CN111583270A - Method for evaluating mixing effect of immiscible two phases - Google Patents
Method for evaluating mixing effect of immiscible two phases Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN111583270A CN111583270A CN202010283220.5A CN202010283220A CN111583270A CN 111583270 A CN111583270 A CN 111583270A CN 202010283220 A CN202010283220 A CN 202010283220A CN 111583270 A CN111583270 A CN 111583270A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- mixing
- lambda
- immiscible
- binary image
- evaluating
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 114
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 54
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 37
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 claims description 32
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 241000283973 Oryctolagus cuniculus Species 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 abstract description 6
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 abstract description 5
- 238000003756 stirring Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000005272 metallurgy Methods 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 9
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 8
- 238000000855 fermentation Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000004151 fermentation Effects 0.000 description 6
- 239000000693 micelle Substances 0.000 description 4
- MSSNHSVIGIHOJA-UHFFFAOYSA-N pentafluoropropane Chemical compound FC(F)CC(F)(F)F MSSNHSVIGIHOJA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 239000003507 refrigerant Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 3
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000035508 accumulation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000575 pesticide Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000002002 slurry Substances 0.000 description 2
- 241000238631 Hexapoda Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000607479 Yersinia pestis Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000012271 agricultural production Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000739 chaotic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001427 coherent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003086 colorant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013078 crystal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 239000000839 emulsion Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005265 energy consumption Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009854 hydrometallurgy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002386 leaching Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006194 liquid suspension Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000704 physical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009853 pyrometallurgy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005507 spraying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007619 statistical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009827 uniform distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011077 uniformity evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
- G06T7/10—Segmentation; Edge detection
- G06T7/11—Region-based segmentation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
- G01N21/84—Systems specially adapted for particular applications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
- G06T7/10—Segmentation; Edge detection
- G06T7/136—Segmentation; Edge detection involving thresholding
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
- G06T7/10—Segmentation; Edge detection
- G06T7/187—Segmentation; Edge detection involving region growing; involving region merging; involving connected component labelling
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
- G01N21/84—Systems specially adapted for particular applications
- G01N2021/8405—Application to two-phase or mixed materials, e.g. gas dissolved in liquids
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a method for evaluating an immiscible two-phase mixing effect, which comprises the steps of photographing materials in a mixing process by a high-speed camera in the material mixing process, carrying out binarization processing on the photographed images to obtain an optimal binary image, dividing the optimal binary image into N regions with equal size, and calculating the 0-dimensional Betty number β of a multiphase mixed fluid mixed pattern in the N different regions0Or 1 st wibeki number β1Determining the 0 th dimension Betty number β of N regions of each optimal binary image0Or 1 st wibeki number β1Variance of (2)By the formula
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical fields of chemistry, metallurgical engineering and the like, in particular to a method for evaluating the mixing effect of immiscible two phases.
Background
Mixing is the intermixing of the components of the material under the influence of external forces, which results in a uniform distribution of the particles of the components in any volume. The method is an important link for ensuring the quality of the matched materials and improving the material effect. There are various methods of mixing, such as mechanical mixing, pneumatic mixing, impulse mixing, etc. The industry often encounters the problem of mixing of three phases, gas and liquid or some two of them. The mixing effect is a measure of the degree of homogeneity of the dispersed blend achieved by the mixing of the different components. The degree of mixing is related to the scale under investigation. At present, the mixing degree of a fluid system can be expressed by the following three ways: the degree of leveling is a measure of the uniformity across the entire range of equipment sizes. The average degree of mixing I of a component is the arithmetic mean of the degrees of mixing of a component obtained from several samples in the same tank, and can be used to measure the overall mixing effect of the system, but the number of samples taken must be specified. Separation scale, a measure of the size of the dispersed micelles (e.g., droplets, bubbles, or solid aggregates) in the mixture. Within the range of the separation scale, the substance is homogeneous or only one substance. The smaller the separation dimension, the more uniform the mixing. For immiscible systems, it is not possible to achieve a separation scale on the molecular level. And measuring the separation strength and the uniformity of the mutual soluble system on a small scale. The liquid has mixture micelles of different sizes and different concentrations, and the difference between the concentration of the mixture micelles and the average concentration is the separation strength. The smaller the separation strength, the more thoroughly the material is mixed and the more fuzzy the interface between the micelles is. When the mixed material has reached an ideal mixing state by molecular diffusion, i.e., when the so-called molecular-scale uniformity is achieved, the separation strength is zero, and it is also impossible to achieve a molecular-scale separation scale for immiscible systems.
The evaluation of the mixing effect is crucial during the mixing operation, and although the method can be used for characterizing the fluid mixing degree, the requirement on the working medium during the use has certain limitation.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention overcomes the defects of the method, provides a method for evaluating the immiscible two-phase mixing effect with strong applicability and higher reliability, and comprises the following specific steps:
(1) in the process of mixing materials, a high-speed camera photographs the materials in the mixing process;
(2) carrying out binarization processing on the shot picture to obtain an optimal binary image;
(3) dividing the optimal binary image into N regions with equal size;
(4) calculating the 0 th dimensional Betty number β of the multiphase mixed fluid mixing pattern in the N different regions0Or 1 st wibeki number β1;
(5) Determine the 0 th dimension Betty number β of each optimal binary image0Or 1 st wibeki number β1Variance of (2)
(6) By the formulaCalculating λ, where d represents the dimension, in two dimensions, d ═ 2; lambda is more than or equal to 0, which indicates that the mixing effect is random, namely the mixing state is disordered; lambda is more than 0 and less than 1, which indicates that the mixture is in a disordered and super-uniform state, lambda is more than or equal to 1, which indicates that the mixing effect is uniform, namely super-uniform, and the closer lambda is to 0, the stronger the disorder is; the closer λ is to 1, the stronger the uniformity.
The capture rate of the high-speed camera in the step (1) is 250 frames/second.
And (2) finding out the optimal threshold value of image binarization by using an iterative method to obtain an optimal binary image.
N in the step (3) is more than or equal to 3, and the N areas are circular or rectangular.
Step (4) 0 th wibeki number β0Or 1 st wibeki number β1Is calculated by the Chom International Rabbit fee software.
And (4) during gas-liquid mixing and liquid-liquid mixing, calculating multiphase in N different areas by using the optimal binary image1 st wibeki number of mixed fluid mixture β1When mixing solid and liquid, the 0 th dimension Betty number β of the multiphase mixed fluid mixing pattern in N different areas is calculated by the optimal binary image0。
In algebraic topology, the Betty number of the topological space β0,β1,β2.., is a family of important invariant, the value is nonnegative integer or infinity, intuitively, β0Is the number of connected components, β1β of the maximum number of cuts, higher order, that cuts through the space along a closed curve to maintain continuitykCan be defined by a coherent group, wherein β0β is the 0 th Betty number representing the number of connected components in the region, which is simply the number of blocks in the region1The invention relates to a method for evaluating multiphase mixed topology disorder and super-uniformity by using 0-dimension or 1-dimension Betty number, which is characterized in that pictures captured by a high-speed camera in a multiphase mixing process are subjected to binarization processing by adopting a statistical method, and then the 0-dimension Betty number β of a multiphase mixing pattern is calculated by a binary image0Or 1 st wibeki number β1Specifically, the mixed pattern is divided into N regions of equal size, and the 0 th-dimensional Betty number β of each region is calculated0Or 1 st wibeki number β1Further, the variance is obtained by the formulaCalculating to obtain lambda, reflecting the mixing uniformity, wherein lambda is more than or equal to 0 to indicate that the mixing effect is random; lambda is more than or equal to 1, the mixing effect is ultra-uniform like crystals; 0 < lambda < 1 indicates that the mixture is in a disordered and ultra-homogeneous state.
The method is simple and reliable, is suitable for all the representations related to the immiscible two-phase mixing effect, can be applied to various fields such as chemical industry and metallurgy, for example, can be used for researching the leaching and stirring process of hydrometallurgy, can also be used for researching the water model research of pyrometallurgy, particularly relates to the multiphase stirring and mixing effect evaluation in the fields of metallurgy and chemical industry, and has high practical value.
When the material is judged to be disordered and super-uniform, when lambda is more than 0 and less than 1, the size of lambda represents the strength of the disordered and super-uniform state, and the smaller the lambda is, the stronger the disorder is; the larger the lambda is, the stronger the uniformity is, and the multiphase mixing state of the working medium is divided into three types: random, disordered and super-uniform, super-uniform (or uniform), and strong discriminability and applicability.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is an optimal binary diagram of example 1.
Detailed Description
The method of the present invention is further illustrated with reference to the accompanying drawings and specific examples.
Example 1
The method for evaluating the incompatible gas-liquid mixing effect comprises the following specific steps:
the first step is as follows: the direct contact heat exchange behavior research of refrigerant pentafluoropropane (gas) and medium and low temperature synthetic heat transfer oil (liquid) in a direct contact heat exchanger is carried out, a high-speed camera is used for photographing the mixing process of the refrigerant pentafluoropropane (gas) and the medium and low temperature synthetic heat transfer oil (liquid), and the capturing rate of the high-speed camera is 250 frames/second;
secondly, performing binarization processing on the shot picture, and finding out the optimal threshold value of image binarization by using an iterative method to obtain an optimal binary image;
the third step: dividing the optimal binary image into 3 regions with equal size, wherein the regions are rectangular;
fourthly, calculating and obtaining the 1 st dimensional Betty number β in 3 different areas through the Chom international rabbit fee software1,β1Represents the number of "channels" in the mixed binary pattern, i.e., the number of "holes" -bubbles generated in the binary pattern, resulting in 3 sets of bubble numbers;
and a sixth step: by varianceIn a correlation systemTo reflect the mixing uniformity, i.e. by formulaDetermining λ, where d represents the dimension, and in two dimensions, d is 2 and N is 3;
the seventh step: analyzing a lambda value, wherein lambda is less than or equal to 0 to indicate that the mixing effect is random, namely the mixing state is disordered; lambda is more than or equal to 1, which indicates that the mixing effect is uniform, namely ultra-uniform; the lambda is more than 0 and less than 1, which indicates that the mixture is in a disordered and super-uniform state, particularly, when the lambda is more than 0 and less than 1, the size of the lambda can qualitatively describe the strength of the disordered and super-uniform state, and the closer the lambda is to 0, the stronger the disorder is; the closer λ is to 1, the stronger the uniformity.
Performing the above processing on the picture taken at 1 min to obtain an optimal binary image, as shown in FIG. 1, wherein 3 represents the ordinal number of the selected region, white is bubble and black is liquid, and determining β of the three regions according to the above method1Has a variance ofWill be provided withd. N is respectively substituted intoLambda-0.56 was obtained, i.e. the mixing process achieved at this time point was a chaotic process.
The pictures taken at 1.5 minutes were processed as described above to obtain β for the three regions as described above1Has a variance ofWill be provided withd. N is respectively substituted intoλ ═ 0.33 was obtained, i.e. the mixing process was disordered and ultra-homogeneous.
The pictures taken at 3 minutes were processed as described above to obtain β of the three regions1Has a variance ofWill be provided withd. N is respectively substituted intoλ 2.33 was obtained, i.e. the mixing process was homogeneous.
From the above analysis, it can be seen that when the mixing time is 1 minute, the mixing is in disorder and not uniformly mixed; when the mixing time is 1.5 minutes, the process is disordered and super-uniform, and the mixture is not uniformly mixed; when the mixing time is 3 minutes, the process is a uniform mixing process, the time point of lambda being 1 can be found out between 1.5 and 3 minutes, the optimal mixing time is obtained, and the time can be uniformly mixed and saves the cost.
Comparative example 1
The first step is as follows: in the research of the direct contact heat exchange behavior of refrigerant pentafluoropropane (gas) and medium and low temperature synthetic heat transfer oil (liquid) in a direct contact heat exchanger, a high-speed camera photographs the mixing process of the refrigerant pentafluoropropane (gas) and the medium and low temperature synthetic heat transfer oil (liquid), and the capture rate of the high-speed camera is 250 frames/second;
secondly, performing binarization processing on the shot picture, and finding out the optimal threshold value of image binarization by using an iterative method to obtain an optimal binary image;
the third step: dividing the optimal binary image into 3 regions with equal size, wherein the regions are rectangular;
fourthly, β in 3 different areas are obtained through calculation by the Chom international rabbit fee software0And β1The picture taken at 1 minute is processed to obtain the optimal second pictureValue map, as shown in FIG. 1, β0Representing the number of connected branches in a mixed binary pattern, i.e. "block" -the number of aggregated liquid distributions not participating in mixing, in solid-liquid mixing, β0Greater indicates better mixing, β1Representing the number of "channels" in the mixed binary pattern, i.e. the number of "holes" -bubbles produced in the binary pattern, in a gas-liquid reaction, β1The larger the size, the better the mixing effect, but if there are 99 bubbles in the area 1, 0 bubble in the area 2 and 0 bubble in the area 3, the mixing uniformity evaluation by such a method is not accurate, and neither the optimum mixing time nor the overall mixing effect can be evaluated.
Example 2
The method for evaluating the incompatible solid-liquid mixing effect comprises the following specific steps:
the first step is as follows: during the process of mixing materials, such as the mixing of solid particles in liquid (water), the materials in the mixing process are photographed by a high-speed camera, and the capture rate of the high-speed camera is 250 frames/second;
the second step is that: carrying out binarization processing on the shot picture, and finding out the optimal threshold value of image binarization by using an iterative method to obtain an optimal binary image, wherein white in the binary image is liquid, and black in the binary image is solid;
the third step: dividing the binary image of the mixed image into 4 regions with equal size, wherein the shape of the regions is rectangular;
fourthly, calculating and obtaining 0-dimensional Betty number β in 4 different areas through the Chom international rabbit fee software0,β0Representing the number of connected branches in the mixed binary pattern, i.e. "block" — the number of solid distributions; obtaining 4 sets of solid distribution quantities, wherein 4 represents the ordinal number of the selected region;
and a sixth step: by varianceIn a correlation systemTo reflect the mixing uniformity, i.e. by formulaDetermining λ, where d represents the dimension, and in two dimensions, d is 2;
the seventh step: analyzing a lambda value, wherein lambda is less than or equal to 0 to indicate that the mixing effect is random, namely the mixing state is disordered; lambda is more than or equal to 1, which means that the mixing effect is uniform, namely ultra-uniform; the lambda is more than 0 and less than 1, the mixture is in a disordered and super-uniform state, particularly, when the lambda is more than 0 and less than 1, the size of the lambda can qualitatively describe the strength of the disordered and super-uniform state, and the closer the lambda is to 0, the stronger the disorder is; the closer λ is to 1, the stronger the uniformity, and the optimum mixing time is obtained by calculating the mixing time at λ ═ 1.
Verifying the optimal mixing time obtained in the example 2, selecting different slurry type stirrers in a biological fermentation tank to enable each area in the tank to achieve solid-liquid suspension and uniform mixing, improving fermentation yield and reducing energy consumption, selecting two non-optimal times according to the optimal mixing time t obtained in the example 2, wherein the three times are (t-3) minutes, t minutes and (t +3) minutes respectively, detecting the final fermentation yield, the fermentation yield obtained in the t-3) minutes is not as good as that obtained in the t minutes, and the difference between the fermentation yield obtained in the t +3) minutes and the fermentation yield obtained in the t minutes is not large, so that the optimal mixing time obtained in the example 2 is correct, the optimal mixing time of the stirrers with different slurry types is compared, and the most appropriate stirrer and stirring duration are selected.
Example 3
The method for evaluating the mixing effect of the incompatible liquid comprises the following specific steps:
the first step is as follows: in the process of mixing materials, the materials in the mixing process are photographed by a high-speed camera in the process of mixing the two immiscible liquids, and the capturing speed of the high-speed camera is 250 frames/second;
the second step is that: carrying out binarization processing on the shot picture, and finding out the optimal threshold value of image binarization by using an iterative method to obtain an optimal binary image; when the two liquids are mixed, the physical properties are different, after binarization treatment, the different liquids are in different colors, and in the process of mixing and diffusing the two liquids, one liquid is white in a binary image, and the other liquid is black;
the third step: dividing the binary image of the mixed image into 5 regions with equal size, wherein the shape of the regions is circular;
fourthly, the 1 st dimensional Betty number β in 5 different areas is obtained through calculation by the Chom international rabbit fee software1,β1Represents the number of "channels" in the mixed binary pattern, i.e., "holes" generated in the binary pattern-the number of small liquid accumulations, yielding 5 sets of liquid accumulation numbers;
and a sixth step: by varianceIn a correlation systemTo reflect the mixing uniformity, i.e. by formulaDetermining λ, where d represents the dimension, and in two dimensions, d is 2;
the seventh step: analyzing a lambda value, wherein lambda is less than or equal to 0 to indicate that the mixing effect is random, namely the mixing state is disordered; lambda is more than or equal to 1, which means that the mixing effect is uniform, namely ultra-uniform; the lambda is more than 0 and less than 1, the mixture is in a disordered and super-uniform state, particularly, when the lambda is more than 0 and less than 1, the size of the lambda can qualitatively describe the strength of the disordered and super-uniform state, and the closer the lambda is to 0, the stronger the disorder is; the closer λ is to 1, the stronger the uniformity, and the optimum mixing time is obtained by calculating the mixing time at λ ═ 1.
The optimum mixing time obtained in example 3 was verified: in agricultural production, in order to reasonably use pesticides, water-insoluble liquid is usually prepared into emulsion (taking oil-water mixing as an example) for spraying crops suffering from diseases and insect pests, so that pesticide liquid is less in loss and more in attachment to leaf surfaces, two non-optimal times are selected according to the optimal mixing time t obtained in example 3 in the mixing process of two liquids (the volume ratio is 1: 1), the three times are respectively (t-10) minutes, t minutes and (t +10) minutes for mixing, and conductivity monitoring is carried out, the t minutes are matched with the time for achieving stable fluctuation, and the optimal mixing time obtained in example 3 is correct.
Claims (6)
1. A method for evaluating the mixing effect of two immiscible phases is characterized by comprising the following specific steps:
(1) in the process of mixing materials, a high-speed camera photographs the materials in the mixing process;
(2) carrying out binarization processing on the shot picture to obtain an optimal binary image;
(3) dividing the optimal binary image into N regions with equal size;
(4) calculating the 0 th dimension Betty number of the mixed pattern in N different regions β0Or 1 st wibeki number β1;
(5) Determine the 0 th dimension Betty number β of each optimal binary image0Or 1 st wibeki number β1Variance of (2)
(6) By the formulaCalculating λ, where d represents the dimension, in two dimensions, d ═ 2; if lambda is less than or equal to 0, representing the mixed state disorder; if lambda is more than 0 and less than 1, the mixture is in a disordered and super-uniform state; if lambda is more than or equal to 1, the mixing effect is uniform.
2. The method for evaluating the effect of immiscible two-phase mixing according to claim 1, wherein the capturing rate of the high speed camera of step (1) is 250 frames/sec.
3. The method for evaluating the immiscible two-phase mixing effect according to claim 1, wherein the step (2) uses an iterative method to find the optimal threshold value for image binarization, so as to obtain the optimal binary image.
4. The method for evaluating the effect of mixing two immiscible phases according to claim 1 wherein N.gtoreq.3 in step (3).
5. The method for evaluating the effect of immiscible two phases in accordance with claim 1, wherein the 0 th dimension Betty number β in the step (4)0Or 1 st wibeki number β1Is calculated by the Chom International Rabbit fee software.
6. The method for evaluating the effect of immiscible two phases as claimed in claim 1, wherein the 1 st wibeki number β of the mixing pattern is calculated during the gas-liquid mixing and the liquid-liquid mixing in step (4)1When mixing solid and liquid, the 0 th dimension Betty number β of the mixed pattern is calculated0。
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010283220.5A CN111583270B (en) | 2020-04-10 | 2020-04-10 | Method for evaluating mixing effect of immiscible two phases |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010283220.5A CN111583270B (en) | 2020-04-10 | 2020-04-10 | Method for evaluating mixing effect of immiscible two phases |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN111583270A true CN111583270A (en) | 2020-08-25 |
CN111583270B CN111583270B (en) | 2022-06-10 |
Family
ID=72113046
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010283220.5A Active CN111583270B (en) | 2020-04-10 | 2020-04-10 | Method for evaluating mixing effect of immiscible two phases |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN111583270B (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN112669268A (en) * | 2020-12-21 | 2021-04-16 | 昆明理工大学 | Method, system and terminal for evaluating distribution uniformity of multiphase mixed concentration field |
Citations (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4681601A (en) * | 1983-12-28 | 1987-07-21 | Polaroid Corporation | Bubble injection dissolved gas measurement method and apparatus |
CN1765815A (en) * | 2005-08-19 | 2006-05-03 | 杨丽 | Clay nanomaterial and its production method |
CN101650292A (en) * | 2009-09-02 | 2010-02-17 | 昆明理工大学 | Method for measuring mixing effect of fluid |
CN101813641A (en) * | 2010-05-11 | 2010-08-25 | 昆明理工大学 | Method for verifying homogeneous state and degree of multiphase stirring and mixing |
CN102004816A (en) * | 2010-11-03 | 2011-04-06 | 昆明理工大学 | Method for representing multiphase mixing effect by utilizing histogram |
CN102507233A (en) * | 2011-10-20 | 2012-06-20 | 中国烟草总公司郑州烟草研究院 | Determining method for mixing ability of respective processing or conveying equipment after blending of reconstituted tobacco shreds |
WO2013062879A1 (en) * | 2011-10-24 | 2013-05-02 | Schlumberger Canada Limited | System and method of quantifying an organic material in a sample |
CN103279433A (en) * | 2013-05-02 | 2013-09-04 | 昆明理工大学 | Method and device for representing particle aggregation bodies |
CN107194062A (en) * | 2017-05-19 | 2017-09-22 | 昆明理工大学 | A kind of bottom convertor water model chaos state characterizing method tested based on modified 01 |
CN110296990A (en) * | 2019-07-08 | 2019-10-01 | 浙江圣兆药物科技股份有限公司 | The device and method of polyvinyl alcohol content in a kind of detection microball preparation |
CN110766650A (en) * | 2019-08-05 | 2020-02-07 | 南方科技大学 | Biological detection early warning method, system, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
-
2020
- 2020-04-10 CN CN202010283220.5A patent/CN111583270B/en active Active
Patent Citations (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4681601A (en) * | 1983-12-28 | 1987-07-21 | Polaroid Corporation | Bubble injection dissolved gas measurement method and apparatus |
CN1765815A (en) * | 2005-08-19 | 2006-05-03 | 杨丽 | Clay nanomaterial and its production method |
CN101650292A (en) * | 2009-09-02 | 2010-02-17 | 昆明理工大学 | Method for measuring mixing effect of fluid |
CN101813641A (en) * | 2010-05-11 | 2010-08-25 | 昆明理工大学 | Method for verifying homogeneous state and degree of multiphase stirring and mixing |
CN102004816A (en) * | 2010-11-03 | 2011-04-06 | 昆明理工大学 | Method for representing multiphase mixing effect by utilizing histogram |
CN102507233A (en) * | 2011-10-20 | 2012-06-20 | 中国烟草总公司郑州烟草研究院 | Determining method for mixing ability of respective processing or conveying equipment after blending of reconstituted tobacco shreds |
WO2013062879A1 (en) * | 2011-10-24 | 2013-05-02 | Schlumberger Canada Limited | System and method of quantifying an organic material in a sample |
CN103279433A (en) * | 2013-05-02 | 2013-09-04 | 昆明理工大学 | Method and device for representing particle aggregation bodies |
CN107194062A (en) * | 2017-05-19 | 2017-09-22 | 昆明理工大学 | A kind of bottom convertor water model chaos state characterizing method tested based on modified 01 |
CN110296990A (en) * | 2019-07-08 | 2019-10-01 | 浙江圣兆药物科技股份有限公司 | The device and method of polyvinyl alcohol content in a kind of detection microball preparation |
CN110766650A (en) * | 2019-08-05 | 2020-02-07 | 南方科技大学 | Biological detection early warning method, system, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
Non-Patent Citations (4)
Title |
---|
MIA BONDELIND 等: "Single- and two-phase numerical models of Dissolved Air Flotation:Comparison of 2D and 3D simulations", 《COLLOIDS AND SURFACES A: PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING ASPECTS》 * |
QINGTAI XIAO 等: "Complexity evolution quantification of bubble pattern in a gas-liquid mixing system for direct-contact heat transfer", 《APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING》 * |
YOSHIRO KANEKO 等: "Synthesis of Water-soluble Silicon Oxide Material by Sol-gel Reaction in Tetraalkoxysilane-aminoalkyltrialkoxysilane Binary System", 《JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH》 * |
肖清泰 等: "基于改进 0-1 测试的多相宏观混合效果混沌表征", 《化学工程》 * |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN112669268A (en) * | 2020-12-21 | 2021-04-16 | 昆明理工大学 | Method, system and terminal for evaluating distribution uniformity of multiphase mixed concentration field |
CN112669268B (en) * | 2020-12-21 | 2023-06-06 | 昆明理工大学 | Multiphase mixed concentration field distribution uniformity evaluation method, system and terminal |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN111583270B (en) | 2022-06-10 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Georgalis et al. | Formation dynamics of protein precrystallization fractal clusters | |
Bröder et al. | Planar shadow image velocimetry for the analysis of the hydrodynamics in bubbly flows | |
Laakkonen et al. | Local bubble size distributions in agitated vessel: comparison of three experimental techniques | |
CN111583270B (en) | Method for evaluating mixing effect of immiscible two phases | |
Ochsenbein et al. | Agglomeration of needle-like crystals in suspension: I. Measurements | |
Guillerme et al. | Study of foam stability by video image analysis: relationship with the quantity of liquid in the foams | |
Schorsch et al. | An optimization-based approach to extract faceted crystal shapes from stereoscopic images | |
Schiele et al. | Analysis of nonideal shape evolution during potash alum crystallization using microcomputed tomography and three-dimensional image analysis | |
Gardner et al. | Colloid aggregation: numerical solution and measurements | |
Meakin et al. | Cluster-cluster aggregation in two-monomer systems | |
CN113887309A (en) | Starch granule identification method based on Mask R-CNN | |
Ogawa | Chemical engineering: a new perspective | |
Oehlschlägel et al. | Water–air transfer rates of microplastic particles through bubble bursting as a function of particle size | |
Schmalenberg et al. | Temperature-controlled minichannel flow-cell for non-invasive particle measurements in solid-liquid flow | |
CN116824120A (en) | Multiphase flow image processing method, device, equipment and medium based on microfluidics | |
Tang et al. | Characterising latex particles and fractal aggregates using image analysis | |
Lahiq et al. | State-of-the-art review on various mathematical approaches towards solving population balanced equations in pharmaceutical crystallization process | |
Zantow et al. | Image-based analysis of droplets in microfluidics | |
CN111855654B (en) | Method for evaluating multiphase flow reinforced stirring and mixing effects | |
CN112669268B (en) | Multiphase mixed concentration field distribution uniformity evaluation method, system and terminal | |
Xiao et al. | Novel 3-D homogeneity metrics of multiple components in gas-stirred liquid systems | |
Bernard-Michel et al. | The study of calcium oxalate precipitation using image analysis | |
Pons et al. | Characterization of viscous fingering in a radial Hele-Shaw cell by image analysis | |
KR20210131399A (en) | Emulsion manufacturing method and manufacturing apparatus | |
RU2275595C1 (en) | Mode of definition of structure of the flow of liquid in an apparatus of intermixing |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |