CN111239725B - Dynamic self-adaptive multi-radar information fusion method - Google Patents
Dynamic self-adaptive multi-radar information fusion method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN111239725B CN111239725B CN202010148975.4A CN202010148975A CN111239725B CN 111239725 B CN111239725 B CN 111239725B CN 202010148975 A CN202010148975 A CN 202010148975A CN 111239725 B CN111239725 B CN 111239725B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- track
- fusion
- period
- data
- max
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S13/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
- G01S13/87—Combinations of radar systems, e.g. primary radar and secondary radar
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S13/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
- G01S13/02—Systems using reflection of radio waves, e.g. primary radar systems; Analogous systems
- G01S13/50—Systems of measurement based on relative movement of target
- G01S13/58—Velocity or trajectory determination systems; Sense-of-movement determination systems
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a dynamic self-adaptive multi-radar information fusion method, which aims at effective dynamic self-adaptive weighted fusion of multi-radar track information, receives and analyzes real-time quality characteristics of radar data sources, further calculates quality weight factors of the data sources, and realizes dynamic self-adaptive data fusion according to the weight factors so as to achieve the purpose of fusing multi-source data into a more optimal result; meanwhile, in order to further improve the stability and accuracy of the fusion result, the sensor data is iteratively optimized by using a filter. The method of the invention shows better fusion effect in both actual scene and simulation scene, and greatly reduces the influence of error and misinformation of the radar sensor.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of multi-sensor information fusion processing and application, in particular to a dynamic self-adaptive multi-radar information fusion method.
Background
The multi-radar information fusion is to make full use of multiple radar information sources and combine redundant or complementary information of the multiple radar information sources in space or time according to a certain processing standard to obtain a consistent explanation or description of a measured object, so that the information system has better performance relative to a system formed by various subsets contained in the information system. The purpose of multi-source information fusion is mainly two aspects: on one hand, aiming at the redundancy of multi-source information, eliminating noise and abnormal values in input information; on the other hand, for the complementarity of the multi-source information, valuable information related to practical application is obtained, and complete information description of the observed object is obtained to the maximum extent.
The multi-source information fusion method has various types, each method has advantages and disadvantages, and the methods have certain differences. The method can be divided into an estimation theory method, an uncertainty reasoning method and an artificial intelligence and mode identification method according to the mathematical basis of the multi-source information fusion algorithm. Information fusion can be divided into data layer fusion, feature layer fusion and decision layer fusion according to the layer where the information source is processed. When the fusion methods are classified according to the fusion levels, a weighted average value or a clustering algorithm is mostly adopted in the data layer information fusion; the feature layer information fusion algorithm comprises a neural network, a fuzzy theory, a D-S evidence theory and the like; algorithms commonly used for the decision-level information fusion include D-S evidence theory, Bayes inference and fuzzy theory.
The estimation theory method comprises a linear estimation technology and a non-linear estimation technology. Common linear estimation techniques include kalman filtering and weighted averaging; nonlinear estimation techniques such as Extended Kalman Filter (EKF), Strong Tracking Filter (STF), and lossless Kalman Filter (UKF), etc. Along with the deepening of the cognition degree of information fusion, the research of a nonlinear non-Gaussian system based on a random sampling technology also obtains a plurality of results.
The uncertain reasoning method aims to realize information processing according to uncertain information and is used for realizing identification, attribute judgment and the like of target identities. The uncertain reasoning method mainly comprises a subjective Bayesian method, a D-S evidence reasoning method, a DSmT method, a fuzzy mathematic theory method, a possibility reasoning method and the like. The subjective Bayesian method requires that possible decisions of the system are mutually independent, and is a high-efficiency information fusion method used in the early stage; the D-S evidence theory adopts a trust function as a measurement, so that the uncertain problem caused by the unknown can be better solved; the DSmT method is an extension of the traditional D-S theory, and by using trust functions in combination, any type of independent source can be expressed. Moreover, considering that the prior probability is not known under normal conditions in practical applications, the result is inaccurate when the set prior probability values do not match.
The artificial intelligence and mode method can process the imperfect data, and the imperfect information is finally integrated into more uniform and perfect information through continuous learning and induction in the information processing process. The main method comprises a rough set theory, a random theory, an information entropy theory, a gray system theory, a Bayesian network, a neural network, a genetic algorithm and the like.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to solve the technical problem of providing a dynamic self-adaptive multi-radar information fusion method, which obtains better fusion effect in a complex actual scene, greatly overcomes the problems of false alarm, missing report and error of a sensor and improves the output precision.
In order to solve the technical problems, the invention adopts the technical scheme that:
a dynamic self-adaptive multi-radar information fusion method comprises the following steps:
step 1: receiving preprocessing: receiving track data sent by each radar source, and preprocessing the received original data, wherein the preprocessing comprises the following steps:
1) numerical value validity judgment||pos-center||2Indicating the distance between the radar track position and the fusion center, and setting an allowable range for an epsilon finger;
2) numerical value out-of-range determinationis _ valid () is a value out-of-bounds overflow judgment, and when the received data exceeds the representation range of the data used by the computer, the overflow of the data is generated; the data overflow condition can occur when the data value exceeds the limit of the word length of the computer, and the overflow type is divided into positive overflow and negative overflow; positive overflow indicates that the data value is greater than the maximum value of the demonstration range of the computer table, and negative overflow indicates that the data value is less than the minimum value of the demonstration range of the computer table;
3) removing ambiguity conflicts, wherein if reports appear for multiple times in the same period and the same batch number of the radar source, only the latest report of the time is retained, and other ambiguity reports are abandoned;
4) forming internal track data, updating or creating the data according to the channel number and the batch number after the judgment of the previous step, and updating the existing internal track by using new data when the data are found out through searching of the channel number and the batch number; if no internal track meeting the conditions exists, establishing an internal track, performing fusion track association by taking the distance as a scale, regarding the fusion track as associable when the distance difference between the fusion track and any fusion track is less than a set association threshold lambda, and finally determining the association relation to follow the principle of selecting nearest neighbor, wherein the reference value of lambda is the product of the fusion period and the uniform velocity of the detection target; in the period, the internal track of new data is not received, and the state of the internal track is updated to be extrapolation waiting;
step 2: quality evaluation;
carrying out quality evaluation on the preprocessed fusion system internal track data to obtain quality factors Q (i) ═ Σ (f) (i), F (i), d (i), s (i)), and obtaining the weight value of the period reflecting radar source and data characteristics thereof on the basis(i, j belongs to A), wherein A represents an internal track set which is related to the same fusion track and survives from different radar sources in the same processing period, i is the serial number of the internal track reported by the radar source to be evaluated, and j is the serial number of the track reported by all the radar sources in the set A;
the four sub-item weight calculation modes for forming the quality factor Q (i) in the period are as follows:
1) obtaining a frequency weight f (i) according to the updated frequency of the sensor
I.e. the cumulative update times count of the internal track iupdate(i) Divided by the number of fused system cycles countsysObtaining; countupdate(i) Initializing to 0 after the internal track is established and starting statistics, and receiving new track data, count, sent by the information source represented by the internal track each timeupdate(i) Increasing by 1; countsysCounting after the self-fusion system is started, and counting every time a system period is passedsysThe value is increased by 1;
2) evaluating the distance weight d (i) of the credibility of the data according to the spatial distance difference
d(i)∈[0,dmax]Wherein d ismaxRepresents the upper limit of the set distance weight, dmaxIn generalTaking the value as 1; dis (i) represents the Euclidean distance of the position after the internal track filtering and the associated fused track prediction position; k represents that the fusion system sets an outlier distance threshold, and the value of K refers to a correlation threshold lambda to ensure that K is less than or equal to lambda.
3) Fitting weight F (i) for evaluating the degree of spatial dispersion in the period by using a fitting curve
F(i)=max(Rx,Ry),F(i)∈[0,1],SSE refers to the sum of the remaining squares, which is the sum of the squares of the differences between the radar reported position and the fitted estimated position range; SSR refers to the regression sum of squares, which is the sum of squared deviations of the regression values of the reported positions and the average value of the reported positions;
4) judging the stability weight s (i) of the course change degree according to the recent history
s(i)=g(θ),s(i)∈[smin,smax]
Wherein, the course approximate included angle theta is the absolute value of the difference between the course of the last period and the latest course of the period, a is the set allowable maximum variation angle, smaxTo set the upper limit of the weight, sminSetting a weight lower limit;
and step 3: dynamic adaptive weighted fusion: carrying out weighted average on the preprocessed system internal track data in combination with the weight obtained by the quality evaluation to obtain a periodic preliminary prediction fusion resultWherein the internal track is predicted at the current period and fused with the track positionThe generation method of (a) is expressed as:
the estimated fusion track position w (i) of the internal track in the period is the filtering position of the internal track obtained after the filtering treatment is carried out on the newly reported track of the sensor in the periodOutput position of latest merged track with last cycleAfter taking balance and accepting the trade-off, the balance proportion is set ad, and the ad belongs to [0,1 ]](ii) a Last cycle newest fusion track output positionObtaining and backfilling after overall evaluation correction and filtering in the previous fusion period;
after that, the overall period situation composed of the ratio of the actual weight sum to the desired weight sum is determined
Qbase=∑(fmax,Fmax,dmax,smax)
Wherein Q isbaseIs the sum of the maximum values of the four weights, fmax,Fmax,dmax,smaxThe maximum value, count, of the weight of the four sub-items of the quality factor Q (i) respectivelyeffThe number of internal tracks in the non-extrapolation waiting state in the period is shown; qty shows the track quality of the full sensor in this period, the larger the value Qty is, the better the overall quality is; further estimating the data quality of each sensor in the period according to Qty, and performing overall estimation on the weighted average preliminary prediction fusion result to obtain the result of the fusion track position after estimationAs a result of optimized fusion, whereinAnd predicting the position of the fused track based on the motion state in the current period.
Further, the method also comprises the step 4: filtering, correcting and backfilling;
the filtering is embedded in the dynamic self-adaptive weighting fusion process, and the filtering operation is carried out on the internal flight path and the fusion result by utilizing a standard KF filter; filtering for merged tracks The final output result of the fusion track in the period is obtained;
backfilling is carried out after weighted average is finished, and the track result is fused in the periodGiving it an associated internal track
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the beneficial effects that: the method can process data of multiple homologous/heterologous sensors, simultaneously obtains better fusion effect in a complex actual scene, greatly overcomes the problems of false alarm, missing report and error of the sensors, and improves the output precision. The fusion system needs less manual intervention, the setting work is completed before the fusion system is started, and no additional intervention operation is needed in the operation process.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a process flow diagram of a dynamic adaptive multi-radar information fusion method of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The present invention will be described in further detail with reference to the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments.
The method comprises the steps of receiving preprocessing, quality evaluation, dynamic self-adaptive weighting fusion, filtering correction, backfilling and the like, and specifically comprises the following steps:
firstly, receiving preprocessing: and receiving track data sent by each radar source, and preprocessing the received original data.
1) Numerical value validity judgment||pos-center||2The distance between the radar track position and the fusion center is indicated, the epsilon indicates a set allowable range, the epsilon value is flexible, the common epsilon is an air condition monitoring range, for example, an air condition center is responsible for monitoring the air condition in a square circle of 50km, and the epsilon can be set to 50000.
2) Numerical value out-of-range determinationis _ valid () is a value out-of-bounds overflow judgment, and when received data exceeds the representation range of data used by a computer, overflow of data occurs. The data overflow condition can occur when the data value exceeds the limit of the word length of the computer, and the overflow type is divided into positive overflow and negative overflow. Positive overflow indicates that the data value is greater than the maximum value of the computer table range, and negative overflow indicates that the data value is less than the minimum value of the computer table range.
3) And (4) eliminating ambiguity conflicts, wherein if multiple reports appear in the same batch number of the same radar source in the same period, only the latest report is kept, and other ambiguity reports are abandoned.
4) Forming internal track data, updating or creating the data according to the channel number and the batch number after the judgment of the previous step, and updating the existing internal track by using new data when the data are found out through searching of the channel number and the batch number; if no internal track meeting the conditions exists, establishing an internal track, performing fusion track association by taking the distance as a scale, regarding the fusion track as associable when the distance difference between the fusion track and any fusion track is less than a set association threshold lambda, and finally determining the association relation to follow the principle of selecting nearest neighbor, wherein the reference value of lambda is the product of the fusion period and the uniform velocity of the detection target; this period does not receive an already internal track of new data, updating its state to extrapolation wait.
And II, evaluating the quality.
Carrying out quality evaluation on the preprocessed fusion system internal track data to obtain quality factors Q (i) ═ Σ (f) (i), F (i), d (i), s (i)), and obtaining the weight value of the period reflecting radar source and data characteristics thereof on the basisA represents the set of internal tracks from different radar sources surviving in the same processing cycle associated with the same fusion track.
The four sub-item weight calculation modes for forming the quality factor Q (i) in the period are as follows:
1) obtaining a frequency weight f (i) according to the updated frequency of the sensor
I.e. the cumulative update times count of the internal track iupdate(i) Divided by the number of fused system cycles countsysThus obtaining the product. countupdate(i) Initializing to 0 after the internal track is established and starting statistics, and receiving new track data, count, sent by the information source represented by the internal track each timeupdate(i) Increasing by 1; countsysCounting after the self-fusion system is started, and counting every time a system period is passedsysThe value is increased by 1.
2) Evaluating the distance weight d (i) of the credibility of the data according to the spatial distance difference
d(i)∈[0,dmax]Wherein d ismaxRepresents the upper limit of the set distance weight, dmaxUsually taken as 1; dis (i) represents the Euclidean distance of the position after the internal track filtering and the associated fused track prediction position; k represents that the fusion system sets an outlier distance threshold, and the value of K refers to a correlation threshold lambda to ensure that K is less than or equal to lambda.
3) Fitting weight F (i) for evaluating the degree of spatial dispersion in the period by using a fitting curve
F(i)=max(Rx,Ry),F(i)∈[0,1],SSE refers to the sum of the remaining squares, which is the sum of the squares of the differences between the radar reported position and the fitted estimated position range, i.e., the sum of the squares of the error terms; SSR refers to the regression sum of squares, which is the sum of squared deviations of the reported position regression values and the reported position mean. The specific calculation method refers to a classical mathematical formula.
4) Judging the stability weight s (i) of the course change degree according to the recent history
s(i)=g(θ),s(i)∈[smin,smax]
Wherein, the course approximate included angle theta is the absolute value of the difference between the course of the last period and the latest course of the period, a is the set allowable maximum variation angle, smaxTo set the upper limit of the weight, sminSetting a weight lower limit; general smaxTaking the value 2, sminValue 0, a value range [0,90 ]]。
Thirdly, dynamic self-adaptive weighted fusion, namely, carrying out weighted average on the preprocessed system internal track data in combination with the weight obtained by the quality evaluation to obtain a periodic preliminary prediction fusion resultWherein the internal track is predicted at the current period and fused with the track positionThe generation method of (a) is expressed as:
the estimated fusion track position w (i) of the internal track in the current period is obtained after filtering treatment by combining the new report track of the current period of the sensorPartial track filter positionOutput position of latest merged track with last cycleAfter taking balance and accepting the trade-off, the balance proportion is set ad, and the ad belongs to [0,1 ]]Wherein ad < 0.5 represents the estimated deviation to the report position, ad 0.5 represents the estimated deviation to the key point of the report and fusion position, and ad > 0.5 represents the estimated deviation to the latest position of the fusion track.
Last cycle newest fusion track output positionObtaining and backfilling after overall evaluation correction and filtering in the previous fusion period; after that, the overall period situation composed of the ratio of the actual weight sum to the desired weight sum is determined
Qbase=∑(fmax,Fmax,dmax,smax)
Wherein Q isbaseIs the sum of the four maximum values of the weights, counteffThe number of internal tracks in the non-extrapolation waiting state in the period is shown; qty shows the total sensor track quality at this period, the larger the value Qty, the better the overall quality. Further estimating the data quality of each sensor in the period according to Qty, and performing overall estimation on the weighted average preliminary prediction fusion result to obtain the result of the fusion track position after estimationAs a result of optimized fusion, whereinAnd predicting the position of the fused track based on the motion state in the current period.
Fourthly, filtering correction and backfilling, wherein filtering is carried outAnd in the dynamic self-adaptive weighting fusion process, the standard KF filter is used for filtering the internal flight path and the fusion result. Filtering for merged tracksThe final output result of the fusion track in the period is obtained, and the filtering work is to ensure the stability of the internal track data and the fusion result so as to improve the processing effect of the method;
Claims (2)
1. A dynamic self-adaptive multi-radar information fusion method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
step 1: receiving preprocessing: receiving track data sent by each radar source, and preprocessing the received original data, wherein the preprocessing comprises the following steps:
1) numerical value validity judgment||pos-center||2Indicating the distance between the radar track position and the fusion center, and setting an allowable range for an epsilon finger;
2) numerical value out-of-range determinationis _ valid () is a value out-of-bounds overflow judgment, and when the received data exceeds the representation range of the data used by the computer, the overflow of the data is generated; the data overflow condition can occur when the data value exceeds the limit of the word length of the computer, and the overflow type is divided into positive overflow and negative overflow; positive overflow indicates that the data value is greater than the maximum value of the computer table demonstration range, and negative overflow indicates that the data value is less than the computer expression(iii) minimum value of range;
3) removing ambiguity conflicts, wherein if reports appear for multiple times in the same period and the same batch number of the radar source, only the latest report of the time is retained, and other ambiguity reports are abandoned;
4) forming internal track data, updating or creating the data according to the channel number and the batch number after the judgment of the previous step, and updating the existing internal track by using new data when the data are found out through searching of the channel number and the batch number; if no internal track meeting the conditions exists, establishing an internal track, performing fusion track association by taking the distance as a scale, regarding the fusion track as associable when the distance difference between the fusion track and any fusion track is less than a set association threshold lambda, and finally determining the association relation to follow the principle of selecting nearest neighbor, wherein the reference value of lambda is the product of the fusion period and the uniform velocity of the detection target; in the period, the internal track of new data is not received, and the state of the internal track is updated to be extrapolation waiting;
step 2: quality evaluation;
carrying out quality evaluation on the preprocessed fusion system internal track data to obtain quality factors Q (i) ═ Σ (f) (i), F (i), d (i), s (i)), and obtaining the weight value of the period reflecting radar source and data characteristics thereof on the basisi, j belongs to A, A represents an internal track set which is related to the same fusion track and survives from different radar sources in the same processing period, i is the serial number of the internal track reported by the radar source to be evaluated, and j is the serial number of the track reported by all the radar sources in the set A;
the four sub-item weight calculation modes for forming the quality factor Q (i) in the period are as follows:
1) obtaining a frequency weight f (i) according to the updated frequency of the sensor
I.e. the cumulative update times count of the internal track iupdate(i) Divided by the number of fused system cycles countsysObtaining; countupdate(i) Initial after internal track establishmentChanging to 0 and starting statistics, and receiving new track data, count, sent by the information source represented by the internal track each timeupdate(i) Increasing by 1; countsysCounting after the self-fusion system is started, and counting every time a system period is passedsysThe value is increased by 1;
2) evaluating the distance weight d (i) of the credibility of the data according to the spatial distance difference
d(i)∈[0,dmax]Wherein d ismaxRepresents the upper limit of the set distance weight, dmaxUsually taken as 1; dis (i) represents the Euclidean distance of the position after the internal track filtering and the associated fused track prediction position; k represents that the fusion system sets an outlier distance threshold, and the value of K refers to a correlation threshold lambda to ensure that K is less than or equal to lambda;
3) fitting weight F (i) for evaluating the degree of spatial dispersion in the period by using a fitting curve
F(i)=max(Rx,Ry),F(i)∈[0,1],SSE refers to the sum of the remaining squares, which is the sum of the squares of the differences between the radar reported position and the fitted estimated position range; SSR refers to the regression sum of squares, which is the sum of squared deviations of the regression values of the reported positions and the average value of the reported positions;
4) judging the stability weight s (i) of the course change degree according to the recent history
s(i)=g(θ),s(i)∈[smin,smax]
Wherein, the course approximate included angle theta is the absolute value of the difference between the course of the last period and the latest course of the period, a is the set allowable maximum variation angle, smaxTo set the upper limit of the weight, sminSetting a weight lower limit;
and step 3: dynamic adaptive weighted fusion: carrying out weighted average on the preprocessed system internal track data in combination with the weight obtained by the quality evaluation to obtain a periodic preliminary prediction fusion resultWherein the internal track is predicted at the current period and fused with the track positionThe generation method of (a) is expressed as:
the estimated fusion track position w (i) of the internal track in the period is the filtering position of the internal track obtained after the filtering treatment is carried out on the newly reported track of the sensor in the periodOutput position of latest merged track with last cycleAfter taking balance and accepting the trade-off, the balance proportion is set ad, and the ad belongs to [0,1 ]](ii) a Last cycle newest fusion track output positionObtaining and backfilling after overall evaluation correction and filtering in the previous fusion period;
after that, the overall period situation composed of the ratio of the actual weight sum to the desired weight sum is determinedi∈A,Qty∈[0,1]
Qbase=∑(fmax,Fmax,dmax,smax)
Wherein Q isbaseIs the sum of the maximum values of the four weights, fmax,Fmax,dmax,smaxThe maximum value, count, of the weight of the four sub-items of the quality factor Q (i) respectivelyeffThe number of internal tracks in the non-extrapolation waiting state in the period is shown; qty shows the track quality of the full sensor in this period, the larger the value Qty is, the better the overall quality is; further estimating the data quality of each sensor in the period according to Qty, and performing overall estimation on the weighted average preliminary prediction fusion result to obtain the result of the fusion track position after estimationAs a result of optimized fusion, whereinAnd predicting the position of the fused track based on the motion state in the current period.
2. The dynamic adaptive multi-radar information fusion method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of 4: filtering, correcting and backfilling;
the filtering is embedded in the dynamic self-adaptive weighting fusion process, and the filtering operation is carried out on the internal flight path and the fusion result by utilizing a standard KF filter; filtering for merged tracks The final output result of the fusion track in the period is obtained;
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010148975.4A CN111239725B (en) | 2020-03-05 | 2020-03-05 | Dynamic self-adaptive multi-radar information fusion method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010148975.4A CN111239725B (en) | 2020-03-05 | 2020-03-05 | Dynamic self-adaptive multi-radar information fusion method |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN111239725A CN111239725A (en) | 2020-06-05 |
CN111239725B true CN111239725B (en) | 2022-02-15 |
Family
ID=70873315
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010148975.4A Active CN111239725B (en) | 2020-03-05 | 2020-03-05 | Dynamic self-adaptive multi-radar information fusion method |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN111239725B (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN112580727A (en) * | 2020-12-22 | 2021-03-30 | 广西壮族自治区计量检测研究院 | Detection data transmission method and device based on data fusion |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103926584A (en) * | 2014-04-30 | 2014-07-16 | 电子科技大学 | Space-frequency-polarization combined cooperation detection method |
CN104280723A (en) * | 2014-10-22 | 2015-01-14 | 四川大学 | Method for processing newly built system track in radar clutter area |
CN106054194A (en) * | 2016-05-10 | 2016-10-26 | 南京信息工程大学 | Spaceborne radar and ground-based radar reflectivity factor data three dimensional fusion method |
CN107192998A (en) * | 2017-04-06 | 2017-09-22 | 中国电子科技集团公司第二十八研究所 | A kind of adapter distribution track data fusion method based on covariance target function |
CN108140323A (en) * | 2015-08-03 | 2018-06-08 | 大众汽车有限公司 | For the method and apparatus of improved data fusion during environment measuring in motor vehicle |
CN110596693A (en) * | 2019-08-26 | 2019-12-20 | 杭州电子科技大学 | Multi-sensor GMPHD self-adaptive fusion method with iterative updating |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7940206B2 (en) * | 2005-04-20 | 2011-05-10 | Accipiter Radar Technologies Inc. | Low-cost, high-performance radar networks |
-
2020
- 2020-03-05 CN CN202010148975.4A patent/CN111239725B/en active Active
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103926584A (en) * | 2014-04-30 | 2014-07-16 | 电子科技大学 | Space-frequency-polarization combined cooperation detection method |
CN104280723A (en) * | 2014-10-22 | 2015-01-14 | 四川大学 | Method for processing newly built system track in radar clutter area |
CN108140323A (en) * | 2015-08-03 | 2018-06-08 | 大众汽车有限公司 | For the method and apparatus of improved data fusion during environment measuring in motor vehicle |
CN106054194A (en) * | 2016-05-10 | 2016-10-26 | 南京信息工程大学 | Spaceborne radar and ground-based radar reflectivity factor data three dimensional fusion method |
CN107192998A (en) * | 2017-04-06 | 2017-09-22 | 中国电子科技集团公司第二十八研究所 | A kind of adapter distribution track data fusion method based on covariance target function |
CN110596693A (en) * | 2019-08-26 | 2019-12-20 | 杭州电子科技大学 | Multi-sensor GMPHD self-adaptive fusion method with iterative updating |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
Title |
---|
High-level Information Fusion:An Overview;PEK HUI FOO;《JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN INFORMATION FUSION》;20131231;第01卷(第08期);第33-72页 * |
一种多雷达航迹加权融合的权值动态分配算法;黄友澎等;《计算机应用》;20080901;第28卷(第09期);第2452-2454页 * |
多源航迹信息融合主要技术研究;杨晓丹 等;《研究与开发》;20170331;第8-11页 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN111239725A (en) | 2020-06-05 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN107092582B (en) | Online abnormal value detection and confidence evaluation method based on residual posterior | |
CN112946624B (en) | Multi-target tracking method based on track management method | |
CN110109095B (en) | Target feature assisted multi-source data association method | |
CN110927712B (en) | Tracking method and device | |
CN111581832B (en) | Improved gray Elman neural network hovercraft motion prediction method based on ARMA model correction | |
CN111239725B (en) | Dynamic self-adaptive multi-radar information fusion method | |
Hung et al. | Modified PSO Algorithm on Recurrent Fuzzy Neural Network for System Identification. | |
CN111917785A (en) | Industrial internet security situation prediction method based on DE-GWO-SVR | |
CN109460608B (en) | High and steep slope deformation prediction method based on fuzzy time sequence | |
CN110849372A (en) | Underwater multi-target track association method based on EM clustering | |
CN116689503A (en) | Strip steel full-length thickness prediction method based on memory function network | |
CN112381334A (en) | Method for predicting deformation trend of high and steep slope based on multi-factor fuzzy time sequence | |
CN114444389B (en) | Air attack target dynamic threat assessment method based on combined weighting and improved VIKOR | |
CN110011847B (en) | Data source quality evaluation method under sensing cloud environment | |
CN105223559B (en) | A kind of long-range radar track initiation method that can switch parallel | |
CN111142101B (en) | Data association method | |
Juang et al. | Automatic construction of feedforward/recurrent fuzzy systems by clustering-aided simplex particle swarm optimization | |
CN113255963A (en) | Road surface use performance prediction method based on road element splitting and deep learning model LSTM | |
CN111340853B (en) | Multi-sensor GMPHD self-adaptive fusion method based on OSPA iteration | |
CN107979606A (en) | It is a kind of that there is adaptive distributed intelligence decision-making technique | |
CN112907975A (en) | Detection method for abnormal parking based on millimeter wave radar and video | |
CN115932913B (en) | Satellite positioning pseudo-range correction method and device | |
CN108922191B (en) | Travel time calculation method based on soft set | |
CN111328015B (en) | Wireless sensor network target tracking method based on Fisher information distance | |
Havangi | Intelligent FastSLAM: An intelligent factorized solution to simultaneous localization and mapping |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |