CN110705888B - Partitioned satellite task planning method for minimum-cost area target coverage - Google Patents

Partitioned satellite task planning method for minimum-cost area target coverage Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN110705888B
CN110705888B CN201910957780.1A CN201910957780A CN110705888B CN 110705888 B CN110705888 B CN 110705888B CN 201910957780 A CN201910957780 A CN 201910957780A CN 110705888 B CN110705888 B CN 110705888B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
coverage
cell
opportunity
straight line
vertex
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN201910957780.1A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN110705888A (en
Inventor
夏维
高天旸
胡笑旋
王执龙
靳鹏
罗贺
伍艺
朱外明
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hefei University of Technology
Original Assignee
Hefei University of Technology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hefei University of Technology filed Critical Hefei University of Technology
Priority to CN201910957780.1A priority Critical patent/CN110705888B/en
Publication of CN110705888A publication Critical patent/CN110705888A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN110705888B publication Critical patent/CN110705888B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0631Resource planning, allocation, distributing or scheduling for enterprises or organisations
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/04Forecasting or optimisation specially adapted for administrative or management purposes, e.g. linear programming or "cutting stock problem"

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a partitioned satellite task planning method for target coverage in a minimum cost area, which comprises the following steps: 1. partitioning a rectangular region to be observed; 2. and allocating observation resources to different partitions and selecting coverage modes for the different partitions so as to maximize the coverage area corresponding to the formed coverage scheme as much as possible, and allocating the observation resources to the different partitions and selecting the coverage modes for the different partitions so as to minimize the coverage cost corresponding to the formed coverage scheme as much as possible. The invention can obtain a satisfactory scheme for completely covering the regional targets with the lowest cost by using proper computing resources, and achieve the balance between the computing resource consumption and the optimality of the solution, thereby fully utilizing satellite resources in the actual environment and carrying out economic and effective coverage search on important regional targets.

Description

Partitioned satellite task planning method for minimum-cost area target coverage
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the field of target task planning of earth observation satellite regions, and particularly relates to a partition satellite task planning method for minimum-cost region target coverage.
Background
An Earth Observation Satellite (EOS), or an imaging Satellite (hereinafter referred to as "Satellite"), has one of its main functions of observing the land, the sea, the atmosphere, etc. through a Satellite-borne sensor (such as a visible light camera and a multispectral camera). The observation requirements are provided by users from various fields and departments, the requirements are summarized at a ground control center of the satellite, the control center comprehensively formulates an imaging coverage plan of each satellite according to the observation requirements by combining the service condition of satellite resources, measurement and control instructions are generated and are uploaded to the satellite through a ground measurement and control station, the satellite performs corresponding actions after receiving the instructions, imaging is performed on a specified area, formed image data are temporarily stored on a satellite-borne hard disk, and when the satellite can communicate with the ground station, the image data are downloaded to the ground station. In the process, a link of making a satellite imaging plan by the ground control center is called as satellite mission planning and is one of key links in the whole satellite use management process.
In a traditional satellite use mode, a satellite independently makes a plan and independently executes an imaging task, and cooperative observation is not carried out between the satellite and the satellite. With the increase of the number of satellites, imaging observation on the ground by using multiple satellites in cooperation has become possible, and the real requirement of multi-satellite cooperation regional imaging exists.
The satellite can only shoot a strip area with limited length and width in one transit, and if the area to be observed is large, the whole area is difficult to be completely observed in one transit of the satellite. If the user urgently needs the image data of the area, multiple satellite transit opportunities can be used for collaborative imaging. Since the sub-satellite point trajectories for each satellite are not necessarily parallel, overlap between the imaged swaths may result. If the arrangement is not reasonable, then a large amount of overlap between the bands may be caused, so that some regions are repeatedly observed and some regions are not observed, which is very unfavorable for reasonable utilization of resources. In order to better utilize the existing satellite coverage resources, a reasonable plan should be made, and the behavior actions (mainly including the on-off time and the side-sway angle) of each transit of the satellite are arranged, so that the effect of the cooperative observation of multiple coverage opportunities of multiple satellites is as good as possible. The method is a typical operational optimization problem, and has urgent practical requirements. The following application scenarios also exist in this type of optimization problem: in a certain time interval, the user department needs the complete image data of a certain larger area, and the number of the available satellites is sufficient, so that the user department can completely shoot the area completely. In this case, in order to save resources as much as possible, it is desirable to make a coverage scheme so that its coverage cost is as small as possible. We call this problem the minimum coverage cost problem in the case of sufficient coverage resources. When a general regional target planning method is used for a large region to be observed in the problem, a large amount of computing resources may be consumed due to the fact that the problem scale is too large and the problem complexity is too high. This is not conducive to the use of the method in a practical engineering environment.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to solve the defects of the prior art and provides a partitioned satellite task planning method with minimum cost for regional target coverage, so that a satisfactory scheme for completely covering regional targets with minimum cost can be obtained by using proper computing resources, and the balance between computing resource consumption and solution optimality is achieved, so that satellite resources can be fully utilized in an actual environment, and economic and effective coverage search is performed on important regional targets.
The invention adopts the following technical scheme for solving the technical problems:
the invention relates to a partitioned satellite task planning method covered by a minimum-cost area target, which is characterized by being applied to a coverage mode planning which completely covers a rectangular area R to be observed by using a sufficient coverage machine set S and ensures that the coverage cost is as small as possible, wherein each coverage opportunity S belongs to S and has own attribute, and the method comprises the following steps: orbit of points under the satellite osSatellite ground clearance hsMaximum boot time msAnd m issMaximum length r corresponding to one coverage patternsMaximum side-swinging angle vsAngle of view w of cameras
The coverage mode c is a rectangular strip formed by satellite shooting and is determined by selecting a certain sidesway angle and on-off time by a coverage opportunity, the coverage cost of the coverage opportunity is in direct proportion to the length of the coverage mode selected by the coverage opportunity, and the proportionality coefficient is
Figure GDA0003383816090000021
Taking any vertex of the rectangular region R to be observed as an origin o, and taking two edges adjacent to the origin as an x axis and a y axis respectively, so as to establish a coordinate system o-xy; the coordinates of four vertexes of the rectangular region R to be observed are respectively marked as an upper left vertex LU (R), a lower left vertex LD (R), an upper right vertex RU (R) and a lower right vertex RD (R); the partition satellite task planning method is carried out according to the following steps:
step 1: partitioning the rectangular region R to be observed;
step 1.1: set the length L of each partitionpAnd width Wp
Step 1.2: calculating the length L of the rectangular region R to be observed according to the coordinates of the four vertexes of the rectangular region R to be observedRAnd width WR
Step 1.3: by LRInteger division LpGet the long number of segments D of a partitionLAnd remainder RLIf there is a remainder
Figure GDA0003383816090000022
Then D will beL+1 assignment to DL(ii) a By WRInteger division of WpObtaining the number of partitioned wide segments DWAnd remainder RWIf there is a remainder
Figure GDA0003383816090000023
Then D will beW+1 assignment to DW
Step 1.4: by LRDivided by DLGet the length L of the final partitionfBy WRDivided by DWObtaining the width W of the final partitionf
Step 1.5: according to the length L of the final partitionfAnd width WfCarrying out average partition on the rectangular region R to be observed so as to obtain four vertex coordinates of each partition;
step 1.6: obtaining a set N of partitions, and the total number of the partitions is | N | ═ DL×DW
Step 2: allocating observation resources to different partitions and selecting a coverage mode for the observation resources so as to minimize the coverage cost corresponding to the formed coverage scheme as much as possible;
step 2.1: randomly assigning coverage opportunities to partitions to form an initial current assignment scheme
Figure GDA0003383816090000031
Wherein, ysRepresents the partition to which the coverage opportunity s is assigned;
step 2.2: computing a set of preferred coverage patterns C under the current allocation scheme Y*(Y) corresponding overlay cost P (Y);
step 2.3: setting a maximum number of iterations
Figure GDA0003383816090000032
And initial annealing temperature T1Making the iteration number k of the current outer loop equal to 1;
step 2.4: if it is not
Figure GDA0003383816090000033
Step 2.9 is switched to, otherwise step 2.5 is executed;
step 2.5: randomly selecting a coverage opportunity
Figure GDA0003383816090000034
And based on coverage opportunities
Figure GDA0003383816090000035
Constructing a plurality of neighbor distribution schemes of a current distribution scheme Y;
step 2.6: respectively calculating the coverage cost corresponding to the better coverage mode set under each neighbor allocation scheme, and selecting one with the minimum coverage cost as the optimal neighbor allocation scheme
Figure GDA0003383816090000036
Step 2.7: comparative optimal neighbor allocation scheme
Figure GDA0003383816090000037
Cost of coverage with current allocation scheme Y, if
Figure GDA0003383816090000038
The optimal neighbor allocation scheme will be used
Figure GDA0003383816090000039
Assigning a value to the current distribution scheme Y and then directly executing the step 2.8, otherwise, executing the step 2.7.1-the step 2.7.2 and then executing the step 2.8;
step 2.7.1: calculating inferior solution acceptance rate of kth iteration
Figure GDA00033838160900000310
Step 2.7.2: the kth secondary generation of a random number r of value 0 to 1kIf r isk≤pkThen the optimal neighbor allocation scheme is used
Figure GDA00033838160900000311
Assigning a value to the current distribution scheme Y;
step 2.8: assigning k +1 to k, updating annealing temperature Tk=Tk-1X lambda is the cooling coefficient, a fixed value smaller than 1 and larger than 0 is taken, and the step 2.4 is carried out;
step 2.9: outputting the current distribution scheme Y and the preferred coverage mode set C selected by each coverage opportunity in the current distribution scheme*(Y) and its corresponding coverage cost P (Y).
The partition satellite task planning method is characterized in that the step 1.5 is carried out according to the following processes:
step 1.5.1: let i equal to 1, and take the coordinate lu (R) at the upper left corner of the rectangular region R to be observed as the ith partition niCoordinates LU (n) of the upper left corner ofi);
Step 1.5.2: dividing the ith into niCoordinates LU (n) of the upper left corner ofi) Is added with LfGet its right upper corner coordinates RU (n)i) Let us coordinate LU (n) in the upper left corneri) Is added with WfTo obtain its leftLower angular coordinate LD (n)i) Then, the coordinate RU (n) at the upper right corneri) Is added with WfObtain its lower right coordinate RD (n)i);
Step 1.5.3: if the ith partition niLower right corner coordinate RD (n)i) Equal to the lower right corner coordinate rd (R) of the rectangular region R to be observed, go to step 1.5.6, otherwise go to step 1.5.4;
step 1.5.4: if the ith partition niRU (n) of the upper right corneri) The abscissa value of the rectangular region R is equal to the abscissa value of the upper right-hand coordinate RU (R) of the rectangular region R to be observed, then let
Figure GDA0003383816090000041
As the i +1 th partition ni+1Coordinates LU (n) of the upper left corner ofi+1) Otherwise, let the ith partition niRU (n) of the upper right corneri) As the i +1 th partition ni+1Coordinates LU (n) of the upper left corner ofi+1);
Step 1.5.5: assigning i +1 to i, and then turning to step 1.5.2 for constructing four-vertex coordinates of the next partition;
step 1.5.6: and finishing the partition, and outputting the four-vertex coordinates of each partition.
The step 2.5 is carried out according to the following processes:
step 2.5.1: order partition set
Figure GDA0003383816090000042
Representing an opportunity to remove coverage in a set of partitions N
Figure GDA0003383816090000043
The iteration number m of the current inner loop is made to be 0 in the set formed after the distributed partitions;
step 2.5.2: if it is not
Figure GDA0003383816090000044
If the value is null, turning to the step 2.5.4, otherwise, assigning m +1 to m, and executing the step 2.5.3;
step 2.5.3: overlay machine to be selected in current allocation scheme YWill be provided with
Figure GDA0003383816090000045
Randomly assigning to partition sets
Figure GDA0003383816090000046
Is a partition of
Figure GDA0003383816090000047
Thereby obtaining a neighbor allocation scheme
Figure GDA0003383816090000048
To be partitioned
Figure GDA0003383816090000049
From a set of partitions
Figure GDA00033838160900000410
Removing, and turning to the step 2.5.2;
step 2.5.4: outputting all resulting neighbor allocation schemes
Figure GDA00033838160900000411
In said step 2.2 and step 2.6, the calculation of the set of preferred coverage modes and corresponding coverage costs for each coverage opportunity selection given an allocation scheme is performed as follows:
step a: taking each different partition and the set of coverage opportunities distributed to the different partitions as input, constructing a grid and calculating local better coverage schemes and corresponding coverage costs of the different partitions by using a heuristic algorithm;
step a.1: dividing the ith into niDividing the cell into a plurality of square cells with the same size to obtain a cell set Ji
Step a.2: according to the divided cell set JiIs assigned to the ith partition niCovering opportunity set SiGenerating basic coverage patterns and composing a total set C of its optional coverage patternsi
The basic coverage mode refers to: the following three cells are present inside:
the four vertexes are all in the area covered by the covering mode;
one of the cells has a vertex positioned on the left boundary of the coverage mode and is named as a left cell, the other cell has a vertex positioned on the upper boundary of the coverage mode and is named as an upper cell, the last cell has a vertex positioned on the lower boundary of the coverage mode and is named as a lower cell, and the left cell, the upper cell and the lower cell can be overlapped;
step a.3: with the ith partition niDivided set of cells JiAnd optional coverage mode set C for each coverage opportunityiSelecting the coverage mode of each coverage opportunity by a heuristic algorithm for input, thereby obtaining a better coverage mode set
Figure GDA0003383816090000051
And simultaneously derive its coverage cost Pi
Step b: overlay scheme for all partitions
Figure GDA0003383816090000052
Combining to obtain a coverage scheme C of the total R of the rectangular region to be observed*Coverage cost { P) corresponding to coverage schemes of all partitionsiThe sum of i | 1,2, …, | N | } yields the coverage cost P of the whole rectangular area R to be observed.
In the step a.2, generating a basic coverage mode for the coverage opportunity set according to the cell set, and forming a total set of the selectable coverage modes according to the cell set are performed according to the following steps:
step a.2.1: if it is not
Figure GDA0003383816090000053
Go to step a.2.4, otherwise execute step a.2.2;
step a.2.2: selecting one of the covering opportunities S E SiDepending on the type of coverage opportunity s, makeConstruction of a set J of cells for a coverage opportunity s in a corresponding manneriBasic coverage pattern set Cs
Step a.2.2.1: from the subsatellite point trajectory o of the coverage opportunity ssJudging the type of the covering opportunity s, wherein the type of the covering opportunity s is divided into a right downward inclined type and a left downward inclined type;
step a.2.2.2: order set
Figure GDA0003383816090000054
Step a.2.2.3: from set of cells JiMiddle screening subset JsAnd subset JsEach cell in (a) may be the left cell of the longest basic coverage pattern covering opportunity s;
step a.2.2.4: if it is not
Figure GDA0003383816090000055
Go to step a.2.2.13, otherwise, select JsStep a.2.2.5 is performed after one cell p;
step a.2.2.5: from set of cells J, according to cell piMiddle screening out cell subset
Figure GDA0003383816090000056
And when p is taken as the left cell
Figure GDA0003383816090000057
Each cell in the set can be used as an upper cell and forms a basic coverage mode of a coverage opportunity s together with p;
step a.2.2.6: if it is not
Figure GDA0003383816090000058
Go to step a.2.2.12, otherwise, choose
Figure GDA0003383816090000059
Step a.2.2.7 is performed after one cell q;
step a.2.2.7: from set of cells J, based on cells p and qiMiddle screening out cell subset
Figure GDA0003383816090000061
And when p is the left cell and q is the upper cell, the subset of cells
Figure GDA0003383816090000062
Each cell in the set can be used as a lower cell, and the lower cell and p and q together form a basic coverage mode of a coverage opportunity s;
step a.2.2.8: if it is not
Figure GDA0003383816090000063
Go to step a.2.2.11, otherwise, choose
Figure GDA0003383816090000064
Step a.2.2.9 is performed after one cell b;
step a.2.2.9: constructing a basic coverage c belonging to a coverage opportunity s based on cells p, q and bs(p,q,b);
Step a.2.2.10: c is tos(p, q, b) addition of CsUnit cell b from
Figure GDA0003383816090000065
Removing, and turning to the step a.2.2.8;
step a.2.2.11: cell q is selected from
Figure GDA0003383816090000066
Removing, and turning to the step a.2.2.6;
step a.2.2.12: cell p from JsRemoving, and turning to the step a.2.2.4;
step a.2.2.13: output overlay mode set Cs
Step a.2.3: will cover the opportunity S from SiRemoving, namely turning to the step a.2.1;
step a.2.4: order to
Figure GDA0003383816090000067
Output overrideMode set Ci
The step a.2.2.3 is carried out according to the following process:
step a.2.2.3.1: order to
Figure GDA0003383816090000068
Step a.2.2.3.2: traverse set JiCalculating the camera yaw angle of the coverage opportunity s when each cell u is taken as the left cell of the coverage pattern
Figure GDA0003383816090000069
Wherein, if the covering chance is a right lower corner inclined type, then
Figure GDA00033838160900000610
The lower left corner vertex LD (u) of cell u and the sub-satellite point locus o covering the opportunity ssIf the covering opportunity is of a downward left-inclined type, the distance therebetween is set to be smaller
Figure GDA00033838160900000611
The top left vertex LU (u) of cell u and the Sum-satellite point trajectory o of coverage opportunity ssIf σ is greater thans(u)|≤vsAdd cell u to the left cell subset Js
The step a.2.2.5 is carried out according to the following process: step a.2.2.5.1: order to
Figure GDA00033838160900000612
Step a.2.2.5.2: calculating the stripe width η of the overlay mode using equation (1) for cell p as the left cells(p):
Figure GDA0003383816090000071
Step a.2.2.5.3: traverse set JiChecking whether one cell t meets the following four conditions, and if all the conditions are met, adding the cell t into the cell
Figure GDA0003383816090000072
Otherwise, the next cell to check continues:
if the coverage opportunity is of a lower right-angle slope type, the four conditions are:
drawing a straight line L through the top point of the lower left corner of the cell pp‖osLine L 'is drawn through the top-right vertex of t't‖osThen straight line LpAnd L'tThe distance between cannot exceed the width η of the stripss(p);
② drawing straight lines L 'by respectively passing top left corners of cells p and t'p⊥osAnd Lt⊥osThen L istL'pAbove (1);
drawing straight line through the top point of the lower left corner of the cell t
Figure GDA0003383816090000073
Then straight line
Figure GDA0003383816090000074
At LpRight side of (c);
fourthly, drawing a straight line through the vertex of the lower right corner of the cell p
Figure GDA0003383816090000075
Then straight line
Figure GDA0003383816090000076
And LtMust not exceed the strip length ls(ii) a Wherein, "|" represents a parallel relationship, and "|" represents a vertical relationship;
if the coverage opportunity is of a lower left corner slope type, the four conditions are:
drawing a straight line L through the top left corner vertex of the cell pp‖osLine L 'is drawn at the bottom right corner vertex of t't‖osThen straight line LpAnd L'tThe distance between cannot exceed the width η of the stripss(p);
② respectively passing through the cells pAnd the top right vertex of t is taken as the straight line L'p⊥osAnd Lt⊥osThen L istL'pAbove (1);
drawing straight line through top left corner vertex of cell t
Figure GDA0003383816090000077
Then straight line
Figure GDA0003383816090000078
At LpRight side of (c);
fourthly, drawing a straight line through the vertex of the lower left corner of the cell p
Figure GDA0003383816090000079
Then straight line
Figure GDA00033838160900000710
And LtMust not exceed the strip length ls(ii) a Where "|" represents a parallel relationship, and "|" represents a vertical relationship.
The step a.2.2.7 is carried out according to the following process: step a.2.2.7.1: order to
Figure GDA00033838160900000711
Step a.2.2.7.2: traverse set JiChecking whether one cell a meets the following four conditions, and if all the conditions are met, adding the cell a
Figure GDA00033838160900000712
Otherwise, the next cell to check continues:
if the coverage opportunity is of a lower right-angle slope type, the four conditions are:
drawing a straight line L through the top point of the lower left corner of the cell pp‖osLine L 'through the top-right vertex of a'a‖osThen straight line LpAnd L'aThe distance between cannot exceed the width η of the stripss(p);
② respectively passing through the cellsp and the top left vertex of a are taken as straight lines L'p⊥osAnd
Figure GDA0003383816090000081
then
Figure GDA0003383816090000082
L'pBelow (1);
drawing straight line through the top point of the lower left corner of the cell a
Figure GDA0003383816090000083
Then straight line
Figure GDA0003383816090000084
At LpRight side of (c);
drawing a straight line L through the vertex of the lower right corner of the cell aa⊥osDrawing a straight line L at the top left corner vertex of the tt⊥osThen straight line LaAnd LtMust not exceed the strip length ls(ii) a Wherein, "|" represents a parallel relationship, and "|" represents a vertical relationship;
if the coverage opportunity is of a lower left corner slope type, the four conditions are:
drawing a straight line L through the top left corner vertex of the cell pp‖osLine L 'is drawn through the bottom right corner vertex of a'a‖osThen straight line LpAnd L'aThe distance between cannot exceed the width η of the stripss(p);
② drawing straight lines L 'by respectively passing top points at the upper right corners of the cells p and a'p⊥osAnd
Figure GDA0003383816090000085
then
Figure GDA0003383816090000086
L'pBelow (1);
drawing straight line through top left corner vertex of cell a
Figure GDA0003383816090000087
Then straight line
Figure GDA0003383816090000088
At LpRight side of (c);
drawing a straight line L through the vertex at the lower left corner of the cell aa⊥osDrawing a straight line L at the top right corner vertex of the tt⊥osThen straight line LaAnd LtMust not exceed the strip length ls(ii) a Where "|" represents a parallel relationship, and "|" represents a vertical relationship.
The step a.2.2.9 is carried out according to the following process:
step a.2.2.9.1: if the coverage chance is a lower right angle oblique type, then pass through the lower left corner vertex LD (p) of the cell p and make a straight line Lp‖osDrawing a straight line L through the top left vertex LU (q) of cell qq⊥osDrawing a straight line L through the top RD (q) at the lower right corner of the cell bb⊥osIf the coverage chance is of the lower left corner slope type, then go through the upper left corner vertex LU (p) of the cell p and make a straight line Lp‖osLine L is drawn through the top right vertex RU (q) of cell qq⊥osDrawing a straight line L through the lower left corner vertex LD (q) of cell bb⊥os
Step a.2.2.9.2: strip width η of overlay mode when calculating cell p as left cells(p);
Step a.2.2.9.3: make a straight line
Figure GDA0003383816090000089
So that it satisfies:
Figure GDA00033838160900000810
Figure GDA00033838160900000811
and LpEqual to ηs(p);
Figure GDA00033838160900000812
At LpRight side of (c);
step a.2.2.9.4: with Lp,
Figure GDA00033838160900000813
Lq,LbThe four straight lines are used as four sides of the rectangle, the intersection points of the four straight lines are used as four vertexes of the rectangle, and the covering mode c is constructeds(p,q,b)。
The step a.3 is carried out according to the following process:
step a.3.1: let JiThe state of all cells in the cell is "uncovered", and the cell is in the "uncovered" state
Figure GDA0003383816090000091
Step a.3.2: let g be 1;
step a.3.3: if g > | CiIf not, go to step a.3.5, otherwise, go to step a.3.4, where | CiI represents a set of optional coverage modes CiThe number of elements in (1);
step a.3.4: selection CiAnd from the set of cells JiSelecting cells which can be completely covered by the g-th coverage mode and have the state of 'uncovered', recording the cells as an effective cell set V (g) and the number of the cells as | V (g) |, and calculating the coverage cost of the g-th coverage mode
Figure GDA0003383816090000092
Wherein lgFor the length of the g-th coverage pattern,
Figure GDA0003383816090000093
calculating the ratio of the effective unit cell number of the coverage mode to the coverage cost for the cost coefficient of the coverage opportunity s' corresponding to the coverage mode g
Figure GDA0003383816090000094
Assigning g +1 to g, and then turning to the step a.3.3;
step a.3.5: if it is
Figure GDA0003383816090000095
Or if the states of all the cells are 'covered', the step a.3.8 is carried out, otherwise, the step a.3.6 is carried out;
step a.3.6: selection CiMedium effective cost ratio maximum covering mode
Figure GDA0003383816090000096
And as corresponding coverage opportunities s*Selected coverage mode, and g*Adding into
Figure GDA0003383816090000097
In (1), covering the pattern g*Valid cell set V (g)*) The states of all the cells in the cell are changed into covered;
step a.3.7: will cover the opportunity s*Corresponding set of coverage patterns
Figure GDA0003383816090000098
From the set of optional overlay modes CiIs removed from CiScreening out the coverage mode subset C ' with the upper cell or lower cell status as ' covered 'iAnd from CiRemoving, and turning to the step a.3.2;
step a.3.8: outputting a set of coverage patterns for each coverage opportunity selection
Figure GDA0003383816090000099
I.e. final coverage scheme, calculation
Figure GDA00033838160900000910
The sum of the coverage costs of all coverage modes, i.e. the i-th partition niCoverage cost Pi
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the beneficial effects that:
1. the invention adopts the concept of 'divide-and-conquer' to provide a solution strategy based on partitions, namely, a large area to be observed is decomposed into a plurality of small partitions, coverage resources are distributed to the partitions, each partition is separately solved, and a plurality of partitions are combined to form an overall coverage scheme, so that the scale of the problem is reduced, and the difficulty of optimization is reduced. Different coverage resource allocation schemes may result in different overall coverage schemes, and therefore it is proposed to search for an optimal resource allocation scheme using a simulated annealing method.
2. The invention adopts a grid discretization method to process the subarea to be observed, and converts the original problem into the problem of covering each cell, thereby reducing the coupling with the computational geometry; meanwhile, based on the grids, a basic coverage mode of each observation opportunity is constructed to serve as an optional coverage mode set, and a decision variable is converted from a value obtained in a continuous space to a value obtained in a discrete space, so that the calculated amount is reduced.
3. The invention adopts a heuristic algorithm based on dynamic greedy, and rapidly finds a better coverage scheme for each discretized partition by sequentially selecting the coverage mode with the highest cost performance. The heuristic algorithm is a polynomial time algorithm, and when the total number of the coverage modes is within a reasonable range, the solving speed is high, the implementation is easy, the interpretability is strong, and the method is stable and reliable, so that a better feasible solution of the coverage scheme can be quickly and effectively found in the simulated annealing process of the method, and the searching speed of the solution space of the distribution scheme is increased.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a method for partitioned satellite mission planning with minimum cost area target coverage according to the present invention;
FIG. 2a is a schematic view of the target coverage of a lower left-inclined zone in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 2b is a schematic diagram of the target coverage of the lower right sloping type zone of the present invention;
FIG. 2c is a schematic diagram of multi-satellite cooperative coverage according to the present invention;
FIG. 3a is a schematic diagram of the formation of a blanket pattern in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 3b is a diagram illustrating the maximum coverage pattern length according to the present invention;
FIG. 3c is a schematic side view of a satellite according to the present invention;
FIG. 3d is a schematic diagram of the maximum lateral swinging angle of the present invention;
FIG. 4a is a schematic diagram of a right down-tilt longest basic coverage pattern according to the present invention;
FIG. 4b is a schematic diagram of a left down-tilt longest basic coverage pattern according to the present invention;
FIG. 5a is a schematic view of the calculation of yaw angle under one aspect of the present invention;
FIG. 5b is a schematic view of the calculation of the yaw angle according to another aspect of the present invention;
FIG. 6a is a schematic diagram of the reduction of the length of the overlay mode according to the present invention;
FIG. 6b is a schematic diagram of the reduction of the length of the overlay mode according to the present invention in FIG. 2.
Detailed Description
As shown in fig. 2a, 2b, and 2c, in the present embodiment, a partitioned satellite mission planning method for completely covering a regional target at a minimum cost is applied to coverage mode planning in which a sufficient set of coverage engines S completely covers a rectangular region R to be observed and the coverage cost is as low as possible, where a coverage opportunity refers to an opportunity at which a satellite can perform coverage observation by passing through the space above the rectangular region to be observed. As shown in fig. 2c, the area of the rectangular region R to be observed is large, and a single coverage opportunity can cover only a small part, so that multiple coverage opportunities are required to be observed cooperatively.
As shown in fig. 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d, each coverage opportunity S e S has its own attributes, including: orbit of points under the satellite osSatellite ground clearance hsMaximum boot time msAnd m issMaximum length r corresponding to one coverage patternsMaximum side-swinging angle vsAngle of view w of cameras(ii) a The trajectory of the satellite around the earth, the point directly below which forms on the ground, should in fact be curved, but can be considered approximately as a straight line within a small range inside the rectangular area to be observed, and for the sake of simplicity, this document will cover the trajectory o of the point below the satellite of the opportunitysThe straight line is regarded as;
the coverage mode c is a rectangular strip formed by satellite shooting and is selected by a coverage opportunityIs determined based on the on-off time, the coverage cost of a coverage opportunity is in direct proportion to the length of the coverage mode selected by the coverage opportunity, and the proportionality coefficient is
Figure GDA0003383816090000111
Taking any vertex of a rectangular region R to be observed as an original point o, and taking two edges adjacent to the original point as an x axis and a y axis respectively, so as to establish a coordinate system o-xy; the coordinates of four vertices of the rectangular region R to be observed are denoted as top left vertex lu (R), bottom left vertex ld (R), top right vertex ru (R), and bottom right vertex rd (R), respectively; as shown in fig. 1, the partition satellite mission planning method is performed according to the following steps:
step 1: partitioning a rectangular region R to be observed;
step 1.1: set the length L of each partitionpAnd width Wp
Step 1.2: calculating the length L of the rectangular region R to be observed according to the coordinates of the four vertexes of the rectangular region R to be observedRAnd width WR
Step 1.3: by LRInteger division LpGet the long number of segments D of a partitionLAnd remainder RLIf there is a remainder
Figure GDA0003383816090000112
Then D will beL+1 assignment to DL(ii) a By WRInteger division of WpObtaining the number of partitioned wide segments DWAnd remainder RWIf there is a remainder
Figure GDA0003383816090000113
Then D will beW+1 assignment to DW
Step 1.4: by LRDivided by DLGet the length L of the final partitionfBy WRDivided by DWObtaining the width W of the final partitionf
Step 1.5: according to the length L of the final partitionfAnd width WfAveragely partitioning the rectangular region R to be observed so as to obtain four tops of each partitionPoint coordinates;
step 1.5.1: let i equal to 1, and take the coordinate lu (R) at the upper left corner of the rectangular region R to be observed as the ith partition niCoordinates LU (n) of the upper left corner ofi);
Step 1.5.2: dividing the ith into niCoordinates LU (n) of the upper left corner ofi) Is added with LfGet its right upper corner coordinates RU (n)i) Let us coordinate LU (n) in the upper left corneri) Is added with WfObtain the coordinates LD (n) of the lower left corneri) Then, the coordinate RU (n) at the upper right corneri) Is added with WfObtain its lower right coordinate RD (n)i);
Step 1.5.3: if the ith partition niLower right corner coordinate RD (n)i) Equal to the lower right corner coordinate rd (R) of the rectangular region R to be observed, go to step 1.5.6, otherwise go to step 1.5.4;
step 1.5.4: if the ith partition niRU (n) of the upper right corneri) The abscissa value of the rectangular region R is equal to the abscissa value of the upper right-hand coordinate RU (R) of the rectangular region R to be observed, then let
Figure GDA0003383816090000121
As the i +1 th partition ni+1Coordinates LU (n) of the upper left corner ofi+1) Otherwise, let the ith partition niRU (n) of the upper right corneri) As the i +1 th partition ni+1Coordinates LU (n) of the upper left corner ofi+1);
Step 1.5.5: assigning i +1 to i, and then turning to step 1.5.2 for constructing four-vertex coordinates of the next partition;
step 1.5.6: and finishing the partition, and outputting the four-vertex coordinates of each partition.
Step 1.6: obtaining a set N of partitions, and the total number of the partitions is | N | ═ DL×DW
Step 2: allocating observation resources to different partitions and selecting a coverage mode for the observation resources so as to minimize the coverage cost corresponding to the formed coverage scheme as much as possible; that is, different coverage opportunities are responsible for covering different partitions, and different allocation schemes eventually bring different coverage schemes, which correspond to different coverage costs, so that the optimal allocation scheme is searched by using a simulated annealing method.
Step 2.1: randomly assigning coverage opportunities to partitions to form an initial current assignment scheme
Figure GDA0003383816090000122
Wherein, ysRepresents the partition to which the coverage opportunity s is assigned;
step 2.2: computing a set of preferred coverage patterns C under the current allocation scheme Y*(Y) corresponding overlay cost P (Y);
step 2.2.1: taking each different partition and the set of coverage opportunities distributed to the different partitions as input, constructing a grid and calculating local better coverage schemes and corresponding coverage costs of the different partitions by using a heuristic algorithm;
step 2.2.1.1: dividing the ith into niDividing the cell into a plurality of square cells with the same size to obtain a cell set Ji(ii) a Wherein the side length of each cell should be sufficiently small. To ensure that there are cells that can be completely covered by the cover pattern.
Without direct calculation of the partitions, when the area to be observed is large, a large number of cells are generated. A large number of coverage patterns are generated based on these cells, consuming a large amount of computing resources. Some large-scale examples cannot solve the solution even in a reasonable time, so a partition-based solution strategy is proposed herein.
Step 2.2.1.2: according to the divided cell set JiIs assigned to the ith partition niCovering opportunity set SiGenerating basic coverage patterns and composing a total set C of its optional coverage patternsi
As shown in fig. 4a and 4b, the basic coverage mode refers to: the following three cells are present inside:
the four vertexes are all in the area covered by the covering mode;
one of the cells has a vertex positioned on the left boundary of the coverage mode and is named as a left cell, the other cell has a vertex positioned on the upper boundary of the coverage mode and is named as an upper cell, the last cell has a vertex positioned on the lower boundary of the coverage mode and is named as a lower cell, and the left cell, the upper cell and the lower cell can be overlapped;
each coverage opportunity may select an infinite number of on/off times and yaw angle values, so each coverage opportunity actually corresponds to an infinite number of coverage modes. However, since all coverage patterns cannot be enumerated, it is difficult to design a solution method for the problem based on the entire set of all coverage patterns. Basic coverage patterns are a special class of coverage patterns that can replace most non-basic coverage patterns and are limited in number. Most of the non-basic coverage patterns can be slightly adjusted to be converted into the corresponding basic coverage patterns, so that the cells with complete coverage are not reduced. Therefore, the basic coverage pattern set is used as the total set of the selectable coverage patterns, so that the continuous space optimization problem is converted into the discrete space optimization problem.
Step 2.2.1.2.1: if it is not
Figure GDA0003383816090000131
Go to step 2.2.1.2.4, otherwise go to step 2.2.1.2.2;
step 2.2.1.2.2: selecting one of the covering opportunities S E SiConstructing a cell-based set J for the coverage opportunity s using a corresponding method, depending on the type of coverage opportunity siBasic coverage pattern set Cs
Step 2.2.1.2.2.1: from the subsatellite point trajectory o of the coverage opportunity ssJudging the type of the covering opportunity s, wherein the type of the covering opportunity s is divided into a right downward inclined type and a left downward inclined type;
step 2.2.1.2.2.2: order set
Figure GDA0003383816090000132
Step 2.2.1.2.2.3: from set of cells JiMiddle screening subset JsAnd subset JsEach cell in (a) may be the left cell of the longest basic coverage pattern covering opportunity s;
step 2.2.1.2.2.3.1: order to
Figure GDA0003383816090000133
Step 2.2.1.2.2.3.2: traverse set JiCalculating the camera yaw angle of the coverage opportunity s when each cell u is taken as the left cell of the coverage pattern
Figure GDA0003383816090000134
If the coverage chance is a right-lower angle tilt type, as shown in fig. 4a, then
Figure GDA0003383816090000135
The lower left corner vertex LD (u) of cell u and the sub-satellite point locus o covering the opportunity ssIf the covering opportunity is of a downward left-inclined type as shown in FIG. 4b, the distance therebetween is set to be shorter
Figure GDA0003383816090000141
The top left vertex LU (u) of cell u and the Sum-satellite point trajectory o of coverage opportunity ssIf σ is greater thans(u)|≤vsAdd cell u to the left cell subset Js
Step 2.2.1.2.2.4: if it is not
Figure GDA0003383816090000142
Go to step 2.2.1.2.2.13, otherwise, select JsStep 2.2.1.2.2.5 is performed after one cell p;
step 2.2.1.2.2.5: from set of cells J, according to cell piMiddle screening out cell subset
Figure GDA0003383816090000143
And when p is taken as the left cell
Figure GDA0003383816090000144
Each of (1) toEach cell can be used as an upper cell and forms a basic coverage mode of a coverage opportunity s together with p;
step 2.2.1.2.2.5.1: order to
Figure GDA0003383816090000145
Step 2.2.1.2.2.5.2: calculating the stripe width η of the overlay mode using equation (1) for cell p as the left cells(p):
Figure GDA0003383816090000146
As shown in FIGS. 5a and 5b, when cell u is the left cell of the overlay mode, the camera roll angle σ of the overlay opportunity ss(u), and a band width η of the overlay modesThe calculation formula of (u) can be derived from elementary geometry. Wherein OB is the perpendicular bisector and the length of OB is the height of the satellite from the ground, i.e. hs. The length of AB is a straight line LuAnd osIs a distance therebetween, i.e.
Figure GDA0003383816090000147
Obviously, angle ABO is a right angle, and therefore, it is easy to find:
Figure GDA0003383816090000148
side-swinging angle of camera
Figure GDA0003383816090000149
In FIG. 5a, angle AOC is the field angle, i.e. wsAnd < AOB > wsThe width of the strip, at this point, is the length of the AC,
Figure GDA00033838160900001410
in FIG. 5b, angle AOD is the field angle, i.e. wsAnd OC is the angular bisector of < AOD, i.e.
Figure GDA00033838160900001411
The width of the strip at this time is the length of AD.
Figure GDA00033838160900001412
∠DOB=wsMinus AOB, can obtain: BD ═ hsTan & lt DOB, and then the following can be obtained:
Figure GDA0003383816090000151
step 2.2.1.2.2.5.3: traverse set JiChecking whether one cell t meets the following four conditions, and if all the conditions are met, adding the cell t into the cell
Figure GDA0003383816090000152
Otherwise, the next cell to check continues:
if the coverage opportunity is of a lower right-angle slope type, the four conditions are:
drawing a straight line L through the top point of the lower left corner of the cell pp‖osLine L 'is drawn through the top-right vertex of t't‖osThen straight line LpAnd L'tThe distance between cannot exceed the width η of the stripss(p);
② drawing straight lines L 'by respectively passing top left corners of cells p and t'p⊥osAnd Lt⊥osThen L istL'pAbove (1);
drawing straight line through the top point of the lower left corner of the cell t
Figure GDA0003383816090000153
Then straight line
Figure GDA0003383816090000154
At LpRight side of (c);
fourthly, drawing a straight line through the vertex of the lower right corner of the cell p
Figure GDA0003383816090000155
Then straight line
Figure GDA0003383816090000156
And LtMust not exceed the strip length ls(ii) a Where "|" represents a parallel relationship, and "|" represents a vertical relationship.
If the coverage opportunity is of a lower left corner slope type, the four conditions are:
drawing a straight line L through the top left corner vertex of the cell pp‖osLine L 'is drawn at the bottom right corner vertex of t't‖osThen straight line LpAnd L'tThe distance between cannot exceed the width η of the stripss(p);
② drawing straight lines L 'by respectively passing top points at the upper right corners of the cells p and t'p⊥osAnd Lt⊥osThen L istL'pAbove (1);
drawing straight line through top left corner vertex of cell t
Figure GDA0003383816090000157
Then straight line
Figure GDA0003383816090000158
At LpRight side of (c);
fourthly, drawing a straight line through the vertex of the lower left corner of the cell p
Figure GDA0003383816090000159
Then straight line
Figure GDA00033838160900001510
And LtMust not exceed the strip length ls(ii) a Wherein, "|" represents a parallel relationship, and "|" represents a vertical relationship;
obviously, cell p itself also satisfies these four conditions.
Step 2.2.1.2.2.6: if it is not
Figure GDA00033838160900001511
Go to step 2.2.1.2.2.12, otherwise, choose to
Figure GDA00033838160900001512
After one cell q, step 2.2.1.2.2.7 is performed;
step 2.2.1.2.2.7: from set of cells J, based on cells p and qiMiddle screening out cell subset
Figure GDA00033838160900001513
And when p is the left cell and q is the upper cell, the subset of cells
Figure GDA00033838160900001514
Each cell in the set can be used as a lower cell, and the lower cell and p and q together form a basic coverage mode of a coverage opportunity s;
step 2.2.1.2.2.7.1: order to
Figure GDA0003383816090000161
Step 2.2.1.2.2.7.2: traverse set JiChecking whether one cell a meets the following four conditions, and if all the conditions are met, adding the cell a
Figure GDA0003383816090000162
Otherwise, the next cell to check continues:
if the coverage opportunity is of a lower right-angle slope type, the four conditions are:
drawing a straight line L through the top point of the lower left corner of the cell pp‖osLine L 'through the top-right vertex of a'a‖osThen straight line LpAnd L'aThe distance between cannot exceed the width η of the stripss(p);
② drawing straight lines L 'by respectively passing top left corners of cells p and a'p⊥osAnd
Figure GDA0003383816090000163
then
Figure GDA0003383816090000164
L'pBelow (1);
drawing straight line through the top point of the lower left corner of the cell a
Figure GDA0003383816090000165
Then straight line
Figure GDA0003383816090000166
At LpRight side of (c);
drawing a straight line L through the vertex of the lower right corner of the cell aa⊥osDrawing a straight line L at the top left corner vertex of the tt⊥osThen straight line LaAnd LtMust not exceed the strip length ls(ii) a Where "|" represents a parallel relationship, and "|" represents a vertical relationship.
If the coverage opportunity is of a lower left corner slope type, the four conditions are:
drawing a straight line L through the top left corner vertex of the cell pp‖osLine L 'is drawn through the bottom right corner vertex of a'a‖osThen straight line LpAnd L'aThe distance between cannot exceed the width η of the stripss(p);
② drawing straight lines L 'by respectively passing top points at the upper right corners of the cells p and a'p⊥osAnd
Figure GDA0003383816090000167
then
Figure GDA0003383816090000168
L'pBelow (1);
drawing straight line through top left corner vertex of cell a
Figure GDA0003383816090000169
Then straight line
Figure GDA00033838160900001610
At LpRight side of (c);
drawing a straight line L through the vertex at the lower left corner of the cell aa⊥osDrawing a straight line L at the top right corner vertex of the tt⊥osThen straight line LaAnd LtMust not exceed the strip length ls(ii) a Where "|" represents a parallel relationship, and "|" represents a vertical relationship.
Obviously, cell p and cell q themselves also satisfy these four conditions.
Step 2.2.1.2.2.8: if it is not
Figure GDA00033838160900001611
Go to step 2.2.1.2.2.11, otherwise, choose to
Figure GDA00033838160900001612
Step 2.2.1.2.2.9 is performed after one cell b;
step 2.2.1.2.2.9: constructing a basic coverage c belonging to a coverage opportunity s based on cells p, q and bs(p,q,b);
Step 2.2.1.2.2.9.1: if the coverage chance is a lower right angle oblique type, then pass through the lower left corner vertex LD (p) of the cell p and make a straight line Lp‖osDrawing a straight line L through the top left vertex LU (q) of cell qq⊥osDrawing a straight line L through the top RD (q) at the lower right corner of the cell bb⊥osIf the coverage chance is of the lower left corner slope type, then go through the upper left corner vertex LU (p) of the cell p and make a straight line Lp‖osLine L is drawn through the top right vertex RU (q) of cell qq⊥osDrawing a straight line L through the lower left corner vertex LD (q) of cell bb⊥os
Step 2.2.1.2.2.9.2: strip width η of overlay mode when calculating cell p as left cells(p);
Step 2.2.1.2.2.9.3: make a straight line
Figure GDA0003383816090000171
So that it satisfies:
Figure GDA0003383816090000172
Figure GDA0003383816090000173
and LpEqual to ηs(p);
Figure GDA0003383816090000174
At LpRight side of (c);
step 2.2.1.2.2.9.4: with Lp,
Figure GDA0003383816090000175
Lq,LbThe four straight lines are used as four sides of the rectangle, the intersection points of the four straight lines are used as four vertexes of the rectangle, and the covering mode c is constructeds(p,q,b)。
Step 2.2.1.2.2.10: c is tos(p, q, b) addition of CsUnit cell b from
Figure GDA0003383816090000176
Go to step 2.2.1.2.2.8;
step 2.2.1.2.2.11: cell q is selected from
Figure GDA0003383816090000177
Go to step 2.2.1.2.2.6;
step 2.2.1.2.2.12: cell p from JsGo to step 2.2.1.2.2.4;
step 2.2.1.2.2.13: output overlay mode set Cs
Step 2.2.1.2.3: will cover the opportunity S from SiRemoving, go to step 2.2.1.2.1;
step 2.2.1.2.4: order to
Figure GDA0003383816090000178
Output overlay mode set Ci
Step 2.2.1.3: with the ith partition niDivided set of cells JiAnd optional coverage mode set C for each coverage opportunityiSelecting the coverage mode of each coverage opportunity by a heuristic algorithm for input, thereby obtaining a better coverage mode set
Figure GDA0003383816090000179
And simultaneously derive its coverage cost Pi
The heuristic algorithm uses a dynamic greedy-based rule to select the coverage mode with the maximum effective cost performance for coverage each time. Once an overlay mode is selected by an overlay opportunity, the overlay opportunity exits subsequent selection activities. Once a cell is covered in the previous selection round, the cell exits the subsequent selection activity. As shown in fig. 6a and 6b, if the upper cell or the lower cell of one overlay mode is "covered", the length of the overlay mode can be reduced to obtain an overlay mode with the same number of completely covered effective cells but with a lower overlay cost. The method is simple, quick and effective, and is very suitable for quickly obtaining a better and feasible coverage scheme under the current environment.
Step 2.2.1.3.1: let JiThe state of all cells in the cell is "uncovered", and the cell is in the "uncovered" state
Figure GDA0003383816090000181
Step 2.2.1.3.2: let g be 1;
step 2.2.1.3.3: if g > | CiIf not, go to step 2.2.1.3.5, otherwise continue, where | CiI represents a set of optional coverage modes CiThe number of elements in (1);
step 2.2.1.3.4: selection CiAnd from the set of cells JiSelecting cells which can be completely covered by the g-th coverage mode and have the state of 'uncovered', recording the cells as an effective cell set V (g) and the number of the cells as | V (g) |, and calculating the coverage cost of the g-th coverage mode
Figure GDA0003383816090000182
Wherein lgFor the length of the g-th coverage pattern,
Figure GDA0003383816090000183
calculating the ratio of the effective unit cell number of the coverage mode to the coverage cost for the cost coefficient of the coverage opportunity s' corresponding to the coverage mode g
Figure GDA0003383816090000184
Namely the effective cost performance, assigning g +1 to g, and then turning to step 2.2.1.3.3;
step 2.2.1.3.5: if it is
Figure GDA0003383816090000185
Or if the states of all cells are "covered", go to step 2.2.1.3.8, otherwise go to step 2.2.1.3.6;
the coverage opportunities that are randomly assigned to each partition generally have the ability to fully cover the partition, provided the coverage opportunities are sufficient. If the situation that partial partitions cannot be completely covered occurs, the neighbor allocation scheme constructed by the insert operator and the exchange operator in the simulated annealing stage is improved.
Step 2.2.1.3.6: selection CiMedium effective cost ratio maximum covering mode
Figure GDA0003383816090000186
And as corresponding coverage opportunities s*Selected coverage mode, and g*Adding into
Figure GDA0003383816090000187
In (1), covering the pattern g*Valid cell set V (g)*) The states of all the cells in the cell are changed into covered;
step 2.2.1.3.7: will cover the opportunity s*Corresponding set of coverage patterns
Figure GDA0003383816090000188
From alternative overlay modesSet CiIs removed from CiScreening out the coverage mode subset C ' with the upper cell or lower cell status as ' covered 'iAnd from CiGo to step 2.2.1.3.2;
step 2.2.1.3.8: outputting a set of coverage patterns for each coverage opportunity selection
Figure GDA0003383816090000189
I.e. final coverage scheme, calculation
Figure GDA00033838160900001810
The sum of the coverage costs of all coverage modes, i.e. the i-th partition niCoverage cost Pi
Step 2.2.2: overlay scheme for all partitions
Figure GDA00033838160900001811
Combining to obtain a coverage scheme C of the total R of the rectangular region to be observed*Coverage cost { P) corresponding to coverage schemes of all partitionsiThe sum of i | 1,2, …, | N | } yields the coverage cost P of the whole rectangular area R to be observed.
The solution space of the allocation scheme is searched by a simulated annealing method so as to obtain a better allocation scheme and maximize the coverage area corresponding to the generated coverage scheme.
Step 2.3: setting a maximum number of iterations
Figure GDA0003383816090000191
And initial annealing temperature T1Making the iteration number k of the current outer loop equal to 1;
step 2.4: if it is not
Figure GDA0003383816090000192
Step 2.9 is switched to, otherwise step 2.5 is executed;
step 2.5: randomly selecting a coverage opportunity
Figure GDA0003383816090000193
And based on coverage opportunities
Figure GDA0003383816090000194
Constructing a plurality of neighbor distribution schemes of a current distribution scheme Y;
step 2.5.1: order partition set
Figure GDA0003383816090000195
Representing an opportunity to remove coverage in a set of partitions N
Figure GDA0003383816090000196
The iteration number m of the current inner loop is made to be 0 in the set formed after the distributed partitions;
step 2.5.2: if it is not
Figure GDA0003383816090000197
If the value is null, turning to the step 2.5.4, otherwise, assigning m +1 to m, and executing the step 2.5.3;
step 2.5.3: coverage opportunities to be selected in current allocation scheme Y
Figure GDA0003383816090000198
Randomly assigning to partition sets
Figure GDA0003383816090000199
Is a partition of
Figure GDA00033838160900001910
Thereby obtaining a neighbor allocation scheme
Figure GDA00033838160900001911
To be partitioned
Figure GDA00033838160900001912
From a set of partitions
Figure GDA00033838160900001913
Removing, and turning to the step 2.5.2;
step 2.5.4: outputting all the obtained neighbor scoresScheme of preparation
Figure GDA00033838160900001914
Herein will be described
Figure GDA00033838160900001915
Assigning to each unassigned partition to search through the entire neighborhood solution, further reducing the number of computations if needed can reduce the number of neighbor solutions constructed.
Step 2.6: respectively calculating the coverage cost corresponding to the better coverage mode set under each neighbor allocation scheme, and selecting one with the minimum coverage cost as the optimal neighbor allocation scheme
Figure GDA00033838160900001916
Step 2.7: comparative optimal neighbor allocation scheme
Figure GDA00033838160900001917
Cost of coverage with current allocation scheme Y, if
Figure GDA00033838160900001918
The optimal neighbor allocation scheme will be used
Figure GDA00033838160900001919
Assigning a value to the current distribution scheme Y and then directly executing the step 2.8, otherwise, executing the step 2.7.1-the step 2.7.2 and then executing the step 2.8;
step 2.7.1: calculating inferior solution acceptance rate of kth iteration
Figure GDA00033838160900001920
Step 2.7.2: the kth secondary generation of a random number r of value 0 to 1kIf r isk≤pkThen the optimal neighbor allocation scheme is used
Figure GDA00033838160900001921
Assigning a value to the current distribution scheme Y;
step 2.8: assigning k +1 to k, updating annealing temperature Tk=Tk-1X lambda is the cooling coefficient, a fixed value smaller than 1 and larger than 0 is taken, and the step 2.4 is carried out;
the magnitude of the annealing temperature represents the magnitude of randomness to the solution space search, and λ can be set larger and the number of iterations increased if the requirement on the final solution quality is high, and can be set smaller if fast convergence is required.
Step 2.9: outputting the current distribution scheme Y and the preferred coverage mode set C selected by each coverage opportunity in the current distribution scheme*(Y) and its corresponding coverage cost P (Y).

Claims (10)

1. A partitioned satellite task planning method for minimum cost area target coverage is characterized by being applied to coverage mode planning for fully covering a rectangular area R to be observed by a sufficient coverage opportunity set S and enabling the coverage cost to be as small as possible, wherein each coverage opportunity S belongs to S and has own attribute, and the method comprises the following steps: orbit of points under the satellite osSatellite ground clearance hsMaximum boot time msAnd m issMaximum length r corresponding to one coverage patternsMaximum side-swinging angle vsAngle of view w of cameras
The coverage mode c is a rectangular strip formed by satellite shooting and is determined by selecting a certain sidesway angle and on-off time by a coverage opportunity, the coverage cost of the coverage opportunity is in direct proportion to the length of the coverage mode selected by the coverage opportunity, and the proportionality coefficient is
Figure FDA0003383816080000014
Taking any vertex of the rectangular region R to be observed as an origin o, and taking two edges adjacent to the origin as an x axis and a y axis respectively, so as to establish a coordinate system o-xy; the coordinates of four vertexes of the rectangular region R to be observed are respectively marked as an upper left vertex LU (R), a lower left vertex LD (R), an upper right vertex RU (R) and a lower right vertex RD (R); the partition satellite task planning method is carried out according to the following steps:
step 1: partitioning the rectangular region R to be observed;
step 1.1: set the length L of each partitionpAnd width Wp
Step 1.2: calculating the length L of the rectangular region R to be observed according to the coordinates of the four vertexes of the rectangular region R to be observedRAnd width WR
Step 1.3: by LRInteger division LpGet the long number of segments D of a partitionLAnd remainder RLIf there is a remainder
Figure FDA0003383816080000011
Then D will beL+1 assignment to DL(ii) a By WRInteger division of WpObtaining the number of partitioned wide segments DWAnd remainder RWIf there is a remainder
Figure FDA0003383816080000012
Then D will beW+1 assignment to DW
Step 1.4: by LRDivided by DLGet the length L of the final partitionfBy WRDivided by DWObtaining the width W of the final partitionf
Step 1.5: according to the length L of the final partitionfAnd width WfCarrying out average partition on the rectangular region R to be observed so as to obtain four vertex coordinates of each partition;
step 1.6: obtaining a set N of partitions, and the total number of the partitions is | N | ═ DL×DW
Step 2: allocating observation resources to different partitions and selecting a coverage mode for the observation resources so as to minimize the coverage cost corresponding to the formed coverage scheme as much as possible;
step 2.1: randomly assigning coverage opportunities to partitions to form an initial current assignment scheme
Figure FDA0003383816080000013
Wherein, ysRepresents the partition to which the coverage opportunity s is assigned;
step 2.2: computing a set of preferred coverage patterns C under the current allocation scheme Y*(Y) corresponding overlay cost P (Y);
step 2.3: setting a maximum number of iterations
Figure FDA00033838160800000210
And initial annealing temperature T1Making the iteration number k of the current outer loop equal to 1;
step 2.4: if it is not
Figure FDA0003383816080000021
Step 2.9 is switched to, otherwise step 2.5 is executed;
step 2.5: randomly selecting a coverage opportunity
Figure FDA0003383816080000022
And based on coverage opportunities
Figure FDA0003383816080000023
Constructing a plurality of neighbor distribution schemes of a current distribution scheme Y;
step 2.6: respectively calculating the coverage cost corresponding to the better coverage mode set under each neighbor allocation scheme, and selecting one with the minimum coverage cost as the optimal neighbor allocation scheme
Figure FDA0003383816080000024
Step 2.7: comparative optimal neighbor allocation scheme
Figure FDA0003383816080000025
Cost of coverage with current allocation scheme Y, if
Figure FDA0003383816080000026
The optimal neighbor allocation scheme will be used
Figure FDA0003383816080000027
Assigning a value to the current distribution scheme Y and then directly executing the step 2.8, otherwise, executing the step 2.7.1-the step 2.7.2 and then executing the step 2.8;
step 2.7.1: calculating inferior solution acceptance rate of kth iteration
Figure FDA0003383816080000028
Step 2.7.2: the kth secondary generation of a random number r of value 0 to 1kIf r isk≤pkThen the optimal neighbor allocation scheme is used
Figure FDA0003383816080000029
Assigning a value to the current distribution scheme Y;
step 2.8: assigning k +1 to k, updating annealing temperature Tk=Tk-1X lambda is the cooling coefficient, a fixed value smaller than 1 and larger than 0 is taken, and the step 2.4 is carried out;
step 2.9: outputting the current distribution scheme Y and the preferred coverage mode set C selected by each coverage opportunity in the current distribution scheme*(Y) and its corresponding coverage cost P (Y).
2. The method for sectorized satellite mission planning according to claim 1, wherein said step 1.5 is performed as follows:
step 1.5.1: let i equal to 1, and take the coordinate lu (R) at the upper left corner of the rectangular region R to be observed as the ith partition niCoordinates LU (n) of the upper left corner ofi);
Step 1.5.2: dividing the ith into niCoordinates LU (n) of the upper left corner ofi) Is added with LfGet its right upper corner coordinates RU (n)i) Let us coordinate LU (n) in the upper left corneri) Is added with WfObtain the coordinates LD (n) of the lower left corneri) Then, the coordinate RU (n) at the upper right corneri) Is added with WfObtain its lower right coordinate RD (n)i);
Step 1.5.3: if the ith partition niLower right corner coordinate RD (n)i) Equal to the lower right corner coordinate rd (R) of the rectangular region R to be observed, go to step 1.5.6, otherwise go to step 1.5.4;
step 1.5.4: if the ith partition niRU (n) of the upper right corneri) The abscissa value of the rectangular region R is equal to the abscissa value of the upper right-hand coordinate RU (R) of the rectangular region R to be observed, then let
Figure FDA0003383816080000031
As the i +1 th partition ni+1Coordinates LU (n) of the upper left corner ofi+1) Otherwise, let the ith partition niRU (n) of the upper right corneri) As the i +1 th partition ni+1Coordinates LU (n) of the upper left corner ofi+1);
Step 1.5.5: assigning i +1 to i, and then turning to step 1.5.2 for constructing four-vertex coordinates of the next partition;
step 1.5.6: and finishing the partition, and outputting the four-vertex coordinates of each partition.
3. The method for sectorized satellite mission planning according to claim 1, wherein said step 2.5 is performed as follows:
step 2.5.1: order partition set
Figure FDA0003383816080000032
Representing an opportunity to remove coverage in a set of partitions N
Figure FDA0003383816080000033
The iteration number m of the current inner loop is made to be 0 in the set formed after the distributed partitions;
step 2.5.2: if it is not
Figure FDA0003383816080000034
If the value is null, turning to the step 2.5.4, otherwise, assigning m +1 to m, and executing the step 2.5.3;
step 2.5.3: coverage opportunities to be selected in current allocation scheme Y
Figure FDA0003383816080000035
Randomly assigning to partition sets
Figure FDA0003383816080000036
Is a partition of
Figure FDA0003383816080000037
Thereby obtaining a neighbor allocation scheme
Figure FDA0003383816080000038
To be partitioned
Figure FDA0003383816080000039
From a set of partitions
Figure FDA00033838160800000311
Removing, and turning to the step 2.5.2;
step 2.5.4: outputting all resulting neighbor allocation schemes
Figure FDA00033838160800000310
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the step 2.2 and step 2.6 of calculating the preferred coverage mode set and corresponding coverage cost for each coverage opportunity selection given the allocation scheme is performed by:
step a: taking each different partition and the set of coverage opportunities distributed to the different partitions as input, constructing a grid and calculating local better coverage schemes and corresponding coverage costs of the different partitions by using a heuristic algorithm;
step a.1: dividing the ith into niDividing the cell into a plurality of square cells with the same size to obtain a cell set Ji
Step a.2: according to the divided cell set JiIs assigned to the ith partition niCovering opportunity set SiGenerating basic coverage patterns and composing a total set C of its optional coverage patternsi
The basic coverage mode refers to: the following three cells are present inside:
the four vertexes are all in the area covered by the covering mode;
one of the cells has a vertex positioned on the left boundary of the coverage mode and is named as a left cell, the other cell has a vertex positioned on the upper boundary of the coverage mode and is named as an upper cell, the last cell has a vertex positioned on the lower boundary of the coverage mode and is named as a lower cell, and the left cell, the upper cell and the lower cell can be overlapped;
step a.3: with the ith partition niDivided set of cells JiAnd optional coverage mode set C for each coverage opportunityiSelecting the coverage mode of each coverage opportunity by a heuristic algorithm for input, thereby obtaining a better coverage mode set
Figure FDA0003383816080000041
And simultaneously derive its coverage cost Pi
Step b: overlay scheme for all partitions
Figure FDA0003383816080000042
Combining to obtain a coverage scheme C of the total R of the rectangular region to be observed*Coverage cost { P) corresponding to coverage schemes of all partitionsiThe sum of i | 1,2, …, | N | } yields the coverage cost P of the whole rectangular area R to be observed.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the step a.2 of generating the basic coverage patterns for the coverage opportunities based on the set of cells and forming the total set of optional coverage patterns is performed by:
step a.2.1: if it is not
Figure FDA0003383816080000043
Go to step a.2.4, otherwise execute step a.2.2;
step a.2.2: selecting one of the covering opportunities S E SiConstructing a cell-based set J for the coverage opportunity s using a corresponding method, depending on the type of coverage opportunity siBasic coverage pattern set Cs
Step a.2.2.1: from the subsatellite point trajectory o of the coverage opportunity ssJudging the type of the covering opportunity s, wherein the type of the covering opportunity s is divided into a right downward inclined type and a left downward inclined type;
step a.2.2.2: order set
Figure FDA0003383816080000044
Step a.2.2.3: from set of cells JiMiddle screening subset JsAnd subset JsEach cell in (a) may be the left cell of the longest basic coverage pattern covering opportunity s;
step a.2.2.4: if it is not
Figure FDA0003383816080000045
Go to step a.2.2.13, otherwise, select JsStep a.2.2.5 is performed after one cell p;
step a.2.2.5: from set of cells J, according to cell piMiddle screening out cell subset
Figure FDA0003383816080000046
And when p is taken as the left cell
Figure FDA0003383816080000047
Each cell in the set can be used as an upper cell and forms a basic coverage mode of a coverage opportunity s together with p;
step a.2.2.6: if it is not
Figure FDA0003383816080000048
Go to step a.2.2.12, otherwise, choose
Figure FDA0003383816080000049
Step a.2.2.7 is performed after one cell q;
step a.2.2.7: from set of cells J, based on cells p and qiMiddle screening out cell subset
Figure FDA0003383816080000051
And when p is the left cell and q is the upper cell, the subset of cells
Figure FDA0003383816080000052
Each cell in the set can be used as a lower cell, and the lower cell and p and q together form a basic coverage mode of a coverage opportunity s;
step a.2.2.8: if it is not
Figure FDA0003383816080000053
Go to step a.2.2.11, otherwise, choose
Figure FDA0003383816080000054
Step a.2.2.9 is performed after one cell b;
step a.2.2.9: constructing a basic coverage c belonging to a coverage opportunity s based on cells p, q and bs(p,q,b);
Step a.2.2.10: c is tos(p, q, b) addition of CsUnit cell b from
Figure FDA0003383816080000055
Removing, and turning to the step a.2.2.8;
step a.2.2.11: cell q is selected from
Figure FDA0003383816080000056
Removing, and turning to the step a.2.2.6;
step a.2.2.12: cell p from JsRemoving, and turning to the step a.2.2.4;
step a.2.2.13: output overlay mode set Cs
Step a.2.3: will cover the opportunity S from SiRemoving, namely turning to the step a.2.1;
step a.2.4: order to
Figure FDA0003383816080000057
Output overlay mode set Ci
6. The method of claim 5, wherein step a.2.2.3 is performed as follows:
step a.2.2.3.1: order to
Figure FDA0003383816080000058
Step a.2.2.3.2: traverse set JiCalculating the camera yaw angle of the coverage opportunity s when each cell u is taken as the left cell of the coverage pattern
Figure FDA0003383816080000059
Wherein, if the covering chance is a right lower corner inclined type, then
Figure FDA00033838160800000510
The lower left corner vertex LD (u) of cell u and the sub-satellite point locus o covering the opportunity ssIf the covering opportunity is of a downward left-inclined type, the distance therebetween is set to be smaller
Figure FDA00033838160800000511
The top left vertex LU (u) of cell u and the Sum-satellite point trajectory o of coverage opportunity ssIf σ is greater thans(u)|≤vsAdd cell u to the left cell subset Js
7. The sectorized satellite mission planning method of claim 5,the method is characterized in that the step a.2.2.5 is carried out according to the following processes: step a.2.2.5.1: order to
Figure FDA00033838160800000512
Step a.2.2.5.2: calculating the stripe width η of the overlay mode using equation (1) for cell p as the left cells(p):
Figure FDA0003383816080000061
Step a.2.2.5.3: traverse set JiChecking whether one cell t meets the following four conditions, and if all the conditions are met, adding the cell t into the cell
Figure FDA0003383816080000062
Otherwise, the next cell to check continues:
if the coverage opportunity is of a lower right-angle slope type, the four conditions are:
drawing a straight line L through the top point of the lower left corner of the cell pp‖osLine L 'is drawn through the top-right vertex of t't‖osThen straight line LpAnd L'tThe distance between cannot exceed the width η of the stripss(p);
② drawing straight lines L 'by respectively passing top left corners of cells p and t'p⊥osAnd Lt⊥osThen L istL'pAbove (1);
drawing straight line through the top point of the lower left corner of the cell t
Figure FDA0003383816080000063
Then straight line
Figure FDA0003383816080000064
At LpRight side of (c);
fourthly, drawing a straight line through the vertex of the lower right corner of the cell p
Figure FDA0003383816080000065
Then straight line
Figure FDA0003383816080000066
And LtMust not exceed the strip length ls(ii) a Wherein, "|" represents a parallel relationship, and "|" represents a vertical relationship;
if the coverage opportunity is of a lower left corner slope type, the four conditions are:
drawing a straight line L through the top left corner vertex of the cell pp‖osLine L 'is drawn at the bottom right corner vertex of t't‖osThen straight line LpAnd L'tThe distance between cannot exceed the width η of the stripss(p);
② drawing straight lines L 'by respectively passing top points at the upper right corners of the cells p and t'p⊥osAnd Lt⊥osThen L istL'pAbove (1);
drawing straight line through top left corner vertex of cell t
Figure FDA0003383816080000067
Then straight line
Figure FDA0003383816080000068
At LpRight side of (c);
fourthly, drawing a straight line through the vertex of the lower left corner of the cell p
Figure FDA0003383816080000069
Then straight line
Figure FDA00033838160800000610
And LtMust not exceed the strip length ls(ii) a Where "|" represents a parallel relationship, and "|" represents a vertical relationship.
8. The method of claim 5, wherein the method comprisesCharacterized in that, the step a.2.2.7 is carried out according to the following process: step a.2.2.7.1: order to
Figure FDA00033838160800000611
Step a.2.2.7.2: traverse set JiChecking whether one cell a meets the following four conditions, and if all the conditions are met, adding the cell a
Figure FDA00033838160800000612
Otherwise, the next cell to check continues:
if the coverage opportunity is of a lower right-angle slope type, the four conditions are:
drawing a straight line L through the top point of the lower left corner of the cell pp‖osLine L 'through the top-right vertex of a'a‖osThen straight line LpAnd L'aThe distance between cannot exceed the width η of the stripss(p);
② drawing straight lines L 'by respectively passing top left corners of cells p and a'p⊥osAnd
Figure FDA0003383816080000071
then
Figure FDA0003383816080000072
L'pBelow (1);
drawing straight line through the top point of the lower left corner of the cell a
Figure FDA0003383816080000073
Then straight line
Figure FDA0003383816080000074
At LpRight side of (c);
drawing a straight line L through the vertex of the lower right corner of the cell aa⊥osDrawing a straight line L at the top left corner vertex of the tt⊥osThen straight line LaAnd LtMust not exceedLength of passing strip ls(ii) a Wherein, "|" represents a parallel relationship, and "|" represents a vertical relationship;
if the coverage opportunity is of a lower left corner slope type, the four conditions are:
drawing a straight line L through the top left corner vertex of the cell pp‖osLine L 'is drawn through the bottom right corner vertex of a'a‖osThen straight line LpAnd L'aThe distance between cannot exceed the width η of the stripss(p);
② drawing straight lines L 'by respectively passing top points at the upper right corners of the cells p and a'p⊥osAnd
Figure FDA0003383816080000075
then
Figure FDA0003383816080000076
L'pBelow (1);
drawing straight line through top left corner vertex of cell a
Figure FDA0003383816080000077
Then straight line
Figure FDA0003383816080000078
At LpRight side of (c);
drawing a straight line L through the vertex at the lower left corner of the cell aa⊥osDrawing a straight line L at the top right corner vertex of the tt⊥osThen straight line LaAnd LtMust not exceed the strip length ls(ii) a Where "|" represents a parallel relationship, and "|" represents a vertical relationship.
9. The method of claim 5, wherein step a.2.2.9 is performed as follows:
step a.2.2.9.1: if the coverage chance is a lower right angle oblique type, then pass through the lower left corner vertex LD (p) of the cell p and make a straight line Lp‖osOver cell qIs taken as a straight line Lq⊥osDrawing a straight line L through the top RD (q) at the lower right corner of the cell bb⊥osIf the coverage chance is of the lower left corner slope type, then go through the upper left corner vertex LU (p) of the cell p and make a straight line Lp‖osLine L is drawn through the top right vertex RU (q) of cell qq⊥osDrawing a straight line L through the lower left corner vertex LD (q) of cell bb⊥os
Step a.2.2.9.2: strip width η of overlay mode when calculating cell p as left cells(p);
Step a.2.2.9.3: make a straight line
Figure FDA0003383816080000079
So that it satisfies:
Figure FDA00033838160800000710
Figure FDA0003383816080000081
and LpEqual to ηs(p);
Figure FDA0003383816080000082
At LpRight side of (c);
step a.2.2.9.4: to be provided with
Figure FDA0003383816080000083
The four straight lines are used as four sides of the rectangle, the intersection points of the four straight lines are used as four vertexes of the rectangle, and the covering mode c is constructeds(p,q,b)。
10. The method for sectorized satellite mission planning according to claim 4, wherein said step a.3 is performed as follows:
step a.3.1: let JiThe state of all cells in the cell is "uncovered", order
Figure FDA0003383816080000084
Step a.3.2: let g be 1;
step a.3.3: if g > | CiIf not, go to step a.3.5, otherwise, go to step a.3.4, where | CiI represents a set of optional coverage modes CiThe number of elements in (1);
step a.3.4: selection CiAnd from the set of cells JiSelecting cells which can be completely covered by the g-th coverage mode and have the state of 'uncovered', recording the cells as an effective cell set V (g) and the number of the cells as | V (g) |, and calculating the coverage cost of the g-th coverage mode
Figure FDA0003383816080000085
Wherein lgFor the length of the g-th coverage pattern,
Figure FDA0003383816080000086
calculating the ratio of the effective unit cell number of the coverage mode to the coverage cost for the cost coefficient of the coverage opportunity s' corresponding to the coverage mode g
Figure FDA0003383816080000087
Assigning g +1 to g, and then turning to the step a.3.3;
step a.3.5: if it is
Figure FDA0003383816080000088
Or if the states of all the cells are 'covered', the step a.3.8 is carried out, otherwise, the step a.3.6 is carried out;
step a.3.6: selection CiMedium effective cost ratio maximum covering mode
Figure FDA0003383816080000089
And as corresponding coverage opportunities s*Selected coverage mode, and g*Adding into
Figure FDA00033838160800000810
In (1), covering the pattern g*Valid cell set V (g)*) The states of all the cells in the cell are changed into covered;
step a.3.7: will cover the opportunity s*Corresponding set of coverage patterns
Figure FDA00033838160800000811
From the set of optional overlay modes CiIs removed from CiScreening out the coverage mode subset C ' with the upper cell or lower cell status as ' covered 'iAnd from CiRemoving, and turning to the step a.3.2;
step a.3.8: outputting a set of coverage patterns for each coverage opportunity selection
Figure FDA0003383816080000091
I.e. final coverage scheme, calculation
Figure FDA0003383816080000092
The sum of the coverage costs of all coverage modes, i.e. the i-th partition niCoverage cost Pi
CN201910957780.1A 2019-10-10 2019-10-10 Partitioned satellite task planning method for minimum-cost area target coverage Active CN110705888B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910957780.1A CN110705888B (en) 2019-10-10 2019-10-10 Partitioned satellite task planning method for minimum-cost area target coverage

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910957780.1A CN110705888B (en) 2019-10-10 2019-10-10 Partitioned satellite task planning method for minimum-cost area target coverage

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN110705888A CN110705888A (en) 2020-01-17
CN110705888B true CN110705888B (en) 2022-03-15

Family

ID=69200135

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201910957780.1A Active CN110705888B (en) 2019-10-10 2019-10-10 Partitioned satellite task planning method for minimum-cost area target coverage

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN110705888B (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112288289B (en) * 2020-10-30 2023-10-17 北京空间飞行器总体设计部 Multi-star collaborative coverage rapid planning method for regional targets

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2001250021A (en) * 2001-03-09 2001-09-14 Hitachi Ltd Integrated production method
CN103294925A (en) * 2013-06-20 2013-09-11 中国科学院遥感与数字地球研究所 Method for realizing multi-satellite combined imaging
CN107145994A (en) * 2017-03-15 2017-09-08 湖南普天科技集团有限公司 A kind of mission planning method for many star synergistic observations
CN107480814A (en) * 2017-07-28 2017-12-15 中国资源卫星应用中心 A kind of method for predicting magnanimity moonscope need satisfaction degree
CN109146955A (en) * 2018-07-26 2019-01-04 西北工业大学 A method of target three-dimensional image information is obtained based on microsatellite group
WO2019054977A1 (en) * 2017-09-15 2019-03-21 Игорь Валентинович ГЛУЩЕНКО Method of searching for hydrocarbon deposits using thermal radiography technology

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2001250021A (en) * 2001-03-09 2001-09-14 Hitachi Ltd Integrated production method
CN103294925A (en) * 2013-06-20 2013-09-11 中国科学院遥感与数字地球研究所 Method for realizing multi-satellite combined imaging
CN107145994A (en) * 2017-03-15 2017-09-08 湖南普天科技集团有限公司 A kind of mission planning method for many star synergistic observations
CN107480814A (en) * 2017-07-28 2017-12-15 中国资源卫星应用中心 A kind of method for predicting magnanimity moonscope need satisfaction degree
WO2019054977A1 (en) * 2017-09-15 2019-03-21 Игорь Валентинович ГЛУЩЕНКО Method of searching for hydrocarbon deposits using thermal radiography technology
CN109146955A (en) * 2018-07-26 2019-01-04 西北工业大学 A method of target three-dimensional image information is obtained based on microsatellite group

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN110705888A (en) 2020-01-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN110728447B (en) Partitioned satellite task planning method for achieving regional target coverage at earliest
CN110727903B (en) Satellite task planning method for realizing maximum observation area by limited coverage resources
CN108632831B (en) Unmanned aerial vehicle cluster frequency spectrum resource allocation method based on dynamic flight path
CN112766813A (en) Air-space cooperative observation complex task scheduling method and system
CN113595619B (en) Unmanned aerial vehicle group communication and coverage combination optimization method
CN110705888B (en) Partitioned satellite task planning method for minimum-cost area target coverage
CN110807579B (en) Satellite task planning method for minimum completion time under condition of sufficient resources
CN111897640A (en) Satellite imaging task planning method and system for regional mapping
CN110782166A (en) Partitioned satellite task planning method capable of covering maximum area by limited resources
CN115659556A (en) Multi-satellite task planning method and system for large-area target
CN111967741B (en) EC 2-based cloud fluidization command architecture design method for unmanned combat system
CN105528243A (en) A priority packet scheduling method and system utilizing data topological information
CN117200857A (en) Cross-correlation function-based beam hopping resource allocation method under cognitive satellite network
Yu et al. 3D deployment of Multi-UAV for energy-saving: A game-based learning approach
CN115130760A (en) Horizontal cylinder facility layout method based on improved wild horse algorithm
CN110717673B (en) Satellite task planning method for minimum observation cost under condition of sufficient resources
CN108364116B (en) Multi-imaging satellite area coverage dynamic scheduling method under satellite resource limitation condition
CN108460178B (en) Multi-imaging satellite coverage optimization method considering sensor side sway
CN114580892A (en) Multi-satellite region observation planning method based on variable neighborhood search
CN108268976B (en) Multi-imaging satellite area coverage task maximum completion time minimization planning method
CN113758467B (en) Remote sensing satellite region observation method based on region division and local grid nesting
CN113706050A (en) Multi-satellite region observation planning method based on adaptive genetic algorithm
CN108268975B (en) Multi-imaging satellite area coverage task planning method considering sensor side sway
CN109710389A (en) A kind of multi-layer satellite coordinated dispatching method and system
CN108334979A (en) More imaging satellite mission planning methods of facing area covering

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant