CN111105067A - Equipment matching scheduling method based on GIS map - Google Patents

Equipment matching scheduling method based on GIS map Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN111105067A
CN111105067A CN201911036608.9A CN201911036608A CN111105067A CN 111105067 A CN111105067 A CN 111105067A CN 201911036608 A CN201911036608 A CN 201911036608A CN 111105067 A CN111105067 A CN 111105067A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
equipment
calculating
fault
gis map
interval
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN201911036608.9A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN111105067B (en
Inventor
陈俊
朱云祥
俞培祥
张黎军
屠锋
张弓
雷东
刘提
王亦昌
朱斌
胡梦洁
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
State Grid Zhejiang Electric Power Co Ltd
Zhejiang Huayun Information Technology Co Ltd
Construction Branch of State Grid Zhejiang Electric Power Co Ltd
Original Assignee
State Grid Zhejiang Electric Power Co Ltd
Zhejiang Huayun Information Technology Co Ltd
Construction Branch of State Grid Zhejiang Electric Power Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by State Grid Zhejiang Electric Power Co Ltd, Zhejiang Huayun Information Technology Co Ltd, Construction Branch of State Grid Zhejiang Electric Power Co Ltd filed Critical State Grid Zhejiang Electric Power Co Ltd
Priority to CN201911036608.9A priority Critical patent/CN111105067B/en
Publication of CN111105067A publication Critical patent/CN111105067A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN111105067B publication Critical patent/CN111105067B/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/04Forecasting or optimisation specially adapted for administrative or management purposes, e.g. linear programming or "cutting stock problem"
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0631Resource planning, allocation, distributing or scheduling for enterprises or organisations
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/06Electricity, gas or water supply
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y04INFORMATION OR COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES HAVING AN IMPACT ON OTHER TECHNOLOGY AREAS
    • Y04SSYSTEMS INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO POWER NETWORK OPERATION, COMMUNICATION OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING THE ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION, MANAGEMENT OR USAGE, i.e. SMART GRIDS
    • Y04S10/00Systems supporting electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
    • Y04S10/50Systems or methods supporting the power network operation or management, involving a certain degree of interaction with the load-side end user applications

Abstract

The invention relates to the field of equipment scheduling, in particular to an equipment matching scheduling method based on a GIS map, which comprises the following steps: calculating to obtain the average fault interval time T of each equipment according to the fault information of each equipment in the using processInterval i(ii) a Calculating the year number Yi of each equipment from the next overhaul date according to the overhaul date of each equipment; according to mean time between failures T of each equipmentInterval iAnd the number of years from the next inspection date YiAnd calculating to obtain the optimal selection value of each equipment through the optimal selection model of the equipment, and selecting the equipment with the maximum optimal selection value for scheduling. The invention has the following beneficial effects: the equipment fully considers the mean time between failures and the years from the next overhaul date before matching and scheduling, thereby obtaining the optimal equipment and reducing the equipmentThe efficiency of the failure occurs in the process of ex-warehouse use, and meanwhile, the delay of maintenance in the use process is avoided.

Description

Equipment matching scheduling method based on GIS map
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of equipment scheduling, in particular to an equipment matching scheduling method based on a GIS map.
Background
In the power grid infrastructure construction process, a large amount of mechanical construction equipment is usually used, and under the condition, equipment management departments of power transmission and transformation engineering companies need to accurately and timely coordinate and schedule related equipment facilities to transport the equipment facilities to engineering sites, so that the engineering construction is smoothly, safely and efficiently carried out.
In the existing actual working process, the equipment management department door usually randomly selects corresponding construction equipment for matching scheduling, and then the construction equipment often has problems such as faults in the construction process.
Disclosure of Invention
In order to solve the problems, the invention provides an equipment matching scheduling method based on a GIS map.
A GIS map-based equipment matching scheduling method comprises the following steps:
calculating to obtain the average fault interval time T of each equipment according to the fault information of each equipment in the using processInterval i
Calculating the year number Yi of each equipment from the next overhaul date according to the overhaul date of each equipment;
according to mean time between failures T of each equipmentInterval iAnd the number of years from the next inspection date YiBy optimally selecting models of the equipment
Figure BDA0002251663450000011
Calculating to obtain an optimal selection value of each device, and selecting the device with the maximum optimal selection value for scheduling, wherein K is a constant; a is a weight coefficient of the mean time between failures; b is a weight coefficient of the number of years from the next inspection date.
Preferably, the mean time between failures T of each equipment is calculated according to the failure information of each equipment in the using processInterval iThe method comprises the following steps:
according to the fault information of each equipment in the using process, the fault times N of each equipment and the working duration T of each equipment which is put into use again after each fault is repaired are obtainedDuration i
According to the duration of each work time T put into use again after each fault repairDuration iCalculating the total working time T of each equipmentGeneral assembly
Calculating to obtain the mean time between failures of each equipment
Figure BDA0002251663450000021
Preferably, the mean time between failures T of each equipment is calculated according to the failure information of each equipment in the using processSpaceriThe method also comprises the following steps:
and selecting the equipment in the period of occasional failure as the equipment to be preferentially selected according to the fault rate bathtub curve of the equipment.
Preferably, the method further comprises the following steps:
the method comprises the steps of obtaining the inventory quantity of replaceable parts of each device and the purchase period of the replaceable parts, calculating the adequacy of each replaceable part, and when the adequacy corresponding to the device with the maximum optimal selection value is lower than a set threshold, selecting the device with the next largest optimal selection value until the adequacy corresponding to the device is larger than the set threshold.
Preferably, the equipment is provided with a GPS positioning module, and the running track of each equipment is generated through the GPS positioning module and displayed on a GIS map.
The invention has the following beneficial effects:
the average fault interval time and the years from the next overhaul date of the equipment are fully considered before the equipment is matched and scheduled, so that the optimal equipment is obtained, the efficiency of the equipment in the process of ex-warehouse use is reduced, and delay in overhaul in the process of use is avoided.
Drawings
The present invention will be described in further detail with reference to the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments.
Fig. 1 is a flowchart of an equipment matching scheduling method based on a GIS map according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 2 is a flowchart of step S2 in the method for matching and scheduling equipment based on a GIS map according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 3 is a fault rate bathtub curve diagram of equipment in an equipment matching scheduling method based on a GIS map according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions of the present invention will be further described below with reference to the accompanying drawings, but the present invention is not limited to these embodiments.
An embodiment of the present invention provides an equipment matching scheduling method based on a GIS map, as shown in fig. 1, including:
s1: root of herbaceous plantCalculating to obtain the average fault interval time T of each equipment according to the fault information of each equipment in the using processInterval i
S2: calculating the year number Yi of each equipment from the next overhaul date according to the overhaul date of each equipment;
s3: according to mean time between failures T of each equipmentInterval iAnd the number of years from the next inspection date YiBy optimally selecting models of the equipment
Figure BDA0002251663450000031
Calculating to obtain an optimal selection value of each device, and selecting the device with the maximum optimal selection value for scheduling, wherein K is a constant; a is a weight coefficient of the mean time between failures; b is a weight coefficient of the number of years from the next inspection date.
The fault information of each device in the using process comprises the following steps: and in the using process, the fault feedback of a user, the detection and maintenance results of equipment and the like are carried out. At the same time, the time of each failure of each equipment will also be recorded. Specifically, as shown in fig. 2, step S1 includes the following steps:
s11: according to the fault information of each equipment in the using process, the fault times N of each equipment and the working duration T of each equipment which is put into use again after each fault is repaired are obtainedDuration i
S12: according to the duration of each work time T put into use again after each fault repairDuration iCalculating the total working time T of each equipmentGeneral assembly
S13: calculating to obtain the mean time between failures of each equipment
Figure BDA0002251663450000041
The next detection date of each equipment is acquired through the existing periodic maintenance date, and equipment which can be subjected to preventive maintenance or third-party delivery inspection in the use period is excluded under the same condition, preferably equipment with a far next detection date, so that delivery inspection or warehouse returning maintenance in the use period is avoided, and the use rate of field equipment is improved.
Establishing an optimal selection model
Figure BDA0002251663450000042
Wherein K is a constant; a is a weight coefficient of the mean time between failures; b is a weight coefficient of the number of years from the next inspection date.
According to mean time between failures T of each equipmentInterval iAnd the number of years from the next inspection date YiAnd calculating to obtain the optimal selection value of each equipment through the optimal selection model H of the equipment, and selecting the equipment with the maximum optimal selection value for scheduling.
In an embodiment, before step S1, the method further includes the steps of: s0: and selecting the equipment in the period of occasional failure as the equipment to be preferentially selected according to the fault rate bathtub curve of the equipment.
Each kind of equipment has its own fault rate bathtub curve, as shown in fig. 3, the fault rate bathtub curve, i.e. the failure rate of the equipment, has different characteristics with the change of the working time, according to the long-term theoretical research and data statistics, most of the equipment failure rate curves are found to be the same as the section of the bathtub, and the section is obviously divided into three sections, which are respectively used for three different stages or periods of the components. The fault rate bathtub curve is divided into an early failure period, a sporadic failure period and a wear failure period. The failure rate of the early failure period and the wear failure period is higher than that of the accidental failure period, so that equipment in the accidental failure period is preferentially selected, and the equipment is less prone to failure in the using process.
In one embodiment, the equipment matching scheduling method based on the GIS map further includes:
the method comprises the steps of obtaining the inventory quantity of replaceable parts of each device and the purchase period of the replaceable parts, calculating the adequacy of each replaceable part, and when the adequacy corresponding to the device with the maximum optimal selection value is lower than a set threshold, selecting the device with the next largest optimal selection value until the adequacy corresponding to the device is larger than the set threshold.
The equipment with high adequacy of replaceable parts is preferably selected under the same conditions, so that the equipment can be quickly repaired in case of equipment failure, and adverse effects are avoidedThe noise is reduced to the minimum. When equipment is dispatched, because the inventory of the parts is related to the inventory of the parts through the equipment, the inventory A of the parts and the replaceable parts thereof is automatically inquired and the purchasing period T is combinedProcurementAnd comprehensively evaluating the adequacy of equipment accessories, and preferably selecting the equipment with abundant accessories.
Wherein, the adequacy is calculated as:
adequacy M is stock quantity A.c + purchasing period TProcurement·d,
Wherein c represents a weight coefficient of the stock quantity A, d represents a procurement period TProcurementThe weight coefficient of (2).
And taking the adequacy and the optimal selection value as conditions for matching and scheduling the equipment, and when the adequacy corresponding to the equipment with the maximum optimal selection value is lower than a set threshold, selecting the equipment with the next largest optimal selection value until the adequacy corresponding to the equipment is larger than the set threshold. The matching scheduling method fully considers the failure factor, the next detection date factor and the adequacy factor of the equipment, so that the equipment obtained by final matching is more reasonable.
In one embodiment, each equipment is provided with a GPS positioning module, and the running track of each equipment is generated through the GPS positioning module and displayed on a GIS map.
The equipment of the installed GPS positioning module is managed by GPS signals, the equipment tracks are tracked according to the positioning information of the GPS positioning module, and meanwhile, the equipment tracks are displayed on a GIS map of a visual end to realize track type tracking and inquiry, so that the equipment track use major event management is realized. In addition, the key events such as the use duration, engineering, places and the like of the equipment from the warehouse-out to the warehouse-in are recorded and displayed.
Various modifications or additions may be made to the described embodiments or alternatives may be employed by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit or ambit of the invention as defined in the appended claims.

Claims (5)

1. A GIS map-based equipment matching scheduling method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
calculating to obtain the average fault interval time T of each equipment according to the fault information of each equipment in the using processInterval i
Calculating the year number Yi of each equipment from the next overhaul date according to the overhaul date of each equipment;
according to mean time between failures T of each equipmentInterval iAnd the number of years from the next inspection date YiBy optimally selecting models of the equipment
Figure FDA0002251663440000011
Calculating to obtain an optimal selection value of each device, and selecting the device with the maximum optimal selection value for scheduling, wherein K is a constant; a is a weight coefficient of the mean time between failures; b is a weight coefficient of the number of years from the next inspection date.
2. The GIS map-based equipment matching scheduling method of claim 1, wherein the mean time between failures (T) of each equipment is calculated according to the failure information of each equipment in the using processInterval iThe method comprises the following steps:
according to the fault information of each equipment in the using process, the fault times N of each equipment and the working duration T of each equipment which is put into use again after each fault is repaired are obtainedDuration i
According to the duration of each work time T put into use again after each fault repairDuration iCalculating the total working time T of each equipmentGeneral assembly
Calculating to obtain the mean time between failures of each equipment
Figure FDA0002251663440000012
3. The GIS map-based equipment matching scheduling method of claim 1, wherein the equipment is matched according to the accident of each equipment in the using processFault information, calculating to obtain average fault interval time T of each equipmentInterval iThe method also comprises the following steps:
and selecting the equipment in the period of occasional failure as the equipment to be preferentially selected according to the fault rate bathtub curve of the equipment.
4. The GIS map-based equipment matching scheduling method of claim 1, further comprising:
the method comprises the steps of obtaining the inventory quantity of replaceable parts of each device and the purchase period of the replaceable parts, calculating the adequacy of each replaceable part, and when the adequacy corresponding to the device with the maximum optimal selection value is lower than a set threshold, selecting the device with the next largest optimal selection value until the adequacy corresponding to the device is larger than the set threshold.
5. The GIS map-based equipment matching scheduling method of claim 1, wherein the equipment is equipped with a GPS positioning module, and the running track of each equipment is generated by the GPS positioning module and displayed on the GIS map.
CN201911036608.9A 2019-10-29 2019-10-29 Equipment matching scheduling method based on GIS map Expired - Fee Related CN111105067B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201911036608.9A CN111105067B (en) 2019-10-29 2019-10-29 Equipment matching scheduling method based on GIS map

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201911036608.9A CN111105067B (en) 2019-10-29 2019-10-29 Equipment matching scheduling method based on GIS map

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN111105067A true CN111105067A (en) 2020-05-05
CN111105067B CN111105067B (en) 2022-08-30

Family

ID=70421411

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201911036608.9A Expired - Fee Related CN111105067B (en) 2019-10-29 2019-10-29 Equipment matching scheduling method based on GIS map

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN111105067B (en)

Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070225845A1 (en) * 2006-03-21 2007-09-27 Hurley Robert P Iii Achieving perceived reliability for repairable systems
CN101853448A (en) * 2010-05-25 2010-10-06 北京航空航天大学 Method for predicting spare part demand in equipment manufacturing process
CN104318328A (en) * 2014-10-17 2015-01-28 华中电网有限公司 Maintenance decision optimization method for power grid device
CN104917085A (en) * 2015-06-17 2015-09-16 云南电网有限责任公司昆明供电局 Transformer maintenance decision method for optimizing reliability and economy
CN107145975A (en) * 2017-04-27 2017-09-08 中国人民解放军西安通信学院 The Forecasting Methodology of optical transmission device spare part quantity
CN107463444A (en) * 2017-07-13 2017-12-12 中国航空工业集团公司西安飞机设计研究所 A kind of false alarm rate distribution method
CN107967520A (en) * 2017-09-27 2018-04-27 国网安徽省电力有限公司 A kind of synthetical condition assessment theoretical method towards novel intelligent station relay protection device
CN109285340A (en) * 2018-01-30 2019-01-29 上海云统信息科技有限公司 A kind of GPS management monitoring system of Mine haul vehicle
CN109685380A (en) * 2018-12-28 2019-04-26 中国工程物理研究院激光聚变研究中心 A kind of large complicated comprehensive performance evaluation method for repairing device
CN109754118A (en) * 2018-12-26 2019-05-14 复旦大学 A kind of prediction technique of system self-adaption

Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070225845A1 (en) * 2006-03-21 2007-09-27 Hurley Robert P Iii Achieving perceived reliability for repairable systems
CN101853448A (en) * 2010-05-25 2010-10-06 北京航空航天大学 Method for predicting spare part demand in equipment manufacturing process
CN104318328A (en) * 2014-10-17 2015-01-28 华中电网有限公司 Maintenance decision optimization method for power grid device
CN104917085A (en) * 2015-06-17 2015-09-16 云南电网有限责任公司昆明供电局 Transformer maintenance decision method for optimizing reliability and economy
CN107145975A (en) * 2017-04-27 2017-09-08 中国人民解放军西安通信学院 The Forecasting Methodology of optical transmission device spare part quantity
CN107463444A (en) * 2017-07-13 2017-12-12 中国航空工业集团公司西安飞机设计研究所 A kind of false alarm rate distribution method
CN107967520A (en) * 2017-09-27 2018-04-27 国网安徽省电力有限公司 A kind of synthetical condition assessment theoretical method towards novel intelligent station relay protection device
CN109285340A (en) * 2018-01-30 2019-01-29 上海云统信息科技有限公司 A kind of GPS management monitoring system of Mine haul vehicle
CN109754118A (en) * 2018-12-26 2019-05-14 复旦大学 A kind of prediction technique of system self-adaption
CN109685380A (en) * 2018-12-28 2019-04-26 中国工程物理研究院激光聚变研究中心 A kind of large complicated comprehensive performance evaluation method for repairing device

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
李珂: "设备维护时间窗与生产计划的联合策略优化研究", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文集》 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN111105067B (en) 2022-08-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Ederer Evaluating capital and operating cost efficiency of offshore wind farms: A DEA approach
US8799042B2 (en) Distribution network maintenance planning
US9008979B2 (en) Total energy quantity controlling device and method
Chan et al. Risk-based assessment of financial losses due to voltage sag
Abiri-Jahromi et al. Optimized midterm preventive maintenance outage scheduling of thermal generating units
Saksornchai et al. Improve the unit commitment scheduling by using the neural-network-based short-term load forecasting
US20130179207A1 (en) Method and Apparatus for High Performance Design of a Project
Dinwoodie et al. Analysis of offshore wind turbine operation and maintenance using a novel time domain meteo-ocean modeling approach
KR101818846B1 (en) Method of Selecting and Configuring Optimal Distributed Resource for Economy DR Bidding of Demand Response Customer
US20150371243A1 (en) Systems and methods for parts forecasting
US20170357923A1 (en) Construction analytics to improve safety, quality and productivity
CN104699890A (en) Modeling method of short-term forewarning model for heavy overload of distribution transformer of urban power network
Browell et al. Forecasting for day-ahead offshore maintenance scheduling under uncertainty
US20110145155A1 (en) Methods, Systems, and Products for Predicting Work force Requirements
Wijaya et al. Downtime analysis of a scaling machine
CN111105067B (en) Equipment matching scheduling method based on GIS map
CN111160670B (en) Deep sea detection equipment dismantling, inspection, maintenance, assembly and debugging engineering execution method
Thomas Quantification of losses of labor efficiencies: Innovations in and improvements to the measured mile
Huo et al. CMMS based reliability centered maintenance
Raghavan et al. Developing life cycle management plans for power plant components
Nandi et al. Trends in project cost control systems
Maherdianta et al. Optimizing EAM & APM supported by ISO 55001 implementation
CN109255470A (en) A kind of non-item class forecasting of cost method of transformer equipment based on big data analysis
Shaik et al. Evaluating reliability of diesel generator peakers using Six Sigma methodologies
Lapshina et al. Forecasting the development of mechanical engineering using the system dynamics method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant
CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee
CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee

Granted publication date: 20220830