CN111506966A - Method and device for judging process coordination model, electronic equipment and storage medium - Google Patents

Method and device for judging process coordination model, electronic equipment and storage medium Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN111506966A
CN111506966A CN202010311417.5A CN202010311417A CN111506966A CN 111506966 A CN111506966 A CN 111506966A CN 202010311417 A CN202010311417 A CN 202010311417A CN 111506966 A CN111506966 A CN 111506966A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
model
process coordination
original
current
coordination model
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN202010311417.5A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN111506966B (en
Inventor
邱世广
刘元吉
段作衡
龙克友
舒阳
郭兴勇
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Chengdu Aircraft Industrial Group Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Chengdu Aircraft Industrial Group Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Chengdu Aircraft Industrial Group Co Ltd filed Critical Chengdu Aircraft Industrial Group Co Ltd
Priority to CN202010311417.5A priority Critical patent/CN111506966B/en
Publication of CN111506966A publication Critical patent/CN111506966A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN111506966B publication Critical patent/CN111506966B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/10—Geometric CAD
    • G06F30/15—Vehicle, aircraft or watercraft design
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/30—Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing

Abstract

The invention belongs to the field of digital process design of airplane assembly, and provides a method and a device for judging a process coordination model, electronic equipment and a storage medium, wherein the method comprises the following steps: judging the relative relation between the original process coordination model and the current process coordination model according to the relative relation between the original design model and the current design model and the increase and decrease characteristics; and when the original process coordination model is not equal to the current process coordination model, changing the current process coordination model. The method and the device can be used for efficiently, accurately and quickly judging whether the process coordination model is changed.

Description

Method and device for judging process coordination model, electronic equipment and storage medium
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of aircraft assembly digital process design, in particular to a method and a device for judging a process coordination model, electronic equipment and a storage medium.
Background
With the development of aviation manufacturing technology, the development and production of modern airplanes gradually change from analog quantity to digital quantity, a digital prototype is adopted to coordinate as a main mode, and the mode gradually changes to a digital design and manufacturing mode, and a three-dimensional digital model is used as a unique carrier for transmitting design information and a manufacturing basis and runs through the whole airplane digital manufacturing process.
The modeling and management of the process coordination model are realized through special software, but whether the process coordination model is changed or not still needs to be judged manually, and design models before and after the process coordination model is needed to be compared. In the whole development process of the airplane, particularly in a trial-manufacture stage, design changes are frequent and large in quantity, the workload of judging whether the manual process coordination model is changed is large, and the design changes which do not involve process coordination information changes in the whole design changes account for a large proportion, so that the progress of process review and process design is influenced. Therefore, the existing method for judging whether the manual process coordination model is changed cannot meet the current aircraft development requirements, and a new method is urgently needed to quickly judge whether the process coordination model is changed, so that the efficiency of process examination and process design is ensured.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a method and a device for judging a process coordination model, electronic equipment and a storage medium, which can realize the high-efficiency, accurate and quick judgment of whether the process coordination model is changed.
The technical scheme provided by the invention is as follows:
the invention provides a method for judging a process coordination model, which comprises the following steps:
and automatically judging the relative relationship between the original process coordination model and the current process coordination model according to the relative relationship between the original design model and the current design model and the increase and decrease characteristics.
And when the original process coordination model is not equal to the current process coordination model, changing the current process coordination model.
Further, before the self-judging of the relative relationship between the original process coordination model and the current process coordination model according to the relative relationship between the original design model and the current design model and the increase and decrease characteristics, the method comprises the following steps:
and comparing the original design model with the current design model to obtain a visual comparison result.
And acquiring the relative relationship between the original design model and the current design model based on the comparison result, wherein the relative relationship comprises intersection, equality, no intersection and inclusion.
Further, the method for automatically judging the relative relationship between the original process coordination model and the current process coordination model according to the relative relationship between the original design model and the current design model and the increase and decrease characteristics comprises the following steps:
when the relative relationship between the original design model and the current design model is intersection and the original process coordination model and the original design model have the same reduction, the current process coordination model is not equal to the original process coordination model.
The current process coordination model is not equal to the original process coordination model when the relative relationship of the original design model and the current design model is non-intersection and the original design model has an increasing portion and a decreasing portion.
When the relative relationship between the original design model and the current design model is inclusion and the original process coordination model and the original design model have the same reduction, the current process coordination model is not equal to the original process coordination model.
Further, the method for automatically judging the relative relationship between the original process coordination model and the current process coordination model according to the relative relationship between the original design model and the current design model and the increase and decrease characteristics comprises the following steps:
when the original design model is equal to the current design model and the original design model has no added and subtracted portions, then the current process coordination model is equal to the original process coordination model.
When the current design model is included in the original design model, the original design model having a reduced portion, and the original process coordination model not having the reduced portion of the original design model, then the current process coordination model is equal to the original process coordination model.
When the original design model is included in the current design model and the original design model has an added portion, then the current process coordination model is equal to the original process coordination model.
Further, the method for discriminating the process coordination model comprises the following steps:
when the original process coordination model is equal to the current process coordination model, the current process coordination model is not changed.
Further, the method for discriminating the process coordination model comprises the following steps:
and defining the original design model, the current design model and the corresponding original process coordination model and the current process coordination model.
Further, the method for discriminating the process coordination model comprises the following steps:
and extracting parameter information of a process coordination model by using the process design model for modeling, wherein the process coordination model comprises process annotations, process geometric bodies and process three-dimensional labels, and the parameter information comprises process characteristics, hole normal vector information, processing requirements, assembly requirements, dimensional tolerance sets and form and position tolerance sets.
The invention also provides a device for judging the process coordination model, which comprises the following components:
a judging module: and the method is used for automatically judging the relative relationship between the original process coordination model and the current process coordination model according to the relative relationship between the original design model and the current design model and the increase and decrease characteristics.
A change module: and the system is used for changing the current process coordination model when the original process coordination model is not equal to the current process coordination model.
The present invention also provides an electronic device, including:
a processor; and a memory storing computer-executable instructions that, when executed, cause the processor to perform a method of discriminating according to the process coordination model.
The invention also provides a storage medium, wherein at least one instruction is stored in the storage medium, and the instruction is loaded and executed by a processor to realize the operation executed by the method for judging the process coordination model.
The method, the device, the electronic equipment and the storage medium for judging the process coordination model provided by the invention at least have the following beneficial effects:
1) by the method and the device for judging the process coordination model, the electronic equipment and the storage medium, whether the process coordination model is changed or not can be judged efficiently, accurately and quickly.
2) And determining the relative relation and the increase and decrease characteristics of the design models before and after the change by comparing the design models before and after the change, and automatically judging whether the process coordination model is changed. The traditional manual judgment method is not used any more, and the judgment efficiency is improved.
3) By the specific judgment rule, the self-judgment process is more accurate and the obtained judgment result is more reliable.
Drawings
The above features, technical features, advantages and implementations of the method, apparatus, electronic device and storage medium for determining a process coordination model will be further described in the following detailed description of preferred embodiments in a clearly understandable manner with reference to the accompanying drawings.
FIG. 1 is a schematic flow chart of a method for discriminating a process coordination model according to the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of model and feature definition in the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of the intersection of an original process design model A1 and a current process design model A2 in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a schematic representation of the original process design model A1 being equal to the current process design model A2 in the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of the intersection of the original process design model A1 and the current process design model A2 in the present invention;
FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of a current process design model A2 included in the original process design model A1 in the present invention;
FIG. 7 is a diagram of a current process design model A2 including an original process design model A1 according to the present invention;
FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram of a process digital model according to the present invention;
FIG. 9 is a schematic structural diagram of an apparatus for determining a process coordination model according to the present invention.
FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram of the electronic device of the present invention;
FIG. 11 is a schematic diagram of a storage medium according to the present invention.
Detailed Description
In the following description, for purposes of explanation and not limitation, specific details are set forth, such as particular system structures, techniques, etc. in order to provide a thorough understanding of the embodiments of the present application. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the present application may be practiced in other embodiments that depart from these specific details. In other instances, detailed descriptions of well-known systems, devices, circuits, and methods are omitted so as not to obscure the description of the present application with unnecessary detail.
It will be understood that the terms "comprises" and/or "comprising," when used in this specification and the appended claims, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
For the sake of simplicity, the drawings only schematically show the parts relevant to the present invention, and they do not represent the actual structure as a product. In addition, in order to make the drawings concise and understandable, components having the same structure or function in some of the drawings are only schematically illustrated or only labeled. In this document, "one" means not only "only one" but also a case of "more than one".
It should be further understood that the term "and/or" as used in this specification and the appended claims refers to and includes any and all possible combinations of one or more of the associated listed items.
In addition, in the description of the present application, the terms "first", "second", and the like are used only for distinguishing the description, and are not intended to indicate or imply relative importance.
In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the following description will be made with reference to the accompanying drawings. It is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some examples of the invention, and that for a person skilled in the art, other drawings and embodiments can be derived from them without inventive effort.
In an embodiment of the present invention, as shown in fig. 1 to 8, a method for determining a process coordination model includes the steps of:
s110, the relative relationship between the original process coordination model and the current process coordination model is automatically judged according to the relative relationship between the original design model and the current design model and the increase and decrease characteristics.
In addition, the method further comprises defining the original design model, the current design model, and the corresponding original process coordination model and the current process coordination model.
Specifically, firstly, process design model features are defined, the process design model before modification is a1, the corresponding process coordination model is B1, the process design model after modification is a2, the corresponding process coordination model is B2, the newly added part of the modified process design model is Δ Ax ═ a1 ∪ a2-a1, the reduced part is Δ Ay ═ a1 ∪ a2-a2, and the unmodified region is a2 ∩ a 1.
Optionally, before the self-judging of the relative relationship between the original process coordination model and the current process coordination model according to the relative relationship between the original design model and the current design model and the increase and decrease characteristics, the method includes the steps of:
and comparing the original design model with the current design model to obtain a visual comparison result.
And acquiring the relative relationship between the original design model and the current design model based on the comparison result, wherein the relative relationship comprises intersection, equality, no intersection and inclusion.
Optionally, the self-determining the relative relationship between the original process coordination model and the current process coordination model according to the relative relationship between the original design model and the current design model and the increase and decrease characteristics includes:
when the relative relationship between the original design model and the current design model is intersection and the original process coordination model and the original design model have the same reduction, the current process coordination model is not equal to the original process coordination model.
The current process coordination model is not equal to the original process coordination model when the relative relationship of the original design model and the current design model is non-intersection and the original design model has an increasing portion and a decreasing portion.
When the relative relationship between the original design model and the current design model is inclusion and the original process coordination model and the original design model have the same reduction, the current process coordination model is not equal to the original process coordination model.
Optionally, the self-determining the relative relationship between the original process coordination model and the current process coordination model according to the relative relationship between the original design model and the current design model and the increase and decrease characteristics includes:
when the original design model is equal to the current design model and the original design model has no added and subtracted portions, then the current process coordination model is equal to the original process coordination model.
When the current design model is included in the original design model, the original design model having a reduced portion, and the original process coordination model not having the reduced portion of the original design model, then the current process coordination model is equal to the original process coordination model.
When the original design model is included in the current design model and the original design model has an added portion, then the current process coordination model is equal to the original process coordination model.
Optionally, when the original process coordination model is equal to the current process coordination model, the current process coordination model is not changed.
For example, as shown in fig. 2-8, wherein 1 represents the design model before modification a1, 2 represents the design model after modification a2, 3 represents the reduced portion Δ Ay, 4 represents the newly added portion Δ Ax of the model after modification, 5 represents the unmodified region a1 ∩ a2, and 6 represents the process coordination model before modification B1.
The method comprises the steps of comparing process design models before and after change, specifically importing the process design models before and after change into self-editing software for comparison, judging the relative relationship between A1 and A2, such as intersection, equality, no intersection, inclusion and the like, judging whether the process coordination model needs to be changed or not by judging the relationship between the new model (the process design models before and after change) and the A2, identifying the increase and decrease features, automatically identifying the features delta Ax, delta Ay and A1 ∩ A2 in the self-editing software, and automatically judging on the basis.
The relationship between a1 and a2 can be divided into 4 relationships, such as intersection, equality, no intersection, inclusion, and the like, and the automatic determination method specifically includes:
1) as shown in fig. 3, a1 intersects a2,
Figure BDA0002457987170000081
and is
Figure BDA0002457987170000082
If it is not
Figure BDA0002457987170000083
Then B1 ∈ a2 ∩ a1 ∈ a2, B2 would not need to be changed, B2 ═ B1, and the process coordination model would not need to be changed.
If it is not
Figure BDA0002457987170000084
Then B1 intersects with decreasing Δ Ay, B2 changes, B2 ≠ B1, requiring process coordination model changes.
2) As shown in fig. 4, a1 ═ a2,
Figure BDA0002457987170000085
and is
Figure BDA0002457987170000086
In this case, B2 is B1, and the process coordination model does not need to be changed.
3) As shown in fig. 5, a1 does not intersect a2,
Figure BDA0002457987170000087
and is
Figure BDA0002457987170000088
At this time, B2 ≠ B1, requiring a change in the process coordination model.
4) As shown in fig. 6, a2 is contained in a1, a2 ∈ a1,
Figure BDA0002457987170000089
and is
Figure BDA00024579871700000810
If it is not
Figure BDA00024579871700000811
Then B1 ∈ a2 ∩ a1 ∈ a2, B2 would not need to be changed, B2 ═ B1, and the process coordination model would not need to be changed.
If it is not
Figure BDA00024579871700000812
Then B1 intersects with decreasing Δ Ay, B2 changes, B2 ≠ B1, requiring process coordination model changes.
5) As shown in fig. 7, a1 is contained in a2, a1 ∈ a2,
Figure BDA00024579871700000813
and is
Figure BDA00024579871700000814
B2-B1, the process coordination model need not be changed.
S120, when the original process coordination model is not equal to the current process coordination model, changing the current process coordination model.
Specifically, after the relative relationship and the increase/decrease characteristics between the original process design model a1 and the current process design model a2 (the process design models before and after the change) are automatically determined, it is recognized that the original process coordination model B1 is not equal to the current process coordination model B2, and the current process coordination model needs to be changed. According to the result of automatic judgment, if the output result is B2-B1, the process coordination model does not need to be changed; if the output result is B2 ≠ B1, the self-programming software needs to be operated to change the process coordination model.
Optionally, the parameter information of the process coordination model is extracted by using the process design model to perform modeling, the process coordination model includes process annotations, process geometry and process three-dimensional labels, and the parameter information includes process characteristics, hole normal vector information, processing requirements, assembly requirements, dimensional tolerance sets and form and position tolerance sets.
The following are exemplary: as shown in fig. 8, in the field of digital aircraft manufacturing, the process design model and the process coordination model related in this embodiment are linearly superimposed to form a process digital model, where the process coordination model mainly includes process annotations, process geometry, process three-dimensional labels, and the like, and can reflect process characteristics, hole normal vector information, processing requirements, assembly requirements, size tolerance sets, form and location tolerance sets, and the process coordination model (process coordination basis model) performs the results of normalized modeling, digital description, and structured organization on the process coordination basis information by using the MBD method on the basis of designing the digital model, and only reflects the aircraft manufacturing coordination basis information.
In another embodiment of the present invention, as shown in fig. 9, an apparatus for determining a process coordination model includes:
a judging module 901: and the method is used for automatically judging the relative relationship between the original process coordination model and the current process coordination model according to the relative relationship between the original design model and the current design model and the increase and decrease characteristics.
In addition, the system also comprises a definition module which is used for defining the original design model, the current design model and the corresponding original process coordination model and the current process coordination model.
Specifically, firstly, process design model features are defined, the process design model before modification is a1, the corresponding process coordination model is B1, the process design model after modification is a2, the corresponding process coordination model is B2, the newly added part of the modified process design model is Δ Ax ═ a1 ∪ a2-a1, the reduced part is Δ Ay ═ a1 ∪ a2-a2, and the unmodified region is a2 ∩ a 1.
Optionally, the apparatus further comprises a comparison module: and comparing the original design model with the current design model to obtain a visual comparison result. And acquiring the relative relationship between the original design model and the current design model based on the comparison result, wherein the relative relationship comprises intersection, equality, no intersection and inclusion.
Optionally, the executing step of the determining module 901 includes:
when the relative relationship between the original design model and the current design model is intersection and the original process coordination model and the original design model have the same reduction, the current process coordination model is not equal to the original process coordination model.
The current process coordination model is not equal to the original process coordination model when the relative relationship of the original design model and the current design model is non-intersection and the original design model has an increasing portion and a decreasing portion.
When the relative relationship between the original design model and the current design model is inclusion and the original process coordination model and the original design model have the same reduction, the current process coordination model is not equal to the original process coordination model.
Optionally, the executing step of the determining module 901 includes:
when the original design model is equal to the current design model and the original design model has no added and subtracted portions, then the current process coordination model is equal to the original process coordination model.
When the current design model is included in the original design model, the original design model having a reduced portion, and the original process coordination model not having the reduced portion of the original design model, then the current process coordination model is equal to the original process coordination model.
When the original design model is included in the current design model and the original design model has an added portion, then the current process coordination model is equal to the original process coordination model.
Optionally, when the original process coordination model is equal to the current process coordination model, the current process coordination model is not changed.
For example, as shown in FIGS. 2-8, wherein 1 represents the design model before modification A1, 2 represents the design model after modification A2, 3 represents the reduced portion Δ Ay, 4 represents the newly added portion Δ Ax of the model after modification, 5 represents the unmodified region A1 ∩ A2, and 6 represents the process coordination model before modification B1.
The method comprises the steps of comparing process design models before and after change, specifically importing the process design models before and after change into self-editing software for comparison, judging the relative relationship between A1 and A2, such as intersection, equality, no intersection, inclusion and the like, judging whether the process coordination model needs to be changed or not by judging the relationship between the new model (the process design models before and after change) and the A2, identifying the increase and decrease features, automatically identifying the features delta Ax, delta Ay and A1 ∩ A2 in the self-editing software, and automatically judging on the basis.
The relationship between a1 and a2 can be divided into 4 relationships, such as intersection, equality, no intersection, inclusion, and the like, and the automatic determination method specifically includes:
1) as shown in fig. 3, a1 intersects a2,
Figure BDA0002457987170000111
and is
Figure BDA0002457987170000112
If it is not
Figure BDA0002457987170000113
Then B1 ∈ a2 ∩ a1 ∈ a2, B2 would not need to be changed, B2 ═ B1, and the process coordination model would not need to be changed.
If it is not
Figure BDA0002457987170000114
Then B1 intersects with decreasing Δ Ay, B2 changes, B2 ≠ B1, requiring process coordination model changes.
2) As shown in fig. 4, a1 ═ a2,
Figure BDA0002457987170000115
and is
Figure BDA0002457987170000116
In this case, B2 is B1, and the process coordination model does not need to be changed.
3) As shown in fig. 5, a1 does not intersect a2,
Figure BDA0002457987170000117
and is
Figure BDA0002457987170000118
At this time, B2 ≠ B1, requiring a change in the process coordination model.
4) As shown in fig. 6, a2 is contained in a1, a2 ∈ a1,
Figure BDA0002457987170000119
and is
Figure BDA00024579871700001110
If it is not
Figure BDA00024579871700001111
Then B1 ∈ a2 ∩ a1 ∈ a2, B2 would not need to be changed, B2 ═ B1, and the process coordination model would not need to be changed.
If it is not
Figure BDA00024579871700001112
Then B1 intersects with decreasing Δ Ay, B2 changes, B2 ≠ B1, requiring process coordination model changes.
5) As shown in fig. 7, a1 is contained in a2, a1 ∈ a2,
Figure BDA00024579871700001113
and is
Figure BDA00024579871700001114
B2-B1, the process coordination model need not be changed.
The change module 902: and the system is used for changing the current process coordination model when the original process coordination model is not equal to the current process coordination model.
Specifically, the executing step of the changing module 902 may include: after the relative relationship and the increase and decrease characteristics between the original process design model a1 and the current process design model a2 (the process design models before and after the change) are automatically determined, it is recognized that the original process coordination model B1 is not equal to the current process coordination model B2, and the current process coordination model needs to be changed. According to the result of automatic judgment, if the output result is B2-B1, the process coordination model does not need to be changed; if the output result is B2 ≠ B1, the self-programming software needs to be operated to change the process coordination model.
Optionally, the modeling module is configured to extract parameter information of a process coordination model for modeling by using a process design model, where the process coordination model includes process annotations, process geometry and process three-dimensional annotations, and the parameter information includes process characteristics, hole normal vector information, processing requirements, assembly requirements, dimensional tolerance sets and form and location tolerance sets.
The following are exemplary: as shown in fig. 8, in the field of digital aircraft manufacturing, the process design model and the process coordination model related in this embodiment are linearly superimposed to form a process digital model, where the process coordination model mainly includes process annotations, process geometry, process three-dimensional labels, and the like, and can reflect process characteristics, hole normal vector information, processing requirements, assembly requirements, size tolerance sets, form and location tolerance sets, and the process coordination model (process coordination basis model) performs the results of normalized modeling, digital description, and structured organization on the process coordination basis information by using the MBD method on the basis of designing the digital model, and only reflects the aircraft manufacturing coordination basis information.
In another embodiment of the present invention, as shown in fig. 10, an electronic device 100 includes a processor 110, a memory 120, wherein the memory 120 is used for storing a computer program 121; the processor 110 is configured to execute the computer program 121 stored in the memory 120 to implement the method in the above embodiments.
The electronic device 100 may be a desktop computer, a notebook computer, a palm computer, a tablet computer, a mobile phone, a human-computer interaction screen, or the like. The electronic device 100 may include, but is not limited to, a processor 110, a memory 120. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that fig. 10 is merely an example of the electronic device 100, does not constitute a limitation of the electronic device 100, and may include more or less components than those shown, or some components in combination, or different components, for example: electronic device 100 may also include input/output interfaces, display devices, network access devices, communication buses, communication interfaces, and the like. A communication interface and a communication bus, and may further include an input/output interface, wherein the processor 110, the memory 120, the input/output interface and the communication interface complete communication with each other through the communication bus. The memory 120 stores a computer program 121, and the processor 110 is configured to execute the computer program 121 stored in the memory 120 to implement the method in the corresponding method embodiment.
The Processor 110 may be a Central Processing Unit (CPU), other general purpose Processor, a Digital Signal Processor (DSP), an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) or other Programmable logic device, discrete Gate or transistor logic device, discrete hardware component, or the like. A general purpose processor may be a microprocessor or the processor may be any conventional processor or the like.
The memory 120 may be an internal storage unit of the electronic device 100, for example: a hard disk or a memory of the electronic device. The memory may also be an external storage device of the electronic device, for example: the electronic device is provided with a plug-in hard disk, an intelligent memory Card (SMC), a Secure Digital (SD) Card, a Flash memory Card (Flash Card) and the like. Further, the memory 120 may also include both an internal storage unit and an external storage device of the electronic device 100. The memory 120 is used for storing the computer program 121 and other programs and data required by the electronic device 100. The memory may also be used to temporarily store data that has been output or is to be output.
A communication bus is a circuit that connects the described elements and enables transmission between the elements. Illustratively, the processor 110 receives commands from other elements through the communication bus, decrypts the received commands, and performs calculations or data processing according to the decrypted commands. Memory 120 may include program modules, illustratively, a kernel (kernel), middleware (middleware), an Application Programming Interface (API), and applications. The program modules may be comprised of software, firmware or hardware, or at least two of the same. The input/output interface forwards commands or data input by a user via the input/output interface (e.g., sensor, keypad, touch screen). The communication interface connects the electronic device 100 with other network devices, user devices, networks. For example, the communication interface may be connected to the network by wire or wirelessly to connect to other external network devices or user devices. The wireless communication may include at least one of: wireless fidelity (WiFi), Bluetooth (BT), Near Field Communication (NFC), Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) and cellular communications, among others. The wired communication may include at least one of: universal Serial Bus (USB), high-definition multimedia interface (HDMI), asynchronous transfer standard interface (RS-232), and the like. The network may be a telecommunications network and a communications network. The communication network may be a computer network, the internet of things, a telephone network. The electronic device 100 may be connected to the network through a communication interface, and a protocol by which the electronic device 100 communicates with other network devices may be supported by at least one of an application, an Application Programming Interface (API), middleware, a kernel, and a communication interface.
One embodiment of the present invention, as shown in fig. 11, is a storage medium having at least one instruction stored therein, and the instruction is loaded and executed by a processor to implement the operations performed by the corresponding embodiments of the method. The storage medium may be, for example, a read-only memory (ROM), a Random Access Memory (RAM), a compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), a magnetic tape, a floppy disk, an optical data storage device, and the like.
They may be implemented in program code that is executable by a computing device such that it is executed by the computing device, or separately, or as individual integrated circuit modules, or as a plurality or steps of individual integrated circuit modules. Thus, the present invention is not limited to any specific combination of hardware and software.
In the above embodiments, the descriptions of the respective embodiments have respective emphasis, and reference may be made to the related descriptions of other embodiments for parts that are not described or recited in detail in a certain embodiment.
Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the various illustrative elements and algorithm steps described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be implemented as electronic hardware or combinations of computer software and electronic hardware. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the implementation. Skilled artisans may implement the described functionality in varying ways for each particular application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from the scope of the present application.
In the embodiments provided in the present application, it should be understood that the disclosed apparatus and method may be implemented in other ways. The above-described embodiments of the apparatus are merely exemplary, and the division of the modules or units is merely an example of a logical division, and there may be other divisions when the actual implementation is performed, and for example, a plurality of units or components may be combined or integrated into another system, or some features may be omitted, or not executed. In addition, the shown or discussed mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection may be an indirect coupling or communication connection of some interfaces, devices or units, and may be in an electrical, mechanical or other form.
The units described as separate parts may or may not be physically separate, and parts displayed as units may or may not be physical units, may be located in one place, or may be distributed on a plurality of network units. Some or all of the units can be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of the embodiment.
In addition, functional units in the embodiments of the present application may be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit may exist alone physically, or two or more units are integrated into one unit. The integrated unit can be realized in a form of hardware, and can also be realized in a form of a software functional unit.
The integrated modules/units may be stored in a storage medium if they are implemented in the form of software functional units and sold or used as separate products. Based on such understanding, all or part of the flow in the method according to the embodiments of the present invention may also be implemented by sending instructions to relevant hardware by the computer program 121, where the computer program 121 may be stored in a storage medium, and when the computer program 121 is executed by a processor, the steps of the above-described embodiments of the method may be implemented. The computer program 121 may be in a source code form, an object code form, an executable file or some intermediate form, etc. The storage medium may include: any entity or device capable of carrying the computer program 121, recording medium, usb disk, removable hard disk, magnetic disk, optical disk, computer Memory, Read-only Memory (ROM), Random Access Memory (RAM), electrical carrier wave signal, telecommunication signal, and software distribution medium, etc. It should be noted that the content contained in the storage medium can be increased or decreased as appropriate according to the requirements of legislation and patent practice in the jurisdiction, and the following are exemplary: in certain jurisdictions, in accordance with legislation and patent practice, computer-readable storage media do not include electrical carrier signals and telecommunications signals.
It should be noted that the above embodiments can be freely combined as necessary. The foregoing is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention, and it should be noted that, for those skilled in the art, various modifications and decorations can be made without departing from the principle of the present invention, and these modifications and decorations should also be regarded as the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims (10)

1. A method for judging a process coordination model is characterized by comprising the following steps:
judging the relative relation between the original process coordination model and the current process coordination model according to the relative relation between the original design model and the current design model and the increase and decrease characteristics;
and when the original process coordination model is not equal to the current process coordination model, changing the current process coordination model.
2. The method for judging the process coordination model according to claim 1, wherein the method comprises the following steps before the step of automatically judging the relative relationship between the original process coordination model and the current process coordination model according to the relative relationship between the original design model and the current design model and the increase and decrease characteristics:
comparing the original design model with the current design model to obtain a visual comparison result;
and acquiring the relative relationship between the original design model and the current design model based on the comparison result, wherein the relative relationship comprises intersection, equality, no intersection and inclusion.
3. The method for judging the process coordination model according to claim 2, wherein the method for automatically judging the relative relationship between the original process coordination model and the current process coordination model according to the relative relationship between the original design model and the current design model and the increase and decrease characteristics comprises the following steps:
when the relative relationship between the original design model and the current design model is intersection and the original process coordination model and the original design model have the same reduction part, the current process coordination model is not equal to the original process coordination model;
when the relative relationship of the original design model and the current design model is non-intersection and the original design model has an increasing portion and a decreasing portion, the current process coordination model is not equal to the original process coordination model;
when the relative relationship between the original design model and the current design model is inclusion and the original process coordination model and the original design model have the same reduction, the current process coordination model is not equal to the original process coordination model.
4. The method for judging the process coordination model according to claim 2, wherein the method for automatically judging the relative relationship between the original process coordination model and the current process coordination model according to the relative relationship between the original design model and the current design model and the increase and decrease characteristics comprises the following steps:
when the original design model is equal to the current design model and the original design model has no added part and no subtracted part, then the current process coordination model is equal to the original process coordination model;
when the current design model is included in the original design model, the original design model having a reduced portion, and the original process coordination model not having the reduced portion of the original design model, then the current process coordination model is equal to the original process coordination model;
when the original design model is included in the current design model and the original design model has an added portion, then the current process coordination model is equal to the original process coordination model.
5. The method for discriminating a process coordination model according to claim 1, comprising the steps of:
when the original process coordination model is equal to the current process coordination model, the current process coordination model is not changed.
6. The method for discriminating a process coordination model according to claim 1, comprising the steps of:
and defining the original design model, the current design model and the corresponding original process coordination model and the current process coordination model.
7. The method for discriminating a process coordination model according to claim 1, comprising:
and extracting parameter information of a process coordination model by using the process design model for modeling, wherein the process coordination model comprises process annotations, process geometric bodies and process three-dimensional labels, and the parameter information comprises process characteristics, hole normal vector information, processing requirements, assembly requirements, dimensional tolerance sets and form and position tolerance sets.
8. An apparatus for discriminating a process coordination model, comprising:
a judging module: the system is used for automatically judging the relative relationship between the original process coordination model and the current process coordination model according to the relative relationship between the original design model and the current design model and the increase and decrease characteristics;
a change module: and the system is used for changing the current process coordination model when the original process coordination model is not equal to the current process coordination model.
9. An electronic device, comprising:
a processor; and a memory storing computer executable instructions that, when executed, cause the processor to perform a method of discriminating a process coordination model according to any of claims 1-7.
10. A storage medium having stored therein at least one instruction, the instruction being loaded and executed by a processor to perform the operations of the method for discriminating a process coordination model according to any of claims 1 to 7.
CN202010311417.5A 2020-04-20 2020-04-20 Discriminating method and device of process coordination model, electronic equipment and storage medium Active CN111506966B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010311417.5A CN111506966B (en) 2020-04-20 2020-04-20 Discriminating method and device of process coordination model, electronic equipment and storage medium

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010311417.5A CN111506966B (en) 2020-04-20 2020-04-20 Discriminating method and device of process coordination model, electronic equipment and storage medium

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN111506966A true CN111506966A (en) 2020-08-07
CN111506966B CN111506966B (en) 2024-03-22

Family

ID=71864219

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202010311417.5A Active CN111506966B (en) 2020-04-20 2020-04-20 Discriminating method and device of process coordination model, electronic equipment and storage medium

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN111506966B (en)

Citations (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6725184B1 (en) * 1999-06-30 2004-04-20 Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Assembly and disassembly sequences of components in computerized multicomponent assembly models
WO2007021552A2 (en) * 2005-08-09 2007-02-22 Nec Laboratories America, Inc. Disjunctive image computation for sequential systems
CN101540581A (en) * 2008-03-21 2009-09-23 株式会社电装 Apparatus for carrying out improved control of rotary machine
US20100218166A1 (en) * 2009-02-20 2010-08-26 Fujitsu Microelectronics Limited Computer product, ip model generating apparatus, and ip model generating method
CN102369140A (en) * 2009-02-27 2012-03-07 贝尔直升机泰克斯特龙公司 System and method for vibration control in a rotorcraft using an adaptive reference model algorithm
US20150371398A1 (en) * 2014-06-23 2015-12-24 Gang QIAO Method and system for updating background model based on depth
CN105488623A (en) * 2015-11-26 2016-04-13 中国航空工业集团公司沈阳飞机设计研究所 Aircraft quality feature data processing method
CN106323575A (en) * 2016-08-26 2017-01-11 四川省建筑科学研究院 Method for testing performance of reinforced concrete frame structure of bottom concrete-filled steel-tubular column
CN107193009A (en) * 2017-05-23 2017-09-22 西北工业大学 A kind of many UUV cooperative systems underwater target tracking algorithms of many interaction models of fuzzy self-adaption
CN108921769A (en) * 2018-07-11 2018-11-30 湖南师范大学 A kind of 3D grid blind watermatking generation method based on layering pseudomorphism analysis
CN109034966A (en) * 2018-07-17 2018-12-18 深圳市艾贝比品牌管理咨询有限公司 Craftwork generation method, terminal and storage medium based on Photographing On-line
CN109069067A (en) * 2015-12-16 2018-12-21 穆罕默德·R·马赫福兹 IMU calibration
CN110210141A (en) * 2019-06-04 2019-09-06 宝业湖北建工集团有限公司 Model collision detection method, device and electronic equipment based on BIM technology
CN110244842A (en) * 2019-05-31 2019-09-17 国网江苏省电力有限公司常州供电分公司 VR model, VR scene process method, VR training system, storage medium and electronic equipment
CN110298626A (en) * 2019-06-10 2019-10-01 西安西电电气研究院有限责任公司 Switchgear manufacturing operations processing method and processing device
CN110530343A (en) * 2019-09-02 2019-12-03 上海嘉实（集团）有限公司 Survey actual quantities system, method, apparatus and storage medium
CN110775171A (en) * 2019-11-13 2020-02-11 合肥工业大学 Formula car hollow wing piece and forming method thereof

Patent Citations (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6725184B1 (en) * 1999-06-30 2004-04-20 Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Assembly and disassembly sequences of components in computerized multicomponent assembly models
WO2007021552A2 (en) * 2005-08-09 2007-02-22 Nec Laboratories America, Inc. Disjunctive image computation for sequential systems
CN101540581A (en) * 2008-03-21 2009-09-23 株式会社电装 Apparatus for carrying out improved control of rotary machine
US20100218166A1 (en) * 2009-02-20 2010-08-26 Fujitsu Microelectronics Limited Computer product, ip model generating apparatus, and ip model generating method
CN102369140A (en) * 2009-02-27 2012-03-07 贝尔直升机泰克斯特龙公司 System and method for vibration control in a rotorcraft using an adaptive reference model algorithm
US20150371398A1 (en) * 2014-06-23 2015-12-24 Gang QIAO Method and system for updating background model based on depth
CN105488623A (en) * 2015-11-26 2016-04-13 中国航空工业集团公司沈阳飞机设计研究所 Aircraft quality feature data processing method
CN109069067A (en) * 2015-12-16 2018-12-21 穆罕默德·R·马赫福兹 IMU calibration
CN106323575A (en) * 2016-08-26 2017-01-11 四川省建筑科学研究院 Method for testing performance of reinforced concrete frame structure of bottom concrete-filled steel-tubular column
CN107193009A (en) * 2017-05-23 2017-09-22 西北工业大学 A kind of many UUV cooperative systems underwater target tracking algorithms of many interaction models of fuzzy self-adaption
CN108921769A (en) * 2018-07-11 2018-11-30 湖南师范大学 A kind of 3D grid blind watermatking generation method based on layering pseudomorphism analysis
CN109034966A (en) * 2018-07-17 2018-12-18 深圳市艾贝比品牌管理咨询有限公司 Craftwork generation method, terminal and storage medium based on Photographing On-line
CN110244842A (en) * 2019-05-31 2019-09-17 国网江苏省电力有限公司常州供电分公司 VR model, VR scene process method, VR training system, storage medium and electronic equipment
CN110210141A (en) * 2019-06-04 2019-09-06 宝业湖北建工集团有限公司 Model collision detection method, device and electronic equipment based on BIM technology
CN110298626A (en) * 2019-06-10 2019-10-01 西安西电电气研究院有限责任公司 Switchgear manufacturing operations processing method and processing device
CN110530343A (en) * 2019-09-02 2019-12-03 上海嘉实（集团）有限公司 Survey actual quantities system, method, apparatus and storage medium
CN110775171A (en) * 2019-11-13 2020-02-11 合肥工业大学 Formula car hollow wing piece and forming method thereof

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
郭飞燕: "飞机数字量装配协调技术研究", 中国博士学位论文全文数据库工程科技Ⅱ辑, no. 04, pages 031 - 11 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN111506966B (en) 2024-03-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN108733342B (en) Volume adjusting method, mobile terminal and computer readable storage medium
CN108038112B (en) File processing method, mobile terminal and computer readable storage medium
JP6374038B2 (en) An efficient hardware mechanism to ensure shared resource data coherency across draw calls
US20220324327A1 (en) Method for controlling terminal, electronic device and storage medium
US9817479B2 (en) Method and apparatus for interpreting a gesture
CN112764817A (en) Equipment function awakening method and device
CN111367407A (en) Intelligent glasses interaction method, intelligent glasses interaction device and intelligent glasses
CN110427213B (en) Method, device, equipment and storage medium for realizing intelligent configuration software
WO2023273463A1 (en) Data plan acquisition method and apparatus, terminal, and storage medium
US20190196794A1 (en) Visual programming method, system and terminal device
CN112598337A (en) Article-oriented vehicle control method, apparatus, device and computer readable medium
CN112433713A (en) Application program design graph processing method and device
CN111506966A (en) Method and device for judging process coordination model, electronic equipment and storage medium
CN111580851A (en) Data management method and related device
CN107609119B (en) File processing method, mobile terminal and computer readable storage medium
CN112015459A (en) Method and device for upgrading image file, terminal and readable storage medium
CN114285831B (en) Data transmission method and device for automobile open architecture
CN112035078A (en) Display method and system of screen content of intelligent terminal and vehicle-mounted terminal
EP4369215A1 (en) Electronic device for combining data and method of controlling same
CN110738258B (en) Image classification method and device and terminal equipment
CN110880999B (en) Electronic red packet identification method and device and terminal equipment
CN114626354A (en) Table generation method and device, terminal equipment and storage medium
CN111143360A (en) Road uplink and downlink identification method and device based on spatial index algorithm, storage medium and terminal
CN116340930A (en) Method, device, equipment and medium for confirming system change
CN114138972A (en) Text type identification method and device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant