CN111703590A - Complex system reliability test method and device, computer equipment and storage medium - Google Patents
Complex system reliability test method and device, computer equipment and storage medium Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN111703590A CN111703590A CN202010363140.0A CN202010363140A CN111703590A CN 111703590 A CN111703590 A CN 111703590A CN 202010363140 A CN202010363140 A CN 202010363140A CN 111703590 A CN111703590 A CN 111703590A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- fault
- complex system
- test
- reliability
- test result
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
- B64F—GROUND OR AIRCRAFT-CARRIER-DECK INSTALLATIONS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH AIRCRAFT; DESIGNING, MANUFACTURING, ASSEMBLING, CLEANING, MAINTAINING OR REPAIRING AIRCRAFT, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; HANDLING, TRANSPORTING, TESTING OR INSPECTING AIRCRAFT COMPONENTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B64F5/00—Designing, manufacturing, assembling, cleaning, maintaining or repairing aircraft, not otherwise provided for; Handling, transporting, testing or inspecting aircraft components, not otherwise provided for
- B64F5/60—Testing or inspecting aircraft components or systems
Abstract
The application relates to a method and a device for testing the reliability of a complex system, computer equipment and a storage medium. The method comprises the steps that computer equipment tests the complex system through a complex system reliability test platform according to preset test requirements of the complex system to obtain test results including fault types and fault numbers occurring in a test time period; analyzing the test result by adopting a fault analysis model constructed according to the fault mode sample set to obtain fault reasons corresponding to all fault types in the test result; and then determining the reliability level of the complex system according to the fault type, the fault reason corresponding to the fault type and the fault quantity. In the method, when the computer equipment performs the reliability test of the complex system, the equipment fault information and the man-machine interaction fault information of the complex system are considered, so that the obtained test result is relatively complete, and the analysis result corresponding to the test result can accurately reflect the fault condition and the reliability condition of the complex system.
Description
Technical Field
The present application relates to the field of reliability testing technologies, and in particular, to a method and an apparatus for testing reliability of a complex system, a computer device, and a storage medium.
Background
Before a special aircraft is put into use, reliability tests are often required for systems on the special aircraft that perform critical tasks. With the development of technology, the component equipment of the system for performing key tasks on special airplanes tends to be complicated in structure, highly integrated and highly integrated. The reliability test for the complex system in the special airplane becomes the difficult content in the field.
In the prior art, a reliability test of a complex system in a special aircraft is usually completed through outfield test flight, and fault information and reliability level of the complex system in the special aircraft are obtained through the outfield test flight.
However, the reliability test environment conditions of the complex system in the special aircraft are not controllable, the time and cost are high, and the test result still cannot accurately and comprehensively reflect the real fault information and reliability condition of the complex system.
Disclosure of Invention
In view of the above, it is necessary to provide a method, an apparatus, a computer device and a storage medium for testing reliability of a complex system.
In a first aspect, a method for testing reliability of a complex system is provided, the method comprising:
testing the complex system through a complex system reliability test platform according to a preset test requirement of the complex system to obtain a test result; the test result is used for representing the fault type and the fault quantity of the complex system in the test time period;
analyzing the test result by adopting a fault analysis model to obtain fault reasons corresponding to all fault types in the test result; the fault analysis model is constructed according to a fault mode sample set, and the fault mode sample set comprises equipment fault information and human-computer interaction fault information which occur in the operation process of the complex system;
and determining the reliability level of the complex system according to each fault type, fault reasons corresponding to each fault type and the fault quantity.
In one embodiment, the method further includes:
and carrying out fault analysis on equipment faults and man-machine interaction faults occurring in the running process of the complex system, and constructing a fault mode sample set.
In one embodiment, the performing fault analysis on the equipment fault and the human-computer interaction fault occurring in the operation process of the complex system and constructing the fault mode sample set includes:
respectively acquiring software fault information, hardware fault information and personnel operation information in a complex system;
and performing cross analysis on the software fault information, the hardware fault information and the personnel operation information to obtain a plurality of operation combinations of the man-machine interaction fault, and obtaining fault information of each operation combination in the complex system to obtain a fault mode sample set.
In one embodiment, after the analyzing the test result by using the fault analysis model to obtain the fault reason corresponding to each fault type in the test result, the method further includes:
and determining a correction measure corresponding to each fault type according to the fault reason corresponding to each fault type.
In one embodiment, the complex system reliability test platform is constructed according to the environmental requirements and the composition structure of the complex system, wherein the environmental requirements comprise the vibration requirement, the temperature requirement and the humidity requirement of the system; the composition structure comprises equipment composition and cable composition of the system.
In one embodiment, the method for constructing the complex system reliability test platform includes:
calculating the weight of each cabinet to be installed and each cable on a vibration table top of the complex system reliability test platform, and analyzing the gravity center distribution of each cabinet to be installed and each cable on the vibration table top according to the weight of each cabinet to be installed and each cable;
adjusting the distribution positions of the cabinets to be installed and the cables according to the analysis result; the distribution positions of the cabinets to be installed and the cables are used for keeping the gravity center of each cabinet to be installed and each cable at the center of the vibration table.
In one embodiment, before the testing the complex system through the complex system reliability testing platform according to the preset testing requirement of the complex system and obtaining the testing result, the method further includes:
adding environmental stress and working stress to a system reliability test platform according to the preset test requirements of the complex system; the environmental stress is used for adjusting the environmental condition of the reliability test platform, so that the reliability test platform meets the actual operation environmental requirement of the complex system; the working stress comprises the matching requirements of frame receiving and transmitting of the system in actual operation.
In one embodiment, after the analyzing the test result by using the fault analysis model to obtain the fault reason corresponding to each fault type in the test result, the method further includes:
obtaining the effective time of a complex system for testing;
checking whether the effective time is equal to the target test time in the test requirement;
if the effective time is less than the target test time, returning to execute the test requirement according to the preset complex system, and testing the complex system through the complex system reliability test platform to obtain a test result;
and if the effective time is equal to the target test time, executing a step of determining the reliability level of the complex system according to each fault type, the fault reason corresponding to each fault type and the fault quantity.
In a second aspect, a device for testing reliability of a complex system is provided, the device comprising:
the test module is used for testing the complex system through the complex system reliability test platform according to the preset test requirement of the complex system to obtain a test result; the test result is used for representing the fault type and the fault quantity of the complex system in the test time period;
the analysis module is used for analyzing the test result by adopting the fault analysis model to obtain fault reasons corresponding to all fault types in the test result; the fault analysis model is constructed according to a fault mode sample set, and the fault mode sample set comprises equipment fault information and human-computer interaction fault information which occur in the operation process of the complex system;
and the determining module is used for determining the reliability level of the complex system according to each fault type, fault reasons corresponding to each fault type and the fault quantity.
In a third aspect, a computer device is provided, which includes a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, and the processor implements the method for testing reliability of a complex system according to any one of the first aspect when executing the computer program.
In a fourth aspect, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, on which a computer program is stored, which, when being executed by a processor, implements the method for testing reliability of a complex system according to any one of the first aspect.
According to the method and the device for testing the reliability of the complex system, the computer equipment tests the complex system through the complex system reliability testing platform according to the preset testing requirement of the complex system to obtain the testing result for representing the fault type and the fault number of the complex system in the testing time period; analyzing the test result by adopting a fault analysis model constructed according to a fault mode sample set to obtain fault reasons corresponding to fault types in the test result, wherein the fault mode sample set comprises equipment fault information and man-machine interaction fault information which appear in the operation process of the complex system; and then determining the reliability level of the complex system according to each fault type, the fault reason corresponding to each fault type and the fault quantity. In the method, when the computer equipment formulates the test requirement of the complex system and constructs a fault mode sample set, the equipment fault information and the human-computer interaction fault information which are possibly generated in the operation process of the complex system are considered, a basic basis is provided for the new human-computer ergonomics problem generated in the reliability test process of the complex system, the test result is complete because the reliability test result of the complex system comprises all fault information including the human-computer interaction fault information in the complex system, so that the comprehensiveness of the test result of the reliability test of the complex system is improved, meanwhile, the fault reason corresponding to each fault type in the test result is obtained by analyzing the test result by adopting a fault analysis model, and the fault information and the reliability condition in the complex system can be reflected in detail and accurately.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a diagram of an exemplary implementation of a method for testing reliability of a complex system;
FIG. 2 is a schematic flow chart of a method for testing the reliability of a complex system in one embodiment;
FIG. 3 is a schematic flow chart of a method for testing the reliability of a complex system in another embodiment;
FIG. 4 is a schematic flow chart of a method for testing the reliability of a complex system in another embodiment;
FIG. 5 is a schematic flow chart of a method for testing the reliability of a complex system in another embodiment;
FIG. 6 is a schematic flow chart of a method for testing the reliability of a complex system in another embodiment;
FIG. 7 is a block diagram of an exemplary embodiment of an apparatus for testing reliability of a complex system;
FIG. 8 is a block diagram showing the structure of a device for testing the reliability of a complex system according to another embodiment;
FIG. 9 is a block diagram showing the structure of a device for testing the reliability of a complex system according to another embodiment;
FIG. 10 is a block diagram showing the structure of a device for testing the reliability of a complex system according to another embodiment;
FIG. 11 is a block diagram showing the structure of a device for testing the reliability of a complex system according to another embodiment;
fig. 12 is a block diagram of a complex system reliability testing apparatus according to another embodiment.
Detailed Description
In order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present application more apparent, the present application is described in further detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of the present application and are not intended to limit the present application.
The method for testing the reliability of the complex system can be applied to the application environment shown in fig. 1. Fig. 1 provides a computer device, which may be a server or a terminal, and its internal structure diagram may be as shown in fig. 1. The computer device includes a processor, a memory, a communication interface, a display screen, and an input device connected by a system bus. Wherein the processor of the computer device is configured to provide computing and control capabilities. The memory of the computer device comprises a nonvolatile storage medium and an internal memory. The non-volatile storage medium stores an operating system and a computer program. The internal memory provides an environment for the operation of an operating system and computer programs in the non-volatile storage medium. The communication interface of the computer device is used for carrying out wired or wireless communication with an external terminal, and the wireless communication can be realized through WIFI, an operator network, NFC (near field communication) or other technologies. The computer program is executed by a processor to implement a method for testing reliability of a complex system. The display screen of the computer equipment can be a liquid crystal display screen or an electronic ink display screen, and the input device of the computer equipment can be a touch layer covered on the display screen, a key, a track ball or a touch pad arranged on the shell of the computer equipment, an external keyboard, a touch pad or a mouse and the like.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the architecture shown in fig. 1 is merely a block diagram of some of the structures associated with the disclosed aspects and is not intended to limit the computing devices to which the disclosed aspects apply, as particular computing devices may include more or less components than those shown, or may combine certain components, or have a different arrangement of components.
The following describes in detail the technical solutions of the present application and how the technical solutions of the present application solve the above technical problems by embodiments and with reference to the drawings. The following several specific embodiments may be combined with each other, and details of the same or similar concepts or processes may not be repeated in some embodiments. It should be noted that, in the complex system reliability testing method provided in the embodiments of fig. 2 to fig. 6 of the present application, an execution main body may be a computer device, or may also be a complex system reliability testing apparatus, and the complex system reliability testing apparatus may be a part or all of the computer device by software, hardware, or a combination of software and hardware. In the following method embodiments, the execution subject is a computer device as an example.
In an embodiment, as shown in fig. 2, a method for testing reliability of a complex system is provided, which relates to a specific process in which a computer device tests the complex system according to a preset test requirement of the complex system to obtain a test result for characterizing fault types and fault numbers of the complex system occurring within a test time period, analyzes the test result to obtain fault causes corresponding to the fault types in the test result, and then determines a reliability level of the complex system according to the fault types, the fault causes corresponding to the fault types, and the fault numbers, and includes the following steps:
s201, testing the complex system through a complex system reliability test platform according to a preset test requirement of the complex system to obtain a test result; the test results are used to characterize the type of fault and the number of faults that occur in the complex system over the test period.
The test requirements of the complex system are set in advance according to the actual situation of the complex system, the test time of the complex system, and the reliability requirements of the complex system, and generally, the test requirements may include the test time requirements, the reliability level requirements, the fault type test requirements, and the like for the complex system. According to the test requirements of the complex system, the computer device tests the complex system through the complex system reliability test platform to obtain a test result, and the test result may include fault information such as fault types and fault numbers of the complex system in a test time period of the complex system reliability test.
In this embodiment, the computer device tests the complex system based on the complex system reliability test platform, analyzes the operation scene of the actual complex system for each test index in the test requirements of the complex system to obtain the reliability test scheme of the current complex system, and completes the test of each test index through the complex system reliability test, so that each test index can expose a problem in the complex system reliability test process, that is, the fault type corresponding to each index is obtained. Optionally, because the test items of the complex system are complex, the computer device may further analyze the test method, the operation steps, and the related test instruments of the test items on the principle of shortening the test time and manpower, so as to obtain a test item combination and a test sequence with the minimum test time and manpower consumption cost, which is not limited in this embodiment.
S202, analyzing the test result by adopting a fault analysis model to obtain fault reasons corresponding to all fault types in the test result; the fault analysis model is constructed according to a fault mode sample set, and the fault mode sample set comprises equipment fault information and human-computer interaction fault information which occur in the operation process of the complex system.
The fault mode sample set comprises equipment fault information and man-machine interaction fault information which occur in the operation process of the complex system; the equipment fault information comprises equipment fault types and corresponding equipment fault reasons; the man-machine interaction fault information comprises a man-machine interaction fault type and a corresponding man-machine interaction fault reason.
In this embodiment, the computer device obtains a test result of the reliability test of the complex system, where the test result includes a test time and all types and numbers of faults occurring in the complex system during the test time. After the computer equipment obtains the test result, fault analysis can be performed on the fault types included in the test result through the fault analysis model, so that fault reasons corresponding to the fault types in the test result are obtained. The fault analysis model is constructed according to a fault mode sample set, and includes an equipment fault type and a corresponding fault reason, a human-computer interaction fault type and a corresponding fault reason, which is not limited in this embodiment.
And S203, determining the reliability level of the complex system according to each fault type, fault reasons corresponding to each fault type and fault quantity.
In this embodiment, the computer device may obtain an average fault interval time of the current complex system according to the test time and the number of faults in the test result of the complex system reliability test, determine the reliability level of the number of faults of the complex system by using a value of the average fault interval time, simultaneously, the computer device may analyze the level of reliability of the fault type of the current complex system according to the fault type in the test result of the complex system reliability test and the fault reason corresponding to each fault type, and determine the reliability level of the current complex system according to the reliability level of the number of faults and the level of reliability of the fault type, which is not limited in this embodiment.
In the method for testing the reliability of the complex system, the computer equipment tests the complex system through the complex system reliability test platform according to the preset test requirement of the complex system to obtain a test result for representing the fault type and the fault number of the complex system in a test time period; analyzing the test result by adopting a fault analysis model constructed according to a fault mode sample set to obtain fault reasons corresponding to fault types in the test result, wherein the fault mode sample set comprises equipment fault information and man-machine interaction fault information which appear in the operation process of the complex system; and then determining the reliability level of the complex system according to each fault type, the fault reason corresponding to each fault type and the fault quantity. In the method, when the computer equipment formulates the test requirement of the complex system and constructs a fault mode sample set, the equipment fault information and the human-computer interaction fault information which are possibly generated in the operation process of the complex system are considered, a basic basis is provided for the new human-computer ergonomics problem generated in the reliability test process of the complex system, the test result is complete because the reliability test result of the complex system comprises all fault information including the human-computer interaction fault information in the complex system, so that the comprehensiveness of the test result of the reliability test of the complex system is improved, meanwhile, the fault reason corresponding to each fault type in the test result is obtained by analyzing the test result by adopting a fault analysis model, and the fault information and the reliability condition in the complex system can be reflected in detail and accurately.
Before the computer device analyzes the test result of the reliability test of the complex system according to the fault analysis model, a fault mode sample set for constructing the fault analysis model needs to be determined, and specifically, in one embodiment, the method further includes:
and carrying out fault analysis on equipment faults and man-machine interaction faults occurring in the running process of the complex system, and constructing a fault mode sample set.
The equipment faults occurring in the running process of the complex system refer to functional faults occurring in software and hardware equipment in the complex system; the human-computer interaction fault occurring in the operation process of the complex system refers to a part related to human-computer interaction in the complex system, for example, an operation fault of a display console in the complex system, and for example, the operation fault of the display console may be insensitive to a keyboard trackball reaction, a cursor drifting and the like, which is not limited in this embodiment.
Specifically, in an embodiment, as shown in fig. 3, the performing fault analysis on the equipment fault and the human-computer interaction fault occurring in the operation process of the complex system and constructing the fault mode sample set includes:
s301, software fault information, hardware fault information and personnel operation information in the complex system are respectively obtained.
The software fault information refers to a fault and a fault cause caused by some functions of the software or a bug existing in the software, for example, the fault information caused by software operation may include a software data interaction fault, and the fault cause is a bug occurring in a software bottom layer design; the hardware fault information refers to faults caused by failure of some functions of the hardware, or aging and damage of the hardware, and fault reasons, for example, the fault information caused by hardware operation may include circuit damage, which is caused by current overload and the like; the human operation information refers to misoperation or fault caused by psychological or physiological reasons of the operator in a human-computer interaction part, and illustratively, misoperation is caused by tension when the operator works for the first time. In this embodiment, the computer device may first analyze the fault information generated by software, hardware, and human operations, respectively.
S302, performing cross analysis on the software fault information, the hardware fault information and the personnel operation information to obtain a plurality of operation combinations of the man-machine interaction fault, and obtaining fault information of each operation combination in the complex system to obtain a fault mode sample set.
The failure mode mainly comprises the insensitive response of a keyboard track ball, the drift of a cursor and the like; faults generated by software and personnel operation mainly relate to a focusing display terminal device, and the fault modes comprise abnormal software popup frames, crash, abnormal restart and the like; in this embodiment, the computer device needs to cross-combine the human mind and physiology, the hardware device, and the software device, and analyze the possible associated failure faults thereof to obtain multiple operation combinations of the human-computer interaction faults, where the associated failure refers to a fault caused by interaction between any two or more of the human mind and physiology, the hardware device, and the software device. The problem of complex systems is not only the problem of independent hardware and software, but also the new problem of influencing user experience brought by the interaction and influence among users, systems and environments. However, it is particularly important to develop the human-machine ergonomic fault pattern analysis of complex system software and hardware to obtain a human-machine ergonomic fault pattern set, and provide guidance for test state monitoring and fault processing. The analysis method is that when the faults occur in the internal and external field tests, the test execution is not influenced, but the operation efficiency of the fighter is greatly influenced in the battle.
In the embodiment, the reliability test of the complex system not only focuses on the faults of hardware and software in the complex system, but also considers the faults generated in the human-computer interaction, analyzes the faults generated in the human-computer interaction, improves the user experience, and improves the operation efficiency of operating the complex system by the operating personnel from the side.
After the computer device analyzes the test result of the complex system to obtain each fault type in the test result and the fault cause corresponding to each fault type, in an embodiment, after the test result is analyzed by using the fault analysis model to obtain the fault cause corresponding to each fault type in the test result, the method further includes:
and determining a correction measure corresponding to each fault type according to the fault reason corresponding to each fault type.
Wherein the corrective action refers to a repair action or a remedial action for the type of failure. In this embodiment, the computer device may determine, according to a failure cause corresponding to the failure type, a corrective measure corresponding to each failure type, for example, if the failure type is a software abnormal box, and the failure cause corresponding to the failure type is that the software firewall disappears, the computer determines that the corrective measure corresponding to the failure type may be to repair the software firewall, which is not limited in this embodiment.
In this embodiment, the computer device may determine the corrective measures according to the fault reasons corresponding to the fault types existing in the complex system, and may timely repair various faults occurring in the complex system, thereby timely improving the reliability of the complex system.
When the computer equipment performs the reliability test of the complex system on the complex system, the reliability test of the complex system needs to be performed based on the reliability test platform of the complex system. In one embodiment, the complex system reliability test platform is constructed according to the environmental requirements and the composition structure of the complex system, wherein the environmental requirements include the vibration requirement, the temperature requirement and the humidity requirement of the system; the composition structure comprises equipment composition and cable composition of the system.
The complex system reliability test platform is used for restoring the components and the functional modules of the complex system as much as possible, and the complex system reliability test platform is attached to the actual operating environment of the complex system as much as possible.
On one hand, the reliability test platform of the complex system should be as close as possible to the actual operating environment of the complex system. Optionally, in an embodiment, the computer device may add the environmental stress and the working stress to the system reliability test platform according to a preset test requirement of the complex system; the environmental stress is used for adjusting the environmental condition of the reliability test platform, so that the reliability test platform meets the actual operation environmental requirement of the complex system; the working stress refers to the matching requirement of frame receiving and transmitting of the system in actual operation.
The environmental stress comprises the environmental stress of a complex system in the actual operation process, including the environmental stress of temperature, humidity, vibration and the like; the working stress comprises the frame receiving and transmitting proportion of the complex system when the complex system is actually in the actual operation process. The computer equipment can distribute the frame receiving time and the frame transmitting time of the complex system based on the reliability test platform of the complex system according to the requirements of the frame receiving and transmitting proportion in the actual use and operation process of the complex system; the environmental stress of the complex system based on the complex system reliability test platform should be consistent with the environmental stress of the complex system in the actual operation process, which is not limited in this embodiment.
On the other hand, in constructing the complex system reliability test platform, when the computer device adds environmental stress to the complex system, especially for the vibration stress, the position setting of each device in the complex system needs to be considered, and in one embodiment, as shown in fig. 4, the method for constructing the complex system reliability test platform includes:
s041, calculating the weight of each cabinet to be installed and each cable on the vibration table top of the complex system reliability test platform, and analyzing the gravity center distribution of each cabinet to be installed and each cable on the vibration table top according to the weight of each cabinet to be installed and each cable.
In this embodiment, the computer device may perform the gravity center distribution analysis of the cabinet to be installed and the cable in the vibration table according to the weight of the cabinet to be installed and the cable and the shape of the vibration table of the complex system reliability test platform by calculating the weight of the cabinet to be installed and the cable of the four blocks of the upper left position, the upper right position, the lower left position and the lower right position of the vibration table of the complex system reliability test platform, respectively.
S402, adjusting the distribution positions of the cabinets to be installed and the cables according to the analysis result; the distribution positions of the cabinets to be installed and the cables are used for keeping the gravity center of each cabinet to be installed and each cable at the center of the vibration table.
In this embodiment, the computer device adjusts the distribution of the cabinet and the cables according to the calculated center of gravity of the cabinet and the cables to be installed, so that the center of gravity of each test box is kept at the center of the vibration table, and optionally, the computer device can also realize horizontal adjustment of the cabinet by controlling the mechanical arm in a hoisting manner; preferably, a steel wire spring component force system can be designed around the complex system reliability test platform to help the vibrating table unload the weight, so that the vibrating table is prevented from being damaged due to the fact that the weight exceeds the bearing capacity of the vibrating table; the computer equipment can calculate and improve the side frame design structure of the complex system reliability test platform according to the weight of the cabinet to be installed and the cable, and further, the computer equipment can carry out overall design on the wire outgoing modes of the five types of cables, namely radio frequency, control, cables, network cables and optical cables, and the embodiment does not limit the design.
In this embodiment, the complex system reliability test platform relates to a plurality of cables and is heavy, a plurality of cabinets, a large volume and a heavy weight, in the complex system reliability test process, there may be a situation that equipment is damaged due to amplification of vibration response, and when the complex system reliability test platform is constructed, the computer equipment determines the gravity center and the installation position of the equipment according to the weight of the cabinet to be installed, the cable and other equipment, so that the damage influence on the complex system reliability test platform due to inaccurate position distribution of the cabinet to be installed, the cable and other equipment is avoided.
In order to improve the accuracy and reliability of the test result of the complex system reliability test, the computer device needs to ensure that the current complex system reliability test meets the corresponding test requirement, in an embodiment, as shown in fig. 5, after the test result is analyzed by using the fault analysis model to obtain the fault reason corresponding to each fault type in the test result, the method further includes:
s501, obtaining the effective time of the complex system for testing.
The effective time of the complex system for testing refers to the running time of the complex system, in other words, the total running test time is subtracted by the invalid test time, namely the effective test time, and the invalid time refers to the time from the time point of the previous test being normal to the time point of the fault occurring suspension test. In this embodiment, the computer device may obtain the valid test time by subtracting the invalid test time from the total test time of the reliability test of the complex system.
S502, checking whether the effective time is equal to the target test time in the test requirement; if the effective time is less than the target test time, executing step S503; if the valid time is equal to the target trial time, step S504 is executed.
In this embodiment, the computer device compares the calculated effective test time of the current reliability test of the complex system with a target test time in a preset reliability test requirement of the complex system, and if the effective test time is less than the target test time, returns to execute the test requirement according to the preset complex system, and tests the complex system through a complex system reliability test platform to obtain a test result; and if the effective test time is equal to the target test time, executing a step of determining the reliability level of the complex system according to each fault type, fault reasons corresponding to each fault type and the fault quantity.
And S503, testing the complex system through the complex system reliability test platform according to the preset test requirement of the complex system to obtain a test result.
In this embodiment, for example, if the target test time in the test requirement of the complex system reliability test is 20 hours, and the effective test time of the current complex system reliability test, which is obtained by the computer device according to the above calculation, is 10 hours, it is determined that the effective test time is less than the target test time, at this time, it is described that the current complex system reliability test time does not reach the test requirement, and the obtained test result has a possibility of inaccuracy, the computer device needs to return to perform the reliability test on the current complex system again to meet the target test time in the test requirement, which is not limited in this embodiment.
And S504, determining the reliability level of the complex system according to each fault type, fault reasons corresponding to each fault type and the fault quantity.
In this embodiment, for example, if the target test time in the test requirement of the complex system reliability test is 20 hours, and the effective test time of the current complex system reliability test obtained by the computer device according to the above calculation is 20 hours, it is determined that the effective test time is equal to the target test time, at this time, it indicates that the current complex system reliability test time has reached the test requirement, and at this time, the computer device may determine the reliability level of the complex system according to each fault type, a fault reason and a fault number corresponding to each fault type in the test process, which is not limited in this embodiment.
In this embodiment, the computer device compares the calculated effective test time of the current complex system with the target test time in the test requirements, verifies whether the effective test time of the current complex system meets the test requirements, and if not, continues to perform the reliability test of the complex system, thereby further improving the reliability of the test result of the reliability test of the complex system.
To better explain the above method, as shown in fig. 6, the present embodiment provides a method for testing reliability of a complex system, which specifically includes:
s601, carrying out fault analysis on equipment faults and human-computer interaction faults occurring in the running process of the complex system, and constructing a fault mode sample set;
s602, testing the complex system through a complex system reliability test platform according to a preset test requirement of the complex system to obtain a test result;
s603, analyzing the test result by adopting a fault analysis model to obtain fault reasons corresponding to each fault type in the test result;
s604, obtaining the effective time of the complex system for testing;
s605, checking whether the effective time is equal to the target test time in the test requirement; if the effective time is less than the target test time, returning to execute the step S602; if the effective time is greater than or equal to the target test time, executing step S606;
s606, determining the reliability level of the complex system according to each fault type, fault reasons corresponding to each fault type and fault quantity;
s607, according to the fault reason corresponding to each fault type, determining the corrective measures corresponding to each fault type.
In the embodiment, when the computer device formulates the test requirement of the complex system and constructs the fault mode sample set, the device fault information and the human-computer interaction fault information which may appear in the operation process of the complex system are considered, a basic basis is provided for the new human-computer ergonomics problem appearing in the reliability test process of the complex system, and the test result is relatively complete because the reliability test result of the complex system comprises all fault information including the human-computer interaction fault information in the complex system, so that the comprehensiveness of the test result of the reliability test of the complex system is improved.
The implementation principle and technical effect of the method for testing the reliability of the complex system provided by the embodiment are similar to those of the method embodiment, and are not described herein again.
It should be understood that although the various steps in the flow charts of fig. 2-6 are shown in order as indicated by the arrows, the steps are not necessarily performed in order as indicated by the arrows. The steps are not performed in the exact order shown and described, and may be performed in other orders, unless explicitly stated otherwise. Moreover, at least some of the steps in fig. 2-6 may include multiple steps or multiple stages, which are not necessarily performed at the same time, but may be performed at different times, which are not necessarily performed in sequence, but may be performed in turn or alternately with other steps or at least some of the other steps.
In one embodiment, as shown in fig. 7, there is provided a complex system reliability testing apparatus, including: a test module 01, an analysis module 02 and a determination module 03, wherein:
the test module 01 is used for testing the complex system through the complex system reliability test platform according to the preset test requirement of the complex system to obtain a test result; the test result is used for representing the fault type and the fault quantity of the complex system in the test time period;
the analysis module 02 is used for analyzing the test result by adopting a fault analysis model to obtain fault reasons corresponding to each fault type in the test result; the fault analysis model is constructed according to a fault mode sample set, and the fault mode sample set comprises equipment fault information and human-computer interaction fault information which occur in the operation process of the complex system;
the determining module 03 is configured to determine the reliability level of the complex system according to each fault type, the fault reason corresponding to each fault type, and the number of faults.
In an embodiment, as shown in fig. 8, the complex system reliability testing apparatus further includes a constructing module 04, configured to perform fault analysis on an equipment fault and a human-computer interaction fault occurring during an operation process of the complex system, and construct a fault mode sample set.
In one embodiment, the building module 04 includes a first obtaining unit, a second obtaining unit, and a fusing unit, where:
the first acquisition unit is used for respectively acquiring software fault information, hardware fault information and personnel operation information in the complex system;
and the fusion unit is used for performing cross analysis on the software fault information, the hardware fault information and the personnel operation information to obtain a plurality of operation combinations of the man-machine interaction fault, and obtaining the fault information of each operation combination in the complex system to obtain a fault mode sample set.
In an embodiment, as shown in fig. 9, the complex system reliability testing apparatus further includes a correction module 05, configured to determine a correction measure corresponding to each fault type according to a fault cause corresponding to each fault type.
In one embodiment, the complex system reliability test platform is constructed according to the environmental requirements and the composition structure of the complex system, wherein the environmental requirements include the vibration requirement, the temperature requirement and the humidity requirement of the system; the composition structure comprises equipment composition and cable composition of the system.
In one embodiment, as shown in fig. 10, the complex system reliability testing apparatus further includes a building platform module 06, specifically configured to calculate the weight of each cabinet to be installed and each cable on the vibration table of the complex system reliability testing platform, and analyze the gravity center distribution of each cabinet to be installed and each cable on the vibration table according to the weight of each cabinet to be installed and each cable; adjusting the distribution positions of the cabinets to be installed and the cables according to the analysis result; the distribution positions of the cabinets to be installed and the cables are used for keeping the gravity center of each cabinet to be installed and each cable at the center of the vibration table.
In an embodiment, as shown in fig. 11, the complex system reliability testing apparatus further includes a construction condition module 07, specifically configured to add an environmental stress and a working stress to the system reliability testing platform according to a preset testing requirement of the complex system; the environmental stress is used for adjusting the environmental condition of the reliability test platform, so that the reliability test platform meets the actual operation environmental requirement of the complex system; the working stress comprises the matching requirements of frame receiving and transmitting of the system in actual operation.
In an embodiment, as shown in fig. 12, the apparatus for testing reliability of a complex system further includes a verification module 08, specifically configured to obtain an effective time for performing a test on the complex system; checking whether the effective time is equal to the target test time in the test requirement; if the effective time is less than the target test time, returning to execute the test requirement according to the preset complex system, and testing the complex system through the complex system reliability test platform to obtain a test result; and if the effective time is equal to the target test time, executing a step of determining the reliability level of the complex system according to each fault type, the fault reason corresponding to each fault type and the fault quantity.
For the specific definition of the complex system reliability testing device, reference may be made to the above definition of the complex system reliability testing method, which is not described herein again. The modules in the complex system reliability testing device can be wholly or partially realized by software, hardware and a combination thereof. The modules can be embedded in a hardware form or independent from a processor in the computer device, and can also be stored in a memory in the computer device in a software form, so that the processor can call and execute operations corresponding to the modules.
In one embodiment, a computer device is provided, comprising a memory and a processor, the memory having a computer program stored therein, the processor implementing the following steps when executing the computer program:
testing the complex system through a complex system reliability test platform according to a preset test requirement of the complex system to obtain a test result; the test result is used for representing the fault type and the fault quantity of the complex system in the test time period;
analyzing the test result by adopting a fault analysis model to obtain fault reasons corresponding to all fault types in the test result; the fault analysis model is constructed according to a fault mode sample set, and the fault mode sample set comprises equipment fault information and human-computer interaction fault information which occur in the operation process of the complex system;
and determining the reliability level of the complex system according to each fault type, fault reasons corresponding to each fault type and the fault quantity.
The implementation principle and technical effect of the computer device provided by the above embodiment are similar to those of the above method embodiment, and are not described herein again.
In one embodiment, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, having a computer program stored thereon, which when executed by a processor, performs the steps of:
testing the complex system through a complex system reliability test platform according to a preset test requirement of the complex system to obtain a test result; the test result is used for representing the fault type and the fault quantity of the complex system in the test time period;
analyzing the test result by adopting a fault analysis model to obtain fault reasons corresponding to all fault types in the test result; the fault analysis model is constructed according to a fault mode sample set, and the fault mode sample set comprises equipment fault information and human-computer interaction fault information which occur in the operation process of the complex system;
and determining the reliability level of the complex system according to each fault type, fault reasons corresponding to each fault type and the fault quantity.
The implementation principle and technical effect of the computer-readable storage medium provided by the above embodiments are similar to those of the above method embodiments, and are not described herein again.
It will be understood by those skilled in the art that all or part of the processes of the methods of the embodiments described above can be implemented by hardware instructions of a computer program, which can be stored in a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium, and when executed, can include the processes of the embodiments of the methods described above. Any reference to memory, storage, database or other medium used in the embodiments provided herein can include at least one of non-volatile and volatile memory. Non-volatile Memory may include Read-Only Memory (ROM), magnetic tape, floppy disk, flash Memory, optical storage, or the like. Volatile Memory can include Random Access Memory (RAM) or external cache Memory. By way of illustration and not limitation, RAM can take many forms, such as Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) or Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM), among others.
The technical features of the above embodiments can be arbitrarily combined, and for the sake of brevity, all possible combinations of the technical features in the above embodiments are not described, but should be considered as the scope of the present specification as long as there is no contradiction between the combinations of the technical features.
The above-mentioned embodiments only express several embodiments of the present application, and the description thereof is more specific and detailed, but not construed as limiting the scope of the invention. It should be noted that, for a person skilled in the art, several variations and modifications can be made without departing from the concept of the present application, which falls within the scope of protection of the present application. Therefore, the protection scope of the present patent shall be subject to the appended claims.
Claims (11)
1. A method for testing the reliability of a complex system, the method comprising:
testing the complex system through a complex system reliability test platform according to a preset test requirement of the complex system to obtain a test result; the test result is used for representing the fault type and the fault quantity of the complex system in a test time period;
analyzing the test result by adopting a fault analysis model to obtain fault reasons corresponding to all fault types in the test result; the fault analysis model is constructed according to a fault mode sample set, and the fault mode sample set comprises equipment fault information and human-computer interaction fault information which occur in the operation process of the complex system;
and determining the reliability level of the complex system according to each fault type, the fault reason corresponding to each fault type and the fault quantity.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
and analyzing the equipment faults and the human-computer interaction faults in the running process of the complex system to construct the fault mode sample set.
3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the fault analysis of the equipment fault and the human-computer interaction fault occurring in the operation process of the complex system, and the construction of the fault mode sample set comprises:
respectively acquiring software fault information, hardware fault information and personnel operation information in the complex system;
and performing cross analysis on the software fault information, the hardware fault information and the personnel operation information to obtain a plurality of operation combinations of man-machine interaction faults, and obtaining fault information of each operation combination in the complex system to obtain the fault mode sample set.
4. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein after the analyzing the test result by using the fault analysis model to obtain the fault cause corresponding to each fault type in the test result, the method further comprises:
and determining the corrective measures corresponding to the fault types according to the fault reasons corresponding to the fault types.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the complex system reliability test platform is constructed according to environmental requirements and component structures of the complex system, the environmental requirements including vibration requirements, temperature requirements, humidity requirements of the system; the composition structure comprises equipment composition and cable composition of the system.
6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the method for constructing the complex system reliability test platform comprises:
calculating the weight of each cabinet to be installed and each cable on a vibration table top of the complex system reliability test platform, and analyzing the gravity center distribution of each cabinet to be installed and each cable on the vibration table top according to the weight of each cabinet to be installed and each cable;
adjusting the distribution positions of the cabinets to be installed and the cables according to the analysis result; the distribution positions of the cabinets to be installed and the cables are used for keeping the gravity center of each cabinet to be installed and each cable at the center of the vibration table.
7. The method according to claim 1 or 5, wherein before the testing the complex system by the complex system reliability testing platform according to the preset testing requirement of the complex system, the method further comprises:
adding environmental stress and working stress to the system reliability test platform according to the preset test requirements of the complex system; the environmental stress is used for adjusting the environmental condition of the reliability test platform, so that the reliability test platform meets the actual operation environment requirement of the complex system; the working stress comprises the matching requirements of frame receiving and transmitting of the system in actual operation.
8. The method according to claim 1, wherein after the analyzing the test result by using the fault analysis model to obtain the fault cause corresponding to each fault type in the test result, the method further comprises:
obtaining the effective time of the complex system for testing;
checking whether the valid time is equal to a target trial time in the trial requirement;
if the effective time is less than the target test time, returning to execute the test requirement according to the preset complex system, and testing the complex system through a complex system reliability test platform to obtain the test result;
and if the effective time is equal to the target test time, executing the step of determining the reliability level of the complex system according to each fault type, the fault reason corresponding to each fault type and the fault quantity.
9. A complex system reliability testing apparatus, the apparatus comprising:
the test module is used for testing the complex system through a complex system reliability test platform according to the preset test requirement of the complex system to obtain the test result; the test result is used for representing the fault type and the fault quantity of the complex system in a test time period;
the analysis module is used for analyzing the test result by adopting a fault analysis model to obtain fault reasons corresponding to all fault types in the test result; the fault analysis model is constructed according to a fault mode sample set, and the fault mode sample set comprises equipment fault information and human-computer interaction fault information which occur in the operation process of the complex system;
and the determining module is used for determining the reliability level of the complex system according to each fault type, the fault reason corresponding to each fault type and the fault quantity.
10. A computer device comprising a memory and a processor, the memory storing a computer program, characterized in that the processor, when executing the computer program, implements the steps of the method of any of claims 1 to 8.
11. A computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, which, when being executed by a processor, carries out the steps of the method of any one of claims 1 to 8.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010363140.0A CN111703590A (en) | 2020-04-30 | 2020-04-30 | Complex system reliability test method and device, computer equipment and storage medium |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010363140.0A CN111703590A (en) | 2020-04-30 | 2020-04-30 | Complex system reliability test method and device, computer equipment and storage medium |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN111703590A true CN111703590A (en) | 2020-09-25 |
Family
ID=72536496
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010363140.0A Pending CN111703590A (en) | 2020-04-30 | 2020-04-30 | Complex system reliability test method and device, computer equipment and storage medium |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN111703590A (en) |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112364491A (en) * | 2020-10-28 | 2021-02-12 | 中国电子产品可靠性与环境试验研究所（（工业和信息化部电子第五研究所）（中国赛宝实验室）） | System safety quantitative test method and device, computer equipment and storage medium |
| CN113472603A (en) * | 2021-05-28 | 2021-10-01 | 深圳供电局有限公司 | Fault detection method and device of uplink communication module and computer equipment |
Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103527194A (en) * | 2013-10-15 | 2014-01-22 | 淮北矿业（集团）有限责任公司 | Real-time monitoring and intelligent evaluation system for health degree of electric traction coal mining machine and method thereof |
| CN109814529A (en) * | 2019-01-23 | 2019-05-28 | 北京博得交通设备有限公司 | A kind of train door prognostic and health management system |
| US20190171539A1 (en) * | 2017-12-02 | 2019-06-06 | Mentor Graphics Corporation | Parallel fault simulator with back propagation enhancement |
| CN110261143A (en) * | 2019-07-10 | 2019-09-20 | 中车株洲电力机车有限公司 | Reliability test method and system under the online operation condition of medium-and low-speed maglev train |
| CN110955932A (en) * | 2019-12-04 | 2020-04-03 | 中国直升机设计研究所 | Airplane part reliability test method |
-
2020
- 2020-04-30 CN CN202010363140.0A patent/CN111703590A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103527194A (en) * | 2013-10-15 | 2014-01-22 | 淮北矿业（集团）有限责任公司 | Real-time monitoring and intelligent evaluation system for health degree of electric traction coal mining machine and method thereof |
| US20190171539A1 (en) * | 2017-12-02 | 2019-06-06 | Mentor Graphics Corporation | Parallel fault simulator with back propagation enhancement |
| CN109814529A (en) * | 2019-01-23 | 2019-05-28 | 北京博得交通设备有限公司 | A kind of train door prognostic and health management system |
| CN110261143A (en) * | 2019-07-10 | 2019-09-20 | 中车株洲电力机车有限公司 | Reliability test method and system under the online operation condition of medium-and low-speed maglev train |
| CN110955932A (en) * | 2019-12-04 | 2020-04-03 | 中国直升机设计研究所 | Airplane part reliability test method |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
| Title |
|---|
| 向荫等: "大型复杂系统可靠性试验故障处理机制研究", 《电子产品可靠性与环境试验》 * |
| 曾声奎等: "《可靠性设计分析》", 30 April 2013, 国防工业出版社 * |
| 王少萍: "《工程可靠性》", 30 June 2000, 北京航空航天大学出版社 * |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112364491A (en) * | 2020-10-28 | 2021-02-12 | 中国电子产品可靠性与环境试验研究所（（工业和信息化部电子第五研究所）（中国赛宝实验室）） | System safety quantitative test method and device, computer equipment and storage medium |
| CN113472603A (en) * | 2021-05-28 | 2021-10-01 | 深圳供电局有限公司 | Fault detection method and device of uplink communication module and computer equipment |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN105335283B (en) | application testing method and device in terminal device | |
| EP2887222A1 (en) | Management system and management program | |
| CN110765024A (en) | Simulation test method, simulation test device, electronic equipment and computer-readable storage medium | |
| CN111703590A (en) | Complex system reliability test method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| WO2015071946A1 (en) | Management computer, deployment management method, and non-transient computer-readable storage medium | |
| CN111078532A (en) | Terminal equipment testing method, device and system | |
| CN104956331A (en) | Management system for managing computer system and management method thereof | |
| EP3734460A1 (en) | Probabilistic software testing via dynamic graphs | |
| CN110443046B (en) | Vulnerability repairing method and device | |
| KR101308022B1 (en) | A testing apparatus for a portable avionics system development and an operating method thereof | |
| CN111581778A (en) | Ship electronic system reliability verification method and device, computer equipment and medium | |
| CN114741284B (en) | Task reliability evaluation method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN109471787B (en) | Software quality evaluation method and device, storage medium and electronic equipment | |
| KR101403685B1 (en) | System and method for relating between failed component and performance criteria of manintenance rule by using component database of functional importance determination of nuclear power plant | |
| CN110609786A (en) | Software testing method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN110633213A (en) | Unit testing method, unit testing device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN111538656B (en) | Monitoring method, device and equipment for gradient inspection and storage medium | |
| CN114938377A (en) | Back-end server management method and device, readable medium and electronic equipment | |
| KR102265779B1 (en) | Apparatus and method for predicting academic achievement using cognitive load indicator variables | |
| CN113918741A (en) | Data processing method, device, system, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN112965910A (en) | Automatic regression testing method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN111984527A (en) | Software performance testing method, device, equipment and medium | |
| CN109284157A (en) | Method, apparatus, equipment and the computer readable storage medium for playing frame is automatically closed | |
| CN112364491B (en) | System safety quantitative test method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN113222393B (en) | Risk assessment method, risk assessment device, computer equipment and computer-readable storage medium |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20200925 |