CN111352408B - A fault detection method for multi-condition process industrial process based on evidence K-nearest neighbors - Google Patents

A fault detection method for multi-condition process industrial process based on evidence K-nearest neighbors Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN111352408B
CN111352408B CN202010164092.2A CN202010164092A CN111352408B CN 111352408 B CN111352408 B CN 111352408B CN 202010164092 A CN202010164092 A CN 202010164092A CN 111352408 B CN111352408 B CN 111352408B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
sample
evidence
condition
training
samples
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN202010164092.2A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN111352408A (en
Inventor
贺凯迅
苏照阳
钟麦英
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Shandong University of Science and Technology
Original Assignee
Shandong University of Science and Technology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Shandong University of Science and Technology filed Critical Shandong University of Science and Technology
Priority to CN202010164092.2A priority Critical patent/CN111352408B/en
Publication of CN111352408A publication Critical patent/CN111352408A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN111352408B publication Critical patent/CN111352408B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B23/00Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
    • G05B23/02Electric testing or monitoring
    • G05B23/0205Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
    • G05B23/0259Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterized by the response to fault detection
    • G05B23/0262Confirmation of fault detection, e.g. extra checks to confirm that a failure has indeed occurred
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/20Pc systems
    • G05B2219/24Pc safety
    • G05B2219/24065Real time diagnostics

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a multi-working-condition process industrial process fault detection method based on evidence K nearest neighbor, which belongs to the field of industrial process monitoring. Then calculating the correlation degree of each sample in the training set and each working condition, and establishing an evidence information base; for a sample to be detected, K samples are selected from the training set by the K neighbor model, and evidence information corresponding to the K samples is synthesized by a D-S evidence theory to obtain a final detection result. The fault diagnosis model established based on evidence K nearest neighbor can be well adapted to the multi-working-condition running state of the system; the method can reduce the false alarm rate in the monitoring process and improve the accuracy of fault alarm.

Description

一种基于证据K近邻的多工况流程工业过程故障检测方法A fault detection method for multi-condition process industrial process based on evidence K-nearest neighbors

技术领域technical field

本发明属于工业过程监控领域,具体涉及一种基于证据K近邻的多工况流程工业过程故障检测方法。The invention belongs to the field of industrial process monitoring, and in particular relates to a multi-condition process industrial process fault detection method based on evidence K nearest neighbors.

背景技术Background technique

随着DCS的广泛应用,从工业过程中收集数据变得越来越容易。数据挖掘和数据库技术的发展也为数据驱动建模方法在工业过程中的发展和应用提供了强有力的技术支持。因此,数据驱动的过程监控、控制和系统优化得到了广泛的应用。With the widespread adoption of DCS, it has become easier to collect data from industrial processes. The development of data mining and database technology also provides strong technical support for the development and application of data-driven modeling methods in industrial processes. Therefore, data-driven process monitoring, control and system optimization are widely used.

锅炉作为一种复杂的大型能源转换设备,是火力发电厂最重要的部分之一,锅炉的稳定运行与电能质量密切相关。然而,锅炉燃烧过程复杂多变,难以利用传统的机理分析建立其精准模型;同时,锅炉负荷随着外界需求而变化,在不同的负荷下,锅炉的操作模式发生改变,运行过程表现出明显的多工况特性。As a complex large-scale energy conversion equipment, the boiler is one of the most important parts of the thermal power plant. The stable operation of the boiler is closely related to the power quality. However, the combustion process of the boiler is complex and changeable, and it is difficult to use the traditional mechanism analysis to establish its accurate model; at the same time, the boiler load changes with the external demand. Under different loads, the operation mode of the boiler changes, and the operation process shows obvious Multi-case feature.

对于传统的故障诊断方法,如主成分分析(principal components analysis,PCA),偏最小二乘(partial least squares,PLS)等长期以来一直用于工业过程的故障检测和诊断。此类方法也被认为是非常有效的。但需要注意的是,PCA、PLS等方法是假设过程变量独立,分布均匀且线性相关的前提下制定的,并且假设系统只有单个正常工况。而在实际的工业生成中,难以符合这种假设条件,导致监控结果不精确,出现大量的错误报警。For traditional fault diagnosis methods, such as principal components analysis (PCA), partial least squares (partial least squares, PLS), etc., have been used for fault detection and diagnosis in industrial processes for a long time. Such methods are also considered to be very effective. However, it should be noted that methods such as PCA and PLS are formulated under the assumption that the process variables are independent, uniformly distributed and linearly correlated, and assume that the system has only a single normal operating condition. In actual industrial production, it is difficult to meet this assumption, resulting in inaccurate monitoring results and a large number of false alarms.

发明内容SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

针对上述技术问题,本发明提出了一种基于证据K近邻的多工况流程工业过程故障检测方法,克服了现有技术的不足,具有良好的效果。In view of the above technical problems, the present invention proposes a multi-condition flow industrial process fault detection method based on evidence K neighbors, which overcomes the deficiencies of the prior art and has good effects.

为了实现上述目的,本发明采用如下技术方案:In order to achieve the above object, the present invention adopts the following technical solutions:

一种基于证据K近邻的多工况流程工业过程故障检测方法,包括如下步骤:A method for detecting faults in a multi-condition process industrial process based on evidence K-nearest neighbors, comprising the following steps:

步骤1:获取工业过程的正常历史工况数据,将此数据作为训练集,对训练集进行标准化,计算标准化后的值;Step 1: Obtain the normal historical working condition data of the industrial process, use this data as a training set, standardize the training set, and calculate the standardized value;

步骤2:通过聚类算法,将标准化后的训练集划分为多个正常工况;Step 2: Divide the standardized training set into multiple normal working conditions through the clustering algorithm;

步骤3:根据相关度准则,确定证据信息,由于每个训练样本都携带证据信息,得出每个训练样本与每个正常工况的相关度,进而建立证据信息库;证据信息库是所有正常样本所携带证据信息的集合;Step 3: Determine the evidence information according to the correlation criterion. Since each training sample carries the evidence information, the correlation between each training sample and each normal working condition is obtained, and then the evidence information database is established; the evidence information database is all normal conditions. A collection of evidentiary information carried by the sample;

步骤4:根据每个训练样本的局部密度,计算训练样本的折扣因子γi,使故障边界适应训练样本的局部特征;Step 4: Calculate the discount factor γ i of the training sample according to the local density of each training sample, so that the fault boundary is adapted to the local characteristics of the training sample;

步骤5:对待测数据进行标准化,并在训练集中找出距离待测数据最近的k个样本;Step 5: Standardize the data to be tested, and find the k samples closest to the data to be tested in the training set;

步骤6:根据D-S证据理论Dempster’s整合规则,将步骤5中的k个样本的证据信息进行合成,得到故障检测结果。Step 6: According to the D-S evidence theory Dempster's integration rule, synthesize the evidence information of the k samples in step 5 to obtain the fault detection result.

优选地,在步骤1中,根据公式(1),计算标准化后的值,正常工况数据集

Figure BDA0002406780310000021
n为正常工况样本的个数,i代表第i个样本,p为每个样本的维度:Preferably, in step 1, according to formula (1), the normalized value is calculated, the normal working condition data set
Figure BDA0002406780310000021
n is the number of samples under normal conditions, i represents the ith sample, and p is the dimension of each sample:

Figure BDA0002406780310000022
Figure BDA0002406780310000022

其中,

Figure BDA0002406780310000023
是实际值,
Figure BDA0002406780310000024
是变量xj的最大值,
Figure BDA0002406780310000025
是变量xj的最小值,
Figure BDA0002406780310000026
是标准化后的值,j表示样本维度。in,
Figure BDA0002406780310000023
is the actual value,
Figure BDA0002406780310000024
is the maximum value of the variable x j ,
Figure BDA0002406780310000025
is the minimum value of the variable x j ,
Figure BDA0002406780310000026
is the normalized value, and j represents the sample dimension.

优选地,所述步骤2中的聚类算法为K均值聚类法、高斯混合模型聚类法、密度峰值聚类法中的任意一种。Preferably, the clustering algorithm in the step 2 is any one of K-means clustering, Gaussian mixture model clustering, and density peak clustering.

优选地,所述步骤3中的相关度准则为欧氏距离、马氏距离、局部密度中的一种或两种方法的组合。Preferably, the correlation criterion in step 3 is one of Euclidean distance, Mahalanobis distance, and local density, or a combination of two methods.

优选地,在步骤3中,根据公式(2),为每个训练样本计算证据信息:Preferably, in step 3, according to formula (2), the evidence information is calculated for each training sample:

Figure BDA0002406780310000027
Figure BDA0002406780310000027

其中,q表示第q个正常工况,diq为第i个样本与第q个正常工况的相关度,c表示总的正常工况数量;

Figure BDA0002406780310000028
表示第i个样本与所有工况相关度的总和,mi({ωq})表示第i个样本属于第q个正常工况的概率。Among them, q represents the qth normal operating condition, d iq represents the correlation between the ith sample and the qth normal operating condition, and c represents the total number of normal operating conditions;
Figure BDA0002406780310000028
Represents the sum of the correlation between the ith sample and all working conditions, and m i ({ω q }) represents the probability that the ith sample belongs to the qth normal working condition.

优选地,在步骤4中,根据公式(3),计算训练样本的折扣因子γiPreferably, in step 4, according to formula (3), the discount factor γ i of the training sample is calculated:

Figure BDA0002406780310000029
Figure BDA0002406780310000029

其中,Di是样本xi与距离样本xi最近的k训练样本之间的距离组合成的集合,ε是quantile函数内的参数。Among them, D i is the set of distances between the sample xi and the k training samples closest to the sample xi , and ε is the parameter in the quantile function.

优选地,在步骤6中,包括以下步骤:Preferably, in step 6, the following steps are included:

步骤6.1:根据公式(4),计算自适应折扣因子γsStep 6.1: According to formula (4), calculate the adaptive discount factor γ s :

Figure BDA0002406780310000031
Figure BDA0002406780310000031

其中,λ用来调整γs的大小,γi为训练样本的折扣因子;Among them, λ is used to adjust the size of γ s , and γ i is the discount factor of training samples;

步骤6.2:根据公式(5),计算训练样本的权重值:Step 6.2: According to formula (5), calculate the weight value of the training sample:

Figure BDA0002406780310000032
Figure BDA0002406780310000032

其中,di表示待测样本与训练样本的欧氏距离,γs为自适应折扣因子;Among them, d i represents the Euclidean distance between the test sample and the training sample, and γ s is the adaptive discount factor;

步骤6.3:根据公式(6),计算待测样本从属于每个工况的mass函数:Step 6.3: According to formula (6), calculate the mass function of the sample to be tested belonging to each working condition:

Figure BDA0002406780310000033
Figure BDA0002406780310000033

其中,α为训练集的置信度,mi(A)为待测样本的证据信息;

Figure BDA0002406780310000034
表示距离待测样本最近的K个训练样本的索引集合,dsi表示待测样本与训练样本之间的距离;Among them, α is the confidence level of the training set, and m i (A) is the evidence information of the sample to be tested;
Figure BDA0002406780310000034
Represents the index set of K training samples closest to the sample to be tested, and dsi represents the distance between the sample to be tested and the training sample;

步骤6.4:根据公式(7)、(8)、(9),合成mass函数,得出诊断结果;Step 6.4: According to formulas (7), (8), (9), synthesize the mass function to obtain the diagnosis result;

Figure BDA0002406780310000035
Figure BDA0002406780310000035

Figure BDA0002406780310000036
Figure BDA0002406780310000036

Figure BDA0002406780310000037
Figure BDA0002406780310000037

其中,K1为标准化因子,ms(Ω)表示测试样本故障概率,ms({ωq})表示测试样本从属于每个工况的概率。Among them, K 1 is the normalization factor, m s (Ω) represents the failure probability of the test sample, and m s ({ω q }) represents the probability that the test sample belongs to each working condition.

本发明所带来的有益技术效果:Beneficial technical effects brought by the present invention:

(1)基于K近邻建立的故障诊断模型可以很好的适应系统多工况运行状态;(2)该方法可以降低在监控过程中的误报率,提高故障报警的精度。(1) The fault diagnosis model based on K-nearest neighbors can be well adapted to the operating state of the system under multiple operating conditions; (2) This method can reduce the false alarm rate in the monitoring process and improve the accuracy of fault alarms.

附图说明Description of drawings

图1为本发明方法的流程图。Figure 1 is a flow chart of the method of the present invention.

图2为本发明实施例训练集聚类结果在二维空间上的投影示意图。FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a projection of a training set clustering result on a two-dimensional space according to an embodiment of the present invention.

图3为本发明实施例采用本发明基于证据K近邻的多工况流程工业过程故障检测方法的故障检测结果示意图。FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a fault detection result of an embodiment of the present invention using the method for detecting faults in a multi-condition process industrial process based on the evidence K nearest neighbors of the present invention.

具体实施方式Detailed ways

下面结合附图以及具体实施方式对本发明作进一步详细说明:The present invention is described in further detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments:

本实例数据由某电厂锅炉系统内一个磨煤机产生,一共采集了2880个样本,28个变量。故障区间为2133-2500。取前1000个正常样本作为训练集,其余样本作为测试集。如图1所示,本发明所述方法,包括如下两大阶段:其分别为离线建模和在线监控,所述离线建模阶段具体包括:The data of this example is generated by a coal mill in a boiler system of a power plant, and a total of 2880 samples and 28 variables are collected. The fault interval is 2133-2500. Take the first 1000 normal samples as the training set and the rest as the test set. As shown in Figure 1, the method of the present invention includes the following two major stages: offline modeling and online monitoring, respectively, and the offline modeling stage specifically includes:

步骤1:对训练集进行标准化;Step 1: Normalize the training set;

Figure BDA0002406780310000041
Figure BDA0002406780310000041

上式中,

Figure BDA0002406780310000042
是实际值,
Figure BDA0002406780310000043
是变量xj的最大值,
Figure BDA0002406780310000044
是变量xj的最小值,
Figure BDA0002406780310000045
是标准化后的值,j表示样本维度。In the above formula,
Figure BDA0002406780310000042
is the actual value,
Figure BDA0002406780310000043
is the maximum value of the variable x j ,
Figure BDA0002406780310000044
is the minimum value of the variable x j ,
Figure BDA0002406780310000045
is the normalized value, and j represents the sample dimension.

步骤2:利用PCA把过程数据组成的高维数据空间投影到低维特征子空间,如图2所示;观察最优聚类个数,通过K均值聚类算法对训练集聚类,参数K=5,把正常工况划分为w1,w2两个工况;Step 2: Use PCA to project the high-dimensional data space composed of the process data into the low-dimensional feature subspace, as shown in Figure 2; observe the optimal number of clusters, and cluster the training set through the K-means clustering algorithm. The parameter K =5, divide the normal working condition into two working conditions, w1 and w2;

步骤3:分别计算出w1,w2的中心点,计算每个训练集与w1,w2的相关度建立证据信息库,并计算每个训练样本的折扣因子γiStep 3: Calculate the center points of w1 and w2 respectively, calculate the correlation between each training set and w1, w2 to establish an evidence information base, and calculate the discount factor γ i of each training sample;

Figure BDA0002406780310000046
Figure BDA0002406780310000046

上式中,Di是训练样本xi与K最近邻模型挑选出训练样本的距离集合,参数ε=0.85。In the above formula, D i is the distance set between the training sample xi and the K nearest neighbor model to select the training sample, and the parameter ε = 0.85.

在线监控阶段主要包括:The online monitoring stage mainly includes:

步骤1:对于一个待测样本xi,首先进行标准化。在训练集中找个5个最近邻的样本组成集合Θ。Step 1: For a sample xi to be tested, first standardize. Find the 5 nearest neighbor samples in the training set to form a set Θ.

步骤2:根据Θ内每个训练集对应的折扣因子计算出待测样本xi的自适应折扣因子γsStep 2: Calculate the adaptive discount factor γ s of the sample xi to be tested according to the discount factor corresponding to each training set in Θ.

Figure BDA0002406780310000051
Figure BDA0002406780310000051

上式中,参数λ=0.2,γi为训练样本的折扣因子;In the above formula, the parameter λ=0.2, and γ i is the discount factor of the training sample;

步骤3:计算出待测样本xi与Θ内每个训练集之间的权重:Step 3: Calculate the weight between the sample xi to be tested and each training set in Θ:

Figure BDA0002406780310000052
Figure BDA0002406780310000052

上式中,di表示待测样本与训练样本的欧氏距离,γs为自适应折扣因子;In the above formula, d i represents the Euclidean distance between the test sample and the training sample, and γ s is the adaptive discount factor;

步骤4:计算待测样本从属于每个工况的mass函数:Step 4: Calculate the mass function of the sample to be tested belonging to each working condition:

Figure BDA0002406780310000053
Figure BDA0002406780310000053

其中,参数α=0.95为训练集的置信度,mi(A)为训练样本的证据信息;Among them, the parameter α=0.95 is the confidence level of the training set, and m i (A) is the evidence information of the training sample;

步骤5:运用Dempster’s整合规则合成Θ内每个训练集携带的证据得到最后的检测结果。规定当ms(Ω)=0.2为故障早期预警边界,ms(Ω)=0.9为故障边界。监控结果如图3所示;Step 5: Use Dempster's integration rule to synthesize the evidence carried by each training set in Θ to obtain the final detection result. It is stipulated that when m s (Ω)=0.2 is the fault early warning boundary, and m s (Ω)=0.9 is the fault boundary. The monitoring results are shown in Figure 3;

Figure BDA0002406780310000054
Figure BDA0002406780310000054

Figure BDA0002406780310000055
Figure BDA0002406780310000055

Figure BDA0002406780310000056
Figure BDA0002406780310000056

其中,K1为标准化因子,ms(Ω)表示测试样本故障概率,ms({ωq})表示测试样本从属于每个工况的概率。Among them, K 1 is the normalization factor, m s (Ω) represents the failure probability of the test sample, and m s ({ω q }) represents the probability that the test sample belongs to each working condition.

上述说明并非是对本发明的限制,本发明也并不仅限于上述举例,本技术领域的技术人员在本发明的实质范围内所做出的变化、改型、添加或替换,也应属于本发明的保护范围。The above description is not intended to limit the present invention, and the present invention is not limited to the above examples. Changes, modifications, additions or substitutions made by those skilled in the art within the scope of the present invention should also belong to the present invention. protected range.

Claims (6)

1. A multi-working-condition process industrial process fault detection method based on evidence K nearest neighbor is characterized by comprising the following steps: the method comprises the following steps:
step 1: acquiring normal historical working condition data of an industrial process, taking the normal historical working condition data as a training set, standardizing the training set, and calculating a standardized value;
step 2: dividing the standardized training set into a plurality of normal working conditions through a clustering algorithm;
and step 3: determining evidence information according to a relevancy criterion, and obtaining the relevancy of each training sample and each normal working condition as each training sample carries the evidence information, thereby establishing an evidence information base; the evidence information base is a set of evidence information carried by all normal samples;
and 4, step 4: calculating discount factor gamma of training samples according to local density of each training sampleiAdapting the fault boundary to the local characteristics of the training sample;
and 5: standardizing the data to be detected, and finding out k samples closest to the data to be detected in a training set;
step 6: synthesizing the evidence information of the k samples in the step 5 according to a Dempster' S integration rule of a D-S evidence theory to obtain a fault detection result; the method comprises the following steps:
step 6.1: calculating an adaptive discount factor gamma according to equation (4)s
Figure FDA0002705629780000011
Wherein λ is used to adjust γsSize of (a), γiA discount factor for a training sample;
step 6.2: according to equation (5), the weight values of the training samples are calculated:
Figure FDA0002705629780000012
wherein d isiRepresenting Euclidean distance, gamma, of the sample to be measured and the training samplesIs an adaptive discount factor;
step 6.3: and (3) calculating a mass function of the sample to be tested belonging to each working condition according to the formula (6):
Figure FDA0002705629780000013
where α is the confidence of the training set, mi(A) The evidence information of the sample to be detected is obtained;
Figure FDA0002705629780000014
index set representing K training samples closest to the sample to be measured, dsiRepresenting the distance between the sample to be tested and the training sample;
step 6.4: synthesizing a mass function according to the formulas (7), (8) and (9) to obtain a diagnosis result;
Figure FDA0002705629780000021
Figure FDA0002705629780000022
Figure FDA0002705629780000023
wherein, K1As a normalization factor, ms(Ω) represents the failure probability of the test sample, ms({ωq} represents the probability that the test sample is subject to each condition.
2. The evidence K nearest neighbor based multi-condition process industrial process fault detection method according to claim 1, wherein: in step 1, the normalized value, normal condition data set, is calculated according to equation (1)
Figure FDA0002705629780000024
n is the number of normal working condition samples, i represents the ith sample, and p is the dimension of each sample:
Figure FDA0002705629780000025
wherein,
Figure FDA0002705629780000026
is the actual value of the,
Figure FDA0002705629780000027
is a variable xjThe maximum value of (a) is,
Figure FDA0002705629780000028
is a variable xjThe minimum value of (a) is determined,
Figure FDA0002705629780000029
is a normalized value and j represents the sample dimension.
3. The evidence K nearest neighbor based multi-condition process industrial process fault detection method according to claim 1, wherein: the clustering algorithm in the step 2 is any one of a K-means clustering method, a Gaussian mixture model clustering method and a density peak value clustering method.
4. The evidence K nearest neighbor based multi-condition process industrial process fault detection method according to claim 1, wherein: and the relevancy criterion in the step 3 is one or a combination of two methods of Euclidean distance, Mahalanobis distance and local density.
5. The evidence K nearest neighbor based multi-condition process industrial process fault detection method according to claim 1, wherein: in step 3, evidence information is calculated for each training sample according to equation (2):
Figure FDA0002705629780000031
wherein q represents the q-th normal operating condition, diqThe correlation degree of the ith sample and the qth normal working condition is shown, and c represents the total number of the normal working conditions;
Figure FDA0002705629780000032
represents the sum of the correlation of the ith sample with all the working conditions, mi({ωqAnd) represents the probability that the ith sample belongs to the qth normal condition.
6. The evidence K nearest neighbor based multi-condition process industrial process fault detection method according to claim 1, wherein: in step 4, the fold of the training sample is calculated according to equation (3)Deduction factor gammai
Figure FDA0002705629780000033
Wherein D isiIs a sample xiAnd distance sample xiThe distance between the nearest k training samples is combined into a set, which is a parameter within the quantile function.
CN202010164092.2A 2020-03-11 2020-03-11 A fault detection method for multi-condition process industrial process based on evidence K-nearest neighbors Active CN111352408B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010164092.2A CN111352408B (en) 2020-03-11 2020-03-11 A fault detection method for multi-condition process industrial process based on evidence K-nearest neighbors

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010164092.2A CN111352408B (en) 2020-03-11 2020-03-11 A fault detection method for multi-condition process industrial process based on evidence K-nearest neighbors

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN111352408A CN111352408A (en) 2020-06-30
CN111352408B true CN111352408B (en) 2020-12-08

Family

ID=71197282

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202010164092.2A Active CN111352408B (en) 2020-03-11 2020-03-11 A fault detection method for multi-condition process industrial process based on evidence K-nearest neighbors

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN111352408B (en)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108171271B (en) * 2018-01-11 2022-04-29 湖南大唐先一科技有限公司 A kind of equipment deterioration early warning method and system
CN112181003A (en) * 2020-08-24 2021-01-05 中国神华能源股份有限公司国华电力分公司 A method and electronic device for pressure control of a unit
CN112199829B (en) * 2020-09-27 2022-06-24 浙江大学 Multi-working-condition multi-stage batch process monitoring method based on density peak clustering and instant learning
CN112327189B (en) * 2020-10-14 2023-06-09 北方工业大学 Comprehensive judging method for health state of energy storage battery based on KNN algorithm
CN113449412B (en) * 2021-05-24 2022-07-22 河南大学 Fault diagnosis method based on K-means clustering and comprehensive correlation

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1920511A (en) * 2006-08-01 2007-02-28 东北电力大学 Fusion diagnosing method of centrifugal pump vibration accidents and vibration signals sampling device
CN102750327A (en) * 2012-05-30 2012-10-24 合肥工业大学 K-means cluster diversified searching method on manifold surface and based on geodesic distance
CN104091035A (en) * 2014-07-30 2014-10-08 中国科学院空间应用工程与技术中心 Health monitoring method for effective loads of space station based on data-driven algorithm
CN104600680A (en) * 2015-02-16 2015-05-06 国家电网公司 Intelligent alarming method based on data fusion
CN106022366A (en) * 2016-07-04 2016-10-12 杭州电子科技大学 Rotary mechanical equipment fault diagnosis method based on neighbor evidence fusion
CN107341447A (en) * 2017-06-13 2017-11-10 华南理工大学 A kind of face verification mechanism based on depth convolutional neural networks and evidence k nearest neighbor
CN107436597A (en) * 2017-07-17 2017-12-05 华南理工大学 A kind of chemical process fault detection method based on sparse filtering and logistic regression
CN108388922A (en) * 2018-03-08 2018-08-10 云南电网有限责任公司电力科学研究院 A kind of recognition methods and system for the major-minor equipment state exception of fired power generating unit

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8285438B2 (en) * 2009-11-16 2012-10-09 Honeywell International Inc. Methods systems and apparatus for analyzing complex systems via prognostic reasoning

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1920511A (en) * 2006-08-01 2007-02-28 东北电力大学 Fusion diagnosing method of centrifugal pump vibration accidents and vibration signals sampling device
CN102750327A (en) * 2012-05-30 2012-10-24 合肥工业大学 K-means cluster diversified searching method on manifold surface and based on geodesic distance
CN104091035A (en) * 2014-07-30 2014-10-08 中国科学院空间应用工程与技术中心 Health monitoring method for effective loads of space station based on data-driven algorithm
CN104600680A (en) * 2015-02-16 2015-05-06 国家电网公司 Intelligent alarming method based on data fusion
CN106022366A (en) * 2016-07-04 2016-10-12 杭州电子科技大学 Rotary mechanical equipment fault diagnosis method based on neighbor evidence fusion
CN107341447A (en) * 2017-06-13 2017-11-10 华南理工大学 A kind of face verification mechanism based on depth convolutional neural networks and evidence k nearest neighbor
CN107436597A (en) * 2017-07-17 2017-12-05 华南理工大学 A kind of chemical process fault detection method based on sparse filtering and logistic regression
CN108388922A (en) * 2018-03-08 2018-08-10 云南电网有限责任公司电力科学研究院 A kind of recognition methods and system for the major-minor equipment state exception of fired power generating unit

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
基于K近邻证据融合的故障诊断方法;侯平智等;《控制与决策》(第10期);第1767-1774页 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN111352408A (en) 2020-06-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN111352408B (en) A fault detection method for multi-condition process industrial process based on evidence K-nearest neighbors
CN112070109B (en) Water chestnut kiln energy consumption abnormality detection method based on improved density peak value clustering
CN106990763B (en) A kind of Vertical Mill operation regulator control system and method based on data mining
CN112036089A (en) A coal mill fault early warning method based on DPC-MND and multivariate state estimation
CN106094744A (en) The determination method of thermoelectricity factory owner's operational factor desired value based on association rule mining
CN107239066B (en) A kind of Vertical Mill operation closed-loop control device and method based on data mining
CN115096627B (en) Method and system for fault diagnosis and operation and maintenance in manufacturing process of hydraulic forming intelligent equipment
CN109670549B (en) Data screening method and device for thermal power generating unit and computer equipment
Xiang et al. Multimode process monitoring based on fuzzy C-means in locality preserving projection subspace
CN109538311B (en) Real-time monitoring method for control performance of steam turbine in high-end power generation equipment
CN108734359B (en) A preprocessing method for wind power prediction data
CN118194026B (en) Gas power generation data analysis system
CN108388234A (en) A kind of fault monitoring method dividing changeable gauge block pca model based on correlation
Li et al. Distance measures in building informatics: An in-depth assessment through typical tasks in building energy management
CN115511387A (en) Oil-immersed transformer state assessment method and system based on multi-source information fusion
CN113341926B (en) Multi-stage intermittent process fault detection method based on sparse weighted neighborhood preserving embedding
CN115329868A (en) Mass-dependent dynamic latent variable method based on parallel projection local retention
JP6830414B2 (en) Diagnostic device and diagnostic method
CN115034443B (en) A boiler performance prediction method based on operating condition division and neural network
CN110826587B (en) Vortex shaft engine fault detection method based on improved weighted support vector machine
CN118265275B (en) Air cooling line control cooling optimization control method
CN113359665A (en) Industrial process fault detection method and system based on weighted key pivot
CN118332471A (en) A method for detecting faults of operating status monitoring sensors for a gas turbine combined cycle unit
Weng et al. A correlation analysis-based multivariate alarm method with maximum likelihood evidential reasoning
CN115310529A (en) Wastewater treatment fault monitoring method based on manifold learning

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant