CN111580123B

CN111580123B - Photoelectric sensor and method for detecting object

Info

Publication number: CN111580123B
Application number: CN202010082254.8A
Authority: CN
Inventors: 罗杰·布塞尔; 奥利弗·奥斯托吉克
Original assignee: Sick AG
Current assignee: Sick AG
Priority date: 2019-02-19
Filing date: 2020-02-07
Publication date: 2023-03-24
Anticipated expiration: 2040-02-07
Also published as: CN111580123A; EP3699640B1; US20200264284A1; EP3699640A1

Abstract

The present application relates to a photosensor and a method for detecting an object. A photoelectric sensor (10) for detecting an object (20) in a monitoring region (18) is proposed, having: a light emitter (12) for emitting light (16) of a wavelength range; a light receiver (34) for generating a reception signal from the emission light (22) diffusely reflected on the object (20); receiving optics (24) arranged upstream of the light receiver (34), the receiving optics having an optical filter (32) matched to the wavelength range for suppressing extraneous light; and a control and evaluation unit (38) which is designed to generate object information from the received signal. Here, a modulation device (36) is provided for changing the angle of incidence of the diffusely reflected emitted light (22) on the optical filter (32).

Description

Photoelectric sensor and method for detecting object

Technical Field

The invention relates to a photoelectric sensor and a method for detecting an object in a monitored area.

Background

Many photosensors operate on the scanning principle, in which a light beam is emitted into the monitored area and the light beam reflected by the object is received again in order to subsequently electronically evaluate the received signals. In this case, the known phase or pulse method is often used to measure the light time of flight in order to determine the distance of the object being swept. This type of distance measurement is also known as ToF (Time of Flight) or LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging).

In order to enlarge the measuring range, the scanning beam can be moved as in a laser scanner. At the laser scanner, the beam generated by the laser is periodically swept over a monitoring area by means of a deflection unit. In addition to the measured distance information, the angular position of the object is inferred from the angular position of the deflection unit and thus the position of the object in the monitored area is recorded in two-dimensional polar coordinates. In most laser scanners, the scanning movement is effected by means of a rotating mirror (Drehspiegel). However, it is also known to rotate the entire measuring head with the light emitter and the light receiver instead of the above-described manner, as described in DE 197 57 849 B4.

In most cases and in particular in distance measurement, the sensor should have to distinguish between useful light and interference from ambient or other light sources. Depending on the application, this can be a very demanding task when the useful light level is very low, for example in particularly bright environments, in case of large target object diffuse reflection differences or measurement distances.

A known measure to improve robustness against extraneous light is to narrow the field of view with a diaphragm that suppresses extraneous light incident from the side. Extraneous light can also be spectrally suppressed. For this purpose, optical band-pass filters are used which are matched to the wavelength of the emitted light.

However, the aperture of the diaphragm cannot be chosen arbitrarily small, since in practice the receiving optics can bundle the received light to a spot size of up to 50 μm, but not larger. A diaphragm aperture of 200 μm is even more realistic under all tolerances (Toleranz) and temperature effects, and even larger in the case of plastic optics or optics that are not calibrated with high accuracy.

Thus, once the effect of the diaphragm is exhausted, the signal-to-noise ratio can still be further improved by making more precise adjustments to the bandpass filter. Here, the narrower the bandwidth of the band-pass filter is without attenuating the useful light, the greater the advantage.

However, the wavelength of the useful light and the passband range of the bandpass filter are susceptible to tolerances and drift (Driften). The wavelength of the emitted light emitted by the laser thus depends on the type of laser, the specific installed laser or at least the batch (production batch) of the laser and the temperature. The passband range of the bandpass filter varies with the angle of incidence. This has two consequences. On the one hand, when the bandpass filter is not precisely oriented, the passband range may shift. Furthermore, the non-parallel beam components may actually encounter filtering effects with different passband ranges.

However, if the wavelength does not match the passband range, the bandpass filter will also block the useful light. For this reason, the passband range of the bandpass filter is designed with margins and is therefore not arbitrarily narrow. Therefore, there is also a limitation to improving the signal-to-noise ratio with the adjusted optical bandpass filter.

The optical bandpass filter may be arranged in front of or on top of the large main lens of the receiving optics. There, the incident light beam is sufficiently collimated, so that a good filtering effect is obtained. However, the auto-collimation device exhibits a problem in terms of structure, and the optical band-pass filter should have at least an opening for emitting light, and extraneous light again invades through the opening. Furthermore, a large filter area is required, which requires a correspondingly high component cost.

When the optical band-pass filter is arranged in front of the optical receiver, these structural difficulties do not arise, and a small filter area is sufficient. However, the incident light beam is no longer parallel at all behind the focusing main lens, so the optical bandpass filter has to cover a large range of angles of incidence, and for this reason only the bandwidth may be limited.

DE 10 2014 116 852 A1 describes a photosensor with an optical filter element between the receiving lens and the light receiver. The effect just described is compensated here by the curved surface of the filter element (krummung). This curved surface is responsible for directing the converging light beams perpendicularly to the filter element, even if their incident angles are different. However, such filter elements are relatively expensive. Furthermore, the remaining effects, which make it difficult to adjust the wavelength and the passband range of the useful light, in particular to calibrate the errors of the filter elements, are not eliminated, wherein the incident light beam is incident obliquely rather than perpendicularly.

US 4 855 shows an optical system with a lens element having a spherical surface with an integrated narrow band pass filter. However, the lens element itself and the remaining optical arrangement are extremely complex and cannot be used at all, for example, in laser scanners.

US 4 184 749 discloses an arrangement consisting of a spherical lens element and a concentric arc-shaped lens element having a narrow band-pass filter on its outer side which is likewise concentric arc-shaped. The task of this device is to receive light from a large field of view and scatter it in such a way that the light beam leaves the concentric lens elements radially, thereby perpendicularly penetrating the arc-shaped band-pass filter. In order to realize a lens element with a band pass filter, the macroscopic curved plate has to be coated at high cost, which is not possible for a market competitive manufacturing cost. This arrangement is also only considered for large image planes and large light receivers. This device is not designed for the ordinary light receiver or pixel of the photosensor and may not be suitable for this.

An optical system for detecting distance information is described in US 2017/0289524 A1. A common receiving lens focuses the light onto a plurality of mechanical diaphragms, behind which small converging lenses are placed, respectively, which collimate the light which is then passed through an optical band-pass filter onto the corresponding pixels of the light receiver. A small converging lens reduces the angle of incidence onto the optical bandpass filter though. However, these small converging lenses must have a relatively large image field due to the short distance from the pixels. This inevitably leads to the image becoming blurred.

Disclosure of Invention

The object of the invention is therefore to further improve the extraneous light suppression of a generic photosensor.

This object is achieved by a photosensor, in particular an optical scanner, and a method for detecting an object in a monitored area. The light emitter generates light of a specific wavelength range, preferably a narrow wavelength range. After the emitted light has been at least partially reflected by the object in the monitoring area, it is received again as diffusely reflected emitted light. The corresponding received signals of the light receivers are evaluated in order to obtain optically detectable information about the object, for example binary presence information, distance, position or also color. Receiving optics are arranged in the receiving path of the diffusely reflected emitted light in front of the light receiver, which receiving optics have an optical filter matched to the wavelength range of the light emitter in order to allow as far as possible only the diffusely reflected emitted light to pass through and to extinguish extraneous light outside its spectrum.

The invention is based upon a basic idea of adjusting an optical filter. For this purpose, the adjusting device is responsible for varying the angle of incidence of the diffusely reflected radiation onto the filter. In this way, the passband range of the optical filter can be adapted to the wavelength range of the emitted light. The adjustment is carried out, for example, as a final calibration step, for example, during the production. For this purpose, the angle of incidence can be adjusted by means of an adjusting device, preferably with constant external light, until a maximum received signal level is reached. The adjustment device is thus used to compensate for tolerances in the wavelength range, remaining calibration errors and/or drifts in the reception path.

The invention has the advantage of effectively inhibiting the extraneous light. Due to the adjustability achieved by means of the adjusting means, no margin or at least less margin is required in the passband range, so that a particularly good signal-to-noise ratio is achieved. There is no dependency on a particular light source, batch or manufacturer, since tolerances of the wavelength range of the light emitter can be reacted to. Overall, the optical filter can be implemented very small and cost-effective.

Preferably, the adjusting means are designed for tilting the optical filter. By placing the filter obliquely with respect to the incident beam, the passband range is shifted. Very inexpensive manufacturing adjustment options are sufficient. In principle, however, it is also conceivable to have, for example, electronic actuators which are regulated automatically during operation, maintenance or field commissioning.

Preferably, the optical filter is a band-pass filter. Thus, the passband range may be specified by a lower limit and an upper limit, or alternatively by a center frequency about which the passband range is generally approximately symmetric. Bandpass filters are particularly suitable for suppressing extraneous light in that they exclude light of both small and large wavelengths.

The wavelength range may be within tolerance due to drift in sensor operation and/or characteristics of the light emitterWavelength range (a)

) An internal offset, and preferably the optical filter has a passband range that is narrower than the wavelength range of the difference. Drift refers to time-dependent effects, for example due to aging and especially temperature. The sensors are designed for specific environmental conditions, such as a specified temperature range. Thus, it can be explained how much the influence of the drift can be. Furthermore, it is also conceivable that the light emitters deviate from their specified wavelength range. Thus creating a tolerance wavelength range and, in general, the optical filter is designed with a margin of its passband range so as to cover the tolerance wavelength range. However, according to this embodiment, the passband range is chosen narrower, in particular resulting in only drift being taken into account, and no offset due to component tolerances being taken into account. The adjusting device ensures that the particularly narrow passband range also matches the actual wavelength range.

Preferably, the optical filter has a passband range having a half-value width of at most 40nm, at most 30nm, at most 20nm or at most 10nm. This is some value of the too narrow passband range that preserves the margin of tolerance according to conventional standards. Typical values for the shift in the center frequency of the light emitter are + -10 nm or, optimally, + -5 nm, based on manufacturing tolerances. Thus, in the case of the mentioned values, the compensation for drift hardly retains any buffer. However, according to the invention, this is even not necessary at all, since at least the manufacturing tolerances are compensated for by the adjusting device.

Preferably, the optical filter is constructed flat. Therefore, the optical filter has no curved surface and is therefore low in cost.

The optical filter has a maximum of 25mm ² Maximum 20mm ² Max 15mm ² Maximum 10mm ² Or 5mm at the maximum ² The area of (c). Preferably, the optical filter is at least e.g. square, such that the boundary corresponds to e.g. 5x5mm ² 、4x4mm ² 、3x3mm ² Or 2x2mm ² . This type of optical filter is also cost-effectiveAnd may be too small to be placed in front of or on top of the main lens.

Preferably, the wavelength range of the light emitter shifts with temperature by a maximum of 0.1nm/K, a maximum of 0.8nm/K, a maximum of 0.6nm/K or a maximum of 0.05nm/K. This limits the drift over temperature so that a narrower passband range is still sufficient to cover the wavelength range shift due to the drift. One option is to use VCSELs in the optical transmitter that can reach these values. Alternatively, the light emitter has a temperature stabilizing device (temperature stabilizing device). Temperature regulation is effected, for example, with a peltier element or by regulating the laser current.

Preferably, the receiving optics have a first focusing optical element. Thereby focusing the diffusely reflected emitted light. A relatively large main or receiving lens is typically used, but an objective lens or a reflecting device with multiple lenses may also be used.

Preferably, the diaphragm is arranged downstream of the first focusing optical element, still preferably the diaphragm is arranged in the focal plane of the first focusing optical element. Since the lateral extraneous light does not reach the light receiver, a geometrical suppression of the extraneous light is ensured in addition to the spectral suppression of the optical filter.

Preferably, the receiving optics have a second focusing optical element, in particular a spherical focusing lens. The second focusing optical element defines the angle of incidence onto the optical filter, i.e. it aligns the incoming light beams, which converge after being focused by the main lens, with each other so that they extend more parallel to each other. A spherical converging lens as the second focusing optical element facilitates calibration and operation due to its arbitrary rotational symmetry. The manufacture of glass spheres is very accurate at low cost.

Preferably, the adjusting device is designed for tilting the optical filter and the second focusing optical element, in particular with a rotation point in the second focusing optical element. In this embodiment, the optical filter is not tilted individually, but rather in a compact assembly consisting of the second focusing optics and, if present, the diaphragm. The rotation point for tilting is preferably located in the second focusing optical element and, in the case of a spherical shape, particularly preferably the center point of this second focusing optical element. Thus, due to the symmetrical nature of the second focusing optical element, rotation does not change the optical effect of the second focusing optical element.

Preferably, the receiving optics have, in order, a first focusing optical element, a diaphragm, a second focusing optical element and an optical filter. The sequence is specified from the viewing angle of the incident diffusely reflected emitted light, which therefore impinges first on the main lens and after the optical filter on the light receiver. Simple alignment and adjustment of the wavelength range of the useful light, a small cross section of the light spot, and a small spread of the angle of incidence onto the optical filter or a light beam which is only slightly divergent at the optical filter are simultaneously achieved with these optical elements.

Preferably, the control and evaluation unit is designed for determining the distance of the object from the light time of flight between the emission of the emitted light and the reception of the diffusely reflected emitted light. A distance measuring sensor is thus produced, and the distance of the object is determined as measurement information about the object. Especially in the case of dark objects with a large effective range, a large amount of ambient light and/or poor diffuse reflection, the useful light component is usually very low, so that the light time-of-flight approach benefits greatly from improved extraneous light rejection.

Preferably, the sensor is designed as a laser scanner and for this purpose has a movable deflection unit for periodically deflecting the emitted light in the monitoring region. Thus, compared to one-dimensional sensors, the monitoring area is significantly increased, i.e. to a scanning plane in the angular range up to 360 ° and with additional deflection in elevation and/or the use of multiple scanning beams offset in elevation, even to a three-dimensional spatial area. Preferably, the laser scanner uses a time-of-flight method of light for distance measurement and thus produces 3D measurement points in the scanning plane or even in space, taking into account the respective angle at which the emitted light is emitted.

The method according to the invention can be further improved in a similar manner and at the same time exhibit similar advantages. These advantageous features are described exemplarily, but not exclusively, in the dependent claims following the independent claims.

Drawings

Further features and advantages of the invention are explained in more detail below on the basis of exemplary embodiments and with reference to the drawings. In the drawings:

FIG. 1 shows a schematic diagram of a photosensor;

FIG. 2 shows a diagram of the optical path in the receive path of an optical filter with a photosensor;

FIG. 3 shows exemplary plots of center wavelength of an optical filter as a function of incident angle for two different refractive indices;

FIG. 4 shows a diagram similar to FIG. 2, now with the optical filter tilted for adapting the angle of incidence or passband range; and

fig. 5 shows a schematic view of a laser scanner.

Detailed Description

Fig. 1 shows a schematic cross-sectional view of a photosensor 10. A light emitter 12 (e.g., a laser or LED) emits emission light 16 into a monitored area 18 via emission optics 14. Preferably, the light emitter 12 has a laser light source, in particular a semiconductor laser in the form of a VCSEL laser or an edge emitter, but also another laser, for example a fiber laser. Thus, the wavelength range of the emitted light 16 may be very severely limited. The wavelengths of light used are generally between 200nm and 2000nm, in particular 660nm, 850nm, 900nm and 1550nm.

If the emitted light 16 falls on the object 20 in the monitoring region 18, a portion of the light returns as diffusely reflected emitted light 22 to the sensor 10 and is guided there by the receiving optics 24 onto the light receiver 34, which has a first receiving lens 26, a diaphragm 28, a (preferably spherical) second lens 30 and an optical filter 32. The optical filter 32 can be placed in different tilted positions by means of the adjusting device 36. The structure and function of the receiving optics 24 is explained in more detail below with reference to fig. 2-4. The light receiver 34 is, for example, a PIN Diode, an APD (Avalanche photodiode) or a single photon APD (SPAD, single photon APD, avalanche photodiode in geiger mode) or a multiple arrangement thereof.

The control and evaluation unit 38 controls the light emitter 12 and evaluates the received signals of the light receiver 34 in order to obtain optically detectable information of the object 20, for example a binary presence determination, an object position or a color. Preferably, the control and evaluation unit 38 determines the distance of the object 20 by means of trigonometry or the light time-of-flight method. The optical time-of-flight method used here may be a single pulse method or a multi-pulse method, but may also be a phase method, and is known per se.

The basic structure of the sensor 10 according to fig. 1 is understood only by way of example. Other arrangements are envisaged, for example coaxial rather than biaxial arrangements, and other sensor types than one-dimensional optical scanners, in particular laser scanners, are also envisaged.

Fig. 2 shows the reception path in front of the light receiver 34 and the light path of the diffusely reflected emitted light 22 again in an enlarged view. To illustrate the size, the spherical second lens 30 may have a diameter of, for example, about 1 mm. A plane 26' behind the first receiving lens 26 is shown, while the first receiving lens 26 is not shown, since the size of the first receiving lens 26 or the main lens in the centimeter range is absolutely a multiple of the second lens 30 and may exceed the imaging scale.

First on the left side of fig. 2, the beam of diffusely reflected emitted light 22 is strongly converged by the focusing of the first receiving lens 26 at different angles of incidence, for example in the range of ± 30 °. The diffusely reflected radiation 22 is focused by a first receiving lens 26 onto a diaphragm 28 having a diaphragm aperture, here illustratively 300 μm. Lateral extraneous light, which in a purely geometrical sense cannot originate from the light emitter 12, is suppressed by the diaphragm effect.

Subsequently, the spherical second lens 30 again orients the light beams as parallel as possible to one another, so that they fall onto the optical filter 32 with the same angle of incidence or always with a small angle of incidence range of, for example, ± 3 °. The second lens 30 is configured as a glass ball, for example. Due to its complete rotational symmetry, the second lens 30 is very easy to handle and does not require any special orientation when inserted into its holder during manufacture.

Since the optical filter 32 is positioned in the focused optical path of the diffusely reflected emitted light 22, the optical filter can be implemented with a small area on the order of the optical receiver 34. In fig. 2, for example, 3 × 3mm of the optical filter 32 is exemplarily set ² 1x1mm of area and light receiver 34 ² The area of (a). Further, since the light beams incident on the optical filter 32 have substantially the same incident angle, the optical filter 32 may be flat.

Traditionally, the passband range of a spectral filter typically has a half-value width of 80 nm. The reason for the relatively large passband range is that a margin is reserved for drift and offset of the wavelength range of the emitted light 22 for diffuse reflection. Drift refers to the change in wavelength range over time due to effects such as component aging and primarily due to temperature dependence. This can also be managed to some extent by having a correspondingly stable laser type as the optical transmitter 12. For example, VCSELs exhibit only a small part of the temperature dependence of conventional edge emitters, for example only one fifth at 0.06mn/K, as a numerical example. Thus, a drift of about 4nm is obtained for an operating range of 70K of the sensor 10. It is also conceivable to use temperature-stabilized light emitters 12. Thus, conventional margins in the passband of the optical filter 32 are not needed for temperature drift alone.

However, there is additionally a shift in the wavelength range. For this reason, the tolerance of the center wavelength of the light emitter 12 is 10nm-20nm, which is due to lot-to-lot variations and wafer variations, especially when changing to other manufacturers' light sources, and thus manufacturing processes.

In addition, the passband range of the optical filter 32 depends on the angle of incidence of the diffusely reflected emitted light 22. Therefore, if the receive optics 24 are not precisely aligned as in fig. 2 to ensure vertical injection, there is an additional offset effect.

The spectral shift as a function of the angle of incidence is illustrated in fig. 3. Therein, the center frequency and the angle of incidence of the optical band-pass filter are plotted with respect to two effective refractive indices n =2 (lower line) and n =3 (upper line).

This is now utilized in accordance with the invention to adapt the passband range of the optical filter 32 to the wavelength range of the diffusely reflected emitted light 22. For this purpose, the optical filter 32 is tilted by means of the adjusting device 36. The adjusting device 36 can be formed by the simplest mechanical devices, which only allow adaptation with corresponding tools and careful implementation during production. Conversely, electronic actuators are also conceivable. What is important here is that the device, but the result of the appropriately tilted optical filter 32, is also, if necessary, simply glued or otherwise fastened in the desired orientation. It is conceivable that the optical filter 32 has been tilted in the basic position. As shown in fig. 3, the more to the right in the figure, the greater the effect per degree. That is, if for example a basic position with an angle of incidence of 17 ° is chosen, a spectral range of ± 5nm is covered by a tuning angle of ± 5 °.

Fig. 4 shows the receiving path of the diffusely reflected emitted light 22 similar to fig. 2, but now the optical filter 32 is tilted, in this example by about 9 °. For a more brightly shown beam of diffusely reflected emitted light 22a, a perpendicular angle of incidence is produced. For comparison, a light beam, shown darker, extending centrally through the diaphragm 28 is also drawn. These are just two examples of detuning and tilting effects. The actual desired tilt angle is one at which the passband range of the optical filter matches as well as possible the wavelength range of the incident diffusely reflected emitted light 22. This does not necessarily correspond to normal incidence, rather, as can be seen from fig. 3, the tilt angle is just the adjustment parameter. In practice, the optimization may be performed by tilting the optical filter 32 until the reception level of the optical receiver 34 is maximum, under active light emitters 12 and dark or extraneous light conditions that are as constant as possible. It has been noted in connection with fig. 3 that the shift and adaptation to the passband range of the optical filter 32 may be ± 5nm or may also be ± 10nm.

Thus, in general, it is possible to use optical filters 32, in particular bandpass filters with a half-value width of only 20nm or even only 10nm, and still continue to allow all the useful light to pass through in the event of a residual drift. Thus, the extraneous light is reduced by a factor of four or even eight compared to the conventional half-value width of 80 nm. Since all the useful light continues to pass when the tilt angle of the optical filter 32 is properly adjusted, the signal-to-noise ratio is correspondingly improved.

Fig. 5 shows a schematic cross-sectional view of an embodiment of the photosensor 10 as a laser scanner. Features already known from fig. 1 are provided with the same reference numerals and are not described again here. In contrast to fig. 1, the light path of the emitted light 16 and the diffusely reflected emitted light 22 extends through the deflection unit 40.

The deflection unit 40 is set in continuous rotational motion with a scanning frequency by a Motor 42. Thus, the emitted light 16 scans the plane during each scan cycle (i.e., during one complete rotation at the scan frequency). The angle measuring unit 44 is arranged on the outer circumference of the deflection unit 40 so as to detect each angular position of the deflection unit 40. The angle measuring unit 44 is here formed by an index plate as an angle measuring body and a fork grating as a scanning device.

In addition to the connection to the light emitter 12 and the light receiver 34, the control and evaluation unit 38 is also connected to a motor 42 and an angle measuring unit 44. The control and evaluation unit determines the distance to the respective swept object using a per se known light time-of-flight method. The measuring points or profiles are thus recorded in polar coordinates together with the angles correspondingly provided by the angle measuring unit 44. At the output 46, these measurement points are output as raw data or measurement results determined from this within the control and evaluation unit 38.

In the laser scanner shown, the light emitter 12 and its emitting optics 14 are located in a central opening of the receiving optics 24. Thereby creating a coaxial arrangement. Alternatively, this can also be achieved with a mirror region of its own for emitting the light 16 or with a beam splitter. As already mentioned in fig. 1, the sensor 10 shown in this figure may alternatively also have a coaxial structure, and likewise a biaxial laser scanner is also possible in reverse. Other alternative configurations of the laser scanner do not use a rotating mirror as deflection unit 40, but rather rotate the entire measuring head with light emitter 12 and light receiver 34.

Claims

1. An optoelectronic sensor (10) for detecting an object (20) in a monitored area (18), the sensor having:

a light emitter (12) for emitting a range of wavelengths of emitted light (16);

a light receiver (34) for generating a reception signal from the emitted light (22) diffusely reflected on the object (20);

receiving optics (24) arranged upstream of the light receiver (34), the receiving optics having an optical filter (32) matched to the wavelength range for rejecting extraneous light;

a control and evaluation unit (38) which is designed to generate object information from the received signal; and

-adjusting means (36) for varying the angle of incidence of the diffusely reflected emitted light (22) on the optical filter (32),

wherein the receiving optics (24) comprise, in order, a first focusing optical element (26), a diaphragm (28), a second focusing optical element (30) arranged as a spherical converging lens, and the optical filter (32), and

wherein the adjusting device (36) is designed to vary the angle of incidence by tilting the optical filter (32) and the second focusing optical element (30).

2. The sensor (10) of claim 1, wherein the optical filter (32) is a band pass filter.

3. The sensor (10) according to any one of claims 1-2, wherein the wavelength range shifts within a tolerance wavelength range due to drift in operation of the sensor (10) and/or characteristics of the light emitter (12), and wherein the optical filter (32) has a passband range that is narrower than the tolerance wavelength range.

4. The sensor (10) according to any one of claims 1-2, wherein the optical filter (32) has a passband range of a half-value width of at most 20nm or at most 10nm.

5. The sensor (10) according to any one of claims 1-2, wherein the optical filter (32) is designed to be flat.

6. The sensor (10) according to any one of claims 1-2, wherein the optical filter (32) has a maximum of 20mm ² Or maximum 10mm ² The area of (a).

7. The sensor (10) according to any one of claims 1-2, wherein the wavelength range of the light emitter (12) is shifted with temperature by at most 0.1nm/K or at most 0.05nm/K.

8. The sensor (10) according to any one of claims 1-2, wherein the adjusting means (36) is designed to tilt the optical filter (32) and the second focusing optical element (30) with a rotation point in the second focusing optical element (30).

9. The sensor (10) according to any one of claims 1-2, wherein the control and evaluation unit (38) is designed for determining the distance of the object (20) from the light time of flight between the emission of the emitted light (16) and the reception of the diffusely reflected emitted light (22).

10. The sensor (10) as claimed in any of claims 1-2, which is designed as a laser scanner and has a movable deflection unit (40) for periodically deflecting the emitted light (16) in the monitoring region (18).

11. A method for detecting an object (20) in a monitoring region (18), wherein emission light (16) is emitted in a wavelength range, the emission light (22) which is reflected diffusely on the object (20) is received again as diffuse reflection by receiving optics (24) and converted into a reception signal in order to generate object information from the reception signal, wherein the receiving optics (24) suppress extraneous light with an optical filter (32) which is matched to the wavelength range,

wherein an angle of incidence of the diffusely reflected emitted light (22) onto the optical filter (32) is adjusted to adapt a passband range of the optical filter (32) to the wavelength range;

wherein the receiving optics (24) are arranged upstream of a light receiver (34), the receiving optics (24) comprising, in order, a first focusing optical element (26), a diaphragm (28), a second focusing optical element (30) provided as a spherical converging lens, and the optical filter (32); and is

Wherein the adjusting means (36) adjusts the angle of incidence by tilting the optical filter (32) and the second focusing optical element (30).