CN111007728A - Motor active-disturbance-rejection self-adaptive control method considering all-state constraint - Google Patents
Motor active-disturbance-rejection self-adaptive control method considering all-state constraint Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN111007728A CN111007728A CN201911395827.6A CN201911395827A CN111007728A CN 111007728 A CN111007728 A CN 111007728A CN 201911395827 A CN201911395827 A CN 201911395827A CN 111007728 A CN111007728 A CN 111007728A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- state
- equation
- motor
- disturbance
- formula
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/04—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
- G05B13/042—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators in which a parameter or coefficient is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Feedback Control In General (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a self-adaptive control method for motor active disturbance rejection considering full-state constraint in the technical field of motor control systems, which comprises the following steps: establishing a motor position servo system model; designing motor active-disturbance-rejection adaptive controller and control law u considering all-state constraint and adjusting parameter k of motor active-disturbance-rejection adaptive control law u considering all-state constraint1,k2,b1,b2,L1,L2Omega and delta, so that the system meets the control performance index, the scheme can effectively solve the problems of uncertain nonlinearity and uncertain parameters of the motor servo system, designs a constraint controller based on the barrier Lyapunov function, finally proves the overall stability of the system through a certificate, and has good parameter convergence and system control precision meeting the performance index under the interference condition; meanwhile, the invention simplifies the design of the controller, and the simulation result shows the effectiveness of the controller.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of motor control systems, in particular to a motor active-disturbance-rejection self-adaptive control method considering all-state constraint.
Background
Due to the wide range of applications in the industry, high performance control of motor driven motion systems has attracted a wide range of attention including engineers and scientists. However, it is not easy to design a high performance controller for the servo system, and since model uncertainty is widely existed in the control system, a designer is likely to encounter many model uncertainties, especially unmodeled nonlinearities such as non-structural uncertainty. These uncertainty factors can severely degrade the control performance that can be achieved, resulting in low control accuracy, limit cycle oscillations, and even instability.
The traditional control mode is difficult to meet the requirement of uncertain nonlinear tracking precision, so that a control method which is simple and practical and meets the requirement of system performance needs to be researched. In recent years, various advanced control strategies are applied to a motor servo system, such as robust adaptive control, adaptive robust and the like, and the control achieves good control accuracy. However, the high-precision control results of the above control strategies are all ensured by large feedback gains, and the high-gain feedback often excites the high-frequency dynamics of the system, which causes instability of the system.
Aiming at the characteristics of uncertain nonlinearity and parameter uncertainty in motor servo, a model of the system is established, an extended state observer and a parameter self-adaptation law of a motor position servo system are respectively designed on the basis, and the system is estimated to estimate the unmodeled interference and unknown parameters and compensate in control input. In addition, in consideration of physical constraint conditions frequently encountered by an actual system, a state constraint controller is designed on the basis of an obstacle Lyapunov function, and effective constraint is carried out on the state of the system.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a motor active-disturbance-rejection adaptive control method considering full-state constraint so as to solve the problems in the background technology.
In order to achieve the purpose, the invention provides the following technical scheme: a motor active-disturbance-rejection self-adaptive control method considering full-state constraint comprises the following steps:
the method comprises the following steps: establishing a motor position servo system model; according to Newton's second law, the dynamic model equation of the inertia load of the motor is as follows:
in the formula: y is angular displacement, m is inertial load, kfIs the torque constant, u is the system control input, b is the viscous friction coefficient,for other unmodeled disturbances, non-linear friction, external disturbances, and unmodeled dynamics are referred to;
in the formula: x ═ x1,x2]TFor the state vector of position and velocity, assume that the output state of the system is constrained in the set Ω, Ω ═ xi:|xi|≤ci,i=1,2},ciConstant > 0, defining unknown parameter set theta ═ theta1,θ2,]TWherein theta1=kf/m,θ2=b/m,Representing concentrated interference;
In the formula: delta1,δ2The method comprises the following steps of (1) knowing;
assume again that instruction x is expected1d(t) and the time i-th derivative thereofi is 1,2 satisfies x1d(t)≤υ0≤c1-L1,υi> 0 is a constant, L1>0 is a design parameter.
Step two: designing a motor active-disturbance-rejection adaptive controller and a control law u considering all-state constraint;
step three: parameter k of motor active-disturbance-rejection adaptive control law u considering all-state constraint1,k2,b1,b2,L1,L2ω and δ, to make the system meet the control performance criteria.
Further, the second step includes the following steps:
s1: constructing an extended state observer of the motor system;
s2: designing a motor active-disturbance-rejection adaptive controller system considering full-state constraint;
s3: and verifying the stability of the system.
Further, the step S1 includes the following steps:
s102: designing an extended state observer with the structure as shown in formula (4) in step S101
The following:
in the formula:is xiI is 1,2, 3; omega>0 is a parameter of the extended state observer, orderi=1,2,3;
If expanded state x3D (x, t), definition h (t) as x3The estimated error dynamics of the observer can be obtained as:
since matrix a satisfies the hervetz criterion, there is a positive definite symmetry of matrix P satisfying the following equation: a. theTP+PA=-2I (9)
In the formula: the matrix I is an identity matrix;
further, the step S2 includes the following steps: headFirst define z1=x1-x1d,
z2=x2-α1,α1For the virtual control law, the barrier Lyapunov function is defined again:
in the formula: b1>0,L1>0 is a constant, V1The time derivative of (a) is:
let virtual control law α1The design is as follows:in the formula: k is a radical of1>0 is a feedback gain, and equation (12) is substituted for equation (11) to obtain:
in the formula: b2>0,L2>0 is a constant; v2The time derivative of (a) is:
in conjunction with equation (2) one can obtain:
finally, based on the disturbance estimation of the extended state observer, the control input u is set as follows:
in the formula: u. ofaAs a model compensation term, usFor the robust term, k2>0 is a feedback gain, and equation (17) is substituted for equation (16), and the following can be obtained:
further, the step S3 is specifically: if (1) a suitable parameter can be selected to satisfy the following equation: c. C2≥|α1|max+L2(19)
(2) The system initial value z (0) can satisfy the following condition:
then, as can be seen from equation (17):
when the interference is time invariant, i.e., h (t) is 0, the adaptive law is designed to:
the system is asymptotically convergent, i.e., when t → ∞ z1→ 0, all signals are bounded, the system state can be effectively constrained;
when system disturbances are time-varying, all signals in a closed-loop control system are bounded, and the system state can be effectively constrained as follows defining a positive lyapunov function:
it satisfies:further, when the interference is time invariant, the lyapunov function is defined as follows:
the derivation of equation (24) and the substitution of equations (7), (18) and (21) can be obtained:
from x1=z1+x1d(t) and expected instruction x1d(t) and the time i-th derivative thereofi is 1,2 satisfies x1d(t)≤υ0≤c1-L1,υi> 0 is a constant, L1>0 is a design parameter, and | x can be obtained1|≤c1Thus x1Is bounded, and α1Is z1Andfunction of z1Andis bounded, can obtain α1Is bounded; from | x2|≤|α1|max+|z2I and I z2|≤L2Let x know2≤c2Is bounded; thus, it can be verified that all signals of the system are bounded, and the system state is restrainable;
when the system interference is time-varying, derivation is performed on equation (22), and equations (8), (21) are substituted to obtain:
integration of equation (26) can result in:
it is demonstrated by equation (27) that all signals in a closed loop system are bounded and the system state is constrained, so the controller is convergent and the system is stable.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the beneficial effects that: the invention establishes a motor position servo system model for the characteristics of a motor position servo system; the motor active disturbance rejection adaptive controller considering the full-state constraint is designed to estimate unmodeled disturbance and carry out feedforward compensation, and meanwhile, the adaptive controller is used for estimating system position parameters, so that the problems of uncertain nonlinearity and uncertain parameters of a motor servo system can be effectively solved, the constraint controller is designed based on the barrier Lyapunov function, the overall stability of the system is finally proved through a certificate, the parameter convergence is good under the interference condition, and the system control precision meets the performance index; meanwhile, the invention simplifies the design of the controller, and the simulation result shows the effectiveness of the controller.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments will be briefly introduced below, and it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious for those skilled in the art that other drawings can be obtained according to the drawings without creative efforts.
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a motor actuator of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of the system control strategy of the present invention;
fig. 3 is a graph of interference estimation and interference estimation error curves in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a graph of a system parameter estimation according to the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a graph of output state curves for the design control method of the present invention;
FIG. 6 is a graph of tracking error for the desired command and two controllers according to the present invention.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
Referring to fig. 1 and fig. 2, the present invention provides a technical solution: a motor active-disturbance-rejection self-adaptive control method considering full-state constraint comprises the following steps:
the method comprises the following steps: establishing a motor position servo system model; according to Newton's second law, the dynamic model equation of the inertia load of the motor is as follows:
in the formula: y is angular displacement, m is inertial load, kfIs the torque constant, u is the system control input, b is the viscous friction coefficient,for other unmodeled disturbances, non-linear friction, external disturbances, and unmodeled dynamics are referred to;
in the formula: x ═ x1,x2]TFor the state vector of position and velocity, assume that the output state of the system is constrained in the set Ω, Ω ═ xi:|xi|≤ci,i=1,2},ciConstant > 0, defining unknown parameter set theta ═ theta1,θ2,]TWherein theta1=kf/m,θ2=b/m,Representing concentrated interference;
In the formula: delta1,δ2The method comprises the following steps of (1) knowing;
assume again that instruction x is expected1d(t) and the time i-th derivative thereofi is 1,2 satisfies x1d(t)≤υ0≤c1-L1,υi> 0 is a constant, L1>0 is a design parameter.
Step two: designing a motor active-disturbance-rejection adaptive controller and a control law u considering all-state constraint;
step three: parameter k of motor active-disturbance-rejection adaptive control law u considering all-state constraint1,k2,b1,b2,L1,L2ω and δ, to make the system meet the control performance criteria.
The second step comprises the following steps:
s1: constructing an extended state observer of the motor system;
s2: designing a motor active-disturbance-rejection adaptive controller system considering full-state constraint;
s3: and verifying the stability of the system.
Step S1 includes the following steps:
s102: designing an extended state observer according to formula (4) in step S101, wherein the extended state observer has the following structure:
If expanded state x3D (x, t), definition h (t) as x3The time derivative of (2) can be obtained from the observer
The estimation error dynamics is:
since matrix a satisfies the hervetz criterion, there is a positive definite symmetry of matrix P satisfying the following equation: a. theTP+PA=-2I (9)
In the formula: the matrix I is an identity matrix;
step S2 includes the following steps: first of all, z is defined1=x1-x1d,z2=x2-α1,α1For virtual control
Law making, then defining the barrier Lyapunov function:in the formula: b1>0,L1>0 is a constant, V1The time derivative of (a) is:
let virtual control law α1The design is as follows:in the formula: k is a radical of1>0 is a feedback gain, and equation (12) is substituted for equation (11) to obtain:
in the formula: b2>0,L2>0 is a constant; v2The time derivative of (a) is:
in conjunction with equation (2) one can obtain:
finally, based on the disturbance estimation of the extended state observer, the control input u is set as follows:
in the formula: u. ofaAs a model compensation term, usFor the robust term, k2>0 is a feedback gain, and equation (17) is substituted for equation (16), and the following can be obtained:
step S3 specifically includes: if (1) a suitable parameter can be selected to satisfy the following equation:
c2≥|α1|max+L2(19)
(2) the system initial value z (0) can satisfy the following condition:
then, as can be seen from equation (17):
when the interference is time invariant, i.e., h (t) is 0, the adaptive law is designed to:
the system is asymptotically convergent, i.e., when t → ∞ z1→ 0, all signals are bounded, the system state can be effectively constrained;
when system disturbances are time-varying, all signals in a closed-loop control system are bounded, and the system state can be effectively constrained as follows defining a positive lyapunov function:
the derivation of equation (24) and the substitution of equations (7), (18) and (21) can be obtained:
from x1=z1+x1d(t) and expected instruction x1d(t) and the time i-th derivative thereofi is 1,2 satisfies x1d(t)≤υ0≤c1-L1,υi> 0 is a constant, L1>0 is a design parameter, and | x can be obtained1|≤c1Thus x1Is bounded, and α1Is z1Andfunction of z1Andis bounded, can obtain α1Is bounded; from | x2|≤|α1|max+|z2I and I z2|≤L2Let x know2≤c2Is bounded; thus, it can be verified that all signals of the system are bounded, and the system state is restrainable;
when the system interference is time-varying, derivation is performed on equation (22), and equations (8), (21) are substituted to obtain:
integration of equation (26) can result in:
it is demonstrated by equation (27) that all signals in a closed loop system are bounded and the system state is constrained, so the controller is convergent and the system is stable.
For example: the initial state of the system is x1(0)=0.02,x2(0) In the simulation, the design controller models the system with the following parameters: m is 0.01, kg m2,kf=5,b=1.25N·s/m,θ1n=600,θ2n=80,θ3n=0,k1=70,k2=0.001,b1=2,b2=0.01,L1=2,L 210, ω 800, PID controller parameter kp=110,ki=70,kdPosition angle input signal y of 0.3d(t)=0.2sin(πt)[1-exp(-0.01t3)]rad, d (x, t) ═ 10sin (2 pi t) N · m, the control law action effect is as shown in fig. 3-6, the algorithm provided by the invention can accurately estimate the interference value and the system state under the simulation environment, compared with the traditional PID control, the controller designed by the invention can greatly improve the control precision of the system under the condition of large interference, and has better state constraint performance; research results show that under uncertain nonlinear influence, the method provided by the scheme can meet performance indexes.
In the description herein, references to the description of "one embodiment," "an example," "a specific example" or the like are intended to mean that a particular feature, structure, material, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment or example is included in at least one embodiment or example of the invention. In this specification, the schematic representations of the terms used above do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment or example. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, materials, or characteristics described may be combined in any suitable manner in any one or more embodiments or examples.
The preferred embodiments of the invention disclosed above are intended to be illustrative only. The preferred embodiments are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise embodiments disclosed. Obviously, many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and the practical application, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention. The invention is limited only by the claims and their full scope and equivalents.
Claims (6)
1. A motor active-disturbance-rejection self-adaptive control method considering full-state constraint is characterized by comprising the following steps: the method comprises the following steps:
the method comprises the following steps: establishing a motor position servo system model; according to Newton's second law, the dynamic model equation of the inertia load of the motor is as follows:
in the formula: y is angular displacement, m is inertial load, kfIs the torque constant, u is the system control input, b is the viscous friction coefficient,for other unmodeled disturbances, non-linear friction, external disturbances, and unmodeled dynamics are referred to;
in the formula: x ═ x1,x2]TFor the state vector of position and velocity, assume that the output state of the system is constrained in the set Ω, Ω ═ xi:|xi|≤ci,i=1,2},ciConstant > 0, defining unknown parameter set theta ═ theta1,θ2,]TWherein theta1=kf/m,θ2=b/m,Representing concentrated interference;
In the formula: delta1,δ2The method comprises the following steps of (1) knowing;
assume again that instruction x is expected1d(t) and the time i-th derivative thereofSatisfy x1d(t)≤υ0≤c1-L1,υi> 0 is a constant, L1>0 is a design parameter.
Step two: designing a motor active-disturbance-rejection adaptive controller and a control law u considering all-state constraint;
step three: parameter k of motor active-disturbance-rejection adaptive control law u considering all-state constraint1,k2,b1,b2,L1,L2ω and δ, to make the system meet the control performance criteria.
2. The adaptive control method for auto-disturbance-rejection of the motor considering the full-state constraint as claimed in claim 1, wherein: the second step comprises the following steps:
s1: constructing an extended state observer of the motor system;
s2: designing a motor active-disturbance-rejection adaptive controller system considering full-state constraint;
s3: and verifying the stability of the system.
3. The adaptive control method for auto-disturbance-rejection of the motor considering the full-state constraint as claimed in claim 2, wherein: the step S1 includes the following steps:
s102: designing an extended state observer according to formula (4) in step S101, wherein the extended state observer has the following structure:
If expanded state x3D (x, t), definition h (t) as x3The estimated error dynamics of the observer can be obtained as:
since matrix a satisfies the hervetz criterion, there is a positive definite symmetry of matrix P satisfying the following equation: a. theTP+PA=-2I (9)
In the formula: the matrix I is an identity matrix.
4. A method of considering a full state approximation as in claim 2The self-adaptive control method for the auto-disturbance rejection of the motor is characterized by comprising the following steps: the step S2 includes the following steps: first of all, z is defined1=x1-x1d,z2=x2-α1,α1For the virtual control law, the barrier Lyapunov function is defined again:
in the formula: b1>0,L1>0 is a constant, V1The time derivative of (a) is:
let virtual control law α1The design is as follows:in the formula: k is a radical of1>0 is a feedback gain, and equation (12) is substituted for equation (11) to obtain:
in the formula: b2>0,L2>0 is a constant; v2The time derivative of (a) is:
in conjunction with equation (2) one can obtain:
finally, based on the disturbance estimation of the extended state observer, the control input u is set as follows:
in the formula: u. ofaAs a model compensation term, usFor the robust term, k2>0 is a feedback gain, and equation (17) is substituted for equation (16), and the following can be obtained:
5. the adaptive control method for auto-disturbance-rejection of the motor considering the full-state constraint as claimed in claim 2, wherein: the step S3 specifically includes: if (1) a suitable parameter can be selected to satisfy the following equation: c. C2≥|α1|max+L2(19)
(2) The system initial value z (0) can satisfy the following condition:
then, as can be seen from equation (17):
when the interference is time invariant, i.e., h (t) is 0, the adaptive law is designed to:
the system is asymptotically convergent, i.e., when t → ∞ z1→ 0, all signals are bounded, the system state can be effectively constrained;
when system disturbances are time-varying, all signals in a closed-loop control system are bounded, and the system state can be effectively constrained as follows defining a positive lyapunov function:
6. the adaptive control method for auto-disturbance-rejection of the motor considering the full-state constraint as claimed in claim 5, wherein: when the interference is time invariant, the lyapunov function is defined as follows:
the derivation of equation (24) and the substitution of equations (7), (18) and (21) can be obtained:
from x1=z1+x1d(t) and expected instruction x1d(t) and the time i-th derivative thereofSatisfy x1d(t)≤υ0≤c1-L1,υi> 0 is a constant, L1>0 is a design parameter, and | x can be obtained1|≤c1Thus x1Is bounded, and α1Is z1Andfunction of z1Andis bounded, can obtain α1Is bounded; from | x2|≤|α1|max+|z2I and I z2|≤L2Let x know2≤c2Is bounded; thus, it can be verified that all signals of the system are bounded, and the system state is restrainable; when the system interference is time-varying, derivation is performed on equation (22), and equations (8), (21) are substituted to obtain:
integration of equation (26) can result in:
it is demonstrated by equation (27) that all signals in a closed loop system are bounded and the system state is constrained, so the controller is convergent and the system is stable.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201911395827.6A CN111007728B (en) | 2019-12-30 | 2019-12-30 | Motor active-disturbance-rejection self-adaptive control method considering all-state constraint |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201911395827.6A CN111007728B (en) | 2019-12-30 | 2019-12-30 | Motor active-disturbance-rejection self-adaptive control method considering all-state constraint |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN111007728A true CN111007728A (en) | 2020-04-14 |
CN111007728B CN111007728B (en) | 2022-12-09 |
Family
ID=70118354
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201911395827.6A Active CN111007728B (en) | 2019-12-30 | 2019-12-30 | Motor active-disturbance-rejection self-adaptive control method considering all-state constraint |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN111007728B (en) |
Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090005886A1 (en) * | 2002-04-18 | 2009-01-01 | Cleveland State University | Extended Active Disturbance Rejection Controller |
CN104345638A (en) * | 2014-10-09 | 2015-02-11 | 南京理工大学 | ADRAC (active-disturbance-rejection adaptive control) method for hydraulic motor position servo system |
CN104570728A (en) * | 2014-11-20 | 2015-04-29 | 南京理工大学 | Self-adaptive robust output feedback control method for motor position servo system |
CN108303885A (en) * | 2018-01-31 | 2018-07-20 | 南京理工大学 | A kind of motor position servo system self-adaptation control method based on interference observer |
CN108469734A (en) * | 2018-03-27 | 2018-08-31 | 安徽工业大学 | Consider the motor servo system Auto-disturbance-rejection Control of state constraint |
CN109995278A (en) * | 2018-12-29 | 2019-07-09 | 中科院计算技术研究所南京移动通信与计算创新研究院 | A kind of motor servo system self-regulation control method considering input-bound |
CN110308651A (en) * | 2018-03-27 | 2019-10-08 | 安徽工业大学 | Electrohydraulic servo system total state about beam control method based on extended state observer |
-
2019
- 2019-12-30 CN CN201911395827.6A patent/CN111007728B/en active Active
Patent Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090005886A1 (en) * | 2002-04-18 | 2009-01-01 | Cleveland State University | Extended Active Disturbance Rejection Controller |
CN104345638A (en) * | 2014-10-09 | 2015-02-11 | 南京理工大学 | ADRAC (active-disturbance-rejection adaptive control) method for hydraulic motor position servo system |
CN104570728A (en) * | 2014-11-20 | 2015-04-29 | 南京理工大学 | Self-adaptive robust output feedback control method for motor position servo system |
CN108303885A (en) * | 2018-01-31 | 2018-07-20 | 南京理工大学 | A kind of motor position servo system self-adaptation control method based on interference observer |
CN108469734A (en) * | 2018-03-27 | 2018-08-31 | 安徽工业大学 | Consider the motor servo system Auto-disturbance-rejection Control of state constraint |
CN110308651A (en) * | 2018-03-27 | 2019-10-08 | 安徽工业大学 | Electrohydraulic servo system total state about beam control method based on extended state observer |
CN109995278A (en) * | 2018-12-29 | 2019-07-09 | 中科院计算技术研究所南京移动通信与计算创新研究院 | A kind of motor servo system self-regulation control method considering input-bound |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
ZHANGBAO XU等: "State Constraint Control for Uncertain Nonlinear Systems With Disturbance Compensation", 《IEEE ACCESS》 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN111007728B (en) | 2022-12-09 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN111152225B (en) | Uncertain mechanical arm fixed time trajectory tracking control method with input saturation | |
CN108303885B (en) | Self-adaptive control method of motor position servo system based on disturbance observer | |
CN107561935B (en) | Motor position servo system friction compensation control method based on multilayer neural network | |
CN108875253B (en) | Terminal sliding mode anti-swing control method and system of under-actuated crane system based on disturbance observer | |
CN107121932B (en) | Motor servo system error symbol integral robust self-adaptive control method | |
CN108388114B (en) | Flexible mechanical arm composite control method based on output redefinition | |
CN108628172B (en) | Mechanical arm high-precision motion control method based on extended state observer | |
CN104333280B (en) | Robustness adaptive control (RAC) method of direct driving motor system | |
CN110673472B (en) | Adaptive robust control method based on neural network compensation dead zone inversion error | |
CN108469734B (en) | Motor servo system active disturbance rejection control method considering state constraint | |
CN108155833B (en) | Motor servo system asymptotic stable control method considering electrical characteristics | |
CN112769364B (en) | Fast self-adaptive anti-interference control method of direct current motor servo system | |
CN111736472B (en) | Motor self-adaptive preset performance asymptotic control method based on RISE | |
Sun et al. | Research on the trajectory tracking control of a 6-DOF manipulator based on fully-actuated system models | |
Qiao et al. | Adaptive control of missile attitude based on BP–ADRC | |
CN109514559B (en) | Flexible mechanical arm time scale separation robust control method based on output redefinition | |
Xie et al. | Neural network‐based adaptive control of piezoelectric actuators with unknown hysteresis | |
Sun et al. | Active disturbance rejection adaptive control of multi‐degrees of freedom hydraulic manipulators | |
CN110829933A (en) | Neural network output feedback self-adaptive robust control method based on transmitting platform | |
CN110888320B (en) | Self-adaptive robust control method based on double-electric-cylinder synchronous motion error modeling | |
CN109324503B (en) | Multilayer neural network motor system control method based on robust integration | |
CN109995278B (en) | Motor servo system self-adjustment control method considering input limitation | |
CN111007728B (en) | Motor active-disturbance-rejection self-adaptive control method considering all-state constraint | |
CN104991445B (en) | A kind of motor servo system of Existence of Global Stable adaptively exports feedback robust control method | |
CN115047760A (en) | FTAIRTSM control method for DC motor servo system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |