CN111552639B - Software test comprehensive control method and system - Google Patents
Software test comprehensive control method and system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN111552639B CN111552639B CN202010328884.9A CN202010328884A CN111552639B CN 111552639 B CN111552639 B CN 111552639B CN 202010328884 A CN202010328884 A CN 202010328884A CN 111552639 B CN111552639 B CN 111552639B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- software
- test
- data
- bug
- testing
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3668—Software testing
- G06F11/3672—Test management
- G06F11/3684—Test management for test design, e.g. generating new test cases
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3668—Software testing
- G06F11/3672—Test management
- G06F11/3688—Test management for test execution, e.g. scheduling of test suites
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Stored Programmes (AREA)
- Debugging And Monitoring (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides a software test comprehensive control method and system, and relates to the technical field of software tests. The method comprises the following steps: s1, preparing work before software testing, and making a pretreatment plan; s2, executing a software test plan, and collecting each single parameter data of the software test; s3, analyzing the data acquired by the software test in real time, and performing analysis, tracking and positioning; s4, testing the BUG by real-time repairing software, and reserving a BUG source code; and S5, carrying out comprehensive software test, and leading out comparison of test results. The invention obviously improves the comprehensive control method of the whole software test, greatly reduces the inconvenience and defects of the software test control method and the system in use, and greatly improves the efficiency of the software test by carrying out online processing, so that the software test has higher efficiency, continuity and accuracy.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of software testing, in particular to a software testing comprehensive control method and a software testing comprehensive control system.
Background
Software testing is the execution process of a program and aims at discovering errors, a successful test case is used for discovering errors which are not discovered so far, and the test is used for discovering errors which are not discovered so far, so that a product is ensured to complete the functions promised or published by the product, the functions which can be accessed by a user are all provided with clear written description, the product meets the requirements of performance and efficiency, and the product is robust and adapts to the environment of the user.
Nowadays, automated testing tools are various, generally, automated testing is performed for a certain testing type or a certain software service type, although there are many control methods and systems for software testing, the existing software testing integrated control method and system have inconvenience and defects in use, and testing efficiency needs to be improved.
Disclosure of Invention
Technical problem to be solved
Aiming at the defects of the prior art, the invention provides a software test comprehensive control method and a software test comprehensive control system, which solve the defects and the defects in the prior art.
(II) technical scheme
In order to realize the purpose, the invention is realized by the following technical scheme: a software test integrated control method comprises the following steps:
s1, preparing work before software testing, and making a pretreatment plan;
s2, executing a software test plan, and collecting each single parameter data of the software test;
s3, analyzing the data acquired by the software test in real time, and performing analysis, tracking and positioning;
s4, testing the BUG by real-time repairing software, and reserving a BUG source code;
and S5, carrying out comprehensive software test, and leading out comparison of test results.
Preferably, in step 1, preparation work before software testing is performed, and a preprocessing plan is made, specifically including the following:
1) writing a test plan: the tester fully masters the performance, characteristics, using method, business process and the like of the software, and the planning and normalization of product testing work are ensured;
2) writing a test case: confirming the range and key points of the test, considering the requirements of logic, data integrity and the like, specifying the requirements of the test in detail, planning and compiling test cases, and designing test data and expected results;
3) building a test environment: the independence and the maintenance of the test environment are ensured, and the update of the test environment is ensured, and meanwhile, the stability and the correctness of the version of the test environment are ensured.
Preferably, the executing of the software test plan and the collecting of each single parameter data of the software test include the following specific contents:
1) each item of the software is independently tested according to the product characteristics and the test requirements, and the test method comprises an integrated test stage and a regression test stage;
2) in the process of executing the test by the software, classifying and storing each single parameter data to be tested, and simultaneously, corresponding the software data to the test data one by one.
Preferably, the real-time analysis software tests the acquired data to perform analysis, tracking and positioning, and the specific contents are as follows:
1) the test equipment analyzes data in the software running state, analyzes and processes the dynamic performance, the static performance, the unit performance, the integration performance and the like of the software, and judges whether the software performance comes in or goes out of a pretreatment plan;
2) when the software running data is analyzed, the testing equipment matches the relevance of the analyzed data and the software in real time, positions the initial position of the data, marks the data one by one and is used for realizing a tracing source in the later period.
Preferably, the real-time repair software tests the BUG and reserves BUG source codes, and the specific contents are as follows:
1) when a tester detects that the BUG exists in the software on line, the tester immediately informs relevant technicians on line, the technicians confirm the BUG on line in real time, and if the BUG does exist and has influence, the technicians repair the BUG on line;
2) in the BUG online repair process, technicians firstly reserve BUG source codes, an emergency code storage folder is established, and all the source codes with the BUG are classified, stored and remarked.
Preferably, the comprehensive software test is performed, and the comparison of the test results is derived, and the specific contents are as follows:
1) after all single items are tested and repaired, comprehensively testing software by using test equipment, simultaneously testing all soft items at the same time node, and collecting data parameters of software testing;
2) and (4) making each data parameter of the comprehensive test result into a table, then exporting the table, and comparing the table data with qualified data to generate a difference statistical result.
The software testing integrated control system comprises a data acquisition unit, a data analysis unit, a central processing unit, a data storage unit, a table generation unit, a data comparison unit and an online interaction unit, wherein the data acquisition unit is connected with the data analysis unit, the data storage unit, the table generation unit and the online interaction unit are all connected with the central processing unit, and the data comparison unit is connected with the table generation unit.
Preferably, the data acquisition unit is used for acquiring parameter data in the software testing process, and the data analysis unit is used for analyzing and processing software testing parameters in real time.
Preferably, the data storage unit is used for storing collected and analyzed data, storing BUG repair data, source codes of BUGs and the like, and the online interaction unit is used for realizing interaction between a tester and a technician.
Preferably, the table generating unit is configured to generate a table for the tested data and import the table into the data comparing unit, and the data comparing unit is configured to compare the table data with the existing qualified data, generate a difference statistical result, and print the difference statistical result.
(III) advantageous effects
The invention provides a software test comprehensive control method and a software test comprehensive control system. The method has the following beneficial effects:
the invention makes a pretreatment plan, executes a software test plan, collects test data and processes, searches and repairs BUG and comprehensively tests the software test, so that the comprehensive control method of the whole software test is obviously improved, the inconvenience and the defects of the software test control method and the system in use are greatly reduced, and the on-line processing is carried out, thereby greatly improving the efficiency of the software test and ensuring that the software test has higher efficiency, continuity and accuracy.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic flow diagram of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of the system of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
Example (b):
as shown in fig. 1-2, an embodiment of the present invention provides a software test comprehensive control method, including the following steps:
s1, preparing work before software testing, and making a pretreatment plan;
s2, executing a software test plan, and collecting each single parameter data of the software test;
s3, analyzing the data acquired by the software test in real time, and performing analysis, tracking and positioning;
s4, testing the BUG by real-time repairing software, and reserving a BUG source code;
and S5, carrying out comprehensive software test, and leading out comparison of test results.
In step 1, preparation work before software testing is carried out, and a pretreatment plan is formulated, wherein the preparation work comprises the following specific contents:
1) writing a test plan: the tester fully masters the performance, characteristics, using method, business process and the like of the software, and the planning and normalization of product testing work are ensured;
2) writing a test case: confirming the range and key points of the test, considering the requirements of logic, data integrity and the like, specifying the requirements of the test in detail, planning and compiling test cases, and designing test data and expected results;
3) building a test environment: the independence and the maintenance of the test environment are ensured, and the update of the test environment is ensured, and meanwhile, the stability and the correctness of the version of the test environment are ensured.
In step 2, executing a software test plan, and collecting each single parameter data of the software test, wherein the specific contents are as follows:
1) each item of the software is independently tested according to the product characteristics and the test requirements, and the test method comprises an integrated test stage and a regression test stage;
2) in the process of executing the test by the software, classifying and storing each single parameter data to be tested, and simultaneously, corresponding the software data to the test data one by one.
And 3, analyzing the data acquired by the software test in real time, analyzing, tracking and positioning, and specifically comprising the following contents:
1) the test equipment analyzes data in the software running state, analyzes and processes the dynamic performance, the static performance, the unit performance, the integration performance and the like of the software, and judges whether the software performance comes in or goes out of a pretreatment plan;
2) when the software running data is analyzed, the testing equipment matches the relevance of the analyzed data and the software in real time, positions the initial position of the data, marks the data one by one and is used for realizing a tracing source in the later period.
And (4) repairing the BUG for the software test in real time, and reserving a BUG source code, wherein the specific contents are as follows:
1) when a tester detects that the BUG exists in the software on line, the tester immediately informs relevant technicians on line, the technicians confirm the BUG on line in real time, and if the BUG does exist and has influence, the technicians repair the BUG on line;
2) in the BUG online repair process, technicians firstly reserve BUG source codes, establish an emergency code storage folder, and store and remark all the source codes with BUGs in a classified manner.
And 5, carrying out comprehensive software test, and leading out comparison of test results, wherein the specific contents are as follows:
1) after all single items are tested and repaired, comprehensive testing is carried out on the software by using testing equipment, all soft items are tested at the same time node, and data parameters of software testing are collected;
2) and making each data parameter of the comprehensive test result into a table, then exporting the table, and comparing the table data with qualified data to generate a difference statistical result.
A software test integrated control system comprises a data acquisition unit, a data analysis unit, a central processing unit, a data storage unit, a table generation unit, a data comparison unit and an online interaction unit, wherein the data acquisition unit is connected with the data analysis unit, the data storage unit, the table generation unit and the online interaction unit are all connected with the central processing unit, and the data comparison unit is connected with the table generation unit.
The data acquisition unit is used for acquiring parameter data in the software testing process, and the data analysis unit is used for analyzing and processing software testing parameters in real time; the data storage unit is used for storing the acquired and analyzed data, the BUG repair data, the source code of the BUG and the like, and the online interaction unit is used for realizing the interaction between a tester and a technician; the table generating unit is used for generating a table for the tested data and importing the table into the data comparison unit, and the data comparison unit is used for comparing the table data with the existing qualified data, generating a difference statistical result and printing the difference statistical result.
The invention makes a pretreatment plan, executes a software test plan, collects test data and processes, searches and repairs BUG and comprehensively tests the software test, so that the comprehensive control method of the whole software test is obviously improved, the inconvenience and the defects of the software test control method and the system in use are greatly reduced, and the on-line processing is carried out, thereby greatly improving the efficiency of the software test and ensuring that the software test has higher efficiency, continuity and accuracy.
Although embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that various changes, modifications, substitutions and alterations can be made in these embodiments without departing from the principles and spirit of the invention, the scope of which is defined in the appended claims and their equivalents.
Claims (2)
1. A software test integrated control method is characterized in that: the method comprises the following steps:
s1, preparing work before software testing, and making a pretreatment plan;
s2, executing a software test plan, and collecting each single parameter data of the software test;
s3, analyzing the data acquired by the software test in real time, and performing analysis, tracking and positioning;
s4, testing the BUG by real-time repairing software, and reserving a BUG source code;
s5, carrying out comprehensive software test, and leading out comparison of test results;
in step S1, preparation work before software testing is performed, and a preprocessing plan is made, specifically including the following contents:
1) writing a test plan: the tester fully masters the performance, characteristics, using method and business process of the software, and the planeness and normalization of the product testing work are ensured;
2) writing a test case: confirming the range and key points of the test, considering the requirements of logic and data integrity, specifying the requirements of the test in detail, planning and compiling test cases, and designing test data and expected results;
3) building a test environment: the independence of the test environment and the updating of the maintenance test environment are ensured, and meanwhile, the stability of the test environment and the correctness of the version are ensured;
the method comprises the following steps of executing a software test plan, and collecting each single parameter data of a software test, wherein the specific contents are as follows:
1) according to the product characteristics and the test requirements, each item of software is independently tested, and the test comprises an integrated test stage and a regression test stage;
2) in the process of executing the test by the software, classifying and storing each single parameter data to be tested, and simultaneously corresponding the software data to the test data one by one;
the real-time analysis software tests the acquired data to analyze, track and position, and the specific contents are as follows:
1) the test equipment analyzes data in the software running state, analyzes and processes the dynamic performance, the static performance, the unit performance and the integration performance of the software, and judges whether the software performance is in or out of a pretreatment plan;
2) when the software running data is analyzed, the testing equipment matches the correlation between the analyzed data and the software in real time, positions the initial position of the data and marks the initial position one by one for realizing the tracing source at the later stage;
the real-time repairing software tests the BUG and reserves BUG source codes, and the specific contents are as follows:
1) when a tester detects that the BUG exists in the software on line, the tester immediately informs relevant technicians on line, the technicians confirm the BUG on line in real time, and if the BUG does exist and has influence, the technicians repair the BUG on line;
2) in the BUG online repairing process, technicians firstly reserve BUG source codes, establish an emergency code storage folder, and store and remark all the source codes with BUGs in a classified manner;
the comprehensive software test is carried out, and the test results are derived and compared, wherein the specific contents are as follows:
1) after all single items are tested and repaired, comprehensively testing software by using test equipment, simultaneously testing all soft items at the same time node, and collecting data parameters of software testing;
2) and (4) making each data parameter of the test result into a table, then exporting the table, and comparing the table data with qualified data to generate a difference statistical result.
2. A software test integrated control system is characterized in that: the system comprises a data acquisition unit, a data analysis unit, a central processing unit, a data storage unit, a table generation unit, a data comparison unit and an online interaction unit, wherein the data acquisition unit is connected with the data analysis unit;
the data acquisition unit is used for acquiring parameter data in the software testing process, and the data analysis unit is used for analyzing and processing software testing parameters in real time;
the data storage unit is used for storing collected and analyzed data, storing BUG repair data and source codes of the BUG, and the online interaction unit is used for realizing interaction between a tester and a technician;
the table generating unit is used for generating a table for the tested data and importing the table into the data comparison unit, and the data comparison unit is used for comparing the table data with the existing qualified data, generating a difference statistical result and printing the difference statistical result.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010328884.9A CN111552639B (en) | 2020-04-23 | 2020-04-23 | Software test comprehensive control method and system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010328884.9A CN111552639B (en) | 2020-04-23 | 2020-04-23 | Software test comprehensive control method and system |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN111552639A CN111552639A (en) | 2020-08-18 |
| CN111552639B true CN111552639B (en) | 2022-08-23 |
Family
ID=72005750
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010328884.9A Active CN111552639B (en) | 2020-04-23 | 2020-04-23 | Software test comprehensive control method and system |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN111552639B (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN114137432A (en) * | 2021-11-26 | 2022-03-04 | 深圳市新威尔电子有限公司 | Channel automatic locking detection method |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103257917A (en) * | 2012-02-16 | 2013-08-21 | 广州博纳信息技术有限公司 | Management method for software evaluation system |
| CN107463501A (en) * | 2017-08-11 | 2017-12-12 | 四川长虹电器股份有限公司 | A kind of defect management system for prompting and based reminding method |
| CN108052455A (en) * | 2018-01-02 | 2018-05-18 | 赛汇检测（广州）有限公司 | A kind of software testing system and its test method |
| CN108958713A (en) * | 2018-06-30 | 2018-12-07 | 安徽合软信息技术有限公司 | A kind of novel sustainable integrated research and development of software environment architecture |
Family Cites Families (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US9329978B2 (en) * | 2013-08-20 | 2016-05-03 | Sap Portals Israel Ltd | Software unit test immunity index |
-
2020
- 2020-04-23 CN CN202010328884.9A patent/CN111552639B/en active Active
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103257917A (en) * | 2012-02-16 | 2013-08-21 | 广州博纳信息技术有限公司 | Management method for software evaluation system |
| CN107463501A (en) * | 2017-08-11 | 2017-12-12 | 四川长虹电器股份有限公司 | A kind of defect management system for prompting and based reminding method |
| CN108052455A (en) * | 2018-01-02 | 2018-05-18 | 赛汇检测（广州）有限公司 | A kind of software testing system and its test method |
| CN108958713A (en) * | 2018-06-30 | 2018-12-07 | 安徽合软信息技术有限公司 | A kind of novel sustainable integrated research and development of software environment architecture |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN111552639A (en) | 2020-08-18 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN106951369B (en) | Management method and device for joint debugging test | |
| CN101526919B (en) | Method for generating script files to test Web application software and device thereof | |
| CN101710378B (en) | Software security flaw detection method based on sequential pattern mining | |
| US20070011541A1 (en) | Methods and systems for identifying intermittent errors in a distributed code development environment | |
| CN113282513B (en) | Interface test case generation method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| Strandberg et al. | Intermittently failing tests in the embedded systems domain | |
| CN111597122A (en) | Software fault injection method based on historical defect data mining | |
| CN112131116A (en) | Automatic regression testing method for embedded software | |
| CN111552639B (en) | Software test comprehensive control method and system | |
| CN112148614A (en) | Regression testing method and device | |
| CN112685320B (en) | Software defect repairing method and device based on multiple candidate programs | |
| CN111177016B (en) | Software test defect management method | |
| CN117520184A (en) | Test system for developing computer software | |
| CN117370217A (en) | Automatic interface test result generation method based on python | |
| CN117421217A (en) | Automatic software function test method, system, terminal and medium | |
| JP7190246B2 (en) | Software failure prediction device | |
| CN113641573B (en) | Program analysis software automatic test method and system based on revision log | |
| Cao et al. | Automated repair of Java programs with random search via code similarity | |
| KR101748378B1 (en) | Performance management system and method for application program in its development process | |
| CN113157551A (en) | ROS-oriented differential fuzzy test method | |
| CN111078193A (en) | Software development method and system for data analysis system | |
| Bicevskis et al. | Data quality model-based testing of information systems | |
| Mohan et al. | Automated Refactoring of Software using Version History and a Code Element Recentness Measure. | |
| CN111651364B (en) | SQL (structured query language) checking method and device under parallel development | |
| Kamlesh et al. | Metrics to Improve Software Reliability Based on an Object-Oriented Perspective |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |