CN110766342A - Order evaluation system and method for manufacturing industry - Google Patents
Order evaluation system and method for manufacturing industry Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN110766342A CN110766342A CN201911058676.5A CN201911058676A CN110766342A CN 110766342 A CN110766342 A CN 110766342A CN 201911058676 A CN201911058676 A CN 201911058676A CN 110766342 A CN110766342 A CN 110766342A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- review
- evaluation
- module
- order
- detection
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 119
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 66
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 51
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 104
- 238000012384 transportation and delivery Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 39
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 29
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims description 49
- 238000012827 research and development Methods 0.000 claims description 26
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 23
- 238000013441 quality evaluation Methods 0.000 claims description 21
- 238000012946 outsourcing Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000009191 jumping Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000002994 raw material Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000012854 evaluation process Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000004886 process control Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000000275 quality assurance Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012790 confirmation Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002159 abnormal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010485 coping Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001939 inductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0635—Risk analysis of enterprise or organisation activities
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/04—Manufacturing
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
- Y02P90/30—Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- General Factory Administration (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses an order review system facing the manufacturing industry, which comprises a review workflow module, a message reminding module, a to-do closed-loop module, a risk checking module and a business interface module. The review workflow module sets each process node to be reviewed and sets serial, parallel, skip and the like of the review nodes; the message reminding module pushes a WeChat reminder to a relevant review responsible person according to the state of the process node; the backlog closed-loop module initiates backlogs, appoints backlog accountants to require time, and has the functions of backlog delay application, completion feedback, task transfer and the like; the risk checking module reminds the delivery risk event and initiates a relevant decision examination and approval; the service interface module provides interface support for data transmission and service coupling between the system and the service system. Therefore, the invention can conveniently, quickly and effectively finish the product deliverable evaluation before the order is received; the invention also discloses an order review method for the manufacturing industry.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of industrial manufacturing, in particular to an order review system and an order review method for manufacturing industry.
Background
Most production tasks of manufacturing enterprises are order pushing type, after receiving the purchasing intention of a client, a market organizes various departments related to production, and feasibility assessment is carried out on factors such as client requirements, process data, material allocation, capacity achievement, quality inspection guarantee, delivery requirements and the like, so that response receiving orders can be provided according to the feasibility assessment, subsequent production abnormity and limitation can be predicted in advance, problems can be solved in advance, delivery is guaranteed, and market reputation is improved.
Although many enterprises have order evaluation links, the actual effect is not ideal, the evaluation process is complicated and even in a form, the abnormal problem can not be really predicted through order evaluation, the problem can not be effectively solved, and the on-time delivery can be realized.
Therefore, a practical and effective order review software system and method is urgently needed in modern manufacturing industry, and whether equipment, technology and the like of a factory can complete orders of customers on time with quality guarantee can be confirmed in the review stage.
Disclosure of Invention
The technical problem to be solved by the invention is as follows: an order review system for the manufacturing industry is provided.
In order to solve the technical problems, the technical scheme adopted by the invention is as follows:
an order review system facing the manufacturing industry comprises a review workflow module, a message reminding module, a to-be-handled closed-loop module, a risk checking module and a business interface module which are in communication connection with one another.
The evaluation workflow module sets a required evaluation node according to the order delivery precondition and the responsibility division of the evaluation post, and performs serial evaluation, parallel evaluation or skipping over setting of the evaluation node according to the actual requirement;
the message reminding module pushes prompt information to a designated responsible person according to the state of the approval node;
the to-be-handled closed-loop module initiates a to-be-handled item from any approval node for order evaluation, specifies key assessment information such as a person to be handled and required completion time, and has the functions of delayed application to be handled, completion feedback, task handover and the like;
the risk checking module reminds risk events influencing order delivery, such as order price, raw material supply and the like, and automatically initiates related decision examination and approval;
the business interface module is used for providing interface support for data transmission and business coupling between the order review system facing the manufacturing industry and the business system, such as data transmission and business coupling between the system and ERP, MES, PDM and other systems.
On the basis of the technical scheme, the invention can be further improved as follows:
furthermore, the review workflow module sets each process node for review according to the key premise of order delivery and post responsibility division of the review activity, and sets serial, parallel, skip and the like of node review according to actual requirements.
Further, the evaluation workflow module sets a flow path according to the business data, specifically, whether the order product is a batch product is judged first, and if the order product is a batch product, the links of quality evaluation, detection evaluation, research and development evaluation are skipped directly.
Further, the review workflow module implements parallel and serial setting of the process nodes, which means that:
if the market evaluation result is not passed, skipping all other evaluation nodes, and directly obtaining the whole evaluation conclusion as not passed;
after the market evaluation passes, performing quality evaluation, detection evaluation and research and development evaluation, wherein the quality evaluation, the detection evaluation and the research and development evaluation are synchronously performed in parallel;
firstly, simultaneously carrying out quality evaluation, detection evaluation and research and development evaluation, and then simultaneously carrying out manufacturing evaluation and material evaluation after all the quality evaluation, the detection evaluation and the research and development evaluation pass;
the quality evaluation means that quality assurance such as whether the requirement of the inspection standard is clear or not, whether the quality process control measures meet the quality requirements of customers or not and the like is confirmed;
the detection evaluation means that the detection guarantee such as whether the detection mold measuring tool is complete, whether the detection standard requirement is clear, the detection period, whether the detection is sent to a third party for detection, whether special detection is needed and the like is confirmed;
the research and development review refers to the confirmation of processing implementation modes such as whether technical requirements are clear, whether a new process is researched, a research and development period, whether product coding attributes and process route data are available, whether a tool and a die are complete, whether outsourcing is needed, whether technical risks exist and the like.
The manufacturing review is used for judging whether the productivity condition is met, whether the production guarantee capacity (tools, auxiliary materials, cutters and the like) is available, whether the delivery can be guaranteed on schedule or not and predicting the production cycle;
the material evaluation is used for confirming the purchasing and inventory conditions of the required raw material inventory condition, whether the specification is met, the outsourcing suggestion, the outsourcing delivery period, whether the supply condition has risks and the like.
Furthermore, a risk checking function of key data related to order delivery is set in the order review flow module according to actual conditions, and a risk threshold is set; in the evaluation process, when the key value is lower than the risk threshold value, a risk checking module of the system automatically gives a prompt and triggers a related risk decision sub-process;
further, the message reminding module configures an information reminding strategy on any node in the review process, wherein the information reminding strategy refers to that defined reminding information is pushed to a configured responsible person when the approval process reaches the approval node, and the information includes but is not limited to item names, responsible persons, completion forms, completion dates, reminding the responsible person, and business data obtained from the review workflow module or the business system.
Further, the plan review, except for manually reviewing whether the response measures given by each node are reasonable and whether the delivery date can be achieved, also reviews the price of the order according to preset cost unit price, batch and quantity, and judges whether potential loss exists by comparing the price of the order, the quantity of the order and the cost unit price and the economic production quantity; and if the potential loss exists, automatically calling the evaluation workflow module to initiate a price evaluation sub-process flow.
Furthermore, any node of the order review can call a to-be-done closed-loop module to initiate a to-be-done task; specific requirements of tasks, delivery forms, responsible persons, cut-off time, appraisers and the like are determined; the to-be-handled closed-loop module calls the message reminding module to initiate task processing reminding to the responsible person, the appraiser and the task transfer person, and meanwhile, the processing personnel can also initiate sub-processes of delay application, completion of feedback, task transfer and the like of the to-be-handled task to the call order review workflow module in the to-be-handled closed-loop module; meanwhile, the to-be-done closed-loop module can also perform data integration with the service system through the service interface module, and synchronizes the to-be-done tasks to an assessment task list of the performance assessment system; and after the completion progress of the tasks to be handled is updated, the closed-loop module to be handled feeds back the completion result to the order review workflow module for subsequent business.
The invention has the following beneficial effects:
1. by judging whether the product is an approved product or not, the related technical approval links are directly skipped for the product with mature manufacturing technology, the approval process is simplified, and the approval time is shortened;
2. and the unconstrained review projects are simultaneously and parallelly promoted, so that the working efficiency is improved.
3. The key nodes are cycled, and the estimated delivery date is more accurate.
4. Each approval link is provided with a responsible person, and reminding information is pushed to the responsible person, so that artificial delay is avoided.
5. And in the price evaluation step, the cost unit price, the economic quantity and the order price quantity are compared, so that the potential loss risk can be conveniently found.
The invention also provides an order review method for the manufacturing industry, which comprises the following steps:
s1, market review, if not, jumping to step S5;
s2, simultaneously performing quality evaluation, detection evaluation and research and development evaluation, and jumping to the step S5 if any evaluation is not successful;
s3, simultaneously carrying out manufacturing evaluation and material evaluation, and jumping to the step S5 if any evaluation is not carried out;
s4, plan review;
and S5, obtaining a review conclusion and ending.
Further, the market review step of step S1 is to determine whether the product is a batch product, and if so, skip step S2.
Further, after the plan review in step S4, a price review step is further included for comparing the unit price of the received order, the unit quantity of the received order, the unit price of the cost, and the unit quantity of the economic production to determine whether the potential loss exists.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of the architecture of the manufacturing industry oriented order review system of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a flow chart of the manufacturing industry oriented order review method of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The principles and features of this invention are described below in conjunction with the following drawings, which are set forth by way of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
Referring to fig. 1, a block diagram of an order review system for manufacturing industry according to the present invention is shown.
An order review system facing the manufacturing industry comprises a review workflow module 1, a message reminding module 2, a to-be-handled closed-loop module 3, a risk checking module 4 and a business interface module 5 which are in communication connection with each other.
The evaluation workflow module 1 sets required evaluation nodes according to the order delivery precondition and the evaluation post responsibility division, and performs serial evaluation, parallel evaluation or skipping over the setting of non-evaluation of the evaluation nodes according to the actual requirement;
the message reminding module 2 pushes prompt information to a designated responsible person according to the state of the approval node;
the to-be-handled closed-loop module 3 initiates the to-be-handled items from any approval node of order review, specifies key assessment information such as to-be-handled persons, required completion time and the like, and has the functions of delayed application to be handled, completion feedback, task handover and the like;
the risk checking module 4 reminds the risk events affecting order delivery, such as order price, raw material supply and the like, and automatically initiates related decision examination and approval;
the business interface module 5 is used for providing interface support for data transmission and business coupling between the order review system facing the manufacturing industry and the business system, such as data transmission and business coupling between the system and ERP, MES, PDM and other systems.
The result of the evaluation is pass or fail.
Further, the review workflow module 1 sets each process node for review according to the key premise of order delivery and post responsibility division of review activity, and sets serial, parallel, skip and the like of node review according to actual requirements, specifically including:
if the market evaluation result is not passed, skipping all other evaluation nodes, and directly obtaining the whole evaluation conclusion as not passed;
after the market evaluation passes, performing quality evaluation, detection evaluation and research and development evaluation, wherein the quality evaluation, the detection evaluation and the research and development evaluation are synchronously performed in parallel;
after the quality evaluation, the detection evaluation and the research and development evaluation are all passed, the manufacturing evaluation and the material evaluation are carried out, and the manufacturing evaluation and the material evaluation are synchronously carried out in parallel;
the quality evaluation means that quality assurance such as whether the requirement of the inspection standard is clear or not, whether the quality process control measures meet the quality requirements of customers or not and the like is confirmed;
the detection evaluation means that the detection guarantee such as whether the detection mold measuring tool is complete, whether the detection standard requirement is clear, the detection period, whether the detection is sent to a third party for detection, whether special detection is needed and the like is confirmed;
the research and development review refers to the confirmation of processing implementation modes such as whether technical requirements are clear, whether a new process is researched, a research and development period, whether product coding attributes and process route data are available, whether a tool and a die are complete, whether outsourcing is needed, whether technical risks exist and the like.
The manufacturing review is used for judging whether the productivity condition is met, whether the production guarantee capacity (tools, auxiliary materials, cutters and the like) is available, whether the delivery can be guaranteed on schedule or not and predicting the production cycle;
the material evaluation is used for confirming the purchasing and inventory conditions of the required raw material inventory condition, whether the specification is met, the outsourcing suggestion, the outsourcing delivery period, whether the supply condition has risks and the like.
The evaluation workflow module 1 sets a flow path according to the business data, specifically, whether the order product is a batch product is judged first, and if the order product is the batch product, the quality evaluation, detection evaluation and research and development evaluation links are directly skipped.
Further, the message reminding module 2 configures an information reminding strategy on any node in the review process, where the information reminding strategy refers to pushing defined reminding information to a configured responsible person when the approval process reaches the approval node, and the information includes, but is not limited to, item name, responsible person, completion form, completion date, reminding of the responsible person, and business data obtained from the review workflow module 1 or the business system.
Furthermore, a critical data risk checking function related to order delivery is set in the order review flow module according to the actual situation; in the evaluation process, when the key value is lower than the risk value, the risk checking module 4 of the system automatically gives a prompt and triggers a related risk decision sub-process;
further, the plan review, except for manually reviewing whether the response measures given by each node are reasonable and whether the delivery date can be achieved, also reviews the price of the order according to preset cost unit price, batch and quantity, and judges whether potential loss exists by comparing the price of the order, the quantity of the order and the cost unit price and the economic production quantity; if the potential loss exists, the evaluation workflow module 1 is automatically called to initiate a price evaluation sub-process flow.
Furthermore, any node of the order review can call the to-be-handled closed-loop module 3 to initiate a to-be-handled task; specific requirements of tasks, delivery forms, responsible persons, cut-off time, appraisers and the like are determined; the to-be-handled closed-loop module 3 calls the message reminding module 2 to initiate task processing reminding to the responsible person, the appraiser and the task transfer person, and meanwhile, the processing personnel can also initiate sub-processes of delay application, feedback completion, task transfer and the like of the to-be-handled task to the call order review workflow module 1 in the to-be-handled closed-loop module 3; meanwhile, the to-be-done closed-loop module 3 can also perform data integration with the service system through the service interface module 5, and synchronizes the to-be-done tasks to the assessment task list of the performance assessment system; after the completion progress of the task to be handled is updated, the closed-loop module to be handled 3 feeds back the completion result to the order review workflow module 1 for subsequent business.
More specifically, the establishment of the order review software system for the manufacturing industry of the present invention requires some basic work:
1) and (4) combing the evaluation responsibilities of the orders of each department, decomposing the precondition of order receiving, inducing the evaluation check items in the range of each position responsibilities, and structuring the evaluation check item data.
2) Defining a concept of the batch products, defining products with mature production process and quality standards in a system and marking the products as the batch products, and when reaching an evaluation task under the market part, if judging the products as the batch products, directly skipping unnecessary evaluation departments such as a research and development part, a quality part, a detection center and the like through an approval process.
3) And combing constraint association among the review examination items. For the order review activities of each department, some review items can be judged by taking other review results as references (for example, the selection of the substitute materials can be limited by the stock condition of the materials and the BOM substitute material list), and the corresponding relation is embodied in the review process. Other review items that do not have a constraint relationship can be adjusted in the system to be processed in parallel.
4) The key nodes are cycled, and their process cycles are defined in order review for the primary business activities that decide or directly affect delivery. And (3) giving out the cycle values such as material purchasing cycle, production processing cycle, product inspection cycle and the like in the links such as material purchasing, production processing, quality inspection and the like so as to reverse the scheduled online date according to the delivery requirement or reply the predicted delivery date of the client according to the scheduled online date.
5) Any link of order review can provide backlog aiming at the delivery problem, and defines the responsible person or responsible department, the completion form and the completion date. And for postponing, changing and finishing feedback of the proposed backlog, the responsibility department is responsible for examining and approving the backlog and bringing the backlog into the work examination of the responsibility department.
6) And structuring evaluation data, electronizing order evaluation to form the order evaluation software system facing the manufacturing industry, realizing online examination and approval through an information system, and after the evaluation of the previous department is finished, recording the time of an approver and the time of the approval by the system and calling a WeChat interface to send an examination and approval prompt to the mobile phone of the next department responsible for the examination and approval.
7) And introducing the cost unit price and the economic production quantity of the product, calculating and maintaining basic data according to the cost model, automatically comparing the order receiving unit price, the order receiving quantity, the cost unit price and the economic production quantity in an order evaluation link system, and automatically initiating order price examination and approval if potential loss exists.
The invention also provides an order review method for the manufacturing industry, which comprises the following steps:
s1, market review, if not, jumping to step S5;
and confirming whether the basic requirements of the product, including key attributes of the product, delivery date, transportation and delivery modes, special customization requirements of the client and other client input information, are complete, judging whether the product is a batch product, if the product is a batch product, passing quality evaluation, detection evaluation, research and development evaluation default evaluation, and jumping to step S3, otherwise, executing step S2.
S2, simultaneously performing quality evaluation, detection evaluation and research and development evaluation, and jumping to the step S5 if any evaluation is not successful;
the quality evaluation, the detection evaluation and the research and development evaluation have no constraint relation, so that the quality evaluation, the detection evaluation and the research and development evaluation are synchronously and parallelly promoted, and the examination and approval time is saved;
the quality evaluation means that quality assurance such as whether the requirement of the inspection standard is clear or not, whether the quality process control measures meet the quality requirements of customers or not and the like is confirmed;
the detection evaluation means that the detection guarantee such as whether the detection mold measuring tool is complete, whether the detection standard requirement is clear, the detection period, whether the detection is sent to a third party for detection, whether special detection is needed and the like is confirmed;
the research and development review means that whether the technical requirements are clear, whether a new process is researched or not, the research and development period, whether the product coding attribute and the process route data are available, whether the tool and the die are complete or not, whether outsourcing is needed or not, whether technical risks exist or not and the like are confirmed;
s3, simultaneously carrying out manufacturing evaluation and material evaluation, and jumping to the step S5 if any evaluation is not carried out;
the manufacturing evaluation and the material evaluation are not mutually restricted, so that the manufacturing evaluation and the material evaluation are synchronously carried out in parallel, and the examination and approval time is saved;
the manufacturing evaluation is used for judging whether the productivity condition is met, whether the production guarantee capacity (tools, auxiliary materials, cutters and the like) is available, whether the delivery can be guaranteed on schedule or not and predicting the production cycle;
the material evaluation is used for confirming the purchasing and inventory conditions of the required raw material inventory condition, whether the specification is met, the outsourcing suggestion, the outsourcing delivery period, whether the supply condition has risks and the like;
s4, plan review; the method is used for checking whether the coping measures of each department are reasonable, whether delivery risks exist or not and whether delivery dates can be achieved or not.
And SS and price evaluation steps for comparing the unit price of the order receiving, the number of the order receiving with the unit price of the cost and the number of the economic production and judging whether potential loss exists.
And S5, obtaining a review conclusion and ending.
The steps comprise an information reminding step, wherein the information reminding step is used for pushing to-be-finished item information to relevant responsible persons, the information comprises item names, responsible persons, finishing forms and finishing dates, and the responsible persons are prompted to process the information on time.
The above description is only for the purpose of illustrating the preferred embodiments of the present invention and is not to be construed as limiting the invention, and any modifications, equivalents, improvements and the like that fall within the spirit and principle of the present invention are intended to be included therein.
Claims (10)
1. An order review system facing the manufacturing industry is characterized by comprising a review workflow module, a message reminding module, a to-be-handled closed-loop module, a risk checking module and a service interface module which are in communication connection with each other;
the evaluation workflow module sets each process node for evaluation according to the precondition of order delivery and the responsibility division of the evaluation post, and sets serial, parallel, skip and the like of node evaluation according to the actual requirement;
the message reminding module pushes prompt information to a designated responsible person according to the state of the process node;
the to-be-handled closed-loop module initiates to-be-handled items from any node of order review, specifies key assessment information such as to-be-handled persons, required completion time and the like, and has the functions of to-be-handled delay application, completion feedback, task handover and the like;
the risk checking module can remind risk events influencing order delivery, such as order price, raw material supply and the like, and automatically initiate related decision examination and approval;
the service interface module provides interface support for data transmission and service coupling between the system and the service system.
2. The order review system for the manufacturing industry as claimed in claim 1, wherein the review workflow module sets each process node for review according to the key premise of order delivery and post responsibility division of review activity, and performs serial, parallel, skip and other settings of node review according to actual requirements.
3. The manufacturing industry-oriented order review system of claim 1 or 2, wherein the review workflow module sets a flow path according to business data, and in particular,
the method comprises the steps of confirming basic information, customization requirements, whether the products belong to batch products and other client input information, judging whether the products belong to batch products, and skipping quality evaluation, detection evaluation and research and development evaluation if the products belong to batch products.
4. The order review system for the manufacturing industry as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein the review workflow module implements parallel and serial arrangement of process nodes, which means that
Setting the process to simultaneously perform quality evaluation, detection evaluation and research and development evaluation according to the business requirements, and then simultaneously performing the evaluation of manufacturing evaluation and material evaluation;
the quality evaluation means that quality assurance such as whether the requirement of the inspection standard is clear or not, whether the quality process control measures meet the quality requirements of customers or not and the like is confirmed;
the detection evaluation means that the detection guarantee such as whether the detection mold measuring tool is complete, whether the detection standard requirement is clear, the detection period, whether the detection is sent to a third party for detection, whether special detection is needed and the like is confirmed;
the research and development review refers to the confirmation of processing implementation modes such as whether technical requirements are clear, whether a new process is researched, a research and development period, whether product coding attributes and process route data are available, whether a tool and a die are complete, whether outsourcing is needed, whether technical risks exist and the like.
The manufacturing evaluation is used for judging whether the productivity condition is met, whether the production guarantee capacity (tools, auxiliary materials, cutters and the like) is available, whether the delivery can be guaranteed on schedule or not and predicting the production cycle;
the material evaluation is used for confirming the purchasing and inventory conditions of the required raw material inventory condition, whether the specification is met, the outsourcing suggestion, the outsourcing delivery period, whether the supply condition has risks and the like.
5. The order review system for the manufacturing industry as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein the review workflow module further sets a risk check function of key data related to order delivery according to actual conditions, and sets a risk threshold; in the evaluation process, when the key value is lower than the risk threshold value, a risk checking module of the system gives a prompt and triggers a related risk decision sub-process;
in a plan review link, in addition to manually reviewing whether the response measures given by each node are reasonable and whether the delivery date can be achieved, examination is carried out on the price of the order according to preset cost unit price, batch and quantity, and whether potential loss exists is judged by comparing the price of the order, the quantity of the order, the cost unit price and the economic production quantity; if the potential loss exists, the system automatically calls the review workflow module to initiate a price review sub-process flow.
6. The order review system for the manufacturing industry as claimed in claim 1, wherein the message reminding module configures an information reminding policy on any node of the review workflow, the information reminding policy is to push defined reminding information to a configured responsible person when the approval process reaches the node, the information includes but is not limited to basic node information such as item name, responsible person, completion form, completion date, and reminding responsible person, and further includes service data obtained from the review workflow module or the service system.
7. The order review system for the manufacturing industry as claimed in claim 1, wherein any node of the order review can call a to-do closed-loop module to initiate a to-do task; specific requirements of tasks, delivery forms, responsible persons, cut-off time, appraisers and the like are determined; the to-be-handled closed-loop module calls the message reminding module to initiate task processing reminding to the responsible person, the appraiser and the task transfer person, and meanwhile, the processing personnel can call the order review workflow module in the to-be-handled closed-loop module to initiate sub-processes of delay application, completion of feedback, task transfer and the like of the to-be-handled task; meanwhile, the to-be-done closed-loop module can also perform data integration with the service system through the service interface module, and synchronizes the to-be-done tasks to an assessment task list of the performance assessment system; and after the completion progress of the tasks to be handled is updated, the closed-loop module to be handled feeds back the completion result to the order review workflow module for subsequent business.
8. An order review method facing the manufacturing industry is characterized by comprising the following steps:
s1, market review, if not, jumping to step S5;
s2, simultaneously performing quality evaluation, detection evaluation and research and development evaluation, and jumping to the step S5 if any evaluation is not successful;
s3, simultaneously carrying out manufacturing evaluation and material evaluation, and jumping to the step S5 if any evaluation is not carried out;
s4, plan review;
and S5, obtaining a review conclusion and ending.
9. The manufacturing industry-oriented order review method of claim 8, wherein in the step S1 market review step, it is first determined whether the product is a batch product, and if so, the step S2 is skipped and the step S3 is directly performed.
10. The manufacturing industry-oriented order review method of claim 8, further comprising a price review step of comparing the order receiving unit price, the order receiving quantity with the cost unit price and the economic production quantity to determine whether the potential loss exists after the plan review of step S4.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911058676.5A CN110766342B (en) | 2019-11-01 | 2019-11-01 | Order evaluation system and method for manufacturing industry |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911058676.5A CN110766342B (en) | 2019-11-01 | 2019-11-01 | Order evaluation system and method for manufacturing industry |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN110766342A true CN110766342A (en) | 2020-02-07 |
| CN110766342B CN110766342B (en) | 2023-04-07 |
Family
ID=69335564
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911058676.5A Active CN110766342B (en) | 2019-11-01 | 2019-11-01 | Order evaluation system and method for manufacturing industry |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN110766342B (en) |
Cited By (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN111860995A (en) * | 2020-07-15 | 2020-10-30 | 江苏泰治科技股份有限公司 | MES processing method for chip packaging bonding process flow |
| CN113721549A (en) * | 2021-08-30 | 2021-11-30 | 上汽通用五菱汽车股份有限公司 | Method and system suitable for tool cost management |
| CN113780968A (en) * | 2021-01-04 | 2021-12-10 | 北京沃东天骏信息技术有限公司 | Task execution method and device |
| CN114066380A (en) * | 2020-08-06 | 2022-02-18 | 浙江杰克智能缝制科技有限公司 | Production management method, system, computer-readable storage medium, and management apparatus |
| CN117495315A (en) * | 2024-01-02 | 2024-02-02 | 东亚银行(中国)有限公司 | Business management method and device based on pipeline flow |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2009009943A1 (en) * | 2007-07-16 | 2009-01-22 | Fanghua Lei | Trading method and system based on network platform |
| CN108304997A (en) * | 2018-01-15 | 2018-07-20 | 暖流信息科技（上海）有限公司 | Order intelligence review system |
| CN109767320A (en) * | 2018-12-17 | 2019-05-17 | 深圳壹账通智能科技有限公司 | Order checking method, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
-
2019
- 2019-11-01 CN CN201911058676.5A patent/CN110766342B/en active Active
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2009009943A1 (en) * | 2007-07-16 | 2009-01-22 | Fanghua Lei | Trading method and system based on network platform |
| CN101743561A (en) * | 2007-07-16 | 2010-06-16 | 雷访华 | Trading method and system based on network platform |
| CN108304997A (en) * | 2018-01-15 | 2018-07-20 | 暖流信息科技（上海）有限公司 | Order intelligence review system |
| CN109767320A (en) * | 2018-12-17 | 2019-05-17 | 深圳壹账通智能科技有限公司 | Order checking method, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| 董鹏;陆洪培;李鹏举;魏华锋;: "基于现代中小型制造企业的订单评审体系研究" * |
| 赵晓英;刘中;: "面向中小制造企业ERP系统开发" * |
Cited By (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN111860995A (en) * | 2020-07-15 | 2020-10-30 | 江苏泰治科技股份有限公司 | MES processing method for chip packaging bonding process flow |
| CN111860995B (en) * | 2020-07-15 | 2024-02-02 | 江苏泰治科技股份有限公司 | MES processing method of chip packaging bonding process flow |
| CN114066380A (en) * | 2020-08-06 | 2022-02-18 | 浙江杰克智能缝制科技有限公司 | Production management method, system, computer-readable storage medium, and management apparatus |
| CN113780968A (en) * | 2021-01-04 | 2021-12-10 | 北京沃东天骏信息技术有限公司 | Task execution method and device |
| CN113721549A (en) * | 2021-08-30 | 2021-11-30 | 上汽通用五菱汽车股份有限公司 | Method and system suitable for tool cost management |
| CN113721549B (en) * | 2021-08-30 | 2023-09-15 | 上汽通用五菱汽车股份有限公司 | Method and system suitable for cutter cost management |
| CN117495315A (en) * | 2024-01-02 | 2024-02-02 | 东亚银行(中国)有限公司 | Business management method and device based on pipeline flow |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN110766342B (en) | 2023-04-07 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN110766342B (en) | Order evaluation system and method for manufacturing industry | |
| CN113344338B (en) | Production scheduling method, system, equipment, medium and production scheduling management platform | |
| Madanhire et al. | Enterprise resource planning (ERP) in improving operational efficiency: Case study | |
| CN110599103A (en) | Production management subsystem based on intelligent manufacturing MES system | |
| CN110580026A (en) | intelligent manufacturing MES system | |
| CN107016449B (en) | Intelligent manufacturing method based on cross-enterprise dynamic planning and scheduling | |
| Kłos et al. | The impact of ERP on maintenance management | |
| Khojasteh | Production Control Systems | |
| CN116976599A (en) | Intelligent scheduling method and related equipment | |
| CN113519009A (en) | Industrial manufacturing resource sharing method, device and system based on block chain | |
| CN111222943A (en) | Order scheduling management system and method | |
| Guillaume et al. | Management of the risk of backorders in a MTO–ATO/MTS context under imperfect requirements | |
| Wänström et al. | The impact of engineering changes on materials planning | |
| Nogueira et al. | Problem on the integration between production and delivery with parallel batching machines of generic job sizes and processing times | |
| Kapulin et al. | Analysis and improvement of production planning within small-batch make-to-order production | |
| CN117519023A (en) | Long-period plan feasibility assessment method, system, equipment and medium | |
| US8170703B2 (en) | Method for controlling a plurality of production processes | |
| das Neves et al. | Deployment the MES (Manufacturing Execution System) aiming to improve competitive priorities of manufacturing | |
| CN115660261B (en) | Production order information processing method, computer device and storage medium | |
| CN111898914A (en) | Enterprise manufacturing and operating system and storage medium | |
| Leung et al. | A real-time hybrid information-sharing and decision support system for the mould industry | |
| CN115032956A (en) | New industry MES system control method based on industrial internet identification analysis | |
| Harhalakis | Engineering changes for made-to-order products: How an MRP II system should handle them | |
| Ani et al. | Factory-in-factory concept as a new business model for automotive production system | |
| Mrugalska et al. | Preventive Approach to Machinery and Equipment Maintenance in Manufacturing Companies |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |