CN110580604A - mass supplier channel service selection method for fourth-party logistics platform - Google Patents
mass supplier channel service selection method for fourth-party logistics platform Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN110580604A CN110580604A CN201910833069.5A CN201910833069A CN110580604A CN 110580604 A CN110580604 A CN 110580604A CN 201910833069 A CN201910833069 A CN 201910833069A CN 110580604 A CN110580604 A CN 110580604A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- service
- supplier
- provider
- score
- goods
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/08—Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
- G06Q10/083—Shipping
- G06Q10/0835—Relationships between shipper or supplier and carriers
Abstract
the invention discloses a method for selecting channel services of a mass supplier on a fourth logistics platform, which comprises the following steps: on each product line, partitioning according to the weight, the volume and the delivery destination of the product, and configuring supplier service for each partition; setting a periodic goods quantity upper limit for configured provider services, and suspending allocation of the provider services when the goods quantity of certain provider services in a period reaches the upper limit; re-screening the screened supplier services, and selecting effective supplier services which are suitable for distributing goods types and meet the goods quantity distribution principle; respectively calculating the time efficiency and the cost comprehensive score of the secondarily screened provider services, and taking the provider with the highest score as the optimal provider service; the channel service selection method for the mass suppliers of the fourth logistics platform can reduce the complexity of the integrated logistics service by more than 60%, simplify logistics switching procedures, reduce errors and reduce the logistics cost by more than 6%.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of logistics, in particular to a channel service selection method for a mass supplier of a fourth logistics platform, which solves the problems of a plurality of logistics routes and channel selection in the traditional logistics industry by utilizing the convenience and high efficiency of the Internet technology.
Background
With the development of economic globalization, cross-regional cooperation between various industries is more compact. Logistics plays an important role in cross-regional cooperation, logistics suppliers are numerous, and how to select proper logistics suppliers becomes a difficult problem for enterprises. Taking a company as an example, there are thousands of suppliers that provide services such as logistics, warehousing, customs clearance, etc. for the company. At present, a set of system for managing the information of the suppliers is not constructed, and the information and the data of the suppliers are dispersedly stored in Excel files respectively arranged by related personnel of a business department, so that the problems that the information of the suppliers cannot be well shared, the information of the suppliers cannot be timely refreshed, the information is inconsistent and the information is disordered are caused. In addition, when the systems such as the OMS, the logistics scheduling system, the WMS system, the financial system, the M2C and the like are involved in acquiring and filling in relevant information of suppliers, because no supplier service interface capable of being connected with each other exists, each system is manually filled in by a service staff or maintains a set of supplier information respectively. Due to the fact that the uniqueness of the supplier information is difficult to guarantee, the problems that the time efficiency statistical result of the supplier is not real, the financial system lacks effective basis when the supplier accounts and settles accounts and the like are caused.
the problem faced by the company is also the problem faced by the logistics industry, in the traditional logistics industry, channel selection is always a difficult problem, and most logistics selection is only a selection process of an end-to-end static logistics merchant. Under this solution, replacing the provider, adding nodes is a workload-intensive and error-prone process. In addition, because the existing logistics service is dispersed and single, in the existing situation, how to meet the logistics requirements of various customers at one place (the place can be a network service) is also a difficult thing.
disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a channel service selection method for a mass supplier on a fourth logistics platform, so as to solve the problems in the background technology.
In order to achieve the purpose, the invention provides the following technical scheme:
A method for selecting a channel service of a mass supplier on a fourth logistics platform comprises the following steps:
1) partitioning each product line according to the weight, the volume and the delivery destination of the product, and configuring supplier service for each partition;
2) Setting a periodic goods quantity upper limit for configured provider services, and suspending allocation of the provider services when the goods quantity of certain provider services in a period reaches the upper limit;
3) after the primary screening of the step 1) and the step 2), if a plurality of provider services are primarily screened, performing a step 4), otherwise, stopping the screening;
4) and performing secondary screening on the primarily screened provider services according to the following three conditions: a. selecting effective supplier service, wherein the supplier service needs to meet the delivery time limit and the product weight and product volume limit, and in the process, one supplier service of a certain country can be suspended, and one country can be defined to only use one supplier service; b. a supplier service preferably adapted to the type of goods to be served, selected primarily by matching the Tag label of the supplier service with the type of product in the order; c. preferably selecting the supplier service which needs to meet the goods distribution principle, mainly selecting the supplier service which does not reach the maximum goods on the day, and selecting the supplier service according to the set goods proportion;
5) After the secondary screening of the step 4), if a plurality of provider services are still screened, performing a step 6), otherwise, stopping the screening;
6) and respectively calculating the time efficiency and the cost comprehensive score of the secondarily screened provider services, and taking the provider with the highest score as the optimal provider service.
As a further scheme of the invention: the calculation method of the comprehensive scores of the time efficiency and the cost in the step 6) comprises the following steps:
6.1) calculating an aging score M, wherein M = S1 a1+ S2 a2, wherein S1 is a target aging score obtained after normalization processing is carried out on a target aging acceptance rate of each provider service, S1 belongs to [0,1], S2 is a total aging score obtained after normalization processing is carried out on an actual total acceptance rate of each provider service, S2 belongs to [0,1], a1 is a target aging weight, a2 is a total aging weight, a1 is more than or equal to 0, a2 is more than or equal to 0, and a1+ a2= 1;
6.2) calculating a cost score N, wherein the cost score N is obtained after normalization processing is carried out on the total cost of the service of each supplier, and N belongs to [0,1 ];
6.3) calculating an age and cost composite score = M b1+ N b2, wherein b1 and b2 respectively represent the composite weight of the age score M and the cost score N, b1 is not less than 0, b2 is not less than 0, and b1+ b2= 1.
as a still further scheme of the invention: in step 1), one provider service supports configuration of multiple partitions, and when a certain provider service can be shipped to all partitions, the partition is not set.
As a still further scheme of the invention: in the step 2), the period can be configured by self, the goods volume is not set for suppliers without goods volume limitation, and in order to avoid the situation that orders cannot be issued (goods are frequently issued, and the suppliers cannot know who to issue goods) in the same product line, the goods volume is not allowed to be set for all the supplier services.
compared with the prior art, the invention has the beneficial effects that: the fourth method for selecting the channel service of the mass suppliers on the logistics platform greatly promotes the development of cross-border logistics industry, can reduce the complexity of integrated logistics service by more than 60%, simplifies logistics switching procedures, reduces errors, and can reduce logistics cost by more than 6%.
Detailed Description
the technical solution of the present invention will be described in further detail with reference to specific embodiments.
a method for selecting a channel service of a mass supplier on a fourth logistics platform comprises the following steps:
1) on each product line, partitioning according to the weight, the volume and the delivery destination of the product, and configuring provider services for each partition, wherein one provider service supports configuration of a plurality of partitions, and when a certain provider service can deliver the product to all the partitions, the partition is not set;
2) Setting a periodic goods quantity upper limit for configured supplier services, and when the goods quantity of a certain supplier service in a period reaches the upper limit, suspending allocation of the supplier service, wherein the period can be configured in a self-defined manner, the goods quantity is not set to be on-line for suppliers without goods quantity limitation, and in order to avoid the situation that orders cannot be issued (goods are frequently issued, goods are few and people do not know who to issue goods), the goods quantity is not allowed to be on-line for all the supplier services in the same product line;
3) after the primary screening of the step 1) and the step 2), if a plurality of provider services are primarily screened, performing a step 4), otherwise, stopping the screening;
4) And performing secondary screening on the primarily screened provider services according to the following three conditions: a. selecting effective supplier service, wherein the supplier service needs to meet the delivery time limit and the product weight and product volume limit, and in the process, one supplier service of a certain country can be suspended, and one country can be defined to only use one supplier service; b. a supplier service preferably adapted to the type of goods to be served, selected primarily by matching the Tag label of the supplier service with the type of product in the order; c. preferably selecting the supplier service which needs to meet the goods distribution principle, mainly selecting the supplier service which does not reach the maximum goods on the day, and selecting the supplier service according to the set goods proportion;
5) After the secondary screening of the step 4), if a plurality of provider services are still screened, performing a step 6), otherwise, stopping the screening;
6) and respectively calculating the time efficiency and the cost comprehensive score of the secondarily screened provider services, and taking the provider with the highest score as the optimal provider service.
The calculation method of the comprehensive scores of the time efficiency and the cost in the step 6) comprises the following steps:
6.1) calculating an aging score M, wherein M = S1 a1+ S2 a2, wherein S1 is a target aging score obtained after normalization processing is carried out on a target aging acceptance rate of each provider service, S1 belongs to [0,1], S2 is a total aging score obtained after normalization processing is carried out on an actual total acceptance rate of each provider service, S2 belongs to [0,1], a1 is a target aging weight, a2 is a total aging weight, a1 is more than or equal to 0, a2 is more than or equal to 0, and a1+ a2= 1;
6.2) calculating a cost score N, wherein the cost score N is obtained after normalization processing is carried out on the total cost of the service of each supplier, and N belongs to [0,1 ];
6.3) calculating an age and cost composite score = M b1+ N b2, wherein b1 and b2 respectively represent the composite weight of the age score M and the cost score N, b1 is not less than 0, b2 is not less than 0, and b1+ b2=1
The formula of the normalization algorithm is:
。
for step 6) the following is exemplified: suppose that three vendor services A, B, C and D are available in Guangzhou to England after the second screening.
6.1) calculating the aging score M
Assuming that the target aging weight a1=0.6 and the total aging weight a2=0.4, the following aging scores are given as follows
And (4) time efficiency scoring result: the provider service C score is the highest among the aging scores.
and (4) analyzing the aging scoring result: the provider service C target salable rate ranks first and the total salable rate ranks second. The total score of the time efficiency calculated by the target and total appropriate normalized scores of 60% and 40% in terms of weight is 0.8, which exceeds the second ranked supplier service D by 0.35. In addition, provider service a, although ranking the total goodness is first, since the target goodness is last ranked and since the target goodness weight is greater, the last score is 0.4, resulting in an age total ranking of third. Finally, the optimized supplier service C truly reflects the time-efficiency comprehensive advantages of the supplier.
6.2) calculating the cost score N
cost scoring results: provider service B score highest
And (5) analyzing the cost scoring result, wherein the cost of the service B of the provider is the lowest, and the score is the highest. The provider service C costs the highest and scores the lowest.
6.3) calculating the comprehensive score of the aging and the cost
suppose that: the aging weight b 1= 0.5, the cost weight b2=0.5
And (4) comprehensive scoring results: provider service B, with the highest score, is preferably selected.
and (4) analyzing a comprehensive grading result: the supplier service C is best aged and has the highest cost, and the aging score is insufficient to make up the disadvantage of overhigh cost. Provider service B is least time-efficient and least costly, but the cost advantage is sufficient to offset the inefficiency.
Practice proves that the fourth method for selecting the channel service of the mass suppliers on the logistics platform greatly promotes the development of the cross-border logistics industry, can reduce the complexity of the integrated logistics service by more than 60%, simplifies the logistics switching program, reduces errors and can reduce the logistics cost by more than 6%.
While the preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail, the present invention is not limited to the above embodiments, and various changes can be made without departing from the spirit of the present invention within the knowledge of those skilled in the art.
Claims (4)
1. A method for selecting a channel service of a mass supplier on a fourth logistics platform is characterized by comprising the following steps:
1) partitioning each product line according to the weight, the volume and the delivery destination of the product, and configuring supplier service for each partition;
2) setting a periodic goods quantity upper limit for configured provider services, and suspending allocation of the provider services when the goods quantity of certain provider services in a period reaches the upper limit;
3) After the primary screening of the step 1) and the step 2), if a plurality of provider services are primarily screened, performing a step 4), otherwise, stopping the screening;
4) And performing secondary screening on the primarily screened provider services according to the following three conditions: a. selecting effective supplier service, wherein the supplier service needs to meet the delivery time limit and the product weight and product volume limit, and in the process, one supplier service of a certain country can be suspended, and one country can be defined to only use one supplier service; b. a supplier service preferably adapted to the type of goods to be served, selected primarily by matching the Tag label of the supplier service with the type of product in the order; c. preferably selecting the supplier service which needs to meet the goods distribution principle, mainly selecting the supplier service which does not reach the maximum goods on the day, and selecting the supplier service according to the set goods proportion;
5) After the secondary screening of the step 4), if a plurality of provider services are still screened, performing a step 6), otherwise, stopping the screening;
6) and respectively calculating the time efficiency and the cost comprehensive score of the secondarily screened provider services, and taking the provider with the highest score as the optimal provider service.
2. The fourth logistics platform mass provider channel service selection method of claim 1, wherein the calculation method of the time efficiency and cost composite score in step 6) is as follows:
6.1) calculating an aging score M, wherein M = S1 a1+ S2 a2, wherein S1 is a target aging score obtained after normalization processing is carried out on a target aging acceptance rate of each provider service, S1 belongs to [0,1], S2 is a total aging score obtained after normalization processing is carried out on an actual total acceptance rate of each provider service, S2 belongs to [0,1], a1 is a target aging weight, a2 is a total aging weight, a1 is more than or equal to 0, a2 is more than or equal to 0, and a1+ a2= 1;
6.2) calculating a cost score N, wherein the cost score N is obtained after normalization processing is carried out on the total cost of the service of each supplier, and N belongs to [0,1 ];
6.3) calculating an age and cost composite score = M b1+ N b2, wherein b1 and b2 respectively represent the composite weight of the age score M and the cost score N, b1 is not less than 0, b2 is not less than 0, and b1+ b2= 1.
3. the fourth logistics platform mass provider channel service selection method of claim 1 or 2, wherein in step 1), one provider service supports configuration of multiple partitions, and when a certain provider service can be shipped to all partitions, the partition is not set.
4. the method for selecting a channel service of a mass supplier on a fourth logistics platform according to claim 3, wherein in step 2), the period is configured by self-definition, the supplier without the limitation of the quantity of goods is not set to be on line, and in order to avoid the situation that the order cannot be issued, the quantity of goods is not allowed to be set to be on line for all the suppliers in the same product route.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910833069.5A CN110580604A (en) | 2019-09-04 | 2019-09-04 | mass supplier channel service selection method for fourth-party logistics platform |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910833069.5A CN110580604A (en) | 2019-09-04 | 2019-09-04 | mass supplier channel service selection method for fourth-party logistics platform |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN110580604A true CN110580604A (en) | 2019-12-17 |
Family
ID=68812523
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910833069.5A Pending CN110580604A (en) | 2019-09-04 | 2019-09-04 | mass supplier channel service selection method for fourth-party logistics platform |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN110580604A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN111598660A (en) * | 2020-05-14 | 2020-08-28 | 杭州乐顺科技有限公司 | Computer screening device and method for screening suppliers and storage medium |
Citations (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN105761036A (en) * | 2016-02-03 | 2016-07-13 | 广州市贝法易商贸有限公司 | Fourth-party logistics platform mass supplier channel service selection method |
-
2019
- 2019-09-04 CN CN201910833069.5A patent/CN110580604A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN105761036A (en) * | 2016-02-03 | 2016-07-13 | 广州市贝法易商贸有限公司 | Fourth-party logistics platform mass supplier channel service selection method |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN111598660A (en) * | 2020-05-14 | 2020-08-28 | 杭州乐顺科技有限公司 | Computer screening device and method for screening suppliers and storage medium |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Villarreal et al. | Improving road transport operations through lean thinking: a case study | |
| Ramaa et al. | Impact of warehouse management system in a supply chain | |
| US8510179B2 (en) | Inventory transaction common object | |
| Tavasszy et al. | A DSS for modelling logistic chains in freight transport policy analysis | |
| US20070174146A1 (en) | Hierarchical stock allocation system and method | |
| MXPA04008805A (en) | Inventory management system for reducing overall warehouse and pipeline inventory. | |
| CN112200437A (en) | Customer distribution method and device | |
| Becker et al. | Identifying the workflow potential of business processes | |
| US20060259342A1 (en) | Rule based document distribution to partners | |
| Tavasszy et al. | Scenario-wise analysis of transport and logistics systems with a SMILE | |
| CN105761036A (en) | Fourth-party logistics platform mass supplier channel service selection method | |
| CN110580604A (en) | mass supplier channel service selection method for fourth-party logistics platform | |
| KR20190032044A (en) | Decision method of terminal according to parcel delivery address | |
| Panicker et al. | Solving a heterogeneous fleet vehicle routing model-A practical approach | |
| BRPI0302415B1 (en) | computer-implemented method for completing orders in a manufacturing facility | |
| Karosekali et al. | Analysis of logistics cost of the maritime (Case of Tanjung Priok Port) | |
| CN115222342A (en) | Intelligent allocation and compensation method, system, equipment and medium | |
| Raimbekov et al. | The study of the logistics development effectiveness in the Eurasian Economic Union countries and measures to improve it | |
| Singer et al. | Fleet configuration subject to stochastic demand: An application in the distribution of liquefied petroleum gas | |
| JPH1087036A (en) | Stock allocating method, and deciding method of distribution mode and stocking position, in physical distribution system | |
| Panchal et al. | Supply chain network redesign problem for major beverage organization in ASEAN region | |
| Gonçalves et al. | A heuristic scheduling policy for multi-item, multi-machine production systems with time-varying, stochastic demands | |
| Kopytov et al. | APPLICATION OF THE ANALITIC HIERARCHY PROCESS IN DEVELOPMENT OF TRAIN SCHEDULE INFORMATION SYSTEMS | |
| Su et al. | The planning for the cross-docking operations of a large supermarket retail supply chain | |
| Giat | The Window Fill Rate in a Multiple Location Inventory System with Periodic Review and Order Crossover |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication | ||
| WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication |
Application publication date: 20191217 |