CN111725771A - A zigzag design of the end part of the explosion-proof device of a 220kV metal type high-voltage cable joint - Google Patents
A zigzag design of the end part of the explosion-proof device of a 220kV metal type high-voltage cable joint Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN111725771A CN111725771A CN201911263243.3A CN201911263243A CN111725771A CN 111725771 A CN111725771 A CN 111725771A CN 201911263243 A CN201911263243 A CN 201911263243A CN 111725771 A CN111725771 A CN 111725771A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- explosion
- stress
- voltage cable
- cable joint
- proof device
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 38
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 title claims abstract description 25
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 25
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 238000004880 explosion Methods 0.000 claims description 18
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 17
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000035939 shock Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000005452 bending Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000011257 shell material Substances 0.000 claims 6
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 abstract description 10
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 abstract description 10
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 19
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 14
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 10
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000002360 explosive Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000001681 protective effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000005422 blasting Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000009413 insulation Methods 0.000 description 4
- 229910000861 Mg alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- SNAAJJQQZSMGQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminum magnesium Chemical compound [Mg].[Al] SNAAJJQQZSMGQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000956 alloy Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005728 strengthening Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001808 coupling effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004703 cross-linked polyethylene Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920003020 cross-linked polyethylene Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 230000005684 electric field Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011900 installation process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010998 test method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004078 waterproofing Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02G—INSTALLATION OF ELECTRIC CABLES OR LINES, OR OF COMBINED OPTICAL AND ELECTRIC CABLES OR LINES
- H02G15/00—Cable fittings
- H02G15/02—Cable terminations
- H02G15/06—Cable terminating boxes, frames or other structures
- H02G15/064—Cable terminating boxes, frames or other structures with devices for relieving electrical stress
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01L—MEASURING FORCE, STRESS, TORQUE, WORK, MECHANICAL POWER, MECHANICAL EFFICIENCY, OR FLUID PRESSURE
- G01L5/00—Apparatus for, or methods of, measuring force, work, mechanical power, or torque, specially adapted for specific purposes
- G01L5/14—Apparatus for, or methods of, measuring force, work, mechanical power, or torque, specially adapted for specific purposes for measuring the force of explosions; for measuring the energy of projectiles
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Cable Accessories (AREA)
Abstract
本发明公开了一种220kV金属型高压电缆接头防爆装置端头部位的折线形设计,包括:通过优化折线偏折角度和法兰尺寸的方法,均衡保护装置端头部位应力分布。利用有限元计算方法,基于电磁‑热和应力场耦合的原理,对不同结构下220kV金属型高压电缆接头防爆壳体端头部位内壁承受的应力进行计算。通过仿真计算,得到不同偏折角度与最大应力值的变化关系,结合保护装置实用性和经济性,采用220kV金属型高压电缆接头防爆装置端头部位折线偏折角度为60°;在端头和壳体连接处优化了法兰的高度和厚度,使端头折线顶点处的应力分布得以均衡,通过仿真计算,采用最优化的法兰高度和厚度分别为20mm和50mm。本发明通过对比折线型端头结构和弧度型端头结构,认为在相同的技术条件下,折线型端头结构具有更好的经济效益。The invention discloses a fold-line design for the end portion of an explosion-proof device of a 220kV metal type high-voltage cable joint. Using the finite element calculation method, based on the principle of electromagnetic-heat and stress field coupling, the stress on the inner wall of the end of the explosion-proof shell of the 220kV metal type high-voltage cable joint under different structures is calculated. Through the simulation calculation, the relationship between different deflection angles and the maximum stress value is obtained. Combined with the practicability and economy of the protection device, the deflection angle of the broken line at the end of the explosion-proof device of the 220kV metal type high-voltage cable joint is 60°; The height and thickness of the flange are optimized at the connection with the shell, so that the stress distribution at the vertex of the end polyline can be balanced. Through simulation calculation, the optimized flange height and thickness are 20mm and 50mm respectively. In the present invention, by comparing the folded-line end structure and the radian-shaped end structure, it is believed that the folded-line end structure has better economic benefits under the same technical conditions.
Description
技术领域technical field
本发明涉及220kV高压电缆接头保护领域,尤其涉及一种220kV金属型高压电缆接头保护装置端头部位的折线形设计。The invention relates to the field of 220kV high-voltage cable joint protection, in particular to a broken-line design of an end portion of a 220kV metal-type high-voltage cable joint protection device.
背景技术Background technique
由于结构复杂,需现场安装且安装工艺参差不齐,导致高压电缆接头成为高压电力电缆运行的薄弱环节。据统计,70%以上的电缆故障出现在接头部位。当高压电缆接头发生绝缘击穿故障时,电弧将在绝缘击穿通道内释放巨大能量,导致电缆接头发生烧毁、爆炸事故。电缆接头爆炸释放的冲击波或碎片会对周围其他电力设施及运维人员造成巨大伤害。因而,需要在高压电缆接头处加装防爆装置,以避免电缆接头爆炸而引起的二次伤害。Due to the complex structure, on-site installation and uneven installation process, the high-voltage cable joint has become a weak link in the operation of high-voltage power cables. According to statistics, more than 70% of cable faults occur at the joints. When the insulation breakdown fault occurs in the high-voltage cable joint, the arc will release huge energy in the insulation breakdown channel, causing the cable joint to burn and explode. The shock wave or debris released by the explosion of the cable joint will cause huge damage to other surrounding power facilities and operation and maintenance personnel. Therefore, it is necessary to install an explosion-proof device at the high-voltage cable joint to avoid secondary damage caused by the explosion of the cable joint.
目前,市场上已开发一系列高压电缆接头防爆装置,以降低此爆炸事故带来的危害。但这些防爆装置,尤其是在其端头部位,都存在内部压力不均衡的问题。当电缆接头发生爆炸时,巨大的电弧能量对保护装置内部产生的冲击力分布将在端头处产生畸变,造成端头某些部位承受的冲击应力远大于其他部位,使得端头部位更容易被炸裂,从而影响保护装置防爆效果。对现行市场常见的电缆接头防爆壳体进行试验测试,结果表明在电缆接头爆炸后,接头保护装置主体部分仍较为完整,而端头部位被严重破坏,出现碎片飞溅的现象。因而,需要对防爆装置端头部位形状进行合理的设计,以均衡爆炸时装置内部的冲击应力。At present, a series of high-voltage cable joint explosion-proof devices have been developed on the market to reduce the harm caused by this explosion accident. However, these explosion-proof devices, especially at their ends, have the problem of unbalanced internal pressure. When the cable joint explodes, the impact force distribution of the huge arc energy on the inside of the protection device will be distorted at the end, causing the impact stress on some parts of the end to be much greater than other parts, making the end part easier be exploded, thus affecting the explosion-proof effect of the protective device. Tests were carried out on the common explosion-proof casings of cable joints in the current market. The results showed that after the explosion of the cable joints, the main part of the joint protection device was still relatively intact, while the end parts were severely damaged, and debris splashed. Therefore, it is necessary to reasonably design the shape of the end portion of the explosion-proof device to balance the impact stress inside the device during explosion.
由于短路电弧的能量更大,对输电电压等级的高压电缆接头防爆装置普遍采用金属外壳(大多为铝镁合金),且为分段式结构,即包含中间本体部分和两端的端头部分。目前,高压电缆接头防爆装置端头部位结构大多仅凭厂家经验设计,没有均衡端头部位内壁冲击波压力分布的措施。通常需要增加防爆装置端头部位的厚度,才能达到防爆效果。采用具有一定的弯曲弧度的端头形状,是均衡装置内部应力分布的有效办法。但对高压电缆接头防爆装置来说,采用弧度设计会明显增加加工过程中的困难程度及制造成本。另外,弧度设计将增加端头部位的长度,可能收到防爆装置实际安装条件的限制,可行性较低。Due to the larger energy of the short-circuit arc, metal casings (mostly aluminum-magnesium alloys) are generally used for high-voltage cable joint explosion-proof devices of transmission voltage levels, and they are segmented structures, that is, including the middle body part and the end parts at both ends. At present, most of the structure of the end part of the explosion-proof device of the high-voltage cable joint is designed only by the experience of the manufacturer, and there is no measure to balance the shock wave pressure distribution on the inner wall of the end part. It is usually necessary to increase the thickness of the end of the explosion-proof device to achieve the explosion-proof effect. It is an effective way to equalize the internal stress distribution of the device by adopting the shape of the end head with a certain bending arc. However, for the high-voltage cable joint explosion-proof device, the use of radian design will significantly increase the difficulty and manufacturing cost in the processing process. In addition, the arc design will increase the length of the end part, which may be limited by the actual installation conditions of the explosion-proof device, and the feasibility is low.
由以上分析可知,端头部位的弧形设计存在加工、使用以及成本方面的问题;折线形设计又必然会有顶点,压力分布会在该点处集中。但在折角顶点处采用法兰连接,相当于进行了结构局部加强,会使得该点处的应力值下降。因而,通过对端头部位折线偏折角度以及与保护装置本体连接的法兰高度和壁厚的设计,可以解决折线型设计内壁压力分布在折角处集中的问题。From the above analysis, it can be seen that the arc design of the end part has problems in processing, use and cost; the polyline design must have a vertex, and the pressure distribution will be concentrated at this point. However, the use of flange connection at the apex of the chamfer is equivalent to local strengthening of the structure, which will reduce the stress value at this point. Therefore, by designing the deflection angle of the broken line at the end and the height and wall thickness of the flange connected to the protective device body, the problem that the pressure distribution of the inner wall of the broken line design is concentrated at the corner can be solved.
发明内容SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
本发明提供了一种220kV金属型高压电缆接头保护装置端头部位的折线形设计,用以解决现有的220kV高压电缆接头保护装置端头部位的弧形设计存在加工、使用以及成本问题和折线形设计内壁应力分布在折角处集中的问题。The invention provides a fold-line design of the end portion of a 220kV metal type high-voltage cable joint protection device, which is used to solve the problems of processing, use and cost of the arc-shaped design of the end portion of the existing 220kV high-voltage cable joint protection device. And the problem that the stress distribution of the inner wall of the polyline design is concentrated at the corners.
为解决上述技术问题,本发明提出的技术方案为:In order to solve the above-mentioned technical problems, the technical scheme proposed by the present invention is:
一种220kV金属型高压电缆接头保护装置端头部位的折线形结构,包括:A folded-line structure at the end of a 220kV metal type high-voltage cable joint protection device, comprising:
在220kV高压电缆接头防爆装置中,其端头部位选择有偏折角度的折线形结构,并且在折角顶点处采用法兰连接,相当于进行了结构局部加强,使得在顶点处的应力畸变程度下降。In the explosion-proof device of 220kV high-voltage cable joints, the folded-line structure with deflection angle is selected at the end part, and the flange connection is adopted at the apex of the folded corner, which is equivalent to the local strengthening of the structure, so that the degree of stress distortion at the apex is decline.
优选地,220kV金属型高压电缆接头故障时,短路电弧释放的能量通过气流作用于防爆壳体,在壳体上产生应力,防爆壳体内壁出现最大应力值以及应力畸变最明显的位置为保护装置端头与本体的连接处,即折角顶点处。Preferably, when the 220kV metal type high-voltage cable joint fails, the energy released by the short-circuit arc acts on the explosion-proof casing through the airflow, and generates stress on the casing. The position where the maximum stress value and the most obvious stress distortion appear on the inner wall of the explosion-proof casing is the protection device. The connection between the end and the body, that is, at the apex of the corner.
优选地,220kV金属型高压电缆接头防爆装置端头部位的应力分布计算,采用有限元软件,建立220kV金属型高压电缆接头防爆装置爆炸过程的仿真模型,通过热-流体-应力多物理场耦合的原理,计算短路电弧产生的爆炸冲击波在防爆装置上产生的冲击应力分布,得到壳体最大应力值和壳体平均应力值。Preferably, for the calculation of stress distribution at the end of the explosion-proof device for 220kV metal type high-voltage cable joints, finite element software is used to establish a simulation model of the explosion process of the explosion-proof device for 220kV metal type high-voltage cable joints, through thermal-fluid-stress multi-physical field coupling According to the principle of calculating the impact stress distribution of the explosion shock wave generated by the short-circuit arc on the explosion-proof device, the maximum stress value of the shell and the average stress value of the shell are obtained.
优选地,折角顶点处所受的最大应力值可通过选取最合适的折线偏折角度α来改变其最大应力值。Preferably, the maximum stress value at the apex of the folding angle can be changed by selecting the most suitable folding line deflection angle α.
优选地,220kV金属型高压电缆接头防爆装置壳体承受应力的大小除与气流冲击力有关外,在壳体折线顶点处采用加厚的法兰,可起到缓解壳体内部应力分布作用。Preferably, the stress on the shell of the explosion-proof device of the 220kV metal type high-voltage cable joint is related to the impact force of the airflow, and a thickened flange is used at the vertex of the broken line of the shell, which can relieve the stress distribution inside the shell.
优选地,设计不同端头部位折线偏折角度以及与保护装置本体连接的法兰厚度h和高度L,通过仿真计算得出最优的折线偏折角度和法兰厚度、高度值。Preferably, the deflection angle of the broken line at different end parts and the thickness h and height L of the flange connected to the protection device body are designed, and the optimal deflection angle of the broken line and the flange thickness and height are obtained through simulation calculation.
优选地,220kV金属型高压电缆接头防爆装置端头结构的折线偏折角度确定为60°,折线顶点连接法兰厚度确定为20mm,高度为50mm,腔体内的应力畸变系数k降至1.48。Preferably, the deflection angle of the broken line of the end structure of the explosion-proof device of the 220kV metal type high-voltage cable joint is determined to be 60°, the thickness of the connecting flange at the vertex of the broken line is determined to be 20mm, the height is 50mm, and the stress distortion coefficient k in the cavity is reduced to 1.48.
本发明具有以下有益效果:The present invention has the following beneficial effects:
本发明的220kV金属型高压电缆接头保护装置端头部位的折线形结构,通过对比初始、优化折线形端头部位和弧度型端头结构,可使保护装置内壁应力畸变系数从初始的4.72降至1.48,认为优化折线形端头部位具有较低的应力畸变系数,防爆性能较好;在相同的技术条件下,优化折线形端头结构具有更好的经济效益。The broken-line structure of the end portion of the 220kV metal type high-voltage cable joint protection device of the present invention can make the stress distortion coefficient of the inner wall of the protection device from the initial 4.72 by comparing the initial and optimizing the broken-line end portion and the arc-shaped end structure. When it dropped to 1.48, it is considered that the optimized zigzag end has a lower stress distortion coefficient and better explosion-proof performance; under the same technical conditions, the optimized zigzag end structure has better economic benefits.
除了上面所描述的目的、特征和优点之外,本发明还有其它的目的、特征和优点。下面将参照附图,对本发明作进一步详细的说明。In addition to the objects, features and advantages described above, the present invention has other objects, features and advantages. The present invention will be described in further detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
附图说明Description of drawings
构成本申请的一部分的附图用来提供对本发明的进一步理解,本发明的示意性实施例及其说明用于解释本发明,并不构成对本发明的不当限定。在附图中:The accompanying drawings constituting a part of the present application are used to provide further understanding of the present invention, and the exemplary embodiments of the present invention and their descriptions are used to explain the present invention and do not constitute an improper limitation of the present invention. In the attached image:
图1是本发明优选实施例的多物理场之间耦合作用形式图;Fig. 1 is the coupling action form diagram between multi-physics fields of the preferred embodiment of the present invention;
图2是本发明优选实施例的高压电缆接头保护装置仿真模型图;2 is a simulation model diagram of a high-voltage cable joint protection device according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention;
图3是本发明优选实施例的高压电缆接头保护装置折线形端部结构图;Fig. 3 is the structure diagram of the broken-line end portion of the high-voltage cable joint protection device according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention;
图4是本发明优选实施例的三维保护装置应力分布示意图;4 is a schematic diagram of stress distribution of a three-dimensional protection device according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention;
图5是本发明优选实施例的保护装置实物图;Figure 5 is a physical diagram of the protection device of the preferred embodiment of the present invention;
图6是本发明优选实施例的防爆装置泄能孔上盖板处气压变化过程图;FIG. 6 is a process diagram of air pressure change at the upper cover plate of the energy release hole of the explosion-proof device according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention;
图7是本发明优选实施例的防爆装置端头部位折线偏折角度与最大应力值的关系曲线;Fig. 7 is the relationship curve between the deflection angle of the broken line and the maximum stress value of the end portion of the explosion-proof device according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention;
图8是本发明优选实施例的不同法兰结构下端头部位的应力特征值;Fig. 8 is the stress characteristic value of the lower end portion of different flange structures according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention;
图9是本发明优选实施例的折线形端头的结构图;Fig. 9 is the structure diagram of the zigzag-shaped terminal of the preferred embodiment of the present invention;
图10是本发明优选实施例的高压电缆接头保护装置爆前示意图;Fig. 10 is the schematic diagram before explosion of the high-voltage cable joint protection device of the preferred embodiment of the present invention;
图11是本发明优选实施例的应变花安装示意图和实物图;Fig. 11 is the installation schematic diagram and the physical diagram of the strain rosette of the preferred embodiment of the present invention;
图12是本发明优选实施例的试验过程和试验测得的典型应变波形图;FIG. 12 is a typical strain waveform diagram of the test process and test measurement of the preferred embodiment of the present invention;
图13是本发明优选实施例的弧度型端头结构图;FIG. 13 is a structural diagram of a curved end head according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention;
具体实施方式Detailed ways
以下结合附图对本发明的实施例进行详细说明,但是本发明可以由权利要求限定和覆盖的多种不同方式实施。The embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings, but the present invention can be implemented in many different ways as defined and covered by the claims.
参见图1,针对电缆接头短路电弧引起爆炸的问题,其核心是温度场、流体场和应力场相互作用的结果,由于电弧爆炸所引起的温度升高,然后气体膨胀,冲击防爆壳体,因而在壳体上产生应力,通过分析总结了电缆接头仿真中多物理场之间耦合的作用关系。Referring to Figure 1, the core of the explosion caused by the short-circuit arc of the cable joint is the result of the interaction of the temperature field, the fluid field and the stress field. Due to the temperature increase caused by the arc explosion, the gas expands and impacts the explosion-proof casing. The stress is generated on the shell, and the interaction between the coupling between the multiphysics in the cable joint simulation is summarized by analysis.
参见图2,以220kV金属型高压电缆接头防爆装置为主要应用对象,给出了其端头部位折线型设计方法。根据国内外相关文献以及工程上220kV XLPE绝缘高压交流电缆附件各部位的几何参数,参考国内附件厂家生产附件原型以及材料承受的电场强度,在COMSOLMultiphysics仿真软件中按照1:1的比例建立了二维轴对称仿真模型。金属型防爆装置采用5系铝镁合金材料,防爆装置长度为2200mm,内壁厚度为460mm,壁厚为8mm。在前期研究仿真中得到了220kV高压电缆接头因绝缘击穿产生的大电流电弧的等效热损耗,因此将220kV高压电缆接头绝缘击穿产生的电弧等效为半径4.4mm,位于轴线正中心处的热源球体,选用的电弧能量热损耗密度为7×1015W/m3。由于本发明针对端头部位的应力分布进行研究,故在模型搭建时省略了壳体上的泄能孔,建立了二维轴对称模型。Referring to Figure 2, taking the explosion-proof device of the 220kV metal type high-voltage cable joint as the main application object, the design method of the broken line at the end part is given. According to the relevant literature at home and abroad and the geometric parameters of each part of the 220kV XLPE insulated high-voltage AC cable accessories in the project, referring to the prototypes of accessories produced by domestic accessory manufacturers and the electric field strength of the materials, a two-dimensional model was established in the COMSOL Multiphysics simulation software according to the ratio of 1:1. Axisymmetric simulation model. The metal type explosion-proof device is made of 5 series aluminum-magnesium alloy material. The length of the explosion-proof device is 2200mm, the inner wall thickness is 460mm, and the wall thickness is 8mm. In the previous research and simulation, the equivalent heat loss of the high-current arc generated by the insulation breakdown of the 220kV high-voltage cable joint was obtained. Therefore, the arc generated by the insulation breakdown of the 220kV high-voltage cable joint is equivalent to a radius of 4.4mm, which is located at the center of the axis. For the heat source sphere, the selected arc energy heat loss density is 7×10 15 W/m 3 . Since the present invention studies the stress distribution at the end portion, the energy leakage hole on the shell is omitted when the model is built, and a two-dimensional axisymmetric model is established.
参见图3和图4,防爆壳体内壁应力畸变最明显的位置为保护装置端头与本体的连接处,即连接点M。最大应力值PM也出现在连接点M处,最大应力值PM达到33296N/m2。通过仿真计算,防爆壳体的平均应力值Pavg,与出现在图4中点N位置处的应力值近似,因此认为可以用靠近电缆出口处的端头点位的应力值反映防爆壳体的平均应力值,平均应力值Pavg为7051N/m2。将最大应力值PM与壳体平均应力值Pavg之比定义为应力的畸变系数k,可得该防爆壳体的应力畸变系数k=4.72。为降低应力畸变系数,需要对折线形结构展开优化设计。Referring to Figures 3 and 4, the most obvious position of stress distortion on the inner wall of the explosion-proof casing is the connection between the end of the protection device and the body, that is, the connection point M. The maximum stress value PM also appears at the connection point M, and the maximum stress value PM reaches 33296 N/m 2 . Through simulation calculation, the average stress value P avg of the explosion-proof casing is similar to the stress value at the point N in Fig. 4. Therefore, it is considered that the stress value at the end point near the cable outlet can reflect the stress value of the explosion-proof casing. The average stress value, the average stress value P avg , was 7051 N/m 2 . The ratio of the maximum stress value PM to the average stress value P avg of the casing is defined as the distortion coefficient k of the stress, and the stress distortion coefficient k=4.72 of the explosion-proof casing can be obtained. In order to reduce the stress distortion coefficient, it is necessary to carry out the optimal design of the broken-line structure.
1、220kV电缆接头防爆壳体端头部位的折线形设计1. The broken line design of the end part of the explosion-proof shell of the 220kV cable joint
1.1折线形防爆壳体端头结构的优化设计方法1.1 The optimal design method of the end structure of the broken-line explosion-proof shell
在分析220kV高压电缆接头防爆装置结构特点及壳体承受应力变化特点的基础上,针对端头折线结构在折角处应力集中的问题,提出了优化端头部位应力分布的折线形设计。设计点和设计方法如下:Based on the analysis of the structural characteristics of the explosion-proof device for 220kV high-voltage cable joints and the stress variation characteristics of the shell, a broken-line design that optimizes the stress distribution at the end is proposed for the problem of stress concentration at the corner of the broken-line structure of the end. The design points and design methods are as follows:
(1)防爆装置端头部位折线的偏折角度α。(1) The deflection angle α of the broken line at the end of the explosion-proof device.
通过选取不同的折线角度α,按照多物理场耦合的有限元仿真方法得出在相同电弧能量下,得到防爆装置端头部位内壁应力分布,并提取其最大应力值;通过数据处理得到偏折角度与防爆壳体端头部位最大应力值的关系曲线;综合壳体应力分布结果和实际条件要求,得到最优化的偏折角度α。By selecting different broken line angles α, according to the finite element simulation method of multi-physics coupling, it is concluded that under the same arc energy, the stress distribution of the inner wall of the end of the explosion-proof device is obtained, and the maximum stress value is extracted; the deflection is obtained through data processing. The relationship curve between the angle and the maximum stress value at the end of the explosion-proof shell; the optimal deflection angle α is obtained by combining the stress distribution results of the shell and the requirements of actual conditions.
(2)防爆装置端头部位与中间壳体在连接点M处法兰的厚度h和宽度L。(2) The thickness h and width L of the flange at the connection point M between the end of the explosion-proof device and the intermediate casing.
在连接点M处采用加厚的法兰,可以有效缓解该处的应力集中现象。因为防爆装置采用分段式结构,实际结构下,连接点M处的本体法兰和端头法兰通过螺栓连接。在保证足够大的螺栓连接强度下,仿真中可把2块法兰作为一个整体。The use of thickened flanges at the connection point M can effectively alleviate the stress concentration there. Because the explosion-proof device adopts a segmented structure, under the actual structure, the body flange and the end flange at the connection point M are connected by bolts. Under the condition of ensuring sufficient bolt connection strength, the two flanges can be regarded as a whole in the simulation.
针对连接法兰的结构,通过设计不同的法兰厚度h和宽度L,分别进行仿真;得到端头部位最大应力值(连接点M处)和端头部位内壁的平均应力值,从而选择使应力分布最均衡的法兰结构。According to the structure of the connecting flange, by designing different flange thicknesses h and widths L, the simulations are carried out respectively; Flange construction for the most balanced stress distribution.
目前,金属型防爆装置都装有泄能孔以及对应的开口方式。以双侧开口型防爆装置为例,本项目组设计了弹簧拉紧式泄能孔,如图5所示。At present, metal type explosion-proof devices are equipped with energy relief holes and corresponding opening methods. Taking the double-sided opening type explosion-proof device as an example, the project team designed a spring tensioned energy relief hole, as shown in Figure 5.
泄能孔的盖板被弹簧拉紧,起到防水以及减少爆炸喷溅物的作用。当出现短路电弧时,保护装置内部压力达到一定程度时,弹簧拉紧式泄能孔的盖板被冲开,泄能孔开始发挥泄能作用,降低装置内部压强。通过仿真计算,电缆接头短路电弧出现后,腔体泄能孔上盖板处的气体压力随时间的变化关系如图6所示。由图6可知,当t=40ms时,保护装置的弹簧拉紧式泄能孔的盖板被冲开,泄能孔开始发挥泄能作用,装置内部压强迅速下降。即直到泄能孔被冲开时,壳体内的气体压强达到最大。为留有一定的裕度,将壳体保持密封的时间设置为70ms,即取仿真时间点为t=70ms时保护装置壳体上的应力值,作为装置设计的依据。The cover plate of the vent hole is tensioned by the spring, which plays the role of waterproofing and reducing explosive splashes. When a short-circuit arc occurs, when the internal pressure of the protection device reaches a certain level, the cover plate of the spring tensioned energy relief hole is punched open, and the energy relief hole begins to discharge energy, reducing the internal pressure of the device. Through the simulation calculation, after the short-circuit arc of the cable joint occurs, the gas pressure at the upper cover plate of the cavity energy discharge hole changes with time as shown in Figure 6. It can be seen from Figure 6 that when t=40ms, the cover plate of the spring tensioned energy relief hole of the protection device is punched open, the energy relief hole begins to discharge energy, and the internal pressure of the device drops rapidly. That is, until the energy relief hole is punched open, the gas pressure in the casing reaches the maximum. In order to leave a certain margin, the time that the casing is kept sealed is set to 70ms, that is, the stress value on the casing of the protection device when the simulation time point is t=70ms is taken as the basis for the device design.
1.2防爆装置端头处偏折角度α的确定1.2 Determination of deflection angle α at the end of explosion-proof device
通过选取不同的折线偏折角度α,且在连接点M处不加法兰时,按照多物理场耦合的有限元仿真方法,计算在相同电弧能量下,防爆装置端头部位内壁应力分布,并提取其最大应力值。由仿真结果可知,最大应力均出现在连接点M处。仿真得到不同的折线偏折角度α与防爆装置端头部位最大应力值(连接点M处的应力值)的关系曲线图如图7所示。由图7可知,当防爆装置端头部位折线偏折角度α越大时,最大应力值P越小。(1)当折线偏折角度α小于60°时,随着α的增加,最大应力P随之下降,且下降速率明显;(2)当折线偏折角度α大于60°时,随着α的不断增加,最大应力P同样随之下降,但下降速度缓慢。By selecting different polyline deflection angles α, and no flange is added at the connection point M, according to the finite element simulation method of multi-physics field coupling, the stress distribution of the inner wall of the end of the explosion-proof device under the same arc energy is calculated, and Extract its maximum stress value. It can be seen from the simulation results that the maximum stress occurs at the connection point M. The relationship curve between the deflection angle α of different broken lines and the maximum stress value at the end of the explosion-proof device (the stress value at the connection point M) is obtained by simulation, as shown in Figure 7. It can be seen from FIG. 7 that when the deflection angle α of the broken line at the end of the explosion-proof device is larger, the maximum stress value P is smaller. (1) When the deflection angle α of the broken line is less than 60°, the maximum stress P decreases with the increase of α, and the decline rate is obvious; (2) When the deflection angle α of the broken line is greater than 60°, with the increase of α, the maximum stress P decreases. With the continuous increase, the maximum stress P also decreases, but the decrease rate is slow.
根据仿真结果,当偏折角度α分别为55°、60°和65°时,端头部位的最大应力值分别为31948N/m2,24584N/m2和23776N/m2。可见,相对于偏折角度α为55°时,偏折角度α为60°时最大应力值下降了23%,偏折角度α为65°时最大应力值仅下降了25.6%。说明当折线偏折角度α大于60°时,α的增加对改善应力分布的效果将极不明显。According to the simulation results, when the deflection angles α are 55°, 60° and 65° respectively, the maximum stress values at the tip are 31948N/m 2 , 24584N/m 2 and 23776N/m 2 , respectively. It can be seen that when the deflection angle α is 55°, the maximum stress value decreases by 23% when the deflection angle α is 60°, and the maximum stress value only decreases by 25.6% when the deflection angle α is 65°. It shows that when the deflection angle α of the broken line is greater than 60°, the effect of increasing α on improving the stress distribution will be extremely insignificant.
另一方面,从高压电缆接头的应用实际条件及制造成本来看,端头部位都不宜设计过长。折线偏折角度α越大,端头部位的长度需要越长。因此,通过对保护装置实用性、安全性和经济性进行综合考虑,最终选取端头部位的折线偏折角度α为60°。On the other hand, from the perspective of the actual application conditions and manufacturing costs of high-voltage cable joints, the end parts should not be designed to be too long. The larger the deflection angle α of the broken line, the longer the length of the end portion needs to be. Therefore, by comprehensively considering the practicability, safety and economy of the protection device, the bending angle α of the broken line at the end portion is finally selected to be 60°.
1.3端头与本体连接法兰的结构设计1.3 Structural design of the connection flange between the end and the body
在实际应用中,220kV电缆接头防爆装置壁厚为8mm时,连接法兰厚度h通常在15-20mm之间,宽度L通常在40-50mm之间。为达到降低壳体应力的最优效果,在仿真中选择五组典型的法兰尺寸进行计算,分别为法兰1(L=40mm,h=15mm),法兰2(L=42.5mm,h=16.25mm),法兰3(L=45mm,h=17.5mm),法兰4(L=47.5mm,h=18.75mm)和法兰5(L=50mm,h=20mm)。In practical applications, when the wall thickness of the explosion-proof device of 220kV cable joint is 8mm, the thickness h of the connecting flange is usually between 15-20mm, and the width L is usually between 40-50mm. In order to achieve the optimal effect of reducing the shell stress, five groups of typical flange sizes are selected for calculation in the simulation, namely flange 1 (L=40mm, h=15mm), flange 2 (L=42.5mm, h =16.25mm), flange 3 (L=45mm, h=17.5mm), flange 4 (L=47.5mm, h=18.75mm) and flange 5 (L=50mm, h=20mm).
当t=70ms时,按本文提出的仿真方法进行计算,在折线偏折角度α为60°时,得到不同尺寸的法兰对应的端头部位最大应力值PM与壳体平均应力值Pavg如图8所示。由图8可见,法兰尺寸越大,防爆装置端头部位的应力最大值PM越小,而壳体平均应力值基本不变。将最大应力值PM与壳体平均应力值Pavg之比定义为应力的畸变系数k,可得不同尺寸的法兰对应的k值如表1所示。When t=70ms, according to the simulation method proposed in this paper, when the deflection angle α of the broken line is 60°, the maximum stress value P M and the average stress value P of the shell corresponding to flanges of different sizes are obtained. avg is shown in Figure 8. It can be seen from Figure 8 that the larger the flange size, the smaller the maximum stress PM at the end of the explosion-proof device, while the average stress value of the shell is basically unchanged. The ratio of the maximum stress value PM to the shell average stress value Pavg is defined as the distortion coefficient k of the stress, and the corresponding k values for flanges of different sizes are shown in Table 1.
表1不同尺寸的法兰对应的应力特征值Table 1 Stress characteristic values corresponding to flanges of different sizes
由表1可得,当选择法兰5(L=50mm,h=20mm)时,应力的畸变系数k=1.48为最小值。因此最终选择法兰厚度h=20mm,法兰宽度L=50mm。From Table 1, when flange 5 (L=50mm, h=20mm) is selected, the distortion coefficient k=1.48 of stress is the minimum value. Therefore, the final selection of flange thickness h=20mm, flange width L=50mm.
1.4 220kV高压电缆接头防爆装置折线型端头优化结构1.4 Optimum structure of broken-line end of 220kV high-voltage cable joint explosion-proof device
通过对折线的偏折角度和法兰的设计,最终确定220kV高压电缆接头防爆装置折线型端头优化结构如图9所示。Through the deflection angle of the folded line and the design of the flange, the optimized structure of the folded-line end of the explosion-proof device of the 220kV high-voltage cable joint is finally determined, as shown in Figure 9.
最终采用的端头结构为折线偏折角度为60°,折线顶点的连接法兰采用厚度为20mm,高度为50mm。腔体内的应力畸变系数k降至1.48。The end structure finally adopted is that the deflection angle of the broken line is 60°, and the connecting flange at the vertex of the broken line adopts a thickness of 20mm and a height of 50mm. The stress distortion coefficient k in the cavity is reduced to 1.48.
2 220kV金属型高压电缆接头保护装置折线型端头设计的爆炸应力测试2 Explosion stress test of 220kV metal type high-voltage cable joint protection device folding line terminal design
2.1试验装置及试验方法2.1 Test device and test method
为了检验220kV高压电缆接头保护装置的折线形优化设计是否合理,按照图9设计的端头部位结构进行了加工。220kV高压电缆接头保护装置采用5系铝镁合金材料,保护装置内置截面为2500mm2的220kV电缆及成套电缆接头装置。试验现场布置如图10所示。端头部位的压力分布测试,采用炸药爆破以测量壳体上的冲击应力的方法。试验在江苏盱眙925厂野外试验场进行。试验爆源选用散装8701炸药100g。试验采用了应变花测量保护装置在爆炸作用下产生的动态应变,并利用压电式冲击波压力传感器测量爆炸产生的冲击波压力大小。应变花安装示意图和安装实物图如图11所示。点位1为壳体最大应力分布位置,点位2为壳体平均应力分布位置。In order to check whether the optimal design of the broken line shape of the 220kV high-voltage cable joint protection device is reasonable, the processing is carried out according to the structure of the end part designed in Figure 9. The 220kV high-voltage cable joint protection device is made of 5-series aluminum-magnesium alloy material, and the protection device has a built-in 220kV cable with a cross-section of 2500mm2 and a complete set of cable joint devices. The layout of the test site is shown in Figure 10. The pressure distribution test at the end, using explosive blasting to measure the impact stress on the shell. The test was carried out in the field test site of Jiangsu Xuyi 925 Factory. The test explosion source is 100g of bulk 8701 explosive. In the test, strain rosettes were used to measure the dynamic strain of the protective device under the action of explosion, and the piezoelectric shock wave pressure sensor was used to measure the shock wave pressure generated by the explosion. Figure 11 shows the schematic diagram of the installation of strain rosettes and the actual installation diagram. Point 1 is the maximum stress distribution position of the shell, and
2.2试验过程及结果2.2 Test process and results
高压电缆保护装置爆破试验现场观察到的现象主要为:在100g8701炸药作用下,保护装置可正常泄能,爆炸冲击波过后壳体无任何损坏。经高速相机拍摄的试验过程和试验测得的典型应变波形如图12所示。一般情况下,应变花能够测量应力待测部件三个方向的应变情况。因此,测量得到的100g8701炸药爆炸冲击对壳体上点位1,2的应力结果和计算得到应力畸变系数k如表2所示。The main phenomena observed in the blasting test of the high-voltage cable protection device are: under the action of 100g8701 explosive, the protection device can discharge energy normally, and the shell is not damaged after the explosion shock wave. The test process captured by the high-speed camera and the typical strain waveform measured by the test are shown in Figure 12. In general, the strain rosette can measure the strain in three directions of the stress-tested part. Therefore, the measured stress results of the explosion impact of 100g8701 explosive on
表2端头典型点位应变测试结果Table 2 Typical point strain test results of the end
由表2数据可知,采用本发明所设计的折线形端头结构后,试验得到的应力畸变系数和仿真结果基本相符。证明本发明对220kV高压电缆接头保护装置端头部位的优化折线形设计是可靠的。It can be seen from the data in Table 2 that after adopting the broken-line terminal structure designed by the present invention, the stress distortion coefficient obtained by the test is basically consistent with the simulation result. It is proved that the present invention is reliable for the optimized fold-line design of the end portion of the 220kV high-voltage cable joint protection device.
3技术经济效益对比3 Comparison of technical and economic benefits
3.1优化的折线形端头和初始折线形端头的技术经济对比3.1 Techno-economic comparison of the optimized zigzag end and the original zigzag end
按220kV高压电缆接头保护装置的初始端头设计(偏折角度α为45°,连接法兰处L为40mm,h为15mm)计算,如1.1节所得结果,壳体的应力畸变系数为4.72。优化的220kV高压电缆接头保护装置的端头设计(偏折角度α为60°,连接法兰处L为50mm,h为20mm),壳体的应力畸变系数为1.48。可见,在技术上优化的端头设计防爆性能得到了明显改进。According to the initial design of the 220kV high-voltage cable joint protection device (deflection angle α is 45°, L at the connecting flange is 40mm, h is 15mm), as obtained in Section 1.1, the stress distortion coefficient of the shell is 4.72. The optimized end design of the 220kV high-voltage cable joint protection device (deflection angle α is 60°, L at the connecting flange is 50mm, h is 20mm), and the stress distortion coefficient of the shell is 1.48. It can be seen that the explosion-proof performance of the technically optimized end design has been significantly improved.
在经济方面,初始结构的端头部位收缩部分的长度比优化后的短76mm,该长度相对于220kV高压电缆接头保护装置本体长度(两侧端头法兰之间的距离,本设计为2600mm)占比极少;连接法兰的尺寸略有变动。可见,初始结构的端头结构在经济成本上并没有很大优势,但优化后的端头结构在防爆性能上却得到了明显提高。因而,优化后的端头结构具有明显的综合技术经济优势。In terms of economy, the length of the contracted part of the end part of the initial structure is 76mm shorter than the optimized one, which is 2600mm relative to the length of the body of the 220kV high-voltage cable joint protection device (the distance between the end flanges on both sides, this design is 2600mm) ) is very small; the dimensions of the connecting flanges vary slightly. It can be seen that the end structure of the initial structure does not have a great advantage in economic cost, but the optimized end structure has significantly improved the explosion-proof performance. Therefore, the optimized terminal structure has obvious comprehensive technical and economic advantages.
3.2优化折线型和弧度型端头结构的技术经济对比3.2 Technological and economical comparison of optimized polyline and radian end structures
保护装置端头部位的弧度型设计与折线型设计相比,关键在于连接点M处设计为圆弧形。根据文献《基于多物理场耦合的高压电缆接头防爆装置端头部位结构的优化设计》给出的弧度型端头结构如图13所示,如果在连接点M处设计成弧度结构,关键在于确定弧度的最佳曲率半径。此时端头法兰和本体法兰平直对接,不存在角度问题,故在法兰连接处不存在应力畸变问题。通过计算发现,当曲率半径大于0.3m时,腔体内壁的最大应力值下降的程度及其微小。故端头部位的曲率半径取0.3m。Compared with the folded-line design, the arc-shaped design at the end of the protective device lies in the design of a circular arc at the connection point M. According to the document "Optimized Design of the End Structure of High-voltage Cable Joint Explosion-Proof Device Based on Multi-Physical Field Coupling", the radian end structure is shown in Figure 13. If the connection point M is designed as a radian structure, the key lies in Determines the optimal radius of curvature in radians. At this time, the end flange and the body flange are directly butted together, and there is no angle problem, so there is no stress distortion problem at the flange connection. It is found by calculation that when the radius of curvature is greater than 0.3m, the maximum stress value of the inner wall of the cavity decreases to a very small degree. Therefore, the radius of curvature of the end part is taken as 0.3m.
为了进一步比较分析,按上述文献中所示模型和参数,计算了不同圆弧曲率半径下,保护装置腔体内壁的最大应力值、平均应力值和应力畸变系数k,计算结果如表2所示。For further comparison and analysis, according to the models and parameters shown in the above literature, the maximum stress value, average stress value and stress distortion coefficient k of the inner wall of the protection device cavity under different arc curvature radii were calculated. The calculation results are shown in Table 2. .
表3不同曲率半径的圆弧对应的应力特征值Table 3 Stress characteristic values corresponding to arcs with different curvature radii
由表2数据可知,当连接点M处采用曲率半径为0.3m圆弧结构时,腔体内壁的应力畸变系数k降至1.42。继续增大曲率半径,畸变系数k的下降并不明显。It can be seen from the data in Table 2 that when the arc structure with a curvature radius of 0.3 m is adopted at the connection point M, the stress distortion coefficient k of the inner wall of the cavity is reduced to 1.42. Continue to increase the radius of curvature, the decrease of the distortion coefficient k is not obvious.
比较表1和表3的数据可知,腔体内壁的最大应力值、平均应力值和应力畸变系数,均与采用优化后的折线型结构相仿,在技术上达到了相同的效果。Comparing the data in Table 1 and Table 3, it can be seen that the maximum stress value, average stress value and stress distortion coefficient of the inner wall of the cavity are similar to the optimized broken-line structure, and the same effect is achieved technically.
然而,比较图9和图13所示折线型端头结构和弧度型端头结构可得,(1)在相同的保护装置本体、端部收缩口径(200mm)和端头部位壁厚(8mm)下,折线型端头长度为225.17mm,弧度型端头长度为338.95mm,弧度型端头比折线型端头长50.53%,增加了材料的用量;(2)端头部位设计为弧度形时,会明显增加加工制作的难度和成本。因而,从经济效益分析,本文设计的折线型端头具有更好的经济效益。However, comparing the structure of the broken-line type end head and the arc type end head structure shown in Figure 9 and Figure 13, (1) in the same protective device body, end shrinkage diameter (200mm) and end wall thickness (8mm) ), the length of the broken-line end is 225.17mm, the length of the arc-shaped end is 338.95mm, and the arc-shaped end is 50.53% longer than the broken-line end, which increases the amount of material; (2) The end portion is designed to be arc-shaped It will obviously increase the difficulty and cost of processing. Therefore, from the analysis of economic benefits, the broken-line terminal designed in this paper has better economic benefits.
综上可知,本发明通过折线形端头结构选取端头部位折线偏折角度α为60°,在端头和壳体连接处增加法兰(L=50mm,h=20mm),可使保护装置内壁应力畸变系数降低至1.48,有效降低壳体承受的应力。通过爆破试验对爆炸过程中端头部位产生的应力变化情况进行测设,测试结果表明采用的折线形端头优化设计时准确可靠的。通过对比初始、优化折线形端头结构和弧度型端头结构,认为优化折线形端头部位具有较低的应力畸变系数,防爆性能较好,在相同的技术条件下,优化折线形端头结构具有更好的经济效益。To sum up, the present invention selects the folded line deflection angle α of the end portion to be 60° through the folded-line end structure, and adds a flange (L=50mm, h=20mm) at the connection between the end and the shell, which can protect the The stress distortion coefficient of the inner wall of the device is reduced to 1.48, which effectively reduces the stress on the shell. The stress change at the end portion during the blasting process is measured and designed through the blasting test. The test results show that the optimal design of the broken-line end is accurate and reliable. By comparing the initial and optimized polyline-shaped end structure and the radian-shaped end structure, it is considered that the optimized polyline-shaped end part has a lower stress distortion coefficient and better explosion-proof performance. Under the same technical conditions, the optimized polyline-shaped end The structure has better economic benefits.
以上所述仅为本发明的优选实施例而已,并不用于限制本发明,对于本领域的技术人员来说,本发明可以有各种更改和变化。凡在本发明的精神和原则之内,所作的任何修改、等同替换、改进等,均应包含在本发明的保护范围之内。The above descriptions are only preferred embodiments of the present invention, and are not intended to limit the present invention. For those skilled in the art, the present invention may have various modifications and changes. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement, etc. made within the spirit and principle of the present invention shall be included within the protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (6)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201911263243.3A CN111725771A (en) | 2019-12-11 | 2019-12-11 | A zigzag design of the end part of the explosion-proof device of a 220kV metal type high-voltage cable joint |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201911263243.3A CN111725771A (en) | 2019-12-11 | 2019-12-11 | A zigzag design of the end part of the explosion-proof device of a 220kV metal type high-voltage cable joint |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN111725771A true CN111725771A (en) | 2020-09-29 |
Family
ID=72564018
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201911263243.3A Pending CN111725771A (en) | 2019-12-11 | 2019-12-11 | A zigzag design of the end part of the explosion-proof device of a 220kV metal type high-voltage cable joint |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN111725771A (en) |
Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH07170640A (en) * | 1993-12-16 | 1995-07-04 | Showa Electric Wire & Cable Co Ltd | Cable terminal part |
CN108631256A (en) * | 2018-07-04 | 2018-10-09 | 长沙理工大学 | Method for designing opening mode of energy discharge hole of explosion-proof device of high-voltage cable connector |
CN109190277A (en) * | 2018-09-14 | 2019-01-11 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | High-voltage cable joint explosion-protection equipment lets out the emulation mode of energy hole opening radius |
CN109408874A (en) * | 2018-09-14 | 2019-03-01 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | The end position crooked radian emulation mode of high-voltage cable joint explosion-protection equipment |
CN109408875A (en) * | 2018-09-14 | 2019-03-01 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | High-voltage cable joint explosion-protection equipment lets out the emulation mode of energy hole aperture position |
CN208638006U (en) * | 2018-08-31 | 2019-03-22 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | A kind of high-voltage cable joint armored cassette |
CN110176744A (en) * | 2019-06-14 | 2019-08-27 | 广东安诺新材料科技有限公司 | High-voltage cable joint metal explosion-proof device and end head parameter determination method and system |
-
2019
- 2019-12-11 CN CN201911263243.3A patent/CN111725771A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH07170640A (en) * | 1993-12-16 | 1995-07-04 | Showa Electric Wire & Cable Co Ltd | Cable terminal part |
CN108631256A (en) * | 2018-07-04 | 2018-10-09 | 长沙理工大学 | Method for designing opening mode of energy discharge hole of explosion-proof device of high-voltage cable connector |
CN208638006U (en) * | 2018-08-31 | 2019-03-22 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | A kind of high-voltage cable joint armored cassette |
CN109190277A (en) * | 2018-09-14 | 2019-01-11 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | High-voltage cable joint explosion-protection equipment lets out the emulation mode of energy hole opening radius |
CN109408874A (en) * | 2018-09-14 | 2019-03-01 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | The end position crooked radian emulation mode of high-voltage cable joint explosion-protection equipment |
CN109408875A (en) * | 2018-09-14 | 2019-03-01 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | High-voltage cable joint explosion-protection equipment lets out the emulation mode of energy hole aperture position |
CN110176744A (en) * | 2019-06-14 | 2019-08-27 | 广东安诺新材料科技有限公司 | High-voltage cable joint metal explosion-proof device and end head parameter determination method and system |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN101432826B (en) | System for preventing rupture of transformer tank | |
CN109408874B (en) | Simulation method for bending radian of end part of explosion-proof device of high-voltage cable joint | |
CN112083356B (en) | Method for checking short circuit bearing capacity of transformer | |
CN209045342U (en) | A kind of shape small size current mutual inductor | |
CN111725771A (en) | A zigzag design of the end part of the explosion-proof device of a 220kV metal type high-voltage cable joint | |
CN111624447A (en) | Method for measuring and estimating blast wave energy generated by short-circuit arc at high-voltage cable joints | |
WO2020249077A1 (en) | Metal explosion-proof device for high-voltage cable joint, and end part parameter determination method and system | |
CN112466627B (en) | Design method and system of transformer oil tank and transformer oil tank | |
CN101923592B (en) | Mechanical performance design method of saturated reactor for converter valve | |
CN114417648A (en) | Method for calculating impact overpressure generated by explosion of cable joint | |
CN112257195A (en) | 10kV High Voltage Switchgear Explosion-Proof Safety Design Method | |
CN108098207B (en) | Movable protection box of electric welding machine | |
CN207624503U (en) | Inner oil type metal bellow oil conservator with micro-positive pressure characteristic | |
CN112580854B (en) | A method for optimizing explosion stress in explosion-proof box of 10kV cable intermediate joint | |
Chen et al. | A preliminary study on anti-explosion performance of UHV transformer | |
CN106252050A (en) | A kind of novel heat-insulation transformator | |
CN213879161U (en) | Telescopic flow guide device | |
CN209281983U (en) | A kind of novel high-frequency transformer | |
Wei et al. | The Shape Design of Energy Leakage Hole of 220kV High Voltage Cable Explosion-Proof Joint | |
CN114861445A (en) | An oil-immersed transformer safety protection calculation method and system | |
CN209487283U (en) | A Supporting and Reinforcing Structure of a Large Transformer Lifting Base | |
CN204946651U (en) | Oil-filled transformer | |
CN205751792U (en) | A kind of oil tank of transformer shell with fireproof electricity-leakage function | |
CN107331507B (en) | A kind of blast protection capacitor | |
CN216772992U (en) | An anti-collision UV transformer |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication |
Application publication date: 20200929 |
|
WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication |