CN110928795A - Stability test method and device for upgrading storage system - Google Patents
Stability test method and device for upgrading storage system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN110928795A CN110928795A CN201911193371.5A CN201911193371A CN110928795A CN 110928795 A CN110928795 A CN 110928795A CN 201911193371 A CN201911193371 A CN 201911193371A CN 110928795 A CN110928795 A CN 110928795A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- upgrading
- storage system
- upgrade
- test
- test script
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 47
- 238000013112 stability test Methods 0.000 title claims description 6
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 213
- 230000001680 brushing effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- BUGBHKTXTAQXES-UHFFFAOYSA-N Selenium Chemical compound [Se] BUGBHKTXTAQXES-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910052711 selenium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000011669 selenium Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012430 stability testing Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002159 abnormal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002860 competitive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011981 development test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009977 dual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3668—Software testing
- G06F11/3672—Test management
- G06F11/3688—Test management for test execution, e.g. scheduling of test suites
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F8/00—Arrangements for software engineering
- G06F8/60—Software deployment
- G06F8/65—Updates
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Debugging And Monitoring (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides a method and a device for testing the stability of the upgrading of a storage system, wherein the method comprises the following steps: s1, obtaining information of a storage system to be upgraded, information of the storage system to be upgraded and test script operation parameters; the information of the storage system to be upgraded comprises the name and the number of the storage system to be upgraded; the test script operation parameters comprise test operation times; s2, configuring a test script and starting upgrading operation according to the information of the storage system to be upgraded and the running parameters of the test script; and S3, configuring a test script to simulate user operation to issue an upgrading instruction to each storage system to be upgraded, setting the upgrading times as the set running times, and simultaneously configuring the test script to collect the test result of each upgrading. The test script can automatically and repeatedly send the upgrading instruction to a large number of storage systems to be tested alternately, can effectively shorten the manual test time and improve the reliability of the test result, and fully solves the problem of low probability.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of storage system upgrading test, and particularly relates to a method and a device for testing the stability of storage system upgrading.
Background
With the dramatic increase in data volume and the rapid development of networks in the information age, storage systems have become increasingly important. In the prior art, storage systems often adopt designs such as dual controllers, distributed type and the like to improve the stability of storage devices. In the daily operation process of the storage system, the operations such as system upgrading and maintenance are inevitable to occur frequently. Due to the particularity of the storage system, in the process of upgrading the storage system, the capability of continuously providing uninterrupted services is also needed, so that the node service to be upgraded is often required to be transferred to other nodes when the storage system is upgraded, and the service switching back is performed after the upgrade is completed. Because services need to be provided to the outside at the same time in the storage system upgrading process, and competitive shutdown exists between the upgrading IO and the service IO, the storage system upgrading process is relatively long in duration. In the development and test process of the storage system, a large amount of functions need to be tested sufficiently, and serious problems that the storage system fails to be upgraded at the later stage, even data is lost due to upgrading failure and the like are avoided.
In the actual development test process, the upgrade test of the storage system is to construct two software versions with different version numbers, and the storage system management interface is used for alternately upgrading the two versions to test whether the terminal equipment has the upgraded capability and can be upgraded to a target version from a current version. In an actual test environment, because the number of the storage systems is limited, the number of times of testing in a manual mode is very limited, and the risk that the problems cannot be fully exposed exists, and once the condition that abnormal upgrading data is lost or crashed occurs in the actual environment, great loss cost is brought to customers. Meanwhile, the duration of the upgrading process of the storage system is long, and upgrading test in a manual mode requires repeated operation and manual recording of test results by testers, so that a lot of time is occupied, and the test efficiency is very low.
Therefore, it is very necessary to provide a method and an apparatus for testing the stability of a memory system upgrade, which address the above-mentioned drawbacks in the prior art.
Disclosure of Invention
Aiming at the defects that the storage system upgrading test in the prior art is manually performed by a tester, the test result is inaccurate, and the problem of high probability cannot be exposed, the invention provides a stability test method and a device for storage system upgrading to solve the technical problem.
In a first aspect, the present invention provides a method for testing the stability of a storage system upgrade, including the following steps:
s1, acquiring test script operation parameters of a storage system to be upgraded;
s2, configuring a test script and starting upgrading operation according to the information of the storage system to be upgraded and the running parameters of the test script;
and S3, configuring a test script to simulate a user to operate the storage system to issue an upgrading instruction and obtain an upgrading test result.
Further, step S3 includes: and the configuration test script outputs an upgrading test result and records the key log information of the upgrading test process.
Furthermore, the test script operation parameters also comprise target upgrade version information, mutual upgrade version information, upgrade image storage paths and upgrade test interval time; the information of the storage system to be upgraded further comprises an identification of the storage system to be upgraded and a corresponding access address of the storage system to be upgraded. The information of the storage system to be upgraded is provided in the form of a storage system list to be tested, and each row in the storage system list file to be upgraded is a storage system access address which can be accessed by a unique identifier.
Further, the step S2 specifically includes the following steps:
s21, configuring a test script to acquire an access address of the storage system to be tested from a list of the storage system to be tested;
s22, configuring a test script to acquire target upgrade version information and mutual upgrade version information according to the upgrade mirror image storage path;
and S23, configuring a test script to start upgrading operation.
Further, the step S3 specifically includes the following steps:
s31, configuring a test script to simulate a user to automatically carry out upgrading operation on a storage system to be tested, and mutually brushing a target upgrading version and a mutual upgrading version;
s32, recording an upgrading test result, recording key information in an upgrading process to a log file, and adding 1 to the upgrading operation times;
s33, configuring a test script to judge whether the upgrade operation times are less than the test operation times;
if yes, configuring a test script to output the test result of the upgrade; returning to step S31;
if not, configuring a test script to clean resources and stopping running.
Further, the upgrade test result comprises upgrade success, upgrade failure and equipment offline; upgrade process key information includes a runtime stamp. The upgrading test result passes through an excel form, wherein a horizontal axis cell of an excel file is a storage system identifier, the excel file can be information which can uniquely identify a storage system such as a storage system address, a vertical axis is an upgrading operation time number, and the upgrading test result of each round of the storage system is in a horizontal axis and vertical axis cross cell; the log file is recorded to a local file system and named with a runtime stamp.
Further, in step S31, the user is simulated by the Selenium technology to automatically perform an upgrade operation on the storage system. And simulating the automatic upgrading operation of the storage system by a user by using an Xpath positioning and searching page element.
In a second aspect, the present invention provides a stability testing apparatus for upgrading a storage system, including
The test script operation parameter acquisition module is used for acquiring the test script operation parameters of the storage system to be upgraded;
the upgrading starting module is used for configuring the test script and starting upgrading operation according to the information of the storage system to be upgraded and the running parameters of the test script;
the upgrading module is used for configuring a test script to simulate a user to operate the storage system to issue an upgrading instruction and obtain an upgrading test result; and outputting an upgrading test result, and simultaneously recording key log information of the upgrading test process.
Further, the upgrade starting module includes:
the access address acquisition unit is used for configuring a test script to acquire an access address of the storage system to be tested from the list of the storage system to be tested;
the upgrading version acquiring unit is used for configuring the test script to acquire target upgrading version information and mutual upgrading version information according to the upgrading mirror image storage path;
the upgrading starting unit is used for configuring a test script to start upgrading operation;
the upgrading module includes:
the simulation upgrading unit is used for configuring a test script to simulate a user to automatically upgrade the storage system to be tested and mutually brushing a target upgrade version and a mutual upgrade version;
the upgrading test result recording unit is used for configuring a test script to record an upgrading test result, recording key information in the upgrading process to a log file, and adding 1 to the upgrading operation times;
the running frequency judging unit is used for configuring the test script to judge whether the upgrading running frequency is less than the test running frequency;
the test result output unit is used for configuring and outputting the upgrade test result when the upgrade operation times are less than the test operation times;
and the resource cleaning unit is used for configuring the test script to clean the resource and stop running when the upgrading running times are equal to the test running times.
Further, the test script operation parameters comprise test operation times, target upgrade version information, mutual upgrade version information, upgrade image storage paths, a to-be-tested storage system list and upgrade test interval time;
the upgrade test result comprises upgrade success, upgrade failure and equipment offline.
The invention obtains necessary information and operation parameters when the storage system to be tested is upgraded through the test script, automatically simulates the operation of a user on a management interface of the storage system according to the information, fills in the necessary information, selects an upgrade version mirror image and issues an upgrade instruction.
The beneficial effect of the invention is that,
according to the stability test method and device for upgrading the storage system, the test script can automatically and repeatedly send the upgrading instruction to a large number of storage system equipment to be tested according to the set test running times and automatically record the key information and the upgrading test result in the upgrading process, a tester does not need to test in a manual mode, the test time can be effectively shortened, the reliability of the test result can be effectively improved, meanwhile, the test script can automatically perform a large number of upgrading tests, and the probability of low-probability problems that the manual test cannot be exposed due to limited test times can be effectively reduced.
In addition, the invention has reliable design principle, simple structure and very wide application prospect.
Therefore, compared with the prior art, the invention has prominent substantive features and remarkable progress, and the beneficial effects of the implementation are also obvious.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments or technical solutions in the prior art of the present invention, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments or prior art will be briefly described below, and it is obvious for those skilled in the art that other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative efforts.
FIG. 1 is a first schematic flow chart of the method of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a second schematic flow chart of the method of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of the system of the present invention;
in the figure, 1-a test script operation parameter acquisition module; 2-upgrading the starting module; 2.1-access address acquisition unit; 2.2-upgrade version acquisition unit; 2.3-upgrade the starting unit; 3-upgrading the module; 3.1-simulating an upgrade unit; 3.2-upgrading the test result recording unit; 3.3-operation times judging unit; 3.4-test result output unit; 3.5-resource cleaning unit.
Detailed Description
In order to make those skilled in the art better understand the technical solution of the present invention, the technical solution in the embodiment of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiment of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiment is only a part of the embodiment of the present invention, and not all embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
Example 1:
as shown in fig. 1, the present invention provides a method for testing the stability of a storage system upgrade, which includes the following steps:
s1, obtaining information of a storage system to be upgraded and test script operation parameters of the storage system to be upgraded; the information of the storage system to be upgraded comprises the name and the number of the storage system to be upgraded; the test script operation parameters comprise test operation times;
s2, configuring a test script and starting upgrading operation according to the information of the storage system to be upgraded and the running parameters of the test script;
s3, configuring a test script to simulate user operation to issue an upgrading instruction to each storage system to be upgraded, setting the upgrading times as set running times, and simultaneously configuring the test script to collect test results of each upgrading; and the configuration test script outputs an upgrading test result and records the key log information of the upgrading test process.
Example 2:
as shown in fig. 2, the present invention provides a method for testing the stability of a storage system upgrade, which includes the following steps:
s1, obtaining information of a storage system to be upgraded and test script operation parameters of the storage system to be upgraded; the test script operation parameters comprise test operation times, target upgrade version information, mutual upgrade version information, upgrade image storage paths and upgrade test interval time; the information of the storage system to be upgraded comprises the name and the number of the storage systems to be upgraded, the identification of the storage system to be upgraded and the corresponding access address of the storage system to be upgraded; providing information of a storage system to be upgraded in a form of a storage system list to be tested, wherein each row in a file of the storage system list to be upgraded is a storage system access address which can be accessed by a unique identifier;
s2, configuring a test script and starting upgrading operation according to the information of the storage system to be upgraded and the running parameters of the test script; the method comprises the following specific steps:
s21, configuring a test script to acquire an access address of the storage system to be upgraded from information of the storage system to be upgraded;
s22, configuring a test script to acquire target upgrade version information and mutual upgrade version information according to the upgrade mirror image storage path;
s23, configuring a test script to start upgrading operation;
s3, configuring a test script to simulate user operation to issue an upgrading instruction to each storage system to be upgraded, setting the upgrading times as set running times, and simultaneously configuring the test script to collect test results of each upgrading; configuring a test script to output an upgrading test result, and recording key log information of an upgrading test process; the method comprises the following specific steps:
s31, configuring a test script to simulate a user to automatically carry out upgrading operation on each storage system to be tested, and mutually brushing a target upgrading version and a mutual upgrading version; simulating a user to automatically upgrade the storage system through a Selenium technology; the method comprises the steps that the Xpath is used for positioning and searching page elements to simulate a user to automatically upgrade a storage system;
s32, recording an upgrading test result, recording key information in an upgrading process to a log file, and adding 1 to the upgrading operation times;
s33, configuring a test script to judge whether the upgrade operation times are less than the test operation times;
if yes, configuring a test script to output the test result of the upgrade; returning to step S31;
if not, configuring a test script to clean resources and stopping running.
The upgrading test result comprises upgrading success, upgrading failure and equipment offline; the key information of the upgrading process comprises a running time stamp; the upgrading test result passes through an excel form, wherein a horizontal axis cell of an excel file is a storage system identifier, the excel file can be information which can uniquely identify a storage system such as a storage system address, a vertical axis is an upgrading operation time number, and the upgrading test result of each round of the storage system is in a horizontal axis and vertical axis cross cell; the log file is recorded to a local file system and named with a runtime stamp.
Example 3:
as shown in fig. 3, the present invention provides a stability testing apparatus for upgrading a storage system, including:
the test script operation parameter acquisition module 1 is used for acquiring information of the storage system to be upgraded and test script operation parameters of the storage system to be upgraded; the information of the storage system to be upgraded comprises the name and the number of the storage system to be upgraded, the identification of the storage system to be upgraded and the corresponding access address of the storage system to be upgraded; the test script operation parameters comprise test operation times, target upgrade version information, mutual upgrade version information, upgrade image storage paths and upgrade test interval time;
the upgrading starting module 2 is used for configuring the test script and starting upgrading operation according to the information of the storage system to be upgraded and the running parameters of the test script; the upgrade starting module 2 includes:
the access address obtaining unit 2.1 is used for configuring the test script to obtain the access address of the storage system to be upgraded from the information of the storage system to be upgraded;
an upgrade version obtaining unit 2.2, configured to configure the test script to obtain target upgrade version information and mutual upgrade version information according to the upgrade image storage path;
the upgrade starting unit 2.3 is used for configuring a test script to start upgrade operation;
the upgrading module 3 is used for configuring a test script to simulate user operation to issue an upgrading instruction to each storage system to be upgraded, the upgrading times are set to be running times, and meanwhile, configuring the test script to collect a test result of each upgrading; outputting an upgrading test result, and simultaneously recording key log information of an upgrading test process; the upgrade module 3 includes:
the simulation upgrading unit 3.1 is used for configuring a test script to simulate a user to automatically upgrade each storage system to be tested, and mutually brushing a target upgrading version and a mutual upgrading version;
the upgrade test result recording unit 3.2 is used for configuring a test script to record an upgrade test result, recording key information in the upgrade process to a log file, and adding 1 to the upgrade operation times; the upgrading test result comprises upgrading success, upgrading failure and equipment offline;
the running frequency judging unit 3.3 is used for configuring the test script to judge whether the upgrading running frequency is less than the test running frequency;
the test result output unit 3.4 is used for configuring and outputting the upgrade test result when the upgrade operation times are less than the test operation times;
and the resource cleaning unit 3.5 is used for configuring the test script to clean the resource and stopping running when the upgrading running times are equal to the test running times.
Although the present invention has been described in detail by referring to the drawings in connection with the preferred embodiments, the present invention is not limited thereto. Various equivalent modifications or substitutions can be made on the embodiments of the present invention by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention, and these modifications or substitutions are within the scope of the present invention/any person skilled in the art can easily conceive of the changes or substitutions within the technical scope of the present invention. Therefore, the protection scope of the present invention shall be subject to the protection scope of the appended claims.
Claims (10)
1. A stability test method for upgrading a storage system is characterized by comprising the following steps:
s1, obtaining information of a storage system to be upgraded and test script operation parameters of the storage system to be upgraded; the information of the storage system to be upgraded comprises the name and the number of the storage system to be upgraded; the test script operation parameters comprise test operation times;
s2, configuring a test script and starting upgrading operation according to the information of the storage system to be upgraded and the running parameters of the test script;
and S3, configuring a test script to simulate user operation to issue an upgrading instruction to each storage system to be upgraded, setting the upgrading times as the set running times, and simultaneously configuring the test script to collect the test result of each upgrading.
2. The method for testing the stability of the storage system upgrade according to claim 1, wherein step S3 further includes: and the configuration test script outputs an upgrading test result and records the key log information of the upgrading test process.
3. The method for testing the stability of the storage system upgrade of claim 1, wherein the test script operation parameters further include target upgrade version information, mutual upgrade version information, upgrade image storage path, and upgrade test interval time; the information of the storage system to be upgraded further comprises an identification of the storage system to be upgraded and a corresponding access address of the storage system to be upgraded.
4. The method for testing the upgrade stability of a storage system according to claim 3, wherein the step S2 comprises the following steps:
s21, configuring a test script to acquire an access address of the storage system to be upgraded from information of the storage system to be upgraded;
s22, configuring a test script to acquire target upgrade version information and mutual upgrade version information according to the upgrade mirror image storage path;
and S23, configuring a test script to start upgrading operation.
5. The method for testing the upgrade stability of a storage system according to claim 4, wherein the step S3 comprises the following steps:
s31, configuring a test script to simulate a user to automatically carry out upgrading operation on each storage system to be tested, and mutually brushing a target upgrading version and a mutual upgrading version;
s32, recording an upgrading test result, recording key information in an upgrading process to a log file, and adding 1 to the upgrading operation times;
s33, configuring a test script to judge whether the upgrade operation times are less than the test operation times;
if yes, configuring a test script to output the test result of the upgrade; returning to step S31;
if not, configuring a test script to clean resources and stopping running.
6. The method for testing the stability of the storage system upgrade of claim 5, wherein the upgrade test results include upgrade success, upgrade failure, and device offline; upgrade process key information includes a runtime stamp.
7. The method for testing the stability of the storage system upgrade according to claim 5, wherein in step S31, the user is simulated by using a Selenium technology to automatically perform the upgrade operation on the storage system.
8. A stability testing device for upgrading a storage system is characterized by comprising
The test script operation parameter acquisition module (1) is used for acquiring the information of the storage system to be upgraded and the test script operation parameters of the storage system to be upgraded; the information of the storage system to be upgraded comprises the name and the number of the storage system to be upgraded; the test script operation parameters comprise test operation times;
the upgrading starting module (2) is used for configuring the test script and starting upgrading operation according to the information of the storage system to be upgraded and the running parameters of the test script;
the upgrading module (3) is used for configuring a test script to simulate user operation to issue an upgrading instruction to each storage system to be upgraded, the upgrading times are set to be running times, and meanwhile, configuring the test script to collect a test result of each upgrading; and outputting an upgrading test result, and simultaneously recording key log information of the upgrading test process.
9. The storage system upgrade stability test apparatus according to claim 8, wherein the upgrade initiation module (2) comprises:
the access address acquisition unit (2.1) is used for configuring the test script to acquire the access address of the storage system to be upgraded from the information of the storage system to be upgraded;
the upgrading version acquiring unit (2.2) is used for configuring the test script to acquire target upgrading version information and mutual upgrading version information according to the upgrading mirror image storage path;
the upgrade starting unit (2.3) is used for configuring the test script to start the upgrade operation;
the upgrade module (3) comprises:
the simulation upgrading unit (3.1) is used for configuring a test script to simulate a user to automatically upgrade each storage system to be tested, and mutually brushing a target upgrading version and a mutual upgrading version;
the upgrade test result recording unit (3.2) is used for configuring a test script to record an upgrade test result, recording key information in the upgrade process to a log file, and adding 1 to the upgrade operation times;
the running frequency judging unit (3.3) is used for configuring the test script to judge whether the upgrading running frequency is less than the test running frequency;
the test result output unit (3.4) is used for configuring and outputting the upgrade test result when the upgrade operation times are less than the test operation times;
and the resource cleaning unit (3.5) is used for configuring the test script cleaning resource and stopping running when the upgrading running times are equal to the test running times.
10. The apparatus for testing stability of storage system upgrade according to claim 9, wherein the test script operating parameters include target upgrade version information, mutual upgrade version information, upgrade image storage path, list of storage systems to be tested, and upgrade test interval time;
the upgrade test result comprises upgrade success, upgrade failure and equipment offline.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201911193371.5A CN110928795A (en) | 2019-11-28 | 2019-11-28 | Stability test method and device for upgrading storage system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201911193371.5A CN110928795A (en) | 2019-11-28 | 2019-11-28 | Stability test method and device for upgrading storage system |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN110928795A true CN110928795A (en) | 2020-03-27 |
Family
ID=69847637
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201911193371.5A Pending CN110928795A (en) | 2019-11-28 | 2019-11-28 | Stability test method and device for upgrading storage system |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN110928795A (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN112231228A (en) * | 2020-11-06 | 2021-01-15 | 广州极飞科技有限公司 | Firmware upgrade test method, device, platform, equipment and storage medium |
CN112435709A (en) * | 2020-12-03 | 2021-03-02 | 中科驭数(北京)科技有限公司 | High-bandwidth memory test system, test method and test equipment |
CN113099439A (en) * | 2021-03-29 | 2021-07-09 | 上海闻泰信息技术有限公司 | OTA upgrade pressure test method, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20130086560A1 (en) * | 2011-09-30 | 2013-04-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Processing automation scripts of software |
CN105335263A (en) * | 2015-11-10 | 2016-02-17 | 浪潮电子信息产业股份有限公司 | Method for automatically testing out-of-band upgrading and degrading of RMC (Remote Management Controller) based on LINUX platform |
CN105335265A (en) * | 2015-12-10 | 2016-02-17 | 浪潮电子信息产业股份有限公司 | Automatic BMC upgrading and downgrading testing method based on LINUX platform |
CN107992423A (en) * | 2017-12-14 | 2018-05-04 | 郑州云海信息技术有限公司 | A kind of test method and device of the firmware promotion and demotion of dual control storage system |
CN108111929A (en) * | 2017-11-17 | 2018-06-01 | 深圳市飞鸿光电子有限公司 | A kind of method based on Python automatic tests, system and test terminal |
CN109491909A (en) * | 2018-11-07 | 2019-03-19 | 郑州云海信息技术有限公司 | A kind of CPLD refreshes verification method, device, terminal and storage medium |
-
2019
- 2019-11-28 CN CN201911193371.5A patent/CN110928795A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20130086560A1 (en) * | 2011-09-30 | 2013-04-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Processing automation scripts of software |
CN105335263A (en) * | 2015-11-10 | 2016-02-17 | 浪潮电子信息产业股份有限公司 | Method for automatically testing out-of-band upgrading and degrading of RMC (Remote Management Controller) based on LINUX platform |
CN105335265A (en) * | 2015-12-10 | 2016-02-17 | 浪潮电子信息产业股份有限公司 | Automatic BMC upgrading and downgrading testing method based on LINUX platform |
CN108111929A (en) * | 2017-11-17 | 2018-06-01 | 深圳市飞鸿光电子有限公司 | A kind of method based on Python automatic tests, system and test terminal |
CN107992423A (en) * | 2017-12-14 | 2018-05-04 | 郑州云海信息技术有限公司 | A kind of test method and device of the firmware promotion and demotion of dual control storage system |
CN109491909A (en) * | 2018-11-07 | 2019-03-19 | 郑州云海信息技术有限公司 | A kind of CPLD refreshes verification method, device, terminal and storage medium |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN112231228A (en) * | 2020-11-06 | 2021-01-15 | 广州极飞科技有限公司 | Firmware upgrade test method, device, platform, equipment and storage medium |
CN112435709A (en) * | 2020-12-03 | 2021-03-02 | 中科驭数(北京)科技有限公司 | High-bandwidth memory test system, test method and test equipment |
CN113099439A (en) * | 2021-03-29 | 2021-07-09 | 上海闻泰信息技术有限公司 | OTA upgrade pressure test method, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN108399114B (en) | System performance testing method and device and storage medium | |
CN110928795A (en) | Stability test method and device for upgrading storage system | |
CN108322348B (en) | Transformer substation monitoring information automatic acceptance signal triggering operation subsystem and method | |
CN104503910A (en) | Product test method by monitoring users' using behavior | |
CN112860569A (en) | Automatic testing method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
CN106776346B (en) | Test method and device of CCMTS (China center testing System) equipment | |
CN111176974B (en) | Disaster tolerance testing method and device, computer readable medium and electronic equipment | |
CN110750445A (en) | Method, system and equipment for testing high-availability function of YARN component | |
CN117914758A (en) | Full-link monitoring method and system for intelligently measuring complex service scene | |
CN116090380B (en) | Automatic method and device for verifying digital integrated circuit, storage medium and terminal | |
CN116909800A (en) | Method and device for locating crash information and storage medium | |
CN114860619B (en) | Database audit program regression testing method and device | |
RU2532714C2 (en) | Method of acquiring data when evaluating network resources and apparatus therefor | |
CN116527553A (en) | Processing method, system and storage medium for automatic test report of switch | |
CN112954725B (en) | Test method, communication system and NB-IoT device | |
CN115794624A (en) | Closed-loop testing method and system for single automation device of intelligent substation | |
CN107167675A (en) | A kind of ageing testing method and device of CANBus terminals | |
CN101316429A (en) | Mobile phone and automatic error report sending method | |
CN111813662A (en) | User behavior driven sustainable integration test method, device and equipment | |
CN112650815A (en) | Method and device for synchronizing environmental data, storage medium and electronic device | |
CN116915583B (en) | Communication abnormality diagnosis method, device and electronic equipment | |
Kreuer | Applying test automation to type acceptance testing of telecom networks: a case study with customer participation | |
CN109673017B (en) | RRU automatic testing method and device | |
CN110213783B (en) | Base station monitoring method, device and system | |
CN107438259B (en) | Method for positioning network management system performance module fault |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20200327 |