CN111259018A

CN111259018A - Validation method, validation device, electronic equipment and storage medium

Info

Publication number: CN111259018A
Application number: CN202010017747.3A
Authority: CN
Inventors: 吴俊生; 宋立昊; 孙建丽
Original assignee: Beijing Baidu Netcom Science and Technology Co Ltd
Current assignee: Beijing Baidu Netcom Science and Technology Co Ltd
Priority date: 2020-01-08
Filing date: 2020-01-08
Publication date: 2020-06-09
Anticipated expiration: 2040-01-08
Also published as: CN111259018B

Abstract

The application discloses an effective verification method, an effective verification device, electronic equipment and a storage medium, and relates to the field of electronic map application. The specific implementation scheme is as follows: detecting and acquiring a checking state of the user generated content checking module for checking the information reported by the user; if the audit state is that the audit is passed, detecting and acquiring a first effectiveness state of information reported by a user in the point of interest service module; if the first effectiveness state is effective, respectively detecting and acquiring a second effectiveness state and a third effectiveness state of information reported by users in the retrieval service module and the base map service module; and feeding back the verification state of the information reported by the user to the terminal where the user is located according to at least one of the audit state, the first effectiveness state, the second effectiveness state and the third effectiveness state. The embodiment can accurately detect whether the information reported by the user takes effect or not, and can avoid the occurrence of frequent reporting when the user obtains inaccurate feedback, thereby effectively reducing the burden of the electronic map server.

Description

Validation method, validation device, electronic equipment and storage medium

Technical Field

The present application relates to the field of computer technologies, and in particular, to an electronic map application field, and in particular, to a validation method and apparatus, an electronic device, and a storage medium.

Background

In order to effectively maintain the electronic map application, a user can newly add a Point Of Interest (POI) which is not shown on the electronic map through a newly added Point function Of a report entry provided by the electronic map application, and can modify the POI shown on the electronic map through a Point error reporting function.

No matter whether the User reports the newly added POI information or reports the modification information of the existing POI, after the User reports the information, a User Generated Content (UGC) auditing module in the electronic map server can carry out naming standard auditing on the User reported information, and if the auditing is passed, the User is directly fed back to the User to be adopted. Therefore, the user thinks that the information reported by the user is adopted by the electronic map server and is updated in the electronic map.

However, in practical applications, after the UGC audit module audits, the subsequent POI information service module further audits the information reported by the user, and if the audit is not passed, the information reported by the user is not adopted, and the information reported by the user is not displayed in the electronic map, but the user does not perceive the process. And after receiving the adopted notice, the user searches the reported information in the electronic map, and finds that the reported information is not modified or newly added. The users can misunderstand that the system has problems, and if the reporting is unsuccessful, the users can continue to report frequently through the channel or other channels, especially multiple users report simultaneously, which causes unnecessary burden to the electronic map server.

Disclosure of Invention

In order to solve the technical problem, the present application provides an effective verification method, an effective verification device, an electronic device, and a storage medium, which are used to avoid frequent reporting by a user and reduce the burden of an electronic map server.

In one aspect, the present application provides a validation method, including:

detecting and acquiring a checking state of the user generated content checking module for checking the information reported by the user;

if the audit state is that the audit is passed, detecting and acquiring a first effectiveness state of the information reported by the user in the point of interest service module;

if the first effectiveness state is effective, respectively detecting and acquiring a second effectiveness state and a third effectiveness state of information reported by the user in a retrieval service module and a base map service module;

and feeding back the verification state of the information reported by the user to the terminal where the user is located according to at least one of the audit state, the first effectiveness state, the second effectiveness state and the third effectiveness state.

Further optionally, in the method described above, the information reported by the user includes: the method comprises the steps of obtaining geographic coordinates of points of interest, names, addresses and states of the points of interest, wherein the states comprise addition, modification or deletion.

Further optionally, in the method as described above, the method further includes:

according to at least one of the audit state, the first effectiveness state, the second effectiveness state and the third effectiveness state, feeding back a verification state of information reported by the user to a terminal where the user is located, wherein the verification state comprises:

if the audit state is that the audit is not passed, feeding back that the information reported by the user is not adopted to the terminal where the user is located;

if the first effectiveness state is invalid, feeding back that the information reported by the user is not adopted to a terminal where the user is located;

if at least one of the second effect state and the third effect state is an invalid state, feeding back that the information reported by the user is not adopted to a terminal where the user is located; or

And if the second effect state and the third effect state are both effective states, feeding back the information reported by the user to the terminal where the user is located as accepted.

Further optionally, in the method as described above, detecting and acquiring a first effectiveness state of information reported by the user in the point of interest service module includes:

sending a first detection request carrying the information reported by the user to the point of interest service module, so that the point of interest service module detects whether the information reported by the user is updated in a point of interest information base, and generates a first detection result; receiving a first detection result returned by the interest point service module; determining the first efficacy status according to the first detection result;

or sending a first information request carrying the interest point name to the interest point service module; receiving a first retrieval result of the interest point service module for performing information retrieval in the interest point information base based on the interest point name; and generating the first effectiveness state according to the first retrieval result and the information reported by the user.

Further optionally, in the method, detecting and acquiring the second efficacy status of the information reported by the user in the search service module includes:

sending a second detection request carrying the information reported by the user to the retrieval service module so that the retrieval service module can detect whether the information reported by the user is updated in a corresponding retrieval database and generate a second detection result; receiving a second detection result returned by the retrieval service module; determining a second effect state according to the second detection result;

or sending a second information request carrying the interest point name to the retrieval service module; receiving a second retrieval result of the retrieval service module for performing information retrieval in the retrieval database based on the interest point name; and generating the second effectiveness state according to the second retrieval result and the information reported by the user.

Further optionally, in the method, detecting and acquiring a third efficacy status of the information reported by the user in the base map service module includes:

sending the information reported by the user to the base map service module so that the base map service module can detect whether the information reported by the user is updated in a corresponding base map database or not and generate a third detection result; receiving a third detection result returned by the base map service module; determining the third efficacy state according to the third detection result;

or sending a third information request carrying the interest point name to the base map service module; receiving a third retrieval result of the base map service module for performing information retrieval in the base map database based on the interest point name; and generating the third efficacy state according to the third retrieval result and the information reported by the user.

Further optionally, in the method described above, if the audit state is after the audit is passed, before detecting and acquiring a first effectiveness state of the information reported by the user in the point of interest service module, the method further includes:

obtaining the information reported by the user from the user generated content auditing module, and forwarding the information to the interest point service module;

or sending a first forwarding indication message to the user generated content auditing module to indicate the user generated content auditing module to forward the information reported by the user to the point of interest service module after the auditing state of the information reported by the user is approved.

Further optionally, in the method described above, before detecting and acquiring the second efficacy status and the third efficacy status of the information reported by the user in the retrieval service module and the base map service module, respectively, if the first efficacy status is valid, the method further includes:

respectively sending the information reported by the user to the retrieval service module and the base map service module so that the retrieval service module can update the retrieval database based on the information reported by the user, and the base map service module can update the base map database based on the information reported by the user;

or sending a second forwarding indication message to the point of interest service module to indicate that the point of interest service module sends the information reported by the user to the retrieval service module and the base map service module respectively after the first effectiveness state is effective, so that the retrieval service module updates the retrieval database based on the information reported by the user, and the base map service module updates the base map database based on the information reported by the user.

In another aspect, the present application further provides an validation apparatus, including:

the first detection module is used for detecting and acquiring the auditing state of the information which is generated by the user and reported by the content auditing module;

the second detection module is used for detecting and acquiring a first effectiveness state of the information reported by the user in the point of interest service module if the audit state is that the audit is passed; (ii) a

A third detection module, configured to detect and obtain, if the first effectiveness state is valid, a second effectiveness state and a third effectiveness state of information reported by the user in the retrieval service module and the base map service module, respectively; (ii) a

And the sending module is used for feeding back the verification state of the information reported by the user to the terminal where the user is located according to at least one of the audit state, the first effectiveness state, the second effectiveness state and the third effectiveness state.

In another aspect, the present application further provides an electronic device, including:

at least one processor; and

a memory communicatively coupled to the at least one processor; wherein the content of the first and second substances,

the memory stores instructions executable by the at least one processor to enable the at least one processor to perform a method as any one of above.

In yet another aspect, the present application also provides a non-transitory computer readable storage medium having stored thereon computer instructions for causing the computer to perform the method of any of the above.

One embodiment in the above application has the following advantages or benefits: checking whether the information reported by the user passes through the UGC checking module or not; if the information passes the detection result, further detecting whether the information reported by the user in the POI service module is effective; if the information reported by the user is effective, further detecting whether the information reported by the retrieval service module and the base map service module is effective; if the information is valid, feeding back the information reported by the user to the terminal where the user is located, wherein the information is adopted; otherwise, the terminal where the user is located is fed back that the reported information of the user is not adopted. According to the technical scheme, the defects of the prior art can be overcome, whether the information reported by the user takes effect or not is accurately detected on the server side of the electronic map, the situation that the user mistakenly considers to take effect due to UGC auditing in the prior art is avoided, but the situation that the user does not actually take effect occurs, the user can be prevented from frequently reporting, and therefore the burden of the electronic map server can be reduced.

Furthermore, the application also discloses two implementation manners for detecting whether the information reported by the user in the POI service module is valid, which can respectively verify whether the information reported by the user is valid at the valid verification device side or the POI service module side, and can accurately detect whether the information reported by the user in the POI service module is valid, so as to ensure the accuracy of whether the reported information fed back to the user subsequently is adopted.

Furthermore, the application also discloses two implementation manners for detecting whether the information reported by the user in the retrieval service module is effective, which can be respectively realized on the effective verification device side or the retrieval service module side to verify whether the information reported by the user is effective, so that whether the information reported by the user in the retrieval service module is effective can be accurately detected, and the accuracy of whether the reported information fed back to the user subsequently is adopted or not is ensured.

Furthermore, the application also discloses two implementation manners for detecting whether the information reported by the user in the base map service module is effective, which can be respectively implemented on the effective verification device side or the base map service module side to verify whether the information reported by the user is effective, and can accurately detect whether the information reported by the user in the base map service module is effective, so as to ensure the accuracy of whether the reported information fed back to the user subsequently is adopted.

Other effects of the above-described alternative will be described below with reference to specific embodiments.

Drawings

The drawings are included to provide a better understanding of the present solution and are not intended to limit the present application. Wherein:

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram according to a first embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram according to a second embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 3 is a diagram of an application framework for the validation method of the embodiment shown in FIG. 2;

FIG. 4 is a schematic illustration according to a third embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 5 is a diagram of an application framework for the validation method of the embodiment shown in FIG. 4;

FIG. 6 is a schematic illustration according to a fourth embodiment of the present application;

fig. 7 is a block diagram of an electronic device for implementing the validation method of the embodiment of the present application.

Detailed Description

The following description of the exemplary embodiments of the present application, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, includes various details of the embodiments of the application for the understanding of the same, which are to be considered exemplary only. Accordingly, those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that various changes and modifications of the embodiments described herein can be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the present application. Also, descriptions of well-known functions and constructions are omitted in the following description for clarity and conciseness.

Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram according to a first embodiment of the present application. As shown in fig. 1, the validation method of this embodiment may specifically include the following steps:

s101, detecting and acquiring an audit state of an UGC audit module for auditing information reported by a user;

the execution subject of the validation method of this embodiment is a validation device, which may be an independent electronic entity or may also be software-integrated, and the validation device may be specifically set on a server side of an electronic map, and may verify whether information reported by a user is valid in the electronic map.

Specifically, in this embodiment, the validation device may detect that the UGC audit module audits the information reported by the user, and obtain a corresponding audit state. The audit state may include two states, audit pass and audit fail.

S102, if the audit state is that the audit is passed, detecting and acquiring a first effectiveness state of information reported by a user in the POI service module;

specifically, the step is used for detecting whether the information reported by the user in the POI service module is effective or not, and acquiring a corresponding first effectiveness state. Similarly, the first state of efficacy may include both an effective state and an ineffective state. The step is executed on the premise that the UGC auditing module executes the information reported by the user after the information auditing is passed.

S103, if the first effectiveness state is effective, respectively detecting and acquiring a second effectiveness state and a third effectiveness state of information reported by users in the retrieval service module and the base map service module;

specifically, the step is used for detecting whether the information reported by the user in the retrieval service module is effective or not, and acquiring a corresponding second effectiveness state. And meanwhile, the system is also used for detecting whether the information reported by the user in the base map service module is effective or not and acquiring a corresponding third effect state. Similarly, the second and third efficacy states may also include both active and inactive states. The precondition for executing the step is that the information reported by the user in the POI service module is detected to be valid, namely the first effectiveness state is executed after being valid.

In practical applications, numbers may be used to identify the audit state, the first effectiveness state, the second effectiveness state, and the third effectiveness state, for example, a number 1 may be used to respectively indicate a state that the audit passes, a state that the first effectiveness state is valid, a state that the second effectiveness state is valid, and a state that the third effectiveness state is valid; the number 0 indicates a state in which the audit is failed, a state in which the first efficacy state is invalid, a state in which the second efficacy state is invalid, and a state in which the third efficacy state is invalid, respectively. In this embodiment, there is a case where the execution of step S102 and/or S103 is not required, for example, when the audit status is that the audit is not passed, so there may be no value of the first efficacy status, the second efficacy status, and/or the third efficacy status at this time. It is noted that the first, second or third efficacy state does not have a value, and the state being invalid is different. For example, a state that is invalid may be identified by a number 0, while an absence of a value is identified by a "null" or "-" or other symbol, indicating that the corresponding efficacy state has not been achieved.

And S104, feeding back the verification state of the information reported by the user to the terminal where the user is located according to at least one of the audit state, the first effectiveness state, the second effectiveness state and the third effectiveness state.

For example, this step may include the following:

1. if the audit state is that the audit is not passed, feeding back that the information reported by the user is not adopted to the terminal where the user is located;

in this case, if the audit state is that the audit is not passed, the steps S102 and S103 are not executed, but the step S104 is directly executed, and the information that the user reported is not adopted is fed back to the user according to the audit state that the audit is not passed.

2. If the first effectiveness state is invalid, feeding back that the information reported by the user is not adopted to the terminal where the user is located;

in this case, after steps S101 and S102 are executed, the audit state is that the audit is passed, the first effectiveness state is invalid, step S103 is not executed, and step S104 is directly executed, and the user is fed back that the information reported by the user is not adopted according to the invalid first effectiveness state.

3. If at least one of the second effect state and the third effect state is an invalid state, feeding back that the information reported by the user is not adopted to the terminal where the user is located; or

In this case, steps S101-S104 are performed, with the audit state being a pass, the first efficacy state being a valid, and at least one of the second efficacy state and the third efficacy state being an invalid state. Specifically, according to the invalid second effect state and/or third effect state, the information reported by the user is fed back to the terminal where the user is located as unadopted.

4. And if the second effect state and the third effect state are both effective states, feeding back the information reported by the user as adopted to the terminal where the user is located.

In the same case 3, steps S101 to S104 are all executed, the audit state is that the audit is passed, the first effectiveness state, the second effectiveness state, and the third effectiveness state are all valid, and all the identifications are valid. At this time, specifically, according to the effective second and third efficacy states, the information reported by the user is fed back to the terminal where the user is located as being adopted.

Specifically, in this embodiment, the validation of whether the information reported by the user is validated by the validation system is based on the premise that the UGC audit module has passed the validation of the information reported by the user. And if the information reported by the user really takes effect in the electronic map, the POI service module of the electronic map is required to be capable of supporting the information reported by the user, searching in the searching service module, and recording and taking effect in the map service module. Based on this, in the validation process of this embodiment, it is required to detect whether the information reported by the user in the POI service module is valid, and detect whether the information reported by the user in the search service module and the base map service module is valid. If the information reported by the user is valid, the information is adopted in the electronic map and is valid; otherwise, as long as one of the information is not valid, the information reported by the user is not adopted in the electronic map and is not valid.

In this embodiment, the information reported by the user may include: the geographical coordinates of the POI, the name, address and status of the POI, which may include new, modified or deleted. Further, other information such as the time point reported by the user may also be included.

For example, in an application scenario, a user finds that a POI is newly opened at a certain position in life, but finds that the POI is not identified in an electronic map, and at this time, the user can report newly-added POI information through a reporting entry of the newly-added POI of the electronic map. For example, the user may manually select the location of the newly added POI in the electronic map, input the name and address of the POI, input the new POI in the status, and click to upload. The position of the newly added POI manually selected by the user can be obtained from the electronic map, and the geographic coordinates of the position, such as longitude and latitude coordinates, are uploaded when the user clicks to upload. Correspondingly, the UGC auditing module of the electronic map receives the information uploaded by the user. Where the POI name may be the actual name of the POI store. The address of the POI is the address of the POI in physical space, such as an address of X route X number of X city, province X, etc.

For another example, in another application scenario, if a user finds that a POI at a certain location is changed in life, for example, the POI is changed to a POI with another name, or the POI needs to be deleted when the user moves, at this time, the user may open the original POI information at the location in the electronic map by clicking, and then upload the modified POI information in the POI information display interface by modifying the POI entry. For example, if the user modifies the name of a POI, the modified name of the POI may be input, the status may be set to be modified, and the user may click to upload the modified name of the POI and the geographic coordinate of the POI selected by the user together with the address of the POI. If the user deletes the name of a certain POI, the state of the POI needs to be set as deleted, and the geographical coordinate of the POI selected by the user, the name of the POI and the address of the POI are uploaded together.

In this embodiment, the auditing of the information reported by the user by the UGC auditing module includes auditing the name and address normative of the POI. If the POI is a chain store, the name of the chain store is named whether to be normal, such as kentucky (X-way store), and the following location information must be in parentheses. The address information must be detailed enough to include the X city Y zone Z way M number, etc. For example, if a new POI is added, the UGC audit module needs to audit whether the new POI point falls on the road, so as to avoid shaking hands of the user, the point is a point on the road, and no POI is available on the road, so the UGC audit module needs to perform the audit, and if the geographic position reported by the user is detected to fall on the road, the audit is not passed, and the user can report again. In practical application, the UGC auditing module may also adopt other strategies to audit the information reported by the user, which is not described in detail herein.

In this embodiment, after receiving the information reported by the user, the POI service module needs to perform fusion processing on the information reported by the user, but it is also necessary to rely on the result of the fusion processing of the information reported by the user by the POI service module if the information reported by the user is effective in the POI service module. For example, the process of fusing the information reported by the user by the POI service module includes: if the POI is newly added, the POI service module detects whether other POI information exists in the POI address according to the POI database, if not, the POI address is allowed to be added, the information of the newly added POI is added in the POI database, and meanwhile, the time for updating the POI is increased; if so, the report of the user is not adopted, and the information of the POI corresponding to the POI address in the POI database is not updated at the moment.

The method for fusing the information reported by the user by the POI service module further includes the step that the POI service module detects whether the POI at the geographic location reported by the user is confidential and is not allowed to be displayed on a map. Specifically, although such a POI is not displayed in the electronic map, there is a record in the POI database, and specifically, a name that does not allow the POI information to be displayed in the electronic map may also be recorded in the POI attribute information, at this time, the POI database is not updated with the information reported by the user, that is, the information reported by the user cannot be adopted.

In addition, although the names of some POIs in the electronic map are seen and modified in real life by the user, such as the names of POIs of high-level VIPs in hospitals, universities, government offices and the like, the names of the POIs which can limit the VIPs in the POI database cannot be modified in a reporting mode through the user. At this time, the POI service module may determine whether the POI is allowed to be modified according to the attribute information of the POI corresponding to the geographic location in the POI database. If not, the POI database is not updated by adopting the information reported by the user, namely, the information reported by the user cannot be adopted.

If the POI service module detects that the name of the POI allows to modify the POI, whether the score of the POI in the information reported by the user is larger than the score of the recorded POI in the POI database can be further judged, if so, the POI database can be updated by adopting the information reported by the user, namely, the POI reported by the user is adopted, otherwise, the POI reported by the user is not adopted.

And scoring the POI can be realized based on the POI reported by different channels. For example, the channels may include user reporting channels, data mining channels, third party data service reporting, and the like. The scoring rules may be preset, for example, the highest scoring of the data mining channel, the lowest scoring of the third-party data service provider reporting channel, and the lowest scoring of the user reporting channel may be set.

Based on the above, if the POI service module adopts the POI reported by the user, that is, the POI database is updated with the information reported by the user, the information reported by the user in the POI service module may be considered to be valid, otherwise, if the POI service module does not adopt the POI reported by the user, the information reported by the user in the POI service module may be considered to be invalid.

The above embodiments are some processing manners of the fusion processing of the information reported by the user by the service module, and in practical applications, the embodiments may also include others, which are not described in detail herein for example.

In this embodiment, if the information reported by the user in the POI service module is valid, it indicates that the information reported by the user is adopted in the POI database, and in order to further update the information reported by the user in the electronic map synchronously, the information reported by the user needs to be valid in the retrieval service module and the base map service module. For example, the information of the corresponding POI is updated in the search database based on the information reported by the user, so that the information reported by the user can be subsequently searched. And secondly, the information reported by the user can be enabled to take effect in the map service module. However, in practical applications, since the display scale of the electronic map is limited, the display space in the electronic map is limited, and whether the bottom map displays the POI or not is affected by many conditions, and not all POIs that can be retrieved can be displayed. However, even the POI information that is not shown can be found in the base map database, so in this embodiment, it can be determined whether the information reported by the user is valid in the base map service module based on the information in the base map database.

In the validation method of the embodiment, whether the examination of the information reported by the user by the UGC examination module passes or not is detected; if the information passes the detection result, further detecting whether the information reported by the user in the POI service module is effective; if the information reported by the user is effective, further detecting whether the information reported by the retrieval service module and the base map service module is effective; if the information is valid, feeding back the information reported by the user to the terminal where the user is located, wherein the information is adopted; otherwise, the terminal where the user is located is fed back that the reported information of the user is not adopted. The technical scheme of the embodiment can overcome the defects of the prior art, accurately detects whether the information reported by the user is effective or not on the server side of the electronic map, avoids the situation that the user mistakenly considers the information to be effective but does not really take effect due to only UGC (UGC) auditing in the prior art, can avoid frequent reporting of the user, and reduces the burden of the electronic map server.

Moreover, by adopting the technical scheme of the embodiment, the final adoption or the adoption of the feedback to the user is the final accurate feedback, and the feedback is not adopted but not substantially adopted like the prior art, so that the technical scheme of the embodiment can also improve the trust degree of the user and enhance the viscosity of the user to the electronic map.

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram according to a second embodiment of the present application; the validation verification method of the embodiment further describes the technical solution of the present invention in more detail based on the technical solution of the embodiment shown in fig. 1. As shown in fig. 2, the validation method of this embodiment may specifically include the following steps:

s201, the validation device detects whether the UGC auditing module passes the auditing of the information reported by the user; if so, executing step S202, otherwise, executing step S214;

optionally, when the step is executed, the verifying device may detect whether the UGC auditing module passes the auditing of the information reported by the user, and obtain a corresponding auditing state; and further detecting whether the audit state is passed.

S202, the validation verification device sends a first forwarding indication message to the UGC auditing module to indicate the UGC auditing module to forward the information reported by the user to the POI service module after the information reported by the user is approved;

s203, the validation device sends a second forwarding indication message to the POI service module to indicate that after the information reported by the user is approved, the second forwarding indication message respectively sends the information reported by the user to the retrieval service module and the base map service module so that the retrieval service module updates the retrieval database based on the information reported by the user, and the base map service module updates the base map database based on the information reported by the user;

before step S203, the validation apparatus may determine that the POI service module passes the verification of the information reported by the user, and then send the second forwarding instruction message to the POI service module, or may send the second forwarding instruction message first when it is not determined that the POI service module passes the verification of the information reported by the user.

In step S203, the POI service module passes the verification of the information reported by the user, that is, the POI service module is verified, and it is determined that the information reported by the user needs to be updated in the POI database.

Fig. 3 is a diagram of an application framework of the validation method of the embodiment shown in fig. 2. As shown in fig. 3, in the validation method of this embodiment, in the processing process from upstream to downstream of the UGC audit module, the POI service module, the retrieval service module, and the base map service module, after the UGC audit module passes the audit of the information reported by the user, the information reported by the user is sent to the POI service module, and after the information reported by the user is passed by the POI service module, the information reported by the user is sent to the retrieval service module and the base map service module, respectively.

In this embodiment, the validation device controls the UGC audit module and the POI service module to forward the user reported information, and if the validation device sends the first forwarding indication message to the UGC audit module, the validation device sends the second forwarding indication message to the POI service module. In practical application, the forwarding rule may also be preset. The forwarding rules are directly set in the UGC audit module and the POI service module without the validation means for control, i.e., without steps S202 and S203.

S204, the validation device acquires the information reported by the user and sends a first detection request carrying the information reported by the user to the POI service module, so that the POI service module can detect whether the information reported by the user is updated in the POI information base;

for example, the validation verification apparatus may obtain information reported by the user from the UGC audit module.

S205, the validation device receives a first detection result returned by the POI service module;

s206, determining whether the information reported by the user in the POI service module is effective or not according to the first detection result; if the result is valid, execute step S207; otherwise, executing step S214;

optionally, when the step is executed, a first efficacy state may also be generated according to the first detection result; further detecting whether the first effectiveness state is effective, and if so, identifying that the information reported by the user in the POI service module is effective; otherwise, if the first effectiveness state is invalid, the information reported by the user in the POI service module is identified not to be effective.

The steps S204 to S206 are processes for detecting whether the information reported by the user in the POI service module is valid.

For example, in this embodiment, if it is identified in the first detection result that the information reported by the user is updated in the POI information base, it indicates that the information reported by the user in the POI service module is valid. And if the information reported by the user is identified in the first detection result not to be updated in the POI information base, the information reported by the user in the POI service module is not effective.

S207, the validation device sends a second detection request carrying the information reported by the user to the retrieval service module so that the retrieval service module can detect whether the information reported by the user is updated in a corresponding retrieval database;

s208, the validation device receives a second detection result returned by the retrieval service module;

s209, the validation device determines whether the information reported by the user in the retrieval service module is valid according to the second detection result; if the result is valid, go to step S210; otherwise, executing step S214;

similarly, optionally, when the step is executed, a second efficacy state may also be generated according to the two detection results; further detecting whether the second effectiveness state is effective, if so, identifying that the information reported by the user in the retrieval service module is effective; otherwise, if the first effectiveness state is invalid, the information reported by the user in the identification retrieval service module is not valid.

The above steps S207 to S209 are processes of detecting whether the information reported by the user in the search service module is valid.

For example, in this embodiment, if it is identified in the second detection result that the information reported by the user is updated in the search database, it indicates that the information reported by the user in the search service module is effective. And if the second detection result indicates that the information reported by the user is not updated in the retrieval database, the information reported by the user in the retrieval service module is not effective.

S210, the validation device sends the information reported by the user to the base map service module so that the base map service module can detect whether the information reported by the user is updated in a corresponding base map database;

s211, the validation device receives a third detection result returned by the base map service module;

s212, the validation device determines whether the information reported by the user in the base map service module is valid according to the third detection result; if yes, go to step S213; otherwise, executing step S214;

similarly, optionally, when the step is executed, a third efficacy state may also be generated according to the three detection results; further detecting whether the third effect state is effective, and if so, identifying that the information reported by the user in the base map service module is effective; otherwise, if the first effectiveness state is invalid, the information reported by the base map service module user is identified not to be effective.

And S213, the validation device sends the information reported by the adoption user to the terminal corresponding to the user, and the operation is finished.

And S214, the validation device sends the information reported by the unadopted user to the terminal corresponding to the user, and the operation is finished.

The above steps S210 to S212 are processes for detecting whether the information reported by the user in the base map service module is valid.

In practice, steps S207-S209 and steps S210-S212 may be interchanged.

For example, in this embodiment, if it is identified in the third detection result that the information reported by the user is updated in the base map database, it indicates that the information reported by the user in the base map service module is effective. And if the third detection result indicates that the information reported by the user is not updated in the base map database, the information reported by the user in the base map service module is not effective.

By adopting the above scheme, the validation method of the embodiment can overcome the defects of the prior art, accurately detect whether the information reported by the user is valid on the server side of the electronic map, avoid the situation that the user is mistaken to be valid only by UGC audit in the prior art but is not really valid in practice, avoid frequent report by the user, and reduce the burden of the electronic map server.

FIG. 4 is a schematic illustration according to a third embodiment of the present application; the validation verification method of the embodiment further describes the technical solution of the present invention in more detail based on the technical solution of the embodiment shown in fig. 1. As shown in fig. 4, the validation method of this embodiment may specifically include the following steps:

s401, the validation device detects whether the UGC auditing module passes the auditing of the information reported by the user; if yes, executing step S402, otherwise executing step S414;

optionally, referring to the explanation of step S201 in the embodiment shown in fig. 2, when the step is executed, the verifying device may also detect whether the UGC auditing module passes the auditing of the information reported by the user, and obtain the corresponding auditing status; and further detecting whether the audit state is passed.

S402, the validation device acquires information reported by the user from the UGC auditing module and forwards the information to the POI service module so that the POI service module can audit whether the information reported by the user meets the updating requirement;

s403, if the validation device determines that the POI service module verifies that the information reported by the user meets the updating requirement, the information reported by the user is respectively sent to the retrieval service module and the base map service module, so that the retrieval service module updates the retrieval database based on the information reported by the user, and the base map service module updates the base map database based on the information reported by the user;

different from the embodiment shown in fig. 2, in this embodiment, forwarding of information reported by a user is controlled by an effective verification device.

Fig. 5 is a diagram of an application framework of the validation verification method of the embodiment shown in fig. 4. As shown in fig. 5, in the validation method of this embodiment, the UGC audit module, the POI service module, the retrieval service module, and the base map service module are all controlled by the validation device in the process from upstream to downstream, and if the UGC audit module passes the audit of the information reported by the user, the validation device first obtains the information reported by the user, and then sends the information reported by the user to the POI service module. And after the verification device for effectiveness determines that the information reported by the user audited by the POI service module meets the updating requirement, the verification device respectively sends the information reported by the user to the retrieval service module and the base map service module.

S404, the validation device sends a first information request carrying the name of the POI to the POI service module;

s405, the validation device receives a first retrieval result of the POI service module for information retrieval in the POI information base based on the POI name;

s406, the validation device determines whether the information reported by the user in the POI service module is valid according to the first retrieval result and the information reported by the user, and if the information reported by the user is valid, the step S407 is executed; otherwise, go to step S414;

optionally, when the step is executed, a first effectiveness state may also be generated according to the first detection result and information reported by the user, and whether the first effectiveness state is valid or invalid is further detected, where valid indicates that the information reported by the user in the POI service module is valid, and invalid indicates that the information reported by the user in the POI service module is not valid.

The steps S404 to S406 are processes for detecting whether the information reported by the user in the POI service module is valid.

For example, in this embodiment, if the first search result is completely consistent with the information reported by the user, it indicates that the information reported by the user is updated in the POI information base, that is, the information reported by the user in the POI service module is valid, and correspondingly, the first validity state is valid. And if the first retrieval result is not completely consistent with the information reported by the user, the information reported by the user is not updated in the POI information base, namely the information reported by the user in the POI service module is not valid, and correspondingly, the first effectiveness state is invalid.

S407, the validation device sends a second information request carrying the POI name to the retrieval service module;

s408, the validation device receives a second retrieval result of the retrieval service module for information retrieval in the retrieval database based on the POI name;

s409, the validation device determines whether the information reported by the user in the retrieval service module is valid according to the second retrieval result and the information reported by the user, and if the information reported by the user is valid, the step S410 is executed; otherwise, go to step S414; optionally, when the step is executed, a second efficacy state may also be generated according to the second detection result and information reported by the user, and it is further detected whether the second efficacy state is valid or invalid, where valid indicates that the information reported by the user in the search service module is valid, and invalid indicates that the information reported by the user in the search service module is not valid.

The steps S407 to S409 are processes of detecting whether the information reported by the user in the search service module is valid.

For example, in this embodiment, if the second search result is completely consistent with the information reported by the user, it indicates that the information reported by the user is updated in the search database of the search service module, that is, the information reported by the user in the search service module is valid, and correspondingly, the second validity state is valid. And if the second retrieval result is not completely consistent with the information reported by the user, the information reported by the user is not updated in the retrieval database of the retrieval service module, namely the second effectiveness state is invalid when the information reported by the user in the retrieval service module is not effective correspondingly.

S410, the validation device sends a third information request carrying the POI name to the base map service module;

s411, the validation device receives a third retrieval result of the base map service module for information retrieval in the base map database based on the POI name;

s412, the validation device determines whether the information reported by the user in the base map service module is valid according to the third retrieval result and the information reported by the user, if so, the step S413 is executed, otherwise, the step S414 is executed;

optionally, when the step is executed, a third efficacy state may also be generated according to the third detection result and information reported by the user, and it is further detected whether the third efficacy state is valid or invalid, where valid indicates that the information reported by the user in the base map service module is valid, and invalid indicates that the information reported by the user in the base map service module is not valid.

The above steps S410-S412 are processes for detecting whether the information reported by the user in the base map service module is valid.

For example, in this embodiment, if the third search result is completely consistent with the information reported by the user, it indicates that the information reported by the user is updated in the base map database of the base map service module, that is, the information reported by the user in the base map service module is valid, and correspondingly, the third validity state is valid. And if the third retrieval result is not completely consistent with the information reported by the user, the information reported by the user is not updated in the base map database of the base map service module, that is, the information reported by the user in the base map service module is not valid, and correspondingly, the third validity state is invalid.

In practical applications, steps S407-S409 and steps S410-S412 may be interchanged.

And S413, the validation device sends the information reported by the adoption user to the terminal corresponding to the user, and the operation is finished.

And S414, the validation device sends the information reported by the unadopted user to the terminal corresponding to the user, and the operation is finished.

Fig. 6 is a schematic diagram according to a fourth embodiment of the present application. As shown in fig. 6, the validation verification apparatus 600 of the present embodiment includes:

the first detection module 601 is configured to detect and obtain an audit state in which the user generated content audit module audits information reported by a user;

a second detecting module 602, configured to detect and obtain that a first effectiveness state of information reported by a user in the point of interest service module passes if the audit state is that the audit passes, and further detect whether the information reported by the user in the point of interest service module is effective;

a third detecting module 603, configured to detect and obtain a second efficacy state and a third efficacy state of information reported by the user in the retrieval service module and the base map service module, respectively, if the first efficacy state is valid;

a sending module 604, configured to feed back, to a terminal where a user is located, a verification state of information reported by the user according to at least one of the audit state, the first efficacy state, the second efficacy state, and the third efficacy state.

For example, in this embodiment, the information reported by the user includes: the geographical coordinates of the points of interest, the names, addresses and states of the points of interest, and the states include addition, modification or deletion.

Further optionally, in the validation apparatus 600 of this embodiment, the sending module 604 is specifically configured to:

if the first effectiveness state is invalid, feeding back that the information reported by the user is not adopted to the terminal where the user is located;

if at least one of the second effect state and the third effect state is an invalid state, feeding back that the information reported by the user is not adopted to the terminal where the user is located; or

And if the second effect state and the third effect state are both effective states, feeding back the information reported by the user as adopted to the terminal where the user is located.

Further optionally, in the validation verification apparatus 600 of this embodiment, the second detection module 602 is configured to:

sending a first detection request carrying information reported by a user to an interest point service module so that the interest point service module can detect whether the information reported by the user is updated in an interest point information base and generate a first detection result; receiving a first detection result returned by the interest point service module; determining the first efficacy state according to the first detection result;

or sending a first information request carrying the name of the point of interest to the point of interest service module; receiving a first retrieval result of information retrieval in an interest point information base by an interest point service module based on an interest point name; and generating a first effectiveness state according to the first retrieval result and the information reported by the user.

Further optionally, in the validation verification apparatus 600 of this embodiment, the third detecting module 603 is configured to:

or sending a second information request carrying the name of the point of interest to the retrieval service module; receiving a second retrieval result of the retrieval service module for performing information retrieval in the retrieval database based on the interest point name; and generating a second effectiveness state according to the second retrieval result and the information reported by the user.

sending the information reported by the user to the base map service module so that the base map service module can detect whether the information reported by the user is updated in a corresponding base map database or not and generate a third detection result; receiving a third detection result returned by the base map service module; determining a third effect state according to a third detection result;

or sending a third information request carrying the name of the point of interest to the base map service module; receiving a third retrieval result of the base map service module for performing information retrieval in the base map database based on the interest point name; and generating a third efficacy state according to the third retrieval result and the information reported by the user.

Further optionally, in the validation verification apparatus 600 of this embodiment, the sending module 604 is further configured to:

the method comprises the steps that information reported by a user is obtained from a user generated content auditing module and is forwarded to an interest point service module, so that the interest point service module can audit whether the information reported by the user meets the updating requirement;

the information reported by the user is respectively sent to the retrieval service module and the base map service module, so that the retrieval service module updates the retrieval database based on the information reported by the user, and the base map service module updates the base map database based on the information reported by the user;

In the validation verification apparatus 600 of this embodiment, the implementation principle and the technical effect of the validation verification implemented by using the above modules are the same as the implementation of the related method embodiment, and the details of the related method embodiment may be referred to and are not repeated herein.

According to an embodiment of the present application, an electronic device and a readable storage medium are also provided.

Fig. 7 is a block diagram of an electronic device implementing a validation method according to an embodiment of the present application. Electronic devices are intended to represent various forms of digital computers, such as laptops, desktops, workstations, personal digital assistants, servers, blade servers, mainframes, and other appropriate computers. The electronic device may also represent various forms of mobile devices, such as personal digital processing, cellular phones, smart phones, wearable devices, and other similar computing devices. The components shown herein, their connections and relationships, and their functions, are meant to be examples only, and are not meant to limit implementations of the present application that are described and/or claimed herein.

As shown in fig. 7, the electronic apparatus includes: one or more processors 701, a memory 702, and interfaces for connecting the various components, including a high-speed interface and a low-speed interface. The various components are interconnected using different buses and may be mounted on a common motherboard or in other manners as desired. The processor may process instructions for execution within the electronic device, including instructions stored in or on the memory to display graphical information of a GUI on an external input/output apparatus (such as a display device coupled to the interface). In other embodiments, multiple processors and/or multiple buses may be used, along with multiple memories and multiple memories, as desired. Also, multiple electronic devices may be connected, with each device providing portions of the necessary operations (e.g., as a server array, a group of blade servers, or a multi-processor system). In fig. 7, one processor 701 is taken as an example.

The memory 702 is a non-transitory computer readable storage medium as provided herein. Wherein the memory stores instructions executable by at least one processor to cause the at least one processor to perform the validation method provided herein. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of the present application stores computer instructions for causing a computer to perform the validation method provided herein.

The memory 702, which is a non-transitory computer readable storage medium, may be used to store non-transitory software programs, non-transitory computer executable programs, and modules, such as program instructions/modules (e.g., related modules shown in fig. 6) corresponding to the validation verification method in the embodiments of the present application. The processor 701 executes various functional applications of the server and data processing by running non-transitory software programs, instructions, and modules stored in the memory 702, that is, implements the validation verification method in the above-described method embodiments.

The memory 702 may include a storage program area and a storage data area, wherein the storage program area may store an operating system, an application program required for at least one function; the storage data area may store data created by use of the electronic device implementing the validation verification method, and the like. Further, the memory 702 may include high speed random access memory, and may also include non-transitory memory, such as at least one magnetic disk storage device, flash memory device, or other non-transitory solid state storage device. In some embodiments, memory 702 may optionally include memory located remotely from processor 701, and such remote memory may be connected over a network to an electronic device implementing the validation verification method. Examples of such networks include, but are not limited to, the internet, intranets, local area networks, mobile communication networks, and combinations thereof.

The electronic device implementing the validation method may further include: an input device 703 and an output device 704. The processor 701, the memory 702, the input device 703 and the output device 704 may be connected by a bus or other means, and fig. 7 illustrates an example of a connection by a bus.

The input device 703 may receive input numeric or character information and generate key signal inputs related to user settings and function controls of the electronic apparatus implementing the validation method, such as an input device such as a touch screen, a keypad, a mouse, a track pad, a touch pad, a pointer stick, one or more mouse buttons, a track ball, a joystick, or the like. The output devices 704 may include a display device, auxiliary lighting devices (e.g., LEDs), and tactile feedback devices (e.g., vibrating motors), among others. The display device may include, but is not limited to, a Liquid Crystal Display (LCD), a Light Emitting Diode (LED) display, and a plasma display. In some implementations, the display device can be a touch screen.

Various implementations of the systems and techniques described here can be realized in digital electronic circuitry, integrated circuitry, application specific ASICs (application specific integrated circuits), computer hardware, firmware, software, and/or combinations thereof. These various embodiments may include: implemented in one or more computer programs that are executable and/or interpretable on a programmable system including at least one programmable processor, which may be special or general purpose, receiving data and instructions from, and transmitting data and instructions to, a storage system, at least one input device, and at least one output device.

These computer programs (also known as programs, software applications, or code) include machine instructions for a programmable processor, and may be implemented using high-level procedural and/or object-oriented programming languages, and/or assembly/machine languages. As used herein, the terms "machine-readable medium" and "computer-readable medium" refer to any computer program product, apparatus, and/or device (e.g., magnetic discs, optical disks, memory, Programmable Logic Devices (PLDs)) used to provide machine instructions and/or data to a programmable processor, including a machine-readable medium that receives machine instructions as a machine-readable signal. The term "machine-readable signal" refers to any signal used to provide machine instructions and/or data to a programmable processor.

To provide for interaction with a user, the systems and techniques described here can be implemented on a computer having: a display device (e.g., a CRT (cathode ray tube) or LCD (liquid crystal display) monitor) for displaying information to a user; and a keyboard and a pointing device (e.g., a mouse or a trackball) by which a user can provide input to the computer. Other kinds of devices may also be used to provide for interaction with a user; for example, feedback provided to the user can be any form of sensory feedback (e.g., visual feedback, auditory feedback, or tactile feedback); and input from the user may be received in any form, including acoustic, speech, or tactile input.

The systems and techniques described here can be implemented in a computing system that includes a back-end component (e.g., as a data server), or that includes a middleware component (e.g., an application server), or that includes a front-end component (e.g., a user computer having a graphical user interface or a web browser through which a user can interact with an implementation of the systems and techniques described here), or any combination of such back-end, middleware, or front-end components. The components of the system can be interconnected by any form or medium of digital data communication (e.g., a communication network). Examples of communication networks include: local Area Networks (LANs), Wide Area Networks (WANs), and the Internet.

The computer system may include clients and servers. A client and server are generally remote from each other and typically interact through a communication network. The relationship of client and server arises by virtue of computer programs running on the respective computers and having a client-server relationship to each other.

According to the technical scheme of the embodiment of the application, whether the UGC auditing module passes the auditing of the information reported by the user is detected; if the information passes the detection result, further detecting whether the information reported by the user in the POI service module is effective; if the information reported by the user is effective, further detecting whether the information reported by the retrieval service module and the base map service module is effective; if the information is valid, feeding back the information reported by the user to the terminal where the user is located, wherein the information is adopted; otherwise, the terminal where the user is located is fed back that the reported information of the user is not adopted. According to the technical scheme, the defects of the prior art can be overcome, whether the information reported by the user takes effect or not is accurately detected on the server side of the electronic map, the situation that the user mistakenly considers to take effect due to UGC auditing in the prior art is avoided, but the situation that the user does not actually take effect occurs, frequent reporting of the user can be avoided, and the burden of the electronic map server is reduced.

Furthermore, according to the technical scheme of the embodiment of the application, two implementation manners for detecting whether the information reported by the user in the POI service module is valid are also disclosed, the verification of whether the information reported by the user is valid can be realized on the valid verification device side or the POI service module side respectively, and the verification of whether the information reported by the user in the POI service module is valid can be accurately detected, so that the accuracy of whether the reported information fed back to the user subsequently is adopted or not is ensured.

Furthermore, according to the technical scheme of the embodiment of the application, two implementation manners for detecting whether the information reported by the user in the retrieval service module is valid are also disclosed, the verification of whether the information reported by the user is valid can be realized on the validation device side or the retrieval service module side respectively, and the verification of whether the information reported by the user in the retrieval service module is valid can be accurately detected, so that the accuracy of whether the reported information fed back to the user subsequently is adopted or not is ensured.

Furthermore, according to the technical scheme of the embodiment of the application, two implementation manners for detecting whether the information reported by the user in the base map service module is effective are also disclosed, the verification of whether the information reported by the user is effective can be realized on the effective verification device side or the base map service module side respectively, and the verification of whether the information reported by the user in the base map service module is effective can be accurately detected, so that the accuracy of whether the reported information fed back to the user is adopted or not in the follow-up process is ensured.

It should be understood that various forms of the flows shown above may be used, with steps reordered, added, or deleted. For example, the steps described in the present application may be executed in parallel, sequentially, or in different orders, as long as the desired results of the technical solutions disclosed in the present application can be achieved, and the present invention is not limited herein.

The above-described embodiments should not be construed as limiting the scope of the present application. It should be understood by those skilled in the art that various modifications, combinations, sub-combinations and substitutions may be made in accordance with design requirements and other factors. Any modification, equivalent replacement, and improvement made within the spirit and principle of the present application shall be included in the protection scope of the present application.

Claims

1. A validation method, comprising:

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the information reported by the user comprises: the method comprises the steps of obtaining geographic coordinates of points of interest, names, addresses and states of the points of interest, wherein the states comprise addition, modification or deletion.

3. The method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the feeding back, to the terminal where the user is located, the verification status of the information reported by the user according to at least one of the audit status, the first effectiveness status, the second effectiveness status, and the third effectiveness status includes:

4. The method of claim 2, wherein detecting and obtaining a first validity status of information reported by the user in the point of interest service module comprises:

sending a first detection request carrying the information reported by the user to the point of interest service module, so that the point of interest service module detects whether the information reported by the user is updated in a point of interest information base, and generates a first detection result; receiving the first detection result returned by the point of interest service module; determining the first efficacy status according to the first detection result;

5. The method of claim 2, wherein detecting and obtaining the second efficacy status of the information reported by the user in the search service module comprises:

sending a second detection request carrying the information reported by the user to the retrieval service module so that the retrieval service module can detect whether the information reported by the user is updated in a corresponding retrieval database and generate a second detection result; receiving the second detection result returned by the retrieval service module; determining the second effect state according to the second detection result;

6. The method of claim 2, wherein detecting and obtaining a third efficacy status of information reported by the user in a base map service module comprises:

7. The method of claim 1, wherein if the audit status is after the audit is passed and before detecting and obtaining the first validity status of the information reported by the user in the point of interest service module, the method further comprises:

8. The method of claim 7, wherein before detecting and obtaining the second efficacy status and the third efficacy status of the information reported by the user in the search service module and the base map service module, respectively, if the first efficacy status is valid, the method further comprises:

9. An validation apparatus, the apparatus comprising:

the second detection module is used for detecting and acquiring a first effectiveness state of the information reported by the user in the point of interest service module if the audit state is that the audit is passed; a third detection module, configured to detect and obtain, if the first effectiveness state is valid, a second effectiveness state and a third effectiveness state of information reported by the user in the retrieval service module and the base map service module, respectively;

10. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein the information reported by the user comprises: the method comprises the steps of obtaining geographic coordinates of points of interest, names, addresses and states of the points of interest, wherein the states comprise addition, modification or deletion.

11. The apparatus of claim 9 or 10, wherein the sending module is configured to:

12. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein the second detection module is configured to:

13. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein the third detection module is configured to:

14. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein the third detection module is configured to:

15. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein the sending module is further configured to:

16. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the sending module is further configured to:

17. An electronic device, comprising:

at least one processor; and

the memory stores instructions executable by the at least one processor to enable the at least one processor to perform the method of any one of claims 1-8.

18. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium having stored thereon computer instructions for causing the computer to perform the method of any one of claims 1-8.