CN111077065A - Method for measuring damaged depth of concrete after high temperature through grouped compression resistance of core samples - Google Patents

Method for measuring damaged depth of concrete after high temperature through grouped compression resistance of core samples Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN111077065A
CN111077065A CN201911396688.9A CN201911396688A CN111077065A CN 111077065 A CN111077065 A CN 111077065A CN 201911396688 A CN201911396688 A CN 201911396688A CN 111077065 A CN111077065 A CN 111077065A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
core sample
fire
damaged
depth
damaged core
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN201911396688.9A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN111077065B (en
Inventor
许肇峰
吴益林
陈映贞
刘仕顺
王勇平
林志春
魏斌
何惟煌
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Guangdong Jiaoke Testing Co ltd
Original Assignee
Guangdong Jiaoke Testing Co ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Guangdong Jiaoke Testing Co ltd filed Critical Guangdong Jiaoke Testing Co ltd
Priority to CN201911396688.9A priority Critical patent/CN111077065B/en
Publication of CN111077065A publication Critical patent/CN111077065A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN111077065B publication Critical patent/CN111077065B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N19/00Investigating materials by mechanical methods
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01BMEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
    • G01B21/00Measuring arrangements or details thereof, where the measuring technique is not covered by the other groups of this subclass, unspecified or not relevant
    • G01B21/18Measuring arrangements or details thereof, where the measuring technique is not covered by the other groups of this subclass, unspecified or not relevant for measuring depth

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analyzing Materials Using Thermal Means (AREA)
  • Sampling And Sample Adjustment (AREA)
  • Golf Clubs (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a method for measuring the concrete damage depth of a bridge after fire through core sample grouping compression resistance, which comprises the following steps: s1, selecting a fire area to be measured and a non-fire area as a reference on the same bridge as a calibration area; s2, drilling a damaged core sample of the high-temperature concrete in a fire area, and drilling an intact core sample in a calibration area, wherein the drilling depth of the damaged core sample and the intact core sample is h; s3, measuring the compressive strength of the intact core sample to obtain a standard value f of the compressive strength of the bridge concreteb(ii) a S4, cutting the damaged core sample from the fire-receiving surface to different depths d1~nAnd respectively measuring the compressive strength f of the damaged core sample after the cutting at different depthsc1~n(ii) a S5, respectively comparing fc1~nAnd fbWhen f iscxAnd fbWhen relevant, fcxCorresponding to the cutting depth d of the damaged core samplexThe damage depth of the fire area; the method can be used forAnd measuring the damage condition of the concrete in the depth direction when the concrete is damaged.

Description

Method for measuring damaged depth of concrete after high temperature through grouped compression resistance of core samples
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of bridge damage detection, in particular to a method for measuring the damaged depth of concrete at high temperature through grouped compression resistance of core samples.
Background
The core drilling method for detecting the concrete strength is a relatively accurate local damage detection method, and the concrete damage condition is evaluated by comparing and analyzing the compressive strengths of grouped core samples after the core samples are drilled and manufactured on the structure. However, the strength of the concrete measured by this method is an average strength value of the core sample, and damage in the depth direction cannot be considered.
Disclosure of Invention
The present invention is directed to overcoming at least one of the above-mentioned disadvantages (shortcomings) of the prior art, and provides a method for measuring a damaged depth of concrete after a high temperature by using a core sample group compression resistance, which is used to solve a damage situation in a depth direction when the concrete is damaged.
The technical scheme adopted by the invention is that,
a method for measuring the damage depth of bridge concrete after fire by core sample grouping compression resistance comprises the following steps:
s1, selecting a fire area to be measured and a non-fire area as a reference on the same bridge as a calibration area;
s2, drilling a damaged core sample of the high-temperature concrete in a fire area, and drilling an intact core sample in a calibration area, wherein the drilling depth of the damaged core sample and the intact core sample is h;
s3, measuring the compressive strength of the intact core sample to obtain a standard value f of the compressive strength of the bridge concreteb
S4, cutting the damaged core sample from the fire-receiving surface to different depths d1~nAnd respectively measuring the compressive strength f of the damaged core sample after the cutting at different depthsc1~n
S5, respectively comparing fc1~nAnd fbWhen f iscxAnd fbWhen relevant, fcxCorresponding to the cutting depth d of the damaged core samplexThe depth of damage in the fire zone.
Compressive strength f of intact core sample sampled in the area of non-firedbThe standard compressive strength of the undamaged bridge concrete is used for comparing the standard compressive strength with the compressive strength of a damaged core sample sampled in a fire passing area to obtain the damaged depth of the damaged core sample, and the damaged core sample is cut off at different depths d from a fire receiving surface1~nTo obtain different compressive strengths fc1~nWhen the compressive strength f is as high as that of a damaged corecxAnd fbThe equivalent indicates that the damaged core sample has no damaged part, i.e. the damaged part is cut off, so the cutting depth dxI.e. the damaged depth of the damaged core.
Further, in the step S4, the damaged core samples are divided into n groups, and each group is cut from the fire surface of the damaged core sample by the depth dnDepth of excision d for each group1~nDifferent; the depth d of the resection1~nGradually excising at equal intervals by unit, wherein the unit excising depth is delta, and the length l of each group of damaged core samples after excisingn=h-dn=h-δ(n-1),n≥1。
Gradually excising the damaged core samples at equal intervals, dividing the damaged core samples with different excising depths into n groups, wherein the depth difference between each group of core samples is delta, and obtaining the excising depth d of each group of damaged core samplesnδ (n-1), n ≧ 1, length ln=h-dnThe damage depth of the damaged core sample can be measured more accurately by equidistant stepwise cutting as h-delta (n-1) and n is more than or equal to 1.
Further, in step S1, a boundary line of a fire area is determined according to actual conditions of the fire, and an area that is 20cm away from the boundary line is divided into the calibration area; in the step S2, the damaged core sample and the sound core sample are sampled on the same member of the bridge, the sampling range of the sound core sample on the calibration area is controlled between 20cm and 75cm from the boundary line, and the sampling path extends along the path direction of the boundary line.
Because the boundary line of the fire area and the calibration area is fuzzy and is not an exact boundary line, if sampling is directly carried out on two sides of the boundary line, the situation that errors occur when the intact core sample and/or the damaged core sample are/is measured is easily caused, the calibration area is controlled to be beyond 20cm of the boundary line, the sampling range is controlled to be between 20cm and 75cm away from the boundary line, the sampling path extends along the path direction of the boundary line, the error situation can be reduced, and meanwhile, the situation that the errors are caused due to different members can be reduced when the damaged core sample and the intact core sample are sampled on the same member of the bridge.
Further, the method for measuring the concrete damage depth of the bridge after the fire through core sample grouping compression resistance is characterized in that in the step S1, the boundary line of the fire area is determined through an appearance method according to the actual situation of the fire and different temperature areas are estimated; in step S2, the damaged core sample is drilled in a temperature range of 500 ℃ or higher.
Further, the method for measuring the concrete damage depth of the bridge after the fire through core sample grouping compression resistance is characterized in that in the step S1, the apparent method estimates that different temperature areas are executed according to the following standards:
temperature/. degree.C <200 300~500 500~700 700~800 >800
Colour(s) Grey leaf of Chinese Grey greenish blue Light gray and pink Pale white and light red Pale white and pale yellow Light yellow
Burst and spall Is free of Local whitewash layer Corner concrete Large area of Loose and large area
Cracking of Is free of Micro cracks Having cracks at corners More cracks Through crack
Hammer action Loud sound Loud sound The sound is stuffy Sound smothering Sound mute
The appearance method is mainly used for preliminarily judging fire field subareas, can intuitively and quickly analyze the fire field subareas in a short time, can estimate areas with different temperatures in a fire area through the surface color and the appearance characteristics of a concrete structure, and is more favorable for accurately measuring the damage depth and the deepest damage depth of the bridge by selecting the temperature area more than or equal to 500 ℃ after the temperature area is determined.
Further, the method for measuring the damage depth of the bridge concrete after the fire through the grouped compression resistance of the core samples is characterized in that in the step S2, the damaged core samples are respectively drilled in three temperature regions of 500-700 ℃, 700-800 ℃ and above 800 ℃, and the steps S4 and S5 are respectively carried out to obtain the corresponding damage depth dx500、dx700And dx800Through dx500、dx700And dx800And calculating the equivalent damage depth D of the bridge member.
After the damage depths of the damaged core samples in three temperature areas of 500-700 ℃, 700-800 ℃ and above 800 ℃ are measured, the equivalent damage depth of the bridge member after fire can be calculated according to the damage depths in the three areas, and the equivalent damage depth can be used for evaluating the overall damage condition of the bridge after fire.
Further, the method for measuring the concrete damage depth of the bridge after the fire through grouped compression resistance of the core samples is characterized in that in the step S2, the damaged core samples and the intact core samples are cylinders with the cross section diameter of 5.5-10.5 cm and the drilling depth of 20-30 cm, and reinforcing steel bar reinforcement is avoided at the positions of the sampling points; when the sampling area of the damaged core sample is in a belt shape, sampling points extend and are distributed in the middle of the belt shape along the direction of the belt-shaped path; when the sampling area of the damaged core sample is planar, the sampling points are distributed in an equilateral triangle in the planar area.
The damaged core sample and the intact core sample cannot be too large, otherwise, the function and the safety of the bridge are affected, so that the size of the sample is controlled to be a cylinder with the cross section diameter of 5.5-10.5 cm and the drilling depth of 20-30 cm; the sample application position needs to avoid reinforcing steel bar reinforcement, otherwise, the function and the safety of the bridge are affected; when the area of the damaged core sample is in a belt shape, the point sample is extended and distributed in the middle of the belt shape along the direction of the belt-shaped path, so that uniform sampling is facilitated, and errors are reduced; similarly, when the sampling area of the damaged core sample is planar, the sampling points are distributed in an equilateral triangle in the planar area, which is beneficial to uniform sampling and reduces errors.
When the fire surface of the damaged core sample is peeled off, firstly, the fire surface of the damaged core sample is subjected to flat cutting treatment;
the step S4 specifically includes:
s41, finding out the damaged core sample with the most serious peeling from all damaged core samples, and determining the flat cutting depth h by taking the maximum peeling depth as a referencep
S42, according to hpSubjecting all damaged core samples to fire surface flat cutting treatment to make each damaged core sample have uniform length h-h before being cut off step by stepp
S43, gradually cutting off each group of damaged core samples subjected to flat cutting treatment, wherein the length l of each group of damaged core samples is obtained after cutting offn=h-dn=h-hp-δn,
dn=hp+δ(n-1),n≥1;
The step S5 specifically includes:
s51, starting from the condition that i is equal to 1, measuring the length l one by one through a pressure testiCompressive strength f of the damaged core sampleci
S52, comparison fciAnd fbThe size of (c), judgment fciWhether or not it falls into fb(1 ± 10%);
s53, if the interval is within, continuing to measure fc(i+1)And fc(i+2)Whether or not it falls into fb(1 ± 10%);
s54. if fc(i+1)And fc(i+2)Are all within the interval, then f is determinedciIs fcxAnd fbEquivalent; s55, determining fciIs corresponding to di=hp+ δ i is the damage depth dx
In step S4, since peeling of the damaged core specimen has an effect on the accuracy of the deep cutting of the damaged core specimen, it is necessary to perform a slicing process, and after finding the damaged core specimen most likely to peel, the damaged core specimen is accurately cut based on the maximum peeling depthAll damaged core samples are cut flatly, and the flat cutting depth is hpSo that the length of each damaged core sample after the uniform slicing treatment is h-hpGradually cutting off each group of damaged core samples after the flat cutting treatment, wherein the length l of each group of damaged core samples after cutting offn=h-dn=h-hpδ n, to yield dn=hp+δ(n-1),n≥1。
In step S5, starting from i ═ 1, length l is measured one by a pressure testiCompressive strength f of the damaged core sampleciObtaining the standard compressive strength f of each damaged core sample and the intact core samplebComparing the sizes and judging fciWhether or not it falls into fb(1. + -. 10%) due to unavoidable errors in the experiment, fbThe interval of (1. + -. 10%) is an interval of an acceptable error range, so fciAnd fb(1 +/-10%) interval to make size comparison; such as fciDuring this interval, continue to measure fc(i+1)And fc(i+2)Whether or not it falls into fb(1. + -. 10%) due to fciIn the interval, which may be accidental, if the damaged core is a critical value for the damage of the core, the compressive strength after the continuous cutting should remain stable, so that a further measurement of f is requiredc(i+1)And fc(i+2)Whether or not it falls into fb(1. + -. 10%) in the interval, e.g. fc(i+1)And fc(i+2)All fall into fb(1. + -. 10%) in the interval, f is provedciAnd fbRather, f can be determinedciIs corresponding to di=hp+ δ i is the damage depth dx
Further, when the fire surface of the damaged core sample is peeled off, firstly, the fire surface of the damaged core sample is subjected to flat cutting treatment; the step S4 specifically includes:
s41, respectively finding out one damaged core sample with the most serious peeling from the damaged core samples in the three temperature areas, and determining the flat cutting depth h of the three temperature areas by taking the maximum peeling depth as a referencep500、hp700And hp800
S42, according to hp500、hp700And hp800Respectively carrying out fire-receiving surface flat cutting treatment on the damaged core samples in the three temperature areas, so that the damaged core samples in each temperature area have uniform lengths h-h before being gradually cut offp500、h-hp700And h-hp800
S43, gradually cutting off each group of damaged core samples in the three temperature areas after the flat cutting treatment, wherein the length of each group of damaged core samples in the three temperature areas after cutting off is respectively as follows:
ln500=h-dn500=h-hp500-δ(n-1),n≥1,dn500=hp500+δn;
ln700=h-dn700=h-hp700-δ(n-1),n≥1,dn700=hp700+δn;
ln800=h-dn800=h-hp800-δ(n-1),n≥1,dn800=hp800+δn;
the step S5 performed on the three temperature regions includes:
s51, starting from i, j and k equal to 1, measuring the length l one by one through a pressure test500i、l700iOr l800iCompressive strength f of the damaged core samplec500i、fc700jOr fc800k
S52, respectively comparing fc500i、fc700jOr fc800kAnd fbThe size of (c), judgment fc500i、fc700jOr fc800kWhether or not it falls into fb(1 ± 10%);
s53, if the interval is within, continuing to measure fc500(i+1)、fc700(j+1)Or fc800(k+1)And fc500(i+2)、fc700(j+2)Or fc800(k+2)Whether or not it falls into fb(1 ± 10%);
s54. if fc500(i+1)、fc700(j+1)Or fc800(k+1)And fc500(i+2)、fc700(j+2)Or fc800(k+2)Are all within the interval, then f is determinedc500i、fc700jOr fc800kIs fcxAnd fbEquivalent;
s55, determining fc500i、fc700jOr fc800kIs corresponding to di=hp500+δi、dj=hp500+ δ j or dk=hp500+ δ k is the damage depth d corresponding to three temperature regions respectivelyx500、dx700And dx800
S56, passing through dx500、dx700And dx800And calculating the equivalent damage depth D of the bridge member.
In step 4, the damaged core samples sampled in the three temperature regions are uniformly subjected to a flat cutting treatment and then are gradually cut off to obtain the lengths of the damaged core samples in the three temperature regions: ln500=h-dn500=h-hp500-δ(n-1),ln700=h-dn700=h-hp700-δ(n-1),ln800=h-dn800=h-hp800Delta (n-1), n is not less than 1, giving dn500=hp500+δ(n-1),n≥1,dn700=hp700+δ(n-1);,dn800=hp800+δ(n-1);
In step 5, the compressive strength f of the damaged core specimen in each temperature region is measured starting from i, j, k equal to 1c500i、fc700jAnd fc800kAnd standard compressive strength f of intact core specimenbComparing and judging fc500i、fc700jAnd fc800kWhether or not it falls into fb(1. + -. 10%) due to unavoidable errors in the experiment, fbThe interval of (1. + -. 10%) is an interval of an acceptable error range, so fc500i、fc700jAnd fc800kAnd fb(1 +/-10%) interval to make size comparison; such as fc500i、fc700jAnd fc800kDuring this interval, continue to measure fc500(i+1)、fc700(j+1)Or fc800(k+1)And fc500(i+2)、fc700(j+2)Or fc800(k+2)Whether or not it falls into fb(1. + -. 10%) due to fc500i、fc700jAnd fc800kIn this interval it may be evenHowever, if the damaged core is critical for the damage of the core, the compressive strength after the cutting should remain stable, and further measurement of f is neededc500(i+1)、fc700(j+1)Or fc800(k+1)And fc500(i+2)、fc700(j+2)Or fc800(k+2)Whether or not it falls into fb(1. + -. 10%) in the interval, e.g. fc500(i+1)、fc700(j+1)Or fc800(k+1)And fc500(i+2)、fc700(j+2)Or fc800(k+2)All fall into fb(1. + -. 10%) in the interval, f is provedc500i、fc700jAnd fc800kAnd fbRather, determine fc500i、fc700jOr fc800kIs corresponding to di=hp500+δ(i-1)、dj=hp500+ delta (j-1) or dk=hp500+ delta (k-1) is the damage depth d corresponding to three temperature regions respectivelyx500、dx700And dx800Finally by dx500、dx700And dx800The equivalent damage depth D of the bridge member may be calculated.
Further, in the step S56, the equivalent damaged depth D ═ Dx500×0.5+dx700×0.3+dx800×0.2。
When the equivalent damage depth is calculated, the damage depths of the damaged core samples in the three temperature regions are calculated according to different proportions, the damaged core samples in the temperature region 500-700 ℃ account for 50%, the damaged core samples in the temperature region 700-800 ℃ account for 30%, and the damaged core samples in the temperature region above 800 ℃ account for 20%, so that the equivalent damage depth D-D of the bridge member is calculatedx500×0.5+dx700×0.3+dx800×0.2。
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the beneficial effects that: the compressive strength of the core sample is compared by gradually cutting off the core sample, the damage depth of the core sample is measured, and the actual damage depth of the concrete after fire can be measured by the method, so that the damage condition of the concrete can be further known and analyzed.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a structural diagram of a damaged core specimen and a sound core specimen in example 1.
FIG. 2 is a distribution diagram of the apparent method of estimating the temperature region of the fire zone in example 2.
FIG. 3 is a structural diagram of a damaged core specimen and a sound core specimen in example 2.
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram showing the sampling of the band-shaped damaged area in example 3.
FIG. 5 is a schematic view showing the sampling of the planar damaged area in example 4.
Detailed Description
The drawings are only for purposes of illustration and are not to be construed as limiting the invention. For a better understanding of the following embodiments, certain features of the drawings may be omitted, enlarged or reduced, and do not represent the size of an actual product; it will be understood by those skilled in the art that certain well-known structures in the drawings and descriptions thereof may be omitted.
Example 1
As shown in fig. 1, the present embodiment is a method for measuring the damage depth of the bridge concrete after fire by core-sample component compression resistance, comprising the following steps:
s1, selecting a fire area to be measured and a non-fire area as a reference on the same bridge as a calibration area;
s2, drilling a damaged core sample of the high-temperature concrete in a fire area, and drilling an intact core sample in a calibration area, wherein the drilling depth h of the damaged core sample and the intact core sample is 20 cm;
s3, measuring the compressive strength of the intact core sample to obtain a standard value f of the compressive strength of the bridge concreteb
S4, cutting the damaged core sample from the fire-receiving surface to different depths d1~nAnd respectively measuring the compressive strength f of the damaged core sample after the cutting at different depthsc1~n
S5, respectively comparing fc1~nAnd fbWhen f iscxAnd fbWhen relevant, fcxCorresponding to the cutting depth d of the damaged core samplexThe depth of damage in the fire zone.
Furthermore, the bridge concrete receiver after fire hazard is measured through core sample grouping compression resistanceMethod for depth of damage, characterized in that in step S4, the damaged core samples are divided into 10 groups, i.e. 1. ltoreq. n.ltoreq.10, each group having a cutting depth d1~nDifferent; the depth d of the resection1~nGradually excising at unit equal distance, wherein the unit excising depth delta is 5mm, the first group excising depth is 0mm, and the length l of each group of damaged core samples after excisingn=h-dn=h-δ(n-1)=200-dn200-5(n-1), 1 ≤ n ≤ 10, and the unit is mm.
In the 10 groups of damaged core samples, 5 damaged core samples in each group are provided, 50 damaged core samples are totally provided, the 50 damaged core samples are respectively subjected to a compressive strength test, and the compressive strength of the damaged core samples in each group is averaged to be used as the compressive strength f of the damaged core samples in each groupcn5 samples of the intact core samples are respectively subjected to a compression strength test, and the average value of the compression strengths of the intact core samples is used as a standard compression strength fbAnd further adjusting the compressive strength f of each group of damaged core samplescnWith standard compressive strength fbCarrying out comparative analysis;
further, in step S1, a boundary line of a fire area is determined according to actual conditions of the fire, and an area that is 20cm away from the boundary line is divided into the calibration area; in step S2, the damaged core sample and the sound core sample are sampled on the same member of the bridge, the sampling range of the sound core sample on the calibration area is controlled between 50cm from the boundary line, and the sampling path is extended along the path direction of the boundary line.
Further, in the step S2, the damaged core sample and the intact core sample are cylinders with a cross section diameter of 5.5cm and a drilling depth of 20cm, and the position of the sampling point avoids the reinforcing steel bar arrangement of the bridge. When the sampling area of the damaged core sample is in a belt shape, sampling points extend and are distributed in the middle of the belt shape along the direction of the belt-shaped path; when the sampling area of the damaged core sample is planar, the sampling points are distributed in an equilateral triangle in the planar area.
Further, when the fire surface of the damaged core sample is peeled off, firstly, the fire surface of the damaged core sample is subjected to flat cutting treatment; the step S4 specifically includes:
s41, as shown in figure 1, finding out the damaged core sample A with the most serious stripping from all damaged core samples, and determining the flat cutting depth h by taking the maximum stripping depth as a referencepIs 3 mm;
s42, according to hpSubjecting all damaged core samples to fire surface flat cutting treatment to make each damaged core sample have uniform length of h-h before being cut off graduallyp=197mm;
S43, gradually cutting off each group of damaged core samples subjected to flat cutting treatment, wherein the length l of each group of damaged core samples is obtained after cutting offn=h-dn=h-hp-δ(n-1)=197-5(n-1),dn=hp+δ(n-1)=3+5(n-1),1≤n≤10;
The step S5 specifically includes:
s51, starting from i-1 to i-10, measuring the length l one by one through a pressure testiCompressive strength f of the damaged core sampleci
S52, comparison fciAnd fbThe size of (c), judgment fciWhether or not it falls into fb(1 ± 10%);
s53, if the interval is within, continuing to measure fc(i+1)And fc(i+2)Whether or not it falls into fb(1 ± 10%);
s54. if fc(i+1)And fc(i+2)Are all within the interval, then f is determinedciIs fcxAnd fbEquivalent;
s55, determining fciIs corresponding to di=hp+ delta (i-1) being the depth of damage dx
The test results show that the average value of the compressive strength of the intact core sample is 51.9MPa, and the average value f of the compressive strength of the damaged core samples of the 1 st to 6 th groupsc1~6Are all less than fbThe 7 th group of damaged core sample is a core sample cut by 30mm, the compressive strength of the core sample is 39-66.4 MPa, and the average compressive strength fc7Is 50.1MPa and falls within fb(1. + -. 10%) of the average compressive strength f of the 8 th and 9 th groups was measuredc8And fc9Result is fc7And fc8All fall into fb(1 ± 10%) of the damaged core samples, the average compressive strength f of the damaged core sample of the 7 th group when i is 7 can be determinedc7And fbIs equal to fc7Corresponding d7The damage depth of the bridge after a fire, d7=3+5×6=33mm。
Example 2
The embodiment provides a method for measuring damage depth of bridge concrete in different temperature areas after fire by core sample component compression resistance, which comprises the following steps:
s1, selecting a fire area to be measured and a non-fire area as a reference on the same bridge as a calibration area;
s2, drilling a damaged core sample of the high-temperature concrete in a fire area, and drilling an intact core sample in a calibration area, wherein the drilling depth h of the damaged core sample and the intact core sample is 20 cm;
s3, measuring the compressive strength of the intact core sample to obtain a standard value f of the compressive strength of the bridge concreteb
S4, cutting the damaged core sample from the fire-receiving surface to different depths d1~nAnd respectively measuring the compressive strength f of the damaged core sample after the cutting at different depthsc1~n
S5, respectively comparing fc1~nAnd fbWhen f iscxAnd fbWhen relevant, fcxCorresponding to the cutting depth d of the damaged core samplexThe damage depth of the fire area;
further, as shown in fig. 2, in step S1, a boundary line of a fire area is determined by an appearance method according to an actual situation of a fire, an area other than the area 20cm from the boundary line is divided into the calibration areas, and different temperature areas are estimated, wherein an area a is a calibration area which is a non-overfire area, an area B is an area having a temperature of 500 to 700 ℃, an area C is an area having a temperature of 700 to 800 ℃, and an area D is an area having a temperature of 800 ℃ or higher, and the intact core sample is sampled in the area a.
Further, in the step S2, the damaged core sample and the sound core sample are sampled on the same member of the bridge, the sampling range of the sound core sample on the calibration area is controlled between 20cm and 75cm from the boundary line, and the sampling path is extended along the path direction of the boundary line.
Further, in the step S4, the damaged core samples are divided into n groups, and each group is cut from the fire surface of the damaged core sample by the depth dnDepth of excision d for each group1~nDifferent; the depth d of the resection1~nGradually excising at equal intervals by unit, wherein the unit excising depth is delta, and the length l of each group of damaged core samples after excisingn=h-dn=h-δ(n-1),n≥1。
In the n groups of damaged core samples, 5 damaged core samples in each group are provided, 5n damaged core samples in total are respectively subjected to compressive strength tests, and the average value of the compressive strength of the damaged core samples in each group is used as the compressive strength f of each group of damaged core samplescn5 samples of the intact core samples are respectively subjected to a compression strength test, and the average value of the compression strengths of the intact core samples is used as a standard compression strength fbAnd further adjusting the compressive strength f of each group of damaged core samplescnWith standard compressive strength fbComparative analysis was performed.
Further, in the method for measuring the concrete damage depth of the bridge after the fire through core sample grouping compression resistance, in the step S1, the apparent method estimates that different temperature regions are executed according to the following criteria:
temperature/. degree.C <200 300~500 500~700 700~800 >800
Colour(s) Grey leaf of Chinese Grey greenish blue Light gray and pink Pale white and light red Pale white and pale yellow Light yellow
Burst and spall Is free of Local whitewash layer Corner concrete Large area of Loose and large area
Cracking of Is free of Micro cracks Having cracks at corners More cracks Through crack
Hammer action Loud sound Loud sound The sound is stuffy Sound smothering Sound mute
Further, in the step S2, the damaged core sample and the intact core sample are sampled as cylinders with a cross section diameter of 5.5cm and a drilling depth of 20cm, and the positions of the sampling points avoid reinforcing steel bar reinforcement;
when the sampling area of the damaged core sample is in a belt shape, sampling points extend and are distributed in the middle of the belt shape along the direction of the belt-shaped path;
when the sampling area of the damaged core sample is planar, the sampling points are distributed in an equilateral triangle in the planar area.
Further, in the step S2, the damaged core sample is drilled in three regions B, C, D, and the steps S4 and S5 are performed to obtain the corresponding damaged depth dx500,dx700And dx800Through dx500、dx700And dx800And calculating the equivalent damage depth D of the bridge member.
Further, the step S4 is specifically:
s41, respectively finding out one damaged core sample with the most serious peeling from the damaged core samples in the three temperature areas, as shown in fig. 3, the damaged core samples with the most serious peeling of the damaged core samples in the three temperature areas are the damaged core sample p in the B area, the damaged core sample q in the C area and the damaged core sample s in the D area, shadow parts are the peeled parts of the core samples, and the flat cutting depths h of the three temperature areas are determined by taking the maximum peeling depth as a referencep500、hp700And hp800
S42, according to hp500、hp700And hp800Respectively carrying out fire-receiving surface flat cutting treatment on the damaged core samples in the three temperature areas, so that the damaged core samples in each temperature area have uniform lengths h-h before being gradually cut offp500、h-hp700And h-hp800
S43, gradually cutting off each group of damaged core samples in the three temperature areas after the flat cutting treatment, wherein the length of each group of damaged core samples in the three temperature areas after cutting off is respectively as follows:
ln500=h-dn500=h-hp500-δ(n-1),dn500=hp500+δ(n-1),n≥1;
ln700=h-dn700=h-hp700-δ(n-1),dn700=hp700+δ(n-1),n≥1;
ln800=h-dn800=h-hp800-δ(n-1),dn800=hp800+δ(n-1),n≥1;
the step S5 performed on the three temperature regions includes:
s51, starting from i, j and k equal to 1, measuring the length l one by one through a pressure test500i、l700iOr l800iCompressive strength f of the damaged core samplec500i、fc700jOr fc800k
S52, respectively comparing fc500i、fc700jOr fc800kAnd fbThe size of (c), judgment fc500i、fc700jOr fc800kWhether or not it falls into fb(1 ± 10%);
s53, if the interval is within, continuing to measure fc500(i+1)、fc700(j+1)Or fc800(k+1)And fc500(i+2)、fc700(j+2)Or fc800(k+2)Whether or not it falls into fb(1 ± 10%);
s54. if fc500(i+1)、fc700(j+1)Or fc800(k+1)And fc500(i+2)、fc700(j+2)Or fc800(k+2)Are all within the interval, then f is determinedc500i、fc700jOr fc800kIs fcxAnd fbEquivalent;
s55, determining fc500i、fc700jOr fc800kIs corresponding to di=hp500+δ(i-1)、dj=hp500+ delta (j-1) or dk=hp500+ delta (k-1) is the damage depth d corresponding to three temperature regions respectivelyx500、dx700And dx800
S56, passing through dx500、dx700And dx800And calculating the equivalent damage depth D of the bridge member.
The test results are dx500About 4cm, dx700About 8cm, dx800About 11 cm.
Further, in the step S56, the equivalent damaged depth D ═ Dx500×0.5+dx700×0.3+dx800×0.2。
D=dx500×0.5+dx700×0.3+dx800×0.2=4×0.5+8×0.3+11×0.2=6.6cm。
Example 3
As shown in fig. 4, this example is a sampling method in the case where the damaged core sample sampling area in examples 1 and 2 is a belt-like damaged area of the bridge concrete after a fire, and black dots are sampling points of the damaged core sample, which are distributed in the belt-like damaged area extending in the belt-like path direction.
Further, as shown in fig. 4, the distance between the sampling points is the same in the band-shaped damaged area, and is t.
Example 4
As shown in fig. 5, this example is a sampling method in the case where the damaged core sample sampling area in examples 1 and 2 is planar, in the figure, the damaged area of the bridge concrete planar after the fire, in the figure, the black dots are the sampling points of the damaged core sample, the sampling points are distributed in an equilateral triangle in the planar area, and the distance between the sampling points on the planar damaged area is t.
It should be understood that the above-mentioned embodiments of the present invention are only examples for clearly illustrating the technical solutions of the present invention, and are not intended to limit the specific embodiments of the present invention. Any modification, equivalent replacement, and improvement made within the spirit and principle of the present invention claims should be included in the protection scope of the present invention claims.

Claims (10)

1. A method for measuring the damage depth of bridge concrete after fire through core sample grouping compression resistance is characterized by comprising the following steps:
s1, selecting a fire area to be measured and a non-fire area as a reference on the same bridge as a calibration area;
s2, drilling a damaged core sample of the high-temperature concrete in a fire area, and drilling an intact core sample in a calibration area, wherein the drilling depth of the damaged core sample and the intact core sample is h;
s3, measuring the resistance of the intact core sampleObtaining the standard value f of the compressive strength of the bridge concrete through the compressive strengthb
S4, cutting the damaged core sample from the fire-receiving surface to different depths d1~nAnd respectively measuring the compressive strength f of the damaged core sample after the cutting at different depthsc1~n
S5, respectively comparing fc1~nAnd fbWhen f iscxAnd fbWhen relevant, fcxCorresponding to the cutting depth d of the damaged core samplexThe depth of damage in the fire zone.
2. The method for measuring concrete damage depth of bridge after fire through grouped compression resistance of core samples according to claim 1, wherein in the step S4, the damaged core samples are divided into n groups, and each group is cut off from the fire surface of the damaged core sample by a depth dnDepth of excision d for each group1~nDifferent; the depth d of the resection1~nGradually excising at equal intervals by unit, wherein the unit excising depth is delta, and the length l of each group of damaged core samples after excisingn=h-dn=h-δ(n-1),n≥1。
3. The method for measuring the concrete damage depth of the bridge after the fire through the core sample group compression resistance according to claim 2, wherein in the step S1, the boundary line of the fire area is determined according to the actual situation of the fire, and the area beyond 20cm from the boundary line is divided into the calibration area; in the step S2, the damaged core sample and the sound core sample are sampled on the same member of the bridge, the sampling range of the sound core sample on the calibration area is controlled between 20cm and 75cm from the boundary line, and the sampling path extends along the path direction of the boundary line.
4. The method for measuring concrete damage depth of an axle beam after a fire through core sample group compression resistance according to claim 3, wherein in the step S1, boundary lines of fire regions are determined by an appearance method according to actual conditions of the fire and different temperature regions are estimated; in step S2, the damaged core sample is drilled in a temperature range of 500 ℃ or higher.
5. The method for measuring concrete damage depth of an axle beam after a fire through core sample group compression resistance according to claim 4, wherein in the step S1, the apparent method estimates that different temperature regions are performed according to the following criteria:
Figure FDA0002346508030000011
Figure FDA0002346508030000021
6. the method for measuring the damage depth of the bridge concrete after fire through grouped compression resistance of core samples according to claim 5, wherein in the step S2, the damaged core samples are respectively drilled in three temperature regions of 500-700 ℃, 700-800 ℃ and above 800 ℃, and the steps S4 and S5 are respectively carried out to obtain the corresponding damage depth dx500、dx700And dx800Through dx500、dx700And dx800And calculating the equivalent damage depth D of the bridge member.
7. The method for measuring the concrete damage depth of the bridge after the fire through the grouped compression resistance of the core samples according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein in the step S2, the damaged core sample and the intact core sample are sampled to be cylinders with the cross section diameter of 5.5-10.5 cm and the drilling depth of 20-30 cm, and the positions of the sampling points avoid reinforcing steel bars;
when the sampling area of the damaged core sample is in a belt shape, sampling points extend and are distributed in the middle of the belt shape along the direction of the belt-shaped path;
when the sampling area of the damaged core sample is planar, the sampling points are distributed in an equilateral triangle in the planar area.
8. The method for measuring the damage depth of the bridge concrete after fire through the grouped compression resistance of the core sample according to any one of claims 2 to 5,
when the fire surface of the damaged core sample is peeled off, firstly, the fire surface of the damaged core sample is subjected to flat cutting treatment;
the step S4 specifically includes:
s41, finding out the damaged core sample with the most serious peeling from all damaged core samples, and determining the flat cutting depth h by taking the maximum peeling depth as a referencep
S42, according to hpSubjecting all damaged core samples to fire surface flat cutting treatment to make each damaged core sample have uniform length h-h before being cut off step by stepp
S43, gradually cutting off each group of damaged core samples subjected to flat cutting treatment, wherein the length l of each group of damaged core samples is obtained after cutting offn=h-dn=h-hp-δ(n-1),dn=hp+δ(n-1),n≥1;
The step S5 specifically includes:
s51, starting from the condition that i is equal to 1, measuring the length l one by one through a pressure testiCompressive strength f of the damaged core sampleci
S52, comparison fciAnd fbThe size of (c), judgment fciWhether or not it falls into fb(1 ± 10%);
s53, if the interval is within, continuing to measure fc(i+1)And fc(i+2)Whether or not it falls into fb(1 ± 10%);
s54. if fc(i+1)And fc(i+2)Are all within the interval, then f is determinedciIs fcxAnd fbEquivalent;
s55, determining fciIs corresponding to di=hp+ delta (i-1) being the depth of damage dx
9. The method for measuring the concrete damage depth of the bridge after fire through core sample group compression resistance according to claim 6,
when the fire surface of the damaged core sample is peeled off, firstly, the fire surface of the damaged core sample is subjected to flat cutting treatment;
the step S4 specifically includes:
s41, respectively finding out one damaged core sample with the most serious peeling from the damaged core samples in the three temperature areas, and determining the flat cutting depth h of the three temperature areas by taking the maximum peeling depth as a referencep500、hp700And hp800
S42, according to hp500、hp700And hp800Respectively carrying out fire-receiving surface flat cutting treatment on the damaged core samples in the three temperature areas, so that the damaged core samples in each temperature area have uniform lengths h-h before being gradually cut offp500、h-hp700And h-hp800
S43, gradually cutting off each group of damaged core samples in the three temperature areas after the flat cutting treatment, wherein the length of each group of damaged core samples in the three temperature areas after cutting off is respectively as follows:
ln500=h-dn500=h-hp500-δ(n-1),dn500=hp500+δ(n-1),n≥1;
ln700=h-dn700=h-hp700-δ(n-1),dn700=hp700+δ(n-1),n≥1;
ln800=h-dn800=h-hp800-δ(n-1),dn800=hp800+δ(n-1),n≥1;
the step S5 performed on the three temperature regions includes:
s51, starting from i, j and k equal to 1, measuring the length l one by one through a pressure test500i、l700iOr l800iCompressive strength f of the damaged core samplec500i、fc700jOr fc800k
S52, respectively comparing fc500i、fc700jOr fc800kAnd fbThe size of (c), judgment fc500i、fc700jOr fc800kWhether or not it falls into fb(1 ± 10%);
s53, if the interval is within, continuing to measure fc500(i+1)、fc700(j+1)Or fc800(k+1)And fc500(i+2)、fc700(j+2)Or fc800(k+2)Whether or not it falls into fb(1 ± 10%);
s54. if fc500(i+1)、fc700(j+1)Or fc800(k+1)And fc500(i+2)、fc700(j+2)Or fc800(k+2)Are all within the interval, then f is determinedc500i、fc700jOr fc800kIs fcxAnd fbEquivalent;
s55, determining fc500i、fc700jOr fc800kIs corresponding to di=hp500+δ(i-1)、dj=hp500+ delta (j-1) or dk=hp500+ delta (k-1) is the damage depth d corresponding to three temperature regions respectivelyx500、dx700And dx800
S56, passing through dx500、dx700And dx800And calculating the equivalent damage depth D of the bridge member.
10. The method for measuring concrete damage depth of bridge after fire through core-sample group compression resistance according to claim 9, wherein in the step S56, equivalent damage depth D ═ Dx500×0.5+dx700×0.3+dx800×0.2。
CN201911396688.9A 2019-12-30 2019-12-30 Method for measuring damaged depth of concrete after high temperature through grouped compression resistance of core samples Active CN111077065B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201911396688.9A CN111077065B (en) 2019-12-30 2019-12-30 Method for measuring damaged depth of concrete after high temperature through grouped compression resistance of core samples

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201911396688.9A CN111077065B (en) 2019-12-30 2019-12-30 Method for measuring damaged depth of concrete after high temperature through grouped compression resistance of core samples

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN111077065A true CN111077065A (en) 2020-04-28
CN111077065B CN111077065B (en) 2022-10-18

Family

ID=70319762

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201911396688.9A Active CN111077065B (en) 2019-12-30 2019-12-30 Method for measuring damaged depth of concrete after high temperature through grouped compression resistance of core samples

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN111077065B (en)

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1285508A (en) * 1999-08-23 2001-02-28 北京市城市建设工程研究院 In-situ testing contrete compression strength by micro core sample method
CN101545840A (en) * 2009-04-29 2009-09-30 徐州建筑职业技术学院 Method for calculating strength of structural concrete by strength of core
CN104964874A (en) * 2015-05-26 2015-10-07 宿州学院 Pit sand concrete compressive strength detection method and apparatus thereof
CN106959308A (en) * 2017-03-20 2017-07-18 东南大学 A kind of concrete structure influence of fire depth detection method
US20170350872A1 (en) * 2014-12-19 2017-12-07 Korea Institute Of Civil Engineering And Building Technology System for predicting residual service life of fire-damaged concrete structures and method for the same

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1285508A (en) * 1999-08-23 2001-02-28 北京市城市建设工程研究院 In-situ testing contrete compression strength by micro core sample method
CN101545840A (en) * 2009-04-29 2009-09-30 徐州建筑职业技术学院 Method for calculating strength of structural concrete by strength of core
US20170350872A1 (en) * 2014-12-19 2017-12-07 Korea Institute Of Civil Engineering And Building Technology System for predicting residual service life of fire-damaged concrete structures and method for the same
CN104964874A (en) * 2015-05-26 2015-10-07 宿州学院 Pit sand concrete compressive strength detection method and apparatus thereof
CN106959308A (en) * 2017-03-20 2017-07-18 东南大学 A kind of concrete structure influence of fire depth detection method

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
李寒: "《上跨高速公路桥梁火灾后结构检测评估实例分析》", 《福建交通科技》 *
殷涛: "《铁路框架桥火灾后的试验研究与损伤评估》", 《高速铁路技术》 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN111077065B (en) 2022-10-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Choi et al. Image-processing technique to detect carbonation regions of concrete sprayed with a phenolphthalein solution
CN105181492B (en) A kind of assay method of surface peening component fatigue crack growth rate
WO1987007022A1 (en) Corrosion monitoring
CN106018083B (en) The method of the plane stress fracture toughness and yield strength of aluminum alloy materials is determined by structure yields load
WO2010078547A1 (en) Process for evaluating corrosion resistance of coating
CN111077065B (en) Method for measuring damaged depth of concrete after high temperature through grouped compression resistance of core samples
CN101216477B (en) In situ quantitative determination method for large-sized metallic inclusion
CN108088904A (en) A kind of method of railway wheel ultrasonic listening field trash
CN111044606B (en) Method for improving accuracy of natural crack eddy current depth measurement
CN110726625A (en) Method for determining length of rock material fracture process area
KR101493944B1 (en) Method for measuring recrystallization rate by electron backscatter diffraction
Main et al. Microstructure and surface finish influences on AA7085-T7452 small fatigue crack growth rates
KR101848067B1 (en) Method for detecting concrete neutralization zone using digital image processing
CN106679911B (en) Beam type structure damage identification method based on multi-scale data fusion theory
CN106600031B (en) Method for predicting residual life of high-voltage transmission strain clamp
CA2739847C (en) Method for determining shape changes of a workpiece
EP3272656A1 (en) Method and device for inspecting the damage on the skin of an aircraft after a lightning strike
WO2024028468A3 (en) Method of characterizing a fault in a scanning electron microscope
CN105021630A (en) Automatic detection method for surface damages of conveyor belt
Benzaoui et al. An experimental testing of the SERMA technology for the quality control of green and baked anodes
CN110373455B (en) Nucleic acid sample measuring method of digital quantitative PCR
NO339677B1 (en) Method for detection of degradiation in metal structures
CN113065224A (en) Deep sea pipeline crack propagation monitoring and reliability evaluation method based on image recognition
Moreira et al. Computational image analysis as an alternative tool for the evaluation of corrosion in salt spray test
Pengfei et al. A volumetric strain-based method to determine crack initiation stress of low-porosity rocks

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant