CN111224751A - Rate control method for improving wireless network coding gain - Google Patents
Rate control method for improving wireless network coding gain Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN111224751A CN111224751A CN202010054093.1A CN202010054093A CN111224751A CN 111224751 A CN111224751 A CN 111224751A CN 202010054093 A CN202010054093 A CN 202010054093A CN 111224751 A CN111224751 A CN 111224751A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- packet
- coding
- transmission
- rate control
- receiving node
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 27
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 37
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 abstract description 5
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000011217 control strategy Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 241001235534 Graphis <ascomycete fungus> Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001186 cumulative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
- H04L1/0001—Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff
- H04L1/0002—Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff by adapting the transmission rate
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
- H04L1/0001—Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff
- H04L1/0009—Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff by adapting the channel coding
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)
- Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a rate control method for improving wireless network coding gain, which can provide rate control aiming at the situation that opportunity network coding faces different users and different channel qualities in an LTE network, and makes up the defect of researching an opportunity network coding rate control mechanism in the prior research; and the code selection strategy based on the transmission efficiency of the coding packet can increase the coding opportunity of network coding under the condition of maximizing the transmission efficiency of the coding packet, improve the average coding degree of the coding packet, and effectively improve the performance gains of time delay, throughput rate and the like of opportunity network coding.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of communication, in particular to a rate control method for improving wireless network coding gain.
Background
Network coding technology has been proven to effectively improve wireless network performance, including performance indexes such as throughput rate, delivery delay, energy efficiency, etc., and has been applied to LTE cellular networks, such as cooperative transmission combining network coding and relay selection, etc. However, in a wireless application environment, due to the fact that the wireless application environment is subjected to a complex and variable communication environment and due to frequent changes of channel conditions, channel quality is reduced, and burst packet loss of transmission packets occurs, the network transmission performance is greatly affected. For the situation of high packet loss rate in these wireless network environments, it is difficult to effectively exert expected performance gain by applying the existing network coding architecture.
In order to ensure reliable delivery of coded packets, in a wireless network with a multi-rate control function, an existing network coding architecture generally defaults to a coding node to deliver coded packets with a lowest transmission rate in exchange for a higher delivery rate. If the primary receiving node receives the encoded packet, the default secondary receiving node also receives the encoded packet. On one hand, the method limits the application of multi-rate and cannot better utilize the bandwidth resources of the wireless network. On the other hand, in an actual network scenario, the method neither can completely ensure reliable delivery of the coded packet, nor introduces some other problems, for example, a lower transmission rate may result in a longer transmission time, thereby greatly increasing the chance of collision of the data packet, and reducing the delivery rate of the network data packet and the overall network throughput rate. Meanwhile, for the coding node, how to handle the broadcast bottleneck problem caused by a plurality of receiving nodes of coding packets with different channel qualities is very urgent. Therefore, how to make a better compromise on the reliable delivery of coded packets and coding gain is an important research aspect.
In the related research of the existing network coding and rate control mechanism, joint design of the network coding and the MAC mechanism is mainly discussed to optimize the network throughput rate performance, and the unified design of a network coding algorithm and rate control is rarely researched. With the application of the millimeter wave technology in the LTE cellular network, compared with the traditional frequency band lower than 6GHz, the transmission packet loss rate of the communication in the millimeter wave frequency band is much higher, and it is necessary to ensure reliable, low packet loss rate and stable data rate. By realizing the unified design of the network coding algorithm and the rate control, higher network throughput rate, higher reliability and lower system delivery delay can be obtained. Therefore, it is very important to research a rate control method based on network coding.
Disclosure of Invention
The technical problem to be solved by the invention is to provide a rate control method aiming at the situation that the opportunistic network coding faces different users and different channel qualities in an LTE network, so as to improve the delivery efficiency of a coding packet and further improve the overall performance of the system by the network coding.
The technical scheme adopted by the invention for solving the technical problems is as follows:
a rate control method for improving wireless network coding gain is characterized in that the method comprises the following steps:
step S1, for transmitting a coded packet with a coding degree n, defining the state in the process of speed control during transmission as the coded packet receiving node set GnEach node in the subset having failed to receive the encoded packet, using an n-bit vector (b)1,b2,...,bi,...,bn) To represent this subset, wherein biE {0, 1}, when biWhen 1, it indicates a receiving node set GnThe ith receiving node in the network has not received the encoded packet yet, when biWhen 0, this indicates the receiving node set GnThe ith receiving node in the network receives the coded packet, and for a coded packet with a coding degree of n, there are n receiving nodes, so that | S | ═ 2nAnd a possible state.
Step S2, when an encoding node is to send an encoded packet, it may select from decision set a ═ { r ═ r1,r2,...,rK,r1≤r2…≤rKSelect a transmission rate, the number of transmission rates in the set is the number of types of decisions that can be selected.
Step S3, for transmission rate rkWhen, the node i belongs to GnGiven a parameter (delivery rate of packets) of pi(rk) The Bernoulli model of (1), then from state StTransition to State St+1The state transition probability of time can be calculated by the following formula:
step S4, defining the profit obtained in the process of state transition to be divided by the time cost brought by the transmission of the coding packet, defining the reward as the transmission efficiency (CPTE) of the coding packet, and carrying out the encoding packetIt designates the receiving node as set GLIf participating in the encoded data packet PiHas a data packet length of li(bits), i is more than or equal to 1 and less than or equal to L, then the corresponding code packetLength equal to the length max of the longest data packet therein1≤i≤Lli(ii) a If decision a is taken during decision stage ttThen from state StTransition to state st+1Reporting of timeComprises the following steps:
step S5, determining an optimization target, optimizing the total expected CPTE value from the decision stage t to the decision stage N-1, and calculating by the following formula:
Step S6, determining an optimal decision, which is given by the following formula:
for the obtained optimal solution and the corresponding optimal decision, the following backward recursion algorithm is used:
And A3, if t is equal to 0, stopping calculation, and otherwise, turning to A2 to continue calculation.
Further, the codec that achieves the maximum CPTE value is selected from all possible codecs, and pl (D (P) is usedi) Represents node D (P)i) Decoding the data packet set cached in the packet pool, optionally obtaining the encoding solution CA through the XOR operation and the corresponding packet set CsetCan be expressed as:
Cset={x1P1}∪{x2P2}∪L{XMPM};
wherein,
accordingly, the initial reception state of the receiving node that gets the encoded packet may be expressed as:
s0={D(x1P1)}∪{D(x2P2)}∪L{D(xMPM)};
therefore, the Integer Linear Programming (ILP) of the code selection problem based on CPTE values is summarized as:
max CPTE(st,t)|t=0,
and obtaining an optimal coding solution through solving.
The invention has the beneficial effects that:
(1) aiming at the opportunity network coding, when the opportunity network coding faces different users and different channel qualities in an LTE network, rate control is provided, and the defect of researching an opportunity network coding rate control mechanism in the existing research is overcome;
(2) the code selection strategy based on the transmission efficiency of the coding packet can increase the coding opportunity of network coding under the condition of maximizing the transmission efficiency of the coding packet, improve the average coding degree of the coding packet, and effectively improve the performance gains of time delay, throughput rate and the like of opportunity network coding.
Drawings
The invention is further illustrated with reference to the following figures and examples.
Fig. 1 is a diagram of a typical "Cross" network coding scenario and packet delivery rates of links at different transmission rates, where a network coding group includes 4 code streams:andbelonging to the case of "Cross" topology;
FIG. 2 is the average delivery delay end-to-end at different rates in the topology shown in FIG. 1, the rate control strategy (COPE) under a typical opportunistic network coding framework and the rate control mechanism (ORC) of the present invention;
fig. 3 is a flow chart of opportunistic network coding rate control.
Detailed Description
A rate control method for improving wireless network coding gain is characterized in that the method comprises the following steps:
step S1, for transmitting a coded packet with a coding degree n,defining the state in the process of controlling the speed rate during transmission as the code packet receiving node set GnEach node in the subset having failed to receive the encoded packet, using an n-bit vector (b)1,b2,...,bi,...,bn) To represent this subset, wherein biE {0, 1}, when biWhen 1, it indicates a receiving node set GnThe ith receiving node in the network has not received the encoded packet yet, when biWhen 0, this indicates the receiving node set GnThe ith receiving node in the network receives the coded packet, and for a coded packet with a coding degree of n, there are n receiving nodes, so that | S | ═ 2nAnd a possible state.
Step S2, when an encoding node is to send an encoded packet, it may select from decision set a ═ { r ═ r1,r2,...,rK,r1≤r2...≤rKSelect a transmission rate, the number of transmission rates in the set is the number of types of decisions that can be selected.
Step S3, for transmission rate rkWhen, the node i belongs to GnGiven a parameter (delivery rate of packets) of pi(rk) The Bernoulli model of (1), then from state StTransition to State st+1The state transition probability of time can be calculated by the following formula:
step S4, defining the profit obtained in the process of state transition to be divided by the time cost brought by the transmission of the coding packet, defining the reward as the transmission efficiency (CPTE) of the coding packet, and carrying out the encoding packetIt designates the receiving node as set GLIf participating in the encoded data packet PiHas a data packet length of li(bits), i is more than or equal to 1 and less than or equal to L, then the corresponding code packetLength equal to the length max of the longest data packet therein1≤i≤Lli(ii) a If decision a is taken during decision stage ttThen from state StTransition to State St+1Reporting of timeComprises the following steps:
step S5, determining an optimization target, optimizing the total expected CPTE value from the decision stage t to the decision stage N-1, and calculating by the following formula:
Step S6, determining an optimal decision, which is given by the following formula:
for the obtained optimal solution and the corresponding optimal decision, the following backward recursion algorithm is used:
And A3, if t is equal to 0, stopping calculation, and otherwise, turning to A2 to continue calculation.
Further, the codec that achieves the maximum CPTE value is selected from all possible codecs, and pl (D (P) is usedi) Represents node D (P)i) Decoding the data packet set cached in the packet pool, optionally obtaining the encoding solution CA through the XOR operation and the corresponding packet set CsetCan be expressed as:
Cset={x1P1}∪{x2P2}∪L{xMPM};
wherein,
accordingly, the initial reception state of the receiving node that gets the encoded packet may be expressed as:
s0={D(x1P1)}∪{D(x2P2)}∪L{D(xMPM)};
therefore, the Integer Linear Programming (ILP) of the code selection problem based on CPTE values is summarized as:
max GPTE(st,t)}t=0,
and obtaining an optimal coding solution through solving.
Referring to fig. 1-3, a typical "Cross" network coding (opportunistic network coding) rate control mechanism is provided;
first constructing a weighted graph G (V, E, f (C)) corresponding to the problem, thereby converting the search for a good package combination problem into a search for the largest weighted cluster in the graph; by separating the vertices in the graph one by one, a suitable coding solution will eventually be found.
In a coding structure with n coded streams, the transmission queue of a coding node contains | qiI from coded stream fiSo that the transmission queues Q of the coding nodes are sharedA packet, and Q ═ P1,P2,…,PK}; according to data packet PiNext hop node D (P)i) And node D (P)i) Decoded packet pool of (2) buffered packet set pl (D (P)i) The method of constructing the weighted graph G (V, E, ω) is as follows:
E={(v1,vj)|D(Pi)≠D(Pj),F(Pi)≠F(Pj),Pi∈pl(D(Pj)),Pj∈pl(D(Pi))};
ω:C→R;
for each data packet PiE.g. Q, 1 is more than or equal to i and less than or equal to K, all correspond to a vertex v in the graphiE.g. V (G); an edge in the edge set E in graph G can be defined as follows: for any two data packets P in the coding node sending queue Qi,PjI ≠ j, packet PiNext hop node D (P)i) Different from the data packet PjNext hop node D (P)j) (ii) a Data packet PiThe associated stream F (P)i) Different from the data packet PjThe associated stream F (P)j) (ii) a Node D (P)j) The buffered data packet set pl (D (P) of the decoded packet pool ofj) Contains a data packet Pi(ii) a Likewise, node D (P)i) The buffered data packet set pl (D (P) of the decoded packet pool ofi) Contains a data packet Pj(ii) a Then there is an undirected edge between the 2 vertices in graph G corresponding to these two packets, since the blob in graph G is a subset of vertex set v (G), the subgraph derived from this subset is a complete graph, and the blob in graph G is a complete graphIs a coding solution, ω is a weight function of the clique C; if we define n (g) as the set of next-hop nodes corresponding to vertices in the clique C, ω (C) ═ CPTE(s)t=N(C)|t)|t=0The value of ω (C) reflects the transmission efficiency of the encoded packet.
The code selection algorithm based on CPTE can be divided into two phases: the first stage is to search the graph G (V, E) for the maximum clique, i.e. the clique with the most number of vertices, and according to the definition of cliques, if the optimal coding solution corresponds to the clique C in the graph G (V, E) and the clique C contains a vertex V, the degree d (V) of which is less than the maximum degree of the vertex in the graph G (V, E), we will derive a sub-graph G from the graph G (V, E)vThe sub-graph GvConsists of vertex V and its neighbors and removes vertex V from graph G (V, E). Here, the set C is used to save the searched maximum clique result; if sub-graph GvIs greater than the number of vertices in set C, we search for subgraph GvAnd stores the searched results in the set CvIn, if set CvIf the number of vertices in (C) is greater than the number of vertices in the set C, then C is usedvThe search results in (1) replace the maximum clique results saved in (C), otherwise we keep set (C) unchanged and will continue searching until set of vertices (V), (G) is empty; if we cannot find a vertex V, so that his degree is smaller than the maximum degree of the vertices in the graph G (V, E), we search directly the maximum degree of the vertices in the graph G (V, E), and due to the limited number of vertices, the search process can be completed in a limited step, and after we obtain the maximum clique C in the first stage, we search the subset of vertices in the set C that can obtain the maximum CPTE value in the second stage.
Referring to fig. 3, the operation in the opportunistic network coding rate control is completed in two stages, in the first stage, based on the construction rules of all candidate original data packets and codes that can participate in coding, an undirected graph G (V, E) is constructed first and the maximum clique C in the graph G (V, E) is searched, any non-empty subset in the set CCorresponding to one possible encoding solution; in the second stage, the arbitrary codes are decodedFor coding packet C1Selects a suitable transmission rate for each transmission within one hop range, we define a measurable metric called the Coded Packet Transmission Efficiency (CPTE) to measure the expected cumulative return, and search for coded packet C1An optimal rate control strategy; then, based on the specific CPTE value of each code packet, the code solution with the largest CPTE value is selected from all possible code solutions, so that the performance gain of opportunistic network coding can be optimized. Therefore, a reasonable coding solution and the corresponding optimal rate control strategy can be found.
The above embodiments do not limit the scope of the present invention, and those skilled in the art can make equivalent modifications and variations without departing from the overall concept of the present invention.
Claims (2)
1. A rate control method for improving wireless network coding gain is characterized in that the method comprises the following steps:
step S1, for transmission a degree of encoding ofDefining the state in the process of rate control during transmission as the receiving node set of the coded packetOne for each node in the subset that did not receive the encoded packetVector of bitsTo indicate this subset, wherein,when is coming into contact withRepresenting a set of receiving nodesTo (1)A receiving node has not received the encoded packet yetThen, it represents the receiving node setTo (1)A receiving node receives the encoded packet with a degree of encoding ofTo the coded packet of (A), it hasA receiving node, therefore, hasA possible state;
step S2, when an encoding node is to send an encoded packet, it may select from the decision setSelecting a transmission rate, wherein the number of the transmission rates contained in the set is the number of the types of the selectable decisions;
step S3, for transmission rate ofTime, nodeGiven a parameter (delivery rate of packets) ofThe Bernoulli model of (1), then the slave stateTransition to StateThe state transition probability of time can be calculated by the following formula:
step S4, defining the profit obtained in the process of state transition to be divided by the time cost brought by the transmission of the coding packet, defining the reward as the transmission efficiency (CPTE) of the coding packet, and carrying out the encoding packetWhich designates the receiving node as a setIf participating in an encoded data packetLength of data packetIs composed of,Then the corresponding code packetThe length is equal to the length of the longest data packet in the data packet(ii) a If in the decision stageTaking decisions at all timesThen slave stateTransition to a StateReporting of timeComprises the following steps:
step S5, determining an optimization target, and optimizing a secondary decision stageTo the decision stageGeneral desiresCPTE value, calculated by the following formula:
Step S6, determining an optimal decision, which is given by the following formula:
for the obtained optimal solution and the corresponding optimal decision, the following backward recursion algorithm is used:
2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein in step S6, the coding solution that can obtain the maximum CPTE value is selected from all possible coding solutions for use in the methodRepresenting nodesDecoding the data packet set cached in the packet pool, optionally obtaining the encoding solution CA through the XOR operation and the corresponding packet setCan be expressed as:
wherein,
accordingly, the initial reception state of the receiving node that gets the encoded packet may be expressed as:
and obtaining an optimal coding solution through solving.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010054093.1A CN111224751A (en) | 2020-01-17 | 2020-01-17 | Rate control method for improving wireless network coding gain |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010054093.1A CN111224751A (en) | 2020-01-17 | 2020-01-17 | Rate control method for improving wireless network coding gain |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN111224751A true CN111224751A (en) | 2020-06-02 |
Family
ID=70828328
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010054093.1A Withdrawn CN111224751A (en) | 2020-01-17 | 2020-01-17 | Rate control method for improving wireless network coding gain |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN111224751A (en) |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103746775A (en) * | 2014-01-23 | 2014-04-23 | 电子科技大学 | Cache mechanism for improving wireless opportunity network coding gain |
US20150049677A1 (en) * | 2013-08-14 | 2015-02-19 | National Cheng Kung University | Method and device for frame aggregation transmission of wireless network system |
-
2020
- 2020-01-17 CN CN202010054093.1A patent/CN111224751A/en not_active Withdrawn
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20150049677A1 (en) * | 2013-08-14 | 2015-02-19 | National Cheng Kung University | Method and device for frame aggregation transmission of wireless network system |
CN103746775A (en) * | 2014-01-23 | 2014-04-23 | 电子科技大学 | Cache mechanism for improving wireless opportunity network coding gain |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
刘青龙: "《提高无线机会性网络编码性能增益机制研究》", 《中国优秀博硕学位论文全文数据库(博士) 信息科技辑》 * |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN109547165B (en) | Design method of sliding window BATS Codes | |
CN102131083A (en) | Method and device for transmitting scalable videos based on priorities | |
Guo et al. | A QoS-oriented high-efficiency resource allocation scheme in wireless multimedia sensor networks | |
Bastopcu et al. | Optimal selective encoding for timely updates | |
US10097602B2 (en) | Channel-aware caching-aided coded multicast | |
CN113490239B (en) | Heterogeneous wireless link concurrent transmission control method based on adaptive network coding | |
Chi et al. | A more efficient COPE architecture for network coding in multihop wireless networks | |
CN111224751A (en) | Rate control method for improving wireless network coding gain | |
CN110535562A (en) | A kind of filtering type dimensionality reduction interpretation method | |
Kim et al. | An enhanced tree routing through multi-criteria decision making over wireless sensor networks | |
CN109561129B (en) | Cooperative computing unloading method based on optical fiber-wireless network | |
Nguyen et al. | Network coding-based wireless media transmission using POMDP | |
Shiming et al. | A simple channel assignment for opportunistic routing in multi-radio multi-channel wireless mesh networks | |
CN114172619A (en) | Network communication method based on distributed batch sparse codes | |
CN111865488B (en) | Code selection method for multi-hop short packet communication | |
Jiang et al. | Improving throughput and fairness of convergecast in vehicular networks | |
CN115378548A (en) | Connectionless-oriented binary superposition determined linear network coding transmission method | |
Li et al. | Random network coding based on adaptive sliding window in wireless multicast networks | |
Shen et al. | Qos-guaranteed wireless broadcast scheduling with network coding and rate adaptation | |
Baboo et al. | Genetic algorithm based congestion aware routing protocol (GA-CARP) for mobile ad hoc networks | |
Lee et al. | Cross layer optimized video streaming based on IEEE 802.11 multi-rate over multi-hop mobile ad hoc networks | |
CN112954719A (en) | Flow matching method for network coding sensing route in wireless multi-hop network | |
CN107147470B (en) | Network coding forwarding rate on-line control method and device | |
Zhao et al. | Queue-aware variable-length coding for ultra-reliable and low-latency communications | |
Hu et al. | CoAOR: An efficient network coding aware opportunistic routing mechanism for wireless mesh networks |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
WW01 | Invention patent application withdrawn after publication |
Application publication date: 20200602 |
|
WW01 | Invention patent application withdrawn after publication |