CN110768945A - Method and device for evaluating website safe operation condition and storage medium - Google Patents
Method and device for evaluating website safe operation condition and storage medium Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN110768945A CN110768945A CN201811579405.XA CN201811579405A CN110768945A CN 110768945 A CN110768945 A CN 110768945A CN 201811579405 A CN201811579405 A CN 201811579405A CN 110768945 A CN110768945 A CN 110768945A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- score
- website
- dns
- ping
- http
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
- H04L63/20—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for managing network security; network security policies in general
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
- H04L63/30—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for supporting lawful interception, monitoring or retaining of communications or communication related information
- H04L63/302—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for supporting lawful interception, monitoring or retaining of communications or communication related information gathering intelligence information for situation awareness or reconnaissance
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Computing Systems (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Technology Law (AREA)
- Debugging And Monitoring (AREA)
Abstract
The embodiment of the invention discloses a method and a device for evaluating the safe operation condition of a website and a storage medium, relates to the technical field of evaluation of safe operation of the website, can effectively evaluate the safe operation condition of the website, and is beneficial to transverse comparison among the websites. The evaluation method for the safe operation condition of the website comprises the following steps: setting a basic score for safe operation of a website; respectively obtaining first influence scores of HTTP, DNS and PING of the current website; and obtaining the running condition score of the current website based on the basic score and the first influence score. The method is suitable for evaluating the safe operation condition of each website, giving out the score of the operation condition and transversely ranking all supervision websites.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of website operation condition evaluation, in particular to a method and a device for evaluating a website safety operation condition and a storage medium.
Background
Currently, in the field of information security, website availability is a fashionable and novel topic and is determined by conditions such as system stability, response speed and the like of a website within a certain time, website operation conditions can reflect website availability more specifically, security workers generally want to know the safe operation conditions of the website, which factors may affect the safe operation conditions, which risks are potentially related, and which risks are concerned with by what weight.
At present, no patent related to the safe operation of the website appears, most of the monitoring of the current mainstream website monitoring system on the safe operation condition of the website is realized through background monitoring, the foreground displays the monitoring data form through a chart, and the safe operation condition score is not used as a label to reflect the safe condition of the website. The background monitoring and foreground data chart display can enable the analysis system to frequently retrieve and log frequently inquire, so that the monitoring system and the database system are delayed in time, the usability of the website is reduced, the user experience is reduced, and in the aspect of users, the data display is indirect and the safe operation degree of the website cannot be clearly seen.
Disclosure of Invention
In view of this, embodiments of the present invention provide a method, an apparatus, and a storage medium for evaluating a website safe operation condition, which can score a safe operation condition of a current website and rank the safe operation condition in all monitoring websites.
In a first aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides a method for evaluating a website safe operation condition, including: setting a basic score for safe operation of a website; respectively obtaining first influence scores of HTTP, DNS and PING of the current website; and obtaining the running condition score of the current website based on the basic score and the first influence score.
According to a specific implementation manner of the embodiment of the present invention, the obtaining the first influence scores of the HTTP, the DNS, and the PING of the current website respectively includes:
determining second influence scores of the current websites HTTP, DNS and PING based on response times of the current websites HTTP, DNS and PING, respectively;
respectively setting weighted values corresponding to HTTP, DNS and PING;
and respectively determining the first influence scores of the HTTP, DNS and PING of the current websites based on the second influence scores and the corresponding weight values.
According to a specific implementation manner of the embodiment of the present invention, the determining the second influence score of the current website HTTP, DNS and PING based on the response time of the current website HTTP, DNS and PING respectively includes:
if the response time of the HTTP, DNS and PING of the current website is larger than the respective set threshold, the second influence score is equal to the basic score;
and if the response time of the current websites HTTP, DNS and PING is not larger than the respective set threshold value, calculating a second influence score by using a preset formula.
According to a specific implementation manner of the embodiment of the present invention, the preset formula is:
y is 100 × T/T; and y is a second influence score, T is response time, and T is a set threshold.
According to a specific implementation manner of the embodiment of the present invention, the obtaining of the running condition score of the current website based on the base score and the first influence score includes: and respectively subtracting the first influence scores of the HTTP, the DNS and the PING from the basic score to obtain the running condition score of the current website.
According to a specific implementation manner of the embodiment of the present invention, the method further includes: the method for tagging the current website based on the operation condition of the website comprises the following steps: safe, risky, unsafe, and extremely unsafe.
In a second aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides an apparatus for evaluating a website safe operation condition, including:
the basic score setting module is used for setting basic scores of safe operation of the website;
the first influence score calculation module is used for respectively obtaining first influence scores of the HTTP, the DNS and the PING of the current website;
and the operation condition evaluation module is used for obtaining the operation condition score of the current website based on the basic score and the first influence score.
According to a specific implementation manner of the embodiment of the present invention, the first influence score calculating module specifically includes:
a second influence score calculation unit for determining second influence scores of the current websites HTTP, DNS, and PING based on response times of the current websites HTTP, DNS, and PING, respectively;
a weight setting unit for setting weight values corresponding to HTTP, DNS and PING, respectively;
and the first influence score calculating unit is used for respectively determining the first influence scores of the HTTP, the DNS and the PING of the current website based on the second influence scores and the corresponding weight values.
According to a specific implementation manner of the embodiment of the present invention, the second influence score calculating unit specifically includes:
if the response time of the HTTP, DNS and PING of the current website is larger than the respective set threshold, the second influence score is equal to the basic score;
and if the response time of the current websites HTTP, DNS and PING is not larger than the respective set threshold value, calculating a second influence score by using a preset formula.
According to a specific implementation manner of the embodiment of the present invention, the preset formula is:
y is 100 × T/T; and y is a second influence score, T is response time, and T is a set threshold.
According to a specific implementation manner of the embodiment of the present invention, the operation condition evaluation module is specifically configured to: and respectively subtracting the first influence scores of the HTTP, the DNS and the PING from the basic score to obtain the running condition score of the current website.
According to a specific implementation manner of the embodiment of the present invention, the method further includes: the website labeling module is used for labeling the current website based on the operation condition of the website, and comprises the following steps: safe, risky, unsafe, and extremely unsafe.
In a third aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides an electronic device, where the electronic device includes: the device comprises a shell, a processor, a memory, a circuit board and a power circuit, wherein the circuit board is arranged in a space enclosed by the shell, and the processor and the memory are arranged on the circuit board; a power supply circuit for supplying power to each circuit or device of the electronic apparatus; the memory is used for storing executable program codes; the processor executes the program corresponding to the executable program code by reading the executable program code stored in the memory, and is used for executing the method of any one of the foregoing implementation modes.
In a fourth aspect, embodiments of the present invention also provide a computer-readable storage medium storing one or more programs, the one or more programs being executable by one or more processors to implement a method as described in any of the preceding implementations.
The method, the device and the storage medium for evaluating the safe operation condition of the website provided by the embodiment of the invention start from the operation conditions of HTTP, DNS and PING, acquire the first influence scores of the HTTP, DNS and PING of the current website, and finally calculate the operation condition score of the current website. And then, the service management personnel can know the running condition of the current website in time according to the grading and transverse comparison results, and finally guide the management personnel to dynamically adjust the maintenance strategy of the website.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly described below, it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present invention, and for those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained according to the drawings without creative efforts.
FIG. 1 is a flowchart illustrating an embodiment of a method for evaluating a website security operation condition according to the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating a method for evaluating the safe operation of a website according to another embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a schematic structural diagram illustrating an embodiment of an apparatus for evaluating a website safe operation condition according to the present invention;
fig. 4 is a schematic structural diagram of the first influence score calculating module in the apparatus for evaluating website safe operation status according to the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a schematic structural diagram illustrating an apparatus for evaluating website safe operation status according to another embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 6 is a schematic structural diagram of an embodiment of an electronic device according to the present invention.
Detailed Description
Embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
It should be understood that the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the invention, and not all embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
To more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention, the words to which the invention relates will now be explained:
the website safely operates: the website can stably run in a period of time and is not directly influenced by risks such as phishing, horse hanging, tampering, loopholes, dark chains and the like, and the website can be scored according to the response speed and page loading time of HTTP, DNS and PING of website pages.
Website availability: the actual efficiency of the website used for a period of time refers to the reliability and maintainability of a website system, and can be divided into usability grades according to the experience effect of safe operation of the website, wherein the higher the usability grade of the website is, the more stable the website is operated, and otherwise, the more unstable the website is operated.
And (3) quantitative calculation: the method is characterized in that a certain amount of data sets are normalized and calculated to obtain a reliable result value, and in website operation condition scoring, certain normalization calculation is carried out through response time and weight of HTTP, DNS and PING to obtain the scoring of the website operation condition.
In a first aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides a method for evaluating a website safe operation condition, which can effectively evaluate an operation condition of a current website and perform a transverse comparison.
Fig. 1 is a flowchart of a method for evaluating a website security operation condition according to an embodiment of the present invention, including:
s101: and setting a basic score for safe operation of the website. The base score is not unique and can be set as required.
S102: first influence scores of the current websites HTTP, DNS and PING are obtained respectively.
In this embodiment, the obtaining the first influence scores of the current websites HTTP, DNS, and PING respectively includes:
determining second influence scores of the current websites HTTP, DNS and PING based on response times of the current websites HTTP, DNS and PING, respectively;
respectively setting weighted values corresponding to HTTP, DNS and PING;
and respectively determining the first influence scores of the HTTP, DNS and PING of the current websites based on the second influence scores and the corresponding weight values.
Wherein the determining a second impact score for the current website HTTP, DNS and PING based on the response time of the current website HTTP, DNS and PING, respectively, comprises:
if the response time of the HTTP, DNS and PING of the current website is larger than the respective set threshold, the second influence score is equal to the basic score;
and if the response time of the current websites HTTP, DNS and PING is not larger than the respective set threshold value, calculating a second influence score by using a preset formula.
More specifically, the preset formula for calculating the second influence score in the above embodiment is not unique, and may be determined according to needs, for example: y is 100 × T/T; and y is a second influence score, T is response time, and T is a set threshold.
S103: and obtaining the running condition score of the current website based on the basic score and the first influence score.
In this embodiment, the obtaining the running condition score of the current website based on the base score and the first influence score includes: and respectively subtracting the first influence scores of the HTTP, the DNS and the PING from the basic score to obtain the running condition score of the current website.
The operation condition of the current website is evaluated from the perspective of HTTP, DNS and PING, and finally the operation condition score of the current website is obtained based on the basic score and the three first influence scores. The safe operation condition of the supervision website is digitized, so that transverse comparison is convenient to carry out, supervision personnel can know the operation condition of each website conveniently, and the monitoring strategy can be adjusted timely as required.
Fig. 2 is a flowchart of another embodiment of the method for evaluating the safe operation condition of the website according to the present invention, including:
s201: the basis of setting the safe operation of the website is 100 points.
S202: determining a second impact score for the current web site HTTP, DNS and PING based on the response times of the current web site HTTP, DNS and PING, respectively.
In this embodiment, if the response times of the current websites HTTP, DNS, and PING are greater than the respective set thresholds, the second influence score is equal to the base score. The respective set thresholds corresponding to HTTP, DNS, and PING may be the same or different, and are set to 5000ms in this embodiment. If the response time of HTTP, DNS or PING is greater than 5000ms, its corresponding second impact is divided into 100 points.
And if the response time of the current websites HTTP, DNS and PING is not larger than the respective set threshold value, calculating a second influence score by using a preset formula. And if the response time of the HTTP, the DNS or the PING is not more than 5000ms, determining the corresponding second influence according to a preset formula. The preset formula for calculating the second influence score in the above embodiment is not unique, and may be determined as required, for example: y is 100 × T/T; and y is a second influence score, T is response time, and T is a set threshold. For example, if the response time of HTTP is 3000ms, the second impact corresponding to HTTP is divided into 60 points.
In this embodiment, the correspondence between the response time t of HTTP, DNS, or PING and the second influence score may be:
(0-40 min): t < ═ 2000 ms;
(41-60 min) 2000ms < t < (3000 ms);
(61-80 min): 3000ms < t ═ 4000 ms;
(81-100 min) 4000ms < t < (5000 ms);
(100 min): t >5000 ms.
S203: and respectively setting weight values corresponding to the HTTP, the DNS and the PING. The set of the weight values is about 40% of the website operation condition, about 30% of the DNS and about 30% of the PING, which are found by monitoring the total logs of a large number of websites, so that the weight values of the HTTP, the DNS and the PING are set to be 0.4, 0.3 and 0.3 respectively, and the sum of the weight values is 1.
It should be noted that the above general setting principle for weights, how to assign the weight proportion specifically, can be set and adjusted on the basis of a great deal of experiments and observations.
S204: and respectively determining the first influence scores of the HTTP, DNS and PING of the current website by multiplying the second influence scores by the corresponding weight values.
S205: and respectively subtracting the first influence scores of the HTTP, the DNS and the PING from the basic score to obtain the running condition score of the current website.
The second influence scores and the corresponding weight values of the HTTP, the DNS, and the PING may be referred to in the following table, where the following table values are for specifically illustrating the implementation of the embodiment, and are not the only values:
s206: the method for tagging the current website based on the operation condition of the website comprises the following steps: safe, risky, unsafe, and extremely unsafe.
In this embodiment, if the website operation status score is 80-100, the tag is set as safe in operation status, 70-80, 60-70, and less than 60, the tag is set as unsafe. Furthermore, the security status picture of the website is drawn based on the label, so that the website can be clearly seenhttp://www.njiairport.com/The operation condition of the website is safe,http:// cargo.juneyaoair.comthere is a risk with this web site that,http://chunqiu.comthis web site is not secure and,http:// qingyang.comthis website is extremely insecure.
In this embodiment, the operation condition of the current website is associated with the operation conditions of HTTP, DNS, and PING, and the specific operation conditions of HTTP, DNS, and PING depend on their respective response times, and finally, a second influence score is obtained based on the response times corresponding to HTTP, DNS, and PING and a preset formula, and an operation condition score of the current website is obtained based on the second influence score, the weight value, and the base score. The website operation condition is visualized into various numerical values, so that the monitoring personnel can conveniently transversely rank the websites, and can give an alarm and deal with the website in time.
In a second aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides an apparatus for evaluating a website security operation condition, which is capable of effectively evaluating an operation condition of a current website and performing a transverse comparison.
Fig. 3 is a schematic structural diagram of an embodiment of an apparatus for evaluating a website security operation condition according to the present invention, where the apparatus of the embodiment may include:
a basic score setting module 10, configured to set a basic score for safe operation of a website;
the first influence score calculating module 20 is used for respectively obtaining first influence scores of the current websites HTTP, DNS and PING;
and the running condition evaluation module 30 is used for obtaining the running condition score of the current website based on the basic score and the first influence score.
Fig. 4 is a block diagram of the first influence score calculating module 20 in the apparatus for evaluating website safe operation condition of the present invention, which specifically includes:
a second influence score calculation unit 201 for determining second influence scores of the current websites HTTP, DNS, and PING based on response times of the current websites HTTP, DNS, and PING, respectively;
a weight setting unit 202 for setting weight values corresponding to HTTP, DNS, and PING, respectively;
and the first influence score calculating unit 203 is used for respectively determining the first influence scores of the current websites HTTP, DNS and PING based on the second influence scores and the corresponding weight values.
In this embodiment, the second influence score calculating unit 201 specifically includes:
if the response time of the HTTP, DNS and PING of the current website is larger than the respective set threshold, the second influence score is equal to the basic score;
and if the response time of the current websites HTTP, DNS and PING is not larger than the respective set threshold value, calculating a second influence score by using a preset formula.
Specifically, the preset formula is as follows:
y is 100 × T/T; and y is a second influence score, T is response time, and T is a set threshold.
In this embodiment, the operation condition evaluation module 30 is specifically configured to: and respectively subtracting the first influence scores of the HTTP, the DNS and the PING from the basic score to obtain the running condition score of the current website.
Fig. 5 is a schematic structural diagram of an evaluation apparatus for website safe operation status according to another embodiment of the present invention, further including: the website tagging module 40 is configured to tag a current website based on the website operating condition score, and includes: safe, risky, unsafe, and extremely unsafe.
In a third aspect, an embodiment of the present invention further provides an electronic device, which is capable of effectively evaluating the operation condition of a current website and performing a lateral comparison.
Fig. 6 is a schematic structural diagram of an embodiment of an electronic device of the present invention, where the electronic device may include: the electronic device comprises a shell 61, a processor 62, a memory 63, a circuit board 64 and a power circuit 65, wherein the circuit board 64 is arranged inside a space enclosed by the shell 61, and the processor 62 and the memory 63 are arranged on the circuit board 64; a power supply circuit 65 for supplying power to each circuit or device of the electronic apparatus; the memory 63 is used to store executable program code; the processor 62 executes a program corresponding to the executable program code by reading the executable program code stored in the memory 63, for executing the method described in any of the foregoing embodiments.
For the specific execution process of the above steps by the processor 62 and the steps further executed by the processor 62 by running the executable program code, reference may be made to the description of the embodiment shown in fig. 1-2 of the present invention, which is not described herein again.
The electronic device exists in a variety of forms, including but not limited to:
(1) a mobile communication device: such devices are characterized by mobile communications capabilities and are primarily targeted at providing voice, data communications. Such terminals include: smart phones (e.g., iphones), multimedia phones, functional phones, and low-end phones, among others.
(2) Ultra mobile personal computer device: the equipment belongs to the category of personal computers, has calculation and processing functions and generally has the characteristic of mobile internet access. Such terminals include: PDA, MID, and UMPC devices, etc., such as ipads.
(3) A portable entertainment device: such devices can display and play multimedia content. This type of device comprises: audio, video players (e.g., ipods), handheld game consoles, electronic books, and smart toys and portable car navigation devices.
(4) A server: the device for providing the computing service comprises a processor, a hard disk, a memory, a system bus and the like, and the server is similar to a general computer architecture, but has higher requirements on processing capacity, stability, reliability, safety, expandability, manageability and the like because of the need of providing high-reliability service.
(5) And other electronic equipment with data interaction function.
In a fourth aspect, embodiments of the present invention also provide a computer-readable storage medium storing one or more programs, the one or more programs being executable by one or more processors to implement a method as described in any of the preceding implementations.
It is noted that, herein, relational terms such as first and second, and the like may be used solely to distinguish one entity or action from another entity or action without necessarily requiring or implying any actual such relationship or order between such entities or actions. Also, the terms "comprises," "comprising," or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. Without further limitation, an element defined by the phrase "comprising an … …" does not exclude the presence of other identical elements in a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises the element.
All the embodiments in the present specification are described in a related manner, and the same and similar parts among the embodiments may be referred to each other, and each embodiment focuses on the differences from the other embodiments.
In particular, as for the apparatus embodiment, since it is substantially similar to the method embodiment, the description is relatively simple, and for the relevant points, reference may be made to the partial description of the method embodiment.
For convenience of description, the above devices are described separately in terms of functional division into various units/modules. Of course, the functionality of the units/modules may be implemented in one or more software and/or hardware implementations of the invention.
It will be understood by those skilled in the art that all or part of the processes of the methods of the embodiments described above can be implemented by a computer program, which can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, and when executed, can include the processes of the embodiments of the methods described above. The storage medium may be a magnetic disk, an optical disk, a Read-Only Memory (ROM), a Random Access Memory (RAM), or the like.
The above description is only for the specific embodiment of the present invention, but the scope of the present invention is not limited thereto, and any changes or substitutions that can be easily conceived by those skilled in the art within the technical scope of the present invention are included in the scope of the present invention. Therefore, the protection scope of the present invention shall be subject to the protection scope of the claims.
Claims (14)
1. A method for evaluating the safe operation condition of a website is characterized by comprising the following steps:
setting a basic score for safe operation of a website;
respectively obtaining first influence scores of HTTP, DNS and PING of the current website;
and obtaining the running condition score of the current website based on the basic score and the first influence score.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein obtaining the first impact scores for the current web sites HTTP, DNS, and PING, respectively, comprises:
determining second influence scores of the current websites HTTP, DNS and PING based on response times of the current websites HTTP, DNS and PING, respectively;
respectively setting weighted values corresponding to HTTP, DNS and PING;
and respectively determining the first influence scores of the HTTP, DNS and PING of the current websites based on the second influence scores and the corresponding weight values.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein determining the second impact score for the current website HTTP, DNS, and PING based on the response times of the current website HTTP, DNS, and PING, respectively, comprises:
if the response time of the HTTP, DNS and PING of the current website is larger than the respective set threshold, the second influence score is equal to the basic score;
and if the response time of the current websites HTTP, DNS and PING is not larger than the respective set threshold value, calculating a second influence score by using a preset formula.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein the predetermined formula is:
y is 100 × T/T; and y is a second influence score, T is response time, and T is a set threshold.
5. The method of any of claims 1 to 4, wherein obtaining a performance score for a current website based on the base score and the first impact score comprises: and respectively subtracting the first influence scores of the HTTP, the DNS and the PING from the basic score to obtain the running condition score of the current website.
6. The method of any of claims 1 to 4, further comprising: the method for tagging the current website based on the operation condition of the website comprises the following steps: safe, risky, unsafe, and extremely unsafe.
7. An apparatus for evaluating a website safe operation condition, comprising:
the basic score setting module is used for setting basic scores of safe operation of the website;
the first influence score calculation module is used for respectively obtaining first influence scores of the HTTP, the DNS and the PING of the current website;
and the operation condition evaluation module is used for obtaining the operation condition score of the current website based on the basic score and the first influence score.
8. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the first impact score calculation module specifically comprises:
a second influence score calculation unit for determining second influence scores of the current websites HTTP, DNS, and PING based on response times of the current websites HTTP, DNS, and PING, respectively;
a weight setting unit for setting weight values corresponding to HTTP, DNS and PING, respectively;
and the first influence score calculating unit is used for respectively determining the first influence scores of the HTTP, the DNS and the PING of the current website based on the second influence scores and the corresponding weight values.
9. The apparatus according to claim 8, wherein the second influence score calculating unit specifically includes:
if the response time of the HTTP, DNS and PING of the current website is larger than the respective set threshold, the second influence score is equal to the basic score;
and if the response time of the current websites HTTP, DNS and PING is not larger than the respective set threshold value, calculating a second influence score by using a preset formula.
10. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein the predetermined formula is:
y is 100 × T/T; and y is a second influence score, T is response time, and T is a set threshold.
11. The apparatus according to any one of claims 7 to 10, wherein the operation condition evaluation module is specifically configured to: and respectively subtracting the first influence scores of the HTTP, the DNS and the PING from the basic score to obtain the running condition score of the current website.
12. The apparatus of any of claims 7 to 10, further comprising: the website labeling module is used for labeling the current website based on the operation condition of the website, and comprises the following steps: safe, risky, unsafe, and extremely unsafe.
13. An electronic device, characterized in that the electronic device comprises: the device comprises a shell, a processor, a memory, a circuit board and a power circuit, wherein the circuit board is arranged in a space enclosed by the shell, and the processor and the memory are arranged on the circuit board; a power supply circuit for supplying power to each circuit or device of the electronic apparatus; the memory is used for storing executable program codes; the processor executes a program corresponding to the executable program code by reading the executable program code stored in the memory for performing the method of any of the preceding claims.
14. A computer readable storage medium, characterized in that the computer readable storage medium stores one or more programs which are executable by one or more processors to implement the method of any preceding claim.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811579405.XA CN110768945A (en) | 2018-12-24 | 2018-12-24 | Method and device for evaluating website safe operation condition and storage medium |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811579405.XA CN110768945A (en) | 2018-12-24 | 2018-12-24 | Method and device for evaluating website safe operation condition and storage medium |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN110768945A true CN110768945A (en) | 2020-02-07 |
Family
ID=69328561
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811579405.XA Pending CN110768945A (en) | 2018-12-24 | 2018-12-24 | Method and device for evaluating website safe operation condition and storage medium |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN110768945A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112929390A (en) * | 2021-03-12 | 2021-06-08 | 厦门帝恩思科技股份有限公司 | Network intelligent monitoring method based on multi-strategy fusion |
Citations (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20080133500A1 (en) * | 2006-11-30 | 2008-06-05 | Caterpillar Inc. | Website evaluation and recommendation tool |
| CN103116708A (en) * | 2013-03-05 | 2013-05-22 | 星云融创（北京）信息技术有限公司 | Device and method for evaluating website experience |
| CN104618178A (en) * | 2014-12-29 | 2015-05-13 | 北京奇虎科技有限公司 | Website bug online evaluation method and device |
| CN104994133A (en) * | 2015-05-22 | 2015-10-21 | 华中科技大学 | Mobile Web webpage access user experience perception evaluating method based on network KPI |
| CN105049301A (en) * | 2015-08-31 | 2015-11-11 | 北京奇虎科技有限公司 | Method and device for providing comprehensive evaluation services of websites |
| CN107360188A (en) * | 2017-08-23 | 2017-11-17 | 杭州安恒信息技术有限公司 | Website value-at-risk appraisal procedure and device based on cloud protection and cloud monitoring system |
| CN108921456A (en) * | 2018-08-21 | 2018-11-30 | 深圳市人民政府金融发展服务办公室 | Methods of risk assessment, device and computer readable storage medium |
-
2018
- 2018-12-24 CN CN201811579405.XA patent/CN110768945A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20080133500A1 (en) * | 2006-11-30 | 2008-06-05 | Caterpillar Inc. | Website evaluation and recommendation tool |
| CN103116708A (en) * | 2013-03-05 | 2013-05-22 | 星云融创（北京）信息技术有限公司 | Device and method for evaluating website experience |
| CN104618178A (en) * | 2014-12-29 | 2015-05-13 | 北京奇虎科技有限公司 | Website bug online evaluation method and device |
| CN104994133A (en) * | 2015-05-22 | 2015-10-21 | 华中科技大学 | Mobile Web webpage access user experience perception evaluating method based on network KPI |
| CN105049301A (en) * | 2015-08-31 | 2015-11-11 | 北京奇虎科技有限公司 | Method and device for providing comprehensive evaluation services of websites |
| CN107360188A (en) * | 2017-08-23 | 2017-11-17 | 杭州安恒信息技术有限公司 | Website value-at-risk appraisal procedure and device based on cloud protection and cloud monitoring system |
| CN108921456A (en) * | 2018-08-21 | 2018-11-30 | 深圳市人民政府金融发展服务办公室 | Methods of risk assessment, device and computer readable storage medium |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112929390A (en) * | 2021-03-12 | 2021-06-08 | 厦门帝恩思科技股份有限公司 | Network intelligent monitoring method based on multi-strategy fusion |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN110868377B (en) | Method and device for generating network attack graph and electronic equipment | |
| CN108875364B (en) | Threat determination method and device for unknown file, electronic device and storage medium | |
| CN106250182B (en) | File processing method and device and electronic equipment | |
| CN110868383A (en) | Website risk assessment method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN108038398B (en) | Two-dimensional code analysis capability test method and device and electronic equipment | |
| KR20190022440A (en) | Data source based work customization apparatus, method, system and storage medium | |
| CN113973012B (en) | Threat detection method and device, electronic equipment and readable storage medium | |
| CN111030968A (en) | Detection method and device capable of customizing threat detection rule and storage medium | |
| CN108880879B (en) | User identity identification method, device, equipment and computer readable storage medium | |
| CN114095567A (en) | Data access request processing method and device, computer equipment and medium | |
| CN111030974A (en) | APT attack event detection method, device and storage medium | |
| CN110826837A (en) | Method and device for evaluating real-time risk of website assets and storage medium | |
| WO2015014260A1 (en) | Data processing method and server therefor | |
| CN115174250A (en) | Network asset safety assessment method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN108804918A (en) | Safety defence method, device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN110659493A (en) | Method and device for generating threat alarm mode, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN110768945A (en) | Method and device for evaluating website safe operation condition and storage medium | |
| CN111027065A (en) | Lesovirus identification method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN110868385B (en) | Website safety operation capacity determination method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN110719367A (en) | Cloud mobile phone friend recommendation method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| CN113901456A (en) | User behavior security prediction method, device, equipment and medium | |
| CN115454670A (en) | Computer process information enumeration method and device and electronic equipment | |
| CN111030977A (en) | Attack event tracking method and device and storage medium | |
| CN116050520A (en) | Risk processing model training method, risk object processing method and related devices | |
| CN116244659B (en) | Data processing method, device, equipment and medium for identifying abnormal equipment |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20200207 |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |