CN111224751A - Rate control method for improving wireless network coding gain - Google Patents

Rate control method for improving wireless network coding gain Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN111224751A
CN111224751A CN202010054093.1A CN202010054093A CN111224751A CN 111224751 A CN111224751 A CN 111224751A CN 202010054093 A CN202010054093 A CN 202010054093A CN 111224751 A CN111224751 A CN 111224751A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
packet
coding
transmission
rate control
receiving node
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
CN202010054093.1A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
刘青龙
张崇富
张华斌
陈又鲜
卢晶琦
林燕婷
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Zhongshan Institute
Original Assignee
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Zhongshan Institute
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Zhongshan Institute filed Critical University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Zhongshan Institute
Priority to CN202010054093.1A priority Critical patent/CN111224751A/en
Publication of CN111224751A publication Critical patent/CN111224751A/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/0001Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff
    • H04L1/0002Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff by adapting the transmission rate
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/0001Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff
    • H04L1/0009Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff by adapting the channel coding

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a rate control method for improving wireless network coding gain, which can provide rate control aiming at the situation that opportunity network coding faces different users and different channel qualities in an LTE network, and makes up the defect of researching an opportunity network coding rate control mechanism in the prior research; and the code selection strategy based on the transmission efficiency of the coding packet can increase the coding opportunity of network coding under the condition of maximizing the transmission efficiency of the coding packet, improve the average coding degree of the coding packet, and effectively improve the performance gains of time delay, throughput rate and the like of opportunity network coding.

Description

Rate control method for improving wireless network coding gain
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of communication, in particular to a rate control method for improving wireless network coding gain.
Background
Network coding technology has been proven to effectively improve wireless network performance, including performance indexes such as throughput rate, delivery delay, energy efficiency, etc., and has been applied to LTE cellular networks, such as cooperative transmission combining network coding and relay selection, etc. However, in a wireless application environment, due to the fact that the wireless application environment is subjected to a complex and variable communication environment and due to frequent changes of channel conditions, channel quality is reduced, and burst packet loss of transmission packets occurs, the network transmission performance is greatly affected. For the situation of high packet loss rate in these wireless network environments, it is difficult to effectively exert expected performance gain by applying the existing network coding architecture.
In order to ensure reliable delivery of coded packets, in a wireless network with a multi-rate control function, an existing network coding architecture generally defaults to a coding node to deliver coded packets with a lowest transmission rate in exchange for a higher delivery rate. If the primary receiving node receives the encoded packet, the default secondary receiving node also receives the encoded packet. On one hand, the method limits the application of multi-rate and cannot better utilize the bandwidth resources of the wireless network. On the other hand, in an actual network scenario, the method neither can completely ensure reliable delivery of the coded packet, nor introduces some other problems, for example, a lower transmission rate may result in a longer transmission time, thereby greatly increasing the chance of collision of the data packet, and reducing the delivery rate of the network data packet and the overall network throughput rate. Meanwhile, for the coding node, how to handle the broadcast bottleneck problem caused by a plurality of receiving nodes of coding packets with different channel qualities is very urgent. Therefore, how to make a better compromise on the reliable delivery of coded packets and coding gain is an important research aspect.
In the related research of the existing network coding and rate control mechanism, joint design of the network coding and the MAC mechanism is mainly discussed to optimize the network throughput rate performance, and the unified design of a network coding algorithm and rate control is rarely researched. With the application of the millimeter wave technology in the LTE cellular network, compared with the traditional frequency band lower than 6GHz, the transmission packet loss rate of the communication in the millimeter wave frequency band is much higher, and it is necessary to ensure reliable, low packet loss rate and stable data rate. By realizing the unified design of the network coding algorithm and the rate control, higher network throughput rate, higher reliability and lower system delivery delay can be obtained. Therefore, it is very important to research a rate control method based on network coding.
Disclosure of Invention
The technical problem to be solved by the invention is to provide a rate control method aiming at the situation that the opportunistic network coding faces different users and different channel qualities in an LTE network, so as to improve the delivery efficiency of a coding packet and further improve the overall performance of the system by the network coding.
The technical scheme adopted by the invention for solving the technical problems is as follows:
a rate control method for improving wireless network coding gain is characterized in that the method comprises the following steps:
step S1, for transmitting a coded packet with a coding degree n, defining the state in the process of speed control during transmission as the coded packet receiving node set GnEach node in the subset having failed to receive the encoded packet, using an n-bit vector (b)1,b2,...,bi,...,bn) To represent this subset, wherein biE {0, 1}, when biWhen 1, it indicates a receiving node set GnThe ith receiving node in the network has not received the encoded packet yet, when biWhen 0, this indicates the receiving node set GnThe ith receiving node in the network receives the coded packet, and for a coded packet with a coding degree of n, there are n receiving nodes, so that | S | ═ 2nAnd a possible state.
Step S2, when an encoding node is to send an encoded packet, it may select from decision set a ═ { r ═ r1,r2,...,rK,r1≤r2…≤rKSelect a transmission rate, the number of transmission rates in the set is the number of types of decisions that can be selected.
Step S3, for transmission rate rkWhen, the node i belongs to GnGiven a parameter (delivery rate of packets) of pi(rk) The Bernoulli model of (1), then from state StTransition to State St+1The state transition probability of time can be calculated by the following formula:
Figure BDA0002372206170000021
step S4, defining the profit obtained in the process of state transition to be divided by the time cost brought by the transmission of the coding packet, defining the reward as the transmission efficiency (CPTE) of the coding packet, and carrying out the encoding packet
Figure BDA0002372206170000022
It designates the receiving node as set GLIf participating in the encoded data packet PiHas a data packet length of li(bits), i is more than or equal to 1 and less than or equal to L, then the corresponding code packet
Figure BDA0002372206170000023
Length equal to the length max of the longest data packet therein1≤i≤Lli(ii) a If decision a is taken during decision stage ttThen from state StTransition to state st+1Reporting of time
Figure BDA0002372206170000024
Comprises the following steps:
Figure BDA0002372206170000031
step S5, determining an optimization target, optimizing the total expected CPTE value from the decision stage t to the decision stage N-1, and calculating by the following formula:
Figure BDA0002372206170000032
in a rate selection process with N decision stages, if
Figure BDA0002372206170000033
Define CPTE(s)t,t)=0。
Step S6, determining an optimal decision, which is given by the following formula:
Figure BDA0002372206170000034
for the obtained optimal solution and the corresponding optimal decision, the following backward recursion algorithm is used:
a1, setting t equal to N and
Figure BDA0002372206170000035
a2, let
Figure BDA0002372206170000036
Calculating CPTE(s)tT) and πt(st);
And A3, if t is equal to 0, stopping calculation, and otherwise, turning to A2 to continue calculation.
Further, the codec that achieves the maximum CPTE value is selected from all possible codecs, and pl (D (P) is usedi) Represents node D (P)i) Decoding the data packet set cached in the packet pool, optionally obtaining the encoding solution CA through the XOR operation and the corresponding packet set CsetCan be expressed as:
Figure BDA0002372206170000037
Cset={x1P1}∪{x2P2}∪L{XMPM};
wherein,
Figure BDA0002372206170000041
accordingly, the initial reception state of the receiving node that gets the encoded packet may be expressed as:
s0={D(x1P1)}∪{D(x2P2)}∪L{D(xMPM)};
therefore, the Integer Linear Programming (ILP) of the code selection problem based on CPTE values is summarized as:
max CPTE(st,t)|t=0
Figure BDA0002372206170000042
and obtaining an optimal coding solution through solving.
The invention has the beneficial effects that:
(1) aiming at the opportunity network coding, when the opportunity network coding faces different users and different channel qualities in an LTE network, rate control is provided, and the defect of researching an opportunity network coding rate control mechanism in the existing research is overcome;
(2) the code selection strategy based on the transmission efficiency of the coding packet can increase the coding opportunity of network coding under the condition of maximizing the transmission efficiency of the coding packet, improve the average coding degree of the coding packet, and effectively improve the performance gains of time delay, throughput rate and the like of opportunity network coding.
Drawings
The invention is further illustrated with reference to the following figures and examples.
Fig. 1 is a diagram of a typical "Cross" network coding scenario and packet delivery rates of links at different transmission rates, where a network coding group includes 4 code streams:
Figure BDA0002372206170000043
and
Figure BDA0002372206170000044
belonging to the case of "Cross" topology;
FIG. 2 is the average delivery delay end-to-end at different rates in the topology shown in FIG. 1, the rate control strategy (COPE) under a typical opportunistic network coding framework and the rate control mechanism (ORC) of the present invention;
fig. 3 is a flow chart of opportunistic network coding rate control.
Detailed Description
A rate control method for improving wireless network coding gain is characterized in that the method comprises the following steps:
step S1, for transmitting a coded packet with a coding degree n,defining the state in the process of controlling the speed rate during transmission as the code packet receiving node set GnEach node in the subset having failed to receive the encoded packet, using an n-bit vector (b)1,b2,...,bi,...,bn) To represent this subset, wherein biE {0, 1}, when biWhen 1, it indicates a receiving node set GnThe ith receiving node in the network has not received the encoded packet yet, when biWhen 0, this indicates the receiving node set GnThe ith receiving node in the network receives the coded packet, and for a coded packet with a coding degree of n, there are n receiving nodes, so that | S | ═ 2nAnd a possible state.
Step S2, when an encoding node is to send an encoded packet, it may select from decision set a ═ { r ═ r1,r2,...,rK,r1≤r2...≤rKSelect a transmission rate, the number of transmission rates in the set is the number of types of decisions that can be selected.
Step S3, for transmission rate rkWhen, the node i belongs to GnGiven a parameter (delivery rate of packets) of pi(rk) The Bernoulli model of (1), then from state StTransition to State st+1The state transition probability of time can be calculated by the following formula:
Figure BDA0002372206170000051
step S4, defining the profit obtained in the process of state transition to be divided by the time cost brought by the transmission of the coding packet, defining the reward as the transmission efficiency (CPTE) of the coding packet, and carrying out the encoding packet
Figure BDA0002372206170000052
It designates the receiving node as set GLIf participating in the encoded data packet PiHas a data packet length of li(bits), i is more than or equal to 1 and less than or equal to L, then the corresponding code packet
Figure BDA0002372206170000053
Length equal to the length max of the longest data packet therein1≤i≤Lli(ii) a If decision a is taken during decision stage ttThen from state StTransition to State St+1Reporting of time
Figure BDA0002372206170000055
Comprises the following steps:
Figure BDA0002372206170000054
step S5, determining an optimization target, optimizing the total expected CPTE value from the decision stage t to the decision stage N-1, and calculating by the following formula:
Figure BDA0002372206170000061
in a rate selection process with N decision stages, if
Figure BDA0002372206170000062
Define CPTE(s)t,t)=0。
Step S6, determining an optimal decision, which is given by the following formula:
Figure BDA0002372206170000063
for the obtained optimal solution and the corresponding optimal decision, the following backward recursion algorithm is used:
a1, setting t equal to N and
Figure BDA0002372206170000064
a2, let
Figure BDA0002372206170000065
Calculating CPTE(s)tT) and πt(st);
And A3, if t is equal to 0, stopping calculation, and otherwise, turning to A2 to continue calculation.
Further, the codec that achieves the maximum CPTE value is selected from all possible codecs, and pl (D (P) is usedi) Represents node D (P)i) Decoding the data packet set cached in the packet pool, optionally obtaining the encoding solution CA through the XOR operation and the corresponding packet set CsetCan be expressed as:
Figure BDA0002372206170000066
Cset={x1P1}∪{x2P2}∪L{xMPM};
wherein,
Figure BDA0002372206170000067
accordingly, the initial reception state of the receiving node that gets the encoded packet may be expressed as:
s0={D(x1P1)}∪{D(x2P2)}∪L{D(xMPM)};
therefore, the Integer Linear Programming (ILP) of the code selection problem based on CPTE values is summarized as:
max GPTE(st,t)}t=0
Figure BDA0002372206170000068
and obtaining an optimal coding solution through solving.
Referring to fig. 1-3, a typical "Cross" network coding (opportunistic network coding) rate control mechanism is provided;
first constructing a weighted graph G (V, E, f (C)) corresponding to the problem, thereby converting the search for a good package combination problem into a search for the largest weighted cluster in the graph; by separating the vertices in the graph one by one, a suitable coding solution will eventually be found.
In a coding structure with n coded streams, the transmission queue of a coding node contains | qiI from coded stream fiSo that the transmission queues Q of the coding nodes are shared
Figure BDA0002372206170000072
A packet, and Q ═ P1,P2,…,PK}; according to data packet PiNext hop node D (P)i) And node D (P)i) Decoded packet pool of (2) buffered packet set pl (D (P)i) The method of constructing the weighted graph G (V, E, ω) is as follows:
Figure BDA0002372206170000071
E={(v1,vj)|D(Pi)≠D(Pj),F(Pi)≠F(Pj),Pi∈pl(D(Pj)),Pj∈pl(D(Pi))};
ω:C→R;
for each data packet PiE.g. Q, 1 is more than or equal to i and less than or equal to K, all correspond to a vertex v in the graphiE.g. V (G); an edge in the edge set E in graph G can be defined as follows: for any two data packets P in the coding node sending queue Qi,PjI ≠ j, packet PiNext hop node D (P)i) Different from the data packet PjNext hop node D (P)j) (ii) a Data packet PiThe associated stream F (P)i) Different from the data packet PjThe associated stream F (P)j) (ii) a Node D (P)j) The buffered data packet set pl (D (P) of the decoded packet pool ofj) Contains a data packet Pi(ii) a Likewise, node D (P)i) The buffered data packet set pl (D (P) of the decoded packet pool ofi) Contains a data packet Pj(ii) a Then there is an undirected edge between the 2 vertices in graph G corresponding to these two packets, since the blob in graph G is a subset of vertex set v (G), the subgraph derived from this subset is a complete graph, and the blob in graph G is a complete graph
Figure BDA0002372206170000073
Is a coding solution, ω is a weight function of the clique C; if we define n (g) as the set of next-hop nodes corresponding to vertices in the clique C, ω (C) ═ CPTE(s)t=N(C)|t)|t=0The value of ω (C) reflects the transmission efficiency of the encoded packet.
The code selection algorithm based on CPTE can be divided into two phases: the first stage is to search the graph G (V, E) for the maximum clique, i.e. the clique with the most number of vertices, and according to the definition of cliques, if the optimal coding solution corresponds to the clique C in the graph G (V, E) and the clique C contains a vertex V, the degree d (V) of which is less than the maximum degree of the vertex in the graph G (V, E), we will derive a sub-graph G from the graph G (V, E)vThe sub-graph GvConsists of vertex V and its neighbors and removes vertex V from graph G (V, E). Here, the set C is used to save the searched maximum clique result; if sub-graph GvIs greater than the number of vertices in set C, we search for subgraph GvAnd stores the searched results in the set CvIn, if set CvIf the number of vertices in (C) is greater than the number of vertices in the set C, then C is usedvThe search results in (1) replace the maximum clique results saved in (C), otherwise we keep set (C) unchanged and will continue searching until set of vertices (V), (G) is empty; if we cannot find a vertex V, so that his degree is smaller than the maximum degree of the vertices in the graph G (V, E), we search directly the maximum degree of the vertices in the graph G (V, E), and due to the limited number of vertices, the search process can be completed in a limited step, and after we obtain the maximum clique C in the first stage, we search the subset of vertices in the set C that can obtain the maximum CPTE value in the second stage.
Referring to fig. 3, the operation in the opportunistic network coding rate control is completed in two stages, in the first stage, based on the construction rules of all candidate original data packets and codes that can participate in coding, an undirected graph G (V, E) is constructed first and the maximum clique C in the graph G (V, E) is searched, any non-empty subset in the set C
Figure BDA0002372206170000082
Corresponding to one possible encoding solution; in the second stage, the arbitrary codes are decoded
Figure BDA0002372206170000081
For coding packet C1Selects a suitable transmission rate for each transmission within one hop range, we define a measurable metric called the Coded Packet Transmission Efficiency (CPTE) to measure the expected cumulative return, and search for coded packet C1An optimal rate control strategy; then, based on the specific CPTE value of each code packet, the code solution with the largest CPTE value is selected from all possible code solutions, so that the performance gain of opportunistic network coding can be optimized. Therefore, a reasonable coding solution and the corresponding optimal rate control strategy can be found.
The above embodiments do not limit the scope of the present invention, and those skilled in the art can make equivalent modifications and variations without departing from the overall concept of the present invention.

Claims (2)

1. A rate control method for improving wireless network coding gain is characterized in that the method comprises the following steps:
step S1, for transmission a degree of encoding of
Figure 467738DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
Defining the state in the process of rate control during transmission as the receiving node set of the coded packet
Figure 252285DEST_PATH_IMAGE002
One for each node in the subset that did not receive the encoded packet
Figure 229469DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
Vector of bits
Figure 297919DEST_PATH_IMAGE003
To indicate this subset, wherein,
Figure 826989DEST_PATH_IMAGE004
when is coming into contact with
Figure 613679DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
Representing a set of receiving nodes
Figure 128974DEST_PATH_IMAGE002
To (1)
Figure 65313DEST_PATH_IMAGE006
A receiving node has not received the encoded packet yet
Figure 516017DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
Then, it represents the receiving node set
Figure 117900DEST_PATH_IMAGE002
To (1)
Figure 623836DEST_PATH_IMAGE006
A receiving node receives the encoded packet with a degree of encoding of
Figure 401299DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
To the coded packet of (A), it has
Figure 773637DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
A receiving node, therefore, has
Figure 269341DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
A possible state;
step S2, when an encoding node is to send an encoded packet, it may select from the decision set
Figure 392017DEST_PATH_IMAGE009
Selecting a transmission rate, wherein the number of the transmission rates contained in the set is the number of the types of the selectable decisions;
step S3, for transmission rate of
Figure 538834DEST_PATH_IMAGE010
Time, node
Figure 331340DEST_PATH_IMAGE011
Given a parameter (delivery rate of packets) of
Figure 327722DEST_PATH_IMAGE012
The Bernoulli model of (1), then the slave state
Figure 988510DEST_PATH_IMAGE013
Transition to State
Figure 740566DEST_PATH_IMAGE014
The state transition probability of time can be calculated by the following formula:
Figure 218820DEST_PATH_IMAGE015
step S4, defining the profit obtained in the process of state transition to be divided by the time cost brought by the transmission of the coding packet, defining the reward as the transmission efficiency (CPTE) of the coding packet, and carrying out the encoding packet
Figure 689116DEST_PATH_IMAGE016
Which designates the receiving node as a set
Figure 153595DEST_PATH_IMAGE017
If participating in an encoded data packet
Figure 510890DEST_PATH_IMAGE018
Length of data packetIs composed of
Figure 910778DEST_PATH_IMAGE019
Figure 117637DEST_PATH_IMAGE020
Then the corresponding code packet
Figure 120229DEST_PATH_IMAGE021
The length is equal to the length of the longest data packet in the data packet
Figure 581297DEST_PATH_IMAGE022
(ii) a If in the decision stage
Figure 962206DEST_PATH_IMAGE023
Taking decisions at all times
Figure 79198DEST_PATH_IMAGE024
Then slave state
Figure 72431DEST_PATH_IMAGE013
Transition to a State
Figure 247060DEST_PATH_IMAGE014
Reporting of time
Figure 723172DEST_PATH_IMAGE025
Comprises the following steps:
Figure 406088DEST_PATH_IMAGE026
step S5, determining an optimization target, and optimizing a secondary decision stage
Figure 750482DEST_PATH_IMAGE023
To the decision stage
Figure 451722DEST_PATH_IMAGE027
General desiresCPTE value, calculated by the following formula:
Figure 613582DEST_PATH_IMAGE028
at one is provided with
Figure 95378DEST_PATH_IMAGE029
In the rate selection process of a decision stage, if
Figure 181146DEST_PATH_IMAGE030
Then define
Figure 219116DEST_PATH_IMAGE031
Step S6, determining an optimal decision, which is given by the following formula:
Figure 302610DEST_PATH_IMAGE032
for the obtained optimal solution and the corresponding optimal decision, the following backward recursion algorithm is used:
a1, setting
Figure 193074DEST_PATH_IMAGE033
And is
Figure 879270DEST_PATH_IMAGE034
A2, let
Figure 555102DEST_PATH_IMAGE035
Calculating
Figure 560230DEST_PATH_IMAGE036
And
Figure 751040DEST_PATH_IMAGE037
a3, if
Figure 178610DEST_PATH_IMAGE038
Otherwise, go to A2 to continue the calculation.
2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein in step S6, the coding solution that can obtain the maximum CPTE value is selected from all possible coding solutions for use in the method
Figure 161478DEST_PATH_IMAGE039
Representing nodes
Figure 711408DEST_PATH_IMAGE040
Decoding the data packet set cached in the packet pool, optionally obtaining the encoding solution CA through the XOR operation and the corresponding packet set
Figure 327197DEST_PATH_IMAGE041
Can be expressed as:
Figure 1803DEST_PATH_IMAGE042
Figure 386648DEST_PATH_IMAGE043
wherein,
Figure 107479DEST_PATH_IMAGE044
accordingly, the initial reception state of the receiving node that gets the encoded packet may be expressed as:
Figure 459832DEST_PATH_IMAGE045
integer linear programming of the code selection problem based on CPTE values
Figure 166888DEST_PATH_IMAGE046
The result is:
Figure 156972DEST_PATH_IMAGE047
Figure 314283DEST_PATH_IMAGE048
and obtaining an optimal coding solution through solving.
CN202010054093.1A 2020-01-17 2020-01-17 Rate control method for improving wireless network coding gain Withdrawn CN111224751A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010054093.1A CN111224751A (en) 2020-01-17 2020-01-17 Rate control method for improving wireless network coding gain

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010054093.1A CN111224751A (en) 2020-01-17 2020-01-17 Rate control method for improving wireless network coding gain

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN111224751A true CN111224751A (en) 2020-06-02

Family

ID=70828328

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202010054093.1A Withdrawn CN111224751A (en) 2020-01-17 2020-01-17 Rate control method for improving wireless network coding gain

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN111224751A (en)

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103746775A (en) * 2014-01-23 2014-04-23 电子科技大学 Cache mechanism for improving wireless opportunity network coding gain
US20150049677A1 (en) * 2013-08-14 2015-02-19 National Cheng Kung University Method and device for frame aggregation transmission of wireless network system

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20150049677A1 (en) * 2013-08-14 2015-02-19 National Cheng Kung University Method and device for frame aggregation transmission of wireless network system
CN103746775A (en) * 2014-01-23 2014-04-23 电子科技大学 Cache mechanism for improving wireless opportunity network coding gain

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
刘青龙: "《提高无线机会性网络编码性能增益机制研究》", 《中国优秀博硕学位论文全文数据库(博士) 信息科技辑》 *

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN109547165B (en) Design method of sliding window BATS Codes
CN102131083A (en) Method and device for transmitting scalable videos based on priorities
Guo et al. A QoS-oriented high-efficiency resource allocation scheme in wireless multimedia sensor networks
Bastopcu et al. Optimal selective encoding for timely updates
US10097602B2 (en) Channel-aware caching-aided coded multicast
CN113490239B (en) Heterogeneous wireless link concurrent transmission control method based on adaptive network coding
Chi et al. A more efficient COPE architecture for network coding in multihop wireless networks
CN111224751A (en) Rate control method for improving wireless network coding gain
CN110535562A (en) A kind of filtering type dimensionality reduction interpretation method
Kim et al. An enhanced tree routing through multi-criteria decision making over wireless sensor networks
CN109561129B (en) Cooperative computing unloading method based on optical fiber-wireless network
Nguyen et al. Network coding-based wireless media transmission using POMDP
Shiming et al. A simple channel assignment for opportunistic routing in multi-radio multi-channel wireless mesh networks
CN114172619A (en) Network communication method based on distributed batch sparse codes
CN111865488B (en) Code selection method for multi-hop short packet communication
Jiang et al. Improving throughput and fairness of convergecast in vehicular networks
CN115378548A (en) Connectionless-oriented binary superposition determined linear network coding transmission method
Li et al. Random network coding based on adaptive sliding window in wireless multicast networks
Shen et al. Qos-guaranteed wireless broadcast scheduling with network coding and rate adaptation
Baboo et al. Genetic algorithm based congestion aware routing protocol (GA-CARP) for mobile ad hoc networks
Lee et al. Cross layer optimized video streaming based on IEEE 802.11 multi-rate over multi-hop mobile ad hoc networks
CN112954719A (en) Flow matching method for network coding sensing route in wireless multi-hop network
CN107147470B (en) Network coding forwarding rate on-line control method and device
Zhao et al. Queue-aware variable-length coding for ultra-reliable and low-latency communications
Hu et al. CoAOR: An efficient network coding aware opportunistic routing mechanism for wireless mesh networks

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
WW01 Invention patent application withdrawn after publication

Application publication date: 20200602

WW01 Invention patent application withdrawn after publication