CN110930793A - College student acceptor assessment method - Google Patents
College student acceptor assessment method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN110930793A CN110930793A CN201811101039.7A CN201811101039A CN110930793A CN 110930793 A CN110930793 A CN 110930793A CN 201811101039 A CN201811101039 A CN 201811101039A CN 110930793 A CN110930793 A CN 110930793A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- students
- examination
- assessment
- team
- student
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B7/00—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Educational Technology (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a college student acceptor assessment method, which belongs to the field of student assessment modes and comprises the following steps of S1: preparing before a test, grouping students, constructing an examination question bank, determining examination steps according to the examination question bank, and examining the examination question bank by teachers; s2: in the examination link, the examined students extract questions to be examined from the examination question library to prepare before examination, and enter formal examination S3 after the preparation before examination is finished: and (4) discussing and commenting after the test, discussing the problems in the assessment link by students, and solving and commenting the problems in the assessment link by teachers. The method can improve the information literacy and enthusiasm of students, and enable the students to verify the learning results of the students so as to find a learning method suitable for the students.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of student assessment modes, in particular to a college student acceptor assessment method.
Background
At present, the student examination mainly adopts a traditional paper examination mode, teachers and lecturers summarize knowledge points, and students answer questions through writing paper. The traditional examination mode cannot fully transfer the initiative of the students in preparing examinations, the paper pen test result can only simply reflect the memory and understanding conditions of the students on the textbook knowledge, and the process evaluation is neglected, so that the comprehensive evaluation on the abilities of the students cannot be carried out. In order to seriously develop the requirements of application talents and ensure the improvement of the teaching quality of teachers, the innovation and the reform of the current assessment mode are imperative.
Disclosure of Invention
In order to overcome the defects in the prior art, the invention provides a college student acceptance assessment method which can improve the information literacy and enthusiasm of students, and enable the students to verify the learning results of the students so as to find a learning method suitable for the students.
The technical scheme adopted by the invention for solving the technical problem is as follows: a college student acceptance assessment method comprises the following steps:
s1: preparing before a test, forming a team by students, constructing an examination question bank according to an examination outline by taking the students as a main body, determining examination steps according to the examination question bank, and auditing the examination question bank by teachers;
s2: in the examination link, an examined student extracts a question to be examined from an examination question library, carries out preparation before examination, enters formal examination after the preparation before examination is finished, answers are carried out on the examined student through a demonstration object, and other students acquire a first-answer opportunity in an online paid manner; three incentive mechanisms are adopted, wherein the first incentive mechanism is that the assessment passage is promoted to be a professional representative, the second incentive mechanism is that the average time is increased, and the third incentive mechanism is that a real object prize is issued;
s3: and (4) discussing and commenting after the test, discussing the problems in the assessment link by students, and solving and commenting the problems in the assessment link by teachers.
Further, the group formation of the students in step S1 is divided into three modes, the first mode is a voluntary group, the students who do not perform the voluntary group formation adopt the second group mode and are hard group, the third mode is a self-recommended group, the self-referee is alone on one team, and if there is a recommended student, the recommended student and the self-referee are on one team.
Further, the examination question bank range comprises any information retrieval website except books.
Furthermore, dividing the assessment outline into n parts, wherein n represents the number of teams, each team is assigned a member to randomly select one part of the n parts to determine the range of the questions, each team of students at least gives out one question according to the assessment outline, and the given questions, the reference documents and the document sources are handed up in a team to form an examination question bank; the students vote on the questions according to the innovation degree, and the person who gives the questions with the largest number of votes obtains the questions and carries out an incentive mechanism on the person.
Furthermore, each team is provided with a team leader, and the team leader can be selected in a self-recommendation or self-recommendation mode, and the method comprises the following specific steps: the students input 'user class-captain in my heart' and send the 'user class-captain' through the corresponding public platform of the WeChat concern, click to enter the received item box, input the message in the form of 'personal name-recommended person name', and the students who do not input the recommended person name default to self-recommend to become the captain.
Further, the presentation object in step S2 is Microsoft PowerPoint 2010 software or focusky software.
Further, in step S3, after the teacher answers and critiques, a score is given; the teacher gives a score of 55% to the students according to the source of the questions given by the students and the degree of fit with the assessment outline, and gives the remaining score of 45% to the students according to the completion condition of the extracted questions to be examined and the response rate of the students to other assessment questions.
Furthermore, each group of students uses the WeChat to input 'earlier review' and 'repeat check in the current question bank' on the corresponding public platform and send the results, and the group with the largest difference between the questions and the current question bank is evaluated as 'star of innovation', so that an incentive mechanism is implemented.
Furthermore, the pre-examination preparation comprises drawing lots to determine examination sequence, designing examination layout and preparing examination content.
The invention has the beneficial effects that: the examination question bank is constructed by taking students as main bodies, the comprehensive ability of the students is favorably cultured, the information literacy of the students is improved, the mode of team formation enables members of each team to have wide thought and interest, the students are mutually matched, the diversity of demonstration objects can enhance the attention of the students, the motivation mechanism mobilizes the enthusiasm of the students, the students can verify the learning achievement of the students after the examination and the comment link is set, and the students can find the learning method suitable for the students by participating in the examination and comment link.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is an overall flow chart of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The invention is further described below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
A college student acceptance assessment method comprises the following steps:
s1: preparing before a test, forming a team by students, constructing an examination question bank according to an examination outline by taking the students as a main body, determining examination steps according to the examination question bank, and auditing the examination question bank by teachers;
s2: in the examination link, an examined student extracts a question to be examined from an examination question library, carries out preparation before examination, enters formal examination after the preparation before examination is finished, answers are carried out on the examined student through a demonstration object, and other students acquire a first-answer opportunity in an online paid manner; three incentive mechanisms are adopted, wherein the first incentive mechanism is that the assessment passage is promoted to be a professional representative, the second incentive mechanism is that the average time is increased, and the third incentive mechanism is that a real object prize is issued;
s3: and (4) discussing and commenting after the test, discussing the problems in the assessment link by students, and solving and commenting the problems in the assessment link by teachers.
The group of students in step S1 is divided into three modes, the first mode is a voluntary group, students who do not perform the voluntary group adopt the second group mode, and the third mode is a rigid group, and the third mode is a self-recommended group, and the self-recommended students and the self-recommended group are one group if there are recommended students.
The examination question bank range comprises any information retrieval website except books.
Dividing the assessment outline into n parts, wherein n represents the number of teams, each team is assigned a member to randomly select one part of the n parts to determine the range of the questions, each team of students at least makes one question according to the assessment outline, and submits the made questions, the reference documents and the document sources to form an examination question bank; the student votes for the questions according to the degree of innovation, and the subject who has the most number of votes is evaluated as a star of the brain cave, and an incentive mechanism is implemented.
Each team is provided with a captain which can be selected in a self-recommending or self-recommending mode, and the method comprises the following specific steps: the students input and send 'captain in the best of our heart of the user class' through a public platform of 'receptor assessment' of the WeChat interest, click to enter a received project box, input a message in the form of 'personal name-recommended person name', and the students who do not input the recommended person name default to self-recommend to become the captain.
The presentation object in step S2 is Microsoft PowerPoint 2010 software or focusky software.
In step S3, after the teacher answers and critiques, a score is given; the teacher gives a score of 55% to the students according to the source of the questions given by the students and the degree of fit with the assessment outline, and gives the remaining score of 45% to the students according to the completion condition of the extracted questions to be examined and the response rate of the students to other assessment questions.
Each group of students uses WeChat to input 'early review' and 'repeat check in the current question bank' on the public platform in the 'receptor assessment mode' and send the results, and the group with the largest difference between the given question and the current question bank is evaluated as 'star of innovation', so that an incentive mechanism is implemented.
The pre-examination preparation comprises drawing lots to determine examination sequence, designing examination layout and preparing examination content.
The above description is only for the purpose of creating a preferred embodiment of the present invention, but the scope of the present invention is not limited thereto, and any person skilled in the art can substitute or change the technical solution and the inventive concept of the present invention within the technical scope of the present invention.
Claims (9)
1. A college student acceptance assessment method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
s1: preparing before a test, forming a team by students, constructing an examination question bank according to an examination outline by taking the students as a main body, determining examination steps according to the examination question bank, and auditing the examination question bank by teachers;
s2: in the examination link, an examined student extracts a question to be examined from an examination question library, carries out preparation before examination, enters formal examination after the preparation before examination is finished, answers are carried out on the examined student through a demonstration object, and other students acquire a first-answer opportunity in an online paid manner; three incentive mechanisms are adopted, wherein the first incentive mechanism is that the assessment passage is promoted to be a professional representative, the second incentive mechanism is that the average time is increased, and the third incentive mechanism is that a real object prize is issued;
s3: and (4) discussing and commenting after the test, discussing the problems in the assessment link by students, and solving and commenting the problems in the assessment link by teachers.
2. The university student acceptance assessment method according to claim 1, wherein the student team in step S1 is divided into three modes, the first mode is a voluntary team, students not performing the voluntary team adopt the second team mode, the third mode is a hard team, the third mode is a self-recommended team, a self-referee is a team, and if there is a recommended student, the recommended student and the self-referee are a team.
3. The college student materialized assessment method according to claim 1, wherein the examination question library scope comprises any one information retrieval website except books.
4. The university student acceptance assessment method according to claim 1, wherein the assessment outline is divided into n parts, wherein n represents the number of teams, each team randomly selects one member to determine the range of the questions in the n parts, each team of students at least gives one question to each person according to the assessment outline, and the given questions, the reference documents and the document sources are handed up to form an examination question bank; the students vote on the questions according to the innovation degree, and the person who gives the questions with the largest number of votes obtains the questions and carries out an incentive mechanism on the person.
5. The university student acceptance assessment method according to claim 2, wherein each team is provided with a captain, and the captain can be selected by self-recommendation or other recommendation, and the method comprises the following steps: the students input 'user class-captain in my heart' and send the 'user class-captain' through the corresponding public platform of the WeChat concern, click to enter the received item box, input the message in the form of 'personal name-recommended person name', and the students who do not input the recommended person name default to self-recommend to become the captain.
6. The college student acceptance assessment method according to claim 1, wherein the presentation object in the step S2 is Microsoft PowerPoint 2010 software or focusky software.
7. The college student acceptance assessment method according to claim 1, wherein in step S3, after the teacher answers and critiques, a score is given; the teacher gives a score of 55% to the students according to the source of the questions given by the students and the degree of fit with the assessment outline, and gives the remaining score of 45% to the students according to the completion condition of the extracted questions to be examined and the response rate of the students to other assessment questions.
8. The university student acceptance assessment method according to claim 5, wherein each team of students uses WeChat to input and send the "earlier review" and the "repeat in the previous question bank" on the corresponding public platform, and the team with the largest difference between the questions and the previous question bank is evaluated as "Innovation Star" and the incentive mechanism is implemented.
9. The university student acceptance assessment method according to claim 1, wherein the pre-examination preparation comprises drawing lots to determine assessment order, designing assessment layout and preparing assessment content.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811101039.7A CN110930793A (en) | 2018-09-20 | 2018-09-20 | College student acceptor assessment method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811101039.7A CN110930793A (en) | 2018-09-20 | 2018-09-20 | College student acceptor assessment method |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN110930793A true CN110930793A (en) | 2020-03-27 |
Family
ID=69855443
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811101039.7A Pending CN110930793A (en) | 2018-09-20 | 2018-09-20 | College student acceptor assessment method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN110930793A (en) |
Citations (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO1999052262A1 (en) * | 1998-04-01 | 1999-10-14 | Ericsson Australia Pty. Ltd. | Method and system of televoting in an intelligent network |
| CN101075232A (en) * | 2006-05-15 | 2007-11-21 | 中国传媒大学 | System and method for automatically stating speech estimation |
| CN103778172A (en) * | 2012-10-18 | 2014-05-07 | 万战斌 | Examination paper information storing method and examination paper editing method and system |
| CN104820707A (en) * | 2015-05-14 | 2015-08-05 | 西安交通大学 | Automatic test paper composition method in B/S (Brower/Server) mode based on knowledge hierarchy in field of computers |
| US20150371547A1 (en) * | 2014-06-19 | 2015-12-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Providing targeted and personalized education to prevent human errors |
| CN106600495A (en) * | 2016-12-14 | 2017-04-26 | 同方知网(北京)技术有限公司 | System for improving learning ability of subject |
| CN107770052A (en) * | 2017-10-31 | 2018-03-06 | 宁波国技互联信息技术有限公司 | A kind of high interactive ballot system based on wechat |
| CN207367410U (en) * | 2017-05-19 | 2018-05-15 | 河北壹在科技有限公司 | A kind of interactive education system |
-
2018
- 2018-09-20 CN CN201811101039.7A patent/CN110930793A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO1999052262A1 (en) * | 1998-04-01 | 1999-10-14 | Ericsson Australia Pty. Ltd. | Method and system of televoting in an intelligent network |
| CN101075232A (en) * | 2006-05-15 | 2007-11-21 | 中国传媒大学 | System and method for automatically stating speech estimation |
| CN103778172A (en) * | 2012-10-18 | 2014-05-07 | 万战斌 | Examination paper information storing method and examination paper editing method and system |
| US20150371547A1 (en) * | 2014-06-19 | 2015-12-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Providing targeted and personalized education to prevent human errors |
| CN104820707A (en) * | 2015-05-14 | 2015-08-05 | 西安交通大学 | Automatic test paper composition method in B/S (Brower/Server) mode based on knowledge hierarchy in field of computers |
| CN106600495A (en) * | 2016-12-14 | 2017-04-26 | 同方知网(北京)技术有限公司 | System for improving learning ability of subject |
| CN207367410U (en) * | 2017-05-19 | 2018-05-15 | 河北壹在科技有限公司 | A kind of interactive education system |
| CN107770052A (en) * | 2017-10-31 | 2018-03-06 | 宁波国技互联信息技术有限公司 | A kind of high interactive ballot system based on wechat |
Non-Patent Citations (5)
| Title |
|---|
| 姜永生: "《信息化教学概论》", 31 August 2018, 北京：中国铁道出版社 * |
| 王晓辉，张庆芳: "微生物学课程教学考核方式初探与实践", 《微生物学杂志》 * |
| 田春苗: "高校法学考试考核过程中提高学生自主学习能力的可行性研究", 《湖北函授大学学报》 * |
| 陈东，续敏，吴登俊: "高教自考命题质量三要素评价体系的创新研究", 《成人教育》 * |
| 马大建: "《校长成长 教师成长》", 31 August 2015, 郑州：大象出版社 * |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Canbazoglu Bilici et al. | Assessing pre-service science teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through observations and lesson plans | |
| Palmer et al. | An evaluation of a project-based learning initiative in engineering education | |
| Kelleghan et al. | The effects of standardized testing | |
| Everton et al. | Educational research and the teacher | |
| Ng et al. | Mathematics teaching during the early years in Hong Kong: A reflection of constructivism with Chinese characteristics? | |
| Tseng et al. | How concept-mapping perception navigates student knowledge transfer performance | |
| Langenau et al. | Web-based objective structured clinical examination with remote standardized patients and Skype: resident experience | |
| Walberg | Tests, testing, and genuine school reform | |
| Tahir | A study on peer evaluation and its influence on college ESL students | |
| Alitto et al. | Examining the effects of adult and peer mediated goal setting and feedback interventions for writing: Two studies | |
| Bobos et al. | Measurement approach to teaching fractions: A design experiment in a pre-service course for elementary teachers | |
| Dou et al. | Affective learning in short-term educational travel abroad: An exploratory mixed-method study | |
| Fujiwara | Beliefs about Language Learning of Thai Students Learning Chinese and Japanese: Relationships with Past Learning Experiences and Target Language Variations. | |
| Hsieh | Comparing yes/no Angoff and bookmark standard setting methods in the context of English assessment | |
| Liu | Dialogue-based peer learning of educational topics in a university classroom | |
| Anderson et al. | Texas agricultural science teachers’ attitudes toward information technology | |
| CN110930793A (en) | College student acceptor assessment method | |
| Allen | Personalized system of instruction and student performance in high school weight training courses | |
| Peters | Lessons about Writing to Learn from a University-High School Partnership. | |
| Jia | English as a second language teachers' perceptions and use of classroom-based reading assessment | |
| Sharma et al. | Coaching as business: exploring its growth in India | |
| Bjork | Educational reform, academic intensity, and educational opportunity in Japan | |
| Duan et al. | A Mathematics Blended Learning Model to Understand the Learning Satisfaction Context of Higher Education Institutions in Guangxi Province | |
| Honeyman et al. | An Evaluation of a Sustainable Bioenergy Professional Development Program. | |
| Fiege | Faculty and student perceptions of students' sense of community in online courses |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20200327 |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |