CN110737985A - Running data verification method and device, computer equipment and readable storage medium - Google Patents
Running data verification method and device, computer equipment and readable storage medium Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN110737985A CN110737985A CN201910978756.6A CN201910978756A CN110737985A CN 110737985 A CN110737985 A CN 110737985A CN 201910978756 A CN201910978756 A CN 201910978756A CN 110737985 A CN110737985 A CN 110737985A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- data
- program
- running
- software implementation
- software
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 53
- 238000013524 data verification Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 21
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 claims description 49
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 claims description 15
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 14
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 14
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000739 chaotic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013502 data validation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004973 liquid crystal related substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/80—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of semi-structured data, e.g. markup language structured data such as SGML, XML or HTML
- G06F16/81—Indexing, e.g. XML tags; Data structures therefor; Storage structures
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/80—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of semi-structured data, e.g. markup language structured data such as SGML, XML or HTML
- G06F16/84—Mapping; Conversion
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T11/00—2D [Two Dimensional] image generation
- G06T11/003—Reconstruction from projections, e.g. tomography
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/10—Image acquisition modality
- G06T2207/10072—Tomographic images
- G06T2207/10081—Computed x-ray tomography [CT]
Abstract
The application relates to running data verification methods, devices, computer equipment and readable storage media, wherein the running data verification method comprises the steps of obtaining standard data of an algorithm development program, running a complete software implementation program to obtain running data, storing the running data in a text form, comparing the running data with the standard data, and verifying the software implementation program.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of data processing, in particular to running data verification methods, devices, computer equipment and readable storage media.
Background
The CT image reconstruction process needs to process a large amount of image data to perform Unit Testing (UT), two different languages and multiple data interaction need to spend a large amount of time and manpower for data comparison, so that the correctness of data in the program operation process is ensured, and the problem caused by reconstruction parameters or data errors in a certain step in the subsequent result test verification process is reduced.
Conventionally, in the process of developing a CT image reconstruction algorithm, developers perform optimization processing on scanned image data based on MATLAB language to obtain a high-quality image, and at the same time, transfer information such as reconstruction parameters and input data to software function implementers to perform unit test and system test of C + + development functions, verify whether the algorithm functions are implemented and whether the performance meets the requirements, and meanwhile, software developers are required to perform corresponding tests on the algorithm to prevent the algorithm from being arbitrarily changed, so that the two parties need to perform data information exchange for many times, and data deviation can be generated due to the exchange. In summary, the conventional method stores the running data of the algorithm step by step or directly debugs and verifies the current data, the operation is complex, the overall algorithm structures of the two parties are disordered, data transmission errors are easy to occur, and the time is long.
Disclosure of Invention
The application provides running data verification methods, devices, computer equipment and readable storage media, which can effectively reduce the complexity of algorithm development and software implementation phase data comparison and can improve the comparison efficiency and accuracy.
a method of operational data validation, the method comprising:
acquiring standard data of an algorithm development program;
running a complete software implementation program to obtain running data, and storing the running data in a text form;
and comparing the operating data with the standard data, and verifying the software implementation program.
In the embodiment, executing the full software implementation to obtain the operational data includes:
initializing and setting a pre-stored function in a software implementation program;
setting keywords of the pre-stored function, and adjusting a default value of the pre-stored function to be th numerical value;
and running the complete software implementation program, recording running data in the running process of the software implementation program by using a pre-stored function, and storing the running data.
In the embodiment, the operation data is stored in XML format.
In the embodiment, comparing the operational data with the standard data to verify the software implementation includes the standard data including input data, output data, and operational parameters;
comparing the input data of the operational data with the input data of the standard data;
comparing the output data of the operational data with the output data of the standard data;
comparing the operating parameters of the operating data with the operating parameters of the standard data;
and verifying the software implementation program according to the comparison result.
In the embodiment, the verifying the software implementation according to the comparison further includes the software implementation including a plurality of sub-functions;
if the verification result of the software implementation program is wrong, independently operating all the subfunctions and acquiring the operation data of the corresponding subfunctions;
and determining the subfunction causing the software implementation program error according to the operation data of all the subfunctions.
In the embodiment, the verifying the software implementation according to the comparison further includes the software implementation including a plurality of sub-functions;
if the verification result of the software implementation program is wrong, acquiring standard data of the algorithm development programs corresponding to all the subfunctions;
and inputting the standard data into a corresponding sub-function, and determining the sub-function causing the software to realize the program error.
In the embodiment, the verifying the software implementation according to the comparison further includes:
and if the verification result of the software implementation program is correct, adjusting the default value of the pre-stored function in the software implementation program to be a second numerical value.
an operational data verification apparatus, the apparatus comprising:
the acquisition module is used for acquiring standard data of the algorithm development program;
the running module is used for running a complete software implementation program to obtain running data and storing the running data in a text form;
and the comparison module is used for comparing the operating data with the standard data and verifying the software implementation program.
computer device comprising a memory and a processor, the memory storing a computer program, characterized in that the processor realizes the steps of the above method when executing the computer program.
computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, characterized in that the computer program realizes the steps of the above-mentioned method when being executed by a processor.
The running data verification method, the running data verification device, the computer equipment and the readable storage medium comprise the steps of obtaining standard data of an algorithm development program, running a complete software implementation program to obtain running data, storing the running data in a text form, comparing the running data with the standard data, and verifying the software implementation program.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present application or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings needed to be used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly described below, it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only embodiments of the present application, and other drawings can be obtained by those skilled in the art without creative efforts.
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a method for validating operational data according to an embodiment ;
FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating operation of a full software implementation to obtain operational data as provided by the embodiment ;
FIG. 3 is a flow chart comparing the operational data to the normative data as provided by the embodiment ;
FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing the construction of an operation data verification apparatus according to exemplary embodiments;
fig. 5 is an internal structural view of a computer device in embodiments.
Detailed Description
In order to make the aforementioned objects, features and advantages of the present application more comprehensible, embodiments accompanying the present application are described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the present application, and in the accompanying drawings, preferred embodiments of the present application are set forth. This application may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete. This application is capable of embodiments in many different forms than those described herein and those skilled in the art will be able to make similar modifications without departing from the spirit of the application and it is therefore not intended to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed below.
In addition, the terms "", "second" are used for descriptive purposes only and are not to be construed as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly indicating the number of technical features indicated.A feature defined as "", "second" may explicitly or implicitly include at least of that feature.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the application, the terminology used herein "and/or" includes or any and all combinations of more than one of the listed items that are relevant.
Fig. 1 is a flowchart of an operation data verification method provided in , where, as shown in fig. 1, the operation data verification method includes steps 110 to 130, where:
And step 120, operating the complete software implementation program to obtain operating data, and storing the operating data in a text form.
The method comprises the steps of developing an algorithm program by utilizing C + +, performing algorithm research by utilizing MATLAB as an example, wherein the MATLAB mainly provides data for checking image quality and the like, executing the algorithm program by acquiring standard data provided by the MATLAB after the algorithm program is developed by the C + +, verifying the algorithm program, specifically, the standard data provided by the MATLAB comprises input data, operating parameters and output data, operating a complete software implementation program by utilizing the input data and the operating parameters provided by the MATLAB as initial parameters and data, and storing all operating data obtained after the operation is finished in a text form.
And step 130, comparing the operating data with the standard data, and verifying the software implementation program.
In the embodiment, times of running of the software implementation program are completed, all the obtained running data are directly generated into files and compared with the standard data generated by MATLAB, the contents do not need to be checked in the single-step running of the program and then compared with the MATLAB result one by one, the time for debugging the program is shortened, and therefore the problem of failure caused by errors of input items can be quickly solved.
The running data verification method provided by the embodiment comprises the steps of obtaining standard data of an algorithm development program, running a complete software implementation program to obtain running data, storing the running data in a text form, comparing the running data with the standard data, and verifying the software implementation program.
In the embodiment, the operation data is stored in XML format.
Writing a record code and an interface frame in C + +, recording a plurality of parameters and input/output data of the software implementation program function into an XML file, automatically generating the XML file containing the parameters and data paths and related input/output data by running a program, comparing whether the contents of the parameters, the input data and the like are correct or not with the file generated by an algorithm group at the later stage, and eliminating image reconstruction failure caused by input error at the initial stage or data transmission error during the operation of a scanning protocol.
In the embodiment, running the complete software implementation to obtain the running data includes steps 210 to 230, where:
step 210, performing initialization setting on a pre-stored function in the software implementation program.
Step 220, setting the keywords of the pre-stored function, and adjusting the default value of the pre-stored function to th value.
And step 230, operating the complete software implementation program, recording and storing the operation data in the operation process of the software implementation program by using a pre-stored function.
The pre-stored function can be preset in the C + + program, and the initial parameters and the operation data are recorded and stored through a frame of the pre-stored function.
In the embodiment, when the switch default value is the th numerical value True, the pre-stored function can be operated (data is stored or read), and when the switch default value is the second numerical value False, the operation on the pre-stored function is prohibited, so as to prevent the influence on the performance of the algorithm in implementation.
The present embodiment takes a metal artifact reconstruction algorithm (MAC) as an example for explanation. The required parameters in the development process are close to 50, the parameters comprise various types such as float, int, array, enum and the like, a plurality of function functional interfaces are required to carry out data interaction, and the data interaction is not easy to be carried out no matter developers carry out self-verification on the data or interact with algorithm personnel. By utilizing the pre-stored function provided by the application, the initial data and the operation data are recorded to form automatic comparison, so that the data can be conveniently operated by developers, and the efficiency and the accuracy of data comparison are improved. The pre-stored function of the MAC algorithm is as follows:
a. initializing an object ParaRecordXML Obj;
b. setting a function default value bRecord ═ true;
c. set the keyword obj. setpath ("MAC");
d. insert (makepair (fmovv)) is stored;
Obj.insert(MakePair(eBpTypes))；……
e. store data obj.insert (stringpara (poroimg), (char @) poroimg, iViewSize);
f. storing the parameters and the data path as XML format obj. WriteXml ();
the data path specifically refers to a data path of input data and an execution result, and the C + + program can acquire the input data and the execution result of the software implementation program by reading the data path.
The method comprises the steps of storing an XML file generated after a program is run and dat format data in positions in a local disk by using a frame of a pre-stored function provided by the application in a C + + program, wherein the XML file comprises parameters and data paths (D: \ ReconPara \ MAC.dat) required by an algorithm function, an algorithm group provides parameters and input and output results in MATLAB (corresponding to content in C + +), and parameter values and data in XML obtained by a software implementer by using C + + are compared and verified with data provided by MATLAB (MATLAB provides matMAT format file which comprises parameter values and input and output data, but the MATLAB implementation algorithm takes longer time and is not suitable for a functional implementation language due to poor flexibility of other language interfaces and the like).
In , the standard data includes input data, output data and operation parameters, the operation data includes input data, output data and operation parameters, comparing the operation data with the standard data, and verifying the software implementation program includes steps 310 to 340, wherein:
and step 340, verifying the software implementation program according to the comparison result.
The comparison method in this embodiment has two implementation modes: 1. writing a record code in the C + + code, and comparing the content required by the running program record with the running data of the MATLAB; 2. and comparing the running data of the MATLAB with the self-generated running data.
, the comparison method is suitable for the situation with less parameters by manually checking the contents of the two files to see if there is an error.
The second mode of realization is applicable to the condition that has a large amount of a plurality of parameters, because the parameter is more, and artifical contrast can be more chaotic, adopts the procedure to read, and automatic contrast is more accurate.
The specific values and data paths of the parameters are obtained mainly by using the XML file in the process of reading data by adopting a program, and then the correctness and positioning problems of a data operation program verification algorithm, data and the like are found according to the paths.
The specific implementation framework is as follows:
a. initializing an object ParaRareadXml Obj;
b. setting a read XML file path obj.SetPath (D: \ ReconPara \ MAC.xml);
c. acquiring parameters and an input data path obj.get (GetPara (T _ MetDist)) from an XML file;
std::string RawPath＝“”；Obj.Get(StringPara(pOriImg),RawPath)。
the parameters and input data required by the algorithm can be obtained through the codes, namely, the initialization process in the C + + program is completed, then the program is executed to reconstruct the image, and whether the generated image is correct or not is verified (the correctness of the content of the XML file is checked, and whether the reason of the positioning failure is the initialization parameters and the data errors or not) or whether the algorithm function is correctly realized is verified.
In the embodiment, the verifying the software implementation according to the comparison further includes the software implementation including a plurality of sub-functions;
if the verification result of the software implementation program is wrong, independently operating all the subfunctions and acquiring the operation data of the corresponding subfunctions;
and determining the subfunction causing the software implementation program error according to the operation data of all the subfunctions.
The method comprises the steps that a plurality of integrated function functions in an image scanning reconstruction protocol of the CT are called according to a specific topological structure to achieve image reconstruction, when an error occurs in a reconstructed image or the reconstruction function cannot be achieved, it cannot be directly judged which sub-function (Functor) has a parameter or data error, and an algorithm developer and a software implementer are required to simultaneously participate in searching for an error source due to the fact that the method for constructing the functions of the two parts is complex and belongs to different development categories.
In the CT reconstruction scanning protocol, if a reconstruction task failure occurs, that is, a result of comparing C + + running data with standard data is incorrect, and it is necessary to investigate which function has an error, all sub-functions may be separately run, and the running data of the corresponding sub-function is acquired, and the running data of the sub-function is stored as an XML file through a frame of the pre-stored function, and the XML file is compared with the standard data provided by MATLAB, so as to determine the sub-function that causes the software implementation program error. Specifically, a preset storage switch of the function may be turned on in a composition algorithm of the Functor, an input and output item of the sub-function is recorded, and whether the generated image of the Functor is correct or not is checked. If the subsequent reconstruction has problems, the comparison method can be used for quickly positioning and eliminating the problem of error of the input item, and the problem solving efficiency is improved.
In the embodiment, the verifying the software implementation according to the comparison further includes the software implementation including a plurality of sub-functions;
if the verification result of the software implementation program is wrong, acquiring standard data of the algorithm development programs corresponding to all the subfunctions;
and inputting the standard data into a corresponding sub-function, and determining the sub-function causing the software to realize the program error.
In the embodiment, standard data generated by the MTALAB is read into the function, and whether the function of the function fails due to an error is checked, so that different working group members can operate conveniently. If the subsequent reconstruction has problems, the comparison method can be used for quickly positioning and eliminating the problem of error of the input item, and the problem solving efficiency is improved.
In the embodiment, the verifying the software implementation according to the comparison further includes:
and if the verification result of the software implementation program is correct, adjusting the default value of the pre-stored function in the software implementation program to be a second numerical value.
After the function development is completed, the switch default value of the pre-stored function is set to the off (False) state, so that the influence on the performance of the algorithm can be reduced.
In conclusion, the pre-stored function is used for carrying out automatic data comparison between MATLAB and C + + and carrying out operation positioning error on data of different functors in the reconstruction protocol, so that the operability of the CT overall reconstruction function data is improved, the complexity of data comparison by developers is effectively reduced, and the working efficiency and the accuracy of data comparison verification are improved.
It should be understood that although the various steps in the flow charts of fig. 1-3 are shown in sequence as indicated by the arrows, the steps are not necessarily performed in the order indicated by the arrows, unless explicitly stated herein, the steps may be performed in other sequences without strict order limitations, and further, at least the portion of the step of in fig. 1-3 may include multiple sub-steps or stages that are not necessarily performed at the same time , but may be performed at different times, the order of performance of the sub-steps or stages may not necessarily be performed in sequence, but may be rotated or alternated with at least portions of other steps or sub-steps or stages of other steps.
In embodiments, as shown in FIG. 4, running data verification devices are provided, including an obtaining module 410, a running module 420 and a comparing module 430, wherein:
an obtaining module 410, configured to obtain standard data of an algorithm development program;
an operation module 420, configured to operate a complete software implementation program to obtain operation data, and store the operation data in a text form;
a comparison module 430, configured to compare the operating data with the standard data, and verify the software implementation program.
In , the running module 420 is used to perform initialization setting on a pre-stored function in the software implementation program;
setting keywords of the pre-stored function, and adjusting a default value of the pre-stored function to be th numerical value;
and running the complete software implementation program, recording running data in the running process of the software implementation program by using a pre-stored function, and storing the running data.
In the embodiment, the operation data is stored in XML format.
In the embodiment, the standard data includes input data, output data, and operating parameters, the operating data includes input data, output data, and operating parameters, the comparison module 430 is configured to compare the input data of the operating data with the input data of the standard data;
comparing the output data of the operational data with the output data of the standard data;
comparing the operating parameters of the operating data with the operating parameters of the standard data;
and verifying the software implementation program according to the comparison result.
In the embodiment, the software implementation program includes a plurality of sub-functions, the running module 420 is configured to run all the sub-functions individually and obtain the running data of the corresponding sub-functions if the verification result of the software implementation program is an error;
and determining the subfunction causing the software implementation program error according to the operation data of all the subfunctions.
In the embodiment, the software implementation program includes a plurality of sub-functions, the running module 420 is configured to obtain standard data of the algorithm development program corresponding to all the sub-functions if the verification result of the software implementation program is an error;
and inputting the standard data into a corresponding sub-function, and determining the sub-function causing the software to realize the program error.
In an embodiment , the running data verification apparatus further includes an adjustment module, after verifying the software implementation program according to the comparison result, the adjustment module is configured to adjust the default value of the pre-stored function in the software implementation program to a second value if the verification result of the software implementation program is correct.
The running data verification device provided by the embodiment of the application comprises an acquisition module 410, a running module 420 and a comparison module 430, wherein standard data of an algorithm development program is acquired through the acquisition module 410, running data is acquired through a complete software implementation program run through the running module 420 and is stored in a text form, and the running data is compared with the standard data through the comparison module 430 to verify the software implementation program.
For specific limitations of the operation data verification device, reference may be made to the above limitations of the operation data verification method, which are not described herein again. The modules in the operation data verification device can be wholly or partially implemented by software, hardware and a combination thereof. The modules can be embedded in a hardware form or independent from a processor in the computer device, and can also be stored in a memory in the computer device in a software form, so that the processor can call and execute operations corresponding to the modules.
In embodiments, computer devices are provided, which may be terminals, the internal structure of which may be as shown in fig. 5, including a processor, a memory, a network interface, a display screen, and an input device connected via a system bus, wherein the processor of the computer device is configured to provide computing and control capabilities, the memory of the computer device includes a non-volatile storage medium, an internal memory, the non-volatile storage medium storing an operating system and a computer program, the internal memory providing an environment for the operating system and the computer program to run in the non-volatile storage medium, the network interface of the computer device is configured to communicate with an external terminal via a network connection, the computer program is executed by the processor to implement methods for running data verification, the display screen of the computer device may be a liquid crystal display screen or an electronic ink display screen, and the input device of the computer device may be a touch layer overlaid on the display screen, or may be a touch pad, a trackball, a keyboard, a mouse, or the like disposed on a housing of the computer device.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the architecture shown in fig. 5 is merely a block diagram of some of the structures associated with the disclosed aspects and is not intended to limit the computing devices to which the disclosed aspects apply, as particular computing devices may include more or less components than those shown, or may combine certain components, or have a different arrangement of components.
In embodiments, computer devices are provided, comprising a memory and a processor, the memory having stored therein a computer program, the processor when executing the computer program implementing the steps of:
acquiring standard data of an algorithm development program;
running a complete software implementation program to obtain running data, and storing the running data in a text form;
and comparing the operating data with the standard data, and verifying the software implementation program.
In embodiments, computer readable storage media are provided, on which a computer program is stored which, when executed by a processor, performs the steps of:
acquiring standard data of an algorithm development program;
running a complete software implementation program to obtain running data, and storing the running data in a text form;
and comparing the operating data with the standard data, and verifying the software implementation program.
It will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that all or a portion of the processes of the methods of the embodiments described above may be implemented by a computer program that may be stored in a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium, which when executed, may include the processes of the embodiments of the methods described above, wherein any reference to memory, storage, database, or other medium used in the embodiments provided herein may include non-volatile and/or volatile memory.
The technical features of the embodiments described above may be arbitrarily combined, and for the sake of brevity, all possible combinations of the technical features in the embodiments described above are not described, but should be considered as being within the scope of the present specification as long as there is no contradiction between the combinations of the technical features.
The above-mentioned embodiments only express several embodiments of the present invention, and the description thereof is more specific and detailed, but not construed as limiting the scope of the invention. It should be noted that, for a person skilled in the art, several variations and modifications can be made without departing from the inventive concept, which falls within the scope of the present invention. Therefore, the protection scope of the present patent shall be subject to the appended claims.
Claims (10)
1, A method for verifying operational data, the method comprising:
acquiring standard data of an algorithm development program;
running a complete software implementation program to obtain running data, and storing the running data in a text form;
and comparing the operating data with the standard data, and verifying the software implementation program.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein running the complete software implemented program to obtain the operational data comprises:
initializing and setting a pre-stored function in a software implementation program;
setting keywords of the pre-stored function, and adjusting a default value of the pre-stored function to be th numerical value;
and running the complete software implementation program, recording running data in the running process of the software implementation program by using a pre-stored function, and storing the running data.
3. The method of claim 2,
the running data is stored in an XML format.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein comparing the operational data to the standard data, validating the software implementation comprises: the standard data comprises input data, output data and operation parameters; the operating data comprises input data, output data and operating parameters;
comparing the input data of the operational data with the input data of the standard data;
comparing the output data of the operational data with the output data of the standard data;
comparing the operating parameters of the operating data with the operating parameters of the standard data;
and verifying the software implementation program according to the comparison result.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the verifying the software implemented program based on the comparison further comprises: the software-implemented program includes a plurality of sub-functions;
if the verification result of the software implementation program is wrong, independently operating all the subfunctions and acquiring the operation data of the corresponding subfunctions;
and determining the subfunction causing the software implementation program error according to the operation data of all the subfunctions.
6. The method of claim 4, wherein the verifying the software implemented program based on the comparison further comprises: the software-implemented program includes a plurality of sub-functions;
if the verification result of the software implementation program is wrong, acquiring standard data of the algorithm development programs corresponding to all the subfunctions;
and inputting the standard data into a corresponding sub-function, and determining the sub-function causing the software to realize the program error.
7. The method of claim 2, wherein the verifying the software implemented program based on the comparison further comprises:
and if the verification result of the software implementation program is correct, adjusting the default value of the pre-stored function in the software implementation program to be a second numerical value.
An operation data verification apparatus of type, comprising:
the acquisition module is used for acquiring standard data of the algorithm development program;
the running module is used for running a complete software implementation program to obtain running data and storing the running data in a text form;
and the comparison module is used for comparing the operating data with the standard data and verifying the software implementation program.
Computer device of , comprising a memory and a processor, the memory storing a computer program, wherein the processor when executing the computer program is configured to carry out the steps of the method of any of claims 1 to 7 as claimed in .
10, computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, which, when being executed by a processor, carries out the steps of the method of any of claims 1 to 7, wherein represents a set of instructions for carrying out the method.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910978756.6A CN110737985A (en) | 2019-10-15 | 2019-10-15 | Running data verification method and device, computer equipment and readable storage medium |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910978756.6A CN110737985A (en) | 2019-10-15 | 2019-10-15 | Running data verification method and device, computer equipment and readable storage medium |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN110737985A true CN110737985A (en) | 2020-01-31 |
Family
ID=69269013
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910978756.6A Pending CN110737985A (en) | 2019-10-15 | 2019-10-15 | Running data verification method and device, computer equipment and readable storage medium |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN110737985A (en) |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112560393A (en) * | 2020-12-17 | 2021-03-26 | 中科芯云微电子科技有限公司 | Comparison verification method and device of EDA software tool |
| CN113907776A (en) * | 2021-10-13 | 2022-01-11 | 武汉联影生命科学仪器有限公司 | Medical equipment component debugging system, device and method and electronic equipment |
| CN117436391A (en) * | 2023-12-21 | 2024-01-23 | 四川思凌科微电子有限公司 | Method for joint simulation of algorithm and hardware |
| CN113907776B (en) * | 2021-10-13 | 2024-04-23 | 武汉联影生命科学仪器有限公司 | Medical equipment component debugging system, device and method and electronic equipment |
Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103853660A (en) * | 2013-12-30 | 2014-06-11 | 中山大学深圳研究院 | Component-oriented model-based software construction and verification method |
| CN108228467A (en) * | 2018-01-30 | 2018-06-29 | 北京航天长征飞行器研究所 | A kind of embedded flying-controlled box algorithm fast verification method and system |
| CN108776640A (en) * | 2018-05-07 | 2018-11-09 | 深圳壹账通智能科技有限公司 | Distributed test method, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
| CN109492197A (en) * | 2018-09-18 | 2019-03-19 | 深圳壹账通智能科技有限公司 | The file information comparison method, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
| CN109582559A (en) * | 2018-09-28 | 2019-04-05 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Verification method, device, electronic equipment and the storage medium of system |
| CN110069415A (en) * | 2019-04-28 | 2019-07-30 | 苏州科达科技股份有限公司 | For in software test procedure software integrity verification and method for testing software |
-
2019
- 2019-10-15 CN CN201910978756.6A patent/CN110737985A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103853660A (en) * | 2013-12-30 | 2014-06-11 | 中山大学深圳研究院 | Component-oriented model-based software construction and verification method |
| CN108228467A (en) * | 2018-01-30 | 2018-06-29 | 北京航天长征飞行器研究所 | A kind of embedded flying-controlled box algorithm fast verification method and system |
| CN108776640A (en) * | 2018-05-07 | 2018-11-09 | 深圳壹账通智能科技有限公司 | Distributed test method, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
| CN109492197A (en) * | 2018-09-18 | 2019-03-19 | 深圳壹账通智能科技有限公司 | The file information comparison method, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
| CN109582559A (en) * | 2018-09-28 | 2019-04-05 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Verification method, device, electronic equipment and the storage medium of system |
| CN110069415A (en) * | 2019-04-28 | 2019-07-30 | 苏州科达科技股份有限公司 | For in software test procedure software integrity verification and method for testing software |
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112560393A (en) * | 2020-12-17 | 2021-03-26 | 中科芯云微电子科技有限公司 | Comparison verification method and device of EDA software tool |
| CN112560393B (en) * | 2020-12-17 | 2023-01-24 | 中科芯云微电子科技有限公司 | Comparison verification method and device of EDA software tool |
| CN113907776A (en) * | 2021-10-13 | 2022-01-11 | 武汉联影生命科学仪器有限公司 | Medical equipment component debugging system, device and method and electronic equipment |
| CN113907776B (en) * | 2021-10-13 | 2024-04-23 | 武汉联影生命科学仪器有限公司 | Medical equipment component debugging system, device and method and electronic equipment |
| CN117436391A (en) * | 2023-12-21 | 2024-01-23 | 四川思凌科微电子有限公司 | Method for joint simulation of algorithm and hardware |
| CN117436391B (en) * | 2023-12-21 | 2024-03-26 | 四川思凌科微电子有限公司 | Method for joint simulation of algorithm and hardware |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US10409700B2 (en) | Flexible configuration and control of a testing system | |
| US11281570B2 (en) | Software testing method, system, apparatus, device medium, and computer program product | |
| US7613954B2 (en) | Test executive with stack corruption detection | |
| RU2390826C2 (en) | Automatic verification of test cases implicitily related to automatic execution of test cases | |
| US6002869A (en) | System and method for automatically testing software programs | |
| US7519867B2 (en) | Test executive which provides heap validity checking and memory leak detection for user code modules | |
| US7882495B2 (en) | Bounded program failure analysis and correction | |
| CN110554965B (en) | Automated fuzz testing method, related equipment and computer readable storage medium | |
| CN112131829A (en) | Verification method, system and related device of chip register | |
| JP2009087354A (en) | Automatic test generation system and method for web application | |
| US20050160405A1 (en) | System and method for generating code coverage information | |
| US9652363B2 (en) | Dependent object delegation tester | |
| US8560991B1 (en) | Automatic debugging using automatic input data mutation | |
| JP2018532169A (en) | Method and apparatus for generating, collecting, storing, and loading debug information about failed test scripts | |
| CN110737985A (en) | Running data verification method and device, computer equipment and readable storage medium | |
| US8140315B2 (en) | Test bench, method, and computer program product for performing a test case on an integrated circuit | |
| US11132286B1 (en) | Dynamic reordering of test case execution | |
| Raghuvanshi | Introduction to Software Testing | |
| US9298428B2 (en) | Graphical user interface editor that displays live data during editing | |
| CN115176233A (en) | Performing tests in deterministic order | |
| Wilson | UNIX test tools and benchmarks: methods and tools to design, develop, and execute functional, structural, reliability, and regression tests | |
| RU2817186C1 (en) | System for confirming tests and testing embedded software of electronic devices | |
| Ngo et al. | ATUA: an update-driven app testing tool | |
| Kövi et al. | Robustness testing of standard specifications-based ha middleware | |
| CN112527658A (en) | Test case processing method and device for unit test |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| CB02 | Change of applicant information | ||
| CB02 | Change of applicant information |
Address after: 201807 Shanghai City, north of the city of Jiading District Road No. 2258 Applicant after: Shanghai Lianying Medical Technology Co., Ltd Address before: 201807 Shanghai City, north of the city of Jiading District Road No. 2258 Applicant before: SHANGHAI UNITED IMAGING HEALTHCARE Co.,Ltd. |