Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a method for detecting impurities in a parecoxib sodium synthesis process, which can realize the detection of various parecoxib sodium synthesis process impurities by adopting one method.
In order to realize the purpose, the specific technical scheme of the method for detecting impurities in the parecoxib sodium synthesis process is as follows:
the method for detecting impurities in parecoxib sodium synthesis process comprises the following steps:
1) dissolving a parecoxib sodium sample to be detected to obtain a solution to be detected;
2) and (4) carrying out high performance liquid chromatography analysis on the solution to be detected to obtain the content of the impurities in the synthesis process.
The analysis conditions of the high performance liquid chromatography are as follows: a chromatographic column: octadecylsilane chemically bonded silica chromatographic column; mobile phase A: 0.01mol/L disodium hydrogen phosphate solution with pH of 2.5-3.5, and a mobile phase B: the volume ratio is 75-85: 15-25 of acetonitrile-methanol mixed solution; the elution gradient program included: 0min, 60-70 vol% of mobile phase A, and 78-30 vol% of mobile phase B40; 30min, 23-27 vol% of mobile phase A and 77-73 vol% of mobile phase B; 41min, mobile phase A60-70 vol%, and mobile phase B40-30 vol%.
The parecoxib sodium synthesis process impurities are process impurities generated in the parecoxib sodium synthesis process.
In the step 2), performing high performance liquid chromatography analysis to obtain the content of the impurities in the synthesis process comprises the following specific steps: and performing high performance liquid chromatography analysis on the solution to be detected to obtain retention time and chromatographic peak of the synthetic process impurities, comparing the retention time with the synthetic process impurity standard substance to obtain chromatographic peak corresponding to each synthetic process impurity, substituting the peak area into the standard working curve of the corresponding synthetic process impurity, and calculating to obtain the content of the synthetic process impurities.
The parecoxib sodium sample to be detected comprises parecoxib sodium raw material medicines, preparation products and synthesized crude products.
Regarding the sample pretreatment in the step 1), dissolving a parecoxib sodium sample to be detected by using a solvent to obtain a solution to be detected, wherein the used solvent can dissolve impurities of a synthesis process to be detected. Preferably, an acetonitrile-water mixed solution can be used as the solvent, and the volume ratio of acetonitrile to water in the acetonitrile-water mixed solution is preferably 40: 60. In addition, in order to improve the detection accuracy and facilitate quantitative calculation, the parecoxib sodium sample to be detected is contained in an amount of 0.5mg per 1mL of the solution to be detected.
Furthermore, the detection method aims at the impurities of the synthesis process, which are found and summarized by combining the synthesis process of the parecoxib sodium through theoretical analysis and actual detection and need to be researched in the quality research of parecoxib sodium bulk drugs or related products. The impurities of the parecoxib sodium synthesis process can be divided into synthesis reaction raw materials and synthesis reaction byproducts, wherein the synthesis reaction byproducts comprise intermediates, isomers, polymers, over-sulfonylation products and unconventional reaction products. The impurities in the parecoxib sodium synthesis process provided by the invention include, but are not limited to, the compounds shown in table 1:
Table 1 parecoxib sodium synthesis process impurity structure, impurity type and brief description
The technical scheme of the invention adopts double mobile phases, wherein the mobile phase A adopts a disodium hydrogen phosphate solution with the pH of 2.5-3.5 and 0.01mol/L, and the mobile phase B adopts a solution with the volume ratio of 75-85: 15-25 of acetonitrile-methanol mixed solution, and an octadecylsilane chemically bonded silica chromatographic column is adopted, and gradient elution under specific conditions is matched, so that simultaneous detection of 10 synthetic process impurities in a parecoxib sodium sample to be detected can be realized on the basis of parecoxib sodium detection. When the method is used specifically, the 10 synthesis process impurities can be detected simultaneously by adopting the method, one or part of the synthesis process impurities can be detected, and the method can be used according to actual detection requirements when being used specifically.
The method for detecting the impurities in the parecoxib sodium synthesis process, provided by the invention, can be used for accurately separating and detecting various impurities in the parecoxib sodium synthesis process in a to-be-detected sample by applying the same analysis method, and is wide in coverage range. Particularly, the detection method can realize effective separation of 4 excessive sulfonylation derived impurities PRX-E, PRX-K, PRX-Q, PRX-U, and can detect the raw materials of the synthesis reaction simultaneously. In the synthesis process of parecoxib sodium, a large amount of sulfonylation reagents are required to be used for reaction, so that disubstituted sulfonylation impurities are likely to be generated, and due to similar chemical structures (such as PRX-E and PRX-Q are isomers, and PRX-K and PRX-U are isomers), the simultaneous separation of multiple excessive sulfonylation impurities is necessary for accurately judging and controlling the types of the impurities. The invention further realizes the separation and detection of other process impurities such as reaction raw materials, reaction intermediates and the like and the excessive sulfonylation impurities while realizing the purpose of the separation and detection of the excessive sulfonylation impurities, and has better technical advantages.
As a further optimized scheme, the detection method provided by the invention is adopted to simultaneously detect 4 excessive sulfonylation products.
As a further optimized scheme, the detection method provided by the invention is adopted to simultaneously detect 4 excessive sulfonylation products and synthesis reaction raw materials.
As a further optimized scheme, the detection method provided by the invention is adopted to simultaneously detect the 10 synthesis process impurities.
In the detection method, a mobile phase A adopts a disodium hydrogen phosphate solution with the pH of 2.5-3.5 and 0.01mol/L, and the pH of the disodium hydrogen phosphate solution is adjusted to 2.5-3.5 by using phosphoric acid. Preferably, the pH of the disodium hydrogen phosphate solution is 3.
Preferably, the volume ratio of the acetonitrile-methanol mixed solution is acetonitrile: methanol 80: 20.
the flow rate of the mobile phase adopted during the high performance liquid chromatography analysis is 0.8-1.2 mL/min, and the preferred flow rate is 1.0 mL/min. The detector adopted by the high performance liquid chromatography is an ultraviolet detector, and the detection wavelength is 215 nm.
The specification of the octadecylsilane chemically bonded silica chromatographic column is 4.6mm x 250mm, and the particle size of the filler is 5 mu m; in particular, selected columns are commercially available, column types include YMC-Pack ODS-AQ (4.6 x 250mm, 5 μm), Welch Ultimate XB-C18(4.6 x 250mm, 5 μm) and the like, and selection of different columns does not preclude the practice of the methods provided herein. The column temperature of the chromatographic column during high performance liquid chromatography is 25-35 ℃, and more preferably 30 ℃.
The detection method has the advantages of good separation effect, high sensitivity and high accuracy. The quantitative limit of impurities in each synthesis process is 0.10-0.30 ng and is lower than 0.01% of the concentration of a test sample; the detection limit of impurities in each synthesis process is 0.05-0.15 ng and is lower than 0.005% of the concentration of a test sample; meanwhile, in the concentration range of 0.01-5.0 mug/mL, the linearity of each impurity concentration and peak area is good, and the correlation coefficient is larger than 0.999; the sample adding recovery rate of 9 samples with the concentration of 3 samples in high, medium and low is measured, the sample adding recovery rate is within the range of 90-110%, the RSD of a measurement result is less than 5%, and the precision and the accuracy are good; in addition, the method has better durability by inspecting the impurity detection capability and separation capability under the conditions of changing the flow rate, the column temperature, the mobile phase proportion, replacing chromatographic columns and chromatographs of different manufacturers and the like without obvious change under each condition.
When the method is used for detecting parecoxib sodium raw material medicine, preparation products or crude synthetic products, the impurity content of the synthetic process in parecoxib sodium samples is detected, so that the production process and the product quality of parecoxib sodium can be effectively evaluated and controlled, the accurate quality control of parecoxib sodium is realized, and the perfect safety evaluation and quality controllability evaluation of medicines are guaranteed.
Detailed Description
The invention is further described with reference to the following specific embodiments and the accompanying drawings. In the following examples, the purity of each synthetic process impurity standard was: PRX-A (purity 99.93%), PRX-B (purity 99.07%), PRX-C (purity 92.95%), PRX-E (purity 98.10%), PRX-F (purity 99.30%), PRX-I (purity 99.50%), PRX-K (purity 99.50%), PRX-N (purity 99.70%), PRX-Q (purity 97.40%), PRX-U (purity 99.30%).
In the following examples, the content of impurities in the parecoxib sodium synthesis process in the sample is measured by an external standard method, namely a standard curve method. The preparation of the standard working solution comprises the preparation of a single standard stock solution of impurities in the synthesis process and the preparation of a series of standard working solutions, and the standard working solution is prepared into a grade 7 standard working solution as shown in Table 2.
TABLE 2 concentration of the series of standard working solutions (. mu.g/mL)
Impurities
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
PRX-A
|
0.030
|
0.254
|
0.508
|
0.762
|
1.016
|
2.539
|
5.079
|
PRX-B
|
0.015
|
0.258
|
0.516
|
0.774
|
1.032
|
2.580
|
5.160
|
PRX-C
|
0.019
|
0.234
|
0.467
|
0.701
|
0.935
|
2.337
|
4.674
|
PRX-E
|
0.010
|
0.245
|
0.490
|
0.735
|
0.981
|
2.451
|
4.903
|
PRX-F
|
0.014
|
0.234
|
0.468
|
0.702
|
0.936
|
2.340
|
4.679
|
PRX-I
|
0.015
|
0.248
|
0.496
|
0.744
|
0.992
|
2.481
|
4.961
|
PRX-K
|
0.016
|
0.262
|
0.524
|
0.786
|
1.048
|
2.621
|
5.242
|
PRX-N
|
0.014
|
0.237
|
0.474
|
0.711
|
0.948
|
2.369
|
4.739
|
PRX-Q
|
0.010
|
0.240
|
0.480
|
0.720
|
0.960
|
2.401
|
4.801
|
PRX-U
|
0.010
|
0.247
|
0.493
|
0.740
|
0.986
|
2.466
|
4.932 |
And (3) carrying out high performance liquid chromatography analysis on the series of standard working solutions, and carrying out regression analysis on the concentration of the target substance according to the chromatographic peak area of the target substance to obtain a regression equation of a standard curve. And substituting the high performance liquid chromatography analysis result of the solution to be detected into the standard curve in the subsequent determination, and calculating to obtain the content of the target object in the solution to be detected.
Example 1
The method for detecting impurities in the parecoxib sodium synthesis process adopts the following steps:
(1) taking a proper amount of parecoxib sodium sample to be detected, precisely weighing, adding acetonitrile-water (40:60, v/v) for dissolving, and quantitatively diluting to prepare a solution containing 0.5mg of parecoxib sodium sample to be detected in every 1mL, wherein the solution is used as a solution to be detected;
(2) and (3) injecting 10 mu L of solution to be detected into a liquid chromatograph, recording a chromatogram, and calculating the content of impurities in each process according to a standard curve method.
The chromatographic conditions for liquid phase detection are as follows: a chromatographic column: YMC-Pack ODS-AQ (4.6X 250mm, 5 μm); mobile phase A: 0.01mol/L disodium hydrogen phosphate solution (pH adjusted to 3.0 with phosphoric acid); mobile phase B: acetonitrile-methanol (75:25, v/v); detection wavelength: 215 nm; column temperature: 30 ℃; flow rate: 0.8 mL/min; sample introduction volume: 10 μ L. The elution procedure is shown in the following table 3, wherein 0-41 min is the elution gradient of impurities in the synthesis process, and 41-55 min is isocratic elution increased for keeping the cleanliness of the chromatographic column.
Table 3 example 1 elution procedure
In order to effectively illustrate the separation effect of example 1, a proper amount of parecoxib sodium (PRX), PRX-A, PRX-B, PRX-C, PRX-E, PRX-F, PRX-I, PRX-K, PRX-N, PRX-Q, PRX-U standard substance is respectively taken, acetonitrile-water (40:60, v/v) is added to dissolve and dilute the solution to prepare a solution containing 0.5mg of parecoxib sodium and 2.5 mug of impurities in each 1mL, and the solution is used as a test solution. A sample solution (10. mu.L) was taken and injected into a liquid chromatograph, and the measurement was carried out under the liquid chromatography conditions of example 1, and a chromatogram was recorded. The chromatogram of the test sample of example 1 is shown in FIG. 1, and the experimental data are shown in Table 4.
Table 4 statistical data table for example 1
Attribution
|
Retention time
|
Area of
|
Degree of separation
|
Tailing factor
|
Number of theoretical plate
|
PRX-C
|
8.778
|
78080
|
--
|
1.127
|
26041
|
PRX-E
|
10.060
|
41886
|
5.723
|
1.084
|
30469
|
PRX-Q
|
10.542
|
18645
|
2.099
|
1.058
|
33953
|
PRX-B
|
19.479
|
46084
|
36.217
|
1.045
|
86675
|
PRX-U
|
20.524
|
37074
|
3.944
|
1.007
|
95813
|
PRX-I
|
21.463
|
37354
|
3.559
|
1.035
|
106722
|
PRX-K
|
22.060
|
30115
|
2.260
|
1.031
|
110311
|
PRX-N
|
22.529
|
46095
|
1.757
|
1.026
|
113376
|
PRX
|
25.550
|
23243036
|
11.013
|
1.043
|
132189
|
PRX-F
|
28.573
|
74851
|
10.512
|
0.995
|
151191
|
PRX-A
|
38.693
|
28756
|
33.112
|
1.002
|
237832 |
Example 2
The method for detecting impurities in the parecoxib sodium synthesis process provided by the embodiment adopts the following steps:
(1) taking a proper amount of parecoxib sodium sample to be detected, precisely weighing, adding acetonitrile-water (40:60, v/v) for dissolving, and quantitatively diluting to prepare a solution containing 0.5mg of parecoxib sodium sample to be detected in every 1mL, wherein the solution is used as a solution to be detected;
(2) and (3) injecting 10 mu L of solution to be detected into a liquid chromatograph, recording a chromatogram, and calculating the content of impurities in each process according to a standard curve method.
The chromatographic conditions for liquid phase detection are as follows: a chromatographic column: welch Ultimate XB-C18 (4.6X 250mm, 5 μm); mobile phase A: 0.01mol/L disodium hydrogen phosphate solution (pH adjusted to 3.2 with phosphoric acid); mobile phase B: acetonitrile-methanol (80:20, v/v); detection wavelength: 215 nm; column temperature: 25 ℃; flow rate: 1.0 mL/min; sample introduction volume: 10 μ L. The elution procedure is shown in the following table 5, wherein 0-41 min is the elution gradient of impurities in the synthesis process, and 41-55 min is isocratic elution increased for keeping the cleanliness of the chromatographic column.
Table 5 example 2 elution procedure
In order to effectively illustrate the separation effect of example 2, a proper amount of parecoxib sodium (PRX), PRX-A, PRX-B, PRX-C, PRX-E, PRX-F, PRX-I, PRX-K, PRX-N, PRX-Q, PRX-U standard substance is respectively taken, acetonitrile-water (40:60, v/v) is added to dissolve and dilute the solution to prepare a solution containing 0.5mg of parecoxib sodium and 2.5 mug of impurities in each 1mL, and the solution is used as a test solution. A sample solution (10. mu.L) was taken and injected into a liquid chromatograph, and the measurement was carried out under the liquid chromatography conditions of example 2, and a chromatogram was recorded. The chromatogram of the test sample of example 2 is shown in FIG. 2, and the experimental data are shown in Table 6.
Table 6 statistical data table for example 2
Attribution
|
Retention time
|
Area of
|
Degree of separation
|
Tailing factor
|
Number of theoretical plate
|
PRX-C
|
8.870
|
13871
|
--
|
--
|
20770
|
PRX-E
|
10.074
|
32581
|
4.797
|
1.009
|
24833
|
PRX-Q
|
10.558
|
35616
|
1.881
|
1.006
|
26516
|
PRX-B
|
19.505
|
27920
|
31.522
|
0.989
|
64024
|
PRX-U
|
20.495
|
30156
|
3.240
|
0.983
|
73518
|
PRX-I
|
21.435
|
29309
|
3.127
|
0.984
|
82247
|
PRX-K
|
22.030
|
22947
|
1.967
|
0.991
|
82750
|
PRX-N
|
22.525
|
37590
|
1.603
|
0.986
|
83861
|
PRX
|
25.523
|
20410945
|
9.445
|
0.999
|
99501
|
PRX-F
|
28.833
|
22798
|
10.479
|
0.982
|
140196
|
PRX-A
|
38.687
|
27151
|
28.857
|
0.985
|
170319 |
Example 3
The method for detecting impurities in the parecoxib sodium synthesis process provided by the embodiment adopts the following steps:
(1) taking a proper amount of parecoxib sodium sample to be detected, precisely weighing, adding acetonitrile-water (40:60, v/v) for dissolving, and quantitatively diluting to prepare a solution containing 0.5mg of parecoxib sodium sample to be detected in every 1mL, wherein the solution is used as a solution to be detected;
(2) and (3) injecting 10 mu L of solution to be detected into a liquid chromatograph, recording a chromatogram, and calculating the content of impurities in each process according to a standard curve method.
The chromatographic conditions for liquid phase detection are as follows: a chromatographic column: YMC-Pack ODS-AQ (4.6X 250mm, 5 μm); mobile phase A: 0.01mol/L disodium hydrogen phosphate solution (pH adjusted to 2.8 with phosphoric acid); mobile phase B: acetonitrile-methanol (85:15, v/v); detection wavelength: 215 nm; column temperature: 35 ℃; flow rate: 1.2 mL/min; sample introduction volume: 10 μ L. The elution procedure is shown in Table 7 below, wherein 0-41 min is the elution gradient of impurities in the synthesis process, and 41-55 min is the isocratic elution increased for maintaining the cleanliness of the chromatographic column.
Table 7 example 3 elution procedure
In order to effectively illustrate the separation effect of example 3, a proper amount of parecoxib sodium (PRX), PRX-A, PRX-B, PRX-C, PRX-E, PRX-F, PRX-I, PRX-K, PRX-N, PRX-Q, PRX-U standard substance is respectively taken, and acetonitrile-water (40:60, v/v) is added to dissolve and dilute the solution to prepare a solution containing 0.5mg of parecoxib sodium and 2.5 mug of impurities in each 1mL, and the solution is used as a test solution. A sample solution (10. mu.L) was taken and injected into a liquid chromatograph, and the measurement was carried out under the liquid chromatography conditions of example 3, and a chromatogram was recorded. The chromatogram of the test sample of example 3 is shown in FIG. 3, and the experimental data are shown in Table 8.
Table 8 statistical table of data of example 3
Attribution
|
Retention time
|
Area of
|
Degree of separation
|
Tailing factor
|
Number of theoretical plate
|
PRX-C
|
8.833
|
13543
|
--
|
--
|
21798
|
PRX-E
|
10.072
|
32363
|
5.074
|
1.016
|
26193
|
PRX-Q
|
10.556
|
35331
|
1.930
|
1.011
|
27946
|
PRX-B
|
19.507
|
27641
|
32.479
|
0.992
|
68284
|
PRX-U
|
20.496
|
29969
|
3.342
|
0.988
|
78299
|
PRX-I
|
21.438
|
29025
|
3.231
|
0.984
|
87089
|
PRX-K
|
22.036
|
22764
|
2.030
|
0.992
|
87400
|
PRX-N
|
22.534
|
37290
|
1.660
|
0.990
|
89354
|
PRX
|
25.527
|
20224773
|
9.737
|
1.001
|
106249
|
PRX-F
|
28.751
|
22807
|
10.539
|
0.983
|
148350
|
PRX-A
|
38.694
|
26997
|
30.001
|
0.993
|
180508 |
Example 4
The method for detecting impurities in the parecoxib sodium synthesis process provided by the embodiment adopts the following steps:
(1) taking a proper amount of parecoxib sodium sample to be detected, precisely weighing, adding acetonitrile-water (40:60, v/v) for dissolving, and quantitatively diluting to prepare a solution containing 0.5mg of parecoxib sodium sample to be detected in every 1mL, wherein the solution is used as a solution to be detected;
(2) and (3) injecting 10 mu L of solution to be detected into a liquid chromatograph, recording a chromatogram, and calculating the content of impurities in each process according to a standard curve method.
The chromatographic conditions for liquid phase detection are as follows: a chromatographic column: YMC-Pack ODS-AQ (4.6X 250mm, 5 μm); mobile phase A: 0.01mol/L disodium hydrogen phosphate solution (pH adjusted to 3.0 with phosphoric acid); mobile phase B: acetonitrile-methanol (80:20, v/v); detection wavelength: 215 nm; column temperature: 30 ℃; flow rate: 1.0 mL/min; sample introduction volume: 10 μ L. The elution procedure is shown in Table 9 below, wherein 0-41 min is the elution gradient of impurities in the synthesis process, and 41-55 min is the isocratic elution increased for maintaining the cleanliness of the chromatographic column.
Table 9 example 4 elution procedure
To effectively illustrate the separation effect of example 4, a proper amount of parecoxib sodium (PRX), PRX-A, PRX-B, PRX-C, PRX-E, PRX-F, PRX-I, PRX-K, PRX-N, PRX-Q, PRX-U standard substance is respectively taken, and acetonitrile-water (40:60, v/v) is added to dissolve and dilute the solution to prepare a solution containing 0.5mg of parecoxib sodium and 2.5 mug of impurities in each 1mL, and the solution is used as a test solution. A sample solution (10. mu.L) was taken and injected into a liquid chromatograph, and the measurement was carried out under the liquid chromatography conditions of example 4, and a chromatogram was recorded. The chromatogram of the test sample of example 4 is shown in FIG. 4, and the experimental data are shown in Table 10.
Table 10 statistical table of data of example 4
Attribution
|
Retention time
|
Area of
|
Degree of separation
|
Tailing factor
|
Number of theoretical plate
|
PRX-C
|
8.752
|
13359
|
--
|
--
|
22969
|
PRX-E
|
10.060
|
32092
|
5.551
|
1.028
|
28036
|
PRX-Q
|
10.545
|
34922
|
2.010
|
1.025
|
30217
|
PRX-B
|
19.486
|
27391
|
33.984
|
1.003
|
75564
|
PRX-U
|
20.473
|
29350
|
3.511
|
0.991
|
86301
|
PRX-I
|
21.414
|
28918
|
3.389
|
0.993
|
95844
|
PRX-K
|
22.010
|
22694
|
2.127
|
0.998
|
96341
|
PRX-N
|
22.516
|
37065
|
1.771
|
0.997
|
98588
|
PRX
|
25.510
|
20024094
|
10.224
|
1.010
|
116444
|
PRX-F
|
28.600
|
22674
|
10.616
|
0.998
|
163336
|
PRX-A
|
38.706
|
26577
|
32.101
|
0.993
|
199609 |
Comparative example 1
The method is characterized in that the following conditions are selected to detect and separate impurities by referring to a detection method disclosed in a parecoxib sodium imported drug registration standard (JX20110120) for injection, and the operation steps are as follows:
(1) taking a proper amount of parecoxib sodium (PRX) and PRX-A, PRX-B, PRX-C, PRX-E, PRX-F, PRX-I, PRX-K, PRX-N, PRX-Q, PRX-U standard products respectively, adding acetonitrile-water (40:60, v/v) to dissolve and dilute the standard products to prepare solutions containing 0.5mg of parecoxib sodium and 2.5 mu g of impurities respectively in each 1mL of standard products, and taking the solutions as test solution.
(2) And (4) injecting the test solution into a liquid chromatograph, and recording the chromatogram.
The liquid chromatography conditions were: a chromatographic column: YMC-Pack ODS-AQ (4.6X 150mm, 5 μm); mobile phase A: 0.01mol/L disodium hydrogen phosphate solution (pH adjusted to 3.0 with phosphoric acid); mobile phase B: acetonitrile; detection wavelength: 215 nm; column temperature: 30 ℃; flow rate: 1.0 mL/min; sample introduction volume: 20 μ L. Elution procedure is as in table 11:
table 11 comparative example elution procedure
Time/minute
|
Mobile phase A (%)
|
Mobile phase B (%)
|
0.01
|
60
|
40
|
7.00
|
60
|
40
|
55.00
|
20
|
80
|
56.00
|
60
|
40
|
65.00
|
60
|
40 |
The chromatogram of the solution to be tested in the comparative example is shown in FIG. 5, and the experimental data are shown in Table 12.
TABLE 12 statistics of comparative examples
Attribution
|
Retention time 1
|
Positioning time 2
|
Area of
|
Degree of separation
|
Tailing factor
|
Number of theoretical plate
|
PRX-C
|
2.979
|
2.943
|
141253
|
--
|
1.453
|
4948
|
PRX-E
|
4.230
|
4.221
|
126355
|
6.837
|
--
|
7410
|
PRX-Q
|
4.478
|
4.479
|
77015
|
1.227
|
--
|
7396
|
PRX-B
|
10.416
|
10.334
|
403227
|
16.338
|
0.931
|
6452
|
PRX-U
|
11.053
|
11.001
|
154348
|
1.414
|
--
|
13390
|
PRX-I
|
12.255
|
12.405
|
108885
|
2.803
|
--
|
10632
|
PRX-K
|
12.554
|
12.044
|
90784
|
0.603
|
--
|
9504
|
PRX-N
|
13.223
|
13.005
|
185897
|
1.421
|
1.052
|
15372
|
PRX
|
17.367
|
/
|
60351134
|
9.700
|
1.046
|
26361
|
PRX-F
|
20.158
|
19.819
|
86718
|
6.802
|
--
|
42148
|
PRX-A
|
31.98
|
32.02
|
97472
|
5.030
|
1.019
|
85634 |
Note: retention time 1: retention time in the test solution; positioning time 2: single needle positioning time of each impurity.
According to the data, the detection method disclosed by the invention can be used for realizing good separation of the 10 synthetic process impurities, so that the quality of parecoxib sodium can be better researched and controlled; in the comparative examples, the separation of the impurity PRX-Q and the impurity PRX-E, the impurity PRX-U and the impurity PRX-B, the impurity PRX-K and the impurity PRX-I, and the impurity PRX-N and the impurity PRX-K was poor.
Examples of the experiments
The chromatographic conditions of example 4 are used for carrying out methodology validation research, the methodology validation test process refers to the methodology validation guiding principle of Chinese pharmacopoeia, the detection limit (S/N is 3) and the quantification limit (S/N is 10) are calculated by using the standard working solution with the lowest concentration, the linear concentration of each process impurity is repeatedly injected for 6 times, the precision of the measurement result is calculated, meanwhile, the recovery rate of a low, medium and high concentration gradient measurement method is set, and the column temperature, the instrument brand, the initial proportion of an organic phase and the durability of a chromatographic column test method are changed. The detection limit, the quantification limit, the precision, the recovery rate and the durability of the method are measured and the results are shown in tables 13-16.
TABLE 13 sensitivity test data for the detection method of the present invention
TABLE 14 precision experimental data of the detection method of the present invention
Name of impurity
|
Measured value%
|
Mean value of
|
RSD%
|
PRX-C
|
102.11~103.17
|
102.5
|
0.36
|
PRX-E
|
102.20~108.97
|
103.6
|
2.56
|
PRX-Q
|
100.23~100.84
|
100.5
|
0.21
|
PRX-U
|
99.85~100.57
|
100.1
|
0.27
|
PRX-K
|
100.73~101.56
|
101.1
|
0.27
|
PRX-N
|
100.11~102.22
|
101.3
|
0.33
|
PRX-I
|
103.32~104.57
|
103.9
|
0.41
|
PRX-F
|
100.40~101.27
|
100.8
|
0.37
|
PRX-A
|
100.48~101.33
|
100.8
|
0.33 |
TABLE 15 Experimental data on recovery rates of the detection methods of the present invention
Impurities in the product
|
Test range
|
The recovery rate is high
|
Mean value of
|
RSD%
|
PRX-C
|
50%~150%
|
101.91~104.37
|
102.7
|
0.86
|
PRX-E
|
50%~150%
|
102.00~105.29
|
103.0
|
1.14
|
PRX-Q
|
50%~150%
|
99.74~101.92
|
100.7
|
0.61
|
PRX-U
|
50%~150%
|
99.41~101.27
|
100.2
|
0.57
|
PRX-K
|
50%~150%
|
100.73~103.13
|
101.4
|
0.67
|
PRX-N
|
50%~150%
|
99.87~103.11
|
101.2
|
1.12
|
PRX-I
|
50%~150%
|
103.32~108.54
|
104.8
|
1.80
|
PRX-F
|
50%~150%
|
100.40~101.94
|
101.0
|
0.42
|
PRX-A
|
50%~150%
|
100.48~101.43
|
101.0
|
0.33 |
TABLE 16 results of durability measurement of the measuring method of the present invention
As is clear from the above-mentioned results, in the method of the present invention,
1) the quantitative limit of each impurity is 0.10-0.30 ng, which is lower than 0.01% of the concentration of the test sample; the detection limit of each impurity is 0.05-0.15 ng, which is lower than 0.005% of the concentration of the test sample;
2) linearity and range: in the concentration range of 0.01-5.0 mu g/mL, the linearity of each impurity concentration and peak area is good, and the correlation coefficient is more than 0.999;
3) precision and accuracy: the sample adding recovery rate of 9 samples with the concentration of 3 samples in high, medium and low are measured, the sample adding recovery rate is in the range of 90-110%, and the RSD of the measurement result is less than 5%, which shows that the method has good precision and accuracy;
4) durability: the method has the advantages that the impurity detection capability and separation capability are inspected by changing the conditions of flow rate, column temperature, mobile phase proportion, replacement of chromatographic columns and chromatographs of different manufacturers and the like, and no obvious change exists under all conditions, so that the method is good in durability.
Therefore, the method has good sensitivity, precision, accuracy and durability.