CN111080142A - Active service auxiliary judgment method based on power failure reporting - Google Patents
Active service auxiliary judgment method based on power failure reporting Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN111080142A CN111080142A CN201911320069.1A CN201911320069A CN111080142A CN 111080142 A CN111080142 A CN 111080142A CN 201911320069 A CN201911320069 A CN 201911320069A CN 111080142 A CN111080142 A CN 111080142A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- user
- fault
- parameter
- priority
- 1year
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 15
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 4
- 238000012913 prioritisation Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000007405 data analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012821 model calculation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/067—Enterprise or organisation modelling
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/06—Energy or water supply
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y04—INFORMATION OR COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES HAVING AN IMPACT ON OTHER TECHNOLOGY AREAS
- Y04S—SYSTEMS INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO POWER NETWORK OPERATION, COMMUNICATION OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING THE ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION, MANAGEMENT OR USAGE, i.e. SMART GRIDS
- Y04S10/00—Systems supporting electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
- Y04S10/50—Systems or methods supporting the power network operation or management, involving a certain degree of interaction with the load-side end user applications
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Telephonic Communication Services (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses an active service auxiliary judgment method based on power failure reporting, which comprises the following steps: a. analyzing the dimensionality influencing the user priority ranking; b. capturing historical behavior data of a user; c. establishing a user priority ranking model; d. and the user priority evaluation is realized through the historical behavior data of the user and the user priority ranking model. The invention is based on the user priority ranking algorithm of the power failure fault reporting behavior, evaluates the user priority by analyzing the historical power failure fault reporting behavior of the user, preferentially solves the problem of power failure of the user who really has a fault and is urgent, improves the user experience and improves the service quality of the power grid.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of electric power data analysis, and particularly relates to an active service auxiliary judgment method based on electric power fault reporting.
Background
Along with the development of the internet technology in the power industry, more and more convenient power systems are applied on line, and for example, a distribution network emergency repair system can distribute orders for users to repair when the users declare power failure. However, when a user reports a power failure fault, the original network repair system is arranged according to the order of the user access telephone, and a large amount of human resources are wasted under the conditions of partial false reports, random reports and the like, so that the problems of overlong waiting time, excessive complaints, poor user experience and the like of partial users are caused.
Disclosure of Invention
Based on the defects of the prior art, the invention provides an active service auxiliary judgment method based on power failure reporting.
The invention is realized by the following technical scheme.
An active service auxiliary judgment method based on power failure reporting comprises the following steps:
a. analyzing the dimensionality influencing the user priority ranking;
b. capturing historical behavior data of a user;
c. establishing a user priority ranking model;
d. and the user priority evaluation is realized through the historical behavior data of the user and the user priority ranking model.
Preferably, the dimension analysis influencing the user prioritization in the step a is as follows:
a1, influence of the user repair fault accuracy on the user priority;
a2, influence of user complaint conditions on user priority;
a3, influence of user false alarm on user priority;
a4, influence of the number of incoming calls of the user on the priority for the same fault.
Preferably, the historical behavior data of the user to be captured in step b is as follows:
b1, taking the year as a unit, capturing behavior data of a user reporting the power failure fault within one year of history;
b2, capturing user declaration fault data;
b3, capturing data confirmed as the fault in the user declaration fault;
b4, capturing the total number of the fault calls declared by the user;
b5, capturing the number of complaints of the user;
b6, capturing the false alarm fault number of the user;
b7, grasping the number of times of incoming calls for the fault declaration by the user.
Preferably, the dimension of the user prioritization model in step c is as follows:
c1, the accuracy of the fault reported by the user;
c2, reporting the fault incoming call frequency by the user;
c3, probability of user complaints;
c4, probability of false alarm of user.
Preferably, the user priority ranking model is established by using the accuracy of the fault reported by the user, the incoming call frequency of the fault reported by the user, the probability of the complaint of the user and the probability of the false report of the user, and the method specifically comprises the following steps:
failure accuracy:
x＝∑t∈1yearAt/∑t∈1vearBt
incoming call frequency of fault reported by user:
y＝(∑t∈1yearTt/∑t∈1yearAt)2
the false alarm probability of the user is as follows:
probability of customer complaints:
P(C)＝(Σt∈1yearCt/Σt∈1yearTt)·E
wherein, the coefficient A is the total number of reported faults, the coefficient B is the number of real faults confirmed in the reported faults, the coefficient T is the total number of reported fault calls, the coefficient C is the number of complaints, the coefficient D is the number of false-reported faults, the coefficient E is the number of calls aiming at the fault, and Sigma ist∈1yearρtThe expression is based on the statistical time of one year,wherein t represents time, and t is belonged to 1year to represent that the statistical time is one year; according to the habit of the user, the priority ranking model determines two parameters, wherein the parameter 1 is F (n):
F(n)＝x+y+z，
F(n)＝∑t∈1year(A3+BT2+ABD2)t/∑t∈1year(BA2)t，
the values of T and D have greater influence on the parameter F (n), namely the more the historical false alarm number is, the more the same fault is frequently reported and repaired, and the lower the priority of the user is ranked;
the parameter 2 is the user complaint probability P (C).
Preferably, two parameters f (n) and p (c) are calculated according to the established user prioritization model, and the user prioritization is determined by using the two parameters, which are as follows:
if the parameter F (n) is less than or equal to 5, the user priority is rated as A level;
if the parameter is 5 < F (n) is less than or equal to 10, the user priority is ranked as B level;
if the parameter is 10 < F (n) is less than or equal to 15, the user priority is ranked as C;
if the parameter 15 is less than F (n), the user priority is ranked as D;
parameter P (C) as a second criterion for user priority rating, user rating being determined by the result of parameter F (n) when parameter P (C) < 1; when the parameter P (C) is more than or equal to 1, the user is directly graded into A grade.
The invention is based on the user priority ranking algorithm of the power failure fault reporting behavior, evaluates the user priority by analyzing the historical power failure fault reporting behavior of the user, preferentially solves the problem of power failure of the user who really has a fault and is urgent, improves the user experience and improves the service quality of the power grid.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a logic analysis diagram of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The present invention is further described with reference to fig. 1 and 2 below:
as shown in fig. 1, an active service auxiliary determination method based on power failure reporting includes: the method comprises the following steps:
a. analyzing the dimensionality influencing the user priority ranking;
b. capturing historical behavior data of a user;
c. establishing a user priority ranking model;
d. and the user priority evaluation is realized through the historical behavior data of the user and the user priority ranking model.
The dimension influencing the priority ranking of the users in the step a is divided into the accuracy of the faults reported by the users, the false alarm condition of the users, the complaint condition of the users and the incoming call frequency of the same fault; the priority of the user can be reduced when the user has more false alarms; the incoming call frequency is high for the same fault, the incoming call repeatedly occupies the electric channel, the priority of the user can be reduced, the accuracy rate of the fault reported by the user is high, and the priority of the user can be improved. If the user has a complaint tendency, the user fault needs to be treated as soon as possible before the complaint of the user, so that the priority of the user is improved to be optimal when the user has the complaint tendency.
As shown in fig. 2, historical behavior data of the number of faults to be captured and reported, the number of confirmed faults, the number of fault calls to report, the number of complaints, the number of power failure false reports, and the number of power failure calls of this time are analyzed according to the dimension affecting the priority ranking of users, and as shown in table 1, historical fault repair data of four users are captured:
TABLE 1
Modeling was performed using the base data, resulting in the following model:
failure accuracy:
x＝∑t∈1yearAt/∑t∈1yearBt
incoming call frequency of fault reported by user:
y＝(∑t∈1yearTt/∑t∈1yearAt)2
the false alarm probability of the user is as follows:
probability of customer complaints:
P(C)＝(Σt∈1yearCt/Σt∈1yearTt)·E
wherein, the coefficient A is the total number of reported faults, the coefficient B is the number of real faults confirmed in the reported faults, the coefficient T is the total number of reported fault calls, the coefficient C is the number of complaints, the coefficient D is the number of false-reported faults, the coefficient E is the number of calls aiming at the fault, and Sigma ist∈1yearρtThe expression is represented by taking one year as the statistical time, wherein t represents the time, and t epsilon 1year represents the statistical time as one year.
According to the habit of the user, the priority ranking model determines two parameters, wherein the parameter 1 is F (n):
F(n)＝x+y+z，
F(n)＝∑t∈1year(A3+BT2+ABD2)t/∑t∈1year(BA2)t，
the values of T and D have greater influence on the parameter F (n), namely the more the historical false alarm number is, the more the same fault is frequently reported and repaired, and the lower the priority of the user is ranked;
the parameter 2 is the user complaint probability P (C).
According to the obtained user data, calculating to obtain a user priority score and a complaint probability, as shown in table 2:
TABLE 2
Two parameters F (n) and P (C) are obtained by model calculation to judge the user priority ranking, which is as follows:
if the parameter F (n) is less than or equal to 5, the user priority is rated as A level;
if the parameter is 5 < F (n) is less than or equal to 10, the user priority is ranked as B level;
if the parameter is 10 < F (n) is less than or equal to 15, the user priority is ranked as C;
if the parameter 15 is less than F (n), the user priority is ranked as D;
parameter P (C) as a second criterion for user priority rating, where the user rating is determined by the result of parameter F (n) when parameter P (C) < 1, and where parameter P (C) ≧ 1, the user is directly rated as level A.
As shown in Table 2, the user 2 has a priority rating of more than 5 and should be rated as class B, but has a complaint tendency because the complaint probability is more than 1, and is rated as the optimal class A.
The above disclosure is not intended to limit the scope of the invention, which is defined by the claims, but is intended to cover all modifications within the scope and spirit of the invention.
Claims (6)
1. An active service auxiliary judgment method based on power failure reporting is characterized by comprising the following steps:
a. analyzing the dimensionality influencing the user priority ranking;
b. capturing historical behavior data of a user;
c. establishing a user priority ranking model;
d. and the user priority evaluation is realized through the historical behavior data of the user and the user priority ranking model.
2. The active service auxiliary decision method based on power failure reporting as claimed in claim 1, wherein: the dimension analysis influencing the user prioritization in the step a is as follows:
a1, influence of the user repair fault accuracy on the user priority;
a2, influence of user complaint conditions on user priority;
a3, influence of user false alarm on user priority;
a4, influence of the number of incoming calls of the user on the priority for the same fault.
3. The active service auxiliary decision method based on power failure reporting as claimed in claim 1, wherein: the historical behavior data of the user required to be captured in the step b is as follows:
b1, taking the year as a unit, capturing behavior data of a user reporting the power failure fault within one year of history;
b2, capturing user declaration fault data;
b3, capturing data confirmed as the fault in the user declaration fault;
b4, capturing the total number of the fault calls declared by the user;
b5, capturing the number of complaints of the user;
b6, capturing the false alarm fault number of the user;
b7, grasping the number of times of incoming calls for the fault declaration by the user.
4. The active service auxiliary decision method based on power failure reporting as claimed in claim 1, wherein: the dimensionality of the user prioritization model in step c is as follows:
c1, the accuracy of the fault reported by the user;
c2, reporting the fault incoming call frequency by the user;
c3, probability of user complaints;
c4, probability of false alarm of user.
5. The active service assistance determination method based on power failure reporting as claimed in claim 4, wherein: establishing a user priority ranking model by using the accuracy of the fault reported by the user, the incoming call frequency of the fault reported by the user, the probability of complaint of the user and the probability of false report of the user, wherein the user priority ranking model specifically comprises the following steps:
failure accuracy:
x＝∑t∈1yearAt/∑t∈1yearBt
incoming call frequency of fault reported by user:
y＝(Σt∈1yearTt/∑t∈1yearAt)2
the false alarm probability of the user is as follows:
probability of customer complaints:
P(C)＝(Σt∈1yearCt/Σt∈1yearTt)·E
wherein, the coefficient A is the total number of reported faults, the coefficient B is the number of real faults confirmed in the reported faults, the coefficient T is the total number of reported fault calls, the coefficient C is the number of complaints, the coefficient D is the number of false-reported faults, the coefficient E is the number of calls aiming at the fault, and Sigma ist∈1yearρtRepresenting that one year is taken as statistical time, wherein t represents time, and t epsilon 1year represents that the statistical time is one year; according to the habit of the user, the priority ranking model determines two parameters, wherein the parameter 1 is F (n):
F(n)＝x+y+z，
F(n)＝∑t∈1year(A3+BT2+ABD2)t/∑t∈1year(BA2)tthe values of T and D have greater influence on the parameter F (n), namely the more the historical false alarm number is, the more the same fault is frequently reported and repaired, and the lower the priority of the user is;
the parameter 2 is the user complaint probability P (C).
6. The active service assistance method based on power failure reporting as claimed in claim 5, wherein: according to the established user priority ranking model, two parameters F (n) and P (C) are calculated, and the user priority ranking is judged by using the two parameters, which are specifically as follows:
if the parameter F (n) is less than or equal to 5, the user priority is rated as A level;
if the parameter is 5 < F (n) is less than or equal to 10, the user priority is ranked as B level;
if the parameter is 10 < F (n) is less than or equal to 15, the user priority is ranked as C;
if the parameter 15 is less than F (n), the user priority is ranked as D;
parameter P (C) as a second criterion for user priority rating, user rating being determined by the result of parameter F (n) when parameter P (C) < 1; when the parameter P (C) is more than or equal to 1, the user is directly graded into A grade.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911320069.1A CN111080142B (en) | 2019-12-19 | 2019-12-19 | Active service auxiliary judgment method based on power failure reporting |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911320069.1A CN111080142B (en) | 2019-12-19 | 2019-12-19 | Active service auxiliary judgment method based on power failure reporting |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN111080142A true CN111080142A (en) | 2020-04-28 |
| CN111080142B CN111080142B (en) | 2022-05-17 |
Family
ID=70315928
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911320069.1A Active CN111080142B (en) | 2019-12-19 | 2019-12-19 | Active service auxiliary judgment method based on power failure reporting |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN111080142B (en) |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN113706179A (en) * | 2021-09-10 | 2021-11-26 | 中国银行股份有限公司 | Method and device for processing manual customer service access sequence |
| CN117559662A (en) * | 2024-01-11 | 2024-02-13 | 广东云扬科技有限公司 | Intelligent power distribution operation monitoring system for electrical safety management |
Citations (10)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN1967593A (en) * | 2006-11-24 | 2007-05-23 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method and system for processing customer service request |
| CN101299863A (en) * | 2008-06-11 | 2008-11-05 | 中国移动通信集团湖北有限公司 | Complaining method, complaint processing method, terminal, complaint processing server and system |
| US20090210100A1 (en) * | 2008-02-15 | 2009-08-20 | The Texas A&M University System | Prioritization of power system related data |
| CN102487523A (en) * | 2010-12-01 | 2012-06-06 | 中国移动通信集团公司 | User compliant analysis method and device |
| CN104125349A (en) * | 2014-06-27 | 2014-10-29 | 国家电网公司 | Voice interaction management method and system based on telephone traffic forecasting |
| CN104639359A (en) * | 2013-11-14 | 2015-05-20 | 华为技术有限公司 | Information processing method and device |
| CN105580032A (en) * | 2013-07-09 | 2016-05-11 | 甲骨文国际公司 | Method and system for reducing instability when upgrading software |
| CN108076237A (en) * | 2016-11-18 | 2018-05-25 | 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 | A kind of phone customer service data processing method and device |
| US20190050868A1 (en) * | 2016-02-22 | 2019-02-14 | Tata Consultancy Services Limited | System and method for complaint and reputation management in a multi-party data marketplace |
| CN109981328A (en) * | 2017-12-28 | 2019-07-05 | 中国移动通信集团陕西有限公司 | A kind of fault early warning method and device |
-
2019
- 2019-12-19 CN CN201911320069.1A patent/CN111080142B/en active Active
Patent Citations (10)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN1967593A (en) * | 2006-11-24 | 2007-05-23 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method and system for processing customer service request |
| US20090210100A1 (en) * | 2008-02-15 | 2009-08-20 | The Texas A&M University System | Prioritization of power system related data |
| CN101299863A (en) * | 2008-06-11 | 2008-11-05 | 中国移动通信集团湖北有限公司 | Complaining method, complaint processing method, terminal, complaint processing server and system |
| CN102487523A (en) * | 2010-12-01 | 2012-06-06 | 中国移动通信集团公司 | User compliant analysis method and device |
| CN105580032A (en) * | 2013-07-09 | 2016-05-11 | 甲骨文国际公司 | Method and system for reducing instability when upgrading software |
| CN104639359A (en) * | 2013-11-14 | 2015-05-20 | 华为技术有限公司 | Information processing method and device |
| CN104125349A (en) * | 2014-06-27 | 2014-10-29 | 国家电网公司 | Voice interaction management method and system based on telephone traffic forecasting |
| US20190050868A1 (en) * | 2016-02-22 | 2019-02-14 | Tata Consultancy Services Limited | System and method for complaint and reputation management in a multi-party data marketplace |
| CN108076237A (en) * | 2016-11-18 | 2018-05-25 | 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 | A kind of phone customer service data processing method and device |
| CN109981328A (en) * | 2017-12-28 | 2019-07-05 | 中国移动通信集团陕西有限公司 | A kind of fault early warning method and device |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
| Title |
|---|
| MD. KAMAL HOSSAIN 等: "Predictive maintenance of network elements using Markov model to reduce customer trouble tickets", 《2017 IEEE CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA AND ANALYTICS》 * |
| 邹保平: "基于用户感知度模型的新型客户业务型态应用", 《国外电子测量技术》 * |
| 陈阳 等: "投诉数据智能挖掘分类管理系统", 《数字技术与应用》 * |
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN113706179A (en) * | 2021-09-10 | 2021-11-26 | 中国银行股份有限公司 | Method and device for processing manual customer service access sequence |
| CN117559662A (en) * | 2024-01-11 | 2024-02-13 | 广东云扬科技有限公司 | Intelligent power distribution operation monitoring system for electrical safety management |
| CN117559662B (en) * | 2024-01-11 | 2024-03-22 | 广东云扬科技有限公司 | Intelligent power distribution operation monitoring system for electrical safety management |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN111080142B (en) | 2022-05-17 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN101267362B (en) | A dynamic identification method and its device for normal fluctuation range of performance normal value | |
| CN111080142B (en) | Active service auxiliary judgment method based on power failure reporting | |
| US20070025528A1 (en) | System and method for automated performance monitoring for a call servicing system | |
| CN116797404A (en) | Intelligent building operation and maintenance supervision system based on big data and data processing | |
| CN104113869B (en) | A kind of potential report user's Forecasting Methodology and system based on signaling data | |
| CN113189418B (en) | Topological relation identification method based on voltage data | |
| CN110954782B (en) | Distribution network instantaneous fault identification method and system based on density peak clustering | |
| CN112434962A (en) | Enterprise user state evaluation method and system based on power load data | |
| CN115470867A (en) | Agent matching method, device, equipment and storage medium based on knowledge graph | |
| CN106803125B (en) | A kind of acquisition abnormity urgency level calculation method based on the conversion of standard electricity consumer | |
| CN115409264A (en) | Power distribution network emergency repair stagnation point position optimization method based on feeder line fault prediction | |
| CN111650432A (en) | Line loss-based electricity stealing determination method and device | |
| CN117829791A (en) | Intelligent gas monitoring information processing method and system based on monitoring Internet of things | |
| CN109963292B (en) | Complaint prediction method, complaint prediction device, electronic apparatus, and storage medium | |
| CN111601329B (en) | Port interrupt alarm processing method and device | |
| CN113517990B (en) | Method and device for predicting net recommendation value NPS (network performance indicator) | |
| CN112990764B (en) | Power grid equipment maintenance condition monitoring method based on reimbursement certificate | |
| CN105338198A (en) | Method for computing availability of call center system | |
| CN108874619A (en) | A kind of information monitoring method, storage medium and server | |
| CN111985901B (en) | Marketing product configuration method, device, equipment and storage medium in telecom industry | |
| CN113869717A (en) | Analysis and study method, device, equipment and storage medium for alarm log | |
| CN111327442B (en) | Complaint early warning threshold value obtaining method and device based on control chart | |
| CN106488480B (en) | Work order engine implementation method and device | |
| CN112769586A (en) | Special line flow early warning method and device based on flow early warning model and storage medium | |
| CN118101421B (en) | Intelligent alarm threshold self-adaption method based on machine learning |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |