CN111665719A - Supply ship synchronous control algorithm with timeliness and stability - Google Patents
Supply ship synchronous control algorithm with timeliness and stability Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN111665719A CN111665719A CN202010530817.5A CN202010530817A CN111665719A CN 111665719 A CN111665719 A CN 111665719A CN 202010530817 A CN202010530817 A CN 202010530817A CN 111665719 A CN111665719 A CN 111665719A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- formula
- tender
- control
- vessel
- matrix
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/04—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
- G05B13/042—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators in which a parameter or coefficient is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02T—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
- Y02T90/00—Enabling technologies or technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
Abstract
The invention provides a tender vessel synchronous control algorithm with timeliness and stability, which comprises a terminal cost function module, a tender vessel model prediction control module and a neural dynamic optimization module. The terminal cost function module ensures the closed loop stability of the supply ship control system by using the terminal cost function; the Model prediction Control module converts the synchronous Control problem of the tender boat into a tracking Control problem following a pilot, and designs a tender boat Control algorithm based on a Model Predictive Control (MPC) algorithm, so that the anti-interference capability of the tender boat during the execution of a tender task is improved, the speeds of two boats can be synchronized during the execution of the tender task, and the tender efficiency is improved; the neural dynamic optimization module solves the problems of large calculation amount and low calculation speed in the traditional model predictive control algorithm by using a parallel calculation framework of a recurrent neural network, and can enable a tender boat to better cope with emergency situations during tender.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of automatic control, in particular to a synchronous control algorithm for a tender boat with timeliness and stability.
Background
Chinese patent CN 201610859143.7 discloses a generalized prediction adaptive tender vessel course control method based on event driving, and the invention provides an event driving-based generalized prediction adaptive tender vessel course control method, firstly, a discrete event trigger working in a discrete state is selected, a trigger judgment function under a variable threshold value is designed, and when the trigger time is reached, the event trigger judges whether the current state meets the trigger condition or not through the trigger judgment function; secondly, a controlled autoregressive integral sliding average model of a rudder angle-course is obtained through a supply ship low-frequency motion mathematical model and is used as a prediction model, and parameters of the prediction model are estimated on line by adopting a forgetting factor recursion least square method; thirdly, the state to be controlled is sent to the controller by combining with the event-driven trigger, and the controller outputs rudder angle control increment and control quantity after resolving through a GPC adaptive algorithm, so that the tender vessel can quickly finish the approaching stage and the parallel stage and keep course tracking of the tender stage. The invention mainly researches the course control problem of the supply ship, but in the course of sailing supply of the supply ship, only the course tracking effect in the supply stage is not enough, the speed synchronization problem of the supply ship and the supplied ship and the position relation between the two ships are considered, and the timeliness and the stability of the algorithm are increased, so that the supply ship can efficiently and safely complete the supply task.
Disclosure of Invention
According to the technical problems provided by the invention, a supply ship synchronous control algorithm with timeliness and stability is provided. The invention mainly utilizes a tender boat synchronous control algorithm with timeliness and stability, and is characterized by comprising the following steps: the system comprises a terminal cost function module, a tender ship model prediction control module and a neural dynamic optimization module.
For the tracking control problem of the supply ship, a three-degree-of-freedom ship motion model is adopted:
wherein η ═ x, y, ψ]TX represents the lateral displacement of the vessel, y represents the longitudinal displacement of the vessel, ψ represents the yaw angle; u, v, r]TU represents the forward speed of the vessel, v represents the lateral speed of the vessel, and r represents the yaw rate of the vessel; j (ψ) represents a rotation matrix,
the tender vessel is typically operated at low speed, and therefore the dynamic model of vessel motion is summarized as:
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,
a matrix of the inertia is represented and,
a damping matrix is represented which,
representing the Coriolis and central centripetal force matrix, τT＝[τuτvτr]TIndicating control force and moment, X(·),Y(·),N(·)Is a hydrodynamic parameter.
The leader ship serves as a reference of a following ship, and a mathematical model of the leader ship is defined as:
coordinate conversion is performed on equations (1) and (3) by the following equation (4):
z1＝xcosψ+ysinψ
z2＝-xsinψ+ycosψ (4)
z3＝ψ
offset (x) of displacemento,yo) In combination with equation (4) above, equation (4) can be converted to:
z1r＝(xr-xo)cosψr+(yr-yo)sinψr
z2r＝-(xr-xo)sinψr+(yr-yo)cosψr
z3r＝ψr(5)
defining a synchronous control error system for the replenishment of a dynamically positioned vessel as:
zie＝zi-ziri＝1,2,3
ue＝u-ur(6)
ve＝v-vr
re＝r-rr
the formula (6) is differentiated and linearized to obtain:
in the formula, xt＝yt＝[z1ez2ez3euevere]T，
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
d11＝-Xu,d22＝-Yv,d33＝-Nr.
according to the actual requirement, selecting proper sampling time, the equation (8) can be converted into discrete form:
x(k+1)＝Ax(k)+Bτ(k) (9)
in the formula, x, y ∈ R6×1,A∈R6×6,B∈R6×3K denotes sampling time points, and A and B are discrete system parameter matrixes.
In the invention, the stability of the control system is ensured by designing a secondary terminal cost function, and in the terminal cost function module, a linear state feedback law is firstly designed for the control system:
τ＝Kx (10)
in the formula, K represents a vector for controlling the gain. The state matrix P of the terminal cost is obtained by solving the lyapunov equation (11)):
(Ak+κI)TP+P(Ak+κI)＝-(Qlq+KTRlqK) (11)
in the formula, Ak＝A+BK，QlqAnd RlqA weight matrix representing the output and input, κ being selected by equation (12):
κ＜-λmax(Ak) (12)
thereby ensuring AkThe real part of all eigenvalues of + kappa I is negative, where lambda ismax(Ak) Is represented by AkMaximum eigenvalue of the real part.
Further, in order to improve the robustness and the anti-interference capability of the system, a tender vessel control algorithm is designed based on a model prediction control algorithm. Defining a prediction time domain as N in the supply ship model prediction control modulepControl time domain as NcIn the prediction calculation process, let τ (k + N)c)＝τ(k+Nc+1)＝...＝τ(k+Nc+Np) Then, the future state information of the system can be calculated sequentially by a certain prediction model (x (k +1) ═ ax (k) + B τ (k)):
where x (k + i | k) i is 1,2pIndicates future state information x (k + i) i, which is predicted from the state information at the sampling time point k, is 1,2p。
According to the above formula (13), the following definitions are made:
rewriting the above formula (13) into a matrix form as shown in formula (15):
X＝Fx(k)+Φ (15)
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,
then, the synchronous multivariable control problem of the supply ship is converted into an optimal control problem with terminal cost:
the constraint conditions are as follows:
min≤≤max(17)
in the formula, QmpcAnd RmpcIs an output weight matrix and an input weight matrix,
PXpis the terminal cost, XpIs the terminal state of X and P is the state matrix of the terminal cost function determined by equation (11).
Furthermore, in order to solve the problems of large calculation amount and low calculation speed in the traditional model predictive control algorithm, in the neural dynamic optimization system module, the parallel calculation architecture of the recurrent neural network is utilized to accelerate the calculation speed, so that the proposed algorithm has timeliness. In the neural dynamics optimization system module, bringing formula (15) into formula (16) results in:
by definition
Equation (18) is simplified to:
J＝TH+W+ξ (20)
the objective function (equation (20)) is solved iteratively by establishing a neural dynamic optimization system (equation (21)), so that the calculation speed is accelerated:
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,
is the convergence rate, and Ω () is taken to be ▽ J, PΩIs the projection operator, and the projection operator,
compared with the prior art, the invention has the following advantages:
(1) the method is based on a model prediction control algorithm, has robustness, and can excellently complete the replenishment task under the condition that external interference exists in the ship;
(2) the method solves the problems of large calculation amount and low calculation speed in the traditional model predictive control algorithm by utilizing the parallel calculation architecture of the recurrent neural network, can ensure that the proposed algorithm has timeliness, and ensures that the supply vessel adopting the method can better cope with changeable external environments;
(3) the invention ensures the closed loop stability of the control system by using the terminal cost function technology, so that the proposed algorithm has stability;
(4) the technology provided by the invention is used for controlling the supply ship, so that the supply ship can automatically follow the leader ship from different initial positions under the condition of interference and achieve the expected target of synchronous speed, the working strength of a rudder during supply can be effectively reduced, the supply ship can reach a supply state more quickly, the anti-interference capability of the supply ship is increased, the speed of the two ships can be ensured to be synchronous during supply, the influence of waves on supply is reduced, and the supply ship can finish the supply task efficiently.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings needed to be used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly introduced below, and it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are some embodiments of the present invention, and for those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained according to these drawings without creative efforts.
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an MPC design with timeliness and stability of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a performance diagram of synchronous control at different starting points according to the present invention.
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of the velocity synchronization process at different initial points according to the present invention.
FIG. 4 is a graphical representation of the response of the control input to various initiation points of the present invention.
Detailed Description
In order to make the technical solutions of the present invention better understood, the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
It should be noted that the terms "first," "second," and the like in the description and claims of the present invention and in the drawings described above are used for distinguishing between similar elements and not necessarily for describing a particular sequential or chronological order. It is to be understood that the data so used is interchangeable under appropriate circumstances such that the embodiments of the invention described herein are capable of operation in sequences other than those illustrated or described herein. Furthermore, the terms "comprises," "comprising," and "having," and any variations thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, system, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of steps or elements is not necessarily limited to those steps or elements expressly listed, but may include other steps or elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus.
As shown in fig. 1-4, the present invention provides a tender vessel synchronization control algorithm with timeliness and stability, which includes: the system comprises a terminal cost function module, a tender ship model prediction control module and a neural dynamic optimization module.
In the application, (1) in a terminal cost function module, the closed loop stability of a control system is guaranteed by designing a secondary terminal cost function; (2) in a model prediction control module of the supply ship, converting a synchronous control problem of the supply ship into a tracking control problem following a pilot, and solving the problem based on a model prediction control algorithm, so that the anti-interference capability of the supply ship is improved, the speed of two ships can be synchronized when a supply task is carried out, and the supply efficiency and the safety are improved; (3) in the neural dynamic optimization module, a parallel computing architecture of a recurrent neural network is used for quickly solving an objective function in the tender vessel model prediction control module, so that the ship can quickly react to a changeable external environment.
For the tracking control problem of the supply ship, a three-degree-of-freedom ship motion model is adopted:
wherein η ═ x, y, ψ]TX represents the lateral displacement of the vessel, y represents the longitudinal displacement of the vessel, ψ represents the yaw angle;υ＝[u,v,r]Tu represents the forward speed of the vessel, v represents the lateral speed of the vessel, and r represents the yaw rate of the vessel; j (ψ) represents a rotation matrix,
the tender vessel is typically operated at low speed, and therefore the dynamic model of vessel motion is summarized as:
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,
a matrix of the inertia is represented and,
a damping matrix is represented which,
representing the Coriolis and central centripetal force matrix, τT＝[τuτvτr]TIndicating control force and moment, X(·),Y(·),N(·)Is a hydrodynamic parameter.
The leader ship serves as a reference of a following ship, and a mathematical model of the leader ship is defined as:
coordinate conversion is performed on equations (1) and (3) by the following equation (4):
offset (x) of displacemento,yo) In combination with equation (4) above, equation (4) can be converted to:
z1r＝(xr-xo)cosψr+(yr-yo)sinψr
z2r＝-(xr-xo)sinψr+(yr-yo)cosψr
z3r＝ψr(5)
defining a synchronous control error system for the replenishment of a dynamically positioned vessel as:
zie＝zi-ziri＝1,2,3
ue＝u-ur(6)
ve＝v-vr
re＝r-rr
the formula (6) is differentiated and linearized to obtain:
in the formula, xt＝yt＝[z1ez2ez3euevere]T，
Wherein
d11＝-Xu,d22＝-Yv,d33＝-Nr；
According to the actual requirement, selecting proper sampling time, the equation (8) can be converted into discrete form:
x(k+1)＝Ax(k)+Bτ(k) (9)
in the formula, x, y ∈ R6×1,A∈R6×6,B∈R6×3K denotes sampling time points, and A and B are discrete system parameter matrixes.
In the invention, the stability of the control system is ensured by designing a secondary terminal cost function, and in the terminal cost function module, a linear state feedback law is firstly designed for the control system:
τ＝Kx (10)
in the formula, K represents a vector for controlling the gain. The state matrix P of the terminal cost is obtained by solving the lyapunov equation (11)):
(Ak+κI)TP+P(Ak+κI)＝-(Qlq+KTRlqK) (11)
in the formula, Ak＝A+BK，QlqAnd RlqA weight matrix representing the output and input, κ being selected by equation (12):
κ＜-λmax(Ak) (12)
thereby ensuring AkThe real part of all eigenvalues of + kappa I is negative, where lambda ismax(Ak) Is represented by AkMaximum eigenvalue of the real part.
Further, in order to improve the robustness and the anti-interference capability of the system, a tender vessel control algorithm is designed based on a model prediction control algorithm. Defining a prediction time domain as N in the supply ship model prediction control modulepControl time domain as NcIn the prediction calculation process, let τ (k + N)c)＝τ(k+Nc+1)＝...＝τ(k+Nc+Np) Then, the future state information of the system can be calculated sequentially by a certain prediction model (x (k +1) ═ ax (k) + B τ (k)):
where x (k + i | k) i is 1,2pIndicates future state information x (k + i) i, which is predicted from the state information at the sampling time point k, is 1,2p。
According to the above formula (13), the following definitions are made:
rewriting the above formula (13) into a matrix form as shown in formula (15):
X＝Fx(k)+Φ (15)
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,
then, the synchronous multivariable control problem of the supply ship is converted into an optimal control problem with terminal cost:
the constraint conditions are as follows:
min≤≤max(17)
in the formula, QmpcAnd RmpcIs an output weight matrix and an input weight matrix,
PXpis the terminal cost, XpRepresents the terminal state of X, and P is the state matrix of the terminal cost function determined by equation (11).
Furthermore, in order to solve the problems of large calculation amount and low calculation speed in the traditional model predictive control algorithm, in the neural dynamic optimization system module, the parallel calculation architecture of the recurrent neural network is utilized to accelerate the calculation speed, so that the proposed algorithm has timeliness. In the neural dynamics optimization system module, bringing formula (15) into formula (16) results in:
by definition
Equation (18) is simplified to:
J＝TH+W+ξ (20)
the objective function (equation (20)) is solved iteratively by establishing a neural dynamic optimization system (equation (21)), so that the calculation speed is accelerated:
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,
is the convergence rate, and Ω () is taken to be ▽ J, PΩIs the projection operator, and the projection operator,
example 1
The embodiment shows the synchronous control performance of the dynamically positioned ship when the novel replenishment ship synchronous control algorithm with timeliness and stability provided by the invention is adopted to finish the tracking replenishment task from different starting points. Fig. 2 shows the tracking performance of a dynamic positioning vessel when the replenishment task is performed from a different starting point, fig. 3 shows the synchronization process of the speed, and fig. 4 shows the response of the control input. In this embodiment, it can be seen from fig. 1 that although the starting point is at a different starting position, the following ship can still automatically follow the leader ship for replenishment, and it can be seen from fig. 2 that the synchronization of the speeds is automatically achieved in a steady state.
In addition, in the embodiment, the calculation time is compared, the comparison result is shown in the following table, and according to the data in the table, the novel supply ship synchronous control algorithm with timeliness and stability provided by the invention can be obtained, so that the calculation time of the traditional MPC algorithm can be effectively reduced, and the timeliness of the designed algorithm can be improved.
TABLE 1 calculated time comparison
The above-mentioned serial numbers of the embodiments of the present invention are merely for description and do not represent the merits of the embodiments.
In the above embodiments of the present invention, the descriptions of the respective embodiments have respective emphasis, and for parts that are not described in detail in a certain embodiment, reference may be made to related descriptions of other embodiments.
In the embodiments provided in the present application, it should be understood that the disclosed technology can be implemented in other ways. The above-described embodiments of the apparatus are merely illustrative, and for example, the division of the units may be a logical division, and in actual implementation, there may be another division, for example, multiple units or components may be combined or integrated into another system, or some features may be omitted, or not executed. In addition, the shown or discussed mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection may be an indirect coupling or communication connection through some interfaces, units or modules, and may be in an electrical or other form.
The units described as separate parts may or may not be physically separate, and parts displayed as units may or may not be physical units, may be located in one place, or may be distributed on a plurality of units. Some or all of the units can be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of the embodiment.
Finally, it should be noted that: the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solution of the present invention, and not to limit the same; while the invention has been described in detail and with reference to the foregoing embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that: the technical solutions described in the foregoing embodiments may still be modified, or some or all of the technical features may be equivalently replaced; and the modifications or the substitutions do not make the essence of the corresponding technical solutions depart from the scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention.
Claims (4)
1. A tender ship synchronous control algorithm with timeliness and stability is characterized in that: the system comprises a terminal state matrix module, a model prediction control module and a neural dynamic optimization module;
for the tracking control problem of the supply ship, a three-degree-of-freedom ship motion model is adopted:
wherein η ═ x, y, ψ]TX represents the lateral displacement of the vessel, y represents the longitudinal displacement of the vessel, ψ represents the yaw angle; u, v, r]TU represents the forward speed of the vessel, v represents the lateral speed of the vessel, and r represents the yaw rate of the vessel; j (ψ) represents a rotation matrix,
the tender vessel is typically operated at low speed, and therefore the dynamic model of vessel motion is summarized as:
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,
a matrix of the inertia is represented and,
a damping matrix is represented which,
representing the Coriolis and central centripetal force matrix, τT＝[τuτvτr]TRepresenting control force and moment; wherein X(·),Y(·),N(·)All represent hydrodynamic parameters;
the leader ship serves as a reference of a following ship, and a mathematical model of the leader ship is defined as:
the formula (1) is converted into by coordinate conversion of the formula (1) and the formula (3) by the following formula (4):
offset (x) of displacemento,yo) In combination with equation (4) above, equation (4) can be converted to:
z1r＝(xr-xo)cosψr+(yr-yo)sinψr
z2r＝-(xr-xo)sinψr+(yr-yo)cosψr
z3r＝ψr； (5)
defining a synchronous control error system for the replenishment of a dynamically positioned vessel as:
the formula (6) is obtained by differentiation and linearization:
in the formula, xt＝yt＝[z1ez2ez3euevere]T，
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
d11＝-Xu,d22＝-Yv,d33＝-Nr；
by actually giving the appropriate sampling time, said equation (8) is converted into a discrete form:
x(k+1)＝Ax(k)+Bτ(k)； (9)
in the formula, x, y ∈ R6×1,A∈R6×6,B∈R6×3K denotes sampling time points, and A and B denote a discretized system parameter matrix.
2. The tender vessel synchronization control algorithm with timeliness and stability of claim 1, wherein:
the closed loop stability of the control system is ensured through a secondary terminal cost function, in the terminal cost function module, a linear state feedback law is firstly designed for the control system:
τ＝Kx； (10)
wherein K represents a vector of control gains; the state matrix P of the terminal cost function is obtained by solving the Lyapunov equation, namely the formula (11):
(Ak+κI)TP+P(Ak+κI)＝-(Qlq+KTRlqK)； (11)
in the formula, Ak＝A+BK，QlqAnd RlqA weight matrix representing the output and input, κ being selected by equation (12):
κ＜-λmax(Ak)； (12)
Akthe real part of all eigenvalues of + kappa I are negative values, where lambda ismax(Ak) Is represented by AkMaximum eigenvalue of the real part.
3. The tender vessel synchronization control algorithm with timeliness and stability of claim 1, wherein:
defining a prediction time domain as N in the supply ship model prediction control modulepControl time domain as NcIn the prediction calculation process, it is assumed that:
τ(k+Nc)＝τ(k+Nc+1)＝...＝τ(k+Nc+Np)；
the future state information of the system can be calculated sequentially by a certain prediction model (x (k +1) ═ ax (k) + B τ (k)):
where x (k + i | k) i is 1,2pIndicates future state information x (k + i) i, which is predicted from the state information at the sampling time point k, is 1,2p；
According to the above formula (13), the following definitions are made:
rewriting the above formula (13) into a matrix form as shown in formula (15):
X＝Fx(k)+Φ； (15)
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,
then, the synchronous multivariable control problem of the supply ship is converted into an optimal control problem with terminal cost:
the constraint conditions are as follows:
min≤≤max； (17)
in the formula, QmpcAnd RmpcIs an output weight matrix and an input weight matrix,
is the terminal cost, XpIs the terminal state of X and P is the state matrix of the terminal cost function determined by equation (11).
4. The tender vessel synchronization control algorithm with timeliness and stability of claim 1, wherein:
in the neural dynamic optimization system module, the proposed algorithm has timeliness through a parallel computing architecture of a recurrent neural network; in the neural dynamics optimization system module, bringing formula (15) into formula (16) results in:
by definition
Equation (18) is simplified to:
J＝TH+W+ξ； (20)
the method comprises the following steps of (1) iteratively solving an objective function, namely the formula (20), by establishing a neural dynamic optimization system, namely the formula (21), so that the calculation speed is accelerated:
where, theta is the convergence speed,Ω()is taken as
PΩIs the projection operator, and the projection operator,
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010530817.5A CN111665719B (en) | 2020-06-11 | 2020-06-11 | Supply ship synchronous control algorithm with timeliness and stability |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010530817.5A CN111665719B (en) | 2020-06-11 | 2020-06-11 | Supply ship synchronous control algorithm with timeliness and stability |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN111665719A true CN111665719A (en) | 2020-09-15 |
| CN111665719B CN111665719B (en) | 2022-11-22 |
Family
ID=72386574
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010530817.5A Active CN111665719B (en) | 2020-06-11 | 2020-06-11 | Supply ship synchronous control algorithm with timeliness and stability |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN111665719B (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112068440A (en) * | 2020-09-18 | 2020-12-11 | 江苏科技大学 | Model prediction control-based AUV (autonomous Underwater vehicle) recovery butt joint power positioning control method |
Citations (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN107544500A (en) * | 2017-09-18 | 2018-01-05 | 哈尔滨工程大学 | A kind of unmanned boat berthing action trail planing method for considering constraint |
| CN108828955A (en) * | 2018-08-16 | 2018-11-16 | 大连海事大学 | Accurate Track In Track control method based on finite time extended state observer |
| CN109116731A (en) * | 2018-07-27 | 2019-01-01 | 北京理工大学 | A kind of data-driven method for optimally controlling switching linear system |
| CN109521797A (en) * | 2018-12-28 | 2019-03-26 | 西北工业大学 | The optimization mowing type formation control method of unmanned boat guidance submarine navigation device group |
| CN109656143A (en) * | 2019-02-25 | 2019-04-19 | 曲阜师范大学 | A kind of sea drives the adaptive tracking control method and system of ship entirely |
| CN110161853A (en) * | 2019-05-09 | 2019-08-23 | 大连海事大学 | A kind of novel ship craft integrated automated driving system with real-time |
| CN110879531A (en) * | 2019-11-22 | 2020-03-13 | 北京理工大学重庆创新中心 | Data-driven self-adaptive optimization control method and medium for random disturbance system |
-
2020
- 2020-06-11 CN CN202010530817.5A patent/CN111665719B/en active Active
Patent Citations (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN107544500A (en) * | 2017-09-18 | 2018-01-05 | 哈尔滨工程大学 | A kind of unmanned boat berthing action trail planing method for considering constraint |
| CN109116731A (en) * | 2018-07-27 | 2019-01-01 | 北京理工大学 | A kind of data-driven method for optimally controlling switching linear system |
| CN108828955A (en) * | 2018-08-16 | 2018-11-16 | 大连海事大学 | Accurate Track In Track control method based on finite time extended state observer |
| CN109521797A (en) * | 2018-12-28 | 2019-03-26 | 西北工业大学 | The optimization mowing type formation control method of unmanned boat guidance submarine navigation device group |
| CN109656143A (en) * | 2019-02-25 | 2019-04-19 | 曲阜师范大学 | A kind of sea drives the adaptive tracking control method and system of ship entirely |
| CN110161853A (en) * | 2019-05-09 | 2019-08-23 | 大连海事大学 | A kind of novel ship craft integrated automated driving system with real-time |
| CN110879531A (en) * | 2019-11-22 | 2020-03-13 | 北京理工大学重庆创新中心 | Data-driven self-adaptive optimization control method and medium for random disturbance system |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| 刘程: "《船舶路径跟踪与减横摇综合控制研究》", 《万方学位论文》 * |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112068440A (en) * | 2020-09-18 | 2020-12-11 | 江苏科技大学 | Model prediction control-based AUV (autonomous Underwater vehicle) recovery butt joint power positioning control method |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN111665719B (en) | 2022-11-22 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Witkowska et al. | Adaptive dynamic control allocation for dynamic positioning of marine vessel based on backstepping method and sequential quadratic programming | |
| Tannuri et al. | Dynamic positioning systems: An experimental analysis of sliding mode control | |
| CN108319140B (en) | Redefined output type model-free self-adaptive course control method and system | |
| CN111007854B (en) | Under-actuated ship trajectory tracking control system | |
| Yang et al. | A recurrent neural network based fuzzy sliding mode control for 4-DOF ROV movements | |
| Zhang et al. | Anti-disturbance control for dynamic positioning system of ships with disturbances | |
| CN110162039A (en) | A kind of novel integrated ship path trace and rollstabilization optimal control method | |
| Shen et al. | Dynamic surface control for tracking of unmanned surface vessel with prescribed performance and asymmetric time-varying full state constraints | |
| CN112034858B (en) | Model-free adaptive heading control method fusing weak observation high-order output data | |
| CN110161853A (en) | A kind of novel ship craft integrated automated driving system with real-time | |
| CN111665719B (en) | Supply ship synchronous control algorithm with timeliness and stability | |
| CN115113524B (en) | ASV multiport event trigger path tracking control method based on intervention LVS guidance | |
| Meng et al. | Distributed leaderless formation control for multiple autonomous underwater vehicles based on adaptive nonsingular terminal sliding mode | |
| McNinch et al. | Sliding mode setpoint control of an underactuated surface vessel: simulation and experiment | |
| Fu et al. | Formation control for water-jet USV based on bio-inspired method | |
| Jia et al. | Distributed dynamic rendezvous control of the AUV-USV joint system with practical disturbance compensations using model predictive control | |
| Børhaug et al. | Formation control of underactuated marine vehicles with communication constraints | |
| Witkowska et al. | Adaptive backstepping tracking control for an over–actuated DP marine vessel with inertia uncertainties | |
| CN112578797A (en) | Ship formation control method based on distributed guidance under switching topology | |
| CN110109357B (en) | Semi-global self-adaptive control method for non-standard type non-linear aircraft | |
| CN116449829A (en) | Ship formation system switching control method based on two-degree-of-freedom LQR | |
| Zhu et al. | Adaptive neural network fixed-time sliding mode control for trajectory tracking of underwater vehicle | |
| Xiang et al. | Coordinated 3D path following for autonomous underwater vehicles via classic PID controller | |
| Sun et al. | Distributed anti-windup NN-sliding mode formation control of multi-ships with minimum cost | |
| Cui et al. | Trajectory re-planning and tracking control of unmanned underwater vehicles on dynamic model |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |