CN110826976A - Enterprise actual controller operation system and method - Google Patents

Enterprise actual controller operation system and method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN110826976A
CN110826976A CN201910878748.4A CN201910878748A CN110826976A CN 110826976 A CN110826976 A CN 110826976A CN 201910878748 A CN201910878748 A CN 201910878748A CN 110826976 A CN110826976 A CN 110826976A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
enterprise
edge
class
representing
node
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201910878748.4A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
丁凯
尹杰
徐蓓芸
吴丽娟
龙腾
陈青山
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Shanghai Linguan Data Technology Co.,Ltd.
Shanghai Shengteng Data Technology Co.,Ltd.
Shanghai yingwuchu Data Technology Co.,Ltd.
Shanghai Hehe Information Technology Development Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Shanghai Shengteng Data Technology Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Shanghai Shengteng Data Technology Co Ltd filed Critical Shanghai Shengteng Data Technology Co Ltd
Priority to CN201910878748.4A priority Critical patent/CN110826976A/en
Publication of CN110826976A publication Critical patent/CN110826976A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10Office automation; Time management
    • G06Q10/105Human resources
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/901Indexing; Data structures therefor; Storage structures
    • G06F16/9024Graphs; Linked lists

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The application discloses an enterprise actual controller operation method. And according to the equity data in the enterprise business information, a knowledge graph reflecting the stockholder investment relation of the enterprise is constructed by adopting a data structure calculated by a graph. And segmenting the knowledge graph to obtain one or more connected subgraphs. And in each connected subgraph, according to the first class of edge expansion representing the direct investment relation, adding a second class of edge representing the absolute stock control relation and a third class of edge representing the important stockholder relation. And in each connected subgraph, extending and adding a fourth class of edges representing the indirect investment relation of the important shareholders according to the third class of edges representing the important shareholders relation. And in each connected subgraph, searching a target node representing an actual controller or a suspected actual controller of the enterprise for each enterprise node. The method and the device can relatively accurately calculate the actual control person and the suspected actual control person; the pruning operation is adopted in the graph calculation process, so that the operation amount is reduced, and the operation speed is improved.

Description

Enterprise actual controller operation system and method
Technical Field
The present invention relates to a data storage and operation method based on Graph Computing (Graph Computing), and more particularly, to a method for storing enterprise-related data and operating an actual controller of an enterprise based on Graph Computing.
Background
An actual controller of an enterprise refers to a natural person or entity that can actually govern the behavior of the enterprise through investment relations, agreements, or other arrangements. The actual controller of an enterprise typically includes the following categories: absolute shareholders holding equity above a first threshold for the enterprise, e.g., 50%; stakeholders whose actual dominating enterprise share voting right exceeds a second threshold, e.g., 30%; the actual stock voting right governing the enterprise can decide the unit or person chosen by more than half of the board of directors; the entity or individual whose share voting authority of the enterprise that can actually be governed is sufficient to have a significant impact on resolution of the stockholder's meeting.
As can be seen from the above description, the definition of the actual controller of the enterprise is rather ambiguous. When the actual controller of the enterprise is obtained through calculation, the calculation result comprises the actual controller of the enterprise, the suspected actual controller of the enterprise, no actual controller of the enterprise and the like. In the actual processing, due to the fact that enterprise information is not disclosed, the operation method is unreasonable and the like, the operation result of an actual controller of an enterprise is not ideal and has deviation.
Graph theory (graph theory) is a branch of mathematics, which takes a graph (graph) as a research object. A graph in graph theory is a graph formed by a number of given nodes (also called vertices, points, verticals, nodes or points) and edges (also called lines, edges, arc or lines) connecting the nodes, and such a graph is generally used to describe a certain relationship between certain things, represent things by nodes, represent two things by edges, and describe the characteristics of things and/or relationships by the properties or weights of the nodes and/or edges.
Knowledge Graph (knowledgegraph) is an application of Graph computation, which consists of several nodes and edges. Nodes represent knowledge and edges between nodes represent relationships between knowledge. If there is a relationship between two nodes, they are connected together by an edge. Knowledge maps are typically stored using Graph databases (Graph Database), commonly used by Neo4j, and the like. At present, the application based on the knowledge graph is mainly embodied in information retrieval, and the related technology of the knowledge graph is relatively deficient in mining enterprise information.
Disclosure of Invention
The technical problem to be solved by the application is to provide a method for calculating an enterprise actual controller based on a knowledge graph, and the storage efficiency and the calculation efficiency can be improved. Therefore, the application also provides a corresponding enterprise actual controller operation system.
In order to solve the technical problem, the application discloses an enterprise actual controller operation method which comprises the following steps. Step S110: and according to the equity data in the enterprise business information, a knowledge graph reflecting the stockholder investment relation of the enterprise is constructed by adopting a data structure calculated by a graph. Step S120: and segmenting the knowledge graph to obtain one or more connected subgraphs. Step S130: and in each connected subgraph, according to the first class of edge expansion representing the direct investment relation, adding a second class of edge representing the absolute stock control relation and a third class of edge representing the important stockholder relation. Step S140: and in each connected subgraph, extending and adding a fourth class of edges representing the indirect investment relation of the important shareholders according to the third class of edges representing the important shareholders relation. Step S150: and in each connected subgraph, searching a target node representing an actual controller or a suspected actual controller of the enterprise for each enterprise node. The operation method of the enterprise actual controller is the first embodiment of the application, and the actual controller and/or the suspected actual controller node of the enterprise node can be accurately calculated through graph calculation; the pruning operation is adopted in the graph calculation process, so that the operation amount is reduced, and the operation speed is improved.
Further, in step S110, data cleaning is performed on the equity data in the enterprise business information, and then a graph is constructed based on the cleaned data. Therefore, additional burden on the construction of the knowledge graph caused by invalid data, error data and the like can be avoided, and interference on subsequent operation can also be avoided.
Further, the data cleaning comprises one or more of stock ratio legality detection cleaning, data consistency checking, invalid data eliminating and missing data filling. This is a preferred implementation of data cleansing.
Furthermore, in the knowledge graph, each enterprise and the direct stock holder thereof are respectively used as each node in the graph; the direct investment relationship of the direct shareholder node to the enterprise node is represented by a first type edge. This is a preferred implementation of constructing a knowledge graph.
Further, each node has entity type attributes, including one or more of E, P, G, S, Z; e represents an enterprise; p represents a natural person; g represents a government agency; s represents a career unit; z represents a social organization. This is used to distinguish between different types of nodes.
Further, the attribute value of the first class edge is a direct investment proportion. This is a preferred implementation of constructing a knowledge graph.
Further, the edges all have a type attribute to distinguish the different types of edges. This is used to distinguish between different types of edges.
Further, in step S130, if any two nodes are connected by a first class edge, and the attribute value of the direct investment proportion of the first class edge is greater than or equal to the first threshold, a second class edge representing the absolute stock control relationship is added between the two nodes. This is a preferred implementation of expanding the knowledge-graph, and new data is expanded by graph computation on the basis of the original data.
Further, the second-class edge has a direction that is the same as the direction of the first-class edge connecting the two nodes. This is a preferred implementation of the extended knowledge-graph.
Further, the attribute of the second-class edge is an absolute stock control relationship, and the direct shareholder node connected with the second-class edge is an absolute stock control shareholder node. This is a preferred implementation of the extended knowledge-graph.
Further, the first threshold is between 45% and 66.7%. This is a preferred range of values for a parameter.
Further, in step S130, if any two nodes are connected by a first class edge, and the direct investment proportion attribute value of the first class edge is smaller than the first threshold and is greater than or equal to the second threshold, a third class edge representing the important shareholder relationship is added between the two nodes. This is a preferred implementation of expanding the knowledge-graph, and new data is expanded by graph computation on the basis of the original data.
Further, the third class of edge has a direction that is the same as the direction of the first class of edge connecting the two nodes. This is a preferred implementation of the extended knowledge-graph.
Further, the attribute of the third-class edge is an important shareholder relationship, and the connected direct shareholder node is an important shareholder node. This is a preferred implementation of the extended knowledge-graph.
Further, the second threshold is between 25% and 35%. This is a preferred range of values for a parameter.
Further, in the step S140, if any two nodes are sequentially connected in the same direction through a plurality of third-type edges, a fourth-type edge representing an indirect investment relationship of an important shareholder is added between the two nodes. This is a preferred implementation of expanding the knowledge-graph, and new data is expanded by graph computation on the basis of the original data.
Further, the fourth class of edges has a direction that is the same as the direction in which the combination of the third class of edges connecting the two nodes points. This is a preferred implementation of the extended knowledge-graph.
Further, the attribute of the fourth class of edge is an indirect investment proportion of an important shareholder, and is obtained by adding attribute values of all paths formed by the first class of edges connecting the two nodes. This is a preferred implementation of the extended knowledge-graph.
Further, in step S150, when a certain source node is connected by one or more second-type edges, all nodes connected by the source node through the second-type edges are used as target nodes representing actual controllers of the enterprise. This is the first implementation to find the target node.
Further, in the step S150, when a certain source node is not connected by any second-class edge or third-class edge, the source node does not have a target node representing an actual controller or a suspected actual controller of the enterprise. This is a second implementation of finding a target node.
Further, in the step S150, when a certain source node is not connected by any second-class edge but is connected by one or more third-class edges, all nodes of the source node connected only by one third-class edge or one fourth-class edge are regarded as candidate nodes, and one or more candidate nodes having the largest attribute value among the direct investment proportion attribute values of the first-class edge connected to the candidate node and the fourth-class edge or the indirect investment proportion attribute values of the important stakeholders of the fourth-class edge are regarded as target nodes representing suspected actual controllers of the enterprise. This is a third implementation of finding a target node.
The application also discloses an enterprise actual controller operation system which comprises a map building module, a connected subgraph segmentation module, a second-class edge expansion module, a third-class edge expansion module, a fourth-class edge expansion module and a target node judgment module. The map construction module is used for constructing a knowledge map reflecting the stockholder investment relation of the enterprise by adopting a data structure calculated by a map according to the equity data in the enterprise business information. The connected subgraph segmentation module is used for segmenting the knowledge graph to obtain one or more connected subgraphs. The second-class edge extension module is used for increasing a second-class edge representing an absolute stock control relation according to the first-class edge extension representing the direct investment relation. The third type edge extension module is used for increasing a third type edge representing an important shareholder relationship according to the first type edge extension representing the direct investment relationship. And the fourth type edge extension module is used for increasing the fourth type edge of the indirect investment relation representing the important shareholder according to the third type edge extension representing the important shareholder relation. The target node judgment module is used for searching a target node representing an actual controller or a suspected actual controller of the enterprise for each enterprise node. The above-mentioned enterprise actual controller operation system is the first embodiment of the present application, and the actual controller and/or suspected actual controller node of the enterprise node can be calculated more accurately through graph calculation; the pruning operation is adopted in the graph calculation process, so that the operation amount is reduced, and the operation speed is improved.
The application also discloses an enterprise actual controller operation method which comprises the following steps. Step S810: and according to the equity data in the enterprise business information, a knowledge graph reflecting the stockholder investment relation of the enterprise is constructed by adopting a data structure calculated by a graph. Step S820: and segmenting the knowledge graph to obtain one or more connected subgraphs. Step S830: and in each connected subgraph, searching a target node representing an actual controller or a suspected actual controller of the enterprise for each enterprise node. The above-mentioned method for calculating the actual controller of the enterprise is the second embodiment of the present application, and can be regarded as a variation of the first embodiment.
Further, in step S830, when a certain source node is connected to the first class of edges, and the direct investment proportion attribute value of at least one first class of edges is greater than or equal to the first threshold, all nodes connected to the source node through the first class of edges whose direct investment proportion attribute value is greater than or equal to the first threshold are used as target nodes representing actual controllers of the enterprise. This is the first implementation to find the target node.
Further, in step S830, when a certain source node is not connected to the first class edge, or is connected to the first class edge, but the direct investment proportion attribute values of all the first class edges are smaller than the second threshold, the source node does not have a target node representing an actual controller or a suspected actual controller of the enterprise. This is a second implementation of finding a target node.
Further, in step S830, when a certain source node is connected to a first class edge, the direct investment proportion attribute values of all the first class edges are smaller than a first threshold, and the direct investment proportion attribute value of at least one first class edge is greater than or equal to a second threshold, all nodes of the source node that are sequentially connected in the same direction through the first class edges whose direct investment proportion attribute values are smaller than the first threshold and greater than or equal to the second threshold are all used as candidate nodes, and one or more candidate nodes connected to one or more paths having the largest overall attribute value among all paths formed by the first class edges whose direct investment proportion attribute values are smaller than the first threshold and greater than or equal to the second threshold, to which the source node is connected, are used as target nodes representing suspected actual controllers of the enterprise. This is a third implementation of finding a target node.
The application also discloses an enterprise actual controller operation system which comprises a map construction module, a connected subgraph segmentation module and a target node judgment module. The map construction module is used for constructing a knowledge map reflecting the stockholder investment relation of the enterprise by adopting a data structure calculated by a map according to the equity data in the enterprise business information. The connected subgraph segmentation module is used for segmenting the knowledge graph to obtain one or more connected subgraphs. The target node judgment module is used for searching a target node representing an actual controller or a suspected actual controller of the enterprise for each enterprise node. The above-mentioned enterprise real controller computing system is the second embodiment of the present application, and can be regarded as a variation of the first embodiment.
The method has the technical effects that the enterprise related data are stored through the graph database, and the actual controller and the suspected actual controller of the enterprise are relatively accurately calculated through a graph calculation mode. The pruning operation is adopted in the graph calculation process, so that the operation amount is reduced, and the operation speed is improved.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a flowchart of a first embodiment of a method for calculating an actual controller of an enterprise according to the present application.
Fig. 2 is a detailed flowchart of the method of constructing a knowledge-graph in step S110.
Fig. 3 is a schematic diagram of one example of the knowledge-graph constructed in step S110.
Fig. 4 is a schematic diagram of an example of splitting a connected subgraph in step S120.
Fig. 5 is a schematic diagram of an example of adding edges of the second class and the third class in step S130.
Fig. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of adding a fourth class edge in step S140.
Fig. 7 is a schematic structural diagram of a first embodiment of an enterprise virtual controller computing system provided by the present application.
Fig. 8 is a flowchart of a second embodiment of a method for calculating an actual controller of an enterprise according to the present application.
Fig. 9 is a schematic structural diagram of a second embodiment of the enterprise real controller computing system provided by the present application.
The reference numbers in the figures illustrate: 700 is an enterprise actual controller computing system; 710 is a map building block; 720 is a connected subgraph segmentation module; 730 is a second class edge extension module; 740 is a third class edge extension module; 750 is a fourth class edge extension module; 760 is a target node decision module; 900 is an actual controller operation system of an enterprise; 910 is a map building block; 920 is a connected subgraph segmentation module; and 930 is a target node decision module.
Detailed Description
Referring to fig. 1, an embodiment of a method for calculating an actual controller of an enterprise provided by the present application includes the following steps.
Step S110: and according to the equity data in the enterprise business information, a knowledge graph reflecting the stockholder investment relation of the enterprise is constructed by adopting a data structure calculated by a graph.
The enterprise business information refers to information registered by an enterprise in a business administration management department, and comprises an enterprise name, an enterprise address, enterprise registered capital, enterprise share right data, enterprise high management data and the like. The stock right data refers to direct stockholders and the ratio of capital investment of the enterprise.
Preferably, in the step S110, data cleaning (datacleaning) is performed on the equity data in the enterprise business information, and then a knowledge graph is constructed based on the cleaned data. The data cleaning comprises one or more of stock ratio legality detection cleaning, data consistency checking, invalid data eliminating and missing data filling.
Referring to fig. 2, the construction of the knowledge graph specifically includes the following steps.
Step S210: and taking each enterprise and the direct stock holder thereof in the enterprise business information as each node in the graph respectively. Each node contains two attributes: entity name, entity type. The entity name attribute refers to a unit name or a natural person name. The entity type attributes include one or more of E, P, G, S, Z. Wherein E represents various types of enterprises such as individual industrial and commercial enterprises, individual exclusive enterprises, cooperative agencies, enterprise legal persons and the like; p represents a natural person; g represents a government agency; s represents a career unit; z represents a social organization.
Step S220: and adding a first class edge representing a direct investment relation between the enterprise node and the direct shareholder node thereof based on the equity data of each enterprise. The first type of edge has a direction, which may be, for example, from the direct shareholder node toward the enterprise node, or may change to the opposite direction. The attribute of the first class of edges is the direct investment proportion.
The map constructed through steps S210 to S220 is a knowledge map reflecting the stockholder investment relationship of the enterprise.
Preferably, all edges in the knowledge-graph have a type attribute to distinguish the first class of edges from the second class of edges, … ….
Step S120: the knowledge graph constructed in step S110 is segmented to obtain one or more connected subgraphs. In the knowledge graph constructed in step S110, if any two nodes can be connected by one or more edges, the two nodes are in a connected subgraph; otherwise, the sub-graphs belong to different connected sub-graphs respectively.
Step S130: in each connected subgraph segmented in step S120, a second class edge representing an absolute stock control relationship and a third class edge representing an important shareholder relationship are added according to the first class edge extension representing the direct investment relationship.
If any two nodes are connected through a first class edge, and the attribute value of the direct investment proportion of the first class edge is larger than or equal to a first threshold value, a second class edge representing the absolute stock control relationship is newly added between the two nodes. The second class of edges has a direction that is the same as the direction of the first class of edges connecting the two nodes. The attribute of the second kind of edge is an absolute stock control relationship, and the direct stock holding shareholder node connected with the second kind of edge is an absolute stock control shareholder node. The first threshold is between 45% and 66.7%, preferably 50%.
If any two nodes are connected through a first class edge, and the direct investment proportion attribute value of the first class edge is smaller than the first threshold value and larger than or equal to the second threshold value, a third class edge representing the important stockholder relation is newly added between the two nodes. The third class of edges has a direction that is the same as the direction of the first class of edges connecting the two nodes. The attribute of the third kind of edge is important shareholder relationship, and the direct shareholder node connected with the third kind of edge is the important shareholder node. The second threshold is between 25% and 35%, preferably 30%.
Step S140: in each connected subgraph divided in step S120, the fourth class of edges representing the indirect investment relationship of the important shareholder is added according to the third class of edge extension representing the relationship of the important shareholder.
If any two nodes are connected in sequence in the same direction through a plurality of third edges, a fourth edge representing the indirect investment relation of the important shareholders is added between the two nodes. The fourth class of edges has a direction that is the same as the direction in which the combination of the third class of edges connecting the two nodes points. The attribute of the fourth category is the indirect investment proportion of the important shareholder, i.e. the actual investment proportion. The attribute of the fourth class edge is obtained by adding the attribute values of all paths formed by the first class edges connecting the two nodes. If any path is only one first-class edge, the overall attribute value of the path is the direct investment proportion attribute value of the first-class edge. If any path is formed by sequentially connecting a plurality of first-class edges in the same direction, the direct investment proportion attribute value of each first-class edge is multiplied to be used as the integral attribute value of the path. If any path is formed by connecting a plurality of first-class edges in different directions, the path is not in the consideration range of calculating the attribute of the fourth-class edge, or the overall attribute value of the path is zero.
Step S150: in each connected subgraph segmented in step S120, the node with the entity type attribute of E is called a source node, the source node is all the enterprise nodes, and a target node representing an actual controller or a suspected actual controller of the enterprise is searched for each source node.
For example, when a source node is connected by one or more edges of the second type, all nodes connected by the source node through the edges of the second type are used as target nodes for representing actual controllers of the enterprise. If the first threshold is greater than or equal to 50%, each source node will only connect one edge of the second type at most. If the first threshold is less than 50%, each source node will connect more than two edges of the second type at the most.
For another example, when a certain source node is not connected by any second-type edge or third-type edge, the source node does not have a target node representing an actual controller or a suspected actual controller of the enterprise, that is, the enterprise does not have an actual controller.
For another example, when a certain source node is not connected by any second-class edge but is connected by one or more third-class edges, all nodes of the source node connected only by one third-class edge or one fourth-class edge are taken as candidate nodes, and one or more candidate nodes with the largest attribute value among the direct investment proportion attribute values of the first-class edges connected with the candidate node and the source node or the indirect investment proportion attribute values of important stakeholders of the fourth-class edges are taken as target nodes for representing suspected actual controllers of the enterprise.
In step S130, the number of the newly added third class edges characterizing the important stakeholder relationship is necessarily less than or equal to the number of the first class edges characterizing the direct investment relationship. In step S140, a fourth edge of the indirect investment relationship representing the important shareholder is expanded based on the third edge, and the operation scale of the fourth edge is inevitably smaller than that of the fourth edge expanded based on the first edge. This is a Pruning operation in graph computation, which can greatly reduce computation resources and computation time.
Referring to fig. 3, this is an example of the knowledge-graph constructed in step S110. Where circles represent nodes and lines represent edges. For simplicity of description, nodes E1 to E7 represent that the entity type attribute is E, node P1 represents that the entity type attribute is P, node G1 represents that the entity type attribute is G, node S1 represents that the entity type attribute is S, and node Z1 represents that the entity type attribute is Z. The direct investment proportion attribute values of the first class edges are represented by k1 and k2 … ….
Referring to fig. 4, this is an example of splitting the connected subgraph in step S120. The knowledge graph shown in fig. 3 is segmented, and 3 connected subgraphs can be obtained.
Referring to fig. 5, this is an example of adding the second class edge and the third class edge in step S130. The node E1 and the node E3 are connected through a first edge k2, and if k2 is greater than or equal to a first threshold value, a second edge s1 is added between the node E1 and the node E3. The direction of the second class of sides s1 is the same as the direction of the first class of sides k 2. The attribute of the second class of edges s1 is an absolute stock control relationship. The node E2 and the node E3 are connected through a first type edge k3, and if k3 is smaller than a first threshold and larger than or equal to a second threshold, a third type edge t1 is added between the node E2 and the node E3. The direction of the third class of side t1 is the same as the direction of the first class of side k 3. The attribute of the third-class edge t1 is the important shareholder relationship.
Referring to fig. 6, this is an example of adding a fourth class edge in step S140. The node E1 and the node E4 are sequentially connected in the same direction through two third-class edges t1 and t2, so that a fourth-class edge f1 is added between the nodes E1 and E4. The direction of the fourth class of side f1 is the same as the direction in which the combination of the third class of sides t1 and t2 points. The node E1 and the node E4 are also connected in sequence in the same direction by first edges k1 and k3, which are called path one, for example. The node E1 and the node E4 are also connected in sequence in the same direction by first edges k2 and k4, which are called path two, for example. The overall attribute value of the path one is k1 × k3, the overall attribute value of the path two is k2 × k4, and the attribute value of the indirect investment proportion of the important shareholder of the fourth type of edge f1 is k1 × k3+ k2 × k4, which represents the actual investment proportion of the node E1 to the node E4 after considering the indirect holdup factor.
Referring to fig. 7, in correspondence with the first embodiment of the above-mentioned method for calculating an actual controller of an enterprise, the present application further provides a first embodiment of a calculation system for an actual controller of an enterprise. The enterprise actual controller computing system 700 comprises a map building module 710, a connected subgraph segmentation module 720, a second-class edge extension module 730, a third-class edge extension module 740, a fourth-class edge extension module 750 and a target node judgment module 760.
The map construction module 710 is used for constructing a knowledge map reflecting the stockholder investment relationship of the enterprise by adopting a data structure of map calculation according to the equity data in the enterprise business information. In the constructed knowledge graph, each enterprise and a direct stock holder thereof are respectively used as each node in the graph. Each node contains two attributes: entity name, entity type. The entity name refers to a unit name or a natural person name. The entity type includes one or more of E, P, G, S, Z. The direct investment relation and the direct investment proportion of the direct stockholder nodes to the enterprise nodes are represented by directional first class edges.
The connected subgraph segmentation module 720 is used for segmenting the knowledge graph constructed by the graph construction module 710 to obtain one or more connected subgraphs.
The second-class edge extension module 730 is configured to add a second-class edge representing an absolute stock control relationship according to the first-class edge extension representing the direct investment relationship.
The third type edge extension module 740 is configured to add a third type edge representing an important stakeholder relationship according to the first type edge extension representing the direct investment relationship.
The fourth type edge extension module 750 is configured to add a fourth type edge of the indirect investment relation representing the important shareholder according to the third type edge extension representing the important shareholder relation.
The target node determination module 760 is configured to find a target node representing an actual controller or a suspected actual controller of the enterprise for each enterprise node, and is responsible for executing step S150.
Referring to fig. 8, an embodiment of the method for calculating an actual controller of an enterprise provided by the present application includes the following steps.
Step S810: and according to the equity data in the enterprise business information, a knowledge graph reflecting the stockholder investment relation of the enterprise is constructed by adopting a data structure calculated by a graph.
Step S820: and (3) segmenting the knowledge graph constructed in the step (S110) to obtain one or more connected subgraphs.
Step S830: in each connected subgraph segmented in step S820, the node with entity type attribute E is called a source node, the source node is all enterprise nodes, and a target node representing an actual controller or a suspected actual controller of the enterprise is searched for each source node.
For example, when a certain source node is connected with a first class edge, and the direct investment proportion attribute value of at least one first class edge is greater than or equal to a first threshold, all nodes connected by the first class edge of which the direct investment proportion attribute value is greater than or equal to the first threshold are used as target nodes representing actual controllers of enterprises. The first threshold is between 45% and 66.7%, preferably 50%.
For another example, when a certain source node is not connected with the first class edge, or is connected with the first class edge but the direct investment proportion attribute values of all the first class edges are smaller than the second threshold, the source node does not have a target node representing an actual controller or a suspected actual controller of the enterprise. The second threshold is between 25% and 35%, preferably 30%.
For another example, when a certain source node is connected with a first class edge, the direct investment proportion attribute values of all the first class edges are smaller than a first threshold, and the direct investment proportion attribute value of at least one first class edge is greater than or equal to a second threshold, all nodes which are sequentially connected in the same direction by the source node through the first class edges of which the direct investment proportion attribute values are smaller than the first threshold and greater than or equal to the second threshold are taken as candidate nodes, and one or more candidate nodes connected with one or more paths with the largest overall attribute value in all paths formed by the first class edges of which the direct investment proportion attribute values are smaller than the first threshold and greater than or equal to the second threshold, which are connected with the candidate node, are taken as target nodes representing suspected actual controllers of the enterprise. If any path is only the first-class edge, the overall attribute value of the path is the direct investment proportion attribute value of the first-class edge. If any path is formed by sequentially connecting a plurality of first-class edges in the same direction, the direct investment proportion attribute value of each first-class edge is multiplied to be used as the integral attribute value of the path. If any path is formed by connecting a plurality of first-class edges in different directions, the overall attribute value of the path is zero.
In step S830, the condition for determining the suspected actual controller node of the enterprise is that the first-class edge is extended outwards according to the direct investment proportion attribute value being smaller than the first threshold and greater than or equal to the second threshold, which significantly reduces the operation scale compared with the external extension only according to the first-class edge. The pruning operation in the graph calculation can greatly reduce the calculation resources and the calculation time.
Referring to fig. 9, in correspondence with the second embodiment of the above-mentioned method for calculating an actual controller of an enterprise, the present application further provides a second embodiment of a calculation system for an actual controller of an enterprise. The enterprise actual controller computing system 900 comprises a map building module 910, a connected subgraph segmentation module 920 and a target node judgment module 930.
The map building block 910 is the same as the map building block 710 described previously.
The connected subgraph segmentation module 920 is the same as the connected subgraph segmentation module 720.
The target node determination module 930 is configured to find a target node representing an actual controller or a suspected actual controller of the enterprise for each enterprise node, and is responsible for executing step S830.
The method comprises the steps of establishing and storing the knowledge map reflecting the equity investment relationship of the enterprise based on a map database of the knowledge map, finding and calculating an actual controller of the enterprise by adopting a technical means of map calculation, and storing the actual controller in the knowledge map. On the premise of ensuring the correct operation result, the method and the device greatly reduce the operation amount of graph calculation through pruning operation, and have the advantages of high calculation speed, low requirement on hardware resources and the like. The query of the actual controller or the suspected actual controller of any enterprise can immediately obtain a result in the knowledge graph, so that the storage and operation efficiency and the response timeliness are greatly improved.
The above are merely preferred embodiments of the present application and are not intended to limit the present application. Various modifications and changes may occur to those skilled in the art. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement and the like made within the spirit and principle of the present application shall be included in the protection scope of the present application.

Claims (27)

1. An enterprise actual controller operation method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
step S110: according to the equity data in the enterprise business information, a knowledge graph reflecting the investing relationship of the shareholders of the enterprise is constructed by adopting a data structure calculated by a graph;
step S120: segmenting the knowledge graph to obtain one or more connected subgraphs;
step S130: in each connected subgraph, according to the first class of edge expansion representing the direct investment relation, a second class of edge representing the absolute stock control relation and a third class of edge representing the important shareholder relation are added;
step S140: in each connected subgraph, according to the third edge expansion representing the important shareholder relationship, a fourth edge representing the indirect investment relationship of the important shareholder is added;
step S150: and in each connected subgraph, searching a target node representing an actual controller or a suspected actual controller of the enterprise for each enterprise node.
2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein in step S110, the stock right data in the enterprise business information is first cleaned, and then a knowledge graph is constructed based on the cleaned data.
3. The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the data cleaning includes one or more of stock ratio validity detection cleaning, data consistency check, invalid data elimination, and missing data filling.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein each enterprise and its direct shareholder are respectively used as each node in the knowledge graph; the direct investment relationship of the direct shareholder node to the enterprise node is represented by a first type edge.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein each node has entity type attributes including one or more of E, P, G, S, Z; e represents an enterprise; p represents a natural person; g represents a government agency; s represents a career unit; z represents a social organization.
6. The method as claimed in claim 4, wherein the attribute value of the first class edge is a direct investment ratio.
7. The method of enterprise beneficiary operations of claim 4, wherein said edges each have a type attribute to distinguish between different types of edges.
8. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein in step S130, if any two nodes are connected by a first class edge, and the attribute value of the direct investment proportion of the first class edge is greater than or equal to the first threshold, a second class edge representing the absolute stock control relationship is added between the two nodes.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the second type of edge has the same orientation as the first type of edge connecting the two nodes.
10. The method as claimed in claim 8, wherein the attribute of the second edge is absolute stock control relationship, and the direct shareholder node connected to the second edge is an absolute shareholder node.
11. The method of claim 8, wherein the first threshold is between 45% and 66.7%.
12. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein in step S130, if any two nodes are connected by a first class edge, and the attribute value of the direct investment proportion of the first class edge is smaller than the first threshold and greater than or equal to the second threshold, a third class edge representing the important shareholder relationship is added between the two nodes.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein the third edge has the same direction as the first edge connecting the two nodes.
14. The method as claimed in claim 12, wherein the attribute of the third edge is important shareholder relationship, and the connected direct shareholder node is an important shareholder node.
15. The method of claim 12, wherein the second threshold is between 25% and 35%.
16. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein in step S140, if any two nodes are connected to each other sequentially in the same direction through a plurality of third edges, a fourth edge representing an indirect investment relationship between important stakeholders is added between the two nodes.
17. The method of claim 16, wherein the fourth class of edges has a direction that is the same as a direction in which a combination of the third class of edges connecting the two nodes is pointed.
18. The method as claimed in claim 16, wherein the attribute of the fourth class of edges is an indirect investment ratio of important stakeholders, and is obtained by adding the attribute values of all paths formed by the first class of edges connecting the two nodes.
19. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein in step S150, when a source node is connected by one or more edges of the second type, all nodes connected by the source node through the edges of the second type are used as target nodes representing actual controllers of the enterprise.
20. The method of claim 1, wherein in step S150, when a source node is not connected by any edge of the second type or the third type, the source node does not have a target node representing an actual controller or a suspected actual controller of the enterprise.
21. The method of claim 1, wherein in step S150, when a source node is not connected by any second-type edge but is connected by one or more third-type edges, all nodes of the source node connected by only one third-type edge or one fourth-type edge are regarded as candidate nodes, and one or more candidate nodes having a largest attribute value among the direct investment ratio attribute values of the first-type edge connected to the candidate node and the indirect investment ratio attribute values of the important shareholder of the fourth-type edge are regarded as target nodes representing suspected actual controllers of the enterprise.
22. An enterprise actual controller operation system is characterized by comprising a map construction module, a connected subgraph segmentation module, a second class edge expansion module, a third class edge expansion module, a fourth class edge expansion module and a target node judgment module;
the map construction module is used for constructing a knowledge map reflecting the stockholder investment relation of the enterprise by adopting a data structure calculated by a map according to the equity data in the enterprise business information;
the connected subgraph cutting module is used for cutting the knowledge graph to obtain one or more connected subgraphs;
the second edge extension module is used for increasing a second edge representing an absolute stock control relation according to the first edge extension representing the direct investment relation;
the third type edge extension module is used for increasing a third type edge representing an important shareholder relationship according to the first type edge extension representing the direct investment relationship;
the fourth type edge extension module is used for increasing a fourth type edge representing the indirect investment relation of the important shareholders according to the third type edge extension representing the important shareholders relation;
the target node judgment module is used for searching a target node representing an actual controller or a suspected actual controller of the enterprise for each enterprise node.
23. An enterprise actual controller operation method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
step S810: according to the equity data in the enterprise business information, a knowledge graph reflecting the investing relationship of the shareholders of the enterprise is constructed by adopting a data structure calculated by a graph;
step S820: segmenting the knowledge graph to obtain one or more connected subgraphs;
step S830: and in each connected subgraph, searching a target node representing an actual controller or a suspected actual controller of the enterprise for each enterprise node.
24. The method as claimed in claim 23, wherein in step S830, when a source node is connected to the first class edges and the direct investment proportion attribute value of at least one of the first class edges is greater than or equal to the first threshold, all nodes connected to the source node through the first class edges having the direct investment proportion attribute value greater than or equal to the first threshold are used as target nodes representing the actual controllers of the enterprise.
25. The method as claimed in claim 23, wherein in step S830, when a source node is not connected to the first class edge, or is connected to the first class edge but the direct investment proportion attribute values of all the first class edges are smaller than the second threshold, the source node does not have a target node representing an actual or suspected actual enterprise controller.
26. The method as claimed in claim 23, wherein in the step S830, when a certain source node is connected with first class edges, the direct investment proportion attribute values of all the first class edges are smaller than a first threshold value, and the direct investment proportion attribute value of at least one first class edge is larger than or equal to a second threshold value, and taking all nodes which are sequentially connected in the same direction by the first class edges of which the direct investment proportion attribute values are smaller than the first threshold value and are larger than or equal to the second threshold value as candidate nodes, and taking one or more candidate nodes connected with one or more paths with the maximum overall attribute values in all paths formed by the first class edges of which the direct investment proportion attribute values are smaller than the first threshold value and are larger than or equal to the second threshold value, which are connected with the candidate nodes, as target nodes for representing suspected actual controllers of enterprises.
27. An enterprise actual controller operation system is characterized by comprising a map construction module, a connected subgraph segmentation module and a target node judgment module;
the map construction module is used for constructing a knowledge map reflecting the stockholder investment relation of the enterprise by adopting a data structure calculated by a map according to the equity data in the enterprise business information;
the connected subgraph segmentation module is used for segmenting the knowledge graph to obtain one or more connected subgraphs;
the target node judgment module is used for searching a target node representing an actual controller or a suspected actual controller of the enterprise for each enterprise node.
CN201910878748.4A 2019-09-18 2019-09-18 Enterprise actual controller operation system and method Pending CN110826976A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910878748.4A CN110826976A (en) 2019-09-18 2019-09-18 Enterprise actual controller operation system and method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910878748.4A CN110826976A (en) 2019-09-18 2019-09-18 Enterprise actual controller operation system and method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN110826976A true CN110826976A (en) 2020-02-21

Family

ID=69548033

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201910878748.4A Pending CN110826976A (en) 2019-09-18 2019-09-18 Enterprise actual controller operation system and method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN110826976A (en)

Cited By (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111325355A (en) * 2020-03-19 2020-06-23 中国建设银行股份有限公司 Method and device for determining actual control persons of enterprises, computer equipment and medium
CN111369365A (en) * 2020-03-09 2020-07-03 中金汇安(北京)科技有限公司 Method for mining potential consistent actors
CN111897966A (en) * 2020-07-02 2020-11-06 苏宁金融科技(南京)有限公司 Method, system and electronic equipment for mining implicit information in knowledge graph
CN111949307A (en) * 2020-07-06 2020-11-17 北京大学 Optimization method and system of open source project knowledge graph
CN112232754A (en) * 2020-09-14 2021-01-15 苏宁金融科技(南京)有限公司 Enterprise data mining method, device and equipment
CN112634056A (en) * 2020-12-17 2021-04-09 企查查科技有限公司 Method, equipment and storage medium for rapidly calculating and updating enterprise share right structure
CN112633889A (en) * 2020-11-12 2021-04-09 中科金审(北京)科技有限公司 Enterprise gene sequencing system and method
CN112783943A (en) * 2021-01-20 2021-05-11 北京百度网讯科技有限公司 Stock control relation extraction method, apparatus, device, storage medium, and program product
CN112991063A (en) * 2021-04-01 2021-06-18 执立信息科技(上海)有限公司 Enterprise equity penetration method
CN112991070A (en) * 2021-03-16 2021-06-18 武汉大学 Multi-layer stock right penetrating method for financial stock right knowledge large graph
CN113032467A (en) * 2021-04-22 2021-06-25 无锡极数宝大数据科技有限公司 Algorithm and device for calculating group member list
CN113641878A (en) * 2021-08-09 2021-11-12 平安科技(深圳)有限公司 Real control person identification method, device, equipment and medium suitable for directed loop
CN114219329A (en) * 2021-12-20 2022-03-22 中国建设银行股份有限公司 Enterprise level determination method and device

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140351261A1 (en) * 2013-05-24 2014-11-27 Sap Ag Representing enterprise data in a knowledge graph
CN105574649A (en) * 2015-12-10 2016-05-11 西安交通大学 Taxpayer tax evasion suspicion group detection method based on multi-stage MapReduce model
CN109189867A (en) * 2018-10-23 2019-01-11 中山大学 Relationship discovery method, apparatus and storage medium based on Corporate Intellectual map
CN109271426A (en) * 2018-10-10 2019-01-25 中科鼎富(北京)科技发展有限公司 Enterprise's association relationship analysis method, device and computer readable storage medium
CN109800335A (en) * 2019-01-23 2019-05-24 平安科技(深圳)有限公司 Generation method, device, computer equipment and the storage medium of enterprise's map
CN110175909A (en) * 2019-05-07 2019-08-27 交通银行股份有限公司 A kind of enterprise's incidence relation determines method and system
CN110232078A (en) * 2019-04-26 2019-09-13 上海生腾数据科技有限公司 A kind of enterprise group's Relation acquisition method and system

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140351261A1 (en) * 2013-05-24 2014-11-27 Sap Ag Representing enterprise data in a knowledge graph
CN105574649A (en) * 2015-12-10 2016-05-11 西安交通大学 Taxpayer tax evasion suspicion group detection method based on multi-stage MapReduce model
CN109271426A (en) * 2018-10-10 2019-01-25 中科鼎富(北京)科技发展有限公司 Enterprise's association relationship analysis method, device and computer readable storage medium
CN109189867A (en) * 2018-10-23 2019-01-11 中山大学 Relationship discovery method, apparatus and storage medium based on Corporate Intellectual map
CN109800335A (en) * 2019-01-23 2019-05-24 平安科技(深圳)有限公司 Generation method, device, computer equipment and the storage medium of enterprise's map
CN110232078A (en) * 2019-04-26 2019-09-13 上海生腾数据科技有限公司 A kind of enterprise group's Relation acquisition method and system
CN110175909A (en) * 2019-05-07 2019-08-27 交通银行股份有限公司 A kind of enterprise's incidence relation determines method and system

Cited By (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111369365A (en) * 2020-03-09 2020-07-03 中金汇安(北京)科技有限公司 Method for mining potential consistent actors
CN111325355A (en) * 2020-03-19 2020-06-23 中国建设银行股份有限公司 Method and device for determining actual control persons of enterprises, computer equipment and medium
CN111325355B (en) * 2020-03-19 2023-12-19 中国建设银行股份有限公司 Method and device for determining actual control person of enterprise, computer equipment and medium
CN111897966A (en) * 2020-07-02 2020-11-06 苏宁金融科技(南京)有限公司 Method, system and electronic equipment for mining implicit information in knowledge graph
CN111949307A (en) * 2020-07-06 2020-11-17 北京大学 Optimization method and system of open source project knowledge graph
CN112232754A (en) * 2020-09-14 2021-01-15 苏宁金融科技(南京)有限公司 Enterprise data mining method, device and equipment
CN112633889A (en) * 2020-11-12 2021-04-09 中科金审(北京)科技有限公司 Enterprise gene sequencing system and method
CN112634056A (en) * 2020-12-17 2021-04-09 企查查科技有限公司 Method, equipment and storage medium for rapidly calculating and updating enterprise share right structure
CN112783943A (en) * 2021-01-20 2021-05-11 北京百度网讯科技有限公司 Stock control relation extraction method, apparatus, device, storage medium, and program product
CN112783943B (en) * 2021-01-20 2024-04-09 北京百度网讯科技有限公司 Stroke relationship extraction method, device, equipment, storage medium and program product
CN112991070B (en) * 2021-03-16 2023-11-10 武汉大学 Multi-layer equity penetration method for financial equity knowledge block diagram
CN112991070A (en) * 2021-03-16 2021-06-18 武汉大学 Multi-layer stock right penetrating method for financial stock right knowledge large graph
CN112991063A (en) * 2021-04-01 2021-06-18 执立信息科技(上海)有限公司 Enterprise equity penetration method
CN113032467B (en) * 2021-04-22 2024-03-08 无锡极数宝大数据科技有限公司 Algorithm and device for calculating group member list
CN113032467A (en) * 2021-04-22 2021-06-25 无锡极数宝大数据科技有限公司 Algorithm and device for calculating group member list
CN113641878A (en) * 2021-08-09 2021-11-12 平安科技(深圳)有限公司 Real control person identification method, device, equipment and medium suitable for directed loop
CN113641878B (en) * 2021-08-09 2024-05-28 平安科技(深圳)有限公司 Real control person identification method, device, equipment and medium suitable for directed loop
CN114219329A (en) * 2021-12-20 2022-03-22 中国建设银行股份有限公司 Enterprise level determination method and device

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN110826976A (en) Enterprise actual controller operation system and method
US20210326885A1 (en) Method and Apparatus of Identifying a Transaction Risk
US10762561B2 (en) Systems and methods for improving computation efficiency in the detection of fraud indicators for loans
CN110781246A (en) Enterprise association relationship construction method and system
US9323779B2 (en) Reverse geocoding system using combined street segment and point datasets
CN110232078B (en) Enterprise group relationship acquisition method and system
CN110781311B (en) Enterprise-consistent-person operation system and method
CN102799954B (en) A kind of Multipurpose Optimal Method and system being applicable to risk assessment
CN112634056A (en) Method, equipment and storage medium for rapidly calculating and updating enterprise share right structure
CN113155141A (en) Map generation method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium
CN112417176B (en) Method, equipment and medium for mining implicit association relation between enterprises based on graph characteristics
CN112991063B (en) Enterprise equity penetration method
CN110765317B (en) Enterprise beneficiary operation system and method
CN105653609A (en) Memory-based data processing method and device
WO2020098315A1 (en) Information matching method and terminal
CN110825817B (en) Enterprise suspected association judgment method and system
CN112232754A (en) Enterprise data mining method, device and equipment
CN110427574B (en) Route similarity determination method, device, equipment and medium
CN112699134A (en) Distributed graph database storage and query method based on graph subdivision
CN110991803A (en) Enterprise actual controller supporting distributed computing and control path computing method
CN105389337A (en) Method for searching big data space for statistical significance mode
JP7384768B2 (en) Community evaluation system, community evaluation method, behavior evaluation system, and behavior evaluation method
CN108009927A (en) One B shareB methods of marking and platform
CN109685453B (en) Method for intelligently identifying effective paths of workflow
CN109582806B (en) Personal information processing method and system based on graph calculation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
TA01 Transfer of patent application right

Effective date of registration: 20210223

Address after: Room 1105-1123, 1256 and 1258 Wanrong Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200436

Applicant after: Shanghai hehe Information Technology Co., Ltd

Applicant after: Shanghai Shengteng Data Technology Co.,Ltd.

Applicant after: Shanghai Linguan Data Technology Co.,Ltd.

Applicant after: Shanghai yingwuchu Data Technology Co.,Ltd.

Address before: Room 1601-120, 238 JIANGCHANG Third Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200436

Applicant before: Shanghai Shengteng Data Technology Co.,Ltd.

TA01 Transfer of patent application right