CN111292003A - Method and device for evaluating product - Google Patents
Method and device for evaluating product Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN111292003A CN111292003A CN202010113137.3A CN202010113137A CN111292003A CN 111292003 A CN111292003 A CN 111292003A CN 202010113137 A CN202010113137 A CN 202010113137A CN 111292003 A CN111292003 A CN 111292003A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- version
- evaluation value
- product
- evaluation
- expected
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 45
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 269
- 238000013210 evaluation model Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 26
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 claims description 60
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 17
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 abstract description 9
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 abstract description 9
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 abstract description 5
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000012356 Product development Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000000644 propagated effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012827 research and development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000010835 comparative analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004973 liquid crystal related substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000035800 maturation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013307 optical fiber Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000611 regression analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/067—Enterprise or organisation modelling
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a method and a device for evaluating a product, and relates to the technical field of computers. One embodiment of the method comprises: acquiring an evaluation value of a first version of a product, and acquiring project information of a second version of the product formed on the basis of the first version; calculating an expected evaluation value of the second version by using a relation model of the item information and the evaluation value based on the evaluation value of the first version and the item information of the second version; acquiring an evaluation value of the second version; evaluating the implementation of the second version of the product using a product evaluation model based on the evaluation value of the second version and the expected evaluation value; according to the method, the expected evaluation value can be calculated through multiple dimensions, the product after the edition modification is comprehensively evaluated based on the expected evaluation value and the actual evaluation value, and compared with the simple comparison of the evaluation values before and after the edition modification of the product, the accuracy of the implementation effect of the evaluation edition modification project is improved.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of computers, in particular to a method and a device for evaluating products.
Background
With the rapid development of the internet, internet products such as internet applications, applets, web pages, etc. become important components of people's daily life, and become important channels for people to obtain external information and receive daily life services. But as the demand of users changes, the internet products are also continuously updated in an iterative way.
In the process of implementing the invention, the inventor finds that at least the following problems exist in the prior art:
for an internet enterprise producing internet products, the birth of an internet product needs to go through multiple links such as product research and development, operation and the like, and how to evaluate the implementation situation of a product reprinting project according to the input of the internet product research and development and the feedback after use becomes a difficult point of an enterprise internet project management and financial department.
Disclosure of Invention
In view of this, embodiments of the present invention provide a method and an apparatus for evaluating a product, which are capable of obtaining an evaluation value of a first version of a product, and obtaining project information of a second version of the product formed based on the first version; calculating an expected evaluation value of the second version by using a relation model of the item information and the evaluation value based on the evaluation value of the first version and the item information of the second version; acquiring an actual evaluation value of the second version; evaluating the implementation of the second version of the product using a product evaluation model based on the actual evaluation value and the expected evaluation value of the second version; the expected evaluation value can be calculated through multiple dimensions, the product after the plate changing is comprehensively evaluated based on the expected evaluation value and the actual evaluation value, and compared with the simple comparison of the evaluation values before and after the plate changing of the product, the accuracy of evaluating the implementation effect of the plate changing project is improved.
To achieve the above object, according to an aspect of an embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method of evaluating a product, including: acquiring an evaluation value of a first version of a product, and acquiring project information of a second version of the product formed on the basis of the first version; calculating an expected evaluation value of the second version by using a relation model of the item information and the evaluation value based on the evaluation value of the first version and the item information of the second version; acquiring an actual evaluation value of the second version; evaluating the second version of the product for implementation using a product evaluation model based on the actual evaluation value and the expected evaluation value of the second version.
Optionally, the method of evaluating a product,
the project information of the second version includes a product type of the product, a development stage of the product, and a development cost for developing the second version.
Optionally, the method of evaluating a product,
the evaluation value is obtained by calculation based on any one or more of evaluation scores of the first version or the second version of the product by the user, data formed by evaluation character extraction and statistics, and user behavior data of the product.
Optionally, the method of evaluating a product,
calculating an expected evaluation value of the second version by using a relation model of the item information and the evaluation value based on the evaluation value of the first version and the item information of the second version, including:
calculating the expected rating value for the second version using the relational model based on a development cost of the second version.
Optionally, the method of evaluating a product,
calculating an expected evaluation value of the second version by using a relational model of the item information and the evaluation value based on the evaluation value of the first version and the item information of the second version, further comprising:
determining a first dimension value in the relationship model corresponding to each development stage according to at least two development stages of a product, and calculating the expected evaluation value of the second version according to the relationship model to which the corresponding first dimension value belongs based on the development stage to which the second version of the product belongs.
Optionally, the method of evaluating a product,
calculating an expected evaluation value of the second version by using a relational model of the item information and the evaluation value based on the evaluation value of the first version and the item information of the second version, further comprising:
according to the product types of the products, second dimension values in the relation models corresponding to the product types are determined, and on the basis of the product types to which the second versions belong, the expected evaluation values of the second versions are calculated according to the relation models to which the corresponding second dimension values belong.
Optionally, the method of evaluating a product,
acquiring an evaluation value of the second version; evaluating the performance of the second version of the product using a product evaluation model based on the evaluation value of the second version and the expected evaluation value, comprising:
and calculating a comprehensive evaluation value of the second version by using a product evaluation model based on the evaluation value of the second version and the expected evaluation value, and evaluating the implementation condition of the second version of the product according to the comprehensive evaluation value.
To achieve the above object, according to a second aspect of an embodiment of the present invention, there is provided an apparatus for evaluating a product, characterized by comprising: the system comprises an information acquisition module, an expected value calculation module and a version evaluation module; the information acquisition module is used for acquiring an evaluation value of a first version of a product and acquiring project information of a second version of the product formed based on the first version; the expected value calculating module is used for calculating the expected evaluation value of the second version by utilizing a relation model of the project information and the evaluation value based on the evaluation value of the first version and the project information of the second version; the version evaluation module is used for acquiring an evaluation value of the second version; evaluating the performance of the second version of the product using a product evaluation model based on the evaluation value of the second version and the expected evaluation value.
Optionally, the apparatus for evaluating a product is characterized in that,
the project information of the second version includes a product type of the product, a development stage of the product, and a development cost for developing the second version.
Optionally, the apparatus for evaluating a product is characterized in that,
the evaluation value is obtained by calculation based on any one or more of the product evaluation score of the first version or the second version by the user, data formed by evaluation character extraction and statistics, and user behavior data of the product.
Optionally, the apparatus for evaluating a product is characterized in that,
calculating an expected evaluation value of the second version by using a relation model of the item information and the evaluation value based on the evaluation value of the first version and the item information of the second version, including:
calculating the expected rating value for the second version using the relational model based on a development cost of the second version.
Optionally, the apparatus for evaluating a product is characterized in that,
calculating an expected evaluation value of the second version by using a relational model of the item information and the evaluation value based on the evaluation value of the first version and the item information of the second version, further comprising:
determining a first dimension value in the relationship model corresponding to each development stage according to at least two development stages of a product, and calculating the expected evaluation value of the second version according to the relationship model to which the corresponding first dimension value belongs based on the development stage to which the second version of the product belongs.
Optionally, the apparatus for evaluating a product is characterized in that,
calculating an expected evaluation value of the second version by using a relational model of the item information and the evaluation value based on the evaluation value of the first version and the item information of the second version, further comprising:
according to the product types of the products, second dimension values in the relation models corresponding to the product types are determined, and on the basis of the product types to which the second versions belong, the expected evaluation values of the second versions are calculated according to the relation models to which the corresponding second dimension values belong.
Optionally, the apparatus for evaluating a product is characterized in that,
evaluating, using a product evaluation model, an implementation of the second version of the product based on the actual evaluation value and the expected evaluation value, comprising:
and calculating a comprehensive evaluation value of the second version by using a product evaluation model based on the actual evaluation value and the expected evaluation value, and evaluating the implementation condition of the second version of the product according to the comprehensive evaluation value.
To achieve the above object, according to a third aspect of embodiments of the present invention, there is provided an electronic apparatus for evaluating a product, comprising: one or more processors; storage means for storing one or more programs which, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to carry out a method as claimed in any one of the above methods of assessing a product.
To achieve the above object, according to a fourth aspect of embodiments of the present invention, there is provided a computer-readable medium having stored thereon a computer program, characterized in that the program, when executed by a processor, implements the method as set forth in any one of the methods of evaluating a product described above.
One embodiment of the above invention has the following advantages or benefits: acquiring an evaluation value of a first version of a product, and acquiring project information of a second version of the product formed on the basis of the first version; calculating an expected evaluation value of the second version by using a relation model of the item information and the evaluation value based on the evaluation value of the first version and the item information of the second version; acquiring an actual evaluation value of the second version; evaluating the second version of the product for implementation using a product evaluation model based on the actual evaluation value and the expected evaluation value of the second version. Therefore, the expected evaluation values are calculated in a multi-dimensional mode, the product after the plate changing is comprehensively evaluated on the basis of the expected evaluation values and the actual evaluation values, and compared with the simple comparison of the evaluation values before and after the plate changing of the product, the accuracy of evaluating the implementation effect of the plate changing project is improved.
Further effects of the above-mentioned non-conventional alternatives will be described below in connection with the embodiments.
Drawings
The drawings are included to provide a better understanding of the invention and are not to be construed as unduly limiting the invention. Wherein:
FIG. 1 is a schematic flow chart of a method for evaluating a product according to a first embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic flow chart of a method for evaluating a product according to a second embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a schematic flow chart of a method for evaluating a product according to a third embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a system for evaluating a product according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 5 is an exemplary system architecture diagram in which embodiments of the present invention may be employed;
fig. 6 is a schematic block diagram of a computer system suitable for use in implementing a terminal device or server of an embodiment of the invention.
Detailed Description
Exemplary embodiments of the present invention are described below with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which various details of embodiments of the invention are included to assist understanding, and which are to be considered as merely exemplary. Accordingly, those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that various changes and modifications of the embodiments described herein can be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Also, descriptions of well-known functions and constructions are omitted in the following description for clarity and conciseness.
As shown in fig. 1, an embodiment of the present invention provides a method of evaluating a product, which may include the steps of:
step S101: the method comprises the steps of obtaining an evaluation value of a first version of a product, and obtaining project information of a second version of the product formed on the basis of the first version.
The evaluation value is obtained by calculation based on any one or more of evaluation scores of the first version or the second version of the product by the user, data formed by evaluation character extraction and statistics, and user behavior data of the product.
Specifically, the internet product may provide one or more feedback channels for the user to evaluate the product, for example, provide an interface for the user to score the usage experience of the product, and obtain the score of the experience of one version of the product, i.e., the evaluation score of the first version or the second version of the product, through the user score; the method can also collect character evaluation of the product by the user, perform semantic analysis by extracting and analyzing keywords in the characters, and form evaluation data according to the semantic analysis and statistics, namely, the data formed by the extraction and statistics of the evaluation characters; furthermore, behavior data of users using the product can be collected by adding a mode of recording user behavior codes in the product, for example, the number of times of using a newly added function user of the product and the steps required for completion and the like; it can be seen that the evaluation value according to the present invention is formed by one or more data through comprehensive calculation. That is, the evaluation value is obtained by calculation based on any one or more of the evaluation score of the user on the first version or the second version of the product, data formed by evaluation character extraction and statistics, and user behavior data using the product; it will be appreciated that, in order to ensure the quantitative validity of the data, the data may be acquired and calculated separately a number of times a month, three months or half a year after a version of the product has been put into use;
further, the project information of the second version includes a product type of the product, a development stage of the product, and a development cost for developing the second version.
Specifically, the item information includes product type indications of different types in internet applications, such as: e-commerce products, tool products, financial products, social products, game products and the like; the development stage of the product includes an initial stage, a growth stage, a maturation stage, a saturation stage, a decline stage and the like, and it can be understood that the user experiences different in different development stages of the product; the development cost for developing the second version comprises the working time length of different department workers participating in the project, the project investment amount and the like.
Step S102: and calculating an expected evaluation value of the second version by utilizing a relation model of the item information and the evaluation value based on the evaluation value of the first version and the item information of the second version.
Specifically, calculating the expected evaluation value of the second version by using a relation model of item information and evaluation value based on the evaluation value of the first version and the item information of the second version includes:
calculating the expected rating value for the second version using the relational model based on a development cost of the second version.
The expression mode of the relational model can be a formula or matrix data; the invention does not limit the specific form of the relational model.
The above steps are described below by taking the formula as an example, as shown in formula (1):
z＝x*y+c (1)
wherein z is an expected evaluation value; x is the multiple of increase or decrease of the second version development cost compared with the budget calculated based on the development cost, y is an evaluation value, and c is a fixed constant in the project;
that is, the expected evaluation value of the second version is calculated using the relational model based on the development cost of the second version;
the invention does not limit the concrete formula content adopted by the relation model.
Step S103: acquiring an evaluation value of the second version; evaluating the performance of the second version of the product using a product evaluation model based on the evaluation value of the second version and the expected evaluation value.
Specifically, based on the calculation in step S102, obtaining an expected evaluation value of the second version, and further obtaining an evaluation value of the second version after a period of use of the second version of the product; the description of the evaluation value is consistent with step S101, and is not repeated herein;
further, based on the evaluation value of the second version and the expected evaluation value, the implementation of the second version of the product is evaluated by using a product evaluation model.
Specifically, based on the evaluation value of the second version and the expected evaluation value, the lift rate of the second version may be calculated by using a product evaluation model, and a calculation method of the lift rate included in the product evaluation model is shown in formula (2):
(evaluation value-expected evaluation value)/expected evaluation value (2)
The value of the lift rate may be greater than 0 or less than 0;
it is understood that in addition to the lift rate, the product evaluation model comprises a plurality of evaluation methods, such as evaluation formulas or evaluation data tables, it is understood that a product may have a plurality of iterative versions, and the evaluation values of the versions may be compared to the evaluation values of one or more versions on which the product is based for lateral comparative analysis; transverse comparison and data regression analysis can also be performed based on expected evaluation values of one or more iterative versions; evaluating the performance of the second version of the product; the performance of the product is evaluated by evaluating the performance of each version of the product.
As shown in fig. 2, an embodiment of the present invention provides a method of evaluating a product, which may include the steps of:
step S201: the method comprises the steps of obtaining an evaluation value of a first version of a product, and obtaining project information of a second version of the product formed on the basis of the first version.
Specifically, the description of the evaluation value and the item information is consistent with step S101, and is not repeated herein;
step S202: calculating an expected evaluation value of the second version by using a relation model of the item information and the evaluation value based on the evaluation value of the first version and the item information of the second version, including: determining, from at least two stages of development of a product, a first dimension value in the relational model corresponding to each of the stages of development.
Specifically, calculating the expected evaluation value of the second version by using a relation model of item information and evaluation value based on the evaluation value of the first version and the item information of the second version includes:
calculating the expected rating value for the second version using the relational model based on a development cost of the second version.
Further, according to at least two development stages of a product, a first dimension value in the relationship model corresponding to each development stage is determined, and based on the development stage to which the second version of the product belongs, the expected evaluation value of the second version is calculated according to the relationship model to which the corresponding first dimension value belongs.
Therefore, the relation model of the project information and the evaluation value comprises the evaluation value, development cost and product development stage factors; calculating expected evaluation values from the evaluation values in different dimensions;
the expression mode of the relational model can be a formula or matrix data; the invention does not limit the specific form of the relational model.
The above steps are described below by taking the formula as an example, as shown in formula (3):
z＝a(y+x*y)+c (3)
wherein z is an expected evaluation value; a is a first dimension value, x is a multiple of cost increase or a multiple of cost decrease of the second version compared with the budget calculated based on the development cost, y is an evaluation value, and c is a fixed constant in the project; wherein, a is a first dimension value set according to the development stage of the product, and it can be understood that the importance degree of the user evaluation is different in different product development stages, for example, the importance of the evaluation value is different between the application which is going to be offline and the application which is just going online; and the dimension of the parameter a in the product development stage is used for increasing the weight of the development cost and the evaluation value for more accurate comprehensive evaluation.
That is, the expected evaluation value of the second version is calculated using the relational model based on the development cost of the second version;
determining a first dimension value in the relationship model corresponding to each development stage according to at least two development stages of a product, and calculating the expected evaluation value of the second version according to the relationship model to which the corresponding first dimension value belongs based on the development stage to which the second version of the product belongs;
the invention does not limit the concrete formula content adopted by the relation model.
Step S203: acquiring an evaluation value of the second version; evaluating the performance of the second version of the product using a product evaluation model based on the evaluation value of the second version and the expected evaluation value.
Specifically, based on the calculation in step S202, obtaining an expected evaluation value of the second version, and further obtaining an evaluation value of the second version after a period of use of the second version of the product; the description of the product evaluation model is consistent with step S103, and will not be repeated here.
As shown in fig. 3, an embodiment of the present invention provides a method of evaluating a product, which may include the steps of:
step S301: the method comprises the steps of obtaining an evaluation value of a first version of a product, and obtaining project information of a second version of the product formed on the basis of the first version.
Specifically, the description of the evaluation value and the item information is consistent with step S101, and is not repeated herein;
step S302: calculating an expected evaluation value of the second version by using a relation model of the item information and the evaluation value based on the evaluation value of the first version and the item information of the second version, including: and determining a second dimension value in the relation model corresponding to each product type according to the product type of the product.
Specifically, calculating the expected evaluation value of the second version by using a relation model of item information and evaluation value based on the evaluation value of the first version and the item information of the second version includes:
calculating the expected rating value for the second version using the relational model based on a development cost of the second version.
Further, according to at least two development stages of a product, a first dimension value in the relationship model corresponding to each development stage is determined, and based on the development stage to which the second version of the product belongs, the expected evaluation value of the second version is calculated according to the relationship model to which the corresponding first dimension value belongs.
Further, according to the product types of the products, second dimension values in the relation models corresponding to the product types are determined, and on the basis of the product types to which the second versions belong, the expected evaluation values of the second versions are calculated according to the relation models to which the corresponding second dimension values belong.
Therefore, the relation model of the project information and the evaluation value comprises the evaluation value, development cost, product development stage and product type factors; calculating expected evaluation values from the evaluation values in different dimensions;
the expression mode of the relational model can be a formula or matrix data; the invention does not limit the specific form of the relational model.
The above steps are described below by taking the formula as an example, as shown in formula (4):
z＝a(y+x*y)+b(y+x*y)+c (4)
wherein z is an expected evaluation value; a is a first dimension value; b is a second dimension value, x is a multiple of the cost increase or decrease of the second version compared with the budget calculated based on the development cost, y is an evaluation value, and c is a fixed constant in the project; wherein, a is a first dimension value set according to the development stage of the product, and it can be understood that the importance degree of the user evaluation is different in different product development stages, for example, the importance of the evaluation value is different between the application which is going to be offline and the application which is just going online; the dimension of the parameter a in the product development stage is used for increasing the weight for the development cost and the evaluation value; further, b is a second dimension value set according to different types of products, and it can be understood that a user has different experiences and evaluations on different types of products, and the value of b may be a positive number or a negative number;
that is, the expected evaluation value of the second version is calculated using the relational model based on the development cost of the second version;
further, according to at least two development stages of a product, determining a first dimension value in the relationship model corresponding to each development stage, and based on the development stage to which the second version of the product belongs, calculating the expected evaluation value of the second version according to the relationship model to which the corresponding first dimension value belongs;
further, according to the product types of the products, second dimension values in the relation models corresponding to the product types are determined, and on the basis of the product types to which the second versions belong, the expected evaluation values of the second versions are calculated according to the relation models to which the corresponding second dimension values belong.
The invention does not limit the concrete formula content adopted by the relation model.
Step S303: acquiring an evaluation value of the second version; evaluating the performance of the second version of the product using a product evaluation model based on the evaluation value of the second version and the expected evaluation value.
Specifically, based on the calculation in step S302, obtaining an expected evaluation value of the second version, and further obtaining an evaluation value of the second version after a period of use of the second version of the product; the description of the product evaluation model is consistent with step S103, and will not be repeated here.
As shown in fig. 4, an embodiment of the present invention provides an apparatus 400 for evaluating a product, including: an information acquisition module 401, an expected value calculation module 402 and a version evaluation module 403; wherein the content of the first and second substances,
the information acquisition module 401 is configured to acquire an evaluation value of a first version of a product, and acquire project information of a second version of the product formed based on the first version;
the expected value calculating module 402 is configured to calculate an expected evaluation value of the second version by using a relationship model between item information and the evaluation value based on the evaluation value of the first version and the item information of the second version;
the version evaluation module 403 is configured to obtain an evaluation value of the second version; evaluating the performance of the second version of the product using a product evaluation model based on the evaluation value of the second version and the expected evaluation value.
Optionally, the information collection module 401 includes the project information of the second version, which includes a product type of the product, a development stage of the product, and a development cost for developing the second version.
Optionally, the information collecting module 401 includes that the evaluation value is obtained by calculation based on any one or more of evaluation scores of the first version or the second version of the product by the user, data formed by evaluation text extraction and statistics, and user behavior data using the product.
Optionally, the expected value calculating module 402 is configured to calculate the expected evaluation value of the second version by using a relationship model between item information and evaluation value based on the evaluation value of the first version and the item information of the second version, and includes:
calculating the expected rating value for the second version using the relational model based on a development cost of the second version.
Optionally, the expected value calculating module 402 is configured to calculate the expected evaluation value of the second version by using a relationship model between item information and evaluation value based on the evaluation value of the first version and the item information of the second version, and further includes:
determining a first dimension value in the relationship model corresponding to each development stage according to at least two development stages of a product, and calculating the expected evaluation value of the second version according to the relationship model to which the corresponding first dimension value belongs based on the development stage to which the second version of the product belongs.
Optionally, the expected value calculating module 402 is configured to calculate the expected evaluation value of the second version by using a relationship model between item information and evaluation value based on the evaluation value of the first version and the item information of the second version, and further includes:
according to the product types of the products, second dimension values in the relation models corresponding to the product types are determined, and on the basis of the product types to which the second versions belong, the expected evaluation values of the second versions are calculated according to the relation models to which the corresponding second dimension values belong.
Optionally, the version evaluation module 403 is configured to obtain an evaluation value of the second version; evaluating the performance of the second version of the product using a product evaluation model based on the evaluation value of the second version and the expected evaluation value, comprising:
and calculating a comprehensive evaluation value of the second version by using a product evaluation model based on the evaluation value of the second version and the expected evaluation value, and evaluating the implementation condition of the second version of the product according to the comprehensive evaluation value.
An embodiment of the present invention further provides an electronic device for evaluating a product, including: one or more processors; the storage device is used for storing one or more programs, and when the one or more programs are executed by the one or more processors, the one or more processors are enabled to realize the method provided by any one of the above embodiments.
Embodiments of the present invention further provide a computer-readable medium, on which a computer program is stored, where the computer program, when executed by a processor, implements the method provided in any of the above embodiments.
Fig. 5 illustrates an exemplary system architecture 500 of an apparatus for evaluating a product or evaluating a product to which embodiments of the present invention may be applied.
As shown in fig. 5, the system architecture 500 may include terminal devices 501, 502, 503, a network 504, and a server 505. The network 504 serves to provide a medium for communication links between the terminal devices 501, 502, 503 and the server 505. Network 504 may include various connection types, such as wired, wireless communication links, or fiber optic cables, to name a few.
The user may use the terminal devices 501, 502, 503 to interact with a server 505 over a network 504 to receive or send messages or the like. The terminal devices 501, 502, 503 may have various client applications installed thereon, such as a web browser application, a search-type application, an instant messaging tool, a mailbox client, and the like.
The terminal devices 501, 502, 503 may be various electronic devices having a display screen and supporting web browsing, including but not limited to smart phones, tablet computers, laptop portable computers, desktop computers, and the like.
The server 505 may be a server that provides various services, such as a background server that supports product evaluation requests made by users using the terminal devices 501, 502, 503. The background server can perform data calculation, analysis and other processing on the received product evaluation request and feed back a processing result to the terminal equipment.
It should be noted that the method for evaluating a product provided by the embodiment of the present invention is generally executed by the server 505, and accordingly, the apparatus for evaluating a product is generally disposed in the server 505.
It should be understood that the number of terminal devices, networks, and servers in fig. 5 is merely illustrative. There may be any number of terminal devices, networks, and servers, as desired for implementation.
Referring now to FIG. 6, a block diagram of a computer system 600 suitable for use with a terminal device implementing an embodiment of the invention is shown. The terminal device shown in fig. 6 is only an example, and should not bring any limitation to the functions and the scope of use of the embodiments of the present invention.
As shown in fig. 6, the computer system 600 includes a Central Processing Unit (CPU)601 that can perform various appropriate actions and processes according to a program stored in a Read Only Memory (ROM)602 or a program loaded from a storage section 608 into a Random Access Memory (RAM) 603. In the RAM 603, various programs and data necessary for the operation of the system 600 are also stored. The CPU 601, ROM602, and RAM 603 are connected to each other via a bus 604. An input/output (I/O) interface 605 is also connected to bus 604.
The following components are connected to the I/O interface 605: an input portion 606 including a keyboard, a mouse, and the like; an output portion 607 including a display such as a Cathode Ray Tube (CRT), a Liquid Crystal Display (LCD), and the like, and a speaker; a storage section 608 including a hard disk and the like; and a communication section 609 including a network interface card such as a LAN card, a modem, or the like. The communication section 609 performs communication processing via a network such as the internet. The driver 610 is also connected to the I/O interface 605 as needed. A removable medium 611 such as a magnetic disk, an optical disk, a magneto-optical disk, a semiconductor memory, or the like is mounted on the drive 610 as necessary, so that a computer program read out therefrom is mounted in the storage section 608 as necessary.
In particular, according to the embodiments of the present disclosure, the processes described above with reference to the flowcharts may be implemented as computer software programs. For example, embodiments of the present disclosure include a computer program product comprising a computer program embodied on a computer readable medium, the computer program comprising program code for performing the method illustrated in the flow chart. In such an embodiment, the computer program may be downloaded and installed from a network through the communication section 609, and/or installed from the removable medium 611. The computer program performs the above-described functions defined in the system of the present invention when executed by the Central Processing Unit (CPU) 601.
It should be noted that the computer readable medium shown in the present invention can be a computer readable signal medium or a computer readable storage medium or any combination of the two. A computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any combination of the foregoing. More specific examples of the computer readable storage medium may include, but are not limited to: an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a Random Access Memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. In the present invention, a computer readable storage medium may be any tangible medium that can contain, or store a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. In the present invention, however, a computer readable signal medium may include a propagated data signal with computer readable program code embodied therein, for example, in baseband or as part of a carrier wave. Such a propagated data signal may take many forms, including, but not limited to, electro-magnetic, optical, or any suitable combination thereof. A computer readable signal medium may also be any computer readable medium that is not a computer readable storage medium and that can communicate, propagate, or transport a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. Program code embodied on a computer readable medium may be transmitted using any appropriate medium, including but not limited to: wireless, wire, fiber optic cable, RF, etc., or any suitable combination of the foregoing.
The flowchart and block diagrams in the figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of code, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). It should also be noted that, in some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems which perform the specified functions or acts, or combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
The modules and/or units described in the embodiments of the present invention may be implemented by software, and may also be implemented by hardware. The described modules and/or units may also be provided in a processor, and may be described as: a processor comprising: the device comprises an information acquisition module, an expected value calculation module and a version evaluation module. The names of these modules do not constitute a limitation to the module itself in some cases, and for example, the expected value calculation module may also be described as "a module that calculates an expected evaluation value of a second version of a product from an evaluation value of a first version of the product and project information of the second version".
As another aspect, the present invention also provides a computer-readable medium that may be contained in the apparatus described in the above embodiments; or may be separate and not incorporated into the device. The computer readable medium carries one or more programs which, when executed by a device, cause the device to comprise: acquiring an evaluation value of a first version of a product, and acquiring project information of a second version of the product formed on the basis of the first version; calculating an expected evaluation value of the second version by using a relation model of the item information and the evaluation value based on the evaluation value of the first version and the item information of the second version; acquiring an evaluation value of the second version; evaluating the performance of the second version of the product using a product evaluation model based on the evaluation value of the second version and the expected evaluation value.
According to the technical scheme of the embodiment of the invention, the expected evaluation value can be calculated through multiple dimensions, the product after the edition modification is comprehensively evaluated based on the expected evaluation value and the actual evaluation value, and the accuracy of evaluating the implementation effect of the edition modification project is improved compared with the simple comparison of the evaluation values before and after the edition modification of the product.
The above-described embodiments should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that various modifications, combinations, sub-combinations, and substitutions can occur, depending on design requirements and other factors. Any modification, equivalent replacement, and improvement made within the spirit and principle of the present invention should be included in the protection scope of the present invention.
It is to be understood that although the terms first, second, third, etc. may be used herein to describe various information, such information should not be limited to these terms. These terms are only used to distinguish one type of information from another. For example, a first version may also be referred to as a second version, and similarly, a second version may also be referred to as a first version, without departing from the scope of the present application.
Claims (10)
1. A method of evaluating a product, comprising:
acquiring an evaluation value of a first version of a product, and acquiring project information of a second version of the product formed on the basis of the first version;
calculating an expected evaluation value of the second version by using a relation model of the item information and the evaluation value based on the evaluation value of the first version and the item information of the second version;
acquiring an evaluation value of the second version; evaluating the performance of the second version of the product using a product evaluation model based on the evaluation value of the second version and the expected evaluation value.
2. The method of claim 1,
the project information of the second version includes a product type of the product, a development stage of the product, and a development cost for developing the second version.
3. The method of claim 1,
the evaluation value is obtained by calculation based on any one or more of evaluation scores of the first version or the second version of the product by the user, data formed by evaluation character extraction and statistics, and user behavior data of the product.
4. The method of claim 2,
calculating an expected evaluation value of the second version by using a relation model of the item information and the evaluation value based on the evaluation value of the first version and the item information of the second version, including:
calculating the expected rating value for the second version using the relational model based on a development cost of the second version.
5. The method of claim 4,
calculating an expected evaluation value of the second version by using a relational model of the item information and the evaluation value based on the evaluation value of the first version and the item information of the second version, further comprising:
determining a first dimension value in the relationship model corresponding to each development stage according to at least two development stages of a product, and calculating the expected evaluation value of the second version according to the relationship model to which the corresponding first dimension value belongs based on the development stage to which the second version of the product belongs.
6. The method of claim 5,
calculating an expected evaluation value of the second version by using a relational model of the item information and the evaluation value based on the evaluation value of the first version and the item information of the second version, further comprising:
according to the product types of the products, second dimension values in the relation models corresponding to the product types are determined, and on the basis of the product types to which the second versions belong, the expected evaluation values of the second versions are calculated according to the relation models to which the corresponding second dimension values belong.
7. The method of claim 1,
acquiring an evaluation value of the second version; evaluating the performance of the second version of the product using a product evaluation model based on the evaluation value of the second version and the expected evaluation value, comprising:
and calculating a comprehensive evaluation value of the second version by using a product evaluation model based on the evaluation value of the second version and the expected evaluation value, and evaluating the implementation condition of the second version of the product according to the comprehensive evaluation value.
8. An apparatus for evaluating a product, comprising: the system comprises an information acquisition module, an expected value calculation module and a version evaluation module; wherein the content of the first and second substances,
the information acquisition module is used for acquiring an evaluation value of a first version of a product and acquiring project information of a second version of the product formed on the basis of the first version;
the expected value calculating module is used for calculating the expected evaluation value of the second version by utilizing a relation model of the project information and the evaluation value based on the evaluation value of the first version and the project information of the second version;
the version evaluation module is used for acquiring an evaluation value of the second version; evaluating the performance of the second version of the product using a product evaluation model based on the evaluation value of the second version and the expected evaluation value.
9. An electronic device, comprising:
one or more processors;
a storage device for storing one or more programs,
when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to implement the method of any one of claims 1-7.
10. A computer-readable medium, on which a computer program is stored, which, when being executed by a processor, carries out the method according to any one of claims 1-7.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010113137.3A CN111292003A (en) | 2020-02-24 | 2020-02-24 | Method and device for evaluating product |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010113137.3A CN111292003A (en) | 2020-02-24 | 2020-02-24 | Method and device for evaluating product |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN111292003A true CN111292003A (en) | 2020-06-16 |
Family
ID=71031064
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010113137.3A Pending CN111292003A (en) | 2020-02-24 | 2020-02-24 | Method and device for evaluating product |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN111292003A (en) |
-
2020
- 2020-02-24 CN CN202010113137.3A patent/CN111292003A/en active Pending
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN109697522B (en) | Data prediction method and device | |
| CN109461023B (en) | Loss user retrieval method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN107767070B (en) | Method and device for information popularization | |
| CN110019367B (en) | Method and device for counting data characteristics | |
| US20200104340A1 (en) | A/b testing using quantile metrics | |
| CN110866040A (en) | User portrait generation method, device and system | |
| CN107426336B (en) | Method and device for adjusting push message opening rate | |
| CN115422924A (en) | Information matching method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN107291923B (en) | Information processing method and device | |
| CN113159453A (en) | Resource data prediction method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| CN110737691B (en) | Method and apparatus for processing access behavior data | |
| EP4116889A2 (en) | Method and apparatus of processing event data, electronic device, and medium | |
| CN111292003A (en) | Method and device for evaluating product | |
| CN115563310A (en) | Method, device, equipment and medium for determining key service node | |
| CN114925275A (en) | Product recommendation method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN114817297A (en) | Method and device for processing data | |
| CN114021642A (en) | Data processing method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN113934894A (en) | Data display method based on index tree and terminal equipment | |
| CN109669668B (en) | Method and device for realizing simulated transaction execution in system performance test | |
| CN113312559A (en) | Contribution information determining method and device and electronic equipment | |
| CN112685456A (en) | User access data processing method and device and computer system | |
| CN111178014A (en) | Method and device for processing business process | |
| CN112989276A (en) | Evaluation method and device of information push system | |
| CN104252411A (en) | System pressure analysis method and equipment | |
| CN113421129A (en) | Bidding determination method and device for advertisement delivery |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| TA01 | Transfer of patent application right | ||
| TA01 | Transfer of patent application right |
Effective date of registration: 20221010 Address after: 12 / F, 15 / F, 99 Yincheng Road, China (Shanghai) pilot Free Trade Zone, Pudong New Area, Shanghai, 200120 Applicant after: Jianxin Financial Science and Technology Co.,Ltd. Address before: 25 Financial Street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100033 Applicant before: CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK Corp. Applicant before: Jianxin Financial Science and Technology Co.,Ltd. |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20200616 |