CN110738423A - Comprehensive efficiency evaluation method for rolling and splicing equipment - Google Patents

Comprehensive efficiency evaluation method for rolling and splicing equipment Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN110738423A
CN110738423A CN201910989243.5A CN201910989243A CN110738423A CN 110738423 A CN110738423 A CN 110738423A CN 201910989243 A CN201910989243 A CN 201910989243A CN 110738423 A CN110738423 A CN 110738423A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
equipment
index
rolling
level
maintenance
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN201910989243.5A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN110738423B (en
Inventor
郭妙贞
李钰靓
张利宏
熊月宏
章强
王维松
郑健
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
China Tobacco Zhejiang Industrial Co Ltd
Original Assignee
China Tobacco Zhejiang Industrial Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by China Tobacco Zhejiang Industrial Co Ltd filed Critical China Tobacco Zhejiang Industrial Co Ltd
Priority to CN201910989243.5A priority Critical patent/CN110738423B/en
Publication of CN110738423A publication Critical patent/CN110738423A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN110738423B publication Critical patent/CN110738423B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
    • G06Q10/06393Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/20Administration of product repair or maintenance
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/30Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing

Abstract

The invention discloses an comprehensive efficiency evaluation method for a rolling-joint device, which comprises the steps of collecting relevant data of the health state of the rolling-joint device, calculating a device health state index according to the relevant data of the health state of the rolling-joint device, collecting relevant data of the maintenance state of the rolling-joint device, calculating a maintenance state index according to the relevant data of the maintenance state, collecting relevant data of the cost control capacity of the rolling-joint device, calculating a cost control capacity index according to the relevant data of the cost control capacity, collecting relevant data of the device guarantee level of the rolling-joint device, calculating a device guarantee level index according to the relevant data of the device guarantee level, calculating a comprehensive efficiency evaluation index of the rolling-joint device according to the four indexes, comparing the comprehensive efficiency evaluation index with a comprehensive efficiency grading standard of the rolling-joint device, and analyzing the health operation state.

Description

Comprehensive efficiency evaluation method for rolling and splicing equipment
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of equipment efficiency evaluation, in particular to a comprehensive efficiency evaluation method for rolling and splicing equipment.
Background
The conventional method for evaluating the efficiency of the rolling and connecting equipment is mainly based on experience management, namely, according to a specification of corresponding equipment and frequency load in a using process, whether the equipment needs to be maintained or not is judged mainly by time and states, deviation often occurs in the judgment of experience, and when deviation occurs in some equipment and the equipment cannot be maintained in time, the equipment fails or is damaged, so that the production efficiency is seriously influenced, so that the requirements on the aspects of equipment maintenance and the like cannot be completely supported by the judgment of the experience, the performance of the equipment cannot be reflected by data, the root cause of the problem cannot be found, a detailed maintenance scheme cannot be specified, and the problem generated by the equipment cannot be radically treated.
the evaluation is carried out by taking the equipment performance indexes mainly comprising the equipment availability ratio of the rolling equipment, the machine hour yield of the rolling equipment, the input and output rate of the rolling equipment, the capacity contribution ratio of the rolling equipment and the cigarette yield as reference evaluation, the evaluation range mainly focuses on the local index evaluation of the current operation condition of the equipment, and the evaluation on the aspects of equipment maintenance condition, product quality, cost management, continuous improvement and the like is weak, relatively incomplete and objective, and the obtained conclusion has insufficient guiding significance for continuous improvement of the equipment.
The patent application with the application publication number CN 107967521A discloses a comprehensive performance evaluation method for devices, which comprises the following steps of A, constructing a mathematical model, namely, respectively counting the running state of the device, the product quality and the consumption parameters of materials, classifying and sorting the parameters according to the results of multiple times of big data statistics, carrying out name system treatment on the devices with different models showing the same faults, establishing corresponding fault codes and fault libraries, B, importing the mathematical model into a data acquisition system, compiling programs according to the constructed mathematical model and basic data to be acquired according to the formula of the mathematical model, importing the programs into the data acquisition system, wherein the device running efficiency score, the quality score, the cost score and the like are formulated through the acquired data, C, acquiring the corresponding index data according to a set module in the mathematical model, substituting the acquired index into the mathematical model in a function form, ensuring that the acquired basic data are in butt joint with the model, D, obtaining the scoring results according to the data by the data acquisition system, simultaneously substituting the acquired index into the mathematical model in a function form, improving the accuracy of the comprehensive performance of the device, and improving the accuracy of the comprehensive performance of the device.
Therefore, the conventional evaluation method for the efficiency of the rolling and splicing equipment has the problems of being systematic, incomplete, not authoritative and the like, and relatively complete evaluation methods are needed to realize the rapid comprehensive evaluation for the efficiency of the rolling and splicing equipment, so that an enterprise is guided to find the problem in advance, the comprehensive efficiency of the rolling and splicing equipment is continuously improved, and the management level of the rolling and splicing equipment is further improved.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide evaluation methods for comprehensive efficiency of rolling equipment, which can be used for establishing equipment comprehensive efficiency evaluation methods in the aspects of equipment health state, maintenance condition, cost control capability, equipment guarantee level and the like in a rolling equipment management system, and transversely comparing four groups of evaluation results including current evaluation results, historical average values, last evaluation results, target values and the like, so as to provide data support for continuous improvement of equipment, process control and trend analysis and improvement of equipment management level.
The technical scheme of the invention is as follows:
evaluation method for comprehensive efficiency of rolling and connecting equipment, comprising the following steps:
collecting the relevant data of the health state of the equipment of the rolling connection equipment, and calculating the health state index of the equipment according to the relevant data of the health state of the equipment;
collecting the data related to the maintenance condition of the rolling equipment, and calculating the index of the maintenance condition according to the data related to the maintenance condition;
collecting cost control capacity related data of the rolling connection equipment, and calculating a cost control capacity index according to the cost control capacity related data;
collecting relevant data of the equipment guarantee level of the rolling equipment, and calculating an equipment guarantee level index according to the relevant data of the equipment guarantee level;
and calculating a comprehensive efficiency evaluation index of the rolling and connecting equipment according to the health state index, the maintenance condition index, the cost control capability index and the equipment guarantee level index of the equipment, and analyzing the health operation condition of the rolling and connecting equipment by comparing the comprehensive efficiency evaluation index of the rolling and connecting equipment with a comprehensive efficiency scoring standard.
Compared with the prior art, the method comprehensively considers the equipment health state index, the maintenance condition index, the cost control capability index and the cost control capability index, and accordingly evaluates the health operation condition of the rolling and connecting equipment, so that the evaluation efficiency of the health condition of the rolling and connecting equipment is greatly improved, the workload of comprehensive efficiency evaluation of the equipment is reduced, and the equipment health condition monitoring level is improved.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly described below, it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only embodiments of the present invention, and other drawings can be obtained by those skilled in the art without creative efforts.
FIG. 1 is a schematic flow chart of the comprehensive efficiency evaluation method of the rolling and connecting equipment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a comprehensive efficiency evaluation index system of the rolling and splicing equipment of the comprehensive efficiency evaluation method of the rolling and splicing equipment of the invention;
FIG. 3 is a distribution diagram of an index system data acquisition method of the comprehensive efficiency evaluation method of the rolling equipment of the present invention;
fig. 4 is a schematic diagram of a device state scoring standard result of the method for evaluating the comprehensive efficiency of the rolling and connecting device.
Detailed Description
For purposes of promoting a better understanding of the objects, aspects and advantages of the present invention, reference is made to the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and examples, it being understood that the specific embodiments described herein are illustrative only and are not limiting upon the scope of the invention.
As shown in fig. 1, the method for evaluating the comprehensive efficiency of the rolling and splicing equipment provided by the invention comprises the following steps:
step 1: and establishing a comprehensive efficiency evaluation model of the rolling and connecting equipment.
The comprehensive efficiency evaluation model of the rolling and connecting equipment is a calculation and organization system of sets of index sets for comprehensive efficiency evaluation of the rolling and connecting equipment, comprises mathematical models of the index sets in the aspects of comprehensive equipment health state, maintenance condition, cost control capability, equipment guarantee level and the like, calculates the value of each index by acquiring and calculating the input of data required by the index by a data acquisition method of the index system, and outputs the comprehensive efficiency evaluation index of the rolling and connecting equipment by preset weight.
The comprehensive efficiency evaluation index of the rolling and connecting equipment is vectors containing four components and marked as:
A[H,M,C,G]
wherein A represents the comprehensive evaluation index of the rolling and splicing equipment; h represents the equipment health state; m represents a maintenance condition; c represents cost control capability; and G represents the equipment guarantee level.
Each dimension is scored as an integer ranging from 0 to 100. The score of each dimension is calculated by multiplying the scores of the subordinate secondary indexes by the weight, and the scores of the secondary indexes are multiplied by the scores of the tertiary indexes by the weight.
Step 2: and constructing a comprehensive efficiency evaluation index system of the rolling and connecting equipment.
Through an analytic hierarchy process and an expert evaluation method, a three-layer index set with -level indexes in the aspects of the health state, the maintenance condition, the cost control capability, the equipment guarantee level and the like of the comprehensive equipment is combed, and a secondary index and a corresponding three-layer index system are respectively established under each -level index in the comprehensive efficiency evaluation index system of the roll-to-roll equipment according to a picture, as shown in figure 2.
The health state of the equipment mainly reflects the normal health degree of the equipment and consists of two-level indexes, namely an equipment efficiency index, an equipment operation index, a product quality index and the like. The equipment efficiency index mainly reflects the input-output condition and the productivity utilization level of the equipment and consists of three-level indexes, namely the input-output rate of the rolling and connecting equipment, the capacity contribution rate of the rolling and connecting equipment, the time utilization rate of the rolling and connecting equipment and the like. The equipment operation index mainly reflects the equipment efficiency and the technical state in the use process of the equipment and comprises three-level indexes of the rolling equipment operation efficiency, the machine hour yield of the rolling equipment type, the rolling equipment availability, the equipment function precision management, the equipment time starting rate and the like. The product quality index mainly reflects the product quality guarantee level produced by equipment and comprises three-level indexes of cigarette yield, cigarette weight standard deviation qualification rate, cigarette circumference inspection qualification rate, cigarette suction resistance inspection qualification rate, cigarette loose end inspection qualification rate, cigarette length inspection qualification rate, cigarette single gram weight deviation average value, cigarette weight standard deviation average value and the like.
Specifically, the equipment health status indicators are:
Figure BDA0002237703640000051
wherein H is the index of the health state of the equipment,
Figure BDA0002237703640000061
the weight of the ith secondary indicator of the health status of the device,
Figure BDA0002237703640000062
ith secondary indicator representing equipment health statusThe score value of (a) is calculated,
Figure BDA0002237703640000064
is the ith secondary index of the health state of the equipment
Figure BDA0002237703640000065
The score of the next jth three-level index,
Figure BDA0002237703640000066
secondary indicators representing equipment health status
Figure BDA0002237703640000067
The weight of the next jth third-level index, m represents the second-level index of the health state of the equipment
Figure BDA0002237703640000068
The number of the next three-level indexes;
Figure BDA0002237703640000069
three secondary indexes of the health state of the equipment are respectively an equipment efficiency index, an equipment operation index and a product quality index;
in-device performance index
Figure BDA00022377036400000610
In the following, m is 3,
Figure BDA00022377036400000611
is an index of equipment performance
Figure BDA00022377036400000612
The next three-level indexes are respectively the input and output capacity of the rolling and splicing equipment, the capacity contribution rate of the rolling and splicing equipment and the time utilization rate of the rolling and splicing equipment;
on-device operation index
Figure BDA00022377036400000613
In the following, m is 5,
Figure BDA00022377036400000614
for equipment operation type index
Figure BDA00022377036400000615
The following five three-level indexes are respectively the operation efficiency of the rolling and splicing equipment, the machine hour yield of the machine type of the rolling and splicing equipment, the completeness rate of the rolling and splicing equipment, the function precision management of the equipment and the time starting rate of the equipment;
in the product quality index
Figure BDA00022377036400000616
In the following, m is 8,
Figure BDA00022377036400000617
is an index of product quality
Figure BDA00022377036400000618
The eight next three-level indexes are respectively the cigarette yield, the cigarette weight standard deviation qualification rate, the cigarette circumference inspection qualification rate, the cigarette suction resistance inspection qualification rate, the cigarette loose end inspection qualification rate, the cigarette length inspection qualification rate, the cigarette single gram weight deviation average value and the cigarette weight standard deviation average value.
The equipment maintenance state mainly reflects the management level of the maintenance of the rolling equipment, the execution state of the related management standard and the technical standard, and consists of secondary indexes such as an equipment maintenance index and an equipment maintenance index, wherein the equipment maintenance index mainly reflects the event or phenomenon that when the rolling equipment loses or reduces the specified function of the rolling equipment, the rolling equipment cannot normally operate, the technical performance is reduced, and the rolling equipment interrupts production or reduces the efficiency to influence the production, and when appropriate measures are taken to restore the level of the original production capacity of the equipment, the equipment maintenance index mainly consists of three-level indexes such as an equipment mean fault interval, a fault mean maintenance time, a mean non-fault working time, an equipment fault outage rate, a maintenance plan completion rate, an overhaul quality -time qualification rate, a repair rate and the like.
The indexes of the maintenance condition are as follows:
wherein M is a maintenance condition index,
Figure BDA0002237703640000072
the weight of the i-th secondary index for the maintenance condition,i-th secondary index representing maintenance conditionThe score value of (a) is calculated,i second level index for maintenance condition
Figure BDA0002237703640000076
The score of the next jth three-level index,
Figure BDA0002237703640000077
second level indicator for indicating maintenance condition
Figure BDA0002237703640000078
Weight of the next jth third level index, m representing the second level index of the maintenance conditionThe number of the next three-level indexes;
Figure BDA00022377036400000710
the two secondary indexes of the maintenance condition are respectively an equipment maintenance index and an equipment maintenance index;
in-plant maintenance indexIn the following, m is 7,
Figure BDA00022377036400000712
for equipment maintenance indexSeven next three-level indexes are respectively the average fault interval of the equipment, the average maintenance time of the fault, the average non-fault working time, the fault outage rate of the equipment, the completion rate of a maintenance plan, the pass rate of times of maintenance quality and the repair rate;
on-device maintenance index
Figure BDA00022377036400000714
In the following, m is 2,
Figure BDA00022377036400000715
for equipment maintenance type indicators
Figure BDA00022377036400000716
The next two three-level indexes are the equipment daily maintenance plan completion rate and the equipment regular maintenance plan completion rate respectively.
The equipment cost control capability mainly reflects the cost and expense condition of the rolling and connecting equipment in the using process of the equipment in the aspects of daily use, maintenance management, daily maintenance and planned maintenance, auxiliary material consumption, spare part management and the like, and the rolling and connecting equipment consists of secondary indexes such as auxiliary material consumption indexes, maintenance cost indexes, spare part cost indexes and the like. The auxiliary material consumption index mainly reflects the auxiliary material consumption control level of equipment in the production process and comprises three-level indexes of a bobbin paper consumption rate, a filter stick consumption rate, a label paper (small box) consumption rate, a carton paper consumption rate and the like. The maintenance cost index mainly reflects the cost consumption condition in the process of equipment maintenance, daily maintenance and planned maintenance, and consists of three-level indexes of maintenance expense rate, unit yield rolling equipment maintenance expense, equipment asset maintenance expense rate, rolling equipment outsourcing maintenance expense rate and the like. The spare part cost index mainly reflects the spare part management level of the rolling equipment and consists of three levels of indexes, namely spare part fund occupancy rate, spare part fund turnover rate and the like.
The cost control capability index is as follows:
Figure BDA0002237703640000081
wherein H is the cost control capability,
Figure BDA0002237703640000082
the weight of the ith secondary indicator of cost control capability,
Figure BDA0002237703640000083
ith secondary indicator representing cost control capabilityThe score value of (a) is calculated,is the ith secondary indicator of cost control capability
Figure BDA0002237703640000086
The score of the next jth three-level index,
Figure BDA0002237703640000087
secondary index representing cost control capability
Figure BDA0002237703640000088
Of the next j' th three-level indexWeight, m represents a secondary indicator of cost control capabilityThe number of the next three-level indexes;
Figure BDA00022377036400000810
three secondary indexes of the cost control capability are respectively an auxiliary material consumption index, a maintenance cost index and a spare part cost index;
in the index of auxiliary material consumption
Figure BDA00022377036400000811
In the following, m is 4,is an index of auxiliary material consumption
Figure BDA00022377036400000813
The lower four three-level indexes are respectively the bobbin paper loss rate, the filter stick loss rate, the trademark paper (small box) loss rate and the carton paper loss rate;
in maintaining cost index
Figure BDA00022377036400000814
In the following, m is 4,
Figure BDA00022377036400000815
to maintain cost index
Figure BDA00022377036400000816
The lower four three-level indexes are respectively maintenance charge rate, unit yield rolling equipment maintenance charge, equipment asset maintenance charge rate and rolling equipment outsourcing maintenance charge rate;
in-spare part cost index
Figure BDA0002237703640000091
In the following, m is 2,is an index of spare part costThe next two third-level indexes are respectively the spare part fund occupancy rate and the spare part fund turnover rate.
The equipment guarantee level mainly reflects the support capability of the equipment in the aspect of continuous improvement and consists of secondary indexes such as equipment technical improvement indexes and education training indexes. The equipment technical improvement index mainly reflects a plan for improving the rolling equipment technology and a plan completion condition, and consists of three-level indexes such as a technical improvement plan completion rate and a small improvement leather activity completion rate. The education training type indexes mainly reflect the execution conditions of the education training plan of the rolling and receiving equipment, the satisfaction degree of staff and the like, and are composed of three-level indexes including training plan completion rate, training coverage rate, staff training satisfaction degree, maintenance training time intensity and the like.
The equipment guarantee level indexes are as follows:
Figure BDA0002237703640000094
wherein G is the equipment guarantee level,
Figure BDA0002237703640000095
the weight of the ith secondary indicator for the equipment safeguard level,
Figure BDA0002237703640000096
ith secondary index representing equipment guarantee level
Figure BDA0002237703640000097
The score value of (a) is calculated,ith secondary index of equipment guarantee level
Figure BDA0002237703640000099
The score of the next jth three-level index,
Figure BDA00022377036400000910
secondary index representing equipment guarantee level
Figure BDA00022377036400000911
The weight of the next jth third-level index, m represents the second-level index of the equipment guarantee levelThe number of the next three-level indexes;
Figure BDA00022377036400000913
two secondary indexes of the equipment guarantee level are respectively an equipment technical improvement index and an education training index;
technical improvement index of equipment
Figure BDA00022377036400000914
In the following, m is 2,
Figure BDA00022377036400000915
is an index of equipment performance
Figure BDA00022377036400000916
The next two three-level indexes are respectively the completion rate of the technical improvement plan and the completion rate of the small improvement leather activity;
in education and training index
Figure BDA00022377036400000917
In the following, m is 4,
Figure BDA00022377036400000918
for equipment operation type indexThe four next three-level indexes are respectively the training plan completion rate, the training coverage rate, the staff training satisfaction degree and the maintenance training time intensity.
As shown in table 1, the scores of each index in the comprehensive efficiency evaluation index system of the rolling equipment in the corresponding statistical period can be calculated by applying a corresponding calculation formula.
Table 1 comprehensive efficiency evaluation index calculation formula of rolling equipment
Figure BDA0002237703640000101
Figure BDA0002237703640000111
Figure BDA0002237703640000121
Figure BDA0002237703640000131
Figure BDA0002237703640000141
And step 3: and establishing an index system data acquisition method.
As shown in fig. 3, the establishment of the index system data collection method is the determination of the collection method of various data required for evaluating the index set of the operation state of the rolling equipment. The index system data acquisition method relates to a data acquisition range which comprises equipment related operation data under the normal use condition of used rolling and connecting equipment. The index system data acquisition method mainly comprises the step of realizing data acquisition of the calculation index system through a data interface of the equipment management information system and an equipment information database. The automatic acquisition of the equipment data is realized by reading a roll-connection equipment PLC, an equipment industrial personal computer (interface), a system log and the like. The reading and statistical analysis of the equipment management database information are performed through data reading or statistical analysis in the database of the equipment management information system.
The data related to the health state of the equipment, the data related to the maintenance condition, the cost control capacity and the data related to the guarantee level of the equipment are obtained from data reading or statistical analysis in a database of an equipment management information system; or reading the roll-to-roll equipment PLC, the equipment industrial personal computer (interface) and the system log.
And aiming at the data acquisition period, the data acquisition frequency of the acquisition index system takes 4 hours as a statistical time period unit. In the actual operation process, the automatic acquisition of the equipment data operates in a mode of real-time data acquisition frequency of the equipment, and then the statistical result is calculated according to the unit of the statistical time period; the data of the reading and statistical analysis of the equipment management database information is updated according to the actual time of the updating of the equipment management data, and statistics is carried out according to the unit of the statistical time period.
Step four: and designing a comprehensive efficiency scoring standard.
The equipment comprehensive performance evaluation standard comprises an equipment comprehensive performance evaluation standard system and an equipment comprehensive performance evaluation result, wherein the equipment comprehensive performance evaluation standard comprises -level indexes of four dimensions, namely the -level indexes of the equipment comprehensive evaluation index, namely the equipment comprehensive performance evaluation index, of the index system of the rolled equipment comprehensive evaluation model, and the four dimensions respectively correspond to the four components of the equipment comprehensive evaluation index, namely the equipment health state, the maintenance state, the cost control performance, the equipment guarantee level and the like of the index system of the rolled equipment comprehensive evaluation model, as shown in FIG. 4, the equipment comprehensive performance evaluation result comprises four groups of dynamic evaluation results of the current evaluation result, the historical average value, the last evaluation result and the target value, wherein:
(1) the scoring result (red) represents the current (current) equipment comprehensive performance status;
(2) historical mean (green), representing the mean of the scores of the device composite performance assessments over the past 12 months;
(3) recent scoring results (blue), representing the maximum value of each dimensional component of the scores of the recent 10-time device comprehensive performance evaluation results;
(4) the target value (orange), represents the target score that needs to be achieved for the enterprise-defined device performance evaluation.
Step five: and calculating the comprehensive efficiency evaluation result of the equipment.
The comprehensive efficiency evaluation result of the calculation equipment is that the values of all indexes in the index system of the comprehensive evaluation model of the rolling equipment are respectively calculated according to the calculation requirements and the statistical intervals through a standard data acquisition method of the index system, and then the comprehensive efficiency evaluation index of the rolling equipment is comprehensively calculated through the comprehensive efficiency evaluation mathematical model of the rolling equipment.
Step six: and analyzing the comprehensive efficiency evaluation result of the equipment.
And analyzing the health operation condition of the equipment by contrasting the comprehensive efficiency evaluation index of the rolling connection equipment with the comprehensive efficiency scoring standard, and taking corresponding improvement measures for equipment management according to the analysis result. The method specifically comprises the following steps:
(a) if the scores of all components of the comprehensive efficiency evaluation index of the rolling and connecting equipment are larger than the target value, the historical average value and the last scoring result, the current equipment management level reaches the target of the preset equipment management level, the comprehensive efficiency of the rolling and connecting equipment is in a very good state, an enterprise should continue to keep the current rolling and connecting equipment management measures, and meanwhile, the current target value is adjusted or kept according to the actual management condition of the rolling and connecting equipment;
(b) when the scores of all components of the comprehensive efficiency evaluation index of the rolling equipment are greater than the historical average value and the last scoring result, and the recent scoring results of the rolling equipment are greater than the historical average value, the comprehensive efficiency control level of the enterprise rolling equipment is in a continuous stable good state;
(c) when the scores of all components of the comprehensive efficiency evaluation index of the rolling equipment are all larger than the historical average value but are all or partially lower than the last scoring result, the comprehensive efficiency of the rolling equipment in the statistical period is in a continuous good but unstable state, and the efficiency management of the rolling equipment is kept;
(d) when the score parts of all components of the rolling equipment are larger than the historical average value or the last scoring result, the comprehensive efficiency of the rolling equipment in the statistical period is in an unstable step-back state. Deeply analyzing the components with the corresponding scores lower than the historical average value by the enterprise, and taking corresponding improvement measures according to the analysis result;
(e) when the scores of all components of the rolling equipment are smaller than the historical average value but part of the scores are larger than the last scoring result, the fact that the equipment management level in the statistical period is in a seriously unstable local good state is shown, and an enterprise needs to take improvement measures immediately;
(f) when the recent scoring result of the rolling-connection equipment is smaller than the historical average value and the last scoring result, the level of the long-term management and control of the enterprise equipment is in a seriously unstable step-out state, the enterprise needs to pay serious attention, and improvement measures are immediately taken.
With the deep application of the equipment management system of the rolling equipment, the capacity of automatically collecting corresponding data of the equipment comprehensive efficiency evaluation index set is provided. And calculating and analyzing the collected equipment management data through an equipment comprehensive efficiency evaluation model to obtain a rolling-connection equipment comprehensive efficiency evaluation index. The comprehensive efficiency evaluation index of the rolling-connection equipment reflects the current comprehensive efficiency management condition of the equipment, and the enterprise can objectively evaluate the accurate comprehensive efficiency condition of the equipment by combining the historical evaluation value, the recent evaluation result and the horizontal comparison of the target value, so that a basis is provided for the operation, maintenance and repair of the equipment, and the direction is pointed for improving the product quality and reducing the cost consumption. The invention greatly improves the evaluation efficiency of the health condition of the equipment, reduces the workload of the comprehensive efficiency evaluation of the equipment and improves the monitoring level of the health condition of the equipment.
The above-mentioned embodiments are intended to illustrate the technical solutions and advantages of the present invention, and it should be understood that the above-mentioned embodiments are only the most preferred embodiments of the present invention, and are not intended to limit the present invention, and any modifications, additions, equivalents, etc. made within the scope of the principles of the present invention should be included in the scope of the present invention.

Claims (8)

1, kinds of rolling equipment comprehensive effectiveness evaluation method, including the following steps:
collecting the relevant data of the health state of the equipment of the rolling connection equipment, and calculating the health state index of the equipment according to the relevant data of the health state of the equipment;
collecting the data related to the maintenance condition of the rolling equipment, and calculating the index of the maintenance condition according to the data related to the maintenance condition;
collecting cost control capacity related data of the rolling connection equipment, and calculating a cost control capacity index according to the cost control capacity related data;
collecting relevant data of the equipment guarantee level of the rolling equipment, and calculating an equipment guarantee level index according to the relevant data of the equipment guarantee level;
and calculating a comprehensive efficiency evaluation index of the rolling and connecting equipment according to the health state index, the maintenance condition index, the cost control capability index and the equipment guarantee level index of the equipment, and analyzing the health operation condition of the rolling and connecting equipment by comparing the comprehensive efficiency evaluation index of the rolling and connecting equipment with a comprehensive efficiency scoring standard.
2. The method for evaluating the comprehensive performance of the rolling and splicing equipment according to claim 1, wherein the equipment health status indexes are as follows:
Figure FDA0002237703630000011
wherein H is the index of the health state of the equipment,the weight of the ith secondary indicator of the health status of the device,
Figure FDA0002237703630000013
ith secondary indicator representing equipment health statusThe score value of (a) is calculated,
Figure FDA0002237703630000015
is the ith secondary index of the health state of the equipment
Figure FDA0002237703630000016
The score of the next jth three-level index,secondary indicators representing equipment health status
Figure FDA0002237703630000018
The weight of the next jth third-level index, m represents the second-level index of the health state of the equipment
Figure FDA0002237703630000019
The number of the next three-level indexes;
Figure FDA00022377036300000110
three secondary indexes of the health state of the equipment are respectively an equipment efficiency index, an equipment operation index and a product quality index;
in-device performance index
Figure FDA0002237703630000021
In the following, m is 3,is an index of equipment performance
Figure FDA0002237703630000023
The next three-level indexes are respectively the input and output capacity of the rolling and splicing equipment, the capacity contribution rate of the rolling and splicing equipment and the time utilization rate of the rolling and splicing equipment;
on-device operation index
Figure FDA0002237703630000024
In the following, m is 5,
Figure FDA0002237703630000025
for equipment operation type index
Figure FDA0002237703630000026
The following five three-level indexes are respectively the operation efficiency of the rolling and splicing equipment, the machine hour yield of the machine type of the rolling and splicing equipment, the completeness rate of the rolling and splicing equipment, the function precision management of the equipment and the time starting rate of the equipment;
in the product quality indexIn the following, m is 8,is an index of product quality
Figure FDA0002237703630000029
The eight next three-level indexes are respectively the cigarette yield, the cigarette weight standard deviation qualification rate, the cigarette circumference inspection qualification rate, the cigarette suction resistance inspection qualification rate, the cigarette loose end inspection qualification rate, the cigarette length inspection qualification rate, the cigarette single gram weight deviation average value and the cigarette weight standard deviation average value.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the index of the maintenance condition is:
Figure FDA00022377036300000210
wherein M is a maintenance condition index,
Figure FDA00022377036300000211
the weight of the i-th secondary index for the maintenance condition,i-th secondary index representing maintenance condition
Figure FDA00022377036300000213
The score value of (a) is calculated,i second level index for maintenance condition
Figure FDA00022377036300000215
The score of the next jth three-level index,
Figure FDA00022377036300000216
second level indicator for indicating maintenance condition
Figure FDA00022377036300000217
Weight of the next jth third level index, m representing the second level index of the maintenance condition
Figure FDA00022377036300000218
The number of the next three-level indexes;
Figure FDA00022377036300000219
the two secondary indexes of the maintenance condition are respectively an equipment maintenance index and an equipment maintenance index;
in-plant maintenance index
Figure FDA0002237703630000031
In the following, m is 7,
Figure FDA0002237703630000032
for equipment maintenance indexSeven next three-level indexes are respectively the mean fault interval of the equipment, the mean maintenance time of the fault, the mean non-fault working time, the failure outage rate of the equipment, the completion rate of the maintenance plan and the overhaulQuality times of qualification rate and repair rate;
on-device maintenance index
Figure FDA0002237703630000034
In the following, m is 2,
Figure FDA0002237703630000035
for equipment maintenance type indicatorsThe next two three-level indexes are the equipment daily maintenance plan completion rate and the equipment regular maintenance plan completion rate respectively.
4. The method for evaluating the comprehensive performance of the rolling and splicing equipment according to claim 1, wherein the cost control capability index is as follows:
Figure FDA0002237703630000037
wherein H is the cost control capability,
Figure FDA0002237703630000038
the weight of the ith secondary indicator of cost control capability,
Figure FDA0002237703630000039
ith secondary indicator representing cost control capabilityThe score value of (a) is calculated,
Figure FDA00022377036300000311
is the ith secondary indicator of cost control capability
Figure FDA00022377036300000312
The score of the next jth three-level index,secondary index representing cost control capability
Figure FDA00022377036300000314
The weight of the next jth three-level index, m represents the second-level index of the cost control capability
Figure FDA00022377036300000315
The number of the next three-level indexes;
Figure FDA00022377036300000316
three secondary indexes of the cost control capability are respectively an auxiliary material consumption index, a maintenance cost index and a spare part cost index;
in the index of auxiliary material consumption
Figure FDA00022377036300000317
In the following, m is 4,is an index of auxiliary material consumption
Figure FDA00022377036300000319
The lower four three-level indexes are respectively the bobbin paper loss rate, the filter stick loss rate, the trademark paper (small box) loss rate and the carton paper loss rate;
in maintaining cost index
Figure FDA00022377036300000320
In the following, m is 4,
Figure FDA00022377036300000321
to maintain cost index
Figure FDA00022377036300000322
The lower four three-level indexes are respectively maintenance charge rate, unit yield rolling equipment maintenance charge, equipment asset maintenance charge rate and rolling equipment outsourcing maintenance charge rate;
in-spare part cost indexIn the following, m is 2,
Figure FDA0002237703630000042
is an index of spare part cost
Figure FDA0002237703630000043
The next two third-level indexes are respectively the spare part fund occupancy rate and the spare part fund turnover rate.
5. The method for evaluating the comprehensive efficiency of the rolling and splicing equipment according to claim 1, wherein the equipment guarantee level indexes are as follows:
Figure FDA0002237703630000044
wherein G is the equipment guarantee level,
Figure FDA0002237703630000045
the weight of the ith secondary indicator for the equipment safeguard level,ith secondary index representing equipment guarantee level
Figure FDA0002237703630000047
The score value of (a) is calculated,
Figure FDA0002237703630000048
ith secondary index of equipment guarantee level
Figure FDA0002237703630000049
The score of the next jth three-level index,
Figure FDA00022377036300000410
secondary index representing equipment guarantee level
Figure FDA00022377036300000411
The weight of the next jth third-level index, m represents the second-level index of the equipment guarantee level
Figure FDA00022377036300000412
The number of the next three-level indexes;
Figure FDA00022377036300000413
two secondary indexes of the equipment guarantee level are respectively an equipment technical improvement index and an education training index;
technical improvement index of equipment
Figure FDA00022377036300000414
In the following, m is 2,is an index of equipment performance
Figure FDA00022377036300000416
The next two three-level indexes are respectively the completion rate of the technical improvement plan and the completion rate of the small improvement leather activity;
in education and training indexIn the following, m is 4,for equipment operation type index
Figure FDA00022377036300000419
The four next three-level indexes are respectively the training plan completion rate, the training coverage rate, the staff training satisfaction degree and the maintenance training time intensity.
6. The integrated performance evaluation method of roll-to-roll apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the health status related data, maintenance status related data, cost control capability related data, and equipment support level related data are obtained from data reading or statistical analysis in a database of an equipment management information system; or reading the roll-to-roll equipment PLC, the equipment industrial personal computer (interface) and the system log.
7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the comprehensive performance evaluation criteria comprises a system of comprehensive performance evaluation criteria and a result of comprehensive performance evaluation, wherein:
the equipment comprehensive performance evaluation standard system is a scoring standard comprising four dimensions of equipment health state, maintenance condition, cost control capability and equipment guarantee level;
the device comprehensive efficiency evaluation result comprises four groups of dynamic scoring results including a current scoring result, a historical average value, a last scoring result and a target value.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein analyzing the health operating condition of the cigarette making machine by comparing the evaluation index of the comprehensive efficiency of the cigarette making machine with the evaluation standard of the comprehensive efficiency comprises:
(a) if the scores of all components of the comprehensive efficiency evaluation index of the rolling and connecting equipment are larger than the target value, the historical average value and the last scoring result, the current equipment management level reaches the target of the preset equipment management level, the comprehensive efficiency of the rolling and connecting equipment is in a very good state, an enterprise should continue to keep the current rolling and connecting equipment management measures, and meanwhile, the current target value is adjusted or kept according to the actual management condition of the rolling and connecting equipment;
(b) when the scores of all components of the comprehensive efficiency evaluation index of the rolling equipment are greater than the historical average value and the last scoring result, and the recent scoring results of the rolling equipment are greater than the historical average value, the comprehensive efficiency control level of the enterprise rolling equipment is in a continuous stable good state;
(c) when the scores of all components of the comprehensive efficiency evaluation index of the rolling equipment are all larger than the historical average value but are all or partially lower than the last scoring result, the comprehensive efficiency of the rolling equipment in the statistical period is in a continuous good but unstable state, and the efficiency management of the rolling equipment is kept;
(d) when the score parts of all components of the rolling equipment are larger than the historical average value or the last scoring result, the comprehensive efficiency of the rolling equipment in the statistical period is in an unstable step-back state. Deeply analyzing the components with the corresponding scores lower than the historical average value by the enterprise, and taking corresponding improvement measures according to the analysis result;
(e) when the scores of all components of the rolling equipment are smaller than the historical average value but part of the scores are larger than the last scoring result, the fact that the equipment management level in the statistical period is in a seriously unstable local good state is shown, and an enterprise needs to take improvement measures immediately;
(f) when the recent scoring result of the rolling-connection equipment is smaller than the historical average value and the last scoring result, the level of the long-term management and control of the enterprise equipment is in a seriously unstable step-out state, the enterprise needs to pay serious attention, and improvement measures are immediately taken.
CN201910989243.5A 2019-10-17 2019-10-17 Comprehensive efficiency evaluation method for rolling and connecting equipment Active CN110738423B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910989243.5A CN110738423B (en) 2019-10-17 2019-10-17 Comprehensive efficiency evaluation method for rolling and connecting equipment

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910989243.5A CN110738423B (en) 2019-10-17 2019-10-17 Comprehensive efficiency evaluation method for rolling and connecting equipment

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN110738423A true CN110738423A (en) 2020-01-31
CN110738423B CN110738423B (en) 2022-10-14

Family

ID=69270081

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201910989243.5A Active CN110738423B (en) 2019-10-17 2019-10-17 Comprehensive efficiency evaluation method for rolling and connecting equipment

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN110738423B (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN116117811A (en) * 2023-02-07 2023-05-16 北京机科国创轻量化科学研究院有限公司 Digital twinning-based industrial robot comprehensive performance analysis method and system

Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104063753A (en) * 2013-03-22 2014-09-24 上海电科智能系统股份有限公司 Comprehensive evaluation method for intelligent traffic operation and maintenance performance
CN105184496A (en) * 2015-09-15 2015-12-23 中国矿业大学 Integrated evaluation method of health index of mine ventilation system
CN105512448A (en) * 2014-09-22 2016-04-20 国家电网公司 Power distribution network health index assessment method
CN105867341A (en) * 2016-05-31 2016-08-17 山东中烟工业有限责任公司 Online equipment health state self-detection method and system for tobacco processing equipment
CN107967521A (en) * 2017-10-31 2018-04-27 河南中烟工业有限责任公司 A kind of equipment complex method of evaluating performance
CN108038626A (en) * 2017-12-27 2018-05-15 山东中烟工业有限责任公司 A kind of cigarette machine Life cycle monitoring system and monitoring method
CN108257041A (en) * 2016-12-29 2018-07-06 中核核电运行管理有限公司 A kind of nuclear power plant system health assessment system
CN110119874A (en) * 2019-03-28 2019-08-13 南京理工大学 The method and dynamic monitor that a kind of pair of railway passenger station transportation service ability is evaluated
CN110209996A (en) * 2019-05-27 2019-09-06 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 It is a kind of for evaluating the method and system of the general level of the health of protective relaying device

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104063753A (en) * 2013-03-22 2014-09-24 上海电科智能系统股份有限公司 Comprehensive evaluation method for intelligent traffic operation and maintenance performance
CN105512448A (en) * 2014-09-22 2016-04-20 国家电网公司 Power distribution network health index assessment method
CN105184496A (en) * 2015-09-15 2015-12-23 中国矿业大学 Integrated evaluation method of health index of mine ventilation system
CN105867341A (en) * 2016-05-31 2016-08-17 山东中烟工业有限责任公司 Online equipment health state self-detection method and system for tobacco processing equipment
CN108257041A (en) * 2016-12-29 2018-07-06 中核核电运行管理有限公司 A kind of nuclear power plant system health assessment system
CN107967521A (en) * 2017-10-31 2018-04-27 河南中烟工业有限责任公司 A kind of equipment complex method of evaluating performance
CN108038626A (en) * 2017-12-27 2018-05-15 山东中烟工业有限责任公司 A kind of cigarette machine Life cycle monitoring system and monitoring method
CN110119874A (en) * 2019-03-28 2019-08-13 南京理工大学 The method and dynamic monitor that a kind of pair of railway passenger station transportation service ability is evaluated
CN110209996A (en) * 2019-05-27 2019-09-06 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 It is a kind of for evaluating the method and system of the general level of the health of protective relaying device

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
朱子玉等: "卷烟工业企业设备健康状态评价体系研究", 《中国设备工程》 *
苗强等: "全员标准化生产维护体系(TSPM)在卷烟生产企业中的应用", 《中国设备工程》 *
靳毅等: "以产品质量为基准的设备综合性能评价研究", 《江苏科技信息》 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN116117811A (en) * 2023-02-07 2023-05-16 北京机科国创轻量化科学研究院有限公司 Digital twinning-based industrial robot comprehensive performance analysis method and system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN110738423B (en) 2022-10-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN104638764A (en) Intelligent state diagnosis and overhauling system for power distribution network equipment
CN106530139A (en) Method for calculating the index parameter of grid investment analysis model
CN110378586B (en) Power transformation equipment defect early warning method and system based on dynamic closed-loop knowledge management
CN116821107A (en) Main data intelligent management method and system for intelligent power plant
CN110738423B (en) Comprehensive efficiency evaluation method for rolling and connecting equipment
CN112329955B (en) Calculation method for determining equipment maintenance grade
CN113673842A (en) Production efficiency diagnosis method, device, equipment and storage medium based on big data
CN109396956B (en) Intelligent monitoring method for hob state of numerical control gear hobbing machine
Ståhl et al. Dynamic manufacturing costs—Describing the dynamic behavior of downtimes from a cost perspective
CN115564307A (en) Comprehensive system management method for enterprise high-quality production development index
CN112001551B (en) Ground and commercial power grid sales electricity quantity prediction method based on large-user electricity quantity information
CN115965081A (en) Electric energy meter fault influence factor positioning method and system
CN108363738A (en) A kind of recommendation method of industrial equipment data analysis algorithm
CN114167342A (en) Evaluation method for running health state of relay protection device
CN110717725A (en) Power grid project selection method based on big data analysis
CN110738427A (en) electric power part work quality scoring system
Yong et al. Big-data-based KPI Performance Appraisal System of State Grid Provincial Metering Center
CN114818990B (en) Method and system for grading quality of maintenance effect of aero-engine
CN117524374B (en) Environmental impact evaluation system and device for product ecological process
CN116882835A (en) Method and device for determining working efficiency of power exchange station, storage medium and electronic equipment
Rina Economic Development Efficiency Evaluation Scheme of Regional Industrial Linkage Project Based on DEA-Malquist
CN117474405A (en) Operation and maintenance equipment evidence comparison and evaluation method and system
CN116338562A (en) Intelligent ammeter operation error monitoring method
CN117524374A (en) Environmental impact evaluation system and device for product ecological process
Wang et al. Benefit evaluation and improvement methods for power grid infrastructure projects

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant