output; Conversion of dc power input into ac power output
- H02M7/42—Conversion of dc power input into ac power output without possibility of reversal
- H02M7/44—Conversion of dc power input into ac power output without possibility of reversal by static converters
- H02M7/48—Conversion of dc power input into ac power output without possibility of reversal by static converters using discharge tubes with control electrode or semiconductor devices with control electrode
- H02M7/53—Conversion of dc power input into ac power output without possibility of reversal by static converters using discharge tubes with control electrode or semiconductor devices with control electrode using devices of a triode or transistor type requiring continuous application of a control signal
- H02M7/537—Conversion of dc power input into ac power output without possibility of reversal by static converters using discharge tubes with control electrode or semiconductor devices with control electrode using devices of a triode or transistor type requiring continuous application of a control signal using semiconductor devices only, e.g. single switched pulse inverters
- H02M7/5387—Conversion of dc power input into ac power output without possibility of reversal by static converters using discharge tubes with control electrode or semiconductor devices with control electrode using devices of a triode or transistor type requiring continuous application of a control signal using semiconductor devices only, e.g. single switched pulse inverters in a bridge configuration
- H02M7/53871—Conversion of dc power input into ac power output without possibility of reversal by static converters using discharge tubes with control electrode or semiconductor devices with control electrode using devices of a triode or transistor type requiring continuous application of a control signal using semiconductor devices only, e.g. single switched pulse inverters in a bridge configuration with automatic control of output voltage or current
- H02M7/53873—Conversion of dc power input into ac power output without possibility of reversal by static converters using discharge tubes with control electrode or semiconductor devices with control electrode using devices of a triode or transistor type requiring continuous application of a control signal using semiconductor devices only, e.g. single switched pulse inverters in a bridge configuration with automatic control of output voltage or current with digital control
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Power Engineering (AREA)
- Inverter Devices (AREA)
Abstract
A quasi-Z source inverter model prediction control method without weight coefficients aims at a Z source inverter to collect voltage and current signals; establishing a mathematical model of the quasi-Z source inverter; therefore, a prediction model of each control object of the quasi-Z source inverter is established, and a delay compensation strategy is added; calculating a reference value of each control object; and the priority of the quasi Z-source inverter control object is determined according to a cascade model prediction control method and by combining the specificity of the inductive current. Compared with the traditional finite set model predictive control method, the cascade model predictive control method effectively eliminates the weight coefficient, makes the control method simpler and reduces the calculated amount of a digital processor.
Description
Technical Field
The invention discloses a quasi Z-source inverter model prediction control method without a weight coefficient, and belongs to the field of control of quasi Z-source inverters.
Background
The quasi-Z-source inverter (qZSI) is used as a novel inverter topology, can overcome the defects of the traditional inverter, has a boosting function, and is very suitable for new energy power generation occasions such as photovoltaic and the like. At present, the research of control methods aiming at a Z-source inverter is mainly divided into two categories, one category is a traditional modulation method, and the other category is mainly a Sinusoidal Pulse Width Modulation (SPWM) method and a space vector modulation (SVPWM) method; the other type is a nonlinear control method mainly based on model predictive control (model predictive control). Compared with the traditional modulation method, the model prediction control method has the characteristics of no modulation, simple control method, excellent dynamic performance and the like. Therefore, the model prediction control method of the quasi-Z source inverter has important research significance.
Document "High-Performance Predictive Control of Quasi-Impedance Source Inverter" (Mostafa Mosa, Robert S.Balog et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS POWER APPARATUS CS 2012,32 (04)). In this document, a finite set model predictive control (FCS-MPC) method is used to control a Z-source inverter, and the predicted values of the inductive current, the capacitive voltage and the output current corresponding to 8 output voltage vectors are substituted into a cost function to calculate, so as to obtain an optimal voltage vector. Although the method can realize good control of the quasi-Z source inverter, 3 weight coefficients exist in the cost function and need to be adjusted simultaneously, and no proper design rule is available at present to guide the design of the weight coefficients, so that when one cost function has a plurality of weight coefficients, the adjustment of the weight coefficients becomes extremely complicated, and if the weight coefficients are not designed properly, the quasi-Z source inverter cannot work normally.
Disclosure of Invention
In order to overcome the defects of the prior art, the invention provides a cascade model predictive control (S-MPC) method, which adopts a cascade thought, so that a quasi-Z source inverter model predictive control method without a weight coefficient is designed, and the defect that the weight coefficient needs to be designed in the traditional finite set model predictive control method is effectively overcome. In addition, by using the predicted value of the inductance current, the state of the next control period of the Z-source inverter can be judged, so that the calculated amount of the digital processor is effectively reduced.
The technical scheme proposed for solving the technical problems is as follows:
a quasi-Z source inverter model prediction control method without weight coefficients comprises the following steps:
the current is recorded as the kth sampling moment, the voltage signal and the current signal of the Z-source inverter are sampled, and the sampling content comprises the following steps: inductor current iL1(k) And a capacitor voltage vC1(k) And outputting the load three-phase current ia(k)、ib(k) And ic(k) Then converting the three-phase current of the load from the three-phase static coordinate system to an alpha beta coordinate system to obtain ioα(k) And ioβ(k);
2.1, establishing an output voltage equation of the AC side of the quasi-Z source inverter
The minimum 8 output voltage vectors required for the qZSI system are first listed in Table 1
TABLE 1
8 output voltage vectors V of qZSIx(k) Is shown as
Wherein a ═ ej2π/3;x=[0~7];vdcThe peak voltage of a direct current side bus connected to the inverter bridge; s1、S3、S5Switch states of A, B, C phases, respectively;
the output voltage equation of the qZSI AC side is
Wherein R, L is the load phase resistance and phase inductance, Vxα、VxβFor the voltage component of the output voltage vector on the α β axis, ioα(k)、ioβ(k) To output currentA current component of the vector on the α β axis;
2.2, establishing an inductance current and capacitance voltage equation of the quasi-Z source impedance network in a non-direct-through state and a direct-through state respectively;
2.2.1) non-pass-through state:
in the formula, L1、C1Respectively, the inductance and capacitance values in the impedance network; rL1Is an inductance L1The stray resistance of (2); v. ofin(k) Is the input voltage; i.e. iL1(k) And vC1(k) Sampling values of the inductive current and the capacitor voltage at the kth sampling moment respectively; i.e. iinv(k)=iA(k)S1+iB(k)S3+iC(k)S5;iA(k)、iB(k) And iC(k) Current values of the phase A, the phase B and the phase C at the kth sampling moment;
2.2.2) straight-through state:
in the formula, L1、C1Respectively, the inductance and capacitance values in the impedance network; rL1Is an inductance L1The stray resistance of (2); i.e. iL1(k) And vC1(k) Sampling values of the inductive current and the capacitor voltage at the kth sampling moment respectively;
step 3, establishing a prediction model of the quasi-Z source inverter, wherein the process is as follows:
3.1) adopting a forward Euler method to control each control variable with a control period TsUnder the conditions of (1) discretization
Substituting the formula (5) into the formulas (2), (3) and (4) respectively to obtain a predicted value of the output current, a predicted value of the inductive current and a predicted value of the capacitive voltage:
predicted value of output current:
in the formula ioα(k) And ioβ(k) Component i on the α β axis of the current sample value at the k-th sampling instantoα(k +1) and ioβ(k +1) is a component of a current predicted value at the k +1 th sampling moment on an alpha beta axis;
predicted values of inductor current and capacitor voltage in non-shoot-through state:
in the formula iL1(k +1) and vC1(k +1) are respectively the predicted values of the inductive current and the capacitive voltage at the (k +1) th sampling moment in a non-direct-connection state;
predicted values of inductor current and capacitor voltage in the shoot-through state:
in the formula iL1(k +1) and vC1(k +1) are respectively the predicted values of the inductive current and the capacitive voltage in the direct-connection state at the (k +1) th sampling moment;
3.2) Compensation method for adding delay
Carrying out cost function calculation by adopting the predicted value of the (k +2) th sampling moment to compensate output delay;
substituting k in the formulas (6), (7) and (8) by k +1 to obtain the predicted value of each control object at the time of k +2, and then substituting the predicted value into a cost function to calculate;
step 4, calculating the reference value of each control object, wherein the process is as follows:
4.1) calculation of reference values for the inductor current and the capacitor voltage
In the formula, Po_refAs an output power reference value, iL1_ref(k) Is the reference value v of the inductor currentC1_ref(k) The reference value of the capacitor voltage is a constant value;
4.2) calculating the phase current amplitude of the reference output current
In the formula Iom_refIs the phase current amplitude of the reference output current and is a constant value;
step 5, designing a cascade model prediction control method suitable for a quasi-Z source inverter
In the quasi-Z source inverter, the control objects are inductive current, capacitance voltage and output current, the inductive current control represents the control of input power, the capacitance voltage control represents the control of boosting on the DC side, the output current control represents the control of inversion on the AC side,
5.1) judging the state of the next control period according to the predicted value of the inductive current
Because of the particularity of the inductive current, the inductive current predicted values corresponding to 7 non-through vectors are the same as 1 value, while 1 through vector corresponds to 1 inductive current predicted value, and the inductive current predicted value in the non-through state is recorded as iL1_ns(k +2) and the predicted value of the inductor current in the through state is iL1_s(k+2);
5.2) obtaining the optimal voltage vector for the capacitor voltage and the output current according to the cascade thought
5.2.1) remember that the method of calculating the capacitor voltage first and then the output current is S-MPC1
Firstly, 7 non-straight-through vectors are substituted into a (12) capacitor voltage cost function g C2 optimal voltage vectors are selected, and then the 2 voltages are usedVector substitution to the output current cost function g of equation (12)iFinally selecting an optimal voltage vector;
in the formula ioα_ref(k) And ioβ_ref(k) Respectively outputting components of three-phase current on an alpha beta axis for reference;
5.2.2) remember that the method of calculating the output current first and then the capacitor voltage is S-MPC2
Firstly, 7 non-straight-through vectors are substituted into an output current cost function g of a formula (12)i2 optimal voltage vectors are selected, and then the 2 optimal voltage vectors are substituted into a capacitance voltage cost function g of an equation (12)CFinally selecting an optimal voltage;
and 6, taking the optimal switching state obtained by calculation in the step 5 as the switching state at the k +1 th moment, and obtaining the switching state at the k +2 th moment from the steps so as to circulate continuously.
Further, in said 5.1), the cost function g in the formula (11)nsAnd gsAll take the form of absolute values; at this time, by comparing gnsAnd gsCan judge what state the next control cycle is, if gns<gsIf the state is judged to be a non-straight-through state, 5.2) is entered; if g isns>gsIf the direct vector is judged to be in the direct state, the direct vector is directly output.
Still further, in the 5.2.1), the capacitance-voltage cost function g in the formula (12)CIn the form of absolute values, and a current cost function g is outputiIn the form of a square.
According to the method, a quasi-Z-source inverter model predictive control method without weight coefficients is designed according to a cascade model predictive control method and by combining the particularity of inductive current, the defect that the weight coefficients need to be designed in a finite set model predictive control method is overcome, and the calculated amount of a digital processor is effectively reduced.
The technical conception of the invention is as follows: aiming at the problem that the adjustment of the weight coefficient is complicated in the Z-source inverter finite set model prediction control method, the invention adopts the cascade model prediction control method, and compared with the traditional finite set model prediction control method, the weight coefficient is effectively eliminated, so that the control method is simpler; in addition, the predicted value of the inductive current is judged, and the calculation amount of the digital processor is effectively reduced.
The invention has the beneficial effects that: the Z-source inverter is controlled by adopting a cascade model predictive control method, so that the weight coefficient is effectively eliminated, and the calculation amount of a digital processor is reduced.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a circuit diagram of a quasi-Z-source inverter;
FIG. 2 is an equivalent circuit diagram of a quasi-Z-source inverter in a non-shoot-through state;
FIG. 3 is an equivalent circuit diagram of a quasi-Z-source inverter in a shoot-through state;
FIG. 4 is a basic flow diagram of the S-MPC1 method of the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a basic flow diagram of the S-MPC2 method of the present invention;
FIG. 6 is a graph of experimental waveforms for the FCS-MPC method;
FIG. 7 is a graph of experimental waveforms for the S-MPC1 method;
FIG. 8 is a graph of experimental waveforms for the S-MPC2 method.
Detailed Description
The invention is further described below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Referring to fig. 1 to 8, a quasi-Z source inverter model predictive control method without a weight coefficient includes the following steps:
the current is recorded as the kth sampling moment, the voltage signal and the current signal of the Z-source inverter are sampled, and the sampling content comprises the following steps: inductor current iL1(k) And a capacitor voltage vC1(k) And outputting the load three-phase current ia(k)、ib(k) And ic(k) Then converting the three-phase current of the load from the three-phase static coordinate system to an alpha beta coordinate system to obtain ioα(k) Andioβ(k);
2.1, establishing an output voltage equation of the AC side of the quasi-Z source inverter
The minimum 8 output voltage vectors required for the qZSI system are first listed in Table 1
TABLE 1
8 output voltage vectors V of qZSIx(k) Is shown as
Wherein a ═ ej2π/3;x=[0~7];vdcThe peak voltage of a direct current side bus connected to the inverter bridge; s1、S3、S5Switch states of A, B, C phases, respectively;
the output voltage equation of the qZSI AC side is
Wherein R, L is the load phase resistance and phase inductance, Vxα、VxβFor the voltage component of the output voltage vector on the α β axis, ioα(k)、ioβ(k) Is the current component of the output current vector on the α β axis;
2.2, establishing an inductance current and capacitance voltage equation of the quasi-Z source impedance network in a non-direct-through state and a direct-through state respectively;
2.2.1) non-pass-through state:
in the formula, L1、C1Respectively, the inductance and capacitance values in the impedance network; rL1Is an inductance L1The stray resistance of (2); v. ofin(k) Is the input voltage; i.e. iL1(k) And vC1(k) Sampling values of the inductive current and the capacitor voltage at the kth sampling moment respectively; i.e. iinv(k)=iA(k)S1+iB(k)S3+iC(k)S5;iA(k)、iB(k) And iC(k) Current values of the phase A, the phase B and the phase C at the kth sampling moment;
2.2.2) straight-through state:
in the formula, L1、C1Respectively, the inductance and capacitance values in the impedance network; rL1Is an inductance L1The stray resistance of (2); i.e. iL1(k) And vC1(k) Sampling values of the inductive current and the capacitor voltage at the kth sampling moment respectively;
step 3, establishing a prediction model of the quasi-Z source inverter, wherein the process is as follows:
3.1), adopting a forward Euler method to control each control variable with a control period TsUnder the conditions of (1) discretization
Substituting the formula (5) into the formulas (2), (3) and (4) respectively to obtain a predicted value of the output current, a predicted value of the inductive current and a predicted value of the capacitive voltage:
predicted value of output current:
in the formula ioα(k) And ioβ(k) Component i on the α β axis of the current sample value at the k-th sampling instantoα(k +1) and ioβ(k +1) is a component of a current predicted value at the k +1 th sampling moment on an alpha beta axis;
predicted values of inductor current and capacitor voltage in non-shoot-through state:
in the formula iL1(k +1) and vC1(k +1) are respectively the predicted values of the inductive current and the capacitive voltage at the (k +1) th sampling moment in a non-direct-connection state;
predicted values of inductor current and capacitor voltage in the shoot-through state:
in the formula iL1(k +1) and vC1(k +1) are respectively the predicted values of the inductive current and the capacitive voltage in the direct-connection state at the (k +1) th sampling moment;
3.2) Compensation method for adding delay
Because of a large amount of calculation in the digital control system, the calculated switching state is output in the next control period, and the last switching state is continuously applied before the calculation, so that the output delay of the system is caused, and the normal work of the system is influenced; carrying out cost function calculation by adopting the predicted value of the (k +2) th sampling moment to compensate output delay;
substituting k in the formulas (6), (7) and (8) by k +1 to obtain the predicted value of each control object at the time of k +2, and then substituting the predicted value into a cost function to calculate;
step 4, calculating the reference value of each control object, wherein the process is as follows:
4.1) calculation of reference values for the inductor current and the capacitor voltage
In the formula, Po_refAs an output power reference value, iL1_ref(k) Is the reference value v of the inductor currentC1_ref(k) The reference value of the capacitor voltage is a constant value;
4.2) calculating the phase current amplitude of the reference output current
In the formula Iom_refIs the phase current amplitude of the reference output current and is a constant value;
step 5, designing a cascade model prediction control method suitable for a quasi-Z source inverter
In the quasi-Z source inverter, the control objects comprise inductive current, capacitor voltage and output current, the inductive current control represents the control of input power, the capacitor voltage control represents the control of boosting on a direct current side, and the output current control represents the control of inversion on an alternating current side;
5.1, judging the state of the next control period according to the predicted value of the inductive current
Because of the particularity of the inductive current, the inductive current predicted values corresponding to 7 non-through vectors are the same as 1 value, while 1 through vector corresponds to 1 inductive current predicted value, and the inductive current predicted value in the non-through state is recorded as iL1_ns(k +2) and the predicted value of the inductor current in the through state is iL1_s(k+2);
Cost function g in equation (11)nsAnd gsAll take the form of absolute values; at this time, by comparing gnsAnd gsCan judge what state the next control cycle is, if gns<gsIf the state is judged to be a non-straight-through state, 5.2) is entered; if g isns>gsIf the direct current state is judged, the direct current vector is directly output;
5.2) obtaining the optimal voltage vector for the capacitor voltage and the output current according to the cascade thought
5.2.1) remember that the method of calculating the capacitor voltage first and then the output current is S-MPC1
Firstly, 7 non-straight-through vectors are substituted into a (12) capacitance-voltage cost functionNumber g C2 optimal voltage vectors are selected, and then the 2 optimal voltage vectors are substituted into an output current cost function g of a formula (12)iFinally, an optimal voltage vector is selected.
In the formula ioα_ref(k) And ioβ_ref(k) Respectively outputting components of three-phase current on an alpha beta axis for reference;
capacitance voltage cost function g in equation (12)CIn the form of absolute values, and a current cost function g is outputiIn the form of a square;
5.2.2) remember that the method of calculating the output current first and then the capacitor voltage is S-MPC2
Firstly, 7 non-straight-through vectors are substituted into an output current cost function g of a formula (12)i2 optimal voltage vectors are selected, and then the 2 optimal voltage vectors are substituted into a capacitance voltage cost function g of an equation (12)CFinally selecting an optimal voltage;
and 6, taking the optimal switching state obtained by calculation in the step 5 as the switching state at the k +1 th moment, and obtaining the switching state at the k +2 th moment from the steps so as to circulate continuously.
Claims (3)
1. A quasi-Z-source inverter model predictive control method without weight coefficients is characterized by comprising the following steps:
step 1, aligning a voltage signal and a current signal of a Z-source inverter to sample;
the current is recorded as the kth sampling moment, the voltage signal and the current signal of the Z-source inverter are sampled, and the sampling content comprises the following steps: inductor current iL1(k) And a capacitor voltage vC1(k) And outputting the load three-phase current ia(k)、ib(k) And ic(k) Then converting the three-phase current of the load from the three-phase static coordinate system to an alpha beta coordinate system to obtain ioα(k) And ioβ(k);
Step 2, establishing a mathematical model of the quasi-Z source inverter, wherein the process is as follows:
2.1, establishing an output voltage equation of the AC side of the quasi-Z source inverter
The minimum 8 output voltage vectors required for the qZSI system are first listed in Table 1
TABLE 1
8 output voltage vectors V of qZSIx(k) Is shown as
Wherein a ═ ej2π/3;x=[0~7];vdcThe peak voltage of a direct current side bus connected to the inverter bridge; s1、S3、S5Switch states of A, B, C phases, respectively;
the output voltage equation of the qZSI AC side is
Wherein R, L is the load phase resistance and phase inductance, Vxα、VxβFor the voltage component of the output voltage vector on the α β axis, ioα(k)、ioβ(k) Is the current component of the output current vector on the α β axis;
2.2, establishing an inductance current and capacitance voltage equation of the quasi-Z source impedance network in a non-direct-through state and a direct-through state respectively;
2.2.1) non-pass-through state:
in the formula, L1、C1Respectively, the inductance and capacitance values in the impedance network; rL1Is an inductance L1The stray resistance of (2); v. ofin(k) Is input intoA voltage; i.e. iL1(k) And vC1(k) Sampling values of the inductive current and the capacitor voltage at the kth sampling moment respectively; i.e. iinv(k)=iA(k)S1+iB(k)S3+iC(k)S5;iA(k)、iB(k) And iC(k) Current values of the phase A, the phase B and the phase C at the kth sampling moment;
2.2.2) straight-through state:
in the formula, L1、C1Respectively, the inductance and capacitance values in the impedance network; rL1Is an inductance L1The stray resistance of (2); i.e. iL1(k) And vC1(k) Sampling values of the inductive current and the capacitor voltage at the kth sampling moment respectively;
step 3, establishing a prediction model of the quasi-Z source inverter, wherein the process is as follows:
3.1) adopting a forward Euler method to control each control variable with a control period TsUnder the conditions of (1) discretization
Substituting the formula (5) into the formulas (2), (3) and (4) respectively to obtain a predicted value of the output current, a predicted value of the inductive current and a predicted value of the capacitive voltage:
predicted value of output current:
in the formula ioα(k) And ioβ(k) Component i on the α β axis of the current sample value at the k-th sampling instantoα(k +1) and ioβ(k +1) is a component of a current predicted value at the k +1 th sampling moment on an alpha beta axis;
predicted values of inductor current and capacitor voltage in non-shoot-through state:
in the formula iL1(k +1) and vC1(k +1) are respectively the predicted values of the inductive current and the capacitive voltage at the (k +1) th sampling moment in a non-direct-connection state;
predicted values of inductor current and capacitor voltage in the shoot-through state:
in the formula iL1(k +1) and vC1(k +1) are respectively the predicted values of the inductive current and the capacitive voltage in the direct-connection state at the (k +1) th sampling moment;
3.2) Compensation method for adding delay
Carrying out cost function calculation by adopting the predicted value of the (k +2) th sampling moment to compensate output delay;
substituting k in the formulas (6), (7) and (8) by k +1 to obtain the predicted value of each control object at the time of k +2, and then substituting the predicted value into a cost function to calculate;
step 4, calculating the reference value of each control object, wherein the process is as follows:
4.1) calculation of reference values for the inductor current and the capacitor voltage
In the formula, Po_refAs an output power reference value, iL1_ref(k) Is the reference value v of the inductor currentC1_ref(k) The reference value of the capacitor voltage is a constant value;
4.2) calculating the phase current amplitude of the reference output current
In the formula Iom_refIs the phase current amplitude of the reference output current and is a constant value;
step 5, designing a cascade model prediction control method suitable for a quasi-Z source inverter
In the quasi-Z source inverter, the control objects are inductive current, capacitance voltage and output current, the inductive current control represents the control of input power, the capacitance voltage control represents the control of boosting on the DC side, the output current control represents the control of inversion on the AC side,
5.1) judging the state of the next control period according to the predicted value of the inductive current
Because of the particularity of the inductive current, the inductive current predicted values corresponding to 7 non-through vectors are the same as 1 value, while 1 through vector corresponds to 1 inductive current predicted value, and the inductive current predicted value in the non-through state is recorded as iL1_ns(k +2) and the predicted value of the inductor current in the through state is iL1_s(k+2);
5.2) obtaining the optimal voltage vector for the capacitor voltage and the output current according to the cascade thought
5.2.1) remember that the method of calculating the capacitor voltage first and then the output current is S-MPC1
Firstly, 7 non-straight-through vectors are substituted into a (12) capacitor voltage cost function gC2 optimal voltage vectors are selected, and then the 2 optimal voltage vectors are substituted into an output current cost function g of a formula (12)iFinally selecting an optimal voltage vector;
in the formula ioα_ref(k) And ioβ_ref(k) Respectively outputting components of three-phase current on an alpha beta axis for reference;
5.2.2) remember that the method of calculating the output current first and then the capacitor voltage is S-MPC2
Firstly, 7 non-straight-through channels are connectedVector substitution formula (12) output current cost function gi2 optimal voltage vectors are selected, and then the 2 optimal voltage vectors are substituted into a capacitance voltage cost function g of an equation (12)CFinally selecting an optimal voltage;
and 6, taking the optimal switching state obtained by calculation in the step 5 as the switching state at the k +1 th moment, and obtaining the switching state at the k +2 th moment from the steps so as to circulate continuously.
2. The quasi-Z-source inverter model predictive control method without weight coefficients as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that in 5.1), the cost function g in formula (11) isnsAnd gsAll take the form of absolute values; at this time, by comparing gnsAnd gsCan judge what state the next control cycle is, if gns<gsIf the state is judged to be a non-straight-through state, 5.2) is entered; if g isns>gsIf the direct vector is judged to be in the direct state, the direct vector is directly output.
3. The quasi-Z-source inverter model predictive control method without weight coefficients as claimed in claim 1 or 2, characterized in that in 5.2.1), the capacitance-voltage cost function g in formula (12)CIn the form of absolute values, and a current cost function g is outputiIn the form of a square.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010572451.8A CN111817595B (en) | 2020-06-22 | 2020-06-22 | quasi-Z-source inverter model prediction control method without weight coefficient |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010572451.8A CN111817595B (en) | 2020-06-22 | 2020-06-22 | quasi-Z-source inverter model prediction control method without weight coefficient |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN111817595A true CN111817595A (en) | 2020-10-23 |
CN111817595B CN111817595B (en) | 2021-12-17 |
Family
ID=72846432
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010572451.8A Active CN111817595B (en) | 2020-06-22 | 2020-06-22 | quasi-Z-source inverter model prediction control method without weight coefficient |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN111817595B (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN112039358A (en) * | 2020-08-26 | 2020-12-04 | 湖南大学 | Voltage floating Z-source inverter control method, system and medium |
CN112688587A (en) * | 2020-12-28 | 2021-04-20 | 珠海创芯科技有限公司 | Robust prediction control method of impedance source inverter |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103326598A (en) * | 2013-05-20 | 2013-09-25 | 河南师范大学 | Three-phase rectifier rapid model predictive control method |
CN107959431A (en) * | 2017-12-01 | 2018-04-24 | 北京航空航天大学 | Quasi- Z-source inverter direct current bus voltage control method is predicted based on straight-through duty cycle |
CN110190766A (en) * | 2019-05-13 | 2019-08-30 | 浙江工业大学 | A kind of quasi- Z-source inverter reduces the model predictive control method of switching frequency |
CN111277156A (en) * | 2020-03-16 | 2020-06-12 | 江苏师范大学 | Multi-level inverter FCS-MPC control method without weight factors |
-
2020
- 2020-06-22 CN CN202010572451.8A patent/CN111817595B/en active Active
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103326598A (en) * | 2013-05-20 | 2013-09-25 | 河南师范大学 | Three-phase rectifier rapid model predictive control method |
CN107959431A (en) * | 2017-12-01 | 2018-04-24 | 北京航空航天大学 | Quasi- Z-source inverter direct current bus voltage control method is predicted based on straight-through duty cycle |
CN110190766A (en) * | 2019-05-13 | 2019-08-30 | 浙江工业大学 | A kind of quasi- Z-source inverter reduces the model predictive control method of switching frequency |
CN111277156A (en) * | 2020-03-16 | 2020-06-12 | 江苏师范大学 | Multi-level inverter FCS-MPC control method without weight factors |
Non-Patent Citations (4)
Title |
---|
周小杰: ""光伏并网控制系统研究"", 《中国博士学位论文全文数据库 工程科技Ⅱ辑》 * |
方番 等: ""储能型准Z源逆变器的有限集模型预测控制策略"", 《中国电机工程学报》 * |
游云峰 等: ""单相级联准z源逆变器有限集模型预测控制"", 《电力系统保护与控制》 * |
赖华: ""优化的三电平逆变器无权重因子模型预测控制"", 《驱动控制》 * |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN112039358A (en) * | 2020-08-26 | 2020-12-04 | 湖南大学 | Voltage floating Z-source inverter control method, system and medium |
CN112688587A (en) * | 2020-12-28 | 2021-04-20 | 珠海创芯科技有限公司 | Robust prediction control method of impedance source inverter |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN111817595B (en) | 2021-12-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN111817595B (en) | quasi-Z-source inverter model prediction control method without weight coefficient | |
Chierchie et al. | Dead-time distortion shaping | |
CN104022627A (en) | Control circuit and power converter | |
Rong et al. | A new voltage measure method for MMC based on sample delay compensation | |
CN103066878A (en) | Control method for modularized multilevel converter | |
WO2023131127A1 (en) | Detection method and device for insulation impedance of direct current side of photovoltaic inverter | |
CN112152469A (en) | Repetitive control method for three-phase AC electronic load | |
CN104348368B (en) | The control method realized in speed change driver | |
CN108964119B (en) | Common-mode voltage estimation method for T-type three-level grid-connected inverter | |
Shabani et al. | A high step-up PWM non-isolated DC-DC converter with soft switching operation | |
CN111740633A (en) | Improved digital control method for grid-connected inverter under unbalanced grid pressure condition | |
CN110995032B (en) | Dead-zone compensation added PWM rectifier dead-beat control method | |
JP2001157441A (en) | Power conversion apparatus | |
TWI718781B (en) | Three-phase dead-time compensation apparatus and method thereof | |
CN114597939A (en) | Method and system for suppressing grid-connected current harmonic waves of inverter | |
CN110445409B (en) | Optimal sequence modulation method for converter with midpoint potential control capability | |
Du et al. | The improved model predictive control based on novel error correction between reference and predicted current | |
Li et al. | A new digital control method for high performance 400 Hz ground power unit | |
CN110677064A (en) | Single-phase PWM rectifier fixed-frequency current prediction control method | |
CN107359804B (en) | Dead-beat control method for LCL type three-level grid-connected inverter | |
CN112290816B (en) | Integrated circuit for controlling three-level inverter | |
Sozanski | Improved shunt active power filters | |
CN110676860A (en) | Fast prediction unbalance control method based on extended instantaneous active theory | |
Dahidah et al. | Single phase active power filter for harmonic mitigation in distribution power lines | |
Kim et al. | Compensation technique for current sensorless digital control of bridgeless PFC converter under critical conduction mode |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |