CN110705843A - People-oriented community development level evaluation index system - Google Patents
People-oriented community development level evaluation index system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN110705843A CN110705843A CN201910871073.0A CN201910871073A CN110705843A CN 110705843 A CN110705843 A CN 110705843A CN 201910871073 A CN201910871073 A CN 201910871073A CN 110705843 A CN110705843 A CN 110705843A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- community
- level
- evaluation
- environment
- safety
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 151
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 57
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 31
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims description 45
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 27
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 claims description 15
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 206010000369 Accident Diseases 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000012854 evaluation process Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000002452 interceptive effect Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 206010039203 Road traffic accident Diseases 0.000 claims description 3
- 208000027418 Wounds and injury Diseases 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 208000014674 injury Diseases 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000009545 invasion Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000003211 malignant effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012797 qualification Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000013441 quality evaluation Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000001755 vocal effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 claims 2
- 239000000969 carrier Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013210 evaluation model Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010191 image analysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 241000287127 Passeridae Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000013473 artificial intelligence Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011158 quantitative evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007115 recruitment Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000001835 viscera Anatomy 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/26—Government or public services
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
A person-oriented community development level evaluation index system comprises a computer, a community Maslow demand model, a community safety guarantee level evaluation module, a community environment livable level evaluation module, a community service convenience level evaluation module, a community harmony level evaluation module and a community innovation realization level evaluation module; the evaluation index system comprises the following working steps: s10, building a community Maslow demand model, S20, evaluating community safety guarantee level, S30, evaluating community environment livable level, S40, evaluating community service convenience level, S50, evaluating community harmony level, S60, evaluating community innovation realization level, and S70, obtaining a community development level evaluation result according to evaluation results from S20 to S60. According to the method, the overall level of community development is comprehensively evaluated by constructing the community Maslow demand model, the evaluation result is more scientific, and the system work efficiency is high.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of urban management and management, in particular to a people-oriented community development level evaluation index system.
Background
Socialists believe that a community should include a certain number of people, a range of territories, a scale of facilities, a certain characteristic culture, a certain type of organization, and based on certain interactive relationships and common cultural relationships, a community of people and their areas of activity that are related to each other within a certain area. The community is a complex system, although sparrows are small and have complete five internal organs, the community has the characteristics of multiple main bodies, multiple functions and multiple service dimensions, and the development and evaluation of the community needs to comprehensively consider and establish an index system.
Different organizations at home and abroad put forward thinking about community evaluation indexes from different dimensions. In the book of death and birth of the great cities in the United states, Yarespectively Buss, made in the United states, it is proposed that communities (streets) should pay attention to public spaces, building density, street suitability, functional mixture degree, community diversity and the like, and the book is an early thought for community construction. In the sustainable urban and community development target of 2030 sustainable development agenda released by the united nations, the problems of safety of special groups of communities, housing guarantee, public transportation, public spaces, natural environment, disasters and the like are concerned. The academia has proposed various concepts for evaluating communities. For example, "livable community", "civilized community", "secure community", "sustainable development community", "healthy community", "harmonious community", etc., the community development targets are proposed from different dimensions, and the community evaluation criteria are established. Although the evaluation angles are different, there is a common principle that "people-oriented", the community development shall be based on whether people's needs are met, and the community evaluation shall pay attention to the real needs, real feelings and real acquirement of residents in the community.
The existing community development level evaluation index system is limited by data or required by related planning business, evaluation dimension is usually focused on one or two specific aspects, and the overall development level of a community is difficult to measure comprehensively. Big data and artificial intelligence technology create better conditions for community evaluation, and more dimensionality and more accurate quantitative evaluation can be realized. Considering the demand of future community development, the community development situation is comprehensively mastered, and the identification of the defects of community development is particularly important, so that a people-oriented community development level evaluation index system is needed to be invented, and more scientific and comprehensive community development evaluation is provided.
Disclosure of Invention
Objects of the invention
In order to solve the technical problems in the background art, the invention provides a human-oriented community development level evaluation index system, and the overall level of community development is comprehensively evaluated by constructing a community Maslow demand model.
(II) technical scheme
In order to solve the problems, the invention provides a human-oriented community development level evaluation index system, which comprises a computer, a community Maslow demand model, a community safety guarantee level evaluation module, a community environment livable level evaluation module, a community service convenience level evaluation module, a community harmony level evaluation module and a community innovation realization level evaluation module;
the evaluation index system comprises the following working steps:
s10, constructing a community Maslow demand model: dividing the demands of residents into safety guarantee demands, environment livable demands, service convenience demands, community harmony demands and innovation realization demands according to a Maslow demand model and according to research information of communities in different cities in China;
s20, evaluating the community safety guarantee level: based on a community security guarantee level evaluation module, evaluating the security situation of a community according to the occurrence situation of a community security event and security guarantee requirements, and obtaining a community security guarantee index by an index weighting method;
s30, evaluating the community environment livability: based on a community environment livable level evaluation module, evaluating the comfort degree of the community space environment according to the spatial characteristics of inhabitants and activities in a community and the environment livable demand, and obtaining a community environment livable index by an index weighting method;
s40, evaluating the community service convenience level: the community-based service convenience level evaluation module is used for evaluating the difficulty level of community residents for acquiring various services according to the supply level and service convenience requirements of various services of a community, and obtaining a community service convenience index by an index weighting method;
s50, evaluating the community harmony level, namely evaluating the activity degree of community residents according to the basic characteristics and the community harmony requirements of community residents based on a community harmony level evaluation module, and obtaining a community harmony index by an index weighting method;
s60, evaluating the community innovation implementation level: based on a community innovation realization level evaluation module, obtaining a community innovation realization index by an index weighting method according to the distribution condition, the development level and the innovation realization demand of industries and enterprises in a community;
and S70, obtaining a community development level evaluation result according to the evaluation results from S20 to S60.
Preferably, the safety guarantee requirements comprise requirements in the aspects of security safety, environmental safety, fire safety, production safety, traffic safety and food safety;
environmental amenity requirements include requirements in terms of natural environment, city environment and cell environment;
service convenience requirements include requirements in government services, public services, business services and property services;
social harmony requirements include requirements in terms of social activity and demographic characteristics;
the innovation realization requirements comprise the requirements of entrepreneurial environment, employment opportunity, industrial activity and innovation quality.
Preferably, in S20, the community safety guarantee level evaluation process includes the following steps:
s21, security and protection safety evaluation: analyzing the comprehensive conditions of security and protection security events of different communities based on the occurrence positions and the number of eight types of malignant alarm conditions, multiple financial invasion alarm conditions and other criminal security and protection alarm conditions in public security events, and obtaining the security and protection level scores of the communities in a data standardization mode;
s22, fire safety evaluation: analyzing the comprehensive conditions of fire safety events of different communities based on the occurrence positions and the number of fire accident alarms causing death, fire accident alarms causing injury and general fire accident alarms in public safety events, and obtaining the fire safety level scores of the communities in a data standardization mode;
s23, traffic safety evaluation: on the basis of the occurrence positions, the number and the grades of traffic accident warnings and traffic jam warnings, traffic safety facilities and management and supervision conditions in different communities are comprehensively considered, the comprehensive conditions of traffic safety events in different communities are analyzed, and community traffic safety level scores are obtained in a data standardization mode;
s24, food safety evaluation: analyzing the comprehensive conditions of food safety events of different communities according to the food random inspection qualification rate in links such as food production, circulation, catering and the like, and obtaining community food safety level scores in a data standardization mode;
s25, evaluating production safety; the comprehensive conditions of the production safety events of different communities are analyzed according to the severity of casualty accidents (number of casualties) in the production process and the production standard conditions of enterprises (penalty amount of production violation enterprises), and community production safety level scores are obtained in a data standardization mode.
S26, evaluating environmental safety; the comprehensive conditions of different community environment safety events are analyzed on the basis of the urban inland inundation disaster risk and the spatial distribution of the geological disaster incidence degree, and the community environment safety level score is obtained in a data standardization mode.
S27, evaluating the safety guarantee level of the community; according to the method of expert scoring, different weighted values are given to security, traffic safety, fire safety, food safety, production safety and environment safety, and a community safety guarantee index is obtained through index weighting.
Preferably, in S30, the community environment livability evaluation process includes the steps of:
s31, evaluation of natural environment: comprehensively considering the degree of cleaning or pollution of air in a community, the peculiar smell degree of a community space, the coverage degree of green vegetation on the ground of the community and the surface temperature of the community, analyzing the comprehensive conditions of natural environments of different communities, and obtaining the level score of the natural environment of the community in a data standardization mode;
s32, evaluation of market environment: analyzing the comprehensive conditions of different community city appearance environments according to the green vision rate, the opening degree of the visual field, the friendly degree of walking, the comfortable degree or the crowding degree of pedestrians on the roads of the community, and obtaining the community city appearance environment level score in a data standardization mode;
s33, evaluating cell environment: analyzing the comprehensive conditions of different community environments according to the old and new degree of residential community buildings, the comfortable degree or the dense degree of residential buildings and the sufficient degree of parking space supply of the community, and obtaining community environment level scores in a data standardization mode;
s34, evaluating the community environment livability: according to the method of expert scoring, different weight values are given to the natural environment, the city appearance environment and the cell environment, and the community environment livable index is obtained through index weighting.
Preferably, in S40, the community service convenience level evaluation includes the following steps:
s41, government affair service evaluation: analyzing the comprehensive situation of different community government affair services based on the development level of community online government services, including government website information disclosure, policy interpretation, interactive communication, government affair services, design display, supervision and management and the like, and the distribution situation of community offline government affair service points, and obtaining community government affair service level scores in a data standardization mode;
s42, property service evaluation: analyzing the comprehensive conditions of different community property services based on the supply level of the community and surrounding life service classes, the community property service management level and the residential cost of residents in the community, and obtaining community property service level scores in a data standardization mode;
s43, public service evaluation: analyzing the comprehensive conditions of public services of different communities based on the supply levels of cultural sports facilities, scientific education facilities, medical and health facilities and municipal facilities in and around the communities, the supply levels of public transportation and the space accessibility of various transportation modes, and obtaining the scores of the community public service levels in a data standardization mode;
s44, business service evaluation: analyzing the comprehensive conditions of different community business services based on the supply levels of various business facilities in and around the community, the quality of the business services and the convenience degree of the electronic business services, and obtaining the community business service level score in a data standardization mode;
s45, evaluating the community service convenience level: according to the expert scoring mode, different weight values are given to government affair services, property services, public services and business services, and the community service profit index is obtained through index weighting.
Preferably, in S50, the evaluation of the community harmony level includes the following steps:
s51, social activity evaluation: analyzing the comprehensive conditions of social activities of different communities based on the activity degree of daily communication of community residents, including resident communication activity space supply and community resident activities, and obtaining community social activity level scores in a data standardization mode;
s52, crowd characteristic evaluation: analyzing the comprehensive conditions of the characteristics of different community crowds based on the activity level of community residents and the diversity of the community residents, and obtaining the score of the characteristic level of the community crowds in a data standardization mode; the vitality level of community residents comprises the proportion information of the population of the young and the middle-aged; the diversity of community residents comprises the specific gravity information of foreign people and minority nationalities;
s53, community harmony level evaluation: according to the method of expert scoring, different weight values are given to social activities and crowd characteristics, and a community harmony index is obtained through index weighting.
Preferably, in S60, the evaluation of the community innovation achievement level includes the following steps:
s61, evaluation of industrial activity: analyzing the development levels of different community industries based on the distribution conditions of enterprise agents and innovation agents in the community, and obtaining the vitality level score of the community industries in a data standardization mode; the innovation main body comprises high and new technology enterprises, higher education institutions and vocational colleges;
s62, entrepreneurship environment evaluation: based on the enterprise distribution condition newly registered in the community in recent years and the supply condition of a creative space in the community, including an innovation carrier, a technology incubator and a public creation space, analyzing the enterprise development activity and the growth degree of different communities, and obtaining community entrepreneurship environment level scores in a data standardization mode;
s63, employment opportunity evaluation: analyzing employment attractiveness of different communities based on employment supply conditions of various industries and new economic industries in the communities, and obtaining community employment opportunity level scores in a data standardization mode;
s64, innovation quality evaluation: analyzing the innovation capability and potential of different communities based on the registration condition of intellectual property rights of enterprises in the communities, including patents, software copyright, art copyright price and the registration capital of enterprises in the communities, and obtaining the community innovation quality level score in a data standardization mode;
s65, evaluating the community innovation implementation level: according to the method of expert scoring, different weighted values of industry activity, entrepreneurship environment, employment opportunity and innovation quality are given, and a community innovation realization index is obtained through index weighting.
The technical scheme of the invention has the following beneficial technical effects:
the method is based on the demands of community residents as the center, and by using the Maslow demand level theory in the human-based principle scientific theory for reference, the constructed community Maslow demand model can more comprehensively evaluate the development level of the community.
The community evaluation index system constructed by the invention comprises 5 first-level indexes, 19 second-level indexes and 45 third-level indexes, the evaluation indexes are more abundant, and the evaluation result is more accurate. The method uses various data types including open data such as government open data, government and government affair data, LBS data, street view data, remote sensing data, POI data, enterprise and business registration data, open data such as internet renting, recruitment and comment and the like in the evaluation process, and meanwhile, the evaluation result is more scientific through intelligent algorithms such as image analysis, text analysis and the like, a community service level evaluation model, a walking equal-time circle measurement model, a traffic accessibility measurement model and the like.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic flow chart of the human-oriented community development level evaluation index system provided by the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a community Maslow demand model in the human-oriented community development level evaluation index system proposed by the present invention.
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of an evaluation index system in the human-oriented community development level evaluation index system provided by the present invention.
FIG. 4 is a diagram of the evaluation result of community safety protection index in the people-oriented community development level evaluation index system provided by the present invention.
FIG. 5 is a diagram of the evaluation result of environmental livable index in the people-oriented community development level evaluation index system.
Fig. 6 is a diagram of a community service convenience index evaluation result in the person-oriented community development level evaluation index system proposed by the present invention.
FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating the evaluation results of community harmony indexes in the people-oriented community development level evaluation index system according to the present invention.
FIG. 8 is a diagram of the results of the innovation achievement index evaluation in the human-oriented community development level evaluation index system provided by the present invention.
FIG. 9 is a diagram of a community star rating result in the human-oriented community development level evaluation index system.
Detailed Description
In order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention more apparent, the present invention is described in further detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings in combination with specific embodiments. It should be understood that the description is intended to be exemplary only, and is not intended to limit the scope of the present invention. Moreover, in the following description, descriptions of well-known structures and techniques are omitted so as to not unnecessarily obscure the concepts of the present invention.
As shown in FIGS. 1-9, the present invention provides a human-oriented system for evaluating the development level of a community.
In an optional embodiment, the system comprises a computer, a community Maslow demand model, a community security protection level evaluation module, a community environment livable level evaluation module, a community service convenience level evaluation module, a community harmony level evaluation module and a community innovation realization level evaluation module;
the evaluation index system comprises the following working steps:
s10, constructing a community Maslow demand model: dividing the demands of residents into safety guarantee demands, environment livable demands, service convenience demands, community harmony demands and innovation realization demands according to a Maslow demand model and according to research information of communities in different cities in China;
s20, evaluating the community safety guarantee level: based on a community security guarantee level evaluation module, evaluating the security situation of a community according to the occurrence situation of a community security event and security guarantee requirements, and obtaining a community security guarantee index by an index weighting method;
s30, evaluating the community environment livability: based on a community environment livable level evaluation module, evaluating the comfort degree of the community space environment according to the spatial characteristics of inhabitants and activities in a community and the environment livable demand, and obtaining a community environment livable index by an index weighting method;
s40, evaluating the community service convenience level: based on the regional service convenience level evaluation module, the difficulty level of community residents in obtaining various services is evaluated according to the supply level of various services and the service convenience requirements of the community, and a community service convenience index is obtained by an index weighting method
S50, evaluating the community harmony level, namely evaluating the activity degree of community residents according to the basic characteristics and the community harmony requirements of community residents based on a community harmony level evaluation module, and obtaining a community harmony index by an index weighting method;
s60, evaluating the community innovation implementation level: based on a community innovation realization level evaluation module, obtaining a community innovation realization index by an index weighting method according to the distribution condition, the development level and the innovation realization demand of industries and enterprises in a community;
and S70, obtaining a community development level evaluation result according to the evaluation results from S20 to S60.
In an alternative embodiment, the security requirements include security, environmental, fire, production, traffic and food safety requirements;
environmental amenity requirements include requirements in terms of natural environment, city environment and cell environment;
service convenience requirements include requirements in government services, public services, business services and property services;
social harmony requirements include requirements in terms of social activity and demographic characteristics;
the innovation realization requirements comprise the requirements of entrepreneurial environment, employment opportunity, industrial activity and innovation quality.
The output result of the invention can reflect the actual development condition of the community better, and has the following advantages:
1. based on the demands of community residents as a center, a Maslow demand hierarchy theory in a human-based principle scientific theory is used for reference, a community Maslow demand model is constructed to evaluate the community development level, and the evaluation result is more comprehensive.
2. The evaluation index system comprises 5 first-level indexes, 19 second-level indexes and 45 third-level indexes, the evaluation indexes are more abundant, and the evaluation result is more accurate.
3. In the evaluation process, multiple data types including government open data, government and government affair data, LBS data, street view data, remote sensing data, network capture data and the like are used, and meanwhile, the evaluation result is more scientific through intelligent algorithms such as image analysis, text analysis and the like, a community service level evaluation model, a walking and other circle measurement model, a traffic reachability measurement model and the like.
In an alternative embodiment, in S20, the community safety and security level evaluation process includes the following steps:
s21, security and protection safety evaluation: analyzing the comprehensive conditions of security and protection security events of different communities based on the occurrence positions and the number of eight types of malignant alarm conditions, multiple financial invasion alarm conditions and other criminal security and protection alarm conditions in public security events, and obtaining the security and protection level scores of the communities in a data standardization mode;
s22, fire safety evaluation: analyzing the comprehensive conditions of fire safety events of different communities based on the occurrence positions and the number of fire accident alarms causing death, fire accident alarms causing injury and general fire accident alarms in public safety events, and obtaining the fire safety level scores of the communities in a data standardization mode;
s23, traffic safety evaluation: on the basis of the occurrence positions, the number and the grades of traffic accident warnings and traffic jam warnings, traffic safety facilities and management and supervision conditions in different communities are comprehensively considered, the comprehensive conditions of traffic safety events in different communities are analyzed, and community traffic safety level scores are obtained in a data standardization mode;
s24, food safety evaluation: analyzing the comprehensive conditions of food safety events of different communities according to the food random inspection qualification rate in links such as food production, circulation, catering and the like, and obtaining community food safety level scores in a data standardization mode;
s25, evaluating production safety; the comprehensive conditions of the production safety events of different communities are analyzed according to the severity of casualty accidents (number of casualties) in the production process and the production standard conditions of enterprises (penalty amount of production violation enterprises), and community production safety level scores are obtained in a data standardization mode.
S26, evaluating environmental safety; the comprehensive conditions of different community environment safety events are analyzed on the basis of the urban inland inundation disaster risk and the spatial distribution of the geological disaster incidence degree, and the community environment safety level score is obtained in a data standardization mode.
S27, evaluating the safety guarantee level of the community; according to the method of expert scoring, different weighted values are given to security, traffic safety, fire safety, food safety, production safety and environment safety, and a community safety guarantee index is obtained through index weighting.
In an alternative embodiment, in S30, the community environment livability evaluation process includes the following steps:
s31, evaluation of natural environment: comprehensively considering the degree of cleaning or pollution of air in a community, the peculiar smell degree of a community space, the coverage degree of green vegetation on the ground of the community and the surface temperature of the community, analyzing the comprehensive conditions of natural environments of different communities, and obtaining the level score of the natural environment of the community in a data standardization mode;
s32, evaluation of market environment: analyzing the comprehensive conditions of different community city appearance environments according to the green vision rate, the opening degree of the visual field, the friendly degree of walking, the comfortable degree or the crowding degree of pedestrians on the roads of the community, and obtaining the community city appearance environment level score in a data standardization mode;
s33, evaluating cell environment: analyzing the comprehensive conditions of different community environments according to the old and new degree of residential community buildings, the comfortable degree or the dense degree of residential buildings and the sufficient degree of parking space supply of the community, and obtaining community environment level scores in a data standardization mode;
s34, evaluating the community environment livability: according to the method of expert scoring, different weight values are given to the natural environment, the city appearance environment and the cell environment, and the community environment livable index is obtained through index weighting.
In an alternative embodiment, in S40, the community service convenience level evaluation comprises the following steps:
s41, government affair service evaluation: analyzing the comprehensive situation of different community government affair services based on the development level of community online government services, including government website information disclosure, policy interpretation, interactive communication, government affair services, design display, supervision and management and the like, and the distribution situation of community offline government affair service points, and obtaining community government affair service level scores in a data standardization mode;
s42, property service evaluation: analyzing the comprehensive conditions of different community property services based on the supply level of the community and surrounding life service classes, the community property service management level and the residential cost of residents in the community, and obtaining community property service level scores in a data standardization mode;
s43, public service evaluation: analyzing the comprehensive conditions of public services of different communities based on the supply levels of cultural sports facilities, scientific education facilities, medical and health facilities and municipal facilities in and around the communities, the supply levels of public transportation and the space accessibility of various transportation modes, and obtaining the scores of the community public service levels in a data standardization mode;
s44, business service evaluation: analyzing the comprehensive conditions of different community business services based on the supply levels of various business facilities in and around the community, the quality of the business services and the convenience degree of the electronic business services, and obtaining the community business service level score in a data standardization mode;
s45, evaluating the community service convenience level: according to the expert scoring mode, different weight values are given to government affair services, property services, public services and business services, and the community service profit index is obtained through index weighting.
In an alternative embodiment, the step of evaluating the community harmony level in S50 includes the steps of:
s51, social activity evaluation: analyzing the comprehensive conditions of social activities of different communities based on the activity degree of daily communication of community residents, including resident communication activity space supply and community resident activities, and obtaining community social activity level scores in a data standardization mode;
s52, crowd characteristic evaluation: analyzing the comprehensive conditions of the characteristics of different community crowds based on the activity level of community residents and the diversity of the community residents, and obtaining the score of the characteristic level of the community crowds in a data standardization mode; the vitality level of community residents comprises the proportion information of the population of the young and the middle-aged; the diversity of community residents comprises the specific gravity information of foreign people and minority nationalities;
s53, community harmony level evaluation: according to the method of expert scoring, different weight values are given to social activities and crowd characteristics, and a community harmony index is obtained through index weighting.
In an alternative embodiment, in S60, the community innovation implementation level evaluation includes the following steps:
s61, evaluation of industrial activity: analyzing the development levels of different community industries based on the distribution conditions of enterprise agents and innovation agents in the community, and obtaining the vitality level score of the community industries in a data standardization mode; the innovation main body comprises high and new technology enterprises, higher education institutions and vocational colleges;
s62, entrepreneurship environment evaluation: based on the enterprise distribution condition newly registered in the community in recent years and the supply condition of a creative space in the community, including an innovation carrier, a technology incubator and a public creation space, analyzing the enterprise development activity and the growth degree of different communities, and obtaining community entrepreneurship environment level scores in a data standardization mode;
s63, employment opportunity evaluation: analyzing employment attractiveness of different communities based on employment supply conditions of various industries and new economic industries in the communities, and obtaining community employment opportunity level scores in a data standardization mode;
s64, innovation quality evaluation: analyzing the innovation capability and potential of different communities based on the registration condition of intellectual property rights of enterprises in the communities, including patents, software copyright, art copyright price and the registration capital of enterprises in the communities, and obtaining the community innovation quality level score in a data standardization mode;
s65, evaluating the community innovation implementation level: according to the method of expert scoring, different weighted values of industry activity, entrepreneurship environment, employment opportunity and innovation quality are given, and a community innovation realization index is obtained through index weighting.
It is to be understood that the above-described embodiments of the present invention are merely illustrative of or explaining the principles of the invention and are not to be construed as limiting the invention. Therefore, any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement and the like made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention should be included in the protection scope of the present invention. Further, it is intended that the appended claims cover all such variations and modifications as fall within the scope and boundaries of the appended claims or the equivalents of such scope and boundaries.
Claims (7)
1. A person-oriented community development level evaluation index system is characterized by comprising a computer, a community Maslow demand model, a community safety guarantee level evaluation module, a community environment livable level evaluation module, a community service convenience level evaluation module, a community harmony level evaluation module and a community innovation realization level evaluation module;
the evaluation index system comprises the following working steps:
s10, constructing a community Maslow demand model: dividing the demands of residents into safety guarantee demands, environment livable demands, service convenience demands, community harmony demands and innovation realization demands according to a Maslow demand model and according to research information of communities in different cities in China, and adopting five modules;
s20, evaluating the community safety guarantee level: based on a community security guarantee level evaluation module, evaluating the security situation of a community according to the occurrence situation of a community security event and security guarantee requirements, and obtaining a community security guarantee index by an index weighting method;
s30, evaluating the community environment livability: based on a community environment livable level evaluation module, evaluating the comfort degree of the community space environment according to the spatial characteristics of inhabitants and activities in the community and the environment livable demand, and obtaining a community environment livable index by an index weighting method;
s40, evaluating the community service convenience level: the community-based service convenience level evaluation module is used for evaluating the difficulty of community residents in acquiring various services according to the supply levels of the various services and the service convenience requirements of the community, and obtaining a community service convenience index by an index weighting method;
s50, evaluating the community harmony level, namely evaluating the activity degree of community residents according to the basic characteristics and the community harmony requirements of the community residents based on a community harmony level evaluation module, and obtaining a community harmony index through an index weighting method;
s60, evaluating the community innovation implementation level: based on a community innovation realization level evaluation module, according to distribution conditions and development levels of industries and enterprises in communities and innovation realization requirements, a community innovation realization index is obtained by an index weighting method;
and S70, obtaining a community development level evaluation result according to the evaluation results from S20 to S60.
2. The people-oriented community development level evaluation index system of claim 1, wherein the safety assurance needs include security, environmental, fire, production, traffic, and food safety needs;
environmental amenity requirements include requirements in terms of natural environment, city environment and cell environment;
service convenience requirements include requirements in government services, public services, business services and property services;
social harmony requirements include requirements in terms of social activity and demographic characteristics;
the innovation realization requirements comprise the requirements of entrepreneurial environment, employment opportunity, industrial activity and innovation quality.
3. The human-oriented community development level evaluation index system according to claim 1 or 2, wherein in S20, the community security assurance level evaluation process comprises the following steps:
s21, security and protection safety evaluation: analyzing the comprehensive conditions of security and protection security events of different communities based on the occurrence positions and the number of eight types of malignant alarm conditions, multiple financial invasion alarm conditions and other criminal security and protection alarm conditions in public security events, and obtaining the security and protection level scores of the communities in a data standardization mode;
s22, fire safety evaluation: analyzing the comprehensive conditions of fire safety events of different communities based on the occurrence positions and the number of fire accident alarms causing death, injury and general fire accident alarms in public safety events, and obtaining the community fire safety level score in a data standardization mode;
s23, traffic safety evaluation: on the basis of the occurrence positions, the number and the levels of traffic accident warnings and traffic jam warnings, traffic safety facilities and management and supervision conditions in different communities are comprehensively considered, the comprehensive conditions of traffic safety events in different communities are analyzed, and community traffic safety level scores are obtained in a data standardization mode;
s24, food safety evaluation: analyzing the comprehensive conditions of food safety events of different communities according to the food random inspection qualification rate in links such as food production, circulation, catering and the like, and obtaining community food safety level scores in a data standardization mode;
s25, evaluating production safety; the comprehensive conditions of production safety events of different communities are analyzed according to the severity of casualty accidents (accident death number) and enterprise production standard conditions (production violation enterprise fine amount) in the production process, and community production safety level scores are obtained in a data standardization mode.
S26, evaluating environmental safety; the comprehensive conditions of different community environment safety events are analyzed on the basis of the urban inland inundation disaster risk and the spatial distribution of the geological disaster incidence degree, and community environment safety level scores are obtained in a data standardization mode.
S27, evaluating the safety guarantee level of the community; according to the method of expert scoring, different weighted values are given to security, traffic safety, fire safety, food safety, production safety and environment safety, and a community safety guarantee index is obtained through index weighting.
4. The human-oriented community development level evaluation index system according to claim 1 or 2, wherein in S30, the community environment livability evaluation process comprises the steps of:
s31, evaluation of natural environment: comprehensively considering the degree of air cleanness or pollution in the community, the peculiar smell degree of the community space, the coverage degree of green vegetation on the community ground and the community ground surface temperature, analyzing the comprehensive conditions of the natural environments of different communities, and obtaining the community natural environment level score in a data standardization mode;
s32, evaluation of market environment: analyzing the comprehensive conditions of different community city appearance environments according to the green vision rate, the opening degree of the visual field, the walking friendliness degree, the comfort degree or the crowding degree of pedestrians on the roads of the community, and obtaining the community city appearance environment level score in a data standardization mode;
s33, evaluating cell environment: analyzing the comprehensive conditions of different community environments according to the old and new degree of residential community buildings, the comfortable degree or the dense degree of residential buildings and the sufficient degree of parking space supply of the community, and obtaining community environment level scores in a data standardization mode;
s34, evaluating the community environment livability: according to the method of expert scoring, different weight values are given to the natural environment, the city appearance environment and the cell environment, and the community environment livable index is obtained through index weighting.
5. The human-oriented community development level evaluation index system according to claim 1, wherein in S40, the community service convenience level evaluation comprises the steps of:
s41, government affair service evaluation: analyzing the comprehensive situation of different community government affair services based on the development level of the community online government services, including government website information disclosure, policy interpretation, interactive communication, government affair services, design display, supervision and management and the like, and the distribution situation of the community offline government affair service points, and obtaining the community government affair service level score in a data standardization mode;
s42, property service evaluation: analyzing the comprehensive conditions of different community property services based on the supply level of the community and surrounding life service classes, the community property service management level and the residential cost of residents in the community, and obtaining community property service level scores in a data standardization mode;
s43, public service evaluation: analyzing the comprehensive conditions of public services of different communities based on the supply levels of cultural sports facilities, scientific education facilities, medical and health facilities and municipal facilities in and around the communities, the supply levels of public transportation and the space accessibility of various transportation modes, and obtaining the scores of the community public service levels in a data standardization mode;
s44, business service evaluation: analyzing the comprehensive conditions of the business services of different communities based on the supply levels of various business facilities in and around the communities, the quality of the business services and the convenience degree of the electronic business services, and obtaining the scores of the community business service levels in a data standardization mode;
s45, evaluating the community service convenience level: according to the expert scoring mode, different weight values are given to government affair services, property services, public services and business services, and the community service convenience index is obtained through index weighting.
6. The human-oriented community development level evaluation index system according to claim 1, wherein the community harmony level evaluation in S50 comprises the following steps:
s51, social activity evaluation: analyzing the comprehensive condition of social activities of different communities based on the activity degree of daily communication of community residents, including resident communication activity space supply and community resident activities, and obtaining community social activity level scores in a data standardization mode;
s52, crowd characteristic evaluation: analyzing the comprehensive conditions of the characteristics of different community crowds based on the activity level of community residents and the diversity of the community residents, and obtaining the score of the characteristic level of the community crowds in a data standardization mode; the vitality level of community residents comprises the proportion information of the population of the young and the middle-aged; the diversity of community residents comprises specific gravity information of foreign population and minority;
s53, community harmony level evaluation: according to the method of expert scoring, different weight values are given to social activities and crowd characteristics, and a community harmony index is obtained through index weighting.
7. The human-oriented community development level evaluation index system according to claim 1, wherein in S60, the community innovation achievement level evaluation comprises the following steps:
s61, evaluation of industrial activity: analyzing the development levels of different community industries based on the distribution conditions of enterprise agents and innovation agents in the community, and obtaining the vitality level score of the community industries in a data standardization mode; the innovation main body comprises high and new technology enterprises, higher education institutions and vocational colleges;
s62, entrepreneurship environment evaluation: based on the enterprise distribution condition newly registered in the community in recent years and the supply condition of innovation space in the community, including innovation carriers, science and technology hatchers and public creation space, analyzing the development vigor and the growth degree of enterprises in different communities, and obtaining community entrepreneurship environment level scores in a data standardization mode;
s63, employment opportunity evaluation: analyzing employment attractiveness of different communities based on employment supply conditions of various industries and new economic industries in the communities, and obtaining community employment opportunity level scores in a data standardization mode;
s64, innovation quality evaluation: analyzing the innovation capability and potential of different communities based on the registration condition of intellectual property rights of enterprises in the communities, including patents, software copyright, art copyright price and the registration capital of enterprises in the communities, and obtaining the community innovation quality level score in a data standardization mode;
s65, evaluating the community innovation implementation level: according to the method of expert scoring, different weighted values of industry vitality, entrepreneurship environment, employment opportunity and innovation quality are given, and a community innovation realization index is obtained through index weighting.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910871073.0A CN110705843A (en) | 2019-09-16 | 2019-09-16 | People-oriented community development level evaluation index system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910871073.0A CN110705843A (en) | 2019-09-16 | 2019-09-16 | People-oriented community development level evaluation index system |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN110705843A true CN110705843A (en) | 2020-01-17 |
Family
ID=69196129
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910871073.0A Pending CN110705843A (en) | 2019-09-16 | 2019-09-16 | People-oriented community development level evaluation index system |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN110705843A (en) |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN114386529A (en) * | 2022-01-19 | 2022-04-22 | 北京融信数联科技有限公司 | Community service analysis method and system based on big data and readable storage medium |
| CN117035565A (en) * | 2023-10-10 | 2023-11-10 | 之江实验室 | Community service management method, device, equipment and storage medium |
-
2019
- 2019-09-16 CN CN201910871073.0A patent/CN110705843A/en active Pending
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN114386529A (en) * | 2022-01-19 | 2022-04-22 | 北京融信数联科技有限公司 | Community service analysis method and system based on big data and readable storage medium |
| CN117035565A (en) * | 2023-10-10 | 2023-11-10 | 之江实验室 | Community service management method, device, equipment and storage medium |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Zavadskas et al. | Safety evaluation methodology of urban public parks by multi-criteria decision making | |
| CN110705843A (en) | People-oriented community development level evaluation index system | |
| Xu et al. | Lightening up Africa: The effects of Chinese aid on the economic development in Africa | |
| Tang et al. | The Shanghai multi-hazard early warning system: addressing the challenge of disaster risk reduction in an urban megalopolis | |
| Huang et al. | Spatial heterogeneity of driving factors for urban heat health risk in Chongqing, China: A new identification method and proposal of planning response framework | |
| Fu et al. | Assessment of urbanization impact on cultural heritage based on a risk-based cumulative impact assessment method | |
| Aguinaldo et al. | Climate change perspectives and adaptation strategies of business enterprises: a case study from Italy | |
| Urdabayev et al. | SWOT analysis of smart city projects in capital cities of Russia and Kazakhstan | |
| Larsson et al. | Data use and data needs in critical infrastructure risk analysis | |
| Zoeteman et al. | Integrated Sustainability Monitoring of 58 EU-Cities: A Study of European Green Capital Award Applicant Cities | |
| Setiadi | Assessing people´ s early warning response capability to inform urban planning interventions to reduce vulnerability to tsunamis | |
| CN112561346A (en) | Urban comprehensive operation index analysis method | |
| Moreno et al. | An effective approach to mainstreaming DRR and resilience in La Paz, Mexico | |
| Kakderi | Smart cities and vision zero: common ground for a generic vision zero methodology | |
| Grimmond et al. | Establishing integrated weather, climate, water and related environmental services for megacities and large urban complexes–initial guidance, Global Framework for Climate Services | |
| Agrawal et al. | Disaster Risk Evaluation–Quantitative Methods in Canada | |
| Campbell et al. | Performative Urban Environments and the Concept of the Future Smart Cities: Toward Establishing Measures for Performative Urban Environments: A Critical Position on Shaping the Future of Smart Cities | |
| Thorat et al. | Analyzing Liveability Index Parameters for Formulating Assessment Model at the Zone Level–A case of Pune City | |
| Suryavanshi | Land use and opportunities for crime: Using GIS as an analysis tool | |
| Sharma et al. | Intelligent Framework and Metrics for Assessment of Smart Cities | |
| Ricardo et al. | Resilience, architecture, and urbanization in sustainable urban development in Latin America: Lacan Cordia | |
| Dahlan et al. | The success factors for government information sharing (GIS) in natural disaster management and risk reduction | |
| Province | DICOMA PV FACILITY AND ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE | |
| ESCAP | Guideline on monitoring and reporting the impact of sand and dust storms through the Sendai framework monitoring | |
| Leite et al. | A case study on urban land use and disaster risks in Brazil |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20200117 |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |