CN110956320B - Address selecting and distributing method of sustainable supply chain based on dynamic relaxation intelligent algorithm - Google Patents

Address selecting and distributing method of sustainable supply chain based on dynamic relaxation intelligent algorithm Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN110956320B
CN110956320B CN201911177354.2A CN201911177354A CN110956320B CN 110956320 B CN110956320 B CN 110956320B CN 201911177354 A CN201911177354 A CN 201911177354A CN 110956320 B CN110956320 B CN 110956320B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
cost
manufacturer
follows
supplier
raw material
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN201911177354.2A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN110956320A (en
Inventor
郭羽含
石扶雨
孙宁
张宇
于俊宇
刘子赫
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Liaoning Technical University
Original Assignee
Liaoning Technical University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Liaoning Technical University filed Critical Liaoning Technical University
Priority to CN201911177354.2A priority Critical patent/CN110956320B/en
Publication of CN110956320A publication Critical patent/CN110956320A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN110956320B publication Critical patent/CN110956320B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/04Forecasting or optimisation specially adapted for administrative or management purposes, e.g. linear programming or "cutting stock problem"
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06NCOMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N3/00Computing arrangements based on biological models
    • G06N3/004Artificial life, i.e. computing arrangements simulating life
    • G06N3/006Artificial life, i.e. computing arrangements simulating life based on simulated virtual individual or collective life forms, e.g. social simulations or particle swarm optimisation [PSO]
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0631Resource planning, allocation, distributing or scheduling for enterprises or organisations
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0637Strategic management or analysis, e.g. setting a goal or target of an organisation; Planning actions based on goals; Analysis or evaluation of effectiveness of goals
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
    • G06Q10/06393Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/30Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Computational Linguistics (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Computing Systems (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a sustainable supply chain address selecting and distributing method based on a dynamic relaxation intelligent algorithm, which comprises the following steps: step 1, based on comprehensive weighted scoring, taking minimized production cost, carbon transaction cost and pollution discharge cost as optimization targets, and establishing a three-level structure sustainable supply chain model integrating supply chain site selection and quantity distribution; and 2, converting the site selection and the quantity distribution of the supply chain into vector forms, and performing iterative updating operation on the solution population by using a dynamic relaxation group intelligent algorithm and combining the fitness function value with the dynamic relaxation factor until the optimal approximate solution of the objective function is obtained, so as to obtain the site selection decision and the quantity distribution scheme of the sustainable supply chain network, and provide a high-quality and high-efficiency solution for designing the complex sustainable supply chain.

Description

Address selecting and distributing method of sustainable supply chain based on dynamic relaxation intelligent algorithm
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of sustainable supply chain site selection and collaborative scheduling, and particularly relates to a site selection and allocation method of a sustainable supply chain based on a dynamic relaxation intelligent algorithm.
Background
The supply chain is a network composed of suppliers, manufacturers and clients, and aims to address and distribute the plurality of factories and the plurality of clients in the sustainable supply chain, the suppliers in the sustainable supply chain process raw materials and provide the raw materials for the manufacturers, and the manufacturers optimize the address decision and the quantity distribution of the supply chain in the process of distributing the raw materials to the clients, and simultaneously comprehensively consider environmental factors (carbon emission and sewage emission), so that the influence of the carbon emission in the production of each link on the environment is effectively reduced. In recent years, the problem of site selection and scheduling of a supply chain has become a popular research direction of supply chain management, and research on supply chain scheduling by a plurality of students is concentrated in the directions of logistics management, supply time and the like, and the influence of site selection decision and allocation of processing raw materials and final products on sustainable production is considered, so that a sustainable supply chain network considering economic benefits and environmental benefits is established, the production efficiency of the supply chain is improved, the consumption of resources is reduced, and finally the production cost and the environmental influence of the supply chain are reduced by optimizing the site selection and allocation of the supply chain. In terms of the method, the traditional particle swarm algorithm solving method has the problems of overlong searching time, easiness in sinking into local optimal solution and the like, and an intelligent algorithm combining dynamic relaxation factors is provided for realizing decision making and scheduling optimization of a sustainable supply chain.
Disclosure of Invention
Based on the defects of the prior art, the technical problem solved by the invention is to provide a sustainable supply chain address selecting and distributing method based on a dynamic relaxation intelligent algorithm, so that the optimal supply chain participant combination is effectively selected, the cost of a supply chain network and the influence on the environment are reduced, and a high-quality and high-efficiency solution is provided for the performance balance of the sustainable supply chain on the economic, social and environmental sides.
In order to solve the technical problems, the invention is realized by the following technical scheme:
the invention provides a sustainable supply chain address selecting and distributing method based on a dynamic relaxation intelligent algorithm, which comprises the following steps:
step 1: based on the comprehensive weighted score, taking the minimum production cost, the carbon transaction cost and the pollution discharge cost as optimization targets, and establishing a three-level structure sustainable supply chain model integrating supply chain site selection and quantity distribution;
step 2: converting the supply chain site selection and quantity allocation into vector forms, and using a dynamic relaxation group intelligent algorithm to execute iterative updating operation on the solution population by combining the fitness function value with the dynamic relaxation factor until the optimal approximate solution of the objective function is obtained, so as to obtain the site selection decision and quantity allocation scheme of the sustainable supply chain network.
Further, the specific steps of the step 2 are as follows:
step 2.1: obtaining a supplier set S and a producer set P with high comprehensive scores based on the comprehensive weighted scores;
step 2.2: converting the site selection and the quantity allocation of the supply chain into an x vector representation, initializing all particles in the solution population, using a dynamic relaxation group intelligent algorithm, performing iterative updating operation on the solution population by combining the fitness function value with the dynamic relaxation factor until the optimal approximate solution of the objective function is obtained, obtaining the site selection decision and the quantity allocation scheme of the sustainable supply chain network, and calculating and recording the fitness values of the solution population and the corresponding population.
Optionally, the step 2.1 includes:
step 2.1.1: the comprehensive weighted scoring index of the supplier comprises the production cost of each raw material of the supplier, the transaction cost of carbon quota, the transaction cost of redundant carbon quota, the operation cost and the corresponding cost of pollution discharge generated by each raw material, and the specific calculation method is as follows:
the calculation formula for the composite score of each raw material production cost of the supplier is as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000031
wherein ,αSAm Weighting the production cost of each raw material of the suppliers; PSM (power management module) im The cost of producing a unit of raw material m for supplier i;
the composite score for the carbon quota transaction costs for the supplier is calculated as follows:
WSC i =αSB×(1/CSP i )
wherein αSB is a weight for the carbon quota transaction cost for the provider; CSP (compact size reduction package) i A cost of purchasing a unit carbon quota amount for vendor i;
the composite score for the excess carbon quota transaction costs for the supplier is calculated as follows:
WSCR i =αSC×(1/CSRP i )
where αsc is a weight for the excess carbon quota transaction cost for the provider; CSRP i Purchasing a cost for provider i of excess/sell excess carbon allowance by one unit carbon allowance;
the comprehensive score of the operation cost of the provider is calculated as follows:
WSO i =αSD×(1/OSF i )
wherein αsd is a weight of the operational cost of the provider; OSF (OSF) i The operating cost for vendor i;
the comprehensive score of the cost corresponding to the pollution discharge generated by each raw material of the supplier is calculated as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000032
wherein ,αSEm Weighting the cost of blowdown for each raw material of the supplier; WSM (Wireless sensor module) im Producing a unit of the amount of waste produced by the raw material m for the supplier i;
the comprehensive scores of pollution treatment measures of suppliers are firstly classified, special symbols and Chinese fonts in the scores are replaced by corresponding scoring numbers, and then the treatment scores are calculated, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000033
wherein ,αSMm Weight of pollution control measures for raw materials, SCM im Scoring pollution abatement measures for each raw material of each supplier;
the vendor's recoverability composite score is calculated as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000041
wherein ,αSRm Weight of recyclability of each raw material, SR im Scoring recyclability of each raw material for each supplier;
the product quality composite score of the supplier is calculated as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000042
/>
wherein ,αSQm SPQ is a weight for quality of each raw material product of suppliers im Scoring the product quality of each raw material for each supplier;
in summary, for each cost composite weighted score of the provider, the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000043
wherein ,
Figure BDA0002290141650000044
Figure BDA0002290141650000045
step 2.1.2: the comprehensive weighted scoring index of the producer comprises the production cost of each product of the producer, the transaction cost of the carbon quota, the transaction cost of the redundant carbon quota, the operation cost and the corresponding cost of pollution discharge generated by each raw material, and the specific calculation method is as follows:
for the comprehensive score of the production cost of each product of the manufacturer, the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000046
wherein ,ρPAn The weight of the production cost of each raw material of the producer; PPN (PPN) jn The cost of producing a unit of product n for producer j;
the composite score for the manufacturer's carbon quota transaction costs is calculated as follows:
WPC j =ρPB×(1/CPP j )
wherein ρPB is the weight of the manufacturer's carbon quota transaction costs; CPP (CPP) j A cost of purchasing a unit carbon quota amount for producer j;
the composite score for the excess carbon quota transaction costs for the manufacturer is calculated as follows:
WPCR j =ρPC×(1/CPRP j )
wherein ρpc is a weight for the manufacturer's excess carbon quota transaction costs; CPRP (CPRP) j Purchasing a cost for excess/sell excess carbon allowance by one unit carbon allowance for producer j;
the comprehensive score of the operation cost of the manufacturer is calculated as follows:
WPCR j =ρPD×(1/OPF j )
wherein ρpd is a weight of the operating cost of the manufacturer; OPF (optical fiber) j The operating cost for producer j;
the comprehensive score of the cost corresponding to the pollution discharge generated by each product of the manufacturer is calculated as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000051
wherein ,ρPEn Weighting the pollution discharge cost of each raw material of the manufacturer; WPN (Wireless Power network) jn The sewage discharge capacity generated by a unit of product n is produced for a producer j;
the pollution treatment measures of the manufacturers are comprehensively scored, the scores are classified, special symbols and Chinese fonts in the scores are replaced by corresponding scoring numbers, and then the treatment scores are calculated according to the following calculation formula:
Figure BDA0002290141650000052
wherein ,ρPNn Weighting pollution control measures of each product, PCN jn Scoring pollution abatement measures for each product of each manufacturer;
the manufacturer's recoverability composite score is calculated as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000053
/>
wherein ,αPRn Weight of recyclability of each product, PR jn Scoring recyclability of each product for each manufacturer;
the product quality comprehensive score of the manufacturer is calculated as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000054
wherein ,αPQn Weight of quality of raw material products of manufacturers, PPQ jn Scoring a product quality of each product for each manufacturer;
in summary, for the cost composite weighted score of each item of the manufacturer, the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000061
wherein ,
Figure BDA0002290141650000062
Figure BDA0002290141650000063
optionally, the specific steps of step 2.2 are as follows:
step 2.2.1: constructing an initial solution population, determining the population scale of the solution population, the space dimension D of particles and the maximum iteration number T, using a Jacobi iteration algorithm according to the order constraint of a customer and the constraint of keeping the proportion of the raw material purchase quantity of a manufacturer to the product production quantity, obtaining a group of rapidly converged values through 10 iterations, and initializing the values to the position of each particle in the solution population, wherein the formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000064
i in the formula is the number of initial groups, D is the space dimension, and T is the maximum update times;
from among solution populations
Figure BDA0002290141650000065
Judging whether the suppliers and the manufacturers operate or not, and judging the corresponding site selection decision, wherein the formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000066
Figure BDA0002290141650000067
the address selection decision needs to be updated simultaneously when the solution population is updated each time; adcp ijm Representing the number of raw materials m supplied by supplier i to producer j, adcp jkn Representing the number of products n that manufacturer j provides to customer k;
step 2.2.2: an initial particle movement velocity is constructed, and the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000071
step 2.2.3: and processing boundary positions of particles and a speed limit of particle updating, and correcting particles which do not meet the condition and the particle updating speed, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000072
/>
Figure BDA0002290141650000073
Figure BDA0002290141650000074
Figure BDA0002290141650000075
x in the formula max and xmin For maximum and minimum values of each particle, V max and Vmin A highest moving speed and a lowest moving speed for each particle;
step 2.2.4: according to the individual particles, a corresponding site selection decision is obtained, the fitness value of the individual particles is calculated and compared through a fitness function, the historical best position pbest and the global best position gbest of the particles i are updated and recorded, and the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000076
Figure BDA0002290141650000077
in the formula
Figure BDA0002290141650000078
Optimal particle position for the extremum of the individual, +.>
Figure BDA0002290141650000079
Particle location for a globally optimal solution;
step 2.2.5: particle movement speed: updating individual particle movement speeds of the correction solution population by combining fitness functions with dynamic relaxation factors;
step 2.2.6: vendor layer: for each supplier S i If the number of supply allocations does not meet the upper production limit MQRM of the supplier im ≥∑ j∈J Adcp ijm Then describe provider S i The amount of raw material to be supplied exceeds the supplier S i The upper supply limit that can be provided needs to be reconsidered by the supplier S i Updating each particle in the solution population in combination with the dynamic relaxation factor while obtaining a correspondence according to the new supply allocation number up to the supplier S i Up to the provider S i Until the constraint condition is satisfied;
step 2.2.7: manufacturer layer: for each producer P j If the production allocation quantity does not meet the production upper limit MQRM of the manufacturer jn ≥∑ k∈K Adcp jkn Description of manufacturer P j The number of products to be provided exceeds the manufacturer P j The upper production limit that can be provided requires reconsideration of the manufacturer P j Updating each particle in the solution population in combination with dynamic relaxation factors while obtaining a correspondence according to the new supply allocation number up to the producer P j Up to the manufacturer P j Until the constraint condition is satisfied;
step 2.2.8: calculating the fitness value of the individual particles according to the mathematical model of the objective function;
step 2.2.9: for individual particles in the solution population, comparing the fitness value of the current particle position with the fitness value of the historical optimal position, and if the fitness value of the current particle is better, updating the current particle position into the historical optimal position, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000081
step 2.2.10: for individual particles in the solution population, comparing the fitness value of the current particle position with the fitness value of the global optimal position, and if the fitness value of the current particle is better, updating the current particle position into the global optimal position, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000082
step 2.2.11: and judging whether the algorithm meets the end condition, if the algorithm does not meet the end condition, returning to the step 2.2.5 to continue iterative updating until the algorithm meets the end condition, stopping calculation, ending the algorithm and outputting the global optimal solution.
By the adoption of the method for selecting and distributing the sustainable supply chain based on the dynamic relaxation intelligent algorithm, the efficiency of the sustainable supply chain for selecting and distributing is improved, the sustainable supply chain collaborative design theory is adopted, the carbon trade market quota cost, the carbon trade cost among enterprises, the sewage discharge cost and the production cost are subjected to collaborative design, the intelligent algorithm based on the dynamic relaxation factor is adopted, the optimal supply chain participant combination is effectively selected, the cost of a supply chain network and the influence on the environment are reduced, and a high-quality and high-efficiency solution is provided for sustainable production of the sustainable supply chain.
The invention relates to a sustainable supply chain addressing and distribution method based on a dynamic relaxation intelligent algorithm, which aims at optimizing minimized production cost, carbon transaction cost and pollution discharge cost and establishes a supply chain mathematical model of a three-level structure for addressing and distribution of integrated manufacturers. Meanwhile, an intelligent solving method based on dynamic relaxation factors is provided, supply chain site selection and quantity distribution are converted into vector forms, correction operation is carried out by combining fitness functions with the dynamic relaxation factors, corresponding site selection decisions are obtained according to the vectors, iterative updating operation is carried out on solution populations by combining fitness function values with the dynamic relaxation factors until optimal approximate solutions of objective functions are obtained, and site selection decisions and quantity distribution schemes of a sustainable supply chain network are obtained. The intelligent algorithm combined with the dynamic relaxation factor adopts the Lagrange relaxation algorithm to obtain the dynamic relaxation factor, optimize particle optimizing speed, strengthen local searching capability of each particle, improve convergence capability of the particles, and have good efficiency in convergence speed and convergence result. The algorithm solves the problem of the addressing and the distribution of the sustainable supply chain, reduces the cost of the sustainable supply chain, reduces the influence on the environment, improves the production efficiency, and can provide a high-quality and high-efficiency solution for the problem of the addressing and the distribution of the sustainable supply chain network.
The foregoing description is only an overview of the present invention, and is intended to be implemented in accordance with the teachings of the present invention, as well as to provide further clarity and understanding of the above and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention, as described in the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solution of the embodiments of the present invention, the drawings of the embodiments will be briefly described below.
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a method of addressing and assigning a sustainable supply chain based on a dynamic relaxation intelligent algorithm of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The following detailed description of the invention, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, illustrates the principles of the invention by way of example and by way of a further explanation of the principles of the invention, and its features and advantages will be apparent from the detailed description. In the drawings to which reference is made, the same or similar components in different drawings are denoted by the same reference numerals.
Unlike sustainable supply chain networks of general methods, the present invention not only incorporates environmental impact into the supply chain network modeling, but also considers production costs and carbon trade quota costs, sewage costs generated during production, and incorporates the operational costs of suppliers and manufacturers into a mathematical model.
The invention relates to a sustainable supply chain address selecting and distributing method based on a dynamic relaxation intelligent algorithm, which comprises the following steps: the method comprises the following steps:
step 1: based on the comprehensive weighted score, taking the minimum production cost, the carbon transaction cost and the pollution discharge cost as optimization targets, and establishing a three-level structure sustainable supply chain model integrating supply chain site selection and quantity distribution; the mathematical model includes an objective function and a constraint, the objective function having the formula:
Figure BDA0002290141650000101
wherein I represents the vendor number, I ε I; j represents the manufacturer number, J e J; k represents the customer number, K ε K; m represents the raw material number, M epsilon M; n represents the product number, N ε N; d (D) kn Order total amount of product n for customer k; PSM (power management module) im The cost of producing a unit of raw material m for supplier i; PPN (PPN) jn The cost of producing a unit of product n for producer j; WSM (Wireless sensor module) im Producing a unit of the amount of waste produced by the raw material m for the supplier i; WPN (Wireless Power network) jn The sewage discharge capacity generated by a unit of product n is produced for a producer j; CSQ (common sense amplifier) i A carbon trade quota market unit amount (planning amount) purchased for supplier i; CPQ (CPQ) j Carbon trade quota market units (planning amounts) purchased by producer j; CSPM (common physical distribution System) im Producing a carbon emission amount per unit of raw material m for supplier i; CPPN (CPPN) jn Producing a carbon emission per unit of product n for producer j; CSP (compact size reduction package) i A cost of purchasing a unit carbon quota amount for vendor i; CPP (CPP) j A cost of purchasing a unit carbon quota amount for producer j; CSRP i Purchasing a cost for provider i of excess/sell excess carbon allowance by one unit carbon allowance; CPRP (CPRP) j Purchasing a cost for excess/sell excess carbon allowance by one unit carbon allowance for producer j; MQRM im A maximum production quantity of raw material m that can be produced for supplier i; MQRM jn Maximum production of product n that can be produced for producer jNumber of pieces; OSF (OSF) i The operating cost for vendor i; OPF (optical fiber) j The operating cost for producer j;
Adcp ijm representing the number of raw materials m supplied by supplier i to producer j, adcp jkn Representing the number of products n that manufacturer j provides to customer k;
os i indicating whether or not vendor i is selected as a supply chain partner, 1 representing selection, 0 representing non-selection; op (op) j Indicating whether producer j is selected as a supply chain partner, 1 representing selection, 0 representing non-selection;
the limiting conditions comprise preconditions and constraint conditions, wherein the preconditions are as follows: all customer orders must be satisfied; the supplier has a supply upper limit constraint and the producer has a production upper limit constraint; the operation cost is fixed in the period of each provider and producer; the constraint conditions are as follows:
the customer's order needs must satisfy the constraints:
Figure BDA0002290141650000111
wherein ,
Figure BDA0002290141650000112
D ln an order total for order product n on behalf of customer k;
the raw material purchase quantity is consistent with the product production quantity in proportion:
Figure BDA0002290141650000121
wherein ,
Figure BDA0002290141650000122
MTN mn representing the quantitative relation proportion between the raw material m and the product n;
vendor supply force constraints:
Figure BDA0002290141650000123
wherein
Figure BDA0002290141650000124
MQRM im Represents the maximum number of raw materials m that can be provided by supplier i;
manufacturer productivity constraints:
Figure BDA0002290141650000125
wherein ,
Figure BDA0002290141650000126
MQRM jn representing the maximum production quantity of the product n by the manufacturer j;
non-negative integer and binary constraints:
Figure BDA0002290141650000127
Figure BDA0002290141650000128
op i ∈{0,1} (8)
op j ∈{0,1} (9)
wherein ,
Figure BDA0002290141650000129
step 2: aiming at the problem of addressing and distribution of a sustainable supply chain, the invention converts the addressing and quantity distribution of the supply chain into a vector form, uses a dynamic relaxation group intelligent algorithm to obtain the optimal approximate solution of an objective function by combining a fitness function value with a dynamic relaxation factor, and obtains the addressing decision and quantity distribution scheme of the sustainable supply chain network. The first stage of the dynamic relaxation intelligent algorithm is to comprehensively evaluate a provider layer and a manufacturer layer by using comprehensive weighted scores to obtain a provider and a manufacturer with better evaluation scores, preferentially enumerate all candidate cooperators which can meet the customer order, eliminate the rest of manufacturers which cannot meet the customer order, calculate an objective function approximation value for each of the rest of candidate suppliers, and select the candidate manufacturer with the minimum objective function approximation value as a partner of a final supply chain network; the second stage is to convert the address and quantity distribution of the supply chain into vector form aiming at the address selecting problem and the distribution problem of the sustainable supply chain, obtain the corresponding address selecting decision according to the quantity distribution among different layers of the supply chain, and then use a dynamic relaxation group intelligent algorithm to execute iterative updating operation on the solution population by combining the fitness function value with the dynamic relaxation factor until the optimal approximate solution of the objective function is obtained, so as to obtain the address selecting decision and the quantity distribution scheme of the sustainable supply chain network.
The specific steps of the step 2 are as follows:
step 2.1: obtaining a supplier set S and a producer set P with high comprehensive scores based on the comprehensive weighted scores; the algorithm calculates an evaluation score for candidate manufacturers, and obtains comprehensive weighted scores of the candidate manufacturers by using a weighted average method according to economic cost (production cost, pollution discharge cost, operation cost, carbon cost and the like) of the candidate manufacturers, environmental influence (pollution treatment measures, recoverability), social evaluation (product quality) and other factors, and screens the partner with the lowest cost; adopting an bubbling sequencing algorithm to respectively select the first omega suppliers and manufacturers with high comprehensive scores, and finally obtaining an optimal supplier set S and an optimal manufacturer set P;
the specific steps of the step 2.1 are as follows:
respectively listing scoring indexes when the suppliers and the manufacturers prefer; giving different weights to each index according to different proportions of the index in the value of the objective function;
step 2.1.1: the grading indexes of the suppliers comprise the production cost of each raw material of the suppliers, the transaction cost of carbon quota, the transaction cost of redundant carbon quota, the operation cost and the corresponding cost of pollution discharge generated by each raw material; the specific method comprises the following steps:
the calculation formula for the composite score of each raw material production cost of the supplier is as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000131
wherein ,αSAm Weighting the production cost of each raw material of the suppliers;
the composite score for the carbon quota transaction costs for the supplier is calculated as follows:
WSC i =αSB×(1/CSP i ) (11)
wherein αSB is a weight for the carbon quota transaction cost for the provider;
the composite score for the excess carbon quota transaction costs for the supplier is calculated as follows:
WSCR i =αSC×(1/CSRP i ) (12)
where αsc is a weight for excess carbon quota transaction costs for the provider;
the comprehensive score of the operation cost of the provider is calculated as follows:
WSO i =αSD×(1/OSF i ) (13)
wherein αsd is a weight of the operational cost of the provider;
the comprehensive score of the cost corresponding to the pollution discharge generated by each raw material of the supplier is calculated as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000141
wherein ,αSEm Weighting the cost of blowdown for each raw material of the supplier;
the comprehensive scores of pollution treatment measures of suppliers are firstly classified, special symbols and Chinese fonts in the scores are replaced by corresponding scoring numbers, and then the treatment scores are calculated, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000142
wherein ,αSMm Weight of pollution control measures for raw materials, SCM im Scoring pollution abatement measures for each raw material of each supplier;
the vendor's recoverability composite score is calculated as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000143
wherein ,αSRm Weight of recyclability of each raw material, SR im Scoring recyclability of each raw material for each supplier;
the product quality composite score of the supplier is calculated as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000144
wherein ,αSQm For weight of quality of each raw material product, SPQ im Scoring the product quality of each raw material for each supplier;
in summary, for each cost composite score of the provider, the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000151
wherein ,
Figure BDA0002290141650000152
Figure BDA0002290141650000153
step 2.1.2: the grading indexes of the manufacturer comprise the production cost of each product of the manufacturer, the transaction cost of the carbon quota, the transaction cost of the redundant carbon quota, the operation cost and the corresponding cost of pollution discharge generated by each raw material; the specific method comprises the following steps:
for the comprehensive score of the production cost of each product of the manufacturer, the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000154
wherein ,ρPAn The weight of the production cost of each raw material of the producer;
the composite score for the manufacturer's carbon quota transaction costs is calculated as follows:
WPC j =ρPB×(1/CPP j ) (20)
wherein ρPB is the weight of the manufacturer's carbon quota transaction costs;
the composite score for the excess carbon quota transaction costs for the manufacturer is calculated as follows:
WPCR j =ρPC×(1/CPRP j ) (21)
wherein ρpc is a weight for the manufacturer's excess carbon quota transaction costs;
the comprehensive score of the operation cost of the manufacturer is calculated as follows:
WPCR j =ρPD×(1/OPF j ) (22)
wherein ρpd is a weight of the operating cost of the manufacturer;
the comprehensive score of the cost corresponding to the pollution discharge generated by each product of the manufacturer is calculated as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000155
wherein ,ρPEn Weighting the pollution discharge cost of each raw material of the manufacturer;
the pollution treatment measures of the manufacturers are comprehensively scored, the scores are classified, special symbols and Chinese fonts in the scores are replaced by corresponding scoring numbers, and then the treatment scores are calculated according to the following calculation formula:
Figure BDA0002290141650000161
wherein ,ρPNn Weighting pollution control measures of each product, PCN jn Scoring pollution abatement measures for each product of each manufacturer;
the manufacturer's recoverability composite score is calculated as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000162
wherein ,αPRn Weight of recyclability of each product, PR jn Scoring recyclability of each product for each manufacturer;
the product quality comprehensive score of the manufacturer is calculated as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000163
wherein ,αPQn Weight of quality of raw material products of manufacturers, PPQ jn Scoring a product quality of each product for each manufacturer;
in summary, for each cost composite score of the manufacturer, the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000164
wherein ,
Figure BDA0002290141650000165
Figure BDA0002290141650000166
step 2.2: the candidate dynamic relaxation intelligent algorithm is a preferred supplier set S, a manufacturer set P and a client set D; converting the site selection and the quantity allocation of a supply chain into an x vector representation, initializing all particles in a solution population according to a Jacobi iteration method, using a dynamic relaxation group intelligent algorithm, carrying out iterative updating operation on the solution population by combining a fitness function value with a dynamic relaxation factor until an optimal approximate solution of an objective function is obtained, obtaining a site selection decision and a quantity allocation scheme of a sustainable supply chain network, calculating and recording fitness values of the solution population and the corresponding population until the intelligent algorithm meets a termination condition, ending the algorithm and outputting a global optimal solution;
the specific steps of the step 2.2 are as follows:
step 2.2.1: constructing an initial solution population, determining the population scale of the solution population, the space dimension D of particles and the maximum iteration number T, using a Jacobi iteration algorithm according to the order constraint of a customer and the constraint of keeping the proportion of the raw material purchase quantity of a manufacturer to the product production quantity, obtaining a group of rapidly converged values through 10 iterations, and initializing the values to the position of each particle in the solution population, wherein the formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000171
i in the formula is the number of initial groups, D is the space dimension, and T is the maximum update times;
from among solution populations
Figure BDA0002290141650000172
Judging whether the suppliers and the manufacturers operate or not, and judging the corresponding site selection decision, wherein the formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000173
Figure BDA0002290141650000174
the address selection decision needs to be updated simultaneously when the solution population is updated each time;
step 2.2.2: an initial particle movement velocity is constructed, and the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000175
step 2.2.3: and processing boundary positions of particles and a speed limit of particle updating, and correcting particles which do not meet the condition and the particle updating speed, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000176
/>
Figure BDA0002290141650000177
Figure BDA0002290141650000181
Figure BDA0002290141650000182
x in the formula max and xmin For maximum and minimum values of each particle, V max and Vmin A highest moving speed and a lowest moving speed for each particle;
step 2.2.4: according to the individual particles, a corresponding site selection decision is obtained, the fitness value of the individual particles is calculated and compared through a fitness function, the historical best position pbest and the global best position gbest of the particles i are updated and recorded, and the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000183
Figure BDA0002290141650000184
in the formula
Figure BDA0002290141650000185
Optimal particle position for the extremum of the individual, +.>
Figure BDA0002290141650000186
Particle location for a globally optimal solution;
step 2.2.5: updating individual particle movement speeds of the modified solution population with an fitness function in combination with dynamic relaxation factors, wherein the particle update speeds in the solution population are improved as follows:
step 2.2.5.1: the update speed and position for each particle in the solution population is calculated as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000187
in the formula
Figure BDA0002290141650000188
For particle speed, +.>
Figure BDA0002290141650000189
Is the particle position, C 1 and C2 R is the acceleration coefficient 1 and r2 Is [0,1]Random numbers in between;
step 2.2.5.2: the update speed of each particle in the solution population is subjected to relaxation optimization by combining the dynamic relaxation factors, and the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA00022901416500001810
in the formula
Figure BDA00022901416500001811
Is dynamic Lagrangian relaxation factor, +.>
Figure BDA00022901416500001812
Is->
Figure BDA00022901416500001813
At->
Figure BDA00022901416500001814
Secondary gradient values at;
step 2.2.5.3: the secondary gradient value is updated, and the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA00022901416500001815
step 2.2.5.4: updating the dynamic Lagrangian relaxation factor by default
Figure BDA00022901416500001816
The values of (2) are all 0, and the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000191
wherein ,
Figure BDA0002290141650000192
the value of (2) will follow fmin and +.>
Figure BDA0002290141650000193
The value of (2) is continuously changed and is in a monotonically decreasing trend;
step 2.2.5.5: for the updated position of each particle in the solution population, the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000194
step 2.2.6: vendor layer: for each supplier S i If the number of supply allocations does not meet the upper production limit MQRM of the supplier im ≥∑ j∈J Adcp ijm Then describe provider S i The amount of raw material to be supplied exceeds the supplier S i The upper supply limit that can be provided needs to be reconsidered by the supplier S i Updating each particle in the solution population in combination with the dynamic relaxation factor while obtaining a correspondence according to the new supply allocation number up to the supplier S i Up to the provider S i Until the constraint condition is satisfied;
step 2.2.7: manufacturer layer: for each producer P j If the production allocation quantity does not meet the production upper limit MQRM of the manufacturer jn ≥∑ k∈K Adcp jkn Description of manufacturer P j The number of products to be provided exceeds the manufacturer P j The upper production limit that can be provided requires reconsideration of the manufacturer P j Updating each particle in the solution population in combination with dynamic relaxation factors while obtaining a correspondence according to the new supply allocation number up to the producer P j Up to the manufacturer P j Until the constraint condition is satisfied;
step 2.2.8: calculating the fitness value of the individual particles according to the mathematical model of the objective function;
step 2.2.9: for individual particles in the solution population, comparing the fitness value of the current particle position with the fitness value of the historical optimal position, and if the fitness value of the current particle is better, updating the current particle position into the historical optimal position, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000195
step 2.2.10: for individual particles in the solution population, comparing the fitness value of the current particle position with the fitness value of the global optimal position, and if the fitness value of the current particle is better, updating the current particle position into the global optimal position, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002290141650000201
step 2.2.11: judging whether the algorithm meets the end condition, if not, returning to the step 2.3 (2.2.5) to continue iterative updating until the algorithm meets the end condition, stopping calculation, ending the algorithm and outputting the global optimal solution.
In this embodiment, all codes are implemented by Matlab, and the specific experimental environment configuration is shown in table 1:
table 1 experimental environment configuration
Content Configuration information
Operating system WINDOWS 10
Processor and method for controlling the same 2.7GHz Intel Core i5
CPU core number 4
Memory 8G
Matlab version R2016a
While the invention has been described with respect to the preferred embodiments, it will be understood that the invention is not limited thereto, but is capable of modification and variation without departing from the spirit of the invention, as will be apparent to those skilled in the art.

Claims (1)

1. The method for selecting and distributing the sustainable supply chain based on the dynamic relaxation intelligent algorithm is characterized by comprising the following steps of:
step 1: based on the comprehensive weighted score, taking the minimum production cost, the carbon transaction cost and the pollution discharge cost as optimization targets, and establishing a three-level structure sustainable supply chain model integrating supply chain site selection and quantity distribution;
step 2: converting the supply chain site selection and quantity allocation into vector forms, and using a dynamic relaxation group intelligent algorithm to execute iterative updating operation on the solution population by combining the fitness function value with the dynamic relaxation factor until the optimal approximate solution of the objective function is obtained, so as to obtain a site selection decision and quantity allocation scheme of the sustainable supply chain network;
the specific steps of the step 2 are as follows:
step 2.1: obtaining a supplier set S and a producer set P with high comprehensive scores based on the comprehensive weighted scores by using a weighted average algorithm;
step 2.2: converting the site selection and the quantity allocation of a supply chain into an x vector representation, initializing all particles in a solution population, performing iterative updating operation on the solution population by using a dynamic relaxation group intelligent algorithm and combining a fitness function value with a dynamic relaxation factor until the optimal approximate solution of an objective function is obtained, obtaining a site selection decision and a quantity allocation scheme of a sustainable supply chain network, and calculating and recording fitness values of the solution population and a corresponding population;
the step 2.1 comprises the following steps:
step 2.1.1: the grading index of the supplier comprises the production cost, the carbon quota transaction cost, the redundant carbon quota transaction cost, the operation cost and the corresponding cost of pollution discharge generated by each raw material of the supplier, and the specific calculation method comprises the following steps:
the calculation formula for the composite score of each raw material production cost of the supplier is as follows:
Figure FDA0004138215130000021
wherein ,αSAm Weighting the production cost of each raw material of the suppliers; PSM (power management module) im The cost of producing a unit of raw material m for supplier i;
the composite score for the carbon quota transaction costs for the supplier is calculated as follows:
WSC i =αSB×(1/CSP i )
wherein αSB is a weight for the carbon quota transaction cost for the provider; CSP (compact size reduction package) i A cost of purchasing a unit carbon quota amount for vendor i;
the composite score for the excess carbon quota transaction costs for the supplier is calculated as follows:
WSCR i =αSC×(1/CSRP i )
where αsc is a weight for the excess carbon quota transaction cost for the provider; CSRP i Purchasing a cost for provider i of excess/sell excess carbon allowance by one unit carbon allowance;
the comprehensive score of the operation cost of the provider is calculated as follows:
WSO i =αSD×(1/OSF i )
wherein αsd is a weight of the operational cost of the provider; OSF (OSF) i The operating cost for vendor i;
the comprehensive score of the cost corresponding to the pollution discharge generated by each raw material of the supplier is calculated as follows:
Figure FDA0004138215130000022
wherein ,αSEm Weighting the cost of blowdown for each raw material of the supplier; WSM (Wireless sensor module) im Producing a unit of the amount of waste produced by the raw material m for the supplier i;
the comprehensive scores of pollution treatment measures of suppliers are firstly classified, special symbols and Chinese fonts in the scores are replaced by corresponding scoring numbers, and then the treatment scores are calculated, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure FDA0004138215130000031
wherein ,αSMm Weight of pollution control measures for raw materials, SCM im Scoring pollution abatement measures for each raw material of the supplier;
the vendor's recoverability composite score is calculated as follows:
Figure FDA0004138215130000032
wherein ,αSRm Weight of recyclability of each raw material, SR im Scoring recyclability of each raw material of the supplier;
the product quality composite score of the supplier is calculated as follows:
Figure FDA0004138215130000033
wherein ,αSQm SPQ is a weight for quality of each raw material product of suppliers im Scoring the product quality of each raw material of the supplier;
in summary, for each cost composite score of the provider, the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure FDA0004138215130000034
wherein ,
Figure FDA0004138215130000035
Figure FDA0004138215130000036
step 2.1.2: the grading indexes of the manufacturer comprise the production cost, the carbon quota transaction cost, the redundant carbon quota transaction cost, the operation cost and the pollution discharge corresponding cost generated by the raw materials of the manufacturer, and the specific calculation method comprises the following steps:
for the comprehensive score of the production cost of each product of the manufacturer, the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure FDA0004138215130000041
wherein ,ρPAn The weight of the production cost of each raw material of the producer; PPN (PPN) jn The cost of producing a unit of product n for producer j;
the composite score for the manufacturer's carbon quota transaction costs is calculated as follows:
WPC j =ρPB×(1/CPP j )
wherein ρPB is the weight of the manufacturer's carbon quota transaction costs; CPP (CPP) j A cost of purchasing a unit carbon quota amount for producer j;
the composite score for the excess carbon quota transaction costs for the manufacturer is calculated as follows:
WPCR j =ρPC×(1/CPRP j )
wherein ρpc is a weight for the manufacturer's excess carbon quota transaction costs; CPRP (CPRP) j Purchasing a cost for excess/sell excess carbon allowance by one unit carbon allowance for producer j;
the comprehensive score of the operation cost of the manufacturer is calculated as follows:
WPCR j =ρPD×(1/OPF j )
wherein pPD is a weight of the operating cost of the manufacturer; OPF (optical fiber) j The operating cost for producer j;
the comprehensive score of the cost corresponding to the pollution discharge generated by each product of the manufacturer is calculated as follows:
Figure FDA0004138215130000042
wherein ,ρPEn Weighting the pollution discharge cost of each raw material of the manufacturer; WPN (Wireless Power network) jn The sewage discharge capacity generated by a unit of product n is produced for a producer j;
the pollution treatment measures of the manufacturers are comprehensively scored, the scores are classified, special symbols and Chinese fonts in the scores are replaced by corresponding scoring numbers, and then the treatment scores are calculated according to the following calculation formula:
Figure FDA0004138215130000051
wherein ,pPNn Weighting pollution control measures of each product, PCN jn Scoring pollution abatement measures for each product of the manufacturer;
the manufacturer's recoverability composite score is calculated as follows:
Figure FDA0004138215130000052
wherein ,αPRn Weight of recyclability of each product, PR jn Scoring recyclability of each product of the manufacturer;
the product quality comprehensive score of the manufacturer is calculated as follows:
Figure FDA0004138215130000053
wherein ,αpQn Weight of quality of raw material products of manufacturers, PPQ jn Scoring the product quality of each product of the manufacturer;
in summary, for each cost composite score of the manufacturer, the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure FDA0004138215130000054
wherein ,
Figure FDA0004138215130000055
Figure FDA0004138215130000056
the specific steps of step 2.2 are as follows:
step 2.2.1: constructing an initial solution population, determining the population scale of the solution population, the space dimension D of particles and the maximum iteration number T, using a Jacobi iteration algorithm according to the order constraint of a customer and the constraint of keeping the proportion of the raw material purchase quantity of a manufacturer to the product production quantity, obtaining a group of rapidly converged values through 10 iterations, and initializing the values to the position of each particle in the solution population, wherein the formula is as follows:
Figure FDA0004138215130000061
i in the formula is the number of initial groups, D is the space dimension, and T is the maximum update times;
from among solution populations
Figure FDA0004138215130000062
Judging whether the suppliers and the manufacturers operate or not, and judging the corresponding site selection decision, wherein the formula is as follows:
Figure FDA0004138215130000063
/>
Figure FDA0004138215130000064
the address selection decision needs to be updated simultaneously when the solution population is updated each time; adcp ijm Representing the number of raw materials m supplied by supplier i to producer j, adcp jkn Representing the number of products n that manufacturer j provides to customer k;
step 2.2.2: an initial particle movement velocity is constructed, and the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure FDA0004138215130000065
step 2.2.3: and processing boundary positions of particles and a speed limit of particle updating, and correcting particles which do not meet the condition and the particle updating speed, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure FDA0004138215130000071
Figure FDA0004138215130000072
Figure FDA0004138215130000073
Figure FDA0004138215130000074
x in the formula max and xmin For maximum and minimum values of each particle, V max and Vmin A highest moving speed and a lowest moving speed for each particle;
step 2.2.4: according to the individual particles, a corresponding site selection decision is obtained, the fitness value of the individual particles is calculated and compared through a fitness function, the historical best position and the global best position of the particles i are updated and recorded, and the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure FDA0004138215130000075
Figure FDA0004138215130000076
in the formula
Figure FDA0004138215130000077
Optimal particle position for the extremum of the individual, +.>
Figure FDA0004138215130000078
Particle location for a globally optimal solution;
step 2.2.5: particle movement speed: updating individual particle movement speeds of the correction solution population by combining fitness functions with dynamic relaxation factors;
step 2.2.6: vendor layer: for each supplier S i If the number of supply allocations does not meet the upper production limit MQRM of the supplier im ≥∑ j∈J Adcp ijm Then describe provider S i The amount of raw material to be supplied exceeds the supplier S i The upper supply limit that can be provided needs to be reconsidered by the supplier S i Updating each particle in the solution population in combination with the dynamic relaxation factor while obtaining a correspondence according to the new supply allocation number up to the supplier S i Up to the provider S i Until the constraint condition is satisfied;
step 2.2.7: manufacturer layer: for each producer P j If the production allocation quantity does not meet the production upper limit MQRM of the manufacturer jn ≥∑ k∈K Adcp jkn Description of manufacturer P j The number of products to be provided exceeds the manufacturer P j The upper production limit that can be provided requires reconsideration of the manufacturer P j Is assigned to each of the solution populations in combination with dynamic relaxation factorsThe particles are updated while being corresponding to the new supply distribution quantity up to the producer P j Up to the manufacturer P j Until the constraint condition is satisfied;
step 2.2.8: calculating the fitness value of the individual particles according to the mathematical model of the objective function;
step 2.2.9: for individual particles in the solution population, comparing the fitness value of the current particle position with the fitness value of the historical optimal position, and if the fitness value of the current particle is better, updating the current particle position into the historical optimal position, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure FDA0004138215130000081
step 2.2.10: for individual particles in the solution population, comparing the fitness value of the current particle position with the fitness value of the global optimal position, and if the fitness value of the current particle is better, updating the current particle position into the global optimal position, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:
Figure FDA0004138215130000082
step 2.2.11: and judging whether the algorithm meets the end condition, if the algorithm does not meet the end condition, returning to the step 2.2.5 to continue iterative updating until the algorithm meets the end condition, stopping calculation, ending the algorithm and outputting the global optimal solution.
CN201911177354.2A 2019-11-26 2019-11-26 Address selecting and distributing method of sustainable supply chain based on dynamic relaxation intelligent algorithm Active CN110956320B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201911177354.2A CN110956320B (en) 2019-11-26 2019-11-26 Address selecting and distributing method of sustainable supply chain based on dynamic relaxation intelligent algorithm

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201911177354.2A CN110956320B (en) 2019-11-26 2019-11-26 Address selecting and distributing method of sustainable supply chain based on dynamic relaxation intelligent algorithm

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN110956320A CN110956320A (en) 2020-04-03
CN110956320B true CN110956320B (en) 2023-05-23

Family

ID=69977038

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201911177354.2A Active CN110956320B (en) 2019-11-26 2019-11-26 Address selecting and distributing method of sustainable supply chain based on dynamic relaxation intelligent algorithm

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN110956320B (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112801810B (en) * 2021-02-25 2024-03-29 辽宁工程技术大学 Sustainable supply chain design method based on graph network

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109492810A (en) * 2018-11-12 2019-03-19 辽宁工程技术大学 A method of solving greening supply chain collaborative design problem

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107506956B (en) * 2017-06-12 2018-06-15 合肥工业大学 Based on improvement particle cluster algorithm supply chain production and transport coordinated dispatching method and system

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109492810A (en) * 2018-11-12 2019-03-19 辽宁工程技术大学 A method of solving greening supply chain collaborative design problem

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Christian N. Samuel et al..Robust closed-loop supply chain design with presorting, return quality and carbon emission considerations.Journal of Cleaner Production.2019,1-15. *
王胜男.需求不确定条件下低碳供应链网络设计研究.中国优秀硕士论文全文数据库.2015,(第2015年第05期),1-46. *
税文兵 等.考虑库存成本的配送中心动态选址模型及算法.公路交通科技.2010,第27卷(第4期),149-154. *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN110956320A (en) 2020-04-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN112051825A (en) Multi-target production scheduling method considering employee operation capacity in automobile trial-manufacturing workshop
CN108960474B (en) Warehouse site selection method for online retailer in warehouse network considering cross
CN101329683A (en) Recommendation system and method
CN108846526A (en) A kind of CO2 emissions prediction technique
Wang et al. An effective evolutionary algorithm for the practical capacitated vehicle routing problems
CN110400069A (en) Comprehensive energy project economics evaluation method and system
CN103942609B (en) Product service supply chain optimization designing method
CN110956320B (en) Address selecting and distributing method of sustainable supply chain based on dynamic relaxation intelligent algorithm
CN111339713A (en) Optimal design method and system for wind power plant, electronic device and storage medium
Sakai et al. Reconfiguration management of remanufactured products for responding to varied user needs
Sasaki et al. Fuzzy multiple objective optimal system design by hybrid genetic algorithm
CN114118536A (en) Planning method for centralized charging station and battery replacement station, planning device and chip thereof
CN114742422A (en) Crude oil scheduling optimization method and device considering low-carbon emission constraint
Ding et al. Pareto optimality of centralized procurement based on genetic algorithm
CN107239853B (en) Intelligent housekeeper system based on cloud computing and working method thereof
Maria et al. Linear physical programming for production planning optimization
WO2023087418A1 (en) Computer second-type assembly line balance optimization method based on migration genetic algorithm
Wang et al. An adaptive multiobjective multitask service composition approach considering practical constraints in fog manufacturing
Wang et al. Task package division method for the integrated scheduling framework of mixed model car-sequencing problem
CN115146866A (en) Multi-equivalent optimal path planning method considering actual multi-constraints
Dissou Efficiency and sectoral distributional impacts of output-based emissions allowances in Canada
CN113361789A (en) Charging station service pricing method based on hierarchical game
CN112598176A (en) Genetic and greedy algorithm fused crowdsourcing efficient assignment method
CN111222652A (en) Intelligent matching method in waste electrical and electronic product recovery process
Chang An improved differential evolution scheme for the solution of large-scale unit commitment problems

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant